Fiscal Year 1997 , ;i* ._ t, A 'ti, STATES 4 ' b ~ca~ REPLY TO ATTENTION OF Honorable Albert Gore, Jr. President of the Senate Washington, D. C. 20510-0010 Dear Mr. President: I am submitting Volume II of the Annual Report on Civil Works Activities for Fiscal Year 1997 in accordance with Section 8 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1888 and Section 925(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. This volume of field reports contains narrative summaries and statistics on water resources development projects of the Army Corps of Engineers where there has been activity between October 1, 1996, and September 30, 1997. Sincerely, /Joseph W. Westphal Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY CIVIL WORKS 108 ARMY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 20310-0108 1 7 SEP 1998 ii I/ ~ire~ DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY CIVIL WORKS 108 ARMY PENTAGON WASHINGTON DC 2031 0-01 08 17 SEP 1998 Honorable Newt Gingrich Speaker of the House of Representatives Washington, D. C. 20515-6501 Dear Mr. Speaker: I am submitting Volume II of the Annual Report on Civil Works Activities for Fiscal Year 1997 in accordance with Section 8 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1888 and Section 925(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. This volume of field reports contains narrative summaries and statistics on water resources development projects of the Army Corps of Engineers where there has been activity between October 1, 1996, and September 30, 1997. Sincerely, Joseph W. Westphal Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) REPLY TO ATTENTION OF U A# North Atlantic Division New England, MA, District.. New York, NY, District .. Philadelphia, PA, District .. Baltimore, MD, District .. Norfolk, VA, District .. South Atlantic Division Wilmington, NC, District Charleston, SC, District .. Savannah, GA, District .. Jacksonville, FL, District Mobile, AL, District Mississippi Valley Division New Orleans, LA, District .. Vicksburg, MS, District Memphis, TN, District .. St. Louis, MO, District Rock Island, IL, District St. Paul, MN, District TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1-1 2-1 3-1 4-1 5-1 6-1 7-1 8-1 9-1 10-1 11-1 12-1 13-1 14-1 15-1 16-1 17-1 18-1 19-1 20-1 21-1 22-1 23-1 24-1 25-1 Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN ...... Great Lakes and Ohio River Division Pittsburgh, PA, District Ohio River Buffalo, NY, District Detroit, MI, District Chicago, IL, District Nashville, TN, District Louisville, KY, District Huntington, WV, District REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Northwestern Division Omaha, NE, District Kansas City, MO, District......................................... Portland, OR, District Seattle, WA, District Walla Walla, WA, District......................................... Pacific Ocean Division Honolulu, HI, District . .. Alaska District South Pacific Division Los Angeles, CA, District ......................................... San Francisco, CA, District ............... ......................... Sacram ento, CA, District .......................................... California Debris Commission ...................................... Albuquerque, NM , District......................................... Southwestern Division Little Rock, AR, District Tulsa, OK, District Fort Worth, TX, District Galveston, TX, District M ississippi River Com m ission ......................................... Construction Engineering Research Laboratory............................ Cold Regions Research & Engineering Laboratory. ... ......................... Waterways Experiment Station ........................................ Engineer Topographic Laboratories ...................................... W ater Resources Support Center ........................................ Permanent International Association of N avigation Congresses .......................................... Support for O thers............. ........... .. Investigation of Projects Under Federal Power Act ............................ Chapter 26-1 27-1 28-1 29-1 30-1 31-1 32-1 33-1 34-1 35-1 35-1-A 36-1 37-1 38-1 39-1 40-1 41-1 42-1 43-1 44-1 45-1 46-1 47-1 48-1 49-1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Regulatory, Sunken Vessel Removal and National Emergency Preparedness .................................... 50-1 Natural Disaster Preparedness, Response and Recovery Activities .................................... 51-1 Appendices Flood Control Reservoirs Operable ..................................... A-1 Flood Control Reservoirs Constructed or Contributed to by Corps .................. A-26 of Engineers but Operated by Others................................ Flood Control Projects Under Construction ................................... B-1 Beach Erosion Control Projects Under Construction ........................ B-16 Environmental Restoration Projects Under Construction ..................... B-18 Navigation Locks and Dams Operable ............. ................... C-1 Navigation Project Under Construction .................................. D-1 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Operable ....................... E-1 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Under Construction ............... F-1 Flood Damages Suffered and Prevented ................................. G-1 Index I-1 111 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT * The New England District comprises all of New England except western Vermont and small portions of Massachusetts and Connecticut along their western boundaries, and includes small portions of southeastern New York, all embraced in the drainage basins tributary to Long Island Sound and the Atlantic Ocean east of the New York-Connecticut State line. It also includes Fishers Island, NY. IMPROVEMENTS Page Flood Control 1. Aquatic Plant Control ......................... 1-3 2. Aunt Lydia's Cove, Chatham, MA ............ 1-3 3. Boston Harbor, MA .................... 1-3 4. Cape Cod Canal, MA ............................. 1-4 5. Cocheco River, NH ................................... 1-4 6. Criehaven Harbor, ME ............................ 1-4 7. Cuttyhunk Harbor, MA .............................. 1-5 8. Duxbury Harbor, MA ........... ......... 1-5 9. Gloucester Harbor and Annisquam River, M A .. ..................................... 1-5 10. Green Harbor, M A ....... ...... .................... ....... 1-6 11. Hyannis Harbor, MA .................................. 1-6 12. Kennebec River, ME ... ...................... 1-6 13. New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA.. 1-6 14. Newburyport Harbor, MA ................. .. 1-7 15. Patchogue River, CT .................................. 1-7 16. Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay and Watch Hill Cove, RI and CT ................ 1-7 17. Plymouth Harbor, MA ... ... .. 1-8 18. Portland Harbor, ME ...... ........................ 1-8 19. Providence River and Harbor, RI.............. 1-8 20. Provincetown Harbor, MA............................ 1-9 21. Royal River, ME ....................... ................. 1-9 22. Salem Harbor, MA ............... ................... 1-9 23. Scarboro River, ME .............................. 1-10 24. Scituate Harbor, MA ......................... 1-10 25. Seekonk River, Providence, RI .................. 1-10 26. Sesuit Harbor, MA ............................ 1-11 27. Wells Harbor, ME ....................... 1-11 28. York Harbor, ME ........ ........................ 1-11 Beach Erosion Control 29. Point Beach, Milford, CT .............. 1-11 30. Woodmont Beach, Milford, CT .................. 1-12 31. Inspection of Completed Beach Erosion Control Projects ........ .... ................. 1-12 32. Allendale Dam, North Providence, RI ....... 1-12 33. Blackstone River Basin, MA and RI ....... 1-12 33A. West Hill Dam, MA .................................... 1-12 34. Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), MA ................... 1-13 35. Connecticut River Basin, VT, NH, MA and CT ........................................ 1-13 35A. Ball Mountain Lake, VT .......................... 1-14 35B. Barre Falls Dam, MA .............................. 1-14 35C. Birch Hill Dam, MA................................. 1-14 35D. Colebrook River Lake, CT ....................... 1-14 35E. Conant Brook Dam, MA .......................... 1-15 35F. Knightville Dam, MA .............................. 1-15 35G. Lancaster, Israel River, NH ....................... 1-15 35H. Littleville Lake, MA ................................... 1-15 351. North Hartland Lake, VT ........................... 1-15 35J. North Springfield Lake, VT .................... 1-15 35K. Otter Brook Lake, NH ............................. 1-16 35L. Surry Mountain Lake, NH ......................... 1-16 35M. Townshend Lake, VT ................................ 1-16 35N. Tully Lake, MA ........................................ 1-16 350. Union Village Dam, VT ........................... 1-16 36. Faulkner Island, CT ................................. 1-16 37. Galilee Salt Marsh, RI ................................ 1-17 38. Housatonic River Basin, CT and MA......... 1-17 38A. Black Rock Lake, CT ................................ 1-17 38B. Hancock Brook Lake, CT ............................ 1-17 38C. Hop Brook Lake, CT ................................. 1-17 38D. Mad River, Waterbury (W oodtick Area), CT ................................... 1-18 38E. Northfield Brook Lake, CT ...................... 1-18 38F. Thomaston Dam, CT ............................ 1-18 39. Merrimack River Basin, NH and MA ........ 1-18 39A. Blackwater Dam, NH ............................. 1-19 39B. Edward MacDowell Lake, NH ................. 1-19 39C. Franklin Falls Dam, NH ........................ 1-19 39D. Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH .................. 1-19 1-1 Navigation Page REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Page 39E. North Nashua River, Leominster, MA ...... 1-20 39F. North Nashua River, Leominster (Sewer Line), MA ...................................... 1-20 40. New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA ................................... 1-20 41. Quonset Point, Davisville, RI .................. 1-20 42. Roughans Point, Revere, MA .................. 1-20 43. Saint John River Basin, ME .................. 1-21 44. Saugus River & Tributaries, MA ........ 1-21 45. Sebago Lake, Sandish, ME .................... 1-21 46. Stamford, CT.......................................... 1-22 47. Thames River Basin, CT, RI, and MA ....... 1-22 47A. Buffumville Lake, MA ........................ 1-22 47B. East Brimfield Lake, MA ........................ 1-22 47C. Hodges Village Dam, MA ...................... 1-22 47D. Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT .................. 1-23 47E. West Thompson Lake, CT .......................... 1-23 47F. Westville Lake, IA .................................... 1-23 48. Town Brook, Quincy and Braintree, MA ... 1-23 49. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ........................................ 1-23 50. Flood Control Reservoir Operations .......... 1-24 51. Hurricane Barrier Operations ............. 1-24 52. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ................................. 1-24 General Investigations 53. 54. 55. Surveys .... .............. ........... ................... 1-25 Collection and Study of Basic Data ........... 1-25 Planning, Engineering and Design ........... 1-25 56. Preconstruction Engineering and Design ................................. ....... 1-25 Tables Table 1-A Cost & Financial Statement .......... 1-26 Table 1-B Authorizing Legislation ................. 1-37 Table 1-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..................... 1-43 Table 1-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects .................. 1-47 Table 1-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................. 1-48 Table 1-F Other Authorized Multiple- Purpose Projects including Power ... 1-50 Table 1-G Deauthorized Projects ..................... 1-51 Table 1-H Navigation Activities Pursuant to Sec. 107 ........................ 1-53 Table 1-I Beach Erosion Activities Pursuant to Sec. 103 ...................... 1-54 Table 1-J Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Sec. 205 ........................ 1-54 Table 1-K Emergency Bank Protection Activities Pursuant to Sec. 14 ..................... 1-54 Table 1-L Blackstone River Basin .................. 1-54 Table 1-M Connecticut River Basin .............. 1-55 Table 1-N Housatonic River Basin ................ 1-57 Table 1-0 Merrimack River Basin ................... 1-58 Table 1-P Thames River Basin ...................... 1-59 Table 1-Q Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ........................ 1-60 1-2 Flood Control (Continued) Page NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT 3. BOSTON HARBOR, MA 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. The program is conducted in all navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels and associated waters under the New England District jurisdiction. Existing project. The purpose of the program is to provide technical assistance in the eradication or control of aquatic plants that are causing or have the potential to cause major economic problems in the above waterways. The plant control is done in the interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health and research. The program is administered by the Chief of Engineers, under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, and in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute at least 50 percent of the cost of planning beyond the reconnaissance stage and at least 50 percent of the cost of controlling the aquatic plants, and in addition must hold the United States free from damages that may occur from control operations. Operations during fiscal year. Program was unfunded during FY 1997. 2. AUNT LYDIA'S COVE, CHATHAM, MA Location. Aunt Lydia's Cove is located in Chatham Harbor, Chatham, Massachusetts. The cove is approximately 90 miles southeast of Boston, Massachusetts on the "elbow" of Cape Cod. Existing project. Provides for the dredging of an entrance channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide for a length of 900 feet, and dredging of a 9.5 acre anchorage also to a depth of 8 feet. This work was completed in June 1995. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. The Chatham Municipal Fish Pier is the only terminal facility in Aunt Lydia's Cove. Initially constructed in 1945, the pier is used to off-load catch, access boats, load supplies and perform some repairs. Two independent fish companies lease space at the pier's main packing facility where fish are offloaded, packed in ice and shipped to various distributors. The pier provides diesel fuel, gasoline, parking and restroom facilities. Transient and recreational boaters use the pier for loading, offloading, and refueling. This facility is adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for improvement dredging was awarded November 17, 1994. Work began in December 1994 and was completed in June 1995. To date, the contractor has received $670,628 with final payment pending at fiscal year end. Location. Boston Harbor includes all expanse of tidewater lying within a line from Point Allerton to Point Shirley and extending from that line westward to mainland. This comprises an area of about 47 square miles, exclusive of the islands. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Charts 13270 and 13272.) Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1917, 1938. Existing project. Completed work at Boston Harbor, adopted in 1825 and supplemented by enactments through 1958, provides for the improvement of the harbor proper and its approaches - Fort Point Channel, Reserved Channel, Chelsea River and Weir River. For a more detailed description see page 3 of Annual Report for 1974. These improvements were completed in May 1966 with the construction of the Chelsea River 35-foot channel and maneuvering basin. New work involves deepening the Mystic River and Reserved Channels from 35 to 40 feet and the Chelsea River Channel from 35 to 38 feet; widening and deepening to 40 feet the Inner Confluence Area which provides access to the Mystic and Chelsea River Channels; and widening at the entrance to the Reserved Channel. The proposed project would increase the navigational efficiency and safety of harbor operations and reduce tidal delays for larger vessels. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing existing projects.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Formal assurances for new work have not been requested yet. Consistent with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the non-Federal sponsor must pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction; reimburse an additional ten percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction (partially offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and dredged material disposal areas); relocate utilities necessary for construction of the project; and deepen berthing areas at the terminals of project beneficiaries. Terminal facilities. There are 156 wharves and piers in harbor, not including Mystic, Weymouth-Fore, and Town Rivers, which are reported elsewhere. Of the terminals, 28 are publicly owned, 13 are open to public use, 73 have mechanical-handling facilities, and 70 have railroad connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. For a full description of channel facilities in Chelsea River, refer to House Document 350, 87th Congress, 2nd session. (See Port Series No. 3, Part 2, Port of Boston, MA dated 1967.) Operations during fiscal year. New work: Continued preconstruction engineering and design activities including preparation of plans and specifications and draft project cooperation agreement. Maintenance: Hired labor costs incurred for maintenance dredging associated with improvement dredging were $93,100 for the preparation of plans and specifica- 1-3 Navigation REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 tions, $32,000 for sampling and testing, and $5,000 for project coordination and management. A contract in the amount of $30,000 for Disposal Cell Monitoring was awarded at the end of the fiscal year with no expenditures reported this fiscal year. 4. CAPE COD CANAL, MA Location. This waterway is a sea level canal; extending from the head of Buzzards Bay, MA, easterly to a point on Cape Cod Bay about 15 miles southeast of Plymouth Harbor, MA. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13246.) Existing project. For description of existing project see Annual Report for 1975. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing existing project.) Navigational improvements were completed in April 1963, with completion of East Boat Basin extension. Initial recreational development consists of public use facilities at various locations, which were completed in February 1965. Improvements to public use facilities at the East Boat Basin were completed in May 1974. Construction of public use facilities at Bourne Scenic Park were completed in May 1976. Canal is crossed by two high-level highway bridges and a vertical-lift railroad bridge. Initial major rehabilitation of Bourne Highway Bridge was completed in December 1965. More recent major rehabilitation of the two highway bridges crossing the canal is completed. Rehabilitation of the Bourne Highway Bridge was completed in 1981. The Sagamore Highway Bridge was completed in 1982. Minor rehabilitation of stone breakwater was completed in October 1963. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for local work. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Terminal facilities. There are seven terminals on the canal, of which three are privately owned. Four are used for receipt and freezing of fish and two are used for receipt and storage of oil. The seventh terminal is the State pier, which is owned by Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and is located on the north bank of the canal at Bourne Neck. Terminals are adequate for purposes for which they are used. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The cost of operation and maintenance work at the Cape Cod Canal totalled $9,635,963 for fiscal year 1997. The cost of work accomplished by hired labor and contract included $1,112,812 for vessel traffic control activities; $994,985 for maintenance of buildings, grounds and utilities; $677,944 for operation and maintenance of recreational facilities; $70,182 for maintenance of roads and bridges; $548,830 for operation and maintenance of vessels; $557,733 for operation and maintenance of the Railroad Bridge; $57,320 for maintenance of project vehicles; $174,960 for Geographic Information System and supporting computer equipment upgrades; $71,178 for periodic inspections; $459,040 for project administration activities; $38,946 for engineering and design activities; and $119,641 for contract supervision and inspection. Engineering and design efforts for rehab of the Railroad Bridge totalled $387,252. Work accomplished by contract included upgrades to the marine traffic control system $3,445,630; inspection of the Sagamore Bridge $111,818; visitation survey $102,098; replacement of the Railroad Bridge generator $223,219 and elevator $294,154; radar station 260 repairs $12,505; replacement of Bourne Bridge deck joint $24,889; and police details at various project sites $17,436. Other miscellaneous costs included $13,750 for hydropower generation; $29,345 for real estate and audit activities; $29,315 for master planning and archeological studies; and $25,639 for Environmental Review Guide for Operation (ERGO) inspection and corrective actions. 5. COCHECO RIVER, NH Location. The Cocheco River is located about 9 miles northwest of Portsmouth, New Hampshire. Existing project. Provides for a 7 foot tidewater channel 60 to 75 feet wide (7.5 feet deep and 50 feet wide in rock), extending from the confluence of the Cocheco and Piscataqua Rivers to the head of navigation at the Upper Narrows in Dover, New Hampshire. Work was completed in 1906. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. The channel is used primarily by recreational craft based at a marina located near the head of the waterway. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs incurred in association with proposed maintenance dredging of the Federal channel were $58,700 for sampling and testing, $4,400 for work on an environmental assessment and $9,200 for project coordination and management. 6. CRIEHAVEN HARBOR, ME Location. Criehaven Harbor is on the northwesterly side of Ragged Island, one of the largest of a group lying about 12 miles off the mouth of Penobscot Bay, Maine. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Charts 225 and 1203.) Existing project. Provides for a rubblestone breakwater extending about 300 feet in a northerly direction from Sunset Point. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) The project was completed in 1935 and repairs were made to the breakwater in May 1938. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. There are several wharves within the harbor sufficient for existing commerce. 1-4 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT Operations duringfiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs incurred for closing out a contract for breakwater repair completed last FY were $1,000 for supervision and inspection and $100 for contract processing. 7. CUTTYHUNK HARBOR, MA Location. Cuttyhunk Harbor is located at the eastern end of Cuttyhunk Island, at the western entrance to Buzzards Bay, about 14 miles south of New Bedford Harbor, MA. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13229.) Existing project. A channel generally 75 feet wide and 10 feet deep from outer harbor to westerly terminal in Cuttyhunk Pond, about 3,500 feet long; an anchorage in inner harbor 10 feet deep, 900 feet long, and 800 feet wide; and maintenance of existing jetties and stone dikes. Existing project was completed in 1939. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Disposal areas for maintenance will be furnished when required. Terminal facilities. Two town wharves of timber and pile construction, having total berthing space of 400 feet, are open to public use. Limited mechanical-handling facilities are available. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the entrance channel by the Government- owned dredge CURRITUCK was performed from May 1 to May 6, 1997 at a plant rental cost of $66,600. A total of 7,000 cubic yards of sand were removed and disposed of at a nearshore site off of Church's Beach. Hired labor costs of $22,600 were incurred for performing and plotting pre- and after-dredge surveys and progress surveys. 8. DUXBURY HARBOR, MA Location. Duxtury Harbor is located on the west side of Duxbury Bay, about 48 miles south of Boston and 18 miles northwest of easterly entrance to Cape Cod Canal. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Charts 245 and 1208.) Previous project. For detail see Annual Report for 1908. Existing project. Channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide along alignment of existing channel to Town Wharf from Easterly Channel, and anchorage basin 8 feet deep of about 21 acres. Construction of existing project commenced June 1959 and was completed January 1960. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. Five wharfs on waterfront, one is open to public without charge, two boatyards and one yacht club. Facilities are very limited, but considered adequate for present activities of harbor. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work under a continuing contract awarded last FY for maintenance dredging of the Federal channel and anchorage basin was completed in November 1996. Approximately 128,410 cubic yards of material were dredged this FY bringing the total cubic yards dredged to 249,410. Contractor earnings this FY were $664,995 Federal and $292,843 State, bringing the total contract cost to $1,338,995 for the Federal portion and $535,643 for the State share to cover added disposal costs. Hired labor costs included $1,700 for the preparation of plans and specifications, $10,700 for.supervision and inspection, $27,400 for performing and plotting after-dredge surveys and $700 for contract processing. 9. GLOUCESTER HARBOR AND ANNISQUAM RIVER, MA Location. Gloucester Harbor is located at the southern extremity of Cape Ann, about 23 miles northeast of Boston Harbor. Annisquam River is a narrow tidal waterway extending across the base of Cape Ann from Gloucester Harbor to Ipswich Bay, a distance of approximately 4 miles. About 1,800 feet of this waterway, at the Gloucester Harbor end, is known as Blynman Canal. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13279). Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1937. Existing project. Provides for a breakwater at the Outer Harbor entrance; the removal of eight ledge areas in the northern half of the harbor; a 20-foot entrance channel into the Inner Harbor, separating into two 20- foot access channels along the side of the State Fish Pier; a 16-foot anchorage at the junction of the two 20-foot access channels; in an 18-foot entrance channel into Harbor Cove, with a 15-foot anchorage outside Harbor Cove and a 10-foot access channel in Harbor Cove; a 16- foot entrance channel into Smith Cove; and removal of a rock shoal in the entrance channel to Harbor Cove to a depth of 24 feet. Annisquam River provides for a channel 8 feet deep from Gloucester harbor to Ipswich Bay, and an anchorage about 17 acres in extent and 8 feet deep at entrance of Lobster Cove. For a more detailed description of existing project see Annual Report for 1973. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project.) Project was completed in July 1965. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. In Gloucester Harbor, 75 piers and wharves, 90 percent of which are used in some connection with the fishing industry. Of these two are owned by the city. Fish pier is owned by Massachusetts and leased to city. All others are privately owned, and not available to the public. There are also two commercial wharves on east bank of Annisquam River. There are no railroad sidings available. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. 1-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Operations duringfiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $1,050 were incurred to conduct initial work on dredged material disposal investigations in conjunction with work by the state. 10. GREEN HARBOR, MA Location. Green Harbor is located on the west side of Massachusetts Bay within the town of Marshfield, MA, about 30 miles southeast of Boston, MA, and nine miles north of Plymouth Harbor, MA. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13253.) Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation, see Annual Report for 1995. Construction was completed in October 1969. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. Major terminal facility is Town Pier in village of Brant Rock. Facility is a bulkheaded, earth-filled landing and parking area about 290 feet wide, extending 210 feet into harbor. A marina service is south of Town Pier; and a facility for recreational craft has been developed on south side of harbor near head of navigation. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the entrance channel by the Government- owned dredge CURRITUCK was performed from May 8 to May 30, 1997 at a plant rental cost of $170,200. A total of 19,000 cubic yards of sand were removed and disposed of at a nearshore site off of Green Harbor Beach. Hired labor costs of $41,800 were incurred for performing pre- and after-dredge surveys and progress surveys. 11. HYANNIS HARBOR, MA Location. Hyannis Harbor is located along the south shore of Cape Cod, about 16 miles west of Chatham, MA. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13237.) Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation, see Annual Report for 1992. New work involves deepening the Federal channel and basin to 13 feet; realigning the entrance channel through the outer Harbor to straighten the approach and eliminate two difficult turns; and widening the channel to 240 feet from the outer Harbor through most of Lewis Bay and to 220 feet from the upper reach of Lewis Bay to the entrance of the Inner Harbor. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Formal assurances for new work have not been requested yet. The project sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas and perform all relocations determined by the Government to be necessary for project construction; provide during the period of construction a cash contribution equal to 10 percent of total project costs; repay with interest, over a period not to exceed 30 years following completion of construction, an additional 10 percent of total project costs partially offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and dredged material disposal areas; and provide and maintain all berthing areas and local access channels commensurate with project features. Terminal facilities. There are two town wharves in the inner harbor. One has a bulkhead frontage of about 800 feet. Other private landings are available. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Plans and specifications were prepared for improvement dredging. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $11,863 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications for maintenance dredging associated with improvement dredging. 12. KENNEBEC RIVER, ME Location. The Kennebec River flows from Moosehead Lake in northern Maine about 150 miles southerly and discharges into the Atlantic Ocean at Popham Beach in Phippsburg, about 25 miles east of Portland, ME. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13298.) Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation, see Annual Report for 1992. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Wharves suitable for landing or loading are at Bath, Woolwich, Richmond, Randolph, Gardiner, Hallowell, and Augusta. Rail connections are available at some wharves. Depths range from 12 to 25 feet. Many facilities are equipped with a mechanism for handling passengers and freight. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $18,600 were incurred for preparation of plans and specifications in association with maintenance dredging of the Federal channel at Doubling Point and Popham Beach. 13. NEW BEDFORD AND FAIRHAVEN HARBOR, MA Location. New Bedford Harbor is a tidal estuary located on the western side of Buzzards Bay, about 27 miles northwesterly from the harbor at Vineyard Haven, Massachusetts and about 37 miles east of Point Judith Harbor, Rhode Island. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 252.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. Provides for a channel 30 feet deep and 350 feet wide from deep water in Buzzards Bay to just above the New Bedford-Fairhaven Bridge, nearly 5 miles, with increased widths for anchorage and maneuvering purposes in the area northwest of Palmer Island and above the bridge; a channel 25 feet deep 200 to 250 feet wide along the New Bedford wharf front near the bridge, about 0.2 miles; a channel 15 feet deep and 150 to 1-6 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT 400 feet wide from Pierce and Kilburn Wharf to the Old South Wharf, then 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide to a point 1,000 feet south of the old causeway pier, about 0.7 miles; and for the maintenance of the 25-foot anchorage area east of the channel north of Palmer Island. Project was completed in 1939. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing existing projects.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. There are 31 wharves in the harbor with a total berthing space of about 19,000 feet. Seven are publicly owned, five have railroad connections and seven have mechanical handling facilities. These facilities are considered adequate for the present needs of commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs $13,280 were incurred to conduct initial work on dredged material disposal investigations in conjunction with work by the state. 14. NEWBURYPORT HARBOR, MA Location. Newburyport Harbor is located at the mouth of the Merrimac River, about 4 miles south of the Massachusetts and New Hampshire state line and 48 miles north of Boston, MA. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13282.) Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation, see Annual Report for 1994. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. Marinas, a yacht club, public landings, and a commercial fish pier extend along the south bank of the Merrimack River below Route 1 highway bridge, and one town pier and four marinas are located on the north side of the river. Terminal facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract adjustment for maintenance dredging performed last FY was made, decreasing the contract amount by $7,267 and bringing the final contract cost to $223,200 Federal and $71,395 State. The State cost share was associated with additional costs for placing material at an alternate disposal site. 15. PATCHOGUE RIVER, CT Location. The Patchogue River is a small tidal stream about 3 miles long located in the town of Westbrook, CT. The mouth of the river is located along the north shore of Long Island Sound, about 7 miles west of the Connecticut River. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Charts 12374 and 12354.) Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation, see Annual Report for 1984. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. For details see Annual Report for 1984. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A continuing contract in the amount of $323,678 was awarded in July 1997 for maintenance dredging of the 8- foot Federal channel and anchorage. Dredging was scheduled to start in October 1997 to avoid the shellfish spawning season. No expenditures on the contract were reported for this FY. Hired labor costs included $28,300 for preparation of plans and specifications, $4,700 for an environmental assessment, $2,800 for supervision and inspection, $19,200 for performing pre-dredge surveys, and $4,800 for project coordination and management. 16. PAWCATUCK RIVER, LITTLE NARRAGANSETT BAY AND WATCH HILL COVE, RI AND CT Location. The Pawcatuck River originates at Worden Pond in South Kingston, in south central Rhode Island, and flows southwesterly entering Little Narragansett Bay about 13 miles east of New London Harbor. Little Narragansett Bay is on Rhode Island-Connecticut boundary at the mouth of Pawcatuck River. Watch Hill Cove is at southeast corner of bay in town of Westerly. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Charts 358 and 1211.) Previous projects. Adopted by River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1871, August 14, 1876, and August 5, 1886. For further details see page 1752 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 69 of Annual Report for 1933. Existing project. Provides for a 10-foot channel, 100 feet wide from Stonington Point through Little Narragansett Bay and up the Pawcatuck River to the lower wharfs in Westerly, a length of about 7 miles; a 7- foot channel, 40 feet wide between the lower and upper wharves in Westerly, a length of about one-half mile; removal of obstruction at Watch Hill; a 10 -foot channel, 100 feet wide from the mouth of the Pawcatuck River to Watch Hill Cove; a 10-foot deep, 16-acre anchorage basin in Watch Hill Cove; and a 200-foot long riprap jetty near the southwest corner of Watch Hill Cove. This work was completed in 1949. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Construction of a 400-foot long breakwater at the entrance of the Watch Hill Cove jetty; and enlargement of the anchorage in Watch Hill Cove were all deauthorized in November 1979. Inactive portions consisting of widening of the 10-foot channel between Stonington Point and Avondale to 200 feet along with rock removal at Pawcatuck Rocks and in vicinity of Rhodes Folley Light were deauthorized in November 1986. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. For further details see Annual Report 1963. Terminal facilities. There are a number of landings in Pawcatuck River. Yacht club 2.5 miles upstream on Rhode Island side of Pawcatuck River has 4 timber piers with 80 mooring piles used by members and guests of club. There are two public landings, one on east shore 1-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 and one on west shore, open to all on equal terms. One dock is operated as a commercial landing open for general use. Only navigation structures or facilities in Little Narragansett Bay consist of a few private piers at residences along shore north of Watch Hill Cove. There is one private and three public landings, all of open pile timber construction in Watch Hill Cove. They consist of three T-head piers and a wharf. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work under a continuing contract awarded last FY for maintenance dredging of the Federal channel in the vicinity of Sandy Point was completed in January 1997. A total of 47,000 cubic yards of sand were dredged and placed on the center portion of Sandy Point. Contractor earnings this FY were $326,444 bringing the total contract cost to $426,444. Hired labor costs included $2,400 for plans and specifications, $51,800 for supervision and inspection, $41,400 for performing and plotting after-dredge surveys, $3,000 for project coordination and management, and $1,200 for contract processing. 17. PLYMOUTH HARBOR, MA Location. Plymouth Harbor is 45 miles south of Boston, MA. Its outer anchorage, the "Cow Yard," is common to Plymouth, Duxbury, and Kingston, MA. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13253.) Previous projects. For details, see Annual Reports for 1815 and 1938. Existing project. Provides riprap along sections of Long Beach damaged by storm of November 1898, and restoring Eel River to its former course; dredging a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide, increased at entrance and on curves, from the bay to town wharves, formerly in areas south of State Pier, a distance of about 2.5 miles, with a suitable turning basin at inner end; dredging a channel 150 feet wide, 15 feet deep, extending northwesterly about 0.3 miles from a point off site of northerly Craigs Wharf (now State Pier) with a turning basin 300 feet square, and of same depth, at its northwesterly end; maintenance of area dredged to 18 feet deep by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, connecting 15-foot channel with 18-foot channel in vicinity of State Pier; a rubblestone breakwater extending 1,400 feet easterly from a point north of Town Wharf, and thence southeasterly for 2,100 feet; an anchorage eight feet deep and 60 acres in area inside breakwater, and elimination of authorized 18-foot anchorage from existing project; recreational development, to provide for sport fishing from breakwater, consisting of stone causeway about 360 feet long from westerly end of breakwater to land, guardrail along top of breakwater and causeway footbridge spanning a navigation opening through breakwater, and public access, parking and sanitary facilities for sport fisherman use. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing existing project.) Project is complete. Construction of anchorage eight feet deep and 60 acres in area inside breakwater was completed in 1967. Construction of the rubblestone breakwater was completed in 1971. Rehabilitation of Long Beach Dike was completed in 1971. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are three wharves of pile and timber construction; one is owned by the State, one by the town, and the third by Plymouth Yacht Club. State and town wharves are open to public use. In addition, there are two boatyards with marine railway facilities along waterfront, equipped for boat building and repairs. Local interests will maintain existing public landings open to all on equal terms, and provide all necessary mooring facilities in anchorage. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $3,898 were incurred for preliminary engineering and design work associated with proposed repair of the Plymouth Long Beach Dike. 18. PORTLAND HARBOR, ME * Location. Portland Harbor is located on the southwestern coast of Maine, about 100 miles northeast of Boston, MA. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13292.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for 1915 and 1936. Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation, see Annual Report for 1978. Project was completed in 1966, except for ledge removal that was completed in 1968. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. There are 37 waterfront facilities, of which 4 are not used. Seven wharves are publicly owned, 4 by the U.S. Government, 2 by State of Maine, and 1 by city of South Portland. Mechanical-handling facilities are available at 24 wharves. Railroad connections have been made to 27 of them. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Costs incurred in association with proposed maintenance dredging of the 35-foot channel were $65,000 for a capping demonstration project using dredged material from the Royal River at the Portland disposal site and $500 for project coordination and management. 19. PROVIDENCE RIVER AND HARBOR, RI Location. The Providence River originates in Providence, RI at the junction of two small streams, the Woonasquatucket and Moshassuck Rivers. It then flows southerly about a mile to the head of Providence Harbor at Fox Point where it is joined by the Seekonk River and continues southerly another 8 miles to Narragansett Bay. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Charts 13224 and 13225.) 1-8 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1936, and 1938. Existing project. Provides for a channel 16.8 miles long and 40 feet deep, generally 600 feet wide from deep water in Narragansett Bay just south of Prudence Island Light to the turn below Field Point at Providence, thence up to 1,700 feet wide to Fox Point. The existing 40-foot channel was completed in January 1976. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing existing project.) Dredging of a 30- foot channel, 150 feet wide from the upper end of the existing project to India Point at the mouth of the Seekonk River was deauthorized in November 1986. Local cooperation. Assurances have been received. However, local interests have yet to provide berthing areas commensurate to channel depths. Terminal facilities. There are 27 water terminal facilities serving port of Providence, RI. Three-fourths of all facilities have railway connections. Four facilities are owned by city of Providence and two by State of Rhode Island. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Costs incurred on various contracts for an Environmental Impact Statement associated with maintenance dredging of the 40-foot Federal channel were $59,540 for sediment profile sampling; $46,333 for benthic sample processing; $27,890 for a computer model for Narragansett Bay Disposal Sites; $10,400 for lobster sampling; $39,000 for Waterways Experimental Station computer modeling for Rhode Island Sound Disposal Sites; $30,733 for shellfish sampling; $7,000 for plant and animal bioaccumulation; and $299,000 for sampling and testing. Other costs were incurred for hired labor totalling $259,300 for work on the Environmental Impact Statement, $29,100 for the preparation of plans and specifications, $34,100 for project coordination and management, and $3,200 for contract processing. 20. PROVINCETOWN HARBOR, MA Location. Provincetown Harbor is located in the bight at the northern extremity of Cape Cod, about 40 miles southeast of Gloucester, 24 miles northeast of the Cape Cod Canal and 40 miles southeast of the entrance to Boston Harbor. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Charts 13249 and 13246.) Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1931. Existing project. Completed work at Provincetown Harbor was adopted in 1910, modified in 1948 and amended twice by the Chief of Engineers in 1967. This work provides for a rubblestone dike extending about 6,150 feet from Stevens Point, at the west end of the harbor, southward across House Point Island Flats to Wood End, and an offshore stone breakwater about 2,500 feet long, parallel to the shore and about 835 feet from the end of MacMillan Wharf. Construction ofthe rubblestone dike was completed in 1914 and the stone breakwater was completed in 1972. New work provides for a channel 13 feet deep by 250 feet wide extending about 2,000 feet from deep water just outside the west end of the stone breakwater to MacMillan Wharf. This work was completed in January 1996. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. Waterfront development in Provincetown extends about 1.5 miles and is mostly privately owned. There are seven piers in this area which handle the entire commerce of the harbor. None of these piers have railroad connections. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Derelict moorings and other obstructions were found during final surveys and were removed by purchase order in December 1996 at a cost of $27,250. 21. ROYAL RIVER, ME Location. Situated 11 miles north of Portland, Maine in Yarmouth Village. Royal River is a small coastal stream which empties into Casco Bay. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13290.) Existing project. Provides for enlargement of channel through bar at Gravel Point, 100 feet wide, 4.5 feet deep up to head of commercial navigation at Yarmouth, and removal of several ledges near village of Yarmouth; construction of 195-foot rubblestone jetty opposite Wolfe's Point, and dredging channel 4.5 feet deep through obstructed channels; as modified under Section 107 authority the project provides for a channel 8 feet deep, 80 feet wide from State channel in Casco Bay to commercial wharf at Yarmouth and anchorage of 8 acres, 6 feet deep downstream of Interstate 95 Highway Bridge. Project was completed in June 1969. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing existing project). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Town has constructed public landing and launching ramp immediately below Interstate 95 Highway Bridge on north bank. There are two boatyards equipped with floats, marine railways and launching ramps. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging under a continuing contract awarded at the end of FY 1995 resumed in October 1996 under a takeover agreement with the bonding company. Work was completed in January 1997. Approximately 87,000 cubic yards of material were removed and disposed of at the Portland Disposal Site. Contractor earnings this FY were $603,379 bringing the total contract cost to $696,779. Hired labor costs included $95,500 for supervision and inspection, $36,700 for performing and plotting pre- and after-dredge surveys, and $2,500 for contract processing. 22. SALEM HARBOR, MA Location. The harbor is located on the north shore of Massachusetts Bay, about 12 miles north of the entrance 1-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 to Boston Harbor. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Charts 240 and 1207.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Report of 1915. Existing project. Channel 32 feet deep and generally 300 feet wide, widened to 400 feet at bends and at inner end, extending about 1.5 miles from deep water in outer harbor to a point about 1,500 feet from Salem Terminal wharf, where it joins locally dredged approach channel of same depth leading to wharf. Project also provides for a channel 10 feet deep in South River, 300 feet wide at 10- foot depth in harbor, gradually narrowing to 200 feet at a point opposite outer end of Derby Wharf, thence 150 feet wide to a bend at outer end of Derby Wharf, thence 90 feet wide to turn near inner end of Derby Wharf, and thence 50 feet wide to upstream end of Pickering Wharf, for a branch channel on east side of Derby Wharf, 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 700 feet long, widening into a basin of south same depth, 500 feet long and 200 feet wide. Existing project was completed in November 1967. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. Extensively developed waterfront of Salem Harbor, including South River, is about 1 mile in extent and owned by private interests; of the nine wharves in the area, Salem Terminal, the largest, serves New England Power Co. generating station, and as principal terminal for receipt and distribution of coal and petroleum products in Salem and tributary area; two belong to National Park Service, and one of these is being used by the Navy for a training center. Nine other wharves in harbor are outside of extensively developed area. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs of $4,800 were incurred to conduct initial work on dredged material disposal investigations in conjunction with work by the state. 23. SCARBORO RIVER, ME Location. Scarboro River is a small and generally shallow stream about 2.5 miles long which rises in the town of Scarboro, Maine, and empties into the north end of Saco Bay, immediately west of Prouts Neck. The project is located about 17 miles southeast of Portland, Maine. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Charts 231 and 1205.) Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation, see Annual Report for 1995. Construction of the project was completed in May 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one wharf of pile and timber construction on Scarboro River, extending northerly from Pine Point almost to southerly limit of anchorage. Facility is owned by town of Scarboro and considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging under a continuing contract awarded last FY commenced in November 1996 and was completed in March 1997. A total of 95,000 cubic yards of material was dredged and transported to the Camp Ellis nearshore disposal site at a cost of $1,227,500. Hired labor costs included $75,400 for supervision and inspection, $69,600 for performing and plotting pre- and afterdredge surveys, $4,400 for project coordination and management, and $1,700 for contract processing. 24. SCITUATE HARBOR, MA Location. Scituate Harbor is located on the Atlantic coast about 14 miles southeast of the entrance to Boston Harbor and 33 miles northwest of the Massachusetts entrance to the Cape Cod Canal. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Charts 232 and 1207.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1931 and 1938. Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation, see annual Report for 1995. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. There are three wharves, one formerly used for the receipt of coal and lumber, one owned by the town and used as a public landing, and one used as a yacht pier. None of these wharves has any railroad connection, but each has good highway facilities. No elaborate freight-handling machinery is available. The facilities appear to be adequate for existing demands. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs incurred in association with a breakwater repair contract completed last FY were $9,100 for supervision and inspection and $500 for contract processing. 25. SEEKONK RIVER, PROVIDENCE, RI Location. The India Point Railroad Bridge is located at the mouth of the Seekonk River in Providence, Rhode Island. Existing project. Provides for the removal of the abandoned India Point Railroad Bridge at a currently estimated cost of $1,300,000. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing project.) Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not been requested yet. Local sponsors must transfer title of the bridge to the United States and provide 50 percent of construction costs. Revenue derived from the sale of scrap from the bridge shall be credited toward the non- Federal share of project costs. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Preparation ofproject plans and specifications continued along with coordination with the Rhode Island State Historic Preservation Office to identify measures to mitigate for the removal of this historic bridge. 1-10 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT 26. SESUIT HARBOR, MA Location. Sesuit Harbor is located on the north shore of Dennis in Barnstable County, about 85 miles southeast of Boston, MA. The town of Dennis is bordered on the north by Cape Cod Bay, Brewster and Harwich on the east, Nantucket Sound on the south, and Yarmouth on the west. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13250.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide from deep water in Cape Cod Bay to a point opposite the Dennis Yacht Club, thence reducing in width to 80 feet at the entrance to the inner harbor basin, for a total channel length of 2,400 feet. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Project was completed in August 1982. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging of the entrance channel by the Government- owned dredge CURRITUCK was performed from May 31 to June 4, 1997 at a plant rental cost of $44,400. A total of 6,000 cubic yards of sand were removed and placed east of the entrance channel in a nearshore area off of Cold Storage Beach. Hired labor costs of $10,600 were incurred for performing and plotting pre- and afterdredge surveys and progress surveys. 27. WELLS HARBOR, ME Location. Wells Harbor is located in the town of Wells at the mouth of the Webhannet River, about 20 miles northeast of Portsmouth Harbor, NH and about 34 miles southwest of Portland Harbor, ME. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Chart 13286.) Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation, see Annual Report for 1991. The project was completed in April 1967. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. There is one wharf of pile and timber construction on the north side of the anchorage. Facility is owned and operated by the town of Wells and is considered adequate. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs incurred for proposed maintenance dredging of the Federal channel, anchorage, and settling basin were $15,300 for sampling and testing, $12,400 for an environmental assessment, and $34,000 for project coordination and management. Substantial time was dedicated to resolve conflicting viewpoints and prepare for Board of Environmental Protection hearings which were subsequently deferred. 28. YORK HARBOR, ME Location. York Harbor is at the mouth of York River, a small stream emptying into the Atlantic Ocean, about 12 miles northeast of Portsmouth, New Hampshire, and 41 miles southwest of Portland, Maine. (See National Ocean Service Coast Survey Charts 228 and 1205.) Previous project. Adopted by the Act of August 5, 1886. For further details see page 40 of Annual Report for 1907. Existing project. Provides for widening by 170 feet the channel off Bragdon Island to a depth of 10 feet, and for removing to the same depth the point of a projecting shoal just above the island; an 8-foot deep anchorage basin, north of Bragdon Island, with an average width of 320 feet and average length of 700 feet, approximately 5.2 acres in area; and an 8-foot deep anchorage basin, south of Bragdon Island, with an average width of 450 feet and average length of 550 feet, approximately 5.6 acres in area. The existing project was completed in 1961. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are eight wharves in York Harbor. One, the combined hotel yacht club and Vinal's boat wharf is located on the northwest side of Stage Neck. Berth depth at this wharf is 13 feet. Five wharves and floats are located on the northeast side of the harbor. All have depths of 13 feet in their berths, and are open to the public without charge. Gasoline, water and supplies are available. There are two wharves on the west side of the harbor, the York Marine Service on Harris Island and the town wharf on Bragdon Island. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Final payment of $12,000 was made on a continuing contract for maintenance dredging completed last FY. Total contract cost was $495,353 for 47,703 cubic yards of material. Hired labor costs included $3,300 for supervision and inspection, and $700 for contract processing. Beach Erosion Control 29. POINT BEACH, MILFORD, CT Location. The city of Milford is located in southcentral Connecticut along the northern shore of Long Island Sound. Point Beach is a residential subdivision located in Milford about 75 miles northeast of New York City and 10 miles southwest of New Haven, Connecticut. Existing project. The proposed project involves raising the first floor of 58 shorefront and backshore residential structures above the estimated 100 year flood elevation. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on January 14, 1997 between the Corps and the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection. The project sponsor must pay 35 percent of all costs allocated to storm damage reduction and assume all costs for the maintenance and repair of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Bids were received in February 1997 but determined to be too 1-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 high by the project sponsor and the solicitation was cancelled. 30. WOODMONT BEACH, MILFORD, CT Location. Woodmont Beach is located on the northern shore of Long Island Sound in the borough of Woodmont, City of Milford about five miles southwest of New Haven, CT and some 82 miles northeasterly of New York City. Existing project. The original project provided for Federal participation in the amount of one-third of the first cost of protection and improvement of those portions of the shore which are publicly owned by widening to a width of 100 feet by direct placement of sand, 500 feet of shore in the first pocket beach west of Merwin Point; widening to a width of 100 - 150 feet, 3,500 feet of shore from Chapel Street northerly to a point about 400 feet north of Anderson Avenue; and construction of five impermeable groins 300 to 400 feet long. This work was completed by the State of Connecticut in 1959. (For details see Annual Report for 1961.) Work authorized in March 1992 provided for the direct placement of sandfill along approximately 1,500 feet of beach between Clinton and Bonsilene Street to form a berm 50 feet wide, reconstruction of the Usher Road/ Dunbar Street and Bonsilene Street groins, and mitigation to replace rocky habitat for Blue Mussels lost as a result of sand placement. This work was completed in 1994. New work involves periodic beach nourishment over the 50-year economic life of the project. (See Table 1-B for Acts authorizing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. In accordance with the Local Cooperation Agreement signed May 18, 1992 between the Corps and the City of Milford, the project sponsor must pay 35 percent of the total cost of periodic beach nourishment. Operations during fiscal year. Initiated preparation of plans and specifications for renourishment of Woodmont Beach. 31. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections of Revere Beach in Massachusetts and Prospect, Sea Bluff and Woodmont Beaches in Connecticut were conducted in FY 1997. The inspections determined that additional maintenance is required for Revere, Prospect and Sea Bluff Beaches, and that a nourishment program is required for Woodmont Beach. Flood Control 32. ALLENDALE DAM, NORTH PROVIDENCE, RI Location. Allendale Dam is located along the Woonasquatucket River which forms the boundary line between the towns of North Providence and Johnston, Rhode Island. Existing project. Provides for the reconstruction of Allendale Dam. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing project.) Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not been requested yet. The project sponsor must obtain title to the Allendale Dam; provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations necessary for project construction; pay 25 percent of project costs; and assume all costs for the operation and maintenance of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. Work continued on negotiation of the project cooperation agreement and transfer of the dam title to the City of North Providence. 33. BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MA AND RI Works covered by this plan include a dam and reservoir on West River and local protection works at three cities on Blackstone River. Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized plan for a reservoir on West River and local protection works at Worcester, MA, and Woonsocket and Pawtucket, RI, substantially in accordance with House Document 624, 78th Congress, 2nd session. Flood Control Act of 1960 authorized a local flood protection project at lower Woonsocket, RI, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 87, 85th Congress, 2nd Session. Local protection nonstructural project authorized in 1982 for Belmont Park section of Warwick, RI, along the Pawtuxet River. Streambank protection projects on the Blackstone River in Millbury, MA, and on the Clear River in Burrillville, RI, were authorized in 1985. (See Table 1-L at end of chapter on Reservoir and Local Protection Projects, Blackstone River Basin, for projects comprising authorized plan.) 33A. WEST HILL DAM, MA Location. Dam is on West River, MA, three miles above its confluence with Blackstone River and 2.5 miles northeast ofUxbridge, MA. (See Geological Survey maps Blackstone, MA and RI, Milford, MA, and Grafton, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Work on contract for dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in June 1-12 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT 1959 and completed in June 1961. Construction of recreational facilities was completed in June 1967. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1944 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 34. CHARLES RIVER (NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE AREAS), MA Location. The Charles River extends inland from Boston Harbor southwesterly toward the Massachusetts-Rhode Island border and is some 80 miles long with a watershed covering 307 square miles. Existing project. For description of existing project and authorizing legislation, see Annual Report for 1995. Land acquisition was completed in 1990. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to prevent modifications or alteration of existing roadways, utilities, bridges, culverts, and any other improvements that might affect the drainage characteristics of the natural storage areas; adopt and enforce regulations to restrict development of flood plain lands; and operate and maintain the existing dams along the Charles River. Local assurances were provided by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Hired labor costs for ordinary maintenance activities, project surveillance and inspection, as well as land use administration, were $141,839. 35. CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT, NH, MA AND CT Location. Works covered by this project are a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Connecticut River in Vermont, New Hampshire and Massachusetts, within a radius of 230 miles from Hartford, CT, and local protection works at several cities in the basin. Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended by Act of May 25, 1937, authorized construction of ten reservoirs on tributaries of Connecticut River in accordance with plans in House Document 412, 74th Congress, 2nd session, as the same may be revised upon further investigation of 1936 flood. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved a general comprehensive plan for control of floods and other purposes in Connecticut River Valley, as set forth in House Document 455, 75th Congress, 2nd session, and authorized $11,524,000 for construction of local flood protection projects in the plan. Act of October 15, 1940, modified Act of June 18, 1938, to provide additional protection at East Hartford, CT, as set forth in House Document 653, 76th Congress, 3rd session. Act of August 18, 1941, modified comprehensive plan approved in 1938 to include improvements recommended in House Document 653, 76th Congress, 3rd session, and House Document 724, 76th Congress, 3rd session, with such further modifications as may be found justifiable in discretion of Secretary of the Army and Chief of Engineers. Latter Act also authorized to be appropriated additional $6 million for local protection works and $10 million for reservoirs. Act of October 26, 1942, further modified plan by including construction of Gully Brook conduit at Hartford, CT. Flood Control Act of 1944 authorized expenditure of $30 million in addition to previous authorization for comprehensive plan approved in 1938 and modified plan by directing specific consideration of an alternative plan of Vermont State Water Conservation Board instead of Williamsville Reservoir in West River Basin, VT; directing consultation with affected States during course of investigations and transmission of proposal and plans to each affected State for written views and recommendations for reservoir projects heretofore authorized for construction at Cambridgeport, Ludlow, South Tunbridge, and Gaysville, and resubmission of projects or modifications for construction of Sugar Hill site. Flood Control Act of 1950 modified project for flood control at Hartford, CT, authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938, as amended to include Folly Brook dike and conduit. Flood Control Act of 1954 modified plan for flood control in Connecticut River Basin to provide for construction of a reservoir on Otter Brook at South Keene, NH, in lieu of any reservoir or reservoirs heretofore authorized. This Act further modified plan for West River Basin of Connecticut River in Vermont to consist of three reservoirs at Ball Mountain, The Island, and Townshend sites, in lieu of plan of eight reservoirs authorized in Flood Control Act of 1944. Flood Control Act of 1958 modified plan for flood control in Connecticut River Basin to include construction of Littleville Reservoir on Middle Branch of Westfield River, MA, and Mad River Reservoir on Mad River, above Winsted, CT. Flood Control Act of 1960 included authorization in Connecticut River Basin of plan for flood protection on Chicopee River, MA, substantially in accordance with House Document 434, 86th Congress; plan for flood protection on Westfield River, MA, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 109, 86th Congress; plan for flood control and related purposes on Farmington River, CT, substantially in accordance with House Document 443, 86th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1968 included authorization in Connecticut River Basin of plan for construction of Beaver Brook Reservoir, on Beaver Brook in Keene, NH, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 60, 90th Congress; and plan for protection on Park River, CT, substantially in accordance with Senate Document 43, 90th Congress. Flood Control Act of 1970 deauthorized the construction ofa reservoir at Claremont, NH. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 deauthorized the construction of Gaysville Lake, VT project. Flood control projects at Cambridgeport Lake, Brockway Lake, Victory Lake, South Tunbridge Lake, Ludlow Lake and The Island Lake, VT; Honey Hill Lake, West Canaan Lake, and the Alternative to Sugar Hill Reservoir, NH, were deauthorized in August 1977 in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974. The authorization for Beaver Brook Lake, NH project expired in April 1978 due to lack of local cooperation. Local protection projects at Gardner, 1-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 MA, West Springfield, MA, Hartford, VT, Wethersfield, CT, and Keene, NH authorized and constructed in accordance with Section 205 of 1948 Flood Control Act. Emergency streambank erosion control projects at Brownsville, VT; Conway, MA; Huntington, MA; Charlestown, NH; North Stratford, NH; Colchester, CT; Middletown, CT; Milford, CT; and Simsbury, CT authorized in accordance with Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act were completed. (See Table 1-M at end of chapter for reservoirs and local protection works for Connecticut River Basin.) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 modified the comprehensive plan for the control of floodwaters in the Connecticut River Basin, Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, and Connecticut, authorized by Section 5 of the Act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1572) by authorizing the design, construction, operation, and maintenance of facilities at Townshend Dam, West River, VT to enable upstream migrant adult Atlantic salmon to bypass that dam and Ball Mountain Dam, VT, and to provide at both Townshend and Ball Mountain Dams facilities as necessary for the downstream passage of juvenile Atlantic salmon. This work was completed in February 1993. 35A. BALL MOUNTAIN LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on West River, 29 miles above its junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, VT. It is two miles north of Jamaica, VT. (See Geological Survey map for Londonderry, VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1994. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1957 and completed in November 1961. Cost of work was $10,448,000 for construction and $350,000 for lands and damages, a total of $10,798,000. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in June 1975 and completed in June 1977. Fish passage facility work began in June 1992 and was completed in February 1993. Project is complete. Project is a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Connecticut River Basin. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract to replace the emergency generator was awarded June 22, 1995. Work began in November 1995 and was substantially complete in January 1996. Final contract amount was $65,082. A contract to replace guard rails was awarded July 1, 1997. Work had just begun at FY end 35B. BARRE FALLS DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Ware River in town of Barre, MA, 31.9 miles above confluence of Ware and Swift Rivers. It is 13 miles northwest of Worcester, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Barre, MA and Wachusett Mountain, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1956 and completed in May 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A second contract to repair fire damage to the Environmental Laboratory was awarded July 19, 1994. Work began the following month and was completed in September 1995. Final contract amount was $396,161. A contract for concrete repairs at the gatehotise and outlet works was awarded January 30, 1995. Work began in April 1995 and was completed in October 1996. Final contract amount was $170,211. A contract to repair concrete at the dam was awarded August 20, 1997. Work had not begun by FY end. 35C. BIRCH HILL DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Millers River, 27.3 miles above its junction with the Connecticut River. It is 1.3 miles east of South Royalston, MA and 7.5 miles northwest of Gardner, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Royalston and Winchendon, MA-NH and Templeton, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in June 1940 and completed in February 1942. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests have contributed $32,000 as their required 50 percent cost sharing of recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 35D. COLEBROOK RIVER LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is in town ofColebrook, Litchfield County, CT, on West Branch Farmington River about 3.9 miles upstream from its confluence with Still River at Riverton, CT, and about 1.5 miles upstream from Goodwin (Hogback) Dam. (See Geological Survey map for Winsted, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1965 and completed in June 1969. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in August 1969 and completed in June 1970. Local cooperation. Water supply contract was signed by Hartford Connecticut Metropolitan Water District. Repayment is being made in accordance with provisions of 1958 Water Supply Act. 1-14 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance. Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 35E. CONANT BROOK DAM, MA Location. Site is in south central part of Massachusetts in town of Monson. Damsite, across Conant Brook, is about two miles southeast of community of Monson, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Monson, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, highway relocations, and appurtenances was initiated in June 1964 and completed in December 1966. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 35F. KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MA Location. Dam is on Westfield River, 27.5 miles above its confluence with Connecticut River. It is four miles north of town of Huntington, MA, and about 12 miles west of city of Northampton, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Westhampton, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1939 and completed in December 1941. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 35G. LANCASTER, ISRAEL RIVER, NH Location. Lancaster is located in northern New Hampshire along the Vermont State line at the confluence of the Connecticut and Israel Rivers. The Israel River has a length of about 21 miles and a drainage area of 135 square miles. Existing project. The local ice jam flood protection project provides for an earth and rock-filled embankment weir, 160 feet long, protected by layers of gabions, which are rock-filled baskets. Fish passage through the weir is assured by four concrete sluiceways. The sluiceways are four feet wide and are provided with stop-log slots. Stop-logs are inserted each year in the late fall to ensure a winter pool behind the weir and are removed each spring. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Project was completed in 1981 at a total cost of $551,605. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Operations during fiscal year. New work: An Embankment Criteria and Performance Report, assessing the current condition and past performance of the project, was provided to the project sponsor during FY 1996. The sponsor has elected not to participate in any operational improvements to the project and will not assume future operation and maintenance of the project. 35H. LITTLEVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Middle Branch of Westfield River, one mile above its confluence with main stem of Westfield River and 25.2 miles above confluence of Westfield River with Connecticut River, in town of Chester, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Chester, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated under a multicomponent contract in June 1962 and completed in September 1965. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, and Title III, Water Supply Act of 1958 applies and fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 351. NORTH HARTLANI LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on Ottauquechee River, 1.5 miles above its junction with Connecticut River, and one mile northwest of North Hartland, VT. Reservoir extends upstream 5.5 miles. (See Geological Survey map for Hanover NH-VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in June 1958 and completed in June 1961. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 35J. NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, VT Location. Dam is in town of Springfield, VT, on Black River, 8.7 miles above its junction with Connecticut River, and three miles northwest of Springfield, VT. (See Geological Survey maps for Ludlow, VT, and Claremont, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam was initiated in May 1958 and completed in November 1960. Local cooperation. Section 2. Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. 1-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 35K. OTTER BROOK LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Otter Brook, 2.4 miles upstream from its junction with The Branch, which flows 2.5 miles to Ashuelot River at Keene, NH. (See National Ocean Survey maps for Keene, NH-VT, and Monadnock, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 and completed in August 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 35L. SURRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Ashuelot River, 34.6 miles above its junction with Connecticut River and five miles north of Keene, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Keene and Bellows Falls, NH-VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1939 and completed in June 1942. Initial phase of additional recreational facilities completed in September 1969, secondary phase in 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 35M. TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT Location. Dam is on West River, 19.1 miles above its junction with Connecticut River at Brattleboro, VT, and about two miles west of Townshend, VT. Reservoir extends upstream about four miles. (See Geological Survey maps for Saxtons River, VT, and Londonderry, VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizating legislation, see Annual Report for 1994. Reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated system for flood control in Connecticut River Basin. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1958 and completed in June 1961. Initial phase of additional recreational facilities completed in October 1969 and secondary phase completed in September 1971. Fish passage facility work began in June 1992 and was completed in February 1993. Project is complete. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract to repair a scour hole was awarded August 18, 1995. Work began in July 1996 and was completed in July 1997. Contractor earnings totalled $668,973, with final payment pending at FY end. 35N. TULLY LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on East Branch of Tully River, 3.9 miles above its junction with Millers River. It is one mile north of Fryville, MA, and 3.5 miles north of Athol, MA. (See Geological Survey map for Royalston, MA-NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was initiated in March 1947 and completed in September 1949. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development, in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreational Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract to repair the Doane Hill Road and spillway bridges was awarded June 29, 1995. Contractor mobilized in August 1995 and completed work in May 1996. Final contract amount was $325,263. 350. UNION VILLAGE DAM, VT Location. Dam is on Ompompanoosuc River, four miles above its junction with Connecticut River. It is onefourth mile north of Union Village, VT, and 11 miles north of White River Junction, VT. (See Geological Survey maps for Strafford, VT and Mount Cube, NH-VT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of the dam was initiated in March 1947 and completed in June 1950. Local Cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 36. FAULKNER ISLAND, CT Location. Faulkner Island is located in Long Island Sound about 3 miles south of Guilford, Connecticut. Faulkner Lighthouse is located about 35 feet from the cliff edge along the eastern side of the island. Existing project. Provides for the construction of shoreline protection measures along the east side of the 1-16 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT island adjacent to Faulkner Lighthouse. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not been requested yet. The island is owned and operated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as a National Wildlife Refuge. Prior to construction, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service must agree to maintain the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Initiated preparation of plans and specifications. 37. GALILEE SALT MARSH, RI Location. Galilee Salt Marsh is located in southern Rhode Island in the town of Narragansett about 30 miles south of Providence, between Point Judith Harbor of Refuge and Bluff Hill Cove. Existing project. Provides for installing two culverts beneath Escape Road and excavating channels to restore about 34 acres of former salt marsh. This area was degraded by the disposal of dredged material from the Federal navigation project at Point Judith Harbor of Refuge. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on May 30, 1996 between the Corps and the Rhode Island and Providence Plantations Department of Environmental Management. The project sponsor must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations determined by the Government to be necessary for project construction; pay a cash contribution in the amount necessary to bring the non-Federal share of study and project costs including lands to 25 percent; and bear all operation, maintenance and repair costs of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract to restore Galilee Salt Marsh was awarded August 13, 1996. Work began in October 1996 and was substantially completed in August 1997. Contractors earnings totalled $1,148,618, with final contract payment pending at FY end. 38. HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CT AND MA Seven flood control reservoirs on tributaries of the Naugatuck River, principal tributary of the Housatonic River, and three local protection projects have been specifically authorized as part of an overall plan for flood control in the Housatonic River Basin. The Naugatuck and Housatonic Rivers converge 12 miles above mouth of Housatonic River. A project for emergency snagging and clearing of the Blackberry River, a tributary of the Housatonic River, was authorized under authority contained in Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Emergency streambank protection projects at: Alford, Green River, MA; Sheffield, MA; Salisbury, CT; and Squantz Pond, Fairfield, CT were authorized under authority provided by Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. Projects for local flood protection for: West Branch, Torrington, CT; East Branch, Torrington, CT; Mad River, Waterbury (Woodtick Area), CT; Pittsfield, MA; and Waterbury-Watertown, CT, were authorized under authority provided by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-N on dams, reservoirs, and local protection projects for Housatonic River Basin.) 38A. BLACK ROCK LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is on Branch Brook, about two miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck River, in towns of Thomaston and Watertown, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Road relocation completed in November 1967. Contract for construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated in July 1967 and completed in July 1971. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 38B. HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Hancock Brook, in town of Plymouth, CT, about 3.4 miles above its confluence with Naugatuck River. (See Geological Survey map for Waterbury, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in July 1963 and completed in August 1966. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 38C. HOP BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Damsite is on Hop Brook, in city of Waterbury and towns of Middlebury and Naugatuck, CT, about 1.4 miles upstream of confluence ofNaugatuck River and Hop Brook. (See Geological Survey map for Waterbury, CT.) 1-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant structures was initiated in December 1965 and completed in December 1968. Construction of a public use facility was completed in November 1973. Construction of an additional restroom was completed in 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 38D. MAD RIVER, WATERBURY (WOODTICK AREA), CT Location. The City of Waterbury is located in westcentral Connecticut, about 20 miles north of New Haven, Connecticut and about 25 miles southwest of Hartford, Connecticut. The Woodtick area of Waterbury is located along the Mad River between Sharon and Frost Road Bridges and consists primarily of residential development including several apartment and condominium complexes, some light manufacturing companies, and a large shopping mall. Existing project. Provides for widening and deepening the existing channel along two restricted areas of the Mad River, totaling 1,450 linear feet. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on June 2, 1993 between the Corps and the State of Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection. The project sponsor shall provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and perform all relocations and alterations of building, utilities, highways, railroads, and bridges determined by the Government to be necessary for construction of the project; pay a cash contribution in the amount necessary to bring the non- Federal share of project costs to 25 percent (a minimum cash contribution of 5 percent is required); assume all costs in excess of the Federal statutory limitation of $5,000,000; and bear all operation, maintenance and repair costs of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for construction of channel improvements along the Mad River was awarded on January 16, 1996. Work began in April 1996 and was completed in August 1997. Final contract amount was $937,760. 38E. NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Northfield Brook, about 1.3 miles upstream from its confluence with Naugatuck River, in town ofThomaston, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenances was initiated in May 1963 and completed in October 1965. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in November 1966 and completed in August 1967. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. However, local interests must establish encroachment lines downstream of dam to permit efficient reservoir operation. State legislation requires establishment of such lines. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 38F. THOMASTON DAM, CT Location. On Naugatuck River, about 30.4 miles above its junction with Housatonic River, and about 1.6 miles north of Thomaston, CT. Reservoir extends upstream about 6.4 miles. (See Geological Survey map for Thomaston, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1958 and completed in November 1960. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1944 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 39. MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, NH AND MA Works covered by comprehensive plan are on Merrimack River and its tributaries in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Flood Control Act of 1936 authorized construction of a system of flood control reservoirs in Merrimack River Basin for reduction of flood heights in Merrimack Valley. Flood Control Act of 1938 approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes as approved by Chief of Engineers pursuant to preliminary examinations and surveys authorized by Act of June 22, 1936, and modified project to provide in addition to construction of a system of flood control reservoirs, related flood control works which may be found justified by the Chief of Engineers. All operations pertaining to flood control in Merrimack River Basin are now carried on under and reported under projects for individual units of comprehensive plan referred to above. No further expenditures are contemplated under general project for flood control in Merrimack River Basin. For final cost and financial summary, see Annual Report for 1946. 1-18 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT A comprehensive plan for development of water resources of the North Nashua River Basin, a principal tributary of the Merrimack River, was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act substantially in accordance with Senate Document 113, 89th Congress. Plan provides for construction of coordinated system of four reservoirs and three local protection projects for flood protection, water supply, recreation and allied purposes. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 deauthorized two of the reservoirs and one of the local protection projects. The 1966 Flood Control Act also authorized construction of Saxonville local protection project substantially in accordance with Senate Document 61, 89th Congress. Emergency streambank protection projects at Amesbury, MA and two in Leominster, MA were authorized under authority provided by Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-0 at end of chapter for reservoirs and related flood control works for Merrimack River Basin.) 39A. BLACKWATER DAM, NH Location. Dam is on Blackwater River, 8.2 miles above confluence with Contoocook River, and 118.8 miles above mouth of Merrimack River. It is in the town of Webster, NH, just above village of Swetts Mills, NH, 18 miles by highway northwest of Concord, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Penacook and Mount Kearsarge, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete except for construction of public facilities. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1940 and completed in November 1941. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract for miscellaneous repairs at Hopkinton - Everett Lakes and Blackwater Dam was awarded July 17,1995. Work began in August 1995 at Blackwater Dam and was completed in June 1997. Final contract amount for work at Blackwater Dam was $195,377. 39B. EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, NH Location. Dam is on Nubanusit Brook, a tributary of Contoocook River, one-half mile upstream from village of West Peterborough, NH, and 14 miles east ofKeene, NH. (See Geological Survey map for Peterboro and Monadnock, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in March 1948 and completed in March 1950. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 39C. FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, NH Location. Dam is on Pemigewasset River, main tributary of Merrimack River, and about 2.5 miles upstream of Franklin, NH. (See Geological Survey maps for Penacook and Holderness, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1939 and completed in October 1943. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 39D. HOPKINTON-EVERETT LAKES, NH Location. Hopkinton Dam is on Contoocook River, 17.3 miles above its junction with Merrimack River and about one-half mile upstream from village of West Hopkinton, NH. Everett Dam is on Piscataquog River, 16 miles above its junction with Merrimack River, and about 1.3 miles southeast of village of East Weare, NH. Two interconnecting canals were provided to enable the two reservoir areas to function as one. (See Geological Survey map for Hillsboro, NH, and Concord, NH.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of two dams and appurtenant works was initiated in November 1959 and completed in December 1962. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in November 1974 and completed in September 1975. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must also bear 50 percent of future recreational development in accordance with 1965 Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract to install Government furnished gates and actuators at Hopkinton Lake Intake Tower was awarded June 28, 1996. Work began in August 1996 and was completed in January 1997. Final contract amount was $150,750. A contract for miscellaneous repairs at Blackwater Dam and Hopkinton - Everett Lakes was awarded July 17, 1995. Repairs at Hopkinton - Everett Lakes began in October 1995 and were com- 1-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 pleted in June 1997. Final contract amount for work at Hopkinton - Everett lakes was $23,800.. 39E. NORTH NASHUA RIVER, LEOMINSTER, MA Location. The city of Leominster is located in north central Massachusetts, approximately 34 miles northwest of Boston. Existing project. Construction of stone slope revetment along 400 feet of eroding streambank adjacent to the Leominster Connector, an arterial roadway that links the interstate highway network with the city. This work was completed in October 1994. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Final project costs were apportioned between the Federal and non-Federal accounts. 39F. NORTH NASHUA RIVER, LEOMINSTER (SEWER LINE), MA Location. The City of Leominster is located in the northern portion of Worcester County in north central Massachusetts, approximately 34 miles northwest of Boston. The erosion site is along the North Nashua River in the vicinity of the Leominster Sewage Treatment Plant. Existing project. Construction of stone slope protection along 480 linear feet of eroding streambank and removal of accumulated snags and debris from the opposite riverbank. The project protects against continued erosion and possible collapse of an existing 36-inch reinforced concrete sewer line. This work was completed in August 1996. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing project.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for construction of emergency streambank protection measures alongthe North Nashua River was awarded September 5, 1995. Work began in July 1996 and was completed the following month. Final contract amount was $190,191. 40. NEW BEDFORD, FAIRHAVEN AND ACUSHNET, MA Location. Main harbor barrier is across New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbor in vicinity of Palmer Island. Supplemental dikes and walls are provided in Clark Cove area of New Bedford and Fairhaven. (See Geological survey maps for New Bedford North, New Bedford South, Marion, and Sconticut Neck, MA and National Ocean Service Coast Survey Charts 13230, 13070 and 13218.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of barrier and appurtenances was initiated in October 1962 and completed in January 1966. Construction of the pumping station was initiated in October 1962 and completed in June 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operations and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract to repair the sector gates was awarded April 23, 1997. Work began in May 1997 and was completed in August 1997. Final contract amount was $262,127. 41. QUONSET POINT, DAVISVILLE, RI Location. Quonset Point is located in east central Rhode Island along the west shore of Narragansett Bay in the village of Davisville and Town of North Kingstown, about 15 miles south of Providence, Rhode Island. Existing project. Provides for the construction of two elevated water storage towers and relocation of 6,000 feet of sewer line at an estimated total cost of $3,200,000. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed January 29, 1997 between the Corps and the Rhode Island Economic Development Corporation. The sponsor must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable borrow and dredged or excavated material disposal areas, and shall perform or ensure performance of all relocations necessary for the construction, operation, and maintenance of the project. The sponsor must also provide 25 percent of construction costs and assume all costs in excess of the Federal limitations of $1,350,000 for construction of the two elevated water storage towers and $1,050,000 for sewer line relocation. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract to construct two elevated water storage towers was awarded May 7, 1997. Work began in August 1997 and was about 5 percent complete at FY end with contractor earnings of $200,000. A contract to relocate about 6,000 feet of sewer line was awarded May 7, 1997. Work began in September 1997 and was about 10 percent complete at FY end with contractor earnings of $100,000. 42. ROUGHANS POINT, REVERE, MA Location. The city of Revere is a coastal community located in Suffolk County about five miles northeast of the city of Boston, MA. Roughans Point is a low-lying, ocean front neighborhood of Revere. The area has 55 acres and about 300 structures, mostly residential homes. Existing project. Project consists of 3,125 feet of stone revetment to dissipate incoming waves, prevent overtopping and stabilize existing facilities along the 1-20 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT shoreline. The revetment would extend from a point about 250 feet south of Eliot Circle southerly to a point 200 feet south of the intersection of Winthrop Parkway and Leverett Avenue. The project also calls for "backwater" protection by raising the ground elevation one foot at the intersection of Bennington Street and State Road and installing a sluice gate on the 42-inch drain from the Roughans area to Sales Creek. Interior drainage improvements consist of a new intake structure at the existing pump station and a new gravity drain with a sluice gate. (See Table 1-B at end of chapter for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed April 25, 1997 between the Corps and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Environmental Management. The project sponsor must provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations necessary for construction of the structural elements of the project, including ponding areas, borrow areas, and disposal areas for excavated material; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacements; pay an amount in cash to bring the total non-Federal share to 35 percent of project costs allocated to storm damage reduction. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract to construct the stone revetment project was awarded September 17, 1997. Work had not begun by FY end. 43. SAINT JOHN RIVER BASIN, ME Location. The project is located in Aroostook county in northern Maine, and lies within the Saint John River Basin. Existing project. The project involves a research and demonstration program of cropland irrigation and soil conservation techniques for increasing potato yield and quality. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) for a two-year research and demonstration program was signed on April 22, 1991 between the Corps and the Maine Aroostook Water and Soil Management Board. The project sponsor must obtain all interests in real estate as determined by the Government and the project sponsor to be necessary for project implementation. The Government will reimburse the project sponsor 65 percent of project costs as work is accomplished, up to the Federal cost limit of$300,000. The LCA was amended on June 6, 1994 to include a third year of research and demonstration at an estimated Federal cost of $252,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Continued research at the University of Maine's farm in Presque Isle, Maine. 44. SAUGUS RIVER & TRIBUTARIES, MA Location. The communities of Revere, Saugus, Malden and Lynn are located along the Massachusetts coastline just north of Boston. Existing project. The proposed project involves the construction of a 1,300 foot long floodgate structure across the mouth of the Saugus River and construction of 3.5 miles of dikes, walls, revetments, sand dunes and beaches along the Revere and Lynn shorefronts. Included with the proposed project is the acquisition, protection and management of 1,650 acres of salt water estuary along the Saugus and Pines Rivers for flood water storage. A mitigation site is planned at the abandoned I-95 embankment to replace 3 acres of clam flats and tidal habitat lost by project construction. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. Formal assurances have not been requested yet. Consistent with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the non-Federal sponsor must provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations necessary for project construction; pay an amount in cash to bring the total non-Federal share of hurricane and storm damage reduction costs to 35 percent; pay 100 percent of the separable costs allocated to recreation; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of project facilities after construction. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The project sponsor indicated by letter dated August 31, 1993 that they intend to investigate a non-structural approach to flood protection as an alternative to the proposed project. Further efforts on the General Design Report were suspended pending the results of the sponsor's investigation. 45. SEBAGO LAKE, STANDISH, ME Location. The town of Standish is located in southeastern Maine, about 15 miles northwest of Portland. Sebago Lake is Portland's primary water supply, and covers about 47 square miles with a total drainage area of361 square miles. The erosion problem is located along the southerly end of the lake adjacent to Maine Highway Route 35. Existing project. Construction of stone slope protection along 1,000 linear feet of eroding shoreline. The project protects against continued erosion and possible collapse of Route 35. Work was completed in December 1996. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing project.) Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed November 29, 1995 between the Corps and the Maine Department of Transportation. The project sponsor must provide all lands, easements, rightsof- way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas, and perform all relocations determined 1-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 by the Government to be necessary for project construction; pay a minimum cash contribution of 5 percent of total project costs during construction; pay an additional cash contribution during construction, so that the total contribution including lands equals 25 percent of total project costs; assume all costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost limitation of $500,000; and bear all costs for maintenance and repair of the project after completion. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for construction of emergency shoreline protection measures along Sebago Lake was awarded August 13, 1996. Work began in November 1996 and was completed the following month. Contractor earnings totalled $479,479 with final payment pending at FY end. 46. STAMFORD, CT Location. The Stamford Hurricane Barrier is located in Fairfield County on the north shore of Long Island Sound, about 30 miles east of New York City and 20 miles southwest of Bridgeport, CT. (See Geological Survey map for Stamford, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation, see Annual Report for 1974. Project was completed in 1969. Local interests still owe a substantial amount based on claims settlements, including interest payment under the Contract Disputes Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for $662,000 outstanding which is local share of final claims settlement including interest payment. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. A contract to replace the navigation gate hoist system was awarded April 11, 1995. The gate hoist system was delivered to the site in June 1996 and installation was completed in August 1997. Contractor earnings totalled $1,331,746 with final payment pending at FY end. 47. THAMES RIVER BASIN, CT, RI, AND MA Works covered by this plan are a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of Thames River in Massachusetts and Connecticut, within a radius of 45 miles from Norwich, CT, and a channel enlargement on Shetucket River where it discharges into Thames River at Norwich. Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, approved plan for a system of reservoirs and channel improvements in Thames River Basin in accordance with House Document 885, 76th Congress, 3rd session, and authorized $6 million for initiation and partial accomplishment of project. Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944, authorized completion of approved plan. Flood Control Act of July 14, 1960, authorized project for West Thompson Reservoir, substantially as recommended in Senate Document 41, 86th Congress, 2nd session. Local flood protection project for West River, New Haven, CT was authorized under authority provided by Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-P on reservoirs and local protection projects, Thames River Basin, for projects comprising approved plan.) 47A. BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Little River, 1.3 miles above its junction with French River, and eight miles northeast of Southbridge, MA. Reservoir extends upstream about 1.7 miles northerly and 1.9 miles southerly. (See Geological Survey maps for Webster, MA and CT, and Leicester, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in September 1956 and completed in June 1958. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 47B. EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 64.5 miles above its confluence with Shetucket River, and one mile southwest of village of Fiskdale, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Whales, MA and CT, Southbridge, MA and CT, East Brookfield, MA, and Warren, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1958 and completed in June 1960. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities. 47C. HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MA Location. Dam is on French River, 15 miles above its confluence with Quinebaug River, at Hodges Village in town of Oxford, MA, about five miles north of Webster, MA. (See Geological Survey maps for Webster, MA, and CT, Leicester, MA, Worcester South, MA, and Oxford, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works, initiated in March 1958, was completed in December 1959. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Major rehabilitation: A contract to rehabilitate Hodges Village Dam was awarded August 5, 1997. Work had not begun by FY end. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 1-22 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT 47D. MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CT Location. Dam is at Mansfield Hollow, CT, on Natchaug River, 5.3 miles above its confluence with Willimantic River. It is four miles northeast of city of Willimantic, CT. (See Geological Survey maps for Spring Hill and Willimantic, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, initiated in 1949, was completed in May 1952. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. A contract to repair the dam's hydraulic system was awarded April 22, 1996. Work began in June 1996 and was completed in November 1996. Final contract amount was $68,302. 47E. WEST THOMPSON LAKE, CT Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, in town of Thompson, CT. Site is in village of West Thompson, two miles upstream from city of Putnam, CT. (See Geological Survey map, for Putnam, CT.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam, road relocation, and appurtenances was initiated in August 1963 and completed in October 1965. Initial phase of recreation facilities was completed in May 1976. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 47F. WESTVILLE LAKE, MA Location. Dam is on Quinebaug River, 56.7 miles above its confluence with Shetucket River, in towns of Sturbridge and Southbridge, MA, and 1.3 miles west of center of Southbridge. (See Geological Survey maps for Southbridge, MA and RI, and East Brookfield, MA.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see Annual Report for 1975. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in April 1960 and completed in August 1962. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary operation and maintenance activities were conducted. 48. TOWN BROOK, QUINCY AND BRAINTREE, MA Location. The project is located in the city of Quincy and the town of Braintree on the south side of Massachusetts Bay, along the eastern shore of Massachusetts, seven miles south of Boston in Norfolk County. The watershed is approximately 4.5 square miles. Existing project. Project provides for the construction of a 12-foot diameter, 4,060-foot long, concrete lined tunnel in bedrock approximately 140 to 180 feet below ground, intake and outlet structures, and improvements to the Town River downstream of the outlet shaft. The tunnel and its appurtenances will be supplemented by reconstruction of the Old Quincy Reservoir Dam, located at the headwaters of Town Brook. Reconstruction work includes a new spillway and outlet structure. The estimated total project cost (October 1997) is $40,000,000, and includes $6,100,000 in approved credit for compatible work that has been accomplished by the project sponsor. Total project costs do not include dam safety measures at Old Quincy Reservoir Dam, which are a non- Federal responsibility. Construction of Town River improvements was initiated in December 1992 and completed in December 1994. (See Table 1-B for Act authorizing existing project.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on July 7, 1992 between the Corps and the Metropolitan District Commission (MDC). The MDC is required to provide all lands, easements, and rights-ofway, presently estimated at $830,000; reconstruct Old Quincy Dam to insure its structural integrity, presently estimated at $9,000,000; pay a cash contribution for the costs allocated to flood control, presently estimated at $3,070,000; so that the total contribution of local interests is equal to 25 percent of costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacements, presently estimated at $44,000 annually. In addition, local interests must do the following: prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent encroachment on both the improvements and unimproved channels, and manage all project-related channels to preserve capacities for local drainage as well as for project functions. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract for construction of the tunnel was awarded September 15, 1993. Work on this contract began in January 1994 and was completed in January 1997. Contractor earnings totalled $20,133,333 with final payment pending at FY end. Continued preparation of plans and specifications for reconstruction of Old Quincy Reservoir. 49. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS In accordance with provisions of the Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended, local flood protection works constructed with Federal funds are transferred to local interests to operate and maintain. To insure compliance 1-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 with regulations prescribed for their operation and maintenance, regular inspections of the following projects were made during the fiscal year: CONNECTICUT: November 96 - E. Hartford, Hartford, New Haven; July 97 - New London, Pawcatuck; September 97 - Ansonia, Derby, Stanford, Torrington. MAINE: October 96 - Machiasport, Millbridge, Ogunquit, Perry, Whiting. MASSACHUSETTS: October 96 - Chicopee, Conway, Fitchburg, Gardner, Huntington, Lowell, Northampton, Springfield, Westfield, West Springfield, Weymouth- Braintree; November 96 - Amesbury, Charles River, Haverhill; May 97 - Charles River, Chicopee, Fitchburg, Gardner, Leominster, West Springfield; July 97 - Holyoke, Saxonville. NEW HAMPSHIRE: October 96 - Keene, Keene (Beaver Brook); November 96 - Farmington, Lincoln, Nashua, Shelburne. RHODE ISLAND: October 96 - Woonsocket. VERMONT: None 50. FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS A coordinated system of flood control dams, all of which have flood control as primary storage available with recreation and/or water supply as secondary storages in most of the projects, has been established in five major flood producing basins in New England. During periods of flood flows, regulation of reservoirs is fully coordinated within each basin dependent upon its location in the watershed, its available storage capacity and origin of the flood. In addition to flood control releases, water supply, flow augmentation and hydropower releases were made from selected reservoirs. Winter pools are maintained at many projects to submerge the flood control gates and keep them from freezing. During FY 97 there were two significant flood events. During October 1996 a powerful nor'easter deposited 3 to 8 inches of rainfall over most watersheds, with greater amounts of 12 to 20 inches along coastal areas. The hardest hit areas were the unregulated watersheds of northeastern Massachusetts, coastal New Hampshire and coastal Maine. The second flood event occurred in April 1997 associated with another nor'easter storm depositing 2 inches of rain in combination with snowmelt. Cumulative damages prevented, due to flood control operations, totalled $23,518,000 during FY 97. CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN Regulation for canoe or kayak activities occurred during FY 97 at Otter Brook in March; Birch Hill, Tully, Littleville and Knightville in April; Ball Mountain and Townshend in April and September. Releases for hydropower from Colebrook Lake during non-flood periods of FY 97 were controlled by the Hartford MDC. MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN Blackwater was regulated for canoe races in April 1997. THAMES RIVER BASIN Mansfield Hollow Lake was regulated for canoe races in June 1997, East Brimfield and Westville Lakes were regulated for a river race in April 1997. The latter two projects also supplied small releases for low flow augmentation to American Optical Co. during the summer months. 51. HURRICANE BARRIER OPERATIONS Five hurricane barriers are situated along the southern coast of New England, protecting coastal communities from tidal flooding associated with hurricanes and severe coastal storms. The Corps operates the navigational elements of the Stamford, CT and New Bedford- Fairhaven, MA barriers. The Fox Point, RI, the Pawcatuck and New London, CT barriers are operated by the local communities. A brief resume of operations for the fiscal year follows: STAMFORD BARRIER. The barrier gates were operated on ten occasions for coastal storms during FY 1997. Total benefits associated with gate operations during FY 1997 totalled $3,252,000. NEW BEDFORD BARRIER. During FY 1997, the New Bedford Barrier was operated on 31 different occasions resulting in a total of $1,135,800 in benefits. FOX POINT HURRICANE BARRIER. The Fox Point Hurricane Barrier was operated once during FY 1997 totalling $114,000 in benefits. PAWCATUCK HURRICANE BARRIER. The Pawcatuck Hurricane Barrier was not operated during FY 1997. NEW LONDON HURRICANE BARRIER. The New London Hurricane Barrier was not operated during FY 1997. 52. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205. Public Law 80-858, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 1-J) Snagging and clearing activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. (None) Emergency Bank Protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act. (See Table 1-K) 1-24 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT Project modifications for the improvement of the environment pursuant to Section 1135, Public Law 99-662, as amended (preauthorization). FY costs were as follows: Initial Appraisals & Coordination $ 24,229 Account Sagamore Marsh, Cape Cod Canal, MA 142,362 Emergency flood control activities--repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Federal costs for FY were $307,925 for disaster preparedness. General Investigations 53. SURVEYS Costs for the FY for surveys from regular funds were $657,177 of which $7,719 was for one flood damage prevention study; $383,524 for two special studies; and $265,934 for coordination studies. 54. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The Division Engineer is the U.S. member on the Saint Croix River Board of Control. Annual inspections are made of conditions on the Saint Croix River and basic hydrologic information is compiled. A report of operations and development in the basin was prepared in cooperation with Canadian counterparts. Total costs for the FY were $28,013. Total costs to September 30, 1997 are $360,004. Concerns about fluctuating water levels on Spednik and East Grand Lakes and its adverse effects on fisheries and recreation were raised at two public meetings held by the International Joint Commission (IJC) in August 1992. These lakes are currently operated in conjunction with downstream hydropower facilities. The IJC has requested that the Saint Croix River Board of Control reexamine the Orders of Approval for Spednik and East Grand Lakes. A range of lake levels and minimum flow releases will be studied to assist the IJC in developing new operational procedures for these lakes which increase recreational opportunities, enhance the environment and improve water level and flow regulation. Total costs for FY were $10,693. Total costs to September 30, 1997 are $101,219. The Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine Environment was established in 1989 under an agreement signed by the Governors of Maine, New Hampshire and Massachusetts, and the Premiers of Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. The Council was tasked under this agreement to develop consistent policies, initiatives and programs designed to protect and conserve the shared natural resources of the Gulf of Maine. In April 1993, the Council requested the New England Division Engineer to participate in this international program as an "observer" to the Council. In this capacity, the Division Engineer is expected to attend Council meetings and support their initiatives to the extent possible. In addition to the Division Engineer's direct participation, a representative of the Corps is a member of the Working Group to the Council, which implements directives of the Council. The Corps representative on the Working Group is assisting the Habitat Sub-Group to establish policies, set priorities and identify lead agencies for implementing habitat restoration projects in the Gulf of Maine. This effort includes investigating potential habitat restoration sites eligible for Corps participation under Section 1135 and coordination of input from other Federal agencies. Total costs for the FY were $8,038. Total costs to September 30, 1997 are $82,052. Flood plain studies comprise compilation and dissemination, upon responsible local request, of information on floods and potential flood damages, including identification of areas subject to inundation by floods of various magnitudes and frequencies, and general criteria for guidance in use of flood plain area; and engineering advice to local interests for their use in planning to ameliorate flood hazard. Total costs for the FY were $476,276. Total costs to September 30, 1997 are $9,213,466. The April 1987 flood was one of the largest of recent times in New England, resulting in spillway discharge at six Corps flood control reservoirs. A comprehensive hydrologic analysis of this flood event is needed to develop a base of information for use in future planning and design studies, as well as reservoir operation. Fiscal year 1997 funds were used to conduct hydrologic analysis of the 1987 flood within the Merrimack River Basin. Total costs for the FY were $20,119. Total costs to September 30, 1997 are $82,688. 55. PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (None.) 56. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Preconstruction Engineering and Design costs were $80,000 for the navigation project at Boston, Massachusetts; $797 for the local protection project at Saugus River and Tributaries, Massachusetts; and $272,369 for work on eight stormwater management projects. 1-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1997 TABLE 1-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Sep. 30,1997 1. Aquatic Plant Control 2. Aunt Lydia's Cove Chatham, MA (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds - Other) 3. Boston Harbor, MA Cape Cod Canal, MA (Contributed Funds) Cocheco River, NH 6. Criehaven Harbor, ME 7. Cuttyhunk Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New York Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 5,000 1,293 5,000 1,968 70,000 747,000 86,801 645,310 - 184,019 - 51,826 - 150,700 - 103,006 208,000 243,079 36,000 75,881 154,831 212,000 137,570 220,898 7,297 28,921 94,674 13,200 13,200 40,183 -88,000 -41,606 97,000 102,804 206,087 215,052 195 304,496 304,496 1,377 1,048,798 7,951 1,024,189 - 13,200 - 13,200 - 184,019 - 92,010 850 62,700 62,250 553,000 25,909,974 3 155,021 25,511,995 s 167,564 10,973,191 * 137,468 10,943,028 4 - 21,798,322 1 - 21,798,322 ' 5,981,000 5,958,000 5,421,313 6,540,254 7,324,656 9,833,620 153,251,390 7,322,857 9,637,583 152,864,978 - 115,432 - 115,432 - 390,677 - 390,677 - 26,609,000 - 26,609,000 - 119,089 - 119,089 7288 7288 7,000 480,000 6,436 420,606 - 601,920 - 74,215 20,000 79,129 500 1,330 662,759 135,054 40,776 40,776 517,617 517,617 - 27,168 - 27,168 143,984 -11,900 141,963 -11,218 2,970 3,970 88,666 1,442,447 89,196 1,442,447 11,643 11,643 1-26 TABLE 1-A (Continued) NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Sep. 30, 1997 Duxbury Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 9. Gloucester Harbor and Annisquam River, MA (Contributed Funds) 10. Green Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 11. Hyannis Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 12. Kennebec River, ME 13. New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA (Contributed Funds) 14. Newburyport Harbor, MA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 421,297 421,297 275 275 41,526 40,488 764,200 763,901 705,000 2,422,240 706,336 2,422,240 - 35,000 s - 35,000 5 - 1,296,934 - 1,296,934 41,762 41,762 7,758 7,758 261,427 193,000 260,318 194,298 230,000 220,822 14,787 14,787 66,200 88,000 9,677 9,677 54,000 53,587 2,119 2,119 -8,835 29,965 32,426 32,426 27,860 27,860 -415 -415 240,848 240,924 160,000 145,899 55,000 53,000 66,922 1,712,949 65,972 1,711,999 - 25,000 - 25,000 - 254,512 - 254,512 222,026 4,180,738 222,028 4,180,389 155,000 187,745 158,341 158,341 843,921 838,326 10,810 1,002,663 12,674 1,002,527 - 129,757 - 129,757 371,328 371,328 1,599,940 1,599,940 10,500 10,394 29,400 29,400 58,165 4,071,388 57,802 4,070,919 16,987 16,267 1,857,618 1,857,618 783,214 782,494 20,385 20,385 565,224 565,224 1-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1997 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Sep. 30, 1997 Newburyport Harbor, MA (continued) 15. Patchogue River, CT (Contributed Funds) 16. Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay and Watch Hill Cove, RI and CT (Contributed Funds) 17. Plymouth Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 18. Portland Harbor, ME 19. Providence River and Harbor, RI 20. Provincetown Harbor, MA Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. 6,464 5,777 14,519 14,519 21,873 21,873 26,143 26,143 348,364 341,195 138,422 137,942 -8,026 6,304,430 -170 6,304,430 124,518 59,935 1,415,524 1,415,524 355,445 355,445 1,034,347 969,284 - 156,694 - 156,694 - 318,787 - 318,787 - 64,952 - 64,952 192,072 190,019 482,322 1,402,060 484,376 1,402,060 20,000 20,000 2,127,218 2,127,218 31,907 31,907 36,361 35,696 170,376 170,376 1,000 1,356 212,467 146,916 5,530 1,483,839 5,429 1,483,428 - 894,475 - 894,475 - 541,611 - 541,611 - 400 - 400 - 9,588,710 - 9,588,710 176,556 8,499,739 242,054 8,499,686 - 25,417,022 - 25,417,022 151,504 285,350 151,504 285,350 33,000 28,133 185,000 31,332 281,447 282,039 103,000 233,646 910,518 6,055,522 888,071 6,032,620 19,623 3,889,577 47,513 3,889,577 1,053,966 1-28 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Sep. 30, 1997 Provincetown Harbor, MA (continued) (Contributed Funds) 21. Royal River, ME (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds - Other) 22. Salem Harbor, MA 23. Scarboro River, ME (Contributed Funds) 24. Scituate Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) 25. Seekonk River, Providence, RI 26. Sesuit Harbor, MA (Contributed Funds) Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 72,045 31,462 156,341 71,285 200,043 194,885 1,053,966 832,045 791,462 336,704 336,704 648,763 1,775,255 738,977 1,775,255 - 49,562 - 49,562 - 18,000 - 18,000 - 20,000 - 20,000 - 1,693,202 - 1,693,202 5,902 5,902 18,260 18,260 30,408 29,562 5,036 5,036 20,980 19,795 657,827 656,642 392,635 392,635 41,000 1,372,991 2,730,988 36,241 1,378,596 2,730,988 10,000 10,000 379,851 379,851 3,802 503,558 3,802 462,621 424,549 464,235 9,181 1,131,479 9,841 1,130,887 - 69,976 - 69,976 200,000 24,981 248,835 246,426 27,637 23,452 25,075 7,355 132,000 132,587 650,000 45,161 62,745 62,741 900,000 120,903 226,306 226,306 958,406 958,197 124,588 124,588 1-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1997 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Sep. 30, 1997 27. Wells Harbor, ME (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds - Other) 28. York Harbor, ME (Contributed Funds) 29. Point Beach, Milford, CT (Contributed Funds) 30. Woodmont Beach, Milford, CT (Contributed Funds) 32. Allendale Dam, North Providence, RI 33A. West Hill Dam, MA 34. Charles River (Natural Valley Storage Areas), MA 35A. Ball Mountain Lake, VT 35B. Barre Falls Dam, MA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 360,973 360,973 2,772 2,772 18,097 18,097 32,500 32,165 73,974 2,035,242 73,707 2,034,639 212,000 212,000 5,000 5,000 239,654 239,654 29,501 106,838 29,501 106,360 617,440 588,033 -11,238 1,116,848 18,647 1,116,848 - 32,161 - 32,161 40,000 209,703 49,179 205,229 70,000 266,00 646,102 312,408 -84,00 -57,673 -45,836 67,623 67,500 5,779 19,400 17,804 25,000 31,038 380,103 376,678 100,000 100,000 50,000 1,228,946 9,420 1,188,366 623,843 " 623,843 " 6,000 66,905 195,000 36,784 268,500 109,468 2,306,902 6 2,306,902 6 506,000 456,000 478,288 468,970 490,000 502,260 528,000 8,131,698 528,434 8,126,621 - 8,606,000 - 8,606,000 216,000 172,000 335,321 157,182 -6,228 1,226 125,000 137,117 -453 1,478 571,000 1,241,000 1,117,000 533,197 1,061,677 1,289,755 138,000 2,312,343 141,839 2,308,875 - 11,107,842 ' - 11,107,842 7 780,000 12,098,723 692,811 11,963,890 1,967,819 1,967,819 1-30 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Sep. 30, 1997 35C. Birch Hill Dam, MA (Contributed Funds) 35D. Colebrook River Lake, CT 35E. Conant Brook Dam, MA 35F. Knightville Dam, MA 35G. Lancaster, Israel River, NH 35H. Littleville Lake, MA 35I. North Hartland Lake, VT 35J. North Springfield Lake, VT 35K. Otter Brook Lake, NH Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 325,000 608,000 336,807 602,755 366,000 381,741 534,000 8,435,060 377,657 8,278,623 4,815,679 8 4,815,679 e 344,000 477,621 336,229 414,558 359,000 421,872. 588,000 8,991,050 534,619 8,918,605 - 32,000 9 - 32,000 9 - 14,263,971 - 14,263,971 583,000 400,000 570,455 422,268 452,500 459,149 381,000 5,655,527 380,737 5,648,229 2,950,530 2,950,530 86,000 162,000 99,241 158,252 350,000 513,000 320,558 551,363 -25,000 696 181,500 191,461 359,000 350,506 -6,000 142 550,000 283,000 507,449 318,901 254,500 248,535 138,000 2,393,697 136,565 2,388,769 - 3,415,640 10 - 3,415,640 10 371,000 9,870,446 374,009 9,860,098 590 595,878 595,878 7,013,412 7,013,412 373,000 6,959,427 332,181 6,905,632 7,312,225 " 7,312,225 " 680,500 477,000 627,478 484,522 456,000 499,408 513,000 8,536,043 516,594 8,504,109 6,831,526 12 6,831,526 12 627,700 498,000 598,219 503,427 532,000 550,692 733,000 12,982,149 743,363 12,966,519 4,360,448 13 4,360,448 13 441,000 702,000 488,129 638,950 395,000 465,319 449,000 8,624,297 449,211 8,620,501 1-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1997 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Sep. 30, 1997 35L. Surry Mountain Lake, NH 35M. Townshend Lake, VT 35N. Tully Lake, MA (Contributed Funds) 350. Union Village Dam, VT 36. Faulkner Island, CT 37. Galilee Salt Marsh, RI (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds - Other) 38A. Black Rock Lake, CT 38B. Hancock Brook Lake, CT 38C. Hop Brook Lake, CT New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 2,833,610 14 2,833,610 14 507,000 698,000 504,155 624,876 -103,772 20,420 -7,547 24,638 693,000 1,226,000 699,486 725,796 - - 377,000 675,000 365,809 610,127 - - 405,000 497,000 401,565 485,139 709,000 933,559 519,000 583,878 297,000 320,280 495,000 594,258 562,000 9,297,491 558,441 9,291,563 8,540,545 15s 8,540,545 1s 624,000 11,216,418 899,401 11,164,730 - 1,666,752 16 - 1,666,752 16 413,000 8,469,725 409,903 8,447,662 - 40,000 9 - 40,000 ' - 4,095,160 17 - 4,095,160 17 342,000 7,816,393 342,801 7,812,947 - 1,500,000 - 151,088 - 146,000 12,511 66,531 92,500 3,336 361,000 374,000 353,859 379,242 147,000 151,000 155,490 138,714 804,500 725,000 742,372 764,775 209,000 126,484 422,025 727,501 70,530 230,000 238,957 191,000 204,310 627,000 648,754 1,500,000 151,088 705,000 1,274,000 842,390 1,249,401 7,975 415,235 19,499 716,122 430,000 415,235 839,500 789,987 8,182,300 8,182,300 383,000 5,200,581 385,956 5,195,803 4,178,911 4,178,911 170,000 2,524,934 173,965 2,523,351 6,151,562 ' 6,151,562 is 796,000 13,845,825 817,097 13,835,875 1-32 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Sep. 30, 1997 38D. Mad River, Waterbury (Woodtick Area), CT (Contributed Funds) 38E. Northfield Brook Lake, CT 38F. Thomaston Dam, CT 39A. Blackwater Dam, NH 39B. Edward MacDowell Lake, NH 39C. Franklin Falls Dam, NH 39D. Hopkinton-Everett Lakes, NH 39E. North Nashua River, Leominster, MA (Contributed Funds) 39F. North Nashua River, Leominster (Sewer Line), MA (Contributed Funds) 40. New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. 15,000 14,496 99,918 96,703 362,000 650,000 402,344 50,324 230,946 1,425,864 465,596 1,407,694 183,949 362,000 234,273 2,850,512 19 2,850,512 19 258,000 383,000 324,999 346,178 321,000 359,137 290,000 4,885,708 262,438 4,852,084 - 14,282,112 - 14,282,112 692,000 747,000 477,382 845,979 301,000 430,000 298,715 399,252 398,000 340,000 386,929 337,895 555,000 503,000 492,569 624,132 557,000 682,175 339,000 377,727 339,000 350,373 679,000 646,800 563,000 9,924,342 571,955 9,922,193 - 1,319,746 20 - 1,319,746 20 367,000 6,176,094 388,817 6,171,054 2,014,253 21 2,014,253 21 375,000 7,145,569 341,020 7,107,210 7,950,487 " 7,950,487 " 473,704 11,385,086 491,588 11,343,668 - - - - 21,452,440 2 - - - - 21,452,440 " 949,000 1,089,000 1,567,000 1,407,022 17,647,592 976,206 1,073,901 1,623,838 1,429,473 17,642,479 83,379 31,931 4,707 9,679 16,167 19,999 50,000 17,720 75,000 2,593 490 125,300 135,864 2,500 34,691 -5,242 2,757 -1,581 -1,501 -19,309 6,527 -3,682 39,127 188,567 188,567 50,919 50,919 264,198 264,198 73,818 73,818 - 11,510,088 - 11,510,088 1-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1997 TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Sep. 30, 1997 New Bedford, Fairhaven, and Acushnet, MA (continued) (Contributed Funds) 41. Quonset Point, Davisville, RI (Contributed Funds) 42. Roughans Point, Revere, MA (Contributed Funds) 43. Saint John River Basin, ME 44. Saugus River & Tributaries, MA 45. Sebago Lake, Standish, ME (Contributed Funds) 46. Stamford, CT (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds - Other) 47A. Buffumville Lake, MA 47B. East Brimfield Lake, MA 47C. Hodges Village Dam, MA Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. 230,000 278,000 230,318 250,174 1,875,000 28,817 194,419 330,000 346,224 97,520 665,000 7,006,821 684,548 7,003,386 525,000 136,396 380,000 14,400 25,000 12,627 10,320 710,000 417,252 6,513,763 2 6,513,763 2 2,400,000 457,153 380,000 14,400 2,171,000 3,950,779 168,378 1,639,367 - 1,400,000 1,400,000 217,000 57,897 -8,000 335,741 5,000 2,767 42,487 -20,000 34,143 75,000 67,868 278,000 875,000 264,297 391,055 149,976 12,253 120,000 37,283 40,000 2,874 517,000 446,524 -4,000 5,525,000 797 5,525,000 300,000 392,082 118,917 159,171 500,000 500,000 158,917 159,171 9,911,300 9,900,640 406,000 1,281,000 7,051,191 756,979 1,323,441 6,926,115 3,367,970 26 3,367,453 2 210,000 209,969 2,998,603 2 2,998,603 26 386,000 515,000 397,143 486,733 326,500 355,781 358,000 6,978,016 366,233 6,971,360 7,057,043 2 7,057,043 2 262,000 394,000 264,514 389,489 357,000 367,695 320,000 6,197,439 316,086 6,191,080 - 4,461,268 28 - 4,461,268 28 1-34 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY94 FY95 FY95 FY97 Sep. 30, 1997 Hodges Village Dam, MA (continued) 47D. Mansfield Hollow Lake, CT 47E. West Thompson Lake, CT 47F. Westville Lake, MA 48. Town Brook, Quincy and Braintree, MA (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds - Other) Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 531,000 926,000 583,711 896,772 660,000 694,181 454,000 10,359,947 456,138 10,353,816 2,000,000 342,810 443,000 656,000 421,805 669,408 482,000 529,000 431,671 523,223 585,000 470,000 525,875 457,249 9,725,000 5,015,819 1,930,000 264,947 2,000,000 377,000 353,463 474,000 507,517 285,000 373,552 2,000,000 342,810 - 6,447,164 29 - 6,447,164 2 341,000 7,462,599 377,318 7,434,104 - 7,001,220 30 - 7,001,220 30 466,000 8,323,997 440,891 8,287,564 5,684,683 31 5,684,683 31 357,000 7,098,559 317,706 7,056,290 7,811,000 1,759,000 3,210,000 28,079,740 9,036,625 6,031,294 2,150,058 26,951,355 445,045 1,535,000 500,000 825,863 - 2,735,000 470,804 2,157,576 - 1,175,000 4,910,000 787,662 - 960,549 1 Excludes $ 6,138,157 from Public Works Funds and $4,849,740 from Emergency Relief Funds. 2 Includes $389,929 Code 711 funds and $511,089 Code 713 funds. 3 Excludes $935,303 Emergency Relief Funds and $1,030,806 Public Works Funds. * Excludes $17,767 Contributed Funds. 6 Excludes $65,000 consisting of $13,000 for public wharf and $52,000 for additional construction. 6 Includes $18,310 Code 711 funds. ' Includes $504,062 Code 711 funds and $67,066 for fish passage facility. e Includes $618,469 Code 711 funds and $32,000 Code 713 Funds. 9 Recreational cost sharing. 10 Includes $199,303 Code 711 funds. 1 Includes $229,436 Code 711 funds. 12 Includes $59,536 Code 711 funds. 13 Includes $364,688 Code 711 funds. 1 Includes $470,077 Code 711 funds. 16 Includes $245,168 Code 711 funds and $1,117,494 for fish passage facility. 16 Includes $3,695 Code 711 funds and $115,138 Code 713 funds. 17 Includes $88,931 Code 711 funds. 18 Includes $143,538 Code 711 funds. 19 Includes $20,000 Code 711 funds. � Includes $2,881 Code 711 funds. 1-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1997 21 Includes $6,432 Code 711 funds. Includes $4,671 Code 711 funds. * Includes $179,727 Code 711 funds. u Excludes $146,020 expended to date for land condemnation. * Excludes $199,410 expended to date for land condemnations. * Includes $71,943 Code 711 funds. n Includes $207,700 Code 711 funds. * Includes $6,255 Code 711 funds and $40,353 Code 713 funds. * Includes $68,717 Code 711 funds. o Includes $315,420 Code 711 funds. 31 Includes $67,667 Code 711 funds. 3 Excludes $554,638 for land costs. * Excludes $118,215 expended for work beyond scope of project. 1-36 TABLE 1-B NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1958 October 23, 1962 October 27, 1965 July 14, 1960 as amended March 2, 1825 June 14, 1880 August 5, 1886 September 19,1890 July 25, 1892 July 13, 1892 June 3, 1896 March 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 July 25, 1912 August 8, 1917 August 30, 1935 3 Do. August 26, 1937 October 17, 1940 September 7, 1940 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 October 23, 1962 November 28, 1990 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text.) Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious Aquatic Plant growths from the waters and streams in the U.S. Research and planning costs to be borne by U.S. Provided for continued research. AUNT LYDIA'S COVE, CHATHAM, MA (See Section 2 of Text) Entrance channel 100 feet wide by 900 feet long and 9.5 acre anchorage area, both 8 feet deep. BOSTON HARBOR, MA (See Section 3 of Text.) Preservation of islands and seawalls. Wier River (Nantucket Beach Channel) 9.5 ft. deep. 100 ft. wide to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket. Fort Point Channel.' Wier River (Nantucket Beach Channel) 9.5 ft. deep. 150 ft. wide to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket. Wier River (Nantucket Beach Channel) from mouth of Wier River to Steamboat Wharf at Nantasket Beach 12 ft. deep, 150 ft. wide. Channel 15 feet deep from Long Island to Nixes Mate Shoal (Nixes Mate to Nubble Channel). Channel 27 feet from Nantasket Roads to President Roads. Dredge Chelsea River channel to 18 feet. For 30-foot channel from sea to President Roads through Broad Sound by less direct route than 35 and 40-foot channels. For 35-foot channel from sea to Boston Naval Shipyard. Chelsea and Charles River Bridges. Elimination from project of removal of Finns Ledge at outer entrance. Dredge Chelsea River channel 25 ft. Depth of 40 feet (45 feet in rock) in Broad Sound Channel. Present project dimensions of channel from President Roads to Commonwealth pier No. 1, East Boston and anchorage area north side of President Roads. Present project dimensions of that part of approach channel to U.S. Navy drydock No.3 at South Boston between Main Ship Channel and U.S. harbor line. Chelsea River, channel 30 feet deep. Reserved channel 30 feet deep. Abandons seaplane channel authorized in 1940 River and Harbor Act (H.Doc.262,76th Cong., 1st sess.) Extension of President Roads anchorage. Reserved channel 35 feet deep, 430 feet wide, extending one Chelsea River Channel and Maneuvering Basin 35 feet deep. Deepen Mystic River and Reserved Channels to 40 feet; Chelsea River Channel to 38 feet; widen and deepen Inner Confluence Area to 40 feet. H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 87-874, 87th Cong. H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong. P.L. 86-645, Section 107. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, August 31, 1994. Annual Report, 1881, p. 518 H. Ex.Doc. 206,48th Cong., 2nd sess., Annual Report, 1885, p. 543. Annual Report, 1890, p. 503 Annual Report, 1893, p. 769 Annual Report, 1887, p.517 Annual Report, 1893, p. 766 H. Ex. Doc. No. 162,53rd Cong., 3rd sess.,Annual Report, 1895, p. 648 H. Doc. 133, 55th Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report, 1898, p. 886. H. Doc. 119, 56th Cong., 2nd sess. Annual'Report, 1901, p. 1096 Authorized by Chief of Engineers. March 11, 1913. H. Doc. 272, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. 2 H. Doc. 931, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess.2 H. Doc. 244, 72nd Cong., 1st sess.2 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 29, 74th Cong., 1st sess.2 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 24, 75th Cong., 1st sess.2 H. Doc. 225, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 2 Public Law 420,78th Cong. H. Doc. 244, 80th Cog., 1st sess. 2 H. Doc. 349, 84th Cong., 2nd sess.2 H. Doc. 350, 87th Cong., 2nd sess.2 Section 101, Public Law 101-640. 1-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1997 TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents BOSTON HARBOR, MA (continued) October 31, 1992 January 21, 1927 (Section 2) Included in Public Works Administration program, September 6, 1933 June 26, 1934 (Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act) Included in Public Works Administration program, April 29, 1935 Included in Emergency Relief Program, May 28, 1935. August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 September 19, 1890 Included in Emergency Relief Program, May 28, 1935 & August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 August 11, 1888 August 18, 1894 June 13, 1902 Deauthorizes portion of the 35-foot channel in Boston Inner Harbor lying easterly of the Charlestown waterfront authorized in 1902 River and Harbor Act. CAPE COD CANAL, MA (See Section 4 of Text.) Purchase canal from Boston, Cape Cod & New York Canal Co., in accordance with contract dated July 29, 1921, executed by that company. Construct three bridges and widen canal to 250 feet. Operation and care of works of improvement provided for the funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Construct a mooring basin. Dredging and bank protection. Existing project for main canal adopted. 15-foot channel and turning basin in Onset Bay. Extend East Boat Basin for an area of about 4.3 acres to a depth of eight feet. COCHECO RIVER, NH (See Section 5 of Text.) Provides for a 3 mile long tidewater channel 7 feet deep and 60 to 70 feet wide. CRIEHAVEN HARBOR, ME (See Section 6 of Text) Provides for a 300-foot rubblestone breakwater at Sunset Point. CUTTYHUNK HARBOR, MA (See Section 7 of Text.) Channel 10 feet deep and 75 feet wide. Anchorage 10 feet deep, 900 long, 800 feet wide. Maintenance of existing jetties and stone dikes. DUXBURY HARBOR, MA (See Section 8 of Text.) Channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide along alinement of existing channel to Town Wharf from easterly channel; anchorage basin 8 feet deep of about 21 acres. GLOUCESTER HARBOR AND ANNISQUAM RIVER, MA (See Section 9 of Text.) Remove ledges and boulders, and dredge in Gloucester Harbor. Construct breakwater at entrance to Gloucester Harbor from Eastern Point to Round Rock shoal. Termination at Cat Ledge of breakwater authorized by Act of August 18, 1894. 1-38 Section 116(2), P.L. 102-580 H. Doc. 139, 67th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 795, 71st. Cong., 3rd sess. Do. Do. Do. Rivers and Harbor Committee Doc. 15, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 431, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 168, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 74, 51st Cong. 1st sess. Do. H. Doc. 81 75th Cong., 1st sess S. Doc. 115, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report 1902. p. 8 9 H. Ex. Doc 56. 48th Cong., 2nd sess. and Anuual Report 1885, p. 534. Annual Report 1902, p. 89 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents GLOUCESTER HARBOR AND ANNISQUAM RIVER, MA (continued) June 25, 1910 August 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 October 23, 1962 Remove 8 ledges in Gloucester Harbor. Dredge in Annisquam River and removal of a ledge in Gloucester Harbor near entrance to Annisquam River. Dredge 8 foot anchorage area in Lobster Cove, Annisquam River. Entrance channel into Inner Harbor 20 feet deep, and turning basin. Access channel 20 feet deep along waterfront to northwest of Gloucester Fish pier. Access channel 20 feet deep along water front southeast of Gloucester Fish pier. Access channel 16 feet deep into Smith Cove. An access channel 18 feet deep along waterfront west of Harbor Cove and into Harbor Cove. A 5-acre anchorage 15 feet deep east of entrance to Harbor Cove. A 10-acre anchorage 16 feet deep opposite entrance to Smith Cove. Remove isolated rock shoal adjacent to entrance channel south of Harbor Cove to a depth of 24 feet. H. Doc. 1112, 60th Cong.,2nd sess. Rivers and Harbor Committee Doc. 39, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 329, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 431, 87 Cong., 2nd sess. March 2, 1907 March 3, 1909 July 25, 1912 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 June 3, 1896 March 3, 1905 March 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 March 3, 1899 March 4, 1913 September 22, 1922 NEW BEDFORD AND FAIRHAVEN HARBOR, MA (See Section 13 of Text.) The 25-foot anchorage area north of Palmer Island. H. Doc. 271, 59th Cong., 2nd sess. Extension of the 25-foot channel along New Bedfrod wharf front. Specified in act. The 18-foot channel in Acushnet River to Belleville (project feature H. Doc. 442, 62d Cong., 2nd sess. was abandoned by Congress in 1955). The 30-foot channel, anchorage, and maneuvering area (channel H. Doc. 348, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. limited to width of 350 feet). Present project dimensions of the anchorage area north of Palmer Rivers and Harbors Committe Island and maintenance of the 25-foot anchorage. Doc. 16, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Elimination from the project of the prior authorization for enlarging and deepening the maneuvering area 30-feet deep east of the harbor channel. The 15-foot and 10-foot channels along Fairhaven wharf. Rivers and Harbors Committe Doc. 25, 75th Cong., 1st sess. PAWCATUCK RIVER, LITTLE NARRAGANSETT BAY AND WATCH HILL COVE, RI AND CT (See Section 16 of Text.) Entrance channel 10 feet deep, 200 feet wide from Stonington H. Doc. 62, 54th Cong., Point through Little Narragansett Bay and up the Pawcatuck 1st sess. River to Avondale, 100 feet wide from Avondale to the lower wharfs in Westerly; channel 7 feet deep, 40 feet wide between the lower and upper wharfs in Westerly; and rock removal at Pawcatuck Rocks and in vicinity of Rhodes Folly Light. (Inactive portions consisting of rock removal and widening the channel between Stonington Point and Avondale from 100 feet to 200 feet were deauthorized in November 1986.) Removal of obstructions near Watch Hill Cove. Specified in act. Channel anchorage and jetty at Watch Hill Cove. H. Doc. 839, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. Breakwater 400 feet long at entrance to Watch Hill Cove; H. Doc. 396, 86th Cong., 2nd sess. extension of Watch Hill Cove jetty 100 feet shoreward; enlargement of entire jetty; and enlargement of anchorage in Watch Hill Cove. (This work was deauthorized in November 1979.) PLYMOUTH HARBOR, MA (See Section 17 of Text.) Beach protection. Annual Report for 1899, p. 1089. Dredging 18-foot channel. H. Doc. 1194, 62nd Cong., 3rd sess. Dredging 15-foot extension, inluding turning basin. H. Doc. 996, 66th Cong., 3rd sess. 1-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1997 TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents PLYMOUTH HARBOR, MA (continued) October 23, 1962 July 9, 1965 August 26, 1937 October 18, 1965 June 25, 1910 June 30, 1948 July 14, 1960, as amended March 3, 1871 River and Harbor Act 1882 July 14, 1960, as amended in 1965 March 3, 1873 September 19, 1890 March 3, 1905 July 3, 1930 March 2, 1945 July 3, 1958 November 17, 1986 December 18, 1991 Intermodal Surface Transportation Infrastructure Act of 1991. October 12, 1996 July 14, 1960 as amended Rubblestone breakwater. Anchorages are eight feet deep inside breakwater. Elimination of authorized 18-foot anchorage from existing project. Recreational development. PROVIDENCE RIVER AND HARBOR, RI (See Section 19 of Text.) Channel 35 feet deep from deep water in Narragansett Bay to Fox Point. Deepen 35-foot channel to 40 feet, and provide a 30-foot channel from the upper end of the existing project to India Point at the mouth of the Seekonk River. (The India Point channel was deauthorized in November 1986.) PROVINCETOWN HARBOR, MA (See Section 20 of Text.) Rubblestone protection dike across House Point Island Flats from Stevens Point to Wood End and extension of Long Point beach protection. Offshore breakwater about 2,500 feet long. Channel 13 feet deep by 250 feet wide extending about 2,000 feet from deep water just outside the west end of the stone breakwater to MacMillan Wharf. ROYAL RIVER, ME (See Section 21 of Text.) Enlargement of channel through bar at Gravel Point and removal of several ledges near Yarmouth. Construction of 195-foot rubblestone jetty and dredging channel. 8-foot channel, 80 feet wide and anchorage. SALEM HARBOR, MA (See Section 22 of Text.) Channel 8 feet deep and 300 feet wide at entrance to South River, and construct a seawall and breakwater for the protection of Long Point. Extends channel 6 to 8 feet deep and 50 to 150 feet wide up South River. Channel 10 feet deep and 200 to 300 feet wide at entrance to South River. Main Ship Channel 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide, and removal of shoal near Abbot Rock Beacon. Main Ship Channel 30 feet deep. Main Ship Channel 32 feet deep and 300 to 400 feet wide. SEEKONK RIVER, PROVIDENCE, RI (See Section 25 of Text.) Removal of abandoned India Point Railroad Bridge. Extends project authorization. Increases total project cost. SESUIT HARBOR, MA (See Section 26 of Text.) Channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide. H. Doc. 124, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 173, 75th Cong., 1st sess. S. Ddc. 93, 88th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 821, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 600, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, July 28, 1995. Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, April 27, 1965. S. Ex. Doc. 25, 42th Cong.,3rd sess. H. Ex. Doc. 28, 51st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 303, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 112, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 701, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 31, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Section 1166(c), P.L. 99-662. Section 1085, P.L. 102-240. Section 301 (a) (13), P.L. 104-303 Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, February 6, 1980. 1-40 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents March 3, 1905 July 14, 1960 October 23, 1962 September 3, 1954 October 23, 1962 October 31, 1992 October 12, 1996 June 30, 1948, as amended October 12, 1996 November 17, 1986 June 30, 1948, as amended July 24, 1946, as amended July 24, 1946, as amended YORK HARBOR, ME (See Section 28 of Text.) Channel off Bragdons Island 170 feet wide, 10 feet deep. Removing to the same depth projecting shoal just above the island. Anchorages 8 feet deep north and south of Bragdons Island. POINT BEACH, MILFORD, CT (See Section 29 of Text.) Project involves raising the first floor of 58 shorefront and back shore residential structures above the estimated 100 year flood elevation. WOODMONT BEACH, MILFORD, CT (See Section 30 of Text.) Widening to 100-foot width by direct placement of sand, 500 feet of shore west of Mervin Point; widening 3,500 feet of shore from Chapel Street; and construction of 5 impermeable groins. Placement of suitable sandfill along approximately 1,500 feet of beach and reconstruction of groins. Mitigation to replace rocky habitat for Blue Mussels. ALLENDALE DAM, NORTH PROVIDENCE, RI (See Section 32 of Text.) Reconstruct dam. Increases total project cost. LANCASTER, ISRAEL RIVER, NH (See Section 35G of Text.) Construction of a gabion overflow weir for local flood protection. FAULKNER'S ISLAND, CT (See Section 36 of Text.) Construct 2,000 linear feet of stone revetment running along the entire east side of the Island and wrapping around the north and south ends. GALILEE SALT MARSH, RI (See section 37 of Text.) Restoration of 34 acres of salt marsh by installing two culverts under Escape Road and excavating channels. MAD RIVER, WATERBURY (WOODTICK AREA), CT (See Section 38D of Text.) Widen and deepen channel along two restricted areas of the Mad River totaling 1,450 linear feet. NORTH NASHUA RIVER, LEOMINSTER, MA (See Section 39E of Text.) Construct 400 linear feet of stone slope protection adjacent to the Leominster Connector. NORTH NASHUA RIVER, LEOMINSTER (SEWER LINE), MA (See Section 39F of Text.) Construct 480 linear feet of stone slope revetment adjacent to an existing 36-inch sewer line. H. Doc. 301, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Ex. Doc. 243, 48th Cong., 2nd sess.2 H. Doc. 395, 86th Cong., 2nd sess.2 Section 103, P.L. 87-874. Authorized by the Chief of - Engineers, November 6, 1995. H. Doc. 203, 83rd Cong., 1st sess. Section 103, P.L. 87-874. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers, March 20, 1992. Section 358, P.L. 102-580. Section 347, P.L. 104-303. Section 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers May 11, 1978. Section 527, P.L. 104-303 Section 1135, P.L. 99-662. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers, January 13, 1995. Section 205,P.L. 80-858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, December 21,1992. Section 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, April 8, 1993. Section 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers September 12, 1994. 1-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1997 TABLE 1-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents October 31, 1992 November 17, 1986 November17, 1986 October 31, 1992 July 24,1946 as amended November 17, 1986 QUONSET POINT, DAVISVILLE, RI (See Section 41 of Text.) Construction of two elevated water storage towers and extension, rehabilitation and relocation of 6,000 feet of sewer line. ROUGHANS POINT, REVERE, MA (See Section 42 of Text.) Stabilize existing facilities along the shore with a 4,080-foot long armor stone revetment. Construct earth berm one-foot high and 200 feet long on existing median strip between Bennington Street and State Road. SAINT JOHN RIVER BASIN, ME (See Section 43 of Text.) Ten-year research and demonstration program of cropland irrigation and soil conservation techniques for increasing potato yield and quality. SAUGUS RIVER & TRIBUTARIES, MA (See Section 44 of Text.) Construct tidal floodgates across the mouth of the Saugus River and 18,400 linear feet of dikes, walls, revetments and dune restoration along the shorefront of Lynn and Revere. SEBAGO LAKE, STANDISH, ME (See Section 45 of Text.) Construct 1,000 linear feet of stone slope protection along the shoreline of Sebago Lake adjacent to Maine Highway Route 35. TOWN BROOK, QUINCY & BRAINTREE, MA (See Section 48 of Text.) Construct 12-foot diameter, 4,060-foot long, concrete lined tunnel in bedrock approximately 140 to 180 feet below ground; channel improvements downstream of the tunnel outlet; and reconstruction of Old Quincy Reservoir Dam located at the headwaters of Town Brook. Section 362, P.L. 102-580. Section 401, P.L. 99-662. Section 1108, P.L. 99-662. Section 101, P.L. 102-580. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated August 1, 1990. Section 14, P.L. 79-526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers April 4, 1995. H. Doc. 39, 99th Cong., 1st sess. 1Contains latest maps. 2 Contains latest published maps. See also Annual Report, 1911, p. 1178 (seawalls and Nixes Mate Channel) and Annual Report, 1903, p. 770 (Fort Point Channel.) 3Authorized in part by Public Works Administration, Sept. 6, 1933. 4A portion has been abandoned pursuant to P.L. 624, December 31, 1970. 1-42 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1997 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Andrews River, MA Apponaug Cove, RI Bagaduce River, ME 3.4 Bar Harbor, ME Bass Harbor, ME' Bass Harbor Bar, ME Beals Harbor, ME Belfast Harbor, ME Bellamy River, NH3 "4 Beverly Harbor, MA Black Rock Harbor, CT Boothbay Harbor, ME Branford Harbor, CT Bridgeport Harbor, CT Bristol Harbor, Bristol, RI Bucks Harbor, Machiasport, ME6 Bucksport Harbor, ME Bullocks Point Cover, RI Bunker Harbor, ME6 Buttermilk Bay Channel, MA6 Camden Harbor, ME Canapitsit Channel, MA' Cape Porpoise Harbor, ME Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, ME Cathance River, ME3 Chatham (Stage) Harbor, MA Clinton Harbor, CT Coasters Island Harbor, RI' Cobscook Bay, ME3 " Cohasset Habor, MA Connecticut River below Hartford, CT Corea Harbor, Gouldsboro, ME' Cross Rip Shoals Nantucket Sound, MA Damariscotta River, ME' Deer Island Thoroughfare, ME' Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, MA Duck Island Harbor, CT East Boothbay Harbor, ME Edgartown Harbor, MA Essex River, MA Exeter River, NH' Fall River Harbor, MA' Falmouth Harbor, MA Fivemile River Harbor, CT Frenchboro Harbor, ME Georges River, ME Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI Greenwich Bay, RI Greenwich Harbor, CT Guilford Harbor, CT Hampton Harbor, NH Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI Harraseeket River, ME' Hay (West Harbor), Fisher's Island, NY 1996 1964 1912 1932 1965 1920 1959 1971 1897 1951 1988 1953 1990 1983 1987 1976 1907 1996 1969 1985 1960 1899 1977 1964 1884 1995 1985 1911 1866 1996 1996 1984 1954 1906 1916 1968 1953 1953 1978 1948 1913 1984 1978 1996 1978 1978 1989 1893 1969 1995 1996 1996 1896 1931 219,042 156,874 28,000 406,591 188,859 4,076 184,880 61,561 34,643 246,048 18,000 9,537 4,491,119 316,288 277,420 18,421 170,902 95,372 163,855 102,400 9,113 175,037 190,438 21,000 266,705 191,406 5,500 4,173 267,737 1,550,185 26 797,954 24,200 5,000 40,000 94,584 482,166 6,500 65,614 21,759 62,454 6,164,757 123,763 35,490 657,345 25,788 189,037 2,000 198,758 137,222 200,000 576,856 30,963 8,401 1-43 791,723 57,469 39 2,187 37,272 20,382 143,077 303,157 28,427 1,667,693 42,668 1,925,607 2,184,927 32,092 20,833 392,230 32,906 235,138 196,489 12,279 361,364 27,827 4,093,412 1,090,484 13,161 461,033 17,559,352 100,469 54,328 905 5,792 362,224 412,764 17,238 62,980 119,181 8 3,032 2,080,567 333,649 352,516 24,616 312,414 604,821 3,719 225,272 1,915,969 2,249,707 2,827,638 26,069 38,462 187,500 104,583 7 100,000 147,887 123,757 69,323 20,000 43,500 43,500 130,410 10,000 9 35,000 100,000 25,500 193,761 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1997 TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1997 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Hendrick's Harbor, ME 1957 28,204 6,325 Hingham Harbor, MA 1954 28,316 176,720 Housatonic River, CT 1983 859,691 2,551,828 222,010 Ipswich River, MA 1969 5,618 67,834 Island End River, Chelsea, MA 6 1983 311,850 6,318 192,336 to Isle Au Haut Thoroughfare, ME 1980 137,653 187,986 Isle of Shoals Harbor, ME and NH 1977 80,691 651,644. Jonesport Harbor, ME 1992 7,489,073 3,928 832,119 Josias River, ME6 1995 621,186 442,802 79,668 ' Kennebunk River, ME 1996 261,417 1,462,500 88,917 Kingston Harbor (North Plymouth), MA 1895 8,940 Lagoon Pond, Martha's Vineyard, MA 6 1976 99,098 37,386 80,990 Lamprey River, NH 4 1913 19,980 65,723 Little Harbor, NH 1996 133,227 399,846 Little Harbor, Woods Hole, MA4 1906 18,000 19,673 Lubec Channel, ME 1956 380,322 33,289 Lynn Harbor, MA 1956 755,576 263,134 Machias River, ME 1972 32,000 260,067 Malden River, MA 2 1922 104,853 45,097 62,000 Matinicus Harbor, ME 1962 14,000 11 8,989 Medomak River, ME 1953 17,000 92,359 Menemsha Creek, MA 1981 56,926 730,659 12,500 Merrimack River, MA 1940 369,891 739,100 Mianus River, CT 1985 132,435 687,412 46,500 Milford Harbor, CT 5 1989 90,506 1,379,402 11,380 12 Moosabec Bar, ME 1930 11,400 25,227 Mystic River, CT 1957 197,582 143,385 14,000 Mystic River, MA 1986 3,222,777 2,021,778 Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge), MA 1989 502,661 13 746,700 Narragansett Town Beach, RI" - 27,398 Narraguagus River, ME 1969 821,144 171,779 New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA 1953 1,857,618 766,227 20,385 New Harbor, ME 5 1966 118,620 42,891 7,015 14 New Haven Breakwater, CT 1950 1,242,246 40,273 New Haven Harbor, CT 1 1995 4,773,246 17,045,397 New London Harbor, CT 1986 638,774 1,916,700 Newport Harbor, RI 1953 733,524 146,478 Niantic Bay and Harbor, CT 6 1972 66,464 152,103 65,139 Northeast Harbor, ME 1954 138,942 51,047 Norwalk Harbor, CT 1983 531,129 3,918,827 34,500 Owl's Head Harbor, ME 3 1968 124,158 27,124 4,383 Pawtuxet Cove, RI 1975 295,356 216,746 295,356 Penobscot River, ME 1985 501,020 1,059,275 Pepperell Cove, ME 1969 171,351 53,156 Pig Island Gut, ME 6 1966 191,753 86,456 Pleasant River, ME 1892 3,500 217 Point Judith Pond and Harbor of Refuge, RI 1996 2,714,510 2 8,075,734 17,587 Pollock Rip Shoals, Nantucket Sound, MA 1956 1,083,504 846,590 Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River, ME and NH 1996 18,360,800 2,308,898 4,437,665 Potowomut River, RI 1882 5,000 50 Richmond Harbor, ME' 1883 20,000 Richmond's Island Harbor, ME 4 1882 119,844 1,808 1-44 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1997 Full Report Contributed See Annual Operation and Funds Expended Project Report for Construction Maintenance (Construction) Rockland Harbor, ME Rockport Harbor, MA Rockport Harbor, ME 3 Rye Harbor,NH Saco River, ME 6 St. Croix River, ME Sakonnet Harbor, RI 6 Sakonnet River, RI Salem Harbor, MA Sandy Bay (Harbor of Refuge), Cape Ann, MA 18 Sasanoa River, ME 3 4 Searsport Harbor, ME Seekonk River,RI South Bristol Harbor, ME Southport Harbor, CT Southwest Harbor, ME Stamford Harbor, CT Stockton Harbor, ME 3,4 Stonington Harbor, CT Stonington Harbor, ME 6 Stony Creek, Branford, CT 6 Sullivan Falls Harbor, ME Taunton River, MA Tenants Harbor, ME Thames River, CT Union River, ME Vineyard Haven, MA Wareham Harbor, MA Warren River, RI Warwick Cove, RI 6 Wellfleet Harbor, MA Westcott Cove, CT Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT Weymouth Back River, MA Weymouth-Fore & Town River, MA 5 Wickford Harbor, RI 6 Wilson Point Harbor, CT 4 Winnipesaukee Lake, NH Winter Harbor, ME 6 Winthrop Harbor, MA Wood Island Harbor and the Pool at Biddeford, ME 6 Woods Hole Channel, MA 1976 1996 1989 1991 1995 1950 1995 1909 1969 1922 1915 1966 1954 1971 1962 1962 1980 1915 1959 1985 1995 1914 1948 1920 1967 1996 1943 1896 1890 1975 1995 1978 1972 1944 1979 and 1983 1973 1895 1952 1976 1895 1995 1940 1,948,462 1,808,745 32,000 130,342 1,064,983 179,550 764,651 38,427 1,693,202 1,925,553 35,000 572,568 672,214 89,593 59,213 19 180,042 892,824 33,000 377,328 898,500 112,487 19,871 442,895 18,750 1,471,919 146,855 27,186 95,997 5,000 155,430 157,634 55,960 19,308 48,740 30,194,613 233,410 54,177 7,500 162,937 8,992 733,272 230,000 Projects are completed unless otherwise noted. 1 Completed except for inactive portion. 2 Inactive. 3 Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress, 1st session. 4 No commerce reported. 1-45 537,778 295,378 274,666 719,718 2,905,755 64,685 392,280 13,578 636,847 16,060 124 83,170 868,373 43,923 434,335 90,085 1,795,347 34,376 157,273 16,558 813,197 32,917 20,854 1,667,740 366,675 26,806 42,891 114,349 1,858,413 347,248 205,744 27,353 1,723,621 162,650 29,870 22,538 38,515 581,295 55,614 51,430 61,338 17 74,996 19,892 21,928 16 67,792 2,567 18,285 7,501 169,636 85,176 133,985 21 32,000 21,000 20,000 630,133 49,094 26 43,660 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1997 6 Portion of project authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86-645, Sec. 107). ' Authorized by the Chief of Engineers (Public Law 86-645, Sec. 107). ' Construction of a public landing by local interests has not been completed. 8 Excludes $5,000 Contributed Funds expended. 9 Excludes $37,200 Contributed Funds, Other. 10 Excludes $582,188 Contributed Funds, Other. 11 Excludes $114,327 expended for rehabilitation; breakwater repaired in 1962. 2 Excludes 173,425 Contributed Funds, Other. 13 Excludes $211,649 expended for minor rehabilitation; jetty repaired in 1963. " Public landing at Back Cove has not been constructed. 15 Improvement adequate for commerce. 16 Costs to local interests for berth improvements are estimated to be $60,000. 17 Excludes $81,548 Contributed Funds, Other. 18 Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 411, 64th Congress, 1st session, and in River an'd Harbor Committee Doc. 3, 65th Congress, 1st session. 'O Excludes $37,714 Emergency Relief Funds. 20 Under State maintenance. 2 Excludes $10,000 Contributed funds, Other. * Lack of local sponsor. (Project authorized by Section 361 of WRDA 1992.) * Excludes $50,000 Contributed Funds. * Excludes $17,495 non-project cost for removal of mooring chains, of which the project sponsor still owes $12,198. * Excludes $10,000 Contributed Funds. 6 Excludes $60,000 expended for major rehabilitation. 2 Excludes $1,926,000 expended for rehabilitation. 1-46 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to Amount See Annual Sep. 30, 1997 Expended by Project Report For Construction Local Interest Burial Hill Beach, Westport, CT 1958 $ 5,810 $ 11,612 Calf Pasture Beach Park, Norwalk, CT 1964 56,386 120,179 Clark Point Beach, New Bedford, MA 6 1982 228,081 228,080 Cliff Walk,Newport, RI' 1995 1,155,491 955,237 Compo Beach, Westport, CT 1962 84,544 169,089 Cove Island, Stamford, CT 1961 47,131 94,262 Cummings Park, Stamford, CT 1963 26,886 53,771 Guilford Point Beach (Jacobs Beach), Guilford, CT 1961 15,620 31,241 Gulf Beach, Milford, CT 1958 21,303 42,606 Hammonasset Beach, Madison, CT 1956 163,183 326,366 Hampton Beach, Hampton, NH 1966 260,868 385,641 Jennings Beach, Fairfield, CT 1956 14,401 28,802 Lighthouse Point Park (Area 9), CT 1961 3,930 7,859 Lynn-Nahant Beach, MA ' 1986 50,000 Middle Beach, CT 1958 8,810 17,620 Misquamicut Beach, Westerly, RI2 1963 14,512 29,024 North Scituate Beach, Scituate, MA 1969 106,552 106,552 Oak Bluffs Town Beach, Martha's Vineyard, MA 5 1976 273,334 198,583 Oakland Beach, Warwick, RI 1982 559,200 181,175 Plum Island, MA 6 1977 118,882 104,875 Prospect Beach, West Haven, CT 6 1995 1,870,407 1,089,351 Quincy Shore Beach, Quincy, MA 1962 621,464 1,242,880 Revere Beach, MA 1994 3,889,016 2,197,312 Roosevelt Campobello International Park, Lubec, ME 1993 233,260 Sand Hill Cove Beach, RI 1959 40,143 82,000 Sandy Point Outfall, West Haven, CT6 1996 889,634 457,495 Sasco Hill Beach, Fairfield, CT 1961 23,759 47,518 Sea Bluff Beach, West Haven, CT 6 1995 677,170 237,628 Seaside Park, CT 1958 150,000 329,921 Sherwood Island State Park, Westport, CT 6 1983 1,186,830 889,330 Short Beach, CT 3 1956 Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, CT 1964 62,560 270,695 Southeast Lighthouse, Block Island, RI 1995 1,648,249 970,000 Southport Beach, CT 1960 17,631 35,263 Town Beach, Plymouth, MA 1964 5,490 10,981 Wallis Sands State Beach, Rye, NH 1966 65,131 435,942 Wessagusset Beach, Weymouth, MA 1971 180,944 200,208 Winthrop Beach, MA 1960 176,567 353,134 Projects are completed unless otherwise noted. 1 Complete except inactive portion. 2 Additional Federal participation will be required based on Public Law 87-874, Sec. 103. 3 Project completed at no cost to Federal Government by using fill from Federal navigation improvement at Housatonic River. (See page 88 of the 1956 Annual Report.) Inactive. 5Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 87-874, Sec. 103.) 6Portion authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 87-874, Sec. 103.) 1-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1997 TABLE 1-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1997 For Last Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Alford, Green River, MA3 Alley Bay, Beals, ME3 Amesbury, Powwow River, MA3 Ansonia - Derby, CT Bagaduce River, ME 3 Beaver Brook, Keene, NH 2 Blackstone River, Millbury, MA 3 Bluffs Community Center, Swansea, MA3 Bound Brook, Scituate, MA4 Canton, MA 2 Charles River Dam, MA Charlestown, NH 3 Cherryfield, ME2 Chicopee, MA Chicopee Falls, MA Clear River, Burrillville, RI 3 Cocheco River, NH 2 Connecticut River, Middletown, CT3 Connecticut River, North Stratford, NH 3 Connecticut River, W. Stewartstown, NH 3 Covered Bridge, Sheffield, MA3 Danbury, CT Derby, CT East Branch Dam, CT East Hartford, CT Farmington River, Simsbury, CT3 Fitchburg, MA (See No. Nashua River) Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT 2 Fort Kent, ME 2 Fox Point Barrier, RI Gardner, MA 2 Gulf Street, Milford, CT 3 Hall Meadow Brook Dam, CT Hartford, CT Hartford, White River, VT 2 Haverhill, MA Hayward Creek, Braintree-Quincy, MA' Holmes Bay, Whiting, ME 3 Holyoke, MA Housatonic River, Pittsfield, MA 2 Housatonic River, Salisbury, CT 3 Housatonic River, Sheffield, MA 3 Huntington, MA 3 Island Avenue, Quincy, MA 3 Islesboro (The Narrows), ME 3 Johnson Bay, Lubec, ME 3 Keene, NH 4 Lee, Housatonic River, MA 3 Little River, Belfast,ME 3 Lowell, MA Lower Woonsocket, RI Machias River, Machias, ME 3 Machias Bay, Machiasport, ME 3 Mad River Lake, CT Marginal Way, Ogunquit, ME 3 1977 1979 1978 1977 1985 1989 1986 1995 1974 1964 1981 1976 1963 1954 1978 1987 1963 1996 1982 1976 1988 1978 1977 1973 1951 1996 1979 1979 1976 1970 1991 1970 1960 1973 1940 1979 1980 1953 1985 1982 1981 1960 1983 1985 1985 1955 1976 1990 1945 1977 1987 1995 1973 1987 41,419 190,500 132,113 18,266,040 129,500 2,591,000 249,999 189,131 47,300 156,568 41,170,921 113,330 191,095 1,433,600 2,183,912 168,000 183,100 262,046 180,000 54,703 250,000 13,143,000 7,582,642 1,959,836 2,135,447 500,000 220,284 1,997,820 11,112,801 495,691 365,000 2,572,357 6,929,100 332,236 1,743,485 2,325,470 207,390 3,418,000 739,003 102,800 202,608 3,900 172,000 165,500 163,082 44,100 37,852 166,682 1,284,974 6,600,681 152,000 133,473 4,773,020 243,000 4,576 54,447 92,981 5,554,088 s 385 411,292 to 69,121 23 180,000 11 12 7,637 257,720 22 3,616,290 13 15,000 21,000 2,781,100 120,000 24,447 43,000 1,266,638 " 32,733 '5 1-48 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1997 For Last Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Merriconeag Sound, Harpswell, ME 3 Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT 3 Narraguagus River, Milbridge, ME 3 Nashua, NH New London, CT Nonewaug River, Woodbury, CT 3 Northampton, MA North Canaan, Blackberry River, CT ' North Nashua River, Fitchburg, MA North Nashua River, Lancaster, MA 3 Norwalk, CT 2 Norwich, CT Park River, Hartford, CT Pawcatuck, CT Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI' Penobscot River, Old Town, ME 2 Perley Brook, Fort Kent, ME 3 Pleasant Point, Perry, ME 3 Point Shirley, Winthrop, MA 3 Port 5 Facility, Bridgeport, CT 3 Prestile Stream, Blaine, ME 3 Riverdale, West Springfield, MA5 Salmon River, Colchester, CT3 Sand Cove, Gouldsboro, ME 3 Saxonville, MA Sebasticook River, Hartland, ME 2 Shelburne, Androscoggin River, NH 3 Smelt Brook, Weymouth-Braintree, MA 2 South River, Conway, MA 3 Springdale, MA Springfield, MA Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, CT 3 Stony Brook, Wilton, NH 4 Sucker Brook Dam, CT Three Rivers, MA Torrington, East Branch, CT 2 Torrington, West Branch, CT 2 Town River Bay, Quincy, MA 3 Village of Saxtons, VT 3 Ware, MA 2 Waterbury-Watertown, CT 2 Weston, VT 4 West Branch, Westfield River, Huntington, MA3 West River, New Haven, CT West Springfield, MA 6 West Warren, MA 2 Winsted, CT Woonsocket, RI Worcester Diversion, MA Projects are complete unless otherwise noted. 1 Inactive. 2 Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 80-858, Sec. 205). 3 Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 79- 526, Sec. 14) 4 Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 83- 780, Sec. 208) 1-49 1980 1988 1995 1950 1992 1985 1950 1977 1981 1979 1952 1960 1986 1966 1986 1986 1994 1987 1995 1986 1980 1996 1983 1984 1980 1985 1977 1978 1987 1952 1950 1983 1973 1976 1970 1963 1963 1983 1985 1963 1963 1957 1983 1996 1992 1964 1954 1962 1978 107,682 110,000 132,967 270,000 6 8,504,919 ' 222,500 960,000 73,865 4,605,000 81,671 52,150 1,209,000 60,176,919 644,311 3,174,260 178,045 70,990 189,000 500,000 227,500 73,674 1,905,261 247,100 127,500 4,218,700 1,857,475 37,657 1,803,738 133,500 700,000 932,000 116,296 19,500 2,227,792 1,577,189 389,237 228,237 55,228 140,500 400,000 265,300 13,000 119,433 3,883,293 2,043,728 389,200 245,500 4,033,100 5,086,896 24,893 16 327 2,015,709 21 17 214,106 20,554 18 182,419 221,614 2 19 5,350 58,800 -20 18,409 748,840 26 14,343 41,000 224,476 70,161 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1997 TABLE 1-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 6 Portion Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Public Law 80-858, Sec. 205). 6 Excludes $147,366 Flood Control and Coastal Emergency funds expended. 7Excludes $852,127 non project cost per 1976 WRDA. e Excludes $727,460 Contributed Funds, Other. 9 Excludes $1,674,567 Contributed Funds, Other. to Excludes $12,000 expended for land condemnations and $25,184 Contributed Funds, Other for relocations. " Excludes $1,146,828 Contributed Funds, Other. ' Excludes $406,653 Contributed Funds, Other. 13 Excludes $245,000 expended for land condemnations. 14 Excludes $488,920 Contributed Funds, Other. TABLE 1-F '" Excludes $11,758 for lands. 16 Excludes $6,120 for lands. 17 Excludes $259,408 Contributed Funds, Other. 18 Excludes $3,109 for lands. 19 Excludes $8,503 Contributed Funds, Other. 9o Excludes $565,168 Contributed Funds, Other. 24Excludes $1,629,256 for lands and $303,251 Contributed Funds, Other. "Excludes $10,195 lands. * Excludes $24,134 Contributed Funds, Other. * Excludes $109,140 for land and $46,929 Contributed Funds, Other. a Excludes $554,638 for lands and $71,650 Contributed Funds, Other. OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTI-PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER Cost to September 30, 1997 For Last Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Report for Construction Funds Passamaquoddy Tidal Power Project, ME 1 1935 $6,384,394 1 Work discontinued in 1937. Facilities transferred to War Assets Administration. 1-50 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Funds Expended For Last Full Report See Annual Date Contributed Project Report for Deauthorized Federal Funds Alternative for Sugar Hill Reservoir Andover Lake, CT Bagaduce River, ME (uncompleted portion) - Baker Brook, MA 1972 Bar Harbor, ME (uncompleted portion of 1888 & 1890 Acts) 1932 Beards Brook Reservoir, NH 1949 Beaver Brook Lake, NH 1973 Bennington Reservoir, NH 1949 Big River Reservoir, RI (portion of 1986 Act) 1987 Black Rock Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion of 1958 Act) 1986 Boothbay Harbor, ME (Portion of 1912 Act) - Boston Harbor, MA (1945 Act) 1997 Boston Harbor, MA (portion of 1902 Act) 1997 Boston Harbor, MA (Chelsea River portion of 1962 Act) 1997 Brant Rock Beach, Marshfield, MA 1961 Branford Harbor, CT (portion of 1902 of Act) 1990 Bridgeport Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion of 1930 Act) 1980 Bridgeport Harbor, CT (portion of 1946 Act) 1980 Bridgeport Harbor, CT (portion of 1958 Act) 1980 Brockway Lake, VT 1946 Cambridgeport Lake, VT Chicopee, MA (uncompleted portion) 1954 Claremont Lake, NH 1968 Clyde, RI 1948 Cocheco River, NH (portion of 1890 Act) 1997 Cohasset Harbor, MA (portion of 1945 Act) 1996 Cohasset Harbor, MA (portion of Section 107 project) 1996 Connecticut River (above Hartford), CT 1932 Connecticut River below Hartford, CT (uncompleted portion) 1979 Connecticut River below Hartford, CT (portion of 1950 Act) 1979 Cotuit Harbor, MA 1962 Dickey - Lincoln School Lakes, ME (portion of 1965 Act) 1984 Dorchester Bay and Neponset River, MA (uncompleted portion) 1968 East Boothbay Harbor, ME (portion of 1910 Act) 1953 Eastport Harbor, ME 1984 Edgartown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion of 1965 Act) 1978 Fall River Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion of 1930 Act) 1984 Falmouth, MA (portion of 1948 Act) 1978 Fivemile River Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion) 1969 Gaysville Lake, VT 1970 Gorton's Pond, Warwick, RI Great Salt Pond, Block Island, RI (uncompleted portion of 1945 Act) 1983 Greenwich Harbor, CT (portion of 1919 Act) - Greenwich Point Beach, CT 1959 Guilford Harbor, CT (portion of 1945 Act) 1995 Harbor of Refuge, Block Island, RI (uncompleted portion of 1912 Act) 1983 Housatonic River, CT (uncompletedportion of 1888 Act) 1979 Honey Hill Lake, NH 1949 Ipswich River, MA (uncompleted portion of 1968 Act) 1969 Kennebec River, ME (uncompleted portion of 1902 Act) 1997 Augn 1977 - - Aug 1977 Oct 1978 Nov 1979 Nov 1986 Aug 1977 Apr 1978 Aug 1977 Nov 1990 Nov 1986 Oct 1992 Jan 1990 Oct 1992 Oct 1996 Nov 1979 Oct 1990 Nov 1979 Oct 1996 Oct 1996 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Dec 1970 Apr 1951 Oct 1996 Oct 1996 Oct 1996 Jan 1990 Oct 1978 Nov 1986 Oct 1978 Nov 1986 Jan 1990 Oct 1996 Nov 1983 Nov 1986 Nov 1986 Oct 1996 Oct 1978 Oct 1976 Nov 1991 Nov 1986 Nov 1990 Oct 1978 Oct 1996 Nov 1986 Nov 1979 Aug 1977 Nov 1986 Nov 1986 94,000 78,000 378,300 205,000 242,700 8,800 132,146 8,541 26,285,298 638,675 206,600 141,530 92,000 1-51 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1997 TABLE 1-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Funds Expended For Last Full Report See Annual Date Contributed Project Report for Deauthorized Federal Funds Kennebunk River, ME (portion of 1962 Act) 1996 Oct 1996 - - Ludlow Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - Lynn Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion of 1954 & 1935 Acts) 1956 Nov 1986 - - Manchester Harbor, MA 1949 Nov 1979 23,986 - Marblehead Harbor, MA 1968 Oct 1978 43,711 - Mattapoisett Harbor, MA 1950 Oct 1978 - - Merrimack River, MA - Nov 1991 - - Milford Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion of 1902 & 1937 Acts) 1981 Nov 1986 - - Monoosnoc Brook, MA (portion of 1966 Act) 1967 Nov 1986 - - Monoosnoc Lake, MA (portion of 1966 Act) 1967 Nov 1986 Mountain Brook Dam, NH 1949 Aug 1977 57,000 - Mystic, CT 1968 Aug 1972 67,700 - Mystic River, CT (uncompleted portion of 1913 Act) 1986 Nov 1986 - - Mystic River, CT (portion of 1913 Act) 1986 Oct 1996 - - Mystic River, MA (portion of 1950 Act) 1986 Oct 1996 - - Nantasket Beach, MA 1971 Jan 1990 - - Nantucket (Harbor of Refuge, MA (uncompleted portion of 1945 Act) 1965 Nov 1986 Nantucket, Harbor of Refuge), MA (uncompleted portion of 1880 Act) 1989 Jan 1990 - - Napatree Beach, RI - Nov 1979 - - Narragansett Pier, RI 1966 Nov 1970 115,590 - Neponset River, Milton Town Landing to Port Norfolk, MA - Nov 1991 New Bedford and Fairhaven Harbors, MA (uncompleted portion of 1912 Act) 1953 Nov 1986 - - Newburyport Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion of 1945 Act) 1997 Nov 1986 - New Haven Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion of 1946 & 1910 Acts)1986 Nov 1986 - - Newburyport, MA (portion of 1910 Act) - Oct 1992 - - Nookagee Lake, MA (portion of 1968 Act) 1976 Nov 1986 563,677 - North Andover and Lawrence, MA 1949 Aug 1977 20,000 - North Hampton Beach, North Hampton, NH 1963 Nov 1981 - - Norwalk Harbor, CT (portion of 1919 Act) 1983 Oct 1996 - - Norwalk-Wilton, CT 1973 Nov 1979 - - Patchoque River, Westbrook, CT (portion of 1954 Act) 1997 Oct 1996 - - Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay, RI and CT (uncompleted portions of 1896 Act) 1978 Nov 1986 - - Pawcatuck River, Little Narragansett Bay, RI and CT 1979 Nov 1979 - - (1960 Act) 1949 Nov 1977 - - Pepperell Cove, ME (uncompleted portion) 1969 Nov 1981 - - Phillips Lake, MA 1982 May 1997 300,000 - Pleasant Bay, MA (portion of 1970 Act) 1971 Nov 1986 - - Point Judith, RI 1968 Nov 1977 198,477 - Pontiac Diversion, RI 1948 Apr 1951 24,200 - Providence River and Harbor, RI (uncompleted portion) 1997 Nov 1986 - - Provincetown Beach (Herring Cove), MA 1961 Oct 1978 - - Provincetown Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion) 1997 Oct 1978 - - Rockland Harbor, ME (uncompleted portion of 1956 Act) 1976 Nov 1986 - - Saco River, ME (uncompleted portion) 1979 Oct 1979 - - Sakonnet Harbor, RI (uncompleted portion) 1982 Jun 1982 176,000 - Salem Harbor, MA (inactive portion of 1958 Act) 1997 Jul 1995 - - Salem Harbor, MA (uncompleted portion of 1997 Nov 1986 - - 1945 Act) Sandy Bay, Cape Ann, MA (uncompleted portion) 1922 Oct 1978 - - Silver Beach to Cedar Beach, CT (uncompleted portion of 1954 Act) 1964 Nov 1986 - - 1-52 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Funds Expended For Last Full Report See Annual Date Contributed Project Report for Deauthorized Federal Funds South Coventry Lake, CT 1951 Aug 1977 96,000 - Southport Harbor, CT (portion of 1935 Act) 1962 Oct 1996 - - South Tunbridge Lake, VT - Aug 1977 - - Stamford Harbor, CT (2 projects uncompleted portions) 1979 Oct 1978 - - Stamford Harbor, CT (inactive portion) 1979 Jan 1990 - - Stonington Harbor, CT (uncompleted portion of 1950 Act) 1959 Nov 1986 - - Stonington Harbor, ME (1960 Act) 1961 Nov 1979 2,543 - Stony Creek, CT (portion of 1960 Act) 1995 Oct 1996 - - Stratford, CT 1973 Mar 1977 934,500 - Sugar Hill Reservoir, NH 1946 Dec 1944 - - Taunton River, MA (inactive portion) 1948 Jan 1990 - - Thames River, CT (uncompleted portion of 1945 Act) 1967 Nov 1986 - - The Island Lake, VT Aug 1977 - - Thumperton Beach, Eastham, MA 1961 Nov 1979 - - Town Beach, Plymouth, MA (inactive portion) 1964 Jan 1990 - - Town Neck Beach, Sandwich, MA (portion of 1960 Act) 1961 Nov 1986 - - Trumbull Lake, CT 1983 May 1997 1,498,800 - Victory Lake, VT 1967 Aug 1977 168,400 - Wareham Harbor, MA (inactive portion) 1896 Jan 1990 Wareham-Marion, MA 1965 Aug 1977 81,715 - West Brookfield Reservoir, MA 1948 Jul 1960 67,000 - West Canaan Lake, NH 1948 Aug 1977 92,000 - Westerly, RI 1966 Nov 1986 - - Westfield, MA 1967 Sep 1969 507,200 - Westport, CT 1965 Feb 1970 29,634 - Westport Harbor and Saugatuck River, CT (uncompleted portion of 1892 & 1954 Acts) 1972 Nov 1979 - - Westport River, MA 1942 Jan 1990 - - Weymouth-Fore and Town Rivers, MA (portion of 1965 Act) 1979 & 1983 Oct 1996 - - Whitmanville Lake, MA 1979 Jul 1995 605,023 - Williamsville Reservoir, VT 1949 Dec 1944 146,500 - Winthrop Beach, MA (uncompleted portion of 1950 Act) 1960 Nov 1986 - - TABLE 1-H NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Contributed Funds Study Identification Costs Expended Hyannis Harbor, Hyannis, MA $187,745 Salem Harbor, Salem, MA 11,176 Saugus and Pine Rivers, MA 15,801 1-53 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1997 TABLE 1-I BEACH EROSION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 103, PUBLIC LAW 87-874 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Contributed Funds Study Identification Costs Expended Nantasket Beach, Hull, MA $15,431 $3,647 North Nantasket Beach, Hull, MA 5,444 $3,500 Silver to Cedar Beach, Milford, CT 2,321 TABLE 1-J FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205 PUBLIC LAW 80-858 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Contributed Funds Study Identification Costs Expended Black Rocks Creek, Salisbury, MA $13,856 Coordination 9,270 Farm River, East Haven, CT 7,004 TABLE 1-K EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 14, PUBLIC LAW 79-526 (PREAUTHORIZATION) Fiscal Year Contributed Funds Study Identification Costs Expended Connecticut River, Walpole, NH $20,000 Coordination 8,538 Housatonic River, New Milford, CT 5,000 North Nashua River, Lancaster, MA 13,667 TABLE 1-L BLACKSTONE RIVER BASIN, MA AND RI (See Section 33 of Text) RESERVOIR Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Black- Reservoir Lands stone Height Capacity and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) Construction Damages' Total West Hill2 Worcester,MA 25.8 51 Earthfill 12,400 $1,366,922 $940,000 $2,306,902 'Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2 See individual report for details. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Black- Lands stone and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages Total Worcester, MA 48 Diversion tunnel and channel 1-54 $4,923,500 $1,179,000 2 $6,102,500 TABLE 1-L (Continued) NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Black- Lands stone and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Woonsocket, RI 15 Channel improvement 3,733,100 1,069,000 e 4,802,100 Lower Woonsocket, Flood wall, conduits and RI 13 channel improvement 8,356,239 435,000 8,791,239 Blackstone River, Millbury, MA 32 Slope protection 256,619 - 256,619 6 Clear River, Burrillville, RI 23 Retaining wall 168,000 - 168,000 Pawtuxet River, Warwick, RI - Land acquisition 4,125,000 - 4,125,000 4 1Includes relocation. ' $3,300,000 Federal; $825,000 non-Federal. 2 $158,000 Federal; $1,021,000 non-Federal. 6 $250,000 Federal; $6,619 non-Federal. 3 $300,000 Federal; $769,000 non-Federal. TABLE 1-M CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT, NH, MA AND CT (See Section 35 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Connec- Reservoir Lands ticut Height Capacity Constr- and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) uction Damages' Total Vermont: Union Village 2 North Hartland 2 North Springfield 2 Ball Mountain 2 Townshend 2 New Hampshire: Surry Mountain 2 Otter Brook 2 Massachusetts: Birch Hill 2 Tully 2 Barre Falls 2 Knightville 2 Littleville 2 Conant Brook 2 Connecticut: Colebrook River 2 Mad River White River Jct. White River Jct. Springfield Brattleboro Brattleboro Keene Keene Gardner Athol Worcester Northampton Northampton Springfield Winsted Winsted 228.4 211.7 191.3 178.2 170 185 120 265 Earthfill Earthfill Earthfill Rockfillearth 168.3 133 Earthfill 38,000 71,400 50,600 54,600 33,200 $3,186,860 6,349,225 4,781,526 10,757,842 $ 908,300 963,000 2,050,000 350,000 $4,095,160 7,312,225 6,831,526 11,107,842 6,662,545 1,878,000 8,540,545 174.4 86 Earthfill 32,500 2,448,610 385,000 2,833,610 171.2 133 Earthfill 18,300 2,982,048 1,378,400 4,360,448 153.3 148.7 130.2 102.8 102.0 122.0 56 Earthfill 62 Earthfill 62 Rockfillearth 160 Earthfill 150 Earthfill 85 Rockfillearth 49,900 22,000 24,000 49,000 32,400 3,740 1,740,679 1,298,752 1,928,819 2,594,440 5,863,412 1,935,530 3,075,000 368,000 39,000 821,200 1,150,000 1,015,000 4,815,679 1,666,752 1,967,819 3,415,640 7,013,412 2,950,530 116.0 223 Rockfill- 98,500 8,341,971 5,922,000 14,263,971 earth 120.0 178 Earthfill 9,700 4,773,020 2,210,000 ' 6,983,020 1-55 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1997 TABLE 1-M (Continued) CONNECTICUT RIVER BASIN, VT, NH, MA AND CT (See Section 35 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Connec- Reservoir Lands ticut Height Capacity Constr- and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) uction Damages' Total Sucker Brook Winsted 118.5 68 Earthfill 1,480 2,227,792 180,0003 2,407,792 'Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 8 Non-Federal cost. 2 For details, see individual report. 4 Non-Federal $670,000; Federal $1,540,000. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Connec- Lands ticut and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages' Total Beaver Brook, Keene, NH 170.4 Channel improvement $ 2,591,000 - $ 2,591,000 Charlestown, NH 181 Riverbank protection 113,330 - 113,330 Chicopee, MA 80 Wall and levee 1,434,000 $ 250,000 1,684,000 Chicopee Falls, MA 83 Wall and levee 2,600,000 70,000 2,670,000 Connecticut River, Middletown, CT 31 Streambank protection 331,167 6 - 331,167 East Hartford, CT 52 Wall and levee 2,143,084 271,000 2,414,084 Farmington River, Simsbury, CT 60 Streambank protection 757,720 10,195 767,915 Folly Brook, Wethersfield, CT 50 Channel improvement 220,284 - 220,284 Gardner, MA 163 Dam and levee 510,691 35,000 545,691 Gulf Street, Milford, CT - Slope protection 386,000 - 386,000 Hartford, CT 52 Wall and levee 9,710,200 1,150,000 10,860,200 Hartford, White River, VT 216 Channel improvement 332,236 - 332,236 Holyoke, MA 85 Wall and levee 3,442,447 150,000 3,592,447 Huntington, MA 100 Riverbank protection 3,900 - 3,900 Israel R., Lancaster, NH 314 Gabion overflow weir 551,606 - 551,606 Keene, NH 167 Channel improvement 44,146 - 44,146 Mill Brook, Brownsville, VT 200.3 Streambank stabilization 110,000 - 110,000 Northampton, MA 94 Wall and levee 960,000 * 150,000 1,110,000 North Stratford, NH 345 Slope protection 180,000 - 180,000 Park River, CT 51 Conduit 58,876,919 1,300,000 60,176,919 Riverdale, MA 80 Wall and levee 2,126,875 7 109,140 2,236,015 Salmon R., Colchester, CT 38 Slope protection 247,100 - 247,100 South River, Conway, MA 107 Slope protection 133,500 - 133,500 Springdale, MA 84 Wall and levee 700,000 57,000 757,000 Springfield, MA 76 Wall and levee 937,350 2 272,000 1,209,350 Three Rivers, MA 98 Wall and levee 1,577,189 700,000 2,277,189 Ware, MA 110 Channel improvement 400,000 85,000 485,000 Weston, VT 195 Channel improvement 13,079 2,000 15,079 West Springfield, MA 76 Wall and levee 2,043,452 3 30,000 2,073,452 West Warren, MA 111 Wall and levee 430,176 64,000 494,176 Winsted, CT 115 Channel improvement 245,500 30,000 275,500 ' To be borne by local interests. Also includes local interests * Includes $835,000 Public Works Administration funds. portion of relocation. * Includes $280,000 Public Works Administration funds. 2 Includes $355,000 Public Works Administration funds. 6 Excludes $24,134 Contributed Funds, Other. 3 Includes $245,000 Public Works Administration funds. 7 Excludes $46,929 Contributed Funds, Other. 1-56 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-N HOUSATONIC RIVER BASIN, CT AND MA (See Section 38 of Text) DAMS AND RESERVOIRS 1 Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Nauga- Reservoir Lands tuck Height Capacity Constr- and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) uction Damages ' Total Hall Meadow Torrington, CT 41.0 73 Rock and 8,620 $2,572,357 $1,290,000 a $3,862,357 earthfill East Branch Torrington, CT 43.7 92 Earthfill 4,350 1,959,836 1,290,000 a 3,249,836 Thomaston Torrington, CT 30.5 142 Rock and 42,000 6,382,112 7,900,000 14,282,112 earthfill Northfield Brook Torrington, CT 30.6 118 Earthfill 2,432 1,875,512 975,000 2,850,512 Black Rock Waterbury, CT 29.0 154 Earthfill 8,700 5,223,700 2,958,600 8,182,300 Hancock Brook Waterbury, CT 25.0 57 Earthfill 4,030 1,593,911 2,585,000 4,178,911 Hop Brook Waterbury, CT 15.9 97 Earthfill 6,970 2,701,562 3,450,000 6,151,562 1 For details of projects, see individual reports. 2 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 3 Includes cost of lands borne by local interests. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Housa- Lands tonic and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages s Total Alford, Green River, MA Ansonia-Derby, CT Covered Bridge, Sheffield, MA Danbury, CT Derby, CT Mad River, Waterbury (Woodtick Area), CT North Canaan, Blackberry River, CT Pittsfield, MA Salisbury, CT Sheffield, MA Squantz Pond, New Fairfield, CT Torrington, East Branch, CT Torrington, West Branch, CT Waterbury- Watertown, CT 111.0 13.0 96.0 56.0 12.0 35.0 83.0 133.0 76.0 96.0 43.0 51.0 52.0 32.0 Earth dike and stone slope protection Wall, levee, channel improvement and pumping station Stone slope protection Walls, channel improvement and bridge replacememt Walls, levees and pumping station Channel improvements Snagging and clearing project Stone arch culvert Gabionade with slope protection Stone slope protection Timber Bulkhead Dike and channel improvement Walls, dikes and channel Wall, dike and channel $41,419 $ - $ 41,419 18,266,040 1,178,000 19,444,040 430,000 13,143,000 - 430,000 1,862,000 15,005,000 7,582,642 647,000 8,229,642 2,100,000 73,865 739,003 102,800 202,608 116,296 389,237 228,237 263,300 - 2,100,000 85,000 73,865 824,003 102,800 202,608 116,296 389,237 228,237 263,300 1 For details of projects, see individual reports. 2 To be borne by local interests. Includes relocations. 1-57 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1997 TABLE 1-0 MERRIMACK RIVER BASIN, NH, AND MA (See Section 39 of Text) RESERVOIRS1 Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Merri. Reservoir Lands mack Height Capacity Constr. and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) uction Damages' Total Franklin Falls Franklin, NH 118.2 140 Earthfill 154,000 $ 6,190,487 $ 1,760,000 $ 7,950,487 Blackwater Concord, NH 118.8 75 Earthfill 46,000 766,746 553,000 1,319,746 Hopkinton- Everett Concord, NH 87.3 115 Earthfill 157,300 12,715,440 8,737,000 21,452,440 Edward MacDowell Keene, NH 161.3 67 Earthfill 12,800 1,708,253 306,000 2,014,253 Phillips Fitchburg, MA 105.4 48 Earthfill 1,600 13,450,000 7,350,000 20,800,000 1 For details, see individual report. 2 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS1 Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Merri- Lands mack and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages ' Total Amesbury, Powwow and 3.0 Wall and revetment $ 132,113 $ - $ 132,113 Merrimack Rivers, MA Haverhill, MA 21.0 Floodwall, conduit and 1,863,485 - 1,863,485 pumping station Lowell, MA 39.0 Wall and levee 490,600 6 90,000 580,600 Nashua, NH 55.0 Wall and levee 270,000 3,000 273,000 ' North Nashua River, 94.0 Stone slope protection 203,675 - 203,675 Leominster, MA North Nashua River, 94.0 Stone slope protection 295,273 - 295,273 Leominster (Sewer Line), MA North Nashua River, MA 100.5 Channel improvement 3,235,000 3 - 3,235,000 Saxonville, MA 69.0 Wall, levee, channel 4,218,700 530,000 4,748,700 1 For details, see individual report. 2 To be borne by local interests. 3 Excludes $1,370,000 Public Works Administration Funds expended on Fitchburg, MA. 4 Excludes $15,000 expended from Contributed Funds. 6 Excludes $794,374 Public Works Administration Funds. 1-58 NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT TABLE 1-P THAMES RIVER BASIN, CT, RI AND MA (See Section 47 of Text) RESERVOIRS' Miles Estimated Federal Cost Above Mouth of Reservoir Lands Thames Height Capacity Constr- and Name Nearest City River (feet) Type (acre-feet) uction Damages' Total Hodges Village Webster, MA 74.5 55 Earthfill 13,000 $1,317,268 $3,144,000 $4,461,268 Buffunville Webster, MA 74.4 66 Earthfill 12,700 2,157,603 841,000 2,998,603 East Brimfield Southbridge, MA 82.8 55 Earthfill 30,000 1,337,043 5,720,000 7,057,043 Westville Southbridge, MA 75.2 80 Earthfill 11,000 2,284,683 3,400,000 5,684,683 West Thompson Putman, CT 59.3 70 Earthfill 25,600 5,036,220 1,965,000 7,001,220 Mansfield Hollow Willimantic, CT 40.0 70 Earthfill 52,000 4,107,164 2,340,000 6,447,164 1 For details, see individual report. 2 Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Miles Estimated Cost Above Mouth of Lands Thames and Location River Type of Structure Construction Damages ' Total Norwich, CT 15.0 Channel improvements $1,209,000 $72,000 $1,281,000 West River, New Haven, CT - Channel improvements 4,619,543 2 554,638 5,174,181 Borne by local interests. 2 Excludes $12,590 for revisions to flood insurance rate map and $71,650 Contributed funds not required. 1-59 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY1997 TABLE 1-Q RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Date Survey Date Survey Project Conducted Project Conducted CONNECTICUT Black Rock Harbor Branford Harbor Bridgeport Harbor Clinton Harbor Connecticut River Below Hartford Duck Island Harbor Greenwich Harbor Guilford Harbor Milford Harbor New Haven Harbor New London Harbor Niantic Bay Harbor Norwalk Harbor Pawcatuck River Stamford Harbor Westport Harbor MAINE Beals Harbor Belfast Harbor Boothbay Harbor Bucks Harbor Corea Harbor Harraseeket River Isle Au Haut Josias River Kennebec River Kennebunk River Lubec Channel New Harbor Penobscot River Rockport Harbor Saco River Searsport Harbor Stockton Harbor York Harbor MASSACHUSETTS Annisquam River Aunt Lydia's Cove Aug/Sep 1997 Dec 1996 Jul/Aug 1997 Mar/Apr/May 1997 Oct 1996 May 1997 May 1997 Sep 1997 May/Jun 1997 Dec 1996 Feb/Mar/Apr/May 1997 July 1997 Oct 1996 Nov/Dec 1996 Feb/Mar 1997 Sep 1997 Oct 1996 Jun 1997 Jul 1997 Sep 1997 Jun 1997 Jul 1997 Jul/Sep 1997 Sep 1997 Nov/Dec 1996 Feb/Mar 1997 Dec 1996 Jun 1997 Feb/Mar 1997 Jun/Jul 1997 Apr 1997 Oct/Nov 1996 Apr/May 1997 Jul 1997 Apr 1997 May 1997 Apr/May 1997 Apr 1997 Cape Cod Canal Chatham (Stage) Harbor Falmouth Harbor Gloucester Hyannis Harbor Ipswich River Island End River Lynn Harbor Menemsha Creek New Bedford Harbor Newburyport Harbor Plymouth Harbor Salem Harbor Sesuit Harbor Vineyard Haven Harbor NEW HAMPSHIRE Cocheco River Hampton Harbor Lamprey River Little Harbor Portsmouth Harbor and Piscataqua River Rye Harbor RHODE ISLAND Great Salt Pond/Block Island Harbor of Refuge/Block Island Little Narraganset Bay and Watch Hill Cove Point Judith Pond Providence River Sakonnet Harbor Warwick Cove May 1997 Dec 1996 Jan 1997 May/Jun 1997 May 1997 Jan/Jun 1997 Jul 1997 Mar/Apr 1997 Apr/May 1997 May 1997 May 1997 May 1997 Apr/May 1997 Apr 1997 Apr 1997 Apr 1997 May 1997 Jul/Aug 1997 Aug 1997 Feb/Aug 1997 Apr 1997 Aug 1997 May 1997 May 1997 May 1997 May 1997 Mar 1997 Oct 1997 Major activities under the Dredged Material Management Program under PCS for fiscal year 1997 were (1) monitoring surveys at the Central Long Island Sound, Western Long Island Sound, Boston Harbor CAD cell, and New London disposal sites (2) maintenance, replacement, and repositioning of disposal site buoys. Additionally, 6 monitoring study or special study reports were completed and distributed to the public and regional resource agencies. Total cost of contracts was $447,000. Labor costs of $152,000 for program management, sampling and testing, and environmental analysis were incurred. 1-60 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT * NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT This district comprises western Vermont, small portions of western Massachusetts and Connecticut, eastern New York including Long Island, and northeastern New Jersey, embraced in the drainage basins tributary to Lake Champlain and St. Lawrence River system east thereof and to the Atlantic Ocean from New York-Connecticut State Line to, but not including Manasquan Inlet, N.J. In addition it exercises jurisdiction over matters pertaining to improvement of Great Lakes to Hudson River waterway. Under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, the District Engineer, as Supervisor of New York Harbor, also exercises jurisdiction under the laws enacted for the preservation of the tidal waters of New York Harbor, its adjacent or tributary waters, and the waters of Long Island Sound. IMPROVEMENTS 1 Aquatic Plant Control...............................................2-3 2. East River, N Y .............................. ................... 2-3 3. East Rockaway Inlet, NY ........................................ 2-4 4. Fire Island to Jones Inlet, NY .................................... 2-4 5. Flushing Bay & Creek, NY .................................... 2-5 6. Hudson River, NY ....................................................... 2-5 7. Hudson River Channel, NY ....................................2-6 8. Jamaica Bay, NY .................... .................... ... 2-6 9. Jones Inlet, N Y ..................................................... ... 2-7 10. Kill Van Kull & Newark Bay, NJ & NY ................... 2-8 11. Narrows and Lake Champlain, NY.............. ........ 2-8 12. Newark Bay, Hackensack and Passaic River, NJ........2-8 13. New York Harbor-Collection and Removal of Drift .................................... ..... 2-9 14. New York Harbor-Entrance Channels and Anchorage Areas....................................2-10 15. New York and New Jersey Channels ....................... 2-10 16. Rondout Harbor, NY .................. ............. ..... 2-11 17. Shark River, NJ ...................................... 2-12 18. Shrewsbury River, NJ ........................................ 2-12 19. Supervisor of New York Harbor ............................. 2-13 20. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys .................... 2-13 21. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................ 2-13 22. Navigation work under special authorization ............ 2-13 Beach Erosion Control 23. East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, NY ................................ ......... 2-13 24. Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, NY .................... 2-14 25. Rockaway Inlet to Norton Point (Coney Island) NY.............. ..................... ... 2-15 26. Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, NJ ............................ 2-16 27. Other Authorized Beach Erosion control projects ........................................ .... 2-17 28. Beach erosion control work under special authorization ................. ....... ...... ............ 2-17 Flood Control 29. North Ellenville, NY ................................................. 2-17 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. Passaic River Basin, NJ & NY ............................... 2-17 Inspection of completed flood control projects..........2-18 Other authorized flood control projects .................... 2-18 Flood control work under special authorization ....................................... 2-18 General Investigations Surveys .............................. ........ .... 2-19 Collection and study of basic data ............................ 2-19 Deauthorized projects ............................................... 2-19 Tables Table 2-A Cost & Financial Statement ............................. 2-20 Table 2-B Authorizing legislation .................................... 2-23 Table 2-C Hudson River. NY Features of Lock and Dam Included in Existing Project ..................................... 2-28 Table 2-E Supervisor of New York Harbor Statement of Activities ................................. 2-28 Table 2-F Reconnaissance & Condition Surveys ............ 2-29 Table 2-G Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............ 2-30 Table 2-H Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects .................................. 2-32 Table 2-I Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ....................................... 2-32 Table 2-J Surveys .................................................... ... 2-33 Table 2-K Preconstruction Engineering and Design ........ 2-33 Table 2-L Cost for Flood Plain Management Services ........................................ ... 2-33 Table 2-M Deauthorized Projects ...................................... 2-34 Table 2-N Section 107 Study ........................................ 2-35 Table 2-0 Section 103 Studies ...................................... 2-35 Table 2-P Section 205 Studies .................................... 2-35 2-1 Navigation Page Flood Control (Cont'd) Page REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 2-2 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in New York District. Existing Project. Provides for control and progressive eradication of water chestnut. Eurasian water milfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from the navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests were required to provide 30 percent of the cost of the program except as modified by 1962 River and Harbor Act and agree to hold the United States free from damages. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 changed the local responsibility from 30% to 50%. In FY 87 the States involved in the program were permitted to keep the cost sharing at 30% by order of the Secretary of the Army. Starting FY 88, however, local sponsors contributed 50% of the costs. Operations and results during period. FY 1997 has been the sixteenth year of a control program started in FY 1982 for the removal of nuisance aquatic plants in the Lake Champlain Basin, Vermont. Recent work continued the removal of water chestnut and eurasian milfoil from portions of the basin. Condition as of September 30. Reconnaissance report covering the aquatic plant problems of the North Atlantic Division areas was completed in August 1967. The General Design Memorandum for this program was completed in March 1982 by the State of Vermont. The total Federal cost of this control program to date is $2,107,414. In FY 1997, the New York District did not cost-share a FY 1997 program with the State of Vermont, as Federal funds were not yet available. In October 1991, Waterways Experiment Station was directed to conduct a multi-year study which would identify and test potential biocontrol agents of water chestnuts. No successful biocontrol agents of water chestnut were identified. The New York District is currently coordinating with the State of Vermont, as Federal funds have been provided in FY 1998 to cost-share a program. 2. EAST RIVER, NY Location. A tidal strait about 16 miles long and 600 to 4,000 feetwide, connecting Hudson River and the Upper Bay at the Battery, New York City, with Long Island Sound at Throgs Neck, New York City, and separating Long Island from Manhattan Island and the mainland. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12335, 12339, and 12366.) Previous projects. For details see page 210 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Channels of following dimensions (depths refer to mean low water): From deep water in Upper New York Bay to Wallabout Channel, 40 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide; from Wallabout Channel to Throgs Neck, 35 feet deep, with widths varying from about 550 to 1,000 feet according to locality; east of F.D. Roosevelt Island up to English Place (43rd Drive), Long Island City, 30 feet deep and varying in width from between South Brother and Berrian Islands, 20 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with widening in approach from main channel; from East River channel to Astoria waterfront, a flared 0.31 mile entrance channel 1,600 to 400 feet wide, a 0.64 mile channel 400 feet wide, and a turning basin 1,000 feet wide and 1,600 feet long, all 37 feet deep in rock and 35 feet in soft material (South Brother Island Channel); removal of Coenties Reef to a depth of 40 feet, also removal of following rocks and reefs lying outside of limiting lines of main channels to give access to wharves: Along Brooklyn shore, Brooklyn Bridge to Manhattan Bridge (Fulton Ferry Reef), to a depth of 25 feet; Jay Street Reef, 25 feet; Corlears Reef, 35 feet; Shell Reef, 25 feet; Horns Hook, 40 feet; Rhinelander Reef, 26 feet; and reef off Oak Point, 30 feet; and construction of a dike in Pot Cove in Hell Gate. Section included for improvement is about 17.8 miles long. Mean range of tide varies according to locality from 4 feet at North Third Street, Brooklyn, and 4.4 feet at the Battery to 4.9 feet at Hallets Point, 6.3 feet at Port Morris, and 7.1 feet at eastern entrance at Throgs Neck; mean range of spring tides 4.8, 5.3, 5.9, 7.6, and 8.5 feet respectively; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary according to locality from 3.8 feet below mean low water at the Battery, 2.4 feet at North Third Street, Brooklyn, and 3.8 feet at Throgs Neck up to about 5.2 feet above mean high water at the Battery and 8.4 feet above mean high water at Throgs Neck; extreme fluctuations do not seriously affect navigation. Local cooperation. Resolutions of 1970 require local interests to furnish lands, easements and rights-of-way for construction and maintenance; hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with project depth; provide upon transfer to the United States, a depth in the existing South Brother Island Channel and turning basin of not less than 30 feet; and establish regulations prohibiting discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the waters of the harbor, which shall be in accordance with regulations of Federal State and local authorities responsible for pollution control. Assurances of local cooperation were furnished by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey under date of April 9, 1974. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1988. Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. A contract for the removal and disposal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 35.0 feet with two feet allowable overdepth below mean low water, in specified areas was awarded to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company on 3 January 1997 for the 2-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 removal of 312,351 cubic yards of material with disposal at the Mud Dump Site in the Atlantic Ocean. Dredging was completed on 17 April 1997. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $1,740,661 was expended during FY 1997. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced June 1916 and was essentially completed in November 1976. Construction of dike at Pot Cove in Hell Gate and a part widening near pierhead line in Jay Street Reef are considered unnecessary for the needs of current navigation. 3. EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, NY Location. On south shore of Long Island between main body of island and western end of Long Beach. It is 10 miles east of Rockaway Inlet and about 27 miles by water south and east from the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12353.) Existing Project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 250 feet wide from 12 foot contour in Long Beach Channel protected by a jetty. Mean tidal range, 4.3 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.2 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmosphere pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 5.6 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $603,969, including $100,000 contributed funds. (See Table 2-B for Authorization Legislation.) Local Cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. There are numerous terminals in Oceanside, Island Park, Long Beach, and East Rockaway, including oil terminals. Other terminals are repair and mooring docks with mechanical handling facilities. There are public wharves at East Rockaway and Woodmere. Waterfront on north side of Long Beach has been bulkheaded. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during period. A contract for dredging was awarded on 19 September 1995. Dredging commenced on 22 December 1995 and was scheduled to be completed on 15 December 1996. The contractor misaligned channel and work was partially completed during FY 1996; however, he returned in FY '97 to complete the dredging. Total cubic yards removed during this maintenance dredging cycle was 414,075 which was disposed of at the beach, east of the jetty. Total operations and maintenance funds expended during FY '97 was $414,111.43. Conditions as of September 30. Work under existing project began February 1933 and is 100 percent complete. East jetty, 4,250 feet long was completed in July 1934. Project channel was completed in May, 1935. 4. FIRE ISLAND TO JONES INLET, NY Location. On south shore of Long Island, about 50 miles by water south and east of the Battery, New York City. Fire Island Inlet is the main entrance into Great South Bay from the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352.) Existing project. A jetty at Fire Island Inlet extending generally southwest and south for 5,000 feet from high ground on Democrat Point at the west end of Fire Island and a channel 14 feet deep and 450 feet wide along the northern edge of the Inlet's shoaling area connecting the ocean to the deep water in the Inlet. Mean tidal ranges at the ocean and inlet ends of Democrat Point are 4.1 feet and 2.4 feet respectively. Irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 2.5 feet below mean low water up to 6.2 feet above mean high water on the ocean side. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Requires cost sharing and lands, easements and rights-of-way. Terminal facilities. Great South Bay has extensive pubhlic and private facilities for mooring and servicing recreational boats. Much of this traffic uses the inlet during the boating season, and some traffic (Coast Guard craft and party and head fishing boats) continues throughout the year. Operations and results during period. The fourth scheduled nourishment cycle commenced on 30 December 1996 and was completed on 16 April 1997. A total of 1,081,861 cubic yards of sand was dredged from Fire Island Inlet and placed at Gilgo Beach (718,923 cy) and Robert Moses State Park (362,938 cy, totally State financed). Total contract cost was $6,439,137.48 ($3,500,000 Construction General funds; $1,881,656 Operations and MAintenance funds; and $910,290 provided by the State of New York. Condition as of September 30. The jetty, completed in 1941, surpassed its capacity as a sand entrapping agent in a little over a decade. Since then extensive sand bars and shoals continued to form west of the jetty and in the inlet throat. Hydraulic dredging in the inlet was undertaken in 1959 and again in 1964 under a combined beach erosion control and navigation authorization (1958 Act). Since then 3 more hydraulic dredging operations were conducted starting in 1973 and completed in 1977 under provisions of the 1962 Act (see Table 2B). Maintenance dredging using small hopper dredges has also been done from time to time. Due to local concerns about inlet dredging and consequent erosion at Oak Beach, maintenance had been deferred since 1979 which allowed the complete shoaling of the authorized project channel. To facilitate navigation in this period the existing natural channel was dredged in FY 1985 and in FY 1987. In FY 1987 sand was deposited offshore of Gilgo Beach by hopper dredge using operations and maintenance funds. O&M funds were also used during FY 1987 and 1988 to make repairs to the inner portion of the jetty. In March 1988 the District recommended a plan to maintain a realigned channel in the vicinity of the natural channel to a depth of 14 feet (plus 2 feet of allowable overdepth) and a width of 450 feet. The plan also recommended placement of the dredged material along Gilgo Beach for shore protection 2-4 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT purposes. The recommended plan was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works on 2 August 1988. Since FY 1990 the realigned channel was dredged to project depth each year with placement of material along Gilgo Beach for shore protection purpose. 5. FLUSHING BAY & CREEK, NY Location. On the north shore of Long Island, opening into East River, 12 miles by water northeast of the Battery, New York City. Bay is 1.8 miles long in a northwest-southeast direction and from 0.4 to 0.8 miles wide. Flushing Creek enters bay from southeast and is about 1.1 miles long. (Chart No. 12339). Previous project. For details see Annual reports for 1915, 1932, and 1938; pages 1772, 169 and 168 respectively. Existing project. (a) A bay channel for a depth of 15 feet at mean low water, and 3,000 feet wide from deep water in East River 1.8 miles to maneuvering area; (b) thence a creek channel with a depth of 15 feet at mean low water and 200 feet wide to Northern Boulevard Bridge, thence decreasing uniformly in width to 170 feet at a point 50 feet downstream from Van Wyck expressway Bridge, a distance of about 1.1 miles; (c) a branch channel with a depth of 15 feet at mean low water and width of 200 feet from bay channel, maneuvering area about 2,000 by 750 feet with a depth of 15 feet at mean low water except approach to west side of municipal boat basin which will remain at 12 feet at mean low water; (e) an anchorage basin about 2,100 feet by 1,800 feet, encompassing about 84 acres with a depth of 6 feet at mean low water, and (f) riprap revetment of 1,400 feet extension of earth dike. Mean tidal range, 6.5 feet at mouth of Flushing bay, 6.8 feet at Northern Boulevard Bridge; mean range of spring tides 8.1 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 4 feet low water to 7.6 feet above mean high water. (See Table 2-B fro Authorization Legislation). Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish lands, easements and rights-of-way for maintenance and for aids to navigation upon request of Chief of Engineers; hold the United States free from damages; make necessary removals or relocations of pipelines, cables and other utilities and all necessary mooring facilities and utilities for recreational boating open to all on equal terms. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1965, Vol. 2 Part 2, pages 244-248. Operations and results during period. A contract for maintenance dredging of Flushing Bay & Creek was awarded to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company for the removal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 15.0 feet below mean low water with 2 feet allowable overdepth on 26 June 1997. Operation and maintenance funds in the amount of $1,205,098 was expended during FY97 to complete dredging, removing 101,071 cubic yards of material Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced April 1963 and was completed October 1964. 6. HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. Location. Originates in Adirondack Mountains, about 250 miles in a direct line and 315 miles along its course from the Battery, New York City, and flows generally southerly into New York Bay- Section under improvement extends from New York City about 156 miles to Waterford. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12335, 12341, 12343, 12347, 12348, and 14786.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938, pages 164 and 226, respectively. Existing projects. A channel 600 feet wide from New York City to Kingston, and thence 400 feet wide to Albany. with widening at bends, a turning basin 700 feet wide and 1,200 feet long at Albany, and 2 anchorages, I near Hudson and I near Stuyvesant, each 400 feet wide and an average length of 2,400 feet; all with depths of 32 feet in soft material and 34 feet in rock to 2.200 feet south of the Mall Bridge; thence 27 feet deep and 400 feet wide to 900 feet south of Mall Bridge, thence 14 feet deep at lower low water and generally 400 feet wide to Federal lock at Troy; and thence of same depth and 200 feet wide to southern limit of State barge canal at Waterford; and removal of State dam at Troy and construction of a lock and dam about 2.5 miles below Waterford. Channel is to be formed by dredging and rock excavation, and maintained by dredging and constructing new, and raising and repairing old, longitudinal dikes, built partly under previous projects and partly by the State of NY. In the tidal section below the Federal dam at Troy, the assumed lowest low water plane downstream to Albany is 3 feet below mean sea level. Mean tidal range is about 5 feet below the dam and about 4.9 feet at Albany. The normal pool level above the dam from Troy to Waterford is 14.3 feet above mean sea level, with the mean range of pool level in seasons of moderate rains being 2.2 feet. (See Table 2-C for features of lock and dam included in existing project.) New work for completed project cost $39,050,019 exclusive of amounts of expended on previous projects. Widening to form harbors at Albany and Troy, N.Y., to 12 feet deep at a cost of $522,000 (1954) and completion of 27-foot channel at Albany at a cost of $642,000 (1957) was placed in deferred for restudy category, and has since been deauthorized. All three features of work are excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. Construction of mooring facilities has been authorized. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish suitable soil disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 6 2-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Operations and results during period. Operation and Maintenance funds in the amount of $99,014 was expended during FY 1997 fro Engineering and Design work associated with preparation of a contract for maintenance dredging of discontinuous reaches of the Hudson River between Albany and Hudson, New York. Government plant and hired labor were employed through the fiscal year performing project condition surveys at a total cost including supervision and administration of $318,650 for maintenance during FY 1997. Government plant and hired labor were employed through the fiscal year in the removal of snags and other obstructions which constituted a potential hazard to navigation at a total cost including supervision and administration of $186,603. Government plant and hired labor were employed through the fiscal year performing operation and maintenance of the Troy Lock and Dam and associated buildings and grounds. Operation of the Troy Lock was suspended for the 1996 navigation season on November 30, 1996 and resumed for the 1997 navigation season on May 1, 1997. Total funds expended for operation and maintenance of the Troy Lock and Dam and associated building and grounds including performing instrumentation monitoring, supervision and administration was $1,029,537 during FY 1997. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project began in July 1910 and was substantially completed in November 1965. New lock and dam at Troy, removal of dam at Troy and construction of 15,545 linear feet of dikes also are complete. In reconstruction of old dikes 39,676 linear feet were raised to adopted crest height. Channel from New York City to Albany is complete to a depth of 32 feet except for the 1,500 linear foot section at the northern end of the 32-foot project which has never been dredged to project depth. Channel from Albany to Waterford is complete to a depth of 14 feet. 7. HUDSON RIVER CHANNEL, NY & NJ Location. Hudson River empties into Upper Bay of New York Harbor at the Battery, New York City. Section included under this title extends from deep water in Upper New York Bay about 14.5 miles to just north of Harlem River (Spuyten Duyvil Creek). Previous project. For details see Annual reports for 1915, and 1938; pages 1765, and 213 respectively. Existing project. A channel 48 feet deep and 2,000 feet wide, suitably widened at bends from West 59th Street, Manhattan, to West 40th Street, thence 45 feet deep of same width of river extending from northline of 59th Street to south side of Little Basin, and thence a channel of same depth to deep water in Upper New York Bay off Ellis Island, substantially as shown on maps in H. Doc. 309, 72nd Cong., 1st sess., subject to provision that no dredging be done under project within 50 feet of pierhead lines; a channel 750 feet wide and 300 feet deep along Weehawken-Edgewater waterfront, removal of a shoal on New York side between West 59th and West 61st Streets to a depth of 40 feet; and removal of an obstruction north of mouth of Spuyten Duyvil Creek to a depth surrounding river bottom. Channel included in project is about 11 miles long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range at the Battery, 4.4 feet, and West 129th Street, 4.1 feet; mean range of spring tides, 5.3 and 4.9 feet respectively; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.8 feet below mean low water at the Battery up to 6.2 feet above mean high water and at West 129th Street from 3.6 feet below mean low water up to 5.3 feet above mean high water. (See Table 2-B fro Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during period.. A contract for the removal of all material in Section 1 and 2 except ledge rock lying above the plane of 40.0 feet below mean low water, plus 2 feet allowable overdepth in specified areas of the Hudson River Channel was awarded on 23 October 1996 for the removal of 234, 966 cubic yards of dredged material with disposal at the Mud Dump Site. Dredging was completed on 20 November 1996. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $910,256 was expended on this project during FY 1997. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project as commenced April 1913 and completed September 1952. Widening and deepening Weehawken-Edgewater Channel to project dimensions was completed in August 1937. Widening 40-foot channel for full width of river from Ellis Island to West 59th Street, Manhattan, was completed in March 1939. Widening 48-foot project to full project width of 2,000 feet from West 40th Street to West 59th Street was completed in November 1950. Deepening 45-foot channel for a width of 2,000 feet from Upper Bay to West 40th Street was completed to project dimensions in September 1952. 8. JAMAICA BAY, NY Location. Inside south shore of Long Island, the entrance being about 17 miles by water south and east of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12350). Previous projects. For details see page 1770 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 185 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Provides for an interior channel extending from vicinity of Marine Parkway Bridge along west and north shores of the bay, 18 feet deep at mean low water and 300 feet wide to Mill Basin, with a swinging basin, 1,000 feet wide and 1,000 feet long at the point - thence 12 feet deep and 200 feet wide to Fresh Creek Basin; and interior channel extending from the same locality along south shore to Head of Bay, 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide, a channel in Mott Basin, 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide extending from the channel along the south 2-6 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT shore, 3,000 feet to junction of the two branches, thence 2,200 feet in north branch (Inwood Creek) and 3,200 feet in south branch; and an entrance channel connecting the two interior channels with deep water in Atlantic Ocean, of suitable hydraulic dimensions to maintain present tidal prism in the bay, but not less than 18 feet deep and 500 feet wide from opposite Barren Island to Rockaway Point, thence enlarging to not less than 20 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide to the sea, protected by one riprap jetty. Length of section included in project is 19.7 miles. Mean tidal range, 4.9 feet at Barren Island, and 5.1 feet at Head of Bay; mean range of spring tides, 5.9 and 6.1 feet, respectively: irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 4 feet below mean low water to 4.9 feet above mean high water. Cost for new work for completed project is $4,466,421 (July 1961), excluding amounts expended on previous projects. Legal cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1945 provides that in lieu of conditions heretofore prescribed local interest furnish suitable areas for disposal of dredged materials for new work and subsequent maintenance, and hold the United States free from damages. City of New York was notified of conditions of local cooperation in letter dated January 25, 1946. In letter dated February 7, 1946, the Mayor of New York advised that disposal areas are available and necessary document "holding the United States free from claim for damages" would be executed. River and Harbor Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable areas for disposal of dredged material during construction and subsequent maintenance, hold the United States free from damages and perform all necessary alterations to existing terminals and bulkheads, and dredge adequate approaches thereto. These conditions have been fulfilled. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5. Operations and results during period. A contract for the removal and disposal of material lying above the plane of 20 feet below mean low water in Jamaica Bay, NY was awarded on 15 August 1996 as a continuing contract. Work began on 29 September 1996 and was completed on 13 November 1996. Approximately 225,837 c.y. of material was removed at a total project cost of $1,500,941 in Operations & Maintenance funds. Total operations & maintenance funds expended on this project in FY '97 was $989.20. Conditions as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced in August 1912 and completed in June 1961. Westerly interior channel from Barren Island to Fresh Creek Basin and swinging basin at Mill Basin were completed in April 1929. Southerly interior channel and channel in Mott Basin, including its two branches were completed in June 1961. No new work dredging of entrance channel, was done, since depths provided under previous project were greater than those required under existing project. East jetty was restored to project dimensions in August 1963. 9. JONES INLET, NY Location. A small inlet on south shore of Long Island connecting Hempstead Bay with Atlantic Ocean, 37 miles by water southeast of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12352). Existing Project. An entrance jetty and channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide, from that depth in the ocean through the inlet to Loop Causeway Bridge over Long Creek. Section included in project is about 2.1 miles long, mean tidal range from 4.2 feet at ocean entrance to 3.1 feet at Loop Causeway Bridge; mean range of spring tide varies from 5 to 3.7 feet, respectively; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 8.5 feet above mean high water.(See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation). Legal cooperation. Complied with except that local interests must furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for future maintenance as required, and must maintain a channel 12 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide from Loop Causeway Bridge over Long Creek to head of navigation in Freeport Creek at Mill Road. Terminal facilities. Within area tributary to Jones Inlet there are a number of privately owned small wharves and numerous boat repair and storage yards. The latter are equipped for repair of pleasure craft and fishing vessels. In addition, there are public wharves open to the public free of charge, with a total dockage of 2,180 feet. Additional terminals would have to be constructed for receipt of commercial freight in any sizable quantity. Operations and results during period. A contract for rehabilitation of the jetty was awarded as a continuing contract FY '96/97/98 to Ribar Contracting, Inc. Rehabilitation of the jetty is continuing as scheduled and is expected to be completed during FY 1998. To date, approximately 65% of rehabilitation is complete as of 30 September 1997. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $690,231.86 was expended during FY 1997 bringing the overall total thus far to $2,787,785.39. Conditions as of September 30. Construction of the existing project was commenced August 1953 and completed June 1959. Studies made in attempt to minimize required maintenance: JONES INLET - JETTY REHABILITATION. The purpose of this study is to develop a feasible and cost effective design for rehabilitation of the Jones Inlet Jetty to insure structural stability and maximize the sand trapping efficiency of the structure. Inlet hydrographic and existing jetty condition surveys have been performed. Preliminary design and cost estimates for alternative schemes have been developed and the superior scheme recommended. JONES INLET - MAINTENANCE MODIFICATIONS. The purpose of this study is to develop feasible and cost efficient alternatives which would minimize channel maintenance requirements. Existing tidal/inlet hydraulics, inlet/bay stability, jetty impoundment rates, etc. have been evaluated. Several methods of shoaling analysis were reviewed and the most applicable used. Preliminary design layouts and cost estimates for a deposition basin and 2-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 navigation channel have been developed and the superior scheme recommended. 10. KILL VAN KULL - NEWARK BAY CHANNEL, NJ & NY Location. The project includes Kill Van Kull connecting upper New York Bay with Newark Bay, and channels in lower Newark Bay serving Port Newark and Elizabeth Marine Terminal. These terminals are located on the west shore of Newark Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12333.) Existing project. Deepening the existing Kill Van Kull channel and channels in lower Newark Bay, including turning and maneuvering areas, as well as deepening the Elizabeth and Port Newark channels. The deepening to be done from the existing 35 foot depth incrementally to 40 feet and then 44 feet. The Federal cost of construction is estimated at $847,000,000 with an additional $793,234,000 to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, the local cooperating agency, has entered into a local cooperation agreement with the Government which was executed on 30 May 1986. A supplemental agreement was executed on 21 May 1987, for Phase I. A new project cooperating agreement will be entered into in 1998 for Phase II (40 feet to 45 feet). Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period, and condition as of Sept. 30. Stage 1, channel deepening to 40 feet in seven contracts was substantially completed. Contract No.1, awarded in June 1987, is completed. Contract No. 2 was awarded in July 1988 and is completed. Contract No. 3 was awarded in Sept. 1988 and is completed. Removal of rock and hard material in the Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay was divided in three contracts, 4A, 4B and 4C. Contract 4A was awarded in April 1991 and was completed in Sept. 1995. Contract No. 5 was awarded in May 1988 and is complete. Contract 4C was awarded in September 1994 and was completed in July 1995. Stage 2, channel deepening to 45 feet has commenced with start of work on a Limited Re-evaluation Report, which was approved Oct., 1997. 11. NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, NY &VT Location. This waterway. 37 miles long, comprises southern end of Lake Champlain and extends from Whitehall to Crown Point, N.Y. at southern extremity of lake, northerly to Benson Landing, VT. (See N.O.S. Chart 14784). Previous projects. For details, see Annual Reports for 1931, and 1963, pages 256 and 177, respectively. Existing project. A channel extending from Whitehall, N.Y. at head of Lake Champlain to Benson Landing, 12 feet deep at low lake level and generally 150 feet wide, and installation of fender booms at Putts Rock, Putts Leap, Narrows near Dresden, Pulpit Point and, Cedar Mountain. Reference plane of low take level is 93 feet above mean sea level. Section included in project is about 13.5 miles. Usual annual variation of lake level is 5.8 feet and extreme variation varies from 0.6 foot below up to 8.8 feet above low lake level. Widening channel throughout its entire length to project width of 200 feet is inactive and excluded from foregoing description of existing project and cost estimate. (See Table 2- B for Authorizing Legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during period. Government plant and hired labor were employed intermittently during the fiscal year 1997 in the removal of snags and obstructions that constituted a potential hazard to navigation at a cost of $16,701. Government plant and hired labor were employed in the repair replacement of deteriorated fender booms at a cost of $3,820 during the fiscal year. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $8,317 were expended in FY 1997 on project condition surveys. Condition as of September 30. Work under the existing project was commenced June 1919 and is about 77 percent complete. A channel 12 feet deep at low lake level and least width of 150 feet has been excavated throughout the length of the improvement, except at the Elbow, where the width is 110 feet. Fender booms have. been placed at the elbow. (Putts Leap and Putts Rock.) 12. NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK AND PASSAIC RIVERS, NJ Location. Newark Bay is an estuary about 1.25 miles wide and 6 miles long extending southerly from confluence of Hackensack and Passaic Rivers to New York and New Jersey Channels. Hackensack River rises near Haverstraw, Rockland County, NY and flows about 45 miles into Newark Bay. Passaic River rises in highlands of northeastern New Jersey and flows about 80miles into Newark Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12333 and 12337). Previous projects. For details, see 1926 Annual Report, pages 265 and 266; and Annual Reports for 1929, 1938, 1954, and 1976, pages 301, 244, 124, and 2-11 respectively. Existing project. A main channel 700 feet wide to the branch channel to Port Newark, thence 500 feet wide to a turning basin 1,300 feet long and 900 feet wide at the junction of the Hackensack and Passaic River channels, length about 4.7 miles; a maneuvering area south of the removed Central Railroad of New Jersey Bridge 2,200 feet long and 300 feet wide with depths of 38 feet in the south half and 35 feet in the north half; a combined bend cutoff and maneuvering area at the south side of the junction with Elizabeth branch channel; and widening bends at the Kill Van Kull and Port Newark Channels. (Authorized depth 35 feet except as noted above). 2-8 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT (adopted 1966); including a triangular area east of Shooters Island with a depth of 37 feet. At Port Newark - A branch channel 500 feet wide, leading to an inshore channel 400 feet wide 1.6 miles (adopted 1945). Authorized depth 37 feet in rock and 35 feet in soft material; a pierhead channel 200 feet wide along the east bulkhead between the Port Newark and Elizabeth branch channels, between 4,100 feet. Authorized depth 35 feet (adopted 1962). At Elizabeth Marine Terminal - A branch channel 500 feet wide, length about 1.4 miles; a pierhead channel along the east bulkhead 290 feet wide, length about 2,600 feet, a southern approach area just above former Central Railroad of New Jersey Bridge enlarged for turning and maneuvering, with a maximum length of about 2,700 feet and width (between the pierhead channel and Newark Bay channel) of about 800 feet. Authorized depth 35 feet (adopted 1962). Location cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1954 provides local interests, furnish lands, right-of-way, the suitable spoil-disposal areas for initial construction and future maintenance; provide depths commensurate with channel depth in approaches and berths at terminals of companies which would use improvement; and hold the United States free from damages. River and Harbor Act of 1962 provides that local interests must provide lands, easements and right-of-way for maintenance and construction, hold United States free from damages, provide and maintain adequate public terminal and transfer facilities, and accomplish without cost to the United States, removal or relocation of pipelines, cable and other utilities. Assurances were furnished by Port of New York Authority and accepted June 12, 1964. Local cooperation required by previous modifications is fully complied with. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1978, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. A continuing contract for the removal and disposal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 40 feet, with 2 feet allowable overdepth below mean low water, in specified areas of the Branch Channels of the Newark Bay Channel at Port Elizabeth, NJ. This includes Port Elizabeth Pierhead Channel, South Elizabeth Channel. The contract was awarded to ECDC Environmental, LC on 25 August 1997. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $387,355.68 was expended on this project during FY 1997. Condition as of September 30. Work under the active portion of the original project began June 1976 and is 100 percent complete. Work remaining to complete existing original project consists of deepening the Hackensack River channel to depths of 32 feet and 15 feet. 13. NEW YORK HARBOR-COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Applies to Lower and Upper Bays, New York Harbor; East River, Harlem River, Hudson River Channel, N.Y., New York and New Jersey Channels, Newark Bay, N.J. and their tributaries. Existing project. Provides for collection, removal and disposal of drift, derelict vessels, deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores of New York Harbor and tributary waters, and for the repair of certain other piers, wharves and shore structures. Work authorized before Act of 1974 was restricted solely to removal of drift from waterway and was funded as maintenance activity. The current estimate of first cost is $292,000,000 (October 1997 P.L.) including $68,000,000 cash contribution from local interests plus $89,000,000 to be contributed for repair and disposal of deteriorated shore structures in use. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation conditions of the plans currently under review by the Chief of Engineers provide that local interests must furnish all lands, easements and rightsof- way required for the improvement; hold the United States free from damages; enact and enforce local legislation to prevent creation of sources of drift, contribute in cash one third of the first cost of the Federal work, and make necessary repairs to deteriorated structures in use so as to eliminate them as a source of drift. These conditions are subject to approval by the Secretary of the Army and the President, as stipulated in Section 113 of the authorizing law, Public Law 91-611. Operations and results (New work-cumulative to date). A total of five Liberty State Park contracts have been completed at a cost of $10,321,211. East River-Manhattan Waterfront contract was completed at a cost of $1,477,806. A contract for the removal of pier 17 and 18 on the East River was completed at a cost of $219,604. The City of Elizabeth contract was completed at a cost of $791,656. The Stapleton, Staten Island contract was completed at a cost of $2,910,400. A contract for the city of Hoboken was completed at a cost of $2,123,404. Working along the Jersey City South waterfront was completed at the cost of $979,580. Contract Number One at Weehawken to Edgewater was completed at a cost of $1,697,487. The Brooklyn Reach One contract was completed at a cost of $5,057,920. Work is completed on the Weehawken to Edgewater contract No. 2 and Jersey City North Contract No. 2. The Bayonne One contract has been completed at a cost of $735,800. Hoboken Pier B was completed at a cost of $973,590, and Jersey City North I was completed at a cost of $2,358,000. Weehawken-Edgewater Contract 2A was completed at a cost of $4,485,000. Engineering and design is in progress for Brooklyn Reach 2B, the Shooters Island Reach, the Arthur Kill, NY & NJ Reaches, the Bayonne 2 Reach, and the Kill Van Kull Reach. The Brooklyn 2A Reach PCA is at ASA (cw) for approval and execution. The PCA for Passaic River Reach has been executed; awaiting rights of entry from the sponsor. Maintenance. U.S. Debris Boats Driftmaster, Gelberman and Hayward and auxiliary plant were assigned the task of removing and disposing of floating debris that is a hazard to navigation. 2-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Removal and disposal of 493,400 cubic feet ( 3,855 cords) of floating debris consisting mainly of driftwood, ranging in size from small blocks to large timbers, including pilings, pieces of wreckage, derelict vessels and sections of deteriorated pier structure was accomplished at a cost of $4,570,994 in FY '97. Conditions as of September 30. For work authorized by Water Resources Development Act, removal of drift sources has been completed in New Jersey at Liberty State Park, the City of Elizabeth, Hoboken, and parts of Jersey City, Weehawken and Edgewater. The New York City work has been completed along the Manhattan side of the East River, along part of the Brooklyn waterfront, and at Stapleton, Staten Island. 14. NEW YORK HARBOR-ENTRANCE CHANNELS AND ANCHORAGE AREAS Location. In Upper and Lower Bays, New York Harbor is 330 miles southwest by water of Boston Harbor. Mass., and 165 miles northeast of entrance to Delaware Bay, N.J. The Upper Bay extends about 5.5 miles southerly from junction of Hudson and East Rivers opposite the Battery, New York City to the Narrows. Lower Bay extends about 9 miles from the Narrows to the sea. (See National Ocean Survey charts 12334, 12335, and 12349.) Existing project. Ambrose Channel 45 feet deep and 2,000 feet wide. extending about 10.2 miles from sea to deep water in the Lower bay; Anchorage Channel, an extension of Ambrose Channel, with same depth and width, in the Upper bay opposite anchorage grounds, about 5.7 miles long; and southerly entrance channel. Sandy Hook Channel (East Section) 35 feet deep and generally 800 feet wide extending 3.4 miles from 35-foot ocean contour to Bayside Channel along an alignment generally west of the South Channel; and elimination from authorized project of that portion of Bayside-Gedney Channel east of junction with new southerly entrance channel; for Bayside Channel 35 feet deep and 800 feet wide, extending about 5.3 miles from Bayside Channel to deep water in Lower bay; a channel along New Jersey pierhead line connecting Kill Van Kull with deep water in anchorage Channel, south of Liberty Island anchorage. 20 feet deep for 500 feet wide with widening at bends to 800 feet and about 3 miles long; an anchorage in vicinity of Liberty (Bedloes) Island (about 160 acres in extent) 20 feet deep; and for removal of Craven Shoal to 30 feet deep; for a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 2.3 miles long, extending from bell buoy 23 to Hoffman and Swinburne Island; for an anchorage area in Red Hooks Flats to depths of 45,40 and 35 feet and an anchorage area in Gravesand Bay to 47 feet deep. Project depths refer to mean low water. Mean tidal range is 4.7 feet at Fort Hamilton; mean range of spring tides, 5.7 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.2 feet above mean high water. Location cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, Vol. 2. Operations and results during period. A contract for the removal and disposal of all material except ledge rock lying above the plane of 35.0 feet with 2 feet allowable overdepth below mean low water, in specified areas from New York Harbor, Sandy Hook Channel, New Jersey was awarded 23 June 1997 to Natco Limited Partnership with disposal of the dredged material at the Mud Dump Site in the Atlantic Ocean. Dredging wa completed on 15 August 1997. Operation and maintenance funds in the amount of $606,980.48 was expended for maintenance dredging of Sandy Hook Channel. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing projects began in 1885 and is 100 percent complete. Main Ship and Bayside-Gedney Channels were completed to 30 feet deep in February 1891. Deepening of Bayside-Gedney Channel to 35 feet for a width of 800 feet was completed in June 1939. Ambrose Channel was completed to 40 feet deep for a width of 2.000 feet in April 1914 and substantially completed to 45 feet for a width of 2,000 feet in 1951. Relocation of Anchorage Channel was completed to 40 feet deep in October 1932. Center 800 feet was dredged to 45 feet in June 1947 and westerly 600-foot strip in April 1948. Easterly 600-foot strip was substantially completed in June 1953. Channel between Staten Island and Hoffman and Swinburne Islands was completed in December 1920 up to within 300 feet of southerly limits of the project. Dredged channel meets all needs of navigation and no further work of improvement is contemplated for the present. Channel along New Jersey pierhead line from Kill Van Kull to Anchorage Channel was completed in March 1939. Widening at bends nearly southerly and northerly ends authorized in 1948 was completed to depths of 45, and 35 feet in October 1976. Anchorage Channel was relocated to the westward in 1982. Red Hook Flats Anchorage was accordingly increased in area. No dredging was required. Liberty (Bedloes) Island anchorage was completed to 20 feet in October 1944. Sandy Hook Channel (east section was completed to a depth of 35 feet in June 1963. Gravesend Bay was completed to a 47- foot depth in November 1977. 15. NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS Location. Extends from deep water northwest of Sandy Hook, through Lower New York Bay and Raritan Bay, to Perth Amboy, and thence through Arthur Kill, Lower Newark Bay, and Kill Van Kull to deep water in Upper New York Bay. This route is approximately along boundary line between States of New York and New Jersey. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12333, 12331, and 12327.) Previous projects. For details see 1963 Annual Report pages 184 and 185. Existing project. A channel through Lower New York Bay, Raritan Bay, Arthur Kill, Lower Newark Bay, and Kill Van Kull to Upper New York Bay and Raritan Bay and in Arthur Kill to a point 1,000 feet north of Smith Creek, widened 2-10 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT to 800 feet in vicinity of Seguine Point and Wards Point, respectively, thence 500 wide to a point 1,000 feet south of Piles Creek; thence 500 to 600 feet wide and passing, north of Shooters Island and protected by a dike o nits northern side to junction of channel into Newark Bay; thence 800 feet wide through Kill Van Kull to Constable Hook; thence 1,000 feet wide for a point near the intersection with the channel along New Jersey pierhead line: and thence 1,400 feet wide through Kill Van Kull to Upper New York Bay; with an anchorage 38 feet deep to accommodate five vessels south of Perth Amboy, all with suitable easing at bends and junctions. Section included in project is 30.8 miles long. In addition, construction of a dike north of Shooters Island and two secondary channels 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide, one south of Shooters Island and the other in Raritan Bay connecting with Raritan River, were completed under previous projects and maintained under existing project. A triangular area at the eastern end of the 30 foot channel south of Shooters Island was deepened to 35 feet in order to provide additional widening in the vicinity of Bergen Point and is included in the Newark Bay project. All depths refer to plane of mean low water. Mean range of tides varies between 4.7 and 5.1 feet; mean range of spring tides 5.7 to 6.3 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 3.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.9 feet above mean high water. Anchorage at Sandy Hook and cutoff at junction of Main Ship Channel are deferred for restudy and excluded from foregoing description and cost estimate. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for the middle section of Arthur Kill where local interest must furnish spoil disposal areas for maintenance. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 5, revised 1988, Vol. 2. Operation and results during period. A contract for the removal and disposal of all material except rock lying above the plane of 15.0 feet below mean low water plus 2 feet allowable overdepth in specified areas of New York & New Jersey Channels (Raritan Bay Reach to Wards Point Bend). Approximate river mile 0 to 12, with placement of the dredged material at the Mud Dump Site in the Atlantic Ocean was awarded on 31 July 1997 to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company removing 602,019 cubic yards of material. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $3,353,643 was expended on this project during FY 1997. Condition as of September 30. Work under active portion of existing project began in October 1933. Work completed consists of providing authorized project depth and widths throughout entire channel form Lower New York Bay to Upper New York Bay and providing depths of 37 and 25 feet in Perth Amboy Anchorage. In addition to above mentioned work, construction of dike north of Shooters Island, two secondary channels 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide, one south of Shooters Island, the other in Raritan Bay connecting with Raritan River were completed under previous projects. Work remaining under existing project consists of dredging cutoff junction of Main Ship Channel to dimensions authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 30, 1935, and May 17, 1950, dredging anchorage in vicinity of Sandy Hook. 16. RONDOUT HARBOR, NY Location. Comprises tidal mouth about 3.5 miles long, of Rondout Creek, whose source is about 18 miles west of Rondout. Creek empties into Hudson River from the west, about 89 miles north of the Battery, New York City, and 55 miles south of Albany. Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide, widening at bends, and 14 feet deep from deep water in Hudson River to highway bridge, 1.3 miles above mouth, thence 12 feet deep to 3.5 miles above mouth, two parallel dikes 350 feet apart to maintain channel, and a branch dike to extend upstream from outer end of north dike to protect that dike from running ice in the Hudson River. Mean tidal range, 3.7 feet; mean range of spring tides, 4.2 feet; extreme range, 8.2 feet; irregular fluctuations due to freshets vary from 2 feet below mean low water up to 2.5 feet above mean high water. New work for completed project cost $131,140. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation). Location cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1965 provides local interests, furnish lands, easements, and rights-ofway for construction and future maintenance of the Federal project as modified and for construction and maintenance of aids to navigation upon request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable spoil-disposal areas and necessary retaining works; hold the United States free from damages, and provide and maintain depths in berthing areas serving terminals commensurate with depths provided in related project areas. Assurance of local compliance were furnished by the town of Ulster on June 9, by the city of Kingston on June 17, and by the town of Esopus on June 20, 1996. Terminal facilities. Seventeen timber wharves with available dockage of 12, 132 feet along waterway. Four terminals are equipped with transfer facilities; all are privately owned. Terminals adequate for present needs of commerce. (For latest full description see Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports on Upper Hudson River, 1941, Corps of Engineers). Operations and results during period. A continuing contract was awarded on 8 August 1997 to Ribar Contracting, to install approximately 76,000 vertical linear feet of round treated timber piles 6,400 linear feet of treated wales, 16 tons of tie rods, and 10,500 tons of stone to form cribbing dike system to repair the breakwater at Rondout Harbor in the amount of $400,000.00. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $426,184.80 was expended on this project during FY 1997. Condition as of September 30. Work under existing project was commenced April 1873 and is about 87 percent complete. Part of diking originally proposed was not built because 2-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 it was deemed of doubtful usefulness. Two parallel dikes of an aggregate length of about 5,000 feet, generally 350 feet apart, with a now obsolete spur from the old lighthouse south of south dike, were built across the bar at mouth of creek. A branch dike about 1,000 feet long, extending northerly from outer end of north dike, was also constructed. Work remaining consists of removal of shoals in the 12 and 14 foot projects and rehabilitation of deteriorated sections of the parallel and branch dikes. 17. SHARK RIVER, NJ Location. A small stream entering the Atlantic Ocean 20 miles south of Sandy Hook on the New Jersey coast. Forty miles by water south of the Battery, New York City. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12326). Existing project. A 1.7 mile channel 18 feet deep at mean low water and 150 feet wide across the bar at entrance to inlet; thence 12 feet deep and generally 100 feet wide through main channel and south channel to route 35 bridge; thence 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide to upper limit of the Belmar municipal boat basin, with additional depths and widths where necessary and practical to produce satisfactory current velocities at bridges; and an anchorage 12 feet deep over 7.3 acres east of route 4-N bridge. Mean tidal range at mouth is 4 feet; mean range of spring tide is 4.8 feet; irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 2.6 feet below low water up to 8.4 feet above mean high water. New work for this project was completed in the amount of $150,000. (See Table 2-B for Authorizing Legislation). Local cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests are required to furnish suitable spoil-disposal area for maintenance. Terminal facilities. Two yacht basins are located on south shore of lower portion of Shark River. One is publicly owned and has a berthage of 2,600 feet. Several boatyards, boat houses, and landings for commercial and recreational craft are located in the lower portion of Shark River. Operations and results during period. A continuing contract for maintenance dredging of channel to remove all material except ledge rock lying above the planes of 8' and 12' below mean low water with 2 feet allowable overdepth in each specified area of Shark River, New Jersey was awarded on 30 September 1996 to TNT Dredging, Inc., removing 69,185 cubic yards of material which was disposed of at Avon By the Sea Beach. Operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $763,531.34 was expended during FY 1997. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work under the existing project was commenced June 1947 and was completed October 1947. 18. SHREWSBURY RIVER, NJ Location. Mainly a large tidal basin in eastern part of New Jersey, the outlet being at the southeast end of Sand Hook. (see National Ocean Survey Chart 12324). Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports of 1915, 1918, and 1938, pages 1778,373, and 267, respectively. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide, following the westerly shore, from deep water in Sandy Hook Bay 2.2 miles to a point 500 feet south of former location of railroad bridge at Highlands; then 9 feet deep and generally 150 feet wide, suitably widened at bends and turns, in south branch of river 6.8 miles to Branchport Avenue Bridge in city of Long Branch; and a channel in north branch (Navesink R.) 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide 6.1 miles from the junction to Red Bank. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide at Highlands. 3.8 feet; at Seabright, 1.7 feet; at Branchport, 1.7 feet; and at Red Bank, 3 feet. Mean range of spring tides is 4.7., 2.1, 2.2, and 3.6 feet respectively, irregular fluctuations due to wind and atmospheric pressure vary from 1.9 feet below mean low water up to 6.5 feet above mean high water. (See Table 2- B for Authorization Legislation). Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands, rights-of-way, and spoil-disposal areas for construction and future maintenance; hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain a suitable public wharf on each of the creeks to be improved, which shall be open to all on equal terms; remove Locust Avenue bridge over Claypit Creek; and make cash contributions of $25,000, $33,000 and $27,500 toward cost of improvement of Claypit, Oceanport, and Little Silver Creeks, respectively. Provided further that construction of any unit of proposed improvement may be undertaken independently of the other units when the required local cooperation has been provided. These conditions have not been fulfilled. Requirements under prior acts have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are numerous terminals along the waterway. Some of which are open to the public. In addition, many private pleasure boat landings have been constructed by owners of riverfront property. None of the terminals has direct rail connections. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during period. A contract for the removal of all material except ledge rock lying above the planes, of 6' below mean low water with 2' allowable overdepth in each specified area of Shrewsbury River-North branch, New Jersey was awarded 25 August 1997 to Disch Construction, with disposal of the dredged material at the upland site shown on contract drawing No. 396, sheet 5 of 5. This contract was previously awarded to S & A Contracting, Inc. and was scheduled for completion in June of FY 1996. The contract was terminated due to default on 29 August 1996. Dredging was completed on 16 December 1997, removing 37,470 cubic yards of material. Operations and maintenance 2-12 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT funds in the amount of $11,940.97 was the actual expense during FY 1997; however the contract cost was $808,665.00. Condition as of September 30. Work under the active portion of existing project began in October 1919. Work completed consisted of providing authorized project dimensions in 12- foot entrance channel, 9-foot channel in South Branch, and a 6- foot channel in North Branch of the river. Work remaining (dredging an inlet channel across the base of Sandy Hook protected by jetties and bulkheads, a bay channel extending to the existing Shrewsbury River Channel and a six-lane fixed highway, bridge to span the new inlet as authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1965) was subsequently reclassified to inactive because of state and local opposition. Formal close out of this work remains. Under the River and Harbor Act of 1950 work remaining consists of dredging turning basin and anchorage in vicinity of Red Bank and channels in Claypit, Oceanport, and Little Silver Creeks. 19. SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTION AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS) The District Engineer, New York District, was designated Supervisor of New York Harbor under the provisions of the River and Harbor Act of June 29, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 441-451), as amended July 12, 1952. Under this Act, the Supervisor of New York Harbor is charged with the mission of preventing the deposit of obstructive and injurious materials in New York Harbor and its adjacent and tributary waters, including Long Island Sound. The River and Harbor Act of August 18, 1894 (33 U.S.C. 452) makes it unlawful for any person or persons to engage in fishing or dredging for shellfish in any of the channels leading to and from New York Harbor, or to interfere in any way with the safe navigation of deep draft traffic; the River and Harbor Act of March 3. 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403, 407, 409) prohibits obstructions to navigable waters such as unauthorized structures, unauthorized fill, deposit of refuse, and willful or negligent abandonment of vessels. Other laws relating to the supervision of New York Harbor and its tributary waters are the Clean Water Act, the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1969, the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, the Federal Power Act of 1920, the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Deepwater Port Act of 1972, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, and the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act. Direct supervision of the waters under the jurisdiction of the New York District is accomplished by means of a patrol vessel whose scope of duty includes surveillance of the water front for unauthorized construction or fill, surveillance of tows enroute to dumping grounds in the Atlantic Ocean to ensure that material is not illegally deposited in the waters of New York Harbor, and investigation of wrecks and abandoned vessels. In addition to the patrol vessels, whose range of patrol is limited to New York Harbor, inspectors utilizing government vehicles equipped with two-way radios patrol shorefront facilities and property. The inspectors operate out of the New York District Office. Their duties include inspection of authorized construction, fill or excavation in waterways, including wetland areas, to ensure that work is performed in accordance with the Corps permit, as well as investigating unauthorized construction activities. The inspectors also patrol all waterways in their respective areas and inform the public of the Corps' role and jurisdiction as well as provide assistance in the preparation of permit application. (See Table 2-E at end of chapter.) 20. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 2-F at end of chapter.) 21. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 2-G at end of chapter.) 22. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 645, 86th Congress as amended (Pre-authorization). (See Table 2-N at end of chapter.) BEACH EROSION CONTROL 23. EAST ROCKA WAY INLET TO ROCKA WAY INLET & JAMAICA BAY, NY Location. Atlantic Coast of New York City, between East Rockaway and Rockaway Inlets, and the lands within and surrounding Jamaica Bay. The coastal area (about 10 miles long) is a peninsula in Queens County separating the ocean and the bay. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 12327, 12350, and 12326). Existing project. The projects consists of nourishing 100 foot wide beach at an elevation of 10 feet above mean low water from Beach 149th Street to 19th Street. Initial beach replenishment was completed in FY 1997. Periodic nourishment (5 contracts) previously took place between 1979 and 1988. Construction of a stone groin at Beach 149th St. was completed in September 1982. A Section 934 Report approved in February 1994, recommended continued nourishment over a nine year period. Federal participation includes first cost and periodic beach nourishment, the total estimated at $62,400,000 (Oct. 1996 P.L.) The Section 934 Report also recommended a reformulation study to evaluate alternative methods of providing drainage protection to the Rockaway area. Local cooperation. Local interests have agreed to provide lands and rights-of-way, including borrow areas; bear a portion of the total cost as a cash contribution; hold the United States free from damages; maintain, during economic life of a project, 2-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 continued public ownership and use of non-Federal publiclyowned shores upon which Federal participation in beach protection is based; maintain and operate all works after completion, control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers. The project cooperation agreement for additional renourishment over the nine year period was executed on 25 May 1995. Operations and results during period and condition as of September 30. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council of Environmental Quality on April 16, 1971. Initial beach restoration was completed in FY 1977. Contract for first increment of periodic nourishment was completed in August, 1982. Contract for construction of a stone groin at Beach 149th Street was completed in September, 1982. Periodic nourishment contracts Nos. 3, 4, and 5 were completed between 1978 and 1988. Contract No. 6 was completed by NATCO Limited Partners in November 1996. The contract included beachfill placement of approximately 3 million cubic yards of sand from Beach 19th to Beach 149th St. 24. FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, NY Location. That portion of Atlantic Coast of Long Island in Suffolk County extending from Fire Island Inlet easterly to Montauk Point, N.Y. about 83 miles long. This frontage comprises about 70 percent of total ocean frontage of Long Island. Fire Island Inlet is about 50 miles by water east of the Battery, New York. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 13209, 12354 and 12353.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in improvement to prevent beach erosion and hurricane damages by: widening beaches along developed areas between Kismet and Mecox Bay, to a minimum width 100 feet at elevation 14 feet above mean sea level; raising dunes to an elevation of 20 feet above mean sea level from Fire Island Inlet to Hither Hills State Park, at Montauk and opposite Lake Montauk Harbor; planting grass on dunes; constructing gated interior drainage structures at Mecox Bay, Sagaponack Lake, and Georgica Pond; constructing up to 50 groins, if needed; and Federal participation in cost of beach nourishment. Local Cooperation. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation is the local cooperating agency. The State agreed to provide necessary lands, rights of way and borrow areas, and furnish 30 percent of the project costs for the Interim Project along the Moriches Inlet to Shinnecock Inlet reach of the authorized project. The State has also agreed to be the local sponsor for interim projects immediately west of Shinnecock Inlet and along Fire Island. Project history. On July 30, 1963, the State reflecting the desires of Suffolk County, requested the inclusion of a minimum of 13 oroins in initial construction of Moriches- Shinnecock reach. Chief of Engineers concurred in inclusion of up to 13 groins. Assurances were executed by Superintendent of Public Works, State of New York, on August 14, and accepted by the District Engineer August 20, 1963. On February 5, 1964, the State requested consideration of a plan, as proposed by Suffolk County, for initial construction of 13 groins of which 11 would be in the Moriches-Shinnecock reach, and 2 in the Southampton-Beach Hampton reach vicinity of Georgica Pond, and that sandfill and dune construction be withheld for the present except for 1 mile on each side of Shinnecock Inlet. On February 27, 1964, the chief of Engineers accepted the proposals, in part, and supplemental assurances were executed by State of New York on April 20, 1964, and accepted by District Engineer April 27, 1964, as follows: the State of New York now elects to proceed with authorized combined beach erosion control and hurricane protection project for South Shore of Long Island; that Superintendent of Public Works hereby reaffirms his assurance of August 14, 1963, relative to complete project; that State of New York, as cooperating agency, will now agree that artificial fills will be added when and to extent found necessary by the Chief of Engineers, but not earlier than 3 years after completion of groins unless both the State of New York and the Chief of Engineers mutually agree to an earlier placement; that the superintendent agrees for State of New York to contribute the full amount of any increase in Federal costs resulting from the separate construction of the groins and subsequent fill; and that the State agree that construction of the two groins in the Georgica Pond area will depend on a favorable finding, following a study by the Chief of Engineers. Study was completed July 31, 1964, recommending construction, and approved by the Chief of Engineers on September 22, 1964. By letter dated November 5, 1964, the New York State Department of Public Works confirmed that title to all properties and interests in properties necessary for constructing the 11 groins was fully vested in Suffolk County. By letter dated December 7, 1964, the Department stated that the county had obtained easements or fee title for the parcels necessary for constructing the two groins. New York State Department of Public Works Furnished $884,600 and $830,330 required contributed funds October 30, 1964, and September 7, 1965, respectively, for construction of 11 groins in Moriches-Shinnecock reach and $439,900 on January 22, 1965, for construction of 2 groins in Georgica Pond area of the Southampton-Beach Hampton reach, The completed 2 groins and 11 groins were accepted by the New York State Department of Public Works for maintenance on May 11, 1966 and April 10, 1967 respectively. On March 22, 1965, the State recommended that planning priority be in the order: Southampton-Beach Hampton (Drainage structures first): Shinnecock Inlet-Southampton; Beach Hampton-Montauk Point; and Fire Island-Moriches Inlet. Planning on the drainage structures was initiated but was suspended, based on: meeting of October 28, 1965 with Georgica Pond Association and the Preservation Society of East End wherein concern was indicated regarding the effects of the proposed drainage structure on ecology, salinity, pond level and aesthetic values; meeting with the Congressional representatives, State legislators, Federal agencies and local officials held on 2-14 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT May 26, 1966: and resolution of the Suffolk County Board of Supervisors adopted June 13, 1966 requesting advancement of the planning of the Fire Island-Moriches Inlet reach (Fire Island National Seashore). On June 16, 1967, the New York State Department of Public Works requested the following works undertaken as immediate priority items: in Moriches- Shinnecock reach, beach and dune fill at 11 groin site, construction of four groins west of the completed 11 groins, beach and dune fill east of the 11 groins; in Southampton-Beach Hampton reach (at East Hampton), construction of two additional groins, and the outlet structure at Georgica Pond. On March 18, 1968 the Suffolk County Board of Supervisors adopted a resolution supporting construction of 4 groin in Reach 2 (Moriches-Shinnecock) and 2 groins in Reach 4 (Southampton-Beach Hampton). On April 22, 1968 the Board adopted a more inclusive resolution authorizing participation in beach erosion and hurricane protection for the Moriches- Shinnecock reach and in the Georgica Pond area of the Southampton-Beach Hampton reach. On December 24, 1968, the Commissioner of the New York State Conservation Department executed the second supplement to the assurances of local cooperation, which was accepted by the District Engineer on January 24, 1969. The reaffirmed previous assurances contained provisions for constructing four additional groins in an area extending 6,000 feet west from the most westerly groin in the existing eleven-groin field in the Moriches Inlet to Shinnecock Inlet Reach, and for placing beach and dune fill in this area to the full design cross section as defined in the authorized project report. A General Design Memo completed in 1980 recommended placement of sand fill in the existing 11 groin field and along 9,500 feet of shore to the west. Condition as of September 30. Engineering and design began November 1962 and the project construction commenced in January 1965. Two groins in Reach 4: Southampton-Beach Hampton, Section 3, were initiated in March, and completed in September 1965, at a total cost of $720,950 of which $382,109 were incurred against required contributed funds. Eleven groins in Reach 2: Moriches-Shinnecock, Section 2, were initiated in January 1965, and completed in October 1966 at a total cost of $2,854,565 of which $1,370.191 were incurred against required contributed funds. Initial beach fill placement for 750,000 cubic yards in Reach 2. Section 1A was completed on May 23, 1969. On August 4, 1969 work started on 4 groins and sandfill in Reach 2, Section 1A and was completed November 14, 1970. 3,083 tons of stone and 1,111,000 cubic yards of sand was placed. Total cost for all Section 1A was $3,663,455 including $1,791,428 in required contributed funds. Funds in the amount of $70,000 were allotted on April 14, 1977 for initiation of the Phase 1 study in Reach 1, Fire Island Inlet to Moriches Inlet. The Final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with Environmental Protection Agency on January 28, 1978. On March 7, 1978, the Department of the Interior, supported by the other environmental resource agencies referred the Environmental Impact Statement to Council on Environmental Quality as unacceptable. On June 6 1978 the Council agreed and recommended project reformulation. Public meetings were held in October 1979 to delineate the scope and level of effort needed to reformulate the the project. A final scoping session was held January 17, 1980 and agreement was reached between the Federal agencies although New York State had strong objections. A plan of study was completed in July 1980. However, because of New York State's inability to financially participate in construction at Westhampton Beach, reformulation was postponed. Two breaches (new inlets) occurred in the vulnerable Westhampton area during periods of storm tides, one in Jan. 1980, just east of the Moriches inlet, and the most recent in Dec. 1992, at the eastern end of Moriches Bay. Both breaches were filled in by contract, the last one completed in Sept. 1993, at a cost of 7 million. In April 1993, the State provided a letter of intent to participate in an intrim project for the Moriches Inlet to Shinnecock Inlet Reach. Based on this agreement in 1993 on a conceptual plan for the most critically eroded reach of the authorized project, the Westhampton Interim Project, the Reformulation Study was reinitiated. A construction contract for the Westhampton Interim Project was awarded in May 1996 to Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Company in the amount of 16 million. The contract was substantially completed in December 1997 and included beach placement of 4 million cubic yards of sand, dune creation, fencing and grass planting, groin modifications and construction of public dune walkovers. In January 1996, a Breach Contingency Plan was approved, which provides a mechanism for rapid response to breaches along the barrier island, within the authorized project. The Reformulation Study, which has been consistently funded since 1993, is currently underway. Data has been collected including beach profile surveys and aerial topography maps of the entire 83 mile long shoreline. Initial scoping for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement has been conducted. The study is scheduled to be completed in June 2002. Based on requests from local, state and congressional interests, evaluations are underway for separable interim measures along Fire Island and immediately west of Shinnecock Inlet 25. ROCKAWAY INLET TO NORTON POINT (CONEY ISLAND AREA), NY Location. Atlantic Coast of New York City, in Brooklyn (Kings County), approximately nine miles south of the Battery, N.Y. City. Existing project. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The authorized plan provides for beach erosion control by restoring the Coney Island public beach up to 250 feet beyond its historic shoreline; the extension of the westerly terminal groin; construction of a terminal groin at the easterly end of the restored beach, and a fillet of beachfill from the terminal groin at W. 37th St. extending approximately 2300 ft. into the community of Sea Gate. The autho- 2-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 rized plan also provides for restoration of the beach by periodic beach nourishment. Local cooperation. The local sponsor is the N.Y: State Dept. of Environmental Conservation. In accordance with the provisions of the Project Cooperation Agreement, the sponsor will; provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way including borrow areas necessary for construction of the project, hold and save the United States free from claims for damages which may result from the construction works and subsequent maintenance of the project; provide a cash contribution toward the total first cost; assure that water pollution that would affect the health of bathers will not be permitted; assure continued conditions of public ownership and use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based, during the economic life of the project; maintain public use facilities open and available to all on equal terms and maintain all improvements after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, including periodic nourishment during the economic life of the project as may be required to serve the intended purpose, subject to Federal participation in the cost of periodic nourishment for the economic project life. Operations and results during period, and condition as of September 30. Post-construction monitoring continued in FY 97. In June 1997, a study was initiated to evaluate the causes of the accelerated beach erosion downdrift of the W. 37th Street groin and to identify alternative for a solution. The study is scheduled to be completed in March 1998. 26. SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, NJ Location. The northern portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey extending from Sandy Hook southerly to Barnegat Inlet - length about 48 miles. Erosion has seriously reduced the width of most beaches in the study area with consequent exposure of the shore to storm damage. Because of this erosion of the shore the area does not provide sufficient recreational beaches for the proper accommodation of the present and prospective tributary population. SECTION I - SEA BRIGHT TO OCEAN TOWNSHIP, NJ Location. That portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey in Monmouth County extending from Sea Bright southerly to Ocean Township - length about 12 miles. Sea Bright is about 30 miles by water south of the Battery, New York City. Authorized project. The Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (PL 100-670 authorized a plan substantially in accordance with the plan recommended in the General Design Memorandum for the project dated May, 1988. In general the plan provides for beach erosion control along approximately 12 miles of coastline, extending from Sea Bright southward to to widen the beach berm to 100 feet at an elevation of 10 feet above mean low water with an additional 2 foot high berm cap to provide an extra increment of protection from overtopping. The project also provides for the notching of 15 groins, and periodic nourishment throughout the 50 year economic life of the project. Total estimated Federal cost for Section I is $617,005,000. Total estimated non-Federal cost for all requirements of local cooperation is $331,995,000. Local cooperation. Includes reconstruction of sea wall at Sea Bright and all lands easements, rights of way and drainage outfall extensions. Operations and results during period and condition as of September 30. The Local Cooperation Agreement for Section I was executed with the State of New Jersey on July 30, 1992. Work under Contract lA was completed in Nov. 1995. Approximately 4.4 million cubic yards of sand was placed under Contract 1A at an estimated cost of $21 million. Work under Contract lB was completed in October 1996. Approximately 3.8 million cubic yards of sand was placed under Contract lB at an estimated cost of $15.8 million. Construction on Contract 2 (Long Branch) began in May 1997 and is continuing. SECTION II- ASBURY PARK TO MANASQUAN, NJ Location. That portion of the Atlantic coast of New Jersey in Monmouth County extending from Asbury Park southerly to Manasquan - length about 9 miles. Recommended project. Provides for Federal participation in the restoration and protection of the shore from Asbury Park to Manasquan by artificial placement of sand to widen the beach to a minimum width of 100 feet at an elevation of 10 feet above mean low water. The project provides for Federal participation in periodic nourishment costs for a period of 50 years from the year that the total quantity to fill placed has equalled that required to restore the beach to project dimensions. Total estimated Federal cost is $409,435,000. Total estimated Non- Federal costs for all requirements of local cooperation is $220,465,000. Operations and results during period and condition as of September 30. The local cooperation agreement for Section II was executed with the State of New Jersey on August 20, 1996. The contract for the Southern Reach (Belmar to Manasquan) was awarded in March 1997. Construction began in June 1997 and is continuing. The award of the Northern Reach (Asbury Park to Avon-by-the-Sea) contract has been delayed due to real estate issues associated with the Ocean Grove fishing pier. Ocean Township, New Jersey, by artificial placement of sand 2-16 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 27. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 2-H at end of chapter). 28. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach Erosion Control activities pursuant to Section 103 Publ. Law 826, 84th congress as amended (See Table 2-0 at end of chapter). FLOOD CONTROL 29. NORTH ELLENVILLE, NY Location. In Ellenville, N.Y., on Beer Kill and Fantine Kill, at their confluence with Sandburg Creek, which discharges into Rondout Creek at Napanoch, N.Y., about 2 miles downstream from Ellenville. (See Geological Survey, Ellenville quadrangle). Existing project. Improvement includes construction of levees and floodwalls along Beer Kill and Fantine Kill-I capping retaining walls along Beer Kill; removing concrete dam, channel improvements and stream diversion on Fantine Kill; providing interior drainage including diversion ditches, drainage structures, ponding areas; alteration of 6 bridges: and relocating structures and utilities. The project was completed in 1975. Since that time severe storms in March 1980 and April 1987 caused erosion of the riprap bank protection and significant damage to the project floodwalls and levees, Subsequent repairs to damaged areas were undertaken in 1981-82 and in 1987-88 under PL-84- 99 authority. A Design Deficiency Report has been prepared and submitted to Office of Chief of Engineers. The recommended plan for design deficiency correction involves repair, reinforcement, and replacement of undermined floodwalls, placement of riprap protection along the Beer Kill Channel bottom and toes of banks; repair and replacement of riprap along the side slopes and toes of the levees, and possible removal of a rock outcrop to reduce erosive velocities. The current Federal cost estimate is $6,100,000 (Oct. 94-P.L.) Local cooperation. Assurances of Local Cooperation were received from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation in 1968 and 1970. An additional Local Cooperation Agreement was signed in November 1987 to cover the repairs accomplished through the PL-84-99 effort. In a letter dated 9 November 1990, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation indicated their willingness to participate and act as local sponsor under the terms of Section 414 of the 1990 Water Resources Development Act (the non Federal share of the cost to correct the deficiency will be the same as at the time the project was authorized and constructed). The Project Cooperation Agency (PCA) was executed in Jan. 1995. Operation and results during period, and condition as of Sept. 30. Construction was completed in September 1996 and the project was turned over to the New York Department of Environmental Conservation in February 1997. 30. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, NJ & NY Location. The Passaic Basin, comprising 787 square miles in northeastern New Jersey and 148 square miles in southern New York State, is located in the greater New York City Metropolitan area. The Passaic River Basin is roughly elliptical in shape 26 miles long and 56 miles wide - and contains portions or Bergen, Essex, Morris, Passaic, Hudson, Somerset, Sussex and Union Counties in New Jersey. The Basin also includes parts of Orange and Rockland Counties in New York. Previous projects. Three Federal flood control projects have been completed by the Corps of Engineers in the Passaic River Basin. A $67,400 desnagging, debris removal, and channel restoration project was completed in 1951 along Beaver Brook and the Pequannock Township Ditch, tributaries of the Pompton River in Pequannock Township, NJ. Along the Pompton River, a channel clearing project including shoal removal and channel restoration was implemented in the two-mile reach from the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Bridge to the Erie Railroad (Greenwood Lake Branch) Bridge. This work, in Pequannock Township, Wayne Township and Lincoln Park Borough, NJ, was completed in 1954 at a cost of $50,000. A $1.5 million basin-wide project to improve the Flood Warning and Preparedness System was completed in 1988. The project was implemented by the Corps of Engineers in conjunction with the National Weather Service and U.S. Geological Survey, the State of New Jersey is the non-Federal sponsor of the project. Project history. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers involvement in Passaic River planning was first authorized in the Flood Control Acts of 1936. Since then, reports recommending plans of action were issued in 1939, 1948, 1962, 1972, and 1973. None of these plans were implemented because they did not receive widespread public support. In 1976, Congress authorized a Phase I Advanced Engineering and Design Study in Section 101(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976. Congressional Guidance on the conduct of the study was provided in House Report 94-1702. Local protection plans were completed for tributary flood damage areas along the Ramapo and Mahwah Rivers at Mahwah, N.J., and Suffern, N.Y., Molly Ann's Brook at Haledon, Prospect Park and Paterson, N.J., the Ramapo River at Oakland, N.J., and the Lower Saddle River in Bergen County, N.J. These projects were authorized in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Construction began on the Molly Ann's Brook project in 1995. The Ramapo River at Oakland project received construction funds in Fiscal Year 1995 and was reauthorized in WRDA 1996. 2-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 In April 1984, the Passaic Basin experienced flooding estimated to be the worst in 40 years. In June 1984, the State of New Jersey selected a dual inlet diversion tunnel plan as the preferred Basin-wide alternative for detailed plan formulation. The Phase I General Design Memorandum and draft Environmental Impact Statement, (EIS), recommending the Pompton River/Passaic Dual Inlet Tunnel Diversion Plan, were completed during FY 1988. The final EIS was filed with EPA in December 1988. Section 101 (a) 18 of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) 1990 (PL 101-640), as modified by section 102 (p) of WRDA '92 (PL 102-580) authorizes construction of the Passaic River Flood Protection Project for the Passaic River Basin which will address both environmental and engineering objectives of the Act. The Passaic River Flood Protection Project combines diversion tunnels, levees, flood walls, channel modification. and natural flood storage to provide flood protection to about 35 towns in the Passaic River Basin. Preconstruction Engineering and Design for the Passaic River Flood Protection Project was initiated in FY 1989 and is continuing with preparation of a General Design Memorandum and Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement with accompanying project cost estimate, and update of buy-out plans. A draft report was completed in Sept. 1995. The final report was completed in July 1996 with the State's decision to implement the natural flood storage areas at this time. Engineering and design for the Joseph G. Minish Passaic River Waterfront Park and Historic Area project element, Consisting of environmental and streambank restoration measures in the city of Newark was completed in May 1996. Condition as of September 30. Construction is continuing on Molly Ann's Brook and the Ramapo River at Oakland. Construction of the Joseph G. Minish Passaic River and Waterfront Park is scheduled for Fall 1998. The purchases of the national flood storage areas is scheduled for Fall 1998. The Saddle River and Mahwah River projects are on hold pending local support. 31. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections of the following completed flood control works and beach erosion and hurricane protection projects were performed to determine the extent of compliance by local interests with operation and maintenance requirements. New England Adams, MA - Hoosic River Bennington, VT - Roaring Branch, Walloomsac River East Barre Dam, VT - Jail Branch Winooski River Inspection Date Sept. 97 Sept. 97 Sept. 97 Montpelier Dam, VT - Winooski River North Adams, MA - Hoosic River Richford, VT - Missiquoi River Waterbury Dam, VT - Little River Wrightsville Dam, VT - North Branch, Winooski River NY - NJ Areas * E. Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet Elizabeth , NJ - Elizabeth River * Fire Is. Inlet to Montauk Pt., NY Herkimer, NY - Bellinger Brook & Mohawk River Holland Patent, NY - Thompson Creek Hoosic Falls, NY - Hoosic River Kingston. NY - Esopus Creek North Ellenville, NY - Beer & Fantine Kills & Sandburg Creek Rahway, NJ - Rahway River * Raritan Bay & Sandy Hook Bay, NJ Old Bridge, Keansburg & Middletown, NJ - Rosendale, NY - Roundout Creek So. Amsterdam, NY - So. Chuctanunda Creek & Mohawk River So. Orange NJ - E. Branch, Rahway River Yonkers, NY - Saw Mill River Chappaqua, NY - Saw Mill River Ardsley, NY - Saw Mill River Sept. 97 Sept. 97 Sept. 97 Sept. 97 Sept. 97 Oct. 96 NI Oct. 96 Oct. 96 Oct. 96 Oct. 96 Oct. 96 Oct. 97 NI NI Oct. 96 Oct. 96 NI Sept. 97 Oct. 96 Oct. 96 * Beach Erosion & Hurricane Protection Projects NI - Not Inspected FY 1997 32. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 2-1 at end of chapter.) 33. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong. as amended (Pre-authorization) (See Table 2-P at end of chapter). Natural Disaster and Emergency Flood Control Activities. Pursuant to Public Law 84-99 and antecedent legislation provides for disaster preparedness, emergency operation, rehabilitation, advance measures, emergency water, and drought assistance. Under disaster preparedness, the New York District initiated revisions to emergency response plans to include lessons learned from previous disasters, attended meetings and seminars dealing with emergency response planning and purchased 2-18 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT supplies and equipment to maintain its' flood fight and response capability. Under emergency operations, the New York District conducted field investigations, provided technical assistance and sandbags to local and county government in response to flooding events. Under disaster preparedness, the New York District initiated revisions to emergency response plans to include lessons learned from previous disasters, attended meetings and seminars dealing with emergency response planning and purchased supplies and equipment to maintain its' flood fight and response capability. The Blizzard of January 1996, subsequent snowmelt and rainfall resulted in widespread flooding throughout New York State requiring a Presidential disaster declaration. The New York District was designated lead district for Corps assistance to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in Damage Assessment Report preparation under Public Law 93- 288. The District coordinated the efforts of 29 people from 8 Corps districts over a 2 1/2 month period in mission execution. In addition under Army Regulation 500-60, Emergency Employment of Army Resources, Disaster Relief, the New York District assisted in TWA Flight 800 recovery efforts off the coast of Long Island, New York. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 34. SURVEYS (See Table 2-J at end of chapter.) 35. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for the period of $165,571 for flood plain management services are set forth in Table 2-L at the end of chapter. 36. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS Projects having all, or inactive or uncompleted portions deauthorized by Congressional Action pursuant to Water Resources Development Acts (See-Table 2-M at end of chapter.) 2-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Projects Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY96 FY 97 September 30, 1997 1. Aquatic Plant Control 2 East River, N.Y 3. East Rockaway Inlet, N.Y. 4. Fire Island to Jones Inlet, N.Y. 5. Flushing Bay & Creek, N.Y. 6. Hudson River, N.Y. 7. Hudson River Channel, N.Y. 8. Jamaica Bay, N.Y. 9. Jones Inlet, N.Y. New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New work Approp. Cost Maint. Appro. Cost New work Approp. Cost Maint. Appro. Cost 58,000 79,583 195,000 159,874 220,000 14,822 68,000 72,300 131,523 86,771 85,000 84,381 2,184,806 1 2,176,007 2 32,723,662 32,723,662 1,745,000 8,290.968 1,740,661 8,255,184 83.969 3 533,334 2,360,000 463,000 2,377,520 479,000 - 7,810,00 -152,678 7,964,37 1,420,000 17,000 1,414,734 22,229 2,734,000 415,000 16,627,560 2,733,537 414,111 16,624,362 0 -290,000 5,304,194 22,900,128 4 1 -291,724 5,270,950 22,874,946 254,000 2,142,000 23,323.050 250,173 2,130,088 23,373,999 1,221,000 1,205,098 2,102,905 2.102,905 8,894,802 8,878,900 44,249,800 5,6 44,249,865 1,362,000 1,902,000 3,486,000 1,895,000 57,260,450 7.8 1,371,344 1,884,264 3,501,224 1,713,221 56,959,519 6,771,870 6,771,870 4,920,000 -170,000 -50,000 918,000 37,144,640 4,948,820 -164,236 -50,426 910,225 37,136,037 4,545,750 4,545,750 1,504,000 55,000 1,500,491 56,667 635,000 990,000 11,944,750 637,471 989,192 11,920,853 1,822,530 1,822,530 3,520,000 227,000 3,510,600 235,362 4,620,000 695,000 23,590,500 4,620,100 690,231 23,584,909 2-20 TABLE 2-A NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Projects Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY96 FY 97 September 30, 1997 10. Kill Van Kull-Newark Bay, N.J. & N.Y. 11. Narrows of Lake Champlain, N.Y. 12. Newark Bay, Hackensack & Passaic River, N.J. 13. New York Harbor- Collection and Removal of Drift 14. New York Harbor- Entrance Channels & Anchorage Areas 15. New York and New Jersey Channels 16. Rondout Harbor N.Y. 17. Shark River N.Y. New work Approp. Cost Maint. Appro. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 10,173,000 5,452,000 2,000,000 1,412,959 263,768,886 12,719,100 9,712,818 2,664,007 2.030,721 262,644,062 9 42,000 45.521 44,000 42.601 45,000 46.334 46,000 28.837 681,811 681,811 10 1,560,090 1.482,786 29,014,500 29,014,500 366,000 419,500 26,556,867 365,262 387,356 26,523,985 6,400,000 249,000 542,000 -105,000 45,541,000 2,817,399 2,038,476 1,860,052 741,285 41,951,544 4,470,000 4,450,000 4,978,000 4,623,000 98,951,250 11 4,395,988 4,512,698 4,986,697 4,570,944 99,159,936 45,009,710 45,009,710 12 4,855,000 6,525,000 6,475,000 9,545,000 95,339,170 4,704,733 6,676,873 6,471,462 9,515,720 95,250,572 41,000 37,432 42,000 45,521 44,000 42,601 50,000 49,746 140,000 134,401 73,052,435 73,052,435 3,453,000 1,514,090 3,353,643 1,453,949 440,000 426,184 65,000 70,773 150,000 150,000 15,863,000 15,780,720 3,725,205 3,711,157 150,000 150,000 4,207,185 4,203,910 2-21 TABLE 2-A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 2-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Projects Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY96 FY 97 September 30, 1997 18. Shrewsbury River, N.J. 19. Supervisor of New York Harbor 23 East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. 24. Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, NY 25. Rockaway Inlet to Norton Point (Coney Island), N.Y. 26. Sandy Hook to Bamegat Inlet, N.J. 29. North Ellenville. N. Y. 30. Passaic River, N.J. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work. Aprop. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 30,000 23,788 770,000 769,249 190,000 194,243 703,000 701,873 610,000 25,000 611,262 11,941 712,000 730,000 35,772,960 709,432 726,567 35,765,081 2,805,000 3,897,000 4,594,000 1,228,000 51,234,000 466,075 1,741,909 9,150,382 2,396,586 49,697,528 15 2,200,000 2,946,000 8,538,000 15,193,000 50,378,438 4,567,001 3.325,814 9,071,276 13,765,050 46,158,803 16 - - - - 113,970 - - - - 143,753 6,744,000 3,075,000 -700,000 300,000 18,001,765 902,836 6,220,317 1,206,038 607,193 16,465,293 17 29,100,000 1,016,000 12,958,000 35,929,573 96,305,573 12,455,999 11,600,136 17,700,877 27,166,129 83,018,544 18 600,000 148,433 17,000,000 9,167,374 1. Of which $12,500 is for North Atlantic Division Accounts. 2. Of which $12,127 is for North Atlantic Division Accounts. 3. Excludes $100,000 for new work expended from contributed funds and includes $82,600 for new work expended from public work fund. 4. Exludes $90,190 for new work expended from contributed funds. Additional NY State Funds were $200,000 in 1990, $581,000 in 1991, $611,574 in 1996 and $2,093,194 in 1997. 5. Includes $5,112,694 for new work for previous project. 6. Includes $238,350 for new work expended from public works funds and $311,461 emergency relief funds. Excludes $81,373 expended from contributed funds. 7. Excludes $454,273 expended between August 18, 1915 and June 30, 1935, for operation and care of lock and dam at Troy, N.Y., under permanent indefinite appropriation. Excludes $23,735 reimbursement for repairs to Troy Lock. -105,000 182.844 1,921,000 -172,000 3,240,000 1,894,610 24,228 3,166,663 --1,400,031 63,459,669 9,255,384 1,767,021 611,699 62,931,963 8. Includes $346,797 for maintenance for previous project. 9. Includes $65,317,927 from contributed funds. 10. Includes $115,000 for new work for previous projects. 11. Includes $2,491,206 expended to date for construction of a land-based overfire air pit incinerator ($1,493,393 in maintenance funds and $997,813 in 0 & M funds.) 12. Includes $116,530 applied to removing wrecks authorized by acts prior to adoption of existing projects. 13. Includes $220,874 for new work for previous projects. 14. Includes $286,600 for maintenance for previous projects. 15. Includes $22,768,611 from contributed funds. 16. Includes $8,700,000 contributed funds. 17. Includes $5,200,000 from contributed funds. 18. Includes $16,500,000 from contributed funds. 2-22 1,145,457 13 1,145,457 6,069,342 14 6,055,573 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized River and Harbor Act of 1959 Section 104 and Harbor Act of 1958 Section 302 River and Harbor act of 1965 March 2, 1915 July 27, 1916 Aug. 8, 1917 July 18, 1989 Sept. 22, 1922 E. Pub. Wks. Comm. Res., Dec. 15, 1970 & S. Pub. Wks. Comm. Dec. 17, 1970 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious Aquatic Plant growths Provided that all research and planning cost to be borne fully by the United States Modified project to include control of waterchestnut EAST RIVER, N.Y. (See Section 2 of Text) Removal of Coenties Reef to 35 feet,, conditioned upon local interests increasing depth to 40 feet. Channel across Diamond Reef 35 feet deep and 1.000 feet wide. Channel east of Blackwells Island to 20 feet; channel between South Brother and Berrian Islands, to 20 feet; channel between North and South Brother Islands to 26 feet. Channel 40 feet deep through East River and Hell Gate. Secure a depth of 40 feet in channel through East River and Hell Gate as soon as practicable. Depth limited to 35 feet in through channel betwen Wallabout Channel and Throgs Neck, Channel east of Blackwells Island, 30 feet to English P1. Eliminated channel between North and South Brother Islands except as authorized prior to existing project. Remove certain rocks and reefs and construct dike in pot cove, Hell Gate. Spur channel to Astoria waterfront 37 feet in rock, 35 feet in material, for a length of 0.95 mile for varying widths, and a turning basin. (South Brothr Island Channel). H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 188, 63rd Cong., 1st sess. Do. Do. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong. 1st sess. Specified in act Rivers & Harbor Committee Doc. 3, 67th Cong. 2nd sess. S. Doc. 91-60, 91st Cong. 2nd sss. July 3, 1930 August 26, 1937 May 17,1950 1958 River & Harbor Act 1962 River & Harbor Act March 1988 Oct. 23, 1962 EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, N.Y. (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide, and a jetty. FIRE ISLAND TO JONES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 4 of Text) construction of jetty. Channel 10 feet deep. Three dredging operations with sand serving as nourishment to the beaches westerly of the inlet Extension of existing jetty, a littoral reservoir, a navigation channel and dikes, sand deposit on westerly beaches 14 foot channel with sand placed along Gilgo Beach FLUSHING BAY & CREEK, N.Y. (See Section 5 of Text) 15 foot bay, creek and branch channels: 15-foot maneuvering area; 6-foot anchorage basin; revetment of dike extension; & abandonment of portion of creek channel & repair of dike. H. Doc 19, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 33, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 762, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 411, 84th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 115, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc 551, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. 2-23 TABLE 2-B Act Document REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 2-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act Work Authorized Document HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. (See Section 6 of Text) June 25, 1910 March 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 July 1, 1935 August 30, 1935 June 20, 1938 September 3, 1954 P.L. 89-72 March 4, 1913 March 4, 1915 August 8, 1917 March 3, 1925 January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 August 30, 1935 August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 Channel 12 feet deep from Hudson to Waterford, remove State lock and dam at Troy and construct a new lock and dam. Channel 27 feet deep from Hudson to Albany, NY Channel 27 feet below Hudson. Operation and care of lock and dam at Troy were included in project. Relocation of 12 foot channel between Troy and Waterford. Deepen channel between Albany and Waterford to 14 feet with no change in depths for harbors in front of Albany & Troy. Deepen channel between New York City and Albany to 32 feet and construct a turning basin and 2 anchorages. Mooring facilities Note: The 12 and 27 foot classification have been deauthorized. HUDSON RIVER CHANNEL, N.Y. (See Section 7 of Text) Channel 30 feet deep from Ellis Island to Newark St., 40 feet deep through shoal from Newark St. to Castle Point and channl 26 by 550 feet along Weehawken-Edgewater waterfront. Remove shoal east side of river between West 19th and West 32nd Sts.; remove rock near Battery to 40 feet; remove obstruction near Spuyten Duyvil Creek. Additional dredging through shoal from Newark St. to Castle Point. Remove shoal between West 32nd and West 61st Sts. to 40 feet and: widen 40 foot channel between the Battery and Canal St. to 2,000 feet. Channel 30 by 750 feet along Weehawken-Edgewater waterfront. Modification of conditions of local cooperation affecting channel along Weehawken-Edgewater waterfront. Channel 40 feet deep between pierhead lines from 20th St., Manhattan, to a point 1,300 feet below Newark St. Hoboken, thence 2,800 feet wide to deep water off Ellis Island. Channel 30 feet deep between 40 foot channel and channel along Jersey City waterfront. Widen 40 foot channel to full width of river from north line of 59th St. to south side of Little Basin, thence a channel of same depth to deep water off Ellis Island. Waiver all conditions of local cooperation affecting channel along Weehawken-Edgewater waterfront. Channel 45 and 48 feet deep and 2,000 feet wide H. Doc. 719, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 350, 68st Cong., 1 st sess. H. Doc. 210, 70th Cong., I st sess. S. Doc. 155, 72th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 572, 75th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 228, 83rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 719, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report 1914, pp. 234-235 H. Doc. 1697, 64th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 313, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 155, 70th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 309, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 49, 72 Cong., 2nd sess. Senate Committee print, 75th Cpng., 1st sess. 2-24 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT June 25, 1910 March 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 March 2, 1945 FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act. (PL99-98) August 8, 1917 March 2, 1907 February 27, 1911 July 25, 1912 January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 March 22, 1945 March 2, 1945 September 3, 1954 October 23, 1962 November 7, 1966 March 14, 1915 JAMAICA BAY, N.Y. (See Section 8 of Text) Construction of 1 jetty. Interior channel along west shore of bay, 18 and 12 feet deep; interior channel along south shore, 15 feet deep; entrance channel 20 and 18 feet deep; and 1 riprap jetty all in lieu of work heretofore authorized. Modified conditions of local cooperation. Channel 15 feet deep in Mott Basin including its 2 branches. JONES INLET, N.Y. (See Section 9 of Text) Construction of jetty and channel 12 feet deep and 250 feet wide. KILL VAN KULL-NEWARK BAY, N.J. & N.Y. (See Section 10 of Text) Deepening existing 35 foot channels in increments to 40 feet and then 44 feet. NARROWS OF, LAKE CHAMPLAIN, N.Y. AND VERMONT (See Section 11 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide. NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK & PASSAIC RIVER, N.J. (See Section 12 of Text) 16-foot channel in Passaic River Widening 16-foot channel in Passaic River 20-foot channel in Passaic River. 10-foot channel in Passaic River. 30-foot channel in Passaic River. 35 and 37 feet in main channel of Newark Bay and branch channel to an inshore channel at Port Newark terminal and remove portion of rock area at Bergen Point to same depths. Modification of local cooperation for 10-foot channel in Passaic River. 34-32 foot channel in Hackensack River including approach channel in Newark Bay from branch channel at Port Newark Terminal and a 25-foot turning basin. 35-foot channels at Port Elizabeth H. Doc. 1488, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 700, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 665,80th Cong. H. Doc 409, 77th Cong. Rivers & Harbor Committee H. Doc. 441, 59th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 441, 59th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 707, 62nd Cong., H. Doc- 284, 60th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 156, 71st Cong. 2nd sess. S. Doc. 250 79th Cong. 2nd sess. H. Doc. 430, 76th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 252, 82nd Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc. 289, 88th Cong. 2nd sess. Widening 35-foot channel in Newark Bay, provision of two maneuvering areas, widening entrance into Port Elizabeth and Port Newark branch channels, deepening and widening Newark Bay 32-foot channel and provision of a turning basin at junction of Hackensack and Passaic Rivers; and deepening 12-foot channel in Hackensack River to 15 fet. NEW YORK HARBOR COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT (See Section 13 of Text) Allotment from appropriations made for New York Harbor and its immediate tributaries may be used for collection and removal H. Doc.494, 89th Cong. 2nd sess. 2-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 July 3, 1930 December 31, 1970 March 7, 1974 July 5, 1884 March 3, 1899 June 25, 1910 August 8, 1917 August 8. 1917 August 8, 1917 August 30, 1935 August 30, 1935 August 26, 1937 of drift in these waterways. Carrying on this work as a separate and distinct project. Increase scope of project to include removal and disposal of derelict vessels, some deteriorated shore structures and debris along shores; and the repair of other shore structures; all subject to approval by Secretary of the Army and the President. Removal and disposal of derelict vessels, some deteriorated shore Structures and debris along shores and the repair of other shore Structures. NEW YORK HARBOR, ENTRANCE CHANNELS AND ANCHORAGE AREAS (See Section 14 of Text) Main-Ship-Bayside-Gedney to 30 feet deep for width of 1,000 feet (Dimensions fixed by Secretary of War, December 27, 1886 by authority of Act of August 5, 1886). Ambrose Channel (East Channel). Maintenance of entrance channel under I head. Anchorage Channel, extension of Ambrose Channel into Upper Bay. Removal of Craven Shoal Channel between Staten Island and Hoffman and Swinburne Islands Dredging south end of Red Hook Flats, Liberty Island Anchorage, and channel along New Jersey pierhead line. Deepen Bayside-Gedney Channel to 35 feet for a width of 800 feet. P.L. 91-611, 91 st Cong., H.R. 1987 P.L. 93-251, 93rd Cong. Annual Reports 1887 p. 62 and 1888, p. 63 H. Doc- 159, 55th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc- 518, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 557, 64th Cong., 1 st sess. H. Doc. 625, 64th Cong 1st sess. H. Doc. 183, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 133, 74th Cong. 1st sess. Deepen Ambrose and Anchorage Channels to 45 feet for a width of 2,000 feet. Senate Commerce Doc. 75th Cong, 1st sess. July 3, 1958 Dredging South Channel, Elimination of portion of Bayside-Gedney Channel October 27, 1965 March 31, 1982 September 6, 1933 August 30, 1965 May 28, 1935 May 17, 1950 October 27, 1965 June 10, 1872 S. Doc. 45, 84th Cong. 1st sess. Deepen and expand Red Hook Flats Anchorage. Deepen Gravesend S. Doc. 17, 89th Cong. Bay Anchorage 1st sess. Further expansion of Red Hook Flats Anchorage and the relocation of OCE Letter 31 Mar. 1982. Anchorage channel. NEW YORK AND JERSEY CHANNELS (See Section 15 of Text) Anchorage off Peth Amboy to 35 feet H. Doc. 1387, 62nd Cong., Doc. 17, 71st. Cong., 2nd sess. Channels 35 feet deep from lower bay to upper bay, except between H. Do. 133, 74th Cong. vicinity of Smith Creek and vicinity of Piles Creek to 30 feet with 1st sess. anchorage 38 feet deep at Sandy Hook and Perth Amboy. Channel 35 feet deep from vicinity of Smith Creek to vicinity of H. Doc. 233, 81st Cong. Piles Creek. 1st sess. Widen entrance to Kill Van Kull to 1,400 feet narrowing to a H. Doc. 108, 98th Cong. minimum width of 1,000 feet. 1st sess. RONDOUT HARBOR, N.Y. (See Section 16 of Text) Parallel dikes, branch dike, and entrance channel, 14 feet deep. S. Ex. Doc. 35, 42nd Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report 1872, p. 810 2-26 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 27, 1965 March 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1975 Aug. 30, 1935 May 17, 1950 1974 & 1986 Water Resources Development Acts 1960 River & Harbor Act 1974 Water Resources Development Act Extension of 14-foot channel and for 12-foot channel Extend 12-foot channel from mile 1.8 to 3.5 SHARK RIVER, N.J. (See Section 17 of Text) Channel 18 feet deep 150 feet wide across entrance bar, 12 feet deep 100 feet wide to Route 35 bridge, 8 feet deep 100 feet wide to upper limit of Belmar boat basin; and 12-foot anchorage. SHREWSBURY RIVER, N.J. (See Section 18 of Text) Channel 6 feet deep in North Branch. Channel 12 feet deep. Channel 9 feet deep. Turning basin and anchorage 6 feet at Red Bank. EAST ROCKA WAY INLET TO ROCKAWAY INLET AND JAMAICA BAY, N.Y. (See Section 23 of Text) Beach nourishment of 100 to 200 foot wide beach at elevation 10 feet MSL FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, N.Y (See Section 24 of Text) Raising dunes, widening beaches, interior drainage structures, groins beach replenishment, annual nourishment. Project modified to provide that non-Federal interst shall contribute 30 percent of first costs. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 17, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 288, 89th Cong, 1st sess.. (contains latest published map) H. Doc. 102, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 1296, 62nd Cong. 3rd sess. H. Doc. 157, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 31, 74th Cong., H. Doc. 285, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 425 86th Cong., 2nd sess. P.L. 93-251, 93rd Cong., H.R. 10203 1986 and 1992 Water Resources Development Acts 1986 Water Resources Development Act Section 501 ROCKAWAY INLET TO NORTON POINT (CONEY ISLAND) N.Y. (See Section 25 of Text) Provide beach fill to public beach to furnish storm damage protection to the area. Extension of terminal groins at W. 37 St. and Brighton Beach Fillet of beach fill at Sea Gate. July 3. 1958 1988 Water Resources Development Act 1962 Flood Control Act 1990 Water Resources Development Act 1976 and 1990 Water Resource Dev. Acts SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, N.J. (See Section 26 of Text) Restoration of beach to minimum width of 100 feet at height of 10 feet above mlw, and construction of 23 new groins and extension of 14 existing groins. NORTH ELLENVILLE, N.Y. (See Section 29 of Text) Levees and floodwalls, removing concrete dam, stream diversion, interior drainage structures. Subsequent damage repairs. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN, N.J. (See Section. 30 of Text) Advanced engineering and design study, involving reformulation of plans for flood control and water resource management. H. Doc..332, 85th Cong., 2nd sess., modified by Appr. Act for Energy & Water Dev.for FY '85 S. Doc. 113, 87th Cong., 2d sess. PL-84-99 H. Rpt. 94 -1702 2-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 HUDSON RIVER, N.Y. FEATURES OF LOCK AND DAM INCLUDED IN EXISTING PROJECT (Section 6 of Text) Location: Below Waterford Above Battery, New York City Locks: Clear Width Greatest length available for full width Lift at lowest stages Depth on miter sills: Upper (at normal pool level) Lower (at lowest low water) Character of foundation: Rock Kind of dam: Fixed Crest Type of construction: Concrete Complete: 1917 Cost $1,463,014 SUPERVISOR OF NEW YORK HARBOR (Section 19 of Text) STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES-FY 1997 1. Number of Patrols a. Shore b. Vessel c. Air (helicopter) 2. Number of Inspections a. Shore Facilities b. Vessels 3. Disposition of Cases a. Voluntary Restoration b. After-the-fact Permit Applications Accepted c. Permit not required or already under permit d. Submitted for litigation to OCE or US Attorney e. Other misc. f. Cases pending as of October 1, 1997 2-28 TABLE 2-C 2.2 miles 152.6 miles 44.4 feet 492.5 feet 17.3 feet 16.3 feet 13.0 feet TABLE 2-E 92 178 0 270 120 116 236 23 17 20 2 23 109 194 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT TABLE 2-F RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS FY 1997 NAME OF PROJECT DATE SURVEY CONDUCTED NEW JERSEY Newark Bay Hackensack & Passaic River .......................... Mar. 97, Apr. 97, May 97, Oct. 97 Raritan River .................................................................................... Feb. 97 - Dec. 97 Sandy Hook @ Leonardo .................................................................... M ar. 97 Sandy H ook B ay ........................................................................................................................................ M ar. 97 Shoal Harbor & Compton Creek.............................................................Oct. 96 Shrewsbury River ......... ..................................... ......... ................................................................. Oct. 96 NEW YORK B row ns C reek....................................................................................................................................................M ar. 97 B ronx R iver .............................................................................................................. Feb. 97 Coney Island Channel .................................................................... ................................. ............ A pr. 97 E ast C hester.................................................................. .... ........................................... .......................... Feb. 97 E ast R iver........................................................................................................................... . ... .......... Jan. 97 Flushing Bay & C reek ........................................................................................... O ct. 96 - A pr. 97 Glen Cove Creek ................... ....................................... Mar. 97 Great South Bay .......................................... .. ........................... Mar. 97 Hudson River Channel .................................................. .....................M ar. 97 - Apr. 97 H untington H arbor .............................................................................................................................. ....... M ar. 97 Jam aica Bay .............. .............................................................. ...................... Oct. 96 Jones Inlet ........................................................................................................ .............................. M ar. 97, A pr. 97 L ake M ontauk ..................................................................................................................... ...... .......... A pr. 97 Long Island Intracoastal W /W ......................................................................... Dec. 96 M am aroneck H arbor ........................................................................................................... ...................... O ct. 96 M ilton H arbor ................................................................................... ...... ......... .......... .......... A pr. 97 New York Harbor ...................................... Oct. 96, Dec. 96, Jan. 97, Feb. 97, Jun. 97 New York & New Jersey ................... ........................................................................ Apr. 96 - Dec. 96 Patchogue River .... ........ ......................................................................... .. ........................ Nov. 96 Peconic River ........................... .................. ................... Apr. 97 Shark R iver ....................................................... .................... A pr. 97 W estchester Creek.....................................................................................Feb. 97 Total cost of Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys in Fiscal Year 1997 was $1,687,221.00. 2-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sept 30, 1997 For Last Full Report See Annual Projects Report For Bay Ridge-Red Hook Channels, NY Bronx River, NY Browns Creek, NY Burlington Harbor, VT Channel between North & South Hero Islands, VT Cheesequake Creek, NJ Coney Island Channel, NY Coney Island Creek, NY East River, NY Echo Bay Harbor, NY Fire Island Inlet, NY Fire Island to Jones Inlet, NY Gordon's Landing, VT Gowanus Creek Channel, NY Great Chazy River, NY Great Kills Harbor, NY Great Lakes to Hudson River W/W, NY Greenport Harbor, NY Harlem River, NY Hempstead Harbor, NY Hudson River Channel, NY Huntington Harbor, NY Keyport Hatbor, NJ Lake Montauk, NY Larchmont Harbor, NY Little Neck Bay, NY Mamaroreck Harbor, NY Matawan Creek, NJ Mattituck Harbor, NY Milton Harbor, NY Moriches Inlet, N. Newark Bay, Hackensack & Passaic Rivers, NJ Newtown Creek, NY '6New Rochelle Harbor, NY New York & New Jersey Channels New York State Barge Canal, NY Northport Harbor, NY Peconic River, NY Peekskill Harbor, NY Plattsburgh Harbor, NY Port Chester Harbor, NY Port Henry Harbor, NY Port Jefferson Harbor, NY Raritan River, NJ Raritan River to Arthur Kill Cut-Off Channel, NJ 1992 1991 1995 1966 1909 1953 1973 1952 1991 1953 1973 1995 1982 1972 1980 1962 1976 1953 1969 1993 1994 1953 1990 1991 1970 1969 1990 1984 1990 1984 1990 1989 1986 1971 1993 1988 1956 1953 1951 1986 1990 1931 1977 1991 1991 Construction $5,523,297 1,149,946 33,976 706,414 31,000 40,000 111,371 69,489 32,723,662 64,584 594,355 17,446,412 34,750 346,831 18,000 137,301 33,562,640 74,681 3,616,119 3,687,949 6,771,870 91,081 40,475 791,680 76,065 1,741,210 513,764 21,000 177,925 151,373 7,725,843 29,014,500 1,168,354 73,214 73,052,435 78,644 25,000 19,400 198,415 433,470 69,406 221,128 1,551,470 810,500 Operation & Maintenance 41,200,035 3 3,802,517 12 1,072,040 9 303,555 1,288 210,675 423,148 6,203 13 5,935,215 21.571 2,908,786 20,993,738 115 394,004 292,919 ' 88,029 20 457 21,720 493,491 76,497 36,440,474 17 57,527 1,417,437 1,288,163 267,768 19 537 1,351,086 315,613 1,417,832 1,057,266 60,491 - 25,255,368 1,760,745 8 212,411 23 49,979,383 61,487 116,500 66,037 256,415 6 1,742,097 25 1,299 31 359,294 16,114,463 3,965,631 2-30 TABLE 2-G NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sept 30, 1997 Projects Rondout Harbor NY Rouses Point, Lake Champlain, N.Y. Sag Harbor, NY Sandy Hook Bay, NJ Sandy Hook Bay @ Leonardo, NJ St. Albans Harbor, Lake Champlain, VT Saugerties Harbor, NY Shark River, NJ Sheepshead Bay. NY Shoal Harbor & Compton Creek, NJ Staten Island.Rapid Transit Railway Bridge, Arthur Kill, NY Sumpawanus (Babylon Creek) Inlet, NY Wallabout Channel, NY Wappinger Creek, NY Washington Canal and South River, NJ Woodbridge Creek, NJ 1. Excludes $104,800 for new work expended from contributed funds. 2. Includes $1,836,400 for new work for previous projects. Excludes $285,600 expended from contributed funds. 3. Includes $496,250 for new work for previous projects and $122,051 from public works funds. 4. Excludes $1,822,530 for new work expended from contributed funds. 6. Includes $16,369 for maintenance for previous projects. 7. Includes $17,000 for new work for previous projects. 8. Includes $43,175 for new work for previous projects. 9. Includes cost of maintenance prior to July 1, 1886. Excludes $1,415,133 for rehabilitation. 10. Includes $169,700 for maintenance for previous projects. 12. Includes $69,036 for new work and $26,921 for maintenance for previous projects. Excludes $10,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 13. Includes $6,187,690 for new work and $37,664 for maintenance for previous projects. 14. Excludes $104,805 for new work expended from contributed funds. For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1989 1895 1964 1985 1991 1917 1988 1987 1948 1990 1973 1895 1953 1950 1953 1953 Construction 142,437 98,468 121,805 26 508,936 56,479 3,125 81,905 18 150,000 33,828 124,572 7 7,730,476 7,000 18,174 13,000 206,116 30 48,823 Operation & Maintenance 3,185,437 249 11,710 4,002,330 679,916 385 429,180 1,254,813 64,078 1,822.938 10 36,312 44,691 212,827 178,398 15. Includes $111,419 for maintenance for previous projects and $64,560 expended from public works funds. 16. 17. Includes $1,490,713 for maintenance for previous projects. Excludes $19,546 for new work expended from contributed funds and $31,454 to be contributed. 19. Excludes $1,741,210 for new work expended from contributed funds. 20. Included $4,456,400 for new work expended from emergency relief funds. 23. Excludes $15,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 25. Excludes $1,000 for new work expended from contributed funds. 26. Excludes $66,758 for rehabilitation. 28. Includes $15,000 for maintenance for previous projects. 30. Includes $84,934 for maintenance for previous projects. 31. Includes costs for new work $171,427 and maintenance $20,646 for previous projects. 2-31 TABLE 2-G REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sept 30, 1997 For Last Full Report See Annual Projects Report For Construction Atlantic.Coast of N.J., Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet 1 Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, N.J. Fire Island Inlet to Jones Inlet, N.Y. 2 1959 1981 1981 $11,061,256 262 18,044,667 217,900 1. Reactivated as a modified project in 1985 (Sec. 21) 2. Listed since 1982 as a navigation and beach nourishment project (Sec. 4) TABLE 2-I OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sept 30, 1997 Projects Adams, Hossic River Basin, Mass. 1 Ardsley, NY Byram River at Pemberwick, Conn. 1,3 East Barre Dam, Winooski River, Vt. 1 Elizabeth, NJ Herkimer, NY Hoosic Falls, Hoosic River Basin. NY I Lamoille River, Vt.: Hardwich Dams 5, 6 Liberty State Park Levee and Seawall, NJ Missisquoi River at Richford, Vt13 North Adams, Hoosic River Basin, Mass. Rahway. NJ Rahway. South Branch, NJ Rosendale, NY Sandburg, Creek. Spring Glen, NY Sawmill R. Elmsford & Greenburgh. NY South Amsterdam, Mohawk River. NY South Ellenville. NY South Orange, NJ Staten Island. NY Wappinger Creek at Pleasant Valley, NY '-3 Waterbury Reservoir Winooski River Basin, Vt. Winooski River. Vt. Wrightsville Dam, Winooski River Basin, Vt. Yonkers, NY 1. Completed. 2. Excludes costs of $913,360 under other contributed funds. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong. as amended. 4. Inactive. For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1964 1990 1959 1963 1985 1973 1956 1939 1990 1965 1968 1971 1979 1975 1976 1987 1967 1984 1981 1983 1959 1976 1940 1970 1984 Construction 6,282,307 2 5,447,281 363,515 2,898,334 54,374,070 1,249,530 9 1,064,626 17,888,670 238,169 15,572,988 7 973,142 8 15,863,723 3,684,966 109,702 62,917 1,564,976 289,702 6,857,484 644,998 142,075 1,438,845 5,897,427 1,549,929 113,754,475 10 Operation & Maintenance 8,200 5. Includes $213,507 emergency relief funds. 7. Excludes cost of $21,000 under other contributed funds. 8. 9. Excludes cost of $51,500 under other contributed funds. Uncompleted portion has been deauthorized. 10. Includes $622,817 contributed funds. 2-32 TABLE 2-H Operation & Maintenance NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT TABLE 2-J SURVEYS Study Class FY 97 Cost Navigation Studies $450,200 Flood Control Studies 304,224 Beach Erosion Studies 2,603,198 Special Studies 1 223,872 TOTAL 3,581,494 1. Includes watershed/ecosystems, special investigations, FERC licensing activities, Intra Army water resources, Nat'l Estuary studies, Marine Fisheries Service, Planning Ass't to States, Coord. studies of other agencies. TABLE 2-K PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Authorized Projects FY 97 Cost Navigation Arthur Kill Channel - Howland Hook Terminal, NY & NJ $1,130,276 Claremont Terminal Channel, NJ 5 Flood Control Green Brook Sub-Basin, NJ $3,090,080 Lower Saddle River, NJ 190,023 Passaic River Mainstem, NJ 611,699 Passaic River Mainstem 104,744 Preservation of Natural Flood Storage Areas, NJ Ramapo and Mahwah Rivers, NJ 1,841 Sawmill River at Elmsford, NY 7,585 TOTAL 5,136,254 TABLE 2-L COSTS FOR FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT SERVICES Study Class FY 97 Cost Flood Plain Technical Services $39,246 Flood Plain Management Unit 14,978 Cooper Lake Dam, NY 26,892 East Barre Dam 34,282 Honk Falls Dam 18,855 Quick Response 6,931 Rutland City Dam, VT 15,216 Reynolds Reservoir Protection Rutland County, VT 185 Winooski River Dams, VT 8,986 TOTAL 165,571 2-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 2-M DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual Projects Report For Bennington, VT (1936 & 41 Acts) Bronx River, N.Y. Brown's Creek, N.Y. Cheesequake Creek, N.J. 4 Coney Island Creek, N.Y. 4-6 East Chester Creek, N.Y. (1950 Act) East Rockaway (Debs) Inlet, N.Y. 4 East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay, N.Y. (Part 11) Eliza ,et, N.J. Glen Cove Harbor, N.Y. Hempstead Harbor, NY (68-Act) 14 Hudson River, NYC to Albany (12 Ft, 27 Ft)18 Huntington Harbor, N.Y. Irvington Harbor, N.Y. Lamoille River, VT Lemon Creek, NY Manhasset Bay. NY Matawan Creek, NJ (1881 Act) N. Shore of Long Island, Suffolk County, NY Newark Bay, Hackensack and Passaic River. N.J. 16 N.Y. & N.J. Channels 4 18 Orowoc Creek, NY. Otter Creek, VT Perth Amboy, N.J. Port Chester Harbor, N.Y. 2. 3 Port Jefferson Hbr. N.Y. (1890, 1930 & 68 Acts) Rahway River, N.J. 6. 7 Raritan River, N.J. 4. 6 Rome Mohawk River, N.Y. 6. 7 Rutland, Otter Creek, VT Sag Harbor, N.Y. (Channel) 1 Shooters Island, N.J. & N.Y. 9 Shrewsbury River, N.J. (1950 & 1965 Act) Swanton Harbor, VT 6 Ticonderoga River, N.Y. 1-6 Waterbury, VT (1941 Act) 7. 8 Waterford. N.Y. 6, 7 Waycake Creek, NJ Westchester Creek, N.Y. 4 1974 1981 1980 1953 1952 1992 1963 1976 1940 1966 1989 1982 1953 1947 1939 1937 1948 1984 1979 1982 1982 1949 1937 1966 1967 1977 1948 1981 1959 1963 1964 1992 1888 1895 1951 1939 1949 1981 Date And Authority Aug. 1982 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1982 Aug.1982 Jul 1992 Aug. 1977 1988 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1977 Jan 1990 Aug. 1987 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1977 Aug. 1977 1988 1988 1988 Jan 1990 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1982 1988 Jan 1990 Jan 1990 Aug. 1977 Jan. 1990 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1982 Aug. 1982 1988 Oct. 1992 Jul 1992 Jan 1990 Aug. 1977 Nov. 1983 Nov. 1981 Aug. 1982 1988 Aug. 1982 Federal Funds Expended 1,149,946 33,976 40,000 69,489 3,503,969 13 60 ,481 165,882 49,035 49,837 433.470 1,551.470 7,000 167,760 9,253 175,933 Construction 670,000 1,159,946 12 33,976 8 40,000 69,489 100,000 1,185,365 60,481 165,882 4-11 39,468 68,581 4.5 49,837 6,621 21.000 433.470 4 37.000 4 1.617.470 15 7,000 211.015 70,500 4 16,500 9,253 2,781 175,933 Operation and Maintenance 1,947,853 505,369 30,675 1,622 59,391 2,455 76,497 51,566 1,621 4.636 257.237 4.951 441.656 307 10.113.903 235 1,260 2,921,311 2-34 NEW YORK, NY DISTRICT 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. No Commerce reported. Completed. A portion of this project is classified "inactive." Uncomplete portion deauthorized. Excludes $19,546 for new work expended contributed funds. Inactive. Entire project deauthorized. Excludes $71,423 for rehabilitation. Removal for navigation. SECTION 107 FY 97 Cost $6,656 SECTION 103 Project FY 97 Cost PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Bouquet River, Elizabeth, NJ CONTINUE FEASIBILITY STUDY Shelter Island, NY CONSTRUCTION FUNDING Asharoken Village, Northport, NY Oakwood Beach, Staten Island, NY COORDINATING PLANS & SPECS Rikes Island, East River, NY SECTION 205 Project COORDINATE RECONNAISSANCE STUDY Poplar Brook, Monmouth Co., NJ FEASIBILITY STUDY Mill Brook, Highland, NJ PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Sauquoit Creek, Whitesboro, NY Elizabeth River, Hillside, NJ COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION Yonkers, Nepera Park, NY INITIATE FEASIBILITY STUDY Fulmer Creek, NY Steele Creek, NY Moyer Creek, NY 2-35 10. Deepening 8 foot project to 10 feet. 11. Includes $93,882 for Rehabilitation. 12. Includes $10,000 expended from contributed funds. 13. Includes $100,000 expended from contributed funds. 14. Deepening project to 13 feet. 15. Includes $66,000 expended from contributed funds. 16. 1912 authorization. 17. 1935 authorization. 18. 1910 construction dikes. TABLE 2-N TABLE 2-0 Project CONTINUE COORDINATING FEASIBILITY STUDY Belford Harbor, N.J. TABLE 2-P $25,487 $52,598 $98,931 $94,215 $19,126 FY 97 Cost $106,104 $69,952 $127,125 $61,793 $82,225 $48,346 $47,380 $46,577 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT * This district comprises a portion of southeastern New York, eastern Pennsylvania, western and southern New Jersey, northern and southern Delaware, and a small Part of northeaster Maryland embraced in the drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean from Manasquan River, NJ inclusive, to south boundary of Delaware. It also includes Chesapeake and Delaware Canal and approach channel thereto in Chesapeake Bay and Elk River, MD. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Barnegat Inlet, NJ....... ..................................... 3-2 2. Chesapeake and Delaware Canal St. Georges Bridge Replacement, DE............................3-2 3. Cold Spring Inlet, NJ ...................... ...................... .3-3 4. Delaware River between Philadelphia, PA and Trenton, NJ...............................3-3 5. Delaware River, PA, NJ, and DE Philadelphia to the Sea................................................. .3-3 6. Delaware River Vicinity of Camden, NJ.....................3-4 7. Indian River Inlet and Bay, DE.................................3-5 8. Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay DE, MD .............................. 3-5 9. Inland Waterway Rehoboth to Delaware Bay, DE.............. ................ ....... 3-6 10. M anasquan River, NJ..................... ......................... 3-7 11. Maurice River, NJ................... ....... 3-7 12. M urderkill River, DE................................................. .3-7 13. New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway...........................3-8 14. Salem River, NJ.............................. ............. .3-9 15. Schuylkill River, PA................................... ........... 3-9 16. Waterway from Indian River Inlet to Rehoboth Bay, DE...................... ....... ... 3-10 17. Wilmington Harbor, DE.. ..............................3-10 Beach Erosion Control Page 18. Cape May Inlet to Lower Twp., NJ....................... ...................... 3-11 19. Delaware Coast Protection, DE....................................3-12 20. Great Egg Harbor Inlet and Peck Beach, NJ ........................ ........ ... .... 3-12 Flood Control Local Protection Page 24. Flood Control Work Under Special A uthorization ............................................... .3-13 25. Francis E. Walter Dam,PA..........................................3-14 26. General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, PA ... ........... .... .... ... ................ .3-14 27. Glen Foerd, PA..........................................................3-15 28. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects.......... ......... .... ..................... .3-15 29. Inspection of Non-Federal Levees............................3-15 30. M olly Ann's Brook, NJ........................................... .3-15 31. National Emergency Preparedness......................... 3-16 32. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ...................... ................. .... 3-16 33. Prompton Lake, PA................. ............................... 3-16 34. Reconnaissance and Conditions Surveys.....................3-16 General Investigations Page 35. Collection and Study of Basic Data.............................3-16 36. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design....................3-17 37. Surveys................................ .................... 3-17 Tables Page TABLE 3-A Cost and Financial Statement.........................3-18 TABLE 3-B Authorizing Legislation............ ...... 3-24 TABLE 3-C Other Authorized NavigationProjects.............................. ....... 3-31 TABLE 3-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects...........................3-33 TABLE 3-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects.......................................... .3-33 TABLE 3-F Deauthorized Projects.................................3-34 21. Beltzville Lake, PA.................... .... 3-12 22. Blue M arsh Lake, PA...................... ....................... 3-13 23. Emergency Bank Protection.......................... 3-13 * All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 3-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 1. BARNEGAT INLET, NJ Location: On the east coast of New Jersey about 50 miles south of Sandy Hook, between Island Beach on the north and Long Beach on the south (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Chart Nos. 825 and 1216). This inlet is the main entrance to Barnegat Bay, largest of the bays on New Jersey coast which are separated from the ocean by narrow barrier beaches. Previous Project: None Existing project: The existing project, adopted as HD 73-19 in 1935 and modified as HD 74-85 in 1937 and HD 79-358 in 1946, provides for a channel eight feet deep through the inlet and ten feet deep through the outer bar, protected by two converging stone jetties and a channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics extending in a northwesterly direction from the gorge in the inlet to Oyster Creek channel and through the latter channel to deep water in the bay. The project was modified in 1946 to provide for the maintenance of a channel eight feet deep and 200 feet wide to connect Barnegat Light Harbor with the main inlet channel. The project length is about 4.5 miles. (For details see page 203, Annual Report 1964.) The Supplemental Appropriation Act of 1985 contained language stating that the existing project has not worked as projected and, in fact, has created a hazard to navigation. As a result, the following administratively approved modifications were constructed as design deficiency correction measures: a new south jetty 4,270 feet in length along an alignment generally parallel to the existing north jetty, extending from the the old groin located near the Barnegat Lighthouse to the tip of the existing south jetty; a navigation channel 300 feet wide to a depth of 10 feet below mean low water from the outer bar in the Atlantic Ocean to the north end of the existing sand dike in Barnegat Bay; remove the shoal located between the north jetty and the proposed navigation channel; jetty sport fishing facilities on the new jetty. All dredged material from initial construction was placed on the shores of Barnegat Light between the existing and new south jetties, and is being stabilized by vegetation and sand fence. Dredged material from maintenance operations are placed on the down draft beaches, the area between the existing and new south jetties, or in other locations as determined by a shoreline monitoring program. Estimated cost for new work (October 1990) Federal share is $31,200,000 and non-Federal is $14,230,000. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1997.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. A local cooperation agreement for the approved modification was executed on 19 May 1986 and a modification to the local cooperation agreement was executed on 20 March 1987. Terminal facilities: There are four docks or terminals in inner harbor at Barnegat Light which furnish adequate facilities for present commerce of locality. Operation during fiscal year: New work, hired labor: Work included supervision and administration and engineering and design. New Work, contract: Monitoring. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, surveys, supervision and administration, beach monitoring and tidal datum. Work also included dredging by the U.S. Government Dredge Currituck, accomplished from November 1, 1996 to December 10, 1996; February 6, 1997 to February 26, 1997; March 25, 1997 to April 26, 1997 and June 7, 1997 to July 20, 1997, removing a total of 350,000 cubic yards of material at a total of $1, 117,200. Maintenance, contract: Beach monitoring. 2. CHESAPEAKE AND DELAWARE CANAL, ST. GEORGES BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, DE Location: The new St. Georges Bridge will carry the new Delaware State Route 1 over the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal in New Castle County, Delaware and will be located approximately 2,200 feet west of the existing St. Georges Bridge. Previous project: None. Existing project: This project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990. It states that the project for navigation, Inland Waterway from the Delaware River to the Chesapeake Bay, Delaware and Maryland, authorized by the first section of the Act of August 30, 1935 (45 Stat. (030) and modified by the Act entailed an Act authorizing construction of a highway bridge across the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal at Saint Georges, Delaware, approved August 7, 1939 (53 Stat. 1240-1241) is modified to direct the Secretary to replace the highway bridge on United States Route 13 in the vicinity of St. Georges, Delaware, to meet current and projected traffic needs, at a Federal cost of $115,000,000. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1997.) Local cooperation: The state will carry out the bridge replacement and the Secretary will reimburse the State for cost incurred. Terminal facilities: None. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included supervision and administration on construction of St. Georges Bridge Replacement. Maintenance, contract: Reimbursement to the State of Delaware for construction of new bridge. 3-2 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT 3. COLD SPRING INLET, NJ Location: In Cape May County, southern New Jersey, about 3 miles east of Cape May City and about 16 miles northeast of Delaware breakwater. Inlet connects Cape May Harbor and New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway with the Atlantic Ocean and is about 1 mile long. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 234, 827 and 1219). Existing project: An entrance channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide, protected by two parallel jetties, and extending from the 25-foot depth curve in the Atlantic Ocean to a line 500 feet harborward of a line joining the inner ends of the jetties, thence 20 feet deep and 300 feet wide to deep water in Cape May Harbor. The total length of the section included in the project is about 2.25 miles. Extreme tidal range, due to ocean storms, is about 11 feet. Project was completed in 1942. (For details see page 238, Annual Report for 1962. See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1997.) Local cooperation: Complied with Act of 1907, except work of deepening and enlarging inner harbor which is 80 percent complete. Terminal facilities: See page 238 Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included supervision and administration. Dredging by the U.S. Government Side Casting Dredge Schweizer was accomplished from March 3, 1997 to March 19, 1997 removing a total of 59,500 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $129,200. Maintenance, contract: Work included installation of geotubes and bank stabilization. Maintenance dredging was accomplished by Barnegat Bay Dredging Company from March 3, 1997 to March 19, 1997 and from May 1, 1997 to May 31, 1997 removing a total of 46,500 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $203,000.00. 4. DELAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, PA AND TRENTON, NJ Location: Rises in southeastern New York, flows generally southerly 367 miles, forming boundary line between New York and New Jersey on the east and Pennsylvania and Delaware on the west, and empties into Delaware Bay. (See U.S. COAST and Geodetic Survey Charts 1218, 280, 294, 295, and 296.) Previous project: For details see page 1778 of annual report for 1915, page 311 of Annual Report for 1924, page 220 of Annual Report for 1934, and page 296, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: A channel from Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, 23.5 miles to upstream end of Newbold Island 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with suitable widening of bends, including relocation of channel at Delair Railroad bridge, and reconstruction of bridge, thence 5.5 miles to upper end of Trenton Marine Terminal, 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with a turning basin 800 feet wide and 1,700 feet long at the terminal; and maintenance of a channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide from upper end of 34-foot channel to Penn Central railroad Bridge at Trenton, dredged under a previous project. Project also provides for an auxiliary channel 20 feet deep and 200 feet wide east of Burlington Island, extending easterly from main channel to upper end of U.S. Pipe and Foundry Co.'s property at East Burlington, with a turning basin 450 feet wide at upper end; for initial excavation, only, of a cross channel 8 feet deep and 200 feet wide through artificial island opposite Delanco, NJ, and for construction of such bank protection works as may be necessary. Section included in project is about 30.5 miles long, excluding auxiliary channel east of Burlington Island, which is 1.4 miles long, and cross channel opposite Delanco. Lower end is about 55 miles above river mouth at Liston Point and about 105 miles above Harbor of Refuge at mouth of Delaware Bay. Freshets, which occur usually during February and March, attain a height of 9 to 20 feet above mean low water in the vicinity of Trenton. Navigation is occasionally suspended during a portion of winter months due to ice. Existing project is 90 percent complete. A 40-foot channel under the 1954 modification from Allegheny Avenue to upper end of Newbold Island was completed April 1964. Work remaining is dredging from upper end of Newbold Island to Trenton Marine Terminal and widening turning basin at terminal which is in deferred category. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1997.) Local cooperation: Modification authorized by 1954 River and Harbor Act provides local interests must provide suitable terminal facilities, furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance, and hold the United States free from damages. Local interest complied with requirements, except city of Trenton has not provided suitable terminal facilities. Terminal facilities: There are 21 piers, wharves, and docks from Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, PA to Trenton, NJ facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details see Port Series No. 8 (revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included environmental monitoring, surveys, general maintenance, disposal area management, supervision and administration and plans and specifications on dredging. Maintenance, contract: Work included environmental monitoring, clearing, grubbing, and dike construction, sluice installation, spillway piping and mitigation area construction. 5. DELAWARE RIVER, PA, NJ, AND DE, PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA Location: See U.S. COAST and Geodetic Survey Charts 1218, 394, 295, and 280. 3-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Previous project: For details see page 1779 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 299, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: Provides for a channel from deep water in Delaware Bay to a point in the bay, near Ship John Light, 40 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide; thence to Philadelphia Naval Base, 40 feet deep and 800 feet wide, with 1,200-foot width at Bulkhead Bar and 1,000-foot width at other bends; thence to Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia, PA, 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend and 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide through Philadelphia Harbor, along west side of channel; and for anchorages at Reedy Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus Hook, and Mantua Creek, each 40 feet deep and 2,300 feet wide with respective length of 8,000, 5,200, 12,650, and 11,500 feet; anchorage at Gloucester 30 feet deep and about 3,500 feet long. Project also provides for construction of dikes and training works for regulation and control of tidal flow; for maintenance of an area on north side of channel opposite Philadelphia Naval Base between Shipway 3 and Schuylkill River to 40 feet deep and width of 150 feet on Mifflin Range and 200 feet on West Horseshoe Range; and for maintenance of any areas dredged by local interests to 35 feet deep between channel and a line 100 feet channelward of pierhead line between Point House wharf and Philadelphia Naval Base, when in opinion of Chief of Engineers such areas are so located as to be of benefit to generate navigation. Section included in project is about 96.5 miles long. All depths refer to plane of mean low water. Under influence of heavy and long-continued winds extreme tidal range is about 14 feet. Normal maximum velocity of tidal currents in the dredged channel varies between 2 and 3.5 miles per hour. Storm tides may increase maximum to as much as 4.5 miles per hour. Estimated cost for new work is $71,630,000 (July 1972) exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Channel to 37 deep and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend and 37 feet deep and 60 feet wide through Philadelphia Harbor along east side of channel and Port Richmond anchorage to 37 feet deep, except for that portion of channel which forms a part of 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide channel portion is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1960) of this portion of project is $2,951,000. Existing project, excluding work deferred for restudy, is about 66 percent complete. The 40-foot channel from Naval Base to the sea was completed in 1942. Dredging Naval Base to Allegheny Avenue to 40 feet deep was completed in 1962. Enlarging anchorage at Marcus Hook was completed in 1967. Work remaining is to construct new anchorages at Reedy Point and Deepwater Point, and enlarge Mantua Creek anchorage, channel dredging from 35 to 37 feet deep over a width of 500 feet through Horseshoe Bend and about 600 feet through Philadelphia Harbor, and deepening Port Richmond Anchorage to 37 feet, all of which have been deferred for restudy. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1997.) Local cooperation: Requirements under 1938 River and Harbor Act for maintaining channel and anchorage in Philadelphia Harbor annually by cities of Philadelphia and Camden were removed (see 1962 Annual Report for details.) Terminal facilities: There are 217 piers, wharves, and docks between Allegheny Avenue, Philadelphia and the sea, 135 on the waterfront of Philadelphia, Camden, and Gloucester, and 82 below Philadelphia. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series Nos. 7, revised 1967, and 8, revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included surveys on dredging, supervision and administration, environmental monitoring, Geographical Information System, property management, analysis of disposal area, plans and specifications, and engineering and design. Other work included general maintenance of National Park Guard Water study and of disposal areas (Penn's Grove, Pedricktown, Fort Mifflin, Oldmans, Penn's Neck and Killcohook) which included pipelines, construction of dikes and sluices, drainage, and ditching. Work also included dredging by the U.S. Government Dredge McFarland, accomplished from June 2, 1997 to September 11, 1997 removing 686,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $4,187,000.00. Maintenance, contract: Work included lease of equipment, tide gages, environmental monitoring, general maintenance of Pea Patch Island, surveys, monitoring disposal area, Environmental Review Guide for Operations assessment, turtle monitoring and maintenance dredging. Maintenance dredging was accomplished by Weeks Marine Incorporated from August 24, 1997 to December 4, 1997 removing 3,739,296 cubic yards of material at a cost of $3,548,849. 6. DELAWARE RIVER VICINITY OF CAMDEN, NJ Location: Camden, NJ, on east bank of Delaware River, is directly opposite the city of Philadelphia, PA. It is about 51 miles above mouth of the river and about 101 miles above Harbor of Refuge at the mouth of Delaware Bay. ( See U.S. Coast Guard and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 295 and 280.) Previous project: Adopted by River and Harbor Act of June 25, 1910. No work was done on this project, for further details, see page 321, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project: The existing project which is a modification to the Delaware River from Philadelphia to the Sea project was adopted as House Document No. 63-1120 in 1919 and modified by House Document No. 70-111 in 1930 and House Document No. 77-353 in 1945. Dredging to project depth of 37 feet in front of the Camden Marine Terminal was completed in March 1988. It also provides for dredging in of Camden to Newton Creek, with the depth increased to 40 feet in front of the Beckett Street Marine Terminal. These depths extend from the ship channel in Delaware River to a line parallel with and 50 feet distant from the established pierhead line. The project length is about four miles. Projects depths are well maintained in 40 foot depth section of channel. 3-4 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1997.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal facilities: See page 228, Annual Report 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included channel exams and maintenance dredging. Maintenance dredging was accomplished by the U.S. Government Dredge McFarland September 18, 1997 to September 30, 1997 removing 139,000 cubic yards of material at a cost of $848,000.00. 7. INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DE Location: Indian River rises in Sussex County, DE, and flows easterly 13 miles into Indian River Bay which is a shallow lagoon 6 miles long and 2 miles wide on the Delaware Coast about midway between Cape Henlopen and the Maryland State line. The inlet is an opening through the barrier beach separating Indian River Bay and the Atlantic Ocean (See U.S. COAST and Geodetic Survey Chart No.1219.) Previous project: Adopted by River and Harbor Act of August 2, 1882. For further details see page 744, Annual Report for 1888. Existing project: This provides for the fixation of the inlet by the construction of two parallel jetties of steel-sheet pile and stone design extending to approximately the 14-foot depth curve in the ocean, and for dredging an entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide, for a distance of 7,000 feet inshore from the jetties; thence a channel 9 feet deep, 100 feet wide in the bay, and 80 feet wide in the river, to and including a turning basin 9 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at Old Landing; thence a channel 4 feet deep and 60 feet wide to the highway bridge at Millsboro. The project also provides that the interior channel dimensions may, at the discretion of the Chief of Engineers, be modified as found desirable to increase the hydraulic efficiency of the channel, without increasing the cost. The total length of the section included in the project is about 13.75 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range at the highway bridge is about 6 feet. Existing project was completed in 1951. For details see Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1997.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with except that local interest are required to furnish suitable areas for disposal of dredged material during maintenance as and when needed, and provide terminal facilities. Terminal facilities: There is a privately owned basin with berthing facilities for small boats located .75 miles west of the highway bridge near the inlet and .25 miles north of the inlet channel, connected therewith by a channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide; a U.S. Coast Guard wharf on the north side of the inlet channel in the same locality; and two wharves at Oak Orchard in Indian River Bay. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included plans and specifications on dredging, supervision and administration and engineering and design. 8. INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE, AND MD Location: The Waterway begins at Reedy Point on Delaware River, about 41 miles below Philadelphia, PA, and passes through the sea level Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, a distance of 14 miles, to Back Creek, at Chesapeake City, MD. It then passes for 5 miles down Back Creek, thence 9 miles down Elk River to Chesapeake Bay and thence 18 miles down Chesapeake Bay to a point near Pooles Island. A branch channel connects Delaware River at Delaware City, DE, with main channel at a point about 1.5 miles west of Reedy Point. (See U.S. COAST and Geodetic Survey Charts 294, 1226, 570, and 572.) Previous project: For details see Annual Report for 1934, page 242, and Annual Report for 1938, page 312. Existing project: A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to water of natural 35-foot depth in Chesapeake Bay including a cutoff at Penn Central Railroad crossing, and having a maximum radius of curvature of 7,000 feet at bends; a high-level, fixed railroad bridge with vertical clearance of 135 feet and horizontal clearance of 600 feet at the railroad crossing over the cutoff (economic study of railroad crossing requested by Office of Management and Budget resulted in construction of a single track vertical lift bridge in lieu of a high-level fixed railroad bridge); high-level fixed highway bridges over canal at Reedy Point, St. Georges, Summit, and Chesapeake City; a bascule drawbridge across Delaware City Branch Channel; extension of entrance jetties at Reedy Point; and anchorage in Elk River, 35 feet deep and 1,200 feet wide, with an average length of 3,700 feet; enlargement of anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to afford an area about 400 feet wide, 1000 feet long, and 12 feet deep; dredging Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, and deepening existing basin to same depth; revetment of banks of canal as required between Delaware and Elk Rivers, and on banks of Delaware City Branch Channel east of Fifth Street Bridge; and construction of bulkheads. Total of section included in project, excluding Delaware City Branch Channel, which is about 2 miles long, is about 46 miles. All depths refer to plane of low water in Delaware River. Extreme tidal range is from 6.3 feet above mean high water to 3 feet below mean low water. Existing project is about 89 percent completed. Channel 27 feet deep and 250 to 400 feet wide. Delaware River to Pooles Island, completed in 1938. High-level fixed highway bridges were completed at St. Georges 3-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 (4-lane) in 1942; at Chesapeake City (2-lane) in 1949; and at Summit (4-lane) in 1960. Relocation of Penn Central Railroad bridge was completed December 21, 1965. Enlargement to 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide St. Georges and Summit bridges and Summit and Goose Island was completed on June 20, 1972 and February 18, 1972, respectively. Removing the old Penn Central railroad bridge was completed on January 21, 1972. Channel work for Part II is about 87 percent complete. Work remaining consists of completing channel enlargement to 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide between Reedy Point Bridge and St. Georges Bridge; widening and deepening the channel between Delaware River and Reedy Point Bridge, the completion of recreation facilities, and miscellaneous completion items. Deepening of the Delaware City Branch Channel from 6 to 8 feet from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with the canal has been deferred for study. Original cost of canal including purchase was $10,709,755; estimated cost of new work for modifications of 1935 and 1954 is federal cost $166,000,000 (October 1992). This portion is deauthorized. Major Rehabilitation of St. Georges and Summit Bridges was completed in fiscal year 1991 at an approximate federal cost of $20,868,000 (90 price level). Portion of project comprising completion of Delaware City Branch Channel from a point 400 feet east of Fifth Street Bridge to its junction with canal is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing estimate. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1997.) Local cooperation: River and Harbor Act of 1954 provided that local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way required for bridges. Assurances accepted and approved February 16, 1955. Requirements for Summit and Reedy Point Bridges have been met. Terminal facilities: Ample mooring facilities at eastern and western ends of canal and bulkheads at Delaware City and St. Georges were constructed by the United States. A small-boat harbor was provided and a wharf constructed at Chesapeake City. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance of traffic control television, dispatch service, operation of traffic, administration building, bridges, roadways, grounds, museum, auxiliary works, and periodic bridge inspection. Also included in work was maintenance night lighting, lease of equipment, surveys, environmental monitoring, electrical maintenance, property management, plans and specifications, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. There was also work on the Disposal Material Management Plan, Geographical Information System, Environmental Review Guide for Operations assessment, mosquito control, monitoring data, replacing sheetpile bulkhead, monitoring stabilization banks, miscellaneous repairs, redesigning project porches, and St. Georges Bridge closure. Maintenance, contract: Work included general maintenance, repairs of equipment, Geographical Information System mapping, aerial photos, monitoring data, Delaware Fish and Wildlife Administration, installation of signs for St. Georges Bridge closing and a new radio system, painting the bridge, replacing office roof, environmental monitoring, bridge inspection, supervision and administration, and lease of equipment. There was also maintenance dredging by Weeks Marine Incorporated from November 21, 1996 to February 11, 1997 removing a total of 1,803,132 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $5,229,083. 9. INLAND WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DE Location: A tidal canal in southeasterly part of Sussex County, DE It extends 12 miles northward from Rehoboth Bay through high land west of town of Rehoboth to Gordon Lake; thence down Lewes River to its junction with Broadkill River near its mouth. An entrance to the waterway from Delaware Bay is about 4 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 379, 1218, and 1219.) Previous project: A canal along a slightly different route formed a part of projected waterway from Chincoteague Bay, Va. to Delaware Bay, begun in 1886 and abandoned in 1905. Existing project: This provides for an entrance channel near Lewes 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide protected by two parallel jetties 500 feet apart; thence a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide to South Street Bridge at Lewes, and a basin of the same depth 1,200 feet long and up to 375 feet in width at the latter point; thence a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide (40 feet wide through Deep Cut near Rehoboth Bay) to Rehoboth Bay; a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the entrance to Broadkill River; two parallel rubble jetties 725 feet long at the Rehoboth Bay entrance; and the construction of the one highway bridge and one railroad Bridge to Rehoboth. The total length of the section included in the project is about 12 miles. The extension of the jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance is considered to be inactive and is excluded from the foregoing cost. The cost of the portion was last revised in 1960 and was estimated to be $816,000. Existing project is about 70 percent complete. For details on completed work see page 241 of Annual Report for 1963. Work remaining, extension of existing jetties at Delaware Bay entrance, is considered inactive. The Sheet Pile Jetty at the Delaware Bay entrance was removed during FY 1987. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1997.) Local cooperation: Complied with except local interest must furnish suitable terminal facilities and necessary spoil-disposal areas. 3-6 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT Terminal facilities: See page 228, Annual Report 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included property management. 10. MANASQUAN RIVER, NJ Location: This small stream flows in eastern part of New Jersey, rises near Freehold, flows easterly and empties into the Atlantic Ocean, about 26 miles south of Sandy Hook. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 795). Previous projects: For details see Annual Report for 1909, page 186, and Annual Report for 1938, page 269. Existing project: A channel 14 feet deep and 250 feet wide, protected by jetties and other works, extending from the Atlantic Ocean to inner end of north jetty, thence 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide to within 700 feet of New York and Long Branch Railroad bridge, thence of same depth and narrowing to 100 feet wide to within 300 feet of bridge; for a widening on northerly side of channel of 200 feet for 3,150 feet deep on south side of channel and for a 27.5-acre anchorage to 12 feet deep about 0.5 miles west of Route 35 highway bridge. Section included in project is about 1.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 3.7 feet at inner end of inlet and 4 feet at ocean end; mean range of spring tides, 4.4 and 4.8 feet, respectively, irregular fluctuations due to wind and barometric pressure vary from 2.7 feet below to 7.5 feet above mean low water at inner end of inlet. Project, excluding 10-and 12-foot anchorages, cost $518,243. Estimated cost (1958) for 10 and 12-foot anchorages portion of project considered inactive is $504,000. Restoration of bulkheads completed 16 August 1965 at a cost of $117,807. Existing project was completed in June 1963. Dredging 19-acre anchorage south of channel and 27.5-acre anchorage west of highway bridge is in the inactive category. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1997.) Local cooperation: River and Harbor Act of 1945 provides that local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances to date have been complied with. Terminal facilities: Five landings with a total wharfage of 700 feet used by commercial fishermen, and 7 landings and boat basins for pleasure craft. Existing facilities are considered adequate for present requirements. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included supervision and administration and engineering and design on north and south jetty repairs. Maintenance, contract: Work included acquisition of right of way, repairing jetties, Waterways Experiment Station inspection of locks, mapping and photography. 11. MAURICE RIVER, NJ Location: This river rises in Gloucester County, N.J. flows southerly and southwesterly 33 miles through Cumberland County and empties into Delaware Bay through Maurice Cove about 87 miles below Philadelphia, PA. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1218.) Previous project: Adopted by the River and Harbor Act of August 2, 1882 and modified in 1890 and 1892. For further details see page 1785, Annual Report for the year 1915. Existing project: This provides for a channel 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide in Delaware Bay across Maurice Cove to the mouth; thence a channel 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide to the drawbridge at Millville, 21.5 miles above the mouth and thence 60 feet wide to the mill dam, a further distance of one-half mile, including a turning basin at Millville. The total length of the section included in the project is about 24 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The mean tidal range at the mouth is 5.8 feet and at Millville 6.0 feet. The extreme tidal range is from about 1 foot below mean low water to about 1 foot above mean high water. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1997.) Local cooperation: The project as modified by the River and Harbor Act of 1935 provides that before the initial or any subsequent maintenance dredging is undertaken, suitable guaranties shall be furnished by responsible local interests that the United States and the contractors will be held and saved free of claims for damages because of the deposit of the excavated material. It is expected that the conditions of local cooperation will be satisfactorily met during the fiscal year 1949. Terminal facilities: There are numerous wharves and piers at the several towns along the river. Public wharves are located at Millville, Mauricetown, Dorchester, Bivalve. Several boat yards with railways and repair and construction facilities are also located along the river. Most of the wharves at Millville and Bivalve have railroad connections. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included surveys and supervision and administration on dredging. Maintenance, contract: Work included maintenance dredging done by Medco Dredging Company removing 40,000 cubic yards of material. 12. MURDERKILL RIVER, DE Location: Rises in Kent County, DE, flows northeasterly 19 miles through county, and empties into Delaware Bay about 25 3-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 miles above Cape Henlopen. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart no. 1218.) Existing project: Provides for a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water, 150 feet wide in Delaware Bay to mouth, and thence 80 feet wide to Frederica, 7.5 miles above mouth. Total length of section included in project is about 8.5 miles. Extreme tidal range is from about 1 foot below mean low water to about 2 feet above mean high water. Estimated cost for new work revised in 1954 is $38,000. Portion comprising widening channel to project width throughout its length is to be restudied and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost of this portion last revised in 1954 was $86,000. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of July 13, 1892 (H. Ex. Doc. 21, 52d Cong., 1st Sess. See page 981 Annual Report for 1892). Latest published map is in House Document 1058, 62d Congress 3rd Session. Existing project about 30 percent complete, including revision to be restudied. Channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide was completed in 1911. Work remaining is widening the channel to project width. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1997.) Local cooperation: None required. Terminal facilities: There are a number of light timber wharves on both sides of river near mouth and two wharves at Frederica, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included environmental monitoring, plans and specifications, supervision and administration, and surveys on dredging. Maintenance, contract: Work included environmental monitoring and maintenance dredging. Maintenance dredging was accomplished by Barnegat Bay Dredging Company February 24, 1997 to March 16, 1997 removing 39,401 cubic yards of material at a cost of $166,680. 13. NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY Location: A sea level inland water route approximately parallel with New Jersey coast, extends from Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, about 26 miles south of Sandy Hook, NJ to Delaware Bay about 3 miles above Cape May point. Waterway extends through inlet and up Manasquan River about 2 miles; thence by Point Pleasant Canal through high ground for 2 miles to head of Barnegat Bay. It then passes through a series of bays, lagoons, and thoroughfares along New Jersey coast to Cape May Harbor; thence across Cape May County to Delaware Bay through a land cut by way of New England Creek basin.(See U.S. COAST and Geodetic Survey Charts, 234, 795, 825, 826, 827, 1216, 1217, 1218, and 1219.) Existing project: This provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and generally 100 feet wide, extending from the Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, NJ to Delaware Bay above Cape May, NJ, by the further improvement of Manasquan River and Inlet, NJ, and the present New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway, and by the construction of a canal of similar dimensions from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay via the New England Creek basin, with adequate jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance. The total length of the project is about 117 miles. Normal tide range in sections of the waterway remote from inlets is 0.5 foot. Estimated cost for new work is $71,549 (July 1969), exclusive of $1,824,940 Navy Department funds and $99,000 contributed by local interests. Portion of project extending from Manasquan River to Cape May Harbor is to be restudied and excluded from new work costs estimate. Estimated cost of this portion is $6,470,000 (July 1954). Existing project was adopted by 1945 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc 133, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.) Latest published map is in project document. River and Harbor Act of 1946 (Public Law 525, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess., as extended by Public Law 240, 82d Cong.), authorized use for a period not to exceed 6 years, of funds from appropriations heretofore or hereafter made for maintenance and improvement of rivers and harbors, for maintenance of canal from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay constructed as an emergency wartime project with Navy Department funds, including cost of maintaining temporary railroad and seashore highway bridges over canal. Existing project is about 25 percent complete. A canal 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay was completed in 1942 as well as two parallel stone jetties at Delaware Bay entrances and a temporary highway and a railroad bridge in 1944, all with Navy Department funds. Work remaining consists of dredging a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet to Cape May Harbor, has been deferred for restudy; however, the project between Ottens Harbor and Richardson Channel and from that point to Cape May are being maintained to 10 feet and 12 feet, respectively, since they were originally dredged to these depths by the State. Section 860 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized, for preconstruction engineering and design, a 15 foot depth in the Vicinity of Cape May Harbor, titled as Cold Spring Inlet. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1997.) Local cooperation: The project is subject to the conditions that the State of New Jersey cede to the United States all right, title, and interest that it has acquired to lands, easements, rights-of-way, and structures other than bridges for the Bayhead-Manasquan Canal; that the State of New Jersey furnish, free of cost to the United 3-8 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and disposal areas required for construction of the Cape May Canal and for improvement of the proposed waterway and for their subsequent maintenance; that local interests provide, maintain, and operate suitable bridges over the waterway; that the State of New Jersey donate to the United States the navigation aids in use on the present New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway; and that the State of New Jersey hold and save the United States and its agents free from any claims for damages resulting from the work of improvement. Compliance with these conditions was completed January 15, 1954, except that local interests are required to furnish disposal areas for the construction and the subsequent maintenance of the proposed improvements. Terminal facilities: See Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, surveys, property management, Environmental Review Guide for Operations assessment, environmental monitoring, and maintenance dredging. There was also plans and specifications and supervision and administration for bank stabilization and dredging and repaired bulkhead. Maintenance, contract: Work included repair of bulkhead and bank stabilization. There was maintenance dredging by Barnegat Bay Dredging Company from April 7, 1997 to September 11, 1997 removing 192,350 cubic yards of material at a total cost of $757,000. 14. SALEM RIVER, NJ Location: This river rises in Salem County, NJ, flows through the county westerly 13 miles, thence southerly 7 miles to the City of Salem, and thence westerly 3 miles, emptying into Delaware River about 45 miles below Philadelphia, PA. It is joined at Salem by Little Salem River, or Fenwick Creek, from the east. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 294.) Previous project: The River and Harbor Act of July 11, 1870, provided for a survey and the original project was adopted by River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1871, and modified in 1878, and a subsequent project adopted by River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1907. This project was further modified as HD 68-110 in 1925, providing an entrance channel from the Delaware River to the fixed highway bridge in Salem with dimensions and limits as shown, including a cut-off and by the WRDA of 1986. The letter provided for channel widening and deepening; a turning basin; and wetland restoration. For further details see the Report of the Secretary of the Army dated 20 October 1994. Existing project: Provides a channel depth to 16 feet below mean low water between the Route 49 highway bridge and the Delaware River, a distance of about 5 miles. The channel is 150- 250 feet wide and a trapezoidal shaped turning basin has a width of 495 feet and average length of 1000 feet. The project also contains 15.6 acres of wetland restoration to replace the loss of wetlands and shallow water habitat. The portion of the project comprising the deepening of Little Salem River to 12 feet is to be restudied and is excluded from the foregoing estimate. The estimated cost of this portion revised in 1953 is $28,000 excluding an equal amount to be contributed by local interests. The dredging for the existing project is completed. The dredging of the channel from Penns Neck Bridge to project dimensions, including the cutoff, was completed in 1928. The channel from Penns Neck Bridge to the fixed highway bridge in Little Salem River was dredged to a depth of 9 feet under a previous project. The work remaining to be done is the deepening of the channel in Little Salem River from 9 feet to 12 feet. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1997.) The controlling depths at mean low water were as follows: In January 1961, Delaware River to Penns Neck Highway Bridge 12.0 feet; and thence in December 1956 to the fixed highway bridge at Salem, 0.9 feet. The existing project was adopted by the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1925 (H. DOC. 110, 68th Cong. 1st Sess.) The latest published map is in this document. Section 859 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized a project depth of 20 feet. Local cooperation: The local cooperation agreement was executed on March 31, 1995 and requires that the Non-Federal sponsor provides cash in the amount of $779,000 and "other" (disposal area and associated costs) costs of $1,556,000 provide real estate and perform associated dredging. These requirements have been satisfied. Terminal facilities: There are 9 wharves on the river all at Salem, NJ. Eight wharves are privately owned and one is owned by the City. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year: New work, hired labor: Work included engineering and design and supervision and administration. New work, contract: Work included wetland restoration and condition surveys. 15. SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA Location: Rises in Schuylkill County, PA, flows generally southeasterly 150 miles, and empties into Delaware River at Philadelphia, PA (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 295 and 280.) 3-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Previous project: For details see page 325, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project: This provides for a channel 33 feet deep and 400 feet wide in Delaware River the mouth and within the river to 29th Street, .75 mile above the mouth; thence the same depth and 300 feet wide to Passyunk Avenue Bridge, 3.5 miles above the mouth; thence 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide to Gibson Point, 4.5 miles above the mouth; and thence 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide to University Avenue Bridge, 6 miles above the mouth, including widening at bends. The total length of the section included in the project is about 6.5 miles. All depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range, due to freshets and prolonged heavy winds, is about 14 feet. The cost for new work for the completed existing project was $7,440,000. Existing project was completed in September 1962. For details see Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1997.) Local cooperation: The River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946, imposed the condition that the City of Philadelphia agree to remove 60,000 cubic yards, place measurement, of material annually from that portion of those portions of the project which the District Engineer may designate until such time as adequate municipal sewage-treatment works are constructed and placed in effective operation. Compliance with this condition has been met through the completion of sewage-treatment works by the City of Philadelphia. All other requirements have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities: There are 38 wharves, piers, and docks within limits of improvement. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No. 7, Revised 1967, Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included surveys, general maintenance, chemical testing, disposal area management, plans and specifications, and supervision and administration. Maintenance, contract: Work included chemical testing. 16. WATERWAY FROM INDIAN RIVER INLET TO REHOBOTH BAY, DE Location: In southeasterly part of Sussex County, connects Rehoboth Bay with Indian River Bay by way of Big Ditch. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1219.) Previous project: Adopted by the River and Harbor Act of August 2, 1882. For further details see page 744, Annual Report for the year 1888. Existing project: This provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide from water of 6-foot depth in Rehoboth Bay to water of the same depth in Indian River Bay by way of Big Ditch. The total length of the section included in the project is about 2.7 miles. The mean tidal range in the vicinity of project in Rehoboth Bay is 0.5 foot; in Indian River Bay 0.9 foot. The extreme tidal range is from 1.5 feet below mean low water to about 2.5 feet above mean high water. Cost for new work for completed project was $90,908, exclusive of $20,000 contributed by local interests. Existing project was adopted by River and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950 (H. Doc) No. 304, 81st Cong., 1st sess.). The latest published map is in the project document. Local cooperation: The act authorizing the project provides that local interests shall give assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will (a) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable disposal areas for initial work and subsequent maintenance when and as required; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, including such damages as may occur to public or leased oyster beds; and (c) make a cash contribution of $20,000 toward the cnstruction of the project. Assurances of local cooperation were approved on February 27, 1956. Condition of local cooperation have been complied with except that local interest are required to furnish suitable spoil-disposal areas for subsequent maintenance as required. Terminal facilities: There are no terminal or transfer facilities in the area that are fully open to public use. However, existing facilities that are available on a limited basis are adequate for the present demand, and can be expected to expand to meet future needs. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included plans and specifications on maintenance dredging. 17. WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE Location: Formed by Christina River, which rises in New Castle County, DE, flows northeasterly 16 miles, passing through the City of Wilmington, DE, and empties into Delaware River about 29 miles below Philadelphia, PA (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 294.) Previous project: For details see page 1785 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 308 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project: This provides for a channel 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide from west edge of Delaware River ship channel to Lobdell Canal, a distance of about 1.2 miles; thence 21 feet deep and 250 feet wide for the distance of .8 mile to the mouth of Brandywine River; thence the same depth and 200 feet wide for a distance of about 2.2 miles to a point approximately 4.2 miles from 3-10 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT the Delaware River ship channel; thence decreasing to a depth of 10 feet in a distance of 750 feet to Penn Central Railroad bridge No. 4; and thence 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide for a distance of about 5.6 miles to Newport, DE, approximately 9.9 miles above Delaware River ship channel, including a turning basin 38 feet deep opposite the Wilmington Marine terminal and extending upstream from the mouth to Lobdell Canal, 320 feet wide, 2,900 feet long on the north side of the channel and decreasing to a length of 2,000 feet on the north side of the basin. It also provides for the removal of about 1,200 feet of the outer end of a stone-filled, pile-and-timber crib jetty constructed 2,150 feet long on the north side of the entrance; for a steel sheet-pile jetty 2,300 feet long, with 120-foot inshore wing, on the south side of the entrance, and for a V-shaped stone-filled pile-and-timber jetty at the mouth of Brandywine River 430 feet along the north side of Brandywine and 260 feet long on the Christina. Depths refer to the plane of mean low water. The extreme tidal range, due to prolonged heavy winds, is about 13 feet. Existing project was completed in 1962. (For details see page 222, Annual Report 1962). Authority from Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of July 1960 provide for channel and turning basin deepening from 35 to 38 feet and the turning basin widened from 200 to 320 feet. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1997.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. Terminal facilities: There are 18 piers, wharves, and docks within limits of the improvement. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details see Port Series No.8, revised 1966-Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included general maintenance, environmental monitoring, surveys, wetland mitigation, property management, supervision and administration, and Disposal Material Management Plan. There was also construction of dikes and sluices, drainage, and maintenance of disposal area, bulkhead replacement, engineering and design, plans and specifications, and replacement of sheet piles on jetty. Maintenance, contract: Work included lease of equipment, wetland mitigation, digital mapping, monitoring of artificial reefs, and replacing south jetty. There was maintenance dredging by Norfolk Dredging Company from January 15, 1997 to February 22, 1997 removing 322,624 cubic yards of material at a cost of $425,026. Beach Erosion Control: 18. CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TWP., NJ Location: The proposed project is located in Cape May County and extends along the beach front from the northern side of Cape May Inlet to the boundary of Lower Township, and Cape May City. Existing project: The plan, as presented in HD 94-641, was authorized for the Phase I Design Memorandum Stage of Advance Engineering and Design by Section lOl1a of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976, proposes the following features: breakwater on the updrift side of Cape May Inlet; beachfill from Cape May Inlet to Cape May Point; provision of a dune with sand fence and grass from Cape May Inlet to Wilmington Avenue; construction of two groins in Cape May City and seven groins in Lower Township; inclusion of all groins comprising the existing project; and periodic nourishment of the beaches and maintenance of the dune and dikes. The Phase I GDM, completed in August 1980 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1981, determined that only beach erosion control measures in Cape May City are warranted. The plan proposed in that document consists of modifying the existing navigation project for Cape May Inlet to provide; a weir-breakwater at Cape May Inlet with construction being deferred pending demonstration of need; two new groins at Trenton and Baltimore Avenues in Cape May City; placement of beachfill between Cape May Inlet and the terminal groin at Third Avenue in Cape May City; maintenance of two new groins and existing groins in Cape May; periodic beach maintenance with material obtained from deposition basin on the northeast side of Cape May Inlet; and institution of a beach monitoring program in Lower Township area. Work for the initial beachfill was accomplished as follows; USGS feeder beach fiscal year 1989, Cape May City groin fiscal year 1990, and Beachfill Cape May City fiscal year 1991. Project estimate costs (October 1995) is Federal, $137,900,000, which includes $48,500,000 of Coast Guard contributions. Non-Federal costs are $10,000,000. The existing authority is for Phase I studies as provided by Section 101(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 in accordance with the provision of House Document 94-641. Continuation of planning and engineering for this proposed project was initiated in October 1977. The Phase I GDM was completed in August 1980 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1981. Phase II AE&D studies were completed in July 1983. The project was authorized for separable elements under Section 501(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1997.) Local cooperation: The State of New Jersey furnished a letter of intent on 6 May 1981 regarding their willingness to comply with the above items of local cooperation. In addition, a draft Section 221 local cooperation agreement has been coordinated with letter of intent on May 31, 1983 regarding compliance with the items of local cooperation. Operations during fiscal year: New Work, hired labor: Work included plans and specification of beachfill groin, supervision and administration, hydraulic studies, and engineering and design. 3-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 New work, contract: Work included survey of the beach, sediment sampling, and periodic nourishment. 19. DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION, DE Location: The project is located in Sussex County, Delaware, on the Atlantic Ocean and starts immediately south of Delaware Bay extending in a southerly direction a distance of 24.5 miles to Fenwick Island on the Delaware-Maryland border. Previous Project: The previous project, adopted as HD 85-216 in 1958 and modified by P.L. 87-874 in 1962, provided for Federal participation in the cost of restoration and subsequent periodic nourishment, and the initial periodic nourishment was completed in 1957 by local interests. The second increment of beach replenishment by local interest was completed in 1963. Existing project: Provides a sand bypass system and periodic nourishment until 2027. (For details, see S. Doc. 90, 90th Cong. 2nd Sess.) Estimated cost of project (October 1995) is $27,600,000 of which $12,800,000 are federal costs and $14,800,000 are required non-Federal costs. The construction of the feeder beach north of Indian River Inlet was completed in 1973 and nourished in 1978, and 1984. Section 869 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 deauthorized the unscheduled portion of the project. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1997.) Local cooperation: Assurances of local cooperation were provided by the State of Delaware, January 13, 1981. Operations during fiscal year: New work, hired labor: Work included supervision and administration, and engineering and design. New work, contract: Work included monitoring and sand bypassing. 20. GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET & PECK BEACH, NJ Location: The project is located in Cape May and Atlantic Counties, New Jersey. Great Egg Harbor Inlet, an unimproved inlet, is about 1.1 miles wide at its narrowest point and provides a tidal connection between the Atlantic Ocean, Great Egg Harbor Bay, the New Jersey Intercoastal Waterway, and Great Egg Harbor River. Peck Beach is occupied in its entirety by the City of Ocean City and extends from Great Egg Harbor Inlet southward to Corson Inlet. The ocean frontage is about eight miles in length. Existing project: The project consists of providing initial beachfill, with subsequent periodic nourishment, with a minimum berm width of 100 feet at an elevation of 8 feet above mean low water. The beachfill extends from Surf Road southwest to 34th Street with a 1000 foot taper south of 34th Street. This plan required the initial placement of 4,118,000 cubic yards of material and subsequent periodic nourishment of approximately 1,072,000 cubic yards every three years. The material for the initial construction, and periodic nourishment is being taken from the ebb shoal area located approximately 5,000 feet offshore of the Great Egg Harbor Inlet. Additionally, the construction of the project required the extension of 38 storm drain pipes. All work is programmed. Estimated cost for new work (October 1995) Federal share is $343,000,000 and non-Federal is $186,000,000. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1997.) Local Cooperation: Federal participation in the proposed project is recommended and contingent on the local sponsor signing the Local Cooperation Agreement which identifies the required items of cooperation. In a letter dated 28 September 1990, the State of New Jersey identified a funding source for their costs and indicated that they were prepared to proceed with the final negotiations to sign the Local Cooperation Agreement as required by Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-611, 42 U.S.C. 196d-5b) and by the Water Resource Development ACT of 1986 (Public Law 99-662).The Local Cooperation agreement was executed in September 1991. Operations during fiscal year: New work, hired labor: Work included engineering and design, hydraulic studies, and supervision and administration. Maintenance, contract: Work included surveys of the beach, aerial photography, monitoring, and periodic nourishment. Flood Control: 21. BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA Location: Damsite is on Pohopoco Creek about 4.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Lehigh River and 4 miles east of Lehighton, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Map for Lehighton, PA-1960.) Existing project: This is a multiple-purpose development project providing water supply, flood control, and recreation. Plan of improvement provides for an earth and rock fill dam 4,200 feet long rising 170 feet above creekbed; a spillway around the north end of dam; and gate control outlet works discharging through a conduit on rock along right abutment. The lake, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, has a reservoir capacity of 68,250 acre-feet at spillway crest level with 1,390 acre-feet of inactive storage, 39,830 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 27,030 acre-feet for flood control. The cost of project was $22,931,400 including $6,100,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project. The 3-12 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT construction of the dam and appurtenances was completed in 1971. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1997.) Local cooperation: Project was approved subject to certain requirements of cooperation by local interests as defined in approved House Document. Resolution of Delaware River Basin Commission providing assurances of repayment of water supply and pollution control costs was accepted June 7, 1965. A contract for repayment of water supply costs was signed October 16,1966. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of reservoir, property management, snowpack and runoff analysis, monitoring, joint use of water facilities, Environmental Review Guide for Operations assessment, and annual dam inspection. Other work included plans and specifications on toe drain, instrumentation and surveillance, water quality testing, water control, general supervision and administration, and painting service bridges. Maintenance, contract: Work included water quality testing and monitoring, purchase and replacement of equipment, painting service bridges, repaired roof on operators building, and installed toe drain. There was also the purchase and replacement of water control device equipment, USGS Cooperative Stream Gaging Program, snow surveys, Waterways Experiment Station investigating intake tower and services by NOAA National Weather Service Report Network. 22. BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA Location: Dam site is on Tulpehocken Creek about 1.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Plum Creek and about 6 miles northwest of Reading, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Bernville, PA) Existing project: This is a multiple-purpose development project providing water supply, flood control, and recreation. Construction started in 1974 and was completed in 1980. The dam is 1,775 feet long and rises 98 feet above creekbed, with spillway about 1,500 feet south of dam, and gate-controlled outlet works discharging through a conduit on rock along right abutment. The lake, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, has a capacity of 50,010 acre-feet at spillway crest level, with 3,000 acre-feet of inactive storage, 14,620 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 32,390 acre-feet for flood control. (For details see H.Doc 533 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.) Cost of project $63,163,791. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1997.) (H. Doc. 533, 87th Cong., 2d Sess., contains latest published maps.) Local cooperation: Project was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as prescribed in House Document cited above. Delaware River Basin Commission on December 29, 1964, adopted a preliminary resolution providing for repayment of water supply costs. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of reservoir and recreation area, natural resource coordination, seasonal employment, Geographical Information System, updated regulation manual, water quality testing, water control, sediment survey, property management, vehicle equipment and utilization. There was work on joint use of water facilities, stilling basin, boat launch (Dry Brooks and State Hill), day use area, installation of siding on storage barn, engineering and design and supervision and administration, Environmental Review Guide for Operation assessment, annual dam inspection, instrumentation and surveillence, sewer investigation, and miscellaneous repairs. Also incurred were costs for maintenance of visitors center and collection booth services. Maintenance, contract: Work included visitor center maintenance, installation of replacement water control device, water quality test, minor repairs to the service bridge, work on stilling basin, maintenance of collection booth services, USGS Cooperative Stream Gaging Program, snow surveys and NOAA National Weather Service Report Network. Work also included maintenance of boat launch (Dry Brooks and State Hill), sewage treatment plant, day use area, repaving of employee parking lot, replaced roof and siding at Visitors Center and installed control gate. 23. EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION Emergency Bank Protection Section 14, Public Law 79-526. Name of Project Cost to 30 Sept. 1997 Plans and Specifications Fort Mifflin, Phila., PA Manasquan River, Howell Twp, NJ Section 14 Coordination Stoney Creek East Norriton, PA 24. $34,587 $ 1,663 $ 3,188 $10,828 FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 838, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Name of Project Cost to 30 Sept. 1997 Feasibility Reports Bock and Brock Creeks, Yardley, PA Little Mill Creek, New Castle City, DE Mill Creek, Upper Moreland, PA Naylor's Run, Cobbs Creek, PA $12,730 $21,521 $14,659 $ 9,497 3-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Section 205 Coordination Upper Mill Creek, Middletown, PA West Branch Delaware River, Stamford, NY Plans and Specifications Palmerton, PA Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood f rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and legislation). Fiscal year costs were $377,323 for disaster prepai Construction Delaware River, Port Jervis $ 2,865 $15,098 $15,878 $67,029 ighting, and antecedent redness. ;10,696 25. FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM, PA Location: Reservoir is in northeastern Pennsylvania on Lehigh River between White Haven and Stoddartsville. Dam is about 0.4 mile below mouth of Bear Creek, about 60 miles above confluence of Lehigh River and Delaware River at Easton, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Stoddartsville, PA). Existing project: Plan of improvement authorized by 1946 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 587, 79th Cong.,2d Sess.) provided for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. Modification of project, authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc.522, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.), provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present single-purpose flood control project. Plan of improvement requires altering spillway, increasing height of dam, constructing a new intake tower, extending outlet tunnel by addition of a concrete conduit, and constructing new dikes and raising existing dikes. Modified dam will rise 264 feet above riverbed and be 3,500 feet long. Reservoir modification, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River Basin, will have a reservoir capacity of 181,000 acre-feet spillway crest level with 3,000 acre-feet of inactive storage, 70,000 acre-feet for water supply and recreation and 108,000 acre-feet for flood control. Total cost is $186,000,000, estimated Federal cost of new work (October 1993) is $30,000,000 including $156,000,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Project as authorized under the 1946 Flood Control Act was completed June 1961. Settlement for lands was completed October 1962. The advance engineering and design for the modified project is completed. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1997.) Local cooperation: None required under 1946 Flood Control Act. Under 1962 Flood Control Act, project was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 522 cited above. The Delaware River Basin Commission expressed its support by a resolution dated 23 April 1980 and reiterated its sponsorship for the modified project in August 1985, October 1985, and July 1988. Operations during fiscal year: New work, hired labor: Work included engineering and design and supervision and administration. Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of reservoir, painting of bridges, repair of gates, periodic inspection, environmental and hydraulic studies on water quality, property management, and Environmental Review Guide for Operations assessment. There was also minor maintenance on recreational facility, data collection, groundwater investment/tank installation, bridge inspection, road cost estimate, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. Maintenance, contract: Work included USGS Storm Gage Program, water quality monitoring, repairs to intake tower, maintenance of water control devices, and lease of equipment. Also, painted service bridges, repaired water gates, and services by NOAA National Weather Service Report Network. 26. GENERAL EDGAR JAD WIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA Location: In Dyberry Creek valley in central part of Wayne County, PA, between borough of Honesdale and village of Tanners Falls. Dam is about 3 miles above confluence of Dyberry Creek and Lackawaxen River in Honesdale and 29 miles above confluence of Lackawaxen and Delaware Rivers. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Honesdale, PA) Existing project: A single-purpose flood control reservoir with a capacity of 24,500 acre-feet formed by an earth embankment, about 1,225 feet long at crest and rising 109 feet above creek bed. It also has a tunnel with intake structure and a chute-type spillway with a stilling basin in left abutment. Reservoir controls runoff from a drainage area of 65 square miles which is 91 percent of watershed of Dyberry Creek and 39 percent of Lackawaxen River watershed above Honesdale, PA. Construction of project was authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act (H.Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.). Project completed in June 1960. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1997.) Local cooperation: Assurances of Compliance with requirements of local cooperation were accepted July 30, 1956. For details see page 251, Annual Report for 1962. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of the reservoir, water control, periodic inspection, property management, Environmental Review Guide for Operations assessment, and supervision and administration. 3-14 $ PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT Maintenance, contract: Work included USGS Cooperative Stream Gaging Program and services by NOAA National Weather Service Report Network. 27. GLEN FOERD, PA Location: The Glen Foerd estate is a National Register Historic Property located on the Delaware River at the confluence with the Poquessing Creek in the City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Previous project: None. Existing project: Since the construction of the historic property in the 1850's, the forces of the Delaware River and Poquessing Creek have caused a significant deterioration of the 1,350-foot river wall on the perimeter of the property, including undermining of the foundation, settlement, loose and dislodged stones and loss of capstones. Significant sections of the wall have already collapsed. Without rehabilitation and restoration, erosive forces will continue to undermine the structural integrity of the river wall, leading to further weakening and collapse of additional sections of the wall, exposing the embankment and endangering other portions of this historic property. Construction of the project was authorized by Section 106 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-640). The project will restore the river wall consistent with the historic nature of the property. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing project to Sept. 30, 1997.) Local cooperation: Local interests will be required to provide items of local cooperation consistent with the requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The local sponsor is the City of Philadelphia, Fairmount Park Commission. Operations during fiscal year: New work, hired labor: Work included engineering and design. 28. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To ascertain whether local interests were maintaining and operating completed projects as required, inspections were made as follows: PROJECT INSPECTION DATES Chester River Darby Creek, Lansdowne, PA Delaware River, East Branch Delaware River, Fort Mifflin Delaware River, Port Jervis Lehigh River, Bethlehem, PA Pennypack Creek Perkiomen Creek Pocono Creek Poquessing Creek October 1996 November 1996 October 1996 November 1996 May 1997 May 1997 October 1996 November 1996 July 1997 October 1996 Rancocas Creek Schuylkill River (Culm Rem. Proj) October 1996 April 1997 Local interests are satisfactorily maintaining and operating projects in accordance with regulation. Costs during the period were $25,161. 29. INSPECTION OF NON-FEDERAL LEVEES Inspection of non-federal levees were conducted at the following sites: PROJECT INSPECTION DATES Hawley, PA East Stroudsburg, PA Stroudsburg, PA 30. July 1997 April 1997 April 1997 MOLLY ANN'S BROOK, NJ Location: Approximately 12 miles northwest of New York City, is located in Haledon, Prospect Park and Paterson, New Jersey along Molly Ann's Brook from the mouth below Totowa Avenue in Paterson upstream to Church Street in Haledon. Previous project: None. Existing project: The recommended plan modified the channel a total length of 2.5 miles. The channel includes both trapezoidal channel sections and walled sections. Five bridges will be replaced and one building will be removed. Estimated cost of project (October 1995) is $ 33,600,000 of which $23,500,000 are federal costs and $10,100,000 are required non-federal costs. Cost are in accordance with Section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act (Public Law 99-662), dated November 17, 1986. (See Table 3-B at end of chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See Table 3-A at end of chapter for total costs for existing Project to Sept. 30, 1997.) Local cooperation: Fully complied with. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on December 16, 1993. The State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and Energy, the non-federal sponsor, provided a portion of their support thru the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. Terminal facilities: None. Operations during fiscal year: New work, hired labor: Work included plans and specifications, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. New work, contract: Work included the demolition of a cheese factory, surveys, utilities, channel improvement from Passaic River to Union Avenue, Union Avenue to Ryerson Avenue, and Ryerson Avenue to Belmont Avenue. 3-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 31. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS The total fiscal year cost for this category amounted to $85,215. 32. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645. Name of Project Cost to 30 Sept. 1997 Feasibility Wilmington Harbor, DE $3,598 33. PROMPTON LAKE, PA Location: In Lackawaxen River Valley in central part of Wayne County, PA, between borough of Prompton and village of Aldenville. Dam is within corporate limits of Prompton, 4 miles upstream from Honesdale, PA, and approximately 30 miles above confluence of Lackawaxen and Delaware River. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle Sheet, Honesdale, PA) Existing project: Plan of improvement authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.) provides for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. Modification of project authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. DOC 522, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.) provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present single-purpose flood control project. Plan of improvement requires construction of control tower with gates and service bridge, placing an impervious blanket on valley walls and floor upstream from dam, widening spillway, and clearing land and relocating roads in reservoir. Dam, completed under 1948 Flood Control Act which will not be modified, is 1,230 feet long and rises 140 feet above riverbed. Existing spillway, cut into rock of right abutment, will be modified and present uncontrolled outlet works discharging into a concrete conduit along right bank, and will be provided with gates and a control tower. Reservoir modification, a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes of Delaware River basin has a capacity of 52,000 acre-feet: 3,500 acre-feet for inactive storage, 28,200 acre-feet for water supply and recreation, and 20,300 acre-feet for flood control. Estimated Federal cost of new work (October 1994) is $3,510,000 including $54,990,000 required non-Federal reimbursement for costs allocated to water supply storage during life of project after use of this storage is initiated. Project as authorized under the 1948 Flood Control Act was completed in November 1960. (For details, see page 358, Annual Report for 1963.) Work accomplished under the 1962 Flood Control Act was preconstruction engineering and design. (See Table 3-B at end of Chapter for Acts authorizing existing project. See table 3-A at end of chapter for total cost for existing project to Sept. 30, 1997.) Local cooperation: Project modification was approved subject to certain requirements by local interests, as defined in House Document 522 cited above. Assurances of compliance under Flood Control Act of 1948 have been met. Delaware River Basin Commission on March 18, 1966, gave their view that the need for water supply was not urgent at that time. However recent studies conducted by DRBC have determined that there is now a need for water supply. In August 1983, DRBC expressed their strong support for the project modification. Preconstruction engineering and design was initiated in 1966, suspended in 1968 and again suspended in and resumed in 1986. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance, hired labor: Work included operation and maintenance of reservoir, instrumentation and surveillance, water quality monitoring and testing, water control, hydraulic studies, Environmental Review Guide for Operations assessment, periodic inspection, sediment survey, property management, engineering and design, and supervision and administration. Maintenance, contract: Work included lease of equipment, USGS Cooperative Stream Gaging, NOAA National Weather Service Report Network, clean relief wells and water quality testing. 34. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Reconnaissance Surveys Lewis & Rehoboth Canal Maurice River, NJ Maurice River, NJ Murderkill River, DE Murderkill River, DE Condition Surveys Broadkill River, DE Cedar Creek, DE Lewis & Rehoboth Canal Mispillion River, DE Mispillion River, DE Oyster Creek, NJ Salem River, NJ Survey Conducted July 1997 January 1997 February 1997 February 1997 March 1997 Survey Conducted May 1997 May 1997 May 1997 May 1997 May 1997 July 1997 July 1997 General Investigations: 35. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Cost and expenditures during the period for flood plain information studies were $209,130. 3-16 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT 36. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Cost and expenditures during the period totaled $1,518,938. SURVEYS Cost for the period were $40,474 for navigation studies, $0 for flood control studies, $1,900,803 for shoreline protection studies, $351,396 for special studies: a total of $2,292,673. 3-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 SEPT. 30, 1997 1. Barnegat Inlet, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Chesapeake & Delaware Canal, St. George's Bridge Replacement 3. Cold Spring Inlet, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Delaware River between Philadelphia, PA and Trenton, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Delaware River, PA, NJ, and DE Philadelphia to the Sea (Regular Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost 20,024 -98,076 21,789 31,083,849 2,100 30,994,363 1,103,000 754,000 1,212,000 1,341,000 19,699,933 1,113,179 751,511 1,211,583 1,288,725 19,633,453 6,199 -30,698 14,000,000 14,000,000 14,008,924 13,997,231 2,789 -13,917,000 -3,575 13,793,140 14,000,000 14,000,000 14,001,341 13,998,657 91,000,000 90,997,015 879,275 879,275 140,000 135,000 511,000 359,000 6,773,651 142,029 123,431 520,156 351,394 6,763,006 1,134,346 1,134,346 150,00010 150,00010 72,147,8003 72,147,8003 371,000 1,925,000 3,378,000 1,059,000 49,446,0374 371,630 1,922,127 3,363,169 1,071,328 49,434,5784 550,000 565,000 15,000 57,879,8725 57,879,8725 12,744,500 11,563,500 12,631,415 11,649,045 20,680,240 13,734,500 480,991,30819 20,586,484 13,772,311 480,534,70119 508,324 508,324 3-18 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 SEPT. 30, 1997 6. Delaware River Vincinity of Camden (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 7. Indian River Inlet and Bay, DE (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 8. Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, DE, and MD (Regular Funds) 9. Inland Waterway, Rehoboth Bay to Delaware Bay, DE and MD (Regular Funds) Contributed Funds) 10. Manasquan River, NJ (Regular Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost -300,000 -180,000 -395,362 -85,104 2,035,000 2,030,685 -641 -7,400 25,000 847,000 -3,125 24,304 846,723 -176,869 23,739 93,111 250,000 70,000 243,074 74,999 445,458 476,000 17,965 477,724 18,887 4,986,9061 5,045,173 i 3,262,562 3,261,386 2,528,131 2,502,386 511,21018 511,21018 4,754,939 4,754,937 1,323,775 1,323,775 210,000 210,000 132,535,5918 132,532,5988 11,763,000 12,054,000 17,757,000 13,123,260 292,266,2259 11,725,894 12,101,644 17,690,726 13,006,114 291,872,5249 -2,652 1,897,000 283,000 1,903,205 276,019 146,000 42,000 154,231 35,273 17,356,718 17,357,915 561,514 561,514 4,804,228 4,803,459 60,000 60,000 334,000 72,774 330,000 768,619 324,936 773,222 8,008,27827,28 8,008,278 5,121,31920 5,125,992 3-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 SEPT. 30, 1997 11. Maurice River, NJ (Regular Funds) 12. Murderkill River, DE (Regular Funds) 13. New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 14. Salem River, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 15. Schuylkill River, PA (Regular Funds) 16. Waterway from Indian River Inlet to Rehoboth Bay, DE (Regular Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 52,600 52,200 45,000 54,712 160,000 625,000 669,595 160,001 617,925 677,068 200,300 202,761 40,000 219,918 39,187 217,359 110,000 110,000 1,577,195 1,577,194 37,630 37,630 2,572,332 2,571,305 71,549" 71,549" 250,000 2,831,000 2,545,000 2,634,851 48,129,16712 243,074 2,829,579 2,507,436 2,655,033 48,097,45212 New Work Approp. 1,800,000 3,560,000 671,230 594,000 Cost 409 3,701,461 2,236,604 650,586 Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 176 26,000 25,587 - 1,399,000 119,509 1,533,000 1,538,273 -2,487 2,408 -1,399 517,772 76,145 1,196,581 1,196,581 99,000 99,000 6,732,8642 6,696,6912 2,870,6866 2,870,6866 1,450,825 765,251 3,334,00713 3,334,00713 25,000 1,923,000 258,744 33,902,293 25,387 1,916,708 263,578 33,889,987 7,189 7,189 335,823 340,104 3-20 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 SEPT. 30, 1997 17. Wilmington Harbor, DE (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 18. Cape May Inlet to Lower Twp., NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 19. Delaware Coast Protection (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 20. Great Egg Harbor Inlet & Peck Beach, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 21. Beltzville Lake, PA (Regular Funds) 22. Blue Marsh Lake, PA (Regular Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. 12,967,000 Cost -511,375 New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,954,72514,7 1,954,72514,7 2,575,000 3,092,000 2,060,000 4,370,000 87,041,725 2,569,553 3,079,009 2,056,636 4,378,512 86,998,010 60,000'7 60,000"7 -1,260,000 65,012 1,973,616 250,000 31,292 159,000 149,863 150,000 191,164 64,000 163,006 - 1,765,000 16,049,176 -52,461 2,027,041 15,646,114 250,000 -2,824,758 162,000 2,935,313 - 214,000 4,879,95323 158,179 235,073 4,415,48623 215,350 215,350 1,268,67121 1,259,00221 -2,380,000 29,374,000 6,163,478 145,239 2,591,461 29,349,005 3,275,000 -461,261 3,229,367 3,281 80,478 904,000 16,532,281 80,709 15,641,762 22,931,831 22,931,831 750,000 747,904 1,053 1,799,100 1,726,066 740,500 935,000 1,120,000 13,052,589 738,073 918,872 1,092,620 12,972,879 63,180,300 63,180,299 2,155,000 2,517,000 2,349,000 26,307,294 2,252,557 2,494,211 2,246,589 26,087,812 3-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 SEPT. 30, 1997 23. Francis E. Walter Dam, PA (Regular Funds) 24. General Edgar Jadwin Dam and Reservoir, PA (Regular Funds) 25. Glen Foerd, PA (Regular Funds) 26. Molly Ann's Brook, NJ (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 32. Prompton Lake (Regular Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 909 680,000 683,032 38,872 - 12,449,682's 45,698 12,437,32315 973,000 1,081,000 1,248,000 13,784,949 995,803 1,047,367 1,237,457 13,733,902 308,300 196,000 287,000 205,000 310,648 194,570 286,156 189,697 200,000 15,381 800,000 9,130 1,432,000 1,557,000 -123,000 4,580,000 130,609 323,470 1,780,216 8,110,218 220,000 137,705 410,000 388,534 741,000 4,164,795 78,757 1,980,000 517,000 606,000 588,000 519,392 618,520 573,281 4,073,105 4,073,105 3,814,364 3,764,783 1,000,000 24,511 9,358,000 8,110,218 2, 200,00022 1,605,80122 4,609,48316 4,609,48316 9,114,641 9,082,709 * Total adjusted to correct discrepancies in prior years. 1. Includes $1,950,906 for 30 and 37 foot projects. 2. Includes $55,809 for new work funds expended on previous project. 3. Includes $2,489,173 for new work for previous projects, $105,000 for preauthorization studies and minus $142,015 adjustment new work toDelaware River, Philadelphia to Sea project from this project underl954 modification. 4. Includes $552,720 for maintenance for previous projects, and $685,000Jobs Bill Funds. 5. Excludes $12,976,054 for new work for previous projects and $142,015 adjustment from Delaware River, Philadelphia to Trenton, NJ under 1954 modification. 6. Includes $1,285 for reconnaissance and condition surveys in FY 1957, $1,792 Operations and Maintenance cost incurred for preperation of environmental impact statement, and $48,000 expended for maintenance on previous projects. 7. Excludes $412,400 spent for Continuing Authority project. 8. Includes $10,709,755 for new work for previous projects. 9. Includes $6,903,748 for maintenance for previous projects, and $9,500 Job Bill Funds. 10. Includes $50,000 Navy Department Funds & $100,00 Contributed Funds. 11. Excludes $1,824,940 Navy Department Funds. 12. Excludes $286,953 Navy Department Funds expended for maintenance. 13. Includes $525,000 for previous projects. 14. Includes $402,121 for new work for previous project, and $206,177 emergency relief funds. 15. Includes $40,000 appropriated and $61,551 expended under Code 710 Recreation Facilities. 16. Includes $63,000 appropriated and $61,551 expended under Code 710 Recreation Facilities, excluded $23,600 preauthorization studies under 1948 modification. 17. Excludes $213,336 spent on Continuing Authority project. 18. Excluded $10,000 for previous projects. 19. Includes $1,025,409 for maintenance of previous projects, and $8,000 Jobs Bill funds. 20. Includes$2,054 for maintenance for previous projects. 21. Excludes $85,000 cash and $130,000 services furnished during preconstruction planning. 3-22 - 7 7 - 7 - 7 7 7 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Projects Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 SEPT. 30, 1997 22. Includes $112,000 for work done for the State of New Jersey. 23. Includes $704,000 AE&D. 24. Includes $36,000 for new work for previous projects. 25. Includes $148,798 for new work on previous projects. 26. Includes $61,172 for maintenance on previouse projects. 27. Includes $39,000 for new work for previous projects. 28. Includes $555,809 for previous projects. 3-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACITIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 3-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 July 2, 1985 Oct. 27, 1990 March 2, 1907 March 2, 1945 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 19352 Aug. 26,1937 July 24, 1946 Sept. 3, 1954 BARNEGAT INLET, NJ (See Section 1 of Text) An 8-foot depth through inlet to Oyster Creek Channel across inner bar, 10-foot depth through outer bar and for jetties. A channel of suitable hydraulic characteristics from gorge to Oyster Creek Channel, and thence to deep water in bay. Maintenance dredging of channel to connect main inlet channel with Barnegat City Harbor. Construction of a parallel, 4270 foot rubble mound south jetty and dredging a channel 10 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 11,300 feet long. CHESAPEAKE AND DELAWARE CANAL ST. GEORGES BRIDGE REPLACEMENT, DE (See Section 2 of Text) The replacement of the U.S. Route 13 bridge near St. Georges, DE, and the state may be reimbursed if it carries out the work COLD SPRING INLET, NJ (See Section 3 of Text) An inlet channel 25 feet deep and jetties. A 20-foot channel to deep water in harbor DELAWARE RIVER BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA, PA AND TRENTON, NJ (See Section 4 of Text) A channel 28 feet deep, 300 feet wide between Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA and Delair Bridge Channel 25 feet deep from Delair Bridge to Trenton, NJ, and maintenance of 12-foot channel from upper end of 25-foot project to Penn Central R.R. Bridge at Ferry St., Trenton. Auxiliary channel, 20 feet deep east of Burlington Island. A cross channel 8 feet deep, opposite Delanco, NJ Anchorage at mouth of Biles Creek A channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide between Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA, and upstream end of Newbold Island, thence 35 feet deep to Trenton Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 73d Con., 2d sess.' Rivers and Harbors CommitteeDoc.85, 74th Cong., 2d sess.' H. Doc.358, 79th Cong 2d sess. H. Doc.236, 99th Cong 2d sess. WRDA 1990 H. Doc. 388, 59th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc.262, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 73d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 66, 74th Cong., 1st sess' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 90, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doe. 679, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doe. 358, 83d Cong., 2d sess. l 3-24 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-B Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Marine Terminal and turning basin to 800 feet wide. Relocate channel at railroad bridge at Delair and suitably reconstruct bridge. Construct necessary bank protection works; and eliminate authorized anchorage near mouth of Biles Creek, PA June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19352 June 20, 19383 March 2, 19454 March 2, 19454 March 2, 19454 Sept. 3, 1954 July 3, 1958 March 2, 1919 July 3, 1930 March 2, 1945 DELAWARE RIVER, PA, NJ, AND DE, PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 35 feet deep from Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA to Delaware Bay. Anchorages 35 feet deep at Port Richmond and Mantua Creek, a 30 foot anchorage at Gloucester, NJ and extend 1,000 foot channel in Philadelphia Harbor to Horseshoe Bend. An anchorage 35 feet deep at Marcus Hook, PA A channel 37 feet deep from Philadelphia - Camden Bridge to Navy Yard, thence 40 feet deep to deep water in Delaware Bay. A 37-foot depth channel from Allegheny Ave., Philadelphia, PA to Philadelphia-Camden Bridge A 37-foot depth in an enlargement of anchorage near Mantua Creek and Marcus Hook. Maintain enlarged channel opposite Philadelphia Navy Yard. A channel from Allegheny Ave., to Naval Base 40 feet deep, 400 feet wide along west side of channel through Philadelphia Harbor and 500 feet wide through Horseshoe Bend. Anchorages at Reedy Point, Deepwater Point, Marcus Hook, and Mantua Creek 40 feet deep and 2,300 feet wide with mean lengths of 8,000, 5,200,13,650 and 11,500 feet respectively. DELAWARE RIVER VICINITY OF CAMDEN, NJ (See Section 6 of Text) A depth of 30 feet from Newton Creek to Kaighn Point, thence 18 feet to Cooper Point. Extending the 30-foot depth upstream to Berkely Street terminal. A depth of 37 feet in front of the Camden Marine terminal Doc. 733, 61st Cong, 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 71st Cong. 2d sess.I Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.5, 73d Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 159, 75th Cong. 3d sess.' H. Doc. 580, 76th Cong. 1st sess.' H. Doc. 340, 77th Cong. 1st sess.' Specified in Act. H. Doc. 358, 83rd Cong. 2d sess.' H. Doc. 185, 85th Cong. 1st sess. 74th Cong., 1st sess.' H. Doc. 1120, 63d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 111, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 353, 77th Cong., 3-25 Documents REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACITIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 3-B Acts Oct. 20, 1988 Aug. 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 7, 1939 Sept. 3, 1954 Aug. 30, 1935 July 25, 1912 Aug. 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized A depth of 40 feet in front of the Camden Marine terminal INDIAN RIVER INLET AND BAY, DE (See Section 7 of Text) A 15-foot inlet channel, steel and stone jetties, 6 foot channel from end of inlet channel to deep water in the bay and authority to modify interior inlet channel. A 9-foot channel from inlet to Old Landing, including basin, and 4-foot channel to highway bridge at Millsboro. INLAND WATERWAY FROM DELAWARE RIVER TO CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE & MD (See Section 8 of Text) A sea level channel 27 feet deep, 250 feet wide from Delaware River to Elk River and 400 feet wide down Elk River and Chesapeake Bay to deep water at or near Pooles Island; alter existing bridges over canal; enlarge Delaware City Branch Channel to 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, with a basin same depth and revetment of both banks east of Fifth Street; enlarge anchorage and mooring basin in Back Creek to 400 feet wide, 1,000 feet long and 12 feet deep; extend jetties at Reedy Point; and construct bulkheads. Construct a 4-lane high-level fixed highway bridge at or near St. Georges. A channel 35 feet deep and 450 feet wide from Delaware River through Elk River and Chesapeake Bay. For an 8-foot depth and width increased to 150 feet in Delaware Bay. INLAND WATERWAY, REHOBOTH BAY TO DELAWARE BAY, DE (See Section 9 of text) For a 6-foot depth canal to connect Rehoboth Bay and Delaware Bay. For a 6-foot depth entrance near Lewes, for jetties, for widening the canal from Broadkill River to Lewes and basin. For a 10-foot depth from Delaware Bay to Lewes and in basin, and for extending jetties. 5 Documents Ist sess. WRDA 1988 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 75th Cong. I st sess. H. Doc. 330, 76th Cong., Ist sess.' H. Doc. 201, 72d Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Does. 18 and 24, 736 Cong., 2d sess.' Public Law 310, 76th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 123, 83d Cong. 2d sess.' H.Doc.275, 73d Cong. 2d sess. I H. Doc. 823, 60th Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 51, 61st Cong., 3d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 56, 75th Cong., 2nd sess.' H. Doc. 344, 77th Cong., 1st sess.' 3-26 v a a a r" va aa VM r v PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 March 2, 1945 June 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 July 13, 1982 July 1, 1945 Nov. 17, 1986 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 8, 1917 July 3, 1930 MANASQUAN RIVER, NJ (See Section 10 of Text) Channel 8 feet deep and provision of works designed to secure channel. Widening channel on northerly side. Deepening channel to 12 and 14 feet, 10 and 12 foot anchorages.7 MAURICE RIVER, NJ (See Section 11 of Text) A 7-foot depth over entire project, with turning basin. An 8 foot depth, and width increased to 150 feet in Delaware Bay. MURDERKILL RIVER, DE (See Section 12 of Text) A channel 7 feet deep at low water from Frederica to the 7 foot curve in Delaware Bay, 80 feet wide down to the mouth, and 150 feet wide at bottom and 250 feet wide at top from the mouth to the 7 foot curve in the bay. Embankment of dredged material on each side to a height of at least 2 feet above high spring tides. NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (See Section 13 of Text) A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and generally 100 feet wide, extending from the Atlantic Ocean at Manasquan Inlet, NJ to Delaware Bay above Cape May, NJ. Construction of a canal of similar dimensions from Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay via the New England Creek basin, with adequate jetties at the Delaware Bay entrance. To increase the depth of the 2,000, foot reach of the Waterway in Cape May County to 15 feet. SALEM RIVER, NJ (See Section 14 of Text) A channel of 10-foot depth from Delaware River Masters Sand Plant Extention of project to Clements Bridge. A channel of 20-foot depth SCHUYLKILL RIVER, PA (See Section 15 of Text) Depths of 35 feet from mouth to Girard Point thence 30 feet, 26, and 22 feet to University Avenue Bridge, Philadelphia. A depth of 30 feet instead of 35 feet between the H. Doc. 482, 70th Cong. 2nd sess. Senate Committee Doc., 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 356, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 664, 59th Cong. 1st sess.' H.Doc 275, 73d Cong., 2d sess.' H.Ex. Doc. 21, 52d Cong., 1st Sess. (See page 981 Annual Report of 1892.) H.Doc. 133, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 525 79th Cong., 2d sess. WRDA of 1986 H. Doc. 217, 70th Cong. 1st Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doc. 15, 73d Cong., Ist sess. WRDA of 1986' H. Doc. 1270, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors 3-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACITIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 3-B Acts July 24, 1946 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized mouth and the conditional restoration and maintenance of the channel belowPassyunk Ave., channel dimensions between Passyunk Ave., and' by the United States. A depth of 33 feet from the channel in Delaware River to Passyunk Ave., restoration of the project channel dimensions between Passyunk Ave., and University Ave., and full maintenance of the entire project. Documents Committee Doc. 40, 71st Cong., 2d sess' H. Doc. 699, 79th Cong., 2d Sess' May 17, 1950 June 3,1896 July 25,1912 Sept. 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935' Oct. 17, 1940 July 14, 1960 WATERWAY FROM INDIAN (See Section 16 of Text) RIVER INLET TO REHOBOTH BAY, DE Provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Rehoboth Bay to Indian River Bay by way of Big Ditch. Project length is about 2.7 miles. WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE (See Section 17 of Text) Depths of 21,10 and 7 feet and jetties. Purchase or construct a dredge and auxiliaries including a wharf and depot, and maintenance of project. Entrance channel and basin with 25-foot depth and construction by local interests of new south jetty. A 30-foot depth between Delaware River and Lobdell Canal and modification or removal of a portion of north jetty. Completion of new south jetty by the United States subject to provision that city of Wilmington reimburse the United States for cost, without interest, of any part of structure that may subsequently be occupied and utilized for city activities. Permit temporary occupancy by city of Wilmington of any part of south jetty for city activities under revocable license, provided occupied portion of jetty is properly maintained without expense to the United States. A 35-foot depth between Delaware River ship channel and Lobdell Canal including turning basin of same depth, opposite Wilmington Marine Terminal, 200 feet H. Doc. 81-304, 81st Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 66, 54th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1897 p. 12501 H. Doc. 359, 62d Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 114, 67th Cong., 1st sess. and S. Committee Print, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 71st Cong. 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 32 73d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 658, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. H. Doc. 88, 86th Cong., 2d sess. 3-28 s awa v a aas r PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-B Acts AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized wide, 2,900 feet long on north side of channel, and 2,000 feet long on north side of basin. CAPE MAY INLET TO LOWER TOWNSHIP, NJ (See Section 18 of Text) Consists of beach fill; dune fill; new groins; main tenance of existing groins; rehabilitation of an existing seawall; and a breakwater with weir and deposition basin at Cape May Inlet. Project may be constructed separately or in combination with any other feature of the project. DELAWARE COAST PROTECTION (See Section 19 of Text) Provides for Federal participation in the cost of restoration and subsequent periodic nourishment, not to exceed 10 years, of the shore from Rehoboth Beach to Indian River Inlet. Project is modified to authorized the construction of sand bypass facilities and stone revetment erosion control measures at Indian River Inlet, DE.8 Rivers & Harbors Act of 1968 WRDA of 1986 H. Doc. 90, 90th Cong 2nd sess. WRDA of 1986 Sec. 869 Nov. 17, 1986 GREAT EGG HARBOR INLET & PECK BEACH, NJ (See Section 20 of Text) Project may be constructed separately or in combination with any other feature of the project. River and Harbor Act of 1965. WRDA of 1986. Consists of providing initial beachfill, with subsequent periodic nourishment, with a minimum berm width of 100 feet at an elevation of 8 feet above mean low water. BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA (See Section 21 of Text) Provides for multiple-purpose development for water supply flood control and recreation BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA (See Section 22 of Text) Provides for multiple purpose development for water supply, flood, control, and recreation. Site is located on Tulpehocken Creek about 1 1/2 miles upstream from its confluence with Plum Creek and about six miles northwest of Reading, PA. FRANCIS E. WALTER DAM, PA (See Section 25 of Text) Provided for a single-purpose flood control reservoir Provides for a multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation. H. Doc.522, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 522, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 587, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 522, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 3-29 Documents Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACITIVITIES FOR FY 1997 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized GENERAL EDGAR JAD WIN DAM AND RESERVOIR, PA (See Section 26 of Text) A single-purpose flood control reservoir with a capacity of 24,500 acre-feet formed by an earth embankment. GLEN FOERD, PA (See Section 27 of Text) Provides for restoration of the 1,350-foot river wall on the perimeter of the historic property for shoreline protection. MOLLY ANN'S BROOK, NJ (See Section 30 of Text) Modify Channel with a total length of 2.5 miles miles. Channel will include both trapezoidal channel sections and walled sections. Five bridges will be replaced and one building will removed. PROMPTON LAKE, PA (See Section 33 of Text) Provides for a single-purpose flood control reservoir. Provides for multiple-purpose development for water supply and recreation in addition to present singlepurpose flood control project. Documents H. Doc 113, 80th Cong., 1st sess. Section 106, WRDA of 1990 WRDA of 1986 H. Doc. 113, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc 522, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Also Public Works Administration September 6, 1933, and Emergency Relief Administration, May 28, 1935. 3. Channel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Naval Base to Philadelphia-Camden Bridge, deferred for restudy. 4. Channel 37 feet deep and 600 feet wide fromPhiladelphia-Camden Bridge to Allegheny Ave. deferred for restudy. 5. Extension of jetties considered to be active. 6. The 10 and 12 foot anchorages are considered inactive. 7. Also May 28, 1935, under Emergency Relief Administration. 8. Deauthorized the remaining portion of the project. 3-30 TABLE 3-B Acts Nov. 17, 1986 PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT TABLE 3-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1997 See Annual Operation and Active Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance Absecon Creek, NJ COMPLETED Absecon Inlet, NJ COMPLETED Alloway Creek, NJ COMPLETED Appoquinimink River,DE COMPLETED Big Timber Creek, NJ COMPLETED Broadkill River, DE COMPLETED Cedar Creek, Sussex City, DE COMPLETED Cohansey River, NJ COMPLETED Cooper River, NJ' COMPLETED Delaware River, Pennsville, NJ COMPLETED Double Creek, NJ' COMPLETED Harbor of Refuge COMPLETED Inland Waterway from Chincoteague Bay to Delaware Bay COMPLETED Little River, DE COMPLETED Mantua Creek, NJ COMPLETED Delaware Bay to Millville COMPLETED Millville fixed bridge to upper end of project SEE TABLE 3-F Mispillion River, DE COMPLETED **Neshaminy State Park Harbor, PA COMPLETED Oldmans Creek, NJ COMPLETED **Pepper Creek, DE COMPLETED Raccoon Creek, NJ COMPLETED St. Jones River, DE Delaware Bay to Lebanon" ' COMPLETED Jetties and entrance at mouth Schuylkill River above Fairmount Dam, PA' COMPLETED Smyrna River, DE Delaware River to Wharf at Smyrna Landing9 COMPLETED Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed bridge. SEE TABLE 3-F Toms River, NJ ACTIVE Tuckerton River, NJ ACTIVE Woodbury Creek, NJ' COMPLETED 1989 1990 1989 1934 1989 1976 1993 1995 1989 1912 1964 1981 1980 1966 1995 1968 1941 1989 1994 1961 1955 1949 1996 1996 1940 11,935 534,20916 21,398 36,973 58,6652 68,228 256,100 146,75620 33,102 256,624 7,800 5,162,23018 168,412"1 12,016 169,6877 143,98423 738,83921 128,20314 31,188 138,094's 83,665'13 207,102 4,291,810 198,844 10,050 60,242 27,0930 84,186* 5,98517317 55,117 41,270 71,925* 243,641 310,738 3,749,983 396,528* 4 1,169,01419 98,36012 288,310 339,340* 161,913 4,203,01322 54,601 32,125 38,988* 368,001 66,093 4 197,327 262,485 660,917 56,474 3-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 TABLE 3-C Active Projects OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September See Annual Operat Status Report For Construction Maint Alloway Creek' INACTIVE 1931 21,398 35,761 Aquatic Plant Control INACTIVE 1975 87,594 Dennis Creek, NJ' INACTIVE 1897 4,701 Goshen Creek, NJ' INACTIVE 1905 15,359 870 Ice Harbor at Marcus Hook, PA" 5 INACTIVE 1928 208,964 14,336 Ice Harbor at New Castle, DE '5 INACTIVE 1898 224,704 Leipsic River, DE' INACTIVE 1931 36,956 32,345 Little Egg Harbor, NJ1'3 INACTIVE -6 15,048 For Last Full Report Cost to September 30, 1997 See Annual Operation and Deferred Projects Status Report For Construction Maintenance St. Jones River, DE 1961 - Delaware Bay to Lebanon' 8 - 207,102 66,093 Jetties and new entrance at mouth DEFERRED - - 1. Completed. 2. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds expended for new work. 3. Abandonment recommended in House Doc. 467, 69th Congress, 1st Sess. 4. Maintenance assumed by local interests. 5. Harbor not now required by commerce. 6. Last appropriation for project was in 1852. No information is at hand relative to work done. 7. Includes $3,000 for new work for previous projects. 8. Includes $54,590 new work and $28,935 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. 9. Includes $55,085 new work and $22,723 maintenance funds expended on previous projects. 10. Includes $2,950 new work funds expended on previous projects. 11. Entire amount expended on previous projects repealed in 1905. 12. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds and includes $25,330 for maintenance for previous project. 13. Encludes $757 new work funds expended on previous projects. 14. Excludes $327,957 contributed funds allotted expended for new work. 15. Excludes $38,988 non-Federal funds. 16. Includes $116.497 for new work on previous projects. 17. Includes $2,489,173 for maintenance for previous projects. 18. Includes $2,749,452 for new work for previous projects. 19. Excludes $1,089 for reconnaissance and condition surveys fiscal year 1963. 20. Includes $36,000 for new work for previous projects. 21. Includes $148,798 for new work on previous projects. 22. Includes $61,172 for maintenance on previous projects. 23. Includes $43,000 new work funds expended on previous projects. * Operation and maintenance figure includes cost incurred for preparation of environmental impact statements. ** Projects authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 3-32 30, 1997 ion and enance PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual Cost to September 30, 1997 Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Brigantine Island INACTIVE* - Corson Inlet and Ludlam Beach, NJ INACTIVE* 1978 314,400 Long Beach Island INACTIVE* - - Townsends Inlet and Seven Mile Beach, NJ INACTIVE* - - - * NO CURRENT YEAR FUNDS. OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 3-E FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Project Allentown, Lehigh River, PA Bethlehem, Lehigh River, PA Mt. Holly, NJ Pottstown, PA Hay Creek, Birdsboro, PA Tamaqua, PA COn COl COl A( INi A( For Last Full Report See Annual Status Report For C VIPLETED 1961 MPLETED 1966 MPLETED 1946 CTIVE 1984 ACTIVE 1984 CTIVE 1990 onstru 1,615,5 4,520,9 283,6 487,3 335,2 628,4 Cost to September 30, 1997 Operation and iction Maintenance 581 1 X95 1 55 1 366 299 X67' 1. Maintenance assumed by local interest as required by authorizing project. 2. Transferred from Baltimore District in FY 1989. 3-33 TABLE 3-D REPORT OF THE SECRECTARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 TABLE 3-F DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Date Federal Contributed Report See Annual And Funds Funds Navigation Projects Report For Authority Expended Expended Appoquinimink River, DE' 1931 3 Oct 78 HD 95-351 $78,243 - Atlantic City, NJ 1972 HD 538 918 $2,083,289 - Barnegat Light, NJ 1964 HD 208 918 $70,908 - Cape May City, NJ 1961 3 Sep 54 Delaware County, PA Long Beach Island, NJ Ocean City, NJ Rehoboth Beach to Indian River Inlet, DE Beach Erosion Projects 1931 1964 1969 1965 For Last Full Report See Annual Renort For HD 206 918 PL 99-662 52 Stat. 323 14 Jul 60 HD 208 918 HD 184 918 HD 216 918 Date And Authority $22,9577 $7,139 $40,665 $395,8319 $326,116 Federal Funds Expended Contributed Funds Expended Hereford Inlet Maurice River, NJ Millville fixed bridge to upper end of project2 Oldmans Creek, NJ3 Rancocas River, NJ4 Smyrna River, DE 5 Wharf at Smyrna Landing to fixed bridge. Flood Control Projects Aquashicola Reservoir, PA 1978 1948 1941 1942 1949 For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1963 Delaware River, Mouth of Neversink Lehigh River at Bethlehem, PA6 1917 1966 Section 12 PL 93-251 Section 12 PL 93-251 2 Nov 79 Section 12 PL 93-251 2 Nov 79 Section 12 PL 93-251 2 Nov 79 HD 95-157 Date 1 And Authority $314,400 $63,313 $57,590 $396,169 Federal Funds Expended 17 Nov 86 PL 99-662 46 Stat. 918 Chester River, 5 Aug 77 HD 94-192 2 Nov 79 Section 12 PL 93-251 $4,520,995 Contributed Funds Expended 17 Nov 86 3-34 u r -- -- " r TABLE 3-F Flood Control Projects Maiden Creek Reservoir, PA PHILADELPHIA, PA DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Date Report See Annual And Report For Authori 1963 Federal Contributed Funds Funds itv Expended Expended 17 Nov 86 Tocks Island, PA,NJ,and NY S Tocks Island (Relocation of U.S. Route 209 only) PA8 Trexler Lake, PA 1979 1979 1981 PL 99-662 46 Stat. 918 23 Oct 62 PL 87-874 23 Oct 62 PL 87-874 17 Nov 86 PL 99-662 76 Stat. 1180 1. Includes $36,973 new work, and $41,270 for maintenance. 2. There is no need now for this portion of the project. 3. Includes $31,188 new work, and $32,125 for maintenance. 4. Includes $44,500 new work, and $13.090 for maintenance. 5. Includes $143,759 new work, $55.085 previous project. $174,602 for maintenance, and $22,723 maintenance, previous project. 6. Maintenance assumed by local interest. 7. Excludes $58,585 Accelerated Public Works funds expended for extention to two groins. 8. National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 terminated Corps authority to proceed with the project. Legislation would be required to proceed with the project. 9. Excludes cost of $1,146,325 to local interests and $272,766 Federal participation expended under Public Works Acceleration Program for extention of five existing groins completed 11 May 1964. 10. Includes $3,489,088 for AE&D. 3-35 65,106,2600 $195,223 -- BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT * This district comprises the watershed of Susquehanna River and its tributaries from headwaters in south central New York State through central Pennsylvania to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; watershed of the Potomac River and its tributaries from headwaters in Maryland, eastern West Virginia, and Northern Virginia to its mouth in Chesapeake Bay; District of Columbia; and southwestern portion of Delaware. It includes that portion of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries north of Smith Point, MD, on western shore of the bay, and includes that portion of Maryland between Chesapeake Bay and Atlantic Ocean. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Baltimore Harbor and Channels, MD and VA ....................... 4-3 2. Baltimore Harbor, MD, Collection and Removal of Drift ....... 4-4 3. Chester River, MD .................... 4-4 4. Crisfield Harbor, MD .................. 4-4 5. Fishing Bay, MD ................... 4-5 6. Fishing Creek, MD ............ ...... 4-5 7. Herring Creek, Tall Timbers, MD ........ 4-5 8. Honga River and Tar Bay, MD .......... 4-6 9. Island Creek, MD ......... ........... 4-6 10. Neabsco Creek, VA .................. .4-7 11. Northeast River, MD ................. 4-7 12. Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD ................ 4-7 13. Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, DC, ......... Collection and Removal of Drift ...... 4- 8 14. Potomac River - Aquatic Plant Control, MD, VA, and DC .................. 4-8 15. Potomac River at Alexandria, VA ........ 4-8 16. Potomac River Below Washington, DC ... .4-8 17. Prevention of Obstructions and Injurious Deposits, MD ........... 4-9 18. Rock Hall Harbor, MD ................. 4-9 19. Tedious Creek, MD .................. 4-9 20. Twitch Cove and Big Thorofare, MD .... 4-10 21. Washington Harbor, DC ............... 4-10 22. Wicomico River, MD ................. 4-11 23. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ... 4-1 1 24. Navigation work under Special Authorization ..................... 4-11 Beach Erosion Control 25. Beach Erosion Control Work under Special Authorization .......... 4-11 26. Atlantic Coast of Maryland ............ 4-11 27. 28. 29. 30. 30A. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. Flood Control Page Broad Top Region, PA ............... 4-12 Cumberland MD, and Ridgeley, WV ..... 4-12 Jennings Randolph Lake, MD and WV ... 4-12 Lackawanna River Basin, PA ........... 4-13 Aylesworth Creek Lake, PA ........... 4-13 Lock Haven, PA .......... .......... 4-13 Moorefield, WV ..................... 4-14 Olyphant, Lackawanna River, PA ....... 4-14 Paxton Creek, Harrisburg, PA .......... 4-14 Petersburg, WV ................... . .4-14 Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, PA .................. 4-15 Scranton, Lackawanna River, PA ........ 4-15 South Central Pennsylvania Environmental Improvement Program . .4-15 39. Southern New York Flood Control Projects .................. .4-16 39A. Addison, NY ..................... 4-16 39B. Almond Lake, NY ................... 4-16 39C. Arkport Dam, NY ................... .4-16 39D. Avoca, NY ......................... 4-16 39E. Binghamton, NY ................... .4-17 39F. Canisteo, NY ...................... 4-17 39G. Corning, NY ....................... 4-17 39H. East Sidney, NY ..................... 4-18 391. Elmira, NY ......... ......... 4-18 39J. Hornell, NY ....................... 4-18 39K. Lisle, NY .......................... 4-19 39L. Oxford, NY ......................... 4-19 39M. Whitney Point Lake, NY .............. 4-19 39N. Whitney Point Village, NY ............ 4-20 40. Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA . .4-20 41. Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects, NY and PA................................4-20 41A. Cowanesque Lake, PA..................................4-20 4-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Flood Control (cont'd) Page 41B. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA......................4-21 42. West Branch of Susquehanna River, PA ...................................... ..........4-21 42A. Alvin R. Bush Dam, PA ...... ............4-21 42B. Curwensville Lake, PA..............................4-21 42C. Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA................4-22 43. Wyoming Valley, PA (Levee Raising).........4-22 44. York, Indian Rock Dam, PA ..................... 4-22 45. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ..................................... 4-23 46. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations.............................................4-23 47. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization .................................... 4-23 Environmental Restoration 48. Chesapeake Bay Oyster Recovery, MD ..................................... 4-23 49. Poplar Island, M D.......... ........................4.-23 Water Supply 50. Washington Aqueduct ................................. 4-24 51. 52. 53. General Investigations Page Surveys ......................... .. ........... 4-24 Collection and Study of Basic Data..............4-24 Pre-construction Engineering and D esign ..................... ..................... 4-24 Tables Table 4-A Cost and Financial Statement...........4-26 Table 4-B Authorizing Legislation ...................... 4-33 Table 4-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ......................... 4-40 Table 4-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ........................... 4-42 Table 4-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........................... .4-42 Table 4-F Not Applicable Table 4-G Deauthorized Projects ...................... 4-44 Table 4-H Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys......................4-46 Table 4-I Inspection of Completed Projects ......................... 4-47 4-2 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT NAVIGATION 1. BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS, MD AND VA Location. Baltimore Harbor is at the head of the navigable portion of Patapsco River about 12 miles from Chesapeake Bay. The Patapsco River rises near the town of Westminster in Carroll County, MD, and flows generally southeast for about 65 miles to enter Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12278.) Existing project. a. A uniform main channel depth of 50 feet between Cape Charles, VA, and Fort McHenry at Baltimore, MD, with dimensions as follows: (1) Cape Henry Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide from the 50-foot depth curve in the Atlantic Ocean to that depth in Chesapeake Bay, a distance of 3.0 miles; (2) York Spit Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide connecting the 50-foot depth curves in Chesapeake Bay near York Spit, a distance of 18.4 miles; (3) Rappahannock Shoal Channel: 50 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide connecting the 50-foot depth curves in the Chesapeake Bay opposite the Rappahannock River, a distance of 10.3 miles; and (4) Baltimore Harbor Approach Channels: 50 feet deep and generally 800 feet wide, widened at the approach and bends, from the 50-foot depth curve in Chesapeake Bay opposite the mouth of the Magothy River to Fort McHenry on the Patapsco River, a distance of 20.2 miles. b. Branch channels with dimensions as follows: (1) Connecting Channel to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal Approach Channel: 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 15.6 miles long from the Cutoff Angle in the main channel to the 35-foot depth curves in the natural channel on the east side of Chesapeake Bay which is part of the inland waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay. The channel includes the Brewerton Extension and Swan Point and Tolchester Channels; (2) Curtis Bay: 50 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 2.3 miles long from the main channel to and including a turning basin at the head of Curtis Bay; (3) Curtis Creek: (a) a channel, 35 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide, from the 50-foot channel in Curtis Bay to 750 feet downstream of the Pennington Avenue Bridge; (b) a channel, 22 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide, from the 35-foot channel to and along the marginal wharf of the Curtis Bay Ordnance Depot; (c) an irregular shaped 3-acre basin, with a depth of 18 feet, adjacent to the head of the 22-foot channel; (d) a basin, 15 feet deep and 450 feet wide, from the end of the 22-foot channel to the end of the marginal wharf; and (e) a channel, 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide, from the 22-foot channel south of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Bridge to the vicinity of Arundel Cove, a distance of 2,800 feet, thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for a distance of 2,100 feet, with an anchorage basin, 700 feet square, adjacent to the channel and southwest of the wharf of the Coast Guard Depot at Curtis Bay; (4) Middle Branch; Ferry Bar East Section: a channel, 42 feet deep and 600 feet wide, from the main channel at Fort McHenry to Ferry Bar, a distance of 1.5 miles; and (5) Northwest Branch: Federal maintenance of 39-foot or 35-foot deep channels after either depth has been provided by local interests: (a) East Channel: a channel, 49 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1.0 mile long with a turning basin at the head of the channel from that depth existing at the time of construction; and (b) West Channel: a channel, 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1.3 miles long with a turning basin at the head of the channel from that depth existing at the time of construction. c. The following anchorages: (1) Riverview Anchorage No. 2: 30 feet deep, 2,400 feet long, and 1,200 feet wide; (2) Riverview Anchorage No. 1: 35 feet deep, 4,500 feet long, and 1,500 feet wide; and (3) Fort McHenry Anchorage: 35 feet deep, 3,500 feet long, and 400 feet wide. The mean range of tide is 2.8 feet at the Cape Henry Channel, 2.3 feet at the York Spit Channel, 1.4 feet at the Rappahannock Shoal Channel, 0.8 foot at the Craighill Entrance, 0.9 foot in the Cutoff Section, 1.1 feet at Fort McHenry, and 1.2 feet at Pooles Island in the upper Chesapeake Bay. Depths refer to mean low water. Estimated cost for new work is $361,581,000 which includes: $8,330,000 for completed work through the River and Harbor Act of 1945; $38,411,000 for work completed under the River and Harbor Act of 1958 of which $33,991,000 is Corps of Engineers, $60,000 is U.S. Coast Guard and $4,360,000 is non-Federal; and $314,840,000 (October 1989 prices) for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970, of which $460,000 is U.S. Coast Guard and $314,380,000 is Corps of Engineers and non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-3 of Fiscal Year 1982 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. The Port of Baltimore has 45 miles of waterfront of which 25 miles are industrially developed. There are 94 covered and open overseas piers for the loading and discharging of 173 ships, providing 84 general cargo, 65 specialized cargo, and 24 public bulk cargo berths. The existing ground storage is equivalent to 53,700 railroad cars of cargo. There are 31 public general merchandise warehouses, with 4.9 million square feet of storage space and 4.7 million cubic feet of cold storage space. Eight ship-building, ship repair, and ship dismantling yards are available for handling up to 90 vessels. The two grain elevators in the port have a capacity of about 8 million bushels. Latest description of terminal facilities is in "Port Series No. 10 (revised 1991)" on Port of Baltimore, MD, (issued by Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors). Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work, Baltimore District: Studies for completing the remaining new work under the River and Harbor Act of 1958, widening the Connecting Channel (Brewerton Channel Eastern Extension) from 450 to 600 feet wide, were completed during the fiscal year at a total cost of 4-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 $952,000 ($121,700 during FY 97). The final Baltimore Harbor & Channels, Maryland and Virginia, 42-Foot Project Brewerton Channel Eastern Extension, Maryland Limited Reevaluation Report and Environmental Assessment, recommending widening of the channel to 600 feet was submitted to Headquarters on August 21, 1997 for approval. New Work, Norfolk District: None. Maintenance, Baltimore District: Condition surveys of the project channels were made. Maintenance dredging, by contract, of the Craighill Channel, Cutoff Angle, Brewerton Channel Eastern Extension, and Tolchester Channel commenced on January 27, 1997 and was completed on May 10, 1997. Approximately 2,109,010 cubic yards of material were dredged and deposited in the approved Hart-Miller Island containment facility in the Chesapeake Bay at a cost of $9,200,629. A contract in the amount of $9,843,000 was awarded on September 16, 1997, to dredge an estimated 2.5 million cubic yards of material from the Craighill Entrance, Craighill Angle, Ft. McHenry Channel, and the Brewerton Channel Eastern Extension and to deposit the material in the approved Hart-Miller Island containment facility in the Chesapeake Bay. Maintenance, Norfolk District: Condition surveys of the Rappahannock Shoal and Atlantic Ocean Channels were made at a cost of $134,000. A contract in the amount of $3,182,560 and was awarded on September 26, 1997 to dredge an estimated 1.1 million cubic yards of material from the Cape Henry and York Spit Channels and to deposit the material in the approved Dam Neck Ocean Placement Area and the Wolf Trap Alternate open water placement area in the Chesapeake Bay. 2. BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD, COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Project applies to Baltimore Harbor, MD, and its tributaries. Existing project. Provides for collection and removal of drift from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary waters, and authorizes the Secretary of the Army to allot such amounts as may be necessary for work from appropriations for maintenance and improvement of existing river and harbor works or other available appropriations, and that this work shall be carried as a separate and distinct project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. Purpose of work is to afford relief from variable conditions of obstruction. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Section 1 of this text. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations, by hired labor, consisted of collection and disposal of 19,980 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. 3. CHESTER RIVER, MD Location. Rises in Kent County, DE, and flows 50 miles generally southwesterly and empties into the Chesapeake Bay. Kent Island Narrows is a passage connecting Chester River and Eastern Bay. Wells Cove is an indentation on the easterly side of Kent Island Narrows about 0.4 mile south of the highway bridge crossing the Narrows. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 12266 and 12270.) Previous project. For details see page 262 of the 1960 Annual Report. Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Crumpton to Jones Landing, section included in project is about 5.5 miles long with the lower end of the section being about 37 miles above mouth of river; for a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide from Chester River to Eastern Bay through Kent Island Narrows; and a channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide extending from 7-foot deep curve in Kent Island Narrows 800 feet into Wells Cove with a basin of same depth and 300 feet square at head of channel. Mean range of tide is 2.4 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $32,454, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. Widening 7-foot deep channel from 75 to 100 feet from Chester River to Eastern Bay through Kent Island Narrows was deauthorized and is excluded from the foregoing estimate. Local cooperation. Fully met except local interests are to furnish disposal areas for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. There are two bulkhead wharves on Chester River section. Facilities on the Kent Island Narrows section of the existing project consist of about 10,000 linear feet of timber pile bulkheaded wharf. About 1,350 linear feet of the wharf is owned and operated by the Queen Anne's County; the remainder is privately owned. The privately owned bulkheaded wharf is operated mostly by the seven marinas located on the Narrows with the remainder being owned and operated by the seafood packing houses in the area. In addition to the slips of the marinas, there are marine railways, launching ramps, and travel-lifts. All of these facilities are in good condition and are located adjacent to the proposed improvements. In Wells Cove there is a small wharf, a small marine railway, and a public landing. All facilities are privately owned except the public landing on Wells Cove. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was awarded on September 30, 1996 in the amount of $583,000. The maintenance work was completed in February, 1997 with the removal of 42,951 cubic yards of material which was placed in a new upland site. 4. CRISFIELD HARBOR, MD Location. Along western limits of the town of Crisfield on east bank of Little Annemessex River, an 4-4 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT estuary of Tangier Sound on east side of Chesapeake Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Previous project. For details see page 279 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water, 425 feet wide from the 12-foot depth curve in Tangier Sound to Somers Cove Light, thence 266 feet wide to the bend about 1,800 feet southwest of railroad pier, and thence of irregular width to a point opposite Consumers Ice Co.; a spur channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the ice plant to Hop Point; a channel 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the 7-foot depth curve in Little Annemessex River via Cedar Creek, a landcut, and Daugherty Creek Canal to Big Annemessex River; a mooring basin 7 feet deep, 160 feet wide and about 875 feet long roughly parallel to Brick Kiln Road, with a channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide leading therefrom to 7-foot project channel connecting Little Annemessex and Big Annemessex Rivers; and an anchorage basin in Somers Cove 10 feet deep, 600 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long, with an approach channel 10 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the 10-foot depth curve in Little Annemessex River through the present entrance to Somers Cove. Mean range of tide at Crisfield is about 1.9 feet. Local cooperation. Local interests furnished disposal areas for future maintenance dredging. Terminal facilities. Waterfront of Crisfield Harbor is built up principally with solid-bulkhead wharves and pile-and-timber piers. Most wharves are privately owned, but are open to the public for transaction of business with the owners. Few of the terminals have mechanical freight-handling devices, but most of the freight is transferred by hand. There are three boatrepair yards with marine railways having capacities up to 250 tons. Existing terminals are adequate for present and reasonably prospective commerce. Sufficient areas are available north of Hop Point and on Somers Cove for construction of additional terminals as needed. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection for future maintenance dredging. 5. FISHING BAY, MD Location. McCready's, Goose, and Farm Creeks are small tidal estuaries of Fishing Bay, a large estuary at head of Tangier Sound. Fishing Bay is connected by Hooper Strait with Chesapeake Bay to the west about 15 miles above mouth of Potomac River. Goose Creek enters the bay about 3.5 miles above the mouth. Farmn Creek enters Fishing Bay about 6 miles above the mouth and approximately opposite mouth of McCready's Creek. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Existing project. Provides for channels 6 feet deep and generally 60 feet wide at mean low water, suitably widened where necessary to offer adequate sheltered anchorage space from deep water in Fishing Bay to vicinity of county or packing house wharves in McCready's, Farm, and Goose Creeks. Mean range of tide is about 2 feet. Terminal facilities. A public wharf built with aid of Federal funds is on McCready's Creek about 200 feet above the mouth. There is a privately owned pile-andtimber pier about 1,500 feet above the mouth of Goose Creek. There are two privately owned wharves on Farm Creek and a public wharf owned by Dorchester County. Private wharves on each of the waterways are open to the public for transaction of business with the owners. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging contract was completed on October 6, 1997. A total of 23,874 cubic yards were removed from McCready's Creek and a total of 30,692 cubic yards were removed from Farm Creek. Approximately 20,000 cubic yards of material from McCready's Creek was beneficially placed along an eroding shoreline adjoining Wharf Road. A total of three geotextile tubes measuring 100 feet each were filled with dredged material to serve as offshore breakwaters on the windward edge of the marsh creation. A 1/2 acre marsh will be planted in 1998. 6. FISHING CREEK, MD Location. A narrow winding tidal stream which enters Chesapeake Bay from the west 56 miles south of Baltimore and about 26 miles south of Annapolis, MD. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12266.) Existing project. A channel 7 feet deep with widths of 100 and 60 feet from deep water in the Chesapeake Bay to an anchorage of same depth, 120 feet wide and 400 feet long, located in marsh 500 feet above mouth of creek, and twin stone jetties at entrance; north jetty is about 1,050 feet long, and south jetty about 1,100 feet long. The mean range of tide is about 1 foot. Cost of new work for the completed project was $111,242. Local cooperation. Fully complied with except that local interests are to furnish disposal areas as needed for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Seven hundred feet of bulkhead wharf are available on the south side of the entrance channel running west from bay shore, and the U.S. Navy Department constructed a pile-and-timber wharf on west side of basin. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance contract was completed on August 29, 1997. A total of 25,015 cubic yards of material was removed and placed in a previously used upland site. 7. HERRING CREEK TALL TIMBERS, MD Location. Herring Creek in St. Mary's County, MD, is a small tidal stream 1 3/4 miles in length which flows 4-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 in a westerly direction and enters the north bank of the Potomac River 16 miles upstream of its mouth at Chesapeake Bay and 92 miles downstream from Washington, DC (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 557.) Existing project. This provides for an entrance channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide, and approximately 1,630 feet long extending from deep water in the Potomac River to deep water within the creek, a turning basin of irregular shape 6 feet deep adjacent to the proposed public wharf, and riprap-stone jetties on the upstream and downstream sides of the entrance channel 770 and 650 feet long, respectively. The plane of reference is mean low water. The tidal ranges are: Mean, 1.6 feet; irregular, 1.9 feet; and extreme, approximately 7 feet. The project was modified in 1986 under Section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968. The modification consists of constructing 250 feet of beachfill, 2,187 linear feet of stone revetment and upgrading 350 linear feet of existing revetment along the Tall Timbers waterfront south of the project inlet to preclude shoreline erosion induced by the project jetties. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) includes the following provisions: 1. Compliance with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions Policies Act of 1970. 2. Provide without cost to the United States, when and as required all lands, easements, rights-of-way and soildisposal areas necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project. 3. Hold and save the United States free from damages to other property resulting from the improvement. Terminal facilities. There are a number of small wharves and landings within the creek, all privately owned. The facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Report of study finalized recommending modification to existing project through the placement of the beachfill section with a stone revetment. 8. HONGA RIVER AND TAR BAY, MD Location. Honga River is a tidal estuary of Chesapeake Bay and penetrates Dorchester County on Eastern Shore of Maryland between Hooper Island and the mainland; Tar Bay lies between Barren Island and the mainland and Hooper Island. Fishing Creek connects Tar Bay and Honga River. Back Creek is a branch of Honga River extending into Hooper Island; the mouth is about 2 miles south of Fishing Creek. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep at mean low water from the 7-foot contour in Chesapeake Bay, through Tar Bay and Fishing Creek to the 7-foot contour in Honga River, 25,300 feet long, and a channel in Back Creek 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the 7-foot depth curve in Honga River to a point near the head of Back Creek with a turning basin of the same depth 150 feet long and 200 feet wide at the head of channel, about 5,500 feet long. Mean range of tide is about 1.4 feet. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $66,119. Local cooperation. Local interests furnished placement areas for future maintenance dredging. Terminal facilities. Numerous small private wharves are scattered along Fishing Creek and Back Creek. A public wharf is on Fishing Creek. A public wharf, four oyster houses, and a marine railway are on Back Creek. Facilities are adequate for existing and reasonable prospective commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was awarded on September 19, 1995 to remove 164,000 cubic yards of material. Contractor defaulted and Bonding Company assumed takeover. Contract was Completed in November 1996 with the removal of 161,777 cubic yards of material and placed behind geotextile tubes. 9. ISLAND CREEK, MD Location. Island Creek in St. Mary's County, MD, is a tidal estuary three-fourths of a mile long, flowing in a southeasterly direction and entering the right bank of St. Mary's River at its junction with the Potomac River, 11 miles upstream of the Chesapeake Bay and 97 miles downstream from Washington, DC. It lies entirely within the lower half of St. George's Island. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 557.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 5 feet deep, 50 feet wide, and 2,000 feet long from the St. Mary's River through the entrance to Island Creek and a turning basin 5 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and 500 feet long within the creek. The plane of reference is mean low water. The tidal ranges are: Mean, 1.5 feet; irregular, 2.5 feet; and extreme, approximately 7 feet. This existing Federal navigation project was modified to provide a jetty 1,200 feet in length just south of the channel. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement was signed on May 10, 1995, with St. Mary's County, MD, which requires the local sponsor to provide all lands, easements, relocations, and rights-of-way necessary for construction of the project; hold and save the U.S. from potential damages; assure public ownership; and provide a 10 percent contribution toward the cost of construction. At the completion of construction, an additional 10 percent contribution must be provided by the local sponsor, however, any credits for lands, easements, relocations and rights-of-way may be applied against this contribution. Local interests are to furnish disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. On Island Creek there are five small private landings or stagings which are considered adequate for present commerce. 4-6 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction was completed on March 27, 1996. Operation and maintenance of the project will be a Federal responsibility. The resulting modification will result in reduced annual operation and maintenance (dredging) costs. 10. NEABSCO CREEK, VA Location. A tidal estuary approximately three miles long, enters the west side of the Potomac River about 83 miles above its mouth and about 27 miles south of Washington, D.C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 560.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide from the Potomac River to the anchorage basin. The project was classified as inactive for many years. On September 2, 1966, Chief of Engineers reclassified the following portion from the inactive to the active category; a channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep, from the Potomac River to the Richmond, Fredericksburg, and Potomac Railroad Bridge over Neabsco Creek and a channel upstream from the railroad bridge 60 feet wide and 6 feet deep to an anchorage basin of the same depth 140 feet wide and 150 feet long. On January 3, 1978, the Chief of Engineers reclassified this portion of the project to inactive category as local cooperation was lacking. The 1986 Water Resource Development Act deauthorized the unconstructed 7 foot channel from the Potomac River to the Upper Landing. Local cooperation. The local interests must provide a suitable placement site for future maintenance dredging. Terminal Facilities. There are numerous privately owned piers along the waterway open to the public. Several repair facilities provide services to navigational interests. Operation and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging. 11. NORTHEAST RIVER, MD Location. A tidal waterway extending southwestward 5.5 miles from the junction of its branches in the town of North East to the head of Chesapeake Bay, 6 miles north of entrance to the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1226.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep at mean low water from that depth in river to foot of Church Street in the town of North East, enlarged at its upper end to form a basin 120 feet wide and 300 feet long. Mean range of tide is 2.25 feet. Local cooperation. Fully met except that local interests are to furnish disposal areas for future maintenance as required. Terminal facilities. There are a few lightly constructed landings for small boats scattered along the waterfront in the town of North East. There are two fish-packing plants, two marine railways, several bulkhead wharves, 11 marinas, and a number of small boathouses along the length of the waterway. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging. 12. OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND SINEPUXENT BAY, MD Location. Ocean City is on a barrier island between Sinepuxent Bay and Atlantic Ocean about 35 miles south of entrance to Delaware Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12211.) Existing project. This provides for an inlet channel 200 feet wide and 10 feet deep through the inlet to the channel in the Isle of Wight Bay, protected on the south side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 8.8 feet above mean low water and a top width of 18 feet, and on the north side by a stone jetty with a top elevation of 9 feet above mean low water and a top width of generally 20 feet, thence generally 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep to the project harbor; a channel 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide in Sinepuxent Bay from the inlet to Green Point, and thence 100 feet wide in Chincoteague Bay; and for a channel 6 feet deep and 125 feet wide from the inlet channel to a point opposite North Eighth Street in Ocean City, thence 75 feet wide into the Isle of Wight Bay. The modification authorized by the 1954 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in December 1989. This work included 16- and 14-foot depth channels with widths from 300 to 100 feet from the Atlantic Ocean to the head of the harbor. Depths in the inlet channel and harbor refer to project datum. Depths in the bay channels refer to mean low water. The elevation of mean low water in the bays above mean low water in the ocean at Ocean City varies from about 0.8 foot in the vicinity of the inlet to 1.7 feet at their heads. The mean range of ocean tide is 3.4 feet. The extreme range is from 3 feet below mean low water to about 3.5 feet above mean high water, a total of 9.9 feet. In the bays the mean range of tide varies from approximately 2.5 feet at the inlet to 0.3 foot at their heads. Greater fluctuations are caused by prolonged high winds. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $1,190,530, exclusive of $500,000 contributed by local interests and exclusive of $3,700,000 for rehabilitating the south jetty. Local cooperation. Fully met except local interests must furnish disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. 4-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Terminal facilities. On bay side of Ocean City: two storage basins, for pleasure and small commercial craft, and numerous privately owned pile-and-timber piers and bulkhead wharves. At project harbor: a public landing about 1,000 feet long, several privately constructed bulkhead wharves open to the public for transaction of business with the owners, and a boat repair yard with a marine railway capable of handling boats up to about 150 tons. All piers and wharves are accessible by highway. Port facilities have been expanded to include all available space in the Fish Harbor. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design work was accomplished to prepare a major maintenance justification for repair of the south jetty and an adjacent scour hole. Maintenance dredging of the Inlet was completed in May, 1997 with the removal of 21,398 cubic yards of sand which was placed on the beach near the Inlet. 13. POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA RIVERS, DC, COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Project applies to the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, Washington, DC, and their tributaries. Existing project. Collection and removal of drift from the waters of the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers and their tributaries in the Washington area from the head of tidewater to Mount Vernon, VA. Total length of project, considering both sides of the waterway, is about 50 miles. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Section 22 of this text. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations by hired labor consisted of collection and disposal of 100,440 cubic feet of driftwood, ranging from small blocks up to timbers of large dimensions. 14. POTOMAC RIVER AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, MD, VA, AND DC Location. The project is located in the Potomac River and its tributaries with the northern boundary at Chain Bridge in Washington, DC, extending southward to the U.S. Route 301 Bridge (see U.S. Coast and Geodetic Chart 12289). Existing project. On July 2, 1986 the Chief of Engineers under the authority of Section 302 of the 1965 River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized the control of hydrilla and other nuisance plants using mechanical harvesting to clear a 60-foot wide, 6-foot deep connecting channel from open waters to eligible public use areas. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed on June 6, 1986 between the Corps, MD, VA, DC, and Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments. The LCA, which must be reexecuted annually, initially expired on September 30, 1991 and included the following provisions: 1. Local sponsors share 50 percent of the program cost; 2. Local sponsors provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; and 3. Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments is responsible for coordinating local interests and issuing work orders for the program. Terminal facilities. There are 75 marina activities between DC and the U.S. Route 50 Bridge providing approximately 3,400 commercial and recreational boat slips and 50 boat ramps. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Hydrilla was harvested in both Maryland and Virginia. Two additional sites were added with the plant spreading farther down the river. Shoreline surveys and aerial photography continued to be performed, however funding has been exhausted and next year's work is in jeopardy. 15. POTOMAC RIVER AT ALEXANDRIA, VA Location. Alexandria is 3 miles below Washington, DC, on right bank of Potomac River, which flows southeasterly into Chesapeake Bay 105 miles downstream. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12289. Existing project. Provides for depth of 24 feet in front of Alexandria between the through channel and a line drawn 20 feet outside of established pierhead line. Project area is about 6,700 feet long and averages 300 feet wide. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal ranges are: mean, 2.8 feet; irregular, 4.5 feet; and extreme, 10.6 feet. Cost of new work for completed project was $95,215. Existing project was adopted by 1910 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 1253, 60th Cong., 2d sess.). Map is in the project document. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Alexandria has 12 regular shipping wharves or landings; nine of these are privately owned (of which four are open to the public by special arrangement) and three owned by the United States. Terminal and transfer facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. 16. POTOMAC RIVER BELOW WASHINGTON, DC Location. Potomac River is formed 21 miles below Cumberland, MD, and flows southeasterly about 285 miles and enters Chesapeake Bay, about 80 miles from 4-8 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Atlantic Ocean. Washington, DC is 108 miles upstream of mouth, and head of tidewater is at mile 117. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 12233, 12286, 12287, 12288, and 12289.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide between the mouth of the river and Giesboro Point at Washington, DC-a distance of 108 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal ranges are: mean, 1.3 feet at mouth, 2.9 feet at Washington; irregular, 2 feet at mouth, 4.5 feet at Washington; extreme, about 6 feet at mouth, 10.7 feet at Washington. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $153,836. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. In general, the improvement is a main river channel, and terminal facilities are only served where the channel runs close to either bank of river. In all, 11 wharves are thus served. These wharves are of open and solid fill construction and bulkhead type. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with proposed maintenance dredging. 17. PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS, MD Location. Project applies to tidal waters of the harbor of Baltimore and its adjacent and tributary waters and to all tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and in Maryland. Existing project. Patrol and inspection throughout the project location to detect violations of sections 13 and 15 of the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 and to investigate obstructions to navigation pursuant to Federal regulations (33 CFR 209.109). Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations, by Supervisor of Harbor of Baltimore included inspections of approximately 60 Federal navigation channels within the project location to insure channels are not obstructed to general navigation by debris, sunken vessels/wrecks, and fishing appurtenances. There were 46 detailed investigations of obstructions or sunken vessels/wrecks. 18. ROCK HALL HARBOR, MD Location. Shallow, open cove on east side of Chesapeake Bay immediately to the south of Swan Point and 23 miles southeast of Baltimore, MD. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 548 and 1226.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from 10-foot depth curve in Swan Creek Inlet to a channel of same dimensions, 700 feet long parallel to harbor terminals at Rock Hall; an anchorage basin of the same depth, 100 feet wide, 250 feet long in a northwesterly extension of the channel fronting the harbor terminals; an anchorage basin 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 350 feet long on an extension of the center line of the 10-foot basin; with an anchorage basin 8 feet deep, 200 feet wide and 600 feet long attached to and extending in a southwesterly direction from the west end of above mentioned 8-foot basin; with twin breakwaters at the harbor entrance. On May 29, 1980, the Chief of Engineers under authority provided by Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended, authorized construction of the following work: Raising the existing west and east breakwaters from four feet to seven feet above mean low water and extending the west breakwater 400 feet at an elevation of seven feet above mean low water; relocating the existing entrance channel at a depth of 8 feet and width of 100 feet; a new channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from the new entrance channel to the existing anchorage basin; a new channel, 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from the end of the existing channel near the County wharf to and including an anchorage basin, 250 feet square, in the eastern end of the harbor. The total cost for this work is $1,744,518, of which $1,071,718 is Federal cost and $672,800 is required local cash contribution. In addition, local interests contributed $106,600 for the retaining dike, bulkheads, and embankments. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work authorized under River and Harbor Acts of 1937 and 1948, except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance as needed. For work authorized by the Chief of Engineers May 29, 1980, local interests must, among other requirements, provide without cost to the United States all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and contribute, in cash 36.9 percent of the first cost and all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $2,000,000, to be paid in a lump sum prior to start of construction, or in installments prior to start of pertinent work items. For details see page 4-9 Annual Report for 1979. Terminal facilities. There are several private terminals: a marine railway, a public timber-pile wharf, and a public bulkhead wharf about 500 feet long. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design work was accomplished in connection with the proposed maintenance dredging. 19. TEDIOUS CREEK, MD Location. Tedious Creek is a small, funnel-shaped estuary located on the eastern shoreline of Maryland's Chesapeake Bay in southern Dorchester County, approximately 75 miles southeast of Baltimore, Maryland. Tedious Creek flows southwesterly (during ebb 4-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 tide) into Fishing Bay at the head of Tangier Sound and is accessible to the Chesapeake Bay via Hooper Strait to the west. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 12261.) Existing project. The project consists of two shore attached breakwaters. The southern breakwater is 800 feet in length, and the northern breakwater is 680 feet in length. The structures have a central gap between them of 420 feet. The crest elevation of the structures is +6 feet mean lower low water. In addition, 50-foot gaps have been constructed along the midpoint of the structures to improve water circulation in the harbor. Two 50-foot sections of revetment have been constructed along the shoreline at the tie-in of the breakwaters to prevent flanking of the structures by erosion. Material excavated from the foundation of the breakwaters was used to create a marsh habitat adjacent to the Sandy Point shoreline using geotextile tubes. Submerged aquatic vegetation will also be planted in the lee of the north breakwater in Spring of 1998. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation agreement was signed on July 2, 1996, with Dorchester County, MD, which requires the local sponsor to provide all lands, easements, relocations, and rights-of-way necessary for construction of the project; hold and save the U.S. from potential damages; assure public ownership; and provide a 10 percent contribution toward the cost of construction. At the completion of construction, an additional 10 percent contribution must be provided by the local sponsor, however, any credits for lands, easements, relocations, and rights-of-way may be applied against this contribution. Terminal facilities. There are three county wharves on Tedious Creek. In all, there are mooring and offloading facilities for 62 commercial fishing vessels and approximately 25 recreational boats. The existing landings and stagings are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A contract for construction of the breakwaters was awarded September 25, 1996. The construction of the breakwaters is complete. Submerged aquatic vegetation will be planted in Spring of 1998. Construction will be completed in June 1998. 20. TWITCH COVE AND BIG THOROFARE, MD Location. A tidal waterway about 4 miles long traversing Smith Island, MD, southeasterly from Chesapeake Bay on the west to Tangier Sound on the east. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1224.) Existing project. A channel 7 feet deep at meanlow water and 60-feet wide from Twitch Cove on Tangier Sound through Big Thorofare, thence through canal at Ewell, MD, thence through Levering Creek and Big Thorofare to vicinity of Swan Point, thence of same depth and 100 feet wide through offshore bar to deep water in Chesapeake Bay, with twin stone jetties at entrance, north jetty is about 2,080 feet long, and south jetty about 1,800 feet long; and anchorage basin 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 700 feet long connecting with west side of existing project channel at Ewell; extension of existing project channel in Levering Creek, 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long; and a channel 4 feet deep and 25 feet wide around point between Big Thorofare and Tylers River. Mean range of tide is 1.7 feet, and extreme tidal range is 3 feet. Federal cost of new work for completed project was $193,175. Local cooperation. Fully complied with, except that local interests are to furnish placement sites for future maintenance as needed. Terminal facilities. Numerous privately owned pileand- timber wharves and bulkheads at Ewell are open to the public for business transactions with the owners. A county wharf is also at west end of town. Five crab houses are on Levering Creek, and one oyster house on project waterway west of Town of Ewell. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Plans and specifications were completed. Major maintenance is scheduled for completion during the summer of 1998. Both jetties will be reconnected to shore and the north jetty will be sandtightened. The south jetty will be repaired to restore the crest to a 3.5' MLLW elevation. 21. WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC Location. Within the District of Columbia at junction of the Anacostia River with the Potomac River which flows southeasterly 108 miles to the Chesapeake Bay. It is southerly 202 miles by water from Baltimore, MD, and northerly 195 miles from Norfolk, VA. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 12289.) Existing projects. The Washington Harbor project provides for a channel in the Potomac River from Giesboro Point to Key Bridge, a second channel from Giesboro Point to the end of Washington Channel, and a third channel from the mouth of the Anacostia River to the foot of 15th Street, SE, with turning basins opposite the Naval Weapons Plant (800 feet wide and 2,400 feet long) and at the head of the Anacostia Channel (400 feet square). Channel dimensions are 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide except upstream from Anacostia Bridge where the width is reduced to 200 feet and from Giesboro Point to a point 3,000 feet downstream of Arlington Memorial Bridge and above Easby Point where channel dimensions are 20 feet deep and 200 feet wide. Channel lengths including turning basins are: Virginia Channel, 5,000 feet; Washington Channel, 10,000 feet; and Anacostia River, 15,000 feet; and operation and maintenance of the inlet gates and lock and the outlet gates of the Tidal Basin constructed under a previous project to flush Washington Channel. Plane of reference is low- 4-10 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT water datum which is .35 foot below mean low tide as observed from 1932 to 1942. Tidal ranges are: mean, 2.9 feet; irregular, 4.5 feet; and extreme, 10.7 feet. Federal cost of new work for the completed project was $162,006. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are four wharves generally of bulkhead type on Virginia Channel that are privately owned and not open to the public except by special arrangement. On Washington Channel there are four piers under jurisdiction of District of Columbia, two of which are open to the public and one open to the public by special arrangement. In Anacostia River there are four privately owned piers and eight governmental piers and slips. None of the piers is open to the public except by special arrangement. Terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: The tidal basin gates were inspected and maintained by hired labor. 22. WICOMICO RIVER, MD Location. Wicomico River has its source in northern part of Wicomico County, MD, and flows generally southwardly emptying into Monie Bay, a tributary of Tangier Sound on the east side of Chesapeake Bay about 85 miles southeast of Baltimore. Webster Cove is the site of an improved small-boat harbor on southeast bank of Wicomico River about 3 miles above the mouth. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 567 and 1224.) Existing project. Channel 14 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Chesapeake Bay to Salisbury, about 37 miles long, including about 12 miles from the mouth of river to Chesapeake Bay; 14 feet deep in channels and turning basins in north and south prongs with channel widths of 100 feet, and a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide extending from 6-foot contour in Wicomico River to and including a basin in Webster Cove of the same depth, 100 feet wide and 400 feet long; and extension of basin 200 feet long and 100 feet wide on each side. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet, and extreme tidal range is 4.4 feet. Cost of new work for the completed project was $421,609, exclusive of amounts expended on the previous project. Local cooperation. Fully met, except that local interests are to furnish disposal areas for future maintenance as needed and hold the United States free from such damages as may occur to public or leased oyster beds. Terminal facilities. Present waterfront at Salisbury consists of pile-and-timber bulkheads with earthfills. Some wharves have warehouses and factories with mechanical freight-handling facilities and rail sidings. All terminals are privately owned. A shipyard, with two marine railways with capacities of 1,200 and 500 tons, respectively, is on right bank of river below prongs. Areas for development of new terminals on north prong are limited. Areas for considerable expansion of terminal facilities are available on main river. There is a pile-and-timber wharf about 4 miles above mouth of river at Mount Vernon. A wharf of similar construction is at White Haven. There is a county wharf at head of basin in Webster Cove, a pile-and-timber pier at oyster house on southwest side of basin, a T-shaped pile-andtimber pier at cafe on southwest side of basin and several small timber piers on walkways that local interests constructed around the basin. Fueling facilities are available at the T-shaped pier. Sufficient areas are available for construction of additional facilities when required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: A maintenance dredging contract was awarded on September 26, 1996 to remove 225,000 cubic yards of material. Dredging was completed. 23. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 4-H at end of chapter.) 24. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Fiscal year costs were $32,582 for Neale Sound, MD; $17 for Pleasure Island Channel, MD; $72,860 for Coan River, VA; $36,120 for Deal Island Harbor, Somerset, MD; $16,447 for Kent Narrows, MD; $48,029 for Rockhold Creek, MD; $4,850 for Section 107 Coordination; and $13,502 for Shallow Creek Spur Channel, MD. Non-Federal contributed costs for the fiscal year were $7,727 for Neale Sound, MD, and $32,730 for Coan River, VA; and $2 for Shallow Creek Spur Channel, MD. BEACH EROSION CONTROL 25. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach Erosion Control pursuant to Sec. 103 of Public Law 727, as amended (preauthorization). None. 26. ATLANTIC COAST OF MARYLAND Location. The project is located on Fenwick Island at Ocean City, MD, which is about 35 miles south of the entrance to Delaware Bay. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1220.) 4-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Existing project. The 50-year project life. The current estimated total project cost is $500,000,000 (including a future inflation allowance through the project completion) which includes $44,881,000 for initial construction and $455,119,000 for periodic nourishment. Local cooperation. The State of Maryland is the project sponsor and the Local Cooperation Agreement was executed March 30, 1990. The sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges and other facilities; pay 35% of the first costs and 47% of periodic nourishment costs; and bear all costs of operation maintenance, replacement and major rehabilitation of storm damage reduction facilities. To date the sponsor has fully met these requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Work continued on beach monitoring throughout the fiscal year. FLOOD CONTROL 27. BROAD TOP REGION, PA Location. The project is located in South Central Pennsylvania, and includes portions of Bedford, Fulton, and Huntingdon Counties. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets Saltillo, PA, and Saxton, PA.) Existing project. Section 304 of the water resources development Act of 1992, as amended provides for a pilot project to develop and carry out a watershed reclamation and protection, and wetlands creation and restoration project using innovative reclamation technologies for the purposes of restoring, maintaining and protecting surface and ground water, including municipal water supplies, from adverse impacts related to acid mine drainage and other runoff. A Master Plan, prepared at a cost of $400,000 identified many potential projects in the Broad Top Region. The Wood-Broad Top-Wells Water Supply and Environmental Restoration project was developed as the initial pilot project. The project consists of two components-replacement and upgrade of the Water Supply System for the villages of Wood and Robertsdale and the restoration of abandoned mine sites at Rocky Ridge South and Defiance North. The current estimated total project cost is $6,975,000, which includes a future inflation allowance through project completion. Federal funds allocated for the project are $5,000,000. Local cooperation. The Wood-Broad Top-Wells Joint Municipal Authority is the non-Federal sponsor for the project. The local sponsor is required to provide 25% of the cost of the project, including lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, replacement, repair and rehabilitation of the project after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Project Cooperation Agreements for construction of the Wood-Broad Top-Wells Water Supply and Environmental Restoration Project were signed in July 1997. (Two construction contracts for work by the Corps and the sponsor were advertised in August 1997). 28. CUMBERLAND, MD, AND RIDGELEY, WV Location. On the North Branch of the Potomac River, 21 miles upstream from its junction with the South Branch of the Potomac River and 197 miles upstream from Washington, DC. (See Geological Survey Quadrangles, Frostburg and Flintstone, MD, WV, and PA.) Existing project. Channel improvements on the North Branch of Potomac River from the Western Maryland Railway bridge in South Cumberland upstream to the mouth of Wills Creek, with levees and fill along the left bank and levees along the right bank from downstream corporate limits of Ridgeley, WV, to a point about 150 feet above Johnson Street Bridge; channel improvements along Wills Creek from its mouth upstream to a point in the Narrows about 500 feet upstream from the highway bridge on U.S. Highway 40; levee and flood wall in West Cumberland, MD, on the left bank of the North Branch of the Potomac River from the mouth of Wills Creek upstream to Kelly Boulevard; levee and flood wall in Ridgeley, WV, on the right bank of the North Branch of the Potomac River from Carpenter Avenue upstream to Patapsco Street near the upstream corporate limits of Ridgeley, WV; interior drainage facilities in Cumberland and West Cumberland, MD, and Ridgeley, WV; removal of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal dam and construction of a new industrial dam on the North Branch of the Potomac River immediately above mouth of Wills Creek; and alteration and reconstruction of highway and railroad bridges. Federal cost of new work for the completed project is $15,633,970, which includes $49,998 emergency relief funds and is exclusive of $197,513 public works acceleration funds. Estimated cost to local interests is $2,900,000 of which $1,402,001 is contributed funds and $1,497,999 is for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 29. JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD AND WV Location. Project is located on the North Branch Potomac River on the state line between Garrett County, MD, and Mineral County, WV. The damsite is located approximately 7.9 miles upstream from the confluence with Savage River at Bloomington, MD. It is also about 4-12 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT 5 air miles southwest of the tritowns of Luke and Westernport, MD, and Piedmont, WV. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheets, Kitzmiller and Westernport, MD.) Existing project. The improvement consists of a rolled earth and rock fill dam with an impervious core and an 800-foot long dike on the left bank. Top of dam is 296 feet above streambed with a total length of 2,130 feet. When filled to spillway crest, the reservoir will extend about 6.6 miles upstream and inundate 965 acres. Flood control storage of 36,200 acre-feet is provided. Storage available for low flow augmentation for water supply and water quality improvement is 92,000 acre-feet. The reservoir controls a drainage area of 263 square miles. Recreation facilities are provided for picnicking, camping and boating. Final project cost is $176,325,300. Local cooperation. See page 4-15 of the 1977 Annual Report for requirements. A water supply contract between the Federal Government and the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission in concert with the Fairfax County Water Authority, VA, and the District of Columbia was executed for repayment of all water supply costs. The first of 50 annual payments began in July 1981. Federally approved water quality standards put into effect by Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia are considered satisfactory assurances of intent to control pollution. Satisfactory assurances have been received from Maryland, West Virginia, and Virginia that they will protect downstream channels from encroachment that would adversely affect operation of the project. Local interests operate a white water access area below the dam. The State of Maryland is building a recreation area on the Maryland side of the lake. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Contract work for repair of WV access road, shoulder and drainage ditch was completed December 1996. 30. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA Flood Control Act of 1962 authorized construction of Aylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local protection works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, PA, substantially as recommended by the Chief of Engineers (S. Doc. 141, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.). The Basin includes an area of 346 square miles in northeastern Pennsylvania. 30A. AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA Location. Project is located in Lackawanna County on Aylesworth Creek about one mile above its confluence with the Lackawanna River, near the community of East Jermyn, PA. Existing project. Provides for an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 90 feet above streambed and a top length of 1,200 feet. The spillway located adjacent to the left abutment is an open cut channel 80 feet wide with a concrete sill. The outlet works consist of a 3-foot diameter uncontrolled conduit. Project controls a drainage area of 6.2 square miles and provides flood control storage of 1,700 acre-feet equivalent to 5.1 inches of runoff from the drainage areas. The lake will extend about 4,600 feet and inundate 87 acres when filled to spillway crest. Recreation facilities constructed by local interests include a bathing beach, bathhouse, and picnic area. Federal cost of new work was $2,268,200 of which $2,153,559 was for construction and $114,641 for lands and damages. In addition $52,200 Federal and $52,200 non-Federal funds were expended for construction of bathhouse facilities under the recreation facilities for completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. The Aylesworth Creek Reservoir Park Authority, representing the Boroughs of Archbald and Jermyn, operate and maintain limited day use facilities including a small beach. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 31. LOCK HAVEN, PA Location. On the West Branch Susquehanna River in the City of Lock Haven, PA, about 194 miles above the mouth of the Susquehanna River in Clinton County, PA. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Lock Haven and Mile Hall, PA.) Existing project. Provides for 36,600 feet of levee and 1,000 feet of concrete floodwall along the West Branch and Bald Eagle Creek, five closure structures, five ponding areas, a sanitary pumping station, 35 gravity type drainage structures, necessary road and utility relocations, non-structural measures for Woodward and Allison Townships, and minor recreation facilities. The current estimated total project cost is $84,000,000. Local cooperation. The Lock Haven Area Flood Protection Authority, a municipal authority created by the City of Lock Haven and Woodward Township, is the sponsor for the project. The Local Cooperation Agreement was signed March 14, 1991. The local sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements, rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities, pay 5% of structural flood control costs during construction; pay 50% of separable recreation costs; and bear all operation maintenance and replacement costs for the project after construction. To date the sponsor has fully met these requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Work continued on construction of swim beach and on fiscal close-out of the project. 4-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 32. MOOREFIELD, WV Location. Moorefield, WV, is located at the junction of the South Fork (Moorefield River) of the South Branch of the Potomac River, 57 miles upstream from the mouth of the South Branch of the Potomac River, and 233 miles upstream from Washington, DC. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Moorefield, WV). Existing project. Provides for a flood warning system, 21,600 feet of earth levee, 1,360 linear feet of floodwall, highway bridge replacement of one span of a railroad bridge, environmental mitigation, and appurtenant project features such as ramps, closures, riprap, relocations, and ponding areas for local drainage. The current estimated total project cost is $26,200,000 which includes a future inflation allowance through project completion. Local cooperation. The Town of Moorefield is the sponsor for the project. The Project Cooperation Agreement was signed May 12, 1994. The local sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements, rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities; pay 5% of the cost allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities after construction. (The cash contribution is deemed satisfied in consideration of the transfer of Grandview State Park to the Federal Government.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The levee construction contract was awarded January 29, 1996, and is 90% complete. The overall project is scheduled for completion in February 1998. 33. LACKAWANNA RIVER, OLYPHANT, PA Location. The project is located along the Lackawanna River in the northeastern portion of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in Lackawanna County. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Olyphant, PA.) Existing project. Provides for 3,800 feet of earth levee, 1,400 feet of concrete floodwall, a closure structure, interior drainage facilities, 1,500 feet of gabion slope protection and associated cultural mitigation and environmental restoration. The current estimated total project cost is $15,400,000 which includes a future inflation allowance through project completion. Local cooperation. The Borough of Olyphant is the sponsor for the project. The local sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities; pay 5% of the costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design continued. The overall project is scheduled for completion in September 2001. 34. PAXTON CREEK, HARRISBURG, PA Location. Harrisburg is located in Dauphin County, PA, on the eastern bank of the Susquehanna River. Paxton Creek, a tributary of the Susquehanna River, flows southwesterly through the City. Existing project. On June 16, 1993 the Director of Civil Works under continuing authority of Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 as amended, authorized construction of an improved flood warning system for Paxton Creek in Harrisburg, PA. The project included the installation of a base station (comprised of antennae, receiver/decoder, personal computer, and appurtenant equipment) within Dauphin County, the utilization of a flood warning dissemination service, a flood forecast model, the installation of an additional rain gauge, and the installation of solar panels on two existing rain gauges and one existing stream gauge. The improved system provides the City of Harrisburg with greater access to real time precipitation and stream data, a flood forecast capability, improved flood warning dissemination, and greater system reliability. Local cooperation. The July 19, 1993 Local Cooperation Agreement between Baltimore District and the City of Harrisburg, in brief, required the local sponsor to provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold and save the U.S. from damages; operate, maintain, repair, replace, and rehabilitate the completed project in accordance with regulations or directions prescribed by the Government; contribute 25% of the total project costs; participate in and comply with applicable Federal flood plain management and flood insurance programs; and develop and adopt a comprehensive, detailed plan for use in conjunction with the flood warning system. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A contract modification to continue providing a flood warning dissemination service through September 30, 1997 was issued on September 18, 1996. 35. PETERSBURG, WV Location. On the South Branch of the Potomac River in eastern Grant County, WV. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Petersburg, East, WV; Petersburg, West, WV; Maysville, WV; and Rig, WV.). Existing project. Provides for 18,460 feet of levee and 900 feet of concrete floodwall along the South Branch, raising of U.S. Route 220 highway bridge, 61,000 cubic yards of channel excavation, ramps, closures, slope protection, relocations, ponding areas for interior drainage, and flood warning system improvements. The current estimated total project cost is $26,600,000 which includes a future inflation allowance through project completion. Local cooperation. Grant County is the sponsor for the project. The Project Cooperation Agreement was signed July 13, 1993. The local sponsor is required to: 4-14 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities; pay 5% of the cost allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities after construction. (The cash contribution is deemed satisfied in consideration of the transfer of Grandview State Park to the Federal Government.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The levee construction contract was awarded November 6, 1995, and is 97% complete. The overall project is scheduled for completion in January 1998. 36. RAYSTOWN LAKE, RAYSTOWN BRANCH, JUNIATA RIVER, PA Location. Dam site is on Raystown Branch, about 5.5 miles upstream from its confluence with Juniata River. Project is about 10 miles south of Huntingdon, PA. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Huntingdon, Mt. Union, Broad Top and Everett, PA.) Existing project. The rock and earthfill dam rises 225 feet above streambed with a gated concrete spillway and auxiliary spillway in the right abutment. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 762,000 acre-feet, of which 248,000 acre-feet are for flood control, 476,000 acre-feet for recreation and water quality control, and the balance for sediment reserve. At full flood control pool elevation, the reservoir would inundate 10,800 acres and extend 34 miles upstream. Recreation facilities are provided for boating, fishing, camping, swimming, hunting, hiking, and picnicking. Federal cost for new work was $77,408,700 of which $46,120,931 was for construction and $31,287,769 was for lands and damages including relocations. Construction of a private hydroelectric plant at Raystown Lake was completed May 1988. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. The fiscal year 1997 Appropriations Act included an additional total of $3.0 million to continue to improve recreation areas as described in the Master Plan. The main improvement is to design and construct a multi-purpose building in the Seven Points Recreation area. Construction began in August 1997 and is scheduled for completion in September 1998. 37. LACKAWANNA RIVER, SCRANTON, PA Location. The project is located along the Lackawanna River in the northeastern portion of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in Lackawanna County. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets, Scranton, PA.) Existing project. Provides for 5,800 feet of earth levee, 1,700 feet of concrete floodwall, 3 closure structures, interior drainage facilities, 2,700 feet of gabion slope protection, an improved flood warning system, removal of a railroad bridge, access ramps, and associated cultural mitigation. The current estimated total project cost is $20,700,000 which includes a future inflation allowance through project completion. Local cooperation. The City of Scranton is the sponsor for the project. The local sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities; pay 5% of the cost allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design continued and a Project Cooperation Agreement was executed for the improved flood warning system in June 1996. The overall project is scheduled for completion in September 2001. 38. SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Location. The south central Pennsylvania area includes twenty-one counties defined by the authorizing legislation. The program area within the Baltimore District consists of the Chesapeake Bay watershed portion of the program area including Bedford, Blair, Clearfield, Franklin, Fulton, Huntingdon, Juniata, Lackawanna, Lycoming, Mifflin, Susquehanna, Snyder, and Wyoming Counties. Existing project. Section 313 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992, as amended, established a pilot program for providing environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in south central Pennsylvania. Such assistance may be in the form of design and construction assistance for water-related environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development projects, including projects for waste water treatment and related facilities, water supply, storage treatment, distribution facilities, and surface water resource protection and development. The Federal share may be provided in the form of grants or reimbursements to the sponsor. Section 313 as amended authorizes Federal appropriations of $80 million to carry out the program, including $40 million within the Chesapeake Bay watershed area. From FY94 through FY97, Congress has added $13,750,000 to the Corps budget for a Master Plan and six identified projects in the Baltimore District as follows: Master Plan $600,000, Mill Run water treatment plant $4,500,000, Broad Top/Coaldale wastewater management and Environmental Restoration $1,750,000, Chestnut Ridge wastewater management $5,250,000, Hyndman Flood Control $1,000,000, Guilford waste water management $330,000, Blair County Airport waste water management $320,000. 4-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Local cooperation. The non-Federal sponsors are required to provide 25% of project costs including lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, replacement, repair and rehabilitation of the project after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Mill Run-physical construction was completed September 1997. Broad Top/Coaldale-Project Cooperation Agreement for Phase I was signed June 1997; sponsor construction was initiated July 1997; Kearney 90% complete; Langdondale 50% complete-on lots 2% complete; North Langdonale under design. Chestnut Ridge-Developed Project Cooperation Agreement; sponsor arranging financing. Hyndman, Guilford, Blair County Airport-Sponsors defining projects. 39. SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Authorized plan provides for construction of reservoirs and related flood control works for protection of towns in New York and Pennsylvania. The improvements are located in the upper watershed of the Susquehanna River to and including the Chemung River. 39A. ADDISON, NY Location. At confluence of Tuscarora Creek and Canisteo River in the City of Addison, NY. (See Geological Survey map for Addison, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 3,100 feet of earth levee and 700 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Canisteo River, extending from high ground on Steuben Street near the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad to the mouth of Tuscarora Creek; removal of existing dam, mill, and raceway from the channel; construction of about 2,200 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending from Tuscarora Street to Canisteo River; construction of 4,600 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Tuscarora Creek, extending from high ground at the southwest edge of the village to high ground at the southeast edge of the village; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 39B. ALMOND LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located two miles upstream from Hornell, NY, on Canacadea Creek, a tributary of the Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for Hornell, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 1,260 feet long rising 90 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and a gated outlet conduit in the left abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5-foot by 10-foot service gates and three emergency gates of the same size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 14,640 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 56 square miles, 36 percent of the watershed of the Canisteo River upstream from Hornell, NY. Recreation facilities include a boat-launching ramp and dock, bathing beach, picnic area, and tent and trailer camping area. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests have developed recreational facilities at the lake in conjunction with the Federal Government. These facilities are operated and maintained by the Steuben County Board of Supervisors. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 39C. ARKPORT DAM, NY Location. Dam is located five miles upstream from Hornell, NY, on the Canisteo River, a tributary of the Chemung River which flows into the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Arkport, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 1,200 feet long, exclusive of spillway, rises 113 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and an ungated outlet in the right abutment. The outlet structure consists of an 8-foot diameter reinforced concrete lined conduit, 660 feet long. A cast iron nozzle is placed in the lower end of the conduit, reducing the outlet size to 4 feet 4 inches. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 7,950 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 31 square miles, 20 percent of the watershed of the Canisteo River upstream from Hornell. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 39D. AVOCA, NY Location. On the Cohocton River at the Village of Avoca, NY, about 30 miles Upstream from the confluence of the Cohocton and Chemung Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Avoca, NY.) Existing project. Provides for improvement and realignment of about 8,300 feet of Cohocton River channel, extending from above the Erie Railroad to below the junction of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; construction of about 8,500 feet of earth levee on left bank of the Cohocton River, extending from high ground above Alexander Avenue to about 1,300 feet belowthe junction of Main Street and U.S. Highway 15; 4-16 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT and 4,500 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Salmon Creek, extending from high ground above Alexander Avenue to the Erie Railroad; a new highway bridge for U.S. Highway 15 over Cohocton River, raising of the Erie Railroad bridge 4 feet; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 39E. BINGHAMTON, NY Location. At the confluence of the Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers in the City of Binghamton, NY. (See Geological Survey map for Binghamton, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of earth levees, concrete flood walls, and appurtenant drainage structures, consisting of about 850 feet of channel excavation and about 1,375 feet of earth levee along Phelps Creek, Town of Port Dickinson; new concrete wall on the right bank of the Chenango River, extending downstream from high ground near the city limits to an existing flood wall below DeForest Street, a distance of about 520 feet; about 150 feet of concrete wall just below Cutler Dam; about 180 feet of concrete wall at the pumphouse near McDonald Avenue; raising existing earth levees on the right bank of Chenango River, extending from Cutler Dam downstream for about 1,220 feet; about 2,915 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Chenango River north of the city limits in the Village of Port Dickinson, extending from Church Street to high ground just north of the city line; about 3,900 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Chenango River, extending from DeForest Street to Cutler Dam; new concrete flood walls and riverbank revetment for about 5,570 feet extending on the left bank of Chenango River from Cutler Dam to the junction with the Susquehanna River; about 540 feet of new concrete flood wall and raising about 1,085 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Susquehanna River, extending from the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad downstream to Tompkins Street Bridge; about 1,940 feet of earth levee; about 1,940 feet of concrete flood wall and capping about 125 feet of concrete flood wall, on the right bank of the Susquehanna River from Stuyvesent Street to mouth of Chenango River; about 8,380 feet of earth levee, about 2,180 feet of new concrete flood wall and raising about 125 feet of existing flood wall on the left bank of the Susquehanna River extending from Pierce Creek to high ground at State Highway 17, a debris dam and flume between Corbett and Hotchkiss Streets and a concrete pressure conduit, 1,060 feet long to carry flow of Park Creek from Vestal Avenue to the Susquehanna River; about 665 feet of levee extending from the Erie Railroad to high ground along the right bank of Chamberlain Creek near the mouth; closure structures at Erie Railroad and at Court Street; a weir, a drop structure, and about 1,800 feet of earth levee, about 2,235 feet of channel excavation, about 645 feet of channel paving and raising, about 470 feet of existing concrete flood wall, and about 200 feet of new concrete flood wall for improvement of Pierce Creek from its mouth to about 1,000 feet above Conklin Avenue; and appurtenant drainage structures. Improvement, supplemented by authorized flood control dams above the area, will provide protection for the City of Binghamton against a flood discharge about 20 percent greater than the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935 on the Chenango River and in March 1936 on the Susquehanna River. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 39F. CANISTEO, NY Location. On Purdy and Bonnets Creeks in the Town of Canisteo, NY, situated along the south side of the Canisteo River, at the confluence of Bonnets Creek and the Canisteo River. (See Geological Survey map for Canisteo, NY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of about 8,000 feet of earth levees on the right bank of the Canisteo River, extending from high ground 1,570 feet west of State Highway Route 21 above the Town to a point at the intersection of Ordway Lane and East Main Street; about 7,400 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Purdy and Bennetts Creeks, extending from the Main Street Bridge to high ground above Greenwood Street 1,000 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Bennetts Creek extending upstream from the Main Street Bridge; a concrete check dam with wing levees from Greenwood Street; a new highway bridge at Greenwood Street; alterations to existing timber check dams in Bennetts Creek; channel excavation in Bennetts and Purdy Creeks; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 39G. CORNING, NY Location. On the Chemung River in the City of Corning, NY, about 44 miles upstream from the confluence of Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Corning, NY.) Existing project. Plan of improvement provides for construction of a pumping station, earth levees, and concrete flood walls, consisting of: about 4,300 feet of earth levee, enlargement of about 8,610 feet of existing earth levee and about 3,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Chemung River, extending from the 4-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Erie Railroad Bridge to high ground at Park Avenue below the City; about 200 feet of concrete flood walls, about 2,500 feet of earth levees and enlargement of about 11,500 feet of existing earth levee on the left bank of the Chemung and Cohocton Rivers, extending from the Erie Railroad Bridge over Cohocton River to the mouth of Post Creek; about 2,500 feet of earth levee and enlargement of about 4,700 feet of existing earth levee on the right bank of Post Creek from its mouth to Watkins Street; realignment of about 3,000 feet of channel, about 8,800 feet of earth levee, about 3,000 feet of channel excavation, a pressure conduit about 400 feet long, a drop structure and a weir for improvement of Cutler Creek, extending from its mouth to high ground at Deckertown Road and Hornby Road; and appurtenant drainage structures. Flood protection on Monkey Run was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1950. Plan of improvement provides for construction of 2,010 feet of open flume, 2,320 feet of pressure conduit storm sewers, and appurtenant facilities between the existing improved channel above Sixth Street and the Chemung River at a point immediately east of Pine Street East. Modified improvement will provide protection for the City of Coming against a flood discharge in Chemung River approximately equal to the maximum flood of record, which occurred in May 1945, and on tributary streams against floods of greater magnitude than known to date. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 39H. EAST SIDNEY LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located near East Sidney, NY, on the Ouleout Creek, about five miles above the confluence of the creek with the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Franklin, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill and concrete structure, 2,010 feet long, including spillway, rises 130 feet above the streambed and consists of a concrete gravity-type section with a compacted earth-dike section at the right abutment. The outlet works consist of five rectangular conduits each 3.5 feet by 5.85 feet and 105 feet long. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 33,500 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 102 square miles which is 93 percent of the Ouleout Creek drainage area, and 5 percent of the watershed of the Susquehanna River upstream from Binghamton, NY, exclusive of the separately controlled Chenango River. Recreation facilities include a bathing beach, picnic and camping areas, and boat-launching and docking facilities. Local cooperation. None required. The Town of Sidney, NY, cooperated in the development of recreation facilities and operates and maintains all the facilities with the exception of the recreational pool, which is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 39I. ELMIRA, NY Location. On the Chemung River in the City of Elmira, NY, about 27 miles upstream from the confluence of the Chemung River and North Branch of Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Elmira, NY.) Existing project. Provides for about 17,700 feet of earth levees, and about 4,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the right bank of the Chemung River, extending from South Hoffman Street to a point below the city near the upper end of Big Island; about 12,100 feet of earth levee and about 6,300 feet of concrete wall on the left bank of the Chemung River extending from Durland Avenue to the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad at the mouth of Newton Creek; about 10,000 feet of earth levee on right bank of Newton Creek, extending from about the intersection of Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad and East Church Street to high ground near intersection of Sullivan and Warren Streets; about 4,300 feet of earth levee on the right bank of Divan Creek; about 2,000 feet of concrete conduit enclosing Hoffman Brook from West Second Street to the Chemung River; clearing islands and riverbanks of trees and brush for about 3.5 miles in the Chemung River; about 14,300 feet of earth levee on the left bank of Seely Creek, extending from the Erie Railroad to high ground approximately 1,000 feet northwest of the intersection of South Broadway and Pennsylvania Avenue; a pumping plant for disposal of interior drainage; an interceptor sewer about 6,000 feet long varying in size from 48 to 96 inches in diameter; and appurtenant structures. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 39J. HORNELL, NY Location. On the Canisteo River in the City of Hornell, NY, about 42 miles upstream from the confluence of the Canisteo and Tioga Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Canisteo, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and earth levees, concrete flood walls, and check dams consisting of: realignment of about 4,600 feet of the Canisteo River channel, and about 5,800 feet of earth levee on its right bank, extending from Seneca Street upstream to the junction of the Pittsburgh, Shawmut & Northern Railroad and the Erie Railroad; about 4,500 feet of earth levee, extending on both sides of Seneca Street from the Canisteo River to Wrightman Avenue and the junction of Cleveland Avenue and Bethesda Drive; about 7,200 feet of earth levee, about 2,500 feet 4-18 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT of concrete flood wall, and raising about 1,500 feet of existing concrete flood wall, on the right bank of the Canisteo River, and about 12,000 feet of channel improvement, extending from Seneca Street to the Erie Railroad; about 2,500 feet of earth levee, about 2,100 feet of concrete flood wall on the left bank of the Canisteo River extending from a point opposite Walnut Street to the Erie Railroad; a ring-earth levee about 2,800 feet long around the sewage-disposal plant on the left bank of the Canisteo River; about 4,500 feet of realignment and improvement of the Canisteo River Channel with about 4,500 feet of earth levee on its right bank extending from Cedar Street downstream to about 1,400 feet above East Avenue; about 2,400 feet of channel paving, 1,400 feet of earth levee, raising about 1,900 feet of concrete flood wall, and construction of one check dam on Canacadea Creek; about 1,600 feet of channel paving and construction of three check dams on Chauncey Run with about 300 feet of new wall and about 300 feet of capping; a weir, a check darn, 3,030 feet of channel paving, 4,800 feet of flood walls and levees, and related work on existing walls, on Crosby Creek; removal of 6 bridges, erection of 4 bridges, miscellaneous bridge structures, and 3 drop structures; and appurtenant drainage structures and small stream control works. Improvement, supplemented by Arkport and Almond Reservoirs above the area, provides protection for the City of Hornell against a flood discharge approximately double the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 39K. LISLE, NY Location. On the Tioughnioga River in the Village of Lisle, NY, about 12 miles upstream from the confluence of the Tioughnioga and Chenango Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Lisle, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and construction of earth levees and concrete flood walls, consisting of: relocation of about 3,000 feet of Dudley Creek Channel, extending from 1,200 feet west of the intersection of Cortland and Main Streets to the confluence with Tioughnioga River, realignment of some 5,700 feet of Tioughnioga River Channel east of the Village; about 4,150 feet of earth levee and 970 feet of concrete wall on the right bank of Dudley Creek and Tioughnioga River; realignment of some 5,700 feet of Tioughnioga Street to the railroad crossing on River Street; raising about 1,860 feet of the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western single track railroad over the levee; relocation of about 1,600 feet of Cortland Street; a new bridge over relocated Dudley Creek; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 39L. OXFORD, NY Location. On the Chenango River in the Village of Oxford, NY, about 40 miles upstream from the confluence of the Chenango and Susquehanna Rivers. (See Geological Survey map for Oxford, NY.) Existing project. Provides for earth levees and clearing of Chenango River Channel, consisting of about 2,100 feet of earth levees on the left bank of the Chenango River, extending from high ground near Cemetery Drive and running mostly along the railroad to high ground near Main Street; removal of dam and island below Main Street; raising the Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad over the levee; and appurtenant closure and drainage structures. Improvement provides protection for the Village of Oxford on the left bank against a flood discharge substantially larger than the maximum flood of record, which occurred in July 1935. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 39M. WHITNEY POINT LAKE, NY Location. Dam is located near Whitney Point, NY, on the Otselic River about 0.7 mile upstream from its confluence with Tioughnioga River. (See Geological Survey map for Whitney Point and Willet, NY.) Existing project. The dam is an earthfill structure, 4,900 feet long, exclusive of a spillway, rises 95 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway and gated outlet in the left abutment. The outlet works consist of three 5-foot by 10-foot gates and one emergency gate of the same size. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 86,440 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 255 square miles, the entire watershed of Otselic River, or 16 percent of the Chenango River watershed upstream from Binghamton, NY. Recreation facilities, constructed in cooperation with local interests, provide for swimming, picnicking, camping, boating, fishing, and hunting. Local cooperation. None required. Local interests operate and maintain all of the recreation facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Design of repairs to the west spillway wall was completed in September 1997. 4-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 39N. WHITNEY POINT VILLAGE, NY Location. On the Tioughnioga River at the confluence of the Tioughnioga and Otselic Rivers, tributaries of the Susquehanna River. (See Geological Survey map for Whitney Point, NY.) Existing project. Provides for channel realignment and earth levees, consisting of realignment of about 1,800 feet of Tioughnioga River Channel, above the confluence with Otselic River; about 7,100 feet of earth levee along the right bank of the Tioughnioga River, extending from high ground on Main Street above the Village to Collins Street just below the Village; and appurtenant drainage structures. Local cooperation. Fully met. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 40. STILL WATER LAKE, LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Location. Dam is on the Lackawanna River, 39 miles from the mouth of the stream and about 4 miles upstream from Forest City, Susquehanna County, PA (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheet, Honesdale, PA.) Existing project. Dam is earthfill type, rising 77 feet above the streambed, with a controlled outlet conduit and side channel spillway in the left abutment. Reservoir capacity is 12,000 acre-feet, of which 11,600 acrefeet is flood control storage and the remainder is used to maintain the existing water supply reservoir for Forest City, PA, at this site. Reservoir area is 422 acres, and the pool extends about 2.1 miles upstream. Reservoir controls 52 percent of the watershed above Carbondale, 26 percent above Olyphant, and 17 percent above Scranton. Federal cost of new work, completed in 1965, was $5,725,700 of which $4,500,500 was for construction and $1,225,200 was for lands and damages. Local cooperation. None required. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 41. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY AND PA Plan of improvement authorized by the 1958 Flood Control Act provides for construction of Cowanesque Lake, PA, Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA, local protection works at Elkland, PA, and Nichols, NY, and channel improvements at Cortland, NY. This project plan supplemented the comprehensive flood control program for Southern New York and Northern Pennsylvania which included the Southern New York flood control project and Stillwater, Genegantslet, and South Plymouth Reservoirs. 41A. COWANESQUE LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on the Cowanesque River about 2.2 miles above its confluence with Tioga River at Lawrenceville, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, PA.) Existing project. The project provides for an earthfill dam 3,100 feet long and rising 151 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled spillway in the right abutment, a gated conduit in the Valley floor, and flood control storage is 82,000 acre-feet. Relocation of the Town of Nelson to a new townsite was authorized by Section 121 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976. The Federal cost of this new work was $106,030,700 of which $61,743,600 was for construction and $44,287,100 was for lands and damages and relocations (which includes $5,755,000 for relocation of the Town of Nelson). Within the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers the project was modified in March 1983 in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended. The modification provides for reallocating 25,600 acre-feet of present flood control storage for water supply storage by raising the permanent pool from elevation 1,045 to 1,080 mean sea level. Other features include modifying the existing intake tower and two access ramps, stabilizing the reservoir slope near the relocated Town of Nelson, replacing existing day-use recreation facilities, and expanding both day-and overnight-use recreation facilities to accommodate an expected increase in annual visitation due to the larger pool. Estimated cost (October 1991) of the modification is $55,198,000 of which $1,257,000 is Federal (for expanded recreation facilities) and $53,941,000 is non- Federal (which includes $39,414,000 for reimbursement of the cost of existing flood control storage reallocated to water supply storage, $13,270,000 cash contribution for the water supply modification, and $1,257,000 cash contribution for expanded recreation facilities). Local cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976, which authorized relocation of the Town of Nelson, provides that before the Secretary of the Army acquires any real estate property for the new townsite, appropriate non-Federal interests shall furnish binding contractual commitments that all lots in the new townsite will be either occupied when available, replacements for open space and vacant lots in the existing town, or will be purchased by non-Federal interests at the fair market value. The required contractual agreement for local cooperation was executed with Nelson Township on August 25, 1977. The March 1983 project modification (discussed above) requires non-Federal interests repay 100 percent of the investment cost of project modifications allocated to water supply, to ter- 4-20 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT restrial wildlife habitat mitigation, and to in-kind replacement recreation, plus the allocated share of the project's original cost (escalated to current price levels). Additionally, they are required to pay annual costs of operation, maintenance, and major replacements allocated to water supply and to provide 50 percent of the cost of expanded recreation facilities, as well as, all operation, maintenance, and replacement costs for the expanded facilities. Water supply and recreation contracts were executed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) and the Susquehanna River Basin Commission on June 30, 1986. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. Design of repairs to the damaged port and quality control gates was completed. 41B. TIOGA-HAMMOND LAKES, PA Location. The dams are located in Tioga County, PA, upstream from the confluence of the Tioga River and Crooked Creek. Tioga Dam is located on the Tioga River and Hammond Dam on Crooked Creek, approximately opposite the Tioga damsite, about 3.3 miles above its mouth and less than one mile from the Village of Brooklyn. (See Geological Survey map for Tioga, PA.) Existing project. Tioga Dam is 2,600 feet long, rising 140 feet above the streambed, with a controlled outlet conduit. Hammond Dam is 5,900 feet long, and has a maximum height of 121.5 feet above the streambed, with a concrete spillway. Both dams are of earth and rockfill construction. The Tioga-Hammond Lakes project controls a total drainage area of 402 square miles, with Tioga Dam controlling 280 square miles of the Tioga River Basin and Hammond Dam controlling 122 square miles of the Crooked Creek Basin. Recreation facilities are provided for swimming, camping, picnicking, boating, and fishing. Federal cost of completed work was $185,620,000 of which $125,029,000 is for completed construction and $60,591,000 is for lands and damages and relocations. Estimated Federal cost (October 1988) of Mill Creek recreation facilities (inactive) is $7,500,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. The Lamb's Creek recreation area which had been closed due to extensive damages sustained during high water event, reopened August 1997 due to the efforts of a local volunteer group. 42. WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA A system of three flood control reservoirs, in the headwaters of the West Branch Susquehanna River, PA, are known as Curwensville, Alvin R. Bush (formerly known as Kettle Creek), and Foster Joseph Sayers (formerly known as Blanchard). In accordance with the terms of local cooperation, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania furnished assurances that it will coordinate operation of George B. Stevenson Reservoir (formerly known as First Fork Reservoir) with operation of Curwensville, Alvin R. Bush, and Foster Joseph Sayers Reservoirs to secure optimum flood control benefits from system operation. George B. Stevenson Reservoir on the First Fork Sinnemahoning Creek in Cameron and Potter Counties, PA, was constructed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania at a first cost of $12,240,000 and an estimated $30,000 annually for operation and maintenance. 42A. ALVIN R. BUSH DAM, PA Location. Alvin R. Bush Dam (formerly Kettle Creek Dam) is located on Kettle Creek about 8.4 miles above the mouth and 15 miles upstream from Renovo, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Keating, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 1,350 feet long, rises 165 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled spillway located in rock adjacent to the right abutment, and has a horseshoe-shaped outlet tunnel with 3 service gates. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 75,000 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 226 square miles or about 92 percent of the Kettle Creek watershed. Recreation facilities are provided for camping, fishing, boating, picnicking, hiking, winter sports, hunting, and swimming by the State of Pennsylvania at Kettle Creek State Park. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 42B. CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on the West Branch of the Susquehanna River approximately 2.5 miles upstream from Curwensville, Clearfield County, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Curwensville, PA.) Existing project. Within the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers, the project was modified in September 1992, in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended. The modification provides for reallocating an estimated 5,360 acre-feet of storage from conservation to water supply. The reallocation project includes a year-round normal pool and modifications to the existing recreation area. Estimated cost of the modification is $1.7 million which is being funded entirely by the local sponsor, the Susquehanna River Basin Commission. In addition, the sponsor will reimburse the Federal Government about $4.5 million for part of the original project cost. 4-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Local cooperation. The 1992 project modification requires non-Federal interests to pay 100 percent of costs allocated to water supply plus the allocated share of the original project cost (escalated to current price levels). Additionally, they must pay annual costs of operation, maintenance, and major replacement allocated to water supply. A water supply contract was executed on September 30, 1994. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Plans and specifications for construction were finalized in June 1996 and a construction contract was awarded August 19, 1996. The overall project completion date was August 1997. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. 42C. FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS DAM, PA Location. Dam is located on Bald Eagle Creek in Centre County, PA, about one mile upstream from Blanchard and about 14 miles above the confluence of Bald Eagle Creek with the West Branch Susquehanna River at Lock Haven, PA. (See Geological Survey map for Howard, PA.) Existing project. Dam is an earthfill structure, about 6,835 feet long, rises 100 feet above the streambed, and has an open-cut concrete chute and uncontrolled concrete weir 600 feet wide located in rock in a saddle adjacent to the left abutment. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consist of a 15-foot diameter circular outlet conduit with two hydraulically-operated wheel gates 7 feet wide and 15 feet high. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 99,000 acre-feet at spillway crest. The project controls a drainage area of 339 square miles or 88 percent of the drainage area above Beech Creek and 43 percent of the Bald Eagle Creek drainage area. Recreation facilities are provided for boating, camping, fishing, picnicking, hunting, swimming, hiking, and winter sports by the State of Pennsylvania at Bald Eagle State Park. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. A contract was awarded September 17, 1996, for rehabilitation of the service gate system in the control tower and work was scheduled to be completed January 1998. 43. WYOMING VALLEY, PA (LEVEE RAISING) Location. The project is located in northeastern Pennsylvania and extends from Duryea on the Lackawanna River southwestward to Nanticoke on the Susquehanna River. The Wyoming Valley flood control projects are located on the Susquehanna River in Luzerne County and are the four contiguous existing Federal flood control projects at Plymouth, Kingston-Edwardsville, Swoyersville-Forty Fort, and Wilkes-Barre and Hanover Township, which together function as a flood control system within the Valley. Existing project. The proposed modification provides for raising existing levees and floodwalls between 3 and 5 feet, structural, mechanical and electrical to pump stations, modifying closure structures, relocating utilities and providing some new floodwalls and levees to maintain the integrity of the existing flood control system. The proposed project also includes a plan to reduce project-related adverse impacts. The current estimated total project is $145,000,000 which includes a future inflation allowance through project completion. The Luzerne County Flood Protection Authority is the sponsor for the project. The Local sponsor is required to: provide lands, easements and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges, and other facilities; pay 17% of costs allocated to recreation; and bear all costs of operations, maintenance and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Initiated construction at Exeter and Swoyersville- Forty Fort. Awarded contract for the Sanitary Pump Stations. Continued design work for Kingston- Edwardsville, Woodward, and 12 other stormwater pump stations, and Wilkes-Barre/Hanover Township. The overall project is scheduled for completion in September, 2001. 44. YORK, INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA Location. On Codorus Creek 10 miles above its confluence with the Susquehanna River. Codorus Creek has tributary branches in York County in the south and central parts of Pennsylvania. (See Geological Survey Quadrangle sheets for York and Hanover, PA.) Existing project. Indian Rock Dam is an earth and rockfill dam about 1,000 feet long at the top, rising 83 feet above the streambed, with a reservoir providing for control storage of 28,000 acre-feet. The dam is on the main branch of Codorus Creek about 3 miles above York. Outlet works are in the right abutment, and the uncontrolled spillway is on the right bank. The reservoir will control the entire drainage area of the main branch of Codorus Creek and 41 percent of the drainage area above York. Improvements in Codorus Creek in the vicinity of and through the City of York provide for 22,969 feet of channel extending from 300 feet above Richland Avenue to a point downstream from the Pennsylvania Railroad crossing known as Black Bridge. Improvements, which will increase channel capacity to 24,000 cubic feet per second, include widening and deepening the channel, bank protection, removal of York Roller Mill Dam, and a low water channel about 3,900 feet long in the vicinity of York Roller Mill Dam. 4-22 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Cost of new work for the completed project was $5,061,167, of which $4,566,446 (regular funds) and $11,588 (emergency relief funds) were for construction and $483,133 (regular funds) was for lands and damages. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance of the project continued. A contract for concrete repair was completed July 1997. 45. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Projects in New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, District of Columbia, and Virginia were inspected during the period by hired labor. See table 4-1. 46. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Operations and results during fiscal year. The operation of George B. Stevenson Dam, PA, was coordinated with the operation of Alvin R. Bush, Curwensville, and Foster Joseph Sayers Dams in the West Branch Susquehanna River Basin in order to secure optimum flood control benefits from the system operation. Costs during the period were $141,471. Supplemental instructions for the operation of Savage River Dam, MD, were provided, during periods of high water, to insure maximum protection for downstream localities. Costs during the period were $318,000. 47. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Cost for the period was $166,586 for the Disaster Preparedness Program. Federal year costs were $4,997 for Section 205 Coordination $23,016 for Anacostia Flood Warning System; $27,891 for Elkton, MD; $62,839 for Gwynns Falls, Baltimore, MD $19,224 for Hancock, MD. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended (pre-authorization). Fiscal year costs were $26,814 for Hooper Island Causeway, MD; $3,612 for Section 14 Coordination; $489,166 for Shallimar-Kitzmiller, MD; and $295 for Punch Island Road, MD. Non-Federal contributed costs were $241,858 for Shallimar-Kitzmiller, MD; and $223 for Punch Island Road, MD. ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION 48. CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RECOVERY, MD Location. The project is located in the Maryland portion of the Chesapeake Bay. Existing project. The authorized project contributes to multi-agency and private efforts to restore oyster populations in the Maryland portion of the Chesapeake Bay. Project elements include: construction and rehabilitation of oyster habitat; construction of seed bar facilities for production of oyster seed or "spat"; purchase of diseasefree spat from state-owned hatcheries, planting of disease-free spat in locations which best foster oyster production and health; and monitoring of project performance to increase oyster populations. The current estimated total project cost is $3,334,000. Local cooperation. The State of Maryland is the sponsor for the project. The local sponsor is required to pay 25% of the cost allocated to fish and wildlife restoration and to bear all costs of operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation and replacement of fish and wildlife facilities after construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Seed and new oyster bars were created with nearly 400,000 bushels of shell at Kedges Strait and in the Patuxent and Choptank Rivers. The State of Maryland placed 8 million spat on these bars. Project monitoring activities were initiated. The overall project is scheduled for completion in September 2000. 49. POPLAR ISLAND, MD Location. The group if islands known as Poplar Island is located in the upper middle Chesapeake Bay approximately 34 nautical miles southeast of the Port of Baltimore and 1 mile northwest of Tilghman Island, Talbot County, MD. Existing project. The authorized project provides for the use of approximately 38 million cubic yards of dredged material from the southern approach channels of the Baltimore Harbor and Channels navigation project to restore 1,110 acres of remote habitat. The restoration project will employ dikes to contain the dredged materials necessary for the wetlands vegetation and to protect the facility from the severe wave activity common in this region of the Chesapeake Bay. The placement site will restore Poplar Island to its approximate 1847 configuration and will consist of 555 acres of upland habitat at an elevation up to +20 feet MLLW and 555 acres of wetland habitat that would be further divided into approximately 444 acres of low marsh and 111 acres of high marsh. The current estimated total project cost is $427 million (including a future inflation allowance through the project completion). 4-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Local cooperation. The State of Maryland is the project sponsor and the Local Cooperation Agreement was executed April 4, 1997. The sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; pay 25% of the cost of the project; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, replacement and major rehabilitation of the ecosystem restoration project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed on April 4, 1997. The Phase I construction contract was advertised on June 6, 1997 but was delayed through the end of the fiscal year by a GAO protest and claim for temporary and permanent injunctive relief. WATER SUPPLY 50. WASHINGTON AQUEDUCT Location. The diversion dam and raw water supply intakes at Great Falls, the two collecting conduits, part of Dalecarlia receiving reservoir, the booster pumping station and the Little Falls raw water pumping station are located in Maryland. All other structures of the water supply system including parts of the raw water collecting system, two purification plants, pumping stations, storage reservoirs, and transmission mains are in the District of Columbia. Federal owned water mains are maintained in Virginia and Maryland. Existing project. Control of the water supply system is vested in the Chief of Engineers (see Acts of March 3, 1859, and March 2, 1867, November 22, 1973 and Sec. 1800 of Revised Statutes). The project includes: administration; operation and maintenance of the collection, purification, pumping, and transmission facilities; protection of the water supply system; engineering; and construction of major water system additions and improvements. Authority to supply water to Arlington County, the City of Falls Church, and other jurisdictions in Virginia is contained in Public Law 119, 69th Congress, approved April 14, 1926; and Public Law 118, 80th Congress, June 26, 1947. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 4-19 of the Fiscal Year 1981 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Purified water was furnished to the District of Columbia; Arlington County, and Falls Church, VA; and to the Federal establishments in the District of Columbia, Arlington County, VA, and Montgomery County, MD. Total consumption for Fiscal Year 1997 was 66.5 billion gallons. The average amount furnished Arlington County and Falls Church, VA was 43.0 million gallons per day. The Corps of Engineers was reimbursed $33,559,714 of which $11,378,480 was from VA. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 51. SURVEYS Federal costs for the fiscal year were $4,041,281 which $751,907 was for navigation studies, $1,239,809 for flood damage prevention studies, $1,610,752 for special studies, $76,018 for review of completed projects, $152,269 for special investigations, $16,980 for interagency water resource development, $11 for National Marine Fisheries Service, $135,099 for environmental infrastructure, and $58,436 for coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests. Non-Federal contributed costs for the fiscal year were $638,349 of which $124,837 was for navigation studies, $417,856 for flood damage prevention studies, $1 for review of completed projects, $45,033 for environmental infrastructure, and $50,622 for coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interest. 52. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for flood plain management activities and general planning guidance during the period was $145,799. Providing assistance and guidance to local interests on methods and procedures for preventing and reducing flood damages was in progress at end of fiscal year. 53. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Washington, DC & Vicinity-The authorized project would provide for raising the grade of a portion of P Street, filling an area near the Lincoln Memorial (along 23rd Street), regrading the area adjacent to 17th Street and constructing a removable closure structure across 17th Street. These measures were authorized to restore the design level of protection of the existing project and to reduce the need for emergency closure in the event of a flood. Total costs during the fiscal year were $65,332. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $2,837,000. Anacostia River and Tributaries, MD and DC-The authorized project is comprised of 13 actions to restore 80 acres of wetlands, restore 5 miles of stream, and create 33 acres of bottomland habitat within the Anacostia Basin. The 13 actions include 2 wetland management wetlands, and restoration of 6 stream reaches. Total costs during the fiscal year were $148,482. Estimated pre-construction planning cost is $2,100,000. Mussers Dam, PA- The authorized project consists of reconstruction of Mussers Dam, a small dam owned by the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission which formerly impounded a 100-acre lake for fish, wildlife, and recreation purposes. In 1992 the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ordered the dam decommissioned and breached due to safety reasons. Total costs during the fiscal year were $48,705. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $850,000. 4-24 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT Baltimore Harbor & Anchorages, MD-The proposed project would: widen and deepen Federal anchorages, widen branch channels, dredge a new branch channel, of Scranton, PA. Total costs during the fiscal year were $231,162. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $2,000,000. dredge a turning basin and deauthorize an existing Lackawanna River at Scranton (Green Ridge Secanchorage. Total costs during the fiscal year were tion), PA-The authorized project would include levees to $88,403. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is provide a 100-year level of flood protection for the Green $900,000. Ridge Section of Scranton, PA. Total costs during the fiscal Lackawanna River at Scranton (Plot Section), PA- year were $296,718. Estimated preconstruction planning The authorized project would include levees to provide cost is $3,000,000. a 100-year level of flood protection for the Plot Section 4-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 4-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Sept. 30, 1997 1. Baltimore Harbor New Work and Channels, MD and VA 2. Baltimore Harbor, MD, Collection & Removal of Drift 3. Chester River, MD 4. Crisfield Harbor, MD 5. Fishing Bay, MD 6. Fishing Creek, MD 7. Herring Creek, Tall Timbers, MD 8. Honga River & Tar Bay, MD Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 441,000 200,000 953,709 503,107 13,710,000 13,826,410 1,373,000 1,382,751 12,736,000 12,840,978 13,712 413,600 390,000 402,593 400,686 231,000 317,480 145,052,7121 110,505 145,003,9931 174,324,6692 174,577,4552 67,141,938 66,304,367 11,823,000 10,888,000 11,401,410 11,268,468 108,000 124,837 378,100 320,000 6,911,699 378,109 319,082 6,910,071 70,4953 70,4953 40,800 (16,000) 43,156 (15,356) 35,100 28,261 35,000 35,000 121,650 25,865 25,000 25,000 20,000 18,669 43,600 673,300 33,600 675,377 79,900 635,000 3,501,224 63,445 650,831 3,500,599 82,200 28,226 10,000 5,413 476,4544 411,0544 37,000 47,400 1,891,833 35,545 48,632 1,890,528 121,650 19,288 16,664 61,817 33,8745 33,8745 67,700 504,000 2,152,660 67,342 503,417 2,151,719 111,242 111,242 25,000 400,000 2,294,880 20,210 398,248 2,302,685 48,000 35,730 12,826 1,506,259 1,504,297 216,329 215,554 10,306 10,306 66,1196 66,1196 782,200 66,000 5,758,135 715,475 140,289 5,790,508 4-26 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Sept. 30, 1997 9. Island Creek, MD New Work 10. Neabsco Creek, VA 11. Northeast River, DE 12. Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD 13. Potomac and Anacostia Rivers, DC Collection & Removal of Drift 14. Potomac River Aquatic Plant Control MD, VA and DC 15. Potomac River at Alexandria, VA 16. Potomac River Below Washington, DC 17. Prevention of Obstructions & Injurious Deposits, Baltimore Harbor, MD Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,301,300 511,500 96,343 572,769 45,000 193,000 33,163 203,933 198,420 58,800 57,840 100,000 84,286 55,000 55,000 20,000 17,525 905 (300) 1,836,336 3,702 696,650 -716,010 - 716,010 (15,169) 41,312 42,272 39,000 37,000 35,854 41,914 37,000 50,000 27,738 57,977 34 34 183,251 58,800 57,840 1,234,517 1,223,699 28,4897 28,4897 1,125,344 1,091,584 362,1938 362,1938 67,000 594,000 124,500 634,000 11,867,580 65,455 595,716 125,282 633,912 11,867,445 810,600 730,000 863,900 759,000 13,452,275 805,998 734,580 858,594 766,753 13,449,559 20,000 49,196 165,355 10,000 52,124 21,416 2,301,065 2,298,320 301,866 125 291.990 95,214 95,214 85,000 89,077 60,000 41,000 36,589 40,798 100,000 62,000 90,822 59,450 431,000 510,000 500,000 577,000 428,340 507,555 503,242 578,054 759,158 735,544 315,836 304,108 2,281,294 3,358,294 9,168,045 9,167,196 4-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Sept. 30, 1997 18. Rock Hall Harbor, MD Maint. 19. Tedious Creek, MD 20. Twitch Cove & Big Thorofare, MD 21. Washington Harbor, DC 22. Wicomico River, MD 26. Atlantic Coast of Maryland 27. Broad Top Region, PA 28. Cumberland, MD and Ridgeley, WV 29. Jennings Randolph Lake, MD and WV Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost 100,600 97,869 95,680 94,959 80,000 24,700 63,125 40,346 240,000 11,884 502 45,000 44,647 45,000 118,077 1,982,500 2,187,800 1,910,739 2,112,079 232,183 335,680 339,528 424,800 424,800 144,000 1,242,000 4,834,911 115,050 1,261,707 4,775,949 3,191,0779 3,191,0779 30,000 32,000 34,000 28,672 32,950 35,050 24,800 5,171,58310,11 22,616 5,169,39910,11 471,60912 471,60912 633,000 59,000 130,000 2,015,400 11,798,399 617,134 84,108 123,464 2,023,344 11,769,051 5,389,000 100,000 3,262,817 2,298,704 2,515,000 1,409,907 2,699,622 1,861,518 92,716 121,260 175,820 100,000 69,963 76,000 75,000 83,000 75,528 71,774 86,698 1,740,800 1,555,000 1,806,000 1,707,001 1,578,993 1,778,273 136,115 68,910 58,752 514,718 27,290,000 27,281,131 16,662,382 16,555,822 100,000 584,682 15,633,970 15,633,970 97,000 1,466,413 92,776 1,462,189 176,325,300 176,333,632 2,122,650 21,653,572 2,165,781 21,643,315 6,350 6,350 6,350 6,350 4-28 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in TextProject Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Sept. 30, 1997 30A. Aylesworth Creek New Work Lake, PA 31. Lock Haven, PA 32. Moorefield, WV 33. Olyphant, Lackawanna River, PA 34. Paxton Creek, Harrisburg, PA 35. Petersburg, WV 36. Raystown Lake, Raystown Branch, Juniata River, PA 37. Scranton, Lackawanna River, PA 38. South Central Environmental Restoration Infrastructure and Resource Protection Development Pilot, PA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost 2,320,400 2,320,400 172,000 147,000 168,871 147,984 12,438,000 10,844,124 1,772,709 1,256,975 1,158,201 694,091 147,000 201,000 2,597,523 147,600 204,245 2,597,237 (370,000) (356,552) 274,893 510,638 - 55,153,000 42,117 54,953,207 100,000 18,121,868 6,650,030 461,000 739,000 8,374,000 8,633,000 18,207,000 410,849 667,330 7,806,602 6,953,624 15,838,405 118,116 1,073,757 118,116 849,288 1,100,000 588,996 84,900 44,647 11,649 (3,433) 13,256 1,205,129 212,189 1,179,593 170,000 577,000 1,847,000 637,460 246,758 1,473,214 1,875 1,778 625 1,484 84,900 44,867 37,500 13,758 532,000 3,435,000 6,495,000 7,077,000 17,909,000 578,433 3,206,453 6,448,069 5,983,404 16,529,058 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 77,408,770 77,408,770 2,651,800 5,465,000 3,425,000 5,556,000 53,372,615 2,764,198 3,699,834 4,865,817 4,807,190 52,246,242 7,500 0 1,000,000 377,000 339,000 1,716,000 739,993 617,428 217,032 1,574,453 28,800 28,800 0 5,000,000 3,500,000 1,750,000 1,850,000 12,100,000 320,682 409,832 1,708,111 3,357,800 5,796,425 43,300 1,595,000 4,291,000 5,929,300 23,040 1,615,197 4,072,647 5,710,884 4-29 7,500 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Sept. 30, 1997 39A. Addison. NY New Work 39B. Almond Lake, NY 39C. Arkport Dam, NY 39D. Avoca, NY 39E. Binghamton, NY 39F. Canisteo, NY 39G. Corning, NY 39H. East Sidney Lake, NY 391. Elmira, NY Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 27,300 26,616 8,000 7,748 8,000 13,000 8,863 12,345 827,050 827,050 314,055 313,326 5,760,211 5,760,211 346,000 388,000 395,000 493,000 6,969,681 338,686 370,920 411,963 505,537 6,969,367 1,910,00013 1,910,00013 168,000 179,000 168,156 172,508 44,300 43,731 68,300 54,067 110,000 108,316 61,400 62,019 16,000 16,065 44,000 52,282 22,900 24,390 45,100 45,001 177,100 227,000 3,464,812 150,532 261,158 3,463,689 14,000 14,247 20,000 15,819 39,000 41,000 44,850 40,491 436,37414 436,37414 559,061 554,622 3,460,00015 3,460,00015 802,281 801,671 1,183,11116 1,183,11116 32,000 50,000 1,074,035 31,639 42,756 1,066,025 3,322,00017 3,322,00017 61,800 51,600 1,174,788 59,906 48,065 1,169,260 401,000 447,000 436,000 460,000 394,280 423,181 468,308 467,499 23,300 16,005 5,000 11,270 12,000 18,500 13,025 12,810 6,049,504 6,049,504 8,858,771 8,946,548 6,883,305 6,883,305 423,049 417,359 4-30 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Sept. 30, 1997 39J. Hornell, NY New Work 39K. Lisle, NY 39L. Oxford, NY 39M. Whitney Point Lake, NY 39N. Whitney Point Village, NY 40. Stillwater Lake, Lackawanna River, PA 41A. Cowanesque Lake, PA 41B. Tioga-Hammond Lakes, PA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 150,300 135,000 159,773 121,600 52,300 51,661 24,000 23,775 31,700 13,000 29,982 12,112 4,558,69818 4,558,69818 158,000 160,000 9,652,576 169,179 162,189 9,650,942 26,100 26,859 37,300 31,500 14,100 27,500 16,619 18,739 661,19919 661,19919 990,422 984,517 131,00020 131,00020 361,232 352,384 5,421,539 5,421,539 993,000 1,410,000 2,461,000 587,900 13,286,196 1,007,822 917,201 2,945,391 603,349 13,445,793 43,100 42,495 19,000 18,903 295,000 313,000 292,202 304,405 (106,000) (106,542) 1,499,800 2,071,000 1,479,342 1,604,961 106,542 18,000 36,000 18,599 26,448 424,096 424,096 553,381 543,727 5,725,700 5,725,700 325,500 336,900 5,310,990 336,909 336,812 5,303,823 107,470,700 2,670 107,470,751 1,862,000 1,615,800 20,087,181 2,307,851 685,483 19,091,287 13,495,276 13,495,275 186,244,800 186,244,800 1,719,800 2,070,000 2,477,900 2,280,000 28,597,943 1,675,247 2,039,394 2,406,505 2,409,061 28,555,473 4-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 4-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Section to in Text Project Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Sept. 30, 1997 42A. Alvin R. Bush Darn, PA 42B. Curwensville Lake, PA 42C. Foster Joseph Sayers Darn, PA 43. Wyoming Valley, PA (Levee Raising) 44. York, Indian Rock Dam, PA 48. Chesapeake Bay Oyster Recovery, MD 49. Poplar Island Restoration, MD New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Contributed Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost S7,103,001 7,103,001 490,000 569,000 519,000 579,000 10,994,076 484,650 549,091 537,348 598,438 11,002,851 497,000 606,000 653,600 479,803 592,908 671,420 249,600 135,390 669,000 685,483 990,400 1,169,309 20,396,060 20,396,060 13,277,176 13,274,995 1,240,000 1,304,699 30,887,06321 30,887,06321 664,000 689,000 742,900 1,152,200 13,696,208 650,934 654,352 773,682 1,150,160 13,669,109 2,000,000 2,021,000 10,307,000 14,328,000 1,833.599 2.090.356 4.790.496 8.714,451 300,000 500,000 182,435 800,000 182,435 5,601,16722 5,601,16722 494,000 596,000 1,413,000 2,129,000 15,860,28023 495,471 518,946 1,481,606 2,151,907 15,863,54323 421,000 149,180 11,000 495,000 211,428 500,809 927,000 861,417 757,000 743,614 I. Includes $8,467,003 for previous projects. 2. Includes $399,802 for previous projects. 3. Includes $38,041 for previous projects. 4. Includes $87,740 for previous projects. 5. Includes $2,839 for previous projects. 6. Excludes $2,200 contributed funds and includes $27,668 emergency relief funds. 7. Includes $20,640 for previous projects. 8. Includes $283,008 public works funds and $67,185 emergency relief funds; excludes $500,000 contributed funds. 9. Includes $3,029,001 for previous project. 10. Includes $1,831,609 for previous project. II. Excludes $4,000 for emergency dredging under provisions of Section 3, 1945 River and Harbor Act. 12. Includes $50,000 for previous project and excludes $14,000 contributed funds. 13. Includes $62,577 emergency relief funds. 14. Includes $109,944 emergency relief funds. 15. Excludes $163,096 contributed funds. 16. Includes $207,520 rehabilitation funds. 17. Excludes $34,729 contributed funds. 18. Includes $250,899 emergency relief funds and excludes $15,000 contributed funds. 19. Includes $71,557 emergency relief funds. 20. Includes $73,465 emergency relief funds. 21. Excludes $263,900 contributed funds in accordance with the Tri-party Agreement for construction of a sanitary system for public use. 22. Includes $11,588 emergency relief funds. 23. Includes $15,000 for deferred maintenance. 4-32 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS, MD and VA Aug. 8, Branch channel 35 feet deep to head of Curtis Bay, and one 35 feet deep and 1917 400 feet wide Fort McHenry to Port Covington entrance channel, thence 150 feet wide to Ferry Bar, and thence 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Hanover Street Bridge, widen approaches and bends, and enlarge anchorage basin near entrance. Inclusion of Patapsco River and tributaries into one project for Baltimore Harbor. 1 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Change in location of anchorage near upper end of Fort McHenry Channel. Increased anchorage facilities. Jul. 3, For 37-foot depth in that portion of channel to Baltimore lying between 37-foot 1930 depth curve near Baltimore Light to Sparrows Point entrance channel; widen angle between Fort McHenry and Ferry Bar section; and for width of 400 feet in Curtis Bay section. Oct. 17, For 22-, 18-, and 15-foot channels in Curtis Creek from 22-foot depth below 1940 Pennington Avenue Bridge to upper end of marginal wharf of U.S. Ordinance Depot. Mar. 2, Uniform main channel 39 feet deep from the ocean through York Spit section 1945 and Craighill entrance to Fort McHenry, additional anchorage area, 2,400 feet long, 1,200 feet wide, and 30 feet deep; a connecting channel 400 feet wide and 27 feet deep from Cutoff Brewerton Angle in main channel to Inland Waterway from Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay; a channel in Curtis Creek 200 feet wide and 35 feet deep from head of existing 35-foot project channel in Curtis Bay to a point in the creek about 750 feet below Pennington Avenue Bridge. Mar. 2, A channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 22-foot depth curve south of 1945 Baltimore & Ohio R.R. bridge about 2,800 feet to vicinity of Arundel Cove, thence 100 feet wide in Arundel Cove for about 2,100 feet; with an anchorage basin about 700 feet square adjacent to channel southwesterly of Coast Guard wharf. Jul. 3, Main channel 42 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide in Cape Henry section at 1958 entrance to Chesapeake Bay and in York Spit section; 42 feet deep and 800 feet wide in Rappahannock Spit section and in approach channel to Baltimore Harbor from Craighill entrance to Fort McHenry, with widening at entrance and bends; channels 42 feet deep and 600 feet wide in Curtis Bay and Ferry Bar sections of harbor; a connecting channel 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide from main channel to approach channel to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal; and for three disjointed sections of channels of same depth and width in Chesapeake Bay leading to Chesapeake and Delaware Canal; and to provide Federal maintenance of 39-foot depth in Northwest Branch, in areas dredged to that depth by local interests. Dec. 31, Deepening of the Cape Henry Channel to 50 feet at the existing width of 1,000 1970 feet, with widening at bends; deepening of the Spit Channel to 50 feet at the existing width of 1,000 feet, with widening at bends; enlargement of the Rappahannock Shoal Channel to a depth of 50 feet and a width of 1,000 feet; deepening of the main ship channel from Chesapeake Bay to Fort McHenry to a depth of 50 feet at the existing width of 800 feet, with widening at bends and at the Craighill Entrance; deepening of the Curtis Bay Channel to a depth of 50 feet at the existing width of 600 feet, and deepening of the 950-foot wide and 980-foot long turning basin at the head of channel to the same depth; deepening of the Northwest Branch-East Channel to a depth of 49 feet from the depth existing at the time of construction at a width of 600 feet, and deepening of the 950-foot wide and 950-foot long turning basin at the head of the channel to the same depth; and deepening and extension of the Northwest Branch-West Channel to a depth of 40 feet from the depth existing at the H. Doc. 799, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. Adopted as a national defense project. (No printed report.) H. Doc. 741, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. In accordance with plans on file in the Office, Chief of Engineers H. Doc. 86, 85th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 181, 94th Cong., 1st Sess. 4-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jun. 30, 1948 Mar. 3, 1873 Sep. 19, 1980 Jun. 30, 1948 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 26, 1937 time of construction, at a width of 600 feet, and with an irregularly shaped turning basin at the head of the channel 40 feet deep and about 2,000 feet long with a maximum width of 1,150 feet. BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD, COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Collection and removal of drift from Baltimore Harbor and its tributary waters. CHESTER RIVER, MD A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from Chester River to Eastern Bay through Kent Island Narrows. A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Crumpton to Jones Landing. A channel 7 feet deep at mean low water and 75 feet wide extending from the 7-foot depth in Kent Island Narrows 800 feet into Wells Cove with a basin of the same depth and 300 feet square at the head of the channel. CRISFIELD HARBOR, MD A 12-foot channel of varying widths to opposite Consumers Ice Co., thence 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from ice plant to Hop Point. 7-foot channel 100 feet wide from opposite Hop Point to an anchorage parallel to Brick Kiln Road. For the 7-foot x 60-foot channel in Little Annemessex River... Mar. 3, A mooring basin 7 feet deep, 160 feet wide, and about 875 feet long roughly 1945 parallel to Brick Kiln Rd., with a channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide leading from there to the 7-foot project channel connecting Little Annemessex and Big Annemessex Rivers. Sep. 3, An anchorage basin in Somers Cove 10 feet by 600 feet by 1,000 feet with an 1954 approach channel 10 feet by 100 feet from 10-foot depth in Little Annemessex River through a land cut in Jersey Island to south side of basin. Aug. 14, Change location and dimensions of approach channel to Somers Cove to 1958 plan No. 2 through the present entrance, at no increase in Federal cost of modification. FISHING BAY, MD Aug. 26, Provided for channels 6 feet deep and generally 60 feet wide at mean low 1937 water, suitably widened where necessary to offer adequate sheltered anchorage space from deep water and in Fishing Bay to vicinity of county or packing house wharves in McCready's, Farm, and Goose Creeks. FISHING CREEK, MD Aug. 26, A channel 7 feet deep with widths of 100 feet and 60 feet from deep water in 1937 Chesapeake Bay to an anchorage of the same depth, 120 feet wide and 400 feet long, located in the marsh 500 feet above the mouth of the creek and twin stone jetties at the entrance. HERRING CREEK, TALL TIMBERS, MD Jul. 3, Provides for an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide with a turning 1950 basin of irregular shape and 6 feet deep, and riprap stone jetties on the upstream and downstream sides of the entrance channel 770 and 650 feet long, respectively. The project length is 1,630 feet. Mar. 7, Constructing 250 feet of beachfill, 2,187 linear feet of stone revetment, and 1986 upgrading 350 feet of existing revetment along the Tall Timbers waterfront. Sec. 111 River and Harbor Act of 1948 H. Doc. 381, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 65, 51st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 380, 80th Cong., 1st Sess.2 H. Doc. 355, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 72, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 457, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 435, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 435, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1286, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.2 H. Doc. 241, 75th Cong., 1st. Sess. H. Doc. 159 84th Cong., 1st Sess.2 Detailed Project Report July 18, 1985 4-34 2. 4. 6. 7. BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents HONGA RIVER AND TAR BAY, MD Aug. 30, Channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from the 7-foot contour in Chesapeake Bay 1935 through Tar Bay and Fishing Creek to the 7-foot contour in Honga River. Jun. 30, Modification providing for a channel in Back Creek 7 feet deep and 60 feet wide 1948 from the 7-foot depth curve in Honga River to a point near the head of Back Creek, with a turning basin of the same depth, 150 feet long and 200 feet wide. 9. Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 19, 1980 ISLAND CREEK, MD A channel 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide through the entrance to Island Creek with an anchorage basin of same depth, 200 feet wide, and 500 feet long in the creek. NEABSCO CREEK, VA Mar. 3, Channel 100 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in the Potomac River to 1881 Atkinson's Upper Landing and Willis' Wharf. NORTHEAST RIVER, MD Aug. 26, Channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in the river to the foot of 1937 Church Street in the town of North East, enlarged at its upper end to form a basin 120 feet wide and 300 feet long. OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND SINEPUXENT BAY, MD Aug. 30, Construction of an inlet between the Atlantic Ocean and Sinepuxent Bay, 10 feet 19353 deep and 200 feet wide, protected by jetties; a channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the inlet to Ocean City, 6 feet deep and 150 feet wide to Green Point, and 100 feet wide into Chincoteague Bay. Aug. 30, Modification providing a 10-foot by 100-foot channel from the inlet to the west 19354 side of the bay with two turning basins; a channel 6 feet deep and 125 feet wide from the inlet channel to opposite North 8th Street, Ocean City, and 75 feet wide into Isle of Wight Bay. Sep. 3, Modification providing for raising the north jetty to an elevation 9 feet above 19455 mean low water, and a channel 300 feet wide and 16 feet deep from the ocean through the inlet to the Isle of Wight Bay Channel, thence 200 feet to the project harbor, and a depth of 14 feet in the project harbor. Channel depths refer to project datum. POTOMAC & ANACOSTIA RIVERS, DC, COLLECTION & REMOVAL OF DRIFT Oct. 27, Collection and removal of drift from waters of the Potomac and Anacostia 1985 Rivers and their tributaries in the Washington, DC area from the head of the tidewater to Mount Vernon, VA. POTOMAC RIVER AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, MD, VA, AND DC Jul. 2, Control of Hydrilla and other nuisance plants using mechanical harvesting to 1986 clear a 60 foot wide, 6 foot deep connecting channel from open waters to eligible public use areas. POTOMAC RIVER AT ALEXANDRIA, VA Jun. 25, A channel 6,700 feet long and averages 300 feet wide for depth of 24 feet in 1910 front of Alexandria between the through channel and a line drawn 20 feet outside of established pierhead line. POTOMAC RIVER BELOW WASHINGTON, DC Mar. 3, A channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide between mouth at Chesapeake Bay 1899 and Giesboro Point at Washington, DC, a distance of 108 miles. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 35, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 580, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. 2 H. Doc. 99, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.2 H. Ex. Doc. 41, 46th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 248, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and HarborS Committee Doc. 38, 72nd Cong., 1st. Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 60, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 444, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doec. 286, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. State Design Memorandum July 2, 1986 H. Doc. 1253, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 33, 52nd Cong., 1st Sess. 4-35 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIONS AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS, BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD Aug. 30, Continuous patrol and inspection of Baltimore Harbor, Chesapeake Bay, and its 1935 tributaries to prevent and detect violations, and issue permits as required for transporting and depositing waste materials in navigable waters. (The project is limited to the tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries that lie within the State of Maryland.) ROCK HALL HARBOR, MD Aug. 26, Channel 60 feet wide and 7 feet deep from that depth in Swan Point Inlet to a 1937 channel of the same dimensions, 700 feet in length parallel to the harbor terminals at Rock Hall; an anchorage basin of the same depth 100 feet wide and about 800 feet long in northwesterly extention of the channel fronting the harbor terminals; and twin breakwaters at the harbor entrance. Jun. 30, Deepening the approach channel to 10 feet and widening to 100 feet from the 1948 10-foot contour in Swan Creek Inlet to the existing channel parellel to the harbor terminals; deepening to 10 feet and widening to 100 feet the existing channel parallel to the harbor terminals; deepening to 10 feet the eastern 250 feet of the present basin; deepening to 8 feet the western 350 feet of the present basin; and a new anchorage basin 600 feet long, 200 feet wide and 8 feet deep attached to and extending from the west end of the existing basin. May 29, 1980 Sec. 107 Jul. 14, 1960 Raising the existing west and east breakwaters from four feet to seven feet above mean low water and extending the west breakwater 400 feet at an elevation of seven feet above mean low water; relocating the existing entrance channel at a depth of 8 feet and width of 100 feet; a new channel, 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from the new entrance channel to the existing anchorage basin; a new channel, 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from the end of the existing channel near the County wharf to and including an anchorage basin, 250 feet square, in the eastern end of the harbor. TEDIOUS CREEK, MD Jun. 25, Construction of two shore-attached breakwaters with a crest height of +6 feet in 1996 order to provide storm protection for commercial vessels in Tedious Creek. Sec. 107 TWITCH COVE AND BIG THOROFARE, MD A channel 4 feet deep and 25 feet wide from Tangier Sound into Big Thorofare River, and one of same dimensions around point between said river and Tyler River. WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC Aug. 30, Provides for: (a) Virginia Channel, from Giesboro Point to area for 25,000 1935 square feet; (b) Washington Channel, from Haines Point to head of Washington Channel, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide; (c) Anacostia River from Giesboro Point to Anacostia Bridge, 24 feet deep and 400 feet wide, with turning basin 800 feet wide and about 2,400 feet long of same depth opposite Naval Weapons Plant, (d) Anacostia River from Anacostia Bridge 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide to turning basin 400 feet square of same depth at foot of 15th Street SE Channel lengths including turning basins are: Virginia Channel, 25,000 feet; Washington Channel, 10,000 feet; and Anacostia River, 15,000 feet; and (e) operation and maintenance of inlet gates and lock and outlet gates of Tidal Basin constructed under a previous project to flush Washington Channel. 17. 18. 4-36 River and Harbor Act, June 28, 1888 as amended by Public Law 85-802, dated August 28, 1959 H. Doc. 204, 75 Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 273, 80th Cong., 1st sess.1 Detailed Project Report, December 1978 Detailed Project Report, March 1995 H. Doc. 285, 62nd Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe. 22, 74th Cong., 1st Sess.2 19. 20. 21. BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 22. Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 WICOMICO RIVER, MD Channel 9 feet deep from Main Street Bridge to about 2 miles below. Extend 9-foot depth into north prong from Main Street Bridge to the Salisbury Dam and turning basin. Extend 9-foot depth into south prong to head of navigation at Cathell Street, including a turning basin, and extend project down to mouth of river in Monie Bay. A 12-foot channel below the Main Street Bridge. A 14-foot channel, 150 feet wide; depths of 14 feet in the north and south prongs and a basin 6 feet deep at Webster Cove and approach channel thereto of the same depth. Sep. 3, Enlarge existing basin at Webster Cove, by dredging an extension 6 feet deep, 1954 100 feet wide, and 200 feet long on each side of existing basin to form a Tshaped harbor. ATLANTIC COAST OF MARYLAND Nov. 17, Consists of a dune beginning at 27th Street extending north to the Delaware line; 1986 a steel sheetpile bulkhead from 27th Street south to Fourth Street; and widened and raised beach from Third Street to just beyond the Delaware line. BROAD TOP REGION, PA Oct. 31, Pilot program to develop and carry out a watershed reclamation and protection, 1992 and wetlands creation and restoration project using innovative reclamation technologies for the purposes of restoring, maintaining and protecting surface and ground water, including municipal water supplies, from adverse impacts related to acid mine drainage and other runoff. Jun. 22, 1936 Jul. 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 CUMBERLAND, MD, AND RIDGELEY, WV Levees, retaining walls, movable dam, and channel clearing for Cumberland, West Cumberland and South Cumberland, MD and Ridgeley, WV. Levees, wall, channel improvement, remove Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Dam and construct new industrial dam. JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD AND WV Construction of Bloomington Lake project. LACKAWANNA RIVER BASIN, PA Oct. 23, Construction of Aylesworth Creek Lake, Fall Brook Lake, and local protection 1962 works on Lackawanna River at Scranton, Pennsylvania. LOCK HAVEN, PA Consists of 36,600 feet of levee and 1,000 feet of concrete floodwall along the West Branch and Bald Eagle Creek, five closure structures, seven ponding areas, a sanitary pumping station, 35 gravity type drainage structures, necessary road and utility relocations, non-structural measures for Woodward and Allison Townships, and minor recreation facilities. H. Doc. 20, 51st Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report 1890, p. 9 47 H. Doc. 569, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1509, 63rd Cong., 3rd Sess. Senate Committee Print, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.2 H. Doc. 619, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess.2 Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Sept. 29, 1981 H. Doc. 101, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. Report on file in Office, Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 469, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 141, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 187, 98th Cong. 4-37 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents MOOREFIELD, WV Nov. 28, Levee, floodwall, closures, relocations and improvements to the flood warning 1990 system. OLYPHANT, LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Oct. 31, Provides for 3,800 feet of earth levee, 1,400 feet of concrete floodwall, a closure 1992 structure, interior drainage facilities, 1,500 feet of gabion slope protection and associated cultural mitigation and environmental restoration. Jun. 4, 1993 PAXTON CREEK, PA Provides for an improved flood warning system. PETERSBURG, WV Nov. 28, Channel improvements, levee and floodwall, closures, relocations, and improve- 1990 ments to the flood warning system. 36. Oct. 23, 1962 37. RAYSTOWN LAKE, RAYSTOWN BRANCH, JUNIATA RIVER, PA Construction of dam and appurtenant facilities. SCRANTON, LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Oct. 31, Provides for 5,800 feet of earth levee, 1,700 feet of concrete floodwall, 3 closure 1992 structures, interior drainage facilities, 2,700 feet of gabion slope protection, an improved flood warning system, removal of a railroad bridge, access ramp, and associated cultural mitigation. Modified Directs Secretary to carry out the project for Plot and Green Ridge sections and by Act of allows non-Federal interest to participate in the financing of the project in Oct. 12, accordance with Section 903(c) of WRDA 86. 1996 SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION Oct. 31, Pilot program for providing environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 1992 South Central Pennsylvania. Modified Expanded scope to include 15 counties; increased program authorization by Acts of limits to $50 million; provided for non-Federal sponsor credit for design Nov. 13, prior to PCA execution; allowed for Federal share of project costs to be 1995 provided in the form of grants or reimbursement of project costs; and provided the non-Federal sponsors to receive credit for reasonable interest to provide non-Federal share of project's cost. Oct. 12, Increased program authorization and allowed for more non-Federal 1996 credits. 39. Jun. 22, 1936 modified by Acts of Jun. 28, 1938 SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Construction of detention reservoirs and related flood control works for protection of Binghamton, Hornell, Coming and other towns in New York and Pennsylvania. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated July 23, 1990 Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 29, 1992 Detailed Project Report, March 1991 Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 29, 1990 H. Doc. 565, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 29, 1992 P.L. 104-303 P.L. 102-580 P.L. 104-46 P.L. 104-303 H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. 4-38 32. 33. 34. 35. 38. BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 18, 1941; Dec. 22, 1944; May 17, 1950; and Jul. 3, 1959 Aug. 18, 1941 STILLWATER LAKE, LACKAWANNA RIVER, PA Construction of a flood control reservoir. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS, NY AND PA Jul. 3, Construction of Cowanesque and Tioga-Hammond reservoirs, local flood pro- 1958 tection works at Elkland, PA, and Nichols, NY and channel improvement at Cortland, NY. Oct. 22, Modification in connection with the construction of Cowanesque Lake to relo- 1976 cate the Town of Nelson, PA, to a new townsite. Mar. 1, Modification of Cowanesque Lake to include water supply as provided by Sec- 1983 tion 4 of the Flood Control Act of 1944 (PL 78-534) and Section 301 of Water Supply Act of 1958 (PL 85-500). WEST BRANCH OF SUSQUEHANNA RIVER, PA Sep. 3, Construction of three flood control reservoirs. 1954 WYOMING VALLEY, PA (LEVEE RAISING) Nov. 17, Modification provides for raising existing levees and floodwalls between 3 and 5 1986 feet, modifying closure structures, relocating utilities and providing some new floodwalls and levees to maintain the integrity of the existing flood control system. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 48. YORK, INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA Construction of Indian Rock Dam and channel improvements on Codorus Creek. CHESAPEAKE BAY OYSTER RECOVERY, MD Nov. 17, Contributes to multi-agency and private efforts to restore oyster populations in 1986 the Maryland portion of the Chesapeake Bay. POPLAR ISLAND, MARYLAND Oct. 12, The project consists of reconstructing Poplar Island to its approximate size in 1996 1847 (1,110 acres), using an estimated 38 million cubic yards of uncontaminated dredged material from maintenance dredging of the southern approach channels of the Baltimore harbor and Channels navigation project. H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 394, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 29, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated October 19, 1983 H. Doc. 702, 77th Cong., 2nd Sess. Report of the Secretary of the Army, dated September 3, 1996. I. Exclusive of portion considered inactive. Inactive portion is widening 35-foot depth channel from 150 to 400 feet from Port Covington to Ferry Bar, widening 27-foot depth channel from 150 to 250 feet to Hanover Street Bridge, and providing a channel 27 feet deep by 250 feet wide to Western Maryland Railway Bridge with an anchorage and turning basin at the upper end. 2. Contains latest published maps. 3. Included in Public Works Administration program September 16, 1993. The site chosen for the inlet under this authorization was opened just south of Ocean City by natural forces during a severe storm in August 1933. This climinated the necessity for an 8-foot channel from the inlet to Ocean City. 4. Included in Emergency Relicf Program 1935. 5. Raising of the north jetty to an elevation of 9 feet above mean low water was accomplished with maintenance funds in 1956. 4-39 Jun. 22, 1936 49. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 4-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1997 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Accotink Creek, VA' Completed 1878 $ 5,000 $ Anacostia River and Flats2 Deferred 1953 3,910,582 Annapolis Harbor, MD Completed 1993 34,2503 51,366 Aquia Creek, VA Inactive 1928 52,4654 11,770 Back Creek, MD Completed 1946 23,061 41,378 Black Walnut Harbor, MD Completed 1982 32,631 431,478 Bonum Creek, VA Completed 1993 202,0005 465,038 Branson Cove, Lower Machodoc River, VA Completed 1950 15,755 35,684 Breton Bay, MD6 Completed 1950 47,9246 47,593 Broad Creek River, DE Completed 1964 64,5107 163,482 Cambridge Harbor, MD Completed 1993 195,9748 958,912 Choptank River, MD 9 Completed 1979 96,796 104,230 Claiborne Harbor, MD' Deferred 1987 42,974 709,096 Corsica River, MD Completed 1948 39,07110 134,770 Cypress Creek, MD Completed 1947 3,057 14,729 Duck Point Cove, MD Completed 1982 25,289 353,188 Elk and Little Elk Rivers, MDI I Completed 1932 90,12112 53,808'13 Goose Creek, MD 14 Completed 1973 75,900 22,062 Herring Bay & Rockhold Creek, MD Completed 1995 50,591 1,115,969 Herring Creek, MD Completed 1989 1,506,259 170,936 Knapps Narrows, MD Completed 1996 46,121 3,004,001 La Trappe, MD Completed 1980 8,06415 40,475 Little Creek, Kent Island, MD Completed 1958 23,000 7,327 Little Wicomico River, MD Completed 1996 81,88542 2,339,948 Lowes Wharf, MD Completed 1986 2,100 330,681 Lower Machodoc Creek, VA Completed 1904 9,916 30,432 Lower Thorofare, Deal Island, MD Completed 1988 1,787,15816 667,276 Madison Bay, MD 14 Completed 1977 125,550 33,353 Manokin River, MD 17 Completed 1919 34,78818 43,534 Middle River and Dark Head Creek, MD Completed 1947 38,71519 61,383 Monroe Bay and Creek, VA Completed 1994 22,434 483,685 Muddy Hook/Tyler Coves, MD Completed 1996 64,001 687,568 Nan Cove, MD4 Completed 1965 34,86120 33,138 Nanticoke River, MD Completed 1995 73,242 619,526 Nanticoke River, DEL and MD Completed 1995 143,13421 1,156,399 Nanticoke River at Bivalve, MD Completed 1983 240,817 142,131 Neale Sound, MD Completed 1991 12,60022 944,099 Neavitt Harbor, MD 14 Completed 1968 36,500 34,533 Nomini Bay and Creek, VA23 Completed 1946 78,446 42,063 Occoquan Creek, VA'' Completed 1971 66,25324 203,198 Parish Creek, MD Completed 1988 19,17025 533,808 Patuxent River, MDI I Completed 1905 14,00026 Pocomoke River, MD Completed 1995 191,72627 3,457,117 Potomac River at Mount Vernon, MD28 Completed 1993 17,000 343,465 Potomac River and Tributaries at and below Washington, DC, Elimination of Waterchestnut Completed 1977 - 184,394 Potomac River at Lower Cedar Point, MD Completed 1920 10,234 6,216 Potomac River North Side of Washington Channel, DC' Completed 1956 1,744,69229 27,46130 Queenstown Harbor, MD Completed 1985 72,85831 321,803 Rhodes Point to Tylerton, MD Completed 1995 304,000 2,403,361 Shad Landing State Park, MD Completed 1966 33,53133 19,198 Shallow Creek, MD14 Completed 1989 278,100 Slaughter Creek, MD Completed 1994 4,140 671,262 St. Catherine's Sound, MD Completed 1989 29,94734 659,369 4-40 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-C (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1997 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance St. George's Creek, MD Completed 1985 147,650 St. Jerome's Creek, MD Completed 1991 44,35735 759,067 St. Michael's Harbor, MD1 4 Completed 1964 16,72336 30,691 St. Patrick's Creek, MD Completed 1987 15,752 151,849 St. Peter's Creek, MD 14 Completed 1963 46,74037 39,964 Smith Creek, MD Completed 1936 5,252 16,448 Susquehanna River above and below Havre De Grace, MD Completed 1985 293,57038 849,350 Susquehanna River at Williamsport, PA14 Completed 1974 57,03139 41,437 Tilghman Island Harbor, MD Completed 1996 424,800 464,788 Town Creek, MD Completed 1950 43,220 56,868 Tred Avon River, MD Completed 1994 523,310 915,239 Tuckahoe River, MD Completed 1980 9,727 23,489 Tyaskin Creek, MD Completed 1923 16,29740 54,302 Upper Machodoc Creek, VA Completed 1971 20,281 40,283 Upper Thorofare, MD Completed 1987 62,446 829,515 Warwick River, MD Completed 1984 22,04141 148,728 1. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized August 5, 1977. 2. Project deferred for restudy. 3. Includes $8,476 for previous projects. 4. Includes $31,065 for previous project. 5. Excludes $3,998 contributed funds. 6. Includes $37,500 for previous project. 7. Includes $50,000 for previous project. 8. Excludes $3,998 contributed funds and includes $61,321 for previous projects. 9. Authorization for the unconstructed portion of the project was withdrawn by the Chief of Engineers January 22, 1979. 10. Includes $30,000 for previous project. 11. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 2, 1979. 12. Includes $79,626 for previous project and excludes $8,414 contributed funds. 13. Includes $24,321 for previous project. 14. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 15. Excludes $1,100 contributed funds. 16. Includes $5,000 for previous project. 17. Abandonment recommended in 1926 (H. doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Sess.) 18. Includes $2,000 expended outside project limits. 19. Excludes $111,581 expended by Navy Department and $52,000 from contributed funds. 20. Excludes $565 contributed funds. 21. Includes $5,000 for previous project. 22. Excludes $1,000 contributed funds. 23. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 24. Includes $25,000 for previous project. 25. Includes $19,170 Works Progress Administration funds. 26. Includes $10,617 for previous project. 27. Unconstructed portion of the project is inactive. Includes $20,500 for previous project. 28. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 2, 1979. 29. Excludes $389,000 contributed funds. 30. Excludes $101,162 Public Health Service funds expended for waterchestnut removal. 31. Includes $19,000 for previous project. 32. Includes $46,121 public works funds. 33. Excludes $24,125 contributed funds. 34. Excludes $600 contributed funds. 35. Includes $26,500 for previous project. 36. Excludes $600 contributed funds. 37. Excludes $6,984 contributed funds. 38. Unconstructed portion of the project was deauthorized November 6, 1977. Includes $22,905 Works Progress funds and $97,390 for previous project. 39. Excludes $40,000 contributed funds. 40. Excludes $10,158 contributed funds. 41. Includes $6,000 for previous project. 42. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 4-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 4-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1997 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Colonial Beach, MD Complete 1995 $ 649,957' Oxford, MD2 Complete 1978 $ 97,7503 Punch Island Road, MD Complete 1996 $ 199,105 Town of North Beach, MD Complete 1995 $ 450,6104 1. Excludes $414,977 contributed funds. 3. Excludes $80,648 contributed funds. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 4. Excludes $245,262 contributed funds. TABLE 4-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1997 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Anacostia River and Tributaries, Flood Protection and Navigation Improvements, DC and MD Anacostia River and Tributaries, Prince Georges Co., MD2 Bainbridge, NY3,4 Bath, NY5 Bayard, WV4 Black Walnut Point, MD Bridgewater, VA4 Bull Run, PA Chesapeake Bay at Hoopersville Road, MD Conklin-Kirkwood, NY4 Cortland, NY 8 Elkland, PA Endicott Johnson City and Vestal, NY Forest Heights, MD4 Fourmile Run, VA Hills Point Road, Dorchester Co., MD3 Greene, NY4 Kingston-Edwardsville, PA Kitzmiller, MD4 Isle of Wight Bay, Ocean City, MD4 Latta Brook Rd., NY McCready's Point Road, MD Middle Hooper Island, MD Nichols, NY Norwich, NY4 Painted Post, NY5 Plymouth, PA Savage River Dam, MD Scranton, PA17 Spring Brook Creek, Pittston Township, PA Solomon Creek, Ashley Borough, Luzerne County, PA Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1995 $ 6,042,325 1977 1959 1970 1965 1985 1953 1984 1993 1955 1970 1971 1979 1964 1987 1989 1951 1979 1965 1992 1984 1993 1993 1974 1950 1970 1958 1954 1971 1993 1993 $ 1,000,0003 382,000 638,332 55,2186 200,500 136,500 2,742,000 156,4917 71,000 324,486 1,297,850 7,034,5349 430,00010 52,480,000 186,077 37,000 4,731,39411 501,50012 972,988 115,500 74,01913 327,16514 1,487,800 94,500 414,181 1,911,68915 2,271,93916 2,006,800 425,96018 70,44119 4-42 $3,735,9791 33,999 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1997 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Solomons Island, Calvert County, MD Completed 1993 126,04920 Sunbury, PA Completed 1953 6,063,00021 Swoyersville-Forty Fort, PA Completed 1968 2,728,113 Tunkhannock Creek, Tunkhannock, PA Completed 1991 174,49122 Tyrone, PA 23 Deferred 1980 6,401,016 Unadilla, NY Completed 1970 1,000,00024 Upper Marlboro, MD4 Completed 1965 590,013 Verona Lake, VA25 Deferred 1978 992,000 Washington, DC and Vicinity Completed 1953 331,92726 Wilkes-Barre, Hanover Township, PA Completed 1958 3,853,45727 Williamsport, PA Completed 1979 12,964,89328 Wyoming Valley, PA Completed 1987 25,549,098 I. Includes $49,998 emergency relief funds. 2. Local interests will not accept operation and maintenance responsibility of the project until the severe erosion and sedimentation of the project caused by tropical storm Eloise is corrected and the project is restored to design condition. 3. Excludes $357,022 contributed funds. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 5. Unit of Southern New York Flood Control Projects. 6. Excludes $182,672 Public Works Acceleration funds and $4,290 contributed funds. 7. Excludes $67,954 Contributed funds. 8. Unit of Susquehanna River Flood Control Projects. 9. Excludes $154,694 contributed funds. 10. Excludes $87,720 contributed funds. 11. Includes $1,162,548 emergency relief funds and excludes $225,877 emergency relief funds expended prior to adoption of project. 12. Excludes $6,616 contributed funds. 13. Excludes $42,081 contributed funds. 14. Excludes $137,900 contributed funds. 15. Includes $4,357 emergency relief funds. 16. Includes $200,000 expended from contributed funds. 17. Unit of Lackawanna River Basin Projects. 18. Excludes $126,225 contributed funds. 19. Excludes $25,014 contributed funds. 20. Excludes $51,666 contributed funds. 21. Excludes $140,504 contributed funds. 22. Excludes $53,383 contributed funds. 23. The unconstructed portion of the project was reclassified to the deferred category January 8, 1981. 24. Excludes $132,578 contributed funds. 25. Authorized for the design memorandum state of advanced engineering and design. 26. Cost of previous project. Includes $106,500 emergency relief funds. 27. Includes $872,715 emergency relief funds. Excludes $36,375 emergency relief funds expended for new work before adoption of project. 28. Includes $1,887 emergency relief funds and excludes $110,835 contributed funds. 4-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 4-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Almond Village, NY1 ,2 Baltimore Harbor & Channels, MD (Ferry Bar & Spring Garden Channel) Betterton Harbor, MD Breton Bay, MD (1902 River & Harbor Act) Broadwater Creek, MD Cadle Creek, MD2 Cambridge Harbor, MD (1948 River & Harbor Act) Channel Connecting Plain Dealing Creek and Oak Chester River, MD (1873 River & Harbor Act) Coan River, VA 1970 1920 1960 1950 1949 1949 1989 1940 1988 1937 1970 1978 1977 Copes Corner Lakes, NY2 Cuckold Creek, MD4 Cunninghill Cove, MD4 Curwensville Lake (WaterLine), PA5 Davenport Center Lake, NY2 1970 Endicott, Johnson City, and Vestal (Remedial), NY5 Fall Brook Lake, PA6 Genegantslet Lake, NY Governors Run, MD 1970 1954 1950 May 26, 1953 1941 Flood Control Act Nov. 17, 1986 1966 Water Reg. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1914 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Jan. 22, 1979 1960 River and Harbor Act Jan 22, 1979 1960 River and Harbor Act Nov. 18, 1991 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 18, 1991 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 4-44 $ 24,6223 787,710 3,482 10,424 212 112 25,419 106,7003 5,720 11,200 286,4003 46,100 214,5783 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Harpers Ferry, WV Hellens Creek, MD Lake Ogleton, MD Marsh Creek Bridge, Foster Joseph Sayers Dam, PA5 Mill Creek, MD Moorefield, WV Neabsco Creek, VA (1881 River & Harbor Act) Ocean City Harbor and Inlet and Sinepuxent Bay, MD (1954 River & Harbor Act) Pocomoke River, MD (1945 River & Harbor Act) Pocomoke River, MD & VA (1954 River & Harbor Act) Saint Georges Creek, MD Sixes Bridge Lake, MD & PA7 South Plymouth Lake, NY Susquehanna River, Sunbury Closure Structure, PA7 Waterway from Little Choptank River to Choptank River, MD West Oneonta Lake, NY2 1. Local cooperation withdrawn, project authorization expired May 26, 1958. 2. Unit of Southern New York Flood Control Projects. 3. Cost for preliminary work only. 4. Project authorization was withdrawn by the Chief of Engineers. 5. Project deauthorized by Section 1001(A) of Public Law 99-662. 6. Unit of Lackawanna River Basin Projects. 7. Authorized for the design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design. 4-45 1937 1950 1950 1949 1941 1978 1989 1989 1989 1971 1974 1953 Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 18, 1991 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 6, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Oct. 3, 1978 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 31, 1989 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Sep. 23, 1986 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Dec. 29, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act Nov. 18, 1991 1986 Water Res. Dev. Act Aug. 5, 1977 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act May 6, 1981 1974 Water Res. Dev. Act 7,9283 14,600 100,0363 305 189,1003 1939 1970 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 4-H RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Date Survey Project Completed DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Anacostia River, DC Feb 1997 Dalecarlia Reservoir Nov 1996 Potomac River below Haines Point Feb 1997 MARYLAND Annapolois Nov 1996 Back Creek Nov 1996 Cambridge Harbor Jul 1997 Chester River Apr 1997 Choptank River Sep 1997 Dog Island Apr 1997 Honga River May 1997 Isle of Wight Bay May 1997 Knapps Narrows Jul 1997 Lower Thorofare May 1997 Muddy Hook July 1997 Nanticoke River Apr 1997 Neale Sound Jun 1997 Pocomoke River May 1997 Shantytown May 1997 Sheep Pen Gut Jan 1997 Sinepuxent Bay Jan 1997 Smith Creek Apr 1997 St. George Creek Apr 1997 St. Jeromes Creek Jan 1997 St. Martin Island Apr 1997 Upper Thorofare May 1997 VIRGINIA Coan River Sep 1997 Little Wicomico River Jun 1997 Occoquan River Jun 1997 Upper Machodoc Jun 1997 Washington Sailing Marina Mar 1997 4-46 BALTIMORE, MD DISTRICT TABLE 4-I Project MARYLAND Anacostia River Basin Cumberland Forest Heights Kitzmiller Upper Marlboro NEW YORK Bainbridge-Newton Creek Bath-Cohocton River Cincinnatus Conklin-Kirkwood Coming-Monkey Run Cortland Endicott-Johnson City & Vestal Greene Nichols Norwich Owego Painted Post Port Dickinson Sherburne Unadilla PENNSYLVANIA Elkland Kingston-Edwardsville Milton Plymouth Scranton Sunbuiry Swoyersville-Forty Fort Tyrone Wilkes-Barre-Hanover Twp. Williamsport VIRGINIA Bridgewater Fourmile Run District of Columbia & MD Proejcts Anacostia River Washngton, DC & Vicinity WEST VIRGINIA Bayard Ridgeley INSPECTION OF COMPLETED PROJECTS Date Inspected October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 4-47 Z V NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT * This district comprises the State of Virginia, except the Potomac, Roanoke, and Ohio River Basins; the entire area on the eastern shore of Virginia except for the project for Pocomoke River, Maryland and Virginia. On the west shore of Chesapeake Bay, all waterways south of Smith Point, VA, at the mouth of the Potomac River except the project for Little Wicomico River, VA. North Carolina, only the Chowan River Basin downstream to and including the mouth of the Meherin River, and the Dismal Swamp Canal Route. of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway to the Albemarle Sound. West Virginia, only the James River Basin. IMPROVEMENTS NAVIGATION 1. Appomattox River, VA 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Bridge at Great Bridge, VA 4. Back River, Poquoson, VA 5. Blackwater River, VA 6. Channel to Newport News, VA 7. Chincoteague Bay, VA 8. Chincoteague Harbor of Refuge, VA 9. Chincoteague Inlet, VA 10. Guilford Creek, VA 11. Hampton Creek, VA Newport News, VA 12. Hampton Roads, VA (Collection and Removal of Drift) 13 Horn Harbor, VA 14. James River, VA 15 Jones Creek, VA 16. Lynnhaven Inlet, VA 17. Newport News Creek, VA 18 Norfolk Harbor and Channels, VA 19. Parker Creek, VA 20. Rudee Inlet, VA 21. Starlings Creek, VA 22. Supervisor of the Harbor of Hampton Roads (Prevention of Obstructive and Injurious Deposits) 23. Thimble Shoal Channel, VA 24. Tylers Beach, VA 25. Waterway on the Coast of Virginia Page 5-2 5-2 5-3 5-3 5-3 5-3 5-3 5-4 5-4 5-4 5-5 5-5 5-5 5-5 5-6 5-6 5-7 5-7 5-8 5-9 5-9 5-9 5-9 5-10 5-10 26 27. York River, VA Navigation Work Under Special Authorization BEACH EROSION CONTROL 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. Virginia Beach, VA (Hurricane Protection) Virginia Beach, VA (Reimbursement) James R. Olin Flood Control Project, VA Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, VA Richmond Filtration Plant, VA Emergency Flood Control Activities GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 34. Surveys 35. Collection and Study of Basic Data TABLES TABLE 5-A Cost and Financial Statement TABLE 5-B Authorizing Legislation TABLE 5-C Data Relative to the Completed Locks TABLE 5-D Other Authorized Navigation Projects TABLE 5-E Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects TABLE 5-F Other Authorized Flood Control Projects TABLE 5-G Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys 5-1 Page 5-10 5-10 5-11 5-11 5-11 5-12 5-12 5-12 5-12 5-13 5-14 5-19 5-23 5-24 5-26 5-26 5-27 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1997 NAVIGATION 1. APPOMATTOX RIVER, VA Location. This river rises in Appomattox County, VA, flows northeasterly 137 miles, and empties into the James River at Hopewell, VA. The portion under improvement extends from its mouth to Petersburg, VA, a distance of 11 miles, which is the length of the tidal and navigable reach. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12251.) Previous projects. For details see page 469 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. This provides for a channel 80 feet wide and 10 feet deep from the mouth of the river to a point 400 feet above Lieutenant Run; thence 80 feet wide and of such depth, not exceeding 10 feet, as can be obtained without rock excavation to the head of navigation at Petersburg; including a basin at the mouth of Poes Run 200 feet long, 150 feet wide, and 20 feet deep; and a turning basin at the mouth of Lieutenant Run 500 feet long, 140 to 160 feet wide, and 12 feet deep in the upper 300 feet, the removal of rock to a depth of 18 feet in the north half of the lower 200 feet, and removal of soft material to rock in the south half of the lower 200 feet of this basin. All depths are referred to mean low water. The project also provides for a dam at Petersburg and the excavation for a width of from 200 to 300 feet of a diversion channel connecting the river above the dam with the river at a point 2.5 miles below; for about 1.7 miles of levees on the low grounds between the navigable and the diversion channels; for a highway bridge and a railway bridge across the diversion channel; and for other work incidental to the diversion channel. Under ordinary conditions the mean tidal range is 2.9 feet and the extremes 2.4 and 2.3 feet. There are no records available of the heights of stage due to ordinary floods. These are estimated at 6 to 8 feet above mean low water at Petersburg, where the extremes are from 15.6 feet to 17.1 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see page 212 of Annual Report for 1969. Terminal facilities. There are about 2,500 feet of wooden bulkhead and a shore landing in Petersburg Harbor. These facilities are in an abandoned, dilapidated condition and have not been used by commercial traffic on the river since 1950. There are two large recreational facilities now in operation on the Appomattox River. One is located about 2 miles downstream from Petersburg, VA and the other is at Hopewell, VA near the confluence of the Appomattox and the James. Operations during fiscal year. Work consisted of coordination and technical assistance to the City of Petersburg in their efforts to secure a site for placing contaminated dredged material. 2. ATLANTIC INTRA COASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (NORFOLK DISTRICT) Location. Two inland water routes approximately paralleling Atlantic coast south of Norfolk, VA between a point in Southern Branch of Elizabeth River, VA 2,500 feet upstream of Norfolk & Western Railway bridge and Virginia-North Carolina state line in North Landing River, a distance of 27.2 miles; and 64.6 miles between mouth of Deep Creek, VA and mouth of Pasquotank River, NC. These routes are shown on National Ocean Service Chart 12206. Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 90 to 250 feet wide following southern Branch of Elizabeth River, 5.2 miles, Virginia Land Cut, 8.3 miles, and North Landing River, 13.7 miles; and construction of tidal guard lock at Great Bridge, VA. It also provides channels 10 feet deep at mean low water and 90 to 100 feet wide in Deep Creek, 3.1 miles, Turners Cut, 4.3 miles and Pasquotank River, 35.1 miles; maintaining Dismal Swamp Canal, 22.1 miles, to about 9 feet deep mean canal level over a width of 50 feet; protection of banks in Turners Cut with sheet piling, and cutting curtain sharp points in Pasquotank River to shorten its course. (See Table 5-C at end of chapter on Data Relative to Completed Locks included in Project.) Project includes operating and care of completed locks, dams and bridges. Southern Branch of Elizabeth River and Deep Creek sections of the two routes are tidal, mean range being about 3 feet with extremes of minus 3.5 and plus 9.6 feet. Remaining sections are non-tidal with fluctuations of 1 to 2 feet in level due to winds. Local cooperation. None required. 5-2 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. See Annual Report for FY 1970. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work consisted of operation and ordinary maintenance of the project consisting of real estate management services, condition and operation studies. Operation and care of locks, bridges, spillways, wharves, canal equipment, grounds, roads, buildings, etc. performed by contract. For the A & C Canal, a contract was awarded to REHAB Federal Systems at North Landing Bridge and Great Bridge in FY 96 and is in progress in FY 97. For the Dismal Swamp Canal, a contract was awarded in FY 96 and completed to replace valves at Deep Creek and South Mills Spillways. A second contract to paint bridges at Deep Creek and South Mills was completed in FY 96. A contract to replace bulkheads at Lake Drummond Spillway was also awarded and substantially completed in FY 96. A contract to Rehab Lake Drummond Office was awarded in FY 96 and under construction in FY 97. 3. ATLANTIC INTRA COASTAL WATERWAY BRIDGE AT GREAT BRIDGE, VA Location. The project is located in the City of Chesapeake, in the southeastern portion of Virginia. The City is bordered by the city of Suffolk on the west, the cities of Norfolk and Portsmouth on the North, the city of Virginia Beach on the east, and North Carolina on the south. The Federally owned Atlantic Intra coastal Waterway highway bridge crosses the Albermarle and Chesapeake Canal in the community of Great Bridge. Existing project. The plan of improvement includes replacement of the existing 55-year old, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2-lane swing bridge with a 5-lane, double-leaf, rolling-lift bascule bridge, 2000 LF of approach roadway, utility relocations, and removal of the existing bridge. Local cooperation. The local sponsor (city of Chesapeake)is required to assume OMRR&R responsibility on project completion in accordance with the provisions described in Section 339 of the National Highway System Designation Act of 1995. (P.L. 104-59) Operations during fiscal year. The Feasibility report was approved in Jul 94. Preconstruction engineering and design was initiated during FY 95 and completed in FY 97. Project Cooperation Agreement signing is scheduled for April 1998. Federal acquisition of real estate and rights-of-way are in progress. Contract award scheduled 4th quarter FY 99. 4. BACK RIVER, POQUOSON, VA Continuing Feasibility Phase 5. BLACKWATER RIVER, VA Operations during fiscal year. Removal of debris that was obstructing the navigation channel was accomplished by government plant and hired labor. See Annual Report for FY 1975 for the last complete report on this project. 6. CHANNEL TO NEWPORT NEWS, VA Location. West of north entrance to Norfolk Harbor Channel, connects deep water in James River with Hampton Roads. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12245.) Existing project. A channel 55 feet deep at mean low water and 800 feet wide from Norfolk Harbor Channel in Hampton Roads to Newport News, a distance of about 4.5 miles, and two deep-draft anchorage berths opposite Newport News 45 feet deep over a 1,200-foot swinging radius. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.7 feet and extremes 2.1 and 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuations due to combined wind and tides, referred to mean low water, are minus 2 feet and plus 9.5 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for dredging the channel to an intermediate depth of 50 feet, which was completed December 2, 1988. The local sponsor (Virginia Port Authority) is required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended, for additional deepening. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 11, (Revised 1993) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by the Water Resources Support Center. Operations during fiscal year. Work consisted of condition surveys of the project and preparation for maintenance dredging in FY 1998. 7. CHINCOTEAGUE BAY, VA Location. The Chincoteague Bay project is located at the community of Greenbackville, Virginia, on the west shore of Chincoteague Bay, a shallow sound on the Atlantic coast of Virginia and Maryland. (See National Ocean Service Chart 5-3 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1997 12211.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 5 feet deep and 60 feet wide from Chincoteague Bay into an L-shaped harbor of the same depth and width at Greenbackville. The total length including the harbor is approximately 4,200 feet. Mean range of tide is about 2 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities at Greenbackville are considered adequate for current and prospective traffic. Operations during fiscal year. A contract to maintenance dredge the channel and harbor was awarded in March 1997 and completed in June 1997; a total of 18,512 cubic yards was removed. 8. CHINCOTEAGUE HARBOR OF REFUGE, VA Location. The Chincoteague Harbor of Refuge is located on the west side and southern tip of the of the island of Chincoteague. Chincoteague Island is separated from the mainland to the west by Chincoteague Channel and from the barrier island known as Assateague Island to the east by Assateague Channel and Assateague Bay. (See National Ocean Service Chart 12211.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 8 feet deep and 60 feet wide from the "Canal" at the lower end of Chincoteague Island, into an anchorage basin of the same depth and 235 feet wide by 650 feet long. The mean range of tide is about 2.6 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see Annual Report for 1974. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities at Chincoteague are considered adequate for current and prospective traffic. Operations during fiscal year. A contract to maintenance dredge the channel and harbor was awarded in April 1997 and completed in May 1997; a total of 8,171 cubic yards was removed. 9. CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA Location. Chincoteague Inlet at the southern end of Assateague Island provides access to the Atlantic Ocean from the inland waterway near the town of Chincoteague, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart 12211.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar in the Atlantic Ocean and to the mouth of the inlet, a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the inlet through the canal, and then along Chincoteague Channel to a point approximately 2,000 feet north of the state highway bridge to Chincoteague, a distance of about 6.6 miles. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet. All depths are referred to mean low water. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see Annual Report for 1974. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities at Chincoteague are considered adequate for current and prospective traffic. Operations during fiscal year. A contract to dredge 100,000 cubic yards from the entrance channel was awarded in June 1997. Work commenced in September 1997, and will be completed during FY 1998. Other work on the project included condition surveys and completion the draft Environmental Assessment for a new dredged material placement plan for the inner channel. 10. GUILFORD CREEK, VA Location. Guilford Creek is located in Accomack County, Virginia, near the communities of Guilford and Parksley, VA, and is tributary to the Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12225.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide over a length of about 1.0 mile, from Beasley Bay into Guilford Creek, and including a turning basin 6 feet deep and 100 feet square. The project also includes construction of a rock groin approximately 100 feet long at the dredged material placement site. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. County of Accomack, VA is the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. Existing terminal facilities are adequate for present commerce. 5-4 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A contract for dredging the Guilford Creek navigation channel and constructing the rock groin at the dredged material placement site was awarded in April 1997 and completed in July 1997; a total of 53,788 cubic yards of material was removed. Additional work to stabilize the dredged material and plant it for environmental enhancement continued into FY 1998. 11. HAMPTON CREEK, VA Location. Hampton Creek is located within the City of Hampton, Virginia and is tributary to Hampton Roads. The project serves the harbor at Hampton, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12245.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 to 200 feet wide over a length of about 2.8 miles, from Hampton Roads and into the creek as far upstream as the Settlers Landing Road highway bridge; a channel in Herberts Creek 12 feet deep and 80 to 100 feet wide over a length of about 1,300 feet, from the Hampton Creek channel upstream to Kecoughtan Road. Mean tide range is 2.6 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded in April 1997; a total of 56,024 cubic yards was removed. 12. HAMPTON ROADS, VA COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT Location. Hampton Roads is a natural harbor 300 miles south of New York and 180 miles south of Washington, D.C. Its principal tributaries are James River, affording a natural deep harbor at Newport News, VA: Elizabeth River, with its Southern, Eastern, and Western Branches providing harbors for Norfolk and Portsmouth, VA; and Hampton Creek, serving the harbor at Hampton, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12248,12245 and 12253.) Existing project. Collection and removal of drift in Hampton Roads and its tributary waters authorizes the Secretary of the Army to allot necessary amounts of work from appropriations for main-other available appropriations and that this work shall be carded on as a separate and distinct project. It is wholly a work of maintenance. The purpose of work is to afford relief from variable conditions of obstruction. No advance estimate of the amount of work is required. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. See Norfolk Harbor. VA and Channel to Newport News, VA. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of the project resulted in collection and disposal of a variety of floating refuse. Operations were performed using government plant and hired labor. 13. HORN HARBOR, VA Location. Horn Harbor is a tidal estuary 4 miles long in Mathews County, VA, entering the Chesapeake Bay on its western shore about 43 miles north of Norfolk, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart 12238.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 7 feet deep and 100 feet wide across the entrance bar. Mean range of tide is about 2 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate for current and prospective traffic. Operations during fiscal year. A contract to maintenance dredge the channel was awarded in June 1997 and completed in September 1997; a total of 5,095 cubic yards was removed. 14. JAMES RIVER, VA Location. The river is formed by the junction of the Cowpasture and Jackson Rivers in Botetourt County, VA, flows east 340 miles and empties into Hampton Roads at Newport News, VA. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12248 and 12251.) Existing project. A channel 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the mouth to Richmond Deepwater Terminal, and a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the Deepwater terminal to Richmond Lock, a mooring basin 35 feet deep, 180 to 220 feet wide and 2,100 feet long alongside the channel opposite waterfront at Hopewell; enlargement of the turning basin at Richmond Deepwater Terminal to 825 feet wide, 2,770 feet long and 35 feet deep; a turning basin in Richmond Harbor 5-5 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1997 200 feet wide, 600 feet long and 18 feet deep; and construction of spur and training dikes. Depth of channels is referred to main low water. Total length of channel included in the project is 91 miles, which is the navigable section. Mean tidal ranges under ordinary conditions for different parts of the river are: mouth, 2.6 feet; Jamestown, 2 feet; City Point, 2.6 feet; and Richmond, 3.2 feet. Spring tide ranges under ordinary conditions at the same localities are mouth, 3.1 feet; Jamestown, 2.4 feet; City Point, 3 feet; Richmond, 3.2 feet. Ordinary fluctuations of stage at Richmond, due to floods are 6 to 12 feet above mean low water. Extreme fluctuations are 16 to 32 feet. Flood heights below Richmond diminish rapidly. The extreme according to available information is about 11 feet lower at Dutch gap, 14 miles below and 17 to 18 feet lower, 20 miles below. For previous projects, see Annual Report for 1938. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for conditions imposed by River and Harbor Act of 1962. However, the local sponsor (Richmond Port Authority) is required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended. Deepening the project from 25 feet to 35 feet, and the widening, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1962 has not been started. Terminal facilities. There are city-owned wharves at Richmond Harbor and at Richmond Deepwater Terminal, and numerous private facilities elsewhere on the James River. The Deepwater Terminal is at the head of the 25-foot deep improved channel, and it serves oceangoing vessels and larger ships engaged in coast-wide trading. For detailed information on the terminal facilities on the James River, see Port Series No. 11, (Revised 1993) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by the Water Resources Support Center. Existing terminal facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded in FY 96 and completed in October 1996 for dredging Dancing Point - Swann Point Shoal Channel (a total of 1,018,111 cubic yards removed), dredging Turkey Island Cutoff (a total of 51,287 cubic yards removed) and dredging Richmond Deepwater Terminal (a total of 146,038 cubic yards removed.) A maintenance dredging contract was awarded in November 1996 and completed in February 1997 for dredging Tribell Shoal Channel (a total of 413,142 cubic yards removed) and for dredging Goose Hill Channel (a total of 997,163 cubic yards was removed.) An Indefinite Delivery Contract for maintenance dredging various shoals on the James River was awarded in July 1997 for a period of one year; work on this contract continued into FY 1998. In addition to maintenance dredging, work on the James River also included condition surveys, environmental and archaeological studies, and engineering investigations related to a shoaling and re-alignment analysis at Turkey Island Cutoff. 15. JONES CREEK, VA Location. Jones Creek is a tributary to the Pagan River, in Isle of Wight County on the southwest shore of the James River. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12248.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide over a length of about 5,000 feet, from the Pagan River into Jones Creek and as far upstream as the State Highway Route 704 Bridge at Rescue, VA. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. County of Isle of Wight, VA is the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. Existing terminal facilities at Rescue, VA are adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The entrance channel to Jones Creek, approximately 700 feet in length, was dredged by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Special Purpose Dredge CURRITUCK and hired labor during the period 1 March through 18 March 1997. The CURRITUCK removed a total of 11,438 cubic yards from the channel. The remainder of the Jones Creek channel is naturally deeper that the project depth of 6 feet. 16. LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA Location. On the south shore of the Chesapeake Bay, 5 miles west of Cape Henry, and 10 miles east of Norfolk, VA, the inlet connects Lynnhaven Roads, a part of the Chesapeake Bay, with a network of inland waters in the northern half of the city of VA Beach. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12254.) Existing project. An entrance channel from Chesapeake Bay through Lynnhaven Inlet, 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide; a mooring and turning basin inside of Lynnhaven Inlet, 10 feet deep, 1,100 feet long, and 750 feet wide; a channel 9 feet deep and 90 feet wide to extend from the mooring and turning basin into Broad Bay via Long Creek-Broad Bay Canal, a side channel from the basin into Long Creek at a depth of 8 feet and width of 100 feet, and a channel through the Narrows connecting Broad and Linkhorn Bays, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide. Mean range of tide in Lynnhaven Inlet is about 2 feet with extreme fluctuations of 1.5 feet below and 9.5 feet above mean 5-6 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT low water. Range in Lynnhaven Bay is a little more than 2 feet, in Broad and Linkhorn Bays, fluctuations in water level are caused by local winds. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. The City of Virginia Beach is the local project sponsor. For details see page 308 of Annual Report for 1965. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. For details see page 308 of Annual Report for 1970. Operations during fiscal year. A contract to maintenance dredge the entrance channel, basin, channel to Broad Bay and the Narrows channel was awarded in September 1997 with work continuing into FY 1998. The entrance channel will be realigned as a result of this dredging contract. 17. NEWPORT NEWS CREEK, VA Location. On the southern end of the peninsula between the James and York Rivers and within the corporate limits of the City of Newport News. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 12245.) Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep and with width varying from 150 to 90 feet, from deep water in Hampton Roads to the municipal boat harbor, and including a turning and anchorage basin at the upper end of the same depth, width varying from 188 to 214 feet, and 500 feet in length. Under a Section 107 modification, a portion of the entrance channel 125 feet wide is being deepened to 18 feet, to connect with the adjacent harbor protected with an L-shaped wave screen. Portions of this harbor are also being deepened to 18 feet under Section 107 authority. Mean range of tide is 2.6 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. The City of Newport News is the local project sponsor. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract to deepen portions of the entrance channel and adjacent harbor within the L-shaped wave screen to a depth of 18 feet was awarded in August 1997; work continued on this contract into FY 1998. 18. NORFOLK HARBOR AND CHANNELS, VA. Location. Norfolk, VA is 187 miles south of Baltimore, MD and 30 miles from entrance to Chesapeake Bay at Cape Charles and Cape Henry. Harbor extends 18.3 miles from 40-foot contour in Hampton Roads to a point 2,500 feet above Norfolk and Western Railway bridge over a Southern Branch of Elizabeth River. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12245 and 12253.) 1938. 1993. Previous projects. For details see Annual Report for Existing project. For details see Annual Report for HAMPTON ROADS AND ELIZABETH RIVER: A channel 55 feet deep and 1,500 feet wide from that depth in Hampton Roads to a point approximately 6.3 miles upstream from the Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel; thence 55 feet deep and 800 feet wide to Lamberts Point; thence 45 feet deep and 750 feet wide to the junction of Southern Branch and Eastern Branch. EASTERN BRANCH: A channel 25 feet deep and 500 feet wide from the junction of the branches to Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge, from the Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide to the Campostella Bridge, channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide to the Norfolk and Western Railway Bridge (formerly Virginian), including a turning basin 25 feet deep and approximately 5.5 acres in size located at the upstream end of the project. WESTERN BRANCH: A channel 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide to a point 0.78 mile from the 40-foot channel, thence 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide for a distance of 0.38 mile; thence 18 feet deep and 150 feet wide for 0.57 mile to a point 0.34 mile above the West Norfolk Bridge. SCOTTS CREEK: A channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide from the 40-foot channel for a distance of 0.73 mile. ANCHORAGE, SEWELLS POINT: Three fixed mooring anchorage facilities with a depth of 55 feet, each capable of accommodating two large vessels simultaneously; two anchorages opposite Sewells Point, 45 feet deep over a swing radius of 2,300 feet; anchorage area on the west side of the 55- foot channel opposite Lamberts Point aggregating 173 acres consisting of open space 1,500 feet square and 38 feet deep, one space 1,500 feet square and 35 feet deep, and one space 3,000 feet long, 1,000 feet wide and 20 feet deep; and 45-acre anchorage, 12 feet deep, near Pinners Point. 5-7 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1997 SOUTHERN BRANCH: The southern branch of the Elizabeth River generally oriented and flows south to north, and in the vicinity of this project is bordered on the east bank by the City of Chesapeake. The Southern Branch 40 Foot Deepening element will deepen a 2.5 mile section of the Elizabeth River from its current depth of 35 feet to 40 feet between the Norfolk and Western Railroad Bridge at mile 15, upstream to the U.S. Routes 460 and 13 highway bridge (also known as Gilmerton Bridge) at mile 17.5. This reach of the channel ranges in width between 250 and 500 feet, with an average width of 300 feet. The channel will be widened at selected points to permit vessels to safely negotiate bends. At mile 17.5, in the vicinity of the Gilmerton Bridge, an 800 foot turning basin with a depth of 40 feet will be constructed. In addition, the possible need for modifying the Gilmerton Bridge will be explored as part of this project. Operations during fiscal year. Planning, engineering and design was temporarily postponed due to questions of local sponsorship. Coordination continued with the local sponsor and other agencies regarding scheduling of additional deepening. Anchorages: Three fixed mooring anchorage facilities with a depth of 55 feet, each capable of accommodating two large vessels simultaneously; two anchorages opposite Sewells Point, 45 feet deep over a swing radius of 2,300 feet; anchorage area on the west side of the 55-foot channel opposite Lamberts Point aggregating 173 acres consisting of open space 1,500 feet square and 38 feet deep, one space 1,500 feet square and 35 feet deep, and one space 3,000 feet long, 1,000 feet wide and 20 feet deep; and a 45-acre anchorage, 12 feet deep, near Pinners Point. Operations during fiscal year. The District completed plans and specifications for the proposed 50-foot anchorage improvements. Coordination continued with the local sponsor and other agencies regarding dredged material management alternatives. Disposal area: A disposal area of about 2,500 acres adjacent to and north of Craney Island, enclosed by stone-faced levee of sand; rehandling basin, approach and exit channels connecting rehandling basin and Norfolk Harbor 55-foot channel and hopper dredge unloading facility. Operations during fiscal year. A contract was awarded in September 1997 and completed in December 1997. A total of 161,172 cubic yards of material was removed from the rehandling basin. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for dredging the channel to an intermediate depth of 50 feet, which was completed December 15, 1988. The local sponsor (Virginia Port Authority) is required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended for additional deepening. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 11 (revised 1993) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by the Water Resources Support Center. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A contract to dredge the Norfolk Harbor 45-Ft. and 50-Ft. Channels was awarded in FY 1996 and completed in November 1996; a total of 985,782 cubic yards were removed. A contract to dredge the Norfolk Harbor 45-Ft. and 50-Ft. Channels was awarded in September 1997 with work continuing into FY 1998. A contract to dredge the Norfolk Harbor 40-Ft. Channel from Lambert Bend to Paradise Creek in the Southern Branch of the Elizabeth River was awarded in September 1997 with work continuing into FY 1998. In addition to maintenance dredging, work also included condition surveys and environmental studies. 19. PARKER CREEK, VA Location. Parker Creek empties into the western side of Metompkin Bay in Accomack County, Virginia. It is on the ocean side of Virginia's Eastern Shore, about 20 miles south of the Maryland-Virginia State line. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12210.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 5 feet deep and 40 feet wide, from the junction with the Waterway on the Coast of Virginia in Metompkin Bay, extending into Parker Creek as far upstream as the 5-ft. contour. Mean range of tide is approximately 3.5 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. The County of Accomack is the local sponsor of the project. Terminal facilities. Existing terminal facilities, including a public dock located on the creek, are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded in September 1997 as a combined contract with the dredging of the Ramshorn Channel on the Waterway on the Coast of Virginia. Work on this contract continued into FY 1998. 5-8 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT 20. RUDEE INLET, VA Location. On the Atlantic Coast of Virginia, within the City of Virginia Beach approximately 5 miles south of Cape Henry. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12205.) Existing Project. An entrance channel 10-ft deep, 10 to 72-ft wide and 1605-ft long; an inner channel 7-ft deep, 72 to 53-ft wide and 2,495-ft long including a safety area 7-ft deep, and approximately 1.9 acres in size and a turning basin 7-ft deep, 175-ft wide and 1,570-ft long; a sand trap 18-ft deep and approximately 3.3 acres in size; and a weir and jetty system at the mouth of the inlet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. The City of Virginia Beach as local sponsor is required to financially participate in continued annual maintenance as described in the Local Cooperation Agreement, and has fully participated through the current fiscal year. Terminal facilities. Existing terminal facilities, are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. A contract to dredge the entrance channel and sand trap was advertised for bids in January 1997 and bids opened during March 1997. The government did not award a contract during the fiscal year and canceled the solicitation. The City of Virginia Beach performed dredging of the project with its own plant and also dredged the entrance channel under an emergency contract. In addition, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Special Purpose Dredge CURRITUCK was successfully tested in the entrance channel during March 1997, and returned for a dredging assignment in September 1997 which continued into FY 1998. 21. STARLINGS CREEK, VA Operations during fiscal year. The project was dredged during FY 1996 under contract. A purchase order was issued to a construction contractor in FY 1997 to improve drainage around the diked dredged material site at the Town of Saxis. For last complete report on the project, see Annual Report of 1991. 22. SUPERVISOR OF NORFOLK HARBOR (PREVENTION OF OBSTRUCTIVE AND INJURIOUS DEPOSITS) The District Engineer, Norfolk District, was designated Supervisor of the harbor of Hampton Roads under the provisions of the River and Harbor Act of June 29, 1888 (33 U.S.C. 441- 451) as amended July 12,1952. Under this Act, the Supervisor of the harbor of Hampton Roads is charged with the mission of preventing the deposit of obstructive and injurious materials in the tidal waters of the harbors of Norfolk, Portsmouth, Newport News, Hampton Roads, and their adjacent and tributary waters, so much of the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries as lies within the State of Virginia, and so much of the Atlantic Ocean and its tributaries as lies within the jurisdiction of the United States within or to the east of the State of Virginia. The River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403,407,409) as amended prohibits obstructions to navigable waters such as unauthorized structures, unauthorized fill, deposit of refuse, and sinking of vessels. Other laws relating to the supervision of Norfolk Harbor and its tributary waters are the Clean Water Act, The Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1969, the Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956, the Federal Power Act of 1920, the National Historic Prevention Act of 1966, the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the Deepwater Port Act of 1972, the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, and the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act. Direct supervision of the waters under the jurisdiction of the Norfolk District was accomplished by means of two patrol vessels performing inspections, removing debris and investigating navigational hazards and sunken abandoned vessels. A derrick boat and crane barge performed removal of sunken vessels and navigational hazards and supported Federal dredging projects. In addition, surveillance of the harbor was performed regarding the Corps' regulatory program, using also two small outboard craft, motor vehicles from land and occasional chartered aerial reconnaissance. This regulatory surveillance involved compliance surveys of permitted activities and evaluation of navigational impacts of proposed piers and other structures. 23. THIMBLE SHOAL CHANNEL, VA Location. In lower portion of Chesapeake Bay between Hampton Roads and the ocean, 20 miles northeast of center of Norfolk Harbor, extending southeasterly 12 miles from a point 1.25 miles east of Thimble Shoal lighthouse toward entrance to Chesapeake Bay. (See National Ocean Service Chart No. 12222.) Existing project. Provides for dredging a channel 12 miles long, 1,000 feet wide, and 55 feet deep at mean low water. To date the 650-ft. wide outbound lane has been deepened and maintained to a depth of 50 feet, and the remaining 350-ft. width 5-9 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1997 is maintained at a 45-ft. depth under the previous project. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 2.5 feet and extreme 3 feet. Extremes of irregular fluctuation, due to combined wind and tides referred to mean low water, and minus 3 feet and plus 7 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For the most recent improvements to the channel (50-ft. depth over 650- ft. wide outbound lane), the Virginia Port Authority was project sponsor and shared in the cost of the improvement. Terminal facilities. Project serves as an entrance channel to Hampton Roads. See Port Series No. 11 (revised 1993) on Ports of Hampton Roads, prepared by the Water Resources Support Center. Operations During Fiscal Year. Work during the fiscal year consisted of condition surveys of the channel and monitoring of the Dam Neck Ocean Dredged Material Management Site as required by the EPA. 24. TYLERS BEACH, VA Operations during fiscal year. The Tylers Beach project was included in the FY 1997 President's Budget and was scheduled for maintenance dredging. During FY 1996 and continuing into October 1996, the Norfolk District coordinated with the Commonwealth of Virginia for renewal of permits needed for continued open water placement of dredged material in the James River at the site used during 1992 and 1982. In October 1996, the Commonwealth declined to re-issue the permits for overboard placement. Consequently the Isle of Wight County as local project sponsor will be required to provide an upland site for containment of the dredged material before any further maintenance of the project may be accomplished. Through FY 1997 the sponsor had not provided an upland placement site. See Annual Report for FY 1982 for last complete report on the project. 25. WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA Location. Between barrier beach along Atlantic Ocean on the east and Virginia portion of mainland peninsula on the west. It extends for 83.7 miles from south end of Chincoteague Bay through a number of creeks, thoroughfares and bays to enter Chesapeake Bay in the vicinity of Fisherman Island, just south of Cape Charles on the southern tip of the peninsula. (See National Ocean Service Chart Nos. 12210, 12211, and 12221.) Existing projects. An inland waterway 6 feet deep at mean low water and 60 feet wide from Chesapeake Bay to Chincoteague Bay, VA. Mean range of tide is about 3 feet. Greater fluctuations in water level are caused by high winds and storms. A modification of the project approved during 170 under Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 authorized relocation of portions of the waterway and widening of 100 feet. Local cooperation. Complied with except that local interests are to furnish spoil disposal areas for future maintenance. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate. Operations during fiscal year. A maintenance dredging contract was awarded in April 1997 and completed in June 1997 to dredge the Swash Bay and White Trout Creek channels; a total of 98,634 cubic yards of material was removed. A dredging contract was awarded in September 1997 for the dredging of a new alignment at the Ramshorn Channel, as a combined contract with Parker Creek. Work on this contract continued into FY 1998. A contract for restoration of a marsh island at Swash Bay was also performed during FY 1997. Other work on the project consisted of condition surveys and environmental studies. 26. YORK RIVER, VA Operations during fiscal year. Work on plans and specifications for the new work dredging of the entrance channel, to dimensions of 37 feet deep and 750 feet wide over its approximately 12 mile length, continued during FY 1997 and is scheduled for completion during FY 1998. See Annual Report for FY 1958 for the last complete report on the York River project. 27. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION The district continues work on six Section 107 (navigation) studies: York River Entrance Channel, VA, continuing the Plans and Specs (P&S) phase); Newport News Creek, VA, continuing the construction phase; Guilford Creek, VA, currently in construction phase with completion scheduled for April 1998: Jones Creek, VA, has completed construction and the project close-out activities have been scheduled; Back River, VA, currently in the feasibility phase; Cape Charles, VA, study is currently in the feasibility phase. 5-10 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT BEACH EROSION CONTROL 28. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. The city of Virginia Beach is located on the south eastern coast of Virginia bordered by the Atlantic Ocean on the east, Chesapeake Bay on the north, the cities of Norfolk and Chesapeake on the west, and North Carolina on the south (See National Ocean Service Chart 12207.) Existing project. The plan of improvement includes construction of a vertical steel sheet-pile wall with concrete cap extending from Rudee Inlet to 58th Street, enhancement of the existing dune system between 58th Street and 89th Street, construction and periodic renourishment of a widened and raised beach berm between Rudee Inlet and 89th Street, a new boardwalk integrated with the vertical wall which will be placed seaward of the existing boardwalk extending from Rudee Inlet to approximately 40th Street, a storm water runoff system consisting of the offshore discharge by pumped flow through submarine pipelines, appropriate beach access structures consisting of ramps and stairs and dune crossover facilities. Local cooperation. The local sponsor (city of Virginia Beach) is required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in The Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction engineering and design were in progress. The General Reevaluation Report, which incorporates the locally preferred plan, was approved in Jul 94. 29. VIRGINIA BEACH, VA, (REIMBURSEMENT) Location. The city of Virginia Beach is located on the southeastern coast of Virginia bordered by the Atlantic Ocean on the east, Chesapeake Bay on the north, the cities of Norfolk and Chesapeake on the west, and North Carolina on the south. (See National Ocean Service Chart 12207.) Existing project. The periodic nourishment program is a modification of the original project adopted by the 1954 River and Harbor Act, which provided for beach restoration and the deferred construction of a system of drains. Comparative cost studies of groin construction versus periodic nourishment indicate that the later is the more suitable and economical method for maintaining share stability, protecting property, and insuring maximum recreation benefits from use of the publiclyowned shores. The current project includes periodic nourishment of approximately 3.3 miles of beach between Rudee Inlet and 49th Street with maintenance of the berm to a minimum width of approximately 100 feet of elevation 7 feet above mean low water. Local cooperation. The non-Federal sponsor is the city of Virginia Beach. The original Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) expired 6 February 1987. Consistent with Section 934 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, a new PCA was required. Ten additional years of Federal participation in periodic nourishment cost sharing were approved on 10 March 1988 by the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works. A PCA for the extension of periodic nourishment was executed on 9 August 1993. Article VII of the 9 August 1993 PCA states 'The Government shall not be obligated to budget for appropriations to reimburse the Local Sponsor for, and costs incurred by the Local Sponsor for periodic nourishment after February 6, 1987, and before execution of this agreement. The Government shall reimburse the Local Sponsor for such costs only when specifically directed by Congress in legislation and when appropriations are made available for such purpose. Operations during fiscal year. The Federal shares (65%) of the 1994 renourishment cost was reimbursed to the city of Virginia Beach. Total cost was $759,402. 30. JAMES R. OLIN FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, VA. Location. The city of Buena Vista is on the left bank of the Maury River, 40 miles below the rivers origin and about 11 miles upstream of its juncture with the main stem of the James River at the community of Glasgow. The Maury River Basin above Buena Vista contains a drainage area of about 840 square miles. Existing projects. The project will provide a system of floodwalls and levees on the left bank and channel modifications to provide flood protection against a flood equal to the August 1969 event which is the maximum flood of recent record. The programmed portion of the project (lower element) consists of a combination levee/floodwall with controlled channelized flow of interior drainage and channel refinement to the Maury River. The unprogrammed portion of the project (upper element) consists of a concrete ringwall around the Georgia Bonded Fibers plant. 5-11 ___. Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1997 Local cooperation. The local sponsor(city of Buena Vista) is required to furnish cost sharing in accordance with the provisions described in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended, for project construction, and maintain and operate all works after completion. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) for the programmed portion of the project was executed on February 17, 1994. Operations during fiscal year. The programmed lower element will be constructed in two phases; Phase I consists of channel refinements to the Maury River; Phase 11 consists of the levee, floodwall, closures and interior drainage canal. Construction for Phase I and Phase II is 100 percent complete. 31. GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA Location. Gathright Dam is on the Jackson River, a tributary of James River at mile 43.4 in Allegheny County. Gathright Dam site is in the reach of the Jackson River known as the Gorge, about 19 miles upstream from Covington, VA. At the elevation of the top of the conservation pool, the lake extends upstream about 9 miles. (See Falling Spring and Mountain Grove, Virginia-West Virginia quadrangles of geological survey.) Existing project. Gathright Dam consists of a 1,172- foot long, rolled-rock-fill dam with an impervious core, with the top at elevation 1,684.5; outlet works consisting of a concrete intake structure located in the right bank 500 feet upstream from the axis of the dam: a 1,075-foot long outlet tunnel through the right abutment and a stilling basin; and a 2,450-foot long fixedcrest emergency spillway excavated in a low saddle in the divide at Fortney Branch about 2.5 miles south of the dam. Discharges through the maximum conservation poot elevation 1,582 will be provided for water quality control. The reservoir area at elevation 1,582 will be 2,530 acres. A total of 302,000 acre-feet of storage between elevation 1,582 and the spillway crest (elevation 1,663.5) will be reserved for flood control. At the spillway crest the reservoir will have an area of 4,540 acres. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Care of service and recreational facilities, water control management, testing and monitoring, supervision and administration and engineering and design. A contract to paint Intake Tower Access Bridge was awarded in January 1996 and substantially completed in October 1996. 32. RICHMOND FILTRATION PLANT, VA Location: The Richmond Water filtration Plant is located in the city of Richmond, VA bordered on the north by Henrico County and on the south by Chesterfield County. Existing project: As a result of Tropical Storm Agnes in June 1972, the water filtration plant was flooded and the estimated 400,000 population served was without potable water supply for over five days and without fire protection for over three days. The project will provide flood protection of the municipal water supply treatment plant from a flood having a recurrence of 360 years. The project will provide flood protection by enclosing three sides of the water filtration plant with a floodwall and tying into high ground. The wall will have an average height of about nine feet with a top elevation of 117 feet MSL. The project will be built through one contract over two years. Local cooperation: The city of Richmond, Virginia is the local sponsor, a Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on October 21, 1994. Operation during the fiscal year: In FY 97, Congress added $3,500,000 for construction of the project. The Administration does not support funding for the project because the lack of flood protection at the filtration plant is considered a design deficiency and should be undertaken by local interests. A construction contract was awarded on July 31, 1995 and is 80 percent complete. 33. EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES During FY 95, $200,369 was spent on the National Emergency Preparedness Program, and $278,226 on the Disaster Preparedness Program. 34. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS SURVEYS Total cost of surveys during the fiscal year amounted to $726,119. The work consisted of a shoreline protection study of Poquoson $282,946; special studies $326,624, to include King George and Caroline Counties, and comprehensive Watershed Studies of the Elizabeth River Basin and Nansemond River Basin; special investigations $29,145; Interagency Water 5-12 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT Resources Development $25,708; National Marine Fisheries Service $1,428; coordination with other agencies and cooperation with states $41,725; and review of the AIWW Bridge Replacement at Great Bridge, VA $18,543. 35. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the fiscal year, cost of collection and study of basic data was $201,635 consisting of flood plain management studies including Quick Responses, Management Service Unit, Technical Services and Environmental Data Studies and special studies. 5-13 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1997 TABLE 5-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Section Project Total Cost In Text Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 To 30 Sep 1997 1. Appommattox River, VA (Regular Funds) 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, between Norfolk, VA and the St. John's River, FL (Norfolk District) (Regular Funds) 3. Atlantic Intracostal Waterway, Great Bridge (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Back River, Poquoson, VA 5. Blackwater River, VA 6. Channel to Newport News, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 7. Chincoteague Bay, VA New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Major Rehab Approp Cost Recreation Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 213,234 255,811 254,240 253,492 - - 1,645,024 - - 1,642,085 2,236,223 3,439,227 1,465,663 2,199,532 3,423,908 1,469,683 - - 870,341 - - 870,341 - 5,898 876,239 - 5,503 875,844 - 1,645,024 - 1,642,085 873,433 8,135,714 841,515 8,178,694 - 479,947 - 479,947 - 59,871 - 59,871 - 307,000 1,046,708 - 320,343 1,036,349 126,300 42,526 12,000 12,000 48,518 286,282 40,311 40,311 32,255 32,255 41,000 208,420 208,420 126,300 42,526 12,000 12,000 4,097,117 4,097,117 448,660 448,660 4,918,544 4,695,108 208,420 208,420 5-14 r TABLE 5-A (Continued) C Section Project In Text Funding 8. Chincoteague Harbor of Refuge, VA New Work (Regular Funds) Approp Cost 9. Chincoteague Inlet, VA New Work (Regular Funds) Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp Cost 10. Guilford Creek, VA New Work (Regular Funds) Approp Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp Cost 11. Hampton Creek, VA New Work (Regular Funds) Approp Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp Cost 12. Hampton Roads, VA Maint (Collection and Approp Removal of Drift) Cost 13. Horn Harbor, VA New Work Approp Cost 14. James River, VA New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 15. Jones Creek, VA New Work (Regular Funds) Approp Cost (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp Cost NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT ;OST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 663,017 663,651 615,000 618,673 3,074,552 3,113,527 958,169 658,169 589,466 589,446 610,000 672,62 604,751 676,15 - 1,884,077 1,878,870 3,945,52 3,945,25 FY 97 Total Cost To 30 Sep 97 112,812 112,812 112,812 112,812 - 227,000 - 227,000 698,000 3,814,846 695,642 3,813,878 - 3,850 - 3,850 997,400 997,400 945,322 945,322 191,200 191,200 76,426 76,426 276,358 276,358 276,358 276,358 72,240 72,240 5 327,998 2,840,623 4 328,450 2,849,920 - 128,401 128,401 - 128,400 128,400 - - 7,639,904 - - 7,639,904 4 890,691 10,755,410 5 884,276 10,343,873 - 209,100 209,100 - 176,103 176,103 - 57,900 57,900 - 18,429 18,429 5-15 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1997 TABLE 5-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Section Project Total Cost In Text Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 To 30 Sep 1997 16. Lynnhaven Inlet, VA 17. Newport News Creek, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 18. Norfolk Harbor, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 19. Parker Creek, VA 20. Rudee Inlet, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 21. Starlings Creek, VA 22. Supervision of the Harbor of Hampton Roads, VA (Prevention of Obstructive and Injurious Deposits) 23. Thimble Shoal Channel, VA 24. Tylers Beach, VA New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost - 445,354 - 445,354 - 129,025 4,485,395 - 129,026 471,231 672,504 681,842 350,300 320,683 - 80,000 - 26,172 250,000 1,100,000 425,000 1,192,000 247,459 625,800 632,230 619,354 5,623,170 6,027,725 1,829,748 432,000 5,614,531 6,064,496 1,829,748 431,007 123,106 116,106 - 446,169 - 446,170 514,218 515,780 200,000 250,919 250,000 250,919 350,300 320,683 80,000 26,172 8,570,632 8,718,169 110,523,326 110,520,822 1,805,451 1,762,697 123,106 116,106 - 836,813 - 836,813 420,557 132,724 49,000 1,644,802 415,735 132,757 45,000 1,635,997 250,000 270,570 497,000 541,030 270,000 672,625 327,998 1,804,317 270,570 676,154 328,449 1,808,130 13,534,967 13,534,967 - 12,486 - 12,735 12,486 12,735 5-16 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Section Project Total Cost In Text Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 To 30 Sep 1997 25. Waterway on the Coast of VA (Regular Funds) 26. York River, VA 27. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization 28. Virginia Beach, VA (Hurrican Protection) (Contributed Funds) 29. Virginia Beach, VA (Reimbursement) 30. James R. Olin Flood Control Project, VA (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 31. Gathright Dam and Lake Moomaw, VA (Regular Funds) 32. Richmond Filtration Plant Flood Protection Richmond, VA (Contributed Funds) New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Cost New Work Approp Cost 1,155,605 741,148 - - - 850,498 - - - 850,498 380,112 916,367 873,423 4,527,126 379,207 916,122 841,515 4,134,592 - 80,000 - 68,651 146,415 1,990,000 877,403 Approp Cost New Work Approp- Cost- New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 163,009 80,000 68,651 450,254 1,505,208 1,113,065 8,000,000 13,458,265 1,451,624 1,079,063 7,591,146 11,982,554 - 8,500,000 - 8,223,000 732.000 513,595 3,500,000 874,245 1,212,000 1,214,660 1,000,000 498,252 11,000 11,000 8,700,000 8,255,884 433,000 948,670 461,000 2,574,670 653,823 948,569 37,685 2,153,672 1,656,000 9,338,492 6,335,000 21,129,492 4,034,559 9,317,821 5,132,000 19,572,631 - - 975,000 3,975,000 - - 482,000 3,022,972 - 80,970,511 - 80,970,511 1,261,256 1,261,256 1,165,324 1,165,324 2,000,000 2,240,817 500,000 - 1,259,178 2,424,152 1,500,000 999,999 - 80,970,511 - 80,970,511 1,269,280 5,078,192 1,274,992 4,894,700 3,510,000 2,975,000 8,719,178 8,456,330 2,011,000 1,010,999 5-17 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1997 TABLE 5-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Section Project Total Cost In Text Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 To 30 Sep 1997 33. Emergency Flood Control Activities 34. Special Investigation Surveys 35. Collection and Study of Basic Data Cost Cost Cost 481,152 328,022 186,396 439,929 690,359 198,437 205,110 786,773 131,143 90,000 726,119 201,635 1,216,191 3,140,987 915,567 5-18 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 03, 1871 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 03, 1909 Jun. 25, 1910 Jan. 21, 1927 Mar. 02, 1945 Annual Report 1874, pt. 11 p. 54 H. Doc. 139, 56 Cong. 2nd sess. and Annual Report 1901, p. 1467 H. Doc. 952, 60th Cong. 1st sess H. Doc. 215, 69th Cong. 1st sess. H. Doc 223, 76th Cong. 1st sess. APPOMATTOX RIVER, VA (See Section 1 of Text) Channel 12 feet deep at mean high water and 60 feet wide. Diversion channel and work incidental thereto. Increasing channel to width of 80 feet and maintenance of diversion works. Channel 80 feet wide and 1 0 feet deep at mean low water between mouth and Petersburg. Existing project dimensions. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (NORFOLK DISTRICT) (See Section 2 of Text) Existing project dimensions and original route, waterway from Norfolk, VA to sounds of North Carolina Original route to Norfolk-Beaufort Inlet section Purchase of Albemarle & Chesapeake Co. Canal Purchase of Lake Drummond Canal (Dismal Swamp Canal) Construct a tidal lock at Great Bridge at a cost not to exceed $500,000 Operating and care of works of improvement provided for with funds from War Department-appropriations for rivers and harbors Construct dikes for protection of canal property against flood tides CHANNEL TO NEWPORT NEWS, VA. (See Section 6 of Text) Channel 35 feet deep, 400 feet wide Channel 35 feet deep, 600 feet wide Channel 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide Channel 40- feet deep, 800 feet wide, two deep-draft anchorage Deepen existing 45 foot channel to 55 feet CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA (See Section 9 of Text) Existing Project (Sec. 107) HAMPTON ROADS AND HARBORS OF NORFOLK AND NEWPORT NEWS, VA COLLECTION AND REMOVAL OF DRIFT (See Section 12 of Text) Collection and removal of floating debris in Hampton Roads and specified in Act its tributary waters Removal of Trigg cofferdam Turning basin at Richmond Harbor 5-19 H. Doc. 317, 54th Cong. 1st sess. AR 1896 H. Doc. 391, 62nd Cong. 2nd sess. H. Doc. 589, 62nd Cong. 2nd sess. Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc. 67th Cong., 2nd sess. S. Doc. 23, 61st Cong., 1st sess. Not available H. Doc 117, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 550, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 486, 67th Cong., 4th sess. H. Doc. 143, 89th Cong., 2nd sess Approved in 1972 Rivers & Harbors Comm. Doc 68 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 738, 77th Cong., 2nd sess Mar. 03, 1899 Jul. 25, 1912 Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 03, 1925 Jul. 03, 1930 Jun. 26, 1934 Mar. 02, 1945 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 08, 1917 Jan. 21,1927 Oct. 27,1965 Oct. 17,1986 Jul. 14, 1960 May 17, 1950 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 02, 1945 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1997 TABLE 5-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Maintaining turning basin at Richmond Deepwater Terminal Channel depth increased to 35 feet to Richmond Deepwater Terminal LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA (See Section 16 of Test) Existing project. Long Creek, Lynnhaven Inlet modification (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 191, 81st Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 586, 87th Cong., 2nd sess H. Doc. 580, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. Approved in 1982 NORFOLK HARBOR CHANNEL, VA (See Section 18 of Text) HAMPTON ROADS AND ELIZABETH RIVER Channel 30 feet deep to Navy Yard Depth of 35 feet to Navy Yard Depth of 40 feet and width of 750 feet to mouth of Southern Branch Widen 40-foot channel to 1,500 feet from 40-foot contour in Hampton Roads to a point just south of Norfolk International Terminal 45 feet deep Ft. Wool to Lambert Point, 800 feet wide Norfolk International Terminal to Lambert Point Deepen existing 45 foot channel to 55 feet deep SOUTHERN BRANCH Channel with a depth of 22 and 25 feet Depth of 40 feet and width of 450 feet from mouth to Belt Line RR Bridge Channel 30 feet deep and 375 feet wide to Virginia RR bridge: thence 25 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide to Norfolk & Western RR bridge Depth of 25 feet and width of 200 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to a point 2,500 feet above with a turning basin 500 feet square Approach and turning area 40 feet deep and a maximum width of 830 feet opposite Norfolk Naval Shipyard: thence a channel 35 feet deep and 375 and 250 feet wide to a point 1900 feet above Norfolk & Western RR bridge and a turning basin 35 feet deep and 600 feet at upstream end 45 feet deep Belt Line bridge to Old Virginia bridge, 35-foot deep turning basin opposite St. Jullians Creek H. Doc. 381, 59th Cong., I st ses H. Doc. 551, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., I1sste ss S. Doc. 122, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1 st sess. H. Doc. 101 3, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 551, 61 st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., I st sess. H. Doc. 226, 68th Cong., I1sste ss. H. Doc. 182, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 545, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1 st sess. 5-20 May 17, 1950 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 02, 1907 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 08,1917 Sep. 03, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 17, 1986 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 08, 1917 Mar. 30, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 30, 1948 Oct. 27, 1965 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 22, 1976 Oct. 17, 1986 Mar. 02, 1907 Mar. 03, 1925 Jul. 03, 1930 Mar. 02, 1945 Mar. 04, 1913 Jul. 03, 1930 Jul. 03, 1930 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 08, 1917 Sep. 3,1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 17, 1986 Jul.14 , 1960 Extend existing 35-foot project to a channel 35 feet deep and 250 feet wide upstream 1.5 miles to the Norfolk and Portsmouth Belt Line RR bridge and a turning basin at the mouth of Mains Creek 35 feet deep and 800 feet square Deepen existing 40-feet of portions to 45-feet deep Deepen portion of the 35-foot, from mile point 15 to Gilmerton Bridge, to 40 feet deep EASTERN BRANCH Width of 500 feet and depth of 25 and 22 feet Removal of shoals at mouth Depth of 25 feet and width of 200 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to Virginia RR bridge 30-foot channel to a point opposite terminal of Imperial Tobacco Co. in Berkley Depth of 25 feet and width of 300 feet from Norfolk & Western RR bridge to Campostella bridge WESTERN BRANCH Channel 24 feet deep and 300 & 400 feet wide to West Norfolk highway bridge For 18-foot channel to a point about 3,000 feet above West Norfolk highway bridge SCOTTS CREEK Channel 12 feet deep and 1 00 feet wide to a point 1 00 feet above the Atlantic Coast Line RR bridge. ANCHORAGES 30-foot anchorage at Lambert Point 12-foot anchorage at Pinner Point An anchorage 38 feet deep and 1,500 feet square: anchorage 35 feet deep and 1,500 feet square: and an anchorage 20 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 3,000 feet long Two anchorages opposite Seweils Point 45 feet deep with 1,200-foot swinging radius Construct a 55-foot anchorage and increase the radius to 1500 feet for an existing 45-foot anchorage RUDEE INLET, VA (See Section20 of Text) Project Authorized (Sec. 107) Existing Project Approved in 1986 5-21 H. Doc. 355, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 101 3, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 373, 59th Cong., I st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 226, 68th Cong., 1 st sess. H. Doc. 37, 71 st Cong., 1 st sess. H. Doc. 224, 76th Cong., 1 st sess. H. Doc. 556, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 265, 70th Cong., I st sess. H. Doc. 189, 70th Cong., I1sts ess. H. Doc. 551, 61stCong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 605, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess. S. Doc. 122, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 397, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1997 TABLE 5-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents ANCHORAGES THIMBLE SHOAL CHANNEL, VA. (See Section 23 of Text) A channel 40 feet deep and 750 feet wide. Channel width increased to 1,000 feet with side channel on either side 32 feet deep and 450 feet wide. Channel 45 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide. WATERWAY ON THE COAST OF VIRGINIA (See Section 25 of Text) Existing project adopted Project modified VIRGINIA BEACH, VA (Hurricane Protection) (See Section 28 of Text) Project authorized Project modified Project modification authorized for Phase I Advanced Engineering and Design Project Modified Participation after Feb. 6,1987 Cost Sharing VIRGINIA BEACH, VA. (Reimbursement) (See Section 29 of Text) Project authorized JAMES R. OLIN FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, VA (See Section 30 of Text) (Formerly BUENA VISTA, VA) Nov. 28, 1990 Project authorized Oct. 05, 1992 Name of Project Changed GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA (See Section 31 of Text) Jul. 24, 1946 Project authorized H. Doc. 140, 65th Cong., Ist sess. S. Doc. 122, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 187, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc 957, 60th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 268, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 186, 83rd. Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 382, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 365, 92nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 216, 89th Cong., 2nd sess Chief of Engrs Report dated July 27,1990 H. Doc. 325, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. 5-22 Aug. 08, 1917 Sep. 03, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 02, 1945 Sep. 03, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 07, 1974 Oct. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 Oct. 05, 1992 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT Table 5-C Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA and St. John's River, Florida: Data Relative to the Completed Locks (See Section 2 of Text) Dimensions Greatest Length Depth on Miles Width Available Miter Sills Year From of for full Character Opened Norfolk, Chamber Width Lift Upper Lower of to Construction VA Location feet (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) Foundation Navigation Cost 12.4 Albemarle and 75 600 2.7 1 1 Piles in sand 1932 $499,913 Chesapeake Canal and shells (Great Bridge, VA) 10.7 Dismal Swamp 52 300 12 12 12 Natural earth 1940 $348,879 Canal with cutoff (Deep Creek) walls 33.1 Dismal Swamp 52 300 12 12 13 Natural earth 1941 $373,226 Canal with cutoff (South Mills, NC) walls 5-23 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1997 TABLE 5-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1997 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For 1992 Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Aberdeen Creek, VA 2/ 1975 109,643 221,827 Appomattox River, VA 1/ 1992 870,341 4,794,436 Atlantic Ocean Channel, VA 1991 608,255 Bennett Creek, VA 1992 442,602 - 104,621 Slackwater River, VA Active portion 2/10/ 1975 342,118 185,577 19,300 Broad Creek, VA 2/ 1986 27,888 697,108 500 Cape Charles, VA 1989 622,644 2,511,748 Carters Creek, VA Active portion 2/ 3/ 1951 28,398 29,127 Channel to Newport News, VA 1992 4,097,117 7,145,456 4,965,108 Channel from Phoebus, VA to deepwater in Hampton Roads 2/ 1944 11,500 64,919 1,200 Channel connecting York River, VA Back Creek to Sleights Wharf 2/ 1950 14,855 38,634 2,500 Chesconessex Creek, VA 2/ 1968 25,516 43,775 Chincoteague Bay, VA 1984 25,126 513,005 Chincoteague Harbor of Refuge, VA 1985 49,396 242,237 Chowan River, NC 2/ 1975 107,220 14,416 5,700 Cockrelis Creek, VA 4/ 1949 Cranes Creek, VA 1992 6,274 685,124 Davis Creek, VA 2/ 1971 97,612 213,105 4,000 Deep Creek, Accomack Co., VA 1974 83,000 197,259 Deep Creek, Newport News, VA 2/ 1991 288,278 3,318,501 Dymers Creek, VA 2/ 1953 5,582 7,658 Finney Creek at Wachapreague, VA 1988 68,656 6,278 7,763 Greenvale Creek, VA 2/ 1991 20,003 775,614 Hampton Creek, VA 1989 186,237 1,270,204 62,969 Hom Harbor, VA 2/ 1990 13,987 351,590 Hoskins Creek, VA 2/ 1990 44,100 1,881,736 500 Jackson Creek, VA 2/ 1971 8,500 50,844 Jarvis Creek, VA 4/ 1979 39,259 Kings Creek, VA 4/ 1957 5,593 Lafayette River, VA 2/ 1982 242,047 371,384 188,962 Little Machiponoo River, VA 1990 0 0 1,211 Little River (Creek), VA 2/ 12/ 1966 168,623 566,521 Locklies Creek, VA 2/ 1928 11,581 68,506 Lynnhaven Inlet, VA 1991 459,612 3,018,333 Mattaponi River, VA 1971 83,836 215,927 Meherrin River, VA 1987 47,734 54,764 Miliford Haven, VA 2/ 1950 24,568 33,688 Mill Creek, VA 2/ 1937 5,445 21,536 Mulberry Creek, 2/ 1950 2,393 2,458 Nandua Creek 2/ 1950 6,988 138,700 Nansemond River, VA 6/ 1978 167,477 508,401 Newport News Creek, VA 2/ 1992 261,697 449,516 Noftoway River, VA 2/ 1986 44,295 8,734 43,000 5-24 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-D (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1997 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For 1992 Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Occohannock Creek, VA Active portion 2/ 1951 13,859 92,044 Onancock River, VA 2/ 5/ 1963 187,914 525,952 Oyster Channel, VA 2/ 1991 119,117 788,122 Pagan River, VA 2/ 6/ 1950 51,425 825,104 Pamunkey River, VA Active portion 2/ 1964 31,376 161,183 Parker Creek, VA 1991 15,530 583,325 Parrotts Creek, VA 2/ 1957 37,045 69,132 Portsmouth Harbor, VA Channel to Nansemond Ordnance Depot 2/ 1947 165,566 66,162 Oueens Creek 2/ 1991 26,949 442,606 Quinby Creek, VA 1991 104,176 1,788,503 Rappahannock River, VA 8/ 9/ 11/ 1983 414,633 1,969,242 Rappahannock River at Bowlers Wharf, VA 4/ 1950 Starlings Creek, VA 1991 66,242 1,143,236 Tangier Channels, VA 1992 146,138 3,506,001 Taskinas Creek, VA 1975 7,479 135 Thimble Shoal Channel, VA 13/ 1991 17,934,772 14,967,074 3,459,868 Totuskey Creek, VA 1970 167,869 451,293 2,000 Tylers Beach Harbor, VA 2/ 1982 311,201 804,713 Urbanna Creek, VA 2/ 7/ 1963 55,724 116,433 Whitings Creek, VA 1990 21,630 431,506 500 Winter Harbor 2/ 1981 171,334 340,837 2,973 Willoughby Channel, VA 2/ 1953 8,500 128,188 Wishart Point Channel, VA 2/ 1975 118,762 151,892 30,625 York River, VA Active portion 1986 265,694 361,616 1/ Includes $22,500 for previous projects. 2/ Completed. 3/ Inaddition, $700 for maintenance was expended from contributed funds. 4/ Inactive. 5/ Includes $33,549 for new work and $24,754 for maintenance for previous projects. 6/ Includes $20,671 for new work for previous projects. 7/ In addition, $61,087 was expended for rehabilitation. 8/ In addition, $168,091 was expended for rehabilitation. 9/ Includes $197,146 for previous new work projects. 10/ Includes $15,000 for new work for previous projects. 11/ Includes $113,500 for previousmaintenance projects. 12/ Federal funds expended by the U.S. Navy for new work. 13/ In addition, $143,00o for maintenance was expended from contributed funds. 5-25 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities For FY 1997 TABLE 5-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30, 1997 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See __For New Work Annual Report Expended From For Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Anderson Park, Newport News, VA 1979 471,474 1,254 176,671 Hampton Institute, VA 1976 156,906 1,589 175,845 Rapidan River, Orange, VA 1984 45,000 - Saxis Island, VA 1987 273,600 - 3,145 Tangier Island Shore Protection, VA 1990 2,481,815 2,008 1,379,371 TABLE 5-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sept. 30,1997 Additional Expenditure Project Report, See For New Work Annual Report Expended From For Construction Maintenance Contributed Funds Newmarket Creek, VA 1970 1,000,000 47,562 550,097 Norfolk Floodwall, VA 1973 1,851,933 51,827 516,256 Scottsville, VA 1989 3,431,746 19,010 32,954 Virginia Beach Canal No. 2. VA 1990 4,708,587 54,380 216,596 5-26 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-G RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS PROJECT NAME MONTH/YEAR TYPE OF SURVEY Appomattox River Atlantic Ocean Channel Baltimore Harbor and Channels: Rappahannock Shoal Channel Bennetts Creek Cape Charles City Harbor Channel to Newport News 50-Foot Channel Anchorages Opposite Newport News Chesconnessex Creek Chincoteague Inlet Inner Channel Ocean Bar Channel Davis Creek Deep Creek - Accomack County Dymers Creek Finney Creek Greenvale Creek James River: City Point Shoal Goose Hill Channel Richmond Deepwater Terminal to Hopewell Rocklanding Shoal Channel Little Machipongo River Locklies Creek Lynnhaven Inlet Milford Haven Nandua Creek Nansemond River - Western Branch Nov 96/Apr 97 Oct 96/Aug-Sep 97 Jan-Feb 97 May 97 Dec 96 Apr 97 Aug 97 Apr 97 May 97/Aug 97 May 97 Jul 97 Jun 97 Aug 97 Feb 97 Jul 97 Oct 96 Oct 96 Mar 97 Oct 96/Jul 97 Jun 97 Apr 97 Oct-Nov 96 May 97 Oct 96/Jun 97 Apr 97 5-27 Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Report of the Secretary of the Army Civil Works Activities for FY 1997 TABLE 5-G (Continued) RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS PROJECT NAME MONTH/YEAR TYPE OF SURVEY Norfolk Harbor: 45-50 Foot Channel 40 Foot Channel Southern Branch 35 Foot Channel Channel from Norfolk Harbor to Thimble Shoal Craney Island Anchorages Sewells Point Anchorages Onancock River Oyster Channel Pagan River Parker Creek Quinby Creek Rappahannock River: Mangoright Bar Rudee Inlet Tangier Channels Thimble Shoal Channel Totuskey Creek Urbanna Creek Waterway on the Coast of VA: Bradford Bay Bogues Bay Burtons Bay Cedar Island Bay Centerline Profile from Chesapeake Bay to VA/MD State Line Channel East of Ramshorn Channel Chesapeake Bay to Magothy Bay Eckichy Marsh Jan 97/Jun 97 Mar 97 May 97 Aug 97 Aug 97 Mar 97 Apr 97 Sep 97 Nov 96 Apr 97 Apr 97 Apr 97 Jul 97 Aug 97 Oct-Nov 96 Mar 97 Jan 97 Feb 97 Feb 97 Feb 97 Feb 97 Aug 97 Aug 97 Dec 96 Jan 97 Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Reconnaissance Reconnaissance Condition Condition 5-28 NORFOLK, VA DISTRICT TABLE 5-G (Continued) RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS PROJECT NAME MONTH/YEAR TYPE OF SURVEY Gargathy Channel Gull Marsh Lewis Creek Metompkin Bay Northam Narrows North Channel Sloop Channel Upper Magothy Bay Willoughby Channel Wishart Point Channel Jan 97 Jan 97 Aug 97 Mar 97 Jun 97 Nov 96 Nov 96 Jan 97 Jan 97 Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Condition Feb 97 Condition 5-29 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT * This district comprises central and eastern North Carolina and a portion of south-central Virginia, embraced in drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean from the southern boundary of Virginia to the Shallotte River, inclusive, with exception of the Meherrin River Basin above Murfreesboro, N. C., the Chowan River Basin above the confluence of the Nottaway and Blackwater Rivers, and the Pasquotank River and its tributaries for navigation only. Also included are those portions of the Yadkin-Pee-Dee and Catawba River basins within the state of N. C. as well as a portion of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway from the northern boundary of North Carolina to Little River, S. C., and a portion of the waterway from Norfolk, Va., to the Sounds of North Carolina, south of the north shore of Albemarle Sound. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Aquatic Plant Control .................................. . 6-2 (R & HAct of 1965) 2. Atlantic Beach Channels, N.C......................... 6-2 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va. and St. Johns River, Fla, (Wilmington District) ................... 6-2 4. Avon Harbor, N.C ........ ....................... 6-4 5. Beaufort Harbor, N.C................ .............. 6-4 6. Belhaven Harbor, N.C. .......... ................... 6-5 7. Cape Fear River, N.C. Above Wilmington .......................... 6-5 8. Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N.C. ...................................... 6-5 9. Channel from Pamlico Sound to Rodanthe, N.C. .................................... 6-6 10. Drum Inlet, N.C. ............................................ 6-6 11. Far Creek, N.C. ....................................... 6-6 12. Lockwoods Folly River, N.C ........................... 6-6 13. Manteo (Sliallowbag) Bay, N.C........................ 6-7 14. Morehead City Harbor, N.C.............................. 6-8 15. Rollinson Channel, N.C ................................. 6-8 16. Silver Lake Harbor, N.C ................................... 6-9 17. Stumpy Point Bay, N.C .................................. 6-9 18. Waterway Connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N.C. ......................... 6-9 19. Water Connecting Swanquarter Bay with Deep Bay, N.C. ................................... 6-10 20. Wilmington Harbor, N.C...................... 6-10 Beach Erosion Control 21. Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N.C........................ 6-11 Flood Control 22. Cape Fear River Basin, N.C ....... ............. 6-12 22-A. B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, N.C ......... 6-12 23. Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N.C ................ 6-12 24. Danville (Southside Wastewater Treatment Plant), Va ................................ ... 6-13 25. Hamlet City Lake, N.C....... ................... 6-14 26. King (Water Plant), N.C .......................... 6-14 27. Lower Creek, Lenoir, N.C ............................ 6-14 28. N.C. Aquarium, Dare County, N.C ................ 6-15 29. Neuse River Basin, N.C. ........................... 6-15 29-A. Falls Lake, N.C.......................................... 6-15 30. Oriental (South Avenue), N.C ................. 6-16 31. Roanoke River Upper Basin, Va.-Headwaters Area ..................................... 6-16 Page 32. Wrightsville Beach, N.C............................ 6-17 33. Yadkin River Basin, N.C. and S.C ................. 6-17 33-A. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, N.C. ...................... ............... 6-17 34. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ...... ...................... 6-17 35. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............................... ... 6-18 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 36. Roanoke River Basin, Va. and N.C ........... 6-18 36-A. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, Va. and N.C.............. .................. 6-18 36-B. Philpott Lake, Va ...................... ................ 6-18 37. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations .............................. 6-18 Miscellaneous 38. Project Modifications For Improvement of Environm ent ........................... ................... 6-20 General Investigations 39. Surveys ........................................ .. ... 6-21 40. Collection and Study of Basic Data .............. 6-21 41. Preconstruction Engineering and D esign ..... ............ ......... .................. 6-21 Tables Table 6-A Cost and Financial Statement ........... 6-22 Table 6-B Authorizing Legislation .............. 6-28 Table 6-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ....................... 6-31 Table 6-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ............................. ... 6-32 Table 6-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ...................... ....... 6-33 Table 6-F Not Applicable Table 6-G Deauthorized Projects ...................... 6-34 Table 6-H Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ............. 6-35 Table 6-I Navigation Work Under Special Authorization....................... 6-35 Table 6-J Dams and Reservoirs ............... 6-36 Table 6-K Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization....................... 6-37 6-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (RIVER AND HARBOR ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Wilmington District. Existing project. The existing project provides for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with the report of the Chief of Engineers, House Document 251,89th Congress, 1st session. The project was authorized by Section 302, 1965 River and Harbor Act (H.D. 25, 89th Congr., 1st sess.). The Act provides that research and planning costs shall be borne fully by the United States. Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project, and participate to the extent of 50 percent of the cost of the program. Recon studies are 100 percent Federal. Requirements are being met. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Operation for FY 97 included chemical control on about 37 river miles of alligator weed (about 13 treatment acres) and 8 acres ofhydrilla, biological control of 15 acres of hydrilla and monitoring at 15 sites. All alligator weed control in FY 97 was by the application of rodeo herbicide. All treatment sites are under maintenance control. No new alligators weed treatment areas were added to the program in FY 97. Hydrilla in Lake Gaston was treated with aquatic herbicide in FY 97 and two Umstead Park lakes were restocked with triploid grass carp. Monitoring of hydrilla control sites, previously stocked with triploid grass carp to determine the effectiveness of the stocking continued in FY 97. The Aquatic Plant Control Program activities were accomplished at a cost of $10,288. Condition at end of fiscal year. All alligatorweed treatment sites were under maintenance control in FY 97. Monitoring of hydrilla control sites previously stocked with triploid grass carp indicates that overall our biological control efforts have been effective. Monitoring indicates that 4 sites no longer contain hydrilla. 2. ATLANTIC BEACH CHANNELS, N.C. Location. In Carteret County, on south side of Bogue Sound, 3 miles west of Beaufort Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Existing project. A channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway in Bogue Sound to the marina east of Money Island; and a channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from the intersection of Money Island and Causeway Channel in Bogue Sound to the southern end of Causeway Channel. The length of channels is 28 miles. Existing project was authorized November 23, 1965, under authority of Section 107, 1960. River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance, and aids to navigation, including suitable spoil-disposal areas, and necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor or the cost of such works; hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain adequate public terminal and transfer facilities open to all equally in both Money Island Channel and Causeway Channel; provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local channels commensurate with the depths provided in the related project areas; and provide a cash contribution toward the first costs of the project, expressed as a percentage of the Federal construction costs, of 50 percent for Money Island Channel, and 41.5 percent for Causeway Channel. Full complied with. Terminal facilities. Numerous wharves and piers exist along Causeway Channel, and a marina near Money Island has berthing facilities for about 100 boats. Existing facilities are not adequate, and additional facilities will be provided by local interests. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between May 30 and June 15, 1997, the contract dredges Cherokee and Blue Ridge, dredged 29,148 cubic yards from shoals in the channel at a cost of $204,038. Preparation of the dredged material management plan preliminary assessment cost $7,832. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed April 1996. 3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL. (WILMINGTON DISTRICT) Location. The project is located on the east coast of the United States, between Norfolk, Va., and St. Johns River, Florida. The section within Wilmington District begins at the Virginia-North Carolina State line and extends generally southerly and southwestwardly to Little River, S. C., a total of 308 statute miles. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 830 to 842, inclusive.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1926, 1932, and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a waterway, 12 feet deep, with widths varying from 90 feet in land cuts to 300 feet in open waters; the construction, operation and maintenance of suitable bridges; saltwater intrusion preventive measures in the vicinity of Fairfield, N. C.; a channel in Peltier Creek, 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from the Intracoastal Waterway in Bogue Sound to and including a basin in Peltier Creek, 6 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and 600 feet long; a channel, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide between the Intracoastal Waterway and the gorge in Bogue Inlet, then 6-2 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar; a channel, 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to a turning basin, 200 feet wide and 350 feet long, at Swansboro; a channel, 6 feet deep and 90 feet wide in New River Inlet, and a connecting channel of the same dimensions to the Intracoastal Waterway near the mouth of New River; a channel, 10 feet deep, and 90 feet wide in New River, between the Intracoastal Waterway and the Seaboard Coastline Railroad bridge at Jacksonville, N. C.; a channel through New Topsail Inlet, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide and a channel from New Topsail Inlet to the Intracoastal Waterway by way of Old Topsail Creek, 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide; a channel, 7 feet deep and 80 feet wide, in Banks Channel, from New Topsail Inlet, paralleling the barrier beach, to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; a channel, 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide, across the ocean bar at Masonboro Inlet, with suitable jetties at the entrance, thence 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide to the channel of the Intracoastal Waterway at Wrightsville Beach by way of Banks and Motte Channels; a turning basin, 15 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 700 feet long, on the east side of Banks Channel near Masonboro Inlet, with three 15-pile dolphins therein; a channel, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide across the ocean bar at Carolina Beach Inlet to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway; a channel, 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 8,000 feet long, to and including a turning basin of the same depth, 130 feet wide and 180 feet long, at Carolina Beach; a yacht basin, 230 feet wide, 450 feet long, and 12 feet deep, at the town of Southport, connected to the waterway by a suitable channel of the same depth; and maintenance of the general navigation features of the North Carolina State Ports Authority Small-Boat Harbor at Southport, consisting of an entrance channel, 150 feet wide and 400 feet long, an eastern harbor-access channel, 70 feet wide and 430 feet long, a western harbor-access channel, 60 feet wide and 185 feet long, to a turning basin, 180 feet wide and 550 feet long, all to a depth of 6 feet. A modification providing for the replacement of five Federally owned and operated highway bridges was authorized in December 1970. A modification providing for 100 percent Federal funding for Walter B. Jones (formerly Wilkerson Creek) and Joseph P. Knapp (formerly Coinjock) bridges was authorized in October 1976. A modification providing for 100 percent Federal funding at Core Creek, Hobucken, and Fairfield Bridges was authorized in November 1986. Estimated Federal cost is $75,630,000 (1997). The tidal lock at Snow's Cut was deauthorized September 23, 1986, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. The 12-foot-deep channel in Peltier Creek was deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The 12-foot deep channel modification to New River was deauthorized January 1, 1990, under Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. The jetties at Masonboro Inlet are complete except for the training wall. The training wall has an estimated Federal cost of $3,470,000 (1992). The wall was reclassified to the "inactive" category on August 14,1992. A Section 111 project to mitigate damages caused by the north jetty was authorized in October 1980 and was completed in April 1981. Length of channels and basins total 347.7 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. In the waterway north of Neuse River, variations in water surface due to winds seldom exceed 2 feet above or below mean stage. Between Beaufort and the Cape Fear River, normal tidal range varies from 3.5 feet at the inlets to 1 foot at points between. Average range of tide is 4 feet on the ocean side of Bogue Inlet and 2.5 feet just inside the inlet. At New River, tidal range varies from 3.5 feet at the inlet to 1 foot at the head of the marshes and zero at Tar Landing, 31 miles above. From Cape Fear River, N. C., to Little River, S. C., mean tidal range varies between 4.7 feet in Cape Fear River and 4 feet at the intermediate inlets, and 2 feet at points midway between the inlets. On October 15, 1954 (Hurricane Hazel), the tide at Holden Beach reached an elevation of 17.6 feet. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date except for the uncompleted modifications. The State of North Carolina has agreed to keep the bridges toll free and upon completion of each bridge, accept maintenance, replacement, and ownership responsibilities thereof. They have withdrawn their offer to contribute 25 percent of the first cost. The Water Resources Acts of 1976 and 1986 modified the terms of local cooperation to delete the non-Federal cost-sharing requirement for all five bridges. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction was completed on Hobucken Bridge at a cost of $2,806,954. Real estate acquisition continued on Fairfield Bridge at a cost of $685,308. Work in connection with the completion of Core Creek cost $2,064. Maintenance: Through Channel - During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations and maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities at a cost of $324,000. Between October 29, 1996, and August 16, 1997, the contract dredge Hampton Roads dredged 1,030,846 cubic yards from shoals in the through channel and constructed dikes at a cost of $5,132,223. Between December 2, 1996 and April 30, 1997, the contract dredges Marion, Richmond and Blue Ridge dredged 234,365 cubic yards from shoals at the inlet crossings at a cost of $1,234,839. Engineering and design for future year maintenance dredging from Norfolk, Va. To S.C. State Line cost $35,604; for the inlet crossings cost $27,195 and for Bear Inlet to Brown Inlet cost $4,976. Mosquito control in disposal areas cost $128,896. Periodic inspection of Fairfield Bridge cost $8,649. Long-term environmental dredging and monitoring study cost $4,961. Two highway bridges were operated and maintained at a cost of $398,979. Condition and operation studies cost $575,333. Study of impacts of beach disposal cost $217. Updating the Colonial Nesting Waterbirds inventory data base cost $8,000. Exploratory drilling of nine disposal sites cost $5,068. Investigation of encroachments leases and signage at Snows Cut cost $2,400. Seabeach Amaranth, Piping Plover and Sea Turtles studies cost $15,129. Sturgeon survey of major drainage areas cost $9,000. Environmental guidance for use of disposal facilities cost $3,085. Dredged material management plan cost $13,258. Dredged material facility surveys and maintenance cost $71,969. Bogue Inlet - During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 133,420 cubic yards 6-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 from shoals in Bogue Inlet at a cost of $238,000. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 89,089 cubic yards from shoals in Bogue Inlet at a cost of $243,000. Condition and operation studies cost $18,472. Carolina Beach Inlet - During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 64,788 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $280,000. During intermittent periods the U.S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 41,140 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $123,000. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 45,650 cubic yards from shoals in Carolina Beach Inlet at a cost of $138,000. Monitoring of Carolina Beach Inlet cost $8,205. Condition and operation studies cost $32,252. Masonboro Inlet - Between November 29 and December 5, 1996, the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 28,970 cubic yards from shoals in Masonboro Inlet at a cost of $49,000. During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities at a cost of $42,000. Repairs to the north jetty were completed at a cost of $531,612. Engineering and design for sand by passing to Masonboro Island cost $28,533. Condition and operation studies cost $11,182. New River Inlet - Between April 4 and July 7, 1997, the contract dredges Marion and Richmond dredged 92,014 cubic yards from the channel to Jacksonville at a cost of $375,979. Between January 28 and 31, 1997, the U.S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 5,880 cubic yards from shoals in New River Inlet at a cost of $18,000. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 392,546 cubic yards from shoals in New River Inlet at a cost of $770,000. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 186,667 cubic yards from shoals in New River Inlet at a cost of $270,786. Condition and operation studies cost $43,020. New Topsail Inlet - Between January 15 and February 8, 1997, the contract dredges Marion and Blue Ridge dredged 211,753 cubic yards from shoals in Topsail Creek and Banks Channel at a cost of $1,040,251. During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities at a cost of $30,000. Between July 21 and August 17, 1997, the U.S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 69,860 cubic yards from shoals in New Topsail Inlet at a cost of $196,000. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 20,139 cubic yards from shoals in New Topsail Inlet at a cost of $217,473. Cost in connection with prior year dredging for the Fry was $445. Condition and operation studies cost $42,105. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in September 1997 except for three tie-up dolphins at Masonboro Inlet and the replacement of Fairfield Bridge. The construction contract was awarded December 22, 1997 with completion scheduled for December 2000. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1997, was $236,657,798, of which $71,195,550 was for new work including $86,851 in contributed funds and $165,462,248 was for maintenance, including $667,300 in contributed funds. 4. AVON HARBOR, N.C. Location. The project is located on the east coast of North Carolina, 9 miles north of Cape Hatteras. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a direct channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 3.5 miles long from the depth in Pamlico Sound southeast to a basin of the same depth, 100 feet wide and 300 feet long at Avon. Plane of reference is mean low water. Variations in the water surface of Pamlico Sound due to winds, seldom range as much as 2 feet above or below mean stage; however, severe windstorms will double or triple that variation. The original project was authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act (H.D. 316, 7 6 th Cong., 1st sess.) and modification for direct channel authorized May 5, 1965, under Section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are five wharves in the basin at Avon, with a total frontage of about 300 feet. These facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design for future years pipeline dredging cost $10,765. Preparation of the dredge material management plan preliminary assessment cost $10,657. Project condition surveys cost $694. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed July 1965. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1962.) 5. BEAUFORT HARBOR, N.C. Location. The project is just inside Beaufort Inlet, adjacent to Morehead City Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for stopping erosion at Beaufort Inlet by jetties and sand fences at Fort Macon and Shackleford points and other shore protection; channels 15 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide in Bulkhead and Gallants Channels, except for a depth of 12 feet in the upper 5,000 feet of Gallants Channel; a harbor of refuge in Town Creek 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long connected to Gallants Channel by a channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, and 1,400 feet long; a basin 12 feet deep, 600 feet wide in front of the town of Beaufort except for a channel 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide through the basin; a stone bulkhead from Town Marsh across Bird Shoal to the west end of Carrot Island; a channel 14 feet deep, 70 feet wide, and 1,900 feet long from Bulkhead Channel to a turning basin 14 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 300 feet long near the upper end of Morgan Creek; and a channel in Taylors Creek 15 feet deep, 100 feet wide, extending about 2.6 miles easterly from about opposite Marsh Street in Beaufort to Lennoxville Point at North River, except for an 800-foot-long section at the east end which is 12 feet deep. Total length of channels is 7.3 miles. Average tidal range is 2.5 feet at Beaufort and 3.5 feet at the inlet. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) 6-4 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully compiled with to date. Terminal facilities. There are fifty waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 2,000 feet. These facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operation and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between June 19 and July 2, 1997, the contract dredge Cherokee dredged 47,847 cubic yards from shoals in Bulkhead Channel at a cost of $183,979. Preparation of the dredged material management plan preliminary assessment cost $13,685. Project condition surveys cost $13,616. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in October 1965 except for the Morgan Creek modification which was completed November 12, 1983. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Costs under existing project to September 30, 1997, were $827,040 for new work, including $34,000 contributed funds and $4,353,017 for maintenance, including $326,225 contributed funds, a total of $5,180,057. 6. BELHAVEN HARBOR, N. C. Location. The town of Belhaven is at the junction of Pantego Creek and Pungo River, about 11 miles above the mouth of the latter. The harbor consist of the lower reaches of Pantego Creek and is about 6,000 feet long. Pungo River forms part of the Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk and the St. Johns River. Norfolk is 130 miles north of Belhaven and Beaufort 66 miles south. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 123.) Existing project. This provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide, extending from deep water in Pungo River to a point about 800 feet east of the highway bridge, with a turning basin 800 feet long and 300 feet wide at the upper end; and for the construction of timber breakwaters at the mouth of Pantego Creek. Pungo River is a nontidal stream with little slope. Variations in the water surface, due to winds, seldom exceed 2 feet above or below mean stage. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of July 3,1930 and June 20,1938. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 12 wharves along the town waterfront, all of timber construction; one is owned by the town and is open to all without charge; four have rail connections. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: North and south timber breakwater repair cost $358,739. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in September 1940. 7. CAPE FEAR RIVER, N. C. ABOVE WILMINGTON Location. The river is formed by confluence of the Deep and Haw Rivers at Moncure, Chatham County, N. C., and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Cape Fear, near the southern extremity of the State. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 426.) Previous project. For details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing projects. The authorized project provides for a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Wilmington to a turning basin 400 feet wide and 550 feet long at Navassa (2.9 miles); a channel 12 feet deep and 140 feet wide from Navassa to mileboard 30 at Acme, with five channel cutoffs, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide to eliminate sharp bends; a channel 8 feet deep from mileboard 30 to Fayetteville by constructing three locks and dams and by dredging river shoals; and recreational facilities at the locks and dams. Total length of the project channels is 113.9 miles. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 25, 1910; June 26, 1934; August 30, 1935; August 26, 1937; October 27, 1965; and Section 4, Flood Control Act of 1944. For further details see Annual Reports for 1962 and 1970. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are twelve waterfront facilities on the river, with a total frontage of 1,190 feet. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell conducted snagging and clearing operations at a cost of $210,000. Repairing and rehabilitation of recreation facilities at the three locks and dams cost $135,564. The Section 216 preliminary assessment cost $19,108. Condition and operation studies cost $24,897. Operation and maintenance of three locks and dams cost $331,216. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in June 1970. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1997, were $25,603,433 of which $3,610,454 (including $1,226,385 public works) was for new work and $21,992,978 for maintenance. 8. CHANNEL FROM BACK SOUND TO LOOKOUT BIGHT, N.C. Location. The project is located on the coast of North Carolina, 8 miles east of Beaufort Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 7 feet deep from Back Sound, through Shackleford Banks to Lookout Bight. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of August 26, 1937 and March 2, 1945. For details see Annuasl Report for 1959. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Not required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between April 7 and 23, 1997, the contract dredge Jekyll Island dredged 78,350 cubic yards from shoals in the channel at a cost of $335,028. Preparation of the dredge material management plan preliminary assessment cost $9,950. Project condition surveys cost $3,641. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in May 1965. 6-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 9. CHANNEL FROM PAMLICO SOUND TO RODANTHE, N.C. Location. East coast of North Carolina, 25 miles north of Cape Hatteras. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1232.) Existing project. A channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 1.25 miles long from Pamlico Sound to a basin at the shore end near Rodanthe of same depth, 80 to 100 feet wide, and total length of about 1,200 feet. Project authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1945. (H.D. 234, 76t Cong., 1st sess.) (For further details see Annual Report for 1950.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish suitable spoil disposal areas for new work and maintenance. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Four terminals with combined frontage of 130 feet, along with bulkheaded portion, are considered adequate. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between February 21 and March 12, 1997, the contract dredge Richmond dredged 89,662 cubic yards from shoals in the channel at a cost of $737,223. Diking work in connection with contract dredging was accomplished at a contributed funds cost of $104,005. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed March 1965. 10. DRUM INLET, N.C. Location. Drum Inlet is an opening through the barrier beach which separates Core Sound from the Atlantic Ocean. It is about 1,100 feet wide and is about 35 miles northeast of Beaufort and opposite the village of Atlantic. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 1233 and 419.) Existing project. The project provides for a channel 12 feet deep at mean low water and 200 feet wide from the gorge in the inlet to the federally improved channel in Core Sound, about 1 mile. The mean range tide is 3.8 feet in the ocean and 0.3 foot in Core Sound at Atlantic. The project also provides for a channel 150 feet wide and 9 feet deep from the gorge in the inlet to deep water in the Atlantic Ocean. The Core Sound portion of the project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of June 20, 1938. (H.D. 414, 75th Cong., 2nd sess.) The channel from the inlet to the Atlantic Ocean was authorized under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between January 24 and March 10, 1997, the contract dredge Jekyll Island dredged 362,424 cubic yards from shoals in the channel at a cost of $1,398,629. Between August 18 and 30, 1997, the U.S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 33,765 cubic yards from shoals in the channel at a cost of $109,200. Between March 20 and April 30, 1997, the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 163,570 cubic yards from shoals in the channel at a cost of $294,000. During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell maintained mooring facilities and dredging ranges at a cost of $78,000. A navigation project management plan was prepared at a cost of $4,968. The environmental assessment for maintenance dredging by government plant was prepared at a cost $20,668. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in February 1972. The Limited Reevaluation Report was completed in September 1994. It determined that resumption of Federal maintenance is economically justified and is environmentally acceptable. Pipeline dredging was completed in March 1997. 11. FAR CREEK, N.C. Location. Flows easterly from Engelhard into Pamlico Sound, about 95 miles south of Norfolk, Va. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1232.) Existing project. A channel 12 feet deep and 80 to 100 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to highway bridge at Engelhard, with a turning basin 12 feet deep, 200 feet wide and 900 feet long at the head. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930, and May 17, 1950. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Project is served by 12 waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 2,300 feet, all privately owned. Existing facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Design for future years pipeline dredging cost $14,427. Preparation of the dredge material management plan preliminary assessment cost $7,898. Project condition surveys cost $1,409. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed June 1957. 12. LOCKWOODS FOLLY RIVER, N. C. Location. The project is located on the south coast of North Carolina about 12 miles west of Cape Fear River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1236 and Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 100 feet wide and 6 feet deep at low water from the ocean to the bridge at Supply 12.5 miles above, to be obtained by dredging through oyster rocks and mudflats. The completed river portion of the project above the waterway was reclassified to the active category in 1971. Lunar tidal ranges in Lockwoods Folly River are 4.5 feet at the inlet and 2 feet at the head of navigation at Supply. The existing project was authorized by the 1890 River and Harbor Act. (See Annual Report for 1887, page 1099.) A modification to enlarge the channel from 6 to 12 feet deep and from 100 to 150 feet wide across the ocean bar for a distance of 4,700 feet was approved by the Chief of Engineers on June 3, 1980, under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. During dredging operations it became apparent that establishment of the 12-foot project would not be possible with currently available equipment. Therefore, the Chief of Engineers, on December 20, 1983, approved the District's recommendation that further construction activity for the Lockwoods Folly Inlet project be suspended until suitable equipment becomes available and that the project be maintained at an 8-foot project depth in the interim. 6-6 WILMINGTON, N. C. , DISTRICT Local cooperation. For the new modification local interests must: (a) pay, contribute in kind, or repay with interest, one-half of the first costs of construction allocated to recreational boating; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages resulting from changes in ground water levels, saltwater intrusion, or wave action due to the construction works, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractor; (c) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction and subsequent maintenance of the project and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, and (d) provide depths in berthing areas commensurate with the project depths, and provide service facilities. Terminal facilities. Thirty-one piers and wharves on the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway at Holden Beach, about 1.25 miles west of Lockwoods Folly Inlet, with a total frontage of about 1,980 feet available. At Dixons Landing, about 2 miles upstream of the inlet, there are five wharves with a total frontage of 240 feet. Numerous natural landings are used for loading and unloading small boats. Berthing space in the vicinity of Lockwoods Folly Inlet totals about 2,220 feet. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: During intermittent periods the U.S. hopper dredge Currituck removed 93,200 cubic yards from shoals in Lockwoods Folly Inlet at a cost of $282,000. Between March 12 and April 7, 1997, the U.S. sidecasting dredge Merritt removed 40,846 cubic yards from shoals in the inlet at a cost of $105,000. A Section 933 preliminary evaluation cost $4,963. Condition and operation studies cost $41,517. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the project was completed in June 1965 except for the latest modification. Work was initiated on the latest modification on September 23, 1982, with a depth of 8 feet being reached in October 1982. The project will be maintained at the 8-foot depth until suitable equipment for deepening to 12 feet becomes available. 13. MANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, N. C. Location. The project is located on the northeastern side of Roanoke Island, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1229.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 14 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the Atlantic Ocean through Oregon Inlet with connecting 12-foot channels, 100 feet wide, to Pamlico Sound, Manteo, and Wanchese; and a channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide connecting the Manteo-Oregon Inlet Channel with Albemarle Sound. Length of channels is 25.4 miles. A newly authorized modification provides for stabilization of Oregon Inlet with a dual rubble-mound jetty system, including means for sand transfer to the downdrift beach; a channel, 20 feet deep and 400 feet wide, through the ocean bar at Oregon Inlet; a channel, 14 feet deep and 120 feet wide, from the gorge in Oregon Inlet to and through Roanoke Sound to and including a 15-acre basin of the same depth at Wanchese; and a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 12-foot-deep channel in Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay through Roanoke and Albemarle Sounds to deep water near the northern end of Croatan Sound. The 12-foot Croatan Sound channel has been deferred due to lack of economic justification. The estimated Federal cost for the modification is $85,651,000 (1997). The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 25,1910; October 17, 1940; May 17, 1950; and December 31, 1970; and under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. For the new modification, local interests must: (a) provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, including suitable areas required for initial and subsequent disposal of spoil and also necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; (b) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent maintenance; (c) continue to provide and maintain adequate terminal and transfer facilities, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; (d) provide and maintain necessary mooring and berthing facilities in any enlarged basin, open to all on equal terms, in accordance with plans approved by the Chief of Engineers; (e) provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with depths provided in the related project areas; (f) accomplish such alterations as required in sewer, water supply, drainage, electrical powerlines, telephone lines, or other utility facilities as well as their maintenance; (g) establish a competent and properly constituted public body empowered to regulate the use, growth, and free development of the harbor facilities, with the understanding that said facilities will be open to all on equal terms; (h) establish regulations prohibiting the discharge of untreated sewage, garbage, and other pollutants in the water of the harbor by the users thereof, which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State, and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; (i) pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreational navigation presently estimated at $9,896,000, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreational navigation facilities presently estimated at $1,125,000 annually; (j) pay 10 percent of the costs allocated to navigation during construction presently estimated at $9,461,000; (k) pay an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations (except utility relocations), and dredged material disposal areas presently estimated at $8,416,000. Reasonable assurances have been received. The State of N. C. has constructed the Wanchese Harbor portion and was reimbursed under Sec. 215, PL 90-483. Terminal facilities. The project is served by 33 waterfront facilities with a total frontage of 3,320 feet. Additional wharves and facilities will be provided with the enlarged basin at Wanchese. 6-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Work continued on the economic update, GDM supplement and EIS supplement at a cost of $264,739. Work on the sand by-passing and fishery management plan continued at a cost of $65,462. Additional engineering and design is being accomplished under preconstruction engineering and design. Maintenance: Between April 2 and September 30, 1997, the contract dredge Richmond dredged 261,378 cubic yards from shoals in Old House Channel and Channel to Wanchese at a cost of $714,572. Between August 12 and September 23, 1997, the contract dredge Mermentau dredged 271,703 cubic yards from shoals in the Ocean Bar and vicinity of the bridge at a cost of $936,431. Cost in connection with prior year ocean bar dredging was $22,730. Cost in connection with future years dredging of Old House Channel and Channel to Wanchese was $267. During intermittent periods the U.S. sidecasting dredge Fry removed 722,854 cubic yards from shoals in Oregon Inlet at a cost of $1,373,100. Project monitoring cost $100,971. National Ocean Survey tidal datum determination cost $1,876. Preparation of the dredge material management plan preliminary assessment cost $2,753. Initiation of the dredge material management plan cost $11,071. Construction of oyster reefs for mitigation cost $82,763. Island H disposal area surveys and monitoring cost $10,288. Condition and operation studies cost $126,134. Diking in connection with dredging of Old House Channel and channel to Wanchese was accomplished at a contributed funds cost of $75,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for the latest modification. (For further detail, see Annual Report of 1962.) 14. MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located on the northern shore of Bogue Sound, adjacent to Beaufort Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 420.) Previous project. For details see page 470 of Annual Report for 1935. Existing project. A channel 47 feet deep and 450 feet wide from deep water in the Atlantic Ocean through the ocean bar at Beaufort Inlet with three wideners; a cutoff channel 400 feet wide; and a depth of 45 feet in the east leg of the basin, including a 1,350 foot diameter turning area; a channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide from the turning basin to Sixth Street, Morehead City, then 12 feet deep, 200 to 400 feet wide to Tenth Street; then 6 feet deep, 75 feet wide, to Bogue Sound. Project also includes assumption of maintenance in the northwest leg and the east leg extension. Jetties at Beaufort Inlet were reclassified to the "active" category on March 8, 1972. The jetties were deauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The project was authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor Act (S.D. 54, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.), the River and Harbor Act of December 31, 1970 and the Water Resources Development Act of 1992. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Twenty-six waterfront facilities serve the port, with a total frontage of 1,250 feet. Marine terminals provide 5,300 feet of berthing space, with a depth alongside of 35 feet, and facilities for transfer of cargoes between rail and water carriers. Improvements to facilities were completed in 1969. For further details see Port Series No. 12, revised 1987, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between March 24 and June 19, 1997, the contract dredge Cherokee dredged 739,584 cubic yards from shoals in the inner harbor at a cost of $2,768,739. Between April 25 and September 30, 1997, the contract dredges Manhattan Island and Northerly Island dredged 191,872 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar at a cost of $881,106. Engineering and design for future years ocean bar dredging cost $8,032. Ocean dumping monitoring cost $4,965. Monitoring of shoreline for dredging impacts cost $20,321. Preparation of the dredge material management plan preliminary assessment cost $11,991. Work on relocation of the near shore disposal area cost $20,849. Benthic sampling cost $25,932. National ocean survey tidal datum study cost $188. Condition and operation studies cost $176,039. Surveys for the State Ports Authority were accomplished at a contributed funds cost of $2,519. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete with the latest modification being physically complete in April 1994. (For further details, see Annual Report of 1962.) Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1997, was $83,454,207 of which $15,892,219 was for new work, including $2,731,996 contributed funds (including $553,477 public works funds) and $67,561,988 for maintenance, including $1,750,331 contributed funds. 15. ROLLINSON CHANNEL, N. C. Location. The project is located about 3.5 miles northeast of Hatteras Inlet. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 5.1 miles long from deep water in Pamlico Sound to and including a basin of the same depth, 80 to 150 feet wide, and 1,450 feet long at Hatteras; a rubble-mound breakwater on each side of the channel at the entrance to the basin; and a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from that depth in Hatteras Inlet gorge to Rollinson Channel, in the vicinity of the basin at Hatteras. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of August 30, 1935; March 2, 1945; September 3, 1954; and October 23, 1962. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Six waterfront facilities serve the channel, with a total frontage of 926 feet. Existing facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between March 18 and 27, 1997, the contract dredge Marion dredged 36,219 cubic yards from shoals in the channel at cost of $342,386. Preparation of the dredge material management plan preliminary assessment cost $7,467. Project condition surveys cost $2,823. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was 6-8 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT completed August 22, 1966. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) 16. SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located at the southwest end of Ocracoke Island, a portion of the Outer Banks on the southeast coast of North Carolina, separating Pamlico Sound from the Atlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1232.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for basin depths of 12 feet in Silver Lake Harbor; an entrance channel 12 feet deep and 60 feet wide, from the basin to Teaches Hole Channel; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from the entrance channel through Big Foot Slough Bar to the 12-foot contour in Pamlico Sound; a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, from the entrance channel through Teaches Hole Channel to the gorge in Ocracoke Inlet, a channel, 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide, across Bluff Shoal; and for rubble-mound training walls on the north and south sides of the entrance channel, 300 feet and 400 feet long, respectively. Mean tidal ranges are 1.9 feet in the throat of Ocracoke Inlet and 1 foot at Ocracoke. Variations in the water surface of Pamlico Sound are generally due to winds and seldom exceed 1 or 2 feet above or below mean stage. Severe storms have raised the water surface as much as 7 feet above normal water level at Ocracoke. (See Table 6-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Twelve waterfront facilities serve the harbor. These facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between March 21 and May 1, 1997, the contract dredge Hampton Roads dredged 203,080 cubic yards from shoals in the channel at a cost of $499,057. Repairs to the south jetty were completed at a cost of $199,940. Project condition surveys cost $2,708. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed July 28, 1970. (For further details see Annual Report for 1961.) 17. STUMPY POINT BAY, N.C. Location. On southeastern side of the mainland, Dare County, N.C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 1229.) Existing project. A channel 75 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in Pamlico Sound to a basin in the harbor at Lake Work, 75 to 100 feet wide, 550 feet long and 10 feet deep, plus an irregularly shaped area providing access to the public wharf, together with protective breakwaters at entrance to the harbor. Project was authorized by 1948 River and Harbor Act and under Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Bulkheads in existing basin provide about 550 linear feet of berthing space, and a wholesale fishhouse provides about 250 feet. Part of the space along the bulkheads is publicly owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce, but any appreciable increase will require additional facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design for future years dredging cost $21,089. Preparation of the dredge material management plan preliminary assessment cost $14,295. Project condition surveys cost $4,417. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed on September 20, 1967. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1966.) 18. WATERWAY CONNECTING PAMLICO SOUND AND BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located in Core Sound, west of the outer banks of eastern North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 420 and 1233.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a through channel to Core Sound 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to Beaufort Harbor; an alternative route of the same dimensions through Back Sound by way of channels at the east and west ends of Harkers Island; a channel 7 feet deep and 70 feet wide from the through channel to the local harbor at Cedar Island, including the authorized passage and future maintenance of a channel through the existing private basin, and an access channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide and about 400 feet long to a basin the same depth, 60 feet by 100 feet; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide from the through channel to Atlantic; a channel 7 feet deep and 75 feet wide, with a basin 200 feet by 500 feet, the same depth, at Sealevel; a channel 5 feet deep and 75 feet wide, with basin 150 feet by 130 feet, the same depth, at Davis; a channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide with a basin 100 feet by 600 feet, the same depth, at Marshallberg; an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide, from Back Sound to harbor of refuge 120 feet by 250 feet, the same depth in Brooks Creek at the west end of Harkers Island; and a channel 7 feet deep and 70 feet wide, from the existing side channel at Atlantic, N.C., to the mouth of Little Port Brook; thence 7 feet deep and 50 feet wide, along the Brook to a basin 600 feet long, 180 feet wide, and 7 feet deep, with a breakwater, beginning at a point between the mouth of Little Port Brook and White Point, running along the channel approximately 2,000 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. The length of the authorized channels is about 50.6 miles. (See Table 6-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully compiled with to date for completed portion. Terminal facilities. Sixteen small wharves serve the waterway Additional facilities are needed along Core Sound. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Between March 11 and 15, 1977, the contract dredge Jekyll Island dredged 20,108 cubic yards from shoals in Atlantic Harbor of Refuge at a cost of $546,864. Preparation of the dredge material management plan preliminary assessment cost $11,941. Project condition surveys cost $7,452. Diking in connection with dredging was accomplished at a contributed funds cost of $14,800. 6-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in September 1972. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1961.) 19. WATERWAY CONNECTING SWANQUARTER BAY WITH DEEP BAY, N.C. Location. On north side of Pamlico Sound, about 10 miles east of mouth of Pamlico River. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 1231.) Existing project. A channel 60 feet wide and 8 feet deep from Deep Bay through present waterway to Swanquarter Bay, and thence through Swanquarter Canal to a basin of the same depth, about 500 feet long and 60 to 300 feet wide, at head of canal. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of June 25, 1910, and March 2, 1945. For further details see Annual Report for 1950. The existing project has been modified to provide a channel 10 feet deep and 80 feet wide from the State ferry channel to the harbor entrance channel, a distance of approximately 4,850 feet; enlarge the harbor entrance channel from 8 to 10 feet deep and 60 to 80 feet wide to the harbor canal, approximately 1,400 feet; and enlarging the harbor canal from 8 to 10 feet deep with the existing width of 60 feet to the turning basin in Swanquarter Harbor, a distance of approximately 2,450 feet. The modification also includes Federal maintenance of the State ferry channel 10 feet deep and 80 feet wide from the intersection of that channel with the Federal improvements to deep water in Swanquarter Bay, to be accomplished only if the State discontinues maintenance. This modification was approved by the Chief of Engineers on June 10, 1983, under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Six waterway facilities serve the waterway, with a total frontage of 355 feet. Existing facilities are adequate for present commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Preparation of the dredge material management plan preliminary assessment cost $9,752. Project condition surveys cost $1,370. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed January 24, 1964, except for the modification which was completed on February 23, 1984 20. WILMINGTON HARBOR, N. C. Location. The project is located on the Cape Fear River, on southeast coast of North Carolina, between the Atlantic Ocean and Wilmington, North Carolina. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 426.) Previous projects. For details, see page 1804 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 533 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized and constructed project provides for a channel 40 feet deep and 500 feet wide from the Atlantic Ocean through the ocean bar and entrance channels to Southport, thence 38 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the upper end of the anchorage basin (foot of Castle Street) at Wilmington, thence 32 feet deep and 400 feet wide, to Hilton Bridge over Northeast Cape Fear River; a 38-foot deep anchorage basin at Wilmington; a 32-foot-deep turning basin opposite the principal terminals; a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide, about 3 miles long, in Cape Fear River; and a channel 25 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Hilton Bridge over Northeast Cape Fear River to a point 1.66 miles above, including a turning basin of the same depth, 700 feet wide and 500 feet long, at a point 1.25 miles above the bridge. The project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930; March 2, 1945; May 17, 1950; October 23, 1962; and March 10, 1964; under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. Three modifications to the project were authorized by the Water Resources Development Acts of November 17, 1986 (PL 99-662) and October 12, 1996 (PL104-303). These three modifications were subquently combined into one project modification by the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act for FY 98. The plan of improvement consists of deepening the ocean bar and entrance channels from the authorized depth of 40 feet to 44 feet; deepening the authorized 38-foot project to 42 feet up to and including the anchorage basin immediately upriver from the State Ports Authority dock, and extending the anchorage basin northward by 300 feet; widening the existing 400-foot wide channel to 600 feet over a total length of 6.2 miles including Lower and Upper Midnight and Lower Lilliput reaches; widen five turns and bends by 100 to 200 feet providing a total average channel width of 500 to 675 feet; widening the Fourth East Jetty Channel to 500 feet over a total length of 1.5 miles; deepening the 32-foot channel between Castle Street and the Hilton Railroad Bridge, the 32- foot turning basin just above the mouth of the Northeast Cape Fear river on the west side, and the 25-foot channel from the Hilton Railroad Bridge to 750 feet upstream all to a depth of 38 feet; deepening the 25-foot channel from 750 feet upstream of the Hilton Railroad Bridge to the turning basin near the upstream limits of the project to 34 feet, along with widening of the channel from 200 to 250 feet; and widening the turning basin from 700 to 800 feet; mitigation to include acquiring, by fee title, 30 acres of upland and construction of an embayment and acquisition of about 500 acres of existing marsh and upland areas for preservation of habitat to offset losses of wetlands and primary nursery areas; and environmental improvements to include acquiring, by easements or fee title, about 2,800 acres of wetlands, river bluffs, and ecotones and provision for a minimum number of specially designed corridors across the wetlands for industrial access to the river for the purpose of environmental enhancement. The environmental enhancement portion of the project is unprogrammed. The estimated Federal cost is $243,063,000. (For further details of authorization, see 1962 Annual Report.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date except for latest modification. In accordance with the costsharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the non-Federal sponsor must (1) provide all lands, easements, rights-ofway, and dredged material disposal area lands presently estimated at $1,158,000, and bear all operation and maintenance costs presently estimated at $6,000 6-10 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT annually; (2) modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project, presently estimated at $20,609,000; (3) pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction presently estimated at $78,758,000 and reimburse an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction (which is partially offset by a credit allowed for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations (except utility relocations), and dredged material disposal areas, presently estimated at $30,400,000; and (4) pay 25 percent of the first costs allocated too fish and wildlife enhancement presently estimated at $1,525,000, and pay 25 percent of the costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of fish and wildlife facilities presently estimated at $16,000 annually, and provide and maintain, at its own expense, the local service facilities necessary to realize the benefits of the general navigation features, presently estimated at $22,909,000. Terminal facilities. Forty-three principal wharves, piers, and docks at port of Wilmington, with a berthing space of about 20,000 linear feet serve the harbor. These facilities handle general cargo and petroleum products. (For further details, see Port Series No. 12, revised 1987, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Between October 1, 1996 and August 16, 1997, the contract dredge R. S. Weeks dredged 155,145 cubic yards from the ocean bar at a Federal cost of $3,224,621 and a non-Federal cost of $1,432,939. The contract for deepening the ocean bar was then terminated for convenience of the government at a Federal cost of $2,671,953 and a non-Federal cost of $890,651. Raising of the dike on the south cell of Eagle Island cost $234,001. These funds were accepted under an advance funds agreement with the State. Maintenance: Between January 24 and March 31, 1997, the contract dredge Arlington dredged 1,003,138 cubic yards from shoals in the anchorage basin at a Federal cost of $1,796,902 and 61,085 cubic yards at the State Ports at a contributed funds cost of $205,956. Dikes were constructed and maintained at a contributed funds cost of $397,285. Between August 24 and September 30, 1997, the contract dredge Cherokee dredged 350,882 cubic yards from shoals in the anchorage basin and river channel at a Federal cost of $848,893 and 37,733 cubic yards from shoals at the State Port at a contributed funds cost of $56,659. Dike construction and ditching was accomplished at a contributed funds cost of $116,318. Between May 11 and June 15, 1997, the contract dredge Illinois dredged 450,721 cubic yards from Smith Island Channel and deposited it on the beach at Bald Head Island under section 933 at a Federal cost of $1,750,565 and a contributed funds cost of $420,396. Between October 1, 1996 and April 25, 1997, the contract dredge R. N. Weeks dredged 438,813 cubic yards from shoals in the Ocean Bar at a cost of $988,842. Between October 1, 1996 and August 16, 1997, the contract dredge R. S. Weeks dredged 7,500 cubic yards from shoals in the ocean bar in connection with the deepening project at a cost of $45,133. Between February 14 and March 13, 1997, the U.S. hopper dredge McFarland dredged 217,267 cubic yards from shoals in the river channel at a cost of $1,429,373. Engineering and design for dredging of the ocean bar in FY 98 cost $3,529. Cost in connection with prior years dredging of the river channel were $17,685. During intermittent periods the U.S. debris boat Snell conducted clearing and snagging operations and maintained dredging ranges and mooring facilities at a cost of $13,000. Ocean dumping monitoring cost $4,235. Section 933 study for Bald Head Island cost $24,122. Dredge material management plan preliminary assessment cost $188. Sedimentation re-evaluation of ocean disposal cost $591. Mosquito control in disposal areas cost $100,346. Miscellaneous real estate activities cost $3,115. Wood debris investigation and removal cost $631,100. Long term project management plan cost $128,274. Miscellaneous environmental activities cost $12,463.Condition and operation studies cost $399,123. Design for Eagle Island dikes was accomplished at a contributed funds cost of $58,310. Eagle Island site investigations were accomplished at a contributed funds cost of $6,758. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the project was completed August 1997 except for latest modification. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1962.) Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1997, was $157,694,302 of which $38,558,242 was for new work, including $6,849,137 contributed funds and $119,136,060 was for maintenance, including $8,842,288 contributed funds. The remaining uncompleted portion of the work authorized under the River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945, was deauthorized in accordance with Section 1001(b) (1), PL 99-662. Design for the latest modification has been initiated under PED with a new construction start scheduled for FY 98. Beach Erosion Control 21. FORT FISHER AND VICINITY, N.C. Location. The project is located in New Hanover County, approximately 20 miles south of Wilmington, N.C., on the peninsula which separates the lower Cape Fear River from the Atlantic Ocean. (See quadrangle sheet, Kure Beach, N.C.) Existing project. The authorized project consists of the construction of a rubble mound revetment, 3,040 feet in length with a maximum crest elevation of 15 feet above mean sea level. In addition, the project includes the construction of a walking path, overlooks, and steps for beach access at both ends of the revetment to provide for public safety. The project was authorized by Section 201 of the River and Harbor Flood Control Act of 1965. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Final cost sharing adjustments resulted in a decrease in Federal cost of $10,806 and an increase in contributed funds cost of $25,537. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed May 31, 1996. 6-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Flood Control 22. CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN, N. C. Location. Work covered by this project consists of a series of dams and reservoirs on tributaries of the Cape Fear River in North Carolina within a radius of 100 miles from Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. Public Law 88-253, approved December 30, 1963, authorized three principal dams and reservoirs and a series of smaller reservoirs on tributaries of the Cape Fear River in accordance with the comprehensive plans in House Document 508, 87th Congress, 2d session. The act also provides that the appropriate agencies of the Departments of the Army and Agriculture shall conduct joint investigations and surveys and prepare a report on the upper tributaries of the Cape Fear River in the interest of watershed protection and flood prevention, and the conservation, development, utilization, and disposal of water. The report was prepared in compliance with provisions of Public Law 87-639. The study was unfavorable and has been submitted to Congress. No further action will be taken. A list of the dams and reservoirs included in the comprehensive plan follows. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) Estimates of cost as given are based on 1960 price levels, except the ones for B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake and Randleman Lake, which were revised in 1990, and Howards Mill Lake in 1980. These three projects have been authorized for construction in accordance with the above authorization. Howards Mill Lake was deauthorized in July 1995 due to the current lack of economic justification. Randleman Lake was reclassified to the "deferred" category in April 1992 due to the current lack of economic justification. Local cooperation. Requirements are given in the individual project reports. 22A. B. EVERETT JORDAN DAM AND LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is located on the Haw River, N. C., 4.3 miles above its mouth, and 2.5 miles north of Moncure, N. C. Existing project. The project provides for an earth dam 1,330 feet long with a maximum height of 112 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled, unpaved chute spillway, and a controlled 19-foot diameter outlet structure. Some saddle dikes are required beyond the spillway. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 753,500 acre-feet, of which 538,400 acre-feet is for flood control and a conservation pool of 215,100 acre-feet for water-quality control, water supply, and sedimentation. The reservoir will be operated as a unit of a coordinated system for control of floods in the Cape Fear River Basin and for water supply, water-quality control, and other purposes. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $147,600,000 (1996), consisting of $89,186,000 for construction, and $58,414,000 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations. The existing project was authorized by Public Law 88-253 approved December 30,1963 (H.D. 508, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. Local interests must protect downstream channels from encroachments and obstructions which would adversely affect operation of the project; reimburse the Federal Government for all costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, presently estimated at $3,700,000 and bear all annual costs for operation, maintenance, and major replacements allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, an amount presently estimated at $46,000 annually; and contribute toward the cost of the ranger security buildings, an amount presently estimated at $44,000. A contract between the State of N. C. and the United States for water supply storage space was executed by ASA (CW) on April 10, 1988. In addition, the State of N. C. has leased the project for public park, recreational, fish, wildlife, and other natural resource management purposes and the estimated cost to the State for O&M under this lease is $806,000 annually. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Wilderness Island, Rivers End, and Rivers Junction O&M roads were completed at a cost of $4,763. Replacement of campfire rings at Crosswinds Campground was completed at a cost of $92,432. Settlement of the claim on Crosswinds construction cost $812,890. Crosswinds Marina breakwater replacement cost $207,563. Total Federal expenditures were $1,282,394, including above items. Maintenance: Paving at Poe's Ridge continued at a cost of $21,132. Sedimentation surveys were accomplished at a cost of $97,338. Hurricane Fran clean up and repairs cost $55,160. Engineering and design for correction of erosion problems at gate 11 cost $9,086. Engineering and design for the management center addition cost $16,808. Normal operation and maintenance cost $1,050,289. Condition at end of fiscal year. All facilities are complete except for the breakwater repairs at Crosswinds Marina and the Mason House restoration. Impoundment was completed in February 1982, with dedication on May 1, 1982. Project completion is scheduled for May 1998, except for the Mason House. 23. CAROLINA BEACH AND VICINITY, N. C. Location. The project is in New Hanover County, about 15 miles southeast of Wilmington, N. C., on the peninsula which separates lower Cape Fear River from the Atlantic Ocean. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Map 834.) Existing project. The authorized project consists of two separable elements, the Carolina Beach Portion and Area South of Carolina Beach and provides for construction of a dune with a crown width of 25 feet at elevation 13.5 feet National geodetic vertical datum (NGVD), a berm with a crown width of 50 feet at elevation 10.5 feet NGVD for Carolina Beach and 9 feet NGVD for the Area South, a rock revetment at elevation 10.5 feet NGVD along the northern 2,050 feet fronted by a 130- foot wide berm at elevation 6.5 feet NGVD, extending about 32,000 feet from the northern limits of Carolina Beach to the southern limits of Kure Beach and Federal participation in the cost of beach nourishment for a period 6-12 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT not to exceed 50 years from year of initial placement. The area south of Carolina Beach was reclassified to the active category, June 1985. Approved estimated Federal cost for new work is $169,015,000 (1997). The project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H.D. 418, 87th Cong. 2d sess.). The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized Federal participation in future nourishment for 50 years. Local cooperation. For the Carolina Beach portion, local interests must: (a) Provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction; (b) make required relocations and alterations of streets, utilities, or structures; (c) contribute 37.9 percent of the total first cost, with credit allowed for (a) and (b); (d) hold the United States free from damages; (e) maintain all works after completion; (f) maintain continued public ownership of the shore; (g) adopt and enforce appropriate ordinances to provide for preservation of improvement and its protective vegetation; (h) control water pollution to extent necessary to safeguard health of bathers; and (i) at least annually inform interests affected that project will not provide any substantial protection from ocean surges higher in elevation than that of Hurricane Hazel, October 15, 1954. Requirements have been fulfilled to date for the town of Carolina Beach portion of the project. For the Area South portion, local interests must: (a) provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, including borrow areas; (b) pay 35 percent of the first costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of hurricane and storm damage reduction facilities; (c) contribute, in cash, 35 percent of the total project cost; (d) inform affected interests of the limitation of the protection afforded by the project no less than once each year; (e) assure that water pollution which would endanger the health of bathers will not be permitted to the extent of its power; (f) assure the continued public ownership of the above shore and its administration for public use during the 50 year economic life of the project; (g) to the extent of its powers, prescribe and enforce regulations to prevent obstruction of or encroachment on the project that would reduce the level of protection it affords or that would hinder operation or maintenance; and (h) provide and maintain necessary access roads, parking areas and other public use facilities open and available to all on equal terms. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Plans and specifications for re-nourishment of the Carolina Beach portion cost $72,080. Construction of the Area South portion of the project continued at a Federal cost of $2,599,269 and a contributed funds cost of $1,801,647. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project construction for the Carolina Beach portion was completed August 12, 1982, except for grassing which was completed in September 1983. The latest increment ofre-nourishment for the Carolina Beach portion was completed in May 1995 with the next increment scheduled for FY 98. The contract for the initial re-nourishment of the Area South portion was awarded August 1996 with completion scheduled for May 1998. 24. DANVILLE (SOUTHSIDE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT), VA. Location. The project area is located in the City of Danville in Pittsylvania County in south-central Virginia, approximately 50 miles northeast of Greensboro, N.C. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Ringgold, Va. - N.C.) Existing project. The project will consist of a dike system around approximately one quarter of the Southside Sewage Treatment Plant. The dike will be constructed at an elevation equivalent to 3 feet above the 100-year frequency flood. This project will protect the control buildings which house electrical motors and pumps for the Treatment Plant. The utility road located to the back of the control building and the existing dike will be raised to the designed elevation while a completely new dike section will be constructed connecting the existing dike and the entrance road at the designated elevation. Approved estimated Federal cost for construction is $192,000 (1997). The project was approved on July 11, 1995, under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interest shall contribute a minimum of 25 percent, but not to exceed 50 percent, total project costs, estimated at $64,000; provide a cash contribution equal to 5 percent of total project costs; provide all lands, easements, rights-of way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas, as may be determined by the Government to be necessary for the construction, operation, and maintenance of the project; shall provide or pay to the Government the cost of providing all retaining dikes, wasteweirs, bulkheads, and embankments, including all monitoring features and stilling basins, that may be required at any dredged material disposal area necessary for the construction of the project; shall accomplish or arrange for accomplishment at no cost to the Government all relocations (excluding railroad bridges and approaches thereto) determined necessary for construction of the project; shall hold and save the Government free from all damages arising from the construction, operation, maintenance, repair, replacement, and rehabilitation of the project and any project-related betterments, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the Government and its contractors; and assume financial responsibility for cleanup of hazardous and toxic waste, as defined in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, which is necessitated by the project. Such costs will not be considered part of the project costs, nor will the sponsor receive credit for such costs it incurs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Construction was initiated at a Federal cost of $120,947 and a contributed funds cost of $33,091. Condition at end of fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded November 20, 1996, with completion scheduled for February 1998. 6-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 25. HAMLET CITY LAKE, HAMLET, N. C. Location. The project is located on Marks Creek within the city limits of Hamlet, N. C. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Hamlet, N. C.) Existing project. A small earth dam constructed in the 1930's under the WPA Program impounds the shallow 50-acre lake. Much of the City's storm runoff empties into the lake and has contributed significantly to a sediment problem. Local interests desire removal of accumulated sediment and debris including construction of sediment traps and providing other devices or equipment to prevent and abate the further deposit of sediment. Results from the bottom sampling and testing program show that contaminants are much more widespread than originally estimated. The final scope of the project is being negotiated with the project sponsor. Approved estimated Federal cost for new work is $2,400,000 (1996). The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Sec. 206, PL 99-662). Local cooperation. Local interests must pay 25 percent of the total cost of the project estimated at $800,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Planning, engineering, and design were completed at a cost of $51,062. Condition at end of fiscal year. The construction contract is scheduled to be awarded in November 1997 with completion in August 1998. 26. KING (WATER PLANT), N.C. Location. The project is located along the Yadkin River, about 10 miles northwest of Winston-Salem, N.C. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, King, N.C.) Existing project. The project consists of approximately 300 linear feet of riprap protection beginning at the north side of the water plant intake and extending 300 feet upstream along the east river bank. The toe of the bank protection is keyed into the stream bed and the rip-rap extends to the top of the bank, approximately 18 feet. Approved estimated Federal cost for construction implementation is $180,000 (1997). The project was approved by the Division Commander on September 7, 1994, under Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and disposal areas necessary for construction and subsequent maintenance and inspection of the project; accomplish without cost to the United States all relocation and alterations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities and other structures and improvements made necessary by the construction; provide, during the period of construction, an amount equal to not less than 25 percent of total project costs, estimated at $60,000, at least 5 percent of which will be cash; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent maintenance, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States; assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $500,000 and assume financial responsibility for cleanup of hazardous and toxic waste, as defined in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, which is necessitated by the project. Such costs will not be considered part of the total project costs, nor will the sponsor receive credit for such costs it incurs. Operations and results during fiscal year. Constructin was completed at a Federal cost of $121,424 and a contributed funds cost of $53,495. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed October 1996. 27. LOWER CREEK, LENOIR, N. C. Location. The project is located in northwest North Carolina near the city of Lenoir in Caldwell County and is approximately 60 miles northwest of Charlotte and approximately 60 miles northeast of Asheville. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Lenoir, N. C.) Existing project. The authorized project involves about 1.4 miles of Lower Creek and .4 mile of Zacks Fort Creek of channel widening with a combination of trapezoidal and bench channel design. The improved channel bottom widths range from 50 to 75 feet, roughly doubling the size of the existing channel. Approved estimated Federal cost for construction is $1,975,000 (1995). The project was approved by the Director of Civil Works on September 16, 1991, under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way, including suitable disposal areas as may be determined by the Chief of Engineers to be necessary for construction and subsequent maintenance and inspection of the project; accomplish without cost to the United States all relocations and alterations of buildings, transportation facilities, and other structures and improvements made necessary by the construction; provide, during the process of construction, an amount equal to not less than 25 percent of total project cost, estimated at $658,000, at least 5 percent of which will be cash. The amount to be provided shall include the value of cost of all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and facility and utility alterations and relocations necessary for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project, including suitable excavated material disposal areas, as may be determined by the Chief of Engineers; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent maintenance, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army; at least annually inform affected interests that the channel will not provide complete flood protection and assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $5,000,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New 6-14 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT work: Cost adjustments resulted in cost of $122. Condition at end of fiscal year. Plans and specifications are substantially complete. The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was executed in November 1991. Work has been suspended due to non-resolution of local sponsor real estate issues. 28. N.C. AQUARIUM, DARE COUNTY, N.C. Location. The project area is located on the west side of Roanoke Island in eastern North Carolina near Manteo. (See quadrangle sheet, Manteo, N.C.) Existing project. The project consists of replacing approximately 760 linear feet of dilapidated timber bulkhead. The existing bulkhead was demolished, the shoreline was graded to a 3.OH:1.OV slope and armor stone was placed on the slope. Approved estimated Federal cost for construction implementation is $500,000 (1997). The project was approved by the Division Commander on August 3, 1995, under Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interest shall contribute a minimum of 25 percent, but not to exceed 50 percent, total project costs, estimated at $266,000; provide a cash contribution equal to 5 percent of total project costs; provide all lands, easements, rights-of way, and suitable borrow and dredged or excavated material disposal areas that the Government determines for the construction, operation, and maintenance of the project; shall perform or ensure performance of all relocations that the Government determines to be necessary for the construction, operation and maintenance of the project; shall hold and save the Government free from all damages arising from the construction, operation, maintenance, repair, replacement, and rehabilitation of the project and any project-related betterments, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the Government and its contractors; assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $500,000; and assume financial responsibility for cleanup of hazardous and toxic waste, as defined in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, which is necessitated by the project. Such costs will not be considered part of the project costs, nor will the sponsor receive credit for such costs it incurs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction was completed at a Federal cost of $422,483 and a contributed funds cost of $205,767. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction contract awarded November 1996 and completed in March 1997. 29. NEUSE RIVER BASIN, N. C. Location. Works covered by this project consist of a series of dams and reservoirs in the Neuse River Basin in North Carolina within a radius of 50 miles from Raleigh, North Carolina. (See Geological Survey Map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1965 authorized construction of the Falls project as the key project in the recommended general plan of development of the Neuse River Basin. The plan will serve as a guide for immediate and future development of the basin's water resources as set forth in House Document 175, 89th Congress, 1st Session. A list of projects included in the general plan of development follows. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) Estimated costs as given are based on 1963 price levels, except for Falls Lake which was revised in 1989. 29A. FALLS LAKE, N. C. Location. The project is on the Neuse River about 10 miles north of the city of Raleigh, North Carolina. Existing project. The authorized project provides for an earth dam 1,915 feet long with a maximum height of 95 feet above streambed. The dam has a 30-foot top width. An uncontrolled chute spillway, 100 feet wide, is located in the east abutment. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 374,450 acre-feet, of which 243,050 acre-feet is for flood control, 45,000 acre-feet for water supply for the city of Raleigh, 61,330 acre-feet for water quality control, and 25,070 acre-feet for sediment storage. The reservoir will be operated as the initial unit of a coordinated system for control of floods in the Neuse River Basin for water supply, water quality control, recreation, and other purposes. Estimated cost of new work is $183,000,000 (1996) consisting of $91,334,000 for construction and $91,666,000 for lands and damages, including highway, railroad, and utility relocations. The project was authorized by the 1965 Flood Control Act (H.D. 175, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) Local cooperation. Local interests must prevent encroachment on downstream channels that would interfere with the operation of the reservoir; pay the United States in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, the entire amount of construction cost allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $13,637,000 and entire amount of operation, maintenance, and replacement costs allocated to water supply, presently estimated at $116,000 annually, the final amounts to be determined after actual costs are known; administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees), with interest, one-half of the separable cost of the project allocated to recreation and one-fourth of the separable cost allocated to fish and wildlife enhancement, the amount involved currently being estimated at $21,595,000, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife lands and facilities, the amount involved currently being estimated at $1,544,000 on an average annual basis. Formal assurances have been received. The N. C. Department of Natural and Economic Resources has been authorized by an act of legislation to assure payment of all non-Federal costs allocable to water supply in all Federal projects as required by law. The State will require repayment of water supply costs, by the users. A contract between the city of Raleigh and the United States for water-supply storage space was approved by the Secretary of the Army on September 11, 1972. A contract agreement for cost sharing of recreational lands and 6-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 facilities in accordance with PL 89-72 was approved by the Secretary of the Army on September 11, 1972. A contract agreement in accordance with Section 221 of PL 91-611 was executed on October 10, 1972. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Wildlife sub-impoundments was continued at a cost of $200,622. Final adjustments in cost sharing for the dam and spillway modification resulted in a decrease in contributed funds cost of $1,081. Total Federal expenditures were $386,428, including the above items. Maintenance: Periodic inspections were accomplished at a cost of $25,646. Sedimentation surveys were accomplished at a cost of $73,273. Debris removal and repairs in connection with Hurricane Fran cost $185,935. Normal operation and maintenance cost $937,007. Condition at end of fiscal year. Reservoir filling was completed on December 7, 1983. Dedication ceremonies were held on April 30,1983. All facilities are basically complete except for fish and wildlife facilities. Project completion is scheduled for March 1998. 30. ORIENTAL(SOUTH AVENUE) N.C. Location. The project is located on the north bank of the Neuse River in Pamlico County, N.C., about 140 miles east of Raleigh (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Oriental, N.C.) Existing project. The recommended project will consist of approximately 990 linear feet of structural sheetpile protection of Neuse River shoreline at South Avenue between Vandermere and Freemason Streets. The sheetpile is about 8 feet long and driven to the point of resistance. Approved estimated Federal cost for the project is $377,100 (1997). The project was approved by the Division Commander on September 23, 1994, under Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and disposal areas necessary for construction and subsequent maintenance and inspection of the project; accomplish without cost to the United States all relocation and alterations of buildings, transportation facilities, storm drains, utilities and other structures and improvements made necessary by the construction; provide, during the period of construction, an amount equal to not less than 25 percent of total project costs, estimated at $126,000, at least 5 percent of which will be cash; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction and subsequent maintenance, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; maintain and operate the project after completion without cost to the United States; assume full responsibility for all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $500,000 and assume financial responsibility for cleanup of hazardous and toxic waste, as defined in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, which is necessitated by the project. Such costs will not be considered part of the total project costs, nor will the sponsor receive credit for such costs it incurs. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Cost sharing adjustments resulted in a decrease in Federal Cost of $18,928 and an increase in contributed funds cost of $19,056 Condition at end of fiscal year. Contract was awarded in June 1995 with completion in February 1996. 31. ROANOKE RIVER UPPER BASIN, VIRGINIA, HEADWATERS AREA Location. The project is located on the Roanoke River in the City of Roanoke, Va. (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Roanoke, Va.) Existing project. The authorized plan includes about 6.4 miles of channel widening along the 10-mile project reach through the City of Roanoke, Va. Channel widening will be accomplished with the construction of a benched channel above the elevation of the average streamflow. Other flood damage reduction features include floodproofing at one location, training walls to prevent floodwater intrusion into low areas along the river (total length 7,200 feet), replacement of two low-level bridges with constrict streamflows and a flood warning system. Recreation facilities consist of a 5-mile recreation trail along the project reach and access and parking areas. Approved estimated Federal cost for new work is $23,900,000. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (H.R. 6, PL 99-662). Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way including spoil disposal areas presently estimated at $8,814,000; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads and other facilities except railroad bridges, where necessary for construction of the project presently estimated at $2,905,000; pay 25 percent of the cost of flood warning system (partially offset by a credit for lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations) presently estimated at $10,000; pay 5 percent of the total cost allocated to flood control in cash in addition to all lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations presently estimated at $1,617,000, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities presently estimated at $101,000, annually; pay one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation presently estimated at $1,687,000, (partially offset by a credit for land, easements, rights-of-way and relocations) and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation facilities presently estimated at $9,000, annually; and pay 25 percent of the cost of non-structural floodproofing (partially offset by a credit for lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations) presently estimated at $367,000. Fully complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design continued at a cost of $176,148. Condition at end of fiscal year. The contract for the flood warning system was completed in January 1991. The contract for the sewage treatment plant floodproofing was awarded in August 1991 and completed in February 1993. Two hazardous material site have been cleared by the owners. Sponsor will initiate land acquisition in FY98. Project completion is scheduled for July 2003. 6-16 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT 32. WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, N. C. Location. A small island 10 miles east of Wilmington, N. C. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Map. p.834) Existing project. Construct a dune with a base bordering at or near the building line, with a crown width of 25 feet at elevation 15 feet above mean low water, together with integral construction of a beach berm with a crown width of 50 feet at elevation 12, extending about 14,000 feet from Moores Inlet on the north to Masonboro Inlet on the south. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act (H.D. 511, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized Federal participation in future nourishment for the life of the project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Plans and specifications for the next renourishment cost $70,572. Condition at end of fiscal year. All work under the initial authorization has been completed. Under WRDA 86 the second renourishment was completed in June 1994. The next renourishment is scheduled for 1998. 33. YADKIN RIVER BASIN, N. C. AND S. C. Location. The river rises on the eastern slope of the Blue Ridge Mountains in western North Carolina, flows generally easterly about 100 miles to the vicinity of Donnaha, North Carolina, thence southeasterly 104 miles to its confluence with Uwharrie River near Badin, North Carolina, where its name changes to Great Pee Dee River. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of North Carolina.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of July 24,1946, authorized construction of four flood control dams in the Upper Yadkin River Basin, two on the Yadkin River above Wilkesboro, North Carolina, and two on Reddies River, a tributary stream. Studies made subsequent to authorization established the economic advantage of providing needed flood-control storage in only two reservoirs, one on the Reddies and one on the Yadkin. Present planning considers only the tworeservoir plan, W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir constructed 1962 and Reddies River Lake. W. Kerr Scott was transferred to the Wilmington District from Charleston in fiscal year 1980. Any future work on Reddies River will also be done by the Wilmington District. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) 33A. W. KERR SCOTT DAM AND RESERVOIR, N. C. Location. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir is on Yadkin River, North Carolina, about 6 miles upstream from Wilkesboro. At full flood-control pool elevation (1,075 feet mean sea level), the reservoir extends 15.7 miles upstream to the Wilkes-Caldwell County line. Existing project. The project consists of a rolled earthfill dam 1,740 feet long, with top of dam at elevation 1,107.5 feet mean sea level or about 148 feet above streambed elevation; a spillway near the north abutment of the dam in a rock cut with crest elevation 1,075; and outlet works consisting of an intake structure, control tower, and a circular concrete conduit 12.25 feet in diameter through the base of the dam near the south abutment. The reservoir has a gross capacity of 153,000 acre-feet of which 112,000 acre-feet are reserved for flood control, 33,000 acre-feet will be used as required for water supply, and 8,000 acre-feet being contained in the minimum pool. Estimated cost is $9,110,000 (1983) for new work. The existing project was authorized by the 1946 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. For details, see page 413 of Annual Report for 1963. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Replacement of the management center was completed at a cost of $1,103,463. Sewer line construction was completed at a cost of $218,204. Periodic inspections cost $33,658. Normal operation and maintenance cost $1,317,877. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was commenced in August 1960 and placed in operation for flood control and water storage purposes in August 1962. 34. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS To determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation, review and inspections were made for the following projects during fiscal year 1997: Ararat River, Surry County, N.C.; Broad Creek, Beaufort County, N.C.; Core Creek, Craven County, N.C.; Deep Creek, Edgecombe County, N.C.; Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N.C.; Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N.C.; Filberts Creek, Chowan County, N.C.; Gardners Creek, Martin County, N.C.' Genoa Sewer Facility, Wayne County, N.C.; Goldsboro, Neuse River, Wayne County, N.C..; Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N.C.; New River, Onslow County, N.C.; Old Field Swamp, Robeson County, N.C.; Pantego and Cucklers Creek, Beaufort County, N.C.; Perquimans River, Perquimans County, N.C.; Pungo Creek, Edgecombe County, N.C.; Pungo River, Edgecombe County, N.C.; Simmons Bay Creek, Columbus County, N.C.; South Creek, Beaufort, N.C.; South Mayo River, Patrick County, N.C.; Swift Creek, Pitt and Craven Counties, N.C.; and White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N.C. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation on local flood protection works where appropriate. Cost for the period was $3,032. Total cost to September 30, 1997, was $531,242, charged to operations. 6-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 35. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). (See Table 6-K.) Emergency flood control activities and hurricane flood and shore-protection activities at Federally authorized projects (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). National Emergency Preparedness Program cost $21,187. Disaster Preparedness Program cost $232,557. Non-reimburssable work in connection with Hurricane Fran cost $259,825. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 36. ROANOKE RIVER BASIN, VA. AND N. C. Location. The project is on the Roanoke River and its tributaries in Virginia and North Carolina within a radius of 100 miles from Danville, Virginia. Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1944 approved a general plan for the comprehensive development of the Roanoke River Basin for flood control and other purposes, and authorized construction of John H. Kerr and Philpott Reservoirs. (See Table 6-J for a list of dams and reservoirs included in the comprehensive plan.) Local cooperation. None required. John H. Kerr and Philpott Reservoirs are the only projects in the comprehensive plan that have been authorized for construction. (See Table 6-J on Dams and Reservoirs.) 36A. JOHN H. KERR DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA. AND N. C. Location. The project is on Roanoke River, about 178.7 river miles above its mouth, in Mecklenburg County, Virginia, and 20.3 miles downstream from Clarksville, Virginia. The reservoir extends upstream on Roanoke River 56 miles and on Dan River 34 miles. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete gravity dam with wing and saddle dikes on the right and left banks, with a total length of about 22,285 feet. The reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated system of reservoirs in the Roanoke River Basin for control of floods, generation of hydroelectric power, regulation of low-water flow, and for other purposes. The power installation is 204,000 kilowatts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Estimated cost is $67,529,000 (1983) for construction and $24,521,000 for lands and damages, including relocation of highways, railroads, and utilities, a total of $92,050,000 for new work. The existing project was authorized by the 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Design of the resource management center addition cost $46,183. Design for the raw water valve replacement in the power house cost $20,561. Design for replacement of the washhouse at the North Bend Park cost $40,644. Sedimentation survey cost $181,415. Hurricane Fran repairs cost $137,368. Design for Island Creek pumping plant rehab cost $17,000. Cultural resources survey cost $43,941. Rehab study of seven main units in powerhouse cost $212,681. Preparation and update of Water Control Plan and Reservoir Regulation Manual cost $53,145. Acquisition of tracts below 326 feet cost $317,800. Road paving and repaving cost $344,416. Earth dike modifications cost $3,066,882. Normal operation and maintenance cost $6,081,655. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for additional recreational facilities. Production of power and protection from floods are provided by project. 36B. PHILPOTT LAKE, VA. Location. The project is located on Smith River, Virginia, 44.3 miles above its junction with Dan River, and 35 miles upstream from Virginia-North Carolina State line in Franklin and Henry Counties. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a concrete gravity dam 892 feet long and with a maximum height of 220 feet. Reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for flood control in the Roanoke River Basin, generation of hydroelectric power, regulation of low-water flow, and for other purposes. The powerhouse has a total installation of 14,000 kilowatts. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Federal cost estimate is $13,933,000 (1983) for construction and $1,157,000 for lands and damages, a total of $15,090,000. Existing project was authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Replacing the powerhouse roof cost $20,486. Investigation of unit 1 cost $36,077. Powerhouse major rehab report cost $52,642. Sedimentation surveys cost $34,571. Hurricane Fran repairs cost $298,345. Replacement of the boathouse cost $71,880. Normal operation and maintenance cost $2,420,810. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete except for additional recreational facilities, and is providing power and flood protection. 37. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS B. Everett Jordan Dam and Lake, located in the Cape Fear River Basin, North Carolina, began Fiscal Year 1997 at elevation 216.53 feet, mean sea level (m.s.1.) or 0.53 feet above guide curve. Heavy rainfall in the second week of October elevated Jordan Lake to 218.86 ft., m.s.1. or 2.86 feet above guide curve on October 10. By October16 Jordan's Lake level was near guide curve and near average rainfall maintained the lake level above 6-18 WILMINGTON, N. C. , DISTRICT guide curve for the next few months. The first few days of January had light rainfall followed by a moderate rainfall event that pushed Jordan Lake to elevation 219.38 feet, m.s.l. or 3.38 feet above guide curve on January 13. The lake level was drawn down to guide curve before the end of January. A second system with light rainfall followed by moderate to heavy rainfall pushed Jordan Lake to a peak of 221.50 feet, m.s.l. or 6.50 feet above guide curve on 17 February. Again the lake level was near guide curve by the end of the month. Near average rainfall from the end of February to mid- April kept the lake level above or near guide curve. Two separate rainfall events, the first beginning on April 20 and the second during the last few days of April produced the highest elevation of the fiscal year at 225.45 ft., m.s.l. or 9.45 feet above guide curve on May 1. The lake was promptly drawn down to guide curve by May 13. Two rainfall events in June caused by upper level lows, trailed by a cold front originating from Canada, helped to maintain lake levels near or above guide curve for the month of June. Jordan Lake elevations were 217.23 feet, m.s.l. on June 4 and 216.76 feet, m.s.l. on June 19, or 1.23 and 0.76 feet above guide curve, respectively. The remnants of Hurricane Danny, originating from the Gulf Coast, crossed the piedmont of North Carolina from July 22 to 26. On July 27, the Jordan Lake level only rose to 218.22 feet, m.s.l. or 2.22 feet above guide curve despite the very heavy rainfall from Hurricane Danny. The effects of Hurricane Danny were mitigated by the dry conditions of the Basin. Rainfall for the remainder of the fiscal year was near or below average. As a result, the Jordan Lake level gradually fell below guide curve on August 13 and continued downward to it's lowest level for the fiscal year on September10 at 214.41 feet, m.s.l. or 1.59 feet below guide curve. Jordan Lake ended the fiscal year at 214.61 feet, m.s.l. or 1.39 feet below guide curve. Maximum flood pool storage utilized during the fiscal year was 29.9 percent and conservation pool storage remaining at the minimum elevation was 84.9 percent. Flood damages prevented during FiscalYear 1997 were $951,800 making a cumulative total of $164,334,300 since inception of the project in 1981. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $98,367. Falls Lake, located in the Neuse River Basin, North Carolina, began Fiscal Year 1997 at elevation 251.71 feet, m.s.l., or 0.71 foot above a falling guide curve. Falls Lake was returning to normal levels after Hurricane Fran in early September 1996. The Falls Lake level fluctuated above guide curve due to rainfall events through June. Notable peaks of 253.83 and 255.25 feet m.s.l. occurred on February 17 and April 30, respectively. The 255.25 feet, m.s.l. peak elevation was the maximum for the fiscal year. Due to below average rainfall and drying conditions, Falls Lake dropped below guide curve at the end of July and remained below through September. Falls Lake ended the fiscal year at the minimum elevation for the fiscal year of 248.99 feet, m.s.l., or 2.01 feet below guide curve. The maximum flood pool storage utilized during the year was 28 percent. The minimum conservation pool storage remaining at the lowest elevation was 85 percent. Flood damages prevented during the fiscal year were $5,395,300 making a cumulative total since inception of the project in 1983 of $328,594,300. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $88,708. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, located in the Roanoke River Basin, Virginia and North Carolina, began Fiscal Year 1997 at elevation 306.51 feet m.s.1. or 7.01 feet above guide curve. This high starting elevation was the result of the flooding from Hurricane Fran which started in early September 1996. The Kerr Reservoir level dropped to slightly above a dropping guide curve at the end of October and hovered above guide curve through November. Heavy rains at the end of November and early December caused Kerr Reservoir to rise to 306.69 feet, m.s.l. on December 10 or 11.19 feet above guide curve. In early January 1997, Kerr Reservoir dropped to near guide curve and remained near guide curve through mid- February. The minimum elevation for the fiscal year occurred on February 13 when Kerr Reservoir dropped to 294.07 feet, m.s.1. or 1.43 feet below guide curve as a result of heavy hydropower demands. Minor flooding occurred in late February and early March. However, Kerr Reservoir only rose about three feet into the flood control pool. Kerr Reservoir then dropped and stayed near the guide curve through April. The only flood event that occurred for the remainder of the fiscal year produced the maximum level of 308.26 feet, m.s.l. or 6.26 feet above guide curve on May 3, 1997. After recessing to guide curve by mid-May, Kerr Reservoir remained near guide curve through July. Then the below average inflows during July through September caused Kerr Reservoir to drop below guide curve for the remainder of the fiscal year. Kerr Reservoir was at 297.25 feet, m.s.l. or 2.25 feet below guide curve at the end of the fiscal year. Maximum flood pool storage utilized during the year was 35 percent. The contractual power pool storage remaining at the lowest elevation during the year was 14 percent. Gross generation for the fiscal year amounted to 576,208,900 kilowatt-hours or 135 percent of the long term normal. Net marketed power revenue was $6,977,447 making a cumulative total of $186,571,375 since inception of the project in 1952. Annual flood damages prevented during Fiscal Year 1997 were $58,367,800 making a cumulative total of $380,935,800 since 1952. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $286,884. Philpott Lake, located on the Smith River in the Dan River Basin, Virginia, began Fiscal Year 1997 at elevation 972.16 feet, m.s.l. or 0.66 foot above the guide curve. The level of Philpott Lake remained near or slightly above guide curve through early November due to above normal inflows. Above normal rainfall in November and the heaviest monthly total for the year of 8.21 inches in December produced much above normal inflows which pushed Philpott Lake above guide curve to peak at 974.19 feet, m.s.l. on November 11 and resulted in the peak elevation of the year on December 3 of 975.72 feet, m.s.l. or 4.22 feet above guide curve. Philpott Lake fluctuated near guide curve through mid-July. Once the lake level dropped below guide curve in July it continued a steady decline through the remainder of the year. The minimum 6-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 elevation for the fiscal year occurred on September 30 when Philpott Lake dropped to elevation 967.78 feet, m.s.l. or 3.72 feet below guide curve. Philpott Lake ended the fiscal year at elevation 967.80 feet, m.s.1. or 3:70 feet below guide curve. The maximum flood pool storage utilized during the year was 15 percent. The contractual power pool storage remaining at the lowest elevation during the year was 70 percent. Gross generation for the fiscal year amounted to 34,982,955 kilowatt hours or 134 percent of normal. Net marketed power revenue was $1,128,662 making a cumulative total since inception of the project in 1953 of $26,738,178. Flood damages prevented during Fiscal Year 1997 were $1,250,300 making a cumulative total of $339,431,300. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $128,662. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, located in the Yadkin-Pee Dee River Basin, North Carolina, began Fiscal Year 1997 at elevation 1030.19 feet, m.s.l., or 0.19 foot above the guide curve. A dry October for the Yadkin Basin kept W. Kerr Scott Reservoir at or near the guide curve for the month. Heavy rainfall on November 7 and 8 caused a lake level rise to 1032.94 feet, m.s.l. or 2.94 feet above guide curve on November 9. By November 11, W. Kerr Scott Reservoir was near guide curve. Heavy rainfall that began in latter November 9 and continued into the beginning of December drove W. Kerr Scott Reservoir to its highest level for the fiscal year at 1040.53 feet, m.s.l. or 10.53 feet above guide curve on December 1. After recovering from this event a week later, W. Kerr Scott Reservoir stayed near guide curve through mid-August. Minor peaks of 1032.99, 1032.73, 1032.04, 1031.18 feet, m.s.l. occurred on March 15, April 29, June 3 and July 24, respectively. Even with the deficit of 6.64 inches of precipitation for the fiscal year, reservoir levels were at or near guide curve until mid-August. The month of August had only 0.85 inches of precipitation. As a result W. Kerr Scott Reservoir fell below guide curve on August 20. The level continued to fall to the lowest level for the fiscal year at 1028.93 feet, m.s.l. or 1.07 feet below guide curve on September 9. Rainfall then helped W. Kerr Scott Reservoir rise above guide curve on September 12. W. Kerr Scott Reservoir ended the fiscal year at elevation 1030.15 feet, m.s.l. or 0.15 foot above guide curve. The reservoir was not largely impacted by the rainfall from either the high level lows from Canada nor the remnants of Hurricane Danny. Maximum flood pool storage utilized during the fiscal year was 15.3 percent, and the conservation pool storage remaining was 96.9 percent at the minimum elevation. Flood damages prevented during Fiscal Year 1997 were $1,027,700 raising the cumulative total since inception of the project in 1963 to $154,229,300. Total cost of functional operation for the period was $82,892. Miscellaneous 38. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT CAPE FEAR LOCK AND DAM NO. 1 FISH LADDER, N.C. Location. The project is located at Lock and Dam No. 1 on the Cape Fear River in Bladen County, North Carolina, 39 miles upstream (northwest) of Wilmington, N.C.) (See USGS quadrangle sheet, Kelly, N.C.) Existing project. The project includes the installation of a prefabricated fish ladder that would provide for passage of anadromous shad and river herring. The project will restore access by these species to 33 miles of high quality spawning habitat in the Cape Fear River above Lock and Dam No. 1. It is anticipated that this project will have a life of 10 to 15 years. This ladder is not expected to pass sturgeon or striped bass; therefore, future studies and projects are needed to provide a comprehensive fish passage solution that addresses all affected species. The fish ladder was attached to the existing lock and dam structure. Approved estimated Federal cost for construction implementation is $78,000 (1997). The project was approved by the Division Commander on April 24, 1996, under Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended. Local Cooperation. The sponsor shall contribute 25 percent of total project modification costs which includes implementation of the authorized improvements as well as planning, engineering, design, supervision and administration, monitoring, and other activities associated with implementation, but does not include the implementation of betterments. The non-federal contrubution will be credit for in-kind work, consisting of monitoring the operation and effectiveness of the fish ladder over two spawning seasons. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Installation of fish ladder was completed at a cost of $32,557. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in May 1996 with completion scheduled for May 1998. Monitoring is continuing. 6-20 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT General Investigations 39. SURVEYS Cost for the period was $472,279 of which $26,212 was for navigation studies, $152,305 was for beach erosion studies, $98,566 for review of completed projects, $59,855 for Special Investigations, $1,906 for FERC licenses review, $22,503 for interagency water resources development, $8,638 for National Estuary studies, $4,283 for the North American Waterfowl Management Plan, $3,815 for cooperation with other Water Resource Agencies, and $54,196 for cooperation with states. Contributed funds in the amount of $27,020 were expended for navigation studies, $174,577 for beach erosion studies and $49,400 for cooperation with states. 40. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain information studies, as authorized by Section 206, 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended, comprise compilation and dissemination, upon the request of a State or a political subdivision thereof, of information on floods and flood damages, including identification of areas subject to inundation by floods of various magnitudes and frequencies, and general criteria for guidance of Federal and non-Federal interests and agencies in the use of flood plain areas; and provide advice to other Federal agencies and local interests for their use in planning to ameliorate the flood hazard. Total costs for the period were $345,472. Total costs to September 30, 1997 were $7,029,225. 41. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Preconstruction engineering and design (PED) for Wilmington Harbor, Northeast Cape Fear River, N. C., was continued at a cost of $40,983. PED was continued on Brunswick County Beaches, N. C., at a cost of $314,987. PED was accomplished on Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N.C., at a cost of $2,057. PED was continued on Wilmington Harbor channel widening, N.C., at a cost of $155,471. PED was continued on Cape Fear-Northeast Cape Fear River, N.C. at a cost of $580,628. 6-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 6-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total cost to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sept. 30, 1997 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Atlantic Beach Channels, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, Va. & St. John River, Fla. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Avon Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Beaufort Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 6. Belhaven Harbor, N.C. 7. Cape Fear River, N.C. above Wilmington New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 215,000 184,383 60,000 89,091 40,000 31,282 10,288 - 221,744 - 211,870 1,715,500 2,038,622 8,852,694 8,720,817 4,400 4,400 85,655 85,655 3,079,000 3,255,406 5,951,622 6,189,726 6,804,000 6,406,295 15,142,622 13,591,014 8,358 8,358 46,300 40,369 1,373,000 1,368,629 722,313 714,506 537,500 415,067 3,101,000 3,494,326 11,279,997 12,751,096 22,710 22,116 960,400 956,263 31,809 31,8091 18,501 18,501 443,163 433,289 10,600 10,6002 71,429,4733 71,307,4063 165,022,6904 164,902,5824 86,851 86,8515 667,300 667,300 74,096 74,096 400,846 400,252 74,986 74,986 - 818,0406 - 818,0406 239,071 4,067,437' 211,280 4,039,646 - 34,000 - 34,000 - 326,225 - 326,225 - 126,687 126,687 352,824 775,525 358,739 775,509 - 3,759,5738 - 3,759,5738 598,000 22,016,6509 720,785 22,001,1569 6-22 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total cost to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sept. 30, 1997 8. Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N.C. 9. Channel from Pamlico Sound to Rodanthe, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Conrtibuted Funds) 10. Drum Inlet, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 11. Far Creek, N.C. 12. Lockwoods Folly River, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 13. Manteo (Shallowbag) Bay, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 14. Morehead City Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost - 88,328 - 88,328 1,664 2,300 730 730 139,200 140,504 688,100 688,100 -75,000 11,123 2,012,800 2,063,400 140,000 239,964 90,000 9,863 3,502,600 3,362,252 370,000 398,000 54,153 54,468 319,399 319,399 175,000 199,448 5,178,676 5,171,301 281,888 329,610 6,745,000 6,648,791 5,413,000 5,555,166 2,516,000 2,731,996 34,000 374,482 - 348,619 3,278,514 - 348,619 3,278,514 - - 42,029 - - 42,029 - 826,416 832,831 - 737,223 743,638 - 106,000 106,000 - 104,005 104,005 - - 152,619 - - 152,619 98,063 1,878,996 3,328,991 72,055 1,905,465 3,328,941 - - 13,500 - - 13,500 - - 164,642 - - 164,642 659.626 658.727 670,570 96,225 23,907 1,798,123 23,734 1,797,951 - 241,27210 - 241,27211 432,631 10,640,449 433,480 10,640,399 - 92,650 - 92,65012 -200,000 9,327,51513 330,201 9,236,32613 3,351,600 3,392,000 87,249,092 3,309,608 3,382,956 87,118,315 - 79,000 2,573,368 399 75,000 2,564,745 -176,346 - 13,204,70714 - - 13,204,70714 2,346,400 6,769,505 68,997,3141's 2,313,104 3,918,162 66,096,2141 -155 -57,518 - 2,731,996 - 2,731,996 5,900 1,755,712 2,519 1,750,331 6-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total cost to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sept. 30, 1997 15. Rollinson Channel, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 16. Silver Lake Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 17. Stumpy Point Bay, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 18. Waterway connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 19. Waterway connecting Swanquarter Bay with Deep Bay, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 20. Wilmington Harbor, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 21. Fort Fisher and Vicinity, N.C. (Regular Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 589,105 589,105 15,500 16,908 308,200 312,408 26,827 26,827 153,524 153,748 2,684 2,684 49,964 49,964 416,821 2,367,939 352,676 2,303,794 - 41,142 - 41,142 - 184,284 - 184,284 716,708 8,609,270 701,705 8,594,267 - 75,000 - 75,000 - - 268,381 - - 268,381 - 39,801 1,181,067 - 39,801 1,181,067 - - 259,000 - - 259,000 41,964 41,964 23,649 23,430 14,492 12,711 - 502,567 - 502,567 565,257 4,079,031 566,257 4,078,031 17,000 14,800 11,122 11,122 5,266,000 7,333,000 1,853,625 4,288,343 5,854,900 5,595,287 -1,350,000 -783,622 273,839 248,693 107,000 191,601 7,291,556 7,347,825 1,050,000 1,579,539 249,225 291,061 900,000 283,739 -240,000 5,400,000 5,580,951 5,896,574 7,485,260 8,225,500 7,545,033 8,197,479 3,000,000 1,928,385 749,000 459,589 1,170,000 1,555,413 19,452 17,252 751,099 751,099 193,847 193,847 160,000 160,000 36,474,22616 36,334,71916 111,124,28317 110,896,38617 2,400,000 7,800,000 2,557,591 6,849,137 1,238,885 1,261,682 -261,300 -10,806 9,288,09518 9,021,33918 2,984,70019 2,984,70020 6-24 WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total cost to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sept. 30, 1997 (Contributed Funds) 22A. B. Everett Jordon Dam and Lake, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 23. Carolina Beach and Vicinity, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 24. Danville (Southside Wastewater Treatment Plant), Va. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 25. Hamlet City Lake, N.C. 26. King (Waterplant), N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 27. Lower Creek, Lenoir, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 28. N.C. Aquarium, Dare County, N.C. (Contributed Funds) 29A. Falls Lake, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 30. Oriental (South Avenue), N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Aprop. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 1,300,000 359,712 1,101,800 1,078,502 1,520,000 1,439,928 75,346 933,105 1,067,000 1,100,006 334,000 2,760,000 516,295 2,200,009 - 1,239,973 - 1,239,973 1,000 19,000 24,646 17,806 1,620,000 1,516,565 720,000 696,590 1,082,000 1,098,274 270,000 378,329 968,000 17,000 14,706 -157,970 2,982,03021 25,537 2,982,03021 1,251,300 1,282,395 1,318,000 1,249,813 2,497,000 2,671,349 3,917,000 1,801,647 130,000 120,947 50,000 33,091 2,355,00 90,63 20,00 19,87 29,00 46,87 03 137,982 0 43,200 '7 42,439 - 57,800 - - 0 -14,000 '9 385 139,162 105,780 8,184 148,682,287 148,053,805 15,848,64322 15,747,45423 - 3,155,000 51,062 1,149,896 26,000 121,424 - 53,495 -6,000 122 - 114,00031 - 114,00031 5,000 9,399 3,700,000 4,051,304 961,200 1,056,414 20,000 29,539 40,000 25,637 1,205,000 2,244,996 1,015,000 1,057,765 - 251,268 - 115,321 251,000 244,007 - 137,000 - 70,000 21,000 24,723 191,000 850,000 1,213,742 1,069,700 986,137 77,976 154,300 147,175 36,644 424,000 422,483 75,000 205,767 973,000 386,428 1,132,000 1,221,861 -1,081 -33,200 -18,989 -11,300 19,056 500,00032 487,84333 266,000 205,767 182,622,996 181,382,804 15,959,26122 15,938,39923 251,268 192,216 417,10034 417,10035 125,700 125,700 6-25 1,764,735 1,764,735 17,733,533 17,399,333 14,050,07024 10,966,71724 232,00025 219,42026 50,000 33,091 219,98027 212,00128 57,800 53,495 524,50029 524,50030 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Proiect 31. Roanoke River Upper Basin Va. - Headwaters Area (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 32. Wrightsville Beach, N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 33A. W. Kerr Scott Dam and Reservoir, N.C. 36A. John H. Kerr Dam and Reservoir, Va. & N.C. (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 36B. Philpott Lake, Va. 38. Cape Fear Lock &, Dam No. 1 Fish Ladder, N.C. Funding FY 94 i New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Aprop. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 46,586 FY 95 -14,000 27,192 850,000 -106,000 672,467 39,617 398,545 398,545 - - 2,023,800 2,011,000 1,949,634 2,145,775 - - 6,608,300 7,057,099 6,798,175 7,296,963 2,171,800 1,977,000 2,146,993 2,056,683 FY 96 109,000 98,535 23,320 Total cost to FY 97 Sept. 30, 1997 258,000 2,548,000 176,148 2,422,271 - 626,586 - 580,855 75,000 3,604,100 70,572 3,556,649 - - 2,620,72936 - - 2,620,72936 - - 8,841,326 - - 8,841,326 4,111,000 2,481,000 33,864,90437 3,921,864 2,673,202 33,716,32938 - - 94,402,927 - - 94,402,927 7,648,000 11,397,500 136,570,188"9 7,582,398 10,863,691 1135,318,72340 - - 7,000 - - 7,000 - - 14,796,384 - - 14,796,384 2,014,100 1,983,736 63,000 11,301 2,855,000 41,005,59641 2,934,811 40,927,55342 7,000 70,00043 32,557 43,85844 1. Includes $2,369 refund to local interests in FY 82. 2. Includes $2,055 refund to local interests. 3. Includes $198,707 for previous projects. 4. Includes $107,634 for previous projects. 5. Includes $13,934 refund to local interests. 6. Includes $25,000 for previous projects. 7. Includes $12,854 for previous projects. 8. Includes $149,119 for previous projects. 9. Includes $8,178 for previous projects. 10. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 64, $3,000; FY 65, -$2,755; FY 71, $8,000; FY 72, $2,000; FY 74, $9,000; FY 75, $25,000; FY 76 & 76T, $20,000; FY 77, $2,500; FY 78, $8,800; FY 79, $3,000; FY 81, $1,680; and preconstruction planning funds: FY 80, $15,000 and FY 81, $19,320. 11. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 64, $219; FY 65, $26; FY 71, $8,000; FY 72, $1,448; FY 73, $552; FY 74, $9,000; FY 75, $11,925; FY 76 & 76T, $27,977; FY 77, $7,598; FY 78, $7,449; FY 79, $4,351; FY 81, $1,680; and preconstruction planning costs: FY 80, $5,686 and FY 81, $1,471. 12. Includes $69,145 refund to local interests. 13. Adjusted by $6,361 to reflect actual costs. 14. Includes $44,484 for previous projects. 15. Includes $284,557 for previous projects. 16. Includes $4,625,614 for new work on previous projects. 17. Includes $602,614 for previous projects. 18. Includes refunds to local interests: FY 78, $92,374; FY 79, $8,000; FY 80, $14,007; FY 81, $1,847; FY 82, $2,823; FY 85, $60,000. 19. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 93, $10,000; FY 94, $5,000 and preconstruction planning and construction funds: FY 95, $40,000. 20. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 93, $5,601; FY 94, $9,399 and preconstruction planning and construction costs: FY 95, $25,637. 21. All contributed funds and costs thru FY 95 are for construction. 6-26 su, , s s ..- ,,. _ .. _s_ _ _ . -- -- WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT TABLE 6-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 22. Includes maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 23. Includes maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 24. Includes refunds to local interests: FY 83, $400,000; FY 84, $128,345; FY 85, $82,600. 25. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 91, $40,000; FY 93, $25,000; and preconstruction planning and construction funds: FY 94, $1,000 and FY 95, $19,000. 26. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 91, $5,385; FY 92, $27,643; FY 93, $7,562; and preconstruction planning and construction costs: FY 93, $725; FY 94, $24,646 and FY 95, $17,806. 27. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 93, $25,000 and FY 94, $20,000; and preconstruction planning and construction funds: FY 95, $43,200. 28. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 93, $20,077 and FY 94, $19,877; and preconstruction planning and construction costs: FY 95, $42,439. 29. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 84, $42,500; FY 85, $25,000; FY 86, $20,000; FY 87, $85,000; FY 88, $67,000; FY 89, $17,000; and preconstruction planning and construction funds: FY 90, $125,000; FY 91, $119,000; FY 93, $15,000; FY 94, $29,000; and FY 95, -$14,000. 30. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 84, $32,715; FY 85, $18,492; FY 86, $31,355; FY 87, $67,544; FY 88, $86,581; FY 89, $17,876 and FY 90, $1,937; and preconstruction planning and construction costs: FY 91, $182,981; FY 92, $30,495; FY 93, $7,138; FY 94, $46,878; and FY 95, $385. 31. All contributed funds and cost thru FY 91 are for preauthorization study. 32. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 93, $10,000; FY 94, $5,000; and preconstruction planning and construction funds: FY 95, $40,000. 33. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 93, $5,601; FY 94, $9,300; and preconstruction planning and construction costs: FY 95, $25,637. 34. Includes preauthorization study funds: FY 93, $25,000; FY 94, $20,000; and preconstruction planning and construction funds: FY 95, $251,000. 35. Includes preauthorization study costs: FY 93, $15,368; FY 94, $29,539; and preconstruction planning and construction costs: FY 95, $244,007. 36. Includes $61,585 refund to local interests. 37. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 74, $4,000; FY 75, $5,500; FY 76 & 76 T, $3,600; FY 77, $5,800; FY 78, $7,200; FY 79, $8,000; FY 80, $10,000; FY 81, $10,000; FY 82, $11,040; FY 83, $7,000; FY 84, $9,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,200; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 38. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 74, $4,000; FY 75, $4,400; FY 76 & 76T, $4,666; FY 77, $5,193; FY 78, $6,824; FY 79, $7,506; FY 80, $11,312; FY 81, $9,688; FY 82, $9,727; FY 83, $7,000; FY 84, $8,444; FY 85, $2,379; and maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,200; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 39. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 74, $35,000; FY 76 & 76T, $48,000; FY 77, $51,400; FY 78, $115,100; FY 79, $63,000; FY 80, $60,000; FY 81, $80,000; FY 82, $67,160; FY 83, $77,759; FY 84, $73,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 79, $167,646; FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 40. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 75, $35,000; FY 76 & 76T, $13,606; FY 77, $85,692; FY 78, $114,604; FY 79, $1,120; FY 80, $118,718; FY 81, $83,760; FY 82, $67,160; FY 83, $77,759; FY 84, $67,850; FY 85, $5,149; and maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 79, $167,350; FY 80, $296; FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 41. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees funds: FY 75, $47,000; FY 78, $40,400; FY 79, $22,000; FY 80, $25,000; FY 81, $20,000; FY 82, $20,240; FY 83, $21,000; FY 84, $19,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams funds: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 42. Includes Special Recreation Use Fees costs: FY 75, $13,741; FY 76 & 76T, $31,666; FY 77, $1,593; FY 78, $39,771; FY 79, $22,629; FY 80, $24,619; FY 81, $20,381; FY 82, $20,240; FY 83, $21,000; FY 84, $19,000; and maintenance and operation of Dams costs: FY 87, $66,678; FY 88, $75,000; FY 89, $73,000; FY 90, $54,000; FY 91, $97,200; FY 92, $79,000; FY 93, $80,300; FY 94, $67,800; FY 95, $153,900. 43. Includes planning and design analysis funds: FY 96, $20,000; and construction implementation funds: FY 96, $43,000. 44. Includes planning and design analysis cost: FY 96, $9,296; and construction implementation cost: FY 96, $2,005. 6-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 6-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA., and ST. JOHNS RIVER, FLA. (See Section 3 of text) July 25, 1912 July 25, 1912 August 8, 1917 July 18, 1918 January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 March 4,19332 June 26, 19343 August 26, 1937 August 26, 1937 June 20, 1938 June 20, 1938 March 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 September 3, 1954 November 29, 1963, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 April 7, 1966, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 Original route of the Norfolk-Beaufort Inlet section. Purchase of canal. Change in route; following changes approved by Secretary of War, April 14, 1919: Albemarle Sound-Pamlico Sound section: Changed from "Alligator River-Rose Bay route" to "Alligator River- Pungo River route." Pamlico Sound-Neuse River section: Changed from "Pamlico Sound-Brant Shoal Neuse River route" to "Goose Creek-Bay River route." Alligator River-Pungo route (proposed land cut connecting the rivers): Changed from a straight line to a bent line approaching nearer town of Fairfield, N. C. A 12-foot channel 90 feet wide from Beaufort to Cape Fear River, N. C., including highway bridge and tidal lock. 4 An 8-foot channel 75 feet wide from Cape Fear River to Winyah Bay, S. C. Construct a suitable bridge near Fairfield, N. C. Operating and care of works of improvements provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Increasing dimensions of waterway to 12 feet deep and 90 feet wide. A 12-foot side channel 90 feet wide to Swansboro. A yacht basin near Southport, 12 feet deep, 230 feet wide, and 450 feet long, with connecting channel. A 6-foot channel 90 feet wide from New River Inlet to Inland Waterway. Six mooring basins. 6 A 12-foot channel in New River. 6, 11 Vicinity of Fairfield - drainage. Masonboro Inlet and connecting channels, including jetties at the inlet.7 A 12-foot channel and basin in Peltier Creek .8 A 6-foot channel 90 feet wide from Intracoastal Waterway to Bogue Inlet gorge. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide through New Topsail Inlet, thence a 7-foot channel 80 feet wide to Intracoastal Waterway by way of Old Topsail Creek; and a 7-foot channel 80 feet wide in Banks Channel from New Topsail Inlet, paralleling barrier beach, to Intracoastal Waterway. H.D. 391, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H.D.589, 62d Cong., 2d sess. H.D. 1478,63d Cong., 3d sess. and H. D. 1136, 64th Cong., 1st sess.' Approved by Secretary of War, May 15, 1919. H.D. 450,69th Cong., I1st sess. H.D. 41, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 6, 75th Cong., 1st sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 75th Cong., 1st sess.' H.D. 549, 75th Cong., 3d sess. 1 H.D. 691, 75th Cong., 3d sess.' H.D. 660, 76th Cong., 3d sess.' H.D. 421, 80th Cong., 1st sess.' H.D. 723, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H.D. 341, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' H.D. 379, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' Detailed Project Report April 1963. Detailed Project Report July 1965 6-28 WILMINGTON, N. C. , DISTRICT TABLE 6-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents November 7, 1966 November 7, 1966 December 31, 1970 October 22, 1976 August 13, 1968 February 18, 1982, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 September 7, 1983, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 November 17, 1986 July 3, 1930 October 17, 1940 February 7, 1967, Sec. 107 July 14, 1960 August 30, 19359 August 26, 1937 March 2, 1945 March 2, 1945 Maintenance of a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and 8,000 feet long, from the through channel of the waterway to and including a basin of the same depth, 130 feet wide and 180 feet long at Carolina Beach. Maintenance of general navigation features of N.C. State Ports Authority Small Boat Harbor at Southport. Replacement of Federally-owned and operated highway bridges at Coinjock, Fairfield, Wilkerson Creek, Hobucken and Core Creek. Modification of terms of local cooperation to allow for full Federal funding of Wilkerson Creek and Coinjock Bridges. Mitigation of damages caused by north jetty at Masonboro Inlet. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide through Carolina Beach Inlet to the Intracoastal Waterway. An 8-foot channel 150 feet wide from the gorge in Bogue Inlet through the ocean bar. Modification of terms of local cooperation to allow for full Federal funding of Core Creek, Hobucken and Fairfield Bridges. SILVER LAKE HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 16 of text) Entrance channel, 5 feet deep and 50 feet wide, from Pamlico Sound to the 3-foot contour in the lake, and training wall at entrance. Channel, 10 feet deep, and anchorage basin of same depth, 100 feet wide across Big Foot Slough and 60 feet wide in entrance. Basin depth of 12 feet in Silver Lake harbor; channels 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide, in Teaches Hole and Big Foot Slough Channels and across Bluff Shoal; entrance channel, same depth, 60 feet wide; and training wall on south side of entrance channel. WATERWAY CONNECTING PAMLICO SOUND AND BEAUFORT HARBOR, N. C. (See Section 18 of text) A 7-foot channel 75 feet wide from Pamlico Sound to Beaufort Harbor via Wainright Channel. A 7-foot channel 75 feet wide to Atlantic. Channels, 7 feet deep, 75 feet wide, at east and west ends of Harkers Island and side channel 5 feet deep, 75 feet wide, with basin 150 by 130 feet, same depth, at Davis. A 7-foot side channel 75 feet wide, with basin 200 feet by 500 feet, same depth, at Sealevel. H.D. 515, 89th Cong., 2d sess. 1 H.D. 514, 89th Cong., 2d sess.1 H.D. 142, 92nd Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 597, 94th Cong., 2d sess. Approved by OCE Oct. 2, 1980 Detailed Project Report June 1980 Detailed Project Report May 1983 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 325, 76th Cong., 1st sess.' Detailed Project Report July 9, 1965 H.D. 485, 72d Cong., 2d sess. 1 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 92, 74th Cong., 2d sess.' H.D. 99, 77th Cong., I1st sess. 1 S.D. 247, 77th Cong., 2d sess.' 6-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 6-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 A 6-foot side channel 60 feet wide, with basin 100 feet by H.D. 68, 81st Cong., 1st sess.' about 600 feet, same depth, at Marshallberg. July 11, 1963, A side channel 7 feet deep, 70 feet wide to local harbor at Detailed Project Report Sec. 107 Cedar Island and an access channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet Dec. 12, 1962 July 14, 1960 wide and about 400 feet long to a basin same depth, 60 by 100 feet. September 22, 1967, An entrance channel 6 feet deep, 60 feet wide, from Back Detailed Project Report Sec. 107 Sound to harbor of refuge 120 by 250 feet, same depth, at March 13, 1967 July 14, 1960 west end of Harkers Island in Brook Creek. February 17, 1969, A channel 7 feet deep, 70 feet wide, from existing side Detailed Project Report Sec. 107 channel at Atlantic to a basin 600 by 180 feet, same depth, Dec. 21, 1967 July 14, 1960 with a breakwater, between mouth of Little Port Brook and White Point. April 3, 1975, Deepening the existing 5-foot channel and basin at Davis Detailed Project Report Sec. 107 to 7 feet. Feb. 8, 1974 July 14, 196010 1. Contains latest published maps. 2. Public Law No. 443, 72d Cong. 3. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 4. Tidal lock in land cut between Myrtle Sound and Cape Fear River, deauthorized September 23, 1986, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 5. Deauthorized August 5, 1977, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 6. A 12-foot by 90-foot channel in New River from Intracoastal Waterway to and including a basin at Jacksonville, N. C. 7. Jetties on each side of Masonboro Inlet. 8. A 6-foot by 50-foot channel provided under Section 3, River and Harbor Act of March 2, 1945; 12-foot by 90-foot project deauthorized November 17, 1986, under authority of Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. 9. Included in the Public Works Administration Program, Jan. 3, 1934. 10. Deauthorized by the Chief of Engineers March 31, 1982. 11. Deauthorized January 1, 1990, under authority of Sec. 1001(b)(1), PL 99-662. 6-30 WILMINGTON, N. C. , DISTRICT TABLE 6-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1997 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report for Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control' (R & H Act of 1958 and 1962) Bay River, N. C.' Black River, N. C. Cashie River, N. C. Channel Connecting Thoroughfare Bay with Cedar Bay, N. C.' Chowan River, N. C. Contentnea Creek, N. C.' Edenton Harbor, N. C.' Fishing Creek, N. C.' Knobb's Creek, N. C. 1,2 Mackay Creek, N. C.' Neuse River, N. C.' Newbegun Creek, N. C. Northeast Cape Fear River, N. C.' Oracoke Inlet, N. C. Pamlico and Tar Rivers, N.C.' Pembroke Creek, N. C. Perquimans River, N. C.' Roanoke River, N.C.' Scuppernong River, N. C.' Smith's Creek (Pamlico County), N. C.' Smiths Creek (Wilmington), N. C.' South River, N. C.' Swift Creek, N. C.' Trent River, N. C.'' ,4 Wallace Channel, Pamlico Sound, N. C. Waterway - Norfolk, Va. to Sounds of N. C. Wrights Creek, N. C.' 1. Completed. 2. Transferred from Norfolk District (FY 1970); Meherrin River, N. C., transferred to Norfolk District. 3. Report of Norfolk District. 4. 8-foot modification deauthorized August 5, 1977, under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 5. Includes $1,959 refund to local interests on Dawson Creek, N. C. 6-31 1969 1950 1969 1950 1975 1950 1941 1960 1922 19613 19383 1982 19283 1950 1991 1996 1976 19103 1996 1950 1989 1950 1936 1940 1968 1965 1976 1984 70,664 44,382 12,358 40,403 69,610 64,395 73,750 22,715 80,500 13,375 477,2235 4,802 10,688 346,240 674,651 60,000 13,750 401,584 81,164 113,273 8,507 12,452 1,600 115,199 132,834 751,196 68,325 49,627 124,846 15,905 25,615 32,247 47,642 8,633 48,969 6,273 342,090 247 61,139 946,665 1,201,550 414 704,009 87,282 52,945 18 23,686 5,422 143,579 85,299 2,893,812 166,602 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 6-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Septemmber 30, 1997 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Fort Macon Park, N. C.' 1973 620,000 1. Uncompleted portion of project was deauthorized November 17, 1986, under authority of Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. 6-32 WILMINGTON, N. C. , DISTRICT TABLE 6-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 1987 1984 1994 1972 Project Ararat River, Mount Airy, N. C.' Black River, Harnett County, N. C.' Blackberry Creek, Henry Country, Va.' Broad Creek, Beaufort County, N. C. 1 Brunswick County Beaches, N. C. (Cape Fear to North Carolina - South Carolina State Line)'o Conetoe Creek, N. C.1 Contentnea Creek, N. C.1 Core Creek, N. C. 1 Dan River, Madison Wastewater Treatment Plant, N. C. 1 Deep Creek, Edgecombe County, N. C.1 Ellerbe Creek, Durham County, N. C.' Ellis Swamp, Gates County, N. C.' Filberts Creek, N. C.1 Gapway Swamp, N. C. & S. C.' ,9 Gardners Creek, N. C. 1 Genoa Sewer Facility, Wayne County, N. C.' Goldsboro, Neuse River, N. C. Joyce Creek, Camden County, N. C. 1 Leesville, Va.' Leith's Creek, Scotland County, N. C."111 Lick Run, Roanoke, Va.' Little Rockfish Creek, Hope Mills, N. C. 1 Little Sugar Creek, Charlotte, N. C.' 9 Neuse River, Oriental, N. C. New River, N. C. 1 New River, Onslow County, N. C.' Northeast Cape Fear River, N. C.' Old Field Swamp, N. C.' 9 Pantego Creek and Cucklers Creek, N. C. Pasquotank River, N. C. Perquimans River, N. C. 1 Pungo Creek, N. C. 1 Pungo River, N. C.1 Randleman Lake, N.C. Reddies River Lake, N. C.11 Roaring River Lake, N. C." Simmons Bay, N. C. 9 South Creek, N. C. 1 Stuart, Va.' Swift Creek, Pitt and Craven Counties, N. C.' Tar River, N. C. Tar River, N. C. 1 Tar River and tributaries, N. C.1 Tar River, Princeville, N. C. Thomasville (Walnut Street), N.C.' Trent River, N. C.1' Waccamaw River & Seven Creeks, N. C. & S. C. 19 White Oak Dike, Bladen and Pender Counties, N.C.' 1. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under special continuing authority. 2. Includes $17,356 refund to local interests. 3. Adjusted to reflect actual cost. 4. Includes $116,508 refund to local interests. 5. Includes $1,519 refund to local interests. 6. Includes $387 refund to local interests. 6-33 6-33 7. Includes $338 refund to local interests. 8. Adjusted $3,000 to include preauthorization cost prior to FY 1960. 9. Transferred from Charleston District, FY 1980. 10. Reclassified to inactive category February 3, 1976. 11. Transferred from Charleston District, FY 1984. 12. Includes $1,057 refund to local interests. For Last Cost to September 30. 1997 Full Report See Annual Operation and Report For Construction Maintenance 1976 1960 1939-1943 & 1958 1965 1989 1984 1963 1971 1970 1969 1972 1985 1984 1984 1989 1982 1974 1978 1979 1992 1950 & 1956 1972 1961 1969 1963 1960 1961 1972 1971 1994 1980 1978 1963 1971 1989 1966 1964 1947 1943 1967 1996 1953 1961 1963 4,901,854 475,574 22,870 283,846 572,1144 29,867 50,889 236,2238 175,315 394,055 223,413 138,1175 37,7773 374,005 54,5977 167,800 50,430 606,18912 367,755 430,951 1,280,317 113,657 763,022 370,446 51,896 580,977 95,873 86,600 517,948 80,931 6,366 582,270 296,6022,3 4,786,088 985,800 370,000 186,435 194,3676 2,220,440 611,096 81,266 18,624 22,660 390,249 59,919 64,769 67,821 214,286 - - - - 623,687 61,473 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 6-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Report Date Funds Funds Project For Deauthorized Expended Expended Adkin Branch, N. C. AIWW - Mooring Basins AIWW - New River Onslow County, N. C. AIWW - Peltier Creek, N. C. 12-foot project AIWW - Tidal Lock in Snows Cut Bodie Island, N. C. Brunswick County Beaches - Long Beach Portion, N. C. - Berm Cape Lookout, N. C. Conoho Creek, N. C. Contentnea Creek, N. C. Davis, N. C. Fort Macon State Park, N. C., Remaining Work Harbor of Refuge, Cape Lookout, N. C. Hominy Swamp, N. C. Howards Mill Lake, N.C. Hyde County Dike, N. C. MacKay Creek, N.C. Mann's Harbor, N. C. Mill Creek, N. C. Mocassin Swamp, N. C. Morehead City Harbor, N. C. Jetties at Beaufort Inlet Moyock Creek, N. C. Nahunta Swamp, N. C. Neuse River, N. C. Neuse River Barrier, N. C. Neuse River, 300 ft.-wide channel in front of New Bern, N. C. North River Dike, N. C. Ocracoke Inlet Jetty, N. C. Ocracoke Island, N. C. Roanoke River, 50 mile long Channel from Palmyra Landing to Weldon, N. C. Rockfish Creek, N. C. Scuppernong River, N. C. Six Runs Creek, N. C. Sweetwater Creek, N. C. Thoroughfare Swamp, N. C. Topsail Beach and Surf City, N. C. Tranters Creek, N. C. Trent River, Basins and Access Channels at New Bern, N. C. Wilmington Harbor Widening and DeeveninE. N. C. 1. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 12, PL 93-251. 2. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 205 of the 1948 FC Act, as amended. 3. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. 4. Deauthorized pursuant to the continuing authority provided the Chief of Engineers under Sec. 107 of the R&H Act of 1960, as amended. 5. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 1002, PL 99-662. 6. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 1001(b)(1), PL 99- 662. 7. Cost-to-date included in remaining authorized portion of project (Engineering and Design only). 8. Deauthorized under authority of Sec. 1001(b)(2), PL 99-662. 6-34 1982 219,477 None 1990 None None None 1990 None 1974 1972 1982 1973 1934 1973 1980 None 1976 1973 1973 1973 1986 1973 1973 None None None None 1986 1975 1983 1976 1987 1971 1973 1976 None 1974 None 1990 8 Sept. 812 5 Aug. 771 1 Jan. 906 17 Nov. 865 23 Sept. 861 5 Aug. 771 1 Jan. 906 5 Aug. 771 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 783 31 Mar. 824 17 Nov. 865 1 Nov. 811 31 Mar. 782 9 Jul. 958 5 Aug. 771 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 784 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 17 Nov. 865 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 784 5 Aug. 771 5 Aug. 771 5 Aug. 771 17 Nov. 865 17 Nov. 865 17 Nov. 865 31 Mar. 782 20 Apr. 882 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 31 Mar. 782 5 Aug. 771 11 Jan. 852 5 Aug. 771 1 Jan. 906 79,782 4,250 25,419 1,396,653 107,472 698,400 130,900 7,265 116,395 36,680 64,416 65,673 30,911 129,592 157,721 234, 032 64,977 64,584 132,767 139,339 -'r- of WILMINGTON, N. C. , DISTRICT TABLE 6-H Project RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Date Survey Conducted Avon Harbor, N.C. Beaufort Harbor, N.C. Channel from Back Sound to Lookout Bight, N.C. Far Creek, N.C. Rollinson Channel, N.C. Silver Lake Harbor, N.C. Stumpy Point Bay, N.C. Waterway connecting Pamlico Sound and Beaufort Harbor, N.C. Waterway connecting Swanquarter Bay with Deep Bay, N.C. August 1997 September 1997 April 1997 October 1996 March 1997 May 1997 October 1996 April 1997 November 1996 NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization) TABLE 6-I Study Identification Fiscal Period Cost Harkers Island, Carteret County, N.C. 36,023 Morehead City Harbor, Pine Knoll Shores, N.C.' 32,492 Morehead City Harbor, West Turning Basin, N.C. 16,005 Walter Slough, Dare County, N.C. 6,017 1. Sec. 111 Project. 6-35 v v TABLE 6-J DAMS AND RESERVOIRS See Miles Height Reservoir Power Estimated Section Project Name Nearest City River Above of Type Capacity Development Construc- Cost Lands Total in Text Mouth Dam (Ft) (acre-feet) (kilowatts) tion and Damages' 22. Cape Fear River Basin, N.C. 29. Neuse River Basin, N.C. B. Everett Jordan' Howards Mill' ' Randleman' Small reservoirs Falls z Wilson Mills Beulahtown Bakers Mills Little Buffalo Buckhorn Wiggins Mill Stantonsburg Great Swamp Black Creek Aycock Swamp Hillsboro Orange Moncure, N.C. Carthage, N.C. Randlenman, N.C. Falls, N.C. Wilson Mills. N.C. Kenly, N.C. Princeton, N.C. Kenly, N.C. Wilson, N.C. Wilson, N.C. Stantonsburg, N.C. Fremont, N.C. Wilson, N.C. Fremont, N.C. Durham, N.C. Durham, N.C. Yadkin River W. Kerr Scott, N.C. Wilkesboro, N.C. Basin, N.C.& S.C. Roanoke River John H. Kerr, Va., and Boydton, Va. Basin, Va. and N.C. N.C. Philpott, Va. ' Bassett, Va. Gaston, Va. and N.C." Roanoke Rapids, N.C. Roanoke Rapids, N.C.7 Roanoke Rapids, N.C. Smith Mountain, Va." Altavista, Va. Leesville, Va." Altavista, Va. Taber, Va. Altavista, Va. Melrose, Va. Bookneal, Va. Randolph, Va. Chase City,Va. Stuart, Va. and N.C. Spray, NC( Schoolfield, Va. and N.C. Danville, Va. Haw Deep Deep Various Neuse Neuse Little Little Little Buffalo Creek Contentnea Creek Contentnea Creek Tisnot Swamp Great Swamp Black Creek Aycock Swamp Eno Little Yadkin-Pee Dee Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke Roanoke 4.3 55.0 85.0 404.0 178.7 336.2 144.9 137.0 314.2 293.7 275.0 262.9 227.8 297.2 226655..99 112 E 106 E 110 E 20 to 70 + E 92 E 81 CG,E 50 E 53 E 51 E 63 E 42 E 36 E 39 E 33 E 37 E 136 E 107 E 148 E 753,500 233,000 108,000 923,000 335,620 201,000 81,000 36,000 13,000 119,000 35,000 48,000 18,000 17,000 7,000 123,000 57,000 153,000 89,186,000 18,874,000 62,300,000 91,334,000 5,749,343 58,414,000 147,600,000" 14,726,000 33,600,00011 61,700,000 124,000,000':' - 38,454,000 91,666,000 183,000,0004 - 13,000,000 - 9,300,000 - 6,600,000 - 1,100,000 - 17,300,000 - 6,700,000 - 5,100,000 - 1,800,000 - 1,509,000 - 550,000 - 8,100,000 - 3,500,000 3,360,657 9,110,000 144 CG,E 2,808,000 204,000 67,529,000 24,521,000 92,050,000' 220 CG" 108 CG,E 75 CG 244 CG 95 CG,E 54 CG 110 CG,E 147 CG,E 138 E 126 CG,E 249,800 432,000 59,300 825,000 76,900 34,000 120,000 350,000 163,000 248,000 14,000 54,000 83,000 41,000 20,000 12,000 43,000 48,000 15,000 80,000 13,933,000 27,000,000 31,300,000 28,000,000 9,100,000 8,000,000 17,700,000 22,100,000 9,000,000 27,800,000 1,157,000 15,090,000 3,500,000 30,500,000 800,000 32,100,000 3,800,000 31,800,000 1,000,000 10,100,000 1,700,000 9,700,000 6,000,000 23,700,000'" 4,700,000 26,800,000 1,100,000 10,100,000 6,400,000 36,000,000 1. Includes highway, railroad, and utility relocations. 2. For details, see individual report. 3. Includes $3,700,000 presently allocated to water supply to be reimbursed in the future by local interests and $44,000 cash contribution for construction of ranger security buildings. 4. Includes $13,637,000 presently allocated to water supply and $21,595,000 recreation and fish and wildlife to be reimbursed in the future by local interests. 5. Exclusive of transmission lines. 6. Construction completed in 1963 by Virginia Electric and Power Co. 7. Based on modified plan developed in fiscal year 1949. Construction completed June 1955 by Virginia Electric and Power Co. 8. Construction completed in February 1966 by Appalachian Power Co. 9. Construction completed in June 1963 by Appalachian Power Co. 10. Includes cost of earth dam on Whipping Creek. 11. Authorizing legislation provided for earth dam; concrete gravity dam constructed. 12. Includes $1,600,000 presently allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife. 13. Includes $74,058,000 presently allocated to water supply, $8,646,000 allocated to recreation and $8,296,000 to flood control to be paid by local intersts during construction. 14. Deauthorized July 1995. Key E ......................... Earth CG ....................... Concrete-Gravity 33. 36. a 0 CI) y a y l1 0z CD r a xS n y a co WILMINGTON, N. C., DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization) TABLE 6-K Study Identification Fiscal Period Cost Adkin Branch, Kinston, N. C. 82,889 Big Foot Creek, Clarkton, N.C. 2,451 Dan River, Halifax County, N.C. 12,045 Great Coharie Creek, N. C. 41,023 Hominy Swamp, Wilson, N. C. 7,3151 Moravian Creek, Wilkesboro, N. C. 26,257 White Marsh, Whiteville, N.C. 8,085 John H. Kerr, Wolftrap Waterfowl Impoundment, Va.2 38,371 Long Beach Restoration of Sea Turtle Habitat, N.C.2 4,792 1. Includes $6,199 contributed funds. 2. Sec. 1135 Project. 6-37 CHARLESTON, S.C., DISTRICT* This district comprises all of South Carolina (except local watersheds draining into the Savannah River). It embraces the drainage basins tributary to the Atlantic Ocean between Little River and Port Royal Sound, except watersheds of Mackey and Skull Creeks, and excluding Hilton Head Island. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Aquatic Plant Control, SC .................... 7-1 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL ........... 7-2 3. Charleston Harbor, SC ..................... 7-2 4. Charleston Harbor Rediversion (FishLift), SC ................. ........... 7-3 5. Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC ............ 7-3 6. Folly River, SC .............................. 7-3 7. Georgetown Harbor, SC ....................... 7-4 8. Little River Inlet, NC and SC ................. 7-4 9. MurrellsInlet, SC ............................ 7-4 10. Port Royal Harbor, SC ........................ 7-5 11. Shipyard River, SC ........................... 7-5 12. Town Creek, SC ............................. 7-5 13. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ........... 7-6 14. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............ 7-6 15. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization...............................7-6 Shore Protection 16. Myrtle Beach, SC ............................ 7-6 17. Other Authorized Shore Protection Projects ....... 7-6 18. Shore Protection Work Under Special Authorization 7-6 Flood Control 19. Inspection of Completed Works ................ 7-7 20. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ......... 7-7 21. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .. 7-7 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, SC Location. The project includes all public waters in the State of South Carolina. Existing Project. The project provides for the control of noxious aquatic plant growths from public waters in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, and public health. Emergency Bank Protection 22. Streambank Erosion Under Special Authorization .. 7-7 23. Indian Bluff, SC .......................... 7-7 24. SC DOT Bridges, SC ......................... 7-7 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 25. Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power ........ 7-8 Miscellaneous 26. Project Modifications For Improvement of Environment ............................... 7-8 27. MurphyIsland, SC ......................... 7-8 General Investigations 28. Active Investigations .......................... 7-8 Tables Table 7-A Cost and Financial Statement .............. 7-9 Table 7-B Authorizing Legislation ................ 7-12 Table 7-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ...... 7-16 Table 7-D Other Authorized Shore Protection Projects .............................. 7-16 Table 7-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........................... . 7-17 Table 7-F Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power .. 7-17 Table 7-G Deauthorized Projects .................. 7-18 Table 7-H Streambank Erosion Under Special Authorization .......................... 7-18 Table 7-I Active General Investigations ............. 7-19 Table 7-J Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .......................... 7-20 Table 7-K Inspection of Completed Works ........... 7-20 *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. Local Cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and contribute 50 percent of the total cost. The South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, Water Resources Division, is designated as the State's lead agency for aquatic plant management and meets local interest requirements. 7-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Operations and results during fiscal year. Aquatic plants now infest approximately 13,500 acres, with the worst infestations occurring in the Cooper River, Lakes Marion, Moultrie and Murray. During FY 97, 4,000 acres of aquatic plants in 17 water bodies were treated with herbicides. Grass carp (4,400) were purchased and stocked in four lakes to control aquatic plants in approximately 300 acres. The total cost of control operations (non-Federal and Federal) in FY 97 was $466,420. The total Federal share of work performed in FY 97 was $6,666. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (CHARLESTON DISTRICT) Location. The project starts near Little River at the North Carolina-South Carolina state line and extends generally south along the coast of South Carolina 62 miles to Winyah Bay; thence 63.5 miles to Charleston; thence 84.5 miles to and including Port Royal Sound; a total of 210 miles. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11513, 11521, 11531, 11534, and 11535.) Previous projects. For further details see page 613 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. The project provides for a waterway twelve feet deep and not less than 90 feet wide with a branch channel of the same dimensions to McClellanville and construction of three bridges crossing the waterway in Horry County, South Carolina. Existing project was completed in 1940; three bridges were completed in 1936. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are rail-water terminals at Georgetown, Charleston and Port Royal and numerous open-pile wharves mostly for shipping agricultural products, fish, oysters, pulpwood, wood products, and petroleum products. Marinas are located at convenient intervals along the waterway where limited supplies and repair facilities are available for both commercial vessels and pleasure craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and recreation requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed by Marinex using a pipeline dredge in the AIWW from Charleston to Port Royal during May 1997 - September 1997, removing 721,134 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $851,335. The cost of operating the Snagboat Snell in the Myrtle Beach Canal area during June 1997 - August 1997 was $266,500. Costs of $408,000 were incurred for contract dike maintenance. Condition and operation studies, natural resource management, project operations management, lands and damages, water control management, planning, engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $922,516. Federal costs for the project 3. CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina about 15 miles south of the midpoint of the coastline, 50 miles southwest of Winyah Bay, SC, and 80 miles northeast of the mouth of Savannah River. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) Previous projects. For further details see page 425 of the Annual Report for 1962; page 1808 of the Annual Report for 1915; page 579 of the Annual Report for 1926; and page 562 of the Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project as authorized by the 1986 Water Resources Development Act provides for deepening of the 35-foot channel to 40 feet (42 feet in the ocean bar and entrance channel) from the 42-foot ocean contour to Goose Creek, a total distance of 27.1 miles, construction of one turning basin, modification of existing turning basins, deepening and modification of the anchorage basin, deepening Shipyard River to 38 feet, and deepening of the Wando River Channel to 40 feet. Existing 40' project was completed in 1996. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully in compliance. Terminal facilities. The SC State Ports Authority owns and operates four public terminals and a grain elevator in Charleston Harbor. These terminals offer more than two miles of berthing space, room enough for seventeen vessels at one time. The Ports Authority operates fifteen custom-built container cranes and a variety of gantry and mobile cranes for breakbulk applications. On the land side, Charleston has extensive interstate and rail connections and is served by over 100 motor carriers. Modern facilities are also at wharves of seven major petroleum companies including storage tank farms. Modern facilities for marine repairs and servicing are available at Detyens Shipyard, located approximately ten miles northeast of Charleston on the Wando River. The Charleston Naval Complex Redevelopment Authority is currently marketing the former naval facilities to private industry and businesses. For further details see Port Series No. 13, 1987, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Accruals in FY 96 were overstated which resulted in adjustments to Federal costs for the project of $-48,635. The non- Federal partner, the South Carolina State Ports Authority, received credit for LERRD's attributable to the project in the amount of $2,996,994. They made the final project reimbursement of $1,966,945 to balance the project cost-sharing requirements. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed (a) by Eastern Dredging Company using a pipeline dredge in the lower harbor during October 1996 - April 1997, removing 1,216,129 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $1,242,430, and (b) by Bean Dredging using a hopper dredge in the entrance channel during March 1997, removing 683,084 cubic yards of material, at a cost were $2,448,351. 7-2 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT of $2,032,468. Costs of $512,712 were incurred for diking activities at Clouter Creek. Condition and operation studies, water control management, natural resource management, project operations management, lands and damages, planning, engineering and design, and supervision and administration costs were $1,165,647. Federal costs for maintenance were $4,953,257. 4. CHARLESTON HARBOR REDIVERSION (FISH LIFT), SC Location. Cooper River is located in Charleston and Berkeley Counties, SC, and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Charleston, SC. (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) All works of improvement are in Berkeley County about 45 miles from Charleston, SC. Existing Project. The completed Cooper River, Charleston Harbor project (See Section 5) resulted in significant reduction in the transfer of blueback herring into the Santee Cooper Lakes. The landlocked striped bass fishery, a major tourist attraction, is dependent on these fish for forage. A model study, completed in March 1992 at CEWES, determined how the turbine discharge could be prevented from overwhelming the attractant flow through the fish lift and how best to improve fish passage. Phase I construction consisted of installation of new wing walls to keep turbulence from the turbines from interfering with the attractant flow to the fish lift entrance. Construction of Phase I was 100% complete in FY 95. Phase IIA work consists of installing adjustable weirs and control equipment on the newly installed concrete wingwalls. Construction will be completed by January 1998. Phase IIB work will consist of installation of three 42 inch siphon pipes, intake structure and outfall structure to increase flow to attract fish. Phase IIB is scheduled for completion in December 1998. Monitoring of the fish lift operation for two years after construction will be required to gather and analyze data to be used to refine the operation of the fish lift and to ensure its effectiveness. Total estimated cost of the project is $4,825,000, all Federal. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. The contract for Phase IIA was awarded to Brantley Construction Company, Inc. on March 15, 1996 (see above existing project write-up for description of phase). Construction payments in FY 97 for Phase IA were $210,605. Model testing for Phase IIB work is underway at the Waterways Experiment Station. Costs for model testing, engineering and design, and supervision and administration were $403,969. Federal costs for the project were $614,574. 5. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC Location. Cooper River is located in Charleston and Berkeley Counties, SC, and empties into the Atlantic Ocean at Charleston (See National Ocean Survey Charts Nos. 11521 and 11524.) Existing project. The major cause of the shoaling problem in Charleston Harbor was the diversion of fresh water from the Santee River through Pinopolis Dam into the salt water of Charleston Harbor, which caused density currents which trapped sediments resulting in a phenomenal rate of deposition. The most practical solution of the shoaling problem was to redivert most of the Santee River waters above Pinopolis Dam back into the lower Santee River through a canal beginning at Lake Moultrie and extending to the Santee River in the vicinity of St. Stephen, South Carolina. The project for Cooper River, as authorized by the 1968 River and Harbor Act, provided that the discharge through the existing Pinopolis Hydroplant be reduced to a flow which would not establish a density current in the harbor. This flow was estimated at 3,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) during the design phase of the project, but after operational tests, this flow is estimated at 4,500 cfs. The excess water impounded in Lake Moultrie is being directed through a new canal above St. Stephen, South Carolina, to enter the Santee River at a point well below the Lake Marion Spillway (Wilson Dam). A new hydroelectric facility was constructed on the new canal at the edge of the swamp adjacent to the Santee River. This plant replaces those features made less effective at Pinopolis through curtailment of flows. The average flow of 11,000 cfs at the new powerplant, plus the 4,500 cfs average release planned for Pinopolis, approximates the historical average flow at Pinopolis. The three generators at the new plant are rated at 28,000 kilowatts each, for a total of 84,000 kilowatts. In the interest of fish and wildlife resources of the area, the project includes a herring lift at the new powerhouse site and a fish hatchery. Construction as initiated March 1977. The power-on-line date was March 1985. The power plant, channels and canals, and attendant work was completed in FY 85. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Design efforts for the modification of the cooling towers are currently underway. The cooling towers were not able to deliver the required cooling capacity after the project came on-line in March 1985. The Corps will bear all lost capacity costs until such time as the facility or its operation can be modified at our expense to eliminate such losses. Relocation of roads and bridges, lands, engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $1,432,918. Maintenance: Funds of $4,044,274 were spent for maintenance of completed work. 6. FOLLY RIVER, SC Location. The project begins in Folly River and Folly Creek north of the Town of Folly Beach and follows a southwesterly course into the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11521.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel, eleven feet deep by 100 feet wide extending from the Stono River one mile through the ocean bar; a channel within Folly River nine feet deep and 80 feet wide, extending three miles 7-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 downstream from U. S. Highway 171 to the confluence of Folly and Stono Rivers; and a channel within Folly Creek nine feet deep by 80 feet wide extending three miles downstream from Highway 171 to the confluence with the Folly River. The existing project was completed in FY 79. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed (a) by the government-owned sidecaster dredge Fry during June 1997 - July 1997, removing 48,000 cubic yards of material, at a cost of, $256,000, and (b) by Marinex using a pipeline dredge in the inside shoals area during April 1997 - May 1997 for a total contract cost of $518,636. The Charleston County Parks and Recreation paid $105,662 and the Federal government paid $412,974 for this work. 52,412 cubic yards of material was placed on the southwest end of the Folly Beach County Park for nourishment efforts and 89,195 cubic yards of material was placed on Skimmer Flats to build a pelican nesting area. Condition and operations studies, planning, engineering and design and supervision and administrative costs were $124,870. Federal costs for the project were $793,844. 7. GEORGETOWN HARBOR, SC Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina 50 miles northeast of Charleston Harbor and 90 miles southwest of the entrance to Cape Fear River, North Carolina. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11532) Previous projects. For further details see page 1806 of Annual Report for 1915; page 549 of Annual Report for 1938; and page 442 of Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorizations provide for a channel 27 feet deep with varying widths of 600 feet to 400 feet from the Atlantic Ocean to and including a turning basin at the U. S. Highway 17 bridge over Sampit River, with a side channel 2,400 feet long and not less than 200 feet wide leading to a turning basin at the upper end of the built-up portion of the city waterfront, a total of 17.9 miles. The project also provides for the continued maintenance to a depth of 18 feet and a width of 400 feet for the bypassed portion of Sampit River opposite the City of Georgetown. The existing project was completed in 1951. The jetties were completed in 1903 - 1904. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities at the Port of Georgetown, suitable for oceangoing vessels, consist of one 500 foot concrete pier with creosote-timber fenders and one 700 foot concrete and steel bulkhead, both of which are backed up by 25 acres of paved area. Since 1984 approximately $8.5 million has been spent on structures and improvements by the SC State Ports Authority and private interests. Other than the 700 foot bulkhead, recent improvements include a 43,000 foot warehouse, salt dome, cement dome, three lumber sheds, plus acquisition of ten additional acres of land. For further details, see Port Series No. 13, 1987, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed by Southern Dredging in the Sampit River and Upper Winyah Bay by pipeline dredge during October 1996 - March 1997, removing 1,768,542 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $2,143,875. Claim costs of $73,579 were paid to Southern Dredging for work performed in FY 94. Water control management, natural resource management, condition and operation studies, project operations management, easement acquisition, planning, engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $605,006. Federal costs for the project were $2,822,460. 8. LITTLE RIVER INLET, NC AND SC Location. The project is located near the North Carolina-South Carolina state line. Little River enters the Atlantic Ocean at Little River Inlet at the state line and affords the only connection between the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway and the ocean along 68 miles of coastline from Shallotte, N. C. to Georgetown, S. C. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11535.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the ocean bar; thence a ten by 90-foot inner channel to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. The entrance channel is stabilized by jetties extending seaward 3,284 feet and 3,830 feet long on the east and west sides of the inlet, respectively. The project was completed in FY 84. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully in compliance. Terminal facilities. There are eight marinas, numerous private docks, and several public boat ramps located in or near Little River. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies, water control management, and supervision and administration costs were $37,110. 9. MURRELLS INLET, SC Location. The project is located on the coast of South Carolina, in Georgetown County, about 13 miles southwest of the City of Myrtle Beach. The inlet is the ocean entrance through a barrier beach to several tidal streams in the Murrells Inlet-Garden City estuarine area. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11535.) Existing project. The project provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the seaward bar; thence a ten 7-4 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT by 90-foot inner channel to a turning basin at the old Army crashboat dock. The entrance channel is stabilized by ocean jetties extending seaward 3,445 feet and 3,319 feet on the north and south sides of the inlet, respectively. The recreational project includes a walkway on the south jetty with access road and parking area. The existing project was completed in 1981. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully in compliance. Terminal facilities. There are five marinas and numerous private docks located about the Murrells Inlet Harbor. There are several public boat ramps in the area. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Condition and operations studies, water control management costs, mapping, and supervision and administration costs were $87,942. 10. PORT ROYAL HARBOR, SC Location. The harbor is located on the coast of South Carolina 57 miles southwest of Charleston Harbor and 23 miles northeast of the mouth of the Savannah River. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11516.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel from the ocean through Port Royal Sound to Port Royal, South Carolina, 27 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar and in Port Royal Sound for approximately 12.8 miles, thence 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Beaufort River and Battery Creek for approximately 8.8 miles to and including a turning basin 27 feet deep and 600 feet wide opposite the wharf of the South Carolina State Ports Authority. The existing project was completed in 1959. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Facilities include one 565 foot concrete wharf and one 50 ton gantry crane. Since the late 1980's improvements to the port facilities consist of two large cargo tanks for storage of clay, a freezer for exports, additional warehouse space and the dock has been reinforced. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Condition and operation studies, water control management, project operations, natural resource management, planning, engineering and design, and supervision and administration costs were $119,173. 11. SHIPYARD RIVER, SC Location. This waterway is a tidal tributary of Charleston Harbor, South Carolina. It has its source about one-half mile below the U. S. Naval Base, whence it flows southerly about one and onehalf miles and empties into the Cooper River, about three-fourths miles above Drum Island. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11524.) Previous projects. For details, see page 610 of Annual Report for 1932 and page 463 of Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 30 feet deep from Cooper River to MacAlloy Corporation's plant, including two turning basins, one opposite Chevron USA Products Company and another at the upper end of the project. The 1986 Water Resources Development Act authorized deepening to 38 feet and enlarging the lower turning basin to 1000 ft. as part of the Charleston Harbor, SC improvement. The existing project was completed in 1951. New work dredging was accomplished in 1989 and 1996 under the Charleston Harbor, SC improvement. The entrance channel and the lower turning basin have been deepened to 38 feet. Cost for that work is reflected in the cost for the Charleston Harbor improvement. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Located in the lower three-quarters of a mile of the channel are wharves operated by the Chevron USA Products Company and the Shipyard River Coal Terminal Company. These wharves accommodate deep-draft, oceangoing vessels for handling petroleum products, coal and miscellaneous dry bulk materials. Located mid-channel are Salmons Dredging Corporation, Detyens Shipyard, and Pre-Stress Concrete Company. Situated in the upper channel is MacAlloy Corporation's wharf used for handling ores. For further details see Port Series No. 13, 1987, Corps of Engineers. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: See new work write-up under the Charleston Harbor improvement, page 7-3. Accruals in FY 96 were overstated which resulted in adjustments to Federal costs for the project of $-29,521. Maintenance: Water control management, project operations management, planning, engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $38,107. Federal costs for the project were $8,586. 12. TOWN CREEK, SC Location. Town Creek Channel begins at the AIWW directly south of the Town of McClellanville in Charleston County, SC. The channel follows Five Fathom Creek in a southerly direction to the Atlantic Ocean. (See National Ocean Survey Chart No. 11531.) Existing project. The project provides a channel ten feet deep by 80 feet wide from the AIWW to the mouth of Five Fathom Creek, a distance of 6.2 miles. The project includes an entrance channel twelve feet deep by 100 feet wide across the ocean bar, a distance of 4.0 miles. The existing project was completed in 1975. 7-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 In 1989, Hurricane Hugo breached Sandy Point and created a new inlet to the ocean. This inlet continued to increase in size and was being used by local traffic to get to the Atlantic Ocean. In 1997, the district requested authority to maintain this new inlet in lieu of the existing authorized channel. Our request to abandon the existing Town Creek channel alignment and establish the Clark's Creek channel alignment was approved by headquarters. The proposed channel relocation, due to natural occurrences, is within the scope of the project authorization. The authorized project dimensions of 12 feet deep by 100 feet wide shall be maintained as appropriate. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements fully satisfied. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance dredging was performed by the government-owned sidecaster dredges Schweizer and Fry during June 1997 - September 1997, removing 38,507 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $517,200. Condition and operations studies, water control management, project operations, natural resource management, planning, engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $50,204. Federal costs for the project were $567,404. 13. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Costs of $19,092 were incurred for a survey of the Ashley River conducted during September 1997. 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 7-C.) 15. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (Preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were Calabash Creek, NC, $28,939 and Coordination Account activities, $4,945. Snagging and Clearing for Navigation (Section 3, Public Law 79-14.) No costs incurred. Shore Protection 16. MYRTLE BEACH, SC Location. Myrtle Beach is located along the northern coast of SC. The area is commonly referred to as the Grand Strand. The Grand Strand extends from Little River Inlet at the NC border, in a southerly direction, to Murrells Inlet, SC for a total distance of approximately 37 miles. This project includes the developed area along the coast of Horry County, SC and a portion of the coastal area of Georgetown County, SC. Major municipalities in the project area include the cities of Myrtle Beach and North Myrtle Beach, Garden City, and the Town of Surfside Beach. Existing project. The plan of improvement would place about 5.1 million cubic yards of sand over a total project reach of 25.4 miles of beach encompassing three separable reaches. This material will come from offshore borrow sites. Periodic nourishment will be required once every 8 to 10 years throughout the project life of 50 years. All work is programmed. Estimated cost (October 1995 price levels) of initial construction is $35,188,000 Federal and $18,947,000 non-Federal for a total of $54,135,000. Estimated cost of periodic nourishment is $105,347,000 Federal and $56,725,000 non-Federal for a total project cost of $216,207,000. Sand placement on the North Myrtle Beach reach was completed in May 1997. Sand placement on the Myrtle Beach reach is 39% complete; completion is scheduled for January 1998. Real estate acquisition on the Garden City/Surfside reach is underway; the construction contract is scheduled for award in April 1998 and will be completed in November 1998. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 7-8 of the FY 1995 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Sand placement was performed by Great Lakes Dredge and Dock along North Myrtle Beach by hopper dredge during October 1996 - May 1997, placing 2,400,000 cubic yards of material, at a cost of $14,294,035. Federal share of contract payments was $9,482,039. Fencing costs for the North Myrtle Beach reach were $184,205. The construction contract for the Myrtle Beach reach was awarded on January 10, 1997 to Great Lakes Dredge and Dock of Oak Brook, IL. Physical construction began on April 8, 1997. Approximately 871,400 cubic yards of sand were placed by pipeline dredge during April 1997 - September 1997 at a cost of $5,546,567. Federal share of contract payments was $3,674,991. Review of local sponsor acquisitions, engineering and design and supervision and administration costs were $1,453,184. Federal costs for the project were $14,794,419. 17. OTHER AUTHORIZED SHORE PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Table 7-D.) 18. SHORE PROTECTION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Shore Protection Activities Pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization) consisted of Arcadian Shores, SC, $50,255. 7-6 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT Flood Control No costs were incurred in FY 97. 19. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to maintain and operate local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. Inspections were made to determine extent of compliance and responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation on local flood protection works when appropriate. Cost for the period was $26,345. For project inspection data see Table 7-K. 20. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 7-E.) 21. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended (Preauthorization). (See Table 7-J) Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting and Rescue Work (Public Law 84-99, and Antecedent Legislation). No costs incurred Federal costs for FY 97 were $301,452 for Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies and $135,564 for the National Emergency Preparedness Program. Emergency Work for Others. Spring Floods ............................... $27,500 Contract Preparedness - Ice .................... $11,000 Emergency Bank Protection 22. STREAMBANK EROSION UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Activities Pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 79-526 as amended (Preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were Castle Pinckney, SC, $4,625; and Coordination Account, $12,091. (See Table 7-H for previous projects in this category.) Snagging and Clearing of Navigable Streams and Tributaries in Interest of Flood Control, Section 208, Public Law 83-780. 23. INDIAN BLUFF, SC Location. Indian Bluff is located adjacent to Lake Marion approximately 9 miles northwest of Eutawville near SC Hwy 6. Existing project. Indian Bluff is a park maintained by Orangeburg County, SC under lease from the SC Public Service Authority. The 42 acre park consists of a restroom facility, picnic areas, small beachfront, 144 linear foot fishing pier, and elevated nature walk. One access road leads into the park. This is the only means of ingress and egress. Approximately 110 linear feet of this road was being threatened from wind generated waves from Lake Marion. The pier, constructed in 1990 at a cost of $80,000, was also in danger of being rendered inaccessible due to the erosion. The project consisted of placement of 2,152 tons of riprap and 663 tons of bedding over geotextile fabric along a distance of approximately 1,113 linear feet. Minor clearing and snagging and shaping of the bank was also accomplished. The existing project was completed in 1997. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations, and alterations required for construction and future maintenance of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide during the period of construction, a cash contribution of 5 percent of the total project costs; if the value of allowable contributions represents less than 25 percent of the total project costs, the local project sponsor shall provide, during the period of construction, an additional cash contribution in the amount necessary to make its total contribution equal to 25 percent of the total project costs; and operate and maintain the project after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Army. The non-Federal partner is Orangeburg County. Operations and results during fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded on August 27, 1996 to Herve Cody of Robbinsville, NC. Contractor mobilized on January 20, 1997 and completed the work on February 5, 1997. Final inspection was conducted on February 6, 1997; project was accepted by the sponsor on October 22, 1997. Total contract payments were $121,841 and the Federal share of contract costs was $91,381. Other costs totaled $3,395. Total Federal costs for FY 97 were $94,776. 24. SC DOT BRIDGES, SC Location. This project consists of five sites. The Big Dutchman Creek site is at SC Hwy S-46-962 in central western York County and abuts the northwestern city limits of Rock Hill, SC. The Calabash Branch site is at SC Hwy S-46-414 in north central York County approximately two miles south of Clover, SC. The Glenn Creek site is at SC Hwy S-44-93 on the eastern border of 7-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Spartanburg County approximately nine miles southeast of the city limits of Spartanburg, SC. The Blue Branch site is at SC Hwy S- 11-246 in south western Cherokee County approximately three miles southwest of the city limits of Gaffney, SC. The Branch of Turkey Creek site is at SC Hwy S-29-521 in central western Lancaster County, at the southern city limits of Lancaster, SC. Existing project. The concern at each of these locations is streambank erosion threatening the embankments at the bridge abutments that will result in failure of the bridge approaches, rendering the access route unusable. The project consisted of shaping existing embankments, placing a geotextile fabric, and overlaying with a double layer mat that was injected with mortar to form a 6" thick articulated blanket. The existing project was constructed in 1997; awaiting final results of concrete tests. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations, and alterations required for construction and future maintenance of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide during the period of construction, a cash contribution of 5 percent of the total project costs; if the value of allowable contributions represents less than 25 percent of the total project costs, the local project sponsor shall provide, during the period of construction, an additional cash contribution in the amount necessary to make its total contribution equal to 25 percent of the total project costs; and operate and maintain the project after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Army. The non-Federal partner is the SC Department of Transportation. Operations and results during fiscal year. The construction contract awarded on September 27, 1996 to Tri-State Consultants of Greensboro, NC. Contractor mobilized on February 18, 1997 and completed the work on August 7, 1997. Final inspection was conducted on September 15, 1997. Total contract payments were $169,950 and the Federal share of contract costs was $127,463. Other costs totaled $9,415. Total Federal costs for FY 97 were $136,878. 25. MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER (See Table 7-F.) Miscellaneous 26. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT Project modifications accomplished under the authority of Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended. Fiscal year costs were Old Dominion Plantation, SC, $56,543; Initial Appraisal Reports, $19,536; and Coordination Account, $4,379. 27. MURPHY ISLAND, SC Location. Murphy Island, Santee Coastal Reserve, is located at the junction of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway and the South Santee River, Charleston County, 35 miles north of Charleston, SC. Existing project. Since construction of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway to its present dimensions in 1940, the salt marsh buffer separating the waterway and the impoundments dikes on Murphy Island has disappeared. Loss of the marsh buffer has allowed spring high tides, storm surge and boat wakes to attack and erode the impoundment dikes. The project consisted of construction of 5,400 feet of setback dike, raising 4,400 feet of the existing dike and installation of seven additional water control structures. The existing project was completed in 1997. (See Table 7-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests were required to provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, utility relocations, andalterations required for construction.. During the period of construction they were required to provide 25 percent of the total project cost paid in cash; maintain and operate the project after completion of construction without cost to the United States; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works, except damages due to the fault of negligence of the United States or its contractors; and comply with Section 601 of the Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Department of Defense Directive 5500.11 issued pursuant thereto and published in Part 300 of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations, in connection with construction, operation, and maintenance of the project. The non-Federal partner is the SC Department of Natural Resources. Operations and results during fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded on September 27, 1996 to Wilco Marsh Buggies, Inc of Harvey, LA. Contractor mobilized on January 30, 1997 and completed the work on June 20, 1997. Final inspection was conducted on June 30, 1997. Total contract payments were $171,718 and the Federal share of contract costs was $136,718. Other costs totaled $39,210. Total Federal costs for FY 97 were $175,928. General Investigations 28. ACTIVE INVESTIGATIONS See Table 7-I which covers: Surveys, Collections, and Study of Basic Data, and Research and Development Activities. 7-8 TABLE 7-A CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. in Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sept. 30, 1997 1 Aquatic Plant Control, SC (Contributed Funds) 2 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, Va. and the St. Johns River, FL 3 Charleston Harbor, SC (Contributed Funds) 4 Charleston Harbor Rediversion (Fish Lift), SC 5 Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC 6 Folly River, SC 7 Georgetown Harbor, SC New Work: Approp. Cost Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 1,695,000 1,500,186 0 0 0 0 1,270,000 1,477,677 0 0 330,000 318,805 0 0 0 6,666 0 0 0 0 10,681,605 10,676,026 52,028 52,028 7,455,378 7,455,378 3,167,000 2,888,000 5,119,000 2,517,000 72,149,668 3,069,567 2,739,077 5,319,569 2,448,351 71,981,370 2,145,000 -360,000 150,000 -56,321 47,395,108 1,903,437 -17,753 158,544 -48,635 47,395,108 3,291,000 4,177,000 3,729,000 4,784,000 130,740,118 3,564,696 4,237,876 3,533,449 4,953,257 130,654,437 530,000 541,134 0 -5,956 0 3,013 575,000 950,000 700,000 546,375 787,387 331,597 0 10,159 -15,152 12,409,848 5 43,624 12,409,848 5 160,000 2,685,000 614,574 2,579,321 0 4,585,000 356,321 203,622,512 778 5,185,203 1,432,918 203,506,683 4,072,000 4,978,000 3,654,000 4,202,000 46,519,513 4,074,487 5,096,380 3,573,977 4,044,274 46,165,090 0 0 0 0 0 0 337,736 337,736 275,000 446,000 243,000 798,000 4,955,999 259,236 447,014 252,125 793,844 4,946,218 0 0 0 0 7,061,755 0 0 0 0 7,061,755 3,286,000 2,828,000 2,533,000 2,690,000 72,585,638 3,241,437 2,848,620 2,423,171 2,822,460 72,533,868 7-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 7-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. in Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sept. 30, 1997 8 Little River Inlet, NC and SC (Contributed Funds) 9 Murrells Inlet, SC (Contributed Funds) 10 Port Royal Harbor, SC 11 Shipyard River, SC 12 Town Creek, SC (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 0 0 52,000 44,305 0 0 39,000 41,293 00 0 0 56,000 46,746 0 0 00 90,000 76,641 33,000 26,648 0 0 0 0 40,000 40,014 717,000 581,500 933,000 723,532 581,609 932,981 0 0 37,000 290,000 755,000 30,901 289,377 726,818 0 0 17,037,428 17,037,428 34,000 2,992,640 37,110 2,983,996 0 0 0 0 1,521,920 1,521,920 15,502,240 15,502,240 84,000 4,115,054 87,942 4,096,397 1,536,893 1,536,893 1,786,100 1,786,100 133,000 13,414,643 119,173 13,399,578 491,974 491,974 5,000 11,218,554 8,586 11,186,569 219,521 219,521 504,000 679,989 396,000 570,000 7,501,286 499,231 692,321 393,924 567,404 7,491,102 00 8,600 8,600 7-10 10 10 TABLE 7-A CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sect. in Total Cost to Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sept. 30, 1997 16 Myrtle Beach, SC New Work: Approp. 0 625,000 1,273,000 15,676,000 20,240,000 11 Cost 0 487,931 1,139,124 14,794,419 19,087,474 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. 0 5,000 1,100,000 7,805,000 8,910,000 12 Cost 0 0 1,093,000 6,687,598 7,780,598 12 23 Indian Bluff, SC New Work: Approp. 0 9,524 117,300 0 126,824 Cost 0 0 30,857 94,776 125,633 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. 0 0 41,350 0 41,350 Cost 0 0 850 40,133 40,983 24 SC DOT Bridges, SC New Work: Approp. 0 8,000 37,923 120,100 166,023 Cost 0 0 27,782 136,878 164,660 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. 0 0 55,344 0 55,344 Cost 0 0 224 49,100 49,324 27 Murphy Island, SC New Work: Approp. 0 0 55,000 176,000 231,000 Cost 0 0 47,352 175,928 223,280 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. 0 0 35,000 11,500 46,500 Cost 0 0 0 42,570 42,570 1 Includes $109,490 for new work for previous projects. 2 Includes $69,422 for maintenance of previous projects. 3 Includes $10,165,564 for previous projects and $751,865 for Preconstruction, Engineering and Design. 4 Includes $401,989 for maintenance of previous projects and $600 for maintenance expended from contributed funds for the existing project. 5 Excludes $2,996,994 credit for LERRD's and $1,966,945 final project reimbursement. 6 Includes $765,000 appropriated and expended in FY 96 under appropriation 96X5125 Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 7 Includes $2,445,852 for new work for previous projects. 8 Includes $114,556 for maintenance of previous projects. 9 Includes $67,000 accomplished under authority of Section 3, P.L. 79-11 incurred through FY 73. 10 Includes $4,150 for new work on previous projects. 11 Includes $2,666,000 for Preconstruction, Engineering and Design. 12 Excludes $1,106,636 credit for LERRD's. 7-11 REPORT ON THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Sect. in Date of Project and Work Text Authorizing Act Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 3, 1925 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 ' Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 18, 1878 Aug. 8, 1917 Jul. 18, 1918 Jan. 21, 1927 1. H.D. 251, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 89-298 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL, SC Provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water-milfoil and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the U.S., in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and state agencies. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA, AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL Channel from Minim Creek to Winyah Bay. Channel from Charleston to a point opposite McClellanville. Branch channel to McClellanville. Extending the channel to Minim Creek, thence through the Esterville-Minim Canal to Winyah Bay. Cut across the Santee Delta at Four Mile Creek. Widening and deepening the waterway from Charleston to Beaufort. A waterway eight feet deep and 75 feet wide from Cape Fear River to Winyah Bay. Construction of bridges across the waterway in Horry County, SC. Cutoff between Ashepoo and Coosaw Rivers. Enlarging the channel from Winyah Bay to Charleston including the branch channel to McClellanville, to depth of ten feet and bottom width of 90 feet. Increasing dimensions of waterway to twelve feet deep and 90 feet wide. Anchorage Basin 125 feet wide, 335 feet long, twelve feet deep, near Myrtle Beach, SC. (Deauthorized by 1986 WRDA) * CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC 2 jetties. Increase in depth to 30 feet with width of 500 feet between the jetties and 1,000 feet seaward thereof. The 40-foot channel to the Naval Base. Act provided that the 40-foot channel should not be undertaken "until the proposed new drydocks at this navy yard, carrying a depth of 40 feet of water over the blocks, has been authorized." This dock was authorized in the Naval Appropriations Act approved July 1, 1918 (40 Stat. L. 725). A 30-foot channel from the sea to Goose Creek via Cooper River, together with a 30-foot channel through Town Creek for commercial purposes. The act also provided that the 40-foot channel be prosecuted only as found necessary for national defense. 7-12 Annual Report, 1889, p. 1184. H.D. 84, 56th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report 1900, p.1908 Annual Report 1903, p. 1133 H.D. 178, 63rd Cong., 1st. sess. H.D. 237, 68th Cong., 1st sess. S.D. 178, 68th Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 41, 71st Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 14, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 129, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc 6, 75th Cong., 1st sess.' H.D. 327, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report 1878, pp. 553-572. H.D. 288, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 1946, 64th Cong., 2nd sess, pt.1, pp. 21-29, 57, 58, and 64-68. H.D. 249, 69th Cong. 1st sess. 2. 3. CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Sect. in Date of Project and Work Text Authorizing Act Authorized Documents Oct. 17, 1940 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 14, 1960 as amended Oct. 22, 1976 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 17, 1991 Aug. 13, 1968 Jul. 14, 1960 as amended Aug. 5, 1886 Jun. 25, 1910 The 35-foot channel depth from the sea to the head of the project via Cooper River and Town Creek, also a channel in Shem Creek to Mount Pleasant, 110 feet wide and ten feet deep, including a turning basin at the upper end. An anchorage area 30 feet deep in the water area between Castle Pinckney and Fort Moultrie.' (Deauthorized by 1986 WRDA) Deepen the 30-foot channel north and east of Drum Island to 35 feet. Shem Creek Channel modified by extending 1,150 feet upstream and downstream from mouth to Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Project authorized for the Phase I design memorandum stage of Advanced Engineering and Design. Deepening 35 foot channel to 40 feet (42 feet in the ocean bar and entrance channel) from the 42 foot ocean contour to Goose Creek, a distance of 27.1 miles, construction of one turning basin, modification of existing turning basins, deepening and modification of the anchorage basin, deepening Shipyard River to 38 feet, maintain the Wando River Channel to 35 feet at Federal expense and the deepening of this channel to 40 feet if economically justified. CHARLESTON HARBOR REDIVERSION (FISH LIFT), SC See Cooper River, Charleston Harbor. Modify the fish lift at the Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, SC (Rediversion Project) and monitor operation of the fish lift for two years following such modifications. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC (ST. STEPHEN PROJECT) Redivert most of the Santee River waters Pinopolis Dam into the lower Santee River through a canal beginning at Lake Moultrie and extending to the Santee River in the vicinity of St. Stephen, South Carolina. FOLLY RIVER, SC Consists of stable all-tide channel nine feet deep and 80 feet wide in Folly River and Folly Creek and an entrance channel at Stono Inlet 100 feet wide and eleven feet deep. GEORGETOWN HARBOR, SC Jetties and earthen dike to protect south jetty. Previous project channel dimensions and training wall. H.D. 259, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 156, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.D. 136, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess.' H.D. 35, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 94-436, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. 99th Cong. 2nd sess., P.L. 96-662 S.D. 88, 90th Cong.,P.L. 90-483 P.L. 102-104 S.D. 88, 90th Cong.,P.L. 90-483 Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Dec. 23, 1977. H. Ex. Doc. 258 48th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report 1885, pp. 1154-1170, and H. Ex. Doc. 117, 50th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report 1889, pp. 1110-1111. H.D. 398, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. and Annual Report 1904, pp. 1591-1605. 7-13 4. 5. 6. 7. REPORT ON THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Sect. in Date of Project and Work Text Authorizing Act Authorized Documents Mar 2. 1945 Auth. by Senate Public Works Comm. and the House Public Works Comm. on Oct. 12, 1972, under auth. of Sec. 201, P.L. 89-298, 1965 FC Act. Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 2, 1945 Auth. by the House Comm. on Public Works on Nov. 10, 1971, and the Senate Comm. on Public Works on Nov 18, 1971, under auth. of Sec. 201, P.L. 89-298, 1965 FC Act. Mar. 7, 1974 10. Sep. 3, 1954 27-foot channel from ocean, including a turning basin in Sampit River. Cutoff and side channel in Sampit River. LITTLE RIVER INLET, NC AND SC 8. H.D. 211, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 21, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 3, P.L. 79-14 H.D. 362, 92nd Cong. H.D. 10203, 93rd Cong., 2nd sess., P.L. 93-251 Provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the ocean bar; thence ten feet by 90-foot inner channel to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Authorized emergency dredging operations as the Chief of Engineers determines necessary to maintain channel depths sufficient to permit free and safe movement of vessels until such time as the authorized project is constructed. MURRELLS INLET, SC Provides for an entrance channel twelve feet by 300 feet across the seaward bar, thence ten by 90-foot inner channel to a turning basin at the old Army crash boat dock. Authorized emergency dredging operations as the Chief of Engineers determines necessary to maintain channel depths sufficient to permit free and safe movement of vessels until such time as the authorized project is constructed. PORT ROYAL HARBOR, SC A channel from the ocean through Port Royal Sound to Port Royal, SC.; 27 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar and in Port Royal Sound for approximately 12.8 miles thence 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Beaufort River and Battery Creek for approximately 8.8 miles to and including a turning basin 27 feet deep and 600 feet wide opposite wharf of the SC State Ports Authority. H.D. 469, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. 7-14 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 Sec. 3, P.L. 79-14 H.D. 137, 92nd Cong. H.D. 10203, 93rd Cong., 2nd sess., P.L. 93-251 9. CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT TABLE 7-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Sect. in Date of Project and Work Text Authorizing Act Authorized Documents 11. Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 3, 1925 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937' Mar. 2, 1945 12. Jul. 14, 1960 as amended 16. Nov. 28, 1990 SHIPYARD RIVER, SC Channel depth of 15 feet and width of 100 feet. Deepenin of channel to 18 feet from deep water in Cooper River upstream 1-1/16 miles. Channel depths of twelve to twenty feet. 28-feet from Cooper River to Gulf Oil Corp's terminal, and the deepening of the channel above that point to twenty feet from the depth of twelve feet previously authorized without local cooperation. Enlargement of the channel to a depth of 30 feet and a width of 200 feet up to the Gulf Oil Corp's terminal, with a turning basin 30 feet deep at the latter point. Extension of the existing 30-foot channel to vicinity of the Pittsburgh Metallurgical Co. Plant, with a turning basin at the upper end. TOWN CREEK, SC An entrance channel twelve feet deep by 100 feet wide across the ocean bar a distance of 4.0 miles and a channel ten feet deep by 80 feet wide from the mouth of Five Fathom Creek to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway, a distance of 6.2 miles. MYRTLE BEACH, SC Storm damage reduction for period nourishment over the 50-year life of the project. S.D. 350, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H.D. 288, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 73th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee Doc. 38, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.D. 93, 79th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 12, 1974. P.L. 101-640, 101st Cong. INDIAN BLUFF, SC 23. Jul. 24, 1946 24. Jul. 24, 1946 27. Nov. 17, 1986 Abate erosion and protect Indian Bluff Park. SC DOT BRIDGES, SC Abate erosion and protect five South Carolina Department of Transportation bridges. MURPHY ISLAND, SC Construct 5,400 feet of setback dikes, raise portions of the existing dike and install seven additional water control structures to enhance water level management. Sec. 14, P.L. 526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 15, 1996. Sec. 14, P.L. 526. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 14, 1996. Sec. 1135(b), P.L. 96-662 99th Cong., 2nd sess. 1/ Included in Public Works Administration Program September 6, 1933. 2/ Included in Emergency Relief Administration Program May 28, 1935. 3/ Contains latest published maps. 4/ Inactive. 5/ Completed under previous projects. 6/ For national defense. 7-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 7-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 14 of Text) For Last Full Report See Cost to Sep. 30, 1997 Annual Report Operation & Project Status For Construction Maintenance Adams Creek, SC Completed 1978 $125,697 $29,143 Aquatic Plant Control, NC and SC 1 Completed 1968 379,680 -- Archers Creek, SC Completed 1914 20,646 -- Ashley River, SC Completed 1955 260,996 589,436 Brookgreen Gardens, SC Completed 1992 94,700 2 4,011 Edisto River, SC Completed 1938 33,103 2,887 Great Pee Dee River, SC Completed 1950 183,712 271,098 Jeremy Creek, SC Completed 1996 49,987 116,175 Lynches River and Clark Creek, SC Completed 1982 9,500 85,595 Mingo Creek, SC Completed 1950 29,050 8,575 Salkahatchie River, SC Completed 1896 15,841 1,936 Santee River, NC & SC Completed 1950 99,750 182,469 Village Creek, SC Completed 1985 26,500 111,314 Waccamaw River, NC and SC Completed 1978 262,814 284,347 Wateree River, SC Completed 1940 60,000 154,559 1 Pilot Program 2 Excludes $7,800 contributed funds OTHER AUTHORIZED SHORE TABLE 7-D PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 17 of the Text) For Last Full Report See Cost to Sep. 30, 1997 Annual Report Operation & Project Status For Construction Maintenance Battery Pringle, SC Completed 1996 $99,200 1 -- Folly Beach, SC Completed 1996 $10,650,487 2 -- Hunting Island Beach, SC Completed 1984 $2,872,717 3 -- 1 Excludes $53,379 contributed funds 2 Excludes $1,059,742 contributed funds and $819,693 credit for LERRD's 3 Excludes $1,249,336 contributed funds 7-16 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT TABLE 7-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 20 of Text) For Last Full Report Cost to Sep. 30, 1997 See Annual Operation & Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Buck Creek, NC & SC 1 Completed 1970 $298,167 -- Cow Castle Creek, SC 1 Completed 1985 250,000 -- Cowpen Swamp, SC 1 Completed 1960 18,679 -- Crabtree Swamp, SC 1 Completed 1969 97,000 -- Eagle Creek, SC 1 Completed 1986 1,245,063 -- Edisto River, SC 1 Discontinued 1947 6,379 -- Edisto River, North Fork, SC 1 Completed 1969 127,660 -- Edisto River, Vicinity Canadays Landing, SC 1 Completed 1958 3,160 -- Gapway Swamp, SC 1 Completed 1969 339,197 -- Kingstree Branch, Williamsburg County, SC 1 Completed 1978 247,242 -- Leith Creek, NC 1 3 Completed 1982 430,951 -- Little Sugar Creek, NC 1 2 Completed 1969 86,600 -- Old Field Swamp, NC 1 2 Completed 1979 763,022 -- Reddies River Lake, NC 3 Completed 1980 985,800 -- Reedy River, SC 1 Discontinued 1974 4,500 -- Roaring River, Wilkes County, NC 1 3 Phase I Only 1978 370,000 -- Saluda River, SC 1 Completed 1963 99,000 -- Sawmill Branch, SC 1 Completed 1971 248,605 -- Scotts Creek, SC 1 Completed 1988 545,000 -- Shot Pouch Creek, Sumter Co., SC 1 Completed 1971 77,400 -- Simmons Bay Creek, NC 2 Completed 1963 186,435 -- Simpson Creek, SC 1 Completed 1957 81,000 -- Socastee Creek, SC 1 Completed 1996 1,093,800 -- Todd Swamp, SC 1 Completed 1964 29,000 -- Turkey Creek, Sumter County, SC 1 Completed 1974 319,669 -- Waccamaw R. & Seven Creeks, NC & SC 1 2 Completed 1961 67,821 -- Wilson Branch, Chesterfield County, SC 1 Completed 1985 277,111 1 Authorized by Chief of Engineers 2 Transferred to Wilmington District in 1980 3 Transferred to Wilmington District in 1984 MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS TABLE 7-F INCLUDING POWER (See Section 25 of the Text) For Last Full Report Cost to Sep. 30, 1997 See Annual Operation & Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Cooper River Seismic Modification, SC Completed 1992 $29,400,000 1 -- 1 Excludes $770,000 for credits to Santee Cooper 7-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 7-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Date Federal Contributed Annual Report and Funds Funds Project for Authority Expended Expended AI5.. I. "',,1kl . CCd '' A,,, "77 UbapoolaUI Cree, , Beresford Creek, SC Charleston Hbr (Anchorage Basin), SC 1954 Congaree River, SC Little Pee Dee River, SC Lumber River, SC & NC Myrtle Beach (Anchorage Basin), SC 1954 Reedy River, Greenville, SC 1971 Russell Creek, SC TABLE 7-H J rug r I Section 12, P.L. 93-251 5 Aug 77 Section 12, P.L. 93-251 17 Nov 86 Section 1002, P.L. 99-662 5 Aug 77 Section 12, P.L. 93-251 5 Aug 77 Section 12, P.L. 93-251 5 Aug 77 Section 12, P.L. 93-251 17 Nov 86 Section 1002, P.L. 99-662 17 Nov 86 Section 1002, P.L. 99-662 5 Aug 77 Section 12, P.L. 93-251 STEAMBANK EROSION UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 22 of the Text) For Last Full Report Cost to Sep. 30, 1997 See Annual Operation & Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Cooper River, Pompion Hill Chapel, SC Completed 1987 $185,000 -- Drayton Hall, SC Completed 1994 $187,800 -- Pinopolis Dam, SC Completed 1996 $431,040 -- Santee Dam, SC Completed 1996 $418,237 -- 7-18 $1,330,000 4,500 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA DISTRICT TABLE 7-I ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Section 28 of Text) ITEM FISCAL YEAR COSTS NAVIGATION STUDIES (CATEGORY 110) Charleston Harbor (Deepening/Widening) $ 4,791 Georgetown Harbor 188,777 SPECIAL STUDIES (CATEGORY 140) Environmental Services Partnerships 570 Yadkin-Pee Dee Rivers Watershed, SC 88,439 COMPREHENSIVE STUDIES (CATEGORY 150) Santee, Cooper, & Congaree Rivers 282,082 REVIEW OF AUTHORIZED PROJECT (CATEGORY 160) AIWW, SC 92,614 MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITIES (CATEGORY 170) Special Investigations $ 32,210 FERC Licensing Activities 2,983 Interagency Water Resources Development 15,216 North American Waterfowl 1,737 COORDINATION STUDIES WITH OTHER AGENCIES (CATEGORY 180) Cooperation With Other Water Resource Agencies 5,707 Planning Assistance to States 1,560 PAS-SC-Greenville County Flood Mapping 2,339 PAS-SC-North Charleston Storm Water Management 56 TOTAL (CATEGORY 100) $ 719,081 FLOOD PLAIN MGMT SERVICES (CATEGORY 250) National Flood Proofing Committee $ 10,095 Flood Plain Management Services 39,739 Technical Services 104,960 Quick Responses 5,044 SAC HES Restudy 41,987 Post Bertha/Fran HES Restudy 45,519 SS-Lancaster, SC 19 HES-Program Management 19,192 SS-Greenville County, SC 51,947 HYDROLOGIC STUDIES (CATEGORY 260) Hydrologic Studies 4,960 TOTAL (CATEGORY 200) $ 323,462 PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING & DESIGN (CATEGORY 400) Charleston Harbor (Deepening/Widening) 280,294 TOTAL (CATEGORY 400) $ 280,294 TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $ 1,322,837 7-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 7-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Preauthorization Studies (See Section 21 of Text) Study Identification Section Fiscal Year Costs Black River, Bishopville, SC 205 $ 38,269 Camp Branch, Lake City, SC 205 36,506 Coordination Account 205 9,781 Sellers Branch, Sellers, SC 205 37 Turkey Creek, Sumter County, SC 205 37,959 TABLE 7-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS (See Section 19 of Text) Project Date of Insection Battery Pringle, SC Cow Castle Creek, SC Drayton Hall, SC Eagle Creek, SC Kingstree Branch, SC Pinopolis Dam, SC Pompion Hill Chapel, SC Santee Dam, SC Sawmill Branch, SC Scotts Creek, SC Turkey Creek, SC Wilson Branch, SC March 1997 March 1997 March 1997 March 1997 March 1997 March 1997 March 1997 March 1997 March 1997 March 1997 March 1997 April 1997 7-20 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT * The District comprises drainage basins that flow into the Atlantic Ocean between Port Royal Sound, SC, and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL, and includes the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between these points. This area covers the headwaters of the Savannah river in southwestern North Carolina, eastern Georgia, and a small portion of northeastern Florida. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Aquatic Plant Control ........ 8-2 2. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Between Norfolk, VA, and St. Johns River, FL (Savannah District) ... 8-2 3. Brunswick Harbor, GA ....... 8-3 4. Savannah Harbor, GA ........ 8-3 5. Savannah River Below Augusta, GA .............. 8-5 6. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ................. 8-6 7. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................. 8-6 8. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .............. 8-6 Beach Erosion Control 9. Beach Erosion Control Work Special Authorization ....... 10. Tybee Island, GA .......... Under . 8-6 8-6 Flood Control 11. Oates Creek, Richmond County, GA................ 8-7 12. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............ 8-7 13. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................. 8-7 14. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .............. 8-7 Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection 15. Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Under Special Authorization .............. 8-7 Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment 16. Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment Under Special Authorization .............. 8-8 17. Lower Savannah River ....... 8-8 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 18. Savannah River Basin, GA and SC ...................... 8-8 19. J. Storm Thurmond Dam and Lake, GA and SC (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake, GA and SC) .......... 8-8 20. Hartwell Dam and Lake, GA and SC ................. 8-9 21. Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, GA and SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake, GA and SC) ..... 8-9 General Investigations 22. Planning Assistance to States.. 8-10 23. Surveys ................. 8-10 24. Collection and Study of Basic Data .................... 8-10 25. Research and Development . . . 8-1 1 Miscellaneous 26. Flood Control and Coastal Emergency ............... 8-11 27. National Emergency Preparedness ............. 8-11 28. Regulatory Functions ........ 8-11 Tables Table 8-A Cost and Financial Statement ........... 8-12 Table 8-B Authorizing Legislation . . 8-14 Table 8-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............ 8-20 Table 8-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ....... 8-21 Table 8-E Savannah River Basin, GA and SC Dams and Lakes . 8-22 8-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Savannah District. Existing project. The project provides for control of water-hyacinth, lyngbya, alligator weed, Eurasian water milfoil, and other noxious aquatic plants from navigable waters, tributary steams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interests of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes. The project provides for continued research for developing the most effective and economic control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers, H. S. 251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. The authorizing act provides that research costs shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing Legislation.) The Final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with EPA on August 6, 1979, and its notice of availability appeared in the Federal Register August 17, 1979. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to hold the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and participate to the extent of 50 percent of the cost of the planning and actual control operations of the program. Requirements are being met. Operations and results during FY. The Georgia Game and Fish Division, Department of Natural Resources, who maintain surveillance of potential aquatic plant problem areas, reported nuisance aquatic plant infestation in Lakes Juliette, Oliver, Jackson, Blackshear, Worth, and in Ebenezer Creek. Also in Little Ocmulgee and George L. Smith State Parks. A work plan was prepared and submitted but was not funded due to National shortfall of funding. 2. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA, AND THE ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (SAVANNAH DISTRICT) Location. This 161-mile section of waterway connects Port Royal Sound, SC, with Cumberland Sound, GA and FL. (See NOAA charts 11489-11507, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 838-841, inclusive.) Previous project. (Between Savannah, GA, and Fernandina, FL) For details see pages 1814, 1821-1823 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 585 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep at mean low water and not less than 90 feet wide between Port Royal Sound, SC, and Savannah, GA; 12 feet deep at mean low water, with widths of 90 feet in land cuts and narrow streams and 150 feet in open waters between Savannah, GA, and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL; and a suitable anchorage basin at Isle of Hope, GA. Mean tidal range between Port Royal, SC, and Cumberland Sound, GA and FL is from 6 to 8 feet with fluctuations from 1.5 to 2.5 feet due to winds and lunar phases. (See Table 8-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Exclusive or adequate terminal facilities at port of entry, this improvement serves numerous wharves, some of which are open to the public on equal terms. Facilities are considered ample for existing commerce. Operations and results during FY. Maintenance: The District used Wright Dredging Company dredge "Hampton Roads" and Marinex Construction Company, Inc. dredge "Clarendon" to dredge the waterway during FY 97. The dredges removed 317,469 cubic yards of material at a cost of $614,999. Condition at end of FY. The main channel of the existing project, completed in 1941, is maintained at 12 feet. The former main channel, now an alternate route through the westerly end of the south channel and northerly end of Wilmington River, will be maintained to a depth of 7 feet mean low water for traffic points north and south of Savannah Harbor. Relocation of the main channel from the Frederica to Mackay Rivers near St. Simons Island, GA, was accomplished under Section 107 of the Continuing Authorities Program after construction of a new bridge for the Torras Causeway. The notice on the final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register October 29, 8-2 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT 1976. Total expenditures for the FY are $1,569,739 (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Section 1135 Study. Savannah District has prepared a feasibility report recommending an Environmental Restoration project in the Lathem River in order to improve water quality. 3. BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA Location. The harbor entrance is 70 statute miles south of the entrance to Savannah Harbor, GA, and 25 statute miles north of the entrance to Fernandina Harbor, FL. (See NOAA Chart 11215, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 447.) Previous projects. For details see page 1818 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 591 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a stone jetty 4,350 feet long at the entrance to East River and the following channels: 32 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the bar; 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide through St. Simons Sound, Brunswick River, and East River to the foot of Second Avenue; 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide in Turtle River to the Allied Chemical Company wharf, formerly the Atlantic Refining Company; 30 feet deep and 400 feet in South Brunswick River; 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide in East River from Second Avenue to its confluence with Academy Creek; 24 feet deep and 150 feet wide from St. Simons Sound to the mouth of Mill Creek; and a channel in Terry Creek 20 feet deep and 150 feet wide from St. Simons Sound to the mouth of Mill Creek; and a channel in Terry Creek 10 feet deep and 80 feet wide from its mouth to a point immediately above the wharf of the former Glynn Canning Company. All depths refer to mean low water. Mean tidal range on the bar is 6.5 feet, at the City of Brunswick 7.3, and 7.6 feet at the upper end of the harbor. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Eighteen wharves and piers, almost all privately owned, have a berthing space of 7,530 linear feet. The Port of Brunswick and the State of Georgia have a transit shed and modem docks with 1,640 feet of berthing space (three general cargo berths) on East River. For further details see Port Series No. 14, Corps of Engineers (revised 1990). Operations and results during FY. Maintenance: The District used the M Operating Company, Inc. dredge "Stuart" to dredge the East River during the last quarter of FY 97. The dredge removed 192,381 cubic yards of material at a cost of $284,749. The District used Weeks Marine, Inc. during the second quarter of the FY to dredge the Bar Channel using dredge "R.N. Weeks". The dredge removed 975,385 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,650,164. The District prepared plans and specifications for the FY 98 Brunswick and Savannah Entrance Channel contract. Total operation and maintenance cost amounted to $3,458,485 for FY 97. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Condition at end of FY. The existing project was completed in December 1960. General condition of the harbor works is satisfactory, providing maintenance dredging continues. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact statement appeared in the Federal Register October 3, 1975. Authorized depths were maintained throughout the FY. Costs for existing completed project thru September 30, 1997, were $95,121,962 of which $329,559 was for New Work and $3,458,485 was for Maintenance. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Feasibility Study: Savannah District has prepared a Feasibility Report with the Georgia Ports Authority recommending deepening the harbor to 36 feet. 4. SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA Location. Harbor entrance is 75 statute miles south of Charleston, SC, and 70 miles north of Brunswick Harbor, GA. (See NOAA Chart 11512, formerly Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 440.) Previous projects. For details see page 1810 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 578 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The project provides for a channel 44 feet deep and 600 feet wide across the ocean bar about 7.0 miles long; 42 feet 8-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 deep and 500 feet wide to the vicinity of Garden City (Georgia Ports Authority terminal) and 36 feet deep and 400 feet wide to the vicinity of the Savannah Sugar Refinery of Savannah Foods and Industries, Inc., about 22.6 miles; and 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide to a point 1,500 feet below the Atlantic Coastal Highway Bridge, about 1.5 miles, a total length of 31.1 miles; Fig Island and Marsh Island Turning Basins 34 feet deep by 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long in the vicinity of the Seaboard Coast Line terminal, and American Oil Company terminal; Kings island Turning Basin 42 feet deep by 1,500 feet wide by 1,600 feet long in the vicinity of the Garden City terminal of the Georgia Ports Authority; Argyle Island and Port Wentworth Turning Basins 30 feet deep by 600 feet long near Savannah Refinery terminal and at the extreme upper limit of the project near the Continental Can Company terminal; and a 1,200 foot long by 1,050 foot wide by 40 foot deep Oyster Bed Island Turning Basin in the vicinity of Georgia Ports Authority's LASH facility. The project also provides for sediment control works consisting of a tide gate structure across Back River; a sediment basin 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide; about 2 miles long, with an entrance channel 38 to 40 feet deep and 300 feet wide; a drainage canal across Argyle Island 15 feet deep and 300 feet wide; control works and canals for supplying fresh water to the Savannah National Wildlife Refuge; and facilities to mitigate damages to presently improved areas other than refuge lands. Mean range of tide is 7.9 feet at the upper end of the harbor and 6.9 feet at the lower end. Extreme ranges are about 11.1 and 10.7 feet, respectively. The tide gate structure across Back River was taken out of operation as of March 1991 to decrease salinity levels in the wildlife refuge. The drainage canal across Argyle Island, which was part of the original tide gate project, was closed as of April 1992 by the New Cut closure contract done by a Section 1135 program. The cost of this contract was $1,531,847. Local cooperation. Local interests must provide suitable disposal areas and retaining dikes for construction and future maintenance of the project. The Chatham County Board of Commissioners, as local assurers, have met all requirements to date. However, one of the upstream disposal areas will be filled to capacity in 1999. The local sponsor has been notified that a new disposal area will be needed to restore lost capacity. Terminal facilities. Sixty-one piers and wharves adequately serve existing waterborne commerce of the port. These facilities, with use of dolphins, have a combined berthing space of 46,930 linear feet at mean low water. Included in the berthing space are six container berths with 271 acres of handling area. All have railway and highway connections. LASH facilities are located at the entrance to the harbor and have depth ranging up to 38 feet mean low water. The berthing space of LASH facilities is included in the above combined berthing space. For further details, see Port Series No. 14, Corps of Engineers (revised 1982) and Annual Report for 1990. Savannah Harbor Widening. The Savannah Harbor Widening project was awarded on 28 September 1990 for $7,735,512. The scope of work included widening of 5.6 miles of channel from 400-500 feet with 1.8 million cubic yards of material dredged after demolition and removal of structures in the riverbank. Chatham County, the local assurer, completed real estate acquisition prior to award expending $3,688,000 in providing LERRD's, as required by the LCA. Construction was completed on April 10, 1992. Significant difficulty was experienced by the contractor in removing debris and obstructions, the quantity of which was only partially quantified before construction. Six additional parcels of real estate had to be acquired during the project due to greater than anticipated amounts of bank sloughing. One parcel required deletion from the contract of 1,000 feet of the widened channel due to impacts to an existing radio tower. This work has been completed under the Savannah Harbor Deepening Contract. A final modification of approximately $2.7 million for excessive dredge downtime was awarded in order to close the contract. The total Federal Cost exclusive of contract claims and additional real estate costs was $8,270,000 and the Non- Federal cost was $6,441,000. Savannah Harbor Deepening. The Savannah Harbor Deepening project was authorized by WRDA 92 on October 31, 1992. The LCA was signed with the local sponsor, the Georgia Ports Authority, on March 2, 1993. Because Federal appropriations would be no earlier than FY 95, the LCA was written and negotiated to allow the local sponsor to up-front the construction funds upon project authorization and the signing 8-4 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT of the LCA. The first phase contracts for the Savannah Harbor Deepening project was awarded in March 1993 for the outer bar channel from Station 0 +000 to -60 + 000 and the lower inner harbor channel from Station 0 + 000 to 70 + 000 for $7,298,876 and $8,748,883, respectively. The second phase, that requiring significant real estate acquisition, was awarded in July 1993 from Station 70 + 000 to 103+000, for $4,675,376. The total project scope entails the deepening of the harbor by 4 feet, from -38 ft mlw to -42 ft mlw in the inner harbor and from - 40 ft mlw to -44 ft mlw in the bar channel, for a total of 31 miles of harbor improvement. Construction was initiated with the Inner Harbor contract (0 + 000 to 70+000) on May 1, 1993, and was completed on April 21, 1994. The authorized cost for the Savannah Harbor Deepening project is $50,050,000. The current estimated cost for the project is $33,000,000. In the FY 95 appropriations bill, Congress provided $11,585,000 as reimbursement to the local sponsor for the Federal share of the NED plan. The appropriations bill also provided the $2,083,000 of those funds be provided for the cost shared Savannah Riverwalk Extension. The PCA for the Savannah Riverwalk Extension Project was executed on July 21, 1995. The current estimate for the project is $3,532,499, of which the Federal share is fixed at $2,083,- 000 and the City of Savannah's share is $1,44- 9,499. Work was completed as scheduled on May 24,1996 and a dedication ceremony took place June 10, 1996. In November 1996, the local sponsor received $7,500,000 towards their reimbursement of the Federal share of the project. The balance of the Federal share will be forwarded to the local sponsor once all of the contracts have been closed out and final audits prepared. Maintenance. The District dredged from station 0+000 to 112+500 using the M Operating Company, Inc. dredge "Stuart", the Wright Dredging Company dredge "Enterprise", and the Norfolk Dredging Company dredge "Essex" to remove 2,492,050 cubic yards of material at a cost of $5,790,140. The District dredged the Sediment Basin using the M Operating Company, Inc. dredge "Stuart" and the Wright Dredging Company dredge "Enterprise" to remove 2,343,921 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,026,495. The District used Gulf Coast Trailing Company during the second quarter in FY 97 to dredge the Bar Channel using the dredge "Atchafalaya". The dredge removed 544,508 cubic yards of material at a cost of $1,570,817. The bar channel was left deficient due to a high number of sea turtles being entrained by the dredging in the Southeast. The District prepared plans and specifications for the FY 98 Brunswick and Savannah Entrance Channel contract. Total costs for operation and maintenance for the FY was $11,580,374 which included such items as salinity monitoring, surveying, cultural resources. $9,836 was provided to continue the Long Term Management Study for dredged material disposal in Savannah Harbor. Condition at the end of the FY. Training walls, jetties, and other structures are in fair condition. Authorized channels are maintained by a planned dredging program with work at critical areas when necessary. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register June 25, 1976. Notices of availability on two Final Supplements to the Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register September 25, 1978, and January 8, 1980. 5. SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA Location. Savannah River is formed by the confluence of the Tugaloo and Seneca Rivers on the boundary line between South Carolina and Georgia. It flows southeast 314 miles, forming the boundary line between two states, and empties into the Atlantic Ocean 16.6 miles below Savannah, GA. (See NOAA Charts 11514 and 11515, formerly Geological Survey maps of South Carolina and Georgia.) Previous project. For details see page 1813 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 581 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 9 feet deep and 90 feet wide (at ordinary summer flow of 5,800 secondfeet at Augusta, GA) from the upper end of the Savannah Harbor to the head of navigation at Augusta, above the 13th Street Bridge (R.M. 202.6), a total distance of about 181 miles. A lock and dam is located approximately 15 miles below the upper limit of the project at New Savannah Bluff. Improvement is to be obtained by construction of contraction works, closure of 8-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 cutoffs, bank protection, dredging, removal of snags, over hanging trees and wrecks, and open-river regulation. Mean tidal variation at the mouth of the river is 7 feet. Freshet variation above the normal pool level (elevation 114.5 mean sea level) of New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam at mile 187 is ordinarily about 13 feet with an extreme of 34 feet. Due to lack of commercial use, the river has not been dredged since FY 79. Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Terminal facilities. The only water terminals served by this improvement are at Augusta, Sylvania, and at or near Savannah. Augusta provided a municipal dock valued at $50,000 and Georgia Ports Authority constructed a state port at Augusta, GA, costing about $418,000. These facilities were expanded in 1965 at an additional cost of about $250,000. These are supplemented by natural landings along the river and extensive facilities at Savannah. Operations and results during FY. In general, open-channel works are in good condition. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement appeared in the Federal Register February 18, 1977. The total cost for the year was $2,599,254. There were no dredging projects during this FY. 6. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Survey Section performed condition surveys on the following active O&M navigation projects: AIWW Brunswick Harbor Savannah Harbor 7. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 8-C.) 8. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION None were conducted in FY 97. Beach Erosion Control 9. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION 10. TYBEE ISLAND, GA Location. Tybee island is located directly south of the Savannah River entrance, about 17 miles east of the City of Savannah, GA. (See NOAA 11512, 11513, and 11509, formerly U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Numbers 440, 1240, and 1241, and on maps included in HD 92-105, 92nd Cong.) The only portion of the island that has developed is bounded on the north by the south channel of the Savannah River, on the east by the Atlantic Ocean, and on the south and west by Tybee Creek and other small tidal streams. This area, hereinafter referred to as "Tybee Island," is occupied by the City of Tybee Island. The ocean face of this area has a wide sandy beach. Tybee Island is about 3.5 miles long from its northerly tip to the mouth of Tybee Creek with an average width of about 0.5 miles. Behind the beach lies a line of sand dunes, a number of which have been removed during the years to make room for improvements and for various other reasons. Those that remain are from 10 to 20 feet high. The ground elevation west of the dunes is from 10 to 18 feet and slopes westward to the salt marsh. Existing project. The approved project plan of improvement provides for an 800-foot rock groin at the north end of the island, with a 225- foot tie-in to high ground. An additional 1,200- foot extension of this groin is deferred, as are two additional intermediate groins (480 feet long); these will be added at a later date, if needed. The plan also provides for the initial restoration of approximately 13,300 feet of beach, from the vicinity of 18th Street to the terminal groin located at the northern end of the island. Periodic nourishment will be provided as needed to maintain suitable beach dimensions. In 1981, the plan was modified to call for the addition of a groin at the south end and modification and rehabilitation of the north rock groin and renourishment. Local cooperation. Local interests must: (a) contribute in cash the required percentage of the first cost (including costs for construction, engineering and design, and administration; and excluding the cost of lands, easements, rightsof- way and relocation) of all items of work to be provided by the Corps of Engineers. The local contribution is presently estimated at 38.0 percent to be paid in a lump sum prior to start of construction or in installments prior to the start of pertinent work items in accordance with 8-6 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT construction schedules as required by the Chief of Engineers, the final apportionment of cost to be made after the actual costs have been determined; (b) provide maintenance and repair of the groins, and provide (after the first 10 years of project life) periodic nourishment of the restored beach as may be required to serve the intended purpose during the life of the project; (c) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements rights-of-way, and relocations required for construction and subsequent nourishment of the project; (e) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (f) provide without cost to the United States access and facilities necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based, and maintain continued public use of the beach and administer it for public use during the life of the project, and provide further the construction on the project shall not be started until local interests furnish lands for beach access and parking, satisfactory to the Chief of Engineers, for the reach from First Street to the terminal groin. To date, local cooperation is being provided as required. Condition at the end of the FY. In January 1987, the South Groin contract was completed at a cost of $607,392. In February 1987, the first periodic renourishment contract was awarded, calling for the placement of approximately 1 million cubic yards of sand on two reaches of the island; the south end from the mouth of Tybee Creek to 14th Street, and the north end from the North terminal groin to about 6th Street. The contract was completed in May 1987, at a contract cost of $1,988,843. A Beach monitoring program was performed for three years to monitor the performance of the design. The Local Sponsor has invested over $200,000 in additional funds for the implementation of a dune building program for the North and South ends of the islands. FY costs were $2,858. A reevaluation study under Section 934 WRDA 86 was initiated in 1990 for the Tybee Island Beach Erosion Control Project. The purpose of the study was to determine if the authorized Tybee Island Beach Erosion Control Project should be extended to a project life of 50 years, and determine if the Federal Government should continue to participate in the project. The study used current Federal policy and economic guidelines to evaluate the economic and environmental feasibility of additional periodic beach nourishment. The study was completed in October 1994. Approval of the report authorized continued Federal participation in the project for the remainder of the project's 50-year life and was approved in June 1995. $2.500 million of FY 97 funds have been appropriated for a 1997 Tybee Island Beach Renourishment project. $400,000 of these funds have been set aside for a study to determine if the South tip of the island and the Back River area up to Horse Pen Creek should be added to the authorized project. FLOOD CONTROL 11. SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN AT OATES CREEK, GA Oates Creek is a major drainage outlet for flood water from an urban area of Augusta, GA. A flood control study of Oates Creek was authorized and completed as part of the Savannah River Basin study. The Oates Creek study area is located just south of Augusta, in Richmond County. The revised FEMA mapping has been prepared in order to reduce the flood insurance costs of the inhabitants of the Oates Creek Basin. The Operation and Maintenance manual was completed in December 1993 and the project was turned over to Richmond County for long term maintenance. For more details, see Annual Report for FY 1995. 12. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Expenditures for inspections of completed flood control projects amounted to $28,581. (See Table 8-A&D.) 13. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 8-D) 14. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION These Flood Damage Reduction activities are accomplished under the authority of Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948 (Public Law 858, 80th Congress) as amended. During FY- 96 a total of $108,036 was spent on preauthorization flood damage reduction studies. Study efforts during the FY were as follows: Ocmulgee River Levee, Macon, GA - $128,972; 8-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 and Harmon Canal - $49,765. Flood Damage Reduction studies are also conducted under the General Investigations Program. The Chatham County Regional Study was authorized by a resolution of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the U.S. House of Representatives, dated September 14, 1996. During FY 97, a total of $67,986 was spent on flood reduction studies. Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection 15. EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION During FY 97, additional meetings were held with representatives from Fort Jackson to discuss conducting erosion and protection studies at Fort Jackson, along the Savannah River in Chatham County, Georgia under Section 103 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962. Letter requesting assistance received from local officials during FY 95. Study on hold due to lack of local sponsor funds. A Section 14 Feasibility Study of Streambank erosion and protection for the city of Baldwin, Georgia continued into FY 97. During FY 97, the Section 14 study was terminated due to the city's plans to phase out a polishing pond as a result of a proposed treatment plant expansion. A total of $57,198 was spent on plans and specifications. The study was being conducted under Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. Additional Section 14 studies included Log Landing Road, a public road in Effingham County in which no Federal interest was found. During FY 97, a total of $4,504 was spent on this study. Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment 16. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION These project modifications are accomplished under the authority of Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662) as amended. Environmental modification study efforts during FY 96 were as follows: Savannah Harbor, Chatham County, GA- Jasper County, SC, monitored post construction environmental and cultural effects - cost shared funding, $6,202 (Federal) and $4,057 (non- Federal). A preliminary restoration plan was prepared for Ebenezer Creek. Project Modification Report being prepared for Latham River/ Jekyll Creek to determine environmental benefits at a cost of $800,000. 17. LOWER SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION STUDY The cost shared Feasibility Phase was initiated June 1993 and completed in March 1996. Recommended plan includes a large partial diversion structure at cut #3, a plug in bend #3 below the mouth of Bear Creek, a realignment and restoration of the mouths of Bear and Mill Creeks, which provides improved flows into both creeks. This is a self sustaining project which would not require O&M dredging. This plan has no impact on navigation. The feasibility phase included a takings analysis which concluded no takings. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design (PED) was initiated in April 1996 and will be completed in September 1998. The total cost of PED phase is $547,000. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 18. SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA AND SC Location. Works covered by this project consist of a series of 11 dams and lakes on the Savannah River and its tributaries in GA and SC. (See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1944 approved the general plan for comprehensive development of the Savannah River basin for flood control and other purposes (HD/657, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and authorized construction of the J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir Project on the Savannah River in Georgia and South Carolina as the initial step of this development. The Flood Control Act of 1950 authorized construction of the Hartwell Lake under the general plan. Richard B. Russell (formerly Trotters Shoals) was authorized for construction by the Flood control Act of 1966 at an estimated cost of $84,900,000. J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, Hartwell Lake, and Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake are the only projects in the comprehensive plan that have been constructed. (See Table 8-E on Darns and Lakes.) Duke Power company has completed construction on the Keowee-Toxaway power complex on 8-8 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT the Keowee River in the headwaters of Hartwell Lake and construction of the Jacassee pumpstorage power project in the headwaters of the Keowee-Toxaway project. The Keowee-Toxaway power complex is located on the Newry- Old Pickens site identified in the approved comprehensive plan. Individual reports on J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, Hartwell, and Richard B. Russell Lakes follow. Local cooperation. None required. 19. J. STROM THURMOND DAM AND LAKE GA AND SC, (formerly Clarks Hill Lake) Location. J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Lake is located at mile 237.7 on the Savannah River about 22 miles upstream from Augusta, GA. (See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, the final cost of which was $79,156,300. The dam has a concrete section 2,282 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet and a controlled spillway 1,096 feet long. The concrete section is flanked on the west side by a rolled-earth embankment of 2,069 feet and on the east side by a similar embankment of 1,329 feet. The total length of the dam is 5,680 feet. The lake covers 71,100 acres at maximum power pool elevation 330 msl. It provides a total storage capacity of 2,900,000 acre-feet allocated as follows: flood control 390,000 acre-feet; hydropower 1,045,000 acre-feet; dead storage 1,465,000 acre-feet. Seven 40,000-kilowatt generators have a combined generating capacity of 282,000 kilowatts with an average annual output of 700 million kilowatt-hours of electrical energy. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during FY. Net generations of electric energy for the period was 732,543 kilowatt-hours, most of which was delivered to the Southeastern Power Administration. Cumulative flood damage prevented through FY 97 was $27,679,098. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance costs during the FY amounted to $9,087,385. The notice of availability on the Final Environmental Impact Statement on J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir Operation and Maintenance appeared in the December 18, 1981 Federal Register. In FY 97 6,221,700 persons visited the facility. Condition at the end of the FY. Construction is complete except for providing additional recreational development. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement.) Major Rehabilitation. The J. Strom Thurmond Powerplant has been identified as a project for the Major Rehabilitation Program. An Evaluation Report was approved in July 1994. FY 96 Appropriations were provided in the FY 96 Energy and Water Bill in November 1996. Current estimate is $69,700,000. The Circuit Breaker Supply Contract was awarded Sep 96 and the Exciter Supply Contract was awarded Oct 96. Project is to be completed April 2004. Scope includes replacement of the seven turbines, rewinding the generators, and replacement of key electrical/mechanical peripheral equipment. Costs for New Work during FY 97 was $3,241,306. 20. HARTWELL DAM AND LAKE, GA AND SC Location. Hartwell Dam and Lake is on the Savannah River 305 miles above its mouth and 89 miles upstream from Augusta, GA (See Geological Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The dam is a concrete gravitytype structure 1,900 feet long with a maximum height of 204 feet and a controlled spillway 480 feet in length. The concrete section is flanked on the east and west abutments by earth embankments totaling 13,360 feet in length and by a saddle dike 2,590 feet long also on the west side. Total length of the dam is 17,850 feet. At maximum conservation pool elevation of 660 feet the lake covers 55,950 acres. Total capacity of the lake is 2,843,000 acre-feet of storage allocated as follows: flood control - 293,000 acre-feet; hydropower - 1,416,000 acre-feet; dead storage - 1,134,000 acre-feet. Four 66,000 kilowatt generators having a generating capacity of 264,000 kilowatts were installed initially with provisions for a future unit. A fifth 80,000 kilowatt generating unit has been installed which increased the rated capacity to 344,000 kilowatts. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during the FY. Net generation of electrical energy for the period 8-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 amounted to 504,805,700 kilowatt-hours, most of which was delivered to the Southeastern Power Administration. Cumulative flood damage prevented through FY 96 is $113,217,272 Maintenance. Operation and maintenance costs during the FY amounted to $9,597,029. The notice on the Final Environmental Impact Statement on the operation and maintenance of Hartwell Dam and Lake appeared in the Federal Register on August 21, 1978. Approximately 10,917,015 persons visited the lake in FY 97. During FY 96 funds were expended for the E&D phase of the major rehabilitation of the four original units at the Hartwell power facility. Major Rehabilitation. The Hartwell Powerplant Major Rehabilitation project was approved by HQUSACE, and was included in the FY 96 budget. The project scope includes the rewinding of the first four generators, the replacement of the transformers, the refurbishment of the turbine water passageways, and the replacement of key electrical/mechanical peripheral equipment. The fully funded cost for the recommended plan is $20,800,000. The main rewind and turbine refurbishment contract was awarded July 3, 1996. The Circuit breaker contract was awarded June 14, 1996. The first unit went off line in March 1997. During the disassembly, it was discovered that the Stator Core for the first unit was deformed, brittle and required a replacement. It was decided to replace all four Stator Cores, in order to achieve the required reliability. A modification is being negotiated to replace these cores. Costs for New Work during FY 97 was $4,528,120. 21. RICHARD B. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA AND SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals Lake, GA and SC) Location. Richard B. Russell Dam is located on the Savannah River 275.1 miles above its mouth, 29.9 miles below Hartwell Dam, and about 37.4 miles above J. Strom Thurmond Dam (formerly Clarks Hill Dam). (See NOAA Survey maps of GA and SC.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for construction of Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake substantially in accordance with the recommendations. The latest approved (FY-96) costs estimate for the project is $596,700,000 of which $446,613,000 is for construction; $28,846,000 for lands and damages; $4,857,- 000 for cultural resources; and $115,224,000 for engineering/design, supervision/administration, and all project studies including environmental. Approval was received in January 1977 to include minimum provisions for pumped storage. A Feasibility Report and Final Environmental Impact Statement to address the installation and operation of four 75 MW reversible pump-turbines were prepared in 1979 with the Record of Decision signed in August 1980. The Richard B. Russell Fish and Wildlife Mitigation Plan was completed in 1981, approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) in September 1982, and the provisions are being implemented. Since 1986, the District has conducted comprehensive fishery studies in the Russell tailrace and J. Strom Thurmond Lake (formerly Clarks Hill Lake) downstream. In addition, the District conducted water quality studies, hydraulic modeling, and an evaluation of various fish protection measures associated with hydroelectric projects. The results of these study efforts have been used to evaluate the need to develop fish protection at the Richard B. Russell Project associated with pumped storage operations. This evaluation is presented in a supplement to the Final Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) on pumped storage. The record-of-decision (ROD) was signed September 1991. Installation of pumped storage is complete; final Phase III environmental testing was completed in October 1996. The Phase III Environmental Report and its Interagency Review was completed in August 1997. The District is currently in the NEPA Documentation Phase and conducting discussions with the resource agencies in attempting to resolve issues and settle the injunction. The Federal Court injunction is still in place prohibiting commercial operation of pumped storage. If the District cannot resolve the issues to the satisfaction of SCDNR, then it will be litigated in Federal Court to lift the injunction. All cost shared recreation is complete except work planned in the McCalla Peninsula with SC in FY 98 and FY 99. Local Cooperation. Federal Water Project Recreation Act. Public Law 89-72; 79 stat. 213C (for Legislative history of Act see page 1864). Operations and Results During FY. Net generations of electric energy for the period was 8-10 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT 474,952 megawatt-hours. Maintenance. The operation and maintenance cost for the FY amounted to $6,763,933. These funds were for management of lake and power activities. Approximately 1,111,800 persons visited the lake in FY 97. Condition at the end of FY. The project is 99 percent complete. Costs of project to September 30, 1997, were $680,619,591 of which $592,495,000 was used for new work and $88,124,591 for maintenance. (See Table 8-A for Cost and Financial Statement. This cost includes both the Dam and Lake and Mitigation Lands.) General Investigation 22. PLANNING ASSISTANCE TO STATES Planning Assistance to States activities are accomplished under the authority of Section 22, Water Resources Development Act of 1974, as amended. During FY 97, a total of $11,831 was expended. 23. SURVEYS During FY 97, costs of $630,944 were incurred as follows: Navigation Studies - $490,070; Flood Damage Prevention Studies - $67,985; Special Studies - $879; and Miscellaneous Activities - $72,010. 24. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During FY 97, under the Flood Plain Management Services Program, flood hazard related information and assistance were provided to state and local governments on a nonreimbursable basis and to other Federal agencies and private persons on a cost recovery basis. Expenditures were as follows: Flood Plain Management Services - $60,424; Technical Services - $47,285; Quick Responses - $2,085; for three Special Studies - $79,918; Georgia HES Restudy - $50,000; and Hydrologic Studies - $7,009. 25. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT No funds were expended for research and development during the fiscal year. Miscellaneous. 26. FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCY Disaster Preparedness Emergency Work for Others: T/S Alberto Hurricane Bertha Hurricane Opal Northern California Flood 1997 Hurricane Danny Spring Flood 1997 Hurricane Fran Advance Contracts For Disasters Total FC&CE $ 299,000 $ 21,000 1,000 1,000 105,000 1,000 51,000 1,053,000 4,000 $1,536,000 National Preparedness 28. REGULATORY FUNCTIONS Permit Evaluation Enforcement Studies Other Navigation Regulations EIS Total Regulatory Expenditure $ 165,000 $2,066,900 545,800 43,100 20,900 3,600 $2,680,300 8-11 27. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS (NEPP) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 8-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY-94 FY-95 FY-96 FY-97 Sep 30, 1997 1. Aquatic Plant Control (1965 R&H Act) 2. Atlantic Intracoastat Waterway between Norfolk, VA, and the St. John's River, FL 3. Brunswick Harbor, GA (Contributed Funds) 4. Savannah Harbor, GA (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 70,000 67,282 32,000 24,366 40,114 375,000 2,324,000 1,659,000 423,007 2,342,397 1,569,739 1,040,159 20,111 1,003,961 942,000 1,041,826 15,000 132,000 300,000 302,000 36,137 135,398 243,993 329,559 3,690,000 3,160,000 3,475,000 3,384,000 3,718,944 3,175,711 3,398,544 3,458,485 -- 450,000 -- 100,000 227,404 958,096(1) 958,096(1) 31,039,507(2) 31,034,117(2) 5,322,608(3) 5,550,808(3) 89,715,928(4) 89,571,154(4) 302,000 355,081 -825,000 11,787,000 566,000 273,000 56,312 8,055,639 2,264,033 160,068 7,263,000 8,444,000 14,333,000 11,478,000 7,285,916 8,580,793 14,092,569 11,580,374 4,244,267 -7,390,400 -263,694 20,108,977 -6,468,694 1,897,773 -65,951 5,988 67,350,721(5) 66,472,002(5) 224,639,693(6) 224,742,067(6) 24,682,032 23,429,519 8-12 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY-94 FY-95 FY-96 FY-97 Sep 30, 1997 5. Savannah River below Augusta, GA 10. Tybee Island, GA (Contributed Funds) 11. Oates Creek, Richmond County, GA (Contributed Funds) 12. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Works 19. J. Strom Thurmond Dam and Reservoir, GA and SC 20. Hartwell Lake, GA and SC 21. Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, GA and SC (Formerly Trotters Shoals) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 228,000 600,000 2,392,000 2,574,000 200,008 637,975 1,677,663 2,599,254 100,000 104,290 25,000 27,143 -- 4,842 149,000 -- 179,344 -- 26,982 -- 39,000 28,638 -3,500 -3,500 8,254,000 8,206,679 39,000 48,747 2,858 966,000 353,876 6,790,031(7) 6,790,031(7) 24,127,771 23,406,854 5,651,249(8) 5,038,678(8) 20,430 488 20,430 9,173,000 9,159,144 296,534 296,534 589,064 552,972 30,706 30,000 28,581 119,000 83,590 -- 84,880,940(9) -- 84,876,004(9) 8,161,100 7,960,000 8,231,618 7,901,320 -- 690,000 -- 635,847 9,073,000 9,087,385 4,155,000 3,241,306 158,981,345(10) 158,567,872(10) 4,845,000 3,877,153 -- 115,874,985(11,12) -- 115,876,925(11,12) 8,379,000 8,540,100 9,065,000 8,309,056 8,803,009 8,769,746 -- -- 908,000 -- -- 782,684 12,259,500 21,281,065 5,828,000 5,775,506 19,496 1. Includes $194,497 for previous projects. 2. Includes $134,789 for previous projects. Does 18,545,000 19,398,075 5,820,100 5,852,098 11,103,000 12,257,080 6,916,000 6,344,213 10,004,000 9,597,029 5,425,000 4,528,120 5,395,000 5,425,293 6,448,000 6,763,933 151,725,627(13) 151,662,889(13) 12,999,950 11,951,340 617,284,000 618,075,780 53,770,991 62,574,104 1,109 -- -- 73,341 4,109 -- -- 73,605 not include $35,000 appropriated but unexpended of contributed funds in FY's 86 and 87. 3. Includes $643,456 for previous projects and $97,521 8-13 TABLE 8-A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 expended from Public Works Funds for existing project. Does not include $10,000 contributed funds. 4. Includes $54,414 for previous projects, $4,995 expended from Public Works Funds for existing project, and $2,150,000 under 1983 Job Bill Act. Does not include contributed funds by Brunswick and Georgia Port Authority. 5. Includes $7,260,384 for previous projects. Does not include $46,847 for removal of sunken vessels or contributed funds. 6. Includes $298,894 for previous projects and $62,727 contributed funds. 7. Includes $93,480 for previous projects and $1,634,562 from Public Works Fund. 8. Does not include $61,856.45 contributed funds. 9. Does not include $395,634 accelerated Public Works Funds. Includes $4,558,- 613 appropriated under Code 710. Also includes $1,000,000 expended under the 1983 Job Bill Act. 10. Includes $576,665 under special recreation use fees and $736,000 under the 1983 Job Bill Act. 11. Includes $17,515,000 appropriated for construction of 5th Unit of which $17- ,469,002 has been expended. 12. Does not include $276,200 accelerated Public Works Funds. Includes $4,861,- 000 appropriated under Code 710 of which $4,851,306 has been expended and $ 545,000 expended under the 1983 Job Bill Act. 13. Includes $797,558 expended special recreation use fees. TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (R&H ACT 1962) Oct. 27, 1965 Provides for control and progressive eradication of HD251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Section 302 noxious aquatic plant growths. 8-14 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. June 3, 1896 Mar. 3, 1899 July 13, 1892 Mar. 3, 1905 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 26, 1937 June 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 15, 1981 ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA, AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (SAVANNAH DISTRICT) Section from Beaufort, SC, to Savannah, GA Route No. 2 adopted. Route No. 1 adopted. Section from Savannah, GA, to Fernandina, FL. Original 7-foot channel. Provided for Skidaway Narrows. Incorporated alternative routes previously improved as separate projects and the auxiliary channels. Section from Cumberland Sound, GA and FL to St. Johns River, FL. Consolidation of the 3 sections shown above, into "Waterway between Beaufort SC, and St. Johns River, FL." Section from Beaufort, SC to Cumberland Sound GA and FL. Removing logs and snags from Generals Cut. Improving Back River to provide a channel 7 feet deep and 150 wide. Channel 75 feet wide between Beaufort, SC, and Savannah, GA. Channel from Baileys Cut to Dover Creek. A 7-foot protected channel around St. Andrews Sound. A 12-foot channel between Beaufort, SC, and Savannah, GA, via Beaufort River and Port Royal Sound. A 12-foot channel between Savannah, GA, and Fernandina, FL, various cutoffs; and anchorage basin at Thunderbolt, GA. An alternate route 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide in that part of Frederica River, GA, not now traversed by the main route, at no additional cost to the United States. Main channel relocated from Frederica River to Mackay River in the vicinity of Torras Causeway. Navigation Project. HD295, 53d Cong., 3d sess. HD295, 53d, Cong., 3d sess. HD41, 52d Cong., 1st sess. HD450, 58th Cong., 2d sess. HD1236, 60th, Cong., 2d sess. HD581, 63d Cong., 2d sess. HD1391, 62d Cong., 3d sess. SD178, 68th Cong., 2d sess. SD43, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Senate committee print, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc 6, 75th Cong.,3d sess. HD618, 75th Cong., 3d sess. HD114, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under the Small Navigation Project Authority, Sec. 107, PL 86-645 as amended. 8-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 3. Mar. 3, 1879 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar 2, 1919 July 3, 1930 July 3, 1930 June 20, 1938 May 17, 1950 Oct. 22, 1976 July 14, 1981 July 13, 1983 Oct. 17, 1986 BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA Construction of East River jetty. Channels in the inner and outer harbors of 30-foot depth at mean high water, with widths varying from 150 feet in Academy Creek to 400 feet across the outer bar, extension of training wall in East River and construction of two spur dikes. Channels 27 feet deep at mean low water over the bar and at Brunswick point; and 24 feet deep at mean low water in the inner harbor and provides for a cut from Academy Creek to Turtle River, if deemed advisable. A channel in Back River 230 feet deep and 150 feet wide. Increased Channel dimensions of the bar, Brunswick Point, East River, and Turtle River, as given in the then existing project. A 10-foot channel in Terry Creek. Increased channel dimensions of the bar, St. Simons Sound, Brunswick River, East River, and Turtle River, as given in the existing project. Provides for Phase I AE&D studies for deepening portions of existing harbor (East River and Entrance Channel) and for provision of a navigation channel to Colonels Island. Enlargement of the maneuvering area of the entrance to East River and dredging Brunswick and Turtle Rivers to obtain depths authorized by the Rivers and Harbors Act of May 17, 1950. Enlargement of the East River Turning Basin to a length of 1,000 feet and a width of 750 feet. Incorporated Georgia Port Authority's 30 foot deep by 300 foot wide by 8000 foot channel in South Brunswick River serving Colonel's Island into Brunswick Harbor Navigation Project. Annual Report, 1980, p.959. HD407, 59th Cong., 1st sess. HD393, 64th Cong., 1st sess. SD57, 71st Cong., 2d sess. SD132, 71st Cong., 2d sess. HD690, 75th Cong., 3d sess. HD110, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Report of Chief of Engineers dated Aug. 18, 1976. HD177, 97th Cong., 1st sess. PL 98-360 HR6, 99th Cong., 2d sess., Section 846 8-16 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 4. Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Jan. 21, 1927 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 7, 1945 July 24, 1946 SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA Tentative provisions for a 26-foot channel from the Quarantine Station to the Seaboard Air Line Railway Bridge. Definite provision for the 26-foot channel. A 21-foot channel from the Seaboard Air Line Railway Bridge to the foot of Kings Island. A 30-foot depth from the sea to the Quarantine Station. A 21-foot channel above Kings Island. Channel 30 feet deep, with general width 50 feet, from the ocean to the Quarantine Station, thence 26 feet deep, general width 400 feet, to the Seaboard Air Line Rho. Bridge, thence 21 feet deep and 300 feet wide to Kings Island. Widening at West Broad and Barnard Streets; anchorage basin; mooring dolphins; regulating dam across South Channel; relocation of the Inland Waterway; dredging Drakes Cut to 13 feet; widening to 525 ft. at Kings Island; extension of training walls, revetments, and jetties. Consolidation of projects relating to Savannah Harbor. Channel 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the Seaboard Air Line Rho. Bridge to the foot of Kings Island. Authorized the 30-foot project and eliminated from the project (a) the relating dam across South Channel; (b) the relocation of the Inland waterway; and (c) the further extension of training walls, revetments, and jetties. Deepening the channel and turning basin above the Seaboard Air Line Rho. Bridge from 26 to 30 feet and widening the channel opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals to a maximum of 550 feet for a length of 5,000 feet. Deepening the channels to 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide across the ocean bar; 34 feet deep and generally 400 feet wide increased to 550 feet opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals, with a turning basin 34 feet deep at the Mexican Petroleum Corp. Refinery; and with such modifications thereof as the Secretary of War and the Chief of Engineers may consider desirable. Extending channel 30 feet deep, 200 feet wide upstream from Atlantic Creosoting Terminal to a point 1,500 feet below the Atlantic Coastal Highway Bridge, with turning basin 30 feet deep at upper end. HD181, 59th Cong., 1st sess. HD563, 62d, Cong., 2d sess. HD1471, 64th Cong., 2d sess. HD261,69th Cong., 1st sess. HD262,69th Cong., 1st sess. SD39, 71st Cong., 1st sess. HD276, 73d Cong., 2d sess. HD283, 76th Cong., 1st seas. HD227, 79th Cong., 1st sess. HD678, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 8-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct 27, 1965 SPCW Resolution June 15, 1976 and HPWTC of June 9, 1976 under authority of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 Deepening the channel to 34 feet and widening to 400 feet from the upper end of the presently authorized 34-foot channel in the vicinity of the American Oil Company Refinery wharf, to the Savannah Sugar Refinery Corp. with a turning basin at the upper end of the proposed improvement made by widening the channel to 600 feet for a length of 700 feet and providing approaches. Enlargement of turning basin near Kings Island to a width of 900 feet and a length of 1,000 feet, with suitable approaches, at a depth of 34 feet. Deepening the bar channel from 36 feet to 40 feet, the channel between the bar channel and Garden City Terminal from 34 feet to 38 feet, and the channel from the Garden City Terminal to the vicinity of the Savannah Sugar Refining Corp., from 30 feet to 36 feet; widening the bar channel from 500 feet to 600 feet, the channel between Fort Pulaski and the Atlantic Coast Line Terminal from 400 feet to 500 feet, and the channel between Garden City Terminal and the Savannah Sugar Refinery Corp., from 200 feet to 400 feet; providing necessary wideners of the bends; constructing a new turning basin 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long by 34 feet deep opposite the Atlantic Coast Line Terminals; and enlargement of existing turning basin at the American Oil Company Terminal from 600 feet wide by 600 feet long to 900 feet wide by 1,000 feet long. Providing sediment control works consisting of tide gate structure across Back River; sediment basin 40 feet deep, 600 feet wide about 2 miles long, with entrance channel 38 to 40 feet deep and 300 feet wide; control works and canals for supplying fresh water to Savannah National Wildlife Refuge; and facilities to mitigate damages to presently improved areas other than refuge lands. Provided for modification of the existing project to include (1) incorporation of the LASH Turning Basin as an element of the existing Federal navigation project for maintenance purposes, (2) enlargement of Kings Island Turning Basin to 1,500 feet by 38 feet. HD 110, 83d Cong., 1st sess. SD115, 87th Cong., 1st sess. HD226, 89th Cong., 1st sess. HD223, 89th Cong., 1st sess. HD94-520, 94th Cong. dated June 8, 1976. 8-18 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents July 16,1984 Oct. 17, 1986 Oct. 31, 1992 5. Sep. 13, 1891 June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 10. SPWC Resolution June 22, 1971, HPWC of June 23, 1972 under authority of Sec. 201 of FC Act of 1965 Oct. 17, 1986 11. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Oct. 17, 1986 Construction of three new work curve wideners in the inner harbor channel. Curve Widener #1 is between mile 11.1 and 11.9. Curve widener #2 is between mile 13.2 and 13.8 and curve widener #3 is between mile 14.0 and 14.8. The Wideners are located on the north side of the channel. Savannah Harbor Widening as described in Report of Chief of Engineers date Dec. 19, 1978. Widen channel from 400 feet to 500 feet between Kings Island turning Basin and Fig Island Turning Basin. Allows planning, engineering and design to remove drift and debris as part of operations and maintenance. Savannah Harbor Deepening deepened harbor from -38 feet to -42 feet mlw in Inner Harbor and from -40 feet to -44 feet mlw in the Bar Channel for a total of 31 miles of harbor improvements. SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA For a 5-foot channel Special improvement by bank protection work of 20 to 25 miles of the river immediately below Augusta. The present 6-foot channel project and Lock and Dam, GA. Provision made for locating the lock and dam at New Savannah Bluff. Conditions of local cooperation modified. Provides for a 9-foot channel. TYBEE ISLAND, GA Project will provide for beach erosion control, consisting of beach restoration, groin nourishment. Extends authority for renourishment with Federal participation from 15 to 50 years. OATES CREEK, GA Provided for construction of the Oates Creek Project. PL 98-360 HD6, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Dated Oct. 17, 1986, Section 201 Section 867 WRDA 1992 HD255, 51st Cong., 2d sess. HD962, 60th Cong., 1st sess. HD101, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Senate Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Com., Doc. 39, 75th Cong., 1st sess. SD6, 81st Cong., 1st sess. HD105, 92d Cong. HR6, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Dated Oct. 17, 1986, Section 867 HR6, 99th Cong., 2d sess. dated Oct. 17, 1986, Section 401 8-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 8-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 19. Flood Control Act of Dec. 22, 1944 Oct. 17, 1986 Jan. 1988 20. Flood Control Act of May 17, 1950. J. STROM THURMOND DAM AND LAKE, GA&SC Approved the general plan for the comprehensive development of the Savannah River Basin and provided for construction of the Project. Recreation and fish and wildlife added as name changed. (Formerly Clarks Hill Lake.) HARTWELL LAKE, GA AND SC Provided for construction of Hartwell Project. Flood Control Act Provided for the completion of the Hartwell Proof July 3, 1958. ject. Water Resources Development Act of 1976. 21. Flood Control Act of Nov. 7, 1966. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Provides for installation of 5th unit. RICHARD B. RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA & SC Provided for construction of the Trotters Shoals Project. Authorized mitigation plan. HD657, 78th Cong., 2d sess. HR6, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Section 864, HJR 376 HD657, 78th Cong., 2d sess. PL516, 82st Cong., 2d sess. PL85-500, 87th Cong., 2d sess. PL94-587, Sec. 182b., 85th Cong. SD52, 89th Cong., 1st sess. HR6, 99th Cong., 2d sess. dated Oct. 17, 1986, Section 601 8-20 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 7 in text) Cost to September 30, 1997 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Bellville Point, GA Completed 1986 599,379 Cedar Point, GA Completed 1982 656,233 Darien Harbor, GA Completed 1975 199,723 185,433 Fancy Bluff Creek, GA 1 Completed 1935 8,000 7,200 St. Mary's River, GA and FL, Completed 1951 15,688 69,936 and North River, GA Sapelo Harbor, GA 2, 3 Completed 1929 17,906 19,594 Satilla River, GA 1, 5, 6 Completed 1951 9,452 57,172 Savannah River above Augusta, See Notes 1929 69,600 85,944 GA 2, 3, 4 Savannah River at Augusta, GA See Notes 1929 200,556 17,444 2, 3, 5 1. Channel adequate for commerce. 2. Project recommended for abandonment in H.D. 467, 69th Cong., 1st session. 3. No commerce reported. 4. About 84 percent completed. Owing to construction of two power dams which submerged much of the work under the present and former projects, this improvement cannot be completed as originally planned. 5. Excludes $185,000 contributed funds ($172,151 for construction and $12,849 for operation and maintenance). 6. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized demonstration project on the Umbrella Creek - Dover Creek for the purpose of reducing shoaling. Monitor for 10 years, develop a hydrodynamic model. 8-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 8-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 13 in text) Cost to September 30, 1997 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Augusta, Savannah River, GA Curry Creek Dam and Lake, GA (1) Dunn Branch, Woodbine, Camden County, GA Macon, GA Oates Creek, GA (2) Peacock Creek, Liberty County, GA Completed See Note Completed Completed Completed Completed 1941 1974 1977 1955 1993 1976 $ 643,016 132,640 380,043 12,565,000 582,163 1. Feasibility report completed. Project not authorized for construction. 2. Authorized by HR 6, Water Resource Development Act of 1986 dated October 17, 1986. First Federal cost of $9,600,000 and non-federal cost of $4,100,000. 8-22 $38,242 5,219 38,243 5,219 SAVANNAH, GA, DISTRICT TABLE 8-E SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN, GA AND SC DAMS AND LAKES (See Section 19, 20, & 21 in text) Estimated Cost Name River Federal Non-Federal Total II Il l l IIII II, I 1 I I III II I-I II I I l l Il II I I I J. Strom Thurmond Dam & Lake, GA and SC Hartwell Dam & Lake, GA and SC Richard B. Russell Dam & Lake, GA and SC(4)(5) Savannah $79,156,000(3) Savannah Savannah 89,240,000 587,100,000 $79,156,000(1,3) 89,240,000(2) 587,100,000 Final Cost. (Excludes $127,000 for preauthorization study.) Approved August 1963. (Excludes $73,000 for preauthorization study.) Approved July 1954. Excludes Code 710 funds. Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake (formerly Trotters Shoals Lake) replaced Goat Island, GA and SC and Middleton Shoals, GA and SC. 8-23 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT * JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT With the exception of a small area in the north-eastern section of Florida, this district comprises a portion of south-central Georgia and all of peninsular Florida, embracing the watersheds tributary to the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico from, and including the harbor at Fernandina, Florida, to and including the Aucilla River. It also includes Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) ............ 3 2. Arecibo Harbor, PR .............................................. 3 3. Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, VA and St. Johns River, FL ..................... 3 4. Bakers Haulover Inlet, FL ...................................... 4 5. Canaveral Harbor, FL ..... ................................... 4 6. Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass .............. 5 7. Charlotte Harbor, FL ............................................ 5 8. Cross Florida Barge Canal ................................... 6 9. Eau Gallie Harbor, FL ..................................... 6 10. Fernandina Harbor, FL .................................... 6 11. Fort Myers Beach, FL ..................................... 7....... 12. Fort Pierce Harbor, FL .................................... 7 13. Intracoastal Waterway, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, FL .................................. 8 14. Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, FL ...................... ............. 9 15. Jacksonville Harbor, FL .................................... 9 16. Jacksonville Harbor (Mill Cove), FL ................ 10 17. John's Pass, FL ........................................... 11 18. Longboat Pass, FL .................................... .. 11 19. M anatee Harbor, FL ......................................... 12 20. Mayaguez Harbor, PR ................................... 12 21. Melbourne Harbor, FL .................................... 13 22. Miami Harbor.................. ........ 13 23. New Pass, Sarasota, FL ..................................... 14 24. Okeechobee Waterway, FL ........................... 14 25. Oklawaha River, FL.................... .............. 15 26. Palm Beach Harbor, FL ........................ ......... 15 27. Ponce de Leon Inlet, FL .................................... 16 28. Ponce Harbor, PR ............................................ 16 29. Port Everglades Harbor, FL .............................. 17 30. Removal of Aquatic Growth from Navigable Waters in the State of Florida .......................... 17 31. St. Augustine Harbor, FL ................................. 18 32. St. Johns River, Jacksonville to Lake Harney, FL .................... .......18 33. St. Lucie Inlet, FL ........................................ 19 34. San Juan Harbor, PR .................................... 20 35. Tampa Harbor, FL ......................................... 20 Navigation (cont.) 36. Navigation Projects on which Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys only were Conducted during Period ..................................... ...... 22 37. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................ 22 38. Navigation Work under Special Authorization .................................... 22 Beach Erosion Control 39. Brevard County, FL .......................................... .. 22 40. Broward County, FL Beach Erosion Control and Hillsboro Inlet, FL Navigation Project .......... 22 41. Duval County, FL ...................................... 23 42. Ft. Pierce Beach, FL .......................................... 24 43. Indian River County, FL .................................. 24 44. Lee County, FL......................... ........ ............. 25 45. M anatee County, FL............................. ......... 25 46. Martin County, FL.................................... 26 47. Nassau County, FL....................................... 26 48. Palm Beach County, FL ................................... 27 49. Palm Beach Island, FL ................................... ... 28 50. Pinellas County, FL .......................... . 28 51. St. Johns County, FL............................................ 29 52. Sarasota County, FL ................................... 29 53. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects .................................... ............. 30 54. Beach Erosion Control Activities under Special Authorization ..................................... 30 Flood Control 55. Central and Southern Florida ........................... 31 56. Dade County, FL ....................................... 32 57. Dade County, N. of Haulover Beach, FL ......... 33 58. Four River Basins, FL ..................................... . 33 59. Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR ................... 34 60. Rio De La Plata, PR .......................................... 35 61. Rio Puerto Nuevo, PR ....................................... 35 62. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ....................................... .......... 36 63. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........... 36 64. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ........................................... 36 9-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 General Investigations 65. Surveys ..................................... 36 66. Collection and Study of Basic Data ..................... 36 67. Continuation of Planning and Engineering .......... 36 68. Advance Engineering and Design ..................... 36 General Regulatory 69. Permit Evaluation.......................37 70. Enforcement........................................ 37 71. Other Navigation Regs .................................. 37 Project Modifications 72. Kissimmee River Restoration ........................... 37 *All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of the chapter. 9-2 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (R&H ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for control and progressive eradication of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water-milfoil, and other noxious aquatic plant growths from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of most effective and economical control measures in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies in accordance with report of Chief of Engineers, H 251/89/1. The Water Resource Development Act of 1986 amended the River and Harbor Act of 1965 requiring the local sponsor to share 50 percent of planning costs and 50 percent of research costs that are local in nature. The cost of research that is regional or national in scope shall be borne fully by the United States. Local cooperation. Florida Department of Natural Resources holds the United States free from damages that may occur from operations performed in connection with this project and contributes 50 percent of cost of operations. Compliance with requirements of local cooperation is on schedule. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Costs incurred was $-55,622. Condition at end of fiscal year. Operations by the Corps and the State of Florida are in progress, water hyacinths within Florida are under maintenance control. Hydrilla is continuing to spread throughout the state and is causing major problems in some areas. 2. ARECIBO HARBOR, PR Location. The harbor is located on the north shore of Puerto Rico about 40 miles west of San Juan Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25668.) Previous project. For details see page 504 of 1956 Annual Report. Existing project. The project provides for a channel 25 feet deep by 400 feet wide, with flare at entrance and widening at inner end to form a maneuvering area, and a stone breakwater 1,200 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. A bulkhead wharf 688 by 220 feet providing a deep water berthing space of approximately 500 feet, and a 300 by 100 foot transit shed. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1944. Breakwater was repaired in 1952. Wave action has since caused damage. 3. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT) Location. That part of Intracoastal Waterway between southerly limit of Fernandina Harbor, FL, at junction of Lanceford Creek and Amelia River, and St. Johns River, FL. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11489.) Previous project. For details see page 605 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. Channel 12, 90 to 150 feet wide from Fernandina Harbor to St. Johns River, about 22 miles long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 6 feet at Fernandina and 3.8 feet at St. Johns River. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Existing project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of 1913 (H 898/62/2) and 1938 (H 618/75/3). Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There is a commercial marina located at Sisters Creek. No other facilities exist along this section of the waterway and none are currently required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations of locks and dams costs was $4,900. Natural resource management cost was $800. Condition and 9-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 operational studies costs was $54,200. Real estate management cost was $1,600. Project operations cost was $159,300. Channel and canal cost was $2,753,800. Engineering and design and construction management costs were $28,000 and $72,400 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1941. 4. BAKERS HAULOVER INLET, FL Location. The inlet connects the Intracoastal Waterway and the Atlantic Ocean and is located 2 miles north of Miami Beach in Dade County, Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 11 by 200 feet, thence 8 by 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, and a marina basin 8 by 200 feet. The length of the project is 1.02 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in December 1964. 5. CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL Location. The harbor is located on the east coast of Florida in Canaveral Bight, about 146 miles south of the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor and 69 miles north of the entrance to Fort Pierce Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11478 and 11484.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 37 foot deep entrance channel and maintenance of the 44 foot deep Navy channel in the 37 foot channel reach; and 35 foot depth turning basin; construction and operation of a sand transfer plant; relocation of the perimeter dike about 4,000 feet westward and extension of the harbor westward; south entrance jetty 1,100 feet long and the entrance jetty 1,150 feet long; a lock; a channel and turning basin 31 feet deep near the relocated dike; and a barge canal 12 by 125 feet from the turning basin to the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway. Plane of reference is mean low water (Banana River) for barge canal. The project is about 11.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 3.5 feet at the entrance and practically non-tidal in Banana and Indian Rivers. (See Table 9-I for Data Relative to Lock.) Estimated cost (October 1996 price levels) for Canaveral Harbor Deepening project is $5,900,000 Federal and $2,900,000 non-Federal and project cost for Canaveral Harbor Sand Transfer System is $123,760,000 Federal and $4,940,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must; provide all lands, rights-of-way, spoil-disposal areas, retaining dikes, and embankments; hold United States free from damages; provide and maintain four-lane bridge and roadway subject to Federal contribution of 65.3 percent of cost of constructing bridge and 51.2 percent of constructing roadway; provide public terminal and transfer facilities; and make alterations as required in berthing facilities. For further details see Senate Document 140, 87th Congress, 2nd session. Non-Federal contribution for new work is $2,827,214. Terminal facilities. Canaveral Harbor has 27 commercial waterfront facilities. The General Cargo Facilities consist of 1,900 feet of usable berthing space capacity of 168,000 square feet. The Oil Handling Facilities operate with 3,760 feet of usable berthing space and 1,413,000 barrels of tank storage. Available warehouse storage includes 28,000 square feet of dry storage and 2,500,000 cubic feet of cold storage. Open storage is 189 acres. Three cruise ship berths totaling 1,400 feet long by 34 foot depth and three 8,800 square foot cruise terminals are also located on the south side. The western cruise ship berth is equipped with a roll on/off ramp and is adjacent to 20 acres of trailer storage area. Hoisting facilities consist of one 45 ton floating crane and crawler and mobile cranes, with capacities from 70 to 200 tons, available from local crane rental services. There are 2 waterfront marine repair facilities with the nearest dry-dock facilities located at Port Everglades and Jacksonville. Two tugs with ratings of 1,600 and 2,250 horsepower are also available. There is no rail service available at the port. The nearest rail service is the Florida East Coast Railway located 9 miles away. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate cost was $52,130. Construction contract cost was $829,001. Reconnaissance cost was $102,504. Feasibility cost was $69,160. Miscellaneous activities cost was $3,753. Engineering and design and construction management costs were $411,091 and $90,087 9-4 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT respectively. HTRW cost was $994. HTRW post construction and financial close-out activities costs was $293. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation of lock and dam amounted to $1,258,300 for the fiscal year. Operation of service utilities costs $31,900. Condition and operation studies cost $124,500. Water quality control costs were $31,000. Real estate management was $200. Project operations management cost was $10,800. Lands and damages cost $1,0000. Lock maintenance cost $52,800. Maintenance of non-recreational buildings and grounds cost was $72,200. Channel and canal maintenance cost was $3,603,700. Engineering and design and construction management cost $130,300 and $261,900 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Contract for the jetty extension and sand-tightening was completed in September 1995. However, due to damage experienced during severe storms in the area, extensive repairs are in order to the jetty head. Letter report has been completed to temporarily sandtighten north jetty. Sandbypassing is being accomplished periodically. WRDA 96 authorized reimbursement to sponsor for the Federal share of Canaveral Harbor Deepening revetment removal and replacement that should have been cost shared. Widening and deepening was completed in FY 95. Erosion of the north bank has resulted. This has placed the Navy's diked disposal area in jeopardy due to possible undermining. Navy has asked that the Corps and local sponsor repair the erosion before further damage is experienced. 6. CHANNEL FROM NAPLES TO BIG MARCO PASS, FL Location. Naples Bay is on the southwestern side of the Florida peninsula about 35 miles south of the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River and approximately 1 mile inland and parallel to the Gulf of Mexico coastline. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11430.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an interior channel 6 by 70 feet from Naples to Big Marco Pass; a channel 12 by 150 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to Gordon Pass, thence 10 by 100-70 feet to a 10 foot depth turning basin in the upper Naples Bay; and an 8 foot depth turning basin at the municipal yacht basin. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 2.1 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see Annual Report of 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Contributed funds for new work were $159,975. Terminal facilities. Four seafood packing houses; 4 marine repair yards; a municipal pier and basin for use by recreational boats; and numerous private piers and slips for both commercial and recreational craft are available. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end offiscal year. The project is complete. 7. CHARLOTTE HARBOR, FL Location. The Harbor is located on the west coast of Florida about 68 miles south of the entrance to Tampa Bay and 150 miles north of Key West. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11429.) Previous projects. For details, see page 457 of 1959 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 32 by 300 feet, increased to 700 feet at the bend, from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Boca Grande to and including a turning basin at 200 feet square at the municipal terminal at Punta Gorda. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 29.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is one foot at Port Boca Grande and 1.4 feet at Punta Gorda. Extreme range is about 3 feet at Port Boca Grande and 3.8 feet at Punta Gorda. Strong southwesterly winds raise water levels about 1.5 feet; strong northerly and easterly winds lower water levels about one foot. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation is fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities consist of a phosphate wharf at Port Boca Grande and a municipal earthfill pier about 850 feet long at Punta Gorda, both open to the public. Railway connections are available at Port Boca Grande, and highway and railway connections are available at Punta Gorda. There is a tank farm at Port Boca Grande for storage and rehandling of bunker fuel oil and numerous facilities are available in the area for docking and servicing small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. 9-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Lands and damages cost was $27,800. Condition, environmental and operation studies cost $21,800. Water quality control cost was $4,500. Inspection cost was $2,500. Project operation maintenance cost was $2,250,800. Engineering and design and construction management costs were $7,800 and $136,000 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1959. (See Table 9-A for total project costs.) In addition, $15,563 was expended from contributed funds for new work in Boca Grande entrance channel. 8. CROSS FLORIDA BARGE CANAL Location. The proposed canal extends up the St. Johns River, past Palatka, thence up the valley of the Oklawaha River across the divide south of Ocala, and down the valley of the Withlacoochee River to the Gulf of Mexico, about 95 miles north of Tampa, Florida. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a lock canal with project depth of 12 feet and a minimum bottom width of 150 feet, with five locks and two earth dams. Project including the section in the St. Johns River is 184 miles long. (See Table 9-J for Locks and Dams.) WRDA 92 authorizes and directs ASA(CW) to offer to enter into a contract to operate and maintain the project at a level necessary to ensure safe operating conditions and to prevent deterioration of the structures. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction of canal; hold the United States free from damages; and operate and maintain all highway bridges and roadways built in connection with project. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Water quality management costs were $1,007.99 and clearing account costs were $44,480.20. Regulation. a. Lake Ocklawaha. During the period, the lake continued to be regulated at 18.0 feet, NGVD by discharging through the Rodman spillway. b. Lake Rousseau. During the period, the lake continued to be regulated at 27.5 feet, NGVD by discharging through the Inglis Main and Bypass Spillways. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of project commenced February 25, 1964, and is 36 percent completed. Inglis Lock, Dam, and Spillway; Rodman Dam and Spillway; Eureka Lock, Dam, and Spillway; Henry H. Buckman Lock; and canal from Palatka to Lake Ocklawaha and from Withlacoochee River to Gulf of Mexico, including Inglis Bypass Channel, are completed. Construction work on the project was terminated in FY 1971 by order of the President. A restudy report and environmental impact statement were completed in February 1977. Project was deauthorized in Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-640) and $5,000,000 of prior appropriations were withdrawn. 9. EAU GALLIE HARBOR, FL Location. The Harbor is located on Indian River about midway of the State of Florida, 176 miles south of Jacksonville Harbor and 174 miles north of Miami Harbor. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 8 by 100 feet from Indian River to and including a 300 by 600 foot turning basin in Eau Gallie. The project is about 2,700 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The harbor is almost nontidal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. A privately owned boatyard in Eau Gallie Harbor provides more than 600 feet of docking space used chiefly by pleasure boats. There are also 2 marine railways and repair and storage facilities available. The facilities are considered adequate for the present needs of navigation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1939. In December 1982, the controlling depth of the channel was 5 feet. 10. FERNANDINA HARBOR, FL 9-6 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Location. Entrance to the harbor is located on the northeast coast of Florida about 95 miles south of the entrance to Savannah Harbor, Georgia, and 22 miles north of the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11503.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 32 foot depth channel (maximum channel in active status: 28 feet) generally 300-400 feet wide from deep water in the ocean to the junction of Lanceford Creek with Amelia River; an 800 foot wide turning basin at the first bend below Lanceford Creek; and 2 jetties, 19,150 and 11,200 feet long. The project is 7 miles long. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 5.8 feet on the bar and 6 feet in the inner harbor. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $935,000. Terminal facilities. There are 2 large wharves operated by industrial plants; 12 wharves serving fishing boats, recreational craft, and other vessels; 3 oil handling wharves with pipelines; and a Municipal Marina and Sportsman's Wharf with public facilities for small craft. Total berthing space is approximately 4,065 feet. Most terminals are served by rail, and all have highway access. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16 (Part 2), 1964.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of locks, dams, and reservoirs cost was $100,700. Condition, environmental and operation studies cost $97,900. Water quality control cost was $34,700. Real estate management cost was $300. Lands and damages cost was $5,000. Channel and canal maintenance cost was $417,800. Engineering and design and construction management cost was $61,000 and $36,000 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The active portion of the existing project is complete. Jetties are in poor condition and are badly in need of repair. Remaining work is to deepen the inner harbor channel and turning basin to 32 feet when and if the presently inactive 1950 authorization is reactivated. The entrance channel has been deepened to 46 feet for the Kings Bay project. Authorized depths were restored as of March 1991. 11. FORT MYERS BEACH, FL Location. Fort Myers Beach is on Estero Island near the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River, about 20 miles below Fort Myers and 110 miles south of Tampa, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11427.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 by 150 feet from that depth in San Carlos Bay into Matanzas Pass, thence 11 by 125 feet in Matanzas Pass to and including a turning basin 2,000 feet upstream from the upper shrimp terminals. Plane of reference is mean low water. Project is 2.5 miles long. Mean tidal range is 1.7 feet. Spring range is about 2.3 feet. Strong northerly winds lower the water surface 1 to 2 feet; strong southerly winds have an opposite effect. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are 3 shrimp-packing houses and several fish-packing houses, 2 marine railways, a fuel terminal and an ice manufacturing plant in the area. There are several commercial facilities for servicing shrimp boats. Recreational craft facilities include 9 marinas, a boat motor testing laboratory which is closed, and numerous privately owned piers and wharves. All terminals have highway access. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. 12. FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FL Location. On east coast of Florida, about 218 miles south of entrance to St. Johns River and about 124 miles north of entrance to Miami Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11475.) Existing project. A channel 350 feet wide at the 27 foot contour in the ocean, tapering to a width of 200 feet at Station 100+00, thence 200 feet wide to Sta. 30+00, and thence flaring to a turning basin 900 feet wide. Entrance channel is 27 feet deep to Sta. 130+00 and thence 25 feet deep to and including the turning basin. Project includes the maintenance of two jetties and shore revetments at the inlet. Length of project is about 3.5 miles. Plan of improvement consists of enlarging the existing entrance channel to 400 feet wide and 30 feet deep , the interior channel to 250 feet wide and 28 feet deep, the 9-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 existing turning basin to 1,100 feet square and 28 feet deep, and providing an access channel 1,250 feet long, 250 feet wide and 28 feet deep north of the main turning basin. Mean tidal range is 2.6 feet at the entrance and 0.7 feet at terminals. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see 1961 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $2,503,387. A 25% contribution and an additional 10% reimbursement over 30 years from locals is required. Terminal facilities. Two earth-filled piers forming a slip 200 by 300 feet, with bulkhead wharf at inner end, affording berthing space of about 1,653 feet. The south pier and bulkhead wharf are municipally owned. Facilities also include a cooling plant, a warehouse and a fruit packing house. The north pier is served by railway and both piers by highway connections. North of the turning basin local interests have provided deep-draft berthing and pier facilities. Also available is a bulkhead wharf with a depth of 25 feet with ample room for open storage and with tank storage for petroleum in the rear. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Navigation ports and harbor cost was $104,297. Maintenance: Operation of locks, dams and reservoirs cost was $27,900. Condition and operation study cost was $52,600. Real estate management cost was $100. Channel and canal maintenance cost was $308,200. Engineering and design cost was $21,700. Construction management cost was $44,700. Condition at end of fiscal year. Mitigation contract completed in May 1996. No further work is scheduled. 13. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FL Location. The Waterway extends from the mouth of the Caloosahatchee River at Punta Rassa, Florida, to the mouth of Anclote River, Florida, following in general an almost continuous series of protected inside waterways along the gulf coast of Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11411, 11425 and 11427.) Previous projects. For details see page 767 of 1945 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 9 by 100 feet from Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River; deepening the existing channel at Casey's Pass to 9 feet; a channel 6 by 80 feet (Cats Point Channel) along the southeastern side of Boca Ciega Bay past Frenchman Creek and Gulfport; maintenance of bulkheads, revetments, and two jetties built at Casey's Pass under previous project; and improvement and maintenance of Sunshine Skyway Channel. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project includes about 160 miles of channels. Mean ranges of tide are 1.7 feet at Punta Rassa, 1 foot at Port Boca Grande, 1.4 feet in Tampa Bay at Anna Maria, and 2 feet at entrance to Anclote River. Extreme ranges are about 4.5 feet at Punta Rassa, about 3 to 4 feet between Port Boca Grande and Corey Causeway over Boca Ciega Bay, and about 5.5 feet at entrance to Anclote River. Southerly winds over the area generally raise water levels by 1 to 1.5 feet; northerly winds lower water levels by 1 to 2 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities include one municipal concrete pier, one railway pier, one freight wharf, one marginal wharf 500 feet long on terminal island, and 11 privately owned landings, all at Sarasota. Municipal pier and freight wharf are open to the public. All piers have highway connections. There are 6 wharves along Boca Ciega Bay and a number of small privately owned piers and wharves at various points along waterway for use by commercial fishing boats and recreational craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of flood control structures cost was $5,000. Condition surveys cost -$27,200. Water control management cost was $1,100. Real estate costs was $31,000. Lands and damages cost was $4,000. Maintenance of levees and floodwalls cost was $19,100. Channel and canal maintenance cost was $51,600. Engineering and design cost was $23,300. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project is complete. A contract to maintain the jetties at Casey's Pass was completed in 1983. 9-8 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT 14. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FL Location. The Waterway extends from Jacksonville to Miami, Florida, following the St. Johns River to the mouth of Pablo Creek and thence following in general an almost continuous series of protected inside waterways along the Atlantic coast of Florida to Miami. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11489, 11485, 11472 and 11467.) Previous projects. For details, see pages 618-619 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 12 by 125 feet from Jacksonville to Miami, modified by Chief of Engineer's report of July 22, 1960; side channels at Sebastian and Daytona Beach and turning basins at Sebastian and Vero Beach, all to an 8 foot depth, and operation and maintenance of Palm Valley highway bridge. Project is 370 miles long, including 21 miles in Jacksonville Harbor. Mean range of tide is 3.8 feet at St. Johns River, 0.7 foot in Indian River at Fort Pierce, 1.8 feet in Lake Worth at Port of Palm Beach terminals, 2.3 feet at the Port Everglades terminals, and 2 feet in Biscayne Bay. The extreme range is about 7 feet at St. Johns River, 1.5 feet at Fort Pierce, and 3 feet in Biscayne Bay. Plane of reference is mean low water. Tidal effect is imperceptible at points along waterway distant from inlets. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are a number of privately owned piers, wharves, and landings at various points along waterway. Terminals with railway connections are available at Jacksonville, Fort Pierce, West Palm Beach, Port Everglades, and Miami. Municipal piers or wharves have been constructed at Titusville, Cocoa, Melbourne, and Vero Beach for handling general freight and at St. Augustine, Daytona Beach, New Smyrna Beach, Eau Gallie, West Palm Beach, Delray Beach, Fort Lauderdale, and Miami for use of recreational craft. Yacht basins, open to the public, have been provided at Jacksonville Beach, Daytona Beach, Titusville, Eau Gallie, Vero Beach, Fort Pierce, West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale, Hollywood, and Miami. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For further details on facilities at Jacksonville, see Port Series No. 15, 1969, and at Palm Beach, Port Everglades, and Miami, see Port Series No. 16, Revised 1972.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of locks and dams cost was $331,100. Operation of service facilities was $144,000. Operation of flood control structures cost was $200. Natural resource management cost was $26,800. Recreational management cost was $2,100. Condition, environmental and operation studies cost $167,200. Water quality control cost was $33,800. Real estate management cost $162,600. Project operations cost was $6,400. Lands and damages cost was $20,500. Maintenance cost of levees and floodwalls was $300. Pumping plant maintenance cost was $100. Utilities, supplies and maintenance cost was $1,400. Channel and canal maintenance cost was $50,200. Engineering and design and construction management cost $551,100 and $12,300 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project as modified by the Chief of Engineers is complete. (Construction of the channel and turning basin at Sebastian, Florida, was deauthorized by WRDA of 1988, P.L. 100-676.) (See Table 9-A for total project costs.) In addition, $2,199,842 has been expended from public works funds for new work. 15. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL Location. The authorized project comprises the lower 24.9 miles of St. Johns River which empties into the Atlantic Ocean near the northeasterly corner of the Florida peninsula. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11491.) Previous projects. For details, see page 607 of Annual Report, 1938. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 38 feet deep by 400-1,200 feet wide from ocean to mile 20 via Dame Point-Fulton Cutoff, thence 34 feet to Commodore Point, and thence 30 feet deep to the FEC railway bridge at Jacksonville, including a 30 foot channel in Arlington cut in the old Dames Point-Fulton channel; maintenance of the existing 42 and 40 foot depth entrance channel; widening of channel by 100 feet near mile 5 and by 200 feet near mile 7; maintenance of jetties at channel entrance; construction of training walls and revetments; a navigation and floodway channel 26 by 200 feet along south side of Commodore Point; on approach and mooring basin 20 feet deep, 1,300 feet long at 20 foot depth contour and 600 feet long at pierhead line near Naval Reserve Armory in south Jacksonville; a depth of 24 feet between that depth contour and the pierhead line from Hogan Creek to the foot of Laura Street; and a depth 9-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 of 28 feet to within 60 feet of pierhead line between foot of Laura Street and St. Elmo W. Acosta (formerly Upper State) bridge. Length of project is about 26.8 miles. In addition the Navy has provided funds for a deeper Jacksonville Harbor entrance channel 42 feet deep and 800 feet long, intersecting with the Navy's Mayport entrance channel to the Mayport turning basin; also an extension of the existing project to provide 38 foot depth for the Navy fuel depot, at Drummond Creek. Mean tidal range is 5.3 feet on the bar, 4.9 feet at Mayport, 2.6 feet at Dame Point, and 1.1 feet at Jacksonville. The extreme range varies from about 9 feet on the bar to about 1.5 feet at Jacksonville. Strong northeasterly winds raise the water level about 2 feet at Mayport and Jacksonville. Strong southwesterly winds lower the water about 1.5 feet at Mayport and one foot at Jacksonville. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Estimated cost of new work (October 1996 price levels) $112,500,000 Federal and $37,500,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with requirements of local cooperation for work performed to date. For work authorized by the 1965 River and Harbor Act, local interests were required to contribute 2.6 percent of the contract price plus supervision and administration for work provided by the Corps; provide all lands and rights-of-way; save the United States free from damages; and provide and maintain public terminal and transfer facilities. Assurances of local cooperation for this work were accepted February 11, 1966. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $927,654. Terminal facilities. Jacksonville Harbor has 84 waterfront facilities. Available at the General Cargo Facilities are 11,140 feet of usable berthing space and 12 transit sheds with a total storage space of 1,009,800 square feet. The Oil Handling Facilities consist of 7,843 feet of usable berthing space and 179 storage tanks providing a total of 8,478,900 barrels of tank storage. Warehouse storage at the port includes 3,266,900 square feet of dry storage and 4,071,100 cubic feet of cold storage. Available open storage is 233 acres. Four fixed cranes with capacities from 40 to 100 tons are located at the port. Available locally are crawler and truck cranes with capacities up to 100 tons. Various phases of marine repair work are accomplished by 7 waterfront repair facilities and numerous other companies located offwater. Dry-dock facilities consist of 6 floating drydocks with capacities from 800 to 33,000 tons. Floating equipment includes 25 tugs with up to 3,300 horsepower and 16 tank barges with capacities up to 20,700 barrels. Three major railroads furnish rail service from port docks to all points outside of Jacksonville. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce (See Port Series No. 15, Rev. 1978.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of locks and dams cost was $124,700. Operation of service utilities cost was $124,200. Operation of power plants cost was $8,500. Natural resource management cost was $500. Recreation management cost was $600. Condition, environmental and operation studies cost $424,300. Water quality control cost was $64,000. Real estate management cost $37,700. Project operations cost was $11,200. Lands and damages cost was $400. Maintenance of levees and floodwalls was $30,000. Channel and canal maintenance cost was $4,210,200. Engineering and design and construction management cost $489,300 and $74,200 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the modification to the project, authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act, is completed. The north jetty is in fair condition and partially submerged at high tide. The south jetty was repaired in FY 1985 to prevent further damage to the Mayport Naval Station. Revetments and retaining walls were in poor condition. Authorized project depths were restored as of January 1991. Feasibility study to consider improvements of depths to 44 feet will be completed in March 1998. PED is scheduled to be initiated in FY 98 and completed September 2000. (See Table 9-A for total project costs.) In addition, $290,013 has been expended from public works funds for new work. 16. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR (MILL COVE), FL Location. The authorized Mill Cove project comprises a 6 square mile body of shallow water on the St. Johns River approximately 10 miles from the Atlantic Ocean near the northeasterly corner of the Florida peninsula. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11491.) Previous project. None. 9-10 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Existing project. The authorized project provides improved flow and circulation through Mill Cove to eliminate further shoaling. This large shallow area averages about 2 to 4 feet deep, is about 5.5 miles long, and varies from 0.5 to 2.0 miles wide. It is situated along the St. Johns River near the Dame Point-Fulton Cutoff portion of the Jacksonville Harbor navigation project. The Mill Cove project includes dredging a 650 foot by 3,600 foot flow channel at the west end to -12 feet MSL; enlarging the weir opening at the eastern end to 1,300 feet wide and -12 feet MSL; and installing flow diversion features at the west and east ends of the cove. Mean tidal range is 4.9 feet at entrance, 4.5 feet at Mayport, 3.0 feet at Dame Point, and 1.2 feet at Jacksonville. Strong northeasterly winds raise the water level about 2 feet at Mayport and Jacksonville. Strong southwesterly winds lower the water about 1.5 feet at Mayport and 1 foot at Jacksonville (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. In conformance with Section 221, Public Law 91-611, and prior to commencement of construction, the Jacksonville Port Authority, as local sponsor, must provide written agreement to the following local cooperation requirements: provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages that result due to construction and maintenance other than damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; accomplish without cost to the United States such utility and other relocations or alterations as necessary for construction. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1990. 17. JOHNS PASS, FL Location. A natural inlet on the west coast of Florida connecting Boca Ciega Bay with Gulf of Mexico. The pass is located about 8 miles northwest of lower Tampa Bay directly across Boca Ciega Bay from St. Petersburg, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11411.) Existing project. Channel 10 by 150 feet in the Gulf, thence 8 by 100 feet inside pass, and 6 by 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, and suitable protective measures over a frontage of approximately 1,000 linear feet of shore along the north end of Treasure Island. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 1.5 feet. Project is about 2.6 miles long. Project was authorized December 2, 1964 by the Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act and by Section 110 of the 1966 River and Harbor Act. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Only small marinas and repair yards for recreational craft are in the general vicinity. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation condition survey cost was $30,800. Engineering and design cost was $4,900. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1968. Authorized project depths were restored as of June 1991. 18. LONGBOAT PASS, FL Location. Longboat Pass is located on the west coast of Florida about 11 miles northwest of Sarasota and 23 miles south of St. Petersburg. Located in Manatee County, it is one of several natural inlets connecting Sarasota Bay, a tidal estuary, with the Gulf of Mexico. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11425.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 12 by 150 feet from the Gulf to Longboat Pass Bridge, thence a channel 10 by 100 feet from Longboat Pass Bridge along a north to northeasterly alignment to the Intracoastal Waterway to Cortez Bridge. The mean tidal range is 2.2 feet and the maximum tidal range is about 5 feet. Currents are predominantly tidal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. See 1978 Annual Report for detailed local cooperation requirements. Contributed funds for new work were $172,324. Terminal facilities. From Sarasota north to Tampa Bay there are about 28 small craft facilities including marinas, boat repair yards, and boat basins along the Intracoastal Waterway. Nine of them are located within 2 miles of Longboat Pass. Numerous private mooring piers and wharves also exist in the area. The marina and repair 9-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 facilities appear adequate for the general boating needs of the area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of locks and dams cost was $100. Operation condition survey cost was $19,700. Project operation management cost was $4,500. Channel and canal maintenance cost was $1,057,600. Construction management cost was $61,400. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. Authorized project depths were restored as of June 1991. 19. MANATEE HARBOR, FL Location. The project is located in Manatee County on the east side of Tampa Bay 10 miles from the Gulf of Mexico. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11414.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for maintenance of the existing 40 foot deep draft navigation channel and turning basin which extends from Tampa Bay Channel to berthing facilities at Port Manatee. Also provide initial construction for a widener at the northwest end of the Manatee Harbor Channel and initial construction to deepen approximately 6.6 acres adjacent to the southern berthing area to provide a larger turning basin. All material from the project will be placed on upland sites west and northeast of the port slip. Estimated cost of new work (October 1996 price levels) $19,985,000 Federal and $15,000,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. A 25 percent contribution and an additional 10 percent reimbursement over 30 years from locals are required. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $2,586,943. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities at Port Manatee consist of 675 acres of port operational lands, a ship basin 1,500 feet long by 788 feet wide; and an approximately 3 mile access channel, with a design width of 400 feet, which connects with the Federally authorized Tampa Bay Channel. The Manatee project was constructed between August 1968 and February 1970. The required design depth was 40 feet, and the dredging contractor was allowed a pay overdepth of 2 feet. Port Manatee also operates its own terminal railroad, which is licensed under the Interstate Commerce Commission, and publishes a switching tariff as a Class III railroad. It also maintains and operates 2 switch engines and about 30,000 feet of track which connects with the CSX Railroad. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Lands and damages cost was -$34,921. Fish and wildlife cost was $201. Channel and canal cost was $1,040,338. Navigation ports and harbor cost was $-4,716. Reconnaissance cost was $7,343. Engineering and design and construction management cost was -$120,129 and $150,079 respectively. Maintenance: Operation of locks and dams cost was $7,100. Operation condition survey cost was $52,900. Channel and canal cost was $100. Engineering and design cost was $18,300. Condition at end of fiscal year. Channel contract awarded in August 1995 and was completed December 1996. Widener, turning basin, and mitigation contract is scheduled for award in April 1998. The dredging will be completed in two phases, with Phase I completed in December 1996 and the second phase currently scheduled for completion in March 1999. 20. MAYAGUEZ HARBOR, PR Location. The Project is on the west coast of Puerto Rico, about 110 miles by water from San Juan Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25673.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 30 by 1,000 foot approach channel to the deep water terminal, decreasing to a 500 foot width opposite the westerly end of terminal, thence the same width to the easterly end of terminal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. A modern deep water terminal is located in the northeast section of the harbor consisting of a bulkhead wharf about 1,270 feet long with a storage transit shed 800 by 60 feet immediately shoreward. The Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company, an agency of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, owns a bulkhead wharf of about 200 feet in line with the existing deep water terminal plant located within the industrial harbor area. In addition, Bumble Bee Packing Company, Inc., owns and operates a dock of about 200 feet for docking tuna fish boats. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. 9-12 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1934. 21. MELBOURNE HARBOR, FL Location. The project is on Indian River about midway of the State of Florida, 179 miles south of Jacksonville Harbor and 171 miles north of Miami Harbor. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 8 by 100 feet from Indian River to a 400 by 800 foot turning basin in Crane Creek. Project is about 3,150 feet long. Plane of reference is mean low water. The harbor is almost non-tidal. Terminal facilities. The Municipal Marina on the north end of the turning basin has a 350 foot steel bulkhead with 11 finger piers, each about 40 feet long. There are also 2 privately owned storage and repair facilities and several privately owned boathouses and docks. The facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1938. As of September 1984 channel depths as authorized were available throughout the project. 22. MIAMI HARBOR, FL Location. Miami is near the northern end of Biscayne Bay, about 71 miles south of the entrance to Palm Beach Harbor. Miami River has its source in the Everglades and flows southeasterly to enter Biscayne Bay at Miami. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11468.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for a 38 by 500 foot channel from the ocean to the outer end of the north jetty, thence 36 by 400 feet through the entrance and across Biscayne Bay to and including a turning basin at the municipal terminals; a 36 foot depth turning basin at Fisher Island; 2 rubblestone jetties at the entrance; and a channel 15 feet deep in Miami River varying in width from 250 feet at mouth to 90 feet 5.5 miles inland. Plane of reference is mean low water, except for 15 foot channel in Miami River where depths are based on flood conditions. Total length of the project is about 13 miles. Mean tidal variation is 2.5 feet at entrance and 2 feet in the bay. Extreme variation is about 4.5 feet at entrance and 3 feet in Biscayne Bay. Strong easterly winds raise the water level about 1.5 feet at entrance and 1 foot in the bay. Strong westerly winds lower water level about 1 foot at entrance and about 0.5 foot in the bay. Estimated cost (October 1996 price levels) for Miami Harbor Channel is $51,066,000 Federal cost and $32,500,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. See 1978 Annual Report for detailed local cooperation requirements. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $2,300,710. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1968 modification to the project were accepted December 18, 1968. Terminal facilities. There are 91 commercial waterfront facilities serving the port. The General Cargo Facilities include 21,373 feet of usable berthing space, 13 transit sheds with a total capacity of 474,300 square feet, and 9 freight stations with a total storage capacity of 270,400 square feet. Oil Handling Facilities consist of 2,714 feet of usable berthing space and 36 storage tanks with a total storage capacity of 744,475 barrels. Available sharehouse storage includes dry storage of 1,450,500 square feet and cold storage of 11,204,000 cubic feet. There are 117.1 acres of open storage at the port. Hoisting Facilities located at the port include two 40 ton cranes and cranes with capacities up to 200 tons available through local rental. Twelve waterfront repair yards and 2 offwater yards serve the port. Dry-dock facilities available include 7 marine railways and 4 boat lifts with haulout capacities ranging from 40 to 1,000 tons and lifting capacities ranging from 79 to 500 tons. Nine tugs, with ratings up to 3,000 horsepower, and 13 tank barges, with capacities up to 35,000 barrels, are also available. Rail Facilities at the port are served by the CSX and the Florida East Coast Railway. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $2,021. Navigation ports and harbors cost was $3,146,807. Reconnaissance cost was $1,401. Engineering and design cost $208,390. Construction management cost was $100,193. Maintenance: Operation of locks and dams cost was $2,200. Operation of flood control structures cost was $600. Condition, operation and environmental studies cost $225,100. Real estate management cost was $4,000. Project operations cost was $5,900. Lands and damages 9-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 cost was $1,000. Channel and canal maintenance cost was $40,700. Engineering and design cost $33,800. Construction management cost was $400. Condition at end of fiscal year. Contract for Dodge Island Channel and turning basin is underway and is scheduled for completion in June 1998. GRR completed to extend the channel along Dodge Island. 23. NEW PASS, SARASOTA, FL Location. Sarasota Bay is a tidal lagoon along the west coast of Florida immediately south of Tampa Bay. New Pass is a gulf inlet across the bay from Sarasota, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11425.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide in the Gulf of Mexico diminishing to 8 by 100 feet through New Pass and extending across Sarasota Bay to the Intracoastal Waterway with side channels to, and turning basins at, Payne Terminal and city pier. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet in Sarasota Bay; mean spring range is 1.7 feet. Project is about 4 miles long. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Consist of Payne Terminal, a slip 200 by 650 feet, and city pier, 400 feet long with 2 finger piers equipped with adequate facilities at each location. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of locks and dams cost was $20,500. Natural resource management cost was $9,300. Condition survey cost was $11,500. Project operation management cost was $3,300. Channel and canal maintenance cost was $1,577,300. Engineering and design cost was $26,600. Construction management cost was $112,000 Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was completed in 1964. Authorized project depths were restored as of April 1991. 24. OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FL Location. The waterway traverses the southern part of the Florida peninsula via the Caloosahatchee River, Lake Okeechobee, and St. Lucie Canal, connecting coastal waterways along the Gulf and Atlantic Shores. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11428.) Previous project. For details, see page 785 of 1949 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for replacing the old locks on the St. Lucie Canal by a single new lock; a channel 10 by 100 feet from Ft. Myers for about 5 miles upstream, thence 8 by 80-100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway, Jacksonville to Miami, near Stuart; a side channel at Ft. Myers; operation and care of St. Lucie Lock; and maintenance of features completed under previous projects as follows: a 12 by 200 foot channel from the Gulf of Mexico to Punta Rassa, thence 10 by 100 feet to Ft. Myers with a 10 foot depth basin at Fort Myers; a 6 by 80 foot channel along the south shore of Lake Okeechobee from Clewiston to St. Lucie Canal; a 6 by 60 foot channel in Taylor Creek from the town of Okeechobee to the Lake; and operation and care of Moore Haven and Ortona Locks. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Non-Federal contribution amounted to $503,700. Terminal facilities. There are 3 freight piers, one municipal recreation pier, 4 privately owned piers, and a municipal yacht basin on the Caloosahatchee River near Fort Myers. The Corps has provided a boat basin, launching ramp, and a 120 foot wharf on the Caloosahatchee River about one-quarter mile below Ortona Lock. There are tie-up dolphins above and below all 5 locks. Commercial yacht basins are provided on the south side of the Caloosahatchee River about halfway between Ortona and Moore Haven Locks and about 3 miles east of LaBelle. A commercial/municipal yacht basin is provided on the north side of the St. Lucie Canal at Indiantown. There are numerous small wooden-pile landings along the Caloosahatchee River, St. Lucie Canal, and on the St. Lucie River, including one railroad terminal pier, municipal pier, and a pier for handling petroleum products at Stuart. Also, 550 feet of wharves have been provided on the west side of Taylor Creek immediately landward of Hurricane Gate No. 6 and 150 feet on the east side of the creek. A yacht basin has been provided on the west side of the creek immediately landward of the hurricane gate. The installations on Taylor Creek are privately owned, but are open to the public. A breakwater protected harbor is available at Pahokee. There is a 440 9-14 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT foot marginal wharf on the Industrial Canal at Clewiston; a 125 foot wharf at LaBelle; a 150 foot wharf at Belle Glade; a 125 foot wharf at Moore Haven; a 50 foot wharf at Alva; and a 30 foot wharf on Taylor Creek at the town of Okeechobee. A docking facility for loading raw sugar was constructed in 1967 on Herbert Hoover Dike near Belle Glade. All have highway and/or railway connections. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9- L for work accomplished.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. (The 8 foot depth basin at Stuart was deauthorized by WRDA of 1988, P.L. 100-676.) 25. OKLAWAHA RIVER, FL Location. The river has its source in a system of large lakes in the central part of the Florida peninsula and flows generally northerly, then easterly, emptying into St. Johns River 22 miles upstream from Palatka. The extreme head of the system is considered to be Lake Apopka, 120 miles above the river's mouth. Previous projects. For details, see page 613 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for clearing a channel to Lake Griffin; maintaining dikes to obtain a navigable depth of about 4 feet to Leesburg and construction of a lock and dam at Moss Bluff. The project length is about 85.7 miles. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Several private and public landings and boat-launching ramps are located along the river. Public recreation craft basins and boat launching ramps are near Silver Springs and State Roads 40 and 316 bridges. There is a municipal wharf on Lake Griffmin at Leesburg. A dam has created Lake Ocklawaha (13,000 acres) with egress to the St. Johns River through Buckman Lock. Along the lake are 4 launching ramps; Payne's Landing, Orange Springs, Kenwood Landing, and Rodman Recreation Area. Access below the dam is at the Ocklawaha Boat launch ramp and at State Road 19. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Channel maintenance cost $83,400. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. (A 6 foot depth channel from the mouth of the river to the head of Silver Springs Run was deauthorized.) The Moss Bluff lock and dam structure was replaced under the Four River Basins, Florida flood control project. 26. PALM BEACH HARBOR, FL Location. The authorized project is located on the east coast of Florida about 71 miles north of the entrance to Miami Harbor and about 264 miles southeasterly from the entrance to Jacksonville Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11472.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 35 by 400 feet merging with an inner channel 33 by 300 feet to and including a turning basin; tank revetment; and restoring jetties. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 1.6 miles long. Mean range of tide in the ocean at the entrance is 2.8 feet and at the turning basin, 2.2 feet. Extreme range of tide is about 4.5 feet at the inlet and 3 feet at the terminals. Seven foot tidal ranges have occurred during storms. For details, see 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. For requirements, see 1961 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. The port has 13 commercial waterfront facilities. The General Cargo Facilities include 5,156 feet of usable berthing space and 6 transit sheds with a total of 118,030 square feet of storage capacity. The Oil Handling Facilities consist of 10 storage tanks with a total capacity of 2,029,600 barrels. Usable berthing space is not available at the Oil Handling Facilities. Dry storage is available at 150,500 square feet, cold storage at 19,200 cubic feet and open storage at 27.1 acres. Seven cranes with capacities from 15 to 230 tons are located at the port. There are no floating cranes, repair facilities or dry-dock facilities located at the port. A 100 ton vertical boat lift is located on the Intracoastal Waterway south of the port for heavy lifts. Two tugs with ratings of 900 and 1,000 horsepower are available. The Palm Beach Belt Line which connects with the Florida East Coast Railway serves the port. 9-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No.16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation for locks and dams cost was $33,400. Operation of service utilities cost was $1,200. Operation of flood control structures cost was $5,000. Condition, operation and environmental studies for the project totaled $144,700. Water quality control cost was $2,300. Real estate management cost was $200. Land and damages cost was $1,600. Utilities and supplies cost was $19,000. Channel maintenance cost $1,757,400. Engineering and design and construction management cost $267,300 and $36,500 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in 1967. Jetties and revetment are in need of repair. The south jetty was completed in FY 1986. Maintenance dredging was completed May 1996. Future maintenance dredging will occur yearly as necessary depending on shoaling conditions. 27. PONCE DE LEON INLET, FL Location. Ponce de Leon Inlet is on the Atlantic coast of Florida about 65 miles south of St. Augustine Harbor and 57 miles north of Canaveral Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11485.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an entrance channel 15 by 200 feet across the ocean bar, thence 12 by 200 feet and 12 by 100 feet through the inlet; thence southward in Indian River North, 12 by 100 feet, and northward in Halifax River, 7 by 100 feet, each leg continuing to the Intracoastal Waterway; ocean jetties on the north and south of the inlet 4,200 and 2,700 feet long respectively, and weir in the north jetty with an impoundment basin inside the jetty. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is 4.1 feet in the ocean and 2.3 feet inside the inlet. the project is about 5 miles long. Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $2,415,600. Terminal facilities. None in the immediate area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance Operation of locks and dams cost was $37,000. Operation and condition surveys cost was $26,000. Project operations management cost was $7,000. Breakwater, seawall, and jetty maintenance cost was $23,200. Engineering and design cost $133,600. Construction management cost was $5,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. Maintenance is required on the North Jetty. Draft report under review is considering shoaling problems impacting navigation safety and Division Engineer's public notice is scheduled for November 1997. Will initiate preconstruction, engineering, and design in FY 98. 28. PONCE HARBOR, PR Location. Ponce Harbor is an open bay about midway on the south coast of Puerto Rico. From the center of the city of Ponce, the harbor is about 3 miles south. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25677.) Previous project. For details, see page 12 of Annual Report for 1975. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a seawall 362 feet long extending northwesterly across the rock reef from near the landward end of the municipal pier, 30 feet deep and containing about 18 acres; a breakwater 2,400 feet long extending southwesterly from Punta Carenero; a channel 36 feet deep by 600 feet wide extending from the Caribbean Sea approximately 2.8 miles up to the port, thence a channel 400 feet wide by 36 feet deep into the harbor, and a 36 foot deep, irregularly shaped turning basin with a diameter of 959 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 0.6 foot, extreme varies between about 1 foot below and 2 feet above mean low water. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Should provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide and maintain at local expense depths in berthing areas and local access channels; hold United States free from any damages resulting from construction and maintenance of the project; relocate without cost to the United States all cables, sewer mains, water supply, drainage and other utility installations as required; provide adequate public terminal and transfer facilities open to all on equal terms. A letter has been received from mayor of Ponce, assuring compliance with local requirements and to cost share the project. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $717,304. A 25 percent contribution is required and an additional 10 percent reimbursement over 30 years from locals. 9-16 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Terminal facilities. The municipality of Ponce owns and operates the only deep-draft terminal facilities in Ponce Harbor, which consist of a municipal pier 515 feet long and 108 feet wide, and a bulkhead wharf 3,811 feet long. Both are equipped for transfer and storage of freight. A 40 ton container lift shore crane is available for the handling of loaded containers. The municipal pier has a steel transit shed 386 by 85 feet. The bulkhead wharf has 4 steel transit sheds totaling over 103,000 square feet. Three concrete and steel warehouses are available providing 800,000 square feet for general storage. Open storage areas for structural steel, lumber, and other bulk and package commodities are also provided. Bulk cement is handled and loaded into cement cargo ships by the use of a private pipeline loading facility. A tuna fish processing and canning factory is located on the premises, with direct access to the bulkhead wharf. Existing facilities are open to the public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. South and north jetties are in fair condition. 29. PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FL Location. The harbor is on the east coast of Florida about 23 miles north of Miami and about 48 miles south of Palm Beach Harbor, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11470.) Existing project. The authorized project provides for an ocean entrance channel 45 by 500 feet through an ocean bar tapering to 42 by 450 feet between rubblestone entrance jetties, and continuing at that depth to an irregularly flared entrance and turning basin of same depth; enlarging Pier 7 channel to 36 by 400 feet for distance of about 1,600 feet; maintenance of the locally dredged channel opposite Berth 18 to 36 feet deep over a length of 700 feet with varying widths of 200 to 150 feet; construction of a south jetty fishing walkway; and, maintenance of the jetties. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 1.9 miles long. Mean range of tide is 2.5 feet at the entrance and 2.3 feet at the terminals; extreme range is about 4.5 feet with storm tides of about 6.5 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for work completed to date. For work under H 144/93/1, local interests must: provide all lands, easements and rights-ofway; save United States free from damages; accomplish utility and other relocations or alterations; provide depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminals commensurate with depths provided in the related project areas; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into waters of the channel by users thereof; prohibit erection of any structure within 100 feet of project channel as authorized at time of construction; provide and maintain public terminal and transfer facilities; contribute 50 percent of total first costs of recreational jetty fishing facility; and operate and maintain jetty fishing facility. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1974 authorization have been furnished by the local sponsor. Terminal facilities. There are 22 commercial waterfront facilities serving the port. The General Cargo Facilities include 13,807 feet of usable berthing space, 7 transit sheds with a total capacity of 393,870 square feet, and 6 container yards with space for 3,965 containers. Oil Handling Facilities consist of 232 storage tanks with a total storage capacity of 9,564,800 barrels. There is no usable berthing space located at the Oil Handling Facilities. Dry storage is available at 225,000 cubic feet and open storage at 100.3 acres. Hoisting facilities available from a local firm include 5 cranes with capacities from 20 to 155 tons. No floating cranes or derricks for heavy lifts are available at the port. There are 2 marine repair yards. Dry-dock facilities include 2 dry-docks with capacities of 2,200 and 3,200 tons and a 4,270 ton vertical boat lift. Three tugs with ratings up to 4,290 horsepower serve the port. The Port Everglades Belt Line connects with the CSX railroad to serve the port. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 16, Rev. 1982.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition survey cost was $16,500. Real estate management cost was $1,000. Project operations cost was $500. Channel and canal maintenance cost was $118,400. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work required to complete the project is construction authorized in H 144/93/1. 30. REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN 9-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 THE STATE OF FLORIDA. Location. Water hyacinth, hydrilla and water lettuce are found in freshwater streams and lakes in various parts of the district. Existing project. The authorized project provides for destruction or removal of aquatic growth in navigable waters of the State so far as they constitute an obstruction to navigation and commerce, using any mechanical, chemical or other means not injurious to cattle, and use of log booms to close sloughs and backwaters as an auxiliary means. No estimate of the final cost of work has been made. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) For further details, see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations continued during the year. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation and Table 9-M for spraying operations.) Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is for maintenance of navigable waterways. During the year 24,556 acres of floating vegetation (water hyacinth and/or water lettuce), and 2,136 acres of hydrilla were controlled in approximately 2,200 miles of waterways. Hyacinth in Lake Okeechobee and in St. Johns River Watershed is under maintenance control. 31. ST. AUGUSTINE HARBOR, FL Location. The harbor is on the east coast of Florida, about 35 miles south of the entrance to St. Johns River and about 180 miles north of Fort Pierce Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11485.) Previous project. For details see page 412 of Annual Report for 1958. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel 16 by 200 feet along the best natural new inlet bar, thence 12 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; a sandtrap groin on the north side of the inlet extending seaward from the shore of Vilano Beach, and a sand-tight jetty on the south side of the channel extending seaward from the shore of Conch Island parallel to and coextensive with the groin; future landward extension of the groin and jetty; and a channel 10 by 100 feet in San Sebastian River from the Intracoastal Waterway to King Street Bridge, with a turning basin near the upper end. Length of the inlet channel is about 1.5 miles, and length of the San Sebastian River channel is about 2.6 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. The mean tidal range is 4.5 feet in the ocean at St. Augustine Inlet and 4.2 feet at the city waterfront. Strong northerly winds, mostly in the winter, lower the water surface about 1 foot. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. There are several timber docks on the Matanzas waterfront of St. Augustine. In this area of the harbor is a concrete dock which serves as a municipal yacht pier. It has fuel facilities, 19 slips and accommodates boats up to 60 feet in length. A large public boat ramp is also available. The principal terminals are the numerous shrimp docks in the San Sebastian River which flows southward through the city into the Matanzas River south of the bridge. These consist of timber wharves, with frame and corrugated iron warehouses thereon, and 9 marine railways for small boats. There is also a marine supply facility and several boat yards. The present terminals have highway connections and several of the shrimp docks have rail connections. They are considered adequate for existing commerce and recreational craft. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation of locks and dams cost was $42,600. Channel and canal maintenance cost was $194,100. Engineering and design cost was $6,300. Construction management cost was $30,200. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for the North Jetty which is in a deferred status. The groin is in good condition except for the 300 feet which has subsided to about elevation 3.0 feet, mean low water. The jetty is in good condition, but is submerged at high tide. Maintenance dredging at the entrance channel was completed June 1996. 32. ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL, JACKSONVILLE TO LAKE HARNEY Location. Rises in marshes of Brevard County, Florida, near east coast, and flows northwesterly to Jacksonville, thence easterly into the Atlantic Ocean, 122 miles south of Savannah River. River is about 285 miles long, of which 161.5 miles are included in project. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11492.) 9-18 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Previous projects. Adopted by River and Harbor Acts of June 14, 1880 and July 5, 1884. For further details see Annual Reports for 1915 and 1938. Existing project. Channel is 13 by 200 feet from Florida East Coast Railway bridge at Jacksonville to Palatka, thence 12 by 100 feet to Sanford, and thence 5 by 100 feet to Lake Harney, with side channel to Enterprise and maintenance of two jetties. Existing project was authorized by River and Harbor Acts of March 2, 1945 (H 445/78/2) and July 24, 1946 (SD 208/79/2). For further details see Annual Report for 1962. Terminal facilities. There are 36 piers and wharves along project, including municipal piers and wharves at Green Cove Springs and Palatka, 12 Navy piers at Green Cove Springs, a municipal recreational pier at Sanford, and 19 privately owned piers, 5 of which have nearby tank storage facilities for petroleum projects. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys cost -$2,519. Real estate management cost was $1,981. Lands and damages cost was $285. Engineering and design cost was $50,796. Construction management cost was $12. Condition at end of fiscal year. Active portion is complete. Condition of project as a whole is adequate for present needs of navigation. (For more detailed information refer to 1963 Annual Report.) 33. ST. LUCIE INLET, FL Location. The inlet is on the east coast of Florida about 19 miles south of the entrance to Fort Pierce Harbor, Florida, and 100 miles north of the entrance to Miami Harbor, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11472.) Previous project. For details see page 764 of Annual Report for 1949. Existing project. The authorized project provides for extending the north jetty about 500 feet and modifying existing jetty to provide a sand bypass weir section about 500 feet long; excavation of a sand impoundment basin adjacent to the bypass weir in the north jetty; construction of a south jetty consisting of a rubblemound structure about 2,400 feet long with a walkway for recreational fishing; channel between existing bar cut and the Intracoastal Waterway 10 by 500 feet through the bar cut, tapering to 150 feet through the inlet, and 7 by 100 feet to the Intracoastal Waterway; and transfer of 380,000 cubic yards of material to the south beach during each two year maintenance period. Total project length is about 1.9 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean tidal range is 2.6 feet on the ocean side and about one foot on the land side of the inlet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Estimated cost of new work (October 1996 price levels) $8,071,000 Federal and $1,595,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Local interests must: contribute 19.9 percent of construction cost allocated to navigation in the combined project, 23.1 percent allocated to beach erosion, and 50 percent of construction cost of jetty fishing walkway; provide 39.8 percent of the annual maintenance cost allocated to navigation and 23.2 percent of the annual costs for maintenance dredging allocated to beach erosion control for periodic beach nourishment and 100 percent of the annual jetty maintenance costs allocated to beach erosion control; maintain jetty fishing walkway; agree that each 5 years the amount of local cost sharing for maintenance is to be adjusted; provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold United States free from damages; provide marina with mooring facilities and utilities; provide and maintain depths in berthing area and local access and feeder channels commensurate with the depths provided in the project; accomplish such alterations as required to sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utility facilities, and take action to place in effect statutes and/or regulations which will protect water quality for the authorized uses of the project. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1974 modification were signed by the local sponsor on August 24, 1978. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $3,743,199. Terminal facilities. A municipal pier provides facilities for docking and servicing charter fishing and small recreational craft. At Stuart there is a dock for handling bulk petroleum products and several marinas which provide facilities for mooring, servicing and minor repair of small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and operations studies cost $5,300. Channel and canal maintenance cost was $58,100. Engineering and design and construction management cost was $9,900 and $9,900 respectively. 9-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Condition at end of fiscal year. Work required to complete the project is construction authorized in HD 294/93/1. Authorized project depths were restored as of July 1991. Maintenance dredging was completed June 1996. Improvements to the inlet were authorized in 1974. Due to limited funding during construction, the south jetty was completed 1,000 feet short of the authorized length, the impoundment basin was not constructed to design capacity as a shallow subsurface rock was encountered. Sufficient commercial benefits were identified in the economic update study to reclassify the inlet from a predominately recreational usage inlet to a commercial usage inlet. Preconstruction, engineering, and design is scheduled for completion in August 2000. Approval is anticipated in June 1998 and will serve as Post-Authorization Change Report (PAC) for the project. 34. SAN JUAN HARBOR, PR Location. San Juan Harbor is on the north coast of Puerto Rico and about 35 miles from the east end of the island and 1,100 miles southeast of Miami, Florida. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 25670.) Previous projects. For details see Annual Reports for 1915, 1916, and 1938. Existing project. Modification of the authorized project to provide the deepening of the Bar Channel to 48 feet and shifting its alignment 350 feet west; deepening Anegado and Army Terminal to 40 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel, the Cruise Ship Basin, Puerto Nuevo Channel, and San Antonio Channel to 36 feet; and deepening Anchorage Area E to 38 feet while reducing its size and constructing 6 mooring dolphins within its limits. A 1,500 foot long extension to San Antonio Channel would be added to the Federal project and Sabana approach deepened to 32 feet. Estimated cost of new work (October 1996 levels) $34,400,000 Federal and $13,600,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Should provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from any damages; provide and maintain depths in berthing areas and local access and feeder channels; provide alterations as required to sewer, water supply, and other utility facilities. It is further recommended that local interests be reimbursed for work performed by them on the project subsequent to project authorization. A 25 percent contribution and an additional 10 percent reimbursement over 30 years from locals are required. Terminal facilities. There are 28 piers and bulkhead wharves in the harbor capable of docking deep-draft vessels, which have an aggregate berthing length of about 23,700 feet. Eleven piers and bulkhead wharves are on the north shore, 2 piers and a three-level ramp facility for roll-on/roll-off operations at Front Graving Dock turning basin and channel, 9 at the eastern side and 3 at the western side of the Army Terminal basin and channel, and 3 on the south shore of San Antonio Channel. One pier and bulkhead wharf are privately owned, 7 are U.S. Government property, and 24 are owned by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Twenty piers and wharves are equipped with mechanical crane transfer facilities. Five wharves are equipped with a special crane for handling loaded containers. Twenty-four are open to the general public. Pier No. 6 was repaired and improved in 1985. There is an aggregate length of about 1,339 feet of berthing space at Catano Point used principally by small vessels within the 18 foot draft range. This space is also open to the public. In addition, there are 10 piers and bulkhead wharves with approximately 6,910 feet of berthing space owned and operated by different agencies of the Federal Government. This space is not open to the public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Lands and damages cost was $12,984. Reservoir cost was $41,505. Navigation ports and harbors cost was $3,096. Reconnaissance cost was $2,096. Feasibility cost was $142,870. Engineering and design cost was $79,415. Construction management cost was $10,498. Maintenance: Operation and condition survey cost was $900. Condition at end of fiscal year. The PED phase was completed in September 1995. Revisions to the plans and specifications were accomplished in FY 97. Execution of PCA was completed June 1997. Authorized in WRDA 1996. Existing project includes the entrance channel and turning basin to Army Terminal which cost $1,543,712 (this expenditure was made from military appropriations and is not included in Table 9-A costs). 35. TAMPA HARBOR, FL 9-20 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Location. Tampa Harbor is in a large natural indentation of the Gulf of Mexico about midway of the west coast of Florida. The entrance is about 220 miles north of Key West and about 330 miles southeast of Pensacola. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11413 and 11414.) Previous projects. For details see page 665 of 1938 Annual Report. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a channel from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Sutton and Tampa; 46 by 700 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to Mullet Key; 44 by 600 feet in Mullet Key Cut Channel; 44 by 500 feet in Tampa Bay from Mullet Key Cut to Hillsborough Bay and Port Tampa Channels; 44 by 500 feet in Hillsborough Bay from junction with Tampa Bay and Port Tampa Channels to the junction with Port Sutton entrance channel, thence 42 by 400 feet to the junction with Seddon and Garrison Channels; 44 by 400 feet in Port Sutton entrance channel; 42 by 400 feet in Sparkman Channel; 40 by 300 feet in Ybor Channel; 42 by 400 feet in Port Tampa Channel; 44 by 400-500 feet in East Bay entrance channel; 44 by 300 feet in East Bay approach channel; 30 by 300 feet in Seddon and Garrison Channels; 30 by 200 feet in Alafia River; 9 by 100 feet in Hillsborough River to a point 2,000 feet above Columbus River bridge; a breakwater; a 43 by 200 foot Port Sutton Terminal Channel 3,700 feet long; turning basins at Ybor Channel, Port Tampa, East Bay, mouth of Hillsborough River, and in Alafia River; and maintenance of a channel 12 by 200 feet in Hillsborough River, a 43 by 200 feet by 3,700 feet long in Port Sutton Terminal Channel, and 34 by 300 feet in East Bay Channel. (The 46 foot and 44 foot depth portions of the project include a 5 foot underkeel clearance. Special studies on the project concluded that 4 feet underkeel is sufficient. Therefore, a one foot overdepth has been placed in an inactive status, resulting in active project depths of 45 and 43 feet respectively.) Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is about 67 miles long, including 10 miles in Hillsborough River and 3.6 miles in Alafia River. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet at the lower end of the bay, 1.6 feet at Port Tampa, and 1.8 feet at Tampa. Extreme range is about 3.8 feet at the lower end of the bay and 4.8 feet at Tampa. Strong southwesterly winds raise the water level about 1.5 feet. Strong northerly winds, which usually occur in the winter, lower the water level about 2 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Estimated cost for Big Bend Channel (October 1996 price levels) $4,903,000 Federal and $6,445,000 non-Federal. For further details, see 1962 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Local cooperation has been fully complied with for work completed to date. See 1978 Annual Report for requirements for work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1970, H 401/91/2 and H 150/91/1. Assurances of local cooperation for the 1970 authorization were approved by the Secretary of the Army on January 10, 1973. The LCA for branch channels was signed June 20, 1986. An amendment to the LCA reflecting cost sharing requirements of WRDA of 1986 for section 6 was signed August 31, 1987. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $1,853,161. A 25 percent contribution and an additional 10 percent reimbursement over 30 years is required from locals. Terminal facilities. There are 102 commercial waterfront facilities serving Tampa Harbor. The General Cargo Facilities consist of 7,226 feet of usable berthing space and 15 transit sheds with a total of 585,200 square feet of storage space. The Oil Handling Facilities include 16,440 feet of usable berthing space and 316 storage tanks for a total capacity of 11,610,350 barrels. Dry storage is available at 1,904,750 square feet, cold storage at 14,309,000 cubic feet, and open storage at 59.4 acres. There are 2 wharves available for coal storage at 750,000 tons total storage and grain elevators with a 3,400,000 bushel total capacity. One elevator on Ybor Channel has a 1,000,000 bushel capacity. Hoisting Facilities include 13 cranes, fixed and mobile, with capacities from 45 to 150 tons and other crawler and mobile cranes available locally. Marine repair yards include 9 waterfront repair facilities and numerous other offwater companies engaged in various phases of marine repair. There are 4 floating and 4 graving docks available at the port with capacities ranging from 548 to 5,400 long tons. Floating equipment includes 24 tugs with up to 3,350 horsepower and 4 companies with tank barges of capacities up to 14,000 barrels. The CSX Railroad serves the port. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 17, Rev. 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost was $9,249. Maintenance: Operations of locks and dams cost was $93,300. Operation of service facilities cost was $75,000. Condition and operation studies cost $288,900. Water quality control costs was $22,600. Real estate management cost was $4,800. Project operations 9-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 management cost was $11,800. Lands and damages cost was $500. Channel and canal maintenance cost was $3,356,800. Engineering and design and construction management cost $460,500 and $195,100 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Alafia River portion of feasibility study is underway with economic, environmental, and ship simulator studies. A PED agreement has been signed by the local sponsor for Big Bend Channel. PED was initiated November 1996. 36. NAVIGATION PROJECTS ON WHICH RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS ONLY WERE CONDUCTED DURING PERIOD. Total cost was $467,181. 37. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 9-C.) 38. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization) Fiscal year costs for Section 107 Coordination Account, $4,955; Island of Vieques, PR $101,842; Aquadilla Harbor, PR, $42,090; Fernandina Harbor, FL $1,959; Port Everglades, FL $15,086; Salt Run, St. Augustine, FL, $9,614; Hernando Beach Channel, FL $42,439. Snagging and clearing for navigation (Section 3 of 1945 River and Harbor Act, Public Law 14, 79th Congress.) No costs incurred. Beach Erosion Control 39. BREVARD COUNTY, FL Location. The project is on the east coast of Florida at approximately the midpoint of the peninsula. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11484 and 11476.) Existing project. The authorization provides for a protective and recreational beach with a berm 50 feet wide at elevation 10 feet above mean low water and a natural seaward slope as would be shaped by wave action, along 14,600 feet of beach at the city of Cape Canaveral and 10,600 feet of beach at Indiatlantic and Melbourne beach, and for periodic nourishment of the restored beach at Indiatlantic and Melbourne beach limited initially to a period of 10 years. Nourishment of the restored beach at the city of Cape Canaveral would be provided by the authorized sand-transfer plant for construction at Canaveral Harbor. The project also provides for improvement of the Federally owned shores for beach erosion control or hurricane protection to be accomplished by the Federal agencies involved, subject to their own determination of economic justification. The areas involved include 4.9 miles of shore at Kennedy Space Center, 4.0 miles at Cape Kennedy Air Force Station, and 2.3 miles at Patrick Air Force Base. Mean tidal range in the area is 3.5 feet. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Estimated cost for new work (October 1996 price levels) $21,479,000 Federal and $19,141,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 50 percent of all first costs of the work and 50 percent of the nourishment cost at Indiatlantic and Melbourne beach for the first 10 years of the project life; provide lands and rights-of-way; provide, after the first 10 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the restored beach at Indiatlantic and Melbourne beach during project life; maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; control water pollution; and hold the United States free from damages. Assurances of local cooperation were approved by the Secretary of the Army on July 9, 1973. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $2,262,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. Feasibility report was completed in September 1996, approved in December 1996, and authorized by Section 101(b) of WRDA 1996. PED agreement was executed September 1997 and PED is scheduled for completion November 1998.. 40. BROWARD COUNTY, FL BEACH EROSION CONTROL AND HILLSBORO INLET, FL NAVIGATION PROJECT 9-22 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Location. Broward County is on the lower east coast of Florida, 300 miles south of Jacksonville and about 30 miles north of Miami. Hillsboro Inlet is in the northern part of Broward County. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466.) Existing project. The authorization provides for Federal participation toward cost of a shore restoration and protection project and a project to maintain a channel adequate for small craft navigation. Plan provides for restoration of a shoreline protection and recreational beach at 4 locations generally 100 feet wide with berm elevation of 10 feet above mean low water; a navigation channel 8 by 100 feet from the Intracoastal Waterway to a point 1,500 feet oceanward in Hillsboro Inlet, thence 10 by 150 feet in the ocean; jetties on north and south sides of ocean entrance; a permanently based floating dredge; and on a deferred basis, a trestle-mounted sand-transfer plant, if needed. Navigation portion of the project is in an inactive status. Mean range of tide in areas is 2.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Cost estimate for new work (October 1996 price levels) is $90,200,000 Federal and $79,000,000 non-Federal contribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 90.5 percent of the first cost beach restoration in the reach between north county line and Hillsboro Inlet, 90 percent of first cost allocated to beach restoration, and 50 percent of first cost allocated to navigation for reach between Hillsboro Inlet and Port Everglades and 72.4 percent of beach restoration in reach between Port Everglades and south county line; provide all lands and rights-of-way; obtain approval of Chief of Engineers of plans and specifications if local interests construct beach erosion features; and furnish assurances that they will hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain adequate public landing or wharf at Hillsboro Inlet; establish a public body to cooperate financially and to provide and operate local facilities for navigation, control water pollution, maintain ownership of publicly owned shores, and maintain all project works except the jetties (maintenance of the channel to revert to the United States if sand-transfer plant is constructed). Assurances of local cooperation were accepted November 22, 1968. Non- Federal contribution for new work was $3,460,990. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $800. Engineering and design cost $6,985. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was constructed by local interests and is complete. The LRR for Hillsboro Inlet has been approved. The Project Study Plan will be submitted for approval. LRR recommends plan larger than authorized. A GRR was initiated to fully evaluate the larger plan. PED is scheduled for completion September 1999. 41. DUVAL COUNTY, FL Locatioh. On upper east coast of Florida, within 20 miles of Florida-Georgia line. Ocean shoreline is about 16 miles long. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11488.) Existing project. Provides for Federal participation toward cost of construction with artificial fill, a beach 60 feet wide at elevation 11 feet above mean low water with a natural slope seaward, and for periodic nourishment for 10 years. Federal participation to be 100 percent of the first cost of construction applicable to the Federal shore and 50 percent applicable to the other publicly owned shore and 55.5 percent of periodic nourishment cost for first 10 years of project life. Mean tidal range at south jetty in St. Johns River is 4.9 feet. Estimated cost of new work (October 1996 price levels) $111,200,000 Federal and $72,900,000 non-Federal. Project was authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1965 (H 273/89/1). Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute 50 percent of first cost of constructing non-Federal publicly owned shores; contribute 44.5 percent of periodic nourishment costs for first 10 years of project life; provide all lands, rights-of-way, and relocations; hold the United states free from damages; control water pollution; and furnish assurances that they will maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of federal participation is based during economic life of project. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted on November 29, 1973. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $16,895,567. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $43,953. Channels and canal cost was $206,000. Navigation ports and harbor cost was $188. Construction cost was $15,221. Reconnaissance cost was $58,127. Engineering and design and construction management cost $11,562 and - $7,429 respectively. 9-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Condition at end of fiscal year. Most recent renourishment was completed December 1995. Ongoing post-construction monitoring includes studies in the borrow area 7 miles offshore, which Minerals Management Service has required. 42. FORT PIERCE BEACH, FL Location. Fort Pierce Beach Erosion Control Project extends 1.3 miles south of Fort Pierce Inlet, on the east coast of Florida about 120 miles north of Miami. * Existing project. The project fill was initially completed by local interests in 1971, using offshore borrow material. Prior to the nourishment, severe shorefront recession had destroyed a private residence and threatened other residences and a state road. Local interests were reimbursed the federal share of the initial project construction cost. Federal participation in renourishment was authorized for an initial 10-year period and subsequently extended five years under the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers until 1985. The project is also periodically nourished with suitable material obtained from operational maintenance of the nearby Fort Pierce Harbor federal navigation project. The project was renourished in the summer of 1980. A Section 111 project authorized in 1982 provides that 60 percent of the cost of material required to nourish 1.2 miles south of Fort Pierce Inlet should be reallocated to the navigation project. A reevaluation report is being conducted to determine whether extension of federal participation in cost sharing to 50 years is warranted. Estimated cost (October 1996 price levels) is $11,700,000 Federal and $12,800,000 non-Federal. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $65,045. Renourishment cost was $160,304. Feasibility cost was $52,306. Engineering and design cost was $190,937. Condition at end of fiscal year. The Section 934 report recommending extension of Federal participation was approved in June 1995 by ASA(CW). However, current Administration policy is to not extend Federal participation at this time. Therefore, the district is awaiting authority to initiate preparation of plans and specifications and execution of a PCA. 43. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FL Location. Indian River County is on the east coast of Florida, midway between Jacksonville and Miami. The authorized project comprises 2.65 miles of beach along the ocean shore of Vero Beach and 1.7 miles along the Sebastian Inlet State Park. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Nos. 11474 and 11476.) Existing project. The authorized project provides nourishment for 8,870 feet (1.68) miles) of the State Park, south of Sebastian inlet. The initial beach fill would consist of 202,000 cubic yards of nourishment material. An estimated 202,000 cubic yards of periodic nourishment at 5-year intervals would be required. The Federal share of the first cost was estimated to be 65 percent of this segment. The plan also provided for nourishment of 9,180 feet (1.74 miles) of Vero Beach. The initial beach fill consisted of 572,000 cubic yards of material, including advance nourishment. The restored beach would have a 20 foot wide level berm at an elevation of 15 feet above mean low water. The beach fill as designed would provide protection against a 10 year return interval storm. An estimated 120,000 cubic yards of periodic nourishment would be required at 5 year intervals. In addition to the beach fill a "Sabecon" reef breakwater was recommended. The structure would be placed 500 feet offshore of the new beach and would be 400 feet in length, with a zero mean low water crest elevation. The Federal share of the first cost was estimated to be 43.7 percent for this segment. The project was authorized on November 17, 1986 (Public Law 99-662) by the 1986 Water Resource Development Act. Local cooperation. The authorization of a beach erosion control project for Indian River County, Florida was made with the provision that the State and local interests will, in addition to the general requirements, agree to comply with the following requirements: provide all necessary lands, easements and rights-of way; including borrow areas and disposal areas for excavated material, and relocations; hold and save the United States free from claims for damages; assure continued conditions of public ownership and public use of the shore; assure maintenance and repair during the economic life of the project; provide and maintain as necessary access roads, parking areas and other public use facilities; provide a cash contribution for periodic nourishment's for the life of the project; provide an additional cash contribution for the Sebastian Inlet State Park Beach. The project, as authorized, provides that the work may be accomplished 9-24 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT in separate units or features and that the written agreement with non-Federal interests be obtained. The Indian River County Board of Commissioners, by letters dated December 21, 1984 and January 15, 1987, affirmed their support for the project and their willingness and ability to share in project costs. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end of fiscal year. No work is currently scheduled. 44. LEE COUNTY, FL Location. Lee County is on the lower Gulf coast of Florida, about 90 miles south of the entrance to Tampa Bay and 130 miles north of Key West. Existing project. The project provides for the Federal participation in restoration and protection of Lee County, Florida, as follows: On Gasparilla Island, restore beach along 2.7 miles of shore and provide revetment along 2,400 feet of shore and a 500-foot terminal groin; on Captiva Island, restore beach along 4.7 miles of shore; and on Estero Island, restore beach along 4.6 and provide a 5-year advance supply of beach nourishment material and periodic nourishment of the restored beaches, as needed, with Federal aid for nourishment limited to the first 10 years of project life after completion of the initial fill placement on each island. Estimated cost (October 1996 price levels) is $8,400,000 Federal cost and $30,300,000 non-Federal cost. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local Cooperation. Local interest must: contribute in cash )including contract price, engineering and design, and supervision and administration) 65.8 percent of first cost at Gasparilla Island, 91.3 percent of first cost at Captiva Island, and 87.5 percent of first coast at Estero Island; contribute toward beach nourishment for the first 10 years of project life, 95.5 percent for Gasparilla Island; 91.3 percent for Captiva Island, and 96.9 percent for Estero Island; and contribute 50.9 percent of the annual maintenance costs of the terminal groin on Estero Island; provide after 10 years of project life periodic nourishment of the restored beaches; provide lands, easements, rightsof- way, and relocations; assure continued public ownership for public use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; control water pollution; save the United States free from damages; and provide an adequate width of beach with acceptable access and other facilities necessary for public use. Operations during the year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $6,348. Construction contract cost was $1,135,700. Reconnaissance cost was $-435. Feasibility cost was $3,572. Engineering and design cost was $57,776. Construction management cost was $3,891. Condition at end of fiscal year. A GRR was initiated in FY 95 for Estero and Gasparilla Islands. The review of a design memorandum for the local renourishment of Captiva Island in FY 96 is underway. Reimbursement of this work will require the negotiation of another Section 215 agreement for the balance of the $3 million ceiling, or negotiation of an agreement under the authority of Section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992. 45. MANATEE COUNTY, FL Location. Manatee County is on the west coast of Florida, just south of the entrance to Tampa Bay. The county's 14 mile gulf shoreline consists of 2 barrier islands, Anna Maria Key and the northern half of Longboat Key, separated from the mainland by Tampa and Sarasota Bays and from each other by Longboat Pass. Project consists of about 7.5 miles of gulf shoreline. Existing project. Provides for Federal participation in the shore protection project for Manatee County which includes the entire 7.5 mile gulf shoreline of Anna Maria Key. The project consists of restoration of 3.2 miles of gulf shore beach to an elevation 6 feet above mean low water with a level berm 50 feet wide and a natural slope seaward as would be shaped by wave action. The project also provides for periodic nourishment of the restored beach and such adjacent shoreline as may be and justified for the project life. Mean tidal range is 2.3 feet. Estimated cost (October 1996 price levels) is $43,600,000 Federal and $36,400,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. The authorization of a shore protection project for Manatee County, Florida was made with the provision that Federal cost sharing would be in accordance with policy established by existing law, and the percentages based on conditions of shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction: Provided that, prior to construction, local interests furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: 9-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas, and relocations necessary for construction of the improvements; (b) Provide a cash contribution equal to 47 percent of the first cost of construction, subject to any credit for eligible construction costs incurred by local interests, and exclusive of costs for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and alterations, and exclusive of the cost of fill placed behind the Corps construction line, the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (c) Provide all costs of construction for nourishment landward of the Corps construction line; (d) Provide a cash contribution for periodic nourishment equal to 41 percent of the cost of each nourishment, such contribution to be made prior to each nourishment operation, and the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (e) Hold and save the United States free from damage due to the construction works, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (f) Assure continued public ownership and administration of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; (g) Provide without cost to the United States appropriate access and facilities, including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based; (h) Adopt appropriate ordinances, or provide other means, to insure the intended use of the beach fill areas; (i) Control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (j) Agree to pay 100 percent of the operation, maintenance, and replacement and rehabilitation's costs of the project, or functional element thereof. Non-Federal contribution for new work is $3,337,348. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $14,197. Construction contract cost was $157,629. Reconnaissance cost was $700. Feasibility cost was $63,046. Engineering and design and construction management cost was $68,537 and -$-65 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial renourishment of 4.7 miles of Anna Maria Island was completed in March 1993. Immediately after completion, a storm significantly reduced the beach section in several areas. The local sponsor has requested that the renourishment be expedited. 46. MARTIN COUNTY, FL Location. Martin County is located on the east coast of Florida about 300 miles south of Jacksonville and 70 miles north of Miami. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Existing project. The recommended plan of improvement for Martin County provides for restoration of a protective beach along 3.75 miles of shoreline. The plan includes restoration of the primary dune as needed and a 35 foot wide protective berm. The recommended plan was designed to reduce environmental impacts. Of primary importance is the impact of project construction on sea turtle nesting. In order to avoid these impacts, project construction has to occur between November 1st and April 15th. Only one island segment is authorized for this project which is located on Hutchinson Island in Martin County. The project begins at the St. Lucie/Martin County line and proceeds south 4 miles. The actual project to be constructed is 3.75 miles. The project was shortened 0.25 miles to avoid impacting sensitive hardgrounds. The borrow area is approximately 3,000 feet offshore of the southern end of the project area. Estimated cost of new work (October 1996 price levels) is $25,600,000 Federal and $30,300,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Martin County Board of Commissioners is the local sponsor. Non-Federal funds will be requested from the sponsor following execution of the PCA. Non-Federal contributions for new work is $5,030,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Lands and damages cost was -$428. Beach renourishment cost was $44,795. Engineering and design cost was $119,813. Construction management cost was $84. Engineering during construction cost $10,299. HTRW cost was $3,385. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial nourishment was completed April 1996. Monitoring required by FDEP permit and approved in GDM. Post-construction monitoring of the project performance, sea turtles, and adjacent hardgrounds is underway. 47. NASSAU COUNTY, FL Location. Nassau County is on the east coast of Florida, north of Jacksonville and adjoins the state of Georgia. The authorized project comprises 4.3 miles of beach along the ocean shore of northern Amelia Island, and tightening 1,500 feet of the shoreward end of the existing south jetty at the entrance to Fernandina Harbor. 9-26 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Existing project. The authorized project would provide initial restoration of 3.6 miles of eroded beach, starting at a point about .7 mile south of the Fernandina Harbor south jetty and extending south to Sadler Road; sand tightening about 1,500 feet of the shoreward end of the south jetty; and periodic nourishment of 4.3 miles of shore between the south jetty and Sadler Road. The restored beach would have a 20 foot wide level berm at an elevation of 13 feet above mean low water. The initial beach fill would consist of an estimated 1,100,000 cubic yards of nourishment material. An estimated 240,000 cubic yards of nourishment at 2-year intervals would be required. Sand tightening would require about 16,700 tons of stone. The Federal share of the first cost was estimated to be 77%. (Sand tightening, accomplished as part of the Navy's effort to deepen and widen the navigation channel, was deleted from the plan.) Estimated cost of new work (October 1996 price levels) $13,000,000 Federal and $3,500,000 non-Federal contributed funds. Local cooperation. The authorization of a shore protection project for Nassau County, Florida was made with the provision that the State and local interests will, in addition to the general requirements, agree to comply with the following requirements: provide without cost to the United States all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas and disposal areas for excavated material and relocations required for construction of the project, including that required for periodic nourishment; hold and save the United States free from claims for damages which may result from construction and subsequent maintenance, operation and public use of the project, except damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; assure continued conditions of public ownership and public use of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based during the useful life of the project; assure maintenance and repair during the useful life of the project as required to serve the project's intended purpose; provide and maintain clearly marked beach access, nearby parking areas, and other public use facilities, open to all on equal terms, and as required to realize the benefits upon which Federal participation is based; provide a cash contribution for beach erosion control equal to the appropriate percentage of the final construction cost allocated to this function, exclusive of lands, easements, rights-of-way, alterations, and relocations, the percentage to be in accordance with existing law and based on shore ownership at the time of implementation; provide a cash contribution for periodic nourishment during the useful life of the project, such contribution to be made prior to each nourishment, with the actual amount to be based on existing law and conditions of ownership at the time of each nourishment; and at least annually inform affected interests of the limitations of the protection afforded by the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $290,732. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preparation of the GRR is underway. Completion of PED is scheduled for September 1999. 48. PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL Location. Palm Beach County is on the east coast of Florida about 300 miles south of Jacksonville and 70 miles north of Miami. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466.) Existing project. Project authorization, the River and Harbor Act of 1962, provides for Federal participation toward the cost of local shore project for restoration of beaches to a general width of 100 feet with a berm elevation of 10 feet above mean low water, and periodic nourishment for 10 years from the year of initial nourishment, as follows: 62.1 percent of the cost for Martin County line-Jupiter Inlet segment; 55.8 percent of cost for Jupiter Inlet-Lake Worth Inlet segment; and 50 percent for south Lake Worth Inlet-Delray Beach; and 53 percent of cost for Delray Beach-Boca Raton inlet segment. Mean range of tide is 2.8 feet in the Atlantic Ocean at Palm Beach and 2.3 feet at Boca Raton Inlet. Estimated cost (October 1996 price levels) for Palm Beach County is $75,900,000 Federal and $152,900,000 non-Federal cash contributions. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Federal participation is subject to the conditions that responsible local authorities will: (a) obtain approval by the Chief of Engineers, prior to commencement of work on the project, of detailed plans and specifications and arrangements for prosecution of the work on the project; (b) provide at their own expense all necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way; (c) furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: (1) assure maintenance of the protective measures during their economic life as may be required to serve their intended purpose, and periodic nourishment of the protective beach at suitable intervals; 9-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 (2) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (3) maintain continued public ownership of the publicly owned shores upon which a part of the recommended Federal participation is based and their administration for public use during the economic life of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $3.937. Reimbursable contract cost $100,394. Reconnaissance cost was $16,911. Feasibility cost was $3,473. Engineering and design was $45,672. Construction management cost was $901. Condition at end of fiscal year. The sponsor completed initial construction of the 1.1 mile initial beach fill at the Jupiter/Carlin portion of the project in May 1995. This project was authorized for construction by the sponsor with subsequent reimbursement of the Federal share of eligible costs. Following receipt of financial information from the sponsor, an audit will be conducted to determine the Federal reimbursement amount. 49. PALM BEACH ISLAND, FL Location. Palm Beach Island is on the east coast of Florida about 300 miles south of Jacksonville and 70 miles north of Miami. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466). Existing project. The River and Harbor Act of 1958 authorization provides for Federal participation in the costs of a plan for protection of the shore of the Palm Beach Island, comprising restoration of a protective beach with berm elevation of 10 feet above mean high water from Lake Worth Inlet to a point about 1,000 feet south of Southern Boulevard extended, thence with a general width of 100 feet to South Lake Worth Inlet, construction and operation of a sand-transfer plant at Lake Worth Inlet, and additional periodic nourishment from Lake Worth or other suitable source, substantially in accordance with the plan developed by the district engineer, with such modifications thereof as may be considered advisable by the Chief of Engineers. Federal assistance would entail contribution of funds in the amount of 4.7 percent of the initial construction cost of the beach restoration and appurtenant drainage work, and of the expenditures for periodic nourishment from Lake Worth for a period of 10 years from the year of the initial placement, plus 19.3 percent of the expenditures for construction, and for operation, maintenance, and current replacements of parts of the sand-transfer plant for the same period. Mean tidal range is 2.8 feet in the Atlantic Ocean at Palm Beach and 2.3 feet at Boca Raton Inlet. Estimated cost (October 1996 price levels) for Palm Beach Island is $13,400,000 Federal and $154,100,000 non-Federal cash contribution. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Federal participation is subject to the conditions that responsible local authorities will: (a) obtain approval of the Chief of Engineers, prior to commencement of work on the project (except the sandtransfer plant already under contract), of detailed plans and specifications and arrangements for prosecution of the work on the project; (b) make appropriate modification of the location of the end of the discharge line of the sand-transfer plant to accomplish satisfactory dispersion of bypassed material; (c) provide at their own expense all necessary lands, easements, and rights-ofway; (d) furnish assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will: (1) assure maintenance of the protective measures during their economic as may be required to serve their intended purpose, and periodic nourishment of the protective beach at suitable intervals, including operation of the sand-transfer plant; (2) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (3) maintain continued public ownership of the publicly owned shores upon which a part of the recommended Federal participation is based and their administration for public use during the economic life of the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. None. Condition at end offiscal year. No work scheduled. 50. PINELLAS COUNTY, FL Location. Pinellas County is on the Gulf coast of Florida, about midway of the peninsula. It extends northerly about 39 miles from the main entrance to Tampa Bay to the vicinity of the mouth of Anclote River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11411.) Previous project. For details see page 429 of Annual Report for 1965. Existing project. The authorized project provides for Federal participation in preserving and protecting the shores of Pinellas County, Florida, by: restoration of 5,000 feet of beach at Clearwater Beach Island; restoration of 49,000 feet of beach at Sand Key; 9-28 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT restoration of 9,200 feet of beach at Treasure Island; construction of 600 feet of revetment at Long Key; and advance nourishment of Long Key and periodic nourishment of each island. Estimated cost (October 1996 price levels) is $129,000,000 Federal and $96,000,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must (a) contribute in cash the required percentages of the first costs of work provided by the Corps of Engineers, the percentages varying with the type of beach ownership; 94.1 to 50 percent of the beach restoration at Clearwater Beach; 98.1 to 50 percent of the improvement at Sand Key; 94.3 to 50 percent of the improvement at Treasure Island; and 50 percent of the first cost of the revetment at Long Key; (b) contribute in cash an amount computed in accordance with the cost sharing provision contained in P.L. 826, 84th Congress as amended by P.L. 87-874, for beach nourishment cost for the first 10 years of the project life; (c) provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; (d) assure maintenance and repair of the stone revetment of Long Key; (e) assure periodic nourishment of the restored beaches; (f) assure public ownership of beaches; (g) assure against water pollution; (h) hold the United States free from damages; and (i) provide beach for public use. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted March 22, 1967. Non-Federal contribution for new work is $20,160,345. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $18,787. Channels and canals cost was $63,825. Navigation ports and harbor cost was $2,011. Beach renourishment cost was $542,808. Reconnaissance cost was $59,614. Feasibility cost was $42,617. Engineering and design and construction management cost $796,736 and $114,950 respectively. Engineering during construction cost was $5,005. Condition at end of fiscal year. Design memorandum for Long Key 4th renourishment, Treasure Island 6th renourishment, project segments for Long Key, Treasure Island, and Sand Key are IAW policy since an agreement was executed April 1995. Federal participation is not IAW policy for Clearwater Beach Island. 51. ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FL Location. St. John's County is located about 100 miles south of the Florida/Georgia border. Existing project. The project consists of restoration of 2.5 miles of shoreline, beginning approximately 2.7 miles south of St. Augustine Inlet, and including the City of St. Augustine Beach. The authorized project provides for initial restoration of the beach to a width of 80 feet +12 feet elevation relative to mean low water. The initial fill would consist of placement of #,580,000 cubic yards of beach quality sand, includes six years of advanced nourishment. The project would replace sand lost due to frequent northeasters and provide storm protection to upland development. The borrow area is located at the ebb tidal shoal south of St. Augustine. The project was authorized with a 50 year project life from the start of construction. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Estimated cost is $161,900,000 Federal and $30,600,000 Non-Federal. Local cooperation. The sponsor of this project is the St. John's County Board of Commissioners. Cost sharing for this project is 76.4 percent Federal and 23.6 percent Non- Federal. The cost sharing reflects the higher Federal percentage required to mitigate for erosion caused by the Federal navigation project at St. Augustine Harbor. PCA will be executed following completion and approval of the General Reevaluation Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $47,871. Beach renourishment cost was $70,142. Reconnaissance cost was $1,392. Feasibility cost was $227. Collection of basic data cost was $4,660. Miscellaneous cost was $6,805. Engineering and design cost was $206,819. Condition at end of fiscal year. The economic update to evaluate the economic justification for the project has been approved and recommendations were made for further design. The General Reevaluation Report is currently underway. 52. SARASOTA COUNTY, FL Location. Sarasota County is on the Gulf coast of Florida about 30 miles south of Tampa Bay. The northern most portion of the project adjoins the Manatee County Beach Erosion Control Project on Longboat Key. The total project consists of about 5.7 miles of gulf shoreline on Longboat Key and Venice Beach. Existing project The authorized project provides for Federal participation in the construction of a protective beach 12,600 feet long at Longboat Key and a protective beach 29,400 feet long at Manasota Key at the City of 9-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Venice, Florida. Two borrow areas will be required. The first is located within 2 shoal areas located between 1 to 2 miles offshore of Manasota Key south of the project area. This borrow area will be supplemented by material located within the ebb tidal shoal of Big Sarasota Pass which is about 13 nautical miles north of the project beach at Venice. The project also provides periodic nourishment of the restored beach and such adjacent shoreline as may be needed and justified for life of the project. The mean tidal range is 2.1 feet. Estimated cost (October 1996 price levels) is $55,200,000 Federal and $26,300,000 non-Federal. The Federal share of each periodic nourishment is 72.55 percent for Venice, and 15.4 percent for Longboat, of applicable nourishment costs. Local cooperation. Federal participation is subject to the conditions that responsible local authorities will: (a) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including borrow areas, and relocations necessary for construction of the improvements; (b)provide a cash contribution equal to 29.3 percent of the first cost of construction, subject to any credit for eligible construction costs incurred by local interests, and exclusive of costs for lands, easements, and rights-of-way, relocations, and alterations, and exclusive of the cost of fill placed behind the Erosion Control Line (ECL), the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (c) provide all costs of construction for nourishment of private lands and share in the costs of construction for public lands landward of the Erosion Control Line (ECL); (d) provide a cash contribution for periodic nourishment equal to 29.3 percent of the cost of each nourishment, such contribution to be made prior to each nourishment operation, and the final percentage to be based on shore ownership and use existing at the time of construction; (e) hold and save the United States free from damage due to the construction works, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors;(f) assure continued public ownership and administration of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based; (g) provide without cost to the United States appropriate access and facilities, including parking and sanitation, necessary for realization of the public benefits upon which Federal participation is based; (h) adopt appropriate ordinances, or provide other means, to insure the intended use of the beach fill areas; (i) control water pollution to the extent necessary to safeguard the health of bathers; and (j) agrees to pay 100 percent of the operation, maintenance, and replacement and rehabilitation costs of the project, or functional element thereof. Non-Federal contribution for new work is $4,994,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Land and damages cost was $35,498. Channel and canal cost was $119,423. Beach renourishment cost was $538,871. Reconnaissance cost was $53,971. Feasibility cost was $18,324. Coordination study cost was $-33. Collection of basic data cost was $2,917. Engineering and design and supervision and administration cost was $176,554 and $74,573 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial construction of 3.2 miles of beach fill was broken into two contracts. The first contract was completed in January 1995. The second contract was completed in June 1996. Construction of an artificial reef is scheduled to be completed in the winter of 1997 as mitigation. 51. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS Key West, FL; Lido Key, FL; Mullet Key, FL; Virginia Key and Key Biscayne, FL were deauthorized January 1, 1990 by the WRDA of 1988, P.L. 100-676. (See Table 9- D.) 52. BEACH EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization) Reports incurring costs during the fiscal year were Little Talbot Island, FL $7,437; Hwy 187, Pinones, PR $149,308. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to section III, Public Law 90-433, Mitigation of Shore Damages Attributable to Navigation Projects. No costs were incurred under the above authorization. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Shoreline Erosion Control Act of 1074, Public Law 93-251. No costs were incurred under the above authorization. 9-30 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Flood Control 55. CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA Location. The project is generally located within the southeastern 18 counties of Florida covering an area of about 15,200 square miles. It is comprised of the Upper St. Johns River basin in the northeastern section of project, Kissimmee River basin in central section north of the Lake Okeechobee-Everglades area in the central and southwestern section, and the east coast Everglades area in southeastern section. Previous projects. Completed works for control of Lake Okeechobee were included in and constructed under the navigation project for Okeechobee Waterway, FL (formerly Caloosahatchee River and Lake Okeechobee drainage area, FL) and under provisions of River and Harbor Acts of July 3, 1930 and August 30, 1935. For further information, see Annual Reports for 1948 and 1949. Existing project. The authorized project is for flood relief and water conservation and provides principally for: an east coast protective levee extending from the Homestead area north to the eastern shore of Lake Okeechobee near the St. Lucie Canal; three conservation areas for water impoundment in the Everglades area west of the east coast protective levee with control structures to effect transfer of water as necessary; local protective works along the lower east coast; encirclement of the Lake Okeechobee agricultural area by levees and canals; enlargement of portions of Miami, North New River, Hillsboro, and West Palm Beach Canals; enlargement of the existing Lake Okeechobee levees and construction of new levees on the northeast and northwest shores of the lake; increased outlet capacity for improved control of Lake Okeechobee; floodway channels in the Kissimmee River basin, with suitable control structures to prevent over-drainage; an interrelated system of canals, levees, pumping stations, and structures in southwest Dade County to control water levels; and facilities for regulating floods in Upper St. Johns River basin; a system of canals and control structures for gravity drainage of Martin County and distribution of available water supplies to portions of Martin and St. Lucie Counties; and works to improve the supply, distribution, and conservation of water resources in central and southern Florida, including the Lake Okeechobee agricultural area, Everglades National Park, and other related areas. The project will provide water control and protection from recurrence of the devastating floodwaters from the Everglades and local sources, for the highly developed urban area along the lower east coast of Florida and for the productive agricultural areas around Lake Okeechobee (including towns around the lake), in the Upper St. Johns and Kissimmee River basins, and in South Dade County. The project includes a total of 990 miles of levees, 978 miles of canals, 30 pumping plants, 212 floodway control and diversion structures, 56 railroad bridge relocations, and 2 highway bridge relocations. The project also provides that upon completion, local interests assume operation and maintenance of all completed works except levees, channels, locks, and control works for regulation of Lake Okeechobee and the main control structures of conservation areas, which will be operated and maintained by the United States. The principal features of the hurricane gates, constructed under previous projects for Okeechobee Waterway and maintained under existing project since July 1, 1950, are set forth in Table 9-Q. Also, see Table 9-N for principal features of locks and dams. Estimated cost for new work (October 1996 price levels) is $1,431,000,000 Federal and $737,200,000 Non- Federal, exclusive of river and harbor funds expended on previous projects.(See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. (See Table 9-R for local cash contribution.) Local interests must also: provide lands, rights-of-way, and spoil disposal areas; hold the United States free from damages; bear the cost of maintenance and operation of all works except those having to do with regulation of Lake Okeechobee and the main control structures of conservation areas; construct and maintain lateral drainage facilities; prohibit encroachment on flood-carrying capacity of the improved channels; and assume cost of all new highway bridges, relocations of existing bridges and alterations to utilities incident to construction of the project. In addition, for small boat navigation channels, local interests must provide, maintain, and operate adequate public landings, sanitary and access facilities, and establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the locks and channels by users thereof. Assurances of local cooperation have been accepted by the District Engineer for all items of work authorized to 9-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 date. Non-Federal contributions for new work is $60,279,999. Operations and results during fiscal year. (See Table 9-S for work accomplished.) Operations and care. a. Features completed under previous navigation project for Okeechobee Waterway and being maintained under this project are: a levee about 70 miles long following in general the south shore of Lake Okeechobee and a north shore levee 15.8 miles long; spillways at Ortona and St. Lucie Locks; 5 hurricane gates; and 16 spillways along St. Lucie Canal. b. Features completed under existing project that are to be maintained with operation and maintenance funds are: (1) Levees 47, 48, 49 and 50 -- total length 63 miles and enlargement of existing levees L-D1, L-D2, L-D3, L-D4, and L-D9, (2) spillway structures S-10, S-11, S-12, S- 18C, S-77, and S-78 (3) C-43, Section 4 (Caloosahatchee River), and (4) W.P. Franklin Lock and Dam. In addition to the actual facilities listed above it is necessary under operation and maintenance to continue meteorological studies, water level records, stream gauging stations, etc., for proper regulation of the level of Lake Okeechobee and storage of water in Conservation Areas 1, 2 and 3. Corps of Engineers - The Corps of Engineers operates and maintains the major outlets to Lake Okeechobee and Water Conservation Area Nos. 1, 2A and 3A in central and southern Florida. South Florida Water Management District - SFWMD is responsible for operation and maintenance of the project facilities, including major pumping stations, spillways, locks (except on Okeechobee Waterway), levees and culverts. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preparation of the Comprehensive Review Study including Water Preserve Areas is underway. Programmed work is 75 percent complete. Engineering and design is underway for South Dade County, Bolles and Cross Canal GRR, C-51 Project, Lake Istokpoga GRR, East Cape and Homestead Canal Plug Repairs, and C-7, 8, and 9 GRR, and Manatee Protection. Construction of the Upper St. Johns Project is underway. C-11 construction was in FY 96 with C-111 spoil mound removal and S-332D pump station construction contract awards. The Federal Interagency Task Force on South Florida Ecosystem Management is providing assistance in expediting Corps projects, including C-111 and the Restudy. Manatee Protection Report was prepared. Construction General funds are being used for Project Modification Report preparation. (For status of work under construction at the end of the fiscal year see Table 9-P.) 56. DADE COUNTY, FL Location. Dade County is on the southeast coast of Florida. Project area consists of that part of the Atlantic shoreline of the county from Government Cut north to Bakers Haulover Inlet and at Haulover Beach Park. (See NOAA Nautical Chart No. 11466.) Existing project. Project provides for a protective and recreational beach having a dune at elevation 11.5 feet and a level berm 50 feet wide at elevation 9 feet, mean low water, for beach erosion control and hurricane protection between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet; a protective and recreational beach with a berm elevation of 9 feet for beach erosion control at Haulover Beach Park; and Federal participation in the initial construction and in periodic nourishment of both the above reaches for the first 10 years of project life. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide in the area is 2.5 feet. Estimated cost of the project (October 1996 price levels) is $163,300,000 Federal cost and $147,800,000 non- Federal cost. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1968 (H 335/90/2). Local cooperation. Local interests must (a) contribute for the first cost of the work: between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet amounts ranging from 60.2 percent of the cost of the fill within the project limit with existing shorefront ownership, and 100 percent of the cost of fill required landward of the project limit; and for the work at Haulover Beach Park, contribute 21.3 percent of the entire first cost excluding costs for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and preproject work, but including credit for preproject work; (b) contribute in cash for the first 10 years of project life, amounts ranging from 88.9 percent of the nourishment cost for the beach, with existing ownership, to 60.7 percent with public ownership, and the entire maintenance cost for dune, all between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet; (c) provide all lands and rights-of-way; (d) hold United States free from damages; (e) assure continued public ownership and use of the shore upon which the amount of 9-32 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Federal participation is based; (f) assure maintenance of the groin, and after 10 years of project life, periodic nourishment of the protective beach and maintenance of the dune during the economic life of the project; (g) assure that water pollution will not be permitted; (h) prevent removal or relocation by man of fill from the beach berm and dune; (i) prevent the erection of barriers to the littoral movement of material that would interfere with the nourishment of the beach; (j) maintain at the parks qualifying for 70 percent Federal participation a zone that excludes permanent human habitation; (k) at least annually inform interests affected that the project will not provide complete protection from a hurricane tide level equal to or higher in elevation than that of the hurricane of September 1926; and (1) establish in public ownership for public use the beaches within project limits as a requirement for Federal participation in the allocated beach erosion control costs of improvement of shores presently in private ownership. Assurances of local cooperation were accepted January 16, 1973. A supplemental agreement for Bal Harbour portion was approved June 30, 1976. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $34,357,335. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $84,402. Channel and canal cost was $124,629. Contract cost $6,918,756. Reconnaissance cost was $101,081. Feasibility cost was $137,583. Engineering and design and construction management cost $726,816 and -$584,694 respectively. HTRW cost was $47,485. Condition at end of fiscal year. Injunction for renourishment of Sunny Isles and Miami Beach dissolved on 22 November 1996. Readvertisement of Sunny Isles and Miami Beach in 1997. Renourishment of Bakers Haulover and N. Government Cut is scheduled for winter 1997. New borrow area under investigation for renourishment of Bal Harbour in fall 1998. Construction of geotube submerged breakwater at Sunny Isles scheduled for summer 1998. 57. DADE COUNTY, NORTH OF HAULOVER BEACH, FL Location. On the southeast coast of Florida. Project area consists of that part of the Atlantic shoreline extending 2.5 miles north of Haulover Beach Park. (See NOAA Nautical chart No. 11466.) Existing project. The existing shore protection project for Dade County provides for Federal participation in the cost of construction of a beach fill for the purpose of erosion control and hurricane protection along 9.3 miles of shore between Government Cut and Bakers Haulover Inlet and for the construction of a beach fill for the purpose of erosion control along the 1.2 miles of shore fronting Haulover Beach Park and provides for protection and nourishment of 2.5 miles of beach shore north of Haulover Beach Park and for extension of the period of Federal participation from 10 years to the life of the project. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Consistent with the cost-sharing and financing concepts agreed to by the administration and Senate Majority Leadership, local interests will be required to: provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way and relocations; pay 50 percent of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; pay 35 percent of the cost allocated to storm damage prevention; hold the United States free from damages; control water pollution; and furnish assurances that they will maintain continued public ownership of the shore upon which the amount of Federal participation is based during economic life of project. Assurances of local cooperation have been requested from local sponsors. Non-federal contribution for new work was $8,082,927. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Channels and canal cost was $115,050. Beach renourishment cost was $231,669. Condition at end of fiscal year. No new work scheduled. 58. FOUR RIVER BASINS, FL Location. The Four River Basins area covers about 6,000 square miles within 14 counties in central and southwest peninsular Florida. Project includes all or part of the four main stream basins -- the Hillsborough, Oklawaha, Withlacoochee, and Peace Rivers -- and all of three smaller coastal basins north of Tampa, Florida, drained by the Pithlachascotee and Anclote Rivers and Lake Tarpon. Existing project. The authorized project provided for improvements for control of floods and drainage, and for conservation through construction of necessary canals, levees, reservoirs, and control structures. More specifically, the project provided for: Green Swamp Area -- a conservation area and 3 storage reservoirs with necessary canals and control structures; Hillsborough River -- 4 flood-storage reservoirs, with necessary channels, control structures and levees; Oklawaha River - 9-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 -a levee on the north shore of Lake Apopka, improvement of parts of the river channel and a west bank levee below Moss Bluff lock and dam, and replacement of the lock and dam; Withlacoochee River -- one flood-storage reservoir with outlet canals and control structures; Peace River -- Peace Creek canal and control structures and improvements to the existing water control and drainage features; Gulf Coastal Areas-Lake Tarpon; outlet canal and control structure; Pithlachascotee River: reservoir with outlet canals and control structures. (See Table 9-T on Moss Bluff Lock.) Estimated cost for new work (October 1996 price level) is $180,700,000 Federal and $155,800,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish all lands, and rights-of-way; provide all alterations or replacements of public and private utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), etc.; hold the United States free from damages; operate and maintain all project works after completion; construct and maintain such associated works as are necessary to realize benefits made available by the project works; and contribute in cash 17 percent of the first cost of construction and 50 percent of recreation costs. Non-Federal contribution for new work is $13,909,201. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost $36,789. Recreation cost was $688. Feasibility cost was $3,244. Research and development cost was $6,063. Engineering and design and construction management cost $94,984 and $12,133 respectively. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project commenced April 18, 1966 and the scheduled work is 98 percent complete. Pending a determination of need, 58 percent of the project is unprogrammed. The only work currently programmed is recreation along the Hillsborough Bypass Canal. 59. PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, PR (This project authorized as Lago de Cerrillos, Lago de Portugues, and Channel Improvement at Ponce.) Location. Portugues and Bucana Rivers originate on the southern slopes of Cordillera Central divide of Puerto Rico and flow from this central ridge of the island to the Caribbean Sea. Their drainage areas are 22.6 and 31.4 square miles, respectively. Ponce, the second largest city in Puerto Rico, is located in the lower coastal area along Portugues River and is the only urban community in the two basins. Existing project. The authorized project provides for 2 multiple-purpose reservoirs for flood control, water supply, general recreation, and fish and wildlife enhancement -- one on Portugues River and the other on Cerrillos River, a tributary to the Bucana River; enlargement of about 5.7 miles of the Bucana River, with an additional 0.2 mile long tieback levee at the upstream terminus of the improvement; enlargement of 2.1 miles of the Portugues River, with an additional 0.5 mile of tieback levee at the upstream terminus of the improvement; and a 1.3 mile diversion channel connecting Portugues River to lower Bucana River. Estimated cost of the project (October 1996 price levels) is $418,825,000 Federal and $145,175,000 non-Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; hold the United States free from damages; operate and maintain all project works after completion; repay construction cost allocated to water supply in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958; pay one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; prohibit discharge of inadequately treated sewage and other pollutants into the reservoir; and prevent encroachment on downstream channels. Assurances of local cooperation have not been completed, except for Cerrillos Reservoir which was signed March 15, 1982. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $5,212,899. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $1,167,888. Relocations cost was $37,127. Construction contract for dams cost was $1,518,070, Cost for channels and canals was $6,599,186. Levees and floodwalls cost was $4,193. Cultural resource preservation cost was $5,000. Permanent operating equipment cost was $-10,650. Reconnaissance cost was $12,295. Feasibility cost was $265,060. Other study cost was $59,923. Collection of basic data cost $66,025. General regulatory function cost was $3,651. Engineering and design and construction management cost $1,283,305 and $1,092,736 respectively. HTRW cost was $11,055. Operations and maintenance cost during construction cost was $260,242. Condition at end offiscal year. Cerrillos Dam filling and monitoring operations are underway. Portugues Dam right abutment foundation contract has been initiated and 9-34 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT test grouting has been completed. Contract for removal of shoals in the Portugues Channel has been initiated. 60. RIO DE LA PLATA, PR Location. The Rio de La Plata basin is located about 11 miles west of the San Juan metropolitan area along the north coast of Puerto Rico. The Rio de la Plata basin drains an area of 240 square miles through several towns and villages into the Atlantic Ocean. Existing project. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990. It would provide 100 year protection upstream of PR Highway 2 and SPF protection down stream and calls for construction of 7.6 miles of levees. The plan includes the replacement of 3 bridges, recreation facilities, and mitigation for the loss of environmental habitats. The benefit-cost ratio is 1.6. Estimated cost (October 1996 price levels) is $63,318,000 Federal and $33,382,000 Non-Federal. Local cooperation. The project cooperation agreement was executed on 7 June 1995. The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Department of Natural and Environmental Resources, is the body authorized to represent the local interest and is responsible for complying with the following requirements: (1) provide a cash contribution equal to five percent of total project costs; (2) provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and dredged material disposal areas; (3) provide an additional cash payment when the sum of both items (1) and (2) are less than 25 percent of total project costs; (4) operate and maintain the project after completion, including accomplishment of any needed repairs or rehabilitation's of any of its components; (5) hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction or subsequent maintenance of the project, expect due to damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (6) prevent future encroachments which might interfere with proper functioning of the project; (7) participate in and comply with applicable Federal flood plain management and flood insurance programs; and (8) (a) provide guidance and leadership to prevent unwise future development in the flood plain; and (b) recreation local cooperation requirements: (1) provide one-half of the separable first cost of post authorization planning and construction of recreation facilities and provide all land required for recreation; and (2) all costs and full responsibility for the operation, maintenance, replacement, and management of recreation lands and facilities. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $78,147. Floodway control cost was $29,576. Reconnaissance cost was $1,428. Feasibility cost was $56,997. Engineering and design cost was $276,397. Condition at end of fiscal year. A new construction start was implemented in FY 95. The PCA was executed on 7 June 1995. Coordination for the relocations and real estate acquisition for the first contract is ongoing and is scheduled for award August 1998. 61. RIO PUERTO NUEVO, PR Location. The Rio Puerto Nuevo drainage basin is located within the San Juan Metropolitan Area along the northern coast of Puerto Rico. The basin joins the southeast side of San Juan Harbor and extends south and up into the foothills of the central mountains of Puerto Rico. The basin is traversed by the Rio Piedras, Rio Puerto Nuevo, Quebrada Margarita, Quebrada Josefina, Quebrada Dona Ana, Quebrada Vista, and Quebrada Guaracanal. Existing project. The authorized project for flood control includes improvements to 11.2 miles of the existing channel of Rio Puerto Nuevo and Rio Piedras and five tributaries of the Rio Puerto Nuevo drainage basin. The 25 square mile drainage basin drains into San Juan Harbor. Estimated cost of the project (October 1996 price levels) is $322,100,000 Federal and $107,600,000 non- Federal. (See Table 9-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must provide cash contribution equal to five percent of the total project costs; provide LERRD (except railroad bridge alterations);provide an additional cash payment when the sum of cash and LERRD are less than 25 percent of the total project costs; operate and maintain project works after completion; hold and save the United States free from damages; prevent future encroachments; participate and comply with Federal flood plain management and flood insurance programs; provide guidance and leadership to prevent unwise future development in the flood plain; provide one-half of the separable first cost of post authorization planning and construction of recreation facilities; and all costs and full responsibility for operations, maintenance, replacement, and management of the recreation lands and facilities. Non-Federal contribution for new work was $5,170,000. 9-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $802,202. Relocations cost was $30,000. Dams cost was $13,642. Channels and canals cost was $8,562,872. Levees and floodwalls cost was $57,642. Reconnaissance cost was $16,652. Feasibility cost was $24,240. Floodway control structure cost was $56,371. Reconnaissance cost was $78,396. Feasibility cost was $104,714. Engineering and design cost was $2,287,820. Construction management cost was $1,453,878. HTRW cost was $6,994. Operation and maintenance cost during construction was $7,075. Condition at end of fiscal year. Contract No.1 for bulkheaded channel was awarded for $36 million and construction is underway. Detailed design work for the high velocity Margarita channel and first segment of Rio Piedras continues. Plans and specifications for construction of the earth trapezoidal Margarita channel is ongoing with award planned in April 1998. 62. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Features transferred to the Central and Southern Florida Flood Control District and Southwest Florida Water Management District were inspected quarterly during the fiscal year at a total cost of $50,722. 63. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 9-E.) 64. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 685, 84th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). (See Table 9-V.) Emergency flood control activities -- repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $531,275 for the Disaster Preparedness Program. Emergency Operations cost was $658,168. Rehabilitation cost was $1,235,309. National Emergency Preparedness Program cost was $184,092. Emergency streambank and shoreline protection activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress as amended (Preauthorization). Federal cost for the fiscal year was Bradenton Beach, FL $9,183; and Juan Mendez Channel, PR $245,943. General Investigations 65. SURVEYS Hired labor costs during the fiscal year were: navigation studies $787,441; flood damage prevention studies $149,599; shoreline protection studies $36,896; special studies $47,517; review of authorized projects $84,206; miscellaneous activities $60,661; and coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests $130,560; for a total cost of $1,296,879. 66. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The requirement for preparation of regular flood plain information studies has been rescinded. FPI studies that deal with land use changes will continue to be prepared. Flood Plain Management Services $60,218; Technical Services $81,785; Quick Responses $4,937; Hurricane Evacuation Study VI $23,858; Florida Statewide Evacuation $1,367; Hurricane Evacuation Study Northern Puerto Rico $18,041; Hurricane Evacuation Study Western Puerto Rico $9,971; Seminole Tribal Floodway $345; Big Cypress Seminole Reservation $241; Indian Praire $8,066; for a total cost of $211,426. 67. CONTINUATION OF PLANNING AND ENGINEERING Navigation cost was Miami Harbor Channel $-33; Palm Valley Bridge $23,382, Hillsboro Inlet $104,632, and St. Lucie Inlet $268,190. Beach erosion cost was Brevard County $36,851, and Monroe County, FL $43,114. Local protection cost was Rio Grande de Loiza, PR $16,847, Arecibo River, PR $33,897, Rio Nigua de Salinas, PR $111,818, and Rio de la Plata, PR $149. Total cost for Continuation of Planning and Engineering was $638,847. 68. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN 9-36 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Navigation cost was Miami River Sediments, FL $-50, Tampa Harbor Big Bend, FL $118,686, and San Juan Harbor, PR $83,614. Beach erosion control cost was Nassau County, FL $290,732, and St. Johns County, FL $8,053. Flood control cost was Guanajibo River, PR $55,895, and Cedar Hammock (Wares Creek), Fl $53,709. Total cost for Advance Engineering and Design was $605,686. General Regulatory 69. PERMIT EVALUATION (R&H ACT of 1899; CWA of 1977; MPRSA of 1972) Location. Navigable waters of the United States, including tributary systems, headwaters and isolated waters, and ocean waters to the limits of the territorial seas. Existing Program. The program evaluates permit applications for work in navigable waters (dredging, filling, and other structures) of the United States, and the transportation of dredged material to the oceans for ocean disposal. Geographic coverage includes Florida, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Decision making criteria consist of the public interest review, Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines, and ocean dumping criteria. Local Cooperation. Joint application agreement with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) and the regional Water Management Districts (WMD) have been signed. Have developed a Programmatic General Permit with the FDEP and are in the process of expanding it. Expect to expand it by the end of 1997. We are working closely with the FDEP on watershed/ecosystem management areas for the state. Joint application booklet with the Virgin Island Department of Planning and Natural Resources (DPNR) is finished. We are developing a joint federal/state process for mitigation banks in Florida. All involved agencies (FWS, EPA, NMFS, FDEP, and the WMDs) have embraced the Mitigation Bank Review Team (MBRT) approach to permitting as laid out in the Federal guidelines. The Federal agencies are in agreement on the credit/debit method. Operations and results during fiscal year. Permit evaluation cost was $6,22,792. (R&H ACT of 1899; CWA of 1977; MPRSA of 1972) Existing program. The program takes appropriate enforcement action against both unauthorized work requiring a permit and noncompliance findings on issued permits. Operation of the program is continuing to make increased use of alternative dispute resolution processes to remediate violations. Close coordination with and cooperation of Department of Justice continues, with development of consent orders and fines as appropriate. Local cooperation: Developed MOA agreement on enforcement with EPA Region II to cover Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands.. The local operating agreement with FDEP and WMD contains provisions for cooperative enforcement, within the limits of state and federal law. Operations and results during fiscal year. Cost incurred this fiscal year for enforcement was $670,931. 71. OTHER NAVIGATION REGS (R&H Act of 1899) Location. Navigable waters of the United States in Florida, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Existing program. This program conducts studies to determine geographic extent of navigable waters of the United States, and establishment of danger or restricted zones in these waters. Local cooperation. This program is carried out with informal cooperation with the State of Florida and cooperation of other Department of Defense agencies needing restricted zones in which to conduct their defense related missions. In addition we are cooperating with the Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND), the local sponsor of the AIWW and the IWW, to update our criteria's for setback requirements for structures in the IWW and the AIWW to ensure the safety of navigation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Navigation studies cost was $-197. Project Modification 72. KISSIMMEE RIVER, FLORIDA 70. ENFORCEMENT 9-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Location. The Kissimmee River Basin comprises 3,013 square miles, and extends from Orlando southward to Lake Okeechobee, the second largest freshwater lake in the United States. The area is bounded on the north by the lakes of the Orlando area, on the west by the Peace River Basin, on the south by Lake Okeechobee, and in the east by the Upper St. John's and the Taylor Creek- Nuddin Slough Basins. The watershed is about 105 miles long and has a maximum width of 35 miles. Existing Project. The purpose of this study is to determine the extent of Federal participation in the Level II Backfilling Plan, as developed by the South Florida Water Management District, for restoration of the Kissimmee River and flood plain ecosystem. It is expected that restoration will restore the ecological integrity of the river system. Environmental improvements through modification of operations for Lake Kissimmee, Cypress, and Hatchineha. The project will include canal and/or structure improvements and real estate acquisition. The recommended plan consists of backfilling approximately 29 miles of C-38. This will result in the restoration of almost 29,000 acres in the floodplain. Three structures will be removed and two bridges and associated utilities will be relocated. Real estate interests will be acquired for effected portions of the floodplain. Estimated cost of the project (October 1996 price level) for Kissimmee River (Upper and Lower Basins) $231,500,000 Federal and $402,600,000 non- Federal. Local Cooperation. The South Florida Water Management District, an agency of the State of Florida, is the feasibility study cost sharing partner, and has expressed its intent to be the project sponsor. Local cost for the Headwater Revitalization is to be credited towards the total project cost. The authorization calls for the restoration to be cost-shared 50%-50% and that the lands be credited toward the total cost of the Kissimmee River Restoration. A draft Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) has been reviewed by the sponsor and a letter of intent has been provided for the Headwaters Revitalization. LCA for the River Restoration project is scheduled for execution in May 1994. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Lands and damages cost was $938,941. Dams cost was $266. Channel and canal cost was $75. Floodway control structure cost was $1,176. Permanent operating equipment cost was $2,161. Reconnaissance cost was $77,242. Feasibility cost was $240,312 Other study cost was $90,000. Collection and study of basic cost was $5,171. Miscellaneous activities cost was $26,378. Research and development cost was $851. General regulatory cost was $20,240. Engineering and Design cost was $3,696,121. Construction management cost was $30,222. HTRW cost was $1,712. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Plans and specifications for Upper Basin features are underway. In the lower basin, two feature design memorandums are underway for the restoration of the Kissimmee River. Construction in the upper basin is expected in FY 97. Construction in the lower basin is scheduled for FY 97 with the first backfilling in FY 99. Headwater Revitalization project modification report approved September 96 and completed the legislative requirements for project implementation. 9-38 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 1.Aquatic Plant Control (R&H Act of 1965) 2.Arecibo Harbor, PR (Federal Funds) 3.Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway between Norfolk, VA and St.Johns River, FL 4.Bakers Haulover Inlet, FL (Federal Funds) 5.Canaveral Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 6.Channel from Naples to Big Marco Pass, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 2,569,000 2,604,000 670,000 1,432,302 3,804,402 844,409 744,000 301,301 731,405 308,143 - 39,330,500 (55,622) 39,254,740 75,000 3,048,000 75,859 3,023,822 5,941,000 6,862,800 1,046,600 1,365,000 2,598,377 10,369,638 1,353,591 1,593,412 4,003,000 3,599,000 2,963,566 5,649,560 3,086,700 3,984,095 3,559,341 5,643,304 1,050,000 171,941 662,032 695,788 2,000 857 408 (163) 1,103 1,128,075' 1,128,075' 4,301,431 4,301,431 361,2252 361,2252 10,737,042 10,708,005 243,2353 243,2353 185,688 185,688 31,618,3104 31,596,848 74,751,366 74,686,333 2,567,441 2,458,421 305,290 305,290 2,243,372 2,243,372 9-39 159,975 159,975 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 7.Charlotte Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) 8.Cross-Florida Barge Canal (Federal Funds) 9.Eau Gallie Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) 10.Fernandina Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 11.Fort Myers Beach Channel, FL (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost - - - - 533,1695 - - - - 533,1695 93,000 165,000 99,000 2,499,000 18,201,644 91,248 166,614 94,474 2,456,676 18,153,410 - 63,567,473 - 63,567,473 115,000 191,348 20,000 30,000 20,000 32,529,6806 (6) 22,715 45,488 32,513,520 2,000 20,000 1,929 16,974 9,627 9,627 2,137 2,137 (763) 2,334 (776) - 4,639,0407 - 4,639,0407 1,796,000 1,768,000 1,393,830 798,000 34,260,010 1,768,672 1,788,068 1,403,250 769,210 34,229,665 10,000 20,000 14,870 19,738 - 40,000 500 0 935,000 935,000 158,1408 158,1408 1,046,131 1,046,131 9-40 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 12.Fort Pierce Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 13.Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Caloosahatchee River to Anclote River, FL (Federal Funds) 14.Intracoastal Waterway Jacksonville to Miami, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 15.Jacksonville Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 470,000 3,080,500 856,000 (150,000) 5,424,500 512,751 2,856,790 1,097,691 (50,461) 5,417,853 855,100 572,000 277,048 510,000 893,400 575,826 274,298 455,008 - 1,991,000 465,000 28,813 - 1,352,897 1,012,618 104,297 294,000 128,000 294,888 130,165 86,000 137,000 60,677 162,166 7,418,238 7,355,323 2,503.387 2.488,387 8,112,557 9 8,112,557 9 7,071,259 10 7,070,929 10 19,251,598 11 19,251,598 " 3,620,000 1,343,000 2,724,700 1,496,000 48,563,382 12 3,638,630 1,288,042 2,697,909 1,513,913 48,487,346 12 -- - - 61,000 -- - - 61,000 - - - - 47,596,278 13 - - - - 47,596,278 13 2,904,000 4,288,000 7,786,000 5,583,000 2,888,513 4,313,791 7,742,496 5,614,015 92,205,998 14 92,181,834 14 - 102,813 - 102,813 927,654 15 927,654 15 - 25,000 - 25,000 9-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 16.Jacksonville Hbr. (Mill Cove), FL (Federal Funds) 17.Johns Pass, FL (Federal Funds) 18.Long Boat Pass, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 19.Manatee Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 20.Mayaguez Harbor, PR (Federal Funds) 21.Melbourne Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 2,202 4,104,000 764 4,094,741 82,098 16 82,098 16 61,500 75,000 60,718 77,015 80,000 75,000 77,566 81,170 - 35,000 - 35,685 -r-r 11,000 1,145,000 10,937 1,143,281 1,285,000 (920,000) 3,440,000 603,100 111,841 141,135 2,912,775 1,348,294 - 25,000 2,413,153 148,790 - - 2,308,658 278,285 1,920,712 1,920,323 1,020,233 1,020,233 3,753,186 3,751,122 172,324 172,324 5,736,100 5,720,684 2,586,943 2,586,943 168,187 168,187 1,061,561 1,061,561 - 17,696 - 17,696 - 634,864 - 634,864 9-42 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 22.Miami Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 23.New Pass Sarasota, FL (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 11,110,923 1,017,000 400,636 3,440,000 49,247,625 17 10,518,179 1,850,835 399,261 3,458,812 49,239,137 17 125,000 112,000 154,300 320,000 127,319 52,881 188,109 313,577 5,956,817 5,924,248 - 2,300,710 18 - 2,274,595 18 45,811 19 45,811 19 302,000 125,000 100,000 1,790,000 305,806 123,803 95,273 1,760,491 24.Okeechobee Waterway, FL (Federal Funds) 25.Oklawaha River, FL (Federal Funds) 26.Palm Beach Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost - - - - 21,756,418 20 - - - - 21,756,418 20 5,540,000 3,518,000 4,270,900 3,425,000 67,080,421 21 5,451,019 3,302,685 4,649,233 3,454,609 67,088,216 21 315,264 22 315,264 22 67,000 104,000 127,000 80,500 66,780 99,798 125,476 83,449 2,803,076 23 2,799,826 23 - - - - 6,924,021 24 - - - - 6,911,204 24 2,039,000 2,305,000 1,703,000 2,215,000 23,558,946 25 2,030,105 2,317,688 1,613,619 2,268,681 23,520,283 25 9-43 Maint: Approp. Cost 6,795,926 6,758,705 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 27.Ponce de Leon Inlet, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 28.Ponce Harbor, PR (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 29.Port Everglades Harbor, Fl (Federal Funds) 30.Removal of Aquatic Growth (Federal Funds) 31. St. Augustine Harbor, FL (Federal Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost - - - - 1,953,276 - - - - 1,953,276 81,000 50,000 255,482 245,000 19,940,420 77,510 47,947 245,932 230,286 19,910,275 - - - 2,415,600 - - - - 2,415,600 -- - - 1,379,000 - - - - 1,112,663 (15,072) (32,000) (668) 10,697 10,031 45,000 44,632 279 (107) 90,000 95,00 47,667 136,65 3,289,000 3,806,000 3,700,000 5,965,00 3,292,416 3,795,707 3,626,023 5,958,50 107,000 255,000 3,291,000 172,000 108,038 246,065 3,192,124 273,090 - 2,227,260 26 - 2,227,260 26 - 1,779,270 - 1,779,270 - 717,304 - 717,304 - 54,426,666 27 - 54,426,666 27 )0 2,034,878 1 2,034,107 )0 64,384,137 )7 64,280,570 - 1,476,434 28 - 1,476,434 28 9,381,107 9,372,479 9-44 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 32. St. Johns River, FL Jacksonville to Lake Harney (Federal Funds) 33. St. Lucie Inlet, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 34.San Juan Harbor, PR (Federal Funds) 35.Tampa Harbor, FL (Main Channel) (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 35.Tampa Harbor, FL (East Bay - Branch Channels) (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost - - - - 1,171,243 29 - - - - 1,171,243 29 - - - - 1,300,299 30 - - - - 1,300,299 30 - - - - 7,766,689 31 -- - - 7,766,489 31 453,000 2,046,000 622,471 (25,000) 10,176,956 450,648 2,047,289 510,532 83,092 10,170,821 (234,222) 461,395 - - 3,743,199 (18,314) 143,981 - - 3,389,087 - 800,000 14,544,968 32 - 481,609 14,226,577 1,375,000 860,000 1,341,441 885,666 33,694 44,275 - 21,535,829 33 57 21,535,772 33 - - (50) - 173,767,440 34 - - - - 173,767,440 34 1,910,000 296,000 3,159,197 4,472,440 48,137,732 35 1,896,810 309,006 3,099,521 4,509,614 48,112,888 35 - - - - 1,038,711 - - - - 1,038,711 New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost (10,000) (187) 25,000 623 1,714,813 1,689,813 - 814,450 - 718,674 9-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 35. Tampa Harbor, FL (Port Sutton) (Federal Funds) 39.Brevard County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 40.Broward County, FL Beach Erosion Control & Hillsboro Inlet, FL Navigation Proj. (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 41.Duval County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 42. Ft. Pierce Beach, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 43.Indian River County, FL (Federal Funds) 44.Lee County, FL (Federal Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 350,000 (15,000) - 9,249 - (7,000) (2,619) 187 8,911 746 - 15,000 14,538 62,036 33,000 3,273 555,000 213,831 2,336,873 2,336,873 29,001 29,001 2,262,000 2,257,081 - 19,393,100 7,785 19,366,852 26,884 26,884 3,460,990 36 3,460,990 36 673,000 3,226,000 955,000 102,303 3,412,853 1,474,284 1,321,500 3,964,500 129,083 1,610,385 1,553,093 - 19,760,900 71,332 19,720,096 302,982 - 85,000 (29,345) 595,000 120,106 123,951 21,661 468,591 (15,000) 360 (319) 16,895,567 15,056,171 2,048,655 1,922,246 - 908,000 - 904,411 - 385,681 - 385,681 1,816,000 491,000 557,000 1,111,000 1,803,381 449,017 320,947 1,206,851 2,864,000 3,780,196 9-46 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 45.Manatee County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 46.Martin County, FL (Federal Funds) 46. Martin County, FL (Cont.) (Contrib. Funds) 47.Nassau County, FL (Federal Funds) 48.Palm Beach County, FL (Federal Funds) 49.Palm Beach Island, FL (Federal Funds) 50.Pinellas County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost (1,700,000) 920,000 (25,000) 339,000 (113,223) 1,082,325 7,220 313,043 (462,652) 702,975 - 246,300 4,667,400 138,900 - 174,576 4,621,034 245,164 - 5,030,000 - 4,766,963 283,000 239,500 266,107 282,011 216,258 9,153 357,000 15,851 290,732 2,972,000 (49,400) 20,000 200,000 2,792,171 145,718 31,140 171,287 6,074,600 6,048,437 3,337,348 3,337,348 5,052,600 5,040,775 5,030,000 4,983,221 1,433,653 1,367,385 9,240,434 9,183,146 13,621 13,621 1,793,000 12,760 1,792,940 837,000 630,000 3,331,000 1,560,000 25,743,693 399,324 925,754 3,540,112 1,646,353 25,591,294 5,625 5,625 20,160,345 - 1,230,971 20,146,700 9-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 51. St. Johns County, FL (Federal Funds) 52.Sarasota County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 55.Central and Southern Florida (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 56.Dade County, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 57.Dade County, N. of Haulover Beach, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 58.Four River Basins, FL (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 150,000 327,500 193,786 334,000 1,235,286 73,131 338,701 218,273 359,162 1,218,755 1,650,000 3,999,799 6,361,000 377,000 13,793,799 378,753 4,316,776 6,495,796 1,020,099 13,676,227 1,812,726 1,671,274 1,510,000 690,059 1,515,707 2,546,140 62,896 17,850,000 8,624,000 6,615,915 16,813,000 7,130,872 8,503,319 16,266,966 17,837,677 10,717,900 12,423,000 10,657,195 12,219,827 10,263,000 10,245,00 10,183,965 10,563,383 263,200 199,560 352,190 1,917,000 (72) 55,561 554,271 1,682,687 2,413,000 100,000 (23,224) 2,455,294 4,000,000 837,382 (133,737) 133,737 724,988 4,606,000 787,857 4,593,948 - 2,500,000 875,958 1,017,755 4,131,499 (139,000) (389) - 346,719 4,994,000 4,814,802 436,242,313 37 434,767,334 37 133,750,940 133,597,102 60,279,999 59,938,004 47,182,552 38 47,026,234 38 34,357,335 39 34,357,158 39 6,801,611 6,801,611 8,082,927 8,082,927 1,723,000 (887,000) 685,000 69,000 76,104,095 40 555,828 393,944 640,914 153,901 76,100,680 40 13,909,201 115,144 13,900,291 9-48 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-A (Cont.) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost To Sect. PROJECT FUNDING FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 59.Portugues and New Work: Bucana Rivers, Approp. 10,356,000 11,536,400 9,660,000 8,232,000 361,406,968 PR Cost 8,613,221 13,093,152 9,677,447 10,839,511 361,157,649 (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. 1,040,000 493,175 156,326 2,135,000 5,212,899 Cost 612,477 492,544 463,304 1,535,598 4,182,985 60.Rio De La Plata, New Work: PR Approp. 656,000 450,000 229,000 418,000 5,067,998 (Federal Funds) Cost 682,028 340,000 258,605 462,859 5,032,056 61 Rio Puerto Nuevo, New Work: PR Approp. 1,242,000 1,747,096 8,170,000 11,173,000 29,872,096 (Federal Funds) Cost 937,898 1,745,925 7,931,655 11,464,449 29,564,476 (Contrib. Funds) New Work: Approp. - 850,000 2,220,000 2,100,000 5,170,000 Cost - 1,870,994 1,997,157 3,868,151 69.General Regulatory New Work: (Federal Funds) Approp. 5,960,000 7,115,000 7,086,000 7,231,000 55,091,200 41 Cost 5,989,891 6,995,379 6,176,766 7,061,780 54,313,918 41 72.Kissimmee River, FL New Work: (Federal Funds) Approp. 22,179,000 4,000,000 - - 32,079,000 Cost 6,821,112 2,663,570 3,716,384 5,130,869 23,149,676 1 Exclude$s2 88,000 for contributed funds for neww ork. 2 Include$s9 7,566 for previous project. 3 Excludes $243,235 contributed funds for new work. 4 Excludes $700,000 contributed by NASA in connection with construction of lock. 5 Include$s1 13,000 for new work on previous project; excludes$ 15,563e xpendefdo r neww ork on existing projecitn BocaG rande ntrancec hanneflr om contributed funds. 6 Exclude$s1 13,744 for maintenanacne do perationosf dams. 7 Include$s9 05,221 expendefdo r recreationfa cilities. 8 Include$s1 0,128c ostf or reconnaissancaen dd etailedp rojectr eport preparedu nderS ection1 07 modification to thep rojectE. xcludes $1,095c ontributed fundsfo r neww ork. 9 Include$s5 15,479 for neww ork for previous projects$: 8,472f or neww ork on SunshineS kyway Channela; nd$ 9,707 for neww ork for CatsP oint ChannelE. xcludes$ 14,473 contributedfu ndsf or neww ork for SunshinSek yway andB oca CiegaB ayc hannels. 10 Includes $450,749 for maintenanfcoer previous project. 11 Include$s9 4,776 for work for previous projects. Exclude$s2 ,199,842 expendefdro mp ublicw orksf undsfo r new work. 12 Include$s2 13,222 for maintenancoen p reviousp rojectasn d $3,179 operatinagn d careu nder provisionosf permaneinntd efinite appropriation. 13 Includes$ 3,520,137 neww orko np revioupsr ojecat nd$ 290,013f or neww orke xpendefdro m publicw orksfu nds. 14 Include$s5 43,399 maintenancoen p revioupsr ojects. 15 Includeusn usecdo ntributefudn dso f $64,136 returnetdo locali nterests. 16 Projecatu thorizeDde cembe2r, 1964b, yC hief of Engineerusn derS ection1 07o f 1960R &H Act andb y Section1 10o f the 1966 R&H Act.C osot f neww orke xclude$s5 3,732c ontributefudn ds. 17 Includes$ 5,502,126 expendefdr om public work fundsf or new work. Includesc ostso f $6,777,906 for recreatiofna cilities. 18 Include$s3 81,479 work-in-kinadn d$ 172,314 in costsfo r northj etty recreatiofanc ility. 19 Exclude$s4 5,811 contributefdu ndsfo r neww ork. 9-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 20 Includes $21,101,919 for new work under previous project, $626,925 for recreational facilities (Code 710), and $27,574 for reconnaissance and detailed project report prepared under Section 107 modification to the project. 21 Includes $7,581,150 for maintenance for previous projects. Excludes $1,000 for maintenance from contributed funds on previous projects, $67,558 which represents services rendered without reimbursement, and $113,744 for maintenance and operations of dams. 22 Includes $3,912 for new work for previous projects. 23 Includes $11,414 for operating and care under provisions for permanent indefinite appropriation. 24 Includes $80,000 new work from public works funds. Excludes $509,506 contributed funds. 25 Includes $30,000 for maintenance from public works funds. 26 Includes $11,588 expended for restudy, but excludes $21,960 expended for new work from contributed funds. 27 Excludes $1,033,069 contributed funds. 28 Includes $71,303 for new work on previous project. Excludes $137,500 contributed funds. 29 Baresford cutoff and completion of cutoffs and easing of bends in Putnam Lake and Volusia Counties in inactive status were deauthorized by Public Law 93-251 section 12. Includes $29,566 for new work under previous project. 30 Includes $25,838 under previous project. 31 Includes $26,689 for new work under previous project. 32 Includes $747,684 for new work under previous project. Excludes $100,000 expended for new work from contributed funds. 33 Includes $44,730 for maintenance from public works funds under previous project. 34 Includes $853,050 for new work from public works funds under previous project & $1,463,000 from emergency relief funds. Excludes $270,466 for new work for Hillsborough River and $13,939 for new work from contributed funds. 35 Includes $17,107 for maintenance under previous project. 36 Excludes work-in-kind. 37 Excludes $15,543 for property received without reimbursement and R&H Funds, expended on previous projects (see cost and financial statement for Okeechobee Waterway, FL, project for these costs). Excludes $100,000 advanced by local interests toward federal costs. Includes $175,000 appropriation and $175,000 cost for new work at C&SF St. Johns Water Management District. 38 Includes $2,294,134 for reimbursement costs to Bal Harbor. 39 Excludes unused contributed funds of $17,969 returned to local interests. 40 Includes costs of $89,691 for recreation facilities at Moss Bluff and $2,638,272 at Lake Tarpon. 41 Funds appropriated under General Regulatory Functions 96X3126. 9-50 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 NAVIGATION PROJECTS Aug. 26, 1937 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 Mar. 4, 1913 Jun. 20, 1939 Jul. 14, 1960 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 1 of Text) Control and progressive eradication of obnoxious aquatic plants, and continued research to develop best method of control. TAMPA, FL May enter into a cooperative agreement under section 229 with the Museum of Science and Industry, Tampa, Fl to provide technical, planning, and design assistance to demonstrate the water quality functions found in wetlands, at an estimated total Federal cost of $500,000. WEST DADE, FL Conduct a reconnaissance study to determine the Federal interest in using the West Dade, FL, reuse facility to improve water quality in, and increase the supply of surface water to, the Everglades in order to enhance fish and wildlife habitat. ARECIBO HARBOR, PR (See Section 2 of Text) Construction of breakwater 1,200 feet long and dredging channel 25 feet deep and 400 feet wide with flare at entrance and widening at inner end to form a maneuvering area. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FL Project for navigation. Operation, maintenance, repair, replacement and rehabilitation shall be a non-Federal responsibility, and the non-Federal interest shall assume ownership for the bridge. ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN NORFOLK, VA AND THE ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL (See Section 3 of Text) Channel 7 x 100 feet. Channel 12 feet deep and 90-150 feet wide with cutoffs. BAKERS HAULOVER, FL (See Section 4 of Text) Channel 11 x 200 feet in ocean entrance, thence 8 x 100 feet to Intracoastal Waterway; Marina basin 8 x 200 feet; reconstruction of jetties and protection of inlet shores. H.Doc. 251, 89th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12,1996 104th Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 43, Cong.,75th 1st sess. P.L.104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. H.Doc. 898, 62nd Cong.,2d sess. H.Doc. 618, 75th Cong.,3d sess. H.Doc. 189, 86th Cong., 1st sess. 9-51 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL (See Section 5 of Text) Entrance channel jetties, a turning basin enclosed by a dike, and a barge canal with a lock. Maintain improved channel, turning basin, enlarge barge channel and lock, relocate dike, provide channel and turning basin west of 35-foot turning basin, construct and operate sand-transfer plant. H.Doc. 367, 77th Cong.,lst sess. S.Doc. 140, 87th Cong.,2d sess. Report of the Mitigation of fish and wildlife losses at Port Canaveral West Chief of Engineers Turning Basin Project. Oct. 1985 Report of the Project for navigation, Canaveral Harbor, FL, Chief of Engineers as modified by the letter of the Secretary Jul. 24, 1991 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 Jun. 20, 1938 Jul. 14, 1960 Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 3, 1925 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 dated Oct. 10, 1991 Modification of navigation project to reclassify the removal and replacement of stone protection on both sides of the channel as general navigation features. CHANNEL FROM NAPLES TO BIG MARCO PASS, FL (See Section 6 of Text) Interior channel 6 x 70 feet. Channel 12 x 150 feet from the Gulf to Gordon Pass, thence 10 x 100 feet to a point 400 feet south of U.S. Highway 41 Bridge, thence 10 x 70 feet to bridge and two turning basins. CHARLOTTE HARBOR, FL (See Section 7 of Text) Channel 24 x 300 feet through Gulf through Boca Grande entrance. Depth of 27 feet at entrance and width of 500 feet at bend. Channel 10 x 100 feet to Punta Gorda and a turning basin. Depth of 30 feet at entrance and width of 700 feet at bend. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 102-580, Oct. 13, 1992 102nd Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104 th Cong. H.Doc. 596, 75th Cong.,3d sess. H.Doc. 183, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 699, 62nd Cong.,2d sess. H.Doc. 113, 66th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 1, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.95, 74thCong.,2dsess. 9-52 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 P.O. 675/77 Jul. 23, 1942 WRDA Nov. 17, 1986 WRDA Nov. 28, 1990 WRDA Oct. 31, 1992 Jun. 20, 1938 Jun. 14, 1880 Jul. 13, 1892 Mar. 2, 1907 Depth of 32 feet in entrance channel. H.Doc. 186, 81st Cong., 1 st sess. CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL, FL (See Section 8 of Text) Barge Canal 12 x 150 feet. Establishment of the Cross Florida National Conservation Area. Deauthorized project purposes in the Act of July 23, 1942, transferred lands and completed facilities to the state, and required state payments to Citrus, Clay, Duval, Levy, Marion. and Putnam counties During the period November 28, 1992 and September 30, 1993, authorized and directed to enter into a contract with the St. Johns River Water Management District and the Southwest Florida Water Management District of the State of Florida for the continued operation and maintenance of the project. The maintenance shall be performed at a level of service that is necessary to ensure safe operating conditions and to prevent deterioration of the structures. No major rehabilitations or renovations shall be performed in such portions of the project during such period. Funding for the continued operation and maintenance of the barge canal project, shall not exceed $300,000 federal and the State of Florida shall pay a nonfederal share of $600,000 to fund the continued maintenance. EAU GALLIE HARBOR, FL (See Section 9 of Text) Channel 8 x 100 feet and a turning basin. FERNANDINA HARBOR, FL (See Section 10 of Text) Entrance jetties. Raising and extending jetties to provide a 19-foot depth. Improvement of inner harbor to obtain 20 to 24-foot depth and 400 to 600-foot channel width. H.Doc. 109, 79th Cong., l st sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 101-640, Nov. 28, 1990, 101st Cong., 2d sess P.L. 102-580, Oct. 31, 1992, 102nd Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 497, 75th Cong.,3d sess. Annual Report 1879 Annual Report 1891 & 1896 H.Doc. 388, 59th Cong., 1st sess. 9-53 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Combining improvement of Fernandina Harbor and Cumberland Sound under the general heading of Fernandina Harbor. Mar. 3, 1925 Jun. 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 WRDA Nov. 28, 1990 Jul. 14, 1960 Auth. by Chief of Engineers Dec. 6, 1968 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act Def. Act of Mar. 4, 1931 Provided for a 26-foot channel. Provided for the 28-foot channel and turning basin. Provided for reducing the maximum width of turning basin from 1,000 to 800 feet, for shifting channel line in this vicinity vicinity 50 feet northwesterly and for including in authorized project small area dredged by Rayonier, Inc. Provided for 32-foot channel and turning basin. Redesignated location of turning basin until Section 107 (R&H Act of 1960) study is completed and the resulting. project constructed FORT MYERS BEACH, FL (See Section 11 of Text) 12 x 150 foot channel in San Carlos Bay, thence 11 x 125 feet in Matanzas Pass to upper shrimp terminals. Extension of 11 x 125 foot channel easterly about 2,000 feet to and including a turning basin adjacent to natural deep water in Matanzas Pass. FORT PIERCE HARBOR, FL (See Section 12 of Text) Expenditure of $20,000 for dredging channel, maintenance by local interests. War Dept. Approp. Expenditure of up to $30,000 for dredging channel. Act, Mar. 4, 1933 H.Doc. 227, 68th Cong.,lst sess. H.Doc. 548, 75th Cong.,3d sess. H.Doc. 284, 87th Cong.,lst sess. H.Doc. 662, 80th Cong.,2d sess. P.L. 101-640, Nov. 28, 1990 101st Cong., ?? sess. H.Doc. 183, 86th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act Specified in Act 9-54 Jun. 25, 1910 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Report of the Chief of Engineers Dec. 14, 1987 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 May 10-16, 1957 Auth. Mar. 1, 1962 by Senate and House Public. Works Comm Auth. by Chief of Engineers, Mar.l, 1963,. under Sec 107 of 1960 R&H Act Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Maintaining channels, jetties, and revetments, and enlarging channels and turning basin to existing project dimensions. Deepening and enlarging channels and turning basin. Total cost of $6,742,000. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE RIVER, FL (See Section 13 of Text) 9 x 100 foot channel; deepening channel at Casey's Pass to 9 feet and construction of highway bridge at Venice. Original route may be modified at no excess cost to U.S. Any route in Venice-Lemon Bay area may be used. Use of alternate Route C-1 in Venice-Lemon Bay area. Local interests to bear costs of Venice Avenue highway bridge and any other necessary crossing over Route C-I. Sunshine Skyway Channel to be improved and maintained to. 9 x 100 feet H.Doc. 252, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 74th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 100-676,, Nov. 17, 1988 100th Cong., 2d sess H.Doc. 371, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 109, 85th Cong.,lst sess. 6 x 80 foot channel in Boca Ciega Bay. INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO MIAMI, FL (See Section 14 of Text) Channel 8 x 75 feet from Jacksonville to Miami. H.Doc. 586, 69th Cong.,2d sess. Channel width of 100 feet. S.Doc. 71, 71st Cong., 2d sess. 9-55 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents PARA Jun. 26, 1934 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar.2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1958 Chief of Engineers Report of Jul. 22, Operation and care of Palm Valley Bridge. Turning basin at Jacksonville Beach. Channel 12 x 125 feet. Side channel and turning basin at Sebastian (deauthorized). Turning basin at Vero Beach. Maintenance of side channel at Daytona Beach. Channel 10 x 125 feet from Ft. Pierce to Miami. Specified in Act H.Doc. 180, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 740, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 336, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 261, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 222, 85th Cong., 1st sess. 1960,Mod. 12-foot channel JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL (See Section 15 of Text) ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL OPPOSITE THE CITY OF JACKSONVILLE Mar. 2, 1907 The 24-foot area from Hogan Creek to Florida East Coast Railroad bridge. Nov. 17, 1986 Deauthorized the 24-foot area from Hogan Creek to Florida East Coast Railroad bridge. JACKSONVILLE HARBOR (MILL COVE), FL (See Section 16 of Text) Report of the Enlarge weir structure and west opening controlling flow into Mill Chief of Engineers Cove, to reduce shoaling and improve navigation as well as Feb. 12,. 1982 circulation. WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 Modification to carry out a project for mitigation consisting of measures for flow and circulation improvement within. Mill Cove. H.Doc 663, 59th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662,, Nov. 28, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. 9-56 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Auth. by Chief of Engineers Dec. 2, 1964 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act and Sec. 110 of 1966 R&H Act JOHN'S PASS, FL (See Section 17 of Text) Channel 10 x 100 feet in gulf, 8 x 100 feet inside pass, 6 x 100 feet to IWW, 2.6 miles long. WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 Auth. by Chief of Engineers, Apr. 20, 1976 under Sec. 107 of 1960 LAKE WORTH INLET, FL Project for navigation and shoreline protection subject to final report to be completed not later than December 31, 1996. LONGBOAT PASS, FL (See Section 18 of Text) 12 x 150 foot entrance channel from Gulf of Mexico to Longboat Bridge; 10 x 100 foot channel from Longboat Bridge northeasterly to IWW; channel from north channel to Cortez Bridge. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. R&H Act, as amended MANATEE HARBOR, FL (See Section 19 of Text) Report of the Provide for maintenance of the existing 40-foot deep draft Chief of Engineers navigation channel and turning basin from Tampa Bay May 12, 1980 to Port Manatee. Initial construction of a widener at Manatee Harbor and deepen area adjacent to berthing area. WRDA Nov. 28, 1990 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Modified the project for navigation authorized by the WRDA of 1986 to construct substantially in accordance with the post authorization change report dated April 1990. MAYAGUEZ HARBOR, PR (See Section 20 of Text) Approach channel 30 feet deep to and along deep water terminal. MELBOURNE HARBOR, FL (See Section 21 of Text) Channel 8 x 100 feet and a turning basin. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L.101-640, Nov. 28, 1990, 101st Cong., ?? sess. H.Doc. 215, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. & River and Harbor Committee Doc. 1,73rd Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 390, 74th Cong., 2d sess. 9-57 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 3, 1930 PWA Program Sep. 6, 1933 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 3, 1925 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 MIAMI HARBOR, FL (See Section 22 of Text) MIAMI RIVER The 15-foot channel in Miami River, 150 feet wide at the mouth. The channel at Dinner Key Airport. An 18-foot channel in a land cut across the peninsula and construction of the north jetty. Construction of the south jetty and increase of channel width to 100 feet. Modification of local cooperation requirements imposed by the Act of July 25, 1912. A channel 25 feet deep with present widths from the ocean to Biscayne Bay, thence 200 feet wide across the bay to but not including the municipal turning basin, and extension of both jetties. A channel width of 300 feet across the bay and enlarging the municipal turning basin, with expenditures thereon limited. to $200,000 A depth of 30 feet from the ocean to and in the turning basin, with the existing authorized project widths, including the 300-foot width in the channel across the bay. Extending the turning basin 200 feet to the southward. The Virginia Key improvement. Specified in Act S.Doc. 95, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. and Specified in Act H.Doc. 622, 56th Cong., 1st sess. (Annual Report 1900, p. 1987) Specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 516, 67th Cong.,4th sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Sen. Comm. Print. 73rd Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 86, 74th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 251, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 9-58 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 For incorporation of the project for Miami River in that for Miami Harbor, the widening at the mouth of Miami River to existing project widths; the channels from the mouth of Miami River to the turning basin and to Government Cut; and the channel from Miami River to the harbor of refuge, provided that local interests contribute one-third of the cost. Jul. 14, 1960 Deletion of Virginia Key development and the Dinner Key, approach channel widening the existing ship channel by easing the ocean bend and increasing the width of the 300-foot wide section to 500 feet, enlarging the existing turning basin 300 feet along both the south and northeasterly sides, and dredging a turning basin along the north side of Fisher Island about 39 acres in extent and 30 feet in depth. Aug. 13, 1968 Enlarging existing entrance channel to 38 x 500 feet, deepening existing 400-foot wide channel across Biscayne Bay to 36 feet; deepening existing turning basins at Biseayne Boulevard terminal and Fisher Island to 36 feet. WRDA Deauthorized the widening at the mouth of Miami River to Nov. 17, 1986 existing project widths; and the channels from the mouth of Miami River to the turning basin, to Government Cut, and to a harbor of refuge in Palmer Lake. Report of the The project for navigation, Miami Harbor Channel. Chief of Engineers Sep. 25, 1989 WRDA The project for navigation, Miami Harbor Channel subject Oct. 12, 1996 to a final report to be completed no later than 31 December 1996. NEW PASS, SARASOTA, FL (See Section 23 of Text) Auth. by Chief 10 x 150 foot entrance channel; 8 x 100 foot inner channels; and of Engineers 8-foot deep turning basins at Payne Terminal and City Pier. Apr. 20, 1964 under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FL (See Section 24 of Text) PARA Jun. 26, Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds 1934 from R&H appropriations. H.Doc. 91, 79th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 71, 85th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 93, 90th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 101-640, Nov. 28, 1990, 101st Cong, ?? sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th, Cong Specified in Act 9-59 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 WRDA Nov. 17, 1986 Auth. by Chief of Engineers Nov. 5, 1968, under Sec. 107 of 1960 R&H Act New lock and weir structure in St. Lucie Canal. Deepening to 8 feet from Ft. Myers to Jacksonville-Miami waterway near Stuart via channel across lake from Clewiston. Channel to yacht basin at Ft. Myers and a basin at Stuart. Deauthorized basin at Stuart. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 696, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 736, 79th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662,, Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. Enlarge existing 8 x 90 foot section of Okeechobee Waterway for about 5 miles upstream from Ft. Myers to 10 x 100 feet. Sep. 19, 1890 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 25, 1912 Jul. 27, 1916 PARA Jun. 26, 1934 WRDA Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 13, 1934 OKLAWAHA RIVER, FL (See Section 25 of Text) Clearing obstructions for channel 4 feet deep from mouth to Leesburg. Channel 6 feet deep from mouth to head of Silver Springs Run. Maintenance of levels in the lakes at head of river. Acceptance of certain artificial waterways in lieu of portions of natural river bed. Operation and care of lock and dam provided for with funds from appropriations for rivers and harbors. Deauthorized channel 6 feet deep from mouth to head of Silver Springs Run PALM BEACH HARBOR, FL (See Section 26 of Text) Maintenance of improvement previously constructed by local interests. Annual Report 1889, p.1360 H.Doc. 782, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Acts Specified in Act Specified in Act P.L. 99-662,, Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 185, 73rd Cong., 2d sess. 9-60 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Dec. 10, 1934 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Report of the Chief of Engineers Dec. 10, 1985 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 Deepening the channels and turning basin, as constructed by local of interests, to 20 feet. Authorized the work previously approved by Public Works Administration, and widening the channels to existing project dimensions, enlarging the 700-foot square turning basin eastward removing the obstructive point on south side of the and inlet, revetting the banks of the inlet restoring existing jetties. Deepening the channels and turning basin to 25 feet. Extending the turning basin 550 feet southward over a 900-foot width, with a flare to the east; provided that local interests may be reimbursed not to exceed $305,000 for work done by them on this modification subsequent to July 1, 1949. An entrance channel 35 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 0.8 mile long merging with an inner channel 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 0.3 mile long, thence flaring into a turning basin, 1,400 feet north-south by a minimum of 1,200 feet east-west. Assume maintenance of locally expanded turning basin to a depth of 25 feet on north side of existing basin. PONCE DE LEON INLET, FL (See Section 27 of Text) Widening and deepening channels; jetties on north and south sides of inlet; a weir in the north jetty and an impoundment. basin inside the weir PONCE HARBOR, PR (See Section 28 of Text) Dredging 3 continuous areas, aggregating 153 acres, to depths of 30, 18, and 9 feet, and construction of a seawall, costs to be shared by U.S. and local interests. Modified conditions of local cooperation to provide that U.S. undertake all dredging at Federal expense and return local funds previously contributed for dredging, all other portions of the improvement hereafter to be at the expense of local interests. Recommended by Chief Engineers to Public Works Administration Oct. 17, 1934 H.Doc. 185, 73rd Cong., 2d sess. and Rivers and Harbors Comm. H. Doc. 42, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 530, 78th Cong., Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 704, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 283, 86th Cong., 1 st sess. (contains latest published map) P.L. 99-662, Nov.17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 74, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 532, 67th Cong., 4th sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 18, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. 9-61 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 H.R. Sep. 23, 1976, S.R. Oct. 1, 1976 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 20, 1938 Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 3, 1958 H.R. May 9, 1974; S.R. May 31, 1974 Eliminate previously authorized 9-foot dredging area, and provided for dredging 30-foot depth area and 18 acres off the municipal pier and for construction of the breakwater off Punta Carenero. Eliminate previously authorized 18-foot and a portion of the 30-foot project outside the proposed 36-foot and a portion adjacent to the municipal bulkhead. Channel 36 x 600 feet from Caribbean Sea to harbor; channel 36 x 400 feet into harbor; and a 36-foot turning basin. PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FL (See Section 29 of Text) Maintenance of harbor constructed by local interests. Enlarge entrance channel and complete turning basin to 1,200 feet square. Widen turning basin 350 feet on north side. Widen turning basin 200 feet on north side, 500 feet on south side and enlarge flare at entrance channel. Deepen and widen entrance channel on a new alignment and increase turning basin in size and depth. Deepen and widen entrance channel, enlarge turning basin, widen Pier 7 channel, maintenance of Berth 18 channel, and planning for a south jetty fishing walkway with construction contingent upon need as developed by detailed post authorization studies. H.Doc. 745, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 532, 94th Cong., Cong., 2d sess. Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 545, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 768, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 346, 85th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 144, 93rd Cong., 1st sess. Report of the Chief of Engineers Sep. 23, 1991 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Project for navigation. P.L. 102-580, Oct.,31 1992 102nd Cong., 2d sess. REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA (See Section 30 of Text) Construction and operation of a suitable vessel and use of log booms for removal of water hyacinths in the navigable waters of the State. Extermination and removal of water hyacinths by any mechanical, chemical or other means. Prohibits use of any chemical process injurious to cattle. Annual Report 1899 Specified in Act Specified in Act 9-62 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 20, 1938 May 17, 1950 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1919 Jun. 14, 1880 Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Mar. 2, 1945 ST. AUGUSTINE HARBOR, FL (See Section 31 of Text) Channel 27 x 200 feet protected by a groin. Channel 16 x 200 feet across bar, and thence 12 feet deep to Intracoastal Waterway; jetty on south side of inlet; future landward extension of groin and jetty; and channel 10 x 100 feet in San Sebastian River. ST. JOHNS RIVER, FL, JACKSONVILLE TO LAKE HARNEY (See Section 32 of Text) A channel 13 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Jacksonville to Palatka. The improvement of Deep Creek. Two jetties at Volusia Bar (Maintenance only; new work completed under previous project). A channel 100 feet wide, 8 feet deep from Palatka to Sanford with a side channel to Enterprise, and thence 5 feet deep to Lake Harney. Cutoffs at Butcher Bend, Shake Creek, and Starks Landing, and easing bends at other points. A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Palatka to Sanford, with a side channel to Enterprise and with cutoffs and easing of bends. (Cutoffs deauthorized) Combining the two projects above into a single project for St. Johns River, FL, Jacksonville to Lake Harney, and for a cutoff 5 feet deep and 75 feet wide between Lake Monroe and the vicinity of Osteen Bridge (Woodruff Creek Cutoff). A channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Palatka to Sanford, and in the branch to Enterprise. ST. LUCIE INLET, FL (See Section 33 of Text) Channel 10 x 200 feet. H.Doc. 555, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 133, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 523, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1899 p. 1343 H.Doc. 699, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. Annual Report for 1879, pp. 795-798 H.Doc. 1111, 60th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 691, 69th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 603, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc. 445, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 208, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 391, 77th Cong., Ist sess. 9-63 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 7, 1966 H.R. May 9, 1974 S.R. May 31, 1974 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 17, 1940 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1958 Modification to maintain existing channel 6 x 100 feet. Extending north jetty and modifying existing jetty to provide a sand bypass weir section; excavation of sand impoundment basin; construction of south jetty with a walkway for recreational fishing; channel 10 x 500 feet through bar cut, tapering to 150 feet through the inlet, and 100 feet and 7 feet deep to the Intracoastal Waterway; and transfer of 380,000 cubic yards of material to the south beach during each two-year maintenance period. SAN JUAN HARBOR, PR (See Section 34 of Text) Anchorage (inner harbor) area of 206 acres and San Antonio Channel to 30-foot depth. Substitution of a 68-acre area 30 feet deep along southeasterly side of anchorage area, for one 25 acres in extent and of same depth extending easterly from eastern end of the San Antonio project channel. Modified condition of local cooperation. H.Doc. 508, 89th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 294, 93rd Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 865, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 45, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Entrance channel across outer bar 38 feet deep and 800 feet wide, and thence across bay to anchorage area (Anegado Reach Channel) 30 feet deep and 700 feet wide and increasing anchorage area to 239 acres to 30-foot depth. Widening Anegado Reach Channel and increasing anchorage. area to 329 acres Removal to 8-foot depth of Anegado, Largo, and Capitanejo Shoals, and dredging to 30-foot depth the entrance channel and turning basin to the Graving Dock. Maintenance of the 30-foot depth entrance channel and turning basin to the Army Terminal. Deepening portions of entrance and approach channels and basins to Army Terminal and San Antonio Pier areas to 35-45 feet; new 32- foot depth Puerto Nuevo Channel; new 36-foot depth anchorage. R&H Comm. Doc. 38, 74th Cong., 1st sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 42, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 364, 76th Cong., 1st sess. Specified in Act H.Doc. 38, 85th Cong., 1st sess. 9-64 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 4, 1976 A bar channel 48 x 800 feet, shifting the centerline 350 feet west; deepening Anegado Channel in steps from 46 to 40 feet while reducing width to 800 feet; deepening Army Terminal Channel and turning basin to 40 feet while widening the channel to 450 feet; deepening Puerto Nuevo Channel to 40 feet and widening it to 400 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel to 40 feet at existing 400-foot width; deepening San Antonio Channel to 38 feet at varying widths, minimum of 500 feet; deepening cruise ship basin at 30 x 250 feet; provide a 38-foot depth in Anchorage Area "E" with irregular width; six mooring dolphins for vessels using the area. Report of the Modification of the authorized project to provide the deepening Chief of Engineers of the Bar Channel to 48 feet and shifting its alignment 350 feet Dec. 23, 1982 to the west; deepening Anegado, and Army Terminal to 40 feet; deepening Graving Dock Channel, and Cruise Ship Basin, Puerto Nuevo Channel, and San Antonio Channel to 36 feet; and deepening Anchorage Area "E" to 38 feet while reducing its size and constructing six mooring dolphins within its limits. A 1,500-foot long extension to San Antonio Channel would be added to the Federal project and Sabana approach deepened to 32 feet. WRDA Modification of the project to deepen the bar channel to depths Oct. 12, 1996 varying from 49 feet to 56 feet below mean low water with other modifications to authorized interior channels as described in the General Reevaluation Report and Environmental Assessment dated March 1994. TAMPA HARBOR, FL (See Section 35 of Text) TAMPA BAY Mar. 3, 1899 For a channel 27 feet deep from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Tampa, 500 feet wide across the bar and 300 feet wide in the bay. Mar. 3, 1905 For a channel depth of 26 feet with sufficient width from the Gulf of Mexico to Port Tampa. TAMPA AND HILLSBOROUGH BAYS Jun. 25, 1910 For a depth of 24 feet in Hillsborough Bay. H.Doc. 574, 94th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662 Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 104-303, Oct.12, 1996 104th Cong. H.Doc. 52, 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Also printed in Annual Report 1899, p. 1640) Channel dimensions specified in Act Specified in Act H.Doc. 634, 61st Cong., 2d sess. 9-65 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1899 Sep. 22, 1922 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 20, 1938 Jun. 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 For a 27-foot depth from Gulf of Mexico up to and in the several channels of Hillsborough Bay, the widths to be 500 feet on the bar, 300 feet in Tampa Bay, Ybor, and Garrison Channels, and 200 feet in Hillsborough Bay, Sparkman, and Seddon Channels, with turning basins at the mouth of Hillsborough and at Ybor Estuary. HILLSBOROUGH RIVER For a 12 x 200 foot channel to within 100 feet of the Lafayette St. highway bridge (maintenance only; new work completed under a previous project under title Improving Hillsborough Bay, FL). TAMPA HARBOR, FL Consolidation of the above projects to form a single project for Tampa Harbor. Increasing the depth of Egmont Channel to 29 feet and the width of Sparkman Channel to 300 feet. For a depth of 32 feet and a width of 600 feet on Egmont Bar, a depth of 30 feet and a width of 400 feet in Mullet Key Cut, and a depth of 30 feet and a width of 300 feet in all other project channels in Tampa Harbor (except in Hillsborough River and in the channel leading to Alafia River); and for a turning basin 2,000 feet long and 500 feet in maximum width at the entrance to the Port Tampa terminals. For widening the bend between Sparkman Channel and Cut D of Hillsborough Bay Channel by 250 feet; widening Ybor Channel to 400 feet and extending the turning basin at the west end of Garrison Channel (mouth of Hillsborough River) easterly for 300 feet. For construction of a breakwater at Peter O. Knight Field, Davis Islands, its maintenance to be assumed by local interest. For widening Sparkman Channel to 400 feet and Ybor Channel to 500 feet; widening the bend between Sparkman and Garrison Channels an additional 250 feet to extend the turning basin westerly and widening the bend between Seddon and Garrison Channels by 150 feet (in lieu of 300 feet previously authorized) to extend the turning basin easterly. H.Doc. 634, 61st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 545, 55th Cong., 2d sess. and Annual Report 1998, pp 1357- 1360 Specified in Act H.Doc. 100, 70th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 22, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 164, 75th Cong., 3d sess. Sen. Comm. Print. 76th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 183, 78th Cong., 2d sess. 9-66 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 Dec. 31, 1970 For a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide in the Hillsborough River for about 2.4 miles above the upper end of the existing 12-foot channel, and for the removal of obstructions thence to the Florida Avenue Bridge. For a channel 25 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Hillsborough Bay channel to and including a turning basin in the Alafia River. (Revoked by Act of May 17, 1950). For deepening Egmont Channel to 36 feet; enlarging Mullet Key Cut, Tampa Bay Channel, Hillsborough Bay Channel, Port Tampa Channel and Port Tampa turning basin to present project dimensions; deepening Sparkman Channel and Ybor turning basin to 34 feet; a channel 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide from Hillsborough Bay Channel to and including a turning basin in Alafia River, 700 feet wide and 1,200 feet long (in lieu of the improvement previously authorized); and substantial widening at entrance, bends, and turns. Extended removal of obstructions in Hillsborough River to City Water Works Dam. Maintenance of cleared channel to be assumed by local interests. Channel and turning basin at Port Sutton 30 feet deep, Ybor Channel 34 x 400 feet. For federal maintenance of Port Sutton Channel, 280 feet wide and an irregularly shaped turning basin both to a depth of 34 feet. H.Doc. 119, 77th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 16, 77th, Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 258, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 567, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 529, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 150, 91st Cong., 1st sess. Enlarge entrance channel across Egmont Bar to 46 x 700 feet from the H.Doc. 401, 91st Gulf to Mullet Key. Cong.,2d sess. Enlarge Mullet Key Cut Channel to 44 x 600 feet. Do. Enlarge Tampa Bay Channel to 44 x 500 feet from Mullet Key Cut Do. through Tampa Bay to the junction of Hillsborough Bay and Port Tampa Channels. Enlarge Hillsborough Bay Channel to 44 x 500 feet from the junction Do. with Tampa Bay and Port Tampa Channels to the junction with Port Sutton entrance channel, and thence deepening to a depth of 42 feet at the existing width of 400 feet to the junction with Seddon and Sparkman Channels. 9-67 Do. Do. Do. Do. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Do. Enlarge Port Sutton entrance channel to 44 x 400 feet. Do. Enlarge Port Sutton turning basin to a depth of 44 feet and a turning diameter of 1,200 feet. Do. Deepening Sparkman Channel to 42 x 400 feet. Do. Deepening Ybor Channel to 40 x 300 feet. Do. Enlarge turning basin at the entrance to Ybor Channel to a depth of 42 feet and an additional width of 200 feet on the southwest edge of the present basin. Do. Deepening Port Tampa Channel to 42 feet at its existing width from the junction with Hillsborough and Tampa Bay Channels to the turning basin. Do. Deepening the Port Tampa turning basin to 42 feet over its existing length of 2,000 feet and width of 900 feet. Do. An entrance channel in East Bay 44 x 400 feet and 500 feet north from the Port Sutton turning basin for a distance of about 2,000 feet. Do. A turning basin in East Bay at a depth of 44 feet and with a turning diameter of 1,200 feet. Do. An approach channel in East Bay 44 x 300 feet north from the East Bay turning basin for a distance of about 2,500 feet. Do. Maintenance of Port Sutton Terminal channel to 44 x 200 feet for a distance of 4,000 feet. Aug. 15, 1985 Maintenance of East Bay channel to 34 x 300 feet for a distance of 5,500 feet. Report of the Port Sutton Channel deepening to 43 feet for a distance of 3,700 Chief of Engineers feet and a width of 200 feet. Mar. 28, 1988 WRDA Maintenance of Alafia Channel to a depth of 34 feet, if a Non-Federal Nov. 28, 1990 Sponsor agrees to reimburse the Secretary Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. Do. H.Doc. 236, 99th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 100-676, Nov. 17,1988, 100th Cong., 2d sess. 9-68 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 Oct. 27, 1965 WRDA Nov. 17, 1986 WRDA Nov. 28, 1990 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 TAMPA HARBOR BRANCH CHANNELS, FL Enlarging Hillsborough Bay Cut D, Sparkman Channel, Port Tampa Channel and existing turning basins at the entrance to Ybor Channel and at Port Tampa, all to a depth of 41 feet with varying lengths and widths and deepening Ybor Channel to a depth of 39 feet. This work will be associated with the Main Channel deepening. TAMPA HARBOR EAST BAY CHANNEL, FL Maintenance dredging at an average annual cost of $471,000. Shoreline protection project for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the project subject to completion of report no later than Dec. 13, 1996. BROWARD COUNTY, FL BEACH EROSION CONTROL AND HILLSBORO INLET, FL, NAVIGATION PROJECT (See Section 40 of Text) Improvement for beach erosion control in Broward County, FL and a combined beach erosion and navigation improvement to Hillsboro Inlet and the shore south thereof to Port Everglades. Deauthorized navigation improvement to Hillsboro Inlet. Continued authorization for Hillsboro Inlet dredging for 5 years. Periodic beach nourishment for a period of 50 years beginning on the date of initiation of construction of segments II and III. Report of the Chief of Engineers Jan. 25, 1979 WRDA Nov.17, 1986 9-69 P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 99-662, Nov.17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 352, 90th Cong.,2d sess. P.L.104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. H.Doc. 91, 89th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 101-640, Nov. 28, 1990 101st Cong., 2d sess P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS BREVARD COUNTY, FL (See Section 39 of Text) Aug. 13, 1968 Federal participation in cost of shore protection project. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents CHARLOTTE COUNTY, FL Report of the Shoreline protection. P.L. 99-662, Chief of Engineers Nov. 12, 1986 2 Apr. 1982 99th Cong., 2d sess. DADE COUNTY, FL (See Section 56 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection and hurricaneflood control project. DADE COUNTY-NORTH OF HAULOVER BEACH, FL (See Section 57 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection and hurricaneflood control project. Report of the Extending of existing shore protection project for Dade County to Chief of Engineers provide for protective beach fill and subsequent nourishment Dec. 17, 1983 Oct. 27, 1965 River and Harbor Act of 1965 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 WRDA Nov.17, 1986 Dec. 31, 1970 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 along 2.5 miles of shore north of Haulover Beach Park. DUVAL COUNTY, FL (See Section 41 of Text) Federal participation in cost of local shore protection project. FORT PIERCE BEACH, FL (See Section 42 of Text) Project for beach erosion control. Periodic beach nourishment for a period of 50 years beginning on the date of initiation of construction. INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FL (See Section 43 of Text) The plans provide for a 2.65 mile beach fill along the ocean shore of Vero Beach, a 1.7 mile beach fill along the ocean shore of Sebastian Inlet State Park and for periodic nourishment of the new beaches. LEE COUNTY, FL (See Section 44 of Text) Federal participation in cost of shore protection project. Modification of the project for shoreline protection, Captiva Island, to reimburse the non-Federal interest for beach nourishment work carried out by such interest as if such work occurred after execution. of the agreement. H.Doc. 335, 90th Cong., Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 236, 99th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 99-662 Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess H.Doc. 273, 89th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct.12, 1996 104th Cong. P.L. 99-662, Nov.17, 1986. 99th Cong., 2d sess H.Doc. 395, 91st Cong., 2nd sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. 9-70 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 15, 1985 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Complete a review not later than 6 months after enactment of this Act to determine if periodic beach nourishment is necessary for Captiva Island for a period of 50 years beginning on the date of initiation of construction. MANATEE COUNTY, FL (See Section 45 of Text) The plan provides for a level berm 50 feet wide at an elevation 6 feet (MLW) along 3.2 miles of shore on Anna Maria Island and nourishment of entire Gulf shore of that island as needed throughout project life. MARTIN COUNTY, FL (See Section 46 of Text) Periodic nourishment over the 50 year life of the project. MONROE COUNTY, FL Report of the Modification of existing project from 6,200-foot long to 8,770-foot Chief of Engineers long beach fill stabilized with 2 groins and periodic nourishment. Apr. 22, 1984 Report of the Chief of Engineers May 19, 1986 Oct. 23, 1962 WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 May 17, 1950 NASSAU COUNTY, FL(See Section 47 of Text) Improvement for beach erosion control on Amelia Island PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, FROM MARTIN COUNTY LINE TO LAKE WORTH INLET AND FROM SOUTH LAKE WORTH INLET TO BROWARD COUNTY LINE (See Section 48 of Text) Federal participation in cost of local shore protection project and sand-transfer plant. Complete a review not later than 6 months after enactment of this Act to determine if periodic beach nourishment is necessary for a period of 50 years beginning on the date of initiation of construction for Jupiter/Carlin, Ocean Ridge, and Boca Raton North Beach segments. PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, FROM LAKE WORTH INLET TO SOUTH LAKE WORTH INLET, FL (See Section 49 of Text) Federal participation in cost of local shore protection project on Palm Beach Island. WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 S.R. May 31, 1974 and H.R. Nov. 20, 1975 WRDA Nov. 28, 1990 9-71 P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. S.Doc. 37, 93rd Cong., 1 st sess. P.L.101-640, Nov.28,1990 101st Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662,, Nov.17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 100-676, Nov.17, 1988,. 99th Cong., 2d sess H.Doc. 164, 87th Cong., 1st sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12,1996 104th Cong H.Doc. 772, 80th Cong., 2d sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 3, 1958 Federal participation in cost of local sand-transfer plant at Lake Worth Inlet and shore protection project. PINELLAS COUNTY, FL (See Section 50 of Text) Nov. 7, 1966 Federal participation in cost of shore protection project. Report of the Restoration of 5,000 feet of beach at Clearwater Beach Island, Board of Engineers 49,000 feet of beach at Sand Key, 92,000 feet of beach at for Rivers and Treasure Island, and construction of 600 feet of revetment at Harbors Apr. 23, Long Key. Also, renourishment of each island. 1985 SARASOTA COUNTY, FL (See Section 52 of Text) Report of the Shoreline protection along 12,600 feet of shoreline on central Chief of Engineers Longboat and 21,100 feet on Manasota Key in the vicinity of Feb.28, 1986 Venice, Florida and periodic nourishment of these areas ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FL (See Section 51 of Text) Report of the Shoreline protection along 2.5 miles of problem area in the Chief of Engineers St. Augustine Beach and Coquina Gables area and periodic Feb. 26, 1980 nourishment. FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS CEDAR HAMMOCK (WARES CREEK), FL WRDA Project for flood control. Oct. 12, 1996 Jun. 30, 1948 H.Doc. 342, 85th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 519, 89th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov.17, 1986. 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 99-662 Nov.17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662 Nov.17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 104-303, Oct.12, 1996 104th Cong CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA, FL (See Section 55 of Text) First phase of comprehensive plan for flood control and other H.Doc. 643, 80th Cong., purposes. 2d sess. (Contains latest published map) Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Modification and expansion of authorization to include entire comprehensive plan of improvement. Canals, levees, and water-control and drainage structures in the Nicodemus Slough area, Glades County. Flood protection on Boggy Creek, near Orlando. H.Doc. 643, 80th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 53, 86th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc.125, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 9-72 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Do. Do. Do. Do. Oct. 27, 1965 Do. Aug. 13, 1968 Do. Flood protection in the Cutler Drain area, near Miami. Flood control and drainage works for South Dade County. Project Shingle Creek between Clear Lake and Lake Tohopekaliga for flood control and major drainage, including development of. Reedy Creek Swamp Improvement of easterly section of West Palm Beach Canal for flood control and major drainage. Primary works for flood control and major drainage in southwest Dade County. Primary works for flood control and major drainage in Hendry County. Gravity drainage in Martin County and distribution of available water supplies to portions of Martin and St. Lucie Counties. Improvement of supply, distribution and conservation of water resources in Central and Southern Florida, including Lake Okeechobee agricultural area, Everglades National Park and other related areas. S.Doc. 123, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc 138, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 139, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 146, 87th Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc. 20, 89th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 102, 88th Cong., 1st sess. S.Doc. 101, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 369, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Approved Navigation improvements suitable for recreational craft. Dec. 17, 1970 under the provisions of Section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 WRDA Deauthorized flood protection on Boggy Creek, near Orlando; Nov. 17, 1986 primary works for flood control and major drainage in southwest Dade County; and navigation improvements suitable for recreational craft. WRDA Extended modified water delivery schedules to Everglades National Nov. 17, 1988 Park. H.Doc. 394, 91st Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov.17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess P.L. 100-676, Nov. 17,1988, 9-73 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Everglades National Construct modifications to the Central and Southern Park Protection and Florida Project to improve water deliveries into the park and Expansion Act shall, to the extent practicable take steps to restore the natural of 1989 hydrological conditions within the park. WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 WRDA Oct.12, 1996 Oct. 23, 1962 WRDA Nov. 17, 1986 Dec. 31, 1970 Modification of project for flood protection of West Palm Beach (C-51) to provide for the construction of an enlarged stormwater detention area, Storm Water Treatment Area 1 East. Modification of the project to implement the recommended plan of improvement for South Dade County (C-111), including acquisition by non-Federal interests of such portions of the Frog Pond and Rocky Glades areas as are needed for the project. FOUR RIVER BASINS, FL (See Section 58 of Text) Control of floods and improvement of drainage, and for water conservation through construction of necessary canals, levees, reservoirs, and control structures. Deauthorized Anclote River control structure and channel improvement. PORTUGUES AND BUCANA RIVERS, PR (See Section 59 of Text) LAGO de CERRILLOS, PR Multiple purpose dam and lake for flood control, water supply and recreation. LAGO de PORTUGUES, PR Multiple purpose dam and lake for flood control, water supply and recreation. PONCE, PR Diversion and enlargement of existing channels through Ponce for flood control. P.L.101-229, Dec.13, 1989 101st Cong., 2d sess P.L. 104-303, Oct.12, 1996 104th Cong. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12,1996 104th Cong. H.Doc. 585, 87th Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc. 422, 91st Cong., 2d sess. WRDA Oct. 12, 1996 RIO GRANDE DE ARECIBO, PR Project for flood control. P.L. 104-303, Oct. 12, 1996 104th Cong. 9-74 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents RIO GRANDE DE LOIZA, PR Report of the Project for flood control. P.L. 102-580, Chief of Engineers Oct. 31, 1992 Mar. 5, 1992 102nd Cong., 2d sess. RIO PUERTO NUEVO, PR (See Section 61 of Text) Report of the Project for flood control. Chief of Engineers 25 Apr. 1986 Report of the Chief Engineers Jan. 1989 Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 WRDA Nov. 28, 1990 WRDA Oct. 31, 1992 RESTORATION PROJECTS WRDA Oct.12, 1996 P.L. 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 99th Cong., 2d sess. RIO DE LA PLATA, PR (See Section 60 of Text) Project for flood control. SAVAN GUT, ST. THOMAS, VI Project for flood control. Increased maximum allotment to $100,000. Set maximum amount allotted under Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 at $10,000,000. TURPENTINE RUN, ST. THOMAS, VI Project for flood control. EVERGLADES AND SOUTH FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, FL Develop a comprehensive plan for the purpose of restoring, preserving, and protecting the South Florida ecosystem which will provide for the protection of water quality in ,and the reduction of the loss of fresh water from the Everglades. The plan shall include such features as are necessary to provide for the water-related needs of the region, including flood control, the enhancement of water supplies, and other objectives served by the Central and Southern Florida Project. P.L. 858, Jun. 30, 1948, 80th Cong, 2d sess. P.L.101-640, Nov. 28, 1990, 101st Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 102-580, Oct. 31, 1992 102nd Cong., 2d sess. P.L. 104-303, Oct.12, 1996 104th Cong. 9-75 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 9-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents WRDA Nov. 28, 1990 KISSIMMEE RIVER RESTORATION, FL (See Section 72 of Text) Conduct a feasibility study for the purpose of determining P.L. 101-640, modifications of the flood control project for central and southern Nov.28,1990 Florida, authorized by section 203 of Flood Control Act of 1948 101st Cong., 2d sess (62 Stat. 1176), which are necessary to provide a comprehensive plan for the environmental restoration. Report of the Project for the ecosystem restoration, to construct the headwaters Chief of Engineers revitalization project, and any modifications for the environmental Mar. 17, 1992 restoration of the Kissimmee River Basin, ensuring that implementation of the project to restore the Kissimmee River will maintain the same level of flood protection as is provided by the current flood control project. P.L. 102-580,, Oct.31, 1992 102nd Cong., 2d sess. 9-76 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 37 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1997 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Anclote River, FL Aquatic Plant Control, FL (R&H Acts of 1958 & 1962) Atlantic Gulf Ship Canal, FL Bayport, FL3 Cedar Island, Keaton Beach, FL Cedar Keys Harbor, FL Christiansted Harbor, St. Croix, VI6 Clearwater Pass, FL2 1 Courtnay Channel, FL' Crystal River, FL' Everglades Harbor, FL' Fajardo Harbor, PR 3 Guayanes Harbor, PR 3 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway St. Marks to Tampa Bay, FL 3 Hillsboro Inlet, FL24 Homosassa River, FL' Horseshoe Cove, FL Hudson River, FL 3 Intracoastal Waterway, Miami to Key West, FL3 Key West Harbor, FL' Kissimmee River, FL' Lake Crescent and Dunns Creek, FL' Largo Sound Channel, FL'12 Little Manatee River, FL3 '11 Manatee River, FL' 5 New River, FL' Orange River, FL' Ozona, FL, channel and turning basin' Palm Beach, FL, side channel and basin 3 Pass-A-Grille Pass, FL1'16 Pithlachascotee River, FL Rice Creek, FL' St. Petersburg Harbor, FL St. Thomas Harbor, VI3 Steinhatchee River, FL' Suwannee River, FL15 Withlacoochee River, FL' 5 1974 $ 267,427 $ 919,411 1968 1939 1972 1977 1964 1980 1940 1941 1964 1945 1945 1974 1965 1937 1977 1974 1963 1972 1931 1931 1966 1949 1970 1956 1962 1963 1946 1966 1973 1957 1983 1949 1940 1977 1969 1,640,997 2 5,099,153 58,524 168,569 5 303,317 46,349 7 22,846 25,000 221,509 8 38,850 3,999 9 347,521 9,889 243,079 1,548,89210 23,479 10,276 117,44313 11,90314 123,350 36,518 2,000 105,527 41,29717 400,00018 85,20819 255,60820 1,989 135,053 76,41822 614,91223 54,969 76,023 58,595 1,568,252 26,779 152,208 51,034 26,454 576,169 28,046 534,623 112,954 9,035 51,149 194,516 31,296 24,918 15,089 60,686 261,401 18,814 1,746,09021 63,343 256,995 620,510 9-77 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 1 Complete. 2 Excludes $1,640,997 contributed funds. 3Inactive. 4 Includes $41,222 for reconnaissance and detailed project reports under Section 107 of the R&H Act of 1960. S Includes $82,500 expended under previous project. Excludes $1,473 contributed funds. 6 Project as modified by Chief of Engineers in report of June 30, 1961, is complete. Previously authorized depth of 25 feet in inactive status. Excludes $42,783 contributed funds. 8 Excludes $36,000 contributed funds. 9 In addition, $1,000 expended from contributed funds. 10 Includes $27,500 for new work under previous project.Excludes $35,371 contributed funds. 1" Deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. 12 Authorized April 20, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 R&H Act. 13 Includes $25,008 for detailed project report but excludes $86,716 expended from contributed funds. 14 Expended on restudy. 15 Inactive portion of project deauthorized by Public Law 93-251,Section 12. 16 Authorized November 19, 1964 by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of R&H Act of 1960. 17 Excludes $41,297 contributed funds. '8 Excludes $215,728 contributed funds. 19 Excludes $93,000 contributed funds. 20 Includes $32,689 under previous project. 21 Includes $20,532 under previous project. 22 Includes $10,154 expended under previous project. 23 Includes $30,000 expended under previous project. 24 Authorized by Section 301, R&H Act of 1965 and Section 107 of P.L. 101-640. 9-78 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS (See Section 53 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1997 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Cape Florida State Park, FL 1969 $34,862 $ El Tuque Beach, Ponce, PR 1985 1,396,730 Lee County, FL 1971 Punta Salinas, PR 1984 855,511 Palm Beach County, FL, from Lake Worth Inlet to South Lake Worth Inlet 1970 195,140 6,257 San Juan, PR 1965 TABLE 9-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 63 of Text) For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1997 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Arch Creek, Dade County, FL 1960 $66,485 ' Biscayne Bay, FL, Hurricane Protection 2 1966 Hillsborough Bay, FL 2 1969 Phillippi Creek Basin, FL 2 1966 SExcludes $11,734 cost of preauthorization studies. Project was authorized February 20, 1959, by Chief of Engineers under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as modified by P.L. 685, 84th Congress. 2 Deauthorized by Public Law 93-251, Section 12. 9-79 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 9-H NAVIGATION PROJECTS ON WHICH RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS ONLY WERE CONDUCTED DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 36 of Text) Date Survey Cost Incurred Project Conducted During Period IWW, Caloosahatchee River to Anclote, FL 4-97 162,166 John's Pass, FL 6-97 35,685 Oklawaha River, FL 7-97 83,449 Manatee Harbor, FL 7-97 78,466 Port Everglades Harbor, FL 9-97 136,651 St. Lucie Inlet, FL 8-97 83,092 Withlacoochee River, FL 7-97 20,634 Total $ 600,143 9-80 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT Distance to nearest town Name of nearest town Distance from Intracoastal Waterway Lock dimensions Lift Depth of Sills (mlw, ocean) Character of foundation Year completed and opened to navigation Contract cost 9.9 miles via 12-foot barge canal and Intracoastal Waterway Cocoa, FL 6.5 miles 909 wide; 6009 long' Varies with tide 14 feet Piles in sand 1965 $2,979,670 56x400 feet authorized. At request of NASA lock was with increased width. Operation and maintenance of lock is a Federal constructed 90 feet wide with NASA bearing additional cost ($700,000). responsibility. Length increased to 600 feet to be compatible TABLE 9-J CROSS-FLORIDA BARGE CANAL PROJECT LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 8 of Text) Henry H. Buckman Lock and Dam Eureka Lock R.N. Bert Dosh Dunellon Inglis Lock Lock Lock and Dam Nearest town (miles) Miles from Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Lock dimensions (ft.)' Normal lift (ft.) Depth over sills at normal pool levels: Upper (ft.) Character of foundation Kind of dam Type construction Percent complete Estimated contract cost Palatka, 11.2 90.4 84 x 600 20 14 Piles in sand Movable Earth3 100 Sparr, 15.8 111.4 84 x 600 20 17 Piles in sand Movable Earth3 100 Ocala, 8.9 127.7 84 x 600 0-152 16-312 Piles in sand None 0 Dunnellon, Inglis, 2.5 3.2 156.5 84 x 600 12-272 16-312 Rock None 0 $6,094,000 $7,975,000 $7,430,000 $9,500,000 $7,800,000 Clear width and greatest available length. 2 Pool level varies with natural ground water profile from minimum elevation of 40 feet to maximum elevation of 55 feet. 3 With concrete spillway and movable gates. 9-81 TABLE 9-I CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL PROJECT DATA RELATIVE TO LOCK (See Section 5 of Text) 168.6 84 x 600 28 18 Rock Movable Earth3 100 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 9-L OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 24 of Text) Work Performed Cost Operations and Maintenance: Operations: Operations of locks, dams, and reservoirs $ 958,700 Operation of service utilities 462,000 Operation of power plants 500 Natural resource management 148,000 Recreation management 244,200 Water Control Management 128,500 Condition and operation studies and activities 67,900 Real estate management 32,000 Construction Management 493,300 Sub-Total 2,535,100 Maintenance: Lands and damages 48,800 Maintenance of locks 71,000 Maintenance of non-recreational buildings and grounds 115,800 Maintenance of recreational facilities 186,400 Maintenance of permanent operating equipment non-recreational -31,500 Channel and canal maintenance 313,800 Engineering and Design 71,500 Construction Management 138,400 Clearing accounts 0 Income Credits 4,800 Sub-Total 919,000 Total $ 3,454,410 9-82 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-M REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH FROM NAVIGABLE WATERS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA CONTROL OPERATIONS (See Section 30 of Text) Locality Cost Channel and canal maintenance $5,884,100 Operation of locks, dams, and reservoirs 97,700 Operation of service facilities 200 Natural resource management 6,900 Water control management 500 Maintenance of non-recreational permanent operating equipment -500 Maintenance of non-recreational buildings and grounds 3,000 Engineering and Design -35,700 Construction Management 2,200 Total $ 5,958,400 9-83 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 9-0 CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COMPLETED DURING FISCAL YEAR 1997 (See Section 55 of Text) Date transferred to Flood Control District Construction for Operation and Feature Period Maintenance Levees: Upper St. Johns L-79 Flowway; S-253 June 1995 - October 1996 July 1997 Upper St. Johns L-77 Flowway; L-77 Levee March 1996 - November 1996 July 1997 TABLE 9-P CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT STATUS OF WORK UNDER CONTRACT AT END OF FISCAL YEAR 1997 (See Section 55 of Text) Construction Approx. % Feature Started Complete Levees: Upper St. Johns L-74N (Part) September 1995 95 Upper St. Johns Site F - Malabar Rd. (Rec) September 1995 95 Hwy. 512 and Fellsmere Access March 1997 60 Upper St. Johns S-252 Flowway; S-252D April 1997 26 SJWMA Improvements July 1997 16 9-84 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-Q CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF HURRICANE GATES (See Section 55 of Text) Depth Character Over of Year Gate' Nearest Town Distance Sills Founda- Com- Actual No. Name (miles) (feet) tion pleted Cost 2. Clewiston, FL 0.5 10 Pile 1935 $309,748 3. Lake Harbor, FL 0.5 10 Rock 1935 316,938 4. Belle Glade, FL 4.0 10 Rock 1935 350,025 5. Canal Point, FL 0.0 10 Rock 1935 262,465 6. Okeechobee, FL 0.5 7 Pile 1936 373,273 'All are 50 feet wide with available length unlimited. They are constructed of concrete with steel sector Gate gates and have no lift. No. 6 has an auxiliary culvert spillway with automatic control. Moore Haven Lock serves as Hurricane Gate Structure 1. TABLE 9-R CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT LOCAL COOPERATION (See Section 55 of Text) Flood Control Act Work Authorized Cash Contribution' Jun. 30, 1948 First phase of comprehensive plan 15.0 Sep. 3, 1954 Second phase of comprehensive plan 20.0 Jul. 14, 1960 Nicodemus Slough area 31.5 Oct. 23, 1962 West Palm Beach Canal 66.3 Boggy Creek Basin 29.7 Shingle Creek Basin 25.9 South Dade County area 19.2 Reedy Creek Swamp 50.0 Oct. 27, 1965 Southwest Dade County 46.0 Hendry County area 19.5 Aug. 13, 1968 Martin County Flood Control Features 34.0 Irrigation Features 49.0 Backflow Features 20.0 P.L. 89-72 Recreation Features 50.0 Water Resources - St. Lucie 20.0 Recreation Features 50.0 Approved Dec. 17, 1970 Navigation improvements suitable for under provisions of recreational craft 50.0 Section 201 of 1965 Flood Control Act (Deauthorized Jan. 1, 1990 by P.L. 99-662) P.L. 99-662 Upper St. Johns River Basin - non-structural flood protection 25.0 Computed on total contract cost and supervision and administration except for Reedy Creek Swamp and Recreation Features which are computed on all costs, including engineering and design and land. -85 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 9-S CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (See Section 55 of Text) Work Performed Cost New Work: Lands and damages Relocations Reservoirs Dams Roads, railroads, and bridges Channels and canals Breakwaters and seawalls Levees Navigation, ports and,harbors Pumping plants Recreation Floodway control and diversion structures Cultural Resource Preservation Reconnaissance Feasibility Other studies Collection and study of basic data Miscellaneous Activities Research and development General regulatory functions HTRW HTRW construction facilities HTRW post construction Funds return to the treasury Engineering and Design Construction Management Total cost $,714,616 18,305 20,561 10,157 22,481 1,220,637 4,839 823,185 34 1,259,190 293,610 88,762 125 150,489 3,996,880 85,051 397 45,871 3,848 2,824 145,685 4,911 17,607 25,978 8,821,179 743,146 $ 19,520,367 Operations: Operation of locks, dams, reservoirs and performance system Operation of service facilities Operation of flood control structures Operation of power plants Natural resource management Operation and maintenance of recreation facilities, service and maintenance of traffic counters, master planning Condition and operation studies, periodic inspections, dam safety studies Roads, railroads, and bridges Water control management National preparedness program 1,587,000 526,900 676,100 -4,600 127,400 290,000 250,900 10,900 1,518,400 300 9-86 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-S CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA PROJECT OPERATIONS AND RESULTS DURING FISCAL YEAR (Cont.) (See Section 55 of Text) Work Performed Cost Real estate management Project operations management Sub-Total Maintenance: Lands and damages Maintenance of dams Maintenance of locks Pumping plant maintenance Maintenance of levees and floodwalls Maintenance of recreational facilities Maintenance and purchase of non-recreational permanent operating equipment Bank stabilization Utilities, supplies, and maintenance of non-recreational buildings and grounds Channel and canal maintenance Engineering and Design Construction Management Clearing accounts Sub-Total Total Special recreation user fees 15,700 739,900 $ 5,738,900 7,000 101,800 -38,100 17,800 3,220,900 136,600 $ 66,500 54,600 271,800 64,900 412,900 425,600 81,500 $ 4,814,500 10,563,300 0 9-87 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 9-T FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLORIDA PROJECT CONDITION AT END OF FISCAL YEAR 1997 (See Section 58 of Text) Date transferred to Construction Southwest Florida Feature Period For Operation and Maintenance Bridges: B-194 Alteration of Facilities B-195 B-594 Alteration of Facilities B-196 SCL RR Bridge, B-196 Channels and Canals: C-135 C-135, Sec. 1A C-135, Sec. 1B C-135, Sec. 1C&2 C-135, Sec. 3A C-135, Sec. 3B C-135, Sec. 4A C-136 C-231, Phase I C-231, Phase II C-331 C-531 C-534 C-135 Structures: S-160 S-161 S-162 S-353 Moss Bluff Lock and Spillway S-551 Levees: L-212, Sec. 1 L-212, Sec. 2 L-112 L-112 & Floodway S-155 S-163 S-159 Middle & Lower S-159 Upper Recreation: Morris Bridge & Flint Creek Sites Dead River Sites Jul 1968 - Mar 1970 May 1971 -Jan 1973 Jan 1973 - Jan 1974 Oct 1972 - Jan 1975 Dec 1972 - Jul 1975 May 1967 - Dec 1968 Jul 1966 - Aug 1967 May 1968 - Sep 1972 Jan 1971 - Dec 1973 Dec 1972 - Apr 1975 Feb 1975 - Aug 1977 Apr 1976 - Jan 1979 Aug 1975 - May 1977 Jul 1973 - Apr 1975 Jul 1973 - Jan 1974 Jul 1967 - Sep 1968 Apr 1966 - Jan 1969 Jun 1979 - Jul 1971 Mar 1977 - Oct 1980 May 1967 - Dec 1968 Aug 1975 - May 1977 Apr 1975 - Jun 1977 Jul 1967 - Sep 1968 Apr 1967 - Mar 1969 Jul 1970 - Feb 1972 Jun 1968 - Jul 1970 Jul 1970 - Sep 1971 Mar 1977 - Oct 1980 May 1978 - Jul 1981 May 1978 - Jul 1981 May 1978 - Jul 1981 Apr 1979 - Aug 1981 Jun 1979 - Sep 1981 Dec 1982 - Aug 1984 Mar 1985 - Jul 1986 Not transferred Do. Do. Do. Jul 1975 Dec 1968 Oct 1967 Not transferred Not transferred Oct 1977 Not transferred Not transferred Nov 1977 Dec 1975 Dec 1975 Sep 1968 Apr 1969 Nov 1971 Dec 1968 Nov 1977 Apr 1977 Nov 1968 Dec 1975 Not transferred Dec 1975 Dec 1975 Oct 1980 Jan 1983 Jan 1983 Jan 1983 Oct 1981 Jan 1985 Dec 1986 9-88 JACKSONVILLE, FL DISTRICT TABLE 9-U FOUR RIVER BASINS, FLORIDA PROJECT MOSS BLUFF LOCK (See Section 58 of Text) Nearest town 20 miles Name of nearest town Ocala, FL Distance above mouth of river 65.5 miles Lock dimensions 30 x 125 feet Normal lift 18.0 feet Elevation of normal pool surface 58 feet Depth of sills 12 feet Character of foundation Piles in sand Kind of dam None Type of construction Reinforced concrete Percent complete 100 Estimated cost (including dam and spillway) $1,990,138 TABLE 9-V FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 685, (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Section 64 of Text) Study Identification Period Costs Detailed Project Report: Bradenton Beach, FL 9,183 Cedar Creek, Jax, FL 148,262 Cedar Hammock, Bradenton, FL 0 Christopher Creek, FL 18,993 Cyril E. King Road, St. Thomas, VI 0 Estate Mon Bijou, St. Croix, VI 7,179 Goodbys Creek, Jax, FL 0 Government Center - N. Miami Bch, FL 0 Hwy 187, El Terraplen 0 Itchapackasassa Creek, Polk Co., FL 13,824 LaGrange Gut,Frederiksted, St. Croix, VI 9,542 Juan Mendez Channel, PR 245,943 Ortega River, FL 0 Pottsburg Creek, Jax, FL 0 Quebrada Blasinia, PR 0 Rio Anton Ruiz-Runta, Santiago, PR 39,672 Rio Cibuco, Vega Baja, PR 29,901 Rio Coamo, Parcelas Valezquez, PR 0 Rio Cidra, La Playita, PR 0 Rio Culebrinas, Aguada, PR 37,875 Rio Culebras, Aguada, PR 5,727 Rio Descalabrada, Santa Isabel, PR 2,722 Rio El Ojo De Agua, PR 41,123 Rio Fajardo, PR 102,986 Rio Guamani, Guayama, PR 8,561 9-89 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF TH ARMY ON CIVIL ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 9-V FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 685, (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Section 64 of Text) Study Identification Period Costs Rio Jacaguas at Juana Dizz, PR 0 Rio Loco, Guanica, PR 63,933 Rio Manati, Barceloneta, PR 456,947 Rio Nigua, Arroyo, PR 0 Rio Patillas, PR 13,804 Rio Yauco, Yauco, PR 0 Sabana Grande, PR 0 Savan Gut, St. Thomas, VI 71,561 Soto Town, St. Thomas, VI 0 Spanish Pond, FL 19,810 Turpentine Run, St. Thomas, VI 7,574 W. Maule Lake - N. Miami Bch, FL 0 Wahneta Canal, Polk Co., FL 0 West Palm Beach, M-Canal, FL 0 Whitaker Bayou, FL 70,477 9-90 MOBILE, AL., DISTRICT * This district comprises a small portion of southeastern Tennessee, western Georgia, western Florida, all of Alabama south of Tennessee River Basin, eastern Mississippi, and a small portion of southeastern Louisiana embraced in drainage basins tributary to the Gulf of Mexico, west of Aucilla River Basin, to and including the Pascagoula River Basin. The Pearl River IMPROVI Navigation Page 1. Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL & GA ....... 10-3 1A. Claiborne Lock and Dam, AL ................... 10-3 1B. Coosa River, Montgomery to Gadsden, AL ..................................... 10-4 2. Apalachicola Bay, FL ................................. 10-4 3. Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, AL, FL & GA........................ 10-4 3A. George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, AL & GA ............................................ 10-5 4. Aquatic Plant Control (R & H Act of 1965) ................................. 10-6 5. Bayou Coden, AL .................................... 10-6 6. Bayou La Batre, AL ................................... 10-7 7. Biloxi Harbor, MS ..................................... 10-7 8. Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL ................................................. 10-8 8A. Jackson Port, Vicinity of Jackson, AL..........10-9 8B. Oliver Lock and Dam (Replacement), AL ................................... 10-9 9. Bon Secour River, AL ............................ 10-10 10. Dauphin Island, AL ................................. 10-10 11. Dog and Fowl Rivers, AL ........................ 10-10 12. East Pass Channel From Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, FL .................. 10-11 13. Fly Creek, Fairhope, AL .......................... 10-11 14. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and Mexican Border .... 10-11 15. Gulfport Harbor, MS ................................... 10-12 16. Mobile Harbor, AL....................................10-12 17. Panama City Harbor, FL ............................ 10-13 18. Pascagoula Harbor, MS ............................. 10-14 19. Pensacola Harbor, FL .................................. 10-14 20. Perdido Pass Channel, AL ......................... 10-15 21. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL & MS ................................. 10-15 Basin, Mississippi was included as part of the Mobile District until October 1, 1981, when responsibilities were transferred to Vicksburg District, Lower Mississippi Valley Division. A section of the Gulf Intracoastal Water from St. Marks, Florida, to Lake Borgne Light No. 29, Louisiana is also within Mobile District. MENTS Page 21A. Tennessee-Tombigbee Wildlife Mitigation, AL & MS ................... 10-16 22. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .................................. 10-17 23. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Project ............................................ 10-17 24. Other Authorized Flood Control Project ......................................... 10-17 25. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .............................. 10-17 26. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ................................. 10-17 27. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ..... 10-17 Flood Control 28. Bayview Court, Bay St. Louis, MS ................................... 10-17 29. Choctawhatchee and Pea Rivers, AL and FL ................................................... 10-17 30. Eslava Creek, Mobile, AL ..................................... 10-17 31. Hancock County Seawall, Hancock County, MS ............................... 10-18 32. Kings Creek Tupelo, M S ................................................. 0-18 33. Saint Louis Bay, Bay St. Louis, MS ................................... 10-18 34. Okatibbee Lake, MS..................................10-18 35. Sowashee Creek, M eridian, M S ............................................. 10-19 36. Threemile Creek, M obile, AL ................................................ 10-19 37. Tombigbee River (East Fork), MS & AL ............................... 10-20 10-i REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Flood Control Page 38. Tombigbee River and Tributaries, MS & AL.............................. 10-20 39. Upper Gordon Creek, Hattiesburg, MS ..................................... 10-20 40. Village Creek, Birmingham, AL ..................................... 10-21 41. Waveland Seawall Waveland, MS ..................................... 10-21 42. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ................... 10-21 43. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............................. 10-21 44. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............................. 10-22 Multiple Purpose Power Projects 45. Allatoona Dam Coosa River Basin, GA ........................... 10-22 46. Buford Dam, Lake Sidney Lanier, GA ............................. 0-22 47. Carters Dam and Reservoir, GA .......... 10-23 48. Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, FL & GA ........................................... 0-23 49. Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, AL ............ 10-24 50. Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam, AL........... 10-24 51. Walter F. George Lock and Dam, AL & GA ..................................... 10-25 52. West Point Lake, Chattahoochee River Basin, AL & GA ...... 10-25 Miscellaneous 53. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations ............................... 10-26 54. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies (FC&CE) ............................ 10-26 55. National Emergency Preparedness Program (NEPP) ........................................ 10-26 56. Regulatory Functions Program .................. 10-26 57. Project Modification to Improve Environment ................................ 10-26 General Investigations Page 58. Surveys ..................................... 10-26 59. Collection and Study of Basic Data............ 10-26 60. Preconstruction Engineering and Design.... 10-26 61. Rivers and Harbors Contributed Funds .................................. . 10-27 Tables Table 10-A Table 10-B Table 10-C Table 10-D Table 10-E Table 10-G Table 10-H Table 10-J Table 10-K Table 10-L Table 10-M Table 10-N Table 10-0 Table 10-P Cost & Financial Statement ......... 10-28 Authorizing Legislation .............. 10-34 Other Authorized Navigation Projects...................... 10-44 Other Authorized Beach Control Erosion Control Project .............. 10-44 Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........................... 10-45 Deauthorized Projects .................. 10-46 Navigation Work Under Special Authorization .................. 10-46 Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................. 10-47 Reconnaisssance and Condition Surveys ..................................... 10-48 Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL & GA Development Proposed Under Existing Project............................... 10-48 Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers, AL, GA, & FL, Locks and Dams and Multiple-Purpose Development Included in Existing Projects ..... 10-49 Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, AL ................................... 10-50 Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL & M S ................................... 10-51 Completed Flood Insurance Studies And Flood Hazard Information Reports For FY 1986 Thru FY 1996............ 10-52 10-2 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Navigation 1. ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, AL AND GA Location. Alabama River is formed 18 miles above Montgomery, Alabama, by the junctions of the Coosa and Tallapoosa Rivers. It then flows southwesterly through Alabama 318 miles and unites with the Tombigbee River about 45 miles north of Mobile, in southwestern Alabama, to form the Mobile River. (See Geological Survey maps for central and southwest Alabama.) The Coosa River is formed at Rome, Georgia, in northwest Georgia, by the junction of the Oostanaula and Etowah Rivers, which have their sources in southeastern Tennessee and northern Georgia. From Rome the Coosa River flows southwesterly through Georgia and Alabama 286 miles and unites with the Tallapoosa River near Montgomery, Alabama, at about the center of the State, to form the Alabama River. (See Geological Survey maps for northeast Alabama, southeast Tennessee, and northwest Georgia.) Previous project. Projects for Alabama River: for details see page 1837, Annual Report for 1915; page 725, Annual Report for 1938; and page 592, Annual Report for 1944. Projects for Coosa River: for details see page 1837, Annual Report for 1915; page 728, Annual Report for 1938; and page 594, Annual Report for 1944. Existing project. The authorized project provides for full development of the Alabama-Coosa Rivers and tributaries for navigation, flood control, power, recreation, and other purposes, in accordance with plans under preparation by Chief of Engineers, subject to modifications thereof which may be advisable for increasing development of hydroelectric power. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Public Law 436, 83rd Congress, suspended authorization of the comprehensive plan, insofar as it provides for development of hydroelectric power for Coosa River, to permit non-Federal interests to develop the Coosa River by construction of a series of dams in accordance with conditions of a license issued pursuant to Federal Power Act and in accordance with certain other provisions and requirements of the aforementioned public law. The plan was further modified by the WRDA of 1986 to authorize planning, engineering and design for the project generally in accordance with the plans contained in Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design, dated May 1982. The present phase of improvement includes the construction of Robert F. Henry and Millers Ferry multiple-purpose improvements, Claiborne Lock and Dam, and supplemental channel work providing for a nine-foot deep navigation channel from the mouth of the Alabama River to Montgomery, Alabama, and construction of Carters Dam, a multiplepurpose improvement on Coosawattee River, Georgia. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation will be determined as formulation of plans for development of projects progress. No action in the matter of local cooperation has been initiated. Terminal facilities. On the east bank of the river a natural landing connects with city streets at Montgomery. There are also various natural landings along the river. Facilities and natural landings on Alabama River are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract maintenance dredging of the river system at a cost of $2,776,100. General charges for water control management, condition surveys, engineering and design, supervision and administration amounted to $1,623,931. Claiborne Lock and Dam charges were $1,119,800. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated on Carters Dam in April 1962, on Millers Ferry Lock and Dam in April 1963, Claiborne Lock and Dam in May 1965, and Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam in June 1966. Carters Dam was completed in FY 1980. The authorized nine-foot navigation channel to Montgomery, Alabama was opened to traffic in January 1972. Overall construction is complete in Millers Ferry Lock and Dam. Construction of Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam is complete. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1997 is $108,367,302, including $3,245,400 for new work and $105,121,902 for maintenance. (See Table 10-L.) 1A. CLAIBORNE LOCK AND DAM, AL Location. The site is in Monroe County at mile 81.8 on the Alabama River, 15 miles northwest of Monroeville and 5.7 miles upstream from the U.S. Highway 84 bridge. Existing project. The existing project consists of a short earth dike on the right bank, a combination of a fixed-crest and gated spillway extending across the river channel and into the left bank, a navigation lock and mound on the left bank, and an earth dike extending across the left overbank to high ground. Normal upper pool is elevation 35 and the minimum pool will be elevation 32 to provide storage for reregulation of Millers Ferry powerplant releases. The 60- mile long reservoir has an area of 5,850 acres and a volume of 96,360 acre-feet. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa projects. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the lock and dam totaled $1,119,800. 10-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1965 and was completed in FY 1976 at a total cost of $27,997,450. Recreation attendance during FY 1997 totaled 177,236 visits. 1B. COOSA RIVER, MONTGOMERY TO GADSDEN, AL Location. The Coosa River is one of the two major tributaries forming the Alabama River approximately 18 miles northeast of Montgomery, Alabama. From its source at the juncture of the Etowah and Ooostanaula Rivers in northwest Georgia, it flows southwesterly about 286 miles to join with the Tallapoosa River in forming the Alabama River. Existing project. The improvement of the Alabama-Coosa River for navigation to Rome, Georgia was authorized by Congress in the River and Harbor Act of 1945. A report in House Document 320, transmitted to Congress on January 27, 1960, recommended that the navigation project for the Coosa River from Montgomery to Gadsden be accomplished after the waterway to Montgomery was assured. The plan of improvement identified in House Document 320 provided for a waterway 9 feet deep with widths of 200 feet to Montgomery, Alabama, and 150 feet to Rome, Georgia. The waterway to Montgomery has essentially been completed. The plan for the Coosa River segment of the waterway between Montgomery and Gadsden was further modified by the WRDA of 1986 to authorize planning, engineering and design for the project generally in accordance with the plans contained in Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design, dated May 1982. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1997 is $14,986,400 for new work. 2. APALACHICOLA BAY, FL Location. The project is on the coast of northwest Florida 160 miles east of Pensacola Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11401.) Previous project. For details, see page 1833, Annual Report for 1915, and page 689, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from the 10-foot depth in Apalachicola Bay, across St. George Island, to within 300 feet of the gulf shore, thence increasing uniformly in width to 200 feet at the shore and continuing with that width to the 10-foot depth in the Gulf of Mexico, with twin jetties extending from the dune line to the outer end of the channel; (b) an inner bar channel, 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide, in Apalachicola Bay; (c) a boat basin 200 feet by 880 feet and 9 feet deep at Apalachicola, Florida, with a connecting channel 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide through Scipio Creek to Apalachicola River; (d) a channel known as Link Channel, 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, in Apalachicola Bay; (e) a channel generally parallel to the shore at Eastpoint, Florida, 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long, and a connecting channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide to water at the same depth in St. George Sound, with twin breakwaters on either side parallel to the shore and having a total length of 5,300 feet; (f) a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide through Bulkhead Shoals, connecting Apalachicola Bay with St. George Sound; and (g) a 6-foot by 100-foot channel about one mile long, generally parallel to the shore at Two Mile, Florida, with a 6-foot by 100-foot connecting channel to water of the same depth in Apalachicola Bay. Mean range of tide throughout this harbor is 1.6 feet. Extreme range, except during storms, is about three feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements have been fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities consist of pile-and-timber wharves which are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys cost $19,100; dredging $80,700; supervision and administration and other miscellaneous costs amounted to $86,111. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, authorized by the 1954 River and Harbor Act, was completed in 1959, including reimbursement to local interests for approved work, as authorized by the 1958 River and Harbor Act. Improvements at Two Mile except for modifications authorized in 1975 were completed in September 1964. Construction of the breakwater and channel improvements authorized in 1975 at Two Mile was completed in September 1977. Construction of breakwaters at Eastpoint authorized in 1983 was completed in March 1984. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1997 is $2,033,461 for new work and $5,314,600 for maintenance, a total of $7,348,061. APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, AL, GA, AND FL Location. The Apalachicola River is formed at the southwest corner of the State of Georgia by the junction of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers and flows south 108 miles emptying into Apalachicola Bay. Florida River enters the Apalachicola from the east at mile 45.4 and the River Styx also enters from the east at mile 36.7 and Chipola River enters 10-4 3. MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT from the west at mile 28.2. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11401.) The Chattahoochee River, 418 miles long, rises in northeast Georgia and flows southwesterly to West Point, and thence southerly to join the Flint River at the southwest corner of Georgia, forming the Apalachicola River. (See Geological Survey maps for northwest Georgia.) The Flint River, 330 miles long, rises in west central Georgia, flows generally southeasterly to Albany, and thence southwest to the southwest corner of the State, where it joins the Chattahoochee River to form the Apalachicola River. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia. Previous project. For details see page 484 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. The authorized project provides for development of the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers for navigation, flood control, hydropower, and recreation. Navigation features of the existing project consist of a continuous 9-foot by 100-foot channel in the Apalachicola River from the intersection of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to the confluence of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, 104 miles, thence to Columbus, Georgia, on the Chattahoochee River, 164 miles, and to Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, 29 miles, and a 3-foot by 100-foot channel on the Flint River from Bainbridge to Albany, Georgia, 74 miles, thence a channel suitable for light draft vessels at moderate stage to Montezuma, Georgia, 79 miles to be accomplished by dredging, contract works, and construction of three locks and dams (Jim Woodruff, George W. Andrews, and Walter F. George) along the 9-foot depth channel, two multipurpose dams (West Point and Buford) on the Chattahoochee River. Three multipurpose dams (Lower Auchumpkee Creek, Lazer Creek, and Spewrell Bluff) on the Flint River were deauthorized in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The project also provides for minor improvements of certain streams tributary to the Apalachicola River, including a 9-foot by 100-foot side channel, approximately 2,000 feet long, from Apalachicola River to Apalachicola River Industrial Park at Blountstown, Fla. Plane side of reference is mean low water. Hydropower and flood control storage are provided at Sidney Lanier, Walter F. George, and West Point, and hydropower is provided at Jim Woodruff. For further details see Annual Report for 1962. The project was originally authorized in section 2 of the River and Harbor Act of 1945, was further modified by the WRDA of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Mean range of tide at the mouth of Apalachicola River is 1.6 feet. At the point where the river is formed the variation between low and high water is about 37 feet. On the Chattahoochee River, variation between average low and high water is about 20 feet, and extreme fluctuation is 65.3 feet at Eufaula. On the Flint River the extreme fluctuation of stage due to flood is 40 feet, while average variation between low and high water is about 21.5 feet. A Comprehensive Basin Study is currently being conducted on the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, Flint (ACF), and Alabama-Coosa-Tallapoosa (ACT) River Systems. Local cooperation. The six Florida Counties that originally served as local sponsors for the Florida portion of the waterway have all informed the District in writing that they no longer wish to serve as local sponsors. The State of Florida has also declined assumption of responsibilities of local sponsorship. At this time no items of local cooperation are being complied with. No local sponsors are required for the Alabama and Georgia portions of the waterway. Terminal facilities. About 200 feet of public docks, in addition to private wharves, are available at Apalachicola, Florida. There are numerous constructed and natural landings along the entire system for launching small craft. For details of other terminal facilities, which are considered adequate for existing commerce, see individual project descriptions. See also Table 10-M on locks and dams and multiple-purpose development included in existing project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging on the river system cost $2,826,200. Operation and maintenance of George W. Andrews Lock and Dam cost $596,500. All other costs for the project amounted to $875,617. Condition at end of fiscal year. Improvement of Apalachicola River channel by dredging to provide project dimensions throughout is complete. All major construction on Lake Sidney Lanier Dam, George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, Jim Woodruff Lock and Dam, Walter F. George Lock and Dam and West Point are complete. Channel rectification in Apalachicola River was completed December 1970. More detailed information concerning condition at the end of fiscal year for individual locks and dams and multiple-purpose developments comprising the system is presented under their respective project titles elsewhere in this report. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1997 is $4,452,162 for new work and $118,984,947 for maintenance, a total of $123,437,109. (See Tables 10-A and 10-M for fiscal year costs and summaries of overall project.) 3A. GEORGE W. ANDREWS LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA Location. The project is on the Chattahoochee River about 46.5 miles above its mouth and about one mile below the town of Columbia, Alabama, near the head of Jim Woodruff Reservoir. (See Geological Survey maps for southeast 10-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Alabama). The pool extends up the navigation channel about 28 miles upstream to Walter F. George Lock and Dam. Existing project. This single-purpose project provides for a concrete fixed-crest spillway 340 feet long extending into the right bank with a crest at elevation 102 feet national geodetic datum, a concrete gate spillway adjacent to the lock 280 feet long with crest at elevation 82 feet national geodetic datum, a single-lift lock with usable chamber dimensions of 82 feet by 450 feet, and a maximum lift of 25 feet. Depths are 13 feet over the lower sill and 19 over the upper sill at normal pool elevation. The underlying foundation is limestone. The project provides for maintenance and care. The House Committee on Public Works, by resolution adopted May 19, 1953, approved the plan as proposed by the Chief of Engineers for a high dam at Walter F. George site and a low dam at the Fort Benning site and a high dam at the upper Columbia site, construction of which was authorized by the 1946 River and Harbor Act as the initiation and partial accomplishment of the plan for full development of the Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint River system. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must operate all movable span bridges, provide suitable public terminals, and hold the United States free from damages. These conditions are being complied with. Terminal facilities. At Columbia, Alabama, there is a public wharf with concrete deck for handling general cargo and a bulk petroleum terminal with an unloading dock. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of lock and dam cost $596,500. Maintenance cost included under overall Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint project. Recreation attendance for FY97 totaled 316,689. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the lock and dam began in March 1959 and was completed in November 1963 at a total cost of $13,038,427. (See also Table 10-M). 4. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (RIVER AND HARBOR ACT OF 1965) Location. Navigable water, tributary streams, connecting channels and other allied waters in Mobile District. Existing project. The existing project provides for management and control of water hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, hydrilla, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths from navigable water, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters of the United States, in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economical control measures to be administered by the Chief of Engineers, under the direction of the Secretary of the Army, in cooperation with other Federal and State agencies. Research and planning cost prior to construction shall be borne fully by the United States. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation). Local cooperation. Local interests shall agree to hold and save the United States free from claims that may occur from control operations and to participate to the extent of 50 percent of such operations. Requirements are being met in the state of Alabama by the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. Operations and results during fiscal year. Contractual services cost $32,104 and water quality studies and overhead amounted to $6,787. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total Federal cost under the exiting project as of September 30, 1997 is $912,815. Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $21,225. 5. BAYOU CODEN, AL Location. The project is located in a small tidal stream on the southern coast of Mobile County, Alabama, emptying into Mississippi Sound about 7.6 miles northwest of Cedar Point, the southern tip of western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1945, page 843. Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel 8 feet deep by 60 feet wide extending from La Belle Avenue bridge south for about 3,000 feet through the bayou to Portersville Bay, thence 8 feet deep by 100 feet wide extending about 2.3 miles westward across Portersville Bay to connect with the Bayou La Batre channel, and a turning basin 8 feet deep by 60 feet wide by 100 feet long on the west side of the bayou channel about 500 feet south of the La Belle Avenue bridge. Mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Small privately-owned timber dock piles used in connection with fishing industry in this locality are adequate for existing commerce. A small ship building facility is located near the upper limits of the channel. The marina which will accommodate about 12 small 10-6 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT recreational craft, and a slip with facilities for loading oyster shells are located near the mouth of the bayou, and are maintained by the Alabama Department of Conservation. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract Dredging cost $416,506 and other miscellaneous cost amounted to $28,249. Condition at end of fiscal year. That portion of the project authorized prior to the 1969 modification was completed in 1956. Construction authorized in 1969 was initiated March 31, 1975 and completed March 26, 1976. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1997 is $330,701 for new work and $1,682,964 for maintenance, a total of $2,013,665. Contributed funds expended for new work amount to $100,000 and $130,340 for maintenance. 6. BAYOU LA BATRE, AL Location. Bayou La Batre is a tidal stream about 10 miles long, emptying into Mississippi Sound on the southern coast of Mobile County, AL., about 10 miles northwest of Cedar Point, the southern tip of the western mainland shore of Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1945, page 844. Existing project. The existing project provides for a 18- foot by 120-foot channel from Pascagoula Ship channel, connecting with the GIWW, along the GIWW alignment, connecting with an extension of the previous 12-foot channel alignment, through Mississippi Sound to the mouth of the bayou, a total distance of approximately 20 miles; then provides for a 12-foot by 100-foot channel to a point about 2,800 feet south of the highway bridge, thence a channel 12 feet deep by 75 feet wide to the bridge, with the channel widened at a point 0.6 mile below the bridge to provide a turning basin 12 feet deep and about 2.6 acres in area. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990, the plan of improvement is to deepen channel to 18-foot by 100-foot from the mouth through the turning basin, a distance of about 1.8 miles; deepen channel from turning basin to 0.29 miles above highway 188 bridge to 14-feet by 75-feet, a distance of about 0.89 miles; extend a 14-foot by 50-foot channel from turning basin into Snake Bayou for about 730 feet and a 12-foot by 50-foot channel within Snake Bayou about 790 feet. Mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.75 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Wooden wharves have been provided at seafood processing plants and public launching ramps are available. Several boatways for construction of small seagoing vessels are also available. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract Dredging cost $1,387,751; Real Estate activities $15,617; engineering and design cost $95,553; and supervision and administration amounted to $113,767. A total Federal cost of $1,612,688 for new work. Maintenance: Condition Surveys and miscellaneous cost $96,301. Dredging cost $1,627,300. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was modified December 30, 1966 under the discretionary authority of the Chief of Engineers to include a turning basin. The project was completed in March 1967. The contract for deepening the Sound Channel was completed in May 1994. The construction of the Bayou Channel was completed in September 1997. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1997 is $5,723,568 for new work and $5,839,912 for maintenance, a total of $11,563,480. Contributed funds from local interests for new work amount to $697,499. 7. BILOXI HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located on Mississippi Sound in southeastern Mississippi, 32 miles by water west of Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi, and 14 miles east of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 584, Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The existing project provides for a continuous channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 23 miles long from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Mississippi Sound east of Deer Island, Biloxi Bay, Back Bay, Cranes Neck, and a land cut to Gulfport lake, including a 500-foot by 2,600-foot basin in the lake, thence a 12-foot deep by 100- foot wide channel for about two miles westward from the west end of the lake, terminating in a 300-foot by 500-foot basin; a 12-foot by 100-foot channel from the main channel in Big Lake to and up Bayou Bernard to the Air Force oil terminal at about mile 2.6; a 12-foot by 150-foot spur channel from the main channel in Biloxi Bay for about one mile, terminating in a 400-foot by 600-foot turning basin opposite Ott Bayou; continuation of maintenance of the 12-by 150- foot lateral channel westward about 2.2 miles to Biloxi's south waterfront; a 10-foot by 150-foot channel from Mississippi Sound, passing west of Deer Island to a point where it connects to the 12-foot by 150-foot lateral channel at Biloxi's south waterfront. Construction for the modifications lateral channel authorized by River and Harbor Act of November 7, 1966 10-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 was commenced in FY 1974 and completed in February 1975. Further modifications to the project were authorized by the Chief of Engineers on March 28, 1979, which provided for a channel 10 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 300 feet long extending northward from the Biloxi Lateral Channel, and into a rectangular basin, approximately 300 by 370 feet, for use by commercial small craft, and an East Harrison County Canal project which provides for a 12-foot project depth, 130- feet wide and about 2,100 feet long, and a 300 by 300 foot turning basin also to a 12-foot project depth. This work was completed in April 1980. Cost of modification as authorized by the 1966 River and Harbor Act was $664,390. That portion of the project providing for an entrance channel 6 feet deep, 50 feet wide, and about 1,800 feet long into Old Fort Bayou, as authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act, is inactive. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion was $6,000. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of wooden piling-andtimber piers for small craft and fishing boats, a bulk gasoline terminal, several boat ways, and concrete products plant are available. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging cost $997,600 and condition surveys cost $16,200. Water quality studies, and miscellaneous costs totaled $60,919. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project, prior to the modification authorized in 1966, was commenced in 1931 and completed in 1962. The 1966 modification was completed in FY 1975. The 1979 modification was completed in 1980. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1997 is $1,431,919 for new work and $14,289,920 for maintenance, a total of $15,721,839. Contributed funds for new work amount to $102,600. Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $238,640. 8. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL Location. Black Warrior River rises in northern Alabama above Birmingham and flows generally southwesterly to unite with the Tombigbee River at Demopolis, Alabama. Thence the Tombigbee flows south, uniting with the Alabama River to form the Mobile River 45 miles above the head of Mobile Bay. Distance by water from Mobile to vicinity of Birmingham is about 430 miles. Previous project. For details see page 732, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide from the mouth of the Tombigbee River, 45 miles above Mobile, to the vicinity of Birmingham, via the Tombigbee and Black Warrior Rivers, to mile 430.4 on Sipsey Fork, mile 429.6 on Mulberry Fork and mile 407.8 on Locust Fork, and for maintenance by snagging of Mobile River above the mouth of Chickasaw Creek, a total waterway distance of about 408 miles. The total lift of 255 feet is accomplished by six locks and dams. The original construction program, consisting of 17 dams and 18 lifts, was completed in 1915. Replacement of the original structures with new 110-by 600-foot locks and dams, under the modernization program is as follows: William Bacon Oliver replaced locks 10, 11, and 12; Armistead I. Selden replaced locks 8 and 9; Demopolis replaced locks 4, 5, 6, and 7; Coffeeville (Jackson) replaced locks 1, 2, and 3; and Holt replaced locks 13, 14, 15, and 16. Thus, 16 of the original locks have been replaced by five new locks. Bankhead Lock and Dam (Lock 17) rehabilitation to replace the original double lift lock with a single lift lock was completed in 1980. The Coffeeville Lock and Dam wildlife refuge, authorized in 1960, includes 4,250 acres within the reservoir area and along its boundaries. A replacement lock for the old Oliver Lock located 2,300 feet downstream has been completed. The replacement lock has dimensions of 110 feet by 600 feet. A fixed crest spillway extends 800 feet across the river. Minimum provision was provided to allow construction of a hydropower plant. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Tidal influence extends upstream from Mobile 101.6 miles to Coffeeville Lock and Dam, where tidal effect is apparent only at low stages of the river. At Mobile the mean and extreme tidal ranges are 1.5 and 3.6 feet, respectively. These are at times slightly increased by the effect of winds. The greatest fluctuation of river stages is at Demopolis, Ala., the maximum being 59.7 feet. Maximum fluctuations at other points are 40 feet at old lock 1, which is 100.6 miles from Mobile; 57.8 feet at Tuscaloosa, 346.1 miles from Mobile; 13 feet at Birmingport, 404.9 miles from Mobile; and 27 feet at Cordova, 424.3 miles from Mobile. Ordinary fluctuations at these points are at old lock 1, 20 feet; at Demopolis, 35 feet; at Tuscaloosa, 40 feet; at Birmingport, four feet; and at Cordova, seven feet. Works of improvement reduced the amount of fluctuations at different points by three to 10 feet. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Docks, storage facilities, and handling equipment have been provided as required at most loading and unloading points along the waterway. These include facilities for handling petroleum and petroleum products, coal, 10-8 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT ores, sand and gravel, pulpwood, manufacturers, and various other commodities. While most terminal facilities are privately owned, many are available for use by the general public. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Table 10-N for existing locks and dams.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract dredging of the river system cost $7,605,200. Condition surveys cost $638,700. Engineering and design cost supervision, administration and other general charges for the overall river project totaled $11,339,580. Recreation attendance FY 1997 totaled 3,550,723 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Work on the project, commenced in 1887, was essentially completed in 1915. Since then three of the original locks and dams (10, 11 and 12) were replaced by William Bacon Oliver (Tuscaloosa) Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1939; four original lock and dams (4, 5, 6 and 7) were replaced by Demopolis Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1954; two original locks and dams (8 and 9) were replaced by Warrior Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in October 1957; three original locks and dams (1,2 and 3) were replaced by Coffeeville Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in August 1960; and four original locks and dams (13, 14, 15 and 16) were replaced by Holt Lock and Dam which was opened to navigation in June 1966. Rehabilitation of the spillway at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam commenced in 1966, and physically completed February 6, 1970. Replacement of the double lift lock with a single lift lock at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam commenced in April 1970 and was completed in 1980. The power plant at John Hollis Bankhead Lock and Dam and Holt Lock and Dam, was built and is operated by the Alabama Power Co. Construction of the new Oliver Lock and Dam is completed with the new lock open to traffic as of July 1991. Project construction began in November 1986 and is scheduled for completion in January 1996. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1997 is $88,461,935 for new work and $356,514,680 for maintenance, and $52,292,880 and major rehabilitation, a total of $497,269,495. 8A. JACKSON PORT, JACKSON, AL Location. The project is located on the Tombigbee River in Clarke County in southwest Alabama in the city of Jackson, Alabama, approximately 90 miles north of Mobile, Alabama. Existing project. None. The authorized Port would be located on the Black Warrior-Tombigbee River System, which is a federally authorized 9 by 300 feet navigation project connecting Birmingham, Alabama with the Port of Mobile. In conjunction with the realignment project on the existing navigation project, the district has been directed to construct a spur canal to serve as a port at Jackson. Local cooperation. Local Cooperation Agreement requirements have not been determined. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Real Estate activities $50; engineering and design $233,433. A total Federal cost of $233,483 for new work. Condition at end of fiscal year. Preparation of the Design Memorandum is currently underway and is scheduled to be approved in October 1998. Design (P&S) is scheduled for completion in January 1999. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1997 is $1,394,507. 8B. OLIVER LOCK AND DAM (REPLACEMENT), AL Location. The project is located at mile 337.7 on the Black Warrior-Tombigbee River System at Tuscaloosa, Alabama. Existing project. The existing navigation facilities on the Black Warrior and Tombigbee include six (6) locks having a total lift of 255 feet. Each of the locks have chamber dimensions of 110 by 600 feet. Original work on the waterway was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1884. The 17 original locks have been replaced by the existing six (6) locks. Previously, Oliver Lock was the only lock in the system with chamber dimensions of 95 by 460 feet. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the plan of improvement was to replace Oliver Lock and Dam at a new location 2,300 feet downstream. The replacement lock with chamber dimensions by 110 by 600 feet was opened to traffic in July 1991. The fixed crest spillway, extends 800 feet across the river. Minimum provisions are being provided to allow construction of a hydropower plant. Land Acquisition is complete. Construction was initiated in November 1986 with the award of the Alabama Power Company relocation contract. The first stage cofferdam and river diversion contract was awarded in February 1987 and the lock and dam construction contract was awarded in March 1988. For other information see description of Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers project. Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement is not required. One-half of the total cost of construction of the navigation lock and dam will be paid by amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design $22,721 and $35,674 for supervision and administration and miscellaneous expenditures. A total Federal cost of $58,395 for new work. Contributed funds expended in FY 1997 totaled $74,658. 10-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete at an estimated cost of $125,000,000. Total Federal (Corps of Engineers) cost under existing project to September 30, 1997 is $61,384,845 for new work. Contributed funds (Inland Waterways Trust) expended total $62,451,012. 9. BON SECOUR RIVER, AL Location. Rises 2 miles south of Foley, Ala., and flows southerly about 8 miles, emptying into Bon Secour Bay, an arm of Mobile Bay in southwest Alabama. Existing project. A 10- by 80-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Bon Secour Bay to mouth of Bon Secour River and extending up river to vicinity of Swifts Landing, thence 6 by 80 feet up river to a point about 600 feet above Oak Landing with two turning and maneuvering areas 150 feet wide and 1,100 to 1,200 feet long opposite Swifts Landing and ice loading dock. Also a 10 by 80 foot South Fork channel from the intersection with the Bon Secour channel, 1.14 miles to a 150 x 150 foot turning basin. Plane of reference is mean low water. Overall length of improvement is about 4.7 miles. Mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Existing project was authorized by Chief of Engineers, May 16, 1963, under authority in Section 107, River and Harbor Act of 1960. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A number of pile-and-timber marginal wharves used by the seafood industry and a marine ways are located along the existing project. These, together with numerous privately owned piers, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging cost $66,300; and miscellaneous cost $13,868. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was commenced in July and completed in October 1964. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1997 is $150,615 for new work and $1,480,093 for maintenance, a total of $1,630,708. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $9,700. 10. DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, AL Location. The project is located between Dauphin and Little Dauphin Island on the west side of the entrance to Mobile Bay, about 30 miles south of Mobile, Alabama and 55 miles west of Pensacola, Florida. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A channel 7 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay to an anchorage basin of the same depth, and about 7 acres in area, in the marsh just north of Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island; a channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide from the anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay; and a jetty and revetment to protect the entrance channel; and (b) an anchorage basin 7 feet deep and 500 feet square at Dauphin Island Village, with an entrance channel of like depth, 100 feet wide and about 8,300 feet long, extending to the 7-foot hydrographic contour in Mississippi Sound. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet, and extreme, except during storms is about 4 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Several privately-owned wharves for handling seafood, a public dock and mooring slip, and a pier for recreational craft are located on the village basin. A marina, public launching ramp, and a number of private piers are located on the bay. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Channel dredging cost $21,500; condition surveys and miscellaneous cost $42,898. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in July 1959. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1997 is $292,864 for new work and $2,780,597 for maintenance, a total of $3,073,461. 11. DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, AL Location. Dog and Fowl Rivers are primarily tidal streams emptying into the west side of Mobile Bay, 8.5 and 17 miles, respectively, south of central Mobile (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Existing project. The Dog River project provides for a 7 by 100-foot channel with a total length of 4.5 miles to provide access to the Mobile ship channel. The Fowl River project provides for a channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide from Mobile Bay into and up Fowl River to deep water about 6,700 feet above its mouth. Total length of the channel is about 2.6 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Mean range of tide is about 1.5 feet in Dog River. Extreme range during storms is about 3.6 feet. This segment of the project was completed in November 1973. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities consist of a boatyard for fabricating steel vessel hulls, nine marinas, four marine 10-10 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT ways, a yacht basin on Dog River; two marinas on Fowl River, and numerous timber piers and docks on both rivers. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Water control management and miscellaneous cost $76,070. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing Fowl River portion of the project was commenced in August 1973 and completed in November 1973. Work on the Dog River channel realignment was initiated and completed during FY 1986. Total Federal cost on the existing project as of September 30, 1997 is $4,102,517; $391,354 for new work and $3,711,163 for maintenance. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $195,626. 12. EAST PASS CHANNEL FROM GULF OF MEXICO INTO CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY, FL Location. East Pass Channel is located in the entrance from the Gulf into Choctawhatchee Bay at eastern end of Santa Rosa Island, 48 miles east of the entrance into Pensacola Bay and 49 miles west of the new entrance to St. Andrews Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11388.) Previous project. For details see page 672 of Annual Report for 1937. Existing project. The existing project provides for a 12- foot by 180-foot channel from the Gulf of Mexico into Choctawhatchee Bay, and a 6-foot by 10-foot channel from East Pass Channel into Old Pass Lagoon. The project consists also of two converging jetties spaced 1,000 feet apart at the seaward end. Mean range of tide is 1.3 feet; extreme range, except during storms, is 2.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Responsibilities of local cooperation have been complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Small privately-owned pile-and-timber piers used in connection with the fishing industry in this locality are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Channel dredging cost $22,400; water quality studies $20,800; condition surveys $6,500; jetty work $930,100; supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs totaled $57,742. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the 1965 modification was commenced October 1967 and completed January 1969. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1997 is $916,715 for new work and $13,057,196 for maintenance, a total of $13,973,911. Contributed funds for new work from local interests amount to $398,000. 13. FLY CREEK, AL Location. Fly Creek (Volanta Bayou) is a small stream about 4.5 miles long rising in Baldwin County, Alabama, 3 miles east of town of Fairhope, from whence it flows northerly, thence westerly and southerly, to form an estuary on eastern shore of Mobile Bay just north of Fairhope and about 13 miles southeast of Mobile, Alabama. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart No. 11376.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long from 6-foot depth in Mobile Bay to a turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 350 feet long, in Fly Creek. Mean tidal range in vicinity of project is about 1.3 feet, and extreme, except during storms, is 3.5 feet. Existing project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of May 17, 1950, (H. Doc. 194, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.). The project document contains the latest published map. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Fairhope Yacht Club has facilities for small recreational craft on the south bank near mouth of creek, consisting of a pile-and-timber service wharves, several sheet metal boat sheds, boat slips, and other mooring facilities. There is also a commercial marina on north bank of creek. Operation and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Channel dredging cost $52,200; supervision and administration and miscellaneous cost $3,256. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was commenced in August and completed in October, 1957. Total project costs as of September 30, 1997 amounted to $850,444 of which $29,000 was for new work and $821,444 for maintenance. 14. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL AND MEXICAN BORDER (MOBILE DISTRICT) Location. The project extends westward from Apalachee Bay, Florida, along the Gulf coast to the Rigolets, Louisiana, via a series of coastal lakes, bays, sounds, and land custs. (For further details see Annual Report for 1962.) Previous project. For details see page 906, Annual Report for 1930. Existing project. The existing project provides for a waterway 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide at mean low water from Apalachee Bay, Florida, to Mobile Bay, Alabama, and 10-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay, Alabama to Rigolets, Louisiana (Lake Borgne Light No. 29), and for a tributary channel (Gulf County Canal), 12 feet deep, 125 feet wide and about six miles long connecting Intracoastal Waterway at White City, Florida, with St. Joseph Bay. The waterway between the 12-foot depth contours in Apalachee Bay and Lake Borgne Light No. 29 at the Rigolets is 379 miles long. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None. Terminal facilities. Facilities are available for public use at Carrabelle, Apalachicola, Panama City, and Pensacola, Florida; Mobile and Bayou La Batre, Alabama; and Pascagoula, Biloxi, Gulfport, Pass Christian, and Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging navigation channel maintenance cost $3,509,900. Condition surveys, water quality studies, supervision and administration totaled $1,134,592. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project is completed except for the portion between Apalachicola Bay and St. Marks, Florida, which has been deauthorized. Modification of the Gulf County Canal to provide a 12-foot by 125-foot channel was commenced July 1968 and completed June 1969. Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1997 is $87,646,759, of which $6,480,299 was for new work and $81,166,460 for maintenance. 15. GULFPORT HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located on Mississippi Sound in southeastern Mississippi, about 35 miles west of Pascagoula, Mississippi, and 60 miles east of New Orleans. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 747. Annual Report for 1938, and page 995, Annual Report for 1948. Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A channel 32 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and about eight miles long across Ship Island Bar, a channel 30 feet deep, 220 feet wide, and about 11 miles long through Mississippi Sound, and an anchorage basin at Gulfport 30 feet deep, 1,320 feet wide, and 2,640 feet long; and (b) maintenance of the existing commercial smallboat harbor about 26 acres in area, and a straight-approach channel, 100 feet wide and about 4,300 feet long, from deep water in Mississippi Sound to a smallboat basin, all at a depth of 8 feet. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.75 feet, and extreme range, except during storms, is about 3.5 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. The project is authorized in the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) 1986, and further amended by WRDA 1988 to modify the existing ship channel to 36 by 300 feet in Mississippi Sound, and 38 by 400 feet across the bar, with changes in the channel alignment and the turning basin for safe and unrestricted navigation. The FY 91 construction appropriation provided for constructing an increment of the authorized project and provide a 36 by 220 feet channel in Mississippi Sound and 38 by 300 feet across the bar. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Conditions of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Existing modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Thin-layer monitoring activities cost $13,689; Engineering and design cost $13,316. A total Federal cost of $27,005. Maintenance: Contract dredging at a cost of $1,383,000. Condition surveys, supervision and administration and miscellaneous costs amounted to $295,098. Condition at end of fiscal year. The main harbor was commenced 1932 and completed April 1950. Maintenance for small boat harbor and approach channel, constructed by local interests in 1950, was authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act. Awarded thin-layer monitoring contract in June 1991 under the authority of WRDA 1986 and 1988. The channel contract was awarded in April 1992, thin-layer monitoring program is continuing. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1997 is $24,142,340 for new work and $52,726,494 for maintenance, a total of $76,868,834. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $8,897,027. 16. MOBILE HARBOR, AL Location. The project is located along the lower 5 miles of Mobile River, and channel extends thru Mobile Bay and into Gulf of Mexico, in southwestern Alabama, 91 miles by water west of Pensacola Harbor, Florida, 90 miles east of Gulfport Harbor, Mississippi, and 144 miles by water northeast of mouth of Mississippi River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11376.) Previous project. For details see page 503, Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A 47-foot by 600-foot channel about 1.5 miles long across Mobile Bar; (b) a 45-foot by 400-foot channel in Mobile Bay to mouth of Mobile River; (c) a 40-foot channel in Mobile 10-12 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT River to highway bridge, varying from 500 to 775 feet wide; (d) a 25-foot channel from highway bridge to and up Chickasaw Creek to a point 400 feet south of mouth of Shell Bayou, widths being 500 feet in Mobile River and 250 feet in Chickasaw Creek; (e) a turning basin 40 feet deep, 2,500 feet long, and 800 to 1,000 feet wide, opposite Alabama State Docks; (f) a turning basin 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and 1,600 feet long opposite Magazine Point; (g) a 27-foot by 150-foot channel from Mobile Bay Channel along Arlington pier to a turning basin 800 feet long and 600 feet wide opposite Brookley Complex ocean terminal, and continuing thence a turning basin 250 feet wide and 800 feet long in Garrows Bend, thence a 22-foot by 150-foot channel to the causeway linking McDuffie Island to the mainland; (h) a channel serving the Theodore Industrial Park 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the main ship channel in Mobile Bay and extending northwesterly for about 5.3 miles to the shore of Mobile Bay, including an anchorage basin near the shoreline, thence a land cut 40 feet deep, 300 feet wide and 1.9 miles long to and including a 42 acre trapezoid turning basin 40 feet deep, and a barge channel 12-by 100-feet, extending 6,500 feet and terminating in a 300- by 300-foot turning basin; and (i) maintenance of Three Mile Creek by snagging, from its intersection with Industrial Canal to Mobile River. The project provides also for an anchorage area 32 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and 200 feet long opposite site formerly occupied by the U.S. Quarantine Station at McDuffie (Sand) Island. Prior to widening the Mobile Bay Channel as authorized in 1954, the Quarantine Station anchorage area was maintained to a project width of 200 feet. Construction by local interests of a solid-fill causeway across Garrows Bend Channel between McDuffie Island and the mainland is also provided for under existing project. Total length of the bay and river channel is about 41.7 miles. Plane of reference is mean low water. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range at the lower end of the improvement is 1.2 feet and at the upper end 1.5 feet. Extreme tidal range is 3.4 feet at the lower end and 3.6 feet at the upper end. Further authorization provides for future development to deepen and widen entrance channel over the bar to 57 feet by 700 feet about 7.4 miles long, deepen and widen bay channel to 55 feet by 550 feet about 27.0 miles long, deepen and widen an additional 3.6 miles of bay channel to 55 feet by 650 feet and provide 55 foot deep anchorage area and turning basin in vicinity of Little Sand Island. All dredged material will be placed in an approved disposal area in the Gulf of Mexico. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement was signed by the local sponsor to construct the project for the first increment of work. Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 18, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and Design $104,360. A total federal cost of $104,360 for new work. Maintenance: Contract dredging at a cost of $17,992,000. Condition surveys cost $523,600. Water quality studies, engineering and design and supervision and administration cost $2,005,342. Condition at end of fiscal year. Phase I of the project modification was completed in June 1990. Current estimated Federal cost is $218,548,000, and non-Federal cost is $178,452,000. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1997 is $96,317,182 for new work and $237,210,763 for maintenance, a total of $333,527,945. Contributed funds expended amounted to $18,506,150 for new work. 17. PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL Location. The project is located on the northwest coast of Florida, 102 miles east of entrance to Pensacola Harbor. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11389.) Previous project. For details see page 710, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel about 3.5 miles long, extending from deep water in'St. Andrew bay through barrier peninsula, known as Lands End, to the Gulf of Mexico, 300 feet wide and 32 feet deep in the bay through Lands End; and 450 feet wide and 34 feet deep in the gulf, protected by east, west jetties, extending 2,075 feet and 2,896 feet respectively; a channel 100 feet wide and 8 feet deep in Grand Lagoon to a point about 2,400 feet east of State Highway 392 Bridge, with branches to serve terminal facilities; and the maintenance of a channel in Watson Bayou, an arm of St. Andrew Bay, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in bay to highway bridge. Authorized modifications includes branch channels 38 feet deep and 300 feet wide, leading from the inner end of the main entrance channel westward to the Port Authority terminal at Dyers Point and eastward to the Bay Harbor terminal, about 3.4 and 3.6 miles in length, respectively; turning and maneuvering areas comprising about 55 acres opposite Dyers Point, and 42 acres opposite Bay Harbor, both at a depth of 38 feet; and an anchoring and loading basin for LASH type intermodal carriers, 40 feet deep and containing about 177 acres in St. Andrew Bay near the inner end of the main entrance channel. Mean tidal range is about normally 1.3 feet and 3.0 feet extreme. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) 10-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Available terminal facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Jetty maintenance cost $2,615,300; condition surveys, engineering and design, water quality studies, and miscellaneous costs totaled $112,576. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project (prior to modifications) was completed in November 1949. Repairs to jetties were commenced in June 1961 and completed October 1968. Modifications to the project at Grand Lagoon were completed in January 1972. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1997 is $1,638,045 for new work and $13,023,278 for maintenance, a total of $14,661,323. Contributed funds expended for new work amount to $80,000. 18. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS Location. The project is located along lower 6.8 miles of Pascagoula River, the lower six miles of Dog River, and in Bayou Casotte (about four miles east of the mouth of Pascagoula River), and through Mississippi Sound into the Gulf of Mexico, in southeastern Mississippi, about 38 miles west of Mobile, Alabama, and about 100 miles east of New Orleans, Louisiana. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 11373.) Previous project. For details see page 741, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for (a) An entrance channel 40 feet deep and 350 feet wide from the Gulf of Mexico through Horn Island Pass, including an impounding area for littoral drift, 40 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 1,500 feet long adjacent to the channel at the west end of Petit Bois Island; (b) a channel 38 feet deep and 350 feet wide in Mississippi Sound and Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge at Pascagoula, including a turning basin 2,000 feet long and 950 feet wide (including channel area) on the west side of the river below the railroad bridge; (c) a channel 38 feet deep and 225 feet wide from the ship channel in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of Bayou Casotte, thence 38 feet deep and 300 feet wide for about one mile to a turning basin 38 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and 1,750 feet long; (d) a 22-foot deep by 150-foot wide channel up Pascagoula River from the railroad bridge to the mouth of Escatawpa (or Dog) River, then up Escatawpa River to Highway 613 (formerly 63) bridge; (e) a 12-foot by 125-foot channel from the highway bridge; via Robertson and Bounds Lakes, to mile 6 on Escatawpa River; and (f) a 12-foot by 80-foot channel extending from deep water in the Pascagoula River (about one-half mile north of the railroad bridge) to a turning basin in Krebs Lake a distance of about 1,500 feet, then along the south bank of the lake a channel 10-foot by 60-foot and terminating at a second turning basin, a distance of 2,700 feet from the first. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is 1.75 feet, and extreme range is 3.75 feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Further authorization provides for deepening and widening gulf entrance channel to 44 by 550 feet; widen Horn Island channel to 600 feet, relocating that channel about 500 feet westwardly; deepen Mississippi Sound portion to 42 feet; widen and deepen Bayou Casotte to 42 by 350 feet and construct turning basin. Disposal of all new work material in Gulf of Mexico. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction Contract cost $412,717; Engineering and Design cost $159,376; supervision and administration cost $2,361. A total Federal cost of $574,454 for new work. Maintenance: Contract dredging at a cost of $2,323,200. Condition surveys cost $52,600. Water quality studies, supervision and administration, and miscellaneous costs totaled $423,402. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was completed in August 1965 and the Krebs Lake project was completed in November 1983. The General Design Memorandum (GDM) was approved in June 1992 for deepening and widening channels. Preconstruction Engineering and Design is complete. The channel dredging contract was awarded in September 1994. Total Federal cost of existing project to September 30, 1997 is $14,585,864 for new work and $63,123,907 for maintenance, a total of $77,709,771. Contributed funds expended for maintenance amounted to $5,191,386. 19. PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL Location. The project is located in a landlocked bay on the coast of northwest Florida about 50 miles east of the entrance to Mobile Bay. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 490 and 11382.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for: (a) A 35-foot by 500-foot entrance channel about five miles long, from the Gulf of Mexico to lower Pensacola Bay; (b) a 33- foot by 300-foot bay channel; (c) two 33-foot by 300-foot 10-14 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT parallel approach channels to opposite ends of the inner harbor channel; (d) an inner harbor channel 500 feet wide, 33 feet deep, and 3,950 feet long; (e) a 30-foot by 250-foot approach channel to the pierhead line south of Muscogee wharf; and (f) a 15-foot by 100-foot entrance channel into Bayou Chico, thence a channel 14 feet deep, 75 feet wide, and about 4,400 feet long to a turning basin 14 feet deep and 500 feet square. Mean range of tide throughout the harbor is about 1.1 feet near the entrance and about 1.6 feet at the head of bay. Extreme tidal range, except during storms, is about three feet. Plane of reference is mean low water. Modification of the Bayou Chico project to provide for enlarging the entrance channel to 21 by 100 feet, the bayou channel to 20 feet by 100 feet, and deepening the turning basin to 20 feet has been deferred for restudy. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Modern rail-connected terminal facilities at this port are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 19, revised in 1979.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous costs totaled $41,273. Condition at end of fiscal year. New work is completed except for features which are deferred for restudy. The modification authorized in 1962 was commenced in March and completed in May 1965. Total Federal cost of the existing project to September 30, 1997 is $1,469,693 for new work and $8,416,335 for maintenance, a total of $9,886,028. Contributed funds for maintenance amount to $297,587. 20. PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, AL Location. The project is located about midway between Pensacola, Florida, and Mobile, Alabama. (See Coast and Geodetic Chart 11378.) Existing project. The existing project provides for a channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide for about 1,300 feet from the Gulf of Mexico into the inlet, thence 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide for about 2,200 feet to the highway bridge, where the channel branches into two arms, each having dimensions of 9 by 100 feet, one of which extends about 3,400 feet into Terry Cove and the other about 3,200 feet into the southern arm of Perdido Bay. The project also provides for two jetties spaced 600 feet apart at the seaward end. The east jetty has a low weir section, 1000 feet long to permit passage of littoral drift into a dredged deposition basin 800 feet by 1,200 feet located between the east jetty and the navigation channel. Mean tidal range is 1.1 feet and extreme is 2.8 feet. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation have been fully complied with to date. Terminal facilities. Six marinas, numerous timber piers, docks, and several launching ramps are available. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging cost $781,000; jetty cost $280,200; condition surveys and miscellaneous costs totaled $49,501. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was commenced in May 1968 and completed in May 1969. Total Federal cost of the existing project to September 30, 1997 is $629,860 for new work and $9,906,852 for maintenance, a total of $10,536,712. Contributions from local interest amount to $510,000 for new work and $10,325 for maintenance. 21. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL AND MS Location. The waterway extends from mile 215 in Pickwick pool on the Tennessee River, southerly through northeastern Mississippi and western Alabama, a total of 234 miles, to the confluence of the Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers at Demopolis, Alabama. Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1953. Existing project. The existing project provides for a waterway 234 miles long, connecting the Tennessee and Tombigbee Rivers via the East Fork of Tombigbee River and Mackeys and Yellow Creeks and consists of three sections as follows: (l) the river section, a 9-foot by 300-foot channel for 149 miles between Demopolis and Amory, Mississippi; (2) the canal section, 12 feet by 300 feet for 46 miles from Amory to Bay Springs; and (3) the divide section, a 12-foot by 300-foot channel (except in the 27 mile long divide cut in which the bottom width is 280 feet) for 39 miles from Bay Springs through the dividing ridge to the Tennessee River. The total life of 341 feet is accomplished by 10 locks (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests have made and are maintaining alterations in highways and highway bridges and in sewer, water-supply, and drainage facilities and provide and maintain suitable and adequate river and canal terminals. Officials of the State of Mississippi were notified of these requirements on December 13, 1949, and officials of the State of Alabama were notified on December 20, 1949. Legislation enabling boards of supervisors of the various counties concerned to enter into agreements with theUnited States relative to navigation projects was adopted by the State of 10-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Mississippi in 1950. A compact between the States of Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky and Florida has been formed for the purpose of promoting the project. The name of this organization is the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway Development Authority. During its 1962 session the Mississippi Legislature authorized the formation of the Tombigbee River Valley Water Management District. The District was organized in accordance with the enabling legislation and is empowered to fulfill the requirements of local cooperation for the portion of the project in Mississippi. A satisfactory resolution has been furnished. During its 1967 session the Alabama Legislature authorized the formation of a public corporation to be named the Tombigbee Valley Development Authority for the purpose of further development of the Tombigbee River and tributary streams. The organization was formed in accordance with the enabling legislation and in a referendum held December 5, 1967 the voters of Alabama authorized a bond issue not to exceed $10,000,000 of finance participation in this project and the Tombigbee River and Tributaries project. A satisfactory resolution has been furnished. Terminal facilities. Docks, storage facilities and handling equipment are still being developed along this new waterway. As of September 30,1997, twelve such facilities were operational, while five were under construction, and five more are planned. The operational facilities are handling grain, wood chips, and logs. When all facilities are complete, about half will be publicly owned and operated. Additional ports and terminals must be completed before the waterway can achieve its full potential. (See Table 10-N for existing locks and dams.) Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Recreation facilities $915,454; real estate $33,041; engineering and design cost $54,506 and supervision and administration cost $25,696, a total of $1,028,697 for new work. Maintenance: Contract dredging on the river system cost $3,425,300. Total cost for operation and maintenance of the project for FY 97 amounted to $21,965,942, which included general charges of $3,535,942; Lock operations and maintenance cost $8,288,000. Recreation costs totaled $6,716,700. Recreation attendance for FY 1997 totaled 3,173,936 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Total Federal cost under the existing project as of September 30, 1997 is $1,052,913,358 for new work, and $264,527,002 for maintenance for a total of $1,317,440,360. Construction formally began December 12, 1972 and overall project is essentially complete. There is currently one (1) recreational contract underway on the project. The waterway was opened for navigation in January 1985. 21A. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY WILDLIFE MITIGATION PROJECT, AL AND MS Location. This project is in Alabama and Mississippi at the following locations: (1) Existing Project Lands - Approximately 72,500 acres of Tennessee-Tombigbee Project Lands have been designated for mitigation purposes. An additional 20,100 acres have also been designated at Coffeeville Lake, Demopolis Lake, Claiborne Lake and Dannelly Lakes in Alabama and at Okatibbee Lake in Mississippi. (2) Separable Lands - Acquisition and management of 88,000 separable lands in the Mobile-Tensaw Delta, Alabama (not less than 20,000 acres); the Pascagoula, Pearl, and Mississippi Delta Basins in Mississippi (not less than 25,000 acres); and the balance at any location in the two states. Previous project. None. This project was a new construction start in Fiscal year 1990. It was authorized by Section 601 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Existing project. The authorized project calls for the acquisition of separable lands at the above named locations. The Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, Mississippi Department of Wildlife Fisheries and Parks, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) assisted in the selection of separable lands. The selected lands are being purchased from willing sellers at fair market value. Emphasis is placed on forested wetlands, with a minimum of 34,000 acres of bottomland hardwoods being purchased. Management of Lands, the separable lands and the existing project lands designated for mitigation purposes will be managed for wildlife. The States will be primarily responsible for managing these lands in accordance with management plans jointly developed by the States, Corps and the FWS. However, due to operational constraints it will be necessary for the Corps to retain management responsibility for some of the existing project lands included in the mitigation program. Local cooperation. A local cooperation agreement is not required since the cost of this project is a 100% Federal responsibility. Operation and results during fiscal year. Land acquisition cost $1,825,110. Wildlife facilities $2,104,986; Roads, railroads, and bridges $692,497; Equipment $261,671; and miscellaneous $113,347; Engineering and Design 10-16 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT $822,166. Supervision and administration, $3,153. Condition at end of fiscal year. Initial funding for the project was received in January 1990. At the end of September 1997, 21,182 acres had been acquired in the Mobile-Tensaw Delta; 13,433 acres in the Pascagoula Basin; 18,542 acres in the Mississippi Delta; 7,295 acres in the Pearl Basin; 14,378 acres in northeast Mississippi; and 11,601 acres in other areas of Alabama. A variety of activities also continued to intensively manage the 92,600 acres of existing project lands included in the Mitigation Program. Scheduled completion date is September 1998. The total project cost is estimated to be $91,800,000. Total Federal cost of the project as of September 30, 1997 is $86,638,705. 22. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Table 10-C.) 23. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT (See Table 10-D.) 24. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 10-E.) 25. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (Preauthorization). Studies conducted under this authority amounted to -$4,078 in FY 1996. (See Table 10-H.) 26. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Table 10-J.) 27. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Table 10-K.) FLOOD CONTROL 28. BAYVIEW COURT, BAY ST. LOUIS, MS Location. Bayview Court is located in the City of Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. The project is on Mississippi Sound about 95 miles from Mobile, Alabama, on the east and about 50 miles from New Orleans, Louisiana, on the west. Existing project. This beach erosion project provides for construction of a 700 linear-foot concrete block revetment. The scarped project will be filled with clean sand, sloped, compacted, and covered with geotextile fabric. Interlocking concrete blocks, connected with cable to form a block mat system, will then be placed over the prepared surface. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Bank stabilization cost $21,463; engineering and design cost $13,913; and $2,613 for supervision and administration. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in November 1995, and completed in May 1996. Total Federal cost to date is $247,362 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $111,337. 29. CHOCTAWHATCHEE/PEA RIVERS, ALABAMA AND FLORIDA Location. The Choctawhatchee and Pea River Basins are located in southeast, Alabama. The damage center of Elba is located approximately 68 miles southwest from the head water of the Pea River. The damage center of Geneva is located approximately 48 miles south from the head water of the Choctawhatchee River. Existing project. The project consists of the installation of 14 combination rain and stream gages within the Choctawhatchee and Pea River Basins. The base stations are located at Elba and Geneva, Alabama. The flood warning system provides early warning time ranging between 18 to 36 hours. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Flood Control cost $26,250; engineering and design cost $7,903; and supervision and administration cost $2,407. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in September 1995. Total Federal cost to date is $230,939 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $91,249. 30. ESLAVA CREEK, MOBILE, AL Location. The city of Mobile, Alabama, which is located on the Gulf Coast of Alabama. The project begins at Pine Hill Drive and ends 2.1 miles upstream at Emogene Street. 10-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Existing project. None. The plan of improvement consists of channel enlargement, bank stabilization measures, and increasing the size of the box culvert at Airport Boulevard by adding an additional barrel. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement with the city of Mobile was signed on September 14, 1987. The local sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design $1,896; and supervision and administration $90. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in December 1994. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1997 is $4,732,721. Contributed funds expended $335,000. 31. HANCOCK COUNTY SEAWALL, HANCOCK COUNTY, MS Location. Hancock County is located on Mississippi Sound about 95 miles from Mobile, Alabama, on the east and about 50 miles from New Orleans, Louisiana, on the west Existing project. The shoreline protection project for Hancock County consists of a 990-foot timber bulkhead, two feet in front of an existing concrete seawall. The project consists of 12-inch diameter timber face piling 5-foot on center. Attached to the piling is 4 x 8-inch timber walls which support 3 x 8-inch treated timber sheeting. The sheeting is backed by filter fabric, and earth fill is placed between the bulkhead and the seawall and sodded. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction contract cost $-3,291; and supervision and administration costs amounted to $1,876. Conditions at end of fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded April 1995, and was completed in August 1995. Total Federal cost to date is $307,000 for new work. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $88,374. 32. KINGS CREEK AT GREEN STREET BRIDGE, TUPELO, MS Location. The project is located on Kings Creek, between Green Street and Spring Street in Tupelo, Mississippi. Existing project. The project provides riprap, sheet pile, and gabion slope and stream channel protection. A 9-foot high gabion wall begins 35 feet upstream of the bridge centerline and extends 37 feet downstream of the centerline along the right bank and 107 feet along the left bank. The channel bottom through the bridge is protected with 12 inch gabion baskets. Sheet piling supported by H-pile was constructed mid-bank at the terminus of the left bank gabion wall and extends 60 feet downstream. Riprap toe protection is placed along both banks between the project and the upstream end of the Spring Street Bridge, located approximately 300 feet downstream of Green Street. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract cost $164,760; and supervision and administration cost is $33,759. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated June 1996 and scheduled for completion in fiscal year 1998. Total Federal cost to date is $301,481 for new work. SAINT LOUIS BAY, BAY ST. LOUIS, MS Location. The project is located in the city of Bay St. Louis, Mississippi. It is on St. Louis Bay about 95 miles from Mobile, Alabama, on the east and about 50 miles from New Orleans, Louisiana, on the west. Existing project. The shoreline erosion project provides for construction of a 1,000 linear-foot concrete/sheetpile wall constructed in front of an existing concrete seawall. Concrete will be placed between the new sheetpile walls and the bottom step of the existing concrete seawall. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Bank stabilization cost $3,906; and supervision and administration cost $2,739. Conditions at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated in June 1997, and completed in Decenber 1997. Total Federal cost to date is $237,400 for new work. Contributed funds expended amounted to $106,173 for new work. 34. OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS Location. The project is located on Okatibbee Creek 37.7 miles above its mouth, in Lauderdale County, Mississippi, seven miles northwest of Meridian. Existing project. The project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, 10-18 33. MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT fish and wildlife, and recreation. The dam consists of a compacted earth fill 6,540 feet long with the top elevation 369.8 feet above national geodetic datum, with top width of 18 feet. The spillway, which is located 1,500 feet east of the east end of the dam, is an unpaved free overflow type, 1,500 feet long with a fixed crest at elevation 359. A sluice intake structure near the center of the dam serves a 9.0-foot diameter concrete conduit. Storage allocated for water supply and water quality control varies seasonally from 21,400 acre-feet to 34,300 acre-feet between a minimum elevation of 328 and top-of-conservation-pool elevation varying from 339 to 343. Storage varying from 46,500 to 59,500 acre-feet between the top of the conservation pool and elevation 352 has been reserved exclusively for storage of flood waters. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with to date. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Costs for the year for ordinary maintenance and recreational management amount to $1,794,079. Recreation attendance at the reservoir during FY 1997 totaled 938,098 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1965, and was completed in November 1968. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1997 is $9,739,528 for new work and $23,415,744 for maintenance, a total of $33,155,272. 35. SOWASHEE CREEK, MERIDIAN, MS Location. The project is located in East Central Mississippi, Lauderdale County, in the city of Meridian, which is approximately 90 miles east of Jackson, Mississippi. Existing project. In 1955, the Corps of Engineers completed channel improvement on the lower 10.5 miles of Sowashee Creek. This work was accomplished under the authority of Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. The plan of improvement consists of a combination of channel enlargement (3.9 miles), and clearing and snagging (6.6 miles) over a reach of 10.5 miles. One (1) railroad bridge and several highway roads and bridges and utilities will require modification for the channel improvement. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement with the Pat Harrison Waterway District was completed on September 23, 1987. The local sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design $74,227. Condition at end of fiscal year. All contracts have been completed except for the recreation contract. Plans and specifications for the expanded recreation were initiated in FY 1993 and were completed in FY 1994. Construction contract award is unscheduled. An Operation and Maintenance Manual was provided to the city. Current estimated Federal cost is $19,718,000; and the non-Federal portion is $12,782,000. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1997 is $15,894,265 for new work. Contributed funds expended $1,212,075. 36. THREEMILE CREEK, MOBILE, AL Location. The project is located near the Gulf of Mexico in the southwest corner of the state of Alabama and in the city of Mobile, approximately 180 miles southwest of Montgomery, Alabama. Threemile Creek originates in the western part of Mobile and flows easterly about 14 miles to enter Mobile River near the Alabama State Docks. The drainage area of the basin consists of 39 square miles of urbanized area. Existing project. None. The authorized flood control project will consist of channel widening and deepening from about 2,000 feet downstream of Stone Street to a point about 6,300 feet upstream of Interstate 65 or a total distance of 5.6 miles. The plan also includes development of certain recreational facilities of the type associated with urban parks. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement with the city of Mobile, Alabama was completed on September 30, 1987. The local sponsor has agreed to make all payments concurrently with project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Engineering and design cost $6,039. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete and has been turned over to the local sponsor. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1997 is $16,989,226 for new work. Contributed funds expended $1,172,516. 10-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 37. TOMBIGBEE RIVER (EAST FORK), MS AND AL Location. The project is located on the Tombigbee River and its tributaries between the junction of the Browns and Mackeys Creek in Itawamba County, Mississippi, for a distance of 53 miles along the East Fork of the Tombigbee River, from Walkers Bridge at the junction of Browns and Mackeys Creeks to the Monroe County line. Existing project. Provides for alleviation of floods from the Tombigbee River by clearing and snagging and excavation of 13 cut-off channels, and other related channel improvements. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with on work done under the 1963 Flood Control Act. Work to be done under authority of the 1941 Flood Control Act requires local interest to provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for project construction; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction of the project; and maintain and operate all the works after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance of channels cost $66,500. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project for Itawamba County, as authorized in the 1936 Flood Control Act, was completed during fiscal year 1940. No work has been done on the extension of the project authorized in the 1941 Flood Control Act. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1997 is $134,801 for new work and $3,614,408 for maintenance, a total of $3,749,209. 38. TOMBIGBEE RIVER TRIBUTARIES, MS AND AL Location. The Tombigbee River rises in extreme northeast Mississippi and flows southerly through eastern Mississippi and western Alabama, emptying into the Mobile River about 45 miles above its mouth at Mobile, Alabama. Tributaries to be improved for flood control are all in northeast Mississippi and northwest Alabama. Luxapalila Creek project consists of 2.1 miles of completed channel modifications. The remaining effort consists of approximately 26 miles of various channel work. Approved estimate of cost for new work is $42,108,000; consisting of $37,743,000 Federal funds, and $4,365,000 non-Federal funds. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction; make all roads, highway bridge, and utility changes, alterations, additions, and relocations necessary for the project; hold the United States free from damages; prevent future encroachments along the improved channels; maintain all works after completion, with the exception of Twenty Mile Creek from mile 11.7 to mile 22.0. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Real estate cost $393; Contract cost $834,007; engineering and design cost $1,099,459; and supervision and administration cost $48,599. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in July 1965, and is proceeding stream by stream as funds are made available. Total project is 98% complete. Luxapalila Creek is the only remaining work scheduled to be accomplished. The main construction contract was awarded in June 1994, and was completed in December 1997. The only remaining work involves a "clean-up" contract of the lower 2.1 mile segment that was completed in 1973 before litigation delayed the remaining work. Total Federal cost of existing project as of September 30, 1997 is $37,327,503 for new work. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $465,202. 39. UPPER GORDON CREEK, HATTIESBURG, MS Location. The proposed project on Gordons Creek is located in Hattiesburg, MS. Existing project. A Federal project on the lower 2.5 miles was constructed in 1979 under the Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948. The project consisted of clearing and snagging from the creek's confluence with the Leaf River upstream to Bay Street and channel widening to a 40-foot bottom width between Bay and Broad Streets. The work will consist of real estate acquisition of eight (8) residences and removal from floodplain; habitat mitigation and channel enlargement for 1.1 miles between Broad and Hardy Streets; and flood damages mitigation downstream of Broad Street. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Real Estate cost $609; engineering and design cost $13,557. Condition at end of fiscal year. The construction contract was awarded in April 1994, and construction was completed 10-20 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT in April 1995. Necessary right-of-ways for channel improvement are available and necessary relocations performed by non-federal sponsors. Also, acquisition of twenty-one (21) residences for mitigation is underway. Total Federal cost to date is $3,818,799 for new work. Contributed funds expended $130,689. 40. VILLAGE CREEK, BIRMINGHAM, AL Location. The project is located in central Alabama, Jefferson County, in the city of Birmingham, Alabama. Existing project. None. The project is basically nonstructural and includes evacuating 642 structures, in six (6) separate neighborhoods, from the floodplain; enlarging 2 miles of the stream channel in the vicinity of the Municipal Airport which also involves modification of three (3) bridges, demolishing two (2) unused bridges, and relocating two (2) waterlines and other utilities, installing three (3) emergency floodwarning devices; and creating an area of 210 acres which can be utilized for future recreation development. Channel enlargements (2 miles) will reduce annual damages near Municipal Airport by 82 percent and evacuation of 642 structures will reduce annual damages in residential areas by 61 percent. The channel segment is not being constructed at the request of the sponsor. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement with the city of Birmingham, Alabama was executed on December 14, 1988. The local sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with the project construction. Operation and results during fiscal year. New work: Real Estate cost $14,982; engineering and design, $110,934. Contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $5,996. Condition at end of fiscal year. Real Estate design memorandum completed February 1988. Real Estate acquisition started January 1989. The project is complete with acquisition of 634 tracts. Current estimated Federal cost is $26,912,000; and the non-Federal portion is $10,388,000. Total Federal cost under existing project to September 30, 1997 is $22,814,376 for new work. Contributed funds for new work amounted to $7,203,102. 41. WAVELAND SEAWALL, WAVELAND, MS Location. The city of Waveland is in the southern portion of Hancock County, Mississippi. It is located on Mississippi Sound about 95 miles from Mobile, Alabama, on the east and about 50 miles from New Orleans, Louisiana, on the west. Existing project. The shoreline protection project for Waveland, Mississippi, consists of a 1,008 linear-foot concrete/sheetpile wall segment, and a 500 linear-foot concrete/sheetpile wall segment constructed in front of an existing concrete seawall. Concrete was placed between the new sheetpile walls and the bottom step of the existing concrete seawalls. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Contract cost $-2,996; Supervision and administration cost $1,303; Contributed funds for new work $3,923.. Conditions at end of fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded in April 1995, and completed in June 1995. Total Federal costs to date are $453,000, and contributed funds expended for new work amounted to $136,923. 42. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Snagging and Clearing for flood control pursuant to Section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. Emergency streambank and shoreline protection pursuant to Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. (See Table 10-J) Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work under Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation, and disaster relief and assistance under Public law 288, 93d Congress. (See Table 10-J) 43. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Local flood protection works for which inspection is performed under this heading consist of levee projects at West Point, Georgia, on the Chattahoochee River; Beaver Creek at Montezuma, Georgia, in the Flint River Basin; Elba and Geneva, Alabama in the Choctawhatchee River Basin; Rome, Georgia, and Little Wills Creek at Collinsville, Alabama, in the Alabama-Coosa River Basin. Channel rectification projects include Little Cove Creek, Glencoe, Alabama and Black Creek, Gadsden, Alabama in the Alabama-Coosa River Basin; Big Brown Creek, Donivan Creek, Twenty Mile Creek and Mantachie Creek, near Fulton, Mississippi, Burketts 10-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Creek and Stanifer Creek near Amory, Mississippi, Houlka Creek and Sakatonchee Creek in Chickasaw and Clay Counties, Mississippi, James Creek in Monroe County, Mississippi, and Luxapalila Creek, Lowndes County, Mississippi, all in the Tombigbee River Basin; Sowashee Creek, Meridian, Mississippi in the Pascagoula River Basin; Burnt Corn and Murder Creeks, Brewton, Alabama in the Conecuh River Basin; Autauga Creek, Prattville, Alabama; Poley Bridge, Goose Pone and Walnut Creeks, Clanton, Alabama; Pinchgut Creek, and Cahaba River, Trussville, Alabama; Town Creek, Americus, Georgia; and Lake Douglas in Bainbridge, Georgia. Shore protection and erosion control projects include Harrison County, Mississippi; Leaf River, Mahned, Mississippi; Chattahoochee River at La Grange, Troup County, Georgia; Pumpkinvine Creek, Emerson, Georgia; and Chickasawbogue Creek, US Highway 43 Bridge, Linden, Alabama. The project at Rome and Montezuma, Georgia and Collinsville, Alabama include pumping stations. Inspections were made during FY 91 to determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation of the project. Responsible local officials were advised of inadequacies in the maintenance and operation of the local flood protection works under their jurisdiction where appropriate. Followup for compliance of the deficient projects continued during the year. Fiscal year costs were $35,534. Total cost to September 30, 1997 is $766,513 charged to maintenance. 44. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 10-E.) Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Multiple Purpose Power Projects 45. ALLATOONA DAM, COOSA RIVER BASIN, GA Location. The project is on Etowah River in Bartow County, Georgia, about 48 miles upstream from Rome, Georgia, about five miles due east of Cartersville, Georgia, and about 2,000 feet downstream from mouth of Allatoona Creek. The reservoir extends about 28 miles up the Etowah River at maximum power-pool elevation of 840 feet above mean sea level. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, regulation of streamflow for navigation, and development of hydroelectric power. Height above the river bottom of the concrete, gravity-type dam is about 190 feet, from elevation 690 feet to 880 feet national geodetic datum. The spillway, with crest at elevation 835, is controlled by nine tainter gates, 40 feet wide by twentysix feet high, and two tainter gates, 20 feet wide by twentysix feet high; having a combined discharge capacity of 321,000 cubic feet per second with the water surface at elevation 870.3. One 48-inch diameter sluicing conduit with a free discharge valve and four sluices, 5 feet-8 inches wide by 10 feet high, are included in dam. Installed generating capacity consists of two 36,000 kilowatt units and one 2,000 kilowatt unit, or a total of 74,000 kilowatts. The reservoir, covering 19,200 acres at elevation 860, has a storage capacity of 670,000 acre-feet. The initial construction cost was $31,424,738, excluding the addition of recreation facilities at the completed project. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. (Sec. 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938, applies). Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the dam, reservoir, powerhouse, service and recreational activities, and administration totaled $5,312,654. Gross power generation amounted to 152,078,400 kilowatt hours during FY 1997 of which 149,014,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance at Allatoona Lake during FY 1997 totaled 5,140,600 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the existing project began in March 1944 and was completed in October 1955. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1997 is $35,709,085 for new work and $118,762,742 for maintenance, a total of $154,471,827. 46. BUFORD DAM, LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA Location. Buford Dam is on the Chattahoochee River about 348.9 miles above its mouth, 50 miles above Atlanta and five miles northwest of Buford, Georgia. The reservoir, Lake Sidney Lanier, extends about 47 miles upstream along the Chattahoochee River, and about 21 miles up the Chestatee River, which enters the Chattahoochee River 14.5 miles above the dam. Existing project. The authorized project provides for a rolled-earth dam 1,630 feet long with crest elevation 1,106 feet national geodetic datum, or about 192 feet above streambed elevation; three earth saddle dikes with a total length of 5,406 feet; a chute spillway with crest at elevation 1,085; a powerhouse in a deep cut with steel penstocks in tunnels, and concrete intake structure at the upstream end of 10-22 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT the tunnels; and a flood control sluice tunnel paralleling the power tunnels. The Lake Sidney Lanier reservoir has a gross capacity of 2,554,000 acre-feet of which 637,000 acre-feet of storage is reserved for flood control storage. The power installations consist of one generating unit of 6,000 kilowatts and two units of 40,000 kilowatts each, or a total of 86,000 kilowatts. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost $6,687,110. Gross power generation amounted to 174,902,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1997, of which 170,296,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Lake Sidney Lanier during FY 1997 totaled 7,395,581 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction commenced in March 1950 and was completed in June 1960. The reservoir was in useful operation for flood control in February 1956. The first power generating unit was placed on the line June 19, 1957; the second on July 26, 1957; and the third on October 10, 1957. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1997 is $53,030,038 for new work and $147,810,158 for maintenance, a total of $200,840,196. (See also Table 10-M.) 47. CARTERS DAM AND RESERVOIR, GA Location. The damsite is in Murray County, Georgia, on the Coosawattee River 26.8 miles above its junction with Conasauga River, one of the headwater tributaries of the Alabama-Coosa system. It is 60 miles north of Atlanta near the town of Oakman, Georgia. The reservoir is in both Murray and Gilmer Counties. Existing project. The existing project consists of a 1,950- foot long rockfill dam across the river, three saddle dikes on the left bank, a 258-foot long high-level, gated spillway on the left bank, a powerhouse on the right bank having two conventional units with a generating capacity of 125,000 kilowatts each and two pump-generating units of the same size, and a regulating dam 2,855 feet long with a gated spillway 208 feet long 1.5 miles downstream from the main dam. The lake has an area of 3,220 acres, at maximum pool power elevation 1,072, total capacity of 472,800 acre-feet, of which 134,900 acre-feet is usable for power and 95,700 acre-feet reserved for flood control and 242,200 acre-feet dead storage. For other information see description of Alabama- Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the dam, reservoir, powerhouse, service and recreational activities and administration totaled $4,446,504. Gross power generation amounted to 331,724,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1997, of which 174,009,000 were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance during FY 1997 totaled 531,377 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction which commenced in April 1962 and completed in September 1980. Total Federal cost of the existing project as of September 30, 1997 is $185,597,459, including $111,140,340 for new work and $74,457,119 for maintenance. 48. JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, GA AND FL Location. The project is located on the Apalachicola River 107.6 miles above its mouth, about 1,000 feet below confluence of the Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, and 1.5 miles northwest of Chattahoochee, Florida. Reservoir extends about 46.5 miles upstream along the Chattahoochee River to the vicinity of Columbia, Alabama, and about 47 miles upstream along Flint River, or 17 miles above Bainbridge, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Existing project. The existing project provides for a concrete open-crest spillway 1,634 feet long on the right bank, with a crest at elevation 79 feet national geodetic datum; a single-lift lock with usable chamber dimensions of 82 by 450 constituting a portion of the dam; an earth section 506 feet feet, a maximum lift of 33 feet, and depth over the sills of 14 feet; a gated spillway 766 feet long with the bridge at elevation 107 feet national geodetic datum, or about 67 feet above the streambed elevation; a powerhouse with an intake section constituting a portion of the dam; an earth section 506 feet long to accommodate the switchyard and substation; and an overflow dike section 2,130 feet long on the left bank, with a crest at elevation 85. The underlying foundation is limestone. At the normal pool elevation of 77, the reservoir has a total capacity of 406,160 acre-feet. The power installation consists of three units of 10,000 kilowatts each, or a total of 30,000 kilowatts. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Localcooperation. Required cooperation is being fulfilled. Easements for rights-of-way and spoil-disposal areas were provided as required along the Apalachicola River. Adequate public terminals were constructed by local interests at Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, and at Columbia, Alabama, on the Chattahoochee River. Facilities are being planned for other localities on the project. 10-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Terminal facilities. A public wharf with concrete deck for handling general cargo, a bulk storage terminal for petroleum, a grain elevator, and private riverside facilities at Bainbridge, Georgia, on the Flint River, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost $6,661,034. Gross power generation, Jim Woodruff Powerhouse, amounted to 210,123,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1997, of which 207,792,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance at Lake Seminole during FY 1997 totaled 1,055,349 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the lock was commenced in 1947, and completed in 1957. The pool was opened to navigation in May 1954, and the pool was raised to project level in January 1957. The first powergenerating unit was placed on-the-line on February 1, the second on March 1, and the third April 26, 1957. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1997 is $47,978,858 for new work and $104,422,340 for maintenance, a total of $152,401,198. (See also Table 10-M.) 49. MILLERS FERRY LOCK AND DAM, AL Location. The site is in Wilcox County at mile 142.2 on the Alabama River, 10 miles northwest of Camden, Alabama, and 30 miles southwest of Selma. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth dike on the right bank, a concrete, gravity-gated spillway in the river channel, a lock and mound on the left bank, an earth dike extending downstream paralleling the lock, to the powerhouse intake structure; a powerhouse, and an earth dike extending to high ground on the left bank. Normal upper pool is at elevation 80. The powerplant contains two 25,000 kilowatt units and one 30,000 kilowatt unit. The 103-mile long reservoir has an area of 17,200 acres at normal pool level and a total capacity of 331,800 acre-feet. The lock chamber is 84 by 600 feet with a 13-foot depth over the miter sills. For other information see description of Alabama-Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of lock, dam, powerhouse, reservoir, and administration cost $7,958,569. Gross power generation amounted to 355,880,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1997, of which 351,328,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance at William "Bill" Dannelly Reservoir during FY 1997 totaled 1,730,000 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1963. The lock was placed in temporary operations in June 1968 and opened to full use in November 1969. The powerhouse units were placed on line during April and May 1970. The project was completed in 1980. Total Federal cost of the project as of September 30, 1997 is $63,125,300 for new work and $72,094,629 for maintenance, a total of $135,219,929. 50. ROBERT F. HENRY LOCK AND DAM, AL Location. The site is in Lowndes and Autauga Counties at mile 281.2 on the Alabama River, 26 miles west of Montgomery. Existing project. The existing project provides for a navigation lock, a gated spillway, and a power plant located at mile 281.2. The normal upper pool is at elevation 125.0 and the minimum lower pool due to the Millers Ferry Lock and Dam is at elevation 80.0. The structures consist of earth dikes and a power plant on the right bank, a gated spillway in the river channel, a lock and mound on the left bank, and an earth dike extending upstream parallel to the Western Railway of Alabama. The total length of the structures is about 14,962 feet with maximum height above the foundation at the power plant intake about 101 feet. The power plant contains four 20,500-kw. units. The 88-mile long reservoir has an area of 12,300 acres at normal pool level and a total capacity of 234,200 acre-feet. The lock has a chamber 84 feet wide and 600 feet long and provides a 12-foot depth over the lower miter sill. For other information see description of Alabama- Coosa project. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance costs amounted to $4,404,812. Gross power generation amounted to 389,540,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1997, of which 386,213,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreation attendance during FY 1997 totaled 1,489,700 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in March 1966 and is complete. The first powerhouse unit was placed in operation in June 1975, with the last unit on line in November 1975. Total Federal cost of the project as of September 30, 1997 is $137,314,278, including $83,360,800 for new work and $53,953,478 for maintenance. 10-24 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT 51. WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA Location. The project is on the Chattahoochee River about 75.2 miles above its mouth and about 1.5 miles above Fort Gaines, Georgia. (See Geological Survey maps for southwest Georgia.) Existing project. The existing project provides for a concrete dam, gated spillway, and single-lift lock, with earth embankments at either side. The non-overflow section of the dam includes a powerhouse and an intake structure. The gated spillway is 708 feet long with a fixed crest at elevation 163 feet national geodetic datum. The two earth embankments, of almost equal lengths, have a total length of 12,128 feet, with a crest elevation at 215, and a maximum height of about 68 feet. The nonoverflow section of the concrete dam is 200 feet long, with the deck of the powerhouse section at elevation 208. The lock, with usable chamber dimensions of 82 feet by 450 feet, has a lift of 88 feet with the normal upper pool elevation at 190. Depths are 13 feet over the lower sill and 18 feet over the upper sill at normal pool elevation. The underlying foundation is limestone. Total reservoir capacity is 934,400 acre-feet, with 244,000 acre-feet reserved for power. The power installation consists of four units of 32,500 kilowatts each, or a total of 130,000 kilowatts. The project provides for maintenance, including operation and care. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Local interests must maintain and operate all utility and highway facilities which may be relocated or otherwise altered as part of the improvement, provide suitable public terminal facilities, and hold the United States free from damages. Local agencies and other organizations have indicated their willingness and ability to comply. Terminal facilities. Public wharves at Eufaula and Phenix City, Alabama, and Columbus, Georgia, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance cost for FY 1997 was $6,411,825. Gross power generation amounted to 471,319,000 kilowatt hours, of which 464,830,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance during FY 1997 totaled 4,883,415 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was completed in 1963. The lock was opened to navigation in June 1963. The first power generating unit was placed onthe- line in March, the second in May, the third in September, and the fourth in November 1963. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1997 is $88,330,669 for new work, major rehabilitation cost $10,932,884 and $138,521,804 for maintenance, a total cost of $237,785,357. (See also Table 10-M.) 52. WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA AND AL Location. The damsite is on the Chattahoochee River 2.8 miles upstream from West Point, Georgia, 201.4 miles above the mouth of the Chattahoochee River, and 309.2 miles above the mouth of the Apalachicola River. At the full power pool elevation of 635 feet above national geodetic datum, the reservoir would lie in Troup and Heard Counties, Georgia, and in Chambers and Randolph Counties, Alabama (See Geological Survey maps of Georgia and Alabama.) Existing project. The existing project provides for flood control, power, recreation, fish and wildlife development, and streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. The project provides for a gravity-type concrete dam 896 feet long with earth embankments at either end 1,111 feet long on the east end and 5,243 feet long on the west end. The total length of the dam and spillway is 7,250 feet. The main dam consists of a concrete non-overflow section, 185 feet long on the west side and an earth embankment retaining wall on the east side; a gravity concrete spillway 390 feet long, including piers and abutments, with six tainter gates, each 50 feet by 41 feet. A monolith intake-powerhouse section and erection bay 321 feet long is constructed directly west and adjacent to the spillway. At the full power-pool elevation of 635 the reservoir provides a total storage of 605,000 acre-feet of which 307,000 acre-feet is usable. During the critical flood season the reservoir is operated with maximum power pool elevation at 625 feet to provide flood storage between elevations 625 and 635. The initial power installation of 73,375 kilowatts consisting of units 1, 2 and 3 were placed in operation in March and April, 1975. (See Table 10-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the project totaled $5,524,045. Gross power generation amounted to 214,317,000 kilowatt hours during FY 1997, of which 10-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 206,537,000 kilowatt hours were delivered to Southeastern Power Administration. Recreational attendance during FY 1997 totaled 2,109,200 visits. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project, which was initiated in June 1966, and completed at the end of FY 1984. Total Federal cost under existing project as of September 30, 1997 is $131,565,760 for new work and $88,620,397 for maintenance, a total of $220,186,157 (See also Table 10-M.) 53. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Mobile District monitors flood control operations of Alabama Power Company's Weiss, H. Neely Henry, and Logan Martin Dams on Coosa River, Alabama, and their Lewis Smith Dam on Sipsey Fork (headwaters of Black Warrior River, Alabama), for compliance with regulation plans prepared in accordance with Public Law 436, 83rd Congress, and Federal Power Commission licenses. Fiscal year cost for these activities on the Weiss, H. Neely Henry, and Logan Martin Dams are included under operation and maintenance costs for the Alabama-Coosa Rivers. Fiscal year cost for the Lewis Smith Dam is included under the overall operation and maintenance costs for the Black Warrior- Tombigbee Rivers System. 54. FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES (FC & CE) Disaster Preparedness Program ............................. $467,450 Emergency Operations ......................................... 439,211 Rehabilitation ........................................................ 173,087 Total FC & CE $1,079,748 55. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM (NEPP) Mobilization Preparedness .................................... $3,423 Government Preparedness ..................................... 18,028 Emergency Facilities .................... ........................- - 00 - Total NEPP $21,451 56. REGULATORY FUNCTIONS PROGRAM Permit Evaluation ............................................... $1,885,038 Enforcement ......................................................... 545,827 Studies ........................................................................... 318 Other Navigational Regulations .................................... -0- Total Regulatory $2,431,183 57. PROJECT MODIFICATION TO IMPROVE ENVIRONMENT (Sec. 1135) Coordination Account Funds.................................... $8,089 Initial Appraisals .................................... 17,136 Jug Creek Waterfowl, GA ...................................... 80 Twentymile Creek Habitat, MS ............................. 61,466 Coosa and Oostanaula .................................... 3,817 Total Improvement (Sec. 1135, P.L. 99-662) $90,588 General Investigations 58. SURVEYS During FY 1997, costs of $849,546 were incurred as shown below: Flood Damage Preventive Studies....................... $69,288 Navigation Studies..................................... 119,516 Special Studies .................................................. 446,115 Coordination with Other Agencies, and non-Federal Interests .................................... 109.663 Miscellaneous Activities ..................................... 104,964 Total Surveys 59. $849,546 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Collection and study of basic data continued during the fiscal year with the initiation of Flood Insurance studies, the cost of which was reimbursable by FEMA. In addition, Flood Plain Management Services were performed at a cost of $295,276 and $3,613 expended for Hydrologic Studies. (See Table 10-P for listings of studies completed during FY 1997.) 60. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Panama City Beaches, FL. The authorized plan consists of the placement of a protective beach to elevation 4', with a storm berm to elevation 7' with an artificial dune system having a top width of 30 feet at elevation 15 and stabilized by vegetation. A comprehensive damage survey was completed during FY 1989 as part of the reevaluation effort. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design (PED) is currently 100% complete. A General Reevaluation Report (GRR) was completed in September 1994 and ASA (CW) approval in February 1996. Fiscal year 1997 expenditures were $9,034. 10-26 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Panama City Harbor. The authorized plan of improvements are the same as described in existing project (see Section 15 in text). Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) is currently 100% complete. A General Reevaluation Report (GRR) was approved in August 1995. Plans and specifications were completed in September 1996. Fiscal year 1997 expenditures were $6,832. Total FY 1997 expenditures for Preconstruction, Engineering and Design (PED) were $243,873. Wolf and Jordan Rivers, MS. The authorized plan provides for deepening the existing industrial channel from 7 by 100 feet to 8 by 100 feet for about 4 1/2 miles from the end of the 200 by 800 foot turning basin to the 8-foot depth contour in St. Louis Bay. Plans and specifications were initiated in January 1997 and are scheduled to be completed in April 1998. Estimate Preconstruction, Engineering and Design cost is $500,000. Fiscal year 1997 expenditures were $228,006. 61. RIVERS AND HARBORS CONTRIBUTED FUNDS Contributed funds expended for authorized Federal studies included: Atlanta Sewer, GA ..................................... $22,785 Mobile Harbor, AL .................................... 43,650 Planning Assistance to States .................................... 68,773 Total Contributed Funds $135,208 10-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 10-A See Section in Text Project Navigation 1. Alabama-Coosa Rivers, AL and GA 1A. Claiborne Lock and Dam, AL 1 B. Coosa River, Montgomery to Gadsden, AL 2. Apalachicola Bay, FL 3. Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers, AL and GA 3A. George W. Andrews Lock and Dam, AL and GA 4. Aquatic Plant Control (Contributed Funds) 5. Bayou Coden, AL (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 6. Bayou La Batre, AL (Contributed Funds) 7. Biloxi Harbor, MS COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Sept. 30, 1997 New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 3,245,400 3,245,400 4,808,700 4,865,758 325,000 317,814 7,319,000 7,292,366 30 70,000 77,126 15,000 22,176 1,752,000 2,558,508 380,000 388,549 139,000 450,730 915,000 585,628 5,258,000 5,293,066 534,000 551,789 5,121,000 5,074,840 30 30 50,000 4,114 54,000 51,620 50,000 74,606 31,000 27,163 71,000 1,053,000 1,411,896 4,357,300 4,588,337 90,000 93,327 5,433,000 5,554,039 30 30 30,000 28,038 16,000 12,313 84,357 297,000 227,956 43,000 39,721 74,235 278,600 284,012 5,514,980 5,519,831 228,000 185,911 4,311,283 4,298,317 38,891 511,100 444,755 80,340 1,763,000 1,612,688 1,805,000 1,723,601 100,000 162,034 1,109,000 1,074,719 105,214,16824 105,121,90224 27,997,450 27,997,450 14,986,40023 14,986,40023 2,033,461' 2,033,461' 5,364,0582 5,314,6002 4,452,16226 4,452,16226 119,079,54727 118,984,94727 13,038,42729 13,038,42729 969,187 912,815 21,225 21,225 330,7013 330,7013 1,755,858 1,682,964 100,000 100,000 134,357 130,340 5,946,095 5,723,568 5,928,746 5,839,912 697,500' 697,4994 1,431,9193 1,431,9195 14,334,7956 14,289,9206 10-28 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Sept. 30, 1997 (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 8. Black Warrior & Tombigbee Rivers, AL 8A. Jackson Port Jackson. AL 8B. Oliver Lock & Dam (Replacement), AL (Contributed Funds) 9. Bon Secour River, AL (Contributed Funds) 10. Dauphin Island, Bay, AL (Contributed Funds) 11. Dog and Fowl Rivers, AL (Contributed Funds) 12. East Pass Channel From Gulf of Mexico into Choctwhatchee Bay, FL (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 18,693,100 18,507,566 165,000 276,520 2,500,000 1,642,866 2,500,000 1,687,594 -4,012 16,246 -63,200 243,000 289,659 19,596,000 19,016,936 156,000 175,093 1,829,946 1,807,852 15,000 -12,917 10,000 7,607 -1,778 2,187 -26,000 9,724 16,531,000 16,664,516 129,000 81,955 719,120 619,310 10,000 35,480 253,000 250,154 675,000 676,095 18,916,779 19,583,480 318,000 233,483 58,395 74,658 70,000 80,168 75,000 64,398 66,000 76,070 102,600 102,600 238,640 238,640 88,461,9357 88,461,935' 357,064,873" 356,51 4,680 52,292,880 52,292,880 1,553,000 1,394,507 61,409,000 61,384,845 62,500,000 62,451,012 150,615 150,615 1,481,258 1,480,093 9,700 9,700 292,864 292,864 2,796,626 2,780,597 41,422 41,422 391,354 391,354 3,711,686 3,711,163 197,450 195,626 916,715 916,715 13,076,961 13,057,196 398,000 398,000 376 1,650,000 1,632,360 681,000 641,669 1,057,000 1,038,915 974,850 1,037,542 10-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Sept. 30, 1997 13. Fly Creek, AL 14. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and Mexican Border 15. Gulfport Harbor, MS (Contributed Funds) 16. Mobile Harbor, AL (Contributed Funds) 17. Panama City Harbor, FL (Contributed Funds) 18. Pascagoula Harbor, MS (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 19. Pensacola Harbor, FL (Contributed Funds) 20. Perdido Pass Channel, AL New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 10,000 17,933 2,340,000 2,360,084 3,281,000 3,338,907 1,436,000 1,414,047 1,363,082 57,000 113,438 15,565,000 15,986,627 -1,599 3,414,000 3,414,781 205,013 2,250,000 2,207,283 103,000 102,106 3,985,000 4,048,591 100,000 109,725 1,579,700 1,643,962 144,999 73,000 62,669 18,251,000 17,557,637 29,762 321,000 314,006 289,000 252,481 2,281,000 2,166,315 840,000 80,623 586,000 57,056 2,753 176,000 138,189 5,044,000 4,811,249 2,643,00 2,771,101 2,400,000 1,206,566 345,994 62,000 60,396 6,152 19,570,000 20,344,111 65,000 10,000 674,000 706,189 2,179,000 2,374,696 1,621,000 1,644,907 525,000 2,473,061 365,000 547,343 304 75,000 55,456 4,680,090 4,644,492 27,005 1,995,000 1,678,098 131,977 100,000 104,360 20,554,000 20,520,942 43,650 2,729,000 2,727,876 550,000 574,454 3,035,900 2,799,202 -412,717 375,000 386,293 60,000 41,273 29,000 29,000 844,721 821,444 6,480,2999 6,480,2999 81,232,33610 81,166,46010 24,179,000" 24,142,340" 53,055,20212 52,726,49412 9,495,000 8,897,027 96,331,93513 96,317,182" 237,451,340'4 237,210,763"4 18,517,500 18,506,150 1,638,045� 1,638,045'" 13,041,01316 13,023,278'6 80,000 80,000 14,634,985" 14,585,864" 63,363,492' 63,123,907" 3,765,000 3,347,533 5,196,884 5,191,386 1,469,69319 1,469,693"9 8,438,35820 8,416,33520 312,350 297,587 629,860 629,860 10-30 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Sept. 30, 1997 (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 21. Tennessee- Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS 21A. Tenn-Tom Wildlife Mitigation Flood Control 28. Bayview Court Bay St. Louis, MS (Contributed Funds) 29. Choctawhatchee and Pea Rivers, AL and FL (Contributed Funds) 30. Eslava Creek, Mobile, AL (Contributed Funds) 31. Hancock Co. Seawall, Hancock County, MS (Contributed Funds) 32. Kings Creek Tupelo, MS (Contributed Funds) 33. Saint Louis Bay, Bay St. Louis, MS (Contributed Funds) 34. Okatibbee Dam, MS Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint.: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost NewWork: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint.: Approp. Cost 25,000 35,662 927,000 926,863 30,400 30,410 1,231,000 1,110,701 10,031,617 9,906,852 510,000 510,000 10,325 10,325 6,085,000 7,880,115 21,449,350 21,764,047 17,024,000 9,514,923 475,000 490,834 99,200 133,997 67,000 34,799 38,000 40,776 1,806,100 1,840,500 980,000 3, 168,823 21,351,000 20,920,787 11,081,000 15,598,516 264,400 85,704 120,800 239,800 27,980 97,300 1,131,000 1,095,628 -167,000 944,336 19,518,000 19,945,758 10,662,000 12,167,962 123,669 120,800 170,696 44,526 40,000 61,405 4,003 213,000 221,019 88,000 85,083 440,000 87,694 244,400 76,092 110,079 1,605,000 1,569,897 12,779 155,965 136,600 154,663 110,029 1,524,000 1,537,858 925,000 1,028,697 21,849,010 21,965,942 3,351,000 5,822,930 -2,000 37,989 -9,463 -9,463 7,500 36,560 2,487 46,723 -13,500 1,905 996 -12,000 -1,415 374 3,291 198,519 112,068 -5,000 6,645 -3,906 -3,856 1,736,875 1,794,079 1,053,352,20021 1,052,913,35821 265,077,19522 264,527,00222 87,760,000 86,638,705 262,400 247,362 111,337 111,337 247,300 230,939 99,787 91,429 4,732,721 4,732,721 335,000 335,000 308,000 307,000 88,374 88,374 500,000 301,481 136,600 112,068 239,400 237,400 106,173 106,173 9,739,528 9,739,528 23,446,710 23,415,744 10-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Sept. 30, 1997 35. Sowashee Creek, New Work: Meridian, MS Approp. 3,240,000 - - - 19,281,000 Cost 636,445 266,733 53,723 74,227 15,894,265 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. - - - - 1,599,000 Cost - - - 65,582 1,212,075 36. Three Mile Creek, New Work: Mobile, AL Approp. 1,150,000 - -40,000 - 17,045,000 Cost 1,092,561 98,207 54,909 6,039 16,989,226 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. - - - - 1,216,000 Cost - 120,000 - 18,000 1,172,516 37. Tombigbee River New Work: (East Fork) Approp. - - - 134,801 MS and AL Cost - - - 134,801 Maint.: Approp. 298,000 114,000 95,000 200,000 3,752,201 Cost 276,521 116,275 118,761 66,500 3,614,408 38. Tombigbee River New Work: Tributaries, Approp. 4,308,000 510,000 5,228,000 2,215,000 37,866,825 MS and AL Cost 631,173 4,281,847 4,950,043 1,982,458 37,327,503 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. 300,000 - 255,000 183,000 872,700 Cost 35,875 29,215 274,980 96,756 465,202 39. Upper Gordon Creek New Work: Hattiesburg, MS Approp. 950,000 1,823,000 225,000 50,00 3,915,000 Cost 898,560 1,817,149 247,722 14,166 3,818,799 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. 130,720 - - 130,720 Cost 130,700 -61 50 - 130,689 40. Village Creek, New Work: Birmingham, AL Approp. 142,000 - 295,000 372,000 22,874,000 Cost 1,240,561 423,611 258,930 140,690 22,814,376 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. - - - 6,864 7,206,574 Cost 392,783 192,008 -9,849 5,996 7,203,102 41. Waveland Seawall New Work: Waveland, MS Approp. 84,000 336,000 - -4,000 456,000 Cost 80,702 342,975 2,710 -1,693 453,000 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. - 133,000 - 3,923 136,923 Cost - 133,000 - 3,923 136,923 Multiple Purpose Power Projects 42. Allatoona Dam, New Work: Coosa River Basin, Approp. - - - - 35,709,08525 GA Cost - - - 35,709,08525 Maint.: Approp. 8,223,600 6,173,000 5,441,857 5,458,465 119,146,846 Cost 8,452,826 5,895,074 5,703,727 5,312,654 118,762,742 43. Buford Dam, New Work: Lake Sidney Approp. - - - - 53,030,03828 Lanier, GA Cost - - - 53,030,03828 Maint.: Approp. 8,127,400 8,783,000 7,154,858 6,942,415 148,266,295 Cost 8,182,544 8,545,555 7,437,967 6,687,110 147,810,158 44. Carters Dam and New Work: Reservoir, GA Approp. - - - - 111,140,340 Cost - - - 111,140,340 Maint.: Approp. 3,998,500 4,585,000 5,250,857 4,451,100 74,591,941 Cost 3,886,696 4,614,226 5,305,994 4,446,504 74,457,119 10-32 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in 'ITxt Project Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Sept. 30, 1997 45. Jim Woodruff Lock New Work: and Dam, GA and Approp. - - - - 47,978,8583' FL Cost - - - - 47,978,8583' Maint.: Approp. 6,459,000 6,001,000 4,595,000 6,570,414 104,680,711 Cost 6,558,195 5,627,012 4,832,076 6,661,034 104,422,340 Major Rehab. Approp. - - 900,000 1,925,000 2,825,000 Cost - - 846,798 1,633,345 2,480,143 46. Millers Ferry Lock New Work: and Dam, AL Approp. - - - - 63,125,300 Cost - - - 63,125,300 Maint.: Approp. 3,541,000 3,172,000 4,126,857 7,901,440 72,197,508 Cost 3,638,758 3,101,776 4,176,137 7,958,569 72,094,629 47. Robert F. Henry New Work: Lock and Dam, AL Approp. - - - - 83,360,800 Cost - - - 83,360,800 Maint.: Approp. 4,141,000 4,606,000 5,318,857 4,333,445 54,047,163 Cost 4,034,150 4,663,796 5,351,663 4,404,812 53,953,478 48. Walter F. George New Work: Lock and Dam, Approp. - - 88,330,66932 AL and GA Cost - - 88,330,66932 Maint.: Approp. 8,427,000 6,968,000 5,387,857 6,069,744 138,652,998 Cost 8,349,043 6,939,755 5,294,028 6,411,825 138,521,804 Major Rehab.: Approp. 24,000 - 473,000 11,091,000 Cost 920 - - 314,884 10,932,884 49. West Point Lake, New Work: Chattahoochee River Approp. -3,000 -- - 131,565,76033 Basin, GA and AL Cost 473 - - - 131,565,76033 Maint.: Approp. 4,727,000 5,870,000 5,847,857 5,311,110 88,641,875 Cost 4,776,323 5,577,985 6,067,778 5,524,045 88,620,397 1. Includes $134,613 for previous projects and $28,500 for DPR on Two-Mile. 2. Includes $168,766 for previous projects. 3. Includes $5,650 for previous projects. 4. Cost for providing spoil dikes for work authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act. 5. Includes $44,382 for previous projects of which $5,000 was contributed funds. 6. Includes $96,509 for previous projects of which $10,200 was contributed funds. 7. Includes $606,931 for previous projects and $1,243,661 for recreational facilities on completed projects. 8. Includes $50,000 for previous projects. 9. Includes $45,605 for previous projects. 10. Includes $65,137 for previous projects. 11. Includes $269,017 for previous projects. 12. Includes $2,312,297 for previous projects and $442,836 Special O and M Funds. 13. Includes $6,683,104 for previous projects, $14,000 Public Work Funds, and $41,242 Emergency Relief funds. 14. Includes $4,096,681 for previous projects and $494,136 Special O and M funds. 15. Includes $203,560 for previous projects, $581,959 Public Works Funds, $457,467 rehabilitation of jetties under existing project and $48,001 for Grand Lagoon modification. 16. Includes $513,604 for previous projects. 17. Includes $904,442 for previous projects. 18. Includes $412,624 for previous projects, $124,565 Special O and M funds, and $829,472 Emergency Work Funds. 19. Includes $594,688 for previous projects. 20. Includes $126,649 for previous projects. 21. Includes $1,993,000 transferred to National Park Service; $210,249 GI funds expended during FY 1957 thru FY 1961. Previous project cost amounted to $197,651. 22. Includes $234,331 for previous projects. 23. Includes $3,692,483 for previous projects. 24. Includes $2,978,050 for previous projects. 25. Includes $3,347,489 for recreational facilities. 26. Includes $1,883,193 Federal funds, $1,924 contributed funds for previous projects; and $809,553 for Lazer Creek design and $301,310 for Rysco Channel. 27. Includes $2,246,233 for previous projects. 28. Includes $8,233,325 for recreational facilities. 29. Includes $84,014 for recreational facilities. 30. Included under maintenance for overall Apalachicola, Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers projects. 31. Includes $1,515,822 for recreational facilities. 32. Includes $2,441,029 for recreational facilities. 33. Includes $35,045 for previous project costs. 10-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 10-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1907 Jan. 21, 1927 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Nov. 21, 1963' Feb. 5, 1975' Aug. 11, 1983' Jul. 3, 1958 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 2, 1969' Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 28, 1990 Jul. 3, 1930 APALACHICOLA BAY, FL (See Section 2 of Text) Channel 18 feet deep through West Pass and Link Channels. Ten feet H. Doc. 422, 59th Cong., deep across the inner bar, and 9 feet deep through Bulkhead Shoals. Ist Sess. Modify project to provide for channel 10 feet deep from mouth of inner H. Doc. 106, 69th Cong., bar channel to Gulf via Link and West Pass Channels, and 10-foot 1st Sess. depth in Bulkhead Shoals Channel. At Eastpoint, Fl., a channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet H. Doc. 156, 82d Cong., long, parallel to shore, with connecting channel 6 feet deep, and 100 feet Ist Sess. wide to St. George Sound, and at Apalachicola, Fl., a small-boat basin 200 feet and 9 feet deep, with a connecting channel 9 feet deep and 80 feet wide through Scipio Creek to the Apalachicola River. Modify project to provide for a channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from H. Doc. 557, 82d Cong., the 10-foot depth in Apalachicola Bay across St. George Island to within 2d Sess. 300 feet of the Gulf shore, thence increasing uniformly in width to 200 feet at shore and continuing at this width to the 10-foot depth in the Gulf, with two jetties extending from the dune line on St. George Island to the outer end of channel, and for abandonment of West Pass Channel upon completion of of channel through St. George Island. Modify improvement of Apalachicola Bay, Fl., authorized by River and Harbor Act of Sept. 3, 1954 to provide that the Secretary of the Army shall reimburse local interests for such approved work as they may have done based upon the reduction in the amount of material which will have to be removed to provide project dimensions at such time as Federal dredging of the channel is undertaken. A channel 6 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 1 mile long, parallel to DPR (Sec. 107) shore at Two Mile, Fl., with a 6-by 100-foot connecting channel to water of the same depth in Apalachicola Bay. A channel 6 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from the eastern DPR (Sec. 107) end of the existing Two Mile channel and generally paralleling the shoreline for a distance of about 9,000 feet to intersect with the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway about 1,650 feet south of Gorrie Bridge at Apalachicola, and a breakwater built to elevation 4.0 feet above mean low water along the seaward side of the existing channel parallel to the shore at Two Mile. The total length of the breakwater of about 6,150 feet, includes two 860-foot legs paralleling the existing entrance channel. Modify Eastpoint project to include breakwaters with a DPR (Sec. 107) total length of 5,300 feet. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (See Section 4 of Text) Aquatic plant control for N.C., S.C., Ga., Fl., Al., Ms., H. Doc. 37, 85th Cong., and La. 1st Sess. Research and planning costs to be borne by U.S. Public law 87-874 87th Cong. Provided for continued research. H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. Increased non-federal cost-sharing from 30% to 50%. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) BAYOU CODEN, AL (See Section 5 of Text) Channel 4 by 40 feet. H. Doc. 824, 77th Cong., Channel 8 by 60 feet to connect with Bayou La Batre 2d Sess. channel. DPR (Sec. 107) BAYOU LA BATRE, AL (See Section 6 of Text) A 12- by 100-foot channel from that depth in Mississippi Sound to a H. Doc. 327, 88th Cong., point about 2,800 feet south of the highway bridge, thence a channel 2d Sess. 12 by 75 feet to the bridge, an overall distance of about 33,500 feet. Deepen existing channel to 18 feet to the bridge; to 14 feet Water Resources above bridge, and into Snake Bayou at a depth of 12 feet. Development Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-640) BILOXI HARBOR, MS (See Section 7 of Text) Channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mississippi Sound H. Doc. 754, 69th Cong., west and north of Deer Island to deep water in Back Bay of Biloxi. 2d Sess. 10-34 TABLE 10-B (Continued) MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 20, 1938 Relocation of channel. H. Doc. 639, 75th Cong., Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Nov. 7, 1966 Mar. 28, 1979' Aug. 15, 1985 Jul. 5, 1884 Mar. 3, 1899 Sep. 19, 1890 Sep. 19, 1890 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1909 Aug. 22, 1911 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 Entrance channel 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide into Old Fort Bayou. Entrance channel 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide through Cranes Neck into Bayou Bernard. Maintain channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide from Biloxi Harbor to Ott Bayou. Continuous channel 12 feet deep from Mississippi Sound the Air Force terminal on Bayou Bernard via Back Bay and Cranes Neck. A 23-mile-long through channel 12 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through: Mississippi Sound, Biloxi Bay (east of Deer Island), Back Bay, Big Lake, and via land cut to Gulfport Lake, including a 500 by 2,600-foot turning basin in the lake, thence, a channel 12 by 100 feet from the western end of Gulfport lake for about 2 miles to a 300- by 500- foot turning basin; adoption for maintenance of a 12- by 150-foot spur channel from the main channel in Biloxi Bay, westward about 1 mile to a 400- by 600-foot turning basin opposite Ott Bayou, and abandonment of the existing 6- by 40-foot channel into Ott Bayou; continuation of maintenance of the 12- by 150-foot lateral channel westward about 2.2 miles from the main channel in Biloxi Bay to a point opposite Oak Street; continuation of maintenance of the channel west of Deer Island. A channel 10 feet deep; 100 feet wide and 300 feet long extending northward from the Biloxi Lateral Channel and, into a rectangular basin approximately 300 feet by 370 feet. A channel 12-feet deep; 130-feet wide and 2,100-feet long, and a 300 by 300 foot turning basin also to a 12-foot depth. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL (See Section 8 of Text) Original appropriation for improving Black Warrior River. Original project for slack-water improvement authorized by Secretary of War, Apr. 19, 1887 Construction of the first locks between Tuscaloosa and Demopolis. (Maintenance of the section of Tombigbee River below lock 1 to its mouth (66 miles) included in the existing project.) Construction of locks and dams, 1, 2, and 3. Merging of the individual project for the Black Warrior and Warrior Rivers and the Tombigbee River below Demopolis Construction of locks and dams 14, 15, 16, and 17. Provides for reconstruction of obsolete structures, modified in plan and location, to provide efficient and economical maintenance and operation. Lift of lock 17 changed to 63 feet, and construction of locks and dams 18 and 19 eliminated from the project. Extension of slack-water improvement on Sanders Ferry on Mulberry Fork and Nichols Shoal on Locust Fork. Raising of various dams 2 feet and raising the lock walls 2 feet at lock 1 to provide a minimum depth of 8 feet at low water, widening the channel to 150 feet where practicable. For snagging Mobile River from the mouth of Chickasaw Creek to the junction of the Alabama and Tombigbee Rivers. 3d Sess. H. Doc. 258, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 326, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 256, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 271, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 513, 89th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) DPR (Sec. 107) Annual Report, 1887, pt. 2, p. 1302. H. Doc. 178, 56th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1901, pt. 3, p. 1858 H. Doc. 165, 57th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report, 1902, p. 1293 Public Law 317 H. Doc. 72, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1918, P. 876 H. Doc. 728, 71st Cong., 3d Sess. 10-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 26, 1934 Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Dec. 21, 1982 Jul. 30, 1983 Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 18, 1986 Aug. 15, 1985 Nov. 17, 1986 May 16, 1963' Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 16, 1991 Increase channel dimensions to 9 by 200 feet; construct crest gates at lock and dam 17; add flashboards at all dams; Sunflower Bend Cutoff. Construction of a lock and dam below Tuscaloosa to replace original locks and dams 10, 11, and 12. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers harbors. Recreation facilities. Construction of a lock and dam near Demopolis to replace existing dams 4, 5, 6, and 7. Provide increased spillway capacity at dam 1. Coffeeville Lock and Dam Wildlife Refuge. Provides for a wider navigation opening at the Franklin Ferry Bridge, Jefferson County, Al. Authorized to widen, as necessary for safe passage, the navigation opening of Franklin Ferry Bridge, Jefferson County, Al. Conduct a feasibility study of protection from erosion problems on the southern bank from river mile 253 to river mile 255. JACKSON PORT, AL (See Section 8A of Text) Construct a spur canal 9 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 1000 feet long in conjunction with the realignment project on the existing navigation proejct. (Jackson Port) OLIVER LOCK AND DAM (REPLACEMENT), AL (See Section 8B of Text) Construction and land acquisition for Oliver Lock Replacement Construction of a lock and dam to replace the William Bacon Oliver Lock and Dam. BON SECOUR RIVER, AL (See Section 9 of Text) A 10- by 100-foot channel from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Bon Secour Bay to mouth of Bon Secour River and extending up river to vicinity of Swift's Landing, thence 6 by 80 feet up river to a point 600 feet above Oak Landing, with two turning and maneuvering areas 150 feet wide and 1,100 and 1,200 feet long opposite Swift's Landing and ice loading dock. Overall length of improvement is about 4.7 miles. DAUPHIN ISLAND BAY, AL (See Section 10 of Text) A channel 7 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Mobile Bay to an anchorage basin of same depth, about 7 acres in area, in marsh just north of Fort Gaines on Dauphin Island; a channel 4 feet deep and 40 feet wide from anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay; and a jetty and revetment to protect entrance channel; and (b) an anchorage basin 7 feet deep and 500 feet square at Dauphin Island Village, with an entrance channel of like depth, 100 feet wide and about 8,300 feet long, extending to 7-foot hydrographic contour in Mississippi Sound. Deepen existing 4-foot channel to 7-feet and 40-feet wide from anchorage basin to Dauphin Island Bay. 10-36 H. Doc. 56, 73d Cong., Ist Sess., and Rivers and Harbors and Committee Doc. 45 73d Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26. 74th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 276, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 382, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. S. Doc. 50, 86th Cong., Ist Sess. Public Law 97, 377 Public Law 98-63 Water Resource Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1987 (P.L. 99-591) The Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 333, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 394, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) TABLE 10-B (Continued) Acts Jun. 23, 1993 May 19, 1969' Jul. 3, 1930 Oct. 24, 1951 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 1, 1980 May 17, 1950 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 23, 1942 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Provides 400 feet of stone protection along the shoreline near the pier and erosion protection for shoreline in the immediate vicinity of Fort Gaines. DOG AND FOWL RIVERS, AL (See Section 11 of Text) To provide small craft navigation on west side of Mobile Bay. EAST PASS CHANNEL FROM GULF OF MEXICO INTO CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY, FL (See Section 12 of Text) Maintenance of 6-foot channel by 100-foot channel from Choctawhatchee Bay into Gulf. Maintenance of 12-foot channel from Choctawhatchee Bay into Gulf, and maintenance of 6-foot channel into Old Pass Lagoon. Construction of twin jetties. (Present project dimensions.) Modifications to provide a channel length of approximately 3,800 feet in lieu of 2,000 feet from the East Pass Channel into Old Pass Lagoon, with no changes in width and depth. FLY CREEK, FAIRHOPE, AL (See Section 13 of Text) A channel 6 feet deep, 80 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long from 6-foot depth in Mobile Bay to a turning basin of same depth, 100 feet wide and 350 feet long, in Fly Creek. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL, AND MEXICAN BORDER (Mobile District) (See Section 14 of Text) APALACHICOLA RIVER TO ST. ANDREW BAY, FL A channel 5 feet deep at mean low water and 65 feet wide at the bottom. A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY TO WEST BAY, FL A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. A channel 6 feet deep at mean low water, with no reference to width. CHOCTAWHATCHEE BAY TO PENSACOLA BAY, FL A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. PENSACOLA BAY, FL, TO MOBILE BAY, AL A channel 9 feet deep at mean low water and 100 feet wide at the bottom. MOBILE BAY, AL, TO NEW ORLEANS, LA A channel 300 feet wide and 10 feet from the 10 foot contour in Mobile Bay to the 10-foot contour in Mississippi Sound. A channel 100 feet wide and 9 feet deep from Lake Pontchartrain to Mississippi Sound. APALACHEE BAY, FL, TO NEW ORLEANS, LA A channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide at mean low water, except in the section between Mobile, Al., and New Orleans, La., where the width is to be 150 feet. 10-37 .+ .. . Documents DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 209, 70th Congress 1st Sess. H. Doc. 470, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 194, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. Energy and Water Development Appropriation H. Doc. 194, 81st Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 670, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 52. 72d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 259, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 565, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 42, 73d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 42, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 71st Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 341, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Public Law 675, 77th Cong., 2d Sess., and H. Doc. 96, 79th Cong., Ist Sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Conditional acquisition of Gulf County Canal, Fl. and enlargement of the canal to 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide. Jun. 17, 1943 Mar. 2, 1945 May 17, 1950 Nov. 7, 1966 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 23, 1930 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 3, 1958 Aug. 15, 1985 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Construction of a movable span in the Georgia, Florida & Alabama R.R. bridge crossing the Ochlockonee River. Abandonment and closure of original channel between Big Lagoon and Pensacola Bay and construction of a new channel to enter the bay north of original entrance. Authorized enlargement of Gulf County Canal to 12 by 125 feet. GULFPORT HARBOR, MS (See Section 15 of Text) A channel 19 feet deep and 300 feet wide from the anchorage basin at Ship Island to Gulfport, Ms., and an anchorage basin next to the shore end 19 feet deep and not less than 2,640 feet by 1,320 feet in area. Combined Ship Island Pass with Gulfport Harbor project. Increased depth to 26 feet and width to 300 feet across Ship Island Bar and depth to 19 feet in channel from anchorage basin at Ship Island to anchorage basin at Gulfport. Authorized relocation of channel across Ship Island Bar. Increased depth to 27 feet and width to 300 feet across Ship Island Bar, 26 feet deep and 220 feet wide through Ms. Sound and depth of 26 feet in the anchorage basin at Gulfport. Increased depth of 32 feet and width to 30 feet across Ship Island Bar, 30 feet deep and 220 feet wide through Ms. Sound and a depth of 30 feet in the anchorage basin at Gulfport. Maintenance of the existing commercial small-boat harbor and an approach channel 100 feet wide and 4,300 feet long, from deep water in Ms. Sound to the small-boat basin, all at a depth of 8 feet. Modify the existing Ship Channel to 36 x 300 feet in Mississippi Sound, and 38 x 400 feet across the bar, with changes in the channel alignment and the entrance to the anchorage basin for safe and unrestricted navigation. Modification of FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act. Dredged material from project shall be disposed of in open water in the Gulf of Mexico in accordance with all provisions of Federal law. Modify of WRDA of 1986 and authorize disposal of dredged material in open waters of the Gulf of Mexico; and by Thin-layer disposal in Mississippi Sound under a demonstration program. MOBILE HARBOR, AL (See Section 16 of Text) For improvement of Threemile Creek by snagging from Mobile River to the Industrial Canal. Adoption of existing channel through Garrows Bend from Choctaw Point in Arlington pier, 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide, with 2 turning basins. Adoption of the existing channel alongside Arlington pier from the of Garrows Bend Channel, 27 feet deep and 150 feet wide. A channel 25 feet deep and generally 500 feet wide in Mobile River from the highway bridge to the mouth of Chickasaw Creek, then 25 feet deep and 250 feet wide in Chickasaw Creek to a point about 400 feet below Shell Bayou. 10-38 H. Doc. 257, 76th Cong., 1st Sess., and Public Law 75, 78th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 442, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 325, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 89-789, 89th Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 120, 55th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 2, 60th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 692, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 112, 81st Cong., Ist Sess. S. Doc. 123, 84th Cong., 2d Sess. The Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (P.L. 100-676) Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 69, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 739, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. TABLE 10-B (Continued) MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 26, 1970 (SR) Dec. 15, 1970 (HR) Aug. 15, 1985 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 Mar. 23, 1967' Jun. 14, 1972 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 4, 1915 Enlarging Mobile Bay Channel to 42 by 600 feet. Enlarging Mobile Bay Channel to 40 by 400 feet. Deepening Mobile River Channel below highway bridge to 40 feet over present widths, including existing turning basin and anchorage areas. Widening river channel opposite Mazagine Point to provide a 40- by 800- by 1,400-foot turning basin. The turning basin was further modified for maintenance by SAD letter of November 27, 1973 under authority contained in ER-1130-2-307 to increase the turning basin's dimensions to 1000' by 1600'. Closure of Garrows Bend Channel by construction and operation of an earth-filled causeway across said channel (work to be done by local interests). To provide a channel 40 feet deep and 400 feet wide from the main ship channel in Mobile Bay and extending northwesterly for about 5.3 miles to the shore of Mobile Bay including an anchorage and turning basin near the shoreline, thence a land-cut 40 feet deep, 300 feet wide and about 1.9 miles long to and including a trapezoidal turning basin 40 feet deep and approximately 42 acres, 40 feet deep; a barge channel 12- by 100-feet extending 6500-feet and terminating in a 300-foot by 300-foot terminal basin. Deepen and widen entrance channel over the bar to 57 by 700 feet, a distance of about 7.4 miles, deepen and widen Mobile Bay Channel from mouth of bay to south of Mobile River, 55 by 550 feet, a distance of about 27.0 miles, deepen and widen an additional 4.2 miles of Mobile Bay Channel to 55 by 650 feet, provide 55 foot deep anchorage area and turning basin in vicinity of Little Sand Island, and construct a 1710 acre disposal area adjacent to the Brookley Industrial Complex. Modification of FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act. Dredged material from project shall be disposed of in open water in the Gulf of Mexico in accordance with all provisions of Federal law. PANAMA CITY BEACHES, FL Shoreline protection to provide a 110-foot wide beach with an artificial dune system and stabilization of vegetation. PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL (See Section 17 of Text) Channels 27 and 29 feet deep. Abandonment of project adopted by act of June 25, 1910. Maintenance of a channel in Watson Bayou 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in St. Andrew bay to the highway bridge. Channels 32 and 34 feet deep. A channel 8 by 100 feet in Grand Lagoon from St. Andrew Bay to a point about 2,400 feet east of State Highway 392. Bridge with branches to serve shore facilities which terminate at the bridge. Channels 38, 40, 42 feet deep. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS (See Section 18 of Text) Provides for through channel from the Gulf to mile 4 on Dog River 25 by 300 feet through Horn Island Pass, thence 22 by 225 feet across Mississippi Sound and up 150 feet in Pascagoula River above bridge, and up Dog River to mile 4, all subject to financial participation by local interests. Waived requirement for financial participation by local interests. H. Doc. 74, 83d Congress, 1st Sess. H. Doc. 74, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. (Under provision of Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control) The Supplemental Appropriations Act. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) H. Doc. 33, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 555, 76th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 559, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) H. Doc. 196, 92d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 682, 62d Cong., River and Harbor Committee Doc. 12, 63d Cong., 2d Sess. 10-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 14, 1960 Jul. 14, 1967 Oct. 23, 1962 Jul. 11, 1983' Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 27, 1962 H. Doc. 188, 81st Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 98, 96th Cong., Cutoff channel, 12 by 125 feet, from State Highway 63 bridge to mile 4 on Dog River, via Robertson and Bounds Lakes. Modification to provide for channel dimensions of 35 by 325 feet through Horn Island Pass, thence 30 by 275 feet across Mississippi Sound and up Pascagoula River to the railroad bridge, and a turning basin just below the bridge. Reimbursement of local interests for work done on Dog River cutoff ($44,000). Modification to provide for maintenance of 12- by 125-foot channel to mile 6 on Dog River, and maintenance of 30-by 225-foot side channel from main ship channel in Mississippi Sound to the mouth of Bayou Casotte, thence 30 by 300 feet in Bayou Casotte to a turning basin of the same depth 1 mile above the mouth. Deepening the Horn Island Pass channel to 38 feet and deepening the main ship channel in Mississippi Sound, the river channel to the railroad bridge, and the turning basin all to 33 feet. Enlarging Horn Island Pass Channel to 40 by 350 feet provision of an impounding area adjacent to and east of channel 40 feet deep, 200 feet wide, and about 1,500 feet long, enlarging main channel in Mississippi Sound and river channel to railroad bridge to 38 by 350 feet, and deepening turning basin in river and Bayou Casotte channels and basin to 38 feet. Modification to provide for channel dimensions 12 by 80 feet extending abut 2,750 feet from deep waters in the Pascagoula River into Krebs Lake to a turning basin, thence, along the south bank of the lake a channel with dimensions of 10 x 60 feet terminating at a second turning basin, a distance of about 2,750 feet. The project was constructed by hydraulic dredging with the disposal placed in an upland diked area. Deepen and widen gulf entrance channel to 44 by 550 feet; widen Horn Island channel to 600 feet, relocating that channel about 500 feet westwardly; deepen Mississippi Sound portion to 42 feet; widen and deepen Bayou Casotte to 42 by 350 feet and construct turning basin. Disposal of all new work material in Gulf of Mexico. PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL (See Section 19 of Text) A channel 30 feet deep at mean low water and 500 feet wide from the Gulf of Mexico to the dock line at the east end of the city of Pensacola, and also provided that $150,000 may be used in constructing or purchasing a seagoing suction dredge. Modified the existing project for the present inner channels and the deepening of the entrance channel to 32 feet. Improvements of Bayou Chico. Maintenance of the entrance channel from the Gulf of Mexico to lower Pensacola Bay, a distance of about 5 miles to dimensions of 35 feet feet deep and 500 feet wide; maintenance of a channel along the south side of the aircraft carrier mooring basin, a distance of about 2.5 miles, to dimensions of 33 feet deep and 300 feet wide; a bay channel 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and about 2.1 miles long; parallel approach channels to opposite ends of the inner-harbor channel, about 1.3 and 1.4 miles in length, each 33 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and flared at the junctions with the inner-harbor channel; and deepening the existing 500-foot wide inner-harbor channel to a depth of 33 feet and lengthening it to 3,950 feet. 10-40 H. Doc. 98, 86th Cong., Ist Sess. Chief of Engineers Report dated Nov. 3, 1960. H. Doc. 560, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) H. Doc. 253, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 96, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 528, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. TABLE 10-B (Continued) MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 24, 1946 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 8, 1995 Sep. 11, 1995 Sep. 10, 19872 Aug. 5, 1995 Jul. 14, 1995 Jun. 12, 1997 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 PERDIDO PASS CHANNEL, AL (See Section 20 of Text) A 12- by 150-foot channel stabilized by twin rubblemount jetties, from the Gulf of Mexico into Perdido Pass, thence 9 by 100 feet into Perdido Bay with a spur channel of the same dimensions into Terry Cove. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL AND MS (See Section 21 of Text) A waterway connecting Tennessee and Tombigbee Rivers via East Fork of Tombigbee River, Mackeys and Yellow Creeks. Plan of improvement consists of three sections: river section, 9- by 300-foot channel for 149 miles between Demopolis and Amory, Ms; canal section, 12 by 300 feet for 46 miles from Amory to Bay Springs; divide section, 12 by 300 feet (except in the 27 mile-long divide cut in which bottom width be 280 feet) for 39 miles from Bay Springs through dividing ridge to Tennessee. Total lift of 341 feet to be accomplished by 10 locks. Total length of project is 234 miles. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WILDLIFE MITIGATION (See Section 21A of Text) Acquire from willing sellers in a timely manner at fair market value 88,000 acres of land for mitigation of wildlife losses resulting from construction and operation of the project for the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway. BAYVIEW COURT, BAY ST. LOUIS, MS (See Section 28 of Text) Provide a 700 linear-foot concrete block revetment for beach erosion protection. CHOCTAWHATCHEE/PEA RIVERS, ELBA AND GENEVA, AL (See Section 29 of Text) Install fourteen (14) combination rain and stream gages within Choctawhatchee and Pea River Basins. ESLAVA CREEK, MOBILE, AL (See Section 30 of Text) Channel enlargement, bank stabilization measures, and increasing the size of the box culvert at Airport Boulevard by adding an additional barrel. HANCOCK COUNTY SEAWALL, HANCOCK CO, MS (See Section 31 of Text) Provide a 990-foot timber bulkhead, two (2) feet in front of an existing concrete seawall for shoreline protection. KING CREEK, TUPELO, MS (See Section 32 of Text) Provide riprap, sheet pile, and gabion slope and stream channel protection. SAINT LOUIS BAY, BAY ST. LOUIS, MS (See Section 33 of Text) Provide a 1,000 linear-foot concrete/sheetpile wall in front of an existing concrete seawall for beach erosion protection. OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS (See Section 34 of Text) Provides for a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, and recreation. SOWASHEE CREEK, MERIDIAN, MS (See Section 35 of Text) Channel enlargement, and clearing and snagging over a reach of 10.5 miles. One railroad bridge and several highway roads and bridges and utilities will require modification for the channel improvement. Development of recreation facilities. TIREEMILE CREEK, MOBILE, AL (See Section 36 of Text) Channel widening and deepening from about 2,000 feet downstream of Stone Street to a point about 6,300 feet upstream of Interstate 65 or a total distance of 5.6 miles. Development of recreational facilities. 10-41 H. Doc. 94, 88th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 486, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. Water Resource Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) DPR (Sec. 103) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 205) DPR (Sec. 14) DPR (Sec. 14) PDA (Sec. 14) H. Doc. 549, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 10-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 18, 1941 Jul. 23, 1958 Jul. 8, 1980 Oct. 13, 19882 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 Apr. 12, 1995 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 28, 1954 May 25, 1982 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Mar. 2, 1945 TOMBIGBEE RIVER (EAST FORK), MS AND AL (See Section 37 of Text) Provides for alleviation of floods from the Tombigbee River by clearing, snagging, and excavation of 13 cut-off channels, and other related channel improvements. TOMBIGBEE RIVER TRIBUTARIES, MS AND AL (See Section 38 of Text) Provides for improvement of 22 tributaries of Tombigbee River. Extends project limits on Twenty Mile Creek and eliminates local cooperation for this remedial work. UPPER GORDON CREEK, HATTIESBURG, MS (See Section 39 of Text) Real Estate acquisition of nine (9) residences; habitat mitigation and channel enlargement. VILLAGE CREEK, JEFFERSON COUNTY, BIRMINGHAM, AL (See Section 40 of Text) Basically nonstructural and includes evacuating 642 structures in six separate neighborhoods from floodplain; enlarge 2 miles of channel and relocate necessary facilities; Install flood warning devices. Authorized the Secretary to acquire private vacant lands within the definite project boundaries established in the Real Estate Design Memorandum as a nonstructural element of the project. WAVELAND SEAWALL, WAVELAND, MS (See Section 41 of Text) Provide a 1,008 linear-foot concrete/sheetpile wall segment, and a 500 linear-foot concrete/sheetpile wall in front of an existing concrete seawall. MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, AL AND GA (See Section 1 of Text) Provides for full development of Alabama-Coosa Rivers and tributaries for navigation, flood control, power, recreation, and other purposes. Authorized construction of Carters Lake, GA, Claibome Lock and Dam, AL, Jones Bluff Lock and Dam, AL, and Millers Ferry Lock and Dam, AL. Suspended comprehensive plan to permit non-Federal interests to develop Coosa River by constructing series of dams. Designated change of name from Jones Bluff to Robert F. Henry Lock and Dam. Modification to the plan for the Coosa River segment of the waterway between Montgomery and Gadsden, AL to carry out planning, engineering, and design in accordance with the Montgomery to Gadsden, Coosa River Channel, AL Design Memorandum No. 1, General Design, dated May 1982. ALLATOONA LAKE, COOSA RIVER BASIN, GA (See Section 45 of Text) Provides for dam and reservoir for flood control, regulation of stream flow for navigation, development of hydroelectric power and recreation. APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE AND FLINT RIVERS, AL, GA AND FL (See Section 3 of Text) Development of Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint Rivers for navigation, flood control, hydropower, and recreation. 10-42 Special Report on Record in Oct. (P.L. 222) 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 167, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. Supplemental Appropriations and Recession Act DPR (Sec. 205) 1980 (P.L. 96-304) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (P.L. 101-640) DPR (Sec. 14) H. Doc. 414, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 436, 83rd Cong. S.2034 97th Cong., 2d Sess. Water Resources Develoment Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) Public Law 228, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 674, 76 Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 342, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. TABLE 10-B (Continued) Acts Jul. 24, 1946 Dec. 22, 1944 Jan. 27, 1981' Nov. 17, 1986 Jul. 24, 1944 Jul. 24, 1946 Dec. 22, 1944 Dec. 22, 1944 May 19, 1953 Oct. 23, 1963 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Modified general plan for full development of Apalachicola, Chattahoochee, and Flint River System and authorized construction of Lake Sidney Lanier multipurpose reservoir. Authorized recreation facilities. Modified the existing project to provide for 9- foot deep by 100-foot wide side channel into the Apalachicola River Industrial Park, Blountstown, Fl. APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT Modified Rivers and Harbors Act of 1945 to restore and maintain access to bendways and interconnecting waterways in the course of routinue maintenance dredging; and to acquire lands for and to construct, operate, and maintain water-related public use and access facilities. LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA (See Section 46 of Text) Provision of recreation facilities. GEORGE W. ANDREWS LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA (See Section 3A of Text) Construction of high dam at Walter F. George site and low dam at George W. Andrews site. Provided recreation facilities. JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, GA AND FL (See Section 48 of Text) Provided for recreation facilities. WALTER F. GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL AND GA (See Section 51 of Text) Authorized construction of high dam at Walter F. George site and low dam at Columbia site. WEST POINT LAKE, CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER BASIN, GA AND AL (See Section 52 of Text) Authorized construction for flood control, power, recreation, fish and wildlife development, and streamflow regulation for downstream navigation. I. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 107 of 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 205 of Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under Section 14 of Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. 10-43 Documents H. Doc. 300, 80th Cong., Ist Sess. DPR (Sec. 107) Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662) H. Doc. 300, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Comm. on Public Works H. Doc. 570, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. " ~' REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 10-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1997 Full Report See Annual Operation Report For Construction Maintenance Blackwater River, FL 1981 $41,650 $330,433 Bluff Creek, MS' 1963 1,000 6,883 Cadet Bayou, MS 1984 87,921 1,461,915 Cahaba River, AL2 1894 45,000 Carrabelle Bar and Harbor, FL 1979 481,627 435,359 Choctawhatchee River, FL and AL 1973 171,885 291,694 Escambia-Conecuh Rivers, AL and FL 1981 208,499 1,168,862 Holmes Creek, FL 1931 8,562 36,800 LaGrange Bayou, FL 1972 289,496 187,089 Leaf and Chickasawhay River, MS 2 1919 23,090 42,676 Noxubee River, MS' 1902 47,528 14,472 Ochlockonee (Ochlockney) River, GA and FL' 2 1900 5,000 Old Town Creek' 2 1887 3,000 Oostanaula and Coosawattee River, GA' 2 1907 32,656 Panacea Harbor, FL 1979 122,383 106,446 Pascagoula River, MS 1956 15,000 179,535 Pass Christian Harbor, MS 1976 59,313 823,385 Port St. Joe Harbor, FL 1984 1,960,862 2,965,283 Removing Water Hyacinths 1984 - 1,100,471 St. Marks River, FL 1965 1,710,809 87,379 Tallapoosa River, AL 2 1893 43,972 Tombigbee River at Columbus Port, MS 1988 500,500 Upper Chipola River, FL from Marianna to its' mouth' 2 1941 36,781 63,193 Wolf and Jordan Rivers, MS 1979 29,195 481,515 1. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. 2. Uncompleted portion of project deauthorized by H. Doc. 96-157, Ist Session. TABLE 10-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECT For Last Cost to September 30, 1997 Full Report See Annual Operation Report For Construction Maintenancez Harrison County, MS, shore protection' 1953 $1,133,000 Panama City Beaches, FL Underway 92,556 1. Completed. 2. Operation and maintenance is the responsibility of local interests. 10-44 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT Alabama River at Montgomery. AL' Armuchee Creek, GA Beaver Creek, Montezuma, GA Big Brown Creek, Prentiss Co., MS Biloxi River at Lorraine Road. Harrison County, MS Black Creek. Gadsden, AL Black Warrior River, U.S. Hwy. 11 Bridge, Fosters. AL Boggy Bayou, Valparaiso. FL Boligee Canal, Boligee, AL Burketts Creek, Amory, MS Chattahoochee River, Eufaula, AL Chickasaw Bogue Creek, U.S. Highway 43 Bridge, Linden, AL Clanton, AL Collinsville. AL County Line Road Bridge, Itawamba Co.. MS County Road 55. Etowah Co., AL Cribbs Mill Creek, Tuscaloosa. AL Dauphin Island Shoreline, AL East End Dauphin Island, AL Fort Toulouse, Wetumpka, AL Gadsden Water Treatment Plant. AL Gotxdfxxod Creek. Chickasaw Co.. MS Gordons Creek. Hattiesburg, MS Gulf Breeze, Santa Rosa Co.. FL Highway 39 Bridge, Gainesville, AL Hintonville Road Bridge, Perry Co., MS Houlka Creek, Chickasaw & Clay Counties. MS Houston School Rd. Bridge, Itawamba Co., MS Hurricane Creek, Prentiss Co.. MS Interstate 59 Bridges, Fosters. AL Lake Douglas, Decatur County, GA Leaf and Bowie Rivers, Hattiesburg, MS Leaf River, County Road Bridge, Mahned. MS Little Cove Creek. Glencoe, AL Magby Creek, Columbus, MS Martin Creek, Prentiss County, MS Mill Creek, Dalton. GA Mill Creek, Sumrall, MS Mound State Park, Moundville, AL Murder and Burnt Corn Creeks, Brewton, AL Murder Creek, Brewton, AL Murder Creek. East Brewton. AL Noxubee River Relief Bridge, Shuqualak. MS Old Hwy. 82 Bridge, Columbus, MS Osborne Creek. Highway 362 Bridge. Prentiss County. MS Portersville Bay East. Mobile Co.. AL Prattville. Autauga Creek, AL Proctor Creek. Atlanta, GA Pumpkinvine Creek. Emerson, GA Raccoon Creek, Baconton, GA Rome, Coosa River, GA Sewerline Protection, Valley, AL Silver Creek. Rome, GA Sope Creek. Marietta, GA Sowashee Creek, Meridian, MS Sun Creek, Okibbeha County, MS Tallabinella Creek, Chickasaw County, MS Tallahala Creek, Pascagoula River, MS Tallahalla Creek, Laurel, MS Tombigbee River Bridge #6, Monroe Co., MS Town Creek, Americus, GA Trim Cane Creek, Okibbeha County, MS Trussville, AL Twenty Mile Creek, Airport Road Bridge, Frankstown. MS West Point, Chattahoochee River, GA Whorton's Bend Road, Etowah Co., AL Wolf Creek. Highway 362 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS Wolf Creek, U.S. Highway 45 Bridge, Prentiss County, MS Yellow Jacket Creek, Hogansville, GA 1. Engineering, design, supervision, and administration (no construction work has been done. Includes $17,000 for pre-authorization studies.) 2. Operation and maintenance is the responsibility of local interests. 10-45 TABLE 10-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS .. ..... r..... For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1965 1966 1958 1987 1985 1953 1986 1994 1987 1984 1988 1985 1964 1940 1992 1996 1994 1996 1996 1994 1996 1988 1985 1991 1990 1991 1982 1988 1992 1987 1970 1990 1986 1991 1991 1988 1992 1994 1994 1980 1994 1986 1988 1987 1985 1996 1946 1994 1985 1994 1955 1989 1992 1990 1956 1984 1988 1988 1996 1996 1965 1984 1965 1986 1955 1991 1985 1986 1966 Constru $144,1 115,5 149,8 137,5 132,1 125,3 181,5 147,2 178,6 1,366,4 206,6 121,7 274,0 71,1 116,8 242,3 1,848.3 352,4 318,5 368,0 360,0 91,5 802.0 147,4 71,0 268,6 238,2 59,3 52,8 155,2 164,9 1,585,0 231,6 144,0 156,5 78,5 474,0 157,3 789,0 190,9 1,215,0 903,4 119,5 143,9 250,0 490,7 649,2 870,0 85,0 385,3 384,5 180,9 604,7 1,538,5 142,6 55,5 81,0 3,945,7 641,0 331,3 340,4 145,5 141,3 215,8 599,6 448,9 114,7 154,6 330,7 Cost to September 30, 1997 Operation tction Maintenance2 94 47 115 00 74 ;89 00 !00 00 154 i00 f18 )24 19 00 48 27 179 80 )00 00 00 )26 132 00 591 19 00 03 !00 )98 00 18 )47 08 00 )65 40 )00 )74 00 174 00 36 )00 50 .80 00 )29 00 50 )37 19 :55 37 69 00 57 )58 23 09 19 34 60 '37 56 53 41 34 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 DEAUTHOR Year ol Project Type Full Rt Bayou Galere, MS' Navigation 194 Buttahatchee Creek, MS2 Flood Control 198 (Auth. P.L. 96-304) GIWW; Apalachicola Bay to Navigation 198 St. Marks River, FL Lazer Creek Lake, GA Hydroelectric power 198 Little Browns Creek, AL2 Flood Control 198 (Auth. P.L. 96-304) Lower Auchumpkee Creek, Hydroelectric power 198 GA Noxubee River, MS2 Flood Control 198 (Auth. P.L. 96-304) Pensacola Harbor Modification, FL Navigation 198 Sipsey River, AL: Flood Control 198 (Auth. P.L. 96-304) Tombigbee River, AL & MS2 Flood Control n/a (Auth. 1941 Act) Westfork, MS2 Flood Control 198 (Auth. P.L. 96-304) 1. H. Doc. 96-157 deauthorized uncompleted portions of certain projects as shown in Table 10-C. 2. Deauthorized tributaries of Tombigbee River improvements. TABLE 10-H TABLE 10-G NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Study Ocean Springs Harbor, MS Ochlockonee Bay, Wakulla Co., FL Oostanaula and Coosa Rivers, GA Section 107 Coordination Account Total Authority 107 107 107 107 10-46 (IZED PROJECTS f Last Deauthorization eport Document 46 H. Doc. 192, 94th Cong., I st Sess., as amended. 89 Public Law 99-662 99th Congress 86 Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress 86 Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress 89 Public Law 99-662 99th Congress 86 Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress 89 Public Law 99-662 99th Congress 86 Public Law 99-662 99th Congress 89 Public Law 99-662 99th Congress Public Law 99-662 99th Congress 89 Public Law 99-662 99th Congress Date Date Deauthorized Aug. 5, 1977 Jul. 9, 1995 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Jul. 9, 1995 Nov. 17, 1986 Jan. 1, 1990 Nov. 17, 1986 Jan. 1, 1990 Jan. 1, 1990 Jan. 1, 1990 Fiscal year 1997 Costs 8,151 0 39 414 8,604 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Fiscal year Study Authority 1997 Costs Big Escambia Creek, Escambia, AL 205 19,750 Black Warrior River, North Port, AL 205 126,983 Choctawhatchee and Pea Rivers, AL & FL 205 84,459 Flint River, Albany, GA 205 107,374 Kinchafoone Creek, GA 205 54,809 Muckalee Creek, GA 205 1,000 Sand Creek, Tupelo, MS 205 43,783 Section 205 Coordination Account 205 3,697 Calhoun Co. Highway 77, AL 14 12,036 Leaf River Bridge, Green Co., MS 14 13,241 Pensacola Bay, Shoreline Dr., Gulf Breeze, FL 14 1,178 River Road, Pascagoula River, MS 14 99,022 Tombigbee River, Spring St. 14 36,516 Section 14 Coordination Account 14 6,613 Total $610,461 10-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 10-K RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Cost During Project Fiscal Year Shoals - Airborne Lidar Bathymetry $2,755,000 Channel Condition Surveys on Florida projects 182,326 Channel Condition Surveys on Alabama & Mississippi projects 165,133 Project Condition Surveys, General 14,656 Total $, 117,115 TABLE 10-L ALABAMA-COOSA RIVERS, AL AND GA DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED UNDER EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 1 of Text) Claiborne Millers Ferry Robert F. Henry Carters Allatoona Proposed Structures Lock and Dam Lock and Dam Lock and Dam Lake Dam3 Dam Miles above mouth of river 81.1' 42.2' 245.4' 26.82 47.84 Nearest town Claiborne, AL Camden, AL Benton, AL Carters, GA Cartersville, GA Distance (miles) 7 10 3 2 4 Greatest lock length available for full width (feet) 600 600 600 Width of lock chamber (feet) 84 84 84 Maximum lift (feet) 30 48 47 Elevation of normal pool surface (mean sea level) 35 80 125 1072 840 Depth over sills at low water (feet) 13 Upper 15 Upper 15 Lower 13 Lower 12 Character of foundation Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock Kind of spillway Gated and Gated Gated Gated Gated Fixed Crest Height of dam (feet) 95.5 99.5 94 451 190 Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Rock-fill Concrete Earth Core Total reservoir capacity (acre-feet) 96,360 331,800 234,200 472,800 670,050 Power development (kw) - 75,000 68,000 500,000 74,000 Percent complete 100 100 100 100 100 Cost to date:5 $27,997,450 $63,125,300 $83,360,800 $111,140,340 $35,709,085 1. Above mouth of Alabama River (river miles). 2. Above mouth of Coosawattee River (river miles). 3. Reregulation dam (Carters) 25.3 (river miles). 4. Above mouth of Etowah River (river miles). 5. Includes cost of added recreation facilities as shown in Table 10A. 10-48 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-M APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE, AND FLINT RIVERS, AL, GA, AND FL, LOCKS AND DAMS AND MULTIPLE-PURPOSE DEVELOPMENT INCLUDED IN EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 3 of Text) Existing Projects Jim George W. Walter F. Buford Dam Woodruff Andrews George Lake Lock Lock Lock West Point Sidney and Dam and Dam and Dam Lake Lanier Miles above mouth 107.61 46.52 75.02 201.42 348.32 Nearest town Chattahoochee, FL Columbia, AL Ft. Gaines, GA West Point, GA Buford, GA Distance (miles) 1 1 2 2.8 5 Greatest lock length 450 450 450 - - and available for full width (feet) Width of chamber (feet) 82 82 82 - - Maximum lift (feet) 33 25 88 - - Elevation of normal pool 77 102 190(Summer) 635(Summer) 1071(Summer) surface (msl) 185(Winter) 625(Winter) 1070(Winter) Depth over sills at low 14 13 13 - - water (feet) Character of foundation Limestone Limestone Limestone Rock Rock Kind of spillway Fixed-gated Fixed-gated Gated Gated Fixed Height of dam (feet) 67 72 114 95 192 Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Earth and Earth and Earth and Earth Total reservoir capacity 367,300 18,180 934,400 604,500 2,554,000 (acre-feet) Power-development 30,000 - 130,000 73,375 86,000 (kilowatts) Percent complete 100 100 100 100 100 100 Year opened to navigation 1954 1962 1963 - - Cost to date:3 $50,459,0015 $13,038,427 $99,263,553' $131,565,760 $53,030,038 1. Above mouth of Apalachicola River (river miles). 2. Above mouth of Chattahoochee River (river miles). 3. Includes cost of added recreational facilities as shown in Table 10-A. 4. Includes $333,198 cost of land for wildlife refuge and $10,932,884 for major rehabilitation. 5. Includes $2,480,143 for major rehabilitation. 10-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 10-N BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL (See Section 8 of Text) Armistead William John Hollis Coffeeville Demopolis Selden Bacon Oliver Holt Bankhead Lock Lock Lock Lock & Dam Lock Lock and Dam and Dam and Dam (Replacement) and Dam and Dam' Miles above Mobile2 116.7 213.2 261.1 337.7 347.0 365.5 Nearest town (Alabama) Coffeeville Demopolis Eutaw Tuscaloosa Tuscaloosa Tuscaloosa Distance (miles) 3 (within city) 6 15 (within city) 6 30 Lock: Grestest length available for full width (feet) 600 600 600 600 600 600 Width of chamber (feet) 110 110 110 110 110 110 Maximum lift (feet) 34 40 22 28 64 68 Depth over sills at low water (feet) 13.0 13.0 13.2 18.0 13.0 14.0 Character of foundation Rock Rock Sand, clay Hard shale Shale, Sandstone sandstone Kind of spillway Fixed-Gated Fixed Gated Fixed Gated Gated Type of construction Lock Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Dam Concrete Concrete Earth-Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Year completed 1965 1962 1962 1934 1969 1985 Year opened to navigation 1960 1954 1957 1991 1966 1975 Actual cost of lock and dam3 $21,597,264 $19,774,583 $13,295,553 $123,835,857 $28,100,000 $52,292,880 1. Single lift lock. 2. Navigation mileage from foot of Government Street, Mobile, Ala. 3. Excludes cost of adding recreation facilities. 4. Scheduled. 10-50 MOBILE, ALABAMA, DISTRICT TABLE 10-0 TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, ALABAMA AND MISSISSIPPI (See Section 21 of Text) Existing Projects Gainesville Aliceville Columbus Aberdeen Lock A Lock B Lock C Lock D Lock E Bay Lock Lock Lock Lock and and and and and Loc and Dam and Dam and Dam and Dam Spillway Spillway Spillway Spillway Spillway and Miles above mouth' 266 307 335 358 371 376 39 398 407 412 Nearest town Gainesville, AL Aliceville, AL Columbus, MS Aberdeen, MS Amory, MS Smithville, MS Fulton, MS Fulton, MS Belmont, MS Tup Greatest lock length 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 available for full width (feet) Width of Chamber (feet) 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 Maximum lift (feet) 36 27 27 27 30 25 25 30 30 84 Elevation of normal 109 136 163 190 220 245 270 300 330 (Sui pool surface (msl) (Wi Depth over sills at 15 15 15 15 15 18 18 18 18 18 low water (feet) Character of foundation Mooreville Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Eutaw Form. Gordo Form. Eutaw Form. Gordo Form. San Chalk Sand & Clay Sand & Clay Sand Lam. Sand Sand & Clay Clay Sand Clay and Kind of spillway Fixed & Fixed & Gated Gated Gated Gated Gated Gated Gated N/A Gated Gated Height of dam (feet) 56 57 57 57 46 48 53 52 44.5 103 Type of construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Con & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & Earth & E Total reservoir capacity 45,290 655 59,483 31,564 4,400 19,000 13,300 24,900 6,900 (Sui (acre-feet) (Wi Percent complete 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Year opened to 1978 1979 1981 1984 1985 1985 1985 1985 1985 198 navigation Estimated Cost $103,214,000 151,255,000 182,650,000 128,262,000 102,685,000 96,905,000 71,375,000 98,205,000 88,173,000 147 Cost to Date $100,010,600 143,190,800 174,620,500 112,620,200 92,190,500 93,106,700 62,197,000 89,610,800 76,917,700 130 1. Miles above Mobile, Alabama (Mile 0.00 is at Bankhead Tunnel on U.S. Highway 90). Springs k Dam elo, MS mmer) 414 nter) 409 dstone Shale icrete ?arth mmer) 180,000 nter) 143,000 5 ,000,000 1,398,000 10-51 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 10-P COMPLETED FLOOD INSURANCE STUDIES AND FLOOD HAZARD INFORMATION REPORTS FOR FY 1987 THRU FY 1997' Date Federal Study Requesting Agency Completed Cost Flood Insurance Studies Lauderdale County, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Mar 87 144,000 Houston County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 87 114,000 St. Clair County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jun 87 43,000 Marengo County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Nov 87 36,000 Greene County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Mar 88 18,550 Covington County, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 88 35,000 Pickens County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 88 50,000 Fulton County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) May 88 180,000 Monroe County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jun 88 33,000 Colquitt County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Sep 88 48,000 Murray County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Sep 88 68,000 Coffee County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 89 48,500 Montgomery County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jul 89 175,000 Clayton County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Nov 89 250,000 Jefferson County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Sep 91 397,000 Calhoun County, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Apr 91 200,000 Fayette County, GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jan 93 264,000 Tupelo, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jun 94 157,965 Mobile, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Nov 94 254,531 Tuscaloosa, AL Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jan 97 182,000 Dougherty Co., GA Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Feb 97 244,000 Meridian, MS Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Jan 96 119,000 Special Flood Hazard Information Rocky Creek and Basie Branch, MS Ellisville, MS Jan 87 $19,000 Springers Branch, MS Starkville, MS May 87 13,000 Dixie Creek, GA La Grange, GA Jun 87 15,000 Little Scooba Creek, MS Scooba, MS Jun 87 18,000 Fishpond Drain & Trib., GA Donalsonville, GA Dec 87 18,000 Dearmenville & Golden Springs, AL Anniston, AL Mar 88 9,000 Chickasawhay River, MS Quitman, MS Jun 89 19,000 Archusa Creek, MS Quitman, MS Jun 89 9,000 Leaf River, MS New Augusta, MS Sep 89 27,000 Shades Creek, AL Jefferson County, AL Sep 90 45,000 Turkey Creek, AL Jefferson County, AL Sep 91 7,000 Leaf River, MS Taylorsville, MS Sep 91 25,000 Oostanaula River, GA City of Rome, GA Jan 92 10,000 Coosa River, GA City of Rome, GA Jul 92 10,000 Big Wills Creek, AL Fort Payne, AL Aug 93 41,800 Dry Creek, AL Oneonta, AL Dec 93 25,000 Big Wills Creek, AL Valley Head, AL Nov 93 34,800 Coosa River, AL Wilsonville, AL May 95 35,000 Choctawhatchee River, FL Holmes County, FL Aug 95 3,000 Thompson Creek, MS Richton, MS Aug 96 44,000 Black Creek, MS Forrest Co., MS Aug 97 35,000 Leaf River, MS McLain, MS Sep 97 19,000 Tanyard Creek, AL Jasper, AL Oct 96 32,000 Cane Creek & Tribs, AL Oakman, AL May 97 45,000 Magby Creek, MS Lowndes Co., MS Apr 96 5,700 1. For list of reports completed by Mobile District for FY 1965 thru FY 1974, see FY 1974 Annual Report, page 10-50; reports completed in FY 1975 see FY 1975 Annual Report, page 10-44; and for reports completed in FY 1976 and FY 1977, see FY 1977 Annual Report, page 10-46. See page 10-48 FY 1978 Annual Report for FY 1978 reports, and see page 10-43 FY 1984 Annual Report for FY 1979 through FY 1984 reports. 10-52 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT * District comprises a portion of Louisiana, embraced in drainage basins tributary to Mississippi River and Gulf of Mexico, except Mississippi River above mile 325.5 above Head of Passes (AHP), drainage area of Ouachita- Black River Basin, and small eastern and western portions of Louisiana tributary to Pearl River and Sabine River and Lake. The New Orleans District territory encompasses 30,000 square miles. It includes sections of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from Lake Borgne Light 29 at the mouth of Pearl River to Sabine River, and the Passes of the Mississippi River. It exercises jurisdiction over flood control work on Mississippi River from mile 325.5 AHP to Gulf of Mexico; Atchafalaya River; and in Atchafalaya Basin; and maintenance of project navigation channel of Mississippi River below mile 325.5 AHP, under supervision of President, Mississippi River Commission (MRC), and Division Engineer, Mississippi Valley Division. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page Flood Control (cont.) Page 1. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, LA ..... 2. Mississippi River Ship Channel, Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA ............... 3. Navigation work under Special authorization .................... Flood Control 4. Comite River, LA (Diversion) ........ 5. Grand Isle and vicinity, LA .......... 6. Lake Pontchartrain and vicinity, LA, (hurricane protection) .............. 7. Lake Pontchartrain Stormwater Discharge Project, LA .............. 8. Larose to Golden Meadow, LA (hurricane protection) .............. 9. Mermentau River, Grand Chenier, LA ... 10. New Orleans to Venice, LA (hurricane protection) .............. 11. Southeast Louisiana Urban Drainage Project ........................ 12. Westwego to Harvey Canal, LA (hurricane protection) .............. 11-2 11-2 11-3 11-3 11-4 11-4 11-5 11-5 11-6 11-6 11-7 11-7 13. Inspection of completed flood control projects ........................ 11-8 14. Flood control work under special authorization .................... 11-8 15. Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection, and Restoration Act ............... 11-8 16. Environmental Work Under Special Authorization .................... 11-11 Tables Table 11-A Cost and Financial Statement ............... 11-12 Table 11-B Authorizing Legislation ...... 11-14 Table 11-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................. 11-19 Table 11-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........... 11-22 Table 11-E Deauthorized Projects ....... 11-23 Table 11-F Active General Investigations ............ 11-24 11-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 1. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, LA Location. In State of Louisiana and the territorial waters of the United States and extends from existing Inner Harbor Navigation Canal at a point 7,500 feet north of existing IHNC lock and about 11,000 feet from Mississippi River, to a turning basin south of Michoud, LA, and then as a land and water cut from turning basin south of Michoud, LA, southeasterly to and along south shore of Lake Borgne and through marshes to and through Chandeleur Sound to 38-foot contour in Gulf of Mexico. (Refer to NOAA Coast Charts Nos. 11340, 11360, 11363, 11369, 11371, and 11373. Also see MRC 1989 (57th edition) folio of maps, Mississippi River-Cairo, IL, to Gulf of Mexico, LA.) Existing project. Provides for a seaway canal, 36 by 500 feet, extending 76 miles as a land and water cut from Michoud southeasterly to and along south shore of Lake Borgne, and across Chandeleur Sound to Chandeleur Island and increasing gradually to 38 by 600 feet in Gulf of Mexico, with protective jetties at entrance, a permanent retention dike through Chandeleur Sound, and a wing dike along islands as required. It also provides for an inner tidewater harbor consisting of 1,000- by 2,000-foot turning basin 36 feet deep at landward end of seaway canal, and a connecting channel 36 by 500 feet wide extending easterly along Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from turning basin, including construction of a suitable highway bridge with approaches to carry Louisiana State Highway 47 (formerly 61) over channel. Plan further provides for future construction of a channel and lock in the vicinity of the existing lock to furnish an additional connection between tidewater harbor and Mississippi River. Estimated cost for new work (October 1997) is $549,800,000 Federal and $115,200,000 non-Federal. This does not include modification for Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Michoud Canal, which is reported separately. The Federal cost excludes $45,000 for aids to navigation by U.S. Coast Guard. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 11-4 of FY 1986 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. A public facility on the waterway is the Public Bulk Terminal of New Orleans constructed by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans, on left descending bank at Mile 63. Two container ship berths are in operation at the Industrial Canal end of the seaway. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor: The Final Evaluation Report was completed for the new lock and connecting channels feature. One dredging contract for removal of 6,500,000 cubic yards of material from the channel at a cost of $3,574,000, one contract to maintain south rock foreshore protection at a cost of $1,669,800, one contract to construct a northbank foreshore dike at a cost of $2,716,000, and one contract to begin repairs on the north jetty at a cost of $1,709,338 were awarded in FY 97. The first and second lifts of the north and south jetties are complete. In October 1996, Tropical Storm Josephine caused the MRGO to shoal to a 30 foot depth. Six contract hopper dredges and the Government hopper dredge McFarland were required to reopen the channel to project depth of 36 feet. Costs of the emergency operations were $18,185,000. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated March 1958. The channel unit is 90 percent complete and the shiplock unit is 0 percent complete. The total project is 75 percent complete. The channel was opened to navigation Jul. 25, 1963, and completed Jan. 20, 1968. Paris Road Bridge was opened to traffic Jul. 21, and completed Nov. 14, 1967. The foreshore protection, south bank, Chalmette Area, Station 367+00 to Station 1007+00 is complete. A Site in the Industrial Canal between Claiborne and Florida Avenues, north of the existing lock, has been identified as the location for the new lock. The recommended plan is a 36 ft. deep by 110 ft. wide by 1200 ft. long deep draft lock. The final report is scheduled to be approved in Nov. 97 with construction scheduled to begin in FY 99. 2. MISSISSIPPI RIVER SHIP CHANNEL, GULF TO BATON ROUGE, LA Location. The project is located in the southeastern portion of Louisiana below Baton Rouge, and consists of the Mississippi River and its major outlet to the Gulf of Mexico, Southwest Pass. Existing project. Provides more efficient deep-draft navigation access to the New Orleans and Baton Rouge reaches of the Mississippi River via Southwest Pass by enlarging the existing channel to a project depth of 55 feet and enlarging the adjacent channel along the left descending bank in New Orleans Harbor to a 40-foot 11-2 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT depth, a turning basin at Baton Rouge, and training works in the passes to reduce maintenance. Estimated cost of existing project (Oct. 1, 1997) is $167,000,000 Federal and $409,000,000 non-Federal. In addition, Coast Guard is to provide navigation aids at an estimated cost of $1,200,000. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on pages 11-2 and 11-3 of the FY 92 Annual Report. A third supplement to the LCA addressing the Permanent Saltwater Intrusion Mitigation Plan was executed on May 28, 1993. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) between the Government and the State of Louisiana was executed on Sep. 3, 1993 which provides for the dredging of a 45-foot channel from Mile 181 AHP to Baton Rouge. Terminal facilities. See Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico, LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction is underway on the permanent mitigation plan. The permanent mitigation plan consists of the Government constructing an underwater sill, when needed, at Mile 64 AHP to prevent the intrusion of saltwater into water supplies of the metropolitan New Orleans area. The plan also provides for upgrading the Plaquemines Parish water distribution system to provide fresh water to water treatment plants impacted by increased saltwater intrusion caused by the deeper channel. The first five contracts for the improvement of Plaquemines Parish water distribution system have been completed and one is underway. A supplemental LCA for this work was executed on May 28, 1993. We have initiated work on the General Design Memorandum for the remaining authorized features of the project. This includes the deepening of the Mississippi River to 55 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to Baton Rouge. Condition as of Sep. 30. The 45-foot channel is completed from the Gulf to Baton Rouge. Construction of the permanent mitigation plan is underway. Work on the General Design Memorandum for the remaining authorized features is underway. 3. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). Preauthorization studies costs for FY 97 were Vermilion River, LA, $956, Taylor Point Cut for $26,429; Bayou Petit Caillou, LA for $24,495; Section 107 Coordination Activities, $2,884; and Bayou Terrebonne, LA, $3,885. Preconstruction Engineering and design work costs for the Bayou Dularge, LA, project were $87,616. Flood Control 4. COMITE RIVER (DIVERSION), LA Location. In East Baton Rouge Parish, LA, between the Comite River and the Profit Island Chute of the Mississippi River, north of the town of Baker, LA, and south of the town of Zachary, LA. Existing project. The project will provide protection for residents of the Comite River Basin by reducing stages in the river below the diversion point for events up to the 100-year flood event,and containing within banks events up to the 10-year flood event. The authorized project consists of construction of an eight-mile diversion channel from the Comite River to an outfall into Lilly Bayou, and then a four-mile diversion along Lilly and Cooper Bayous to the Profit Island Chute of the Mississippi River. The project also includes a diversion structure in the new channel near the diversion point, a stage control structure and an outfall structure near and at the outfall into Lilly Bayou, and four control structures at the intersections of Whites, Cypress and Baton Rouge Bayous, the fourth near McHugh Road. A levee will be constructed of disposed material on the lower south bank of the new channel to assure against induced flooding on the south side, and clearing and snagging of White, Cypress and Baton Rouge Bayous north of the diversion channel. Mitigation for the project includes the planting of trees on cleared land near the diversion point and on portions of the disposal area, the protection and management of existing forested lands near the diversion point. Upgrading two gauging stations and installing six new gauging stations to assist in flood prediction is also included in the project. The current approved cost of the project is $164,000,000, including $101,288,000 Federal cost and $62,712,000 non-Federal cost. 11-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Local Cooperation. The cost sharing provisions contained in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 require that local interests shall: (a) Provide to the Federal Government all lands, easements, rightsof- way, and dredged material disposal areas, and perform the necessary relocations required for construction, operation, and maintenance of the project (Current estimate is $54,552,000); and (b) Provide to the Federal Government a cash contribution equal to 5 percent of the total cost of the project, excluding cultural resources (Current estimate is $8,160,000). The total cost of items (a) and (b) mentioned above is limited to 50 percent of the total cost of the project. Upon completion of the Feasibility Study, the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development signed a letter of intent to sponsor the project. Operations and results during the fiscal year. In FY 97 Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) efforts continued on the plans and specifications for the Lilly Bayou Control Structure. Condition as of Sep. 30. The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 reauthorized the project. Work on the initial set of plans and specifications is proceeding. Flood Control 5. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA Location. In south Jefferson Parish, LA, along the Gulf of Mexico, about 50 miles south of New Orleans and 45 miles northwest of Southwest Pass (Mississippi River). Existing project. The project provides protection from waves driven by hurricanes that have a frequency of recurrence of up to once in every 50 years. The plan consists of a berm and vegetated dune extending the length of Grand Isle's gulf shore and a jetty to stabilize the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. The dune has a 10-foot-wide crown at an elevation of 11.5 feet NGVD, 1 on 5 side slopes, and protective vegetation. The sandfill berm slopes from an elevation of 8.5 feet NGVD at the toe of the dune 180 feet gulfward to an elevation of 3 feet NGVD and, from this point, assumes its natural slope to the offshore bottom. The jetty provided by the plan has a top width of 6 feet at an elevation of 4 feet mean sea level, 1 on 2 side slopes, and extends approximately 3,600 feet along the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. Estimated cost of project (October 1991) is $20,933,000 Federal and $12,567,000 non-Federal, including $7,157,484 contributed funds. The repair and restoration of Grand Isle were accomplished by two separate contracts. The jetty extensions and sand bar removal contract (partial fix), was completed in early 1988. The dune repair and structural reinforcement contract was physically completed Sep. 4, 1991. An O&M Manual has been approved. The project has been turned over to the State of Louisiana for operation and maintenance. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 11-4 of the FY 92 Annual Report. An additional $4,750,000 was deposited in escrow to complete restoration of the dune which was completed on Sep. 4, 1991. Condition as of Sep. 30. The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 authorized construction of $17 million of additional improvements to the project subject to approval of a report justifying the improvements. Work has begun on preparation of the report. The project is in a deteriorated condition as a result of storm damage and the lack of maintenance. Local interests have initiated Phase I of their proposed repairs, but have not initiated Phase II. 6. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In southeastern Louisiana, vicinity of New Orleans, in St. Charles, Jefferson, Orleans, St. Bernard, and St. Tammany Parishes, comprising lower land and water area between the Mississippi River alluvial ridge and the Pleistocene escarpment to north and west. The dominant topographic feature is Lake Pontchartrain, a shallow tidal basin, about 640 square miles in area and averaging 12 feet deep, connecting with lesser Lake Maurepas to the west and through Lake Borgne and Mississippi Sound to the Gulf to the east. The lake drains about 4,700 square miles of tributary area. (Refer to Geological Survey quadrangles Yscloskey and Malheureaux Point, Drum Bay, Door Point, Lake Eugenie, Oak Mound Bayou, Mitchell Keys, Lake Eloi, and Morgan Harbor; Engineer quadrangles Slidell, Covington, Ponchatoula, Springfield, Denham Springs, Donaldsonville, Mt. Airy, Bonnet Carre', Spanish Fort, Chef Menteur, Rigolets, St. Bernard, New Orleans, and Hahnville; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1115 and 1116. Existing project. Provides protection to the greater New Orleans area and other communities bordering Lake Pontchartrain from the effects of hurricane-generated floods. The project is comprised of 11-4 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT two major features: The Chalmette Area Plan and the High Level Plan. The Chalmette Area Plan consists of a levee and floodwall system around the Chalmette area and along the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, with connections to the Mississippi River levees. The High Level Plan provides for heightening and strengthening the existing hurricane protection levee systems in Orleans Parish and the east bank of Jefferson Parish, repairing and rehabilitating the Mandeville Seawall in St. Tammany Parish; building a new mainline hurricane levee on the east bank of the St. Charles Parish just north of U.S. Highway 61 (Airline Highway); raising and strengthening the existing levee which extends along the Jefferson- St. Charles Parish boundary between Lake Pontchartrain and Airline Highway; and deferring construction of the proposed Seabrook lock until its feasibility as a feature of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet navigation project can be determined. Areas which will be enclosed by the levee and floodwall construction will be provided protection against tidal surge resulting from the Standard Project Hurricane (SPH). The estimated project cost for work (October 1997) is $506,000,000 Federal and $206,000,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 11-5 of the FY 92 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Preparation of design memorandums and plans and specifications continued by hired labor, Architect-Engineer Contractors, and the local sponsors. A change from the original Barrier Plan to the current high level plan was approved in February 1985 by the Office, Chief of Engineers. A draft mitigation report with corresponding EIS was prepared and distributed for public review on Mar. 16, 1988, and subsequently approved. The Louisiana Department of Natural Resources agreed to fund the Local Sponsor's share of mitigation and a mitigation dike was constructed in FY 97. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction started May 1967 and is 86 percent complete. In FY 98, we will initiate award of fifteen construction contracts, continue one ongoing construction contract, and complete five construction contracts. In FY 99, we will initiate award of three construction contracts, and complete sixteen construction contracts. 7. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN STORMWATER DISCHARGE PROJECT Location. The project is located on the east bank of the Mississippi River in Jefferson Parish, near New Orleans, Louisiana. Project Description. The project encompasses the design, construction, construction management, and monitoring of improvements to demonstrate a process that will reduce the impacts of stormwater discharges from Jefferson Parish on the water quality of Lake Pontchartrain. Features include: a 20,000 gpm stormwater pump station, sewer force main from the stormwater pump station to the existing Parish wastewater treatment plant, and modifications to the treatment plant. Local Cooperation. The project requires that the local sponsor provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and disposal areas (LERRD's) needed for project construction. The total of the local share must be a minimum of twenty-five percent of the project total, but not exceed fifty percent. Design and construction of modifications or additions to the Sponsor's facilities will be conducted by the facility owner under technical oversight by the Corps of Engineers. Section 307(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 provides for reimbursement to the Local Sponsor for work compatible with project requirements. Condition as of Sep. 30. Local interests are continuing design efforts, construction activities, and initiating preconstruction water quality monitoring activities. During FY 97, the Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed, which included language proposing that local interests receive credit for work done necessary for the project prior to the signing of the PCA. In FY 97, two contracts for construction of project features were awarded, and project management, technical oversight and construction activities continued. 8. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. In coastal section of Louisiana, along Bayou Lafourche, and includes lands on both banks of the bayou from Larose to 2 miles south of Golden Meadow. (Refer to Geological Survey quadrangles Cutoff, Lake Felicity, Bay Dosgris, Golden Meadow Farms, Bay Tambour, Mink Bayou, Caminada Pass, 11-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Leeville, Belle Pass, Pelican Pass, and Calumet Island; Engineer quadrangles New Orleans, Hahnville, Point a la Hache, Barataria, and Fort Livingston; and Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 1115 and 1116.) Existing project. Provides a loop levee about 40 miles long along both banks of Bayou Lafourche from Larose to South Golden Meadow; enlargement of 3 miles of existing levee at Golden Meadow; floodgates for navigation and hurricane protection in Bayou Lafourche at upper and lower bayou crossings; about 8 miles of low interior levees to regulate intercepted drainage. Estimated cost for new work (October 1997) is $80,000,000 Federal and $34,000,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 11-6 of the FY 92 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction contracts awards were delayed due to funding constraints. One 3rd Lift contract will be completed and another contract awarded in FY 98.. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction commenced in February 1972 and is 87 percent complete. 9. MERMENTAU RIVER, GRAND CHENIER, LA Location. Along the right descending bank of the Mermentau River near the town of Grand Chenier, Sections 3 and 4, Township 15 South, Range 6 West, Cameron Parish, Louisiana. Existing project. The authorized project consists of construction of approximately 2,000 feet of rock dike parallel to Parish Road 218 about 15 feet riverside of the road centerline. Fill material would be placed between the existing roadway tow and the newly constructed dike to replace the eroded shoreline. Both fill and stone material would be imported to the site. Local Cooperation. Local cooperation for this project is being supplied in accordance with the provisions of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. This act requires that the local interest shall: (a) Provide to the Government all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas, and perform the necessary relocations required for construction, operation and maintenance of the project (current estimate is $0); (b) Bear 25 percent of the first cost of the project (12.5 percent up front, 12.5 percent after completion, or repaid over 30 years). The Cameron Parish Police Jury has signed the Project Cooperation Agreement and is the local sponsor for this project. Operations and results during the fiscal year. In FY 96 construction was completed on this project. Condition as of Sep. 30. Final costs are $298,800 Federal and $89,000 non-Federal. 10. NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION Location. Includes land subject to inundation by hurricane tides extending along both banks of the Mississippi River below New Orleans from vicinity of Phoenix to Venice, LA. Existing project. Provides for improvements along Mississippi River below New Orleans, LA, for prevention of hurricane tidal flood damages by increasing heights of existing back levees and modifying existing drainage facilities where necessary in three separate reaches: Reach A, on the west bank from St. Jude to Tropical Bend, 18 miles, 4,340 acres protected; Reach B, on the west bank from Tropical Bend to Venice, 21 miles, 4,900 acres protected; and Reach C, on the east bank from Phoenix to Bohemia 16 miles, 5,470 acres protected, and raising the river levee on the west bank (MR&T levee) from St. Jude to Venice, to a grade high enough to prevent overtopping by tidal surges from the east, generally called the West Bank River Plan. Reach B was later divided into two units, Reach B-1 from Tropical Bend to Fort Jackson and Reach B-2 from Fort Jackson to Venice, LA, as a result of a request made by the local agency. Estimated cost of new work (October 1997) is $169,000,000 Federal and $72,000,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way including borrow areas and spoil disposal areas necessary for the construction of the project, at costs presently estimated at $8,632,000; accomplish all necessary alterations and relocations to roads, pipelines, cables, wharves, and other facilities required by the construction of the project at costs presently estimated at $6,132,000; bear 30 percent of the first cost, a sum presently estimated at $72,000,000, and cash contribution or equivalent work presently estimated at $57,236,000 to be paid either in a lump sum prior to initiation of construction or in installments prior to start of pertinent work items. 11-6 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT The local sponsor has requested that an area extending from the upstream limits of Reach A at City Price to St. Jude, Louisiana be incorporated into the project. This work involves upgrading 3.3 miles of existing non-Federal levees to project standards. The local sponsor has elected to pay all of the costs of this reach of levee. While the sponsor will not receive credit for these costs, the increased protected area would be eligible for Federally subsidized flood insurance. Savings to the project achieved by a portion of levee no longer being required at the upstream end of Reach A, will be creditable to the local sponsor. A Post Authorization Change report was prepared for this reach and was approved by the Lower Mississippi Valley Division on Mar. 6, 1992. Supplemental assurances for the City Price to St. Jude reach were accepted on Feb. 18, 1993. Assuring Agency: Plaquemines Parish Government. Assurances for all reaches of the project have been furnished. Requirements are described in full on page 11-7 of the FY 92 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction during FY 97 was initiated on two contracts, and completion of one other, and continuation of another contract. A second enlargement construction contract is scheduled for award in FY 98. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began on the project in September 1968 and the total project is approximately 73 percent complete. 11. SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA URBAN DRAINAGE PROJECT (FLOOD CONTROL) Location. The authorized project is located in Orleans, Jefferson and St. Tammany Parishes. Features in Orleans Parish (city of New Orleans) are located on the east bank of the Mississippi River. Work in Jefferson Parish is located on the east and west banks of the Mississippi River in the vicinity of New Orleans, LA. St. Tammany Parish features are located in the southern portion of the parish, near Lake Pontchartrain, in and around the communities of Slidell, Mandeville, Madisonville, Abita Springs, and Lacomb, LA. Project Features. The work in Orleans Parish consists of enlargement of a major pumping station and work on two other stations; and improvements to about seven drainage canals and underground drainage lines. Jefferson Parish features include improvements to five pumping stations and almost thirty drainage canals. Work in St. Tammany includes: channel improvements, retention ponds, levees, and structure raising. Local Cooperation. The project requires that the local sponsor(s) provide all lands, easements, rights-ofway, relocations, and disposal areas (LERRDs) needed for project construction, as well as a minimum five percent cash contribution. The total (value) of the locals share must be a minimum of twenty-five percent of the project total, but not exceed fifty percent of the project total. Jefferson Parish and the Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans executed the Project Costsharing Agreements (PCAs) in January 1997. Operations and results during fiscal year. Technical reports for work in Orleans and Jefferson parishes were completed in FY 96 and approved in October 1996. Locals in Jefferson and Orleans parishes began (and in some instances, completed) some of the design and construction of features authorized in the project, for which they will get credit. Architect- Engineer contractors, working for both the Corps and the parishes, are doing most of the design work. Federal construction began in March 1997. Condition as of Sep. 30. Four Federal contracts were awarded in FY 1997 with fourteen scheduled for FY 1998. 12. WESTWEGO TO HARVEY CANAL, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) Location. The project includes the Urban area within Jefferson parish between Westwego and the Harvey Canal on the west bank of the Mississippi River in the vicinity of New Orleans, Louisiana. The project area is generally bounded by the Harvey Canal to the east, Lakes Cataouatche and Salvador to the southwest, the Mississippi River to the north, and Barataria Bay to the south. A Post Authorization Change Report was approved in WRDA 96 that provides protection for the Lake Cataouatche area. Existing project. The plan of protection consists of about 36 miles of floodwalls and new and enlarged levees designed to protect against tidal floodwaters resulting from the Standard Project Hurricane (SPH). 11-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 The SPH has a frequency of recurrence of once in about 500 years. The elevation of the SPH floodwalls and levees varies from 9 feet NGVD to 17 feet NGVD. The project plan includes mitigation which consists of the construction of a timber pile and tire breakwater on the west bank of Lake Cataouatche adjacent to the Salvador Wildlife Management Area and the acquisition and management of 1,024 acres of wooded wetlands. The estimated project cost (October 1997) is $96,300,000 ($62,600,000 Federal and $33,700,000 non-Federal). Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 11-8 of the FY 92 Annual Report. Excerpts are presented below. (2) Accomplish all necessary alteration and relocations to roads, railroads, pipelines, cables, wharves, and other facilities required by the construction of the project. (4) Bear 35 percent of the first cost of construction. Funds provided by non-Federal interests for interim hurricane protection may be considered beneficial expenditures and may be credited as a part of the non-Federal contribution of the project pursuant to the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and subsequent policies. Operations and results during fiscal year. The New Westwego to Orleans Village Levee (1st Lift) contract will be completed in Nov. 97 and the Orleans Village to Hwy. 45 Levee (1st Lift) contract is scheduled for award in Aug. 98 and completion in FY 99. Conditions as of Sep. 30. Project construction began in Feb 1991 and is 40 percent complete. Completion is scheduled in 2005. 13. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Various hurricane protection projects, as well as small flood control projects, were inspected during FY 1997. Also, periodic inspection and continuing evaluation of completed civil works structures was conducted in accordance with ER 1110-2-100, at various times during the year on an as needed basis. Fiscal year costs for the period were $284,045. Total costs to Sep. 30, 1997 were $4,952,754. 14. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Disaster preparedness, fiscal year costs for the period were $148,783. Emergency flood fight activities cost $576,931. Emergency activities for Hurricane Danny in FY 97 were $7,563. Rehabilitation investigation costs through FY 97 were $4,526 for Grand Isle following Hurricane Danny. Rehabilitation costs through FY 97 were $4,526 for Grand Isle, Post Andrew. Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). Detailed studies cost for FY 97 were W14, Canal Basin, Slidell, LA, $84; Jean Lafitte, La (Fisher School Basin) $133,810; the Rosethorne Basin in Lafitte, LA $104,600; Lockport to La Rose, LA $31,289. Section 205 Coordination, $9,816; Bayou Chevreuil and Grand Bayou, LA, $148; Choctaw Bayou and Coulee Des Grues Avoyelles, $421; Little Chenier, $790. Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 14, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). Detailed studies costs for FY 97 were on Highway 16, Tangipahoa, $6,467; Highway 3066, Iberville, $47,644; Bayou des Glaises, Moreauville, LA, $16,477; Bayou Road, St. Bernard Parish, LA, $509; and St. Joseph's Catholic Church $40,438. 15. COASTAL WETLANDS PLANNING, PROTECTION AND RESTORATION ACT (TITLE III OF PUBLIC LAW 101-646, DATED NOV. 29, 1990) Location. The coastal parishes of Louisiana. Authority. Activities were authorized by the Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and Restoration Act (CWPPRA) (Title III of Public Law 101-646, dated Nov. 29, 1990), which established the Louisiana Coastal Wetlands Conservation and Restoration Task Force. The Task Force consists of the Secretary of the Army (chairman); the Administrator of the Environmental 11-8 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT Protection Agency; the Governor of the State of Louisiana; the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of Agriculture; and the Secretary of Commerce. Local Cooperation. The conditions of local cooperation are established by this act. Condition of Sep. 30. The first Priority List (PPL) was approved by the Task Force on Oct. 31, 1991. Seventeen projects were named on the list; three of these were deauthorized due to unforeseen implementation problems. Funds in the amount of $38.6 million ($28.1 million Federal, $10.5 million State) were made available for construction of these projects. Engineering and design of several of the projects has been completed, and the Task Force has given final approval for construction for 13 of the 14 remaining projects. Of the 14 remaining projects, construction has been completed on 10: West Hackberry Vegetative Plantings Demo, March 94; Bayou Labranche Wetlands Restoration, April 94; Cameron Prairie Refuge Shoreline Protection, August 94; Sabine Wildlife Refuge Erosion Protection, March 95; Vermilion River Cutoff Bank Protection, February 96; Lake Salvador Shoreline Protection at Jean Lafitte, March 96; Bayou Sauvage #1, May 96; Timbalier Vegetative Plantings Demo, July 96; Falgout Canal Vegetative Plantings Demo, December 96; and Cameron-Creole Watershed Hydrologic Restoration, January 97. Two projects are under construction: GIWW to Clovelly Wetland Restoration and Barataria Bay Waterway Marsh Creation. Additionally, one of the deauthorized projects, Dewitt/Rollover Vegetative Plantings Demo was completed in August 94. The 2nd PPL was approved by the Task Force on Oct. 19, 1992. Nineteen projects were named on the list with four of the projects placed in a deferred status, to be constructed if prior projects were found to be unimplementable. Additional funds in the amount of $38.4 million ($28.2 million Federal, $10.2 million State) were made available for construction of these projects. Engineering and design on several of the projects has been completed, and the Task Force has given final approval for construction for 13 of the 15 remaining projects. Of the 15 remaining projects, construction has been completed on 5: Vermilion Bay/Boston Canal, November 95; Mud Lake, June 96; Clear Marais Bank Protection, March 97; Point Au Fer, May 97; and, Bayou Sauvage #2, May 97. One project, Freshwater Bayou, is under construction. The 3rd PPL was approved by the Task Force on Oct. 1, 1993. Nineteen projects were named, with two projects in a deferred status, to be constructed if prior projects were found to be implementable. Additional funds in the amount of $40.1 million ($29.9 million Federal, $10.2 million State) were made available for construction of these projects. Engineering and design of several of the projects has been completed, and the Task Force has given final approval for construction for 8 of the 17 remaining projects. Of the 17 remaining projects, construction has been completed on one project; South West Shore White Lake Demo, July 96. Four projects are under construction: Red Mud Demo, Channel Amor Gap Crevasse, Cameron Creole Maintenance, and Lake Salvador Shore Protection Demo. The 4th PPL was approved by the Task Force on Dec. 16, 1994. Seventeen projects were named on the list. Additional funds in the amount of $35.0 million (30.0 million Federal, $5.0 million State) were made available for construction of these projects. Due to the reduction in State's funding capability, only 10 projects were selected for cost-sharing. Engineering and design on several of the projects has been completed, and the Task Force has given final approval for construction for 3 of the 10 remaining projects. However, construction has not yet begun on any of the 4th PPL projects. The 5th PPL was approved by the Task Force on Feb. 28, 1996. Nine projects were named on the list. Additional funds in the amount of $38.4 million ($33.4 million Federal, $5.0 million State) were made available for construction of these projects. Due to the reduction in the State's funding capability, 3 of the projects were approved for phased construction, with the balance of their funding to come from future lists. Engineering and design on several of the projects has been completed, and the Task Force has given final approval for construction for 2 of the 9 projects. One project, Racoon Island Breakwaters Demo, was completed in July 97. The 6th PPL was approved by the Task Force on April 24, 1997. Thirteen projects were named on the list. Additional funds in the amount of $49.1 million (39.1 million Federal, $10.0 million State) were made available for construction of these projects. Five of the projects were approved for phased construction, with the balance of their funding to come from future lists. Engineering and design on several of the projects has begun and preliminary construction schedules are presently being verified. In response to Section 303(b) of the CWPPRA, the Louisiana Coastal Wetlands Restoration Plan report was 11-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 published in November 1993. Following public review of the final report, a Record of Decision was prepared, signed by the Task Force chairman, and submitted to HQUSACE for transmittal to the ASA(CW). The report proposed $1.3 billion worth of projects that could prevent 65 percent of the coastal wetland losses over the next 20 years. The State of Louisiana has expressed its intention (by letter of Jan. 5, 1993) to develop a Conservation Plan in accordance with provisions of the CWPPRA. Once such a plan has been approved (by the Administrator of the EPA, the Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Secretary of the Army), the State's share in project construction will be reduced from 25 percent to 15 percent. The State submitted the plan to the approving agencies in May 1997. Approval was received on Nov. 21, 1997. Section 532 of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1996 amends the CWPPRA to provide for a further reduction in the State's share of CWPPRA projects. Upon approval of the Conservation Plan, the State's share of projects in 1996 and 1997 will be 10 percent. In a Sep. 3, 1996, speech in the House of Representatives, the Honorable Bud Shuster of Pennsylvania said that the intent of the legislation was to reduce the State's share of projects approved on the 5th and 6th Priority Project Lists. The amendment further provides that the Secretary of the Army must determine that a reduction in the non-Federal share is warranted. The Task Force approved a planning budget of $2,561,612 for program management and preparation for completing the 7th Priority Project List and beginning the 8th List. The Task Force is scheduled to complete the selection of the 7th Priority Project List in January 1998. In addition, $550,000 and $562,900 were budgeted for the Barrier Shoreline Protection and the Mississippi River Sediment, Nutrient, and Freshwater Redistribution feasibility studies, respectively. Recognizing that restoration of the state's coastal wetlands requires projects of a more complex nature and a larger scope that can be analyzed in the process of developing annual priority lists, the Task Force has authorized the initiation of two feasibility studies. Projects with costs of more than $40 million cannot be accommodated by the present funding stream of $35 million per year and would need authorization through a Water Resources Development Act or similar act for implementation. The Mississippi River Sediment, Nutrient, and Freshwater Redistribution study, which is being managed by the Corps of Engineers, is intended to develop a plan for optimizing the resources of the Mississippi River, giving consideration to the river's many uses (e.g., navigation and water supply, in addition to creation and nourishment of wetlands). The study is scheduled for completion in December 1998. The Louisiana Barrier Shoreline study which is being managed by the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, is intended to determine the feasibility of restoring the state's barrier islands and other shorelines to protect coastal wetlands and related resources. The first phase of this study is scheduled for completion in December 1997. The State of Louisiana has developed a conservation plan in accordance with Section 304 of the act. The plan estimates that less than 200 acres of coastal wetlands are lost due to developmental activities and recommends measures to offset these losses. Once such a plan has been approved (by the Administrator of the EPA, the Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Secretary of the Army), the State's share in project construction will be reduced from 25 percent to 15 percent. The plan is currently under review for approval by the participating agencies. The Task Force approved a fiscal year 1997 planning budget of $2.7 million for program management and preparation of the 6th and 7th Priority Project List. In addition, $355,000 and $1.46 million were budgeted for the Barrier Shoreline Protection and the Mississippi River Sediment, Nutrient, and Freshwater Redistribution feasibility studies, respectively. In June 1997, the Task Force initiated a strategic planning effort called Coast 2050. The purpose of this program is to develop, within 18 months, a technically sound strategic plan to sustain coastal resources and provide an integrated multiple use approach to ecosystem management. The development of this strategy differs from the 1993 restoration plan in that regional strategies, rather than basin strategies, will be developed and prioritized. Also, the regional strategies will be integrated into other coastal uses, such as navigation, water supply, transportation, and flood protection. The effort will involve soliciting public opinion and recommendations on coastal planning and restoration efforts. Coast 2050 is scheduled for completion in December 1998. 11-10 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT 16. ENVIRONMENTAL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Environmental Activities pursuant to Section 204 of Public Law 580, 102nd Congress (pre-authorization). Preauthorization study costs for FY 97 were Barataria Bay Waterway, Grand Terre Island, Jefferson Parish, LA, at a cost of $31,180; Marsh Creation, Jefferson Parish, LA at a cost of $38,945; Brown Lake, Cameron and Calcasieu Parishes, LA, at a cost of $11,720; Sabine National Wildlife Refuge, LA, at a cost of $-3,956; and Mississippi River - Gulf Outlet, LA, Mile 14-11, at a cost of $20,262. 11-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 11-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 1997 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, LA (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 2. Mississippi River Ship Channel-Gulf to Baton Rouge (Contrib. Funds) 5. Comite River, LA (Diversion) 6. Grand Isle and Vicinity, LA (Contrib. Funds) 7. Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity, LA (Hurricane Protection) (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 8. Lake Pontchartrain Stormwater Discharge New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib; Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 2,100,000 1,000,000 1,861,000 1,370,000 104,927,200 2,215,848 993,639 1,927,198 1,371,613 104,817,817 12,023,000 8,911,000 17,005,000 21,173,000 219,943,476 12,025,900 9,025,191 17,004,481 20,342,160 219,037,177 1,240,4771 1,196,4771 8,563,000 1,130,000 -1,840,000 1,485,000 22,322,000 4,207,897 2,480,533 1,267,380 1,424,837 22,010,828 1,000,000 535,000 415,241 1,120,479 0 20,256 1,355,641 1,190,000 159,000 296,000 1,405,498 1,078,838 341,114 279,840 0 149,526 0 166 4,772,000 4,757,224 3,900,641 3,832,252 0 102,000 247,000 19,057,500 140,114 247,888 186,072 18,931,692 7,157,484 7,157,484 28,619,000 13,300,000 13,348,000 17,025,000 344,022,000 22,279,917 20,694,000 17,094,000 18,367,390 343,131,394 2,179,000 2,200,000 3,522,000 2,073,018 745,084 814,000 3,038,000 1,056,430 11,394,018 8,221,430 1,723,000 673,000 550,000 2,650,000 5,596,000 112,000 333,000 320,000 3,286,913 4,051,913 11-12 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 1997 9. Larose to Golden Meadow, LA (Hurricane Protection) (Contrib. Funds) 10. Mermentau River, Grand Chenier, LA New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work (Fed) Approp. Cost New Work (Non-Fed) Approp, Cost 11. New Orleans to Venice, LA (Hurricane Protection) (Regular Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 12. Southeast Louisiana, Louisiana 13. Westwego to Harvey Canal, LA (Hurricane Protection) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 2,565,000 2,200,000 1,101,000 489,000 69,793,000 2,302,671 2,577,891 1,167,000 398,829 69,693,829 129,000 129,000 20 20 910,000 273,000 4,543,000 987,000 -10,513 4,210,487 170 128,800 140 158,800 0 0 55 0 298,800 298,800 89,000 89,000 34,000 89,000 1,062,000 1,135,000 2,616,000 3,926,000 140,912,000 1,719,241 1,572,112 2,681,149 3,910,154 140,869,958 0 1,502,052 175,000 600,000 2,920,000 17,494,197 0 804,026 1,632,249 16,033,761 0 0 New Work Approp. Cost 2,000,000 14,070,000 16,070,000 1,694,000 7,613,261 9,307,261 6,264,000 3,693,000 3,618,000 6,999,000 30,734,000 2,333,189 4,013,899 7,438,028 6,534,898 30,080,906 11-13 1. Contributed by Board of Commissioners, Port of New Orleans, for providing fill for future industrial sites adjacent to turning basin and for dredging cable and pipeline crossings. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 29, 1956 Oct. 22, 1976 Water Resources Development Act, 1986 LAKE CHARLES, LA The project for deepening of the project for navigation, Lake Charles, Louisiana, to a depth of 45 feet, at a total cost of $1,070,000. MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO GULF OF MEXICO, LA Combines projects of Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to New Orleans, Mississippi River, South Pass, and Southwest Pass, adding thereto project for Mississippi River from New Orleans to Head of Passes, to provide a single project, "Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the Gulf of Mexico," with channel dimensions as follows: Baton Rouge to New Orleans, 35 by 500 feet; port limits of New Orleans, 35 by 1,500 feet; New Orleans to Head of Passes, 40 by 1,000 feet; Southwest Pass, 40 by 800 feet; Southwest Pass Bar Channel, 40 by 600 feet; South Pass, 30 by 450 feet; South Pass Bar Channel, 30 by 600 feet. Deepen existing channel from 35 to 40 feet by 500 feet wide from one-tenth mile below Louisiana Highway Commission bridge at Baton Rouge to upper limits of Port of New Orleans, and also 40 by 500 feet within presently authorized 35- by 1,500-foot channel in port limits of New Orleans. MISSISSIPPI RIVER-GULF OUTLET, LA (See Sec. 1 of Text) Construct a seaway canal 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide from Michoud to 38-foot contour in gulf and an inner tidewater harbor consisting of a 1,000- by 2,000-foot turning basin 36 feet deep and a connecting channel 36 feet deep and 500 feet wide to Inner Harbor Navigation Canal and provides, when economically justified, for construction of a lock to Mississippi River in the vicinity of Meraux, LA. Amends above Act making the construction of bridge relocations a Federal responsibility when required by the the construction of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet channel. The Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet feature is modified to provide that the replacement and expansion of the existing industrial canal lock and connecting channels or the construction of an additional lock and connecting channels shall be in the area of the existing lock or at the Violet site. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 H. Doc. 215, 76th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 36, 87th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 245, 82d Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 186, Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (PL 94-587) 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 11-14 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Approp. Act of 1985, dated Jul. 2, 1986 (PL 99-88) Nov. 17, 1986 (PL 99-662) Aug. 30, 1985 Oct. 23, 1962 Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Water Resources Development Act, 1992 MISSISSIPPI RIVER SHIP CHANNEL, GULF TO BATON ROUGE, LA (See Sec. 2 of Text) Will provide more efficient deep-draft navigation access to the New Orleans and Baton Rouge reaches of the Mississippi River via Southwest Pass by enlarging the existing channel to a project depth of 55 feet and enlarging the adjacent channel along the left descending bank in New Orleans Harbor to a 40-foot depth, a turning basin at Baton Rouge, and training works in the passes to reduce maintenance. Formalizes the cost sharing provisions of the project, permits the State of Louisiana to enact user fees to defray their portion of the project costs, and implements harbor maintenance fees to help pay for the Federal cost of the project. It also provides an option to the local sponsor to defer their initial payment for one year following initiation of construction. In terms of channel depths up to 45 feet, the cost sharing requirements are 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal for construction and 100 percent Federal for maintenance. For channels deeper than 45 feet, the cost sharing requirements are 50 percent Federal and 50 percent non-Federal for both construction and maintenance. WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO BAYOU DULAC, LA (Bayous Grand Caillou and LeCarpe, LA) Channel 5 by 40 feet from Intracoastal Waterway at Houma through Bayou LeCarpe, Bayou Pelton, and Bayou Grand Caillou to Bayou Dulac, about 16.3 miles. Channel 10 by 45 feet in Bayou LeCarpe from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to Houma navigation canal. BAYOU RIGOLETTE, LA A project to construct six additional floodgates at Bayou Rigolette, LA, adjacent to the existing drainage structure, at a total cost of $2,300,000. COMITE RIVER, LA (Diversion) (See Sec. 4 of Text) Construct an eight-mile diversion channel from the Comite River to an outfall into Lilly Bayou, and then a four-mile diversion along Lilly and Cooper Bayous to the Profit Island Chute of the Mississippi River. Also included is a stage control structure in the Comite River at the diversion point, a diversion structure in the new channel near the diversion point, a stage control structure and an outfall structure near and at the outfall into Lilly Bayou, and three control structures at the intersections of Whites, Cypress and Baton Rouge Bayous. H. Doc. 2577, 99th Cong., 1st sess. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 206, 72d Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 H. Doc. 419, 84th Cong 11-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Adopted by Committee Resolutions Sep. 23, 1976, and Oct. 1, 19762 Oct. 27, 1965 Section 107, Rivers and Harbors Act of 1960, as amended Water Resources Development Act, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Water Resources Development Act, 1992 Oct. 27, 1965 GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LA (See Sec. 5 of Text) To provide hurricane protection by placement of a berm and vegetated dune extending the length of Grand Isle's gulf shore and a jetty to stabilize the western end of the island at Caminada Pass. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN AND VICINITY, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) (See Sec. 6 of Text) Control of hurricane tides by construction of two independent units, the Lake Pontchartrain Barrier plan and the Chalmette Area plan. NORTH PASS - PASS MANCHAC, LA The Corps of Engineers may construct small river and harbor improvement projects not specifically authorized by Congress when they will result in substantial benefits to navigation. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, NORTH SHORE, LA The project for navigation, Lake Pontchartrain North Shore, LA: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated February 14, 1979, at a total cost of $1,310,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $655,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $655,000. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN STORMWATER DISCHARGE, LA (See Section 7 of Text) Provides for design and construction of project to to address water quality problems associated with stormwater discharges. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LA (HURRICANE PROTECTION) (See Sec. 8 of Text) A loop levee about 40 miles long along both banks of Bayou Lafourche from Golden Meadow to Larose; enlargement of 3 miles of existing levee at Golden Meadow; floodgates for navigation and hurricane protection in Bayou Lafourche at upper and lower bayou crossings; about 8 miles of low interior levees to regulate intercepted drainage; and seven multibarreled culverts controlled by flapgates. H. Doc. 639, 94th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 231, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 86-645 Jul. 14, 1960 Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 102-580 H. Doc. 184, 89th Cong., 1st sess.1 11-16 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Section 14, Flood Control Act of 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, FY 1996 Water Resources Development Act, 1996 MORGAN CITY AND VICINITY, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION Construction of new levees along Lake Palourde and Bayou Ramos, levee to tie-in with Bayou Boeuf lock levee and three gravity drainage structures in Morgan City unit and enlargement of bank levee, construction of new levee, and construction of one floodgate and five gravity drainage structures in Franklin and vicinity unit. The Franklin Area reparable element is currently under review for deauthorization in accordance with WRDA 1990. MERMENATU RIVER - GRAND CHENIER, LA (See Sec. 9 of Text) Construction of emergency bank-protection works to prevent flood damage to highways, bridge approaches and public works. NEW ORLEANS TO VENICE, LA, HURRICANE PROTECTION (See Sec. 10 of Text) Improvements along Mississippi River below New Orleans, LA, for prevention of hurricane tidal flood damages by increasing heights of existing back levees and modifying existing drainage facilities where necessary in five separate reaches. SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA, LA (See Section 11 of text) Provides for drainage canal and pump station improvements in Orleans and Jefferson Parishes, and drainage improvements, flood protection and structure raising in St. Tammany Parish. H. Doc. 167, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong, 2d sess. Jul. 24, 1946 H. Doc. 550, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 104-46 (Sec 108) Public Law 104-303 (Sec 533) Water Resources Development Act, 1986 WEST BANK HURRICANE PROTECTION LEVEE, JEFFERSON PARISH, LA, WESTWEGO TO HARVEY CANAL (See Sec. 12 of Text) Structural and nonstructural measures to prevent flood damage to those areas identified in the Feb. 1984 draft Environmental Impact Statement for the West Bank Hurricane Protection Levee, Jefferson Parish, LA, at a total cost of $61,500,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $40,000,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $21,500,000. Funds provided by non-Federal interest for interim hurricane protection may be considered beneficial expenditures and may be credited as part of the non- Federal contribution of the project pursuant to Section 104 of this Act. Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986 11-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 11-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents COASTAL WETLANDS PLANNING, PROTECTION AND RESTORATION ACT (See Section 15 of Text) Coastal Wetlands Directed the Secretary of the Army to convene the Public Law 101-64 Planning, Louisiana Coastal Wetlands Conservation and Restoration Nov. 24, 1990 Protection and Task Force to initiate a process to identify and prepare a list Section 301-306 Restoration Act of coastal wetlands restoration projects in Louisiana to provide for the long-term conservation of such wetlands and dependent fish and wildlife populations in order of priority in creating, restoring, protecting, and enhancing coastal wetlands, taking into account the quality of such coastal wetlands, with due allowance for small-scale projects necessary to demonstrate the use of new techniques or materials for coastal wetlands restoration. 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act. 11-18 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1997 For Last Mo. and Yr. Ful Report Operation Completed See Annual and Deauthorized Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance or Reclassified Alteration of Berwick Bay Bridge1 Amite River and Bayou Manchac, LA Aquatic Plant Control Program, LA Atchafalaya River Bayous Chene Boeuf, and Black, LA Atchafalaya River, Morgan City to Gulf of Mexico, LA Barataria Bay Waterway, LA Bayou Bonfouca, LA Bayou Dorcheat, Loggy Bayou and Lake Bisteneau, LA2,3 ,4 ,5 Bayou Dupre, LA Bayou Lacombe, LA Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche Jump Waterway, LA Bayou La Lautre, St. Malo, and Yscolskey, LA Bayou Plaquemine Brule, LA Bayou Queue de Tortue, LA Bayou Segnette Waterway, LA Bayou Teche, LA Bayou Teche & Vermilion River, LA Bayou Terrebonne, LA,3 7 Bayou Vermilion, LA3 Big Pigeon and Little Pigeon Bayous, LA Calcasieu River and Pass, LA Calcasieu River at Coon Island, LA8 Calcasieu River at Devil's Elbow, LA Cascasieu River Salt Water Barrier, LA9 Cane River, LA2,5 Chefuncte River and Bogue Falia, LA Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA10 Freshwater Bayou, LA Grand Bayou Pass, LA Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL, & Mexican Border Houma Navigation Canal, LA Inland Waterway from Franklin to Mermentau River, LA ,11 Intracoastal Waterway from the Mississippi River to Bayou Teche, LA12 Lake Charles Deep Water Channel, LA13 Leland Bowman Lock, LA Little Caillou Bayou, LA Mermentau River, Bayou Nezpique, and Bay Des Cannes, LA Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete 1967 1978 1984 1984 1981 1984 1974 1887 1968 1967 1984 1970 1950 1970 1958 1984 1983 1961 1947 1936 1984 1976 1981 1973 1910 1967 1971 1984 1950 1985 1984 1960 1956 1950 1987 1973 1977 28,234 17,098,851 69,087 -- 30,356,691 118,252,511 501,963 1,572,685 30,997 5,000 38,915 4,716 1,624,424 96,916 33,410 33,355 238,828 754,330 2,891,822 120,089 34,900 27,830,835 1,015,81410 5,856,200 4,197,262 2,500 58,342 202,817 7,116,224 7,676 30,306,014 320,758 104,187 119,191 2,199,847 223,616 36,780 28,315 676,604 8,841,025 1,939,984 251,691 200,169 37,169 164,243,029 -- -- _ 2,000 463,401 452,611 32,556,820 14,48010 63,284,470 517,276,750 -- 30,284,759 249,052 32,200,010 77,761 5,197,97514 552,780 11,699 241,896 751,485 114,519 11-19 1928 1914 Nov. 1963 1931 1939 1938 May 1956 1915 Mar. 1923 Mar. 1957 1916 1896 2 Oct. 1968 Apr. 1974 Sep. 1978 Jan. 1968 -- 1959 Dec. 1914 Aug. 1968 1939 2 Mar. 1985 1929 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 11-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (Continued) Cost to Sep. 1997 For Last Mo. and Yr. Full Report Operation Completed See Annual and Deauthorized Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance or Reclassified Mermentau River, LA Complete 1985 4,672,579 37,358,662 Jul. 1952 Mississippi River Baton Rouge to Gulf of Mexico, LA -- 1991 84,568,12816 949,251,84917 -- Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, -_21 1996 88,535,00020 218,837,615 Jan. 196821 Michoud Canal, LA Complete 1976 2,499,555 1,271,252 Nov. 1974 Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, LA Complete 1986 10,014,012 29,083,009 Complete Navigation work under special authorization (Calcasieu Pass channel in Old River Bend at Cameron, LA)1 5 -- 1957 -- 139,755 -- North Pass-Pass Manchac, LA Complete 1996 533,492 -- May 1995 Pass Manchac, LA Complete 1950 79,845 124,681 1912 Petite Anse, Tigre, and Carlin Bayous, LA Complete 1981 -- 1,453,172 Nov. 1980 Removal of Aquatic Growth, LA 1984 -- 41,750,157 Sulphur River, AR and TX2 ,5 -- 1919 45,989 ---- Tangipahoa River, LA -- 1985 -- 1,518,553 -- Tickfaw, Natalbany, Ponchatoula, and Blood Rivers, LA3 Complete 1973 8,115 93,565 1921 Waterway from White Lake to Pecan Island, LA11 -- 1948 10,904 742 -- Waterway from Empire, LA, to Gulf of Mexico Complete 1981 1,068,142 1,658,248 Jun. 1950 Waterway from Intracoastal Waterway to Bayou Dulac, LA Complete 1990 641,608 1,846,261 Aug. 1964 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Transferred to Department of Transportation. Authorized under Truman-Hobbs Act. Completed. Date will be furnished when available. Includes previous project costs. No commerce reported. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. Completed except that portion above mile 10.3 providing for widening from 40 feet to 60 feet, which is inactive. By Public Law 88-404, that portion of Bayou Terrebonne between point where Barrow Street crosses said stream and a line determined by prolonging and extending eastern right-of-way line of New Orleans Boulevard southerly to south bank of said stream was declared nonnavigable. Includes $66,000 contributed funds. Operation and maintenance of the structure reported under project "Calcasieu River and Pass, LA." Excludes $50,000 contributed funds. Not completed; incorporated in navigation project "Mermentau River, LA." Not completed; superseded for most of it length by present 12- by 125-foot Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, which coincides with or parallels it. Maintenance project; no future work schedules. Includes $57,555 ($29,974 of which was from Public Works funds) for new work on previous project. Includes $114,519 for maintenance of previous project. Work is under continuing authority. Includes $1,729,989 for previous project. 11-20 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (Continued) 17. Does not include allotment of $40,000 (9613123). 18. Does not include expenditures of $63,370 (9613123). 19. Includes $169,055 for previous projects and $3,379,676 from permanent indefinite appropriation. 20. Includes $8,811,000 Non-Federal Costs. 21. Channel completed except for IHNC Lock replacement and foreshore protection. 11-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 11-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1997 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Amite River and Tributaries, LA 1964 3,034,2551 -- Feb. 1964 Bayou Choupique, LA2 1954 129,930 -- Mar. 1954 Bayou Rapides, LA2 1952 95,179 -- Dec. 1951 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA 1979 1,018,005 -- -- Morgan City and Vicinity, LA 1992 1,975,628 -- 1. In addition, the following was expended from contributed funds: Amite River and tributaries ................. $ 430 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA ....... 425,209 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended) 11-22 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-E DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Date Federal Contributed Report See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report for Authority Expended Expended Baton Rouge Harbor 1946 Nov. 2, 1979 Segment Between Section 12, Mi 2.5 and 5.0 Public Law 93-251 (WRDA 74) Bayou Grosse Tete, 1969 May 6, 1981 LA DAEN-CWP-A Letter Subj: Completed Action on 5th Deauthorization Rpt, dated Jun. 17, 1981 Lake Borgne and 1942 Nov 1979 Chef Menteur Bulkheads and Jetties Vinton Waterway, LA 1950 Nov. 2, 1979 Section 12, Public Law 93-251 (WRDA of 1974) 11-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 11-F ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 97 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Navigation(110) Calcasieu River; Hackberry, LA-10452 63,232 Intracoastal Waterway Locks, LA-81289 574,093 Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, St. Bernard Parish, LA (Bank Erosion)-10241 267 Mississippi River Ship Channel Improvements, LA-10454 249,204 Flood Control Studies(120)886,796 Amite River-Darlington Reservoir-81304 275,620 Amite River & Tributaries, LA-50100 32,053 Bayou Blanc, Crowley, LA-13325 59,678 Bayou Tigre, Erath, LA-13291 831 Black Bayou, Diversion, LA-13290 66,872 Jefferson Parish, LA-13236 357,425 Lafayette Parish Feasibility Study-13251 328,544 Lafayette Parish, LA Reconnaissance Study-13251 28 Lake Dauterive/Lake Fausse Pt., LA-13292 974 Orleans Parish, LA-13237 182,803 St. Tammary Parish, LA-13155 665 West Bank of Mississippi River-Vicinity of New Orleans, LA-59360 137 Westshore, Lake Pontchartrain-10455 214,155 Special Studies(140)1,519,785 Environmental Services Partnerships-14190 2,042 Sabine Diversion Canal, LA-10493 83,587 85,629 Miscellaneous Activities(170) Gulf of Mexico Program-17251 97,350 Interagency Water Resources Development-14713 30,676 National Estuary Program-53903 6,833 National Marine Fisheries Service-53906 56 North American Waterfowl Management-53904 4,040 Special Investigations-17250 14,781 153,736 Planning Assistance to States(186)153,736 Alexandria, LA GIS Mapping-22027 3,933 Ascension Parish Hydrologic & Hydraulic Modeling-022040 8,033 Baker Canal & Tributaries Erosion Study-022014 48 Bayou Lafourche Water Management-022015 171 Chitimacha Indian Tribe Emergency response Phase 2-071505 20,262 Chitimacha Indian Tribe Hydrologic & Hydraulic Analysis-071504 9,339 Chitimacha Indian Tribe Hydrologic & Hydraulic Modeling-071504 43 Comprehensive Performance Evaluations-022036 17,881 E. Baton Rouge Parish Data Management-022032 78,793 E. Baton Rouge Parish Drainage Maintenance & Construction-022013 330 E. Baton rouGe Parish GIS Mapping-022028 69,893 E. Baton Rouge Parish Structural Acquisition & Relocation Study-022012 242 Flood Warning/Preparation Regional Plan-022021 308 Jefferson Parish Bicycle Transportation Corridor-022011 54 Lafayette Parish Flood Preparation-022031 957 11-24 NEW ORLEANS, LA, DISTRICT TABLE 11-F ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (Continued) (96X3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 97 Categories 279 115 25 130 154 12,399 71,424 253 742 15 58,998 72 2 78 18,936 373,909 Lake Pontchartrain Wetland Demo-022006 Marsh Restoration - Barataria Unit-022017 Negotiation Funds-014800 Orleans Parish Multi-Use Transportation Cooridor-022010 Planning Assistance to States-014822 Plaquemine City Bank Stabilization-022033 Plaquemines Parish GIS Mapping-022030 Regional Flood Warning Preparedness Regulations-022023 St. Bernard Parish Digitized Mapping-022020 St. Bernard Parish Digitized Mapping-022008 St. Charles Parish Water Resources Data Management-022035 St. Gabriel, LA GIS Mapping-022026 State Hazard Mitigation Plan-022019 Tangipahoa Parish Digitized Mapping-022025 W. Baton Rouge Parish Riverfront Development-022034 TOTAL (Category 100) COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services(250) Flood Plain Management-82030 Quick Responses-82045 Flood Plain Management Services-82040 Special Studies, Chitimach GIS Mapping, LA-083011 Special Studies-Folsom, LA-83007 Special Studies-Killian, LA-83008 Special Studies - Breaux Bridge, LA-083009 Southwest, LA. Hurricane Evacuation-083010 Southwest, LA. Hurricane Evacuation-083001 TOTAL (Category 200) PROJECTS NOT AUTHORIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION (Category 400) Navigation Projects (421) Bayou Lafourche and Lafourche Jump Waterway, LA-(421) 10009 Flood Control Projects (450) East Baton Rouge Parish, LA-12909 West Bank, East of Harvey Canal, LA-059360 TOTAL (Category 400) ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (Category 600) Flood Control Projects (650) Comite River, LA-77059 TOTAL (Category 600) GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 23,450 5,715 94,060 -237 22,118 0 10 17,941 2,235 163,280 $ 3,019,855 $ 163,280 $ 56,835 450,801 $ 56,177 $ 563,813 $ 279,840 $ 279,840 $4,026,788 11-25 ----- -- VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT * This district comprises western and central Mississippi, southern Arkansas, northern Louisiana, and a very small portion of southwestern Tennessee, embraced in drainage basins of eastern tributaries of Mississippi River south of Horn Lake Creek to and including Buffalo River; Pearl River Basin in Mississippi; independent tributaries of the Gulf of Mexico south of the Buffalo River Basin to the Mississippi-Louisiana state line; western tributaries of Navigation 1. Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR .................... 2. Red River emergency bank protection ... 3. Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA ........... 4. Navigation work under special authorization .................... Mississippi River between White and Atchafalaya Rivers including Arkansas River Basin below a point 3 miles upstream from Pine Bluff and Arkansas River below mile 36.1 near Pendleton, AR; Ouachita and Black Rivers in Arkansas and Louisiana; and Red River in Louisiana and Arkansas to the Texas-Arkansas state line. The Vicksburg District territory encompasses 68,000 square miles. IMPROVEMENTS Page Flood Control (cont.) 12-2 12-2 12-3 12-3 Flood Control 5. Aloha Rigolette, LA ............... 6. Canal 43, AR................... 7. McKinney Bayou, AR ............. 8. Ouachita River Levees, LA .......... 9. Ouachita River and tributaries AR and LA ..................... 10. Pearl River Basin, MS and LA ....... 11. Pearl River, Slidell, St. Tammany Parish, LA .......................... 12. Red River below Denison Dam (Vicksburg Dist.) ................. 13. Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabilization (Vicksburg District) ....................... 14. West Agurs, LA, Levee ............ 15. Inspection of completed Flood Control Projects ........................ 12-4 12-4 12-4 12-5 12-5 12-6 12-7 12-7 12-8 12-8 12-8 16. Flood control work under special authorization .................... 17. Ecosystem Restoration Work Under Special Authorization .............. Page 12-8 12-9 Tables Table 12-A Cost and Financial Statement .. 12-10 Table 12-B Authorizing Legislation ...... 12-12 Table 12-C Ouachita and Black Rivers, AR and LA (9-Foot Project), Locks and Dams ........... 12-16 Table 12-D Other Authorized Navigation Project ................. 12-17 Table 12-E Ouachita River and Tributaries-Existing Project ... 12-19 Table 12-F Red River Below Denison Dam (Vicksburg District) New Projects ............. 12-20 Table 12-G Red River Below Denison Dam (Vicksburg District) Incorporated Projects ........ 12-21 Table 12-H Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........... 12-22 Table 12-I Deauthorized Projects ....... 12-24 Table 12-J Active General Investigations ............. 12-25 12-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Navigation 1. OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS BELOW CAMDEN, AR Location. Ouachita River rises in Polk County, AR, and flows southeasterly and southerly about 600 miles. Below its confluence with the Tensas and Little Rivers at Jonesville, LA, it is called Black River, which enters Red River 35.5 miles from the Mississippi River. Previous projects. See page 683 of Annual Report for 1962 for details. Existing project. See page 684 of Annual Report for 1962 for details of the old 6.5-foot navigation project. Modified project and project for Red River below Fulton, AR, provide for a channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide in Red River between Old River and mouth of Black River, and in Black and Ouachita Rivers from mouth of Black River to Camden, AR. Authorized features for the modified project include four new locks and dams, in-river construction dredging to achieve a 9-foot navigation channel depth, and channel realignment. All 4 locks and dams are complete and in operation and initial channel dredging is complete providing 9-foot navigation depth. Remaining work consists of realignment of 25 restricted bendway sites between river miles 195 at Sterlington, LA, and river mile 335 at Camden, AR, on the Ouachita River. With these improvements in place the river system will be navigable by a four-barge tow (two abreast) to Crossett, AR, river mile 237, and a two-barge tow (abreast) to Camden, AR. Mitigation features include the 65,000-acre Felsenthal National Wildlife Refuge in Arkansas, the 18,000-acre D'Arbonne National Wildlife Refuge in Louisiana, a series of recreation facilities along the waterway, and improvements to Catahoula Lake to preserve it for migratory waterfowl. Estimated total cost for the nine-foot navigation project is $281,009,000 which includes $263,000,000 Federal costs and $18,009,000 non-Federal costs. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to furnish the construction rights-of-way for the realignment work. Seven of the 25 sites are within the Felsenthal National Wildlife Refuge and are already owned by the Federal Government. However, there have been no indications that the land for the remaining 18 sites will be forthcoming because of strong opposition to the realignment work by local environmental groups. The six remaining recreation facilities are unscheduled at this time due to the lack of required cost sharing agreements. Terminal facilities. Public loading docks are at Columbia, LA, and Camden and Crossett, AR. Privately owned docks and loading and unloading facilities are at Columbia, Monroe, and Sterlington, LA, and El Dorado, Calion, and Camden, AR. Two grain-handling facilities and a petroleum-loading facility are in the vicinity of Jonesville, LA, a grain-handling facility is in the vicinity of Acme, LA, and a petroleum-loading facility is in the vicinity of Smackover, AR. Operations and results during fiscal year. In FY 97, maintenance dredging was performed from Camden, AR, to the mouth of the Black River by the contract Dredge North Carolina. 430,071 cubic yards of material were moved from the navigation channel. Condition as of Sep. 30. The project is 92 percent complete and provides limited navigation as far north as Camden, AR. All four locks and dams associated with the project are complete and in operation. Design and construction of the remaining features is on hold pending a consensus between the states of Arkansas and Louisiana concerning the type of development desired or the additional studies needed to reach a decision. 2. RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION Location. In northwest Louisiana, southwest Arkansas, and northeast Texas, along the Red and Old Rivers between the Mississippi River and the head of the levee system above Index, AR. Existing project. Provides for realigning the banks by means of cutoffs and training works and for stabilizing banks by means of revetments, dikes, and other methods as emergency conditions may require in advance of developing the design for the entire Red River Waterway project. Estimated cost for this work (October 1997) is $112,862,000 Federal and $2,182,000 non-Federal, including a cash contribution of $7,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. For details see pages 11-19 to 11-20, Annual Report FY 80. Operations and results during fiscal year. Work by hired labor consisted of preparing plans and specifications, surveys, and general engineering. 12-2 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT Construction was completed on Canale Revetment and initiated on Hurricane and Cat Island. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in October 1972 and is 99 percent complete. 3. RED RIVER WATERWAYPROJECT Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA Reach Location. From east central to northwest Louisiana along the Red and Old Rivers between the Mississippi River and Shreveport, LA. Existing project. Provides a navigation route from the Mississippi River at the junction with Old River via Old and Red River to Shreveport, LA, developing a channel approximately 236 miles long, 9 feet deep, and 200 feet wide. The development includes five locks and dams, realignment and contraction of the river as necessary to develop an efficient channel, and bank stabilization as necessary to hold the newly developed channel in position. Facilities to provide and acquisition of wildlife mitigation lands opportunities for recreation and for fish and wildlife development and acquisition of wildlife mitigation lands are an integral part of the project. Estimated cost for new work is $1,886,759 Federal and $101,670 non-Federal, including $54,233,000 contributed funds. The Federal cost includes $463,000 for aids to navigation by U.S. Coast Guard. Local cooperation. For details see page 11-21, Annual Report FY 80. The Red River Waterway Commission, governing body of the Red River Waterway District, executed an act of assurance for all project features in Louisiana on Feb. 26, 1969, supported by resolution dated Jan. 30, 1969. The assurances were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Apr. 15, 1969. The Commission furnished amended assurances covering the provisions of Public Law 91-646 and Public Law 91-611 on May 23, 1973, for the portion of the project within Louisiana. These were accepted for and on behalf of the United States on Nov. 14, 1973. A Local Cooperation Agreement between the Department of the Army and the Red River Waterway Commission for the acquisition of mitigation lands in the vicinity of Loggy Bayou Wildlife Management Area was executed on Jun. 16, 1993, and a project cooperation agreement between the same agencies for the acquisition of mitigation lands in the vicinity of Bayou Bodcau was executed on July 17, 1996. Terminal facilities. Local interests are to provide adequate terminal facilities along the waterway. The Corps entered into an agreement with the City of Alexandria, LA, whereby material excavated from the Philip Bayou Realignment could be used as fill for port construction at mile 109. Construction of the realignment and port fill are complete. Construction of the Caddo--Bossier and Natchitoches Parish ports by local interests is underway. Operations and results during fiscal year. The following contracts were completed in FY 97: L&A Bridge Trackwork, St. Maurice Capout, Kadish Capout, Coushatta Boat Ramp, McDade, Elm Grove, Cecile, and Curtis Capouts. Engineering and design for additional channel work was continued. Eagle Bend Capout was initiated. In addition, acquisition of mitigation lands in the Bayou Bodcau area was initiated. Maintenance dredging was performed along the waterway by the Contract Dredge Butcher, during Fiscal Year 1997. 1,571,512 cubic yards of material were removed from the navigation channel. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in July 1973, and project is 88 percent complete. A Reconnaissance Study was initiated in FY 95 to determine the feasibility of extending navigation on the Red River from the vicinity of Shreveport, LA to the vicinity of Index, AR, or to any justifiable interim point. The study was completed in November 1995. Feasibility phase studies were not recommended. A feasibility study was authorized by WRDA 96. 4. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 87-645, as amended. No activity for FY 97. Flood Control 12-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 5. ALOHA-RIGOLETTE AREA, LA Location. The project is located in north-central Louisiana between the towns of Winnfield and Pineville on the left descending bank of the Red River. Authorized Project. The recommended plan consists of a three-barrel floodgate structure installed at the mouth of Bayou Darrow to reopen it to the Red River, 8.2 miles of clearing and snagging on Bayou Darrow from its mouth upstream to Bayou Rigolette, construction of a closure and low-flow structure on Bayou Rigolette just below its junction with Bayou Darrow, and realignment of Sam's Bayou and appropriate mitigation features. Local Cooperation. The City of Colfax, LA, has agreed to cost share this project. The Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on Sept. 19, 1994. Operations And Results During Fiscal Year. Construction underway on the Bayou Darrow Structure and Low Flow Structure. Completed work on plans and specifications for Items 3 and 4. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction underway on Items 1 and 2 was issued on Oct. 1, 1996. 6. CANAL 43, AR Location. Canal 43 drains into Lake Chicot and is located in Lincoln and Desha Counties, AR. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for enlarging the channel beginning approximately 1500 feet downstream of State Highway 165 and extending approximately 11.2 miles upstream; and provides a 1-year frequency protection to adjacent agricultural lands. Total estimated Federal cost is $878,000. Local cooperation. The Cummins Drainage District has provided the necessary rights-of-way for project construction plus cash requirements totaling five percent of the total project costs. In addition, the drainage district is accomplishing all required relocations. Operation and maintenance of the channel features have been released to Cummins Drainage District. Condition as of Sep. 30. The construction contract was awarded Sep. 12, 1989, and construction was essentially completed on Aug. 17, 1990. This work is complete and has been returned to the sponsor. 7. MCKINNEY BAYOU, AR Location. The project area is located in southwestern Arkansas in the vicinity of Texarkana, AR and TX. The McKinney Bayou area is a crescent-shaped watershed located adjacent to the Red River containing approximately 340 square miles. Existing project. The authorized project consists of flow diversion to the Red River at the state line between Arkansas and Texas, flow diversion into the Red River at Buzzard Bluff, improvement of McKinney Bayou channel, and land acquisition for mitigation. The State Line Diversion, Buzzard Bluff Diversion, and channel improvement features have subsequently been reclassified to the inactive category due to a lack of local support or lack of economic justification. Alternative plans developed to reduce flooding consisted of various channel improvements on the lower 27.6 miles of McKinney Bayou. A clearing and snagging alternative with project first costs of $3.2 million and a plan combining clearing and snagging with channel improvement with project first costs of $4.9 million were found economically feasible. Shortly after initiation of reconnaissance studies, Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, in an effort to streamline the study process, approved proceeding directly from the reconnaissance phase to preconstruction engineering and design (PED), subject to reconnaissance study finding being substantially in accordance with the authorized McKinney Bayou project and with previous U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New Orleans Disrict, study findings. Under this arrangement, the cost-shared feasibility phase would be eliminated. Study findings substantiated this decision. As a result, it was recommended that the study effort progress into PED. The reconnaissance report was approved by the U.S. Army Corps, Mississippi Valley Division, on May 12, 1997. The plan recommended for implementation would be developed during PED. The local cost-sharing sponsors, the Miller County Improvement and Drainage District and the McKinney Bayou Drainage District have indicated by letters dated Sep. 24, and Sep. 30, 1997, respectively, that they do not have the financial resources to undertake project construction. Therefore, they do not wish to continue into the next project development phase, PED. The project is being held in abeyance pending further developments regarding the local sponsor's ability to cost-share. If this cost-sharing issue cannot be resolved, all activities associated with the project will be terminated and it will be classified as inactive. 12-4 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT Condition as of Sep. 30. A new start reconnaissance study was initiated in January 1996. This restudy of the authorized project to address the feasibility of channel improvements on McKinney Bayou to reduce flooding of agricultural and other properties was completed in March 1997. Project is approved to proceed directly into preconstruction engineering and design pending execution of a PED cost sharing agreement. 8. OUACHITA RIVER LEVEES, LA Location. East bank of Ouachita River between Bastrop, LA, and Sandy Bayou. Loop levees on the west bank at West Monroe, Columbia, and Bawcomville. Existing project. There are 105.8 miles of levee on the east bank and 11.6 miles of levee in the three loops on the west bank. A Summary Report authorized gravel surfacing 117.4 miles of levee, and enlarging 36.6 miles of levee. Estimated Federal cost is $29,900,000. Estimated non-Federal cost is $5,404,000. Local cooperation. Requirements and assurances of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-6 of FY 80 Annual Report. A supplemental agreement for the Bawcomville segment was executed in FY 90. The 1991 Water and Energy Appropriations Act gave the Federal government responsibility for the repair and/or replacement of the deteriorated drainage structures. The Assurances Agreement for Local Cooperation was supplemented to reflect this change in responsibility. The supplemental agreement covered work performed in Fiscal Years 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997. Condition as of Sep. 30. Item 1 of the Monroe to Sandy Bayou Levee enlargement project was completed Jul. 7, 1978. Additional work was deferred pending results of a comprehensive study of the entire Ouachita River Levee System. A summary report indicating that it is economically feasible to raise portions of the existing levee to authorized grade and that complete rehabilitation of the levee system was necessary was approved by LMVD on Oct. 1, 1986. The study results were disseminated to the project sponsor and interested parties in October 1986. The Project was reclassified as an active project on May 7, 1987. The final summary report was sent to the Office of the Chief of Engineers in July 1988 and design was initiated on the Bawcomville segment of the Ouachita River levees. A construction contract for the Bawcomville levee enlargement was awarded in FY 90, and is complete. In FY 97 four deteriorated culverts were lined, replaced one deteriorated culvert, and the gravel surfacing of the West Monroe and Columbia ring levees was completed. The final structures are currently under contract. 9. OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA Location. Improvements comprising comprehensive projects are on main stem Ouachita River, AR and LA, on its tributaries, Caddo and Little Missouri Rivers, and in Pine Bluff, AR. Description of Ouachita River Basin is presented in greater detail on page 690 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The authorized general plan for flood control and other purposes in the Ouachita River Basin includes the projects listed in Table 12-E. The 1966 Flood Control Act modified the Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, AR and LA, project to include 10 water-retention lakes in the western tributaries of Bayou Bartholomew in Arkansas and 6 local levee units along the main stem of the bayou in Louisiana. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed features of comprehensive project. (See individual statements for further details.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operations for Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, DeGray Lake, Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, and Ouachita River Levees are shown in individual reports in 1985. Condition as of Sep. 30. Pertinent data on those features which are complete or not started are in Table 12-E. Conditions of Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, DeGray Lake, and Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson are given in the individual reports in 1985 report. Reconnaissance studies of flooding problems in Ouachita Parish, LA, were initiated in January 1994. Study efforts are concentrating on the developing urban area around Monroe, LA. The reconnaissance report, completed in January 1995, recommended a feasibility study be conducted on flood reduction for the River Styx Bayou area under authority of Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. The study addressed alternative sized pumping stations. The final Detailed Project Report was completed in November 1995. Plans and specifications for the project are 12-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 essentially complete and the contract will be advertised upon completion of the right-of-way acquisition by the Project Sponsor. Planning and design for the Youngs Bayou Project are still on hold due to the Sponsor's inability to participate in the project. 10. PEARL RIVER BASIN, MS AND LA Location. The basin comprises most of the South-central portion of Mississippi and a small part of southeast Louisiana. The Pearl River begins in Neshoba County, MS, and flows southwesterly 113 miles to the vicinity of Jackson, MS, then southeasterly 233 miles to the vicinity of Bogalusa, LA. At that point, the Pearl River splits into the East and West Pearl Rivers, and flows southerly 44 and 48 miles, respectively, before entering the Rigolets and Lake Borgne. Existing projects. The Jackson-East Jackson Flood Control Project provides for improvements of the Pearl River at Jackson, MS. This project includes two levee systems totaling 13.2 miles in length, with two pumping stations, four gated outlets, and 18.9 miles of channel rectification including three cutoffs with a total length of 2.2 miles in the Pearl River. This project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of Jul. 14, 1960. Construction began in July 1964 and work was completed in FY 68. Total Federal cost of the project was $7,190,200. The FY 83 Jobs Bill authorized extension of the Jackson-East Jackson West Bank levee system along the Fortification Street I-55 exit. This extension was initiated and completed in FY 84. Public Law 98-63, dated Jul. 29, 1983, authorized the vicinity of Jackson project. This authority provided for additional measures to prevent recurring flood damages along the Pearl River at Jackson and included 3.3 miles of floodway clearing and enlarging the opening at the Highway 25 Bridge. This work has been completed. Mitigation lands for the clearing were purchased by the local sponsor in May 1985 and the Corps has reimbursed the local sponsor to cover the cost of these lands. Total Federal cost of this project is $1,800,000. Authorized projects. Public Law 99-88, dated Aug. 15, 1985, authorized planning, design, engineering, and construction of a levee system in Slidell, LA, to protect 3,265 residential and commercial structures from floods in the West Pearl. Public Law 99-662, dated Nov. 17, 1986, authorized construction of Shoccoe Dam and various flood control measures for Carthage-Leake County, MS. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 12-6 of the FY 92 report. Condition as of Sep. 30. An overall basin study is essentially complete, except for alternative studies to Shoccoe Dry Dam as discussed below. Flood control feasibility studies for Jackson, MS, recommending Shoccoe Dam, and for Slidell, LA, recommending a 15-mile levee system, have been completed. Detailed engineering and design studies were on hold for the Slidell levee system, due to the failure of a local funding referendum. As a result of upstream opposition, Shoccoe Dam is not implementable. In response to a request by the local sponsor, the Pearl River Basin Development District, reconnaissance studies to evaluate alternatives to Shoccoe for flood damage reduction in the Jackson Metropolitan Area have been completed and a potentially feasible levee plan identified. A Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement was signed with the Local Sponsor on Sep. 25, 1991. The feasibility studies focused on a comprehensive levee system and other flood control measures across the basin to reduce damages associated with flooding from the Pearl River. The Feasibility Study is scheduled for completion in June 1998. Studies of various flood control measures for Carthage-Leake County, Columbia and Picayune, MS; Bogalusa, LA, and the Bogue Chitto Subbasin have been completed. None were found economically feasible. We are currently coordinating with the NRCS to identify other feasible projects in the basin. Navigation studies have been conducted on the East and West Pearl Rivers. Results of these studies indicate that maintenance necessary to reopen the existing West Pearl River navigation project is economically justified. The final EIS was filed with EPA in March 1994. Studies indicate that the West Pearl River Navigation Project is economically justified, engineeringly feasible, and in the overall public interest. Maintenance dredging was to resume in the spring of 1995; however, the Corps was enjoined from dredging until a trial could be held in Federal court. At present, litigation has been stated and the court has retained jurisdiction until the Corps is prepared to initiate dredging and notified the court. This notification could take place when the record of decision is signed and the Corps is ready in all other aspects to initiate dredging. The NEPA process is not complete; therefore, dredging of the West Pearl River will not occur in 1998. Studies also indicate that the East Pearl River does not have sufficient existing flows 12-6 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT to support a 7- to 9-foot-deep navigation channel. The navigation study for Port Bienville, MS, has been terminated due to withdrawal of the Hancock County Port and Harbor Commission as local sponsor. Reconnaissance studies of flow distribution between the West Pearl River and the East Pearl River (boundary between the States of Louisiana and Mississippi) in the Lower Basin have been completed. A water resources development plan for flow redistribution in the Lower Basin was found economically feasible. However, the primary benefit of the plan would accrue to recreation. Reconnaissance studies did not find any problem that would be solved by a Federal project, given the current policies and priorities of the Administration. Investigations of low flow conditions in the Walkiah Bluff area were initiated in FY 95 under authority of Section 307(d) of WRDA 90. A detailed project report was completed in May 1997 which recommended a 50-50 low-flow distrubution (50 percent down Wilson Slough and 50 percent down the Pearl River). Preparation of plans and specifications for this project are underway. Reconnaissance studies of flood damage prevention and erosion control along Caney Creek in Jackson, MS, have been completed. These studies indicated that flood damages attributable to headwater flooding from Caney Creek are relatively insignificant and will not economically justify a water resource improvement plan under current conditions. Studies also found that most of the more serious streambank erosion problems along the creek have been corrected through actions undertaken by other public entities and agencies. 11. PEARL RIVER, SLIDELL, ST. TAMMANY PARISH, LA Location. The project is located in the southeastern portion of the State of Louisiana and consists of the area bounded by the West Pearl River on the east, Interstate 10 on the west, and Lake Pontchartrain on the south. Authorized project. The project is broken into two segments of levees. The segment north of 1-10 will consist of 4.0 miles of levee, a pumping station, a floodgate structure, and minor drainage structures. This levee will protect the Slidell area north of I-10 from flooding associated with a 200-year hydrological event on the Pearl River. The segment south of I-10 will consist of 9.0 miles of levees, three pumping stations, floodgates, and minor drainage structures. This levee will protect the Slidell area south of I-10 from flooding associated with a 200-year hydrological event on the Pearl River and provides the same level of protection against hurricane surges. These two levee segments total 13 miles oflevee and would protect some 3,029 homes. Estimated Federal cost is $29,867,000. Estimated non-Federal cost is $9,956,000. Local cooperation. The project sponsor, St. Tammany Levee Board, and the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works), in an agreement consistent with the Fiscal Year 1985 Supplemental Appropriation Act Public Law 99-88) and Senate Report 1567, signed the Local Cooperation Agreement Jun. 30, 1986. Operations and results during fiscal year. This project is on hold pending identification of a source of non-Federal funding. Condition as of Sep. 30. Completed resolution of comments on the General Design Memorandum for north levee only. Preparation of plans and specifications is on hold pending identification of a source of funding for the project by locals. No construction has taken place. 12. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT) Location. On Red River and its tributaries below Denison Dam, in Oklahoma, Arkansas, Texas, and Louisiana. (Refer to Geological Survey State maps and folio "Maps of Red River" - 1958 edition.) Existing project. Flood Control Act of 1946 approved general plan for flood control on Red River below Denison Dam, TX and OK, which provides for construction of six flood control reservoirs in combination with existing or authorized Federal and non-Federal levee improvements, modified as required, and channel stabilization at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. This act further authorized incorporation of several separate existing projects for flood damage prevention along Red River below Denison, above jurisdiction of the MRC, into this project. By Public Law 780, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess., as amended by Public Law 218, 84th Cong., 1st sess., and Public Law 645, 86th Cong., Ist sess., plan of improvement was amended to include additional projects as indicated in following lists of reservoirs and local protection works considered in general flood control plan for the Red River below Denison Dam, and existing flood control projects incorporated into project in Vicksburg District. (See Table 12-F for new projects and Table 12-G for incorporated projects.) 12-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Local cooperation. See individual reports herein. 13. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM, LEVEES AND BANK STABILIZATION (VICKSBURG DISTRICT) Location. Along the main stem of the Red River from the head of the levee system immediately above Index, AR, through the southwest corner of Arkansas to the vicinity of Boyce, LA, on the right bank, and Pineville, LA. on the left bank. Existing project. Raising and strengthening existing and authorized Red River levees to provide protection against flooding and bank protection works at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. The plan consists of raising and strengthening existing and authorized Red River levees to provide against a flood approximately 20 percent greater than the flood of 1945, the flood of record, as modified by authorized reservoirs. Bank protection works are to be constructed at locations where levee setbacks are impossible or uneconomical. Estimated cost for new work (October 1997) is $85,573,000 Federal and $5,975,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described on page 12-10 of FY 1984 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Hired labor forces continued investigations, surveys, and preparation of plans and specifications. A report on rehabilitation of the levee system within Arkansas was submitted to higher authority and approved. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in February 1948 and the levee and bank stabilization are complete with the exception of levee rehabilitation within the state of Arkansas. Construction was initiated on the rehabiliation of levee Item 2 in Arkansas. 14. WEST AGURS, LA, LEVEE Location. The West Agurs, LA, Levee is located in Caddo Parish in northwestern Louisiana, immediately adjacent to the northern corporate limits of Shreveport. Existing Project. The West Agurs levee was constructed by local interests in 1961 and incorporated into the Federal project Red River Below Denison Dam Project in 1983. The levee extends from U.S. Highway 71 at the north end of the area to the Texas and Pacific Railroad at the lower end, a distance of approximately 3 miles. In addition to the levee, appurtenant interior drainage works include a borrow pit channel at an approximate bottom elevation of 150.0 feet NGVD, a 55 CFS pumping station, and one 10- by 10-foot floodgate. The entire system was designed to protect the 700-acre West Agur area from Twelve Mile Bayou headwater and Red River backwater flooding. Total Federal cost is $0. Local Cooperation. The Caddo Levee District completed levee improvements consisting of a temporary ponding area required for the levees to be incorporated into the Federal project in 1983. The West Agur levee was incorporated into the Federal system in 1983. Operation and maintenance of the levee is the responsibility of the Caddo Levee District. Condition as of Sep 30. Studies of flooding problems in the West Agur area were initiated in March 1997 under the authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act as amended. The study is investigating the need for an additional pump(s) to provide flood protection to commercial and industrial properties located within the leveed area. The study is scheduled to be completed in July 1998. 15. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed work was accomplished at a cost of $289,130 for the fiscal year. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1997, is $4,609,110. 16. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) FY 97 costs for the period were $196,673 for disaster preparedness. Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in the interest of flood control (Sec. 208 of 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Cong.) 12-8 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT No activity during the period. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1956 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Cong.) Total FY costs for emergency bank protection work was $386,148. This included work on Culley-Brashear Ditch, Madison County, MS, $11,386. U.S. Highway 65, East Carroll Parish, LA, $2,923. Hwy 80 Clear Creek, $44,015; and Big Black River, U.S. Highway 51 Bridge, $30,453. Yazoo River, Greenwood-Leflore Hospital $3,218 and Coordination Account Funds $9,561. Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). Boeuf-Tensas Basin, $1,852; Ouachita Parish River Styx $475,348, Twelve Mile Bayou 38,700 and Camden, AR $8,590 and coordination account funds $10,000. 17. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Project modifications for improvement of environment pursuant to Sec. 1135, Public Law 99-662, as amended (preauthorization). During the FY, $22,873 was expended on initial appraisals; $4,889 on Coordination Account Funds; $118,092 on Lake Whittington Weir, MS. Project modifications for improvement of environmental pursuant to Section 307(d), Public Law 102-580. During the FY, $293,276 was expended on Pearl River, Walkiah Bluff, MS and LA, 12-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 12-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 1997 Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR (6.5-foot navigation project) New Work Approp.$ Cost -- $ 5,248,6191 -- 5,248,6191 1. Ouachita and Black Rivers below Camden, AR (9-foot navigation project) 2. Red River Emergency Bank Protection (Contrib. Funds) 3. Red River Waterway Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA (Contrib. Funds) 5. Aloha- Rigolette, LA 6. Canal 43, AR (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 605,000 75,503 -- 30,000 453,099 111,076 -- 230,609,2512 -- 230,110,2342 6,617,598 6,722,000 6,795,000 8,698,000 132,418,103 6,426,981 6,968,452 6,834,260 8,646,907 132,173,688 3,500,000 6,000,000 6,600,000 6,000,000 65,008,000 586,791 2,700,965 7,831,332 8,451,252 61,941,084 -- -- -- -- 6,825 -- -- -- -- 6,825 145,000,000 24,219,000 18,990,200 8,904,000 1,290,844,200 124,656,309 60,679,112 19,445,126 4,921,367 1,286,570,018 6,189,000 7,096,000 7,222,000 9,167,000 68,572,791 6,650,038 7,267,016 7,265,615 9,051,268 67,407,512 -- 1,265,077 30,558 674,929 5,067,552 587,352 4,879,967 450,000 168,000 271,800 1,814,000 4,334,800 342,951 265,775 319,174 1,518,306 4,034,073 24,000 20,161 897,000 898,061 80 -- 80 -- 32,553 12-10 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 1997 8. Ouachita River New Work Levees, LA Approp. 6,300,000 4,500,000 2,300,000 95,000 24,463,758 Cost 3,679,603 5,456,388 2,790,774 2,563,294 20,959,019 10. Pearl River New Work Vicinity of Approp. -- -- -- -- 2,080,000 Jackson, MS Cost -- -- -- -- 2,079,999 Pearl River New Work -- 2,000,000 -- -- 2,000,000 Walkiah Bluff Approp. -- 176,327 572,763 293,276 1,042,366 Cost Maint. Approp. 231,000 748,000 388,000 156,000 2,495,500 Cost 333,596 791,623 392,018 152,834 2,402,959 11. Pearl River, New Work Slidell, St. Approp. -- -- -20,000 -- 3,586,000 Tammany Parish, Cost 77,520 14,356 1,089 -- 3,682,404 LA 12. Red River New Work below Denison Approp. 3,500,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 -- 75,461,000 Dam Levees and Cost 1,250,675 2,206,193 756,231 681,346 72,433,862 Bank Stabilization (Vicksburg District) Natchez Bluff New Work -- -- -- 4,500,000 4,500,000 Approp. -- -- -- 631,071 631,071 Cost 1. Includes $674,068 for new work on previous projects. 2. Includes $3,312,000 PL 98-8 Jobs Bill. Excludes $47,854,000 previously allocated to New Orleans District. 3. Excludes New Orleans District allocation and cost. 12-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 12-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Dec. 31, 1970 OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS BELOW CAMDEN, AR (See Section 1 of Text) Modification of existing project to provide for 9-foot channel and deepening canal to Felsenthal, AR. Modification of 9-foot project to provide four new locks and dams and channel improvements. Migratory waterfowl refuges on Bayou D'Arbonne in connection with the pool of the Columbia Lock and Dam and in the pool of the Felsenthal Lock and Dam. RED RIVER EMERGENCY BANK PROTECTION (See Section 2 of Text). Realining the banks by dredging cut-offs and training works and stabilizing banks by means of revetments and dikes. RED RIVER WATERWAY-MISSISSIPPI RIVER TO SHREVEPORT, LA (See Section 3 of Text) Develop a 9 by 200 feet, approximately 236 miles long from Mississippi River at junction of Old River via Old River and Red River to Shreveport, LA, consisting of realinement, bank stabilization, and construction five locks and dams. ALOHA-RIGOLETTE AREA, LA (See Section 5 of Text) Original author incorporated into RRBW Protection FCA 1946 project modified to provide Bayou Darrow outlet. BAYOU BODCAU AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA Extend Cypress Bayou-Red Chute Bayou levee, construct stream closure landside drainage channel and three culverts on Red Chute Bayou and clearing and snagging channel; extend Flat River-Loggy Bayou levee, close Flat River near junction with Cutoff Bayou, and construct control structures on Flat River near junction with Red Chute Bayou; and enlarge Flat River channel to 20 to 35 feet, a distance of 11.6 miles. CANAL 43, AR (See Section 6 of Text) Channel enlargement Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended Authorized by Chief of Engineers, October 31, 1988. CANEY CREEK, MS Authorizes construction of such bank stabilization measures for Caney Creek in the vicinity of Jackson, MS, between McDowell Road and Raymond Road as the Secretary determines necessary for flood damage prevention and erosion control along approximately 3,000 feet of the creek. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. 12-12 S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 112, 86th Cong., 2d sess. Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Nov. 25, 1970, and H. Doc. 92-109, 92d Cong., 1st ;ess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 304, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 101- 101 Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 203, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 Aug. 18, 1941 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 30, 1948 Nov. 17,1986 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Water Resources Development Act of 1996 Jun. 30, 1948 as amended NATCHEZ BLUFFS, MS Authorizes bluff stabilization in accordance with the Natchez Bluff study at a total cost of $17,200,000, estimated federal cost of $12,900,000 and non federal cost of $4,300,000. CHAUVIN BAYOU, LA Construction of a 250-cfs pumping plant located adjacent to Chauvin Bayou at the Ouachita River levee and a water control structure in Canal L-11. Public Law 104-303 Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers Feb. 6, 1990. LEAD BAYOU, MS Channel enlargement. Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Jun. 10, 1980. MCKINNEY BAYOU, AR AND TX (See Section 7 of text) Authorizes a comprehensive study and recommendations for development and efficient utilization of water and related resources for the McKinney Bayou area, a tributary of Red Water. MONROE AND WEST MONROE, LA, AND OUACHITA PARISH, LA Authorizes such structural and nonstructural measures as the Secretary deems feasible to prevent flood damage to the cities of Monroe and West Monroe, LA, and Ouachita Parish, LA. OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, AR AND LA (See Section 9 of Text) Authorized DeGray Lake; Murfreesboro Lake; extension of floodwall at Monroe to partially close the existing gap; local protection at Bawcomville, LA (subsequently constructed under Sec. 6, Act of May 15, 1928, with local interests contributing one third of cost); Bayou Bartholomew channel improvement, including Deep Bayou and Overflow Creek; Pine Bluff local protection; local protection at Calion, AR; and incorporation, into the Ouachita River and Tributaries project, of all existing projects and portions thereof in the basin above the lower end of the levees on the east bank of the Ouachita River. In addition, the Chief of Engineers authorized on Nov. 14, 1966, additional work on the levees. Public Law 98-63 98th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 12-13 Jun. 30, 1948, as amended Jul. 29, 1983 Nov. 17, 1986 May 17, 1950 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 12-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 14, 1960 Jun. 13, 1983 Jul. 29, 1983 Aug. 15, 1985 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 30, 1948, as amended Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 Water Resources Development Act of 1996 PEARL RIVER, MS AND LA (See Section 10 of Text) Construction of levee system and channel rectification, Pearl River, vicinity of Jackson, MS Accomplish the clearing and channel improvements at Hwy 25 bridge on the Pearl River in the vicinity of Jackson, MS. Design and construct protection to prevent flooding along the Pearl River in the vicinity of Jackson, MS Planning, design, engineering, and construction of a levee system for Slidell, LA, pending binding cost-sharing arrangements acceptable to the Secretary of the Army or under terms and conditions provided in subsequent legislation when enacted into law. Authorizes the Pearl River Basin, including Shoccoe, MS, for the construction of the Shoccoe Dam plus upstream flood control measures at east-central Leake County, south part of Carthage, MS, Highway 35 vicinity, upstream reservoirs on the Pearl River and upstream channels on the Pearl River and elsewhere in Leake County. PEARL RIVER, SLIDELL, ST. TAMMANY PARISH, LA (See Section 11 of Text) Authorizes flood control improvements for Pearl River Basin, St. Tammany, LA, subject to a favorable Chief's report and approval by the Secretary of the Army for Civil Works. PORTER BAYOU, MS Selective snagging and clearing of Porter Bayou, MS, from mile 12.5 to mile 32.3 RED RIVER WATERWAY, LA (See Section 12 of Text) Water Resources Development of 1986 authorized for construction the project for mitigation of wildlife losses, Red River Waterway, LA, which may include all or such portion of any land adjacent to the Loggy Bayou Wildlife Management Area. Water Resources Development Act of 1990 modified the mitigation project to authorize the Secretary to acquire an additional 12,000 acres adjacent to or close to the Bayou Bodcau Wildlife Management Area. WRDA 96 modified the mitigation project to authorize the Secretary to acquire lands adjacent to Loggy Bayou Wildlife Management Area in Caddo and Red River Parishes and increasing the authorized cost to $10,500,000. H. Doc. 441, 86th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 153, 98th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 98-63, 98th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 99-88, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662 99th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 18, 1982. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 101-640, 101st Cong., 2d sess. Section 301, Public Law 104-303 12-14 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Water Resources WRDA 96 modified the project to include dredging of the entrance Section 301, Public Development to the Oxbow Lakes designated for preservation in project Law 104-303 Act of 1996 documentation and stated that the cost sharing for this dredging should be the same as the general navigation features. RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM LEVEES AND BANK STABILIZATION (VICKSBURG DIST.) (See Section 13 of Text) Jul. 24, 1946 Levee and bank stabilization. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Aug. 13, 1968 Deauthorization of Morringsport Dam and Reservoir on H. Doc. 304, Cypress Creek; realining and stabilizing the banks of the 90th Cong., 2d sess. Red River; and recreational facilities from the Mississippi River to Denison Dam, OK and TX. RED RIVER WATERWAY-SHREVEPORT, LA, TO INDEX, AR Aug. 13, 1968 Provides for realinement of the channels of the Red River H. Doc. 304, from Shreveport, LA, to Index, AR. 90th Cong., 2d sess. 12-15 TABLE 12-C OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, AR AND LA (9-FOOT PROJECT), LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Min. Depth Greatest on Available Lower Miles Length Max. Elev. Miter Above Width for Full Lift Normal Still at Miles Mouth of Width at Pool Normal Per- Total from of Lock of Lock Low Surface Pool Character cent Estimated Nearest Black Chamber Chamber Water (feet Level or Kind of Type of Com- Project Location Town River (feet) (feet) (feet) msl) (feet) Foundation Dam Construction plete Cost Jonesville, LA N Columbia, LA Felsenthal, AR Calion, AR (H. K. Thatcher) 10 25 84 600 5 117 84 600 1 227 84 600 7 283 84 600 30 34 14 Piling 18 52 13 do 18 701 13 Earth 12 77 13 do Moving Tainter gated dam; bascule gated navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates do Tainter gated dam; fixed crest navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates do Tainter gated dam; hinged crest gated navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates. do Tainter gated dam; hinged crest gated navigation pass; steel mitering lock gates. 1002 $ 43,585,000 952 46,235,000 882 882 102,161,000 71,019,000 Estimated Federal Cost Estimated Non-Federal Cost Total Estimated Cost 1. Fish and wildlife impoundment level. Navigation pool elevation 65. 2. The percent complete reflects all work within the pool. 0 0 'El x 0 b x t.i .� O z 0 0" 'El 0 pg m g $263,000,000 18,009,000 281,009,000 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1997 Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Bayou Bartholomew, LA and AR1,2,3'4 Bayous D'Arbonne and Corney, LA1',2'4 Big Black River, MS 1 ,4,5 Big Sunflower River, MS1 '4 ,6'7 Boeuf River, LA1, 3'4 '7 '8 '9 Claiborne County Port, MS Cypress Bayou and Waterway between Jefferson, TX, and Shreveport, LA15 Homochitto River, MS4 Lake Providence Harbor, LA Little Missouri River, AR1,4 ,5 Little River, LA1,4,5,10 Little Tallahatchie River, MS1 ,7 Madison Parish Port, LA Mouth of Yazoo River, MS 1,7,11 Ouachita and Black Rivers, AR and LA, Felsenthal Canal Overton-Red River Waterway, LA Pearl River, MS Red River below Fulton, AR1 ',16 ,1 7, 18 Red River Waterway LA, AR, OK, and TX1, 1 7 ,18 Red River Waterway, Shreveport, LA to Daingerfield, TX 1 Removings snags and wrecks from Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers 11 Rosedale Harbor, MS Saline River, AR1,3,4' 5 Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers, MS 1,4,5 Tensas River and Bayou Macon, LA1 ,8,13 Yalobusha River, MS1,4,5, 14 -- 1931 -- 1941 -- 1895 -- 1942 -- 1949 -- 1985 Complete 1971 -- 1910 -- 1985 -- 1873 -- 1890 -- 1913 -- 1985 -- 1953 -- 193712 -- 1985 -- 1985 -- 1978 -- 1969 -- 1976 -- 1948 -- 1985 -- 1931 -- 1939 1949 -- 1937 12-17 $ 45,874 19,000 15,000 560,027 30,000 2,000,000 202,817 15,482 208,537 19,992 1,500 19,000 656,000 1,179,211 8,562,908 1,963,806 $ 42,857 37,804 -- 459,328 103,737 498,530 452,611 8,518 5,079,179 -- .-- 907,780 840,097 4,387,192 3,498,242 2,147,890 1 Dec. 1983 Dec. 1914 1 1 1 1 Dec. 1980 1 1956 1 1 150,800 1 Sep. 1978 1 1 1 1 2,000,000 26,900 43,481 38,367 7,000 272,500 4,767,581 12,792 173,066 85,352 15,936 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 12-D OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (Continued) For Last Cost to Sep. 1997 Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Yazoo River, MS -- 1987 9,341,826 1,209,895 1 Yellow Bend Port, AR Complete 1991 3,793,069 509,291 Aug. 1991 1. Status and Date unavailable. 2. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 1962, 64th Cong., 2d sess., and H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 3. Channels adequate for existing commerce. 4. Inactive project. No commerce. 5. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 6. Project curtailment recommended by elimination of work between Pentecost and mouth of Hushpuckena River. (Abandonment of entire project erroneously recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 7. See report of Mississippi River Commission for operations in connection with Yazoo Basin. 8. Report of New Orleans District, pp. 919-920 for Fiscal Year 1949. 9. Project curtailment recommended by elimination of work above Girard, LA. (Abandonment of entire project recommended erroneously in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess.) 10. Due to decline of traffic, local interests not sufficiently interested to provide rights-of-way and dumping privileges. 11. No additional funds available under this project. Work is being carried on under appropriation flood control, Mississippi River and tributaries. 12. Year authorized. 13. Inactive. Channel adequate for commerce. 14. See report of Mississippi River Commission for operations in connection with Yazoo Basin flood control project including channel clearing and rectification and Grenada Lake on Yalobusha River. 15. Excludes $50,000 contributed funds. 16. Includes $1,553,878 for previous projects. 17. Incorporated in the project "Red River Waterway-Mississippi River Shreveport, LA" Sept. 30, 1976. 18. Emergency bank protection on this project is reported separately as "Red River Emergency Bank Protection." Two reaches, "Red River Waterway-Mississippi River to Shreveport, LA" and "Red River Waterway-Shreveport, LA, Daingerfield, TX," are also reported separately. 19. Includes $674,068 for new work on previous projects. 12-18 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-E OUACHITA RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 10 of Text) For Last Estimated Full Report Federal See Annual New Work Project Report for: Cost Blakely Mt. Dam-Lake Ouachita, AR 1985 $ 44,100,000 DeGray Lake, AR 1985 72,034,0002 Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, AR 1985 20,900,000 Calion, AR 1960 970,9963 Columbia, LA 1941 204,7403 Existing levees and extensions thereto from Bastrop, LA, to mouth of Boeuf River and at West Monroe, LA 1961 3,025,1813 Little Missouri River below Murfreesboro, AR 1957 354,8023 Ozan Creek, AR 1957 57,7423 Terre Noire Creek, AR 1948 123,7003 Pine Bluff, AR, local protection 1954 172,5823 Monroe, LA, floodwall extension (Plan B) 1984 2,561,0003 Ouachita River Levees (additional work) (1) 9,400,000 Total $153,904,7434 1. 2. 3. 4. See individual reports herein. Includes $5,800,000 for water supply to be reimbursed by local interests. Actual cost of completed project. Excludes the authorized Murfreesboro Lake, AR, project, which is inactive. The latest estimated cost (1954) was $4,190,000. 12-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 12-F RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT): NEW PROJECTS (See Sec. 13 of Text) Drainage Conserva- Flood Area tion Control Estimated (square Storage (acre- Federal Project Stream miles) (acre-feet) feet) Cost Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR2 and LA -- 1,158 -- -- $25,100,0003 Bayou Nicholas-Coushatta, LA -- -- -- -- 70,7174 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA5 -- -- -- -- 243,3363 Caddo Lake, LA1 Caddo Lake -- -- -- 3,586,000 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA Red River -- -- -- 1,950,0003 Garland City, AR 1 '6 -- -- -- -- 1,450,0003 Maniece Bayou, AR -- -- -- -- 970,0323 McKinney Bayou, AR7 '8 -- -- -- -- 5,610,0003 Posten Bayou, AR and LA2 '6 '9 -- -- -- -- 560,000 Red River below Denison Dam levees and bank stabilization, TX, AR, and LA1'3 -- -- -- -- 66,775,0003 Total 99,191,885 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Details presented in individual report herein. Construction on this project not started. In addition, non-Federal funds are: Bayou Bodcau and tributaries, AR and LA .............................................. $5,300,000 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA (cash contribution) ................................ 89,047 Caddo Lake, LA ................................................................. 28,000 Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA ......................................... 480,000 East Point ........................................................................ 67,000 Garland City, AR ........................................................ ......... 6,000 Maniece Bayou, AR (cash contribution) ................................................... 18,000 McKinney Bayou, AR (cash contribution) ................................................ 508,000 Red River below Denison Dam, levees and bank stabilization, TX, AR, and LA .................... 1,560,000 For last full report, see Annual Report for 1964. For last full report, see Annual Report for 1951. Inactive. Includes $4,330,200, Code 711, and $399,739 accelerated Public Work funds. Joint-use pool (sediment). Deauthorized by resolution Dec. 17, 1970, which also authorized new project "Posten Bayou, AR," under provision of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965. 12-20 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-G RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM (VICKSBURG DISTRICT): INCORPORATED PROJECTS (See Sec. 13 of Text) For Last Flood Estimated Full Report Control Federal See Annual Project Type of Work Act Cost Report For: Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA Levee and appurtenances 1941 $ 1,653,2371 1956 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA2 Flood-control reservoir 1938 5,120,7401 4 Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA Channel improvement 1941 319,2001 1948 Bayou Pierre, LA Channel enlargement 1936 255,5291 4 Black Bayou Lake, LA5'6 Flood-control reservoir 1936 714,000 1945 Colfax, Grant Parish, LA Cutoff 1938 70,3481,7 1938 Grant Parish, below Colfax, LA Levees 1938 38,8091 1941 Hempstead County levee district No.l, AR Levee enlargement 1938 88,0061 1941 Natchitoches Parish, LA Levee and appurtenances 1936 1,529,9271,8 1956 Pineville, Red River, LA Levee and appurtenances 1941 232,4261 1953 Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, LA Bank protection 1944 3,908,0001 1953 Red River Parish, LA Levee enlargement 1936 149,4351 1939 Saline Point, LA Cutoff 1936 124,1111 1945 Wallace Lake, LA Flood-control reservoir 1936 1,219,3711,3 4 West Agurs, LA Levee and appurtenauces 1976 0 Total $15,467,134 1. Actual cost. 2. Project transferred to Vicksburg District, August 1982. 3. Includes amounts indicated for recreational facilities under Code 711, Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA, $1,027,000; Wallace Lake, LA, $17,164. 4. Included in this report. 5. Work not started. 6. Inactive. 7. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7 of Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended by Sec. 9 of Flood Control Act of 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 8. In addition, $25,000 was expended from contributed funds. 12-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 12-H OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD 'CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1997 Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Aloha-Rigolette Area, Grant and Rapides Parishes, LA1 1956 $ 1,896,826 $ -- Apr. 1955 Bayou Bodceau and Tributaries AR and LA 1995 1,037,952 1,600,919 -- Bayou Bodcau, Red Chute, and Loggy Bayou, LA1 1948 319,200 -- Jan. 1948 Bayou Bodcau Reservoir, LA 1985 -- 5,677,514 Apr. 1961 Bayou Pierre, LA 1985 -- 292,749 FY 1939 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA1,2 1951 243,3362 -- Jun. 1939 Big Black River, MS3 1956 910,185 670,7503 Big Choctaw Bayou, LA3,4 1966 248,823 -- Black Bayou Reservoir, LA1 '5 '6 1945 -- -- -- Blakely Mt. Dam - Lake Ouachita, Ouachita River, AR 1985 34,023,108 90,661,524 Oct. 1955 Caddo Lake Dam, LA 1986 -- 1,689,120 -- Campti-Clarence Area in Natchitoches Parish, LA 1978 1,655,700 -- Jul. 1978 Chauvin Bayou, LA 1995 4,245,863 -- -- Colfax, Grant Parish, LA' 7 1938 70,348 -- -- DeGray Lake Caddo River, AR 1985 72,033,992 63,454,988 Dec. 1971 East Point, LA 1969 286,069 3,051,536 Aug. 1968 Garland City, AR 1976 1,335,841 -- Jul. 1974 Grant Parish below Colfax, LA1',3 1941 38,809 -- 3 Hempstead County Levee District No. 1, AR1',3 1941 88,006 -- Homochitto River, MS3 1956 205,000 144,650 Maniece Bayou, AR 1'2 1970 970,9322 -- Aug. 1969 Monroe Floodwall, LA 1984 2,560,000 Murfreesboro Dam and Lake4 1951 --- Narrows Dam-Lake Greeson, Little Missouri River, AR 1985 16,516,689 63,280,674 May 1950 Natchez Port Area, MS34 1969 538,000 -- 5 Natchitoches Parish, LA',2 1956 1,529,478 -- Aug. 1955 12-22 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-H OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (Continued) CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 1997 Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Pearl River, Jackson-East Jackson, MS 1986 2,790,127 -- 1987 Pineville, Red River, LA34 1953 232,426 -- Dec. 1951 Lead Bayou, MS 1991 1,961,089 -- Nov. 1988 Porter Bayou 1995 1,049,278 -- Sep. 1993 Posten Bayou, AR8 1973 -- ---- Poverty Point, LA 1986 250,000 -- Oct. 1985 Red River Parish, LA1'3 1939 149,435 -- 3 Red River in vicinity of Shreveport, LA1 1953 3,908,000 -- Mar. 1953 Red River Waterway, 1994 855,497 Shreveport, LA to Index, LA9 Saline Point, LA1 3 1945 124,111 -- Twelvemile Bayou, LA4 1966 335,433 -- May 1965 Wallace Lake, LA 1985 -- 1,879,771 Dec. 1946 1. Authorized under project "Red River Below Denison Dam." 2. In addition, the following was expended from contributed funds: Amite River and tributaries ........................................................... $ 430 Bayou Pierre in vicinity of Shreveport, LA .................................... ......... ..... 89,047 Choctaw Bayou and Tributaries, LA ............................. ....... . ......... 170,799 Harvey Canal, Bayou Barataria Levee, LA ................................................................. 425,209 Maniece Bayou, AR ...................... ................................. .. ............ .. 39,293 Natchitoches Parish, LA ............................................... ........... 250,000 3. Completion Date Unavailable. 4. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Sec. 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 5. Construction not initiated. 6. Inactive. 7. Completed under provisions of Sec. 7 Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended by Sec. 9, Flood Control Act 1936, and included in 1939 Annual Report of President, Mississippi River Commission, p. 2214. 8. Posten Bayou Project, authorized by Senate and House Resolutions, Dec. 17 and 15, 1970, deleted the plan authorized by the Flood Control Act dated Aug. 3, 1955. 9. Excludes New Orleans District allocation and cost. 12-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 12-I DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contrib See Annual And Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Extended Exp Bayou Bartholomew and Tributaries, AR and LA 1990 May 17, 1950 974,000 -- S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Buffalo River, MS 1 1940 Nov 1986 -- -- McKinney Bayou, Finn 19632 Aug 1977 -- -- Bayou Segment, AR 1. Deauthorized by Sec. 1002, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. 2. Date Authorized. 12-24 VICKSBURG, MS, DISTRICT TABLE 12-J ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 97 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention (120) McKinney Bayou, AR and TX -75353 198,919 Subtotal 198,919 Miscellaneous Activities (170) Interagency Water Resources (173) -14713 36,958 Special Investigations (171) -17250 12,379 North American Waterfowl Management Plan (175) -53904 2,490 Subtotal 51,827 COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES AND NON FEDERAL INTERAGENCIES (180) Cooperation with other Water Resource Agencies-53907 2,995 Jackson Pearl RV Res Release -028001 38,974 Subtotal 41,969 TOTAL (Category 100) 292,715 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Services -82030 14,974 Quick Response -82045 3,870 Special Studies Clear & Black Lakes, LA -83005 39,079 Special Studies Carthage, MV -083006 24,055 Technical Services -82040 49,661 131,639 Hydrologic Studies (260) Hydrologic Studies (260) -53820 8,227 TOTAL (Category 200) 139,866 PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (600) Locks and Dams (622) Red River Waterway to Dainger Field -075024 263 TOTAL (Category 600) 263 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $ 432848 12-25 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT * This district comprises a portion of southeastern Missouri and southern Illinois, western portions of Kentucky and Tennessee, a small portion of northern Mississippi, and the northeastern portion of Arkansas; includes area embraced in drainage basins of eastern tributaries of the Mississippi River south of Ohio River Basin to Nonconnah and Horn Lake Creeks, inclusive, and those of western tributaries south of Little River diversion channel and Commerce, MO, including St. Francis River Basin and White River and tributaries below Peach Orchard Bluff, AR, on the right bank and below Augusta, AR, on the left bank; also includes left bank Mississippi River levee from vicinity of Memphis south to about mile 620, and right bank levees from Cape Girardeau, MO, to about mile 605. Flood Control 1. Mayfield Creek, KY ............... 2. Inspection of completed flood control projects ............. .... ...... 3. Flood control work under special authorization ..................... 4. Ecosystem Restoration work under special authorization ............... IMPROVEMENTS Page Tables 13-1 13-2 13-2 13-2 Table 13-A Cost & Financial Statement ... Table 13-B Authorizing Legislation ...... Table 13-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................. Table 13-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................. Table 13-E Deauthorized Projects ....... Table 13-F Active General Investigations .. Flood Control 1. MAYFIELD CREEK, KENTUCKY Location. Mayfield Creek is located in West Kentucky in Ballard, Carlisle and McCracken Counties. Project limits extend from the confluence of Mayfield Creek with the Mississippi River upstream 25 miles to near the Graves-McCracken County line. Existing project. The project was approved for construction on Sept. 26, 1991, under the authority of Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. The project consists of selective clearing and snagging of debris and excavation of sediment deposits according to provisions contained in the Stream Obstruction Removal Guidelines. The project would provide a level of protection less than 1 year. However, positive drainage would be established and reduction in flood duration is accomplished. The estimated construction cost for the project is $4,090,000. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed with the Sponsor Chairman for The Mayfield Creek Coalition on Sept. 27, 1991. The sponsor is required to provide the lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations required for project construction and cash contribution sufficient to bring the non-Federal share to 25 percent of the total project cost. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction is completed on 20 miles of channel. Remaining work is scheduled for completion December 1996. 13-1 Page 13-3 13-3 13-4 13-5 13-6 13-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 2. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspected completed projects at a cost of $174,799 in the period. Total cost as of Sep. 30, 1997, was $2,729,783. This included in-depth inspection of projects. 3. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). During this period $245 was expended on Raft Creek, AR; $1,161 on Tar Creek, Chester County, TN; $66,308 on Main Ditch #8, Pemiscot Co. MO; and $6,699 on Arlington, KY; $7,133 on Little River Diversion, Dutchtown, MO; $20,390 was expended on Scott City, MO. Emergency bank stabilization activities pursuant to Sec. 14, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., as amended. During FY 1997, $31,743 was expended on Town Creek, Somerville, TN; $1,000 on Bartlett Road, Harrington Creek, Memphis, TN; $27,401 on Gray's Creek, Shelby County, TN; $35,473 on Loosahatchie Interceptor Sewer Shelby. Emergency flood control activities, Public Law 99, 84th Cong. Federal cost was $267,831 for disaster preparedness and $477,635 for emergency operations in FY 97. Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 208, Public Law 780, 83rd Cong., as amended. During FY 1997, $310,141 was expended on Hatchie River in Alcorn and Tippah Counties, MS; $54,354 on Cypress Creek, McNairy Cty, TN. 4. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Project Modifications for improvement of environment pursuant to Sec. 1135, Public Law 99-662, as amended (preauthorization). During this period $10,906 was expended on Simmons Field Control Structure, Mississippi County, AR. 13-2 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 13-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 1997 1. Mayfield Creek, New Work TN Approp. $470,000 971,400 150,000 272,000 3,188,400 Cost 445,944 944,601 185,912 295,168 3,090,412 TABLE 13-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 24, 1946 Mayfield Creek, KY (See Sec. 1 of Text) Approved Sept. 26, 1991' as amended 1. Authorized under authority of Sec. 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. 13-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 13-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1997 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Caruthersville Harbor, MO 1984 $768,992 $ 3,927,681 Dec. 1980 Helena Harbor, AR 1984 90,847 7,291,219 Sep. 1963 Elvis Stahr Harbor, KY 1984 149,827 7,253,578 Jan. 1963 New Madrid Harbor, MO6 1984 196,373 1,657,604 Oct. 1970 Obion River, TN1'3 1911 28,716 -- -- Osceola Harbor, AR 1984 269,115 10,255,955 Nov. 1974 Removing snags and wrecks from Mississippi River below mouth of Missouri River and from Old and Atchafalaya Rivers 4 5 1948 -- 318,8334 White River, AR (below Newport) 1984 169,994 38,439,150 -- Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN 1984 586,500 13,222,137 1959 1. No commerce. 2. Existing project is for maintenance only. 3. Recommended for abandonment in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 4. Completion date not available. 5. No funds available under this project. Work being carried on under "Appropriation, Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries." 6. WRDA 92 (Section 102) modified authorization by directing the Secretary to assume responsibility for maintenance of New Madrid County Harbor constructed by non-Federal interest. 13-4 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 13-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1997 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Big Creek Canal, Millington, TN Bradford, TN Cottonwood Slough pumping plant, IL1 Drinkwater Sewer, MO Dyersburg, TN1 Dyersburg, TN (SW) Fletcher Creek at Memphis, TN Grays Creek Canal Shelby Co., TN Hatchie River, Alcorn Co., MS Humboldt, TN Memphis, Wolf River, and Nonconnah Creek, TN Millington, TN Mounds and Mound City, Ohio River Basin, IL3 Nixon Creek, TN1 Nonconnah Blvd. Nonconnah Creek, TN Nonconnah Creek, Interceptor Sewer, Memphis, TN Nonconnah Creek at Perkins Street, Memphis, TN N. Second St., Memphis, TN (Wolf River Bridge) N. Second St. at Wolf River, Memphis, TN Plainview Road Bridge, Chester County, TN Quince Road Bridge, Memphis, TN Sandy Creek Jackson, TN St. Francis River Highway No. 90, AR Treasure Island, MO Turner Creek, Corinth, MS US Hwy 51, Nonconnah Creek, TN W. Hickman, Area, Hickman, KY 1977 1984 1964 1984 1962 1981 1993 1985 1987 1989 1960 1996 1955 1952 1983 1987 1993 1983 1991 1991 1993 1985 1985 1981 1987 1984 1983 $ 70,363 95,061 147,000 1,494,828 229,6492 1,820,869 421,898 155,280 85,200 1,141,407 11,141,199 830,898 1,132,704 62,821 249,999 259,000 830,781 249,999 367,012 124,954 156,565 238,000 161,000 861,528 100,600 369,200 1,674,180 -- Dec. 1983 -- Feb. 1964 -- Jun. 1980 -- Jun. 1962 -- Oct. 1976 -- Sept. 1991 -- Aug. 1985 -- Feb. 1986 -- Apr. 1988 -- May 1959 -- Dec. 1995 -- Oct. 19594 -- Dec. 1951 -- Nov. 1981 -- Dec. 1986 -- Feb. 1992 -- Sep. 1980 -- Jan. 1990 -- Sep. 1990 -- Jul. 1991 -- Dec. 1984 -- Sep. 1985 -- Mar. 1978 -- Mar. 1987 -- Mar. 1983 -- Oct. 1976 13-5 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Sec. 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 2. Includes $21,863 contributed funds. 3. Work being completed under Mississippi River and Tributaries project. 4. Exclusive of Cache River Pumping Station. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 13-E DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For: Deauthorized Expended Expended Big Creek and L'Anguille River, White River Basin, AR 1977 May 6, 81 -- -- Clarendon to Laconia Circle White River Basin, AR 1937 May 6, 81 -- -- Huntingdon, TN 1983 Sep 80 2,900,281 -- Long Lake Area, Helena, AR 1983 Jul 83 61,281 13-6 MEMPHIS, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 13-F ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 97 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) Hickman Bluff, KY - 77067 $115 115 Environmental Services Partnership (140) Environmental Services Partnership $ 77 $ 77 Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations (171) -17250 $10,272 Intra Agency Water Resources Development-14713 14,367 North American Waterfowl Mgmt (176) - 53904 6837 31,476 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Dept. of Agriculture (181) - 77067 $201 $201 TOTAL (Category (100) $ 31,869 COLLECTIONS AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Services 137,328 137,328 TOTAL (Category 200) $137,328 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $169,197 13-7 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT * This district comprises those portions of southwestern Illinois and eastern Missouri embraced in drainage basin of Mississippi River and its western tributaries, exclusive of the Missouri River, from the mouth of the Ohio River to mile 300, and of its eastern tributaries to Hamburg Bay at mile 261 on left bank, exclusive of tributary basin of Illinois Waterway upstream of new La Grange Lock and Dam at mile 80.15 above confluence of the Illinois and Mississippi Rivers. The St. Louis District territory encompasses 27,000 square miles. District also includes drainage basin in Missouri tributary to the Little River diversion channel. Report on the Mississippi River between the Missouri River and mile 300 is included in separate report on the Mississippi River between the Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN. Report on the portion of the Illinois River downstream of new La Grange Lock and Dam is included in report of the Chicago District on the Illinois Waterway, Illinois and Indiana. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page Flood Control (cont.) 1. Illinois Waterway, IL (St. Louis Dist.) . .. 14-2 2. Mississippi River between Missouri and Minneapolis, MN (St. Louis Dist.) (Includes Melvin Price Locks & Dam) ... 14-2 3. Mississippi River between Ohio and Missouri Rivers, MO and IL .......... 14-2 4. St. Louis Harbor, MO and IL ......... 14-3 5. Navigation work under special authorization ..................... 14-3 Flood Control 6. Alton to Gale Organized Levee Districts, IL & MO ................ 7. Cape Girardeau-Jackson, MO ......... 8. East St. Louis and vicinity, IL ......... 9. Meramec River Basin (Valley Park), MO . 10. Nutwood Drainage and Levee District, IL ...................... 11. Ste. Genevieve, MO ................ 12. Inspection of completed flood control projects .................. . 14-3 14-4 14-4 14-5 14-5 14-5 14-6 13. Flood control work under special authorization .................... 14. Ecosystem restoration work under special authorization ............... Multiple-Purpose Project Including Power 15. Upper Mississippi River Environmental Management Program .............. 14-6 14-6 14-6 Tables Table 14-A Cost and Financial Statement ............... 14-8 Table 14-B Authorizing Legislation ...... 14-10 Table 14-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ................. 14-15 Table 14-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........... 14-16 Table 14-E Deauthorized Projects ....... 14-18 Table 14-F Active General Investigations (96X3121) .... 14-20 14-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Navigation 1. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL (ST. LOUIS DIST.) See report on Illinois Waterway, IL and IN, under Rock Island District. 2. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN (ST. LOUIS DIST.) See separate section entitled "Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN," printed in the Annual Report of the Chief of Engineers. This section includes Lock & Dam 24 Major Rehabilitation, Lock & Dam 25 Major Rehabilitation, and Melvin Price Locks & Dam. 3. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS, MO AND IL Location. Mississippi River rises in Lake Itasca, MN, and from that lake flows southerly about 2,340 miles and empties into the Gulf of Mexico. Portion included in this report embraces the 195-mile section known as middle Mississippi, between tributary Ohio and Missouri Rivers about 974 to 1,169 miles from the gulf. See folder by Corps of Engineers of Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Minneapolis, MN. Previous projects. For details see page 1879 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1014 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. The existing project provides for obtaining and maintaining a minimum channel depth of not less than 9 feet, a minimum width of not less than 300 feet at low water, with additional widths in bends from mouth of Ohio River (about 974 miles from gulf) to northern boundary of city of St. Louis, mile 191, thence 200 feet wide, with additional width in bends to mouth of Missouri River, mile 195; to be obtained: (1) by regulating works, for closing secondary channels, contracting river by building new banks where river width is excessive and protecting new and old banks from erosion where necessary to secure permanency at an estimated total Federal cost (Oct 1997 price level) of $272,000,000; (2)by dredging to maintain project channels; (3) by construction of works authorized for Chain of Rocks reach in 1945 River and Harbor Act, which approved a comprehensive plan for development of the river at Chain of Rocks to provide for construction of a lateral canal at a cost of $59,720,600; and (4) by construction of a fixed-crest rock-fill dam about 900 feet below Chain of Rocks Bridge, authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act, at a cost of $4,353,000, excluding $7,000 costs to Coast Guard for aids to navigation. A small boat harbor opposite Chester, IL, was deauthorized and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. See H. Doc. 669 (76th Cong., 3rd sess.) for report of Chief of Engineers dated Feb. 27, 1940, containing a general plan for improvement of Mississippi River between Coon Rapids Dam and mouth of Ohio River for purposes of navigation, power development, flood control, and needs of irrigation. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Existing facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Regulating Works: contracts continue on stone dike and revetment construction; as well as engineering bendway weir design, supervision and administration. Construction on existing project began in 1881 and project has been in beneficial use practically from its inception. Projects on Dam 27 and Chain of Rocks are complete. Work on the project is about 68 percent complete. Channel as a whole has been greatly improved by the work completed to date. Dredging is required at low stages to remove temporary shoals and maintain required channel depths. River is generally above 10-foot stage, St. Louis gage, from latter part of February to the latter part of August, during which time project channel depths generally prevail without dredging. During FY 1988 through FY 1990 low water conditions (drought) increased maintenance dredging. To improve navigation depths a rock removal contract began Oct. 1988 and was completed in July 1991. Following the great Mississippi River Flood of 1993, it became apparent that the Chain of Rocks, East Canal Levee was not performing as intended. Sand boils were developing along a sizeable reach at flood elevations considerably below design height. Emergency repairs were completed in FY 97. In FY 96, repairs and rehabilitation of the relief well system were completed. In FY 97, work was completed on the relocation of a drainage ditch at the toe of the levee. The cost of the emergency repairs totals nearly $12,000,000. A design deficiency report has been submitted to Headquarters recommending additional 14-2 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT berms, relief wells and a pump station. However, no further remedial measures are scheduled, pending final approval of this report and subsequent funding. Maintenance. Work consists of approximately 2,000 feet of dike repair and 5,000 feet of revetment repair yearly. U.S. plant and hired labor plus contract dredging perform channel dredging removing 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 cubic yards of material (average year) from main channel. Condition and operation studies, recreation planning, engineering and design, and operation and maintenance of Lock and Dam 27 continued. 4. ST. LOUIS HARBOR, MO AND IL Location. The project area includes both sides of the Mississippi River from miles 138.8 to 208.8 above the Ohio River (generally, the limits of the Port of Metropolitan St. Louis). Existing project. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The authorized project includes improvements in two areas: the North Riverfront area in Missouri (which is served by the St. Louis Municipal Docks) and the Tri-City Port area along the east bank of the Chain of Rocks Canal in Illinois. The principal project at the St. Louis Municipal Docks is an L-dike sediment control structure in the river to provide reliable water access to the dock when the river is low. The principal project at the Tri-City Port area is a 210 ft. wide harbor along 6,900 ft. of the Chain of Rocks Canal. The North Riverfront project and half the Tri-City harbor (3.450 ft.) would be constructed in Phase 1, and the second half of the Tri-City harbor in Phase 2 approximately 10 years later. Estimated cost of the project (1996) is $14,367,000 Federal and $28,715,000 Non-Federal. A March 1986 Reevaluation Report described model tests which showed that the L-dike sediment control structure recommended for the St. Louis Municipal Docks would not be effective but that appropriate configuration of a new outer wall for the docks, referred to as the Prototype River Access Improvement Structure (PRAIS), would divert currents so as to control scour and sedimentation and maintain sufficient water depths for the needs of the harbor. Local cooperation. The District coordinated with the two local sponsors and found that (1) the city of St. Louis Port Authority supports the PRAIS project and (2) the Tri-City Regional Port Authority wants the Corps to consider the possibility of reducing the length of their Phase I harbor to 1,800 ft. and shifting its location so that it is a northern extension of the existing Tri-City harbor (the authorized project length of 6,900 ft. would be maintained by increasing the length of the Phase 2 harbor to 5,100 ft.). Operations and results during the fiscal year. In January 1992 District completed a letter report that documented a preliminary analysis of the costs and benefits of the PRAIS and the Tri-City harbor projects. Headquarters reviewed the letter report and directed that new economic studies and other work be accomplished and documented in a General Reevaluation Report (GRR) with a Project Study Plan (PSP) will describe how the reevaluation studies will be accomplished. Preparation of the GRR began in FY 97 and will continue in FY 98. 5. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION No activity for FY 96. 6. ALTON TO GALE ORGANIZED LEVEE DISTRICTS, IL & MO Location. The levee system is located adjacent to the Mississippi River between Alton and Gale, Illinois. Existing Project. The project is authorized by the Flood Control Acts of 1936, 1938 and 1946. Construction of the Alton to Gale levee system was completed in 1977. Some reaches of this levee system have, for many years, been experiencing a significant number of slides associated with design deficiencies increasing the probability of levee failure during flood events. The recommended plan will correct these slides by a lime stabilization procedure. Estimated cost (1997) is $109,018,000 Federal and $4,374,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. The cost sharing applicable for the Alton to Gale Levee Slide repairs is in accordance with policies established for the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. The local sponsor is required to operate and maintain all works after completion. Supplemental assurances have been executed for the portion of the remedial work that is 100% federally funded. Operations and results during fiscal year. PL 84-99, 1995 Flood Repair completed (see paragraph 19). Resumption of project initiated. New slides were discovered during the 1997 spring levee inspections. A contract was awarded in July 1997 to repair the Blue 14-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Waters Levee in the Metro East Drainage and Levee District. 7. CAPE GIRARDEAU-JACKSON, MO Location. Missouri, along the right bank of the Mississippi River between River Miles 50 and 55 above the Ohio River. Existing Project. The project includes a 157 acre dry detention reservoir; approximately one mile of channel improvements on Cape La Croix Creek and two miles of channel improvements on Walker Branch, eight bridge replacements; recreational/environmental features and non structural features which are not going to be implemented at this time. The project is authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662). The estimated Federal project cost (1997) is $35,187,000. Non-Federal cost is $12,715,000. Local Cooperation. The city of Cape Girardeau, MO, local sponsor, is strongly supportive of the project. The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was executed on May 25, 1990 with a modification to the LCA executed on Oct. 27, 1992. Requirements of local cooperation are fully described in the FY 1991 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Design continued on Walker Branch #3 and the Detention Reservoir. 8. EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL Location. Project is in St. Clair and Madison Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Mississippi River between river miles 175 and 195 above the Ohio River. Project includes all bottom lands between bluffs on the east and Mississippi River and Chain of Rocks Canal on the west, and extends from Cahokia diversion channel on the north to Prairie du Pont Creek on the south. (See Corps of Engineers Navigation Charts, Middle and Upper Mississippi River, Cairo, IL, to Minneapolis, MN.) Existing project. The 1936 Flood Control Act authorized raising and enlarging existing levee systems by construction or reconstruction of 19.8 miles of levee, including 3.1 miles of floodwall, together with necessary appurtenant works consisting of gravity drainage structures, highway and railroad closure structures, alterations and reconstruction of existing pumping plants, alterations to railroad bridges and approaches at levee crossings, service roads on levee crown, and seepage control measures. Work under this authorization provides the area protection against a flood flow of 1,300,000 cfs which was originally considered a 200-year frequency flood; however, with the completion of retention reservoirs upstream this protection is currently considered a 500-year level of protection. The completed 10 miles of levee along Chain of Rocks Canal and Lock 27 provide flood protection on the landward side integral with and to the same degree as the East St. Louis levee. Final cost of work under this authorization is $22,550,100. The Flood Control Act of 1965 modified existing project to provide for channel improvements, diversion ditches, flood plain detention areas, a reservoir on Little Canteen Creek, and a pumping plant to considerably reduce damages resulting from interior flooding. This act also authorized reconstruction of a channel stabilization dam in Cahokia Creek diversion channel to provide protection to adjacent levees and bridges from scour and eventual loss. Post authorization studies in the early 1980's have indicated that flood plain detention areas, the reservoir on Little Canteen Creek and other related flood control measures in the Cahokia-Harding Ditch Area are not economically feasible. Severe flooding which has resulted in National Disaster Declarations each of the last four years for the Harding Ditch and Cahokia Canal areas has resulted in a new Congressional appropriation in FY 97 to restart a general reevaluation of the interior area. Also, further studies of the channel stabilization dam in Cahokia Creek diversion channel have been deferred due to lack of support from the local sponsor of the project. Estimated total Federal project cost of work under this authorization is $33,600,000 (1985), $22,020,000 for Cahokia-Harding Ditch Area, and $11,580,000 for Blue Waters Ditch. Non-Federal cost is $20,770,000. The 1988 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act authorized repair and rehabilitation of pump stations and appurtenant works, channels and bridge structures. The estimated total cost of this work (1996) is $28,336,000 Federal and $12,292,000 Non-Federal. Local cooperation. For work under the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1988, PL 100-202, local interests have entered into three Local Cooperation Agreements (LCA) which cover all of the work in the Flood Protection Rehabilitation project. Construction work under the first LCA is complete, and construction work under the remaining two LCA's is under way. A fourth LCA is planned for work on Canteen Creek. 14-4 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Contracts were awarded for repairs to the East St. Louis Pump Station North Sewer, permanently closing small gravity drains, and Horseshoe Lake Gravity drains. The local sponsor initiated ditch rehabilitation. 9. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN (VALLEY PARK), MISSOURI Location. The project is located in St. Louis County, Missouri, adjacent to the left bank of the Meramec River between miles 20.7 and 22.1 above the confluence with the Mississippi River. Existing project. The project was authorized for construction by Section 2(h), Public Law 97-128, Dec. 29, 1981, and Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and would afford partial flood protection to the area. The project provides for construction of 3.2 miles of earthen levee with six gravity drains, three closure structures, interior ponding areas and 33 relief wells required for under-seepage control. Recreational features include standard play equipment, multi-user courts, play field areas, picnic tables, comfort stations, parking areas and hiking/biking trails. Estimated total project cost (1997) $23,839,000; $17,826,000 Federal, and $5,913,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. The Board of Alderman for the City of Valley Park, Missouri, authorized the mayor to issue a Letter of Intent to sponsor the project. The letter dated Feb. 18, 1987, acknowledged that city officials were aware of cost sharing requirements and of the items of local cooperation and favored construction of the project. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on August 12, 1992. Operations and results during fiscal year. A Plan Formulation Report and General Design Memorandum was issued in March 1987. A feature design memorandum was approved in Dec. 1993. The first construction contract is complete. 10. NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Location. The levee district is in Green and Jersey Counties, IL, on the left bank of the Illinois River between miles 15.2 and 23.7 above the Mississippi River. (See Quincy, IL-MO, sheet of maps of the United States, published by Army Map Service, scale 1:250,000.) Existing Project. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess.). Project provides for raising and enlarging 11.4 miles of levee, construction of 1.0 miles of new levee, altering a pumping station and construction of seepage control measures. This project would provide protection to 10,360 acres of land, 9,365 of which are highly productive agricultural lands. A General Design Memorandum (GDM), completed in 1986, indicated that the plan was not economically justified at the interest rate used at the time. Therefore, the project was not funded. It was declared inactive on Jun. 3, 1987. Local Cooperation. Requirements of local cooperation are described on page 14-11 of FY 1980 Annual Report except that cost sharing policies established by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL-99-662, will also apply. The Nutwood Drainage and Levee District is the local sponsor. Operations and results during fiscal year. As a result of the Great Flood of 1993 and the inundation of Illinois State Highway 16/100 within the project area, the 1995 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Bill included funding to perform a flood damage reduction study. The cost sharing agreement for preconstruction engineering and design (PED) was executed in July 1997. PED will continue in FY 98. The present total Federal project cost (1997) is $10,500,000; non-Federal cost is $3,500,000. 11. STE. GENEVIEVE, MO Location. The City of Ste. Genevieve is located in Ste. Genevieve County at the edge of the Mississippi River floodplain about 54 miles south of St. Louis, MO. Existing project. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662). The authorizing language states "Congress finds that, in view of the historic preservation benefits resulting from the project," the overall project consists of four parts. Part 1 is a major levee and associated features that will protect the town from the Urban Design Flood on the Mississippi River. Parts 2 and 3 are channel improvements on tributary streams that flow through the town, North and South Gabouri Creek, respectively. Part 4 is recreation features on flood control lands. The Corps of Engineers and the project sponsor are concentrating on designing and constructing Part 1, and Parts 2, and 3 and 4 have been placed in a deferred category. 14-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Local cooperation. The project sponsor is the Ste. Genevieve Joint Levee Commission. The City of Ste. Genevieve, Ste. Genevieve County Levee District Number 2, and Ste. Genevieve County Levee District Number 3 hold membership on the Commission. Operations and results during fiscal year. Progress was made on design and land acquisition for Part 1 of the project. A contract for the North Closure was awarded in FY 97 and will continue in FY 98. 12. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed work was accomplished at a cost of $545,142 for the Fiscal Year 1997. Total cost as of end of fiscal year is $10,074,385. 13. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., as amended (preauthorization). Preauthorization study costs for Fiscal Year 1997 were $712,500 for St. Peters, MO; $132,946 for Bois Brule L&D District, MO; $25 for Prairie Dupont L&SD; $1,157 for Modoc L&D District, Prairie, IL; and $34,899 for Grand Tower D&LD, IL; and $7,610 for Grafton, IL. Emergency bank stabilization activities pursuant to Sec. 14, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., as amended. During FY 1997, $3,938 was expended on South Senior High School; $14,602 for Fayette Co. Hwy 23; $135,030 for Lincoln County Road 729; $9,097 for Lincoln County Road; and $14,406 for Wildwood, MO. Emergency flood control activities- repair flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $233,287 for Disaster Preparedness, $36,597 for Emergency Operations, and $3,681,952 for Rehabilitation. 14. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Project Modifications for improvement of environment pursuant to Sec. 1135, Public Law 99-662, as amended (preauthorization). During this period $136 was expended on Lower Cache River, $4,944 on Coordination Account; $11,547 on Initial Appraisals; and $315,034 on Carlyle Lake Wildlife Management. Multiple-Purpose Project Including Power 15. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Location. The portion of the Upper Mississippi River within the boundaries of the St. Louis District extends from the mouth of the Ohio River (river mile 0) to river mile 300, downstream of Lock and Dam 22. Existing project. The project is composed of five elements: Habitat Rehabilitation and Enhancement Projects, Long-term Resource Monitoring, Recreation Projects, Studies of Recreation Impacts and Navigation Traffic Monitoring. (The St. Louis District's involvement has been limited to Habitat Rehabilitation and Enhancement Projects and Long Term Resource Monitoring.) The overall program, involving five states and three engineer districts, is administered by the Mississippi Valley Division. In the St. Louis District, three habitat rehabilitation projects have been constructed. These are Clarksville Management Area, Missouri, Dresser Island, Missouri, and Pharrs Island, Missouri. All projects are being operated and maintained by the state of Missouri. Through FY 1997, funds allocated to the St. Louis District have amounted to $20,315,000 for design and construction of Habitat Rehabilitation and Enhancement Projects (HREP), $938,677 for Long Term Resource Monitoring (LTRM) and $1,358,000 for Program Management. The authorization limit for the overall program projected over a 10-year period is $191,415,000. 14-6 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT During FY 97, $24,035 was expended on Baseline Monitoring LTRM; $9,014 on Batchtown; $1,624 on Biological Response Monitoring; $68 on Calhoun Point, IL; $226,474 on Cuivre Island; $45 on Least Tern, MO; $ on Pharrs Island; $204,814 on Program Management, UMREMP; $4,424 on Project Coordination LTRM: $33 on Project Evaluation LTRM; $98,894 on Stag Island, MO; $217,852 on Stump Lake; and $2,506,456 on Swan Lake. Local cooperation. The terms of local cooperation, as established by Public Law 99-662, will vary according to the nature of the project, land ownership and pre-existing management responsibilities. The local sponsor for Habitat Rehabilitation and Enhancement projects is usually the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in coordination with the state of Missouri or the state of Illinois. A PCA agreement with the state of Missouri was completed in FY 97 for the Cuivre Island project. Operations and results during the rascal year. During FY 1997 two of three contracts were completed on Stump Lake, and two contracts were completed on Swan Lake. Both Swan Lake and Cuivre Island advertised and awarded contracts. The final Definite Project Report was approved for Batchtown, and Calhoun Point and is awaiting approval. Habitat and biological response monitoring activities continued at the Dresser Island, Missouri, Clarksville Refuge, Missouri, and Pharrs Island, Missouri, projects. 14-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 14-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 1997 3. Mississippi River Between Ohio and Missouri Rivers (Includes Chain of Rocks) 6. Alton to Gale Organized Levee Districts, IL & MO (Contrib. Funds) 7. Cape Girardeau Jackson, MO (Contrib. Funds) 8. East St. Louis and Vicinity, IL (Contrib. Funds) 9. Meramee R. Basin Valley Park, MO (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp, Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 4,666,000 7,087,000 4,560,000 3,617,000 $248,374,6001 3,944,585 9,262,508 4,832,000 3,954,760 248,275,9221 9,559,523 13,089,626 19,725,000 17,858,442 377,765,4212 12,287,956 13,060,229 19,772,318 17,112,937 376,759,2352 231,000 -294,000 178,757 115,154 20,000 14,000 133,000 8,841,000 48,572 8,749,706 60,250 10,000 60,250 10,000 6,700,000 1,400,000 750,000 446,000 22,208,000 5,232,639 4,376,843 1,694,594 514,368 22,188,153 39,737 233,860 -414,597 259,576 213,401 -317,820 423,700 21,128 1,974,800 1,569,827 7,660,000 2,451,000 3,393,000 2,162,000 41,285,3263 4,709,554 5,914,756 3,537,119 2,086,086 41,063,2674 2,238,000 1,382,000 1,410,000 350,000 7,407,600 2,854,353 1,473,320 1,540,600 183,210 7,010,945 2,940,000 -257,000 2,320,000 459,000 7,871,000 672,181 1,898,392 2,920,661 513,357 7,834,837 247,100 246,399 115,000 340,000 21,285 405,325 30,000 -1,868 732,100 424,742 14-8 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Funds Section to Sep. 30, in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 1997 11. Ste. Genevieve, New Work MO Approp. 0 3,000,000 1,000,000 0 4,000,000 Cost 0 13,781 -92 311,493 325,182 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. 0 0 0 1,314,638 1,314,638 Cost 0 0 0 434,392 434,392 1. Excludes previous project cost of $1,416,620. 2. In addition $1,139,000 was expended for rehabilitation. 3. Includes $8,072,326 for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. 4. Includes $7,921,939 for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965. 5. Includes $216,628 for definite project study under 1938 Flood Control Act. 14-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 14-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 12, 1996 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 19071 Mar. 3, 19051 Jun. 25, 1910 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 19542 Jul. 3, 19583 Oct. 21, 1978 Dec. 29, 1981 Aug. 15, 1985 and Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 Oct. 31, 1992 KASKASKIA RIVER, IL Construct canal, lock, and dam to provide a 9-foot navigation channel from mouth to Fayetteville, IL. "..i.s modified to add fish and wildlife and habitat restoration as project purpose." MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN OHIO AND MISSOURI RIVERS (See Section 3 of Text) Project for regulating works in 1881. (To obtain a minimum depth of 8 feet.) Dredging introduced as part of the project. These acts practically abrogated that part of project for middle Mississippi which proposed regulating works. Regulating works restored to project and appropriations begun with a view to completion of improvement between Ohio and Missouri Rivers within 12 years at an estimated cost of $21 million, exclusive of amounts previously expended. For 9 feet deep and 300 feet wide from Ohio River to northern Rivers and Harbors boundary of city of St. Louis. Project between northern boundary of St. Louis and Grafton (mouth of Illinois River) modified to provide a channel 9 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide with additional width around bends. Modified to provide construction of a lateral canal with lock at Chain of Rocks. Modified to provide construction of a small-boat harbor opposite Chester, IL. Modified to provide construction of a fixed crest rockfill dam 900 feet below Chain of Rocks Bridge. MELVIN PRICE LOCKS & DAM (FORMERLY LOCK AND DAM NO. 26 (REPLACEMENT)) Construct new dam and a 1,200-foot lock approximately 2 miles downstream of the existing structure. Change name from "Lock and Dam No. 26" to "Melvin Price Lock and Dam" upon termination of service in U.S. Congress. Construct a second lock, 600 feet long at the Lock and Dam No. 26. (Replacement) Project. Modified to provide construction of cost-shared recreation facilities within the state of Illinois Modified to allow cost-shared recreation with other non-Federal interests and authorized a 24,000 square foot visitor center. S. Doc. 44, 87th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 104-303 Annual Report, 1881, p. 1536. Committee Doc. 9, 69th Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 231, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 230, 83d Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 95-502, 95th Cong. Public Law 97-118, 97th Cong. Public Law 99-88 and Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong. Public Law 101-640, 101st Cong. Public Law 102-580, 102nd Cong. 14-10 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 12, 1996 1960 River and Harbor Act as amended. Section 107 Nov. 26, 1986 Oct. 12, 1996 Jun. 22, 1936 Jun. 28, 1938 1946 Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 12, 1996 Nov. 28, 1990 Amended project for recreation to include other contiguous nonproject lands, including those referred to as the Alton Commons. SOUTHEAST MISSOURI PORT, MO Construct harbor channel with adjacent landfill. ST. LOUIS HARBOR, MO & IL (See Section 4 of Text) As outlined in the Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated Apr. 30, 1984, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes navigation improvements. The Secretary shall complete a limited reevaluation of the authorized St. Louis Harbor Project in the vicinity of the Chain of Rocks Canal, Illinois, consistent with the authorized purposes of that project, to include evacuation of waters collecting on the land side of the Chain of Rocks Canal East Levee ALTON TO GALE ORGANIZED LEVEE DISTRICTS, IL & MO (See Section 6 of Text) Authorized construction of levees to protect area from flooding from the Mississippi River. CAPE GIRARDEAU, JACKSON METROPOLITAN AREA, MO (See Section 7 of Text) As outlined in the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Dec. 8, 1984, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes flood control and related recreational improvements in the Cape La Croix Creek Watershed. As outlined in the Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated July 18, 1994, the Water Resources and Development Act of 1996 authorizes construction, including nonstructural measures, at a total cost of $45,414,000 ($33,030,000 Federal; $12,384,000 non-Federal) COLDWATER CREEK, MO As outlined in the report of the Chief of Engineers dated Aug 9, 1988, the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 authorizes flood control. Public Law 104-303 Public Law 99-662 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 104-303 Special report on record in OCE Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 104-303, 104th Congress Public Law 101-640 101st Cong. 14-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 14-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 22, 1936 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 22, 1976 Dec. 22, 1987 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 17, 1986 Jul. 14, 1984 Jun. 28, 1938 Nov. 7, 1966 EAST ST. LOUIS AND VICINITY, IL (See Section 8 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee. Construct pumping plant and other modifications to reduce interior flooding. Construct Blue Waters Ditch as independent section. Repair and rehabilitate pump stations and appurtenant works, channels, and bridges. ELDRED AND SPANKEY DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. HARTWELL DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. HILLVIEW DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. KASKASKIA ISLAND DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee. MALINE CREEK, MO As outlined in the Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Nov. 2, 1982, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes flood control, recreation, and environmental improvements. MAUVAISE TERRE DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, MO (See Section 9 of Text) Construct reservoirs and local protection project. Construct Pine Ford, Irondale, and 1-38 dams and 19 Angler-use sites. (See Section 14 of Text) Special report on record in OCE. H. Doc 329, 88th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 94-587, 94th Cong. Public Law 100-202, 100th Cong. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 519, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Energy and Water Development Approp. Act of 1985, 98th Cong., 2nd sess. Flood Control Committee, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 525, 89th Cong., 2d sess. 14-12 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Dec. 29, 1981 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 28, 1990 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 28, 1938 Oct. 23, 1962 Undertake structural and nonstructural flood control measures. MCGEE CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Reconstruct existing levee and construct pumping plant to reduce flooding. MEREDOSIA LAKE AND WILLOW CREEK DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. NUTWOOD DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL (See Section 10 of Text) Raise and enlarge existing levee and other modifications. REND LAKE, BIG MUDDY RIVER, IL Construct dam at Benton, IL, and subimpoundment dams on upper arms of reservoir. RIVER DES PERES, MO As outlined in the report of the Chief Engineers dated May 23, 1989, the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 authorizes flood control. STE. GENEVIEVE, MO (See Section 11 of Text) As outlined in the Report of the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors dated Apr. 16, 1985, the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorizes construction of a levee and a pumping plant to protect the city from Mississippi River and Gabouri Creek floods. WOOD RIVER DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, IL Construct reservoirs and local protection projects. CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND RESERVOIR, SALT RIVER, MO Modified act of Jun. 28, 1938 by deleting the reservoir therefrom and reauthorizing it as a separate multiplepurpose project. Public Law 97-128, 97th Cong. Amended Section 1128, Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 472, 87th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 541, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 101-640 101st Cong. Public Law 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 507, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 14-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 14-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Changes name of project from Joanna Dam to present Public Law 89-298, designation. 89th Cong. 1. Also joint resolution, Jun. 29, 1906. 2. Inactive. 3. All work completed. 14-14 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1997 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Cuivre River, MO1 1883 $ 12,000 $ -- -- Moccasin Springs, MO 1969 76,4362 -- Southeast Missouri Port, MO 1993 3,466,522 1,584,442 Apr. 89 Wabash Railroad Bridges, Illinois River, Meredosia, and Valley City, IL 1961 2,653,194 1961 -- 1. Inactive. River declared nonnavigable by act of Mar. 23, 1900. 2. Excludes $56,605 contributed funds. 14-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 14-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1997 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Clarence Cannon Dam and Reservoir, Salt River, MO 1996 313,180,128 70,746,649 -- Cache River Diversion, IL 1953 2,837,114 -- 1953 Cape Girardeau, MO, No. 2 1965 5,157,805 -- 1964 Carlyle Lake, IL 1981 42,819,400 81,194,292 Oct. 1976 Chouteau, Nameoki, and Venice Drainage and Levee District, IL 1955 185,700 -- 1955 Columbia Drainage and Levee District No. 3, IL 1981 2,818,000 -- Aug. 1981 Degognia and Fountain Bluff Levee and Drainage District, IL 1959 5,889,500 -- 1959 Dively Drainage & Levee District, IL 1976 1,720,000 -- 1976 Emergency bank protection for certain highway and railroad facilities at Price Landing, MO (see Flood Control Act of 1944)1 1950 55,415 -- Oct. 1949 Emergency repairs to levees on Mississippi, Illinois, and Kaskaskia Rivers and flood fighting and rescue work (Sec. 5, Flood Control Act of 1941, as amended) 1 1953 -- -- 1951 Emergency protection for certain highway and railroad facilities at Chester, IL, bridge (Sec. 12, Flood Control Act of 1944) 1952 50,000 -- Jan. 1952 Emergency protection for Illinois approach, Chain of Rocks Bridge (Sec. 12, Flood Control Act of 1944) 1946 25,000 -- Aug. 1945 Fort Chartres and Ivy Landing Drainage District No. 5, IL 1970 1,154,800 -- 1958 Grand Tower Drainage and Levee District, IL 1959 4,677,900 -- 1959 Harrisonville Levee and Drainage District, IL 1981 6,829,069 -- Mar. 1981 Kaskaskia Island Drainage and Levee District, IL 1959 297,460 -- 1949 Kaskaskia River, IL2 1989 147,387,000 23,997,373 1988 Lake Shelbyville, IL 1981 44,000,000 86,930,853 Sep. 1978 Mauvaise Terre Drainage and Levee District, IL 1989 589,000 -- 1988 McGee Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1989 25,043,300 -- 1989 Meredosia Lake and Willow Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1944 249,738 -- 1944 Miller Pond Drainage District, IL 1955 164,183 -- 1955 14-16 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD (Continued) CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 1997 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Mo. and Yr. Project Report For: Construction Maintenance Completed Mississippi River Agricultural Area 8, MO 1987 2,137,000 -- -- Mississippi River at St. Louis, MO 1980 79,265,166 -- Jan. 1980 Mississippi River, Alton to Gale, IL, underseepage measures -- 85,422 -- Oct. 1962 North Alexander Drainage and Levee District, IL 1957 939,569 -- 1957 Nutwood Drainage and Levee District, IL 1989 670,000 -- 1984 Perry County Drainage and Levee 3 District Nos. 1, 2, and 3, MO 1987 7,968,700 -- 1986 Pine Ford Lake, MO 1996 3,644,000 -- Prairie du Pont Levee and Sanitary District, IL4 1970 6,005,127 -- 1970 Prairie du Rocher and vicinity, IL 1959 3,882,600 -- 1959 Preston Drainage and Levee District, IL 1959 1,866,910 -- 1959 Rend Lake, Big Muddy River, IL 5,6 1989 43,700,900 63,555,160 1988 Strington, Ft. Chartres, and Ivy Landing, IL 1957 2,123,700 -- Aug. 1956 Urban areas at Alton, IL 1960 192,000 -- -- Village of New Athens, IL 1981 1,983,000 -- Sep. 1981 Valley City Drainage & Levee District, IL7 1967 91,952 -- 1967 Wood River Drainage and Levee District, IL8 1989 17,163,821 -- 1988 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Work complete, now performed under Public Law 99. Excludes $10,461 expended on previous project. Excludes $6,800,700 for previous project. Includes $5,235,927 for previous project. Excludes $550,000 Area Development Administration Funds allotted to the State of Illinois for increased construction costs of Interstate Highway 57 to meet project requirements, and excludes $449,093 Area Redevelopment Administration Funds allotted to the Corps. Includes $6,103,711 credit to State of Illinois for work in kind. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended). Funds are for work authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938. 14-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 14-E DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contrib See Annual And Funds Funds Project Angler-use sites, Meramec Basin, MO Big Swan D&L District Illinois River, IL Cape Girardeau, MO Reaches Nos 1, 3, and 4 Clear Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL East Cape Girardeau and Clear Creek D&L District, IL Eldred, IL Fort Chartres & Ivy Landing D&L District No. 5 and Stringtown Drainage and Levee District No. 4, IL Grafton Small Boat Harbor, IL I-38 Lake, MO Indian Creek Area Illinois River, IL Irondale Lake, MO Keach Drainage and Levee District, IL Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, IL, Nos. 2, 5, 6 and 7 Levee Districts between Carlyle and New Athens, IL Nos. 3, 4, 8, 10 and 13 Levee Districts between Cowden and Vandalia, IL Meramec Park Lake, MO Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 10, MO Mississippi River Agricultural Area No. 12, MO Mississippi River at Alton, IL Small Boat Harbor Preston Drainage and Levee District, IL Richland Creek, IL Riverland Levee District, MO Scott County D&L District Illinois River, IL Small Boat Harbor opposite Chester, IL Small Boat Harbor opposite Hamburg, IL Ste. Genevieve County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO Report For Authority Expended Exp 1967 WRDA 1986 -- 1959 1964 1963 1962 1971 19621 1979 1979 1978 1967 1967 19581 1959 1969 1936 19541 19501 1936 Oct 86 WRDA 1986 Oct 86 Oct 78 PL 100-676 Jan 90 PL 100-676 Jan 90 Nov 79 WRDA 1986 Oct 86 Nov 77 PL 100-676 1 Jan 1990 Nov 81 PL 100-676 1 Jan 1990 WRDA 1986 Oct 86 Nov 79 Nov 79 Oct 78 Dec 81 Nov 79 WRDA 1986 Oct 86 Nov 77 PL 100-676 1 Jan 1990 PL 100-676 10 Aug 89 Aug 77 WRDA 1986 Oct 86 Nov 77 Nov 77 Nov 77 $ 22,000 4,984,500 1,920,600 -- -- 496,000 37,682,514 -- -- 1,866,910 401,000 1 Year authorized. 14-18 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-E DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (Continued) For Last Full Report Date Federal Contrib See Annual And Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Exp St. Louis County Drainage and Levee District No. 1, MO Union Lake, MO Wiedmer Chemical Drainage and Levee District, MO 1936 1979 1936 Nov 77 PL 100-676 Jan 90 4,931,154 4,931,154 Nov 77 14-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 14-F ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (96X3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 97 Categories SURVEYS (Category 100) Navigation Studies (110) Miss. River, Vicinity St. Louis-10400 $802 Subtotal 802 Flood Damage Prevention Studies(120) Chesterfield, MO-10457 144,217 Festus and Crystal City, MO-10458 125,468 Kimmswick, MO-10459 10,582 Lower River des Peres, MO-10460 16,243 Feasibility Studies, Alexander and Pulaski Counties, IL-12217 $159,332 Flood Plain Management Upper Miss-13245 227 Subtotal 456,069 Review of Authorized Projects (160) Nutwood D&L Dist, IL-00623 29,940 Wood River D&LD, IL-20180 35,929 Subtotal 65,869 Miscellaneous Activities(170) Interagency Water Resources Development-14713 38,027 Review of FERC Licenses-53857 -190 Special Investigations-17250 8,604 Waterfowl Management Plan-53904 7,276 Subtotal 53,717 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies(180) St. Claire-17008 5 Planning Assit to State-MO 166 Subtotal 171 TOTAL (Category 100) $576,628 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250)-82030, -82040, 108,308 82045, 83015, and 83017 Hydrology Studies (260)-53820 39,807 Automated Information System Support (294)Cage-53914 24,744 Automated Information System Support (294)GCase-53916 6,668 TOTAL (Category 200) 179,527 14-20 ST. LOUIS, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 14-F ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (Continued) (96X3121) Federal Cost Totals by Item and CWIS Number FY 96 Categories ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (Category 600) Nutwood D&LD, IL-00623 79,943 St. Louis Harbor, MO & IL-10184 504,890 Ste. Genevieve, MO-75453 865,757 TOTAL (Category 600) 1,450,590 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (NON REIMBURSABLE) $2,206,745 14-21 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT* This district comprises most of the northern half of Illinois, portions of southern Wisconsin, southern and southwestern Minnesota, eastern and central Iowa, and northeastern Missouri, embraced in drainage basin of Mississippi River and its eastern and western tributaries between mile 300 (above mouth of Ohio River) and 614, and of its eastern tributaries only, between Hamburg Bay, at mile 261 and 300. This district also includes the Illinois Waterway above mile 80 with its tributaries and drainage basins. The section of the Mississippi River between river miles 300 and 614 is included in the report on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Illinois and Mississippi Canal, IL............ 15-2 2. Illinois Waterway, IL and IN.................. 15-2 3. Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN ........................ 15-3 4. Upper Mississippi River - Illinois Navigation Study .................... ... 15-3 5. Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program (UMRS-EMP), IL, IA, MN, MO, WI ........................ 15-3 6. Other Authorized Navigation Projects......... 15-4 Flood Control 7. Coralville Lake, IA ........................... 15-4 8. Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA ................ ............ 15-4 9. Farm Creek, IL .............................. 15-4 10. Loves Park, IL ........................ 15-4 11. Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, IA........ 15-5 12. Saylorville Lake, IA .......................... 15-5 13. West Des Moines, IA ................ ....... 15-5 14. Muscatine Island, IA ...................... 15-6 15., Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............................. 15-6 16. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects........15-6 17. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............................. 15-6 General Investigations 18. Surveys .................... ................ 15-6 19. Collection and Study of Basic Data............ 15-6 20. Preconstruction Engineering and Design. ...... 15-6 Tables Page Table 15-A Cost and Financial Statement......... 15-7 Table 15-B Authorizing Legislation .............. 15-8 Table 15-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........................ ... 15-11 Table 15-D Not Applicable Table 15-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects....................15-11 Table 15-F Not Applicable Table 15-G Deauthorized Projects...............15-13 Table 15-H Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects....................15-14 Table 15-I Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ...................... 15-15 Table 15-J Illinois Waterway: Existing Locks and Dams.................... 15-17 Table 15-K Illinois Waterway: Lock and Dam Construction, Foundations, Cost.... 15-17 Table 15-L Illinois Waterway: Additional Features Entering into Cost.......... 15-18 Table 15-M Illinois Waterway: Existing Project... 15-19 Table 15-N Illinois Waterway: Total Cost of Existing Project..................15-20 15-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Navigation 1. ILLINOIS AND MISSISSIPPI CANAL, IL Location. This canal extends for 75 miles from the Illinois River near LaSalle, IL, to the Mississippi River at Rock Island, IL. A feeder canal, 29 miles in length, extends from the summit level of the canal to the Rock River at Rock Falls, IL. Existing project. See pages 1306-1308 of Annual Report for 1962 for details regarding project. The canal was constructed in the period 1892-1918. The canal has not been operated for navigation since June 1951 in accordance with Corps policy to discontinue operation of waterways affording little or no benefit to navigation. The River and Harbor Act of 1958 authorized the appropriation of $2,000,000 for the purpose of placing the canal in proper condition for public recreational use and to convey and transfer the canal to the State of Illinois as part of the State park system. The repair and modification program was initiated in 1961, and a number of canal features have been repaired or modified. In connection with this program, fee title to 1,062 acres and recreational flowage easements over 309 acres of land in Rock River at Rock Falls, formerly under navigation flowage easement, have been acquired. The State of Illinois accepted title to the canal as of August 1, 1970. The River and Harbor Act of 1970 authorized the additional appropriation of $6,528,000 to be expended for the repair, modification, and maintenance of bridges, title transfer, modification or rehabilitation of hydraulic structures, fencing, clearing auxiliary ditches, and for the repair and modification of other canal property appurtenances. The repair and modification work was underway until a suit was filed by three Illinois counties and their Commissioners of Highway against the Federal Government and the State in 1974 over maintenance of highway bridges crossing the canal. After the lawsuit was filed, further rehabilitation work by the Federal Government on the canal was suspended. On November 4, 1981, the Corp of Engineers deposited $3,722,572 with the Clerk of the U.S. District Court in Chicago in full satisfaction of the Court's judgment. These funds were used by the counties to complete bridge rehabilitation work as directed in the court order. Rehabilitation work by the Federal Government in coordination with the state was resumed in 1984 with the remaining authorization expended in 1987. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized an additional appropriation of $8,472,000 to accomplish the work described in the 1970 River and Harbor Act. The State of Illinois filed an additional lawsuit against the United States on July 6, 1987 in the U.S. Claims Court in the amount of $8,472,572. In a preliminary decision on September 22, 1988, the court dismissed the claim for $3,722,572. A settlement agreement between the State of Illinois and the United States was signed on November 14, 1991. The agreement provided that Illinois release all claims against the United States as stipulated in the claims court and that the United States provide $4,750,000 to Illinois as reimbursement for previous repair work performed upon the canal bridges by Illinois. On December 16, 1991, the U. S. Claims Court entered a judgment for $4,750,000 in favor of the State of Illinois. This judgment was paid in FY92. Once funds are received, principal work features to restore the canal to acceptable conditions consist of the repair or resonstruction of retaining walls, embankmenets, protions of the lock and dam structures, culverts, drainage ditches, and other related work features which the United States has maintained or has been obligated to maintain under previous agreements. These features are consistent with a Master Management Plan prepared by the Illinois Department of Conservation. NEPA documentation to assess remaining work items must be completed prior to initiation of construction. Local cooperation. A revised Supplemental Agreement with all work items remaining was coordinated in FY 93. Additional funding is needed prior to the District continuing design and construction on the canal. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and Design work was performed for a total cost of $693,069. 2. ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN Location. Illinois River (entirely within State of Illinois), formed by confluence of Kankakee and Des Plaines River, flows southwesterly and enters Mississippi at Grafton, IL, about 38 miles above St. Louis. Illinois Waterway comprises Illinois River from its mouth to confluence of Kankakee and Des Plaines Rivers (273 miles), Des Plaines River to Lockport (18.1 miles) and Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal and South Branch of Chicago River to Lake Street, Chicago (34.5 miles). Also from a point 12.4 miles above Lockport, II, waterway comprises Calumet-Sag Channel and Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers to turning basin 5, near entrance to Lake Calumet (23.8 miles); and Grand Calumet River from junction to 141st Street, deep (lake) draft navigation (9 miles) and to Clark Street, Gary, IN (4.2 miles). Previous projects. For details, see page 1945 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1172 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. See table 23-K and page 1255 of Annual Report for 1963. Cost of new work was $124,041,436 and includes $445,000 for Recreation Facilities under Code 711. Calumet-Sag Modification, Part III, placed in the deferredfor- restudy category in March 1972, cost of $33,000,000 (July 1971) Federal and $20,700,000 (July 1971) non Federal; is excluded from present cost estimate. Land acquired for the project consisted 1100.5 acres in fee and 1009.8 acres in flowage easement. See Table 23-B for authorizing legislation. (See Table 15-J through 15-N on existing locks and dams; lock and dam construction, foundations, cost; additional features entering into cost of project; existing project and total cost of existing project.) Local cooperation. Complied with for completed modifications and Part I of Calumet-Sag Modification. All pools above Alton Pool: Maintenance: Channel dredging by contract cutterhead pipeline dredge was performed in LaGrange, Peoria, and Starved Rock at various locations at a cost of $896,300 15-2 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT with a total of 178,700 cubic yards of material being removed. Dredging inspection and reports were completed at a cost of $87,800. Dredged material disposal activities and other environmental concerns in connection with dredging cost $138,900. Strike removal and snagging and clearing was accomplished in various locations by hired labor at a cost of $51,400. Maintenance of the Lucas-Berg Disposal Facility cost $1,400. Structural repairs to locks and dams were performed by hired labor at a cost of $1,957,700. Lockport sluiceway grouting was continued at a cost of $63,600. Lockport floating mooring bits was initiated at a cost of $74,100. Replace maintenance building at Lockport was initiated at a cost of $39,100. New water supply at Brandon Road was initiated at a cost of $65,500. Costs associated with buyout of land and buildings at Peoria Project Office is $1,187,200. Real Estate support of maintenance activities cost $409,900. Buildings, grounds, and utility maintenance at the locks and dams and Illinois Waterway Project Office at Peoria totaled $3,800. Environmental compliance work continued at a cost of $15,800. Permanent operating equipment costs were $186,300. Data collection equipment and water quality monitoring continued at a cost of $22,900. Engineering and design work cost $514,700, and supervision, administration, and inspection for the maintenance features totaled $265,500. As built drawing continued at a cost of $22,700. Total maintenance costs were $6,004,600. Net credits to the project were $14,400. Operation and Care: Operation of the locks and dams and routine maintenance and minor repairs thereto were made at a cost of $8,529,100. Operation of Illinois Waterway Project Office, shops, warehouse, grounds, and utilities at a cost of $979,500. Real Estate management services were provided at a cost of $51,100. Visitors' Center at Starved Rock Lock and Dam was operated at a cost of $204,900. Surveys, studies, and other inspections were performed at a cost of $1,049,600; natural and cultural resource costs were $102,000; water control management costs were $729,700; and master plans cost $200. Supervision and administration for the operation features totaled $642,400. Total operation costs were $12,288,500. Total operation and maintenance costs were $18,293,100 for all pools above Alton pool. Rehabilitation: Major Rehabilitation continued on the Illinois Waterway, Four Locks for a cost of $1,668,318. Total costs incurred were $1,668,318. Alton Pool Operation: Costs for the year were $9,883 for natural resource management; $91,678 for condition and operation studies; $59,966 for water control management, and $69,365 for supervision and administration. Total costs were $230,892. Alton Pool Maintenance: Costs for the year were $994,093 for dredging; $124 for engineering and design; $144,839 for miscellaneous other, and $38,060 for supervisions and administration. Total maintenance costs were $1,177,116. Total operation and maintenance costs for all pools above Alton Pool were $18,293,100. Rehabilitation costs were $1,688,318. Alton Pool operation and maintenance costs were $1,408,008. Total costs incurred were $21,369,426. 3. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN For report on this improvement, see chapter on "Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN." 4. UPPER MISSISSIPPI - ILLINOIS NAVIGATION STUDY Location. The study includes both the Upper Mississippi River and the Illinois Waterway. The study area covers over 850 miles of navigable waterways and 29 locks and dams of the Upper Mississippi River from the headwaters at St. Anthony Falls near Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota; downstream to the mouth of the Ohio River at Cairo; and the Illinois Waterway (eight locks and dams) from Lake Michigan in Chicago, Illinois, southwest to where the waterway joins with the Mississippi River at Grafton, Illinois, 348 miles long. The Upper Mississippi River system meanders through the states of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois, and Missouri, and over 40 counties. The Illinois Waterway is located entirely within the State of Illinois. Existing project. The project consists of addressing the need for navigation improvement on the river system. Undertaken by three Corps Districts (St. Paul, Rock Island, and St. Louis), the purpose of the study is to examine information related to the existing condition of the structures and investigate system congestion (lockage delays, inadequate capacity, and recreation/commercial locking conflicts). The review of this completed project is authorized by Section 216, Flood Control Act of 1970, PL 91-611. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. The Feasibility Phase was continued during FY 1997 at a cost of $8,298,606. 5. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (UMRS-EMP), IL, IA, MN, MO, WI Location. The project is authorized for those river reaches having commercial navigation channels on the Upper Mississippi River, Illinois River, Minnesota River, St. Croix River, and Kaskaskia River in the states of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin. Existing project. The purpose of the UMRS-EMP as stated in the authorizing legislation is to ensure the coordinated development and enhancement of the Upper Mississippi River system, recognizing its several purposes. The program includes habitat rehabilitation and enhancement projects to counteract the effects of backwater sedimentation. Long Term Resource Monitoring will provide the means for more informed management of the UMRS. Also authorized was a study of the economic impacts of completed recreation, completed navigation traffic monitoring, and recreation projects (currently unfunded). The program was initiated in 1986 utilizing funds provided by PL 99-88, FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriation Act. PL 99-662, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, further defined the program and provided for 15-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 a 10 year implementiation period. The implementation period was extended to 15 years by PL 101-640, Water Resources Development Act of 1990. Local Cooperation: Local cooperation agreements are obtained for habitat projects for such projects not located on lands managed as a national wildlife refuge, within the meaning of Section 906(e) of the 1986 WRDA. Operations During Fiscal Year. Expenditures during the year totaled $18,796,000. The majority of funds was expended on two primary program elements: habitat projects and long term resource monitoring. General design continued on 11 projects; construction was initiated on two projects; continued on thirteen projects; and completed on two projects. Construction has essentially been completed on a total of 25 projects since the program was initiated. Data analysis and production of technical and special reports continued by the Environmental Management Technical Center in Lake Onalaska, WI. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 15-C Flood Control 7. CORALVILLE LAKE, IA Location. Coralville Lake is formed by the Coralville Dam on the Iowa River, several miles upstream from Iowa City, Johnson County, IA, about 83 miles above the confluence of the Iowa River with the Mississippi River. Existing project. See page 28-4, Annual Report for 1981, for project details. Construction began in July 1949 and the project has been in operation since February 1958. About 25,068 acres of land were acquired in fee and flowage easements obtained for 29,169 acres. The project was modified to provide for construction of a highway bridge crossing the lake at the Mehaffey site, which was begun in June 1964 and completed in October 1966. See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation. Operations during fiscal year. No new work was performed during FY 97. Operation and Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities continued at a cost of $3,385,267. 8. DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER AND GREENBELT, IA Location. The greenbelt area is located along both banks of the Des Moines River in central IA and extends from a point at which relocated U.S. Highway 92 crosses the Des Moines River near Harvey, upstream approximately 169 river miles to U.S. Highway 20, and includes portions of Fort Dodge, IA. It also includes the Corps' operated Lake Red Rock and Saylorville Lake projects. Existing project. The project will include, but not be limited to: (1) the construction, operation, and maintenance of recreational facilities and streambank stabilization structures; (2) maintenance of all structures constructed before the date of authorization of this project (other than any such structure operated and maintained by any person under a permit or agreement with the Secretary); (3) such tree plantings, trails, vegetation, and wildlife protection and development for recreational purposes; and (4) the prohibition or limitation by the Secretary of the killing, wounding, or capturing at any time of any wild bird or animal in such areas as may be directed by the Secretary. In carrying out the project the Secretary may acquire by purchase, donation, exchange, or otherwise, land and interests therein, as the Secretary determines are necessary to complete the project. The authorization requires that an Advisory Committee be established for consultation with the Department of the Army consisting of 47 members: three Corps of Engineers appointees, one person from the city of Des Moines, and one from each other incorporated municipality within the greenbelt, two from each of the nine counties in the greenbelt, and five from the State of Iowa. See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Letters of assurance have been received for 15 separable elements. Local cooperation Agreements have been executed for five separable elements. Operations during fiscal year. Coordination was maintained with the Advisory Committee in accordance with Public Law 99-88. Construction was completed on the Downtown Riverfront Plaza/Amphitheater, the Signage Project for the Neal Smith Bike Trail, and the Neal Smith Prairie Learning Center. Construction continued on the Red Rock Trails Segment IVA. Due to lack of funding, work remained deferred on eleven projects: awarded for Red Rock Trails Segment IVA; Botanical Center Park; Johnston Trail and Canoe Access; Raccoon River Trail; Raccoon River Regional Park; Polk City - Big Creek Trail; Webster City - Briggs Wood Trail; Dayton - Stratford Trail; Knoxville; Riverview Park; and Saylorville Barrier Dam Trail. Eleven projects in total have been completed to date. Costs incurred were $2,192,805. 9. FARM CREEK, IL Location. Farm Creek watershed in Tazewell County, IL, is 60 square miles in extent. Stream empties into Illinois Waterway at mile 162 above mouth. Existing project. See page 28-5, Annual Report for 1983 for description of project. See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance activities were continued at a cost of $180,424. 10. LOVES PARK, IL Location. The Loves Park project is located in Winnebago County, IL on the northeast boundary of the city of Rockford, IL. Loves Park is 17 miles south of the Illinois- Wisconsin state line. Existing project. The project provides 100-year level of protection against flooding along Loves Park Creek. Protection measures consist of 17,900 feet of channel improvements, a 16,300 GPM pump plant, and ponding. The estimated project cost is $32,100,000 including $10,200,000 non-federal 15-4 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT costs. See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation: The local cooperation agreement was executed on March 26, 1991. Operation during fiscal year. Planning, Engineering, and Design was continued to develop Plans and Specifications relative to Stage 1. Construction was completed on Stages IIA-2 and IIB. Total costs incurred were $1,424,638. 11. RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA Location. The site of this project is on the Des Moines River, chiefly in Marion County, but extending into Jasper, Warren, and Polk Counties. The dam is 142.9 miles above the mouth of the Des Moines River, which empties into the Mississippi River at mile 361.4 above the mouth of the Ohio River. The city of Des Moines lies northwesterly from the site, about 60 miles upstream. Existing project. See page 28-6, Annual Report for 1981 for description of the project. Construction began in May 1960, and the dam was placed in beneficial use for storage of flood water in January 1969. Land acquired for the project consisted of 56,150.46 acres in fee and 29,169 acres in flowage easement. Landowner complaints, that lake operation have flooded their lands more frequently than what they were told to expect when flowage easements were initially acquired, led Congress to modify the project authorization. Language in PL 99-190 authorizes acquisition from willing sellers fee simple title in real property, which is subject to periodic flooding in connection with the operation of the project. Potentially there are approximately 1,000 tracts consisting of about 30,000 acres. Estimated Federal cost is $43,500,000. See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Land Acquisition costs were $69,372. The last REDM 5B was approved December 1992. Operation and Maintenance activities were continued at a cost of $5,242,535. 12. SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA Location. The project site is chiefly in Polk County, IA, but portions extend into Dallas and Boone Counties. The dam is about 213.7 miles above the mouth of the Des Moines River and about 5 miles upstream from the city of Des Moines, IA. Existing project. The dam is an earth embankment 6,750 feet long at crest with a height of 120 feet. Outlet works are a single circular concrete conduit, 22 feet in diameter, located at the toe of the west bluff. Control structure is at upstream end of conduit and uses three gates. A stilling basin is provided to dissipate energy of discharge from outlet conduit. Spillway is in west bluff, weir 430 feet long. Water flowing over the spillway weir discharges into a paved chute and thence into an excavated earth channel to the Des Moines River. Top of spillway is about 31 feet below top of earth embankment secton, and flow over weir is uncontrolled when water in reservoir reaches its crest. Watershed area above dam site is 5,823 square miles. With pool at spillway crest elevation, lake area is 16,700 acres and contains about 676,000 acre-feet of water at that height (602,000 for flood control and 74,000 for a conservation pool to maintain minimum flows at downstream points). Lake supplements capacity of downstream Lake Red Rock at river mile 142.9. The two lakes provide a high degree of flood protection to the lower Des- Moines River Valley. Reaches along the Mississippi River downstream from the mouth of the Des Moines River are also benefited. A project modification plan to minimize the adverse environmental effects at Ledges State Park, located upstream from the dam, was authorized in 1976. The project modification included relocation of affected park facilities, acquisition of additional park land, and the development of a floodway corridor, with recreational facilities, from the dam downstream to Sixth Avenue in Des Moines. Improvements to Highway 415, the main access road to existing facilities on the east side of the reservoir, were added to the project by Congress in 1984. Segments A and B of Highway 415 have been completed. Segment C of Highway 415 was completed in 1994. Construction began in June 1965, and the dam was placed in operation for the storage of flood water in April 1977. Remedial work in Big Creek Valley, consisting of diversion dam and channel and a barrier dam, for the protection of the town of Polk City was completed in December 1974. The land acquisition program involved 26,088 acres in fee and flowage easements for 1,950 acres. The estimated project cost is $116,470,000 including $2,820,000 in non-Federal costs from the State of Iowa and the City of Des Moines, for recreational development. See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Project right-ofway has been transferred to the Iowa Department of Transportation, the project sponsor. Planning, Engineering, and Design efforts were halted on the 86th Street Improvements and Extension project. Costs incurred were $35,596. Operation and maintenance activities were continued at a cost of $5,942,532. The project is about 97 percent completed, excluding deferred work. 13. WEST DES MOINES, IA Location. The city is located in Polk County in central Iowa. Existing project. The project will provide flood protection from the Raccoon River and Walnut Creek. The project consists of four stages: Stage I, 3,100 feet of levees and floodwalls along Walnut Creek north of Ashworth Road; Stage II, 9,000 feet of levees along the Raccoon River from Jordan Creek to 63rd Street, with pump station; Stage IIIA, 4,500 feet of levees along the lower end of Walnut Creek; and Stage IIIB, 5,800 feet of levees and flood walls tieing Stages I and IIIA together along Walnut Creek with pump station and Stages II and IIIA along the Raccoon River. The project will provide 100-year protection and will prevent 4.387 million dollars in average annual damages. See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation. 15-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the project is complete. Total costs incurred during FY 97 were $1,520,161. 14. MUSCATINE ISLAND, IA Location. Muscatine Island lies on the west bank of the Mississippi River in Muscatine and Louisa Counties, Iowa, adjacent and in the city of Muscatine, IA. The flood protection area of 30,800 acres is protected by 15.6 miles of existing sand and clay levees. The protected area consists of residential, commercial, industrial and agricultural areas and also includes U.S. Highway 61 and the Muscatine Municipal Airport. Existing Project. The existing levee will be raised to increase the level of protection from less than a 100-year flood to a 200-year flood and associated closure and utility improvements. The 200-year protection level is achieved by improving and raising approximately 6.6 miles of the existing levee system. Also included in the project is construction of an upstream railroad closure structure, improving drainage facilities, concrete I-wall sections and relocating existing utilities. See Table 15-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. The city of Muscatine and Muscatine Island Levee District are co-sponsors for the project. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed on 21 September 1995. Operations during fiscal year. Stage I (Railroad Closure) was completed in December 1996. Stage II (Levee Raise) was awarded in September 1997. Stage IIA (Industrial Levee Raise) and Stage II (Agricultural Levee Raise) are scheduled to be awarded in April and July 1998, respectively. The entire project is scheduled to be completed in July 2000. Total costs incurred during FY 97 were $491,445. 15. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Federal flood control regulations (part 208 of title 33, Code of Federal Regulations) provide that the structures and facilities constructed by the United States for local flood protection shall be continuously maintained in such a manner and operated at such times and for such periods as may be necessary to obtain the maximum benefits. Costs during the period for inspections of projects turned over to local interests to ascertain compliance with Federal requirements were $196,518. (See Table 15-H for list of completed flood control projects inspected.) 16. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 15-E. 17. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities, Section 205, Public Law 84-685. See Table 15-I Snagging and Clearing of Navigable Streams and Tributaries in Interest of Flood Control, Section 208, Public Law 83-780. See Table 15-I. Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526.) See Table 15-I. Emergency Flood Control Activities, Public Law 99, 84th Congress. See Table 15-I. General Investigations 18. SURVEYS There were three flood prevention studies in progress during FY 97 at a cost of $210,451. There were three Reviews of Completed Projects at a cost of $271,165. Special Investigations, FERC, Interagency Water Resource Development, North American Waterfowl Management, Coordination Studies with Other Agencies, and Planning Assistance to States efforts totaled $158,787. Total cost of surveys was $640,403. 19. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services cost $194,050. Hydrologic Studies were continued during FY 97 at a cost of $35,720. Total cost for collection and study of basic data in FY 97 was $229,770. 20. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN There were no PED's in progress during FY 97 15-6 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project 1. Illinois and Mississippi Canal, IL 2. Illinois Waterway IL and IN 4. Upper Mississippi -Illinois Navigation Study 5. Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program, IL, IA, MN, MO, WI 7. Coralville Lake, IA 8. Des Moines Recreational River and Greenbelt, IA 9. Farm Creek, IL 10. Loves Park, IL 11. Red Rock Dam and Lake Red Rock, IA 12. Saylorville Lake IA Funding New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New' Work: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Contributed Funds: Approp. Cost FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 108,000 15,807 16,045,664 15,218,077 1,240,000 258,113 1,240,000 257,136 7,563,000 7,180,365 20,501,000 14,914,000 686,000 593,905 2,953,100 2,867,986 3,050,000 1,549,024 8,046 279,000 299,978 1,447,048 1,097,338 91,666 671,000 1,029,347 4,183,300 3,710,461 50,000 339,070 4,316,800 4,015,295 139,956 238,592 70,000 950,000 58,860 693,069 67,000 173,433 17,983,000 19,692,026 10,289,507 11,141,732 10,296,000 11,141,732 7,890,600 9,547,350 15,498,000 20,608,000 365,000 348,821 2,910,500 3,059,707 4,000,000 1,528,222 1,065,037 709,118 278,000 275,657 3,232,000 2,347,835 1,490,000 292,049 900,952 4,223,500 4,671,960 450,000 470,909 3,375,082 3,569,385 33,821 19,045,000 18,278,706 435,000 620,098 435,000 1,048,220 9,321,000 8,298,606 17,906,000 18,796,000 14,000 35,173 2,834,000 3,353,000 2,601,200 3,385,267 2,446,151 2,192,805 327,188 212,000 196,488 1,791,000 3,451,391 1,490,000 1,166,344 237,000 457,085 4,907,000 5,048,062 20,000 686,151 3,927,000 4,097,403 (3,411) 24,348 177,000 180,424 1,254,000 1,424,638 250,000 463,558 69,372 5,618,186 5,242,535 (979) 100,000 35,596 6,436,000 5,942,532 20,862,000 21,065,271 2,044,000 2,137,938 2,044,000 1,672,331 7,069,000 6,634,876 17,842,000 21,106,000 43,125 84,996 Total Cost to September 1997 7,605,143' 7,605,143' 22,397,248' 22,107,5142 126,707,751' 126,706,419' 403,745,237' 400,012,733" 161,146,939 160,442,538 13,893,319 12,834,208 39,060,600 25,702,168 164,820,000 143,507,000 1,444,000 1,361,893 30,179,488' 30,173,702' 52,837,274 50,420,344 13,646,000 13,092,087 1,457,849 1,444,555 9,859,0206 9,859,0206 4,785,541 4,661,922 9,875,176 9,790,467 2,309,000 2,193,718 13,646,000 10,968,654 60,455,673 57,548,193 18,871 18,422 128,147,887 127,851,395' 61,732,241 58,404,883 3,394,686 2,938,577 15-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 15-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 September 1997 13. West Des Moines, IA New Work: Approp. 2,804,000 3,318,000 3,675,000 1,648,000 12,204,000 Cost 1,917,397 4,147,502 3,731,279 1,520,161 12,015,284 Contributed Funds: Approp. 779,000 945,000 900,000 342,000 2,021,000 Cost 568,543 877,607 624,536 473,161 1,666,240 14. Muscatine Island, IA New Work: Approp. 2,000 200,000 310,000 473,000 983,000 Cost 34,309 143,196 334,179 491,445 968,820 Contributed Funds: Approp. - - 100,000 215,000 315,000 Cost - - 65,911 222,503 288,414 1. Includes $25,000 Emergency Relief Funds. 2. Includes $4,143,282 for Operating and Care under the "Permanent Indefinite Appropriation." 3. Includes $2,569,102 for previous projects. 4. Includes $1,028,468 for previous projects. TABLE 15-B See Section in Text 5. Includes cost of Mehaffey Bridge, $1,365,074 (excluding $100,000 contributed funds). 6. Excludes $161,813 contributed funds. 7. Excludes $950,000 non-Federal cost. I)ate Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 June 26, 1934' August 30, 1935 August 30, 1935" June 14, 19:17 June 20, 1938 October 23, 1943 ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN Channel 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide from mouth of Illinois River to Utica, 231 miles, modification of 2 U.S. locks and dams, removal of 2 State dams. (Act authorized appropriation of not to exceed $3,500,000 for carrying on work.) Channel 9 feet deep from Utica, IL, to heads of present Federal projects on Chicago and Calumet Rivers 94.6 miles to Lake Street, and 96.3 miles to turning basin 5, respectively, to be secured by means of completed dams, locks, lateral canals, and dredging begun by State of Illinois in general accordance with present plans of State for that work. Act adopting project authorized appropriation of not to exceed $7,500,000 for carrying on work. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriation for rivers and harbors. Construct modern locks and dams at LaGrange and Peoria and a channel 9 feet deep and 300 feet wide below Lockport, exact location and details of design of all structures to be left to discretion of Chief of Engineers, and, for time being, that no change be made in water authorized for navigation of Illinois River by act of July 3, 1930. Also provides for 3 passing places along Sag Channel and authorized channel in Calumet-Sag route to turning basin 5, and dredging at entrance of Lake Calumet. Realign portion of Calumet River and abandonment of bypassed section of Calumet River. Modifies local cooperation requirements in 1935 act. Pay damages to levee and drainage districts due to seepage and other factors, not to exceed $503,500. Rivers and Harbors Committee l)oc. 69th Cong., 1st sess., and S. Doc. 130, 69th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 126, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 184, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess.2 H. Doc. 180, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Il airbors Commi ittee Doc. 19, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 711, 77th Cong., 2nd sess. 15-8 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Documents ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION I)ate Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized March 2, 1945 (Continued) J.uly 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 July 17, 1953 July 3, 1958 August 18, 1968 November 17, 1986 Enlarge Calumet-Sag Channel to 160 feet wide and a usable depth of 9 feet. Dredge a barge channel 160 feet wide with a usable depth of 9 feet in Grand Calumet and Little Calumet River Branch of Indiana Harbor Canal to deep (lake) draft through 141st St., East Chicago, IN. Construct in Little Calumet River a lock of suitable dimensions for large navigation. Rebuild or otherwise alter at Federal expense all obstructive railroad bridges across Calumet-Sag Channel, Little Calumet River, Calumet River, Grand Calumet River, and Indiana Harbor Canal, so as to provide. sulitable clearance, except that. no led(lerail fun(ds shall he expenclded for removal or alteration of Illinois Central RR bridge at mile 11.20 of Little Calumet River. Substitute following work for that authorized by act of March 2, 1945; replace emergency dam( in ('Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal; enlargemient of I h t canal thence to Sag .Junction and of('a lu met Sag ( ha nel to afford channels 225 feet wide and usable depth of 9 feet; construct along general route depth of 9 feet to 225 feet wide between Little Caluimet River and junction with Indiana Harbor Canal and 160 feet wide thence to Clark St., Gary, IN, with a turning basin at Clark St., enlarge Indiana harbor Canal to 225 feet wide and usable depth of 9 feet between (Iand Calumet River and vicinity of 141st St., inclusive; remove Blue Island lock and construct a lock and control works in Calumet River near its head, and sinmilar structures in proposed (Gra(nd (alum et Channel west of Indiana I larbor Canal; alter or eliminate railroad bridges across three channels lakeward of Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, or construct new railroad bridges to provide suitable clearance. A small-boat harbor in vicinity of Peoria, IL, lby construction of a basin 510 by 250 feet, dredged to 7 feet deep. $48,933 to reimnburse Nutwood Drainage and Levee District for additional pumping operation; supplementing $58,750 authorized in October 1943 act. Federal participation in alteration of highway bridges, Calumet-Sag Modification, Part I, which constitute unreasonable obstructions to navigation, in accordance with Public Law 647, 76th Cong., as amended. Federal participation in alteration of highway bridges, Calumet-Sag Modification, Part II, which constitute unreasonable obstructions to navigation, in accordance with Public Law 647, 76th Cong., as amended. Illinois River at Peoria, i, modification of navigation project to include an adjacent downstream water area. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM, IL, IA, MN, MO, WI 15-9 See Section in 'l'ext H. Doc. 145, 76th Cong., 1st sess. II. I)oc. 677, 79th Cong., 2tnd sess. I1. D)oc. 698, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. II. Doc. 144, 81st Cong., 1st sess. II. D)oc. 45, 85th Cong., 1st sess.' Specified in Act. Also II. Doc. 45, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 857, II.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. D)octmenrts REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 15-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 6. August 15, 1985 ()'.i,. 99-88) November 17, 1986 June 28, 1938 July 14, 1960 8. August 15, 1985 (P.L. 99-88) November 17, 1986 9. 1944 Flood Control Act 10. November 17, 1986 11. June 28, 1938 December 19, 1985 12. July 3, 1958 October 22, 1976 13. November 17, 1986 19. November 17, 1986 Provide for a 10- ear environmental program to include habitat rehabilitation and enhancenent; longterni resource monitoring with compurlterized inlventory and analysis; recreational development; assessment of economic benefits from recreat inall act ivit ies; a nd navigation system traffic moniltoring. Approves 1982 Upper Mississippi River Master Plan, authorizes interstate agreements between Upper Mississippi River states, directs Secretary to implement GREAT II recommendations for disposal of dredged material and facilitate the productive use of dredge material, directs and interagency agreement with the Department of Interior for its participation in the plan, authorizes second lock at Lock and Dam No. 6. CORALVILLE LAKE, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Highway bridge across Coralville Lake at or near the Mehaffey site. DES MOINES RECREATIONAL RIVER AND GREENBELT, IA Recreational development; environmental enhancement; and related streambank stabilization. Defines area of work. FARM CREEK, IL Two flood detention dams and channel improvements. LOVES PARK, IL Improved channel, pumping plant and pond storage. RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Land Acquisition SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA Reservoir for flood control and recreation. Modification to minimize adverse project impact on Ledges State Park. WEST DES MOINES, IA Construct levees and floodwall. MUSCATINE ISLAND LEVEE DISTRICT AND MUSCATINE-LOUISA COUNTY DRAINAGE DISTRICT, NO.13, IA Raise existing levees 11. D)oc. 2577, 99th111 Cong.. Ist sess. Sec. 1103, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. None H. Doc. 2577, 99th Cong., 1st sess. Sec. 604, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. H. Doc. 802, 78th Cong., 2nd sess. Sec. 401, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. PL 99-190 S. Doc. 9, 85th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 487, 94th Cong., 2nd sess. Sec. 401, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Sec. 401, H.R.6, Water Resources Development Act of 1986. 15-10 1. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act 2. Contains latest published map of Illinois and Des Plaines Rivers. 3. Included, in part, in Public Works Administratiove Program October 31, 1934, and February 28, 1935. 4. Contains lataest published maps of Calumet - Sy portion. ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION (See Section 6 of Text) PROJECTS Cost To September 30, 1997 For Last Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Hannibal SBH, MO Completed 1958 $ 108,700^ $130,319 Squaw Chute at Quincy, IL Completed 1967 70,979' 9,345 Muscooten Bay, Illinois River, IL Completed 1985 265,4993 171,000 Quincy, IL, Harbor Access Channel Completed 1970 35,4772 37,700 Muscatine Harbor, IA Completed 1964 353,000 356,061 1. Excludes $25,851 contributed funds. 3. Excludes $137,869 contributed funds. 2. Excludes $35,350 contributed funds. 4. Excludes $20,300 contributed funds. TABLE 15-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 16 of Text) Cost To September 30, 1997 For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Completed I'rojects Banner Special Drainage and Levee Diistricts, IL Bear Creek Dlam (City of Hannibal, MO) Bettendorl, IA Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL Canton, MO' Clinton, IA Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL I)es Moines and Mississippi Levee l)istrict No. I, MO Des Moines, IA Drury Drainage District, ILI DI buque, IA East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL 1943 1962 1987 1943 1964 1991 1954 1941 1969 1972 1964 1974 1941 $ 247,822 1,679,056 14,930,085 144,910 1,496,555 26,237,690 1,923,145 68,898 1,492,016 4,993,224 1,144,875 10,861,170 207,826 $ 228,073 839,615 23,323 145,415 15-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 15-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) (See Section 16 of Text) Cost To September 30, 1997 For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Completed Projects East Moline, IL 1984 9,692,097 - - East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, IL 1946 279,963 - - Elkport, IA 1951 34,200 - - Evansdale, IA 1983 4,409,088 - - Fabius River Drainage District, MO 1941 60,500 - - Fabius River Drainage District, MO 1963 1,621,841 - - Farmers Levee and Drainage District, IL 1942 155,562 - - Fulton, IL 1984 18,017,200 - - Galena, IL 1952 844,100 - 118,000 Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA 1949 299,000 - - Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA 1967 1,727,711 - - Gregory Drainage District, MO 1940 77,100 - - Gregory Drainage District, MO 1972 1,538,963 - 20,626 Hannibal, MO 1993 6,058,965 - 600,000 Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, IL 1968 1,453,217 - - Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, IL 1968 1,043,902 - - Henderson County Drainage District No. 3, IL 1949 42,700 - - Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, IL 1940 109,593 - - Hunt Drainage District and Lima Lake Drainage District, IL 1972 4,772,498 - - Indian Grave Drainage District, IL 1972 3,551,961 - - Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, IA 1972 6,044,693 - - Kishwaukee River at DeKalb, IL' 1957 123,300 - - Lacey Langellier, West Mantanzas and Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL 1954 1,290,000 - - Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL 1943 117,731 - - Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL 1938 152,000 - - Marengo, IA' 1981 2,447,001 - - Marion County Drainage District, MO 1967 873,748 - - Marshalltown, IA 1978 8,437,511 - 252,136 Mason and Menard Drainage District, IL 1940 93,808 - - Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, IL' 1977 1,995,322 - 269,739 Milan, IL 1988 13,437,663 - 213,554 Muscatine, Mad Creek, IA' 1983 1,129,800 -- Muscatine Island Levee District and Muscatine- Louisa County Drainage District No. 13, IA 1970 3,293,276 - 220,000 Near Springfield on Sangamon River, IL 1941 - - - Oakford Special Drainage District, IL 1940 38,417 - - Okabena Creek at Worthington, MN' 1957 72,432 -- Ottumwa, IA 1977 233,145 - - Pekin and La Marsh Drainage and Levee District, IL 1955 158,383 - - Penny Slough, Rock River, IL 1940 85,800 - - Rock Island, IL 1979 7,582,373 - - Rockford, IL 1989 10,032,496 - 514,188 Rocky Ford Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 108,797 - - Sabula, IA 1958 411,915 - Sangamon River (Mouth), IL 1980 1,048,990 272,848 15,122 Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, IL 1945 32,281 - - Sid Simpson Project, IL 1968 5,789,800 -- Sny Basin, IL 1972 14,003,560 - Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL 1942 61,400 - Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL 1968 4,956,749 -- 15-12 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 16 of Text) Cost To September 30, 1997 For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended South Beardstown and Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL 1942 220,729 - - South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, IL 1942 171,839 -- South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 1940 61,200 - - South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 1968 1,231,243 -- South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL 1991 7,204,952 - 2,056,960 South River Drainage District, MO 1941 55,300 - - South River Drainage District, MO 1966 1,106,056 - Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL 1941 185,980 - Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage Union No. 1 and Bay Island Drainage and Levee District No. 1, IL 1967 3,306,695 -- Union Township Drainage District, MO 1947 116,576 - Van Meter, IA' 1965 113,842 -- Waterloo, IA 1987 48,620,099 - 83,300 Waterloo Bridges, IA 1991 1,125,000 - 1,108,787 Authorized Projects Not Constructed Ames Dam and Reservoir, Skunk River, IA 1987 1,400,800 - - Davenport, IA 1987 - - Moline, IL2 1987 - - - Peoria, IL 1973 534,580 -- Rock River Agricultural Levees, IL 1984 858,000 -- 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act). 2. FY 89 funds of $5,639 were expended to close out project. TABLE 15-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For l)eauthlorized Expended Expended Cal.-Sag Channel, Part II Illinois Waterway, IL and IN Campbells Island Mississippi River, IL Carroll County Levee and Drainage District, IL Central City Lake, Wapsipinicon River, IA Farmers Drainage and Levee District (Sangamon River), IL Green Island Levee and Drainage District, IA Ilenderson River, IL Illinois Waterway, IL and IN Duplicate Locks Illinois Waterway Navigation Project (Pekin, IL) Janesville and Indian Ford Dams, WI 1986 1969 1938 1970 1942 1938 1964 1982 1986 1938 1986 1979 1977 1977 1986 1977 1977 1981 1986 1977 $ 76,664 55,664 102,310 15-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 15-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Keithsburg Drainage District, IL 1938 1977 - - Pecatonica River at Darlington, WI - 1977 - - Rochester Lake, Cedar River, IA - 1977 South Beloit, IL 1979 1986 270,000 - William L. Springer Lake Decatur, IL 1979 1986 - - Illinois Waterway, Marseilles Canal, IL 1989 1990 - - Peoria Levees, IL - 1990 - - TABLE 15-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 15 of Text) Date Project Inspected Alpine Dam and Page Park Dam, Rockford, IL Banner Special Drainage and Levee District, IL Bear Creek Reservoir, Hannibal, MO Bay Island Drainage and Levee District, IL Bettendorf, IA Big Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL Burlington, IA Canton, MO Clinton, IA Coal Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Crane Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL DeKalb, IL Des Moines, IA Des Moines and Mississippi Levee District No. 1, MO Des Moines County DD7, IA Des Moines County DDS, IA Drury Drainage District, IL Dubuque, IA East Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL East Moline, IL East Peoria Drainage and Levee District, IL East Peoria Sanitary District, IL Elkport, IA Evansdale, IA Fabius River Drainage District, MO Farmers Drainage and Levee District, IL Fulton, IL Galena, IL Green Bay Levee and Drainage District No. 2, IA Gregory Drainage District, MO Hannibal, MO Henderson County Drainage District No. 1, IL Henderson County Drainage District No. 2, IL Hennepin Drainage and Levee District, IL Herget Drainage and Levee District, IL Hunt Drainage District & Lima Lake Drainage District, IL Indian Grave Drainage District, IL October 1996 October 1997 December 1996 November 1996 October 1996 January 1997 October 1996 December 1996 November 1996 January 1997 March 1997 October 1996 October 1996 December 1996 November 1996 November 1996 November 1996 October 1996 February 1997 October 1996 February 1997 April 1997 October 1996 December 1996 December 1997 January 1997 November 1996 October 1996 December 1996 December 1996 February 1996 November 1996 November 1996 April 1997 April 1997 December 1996 December 1996 15-14 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL (Continued) (See Section 15 of Text) PROJECTS Date Project Inspected Iowa River-Flint Creek Levee District No. 16, IA Kerton Valley Drainage and Levee District, IL Lacey Drainage and Levee District, IL Langellier Drainage and Levee District, IL Lima DD, IL Liverpool Drainage and Levee District, IL Lost Creek Drainage and Levee District, IL Mad Creek, Muscatine, IA Marengo, IA Marion County Drainage District, MO Marshalltown, IA Mason and Menard Drainage District, IL Meredosia Levee and Drainage District, IL Milan, IL Muscatine Island, L&DD, & Louisa DD No. 13, IA Oakford Special Drainage and Levee District, IL Pekin-LaMarsh Drainage and Levee District, IL Penny Slough Drainage and Levee District, IL Rock Island, IL Sabula, IA Sanitary District of Beardstown, IL Seahorn Drainage and Levee District, IL Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL South Beardstown Drainage and Levee District, IL South Quincy Drainage and Levee District, IL South River Drainage District, MO Spring Lake Drainage and Levee District, IL Subdistrict No. 1 of Drainage District Union No. 1 and Bay Island Levee and Drainage District No. 1, IL Tama, IA The Sny Basin, IL Valley Drainage and Levee District IL Van Meter, IA Volga, IA Waterloo, IA West Matanzas Drainage and Levee District, IL Worthington, MN November 1996 January 1997 January 1997 January 1997 December 1996 January 1996 November 1996 October 1996 October 1996 December 1996 October 1996 February 1996 November 1996 November 1996 November 1996 March 1997 January 1997 November 1996 October 1996 December 1996 January 1997 November 1996 December 1996 November 1996 December 1996 December 1996 April 1997 November 1996 October 1996 March 1996 April 1997 October 1996 October 1996 October 1996 January 1997 September 1996 TABLE 15-I FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as Amended (Preauthorization) (See Section 17 of Text) Study Identification Cedar River, Cedar River City, IA East Peoria, IL Illinois River, Liverpool, IL Fiscal Year Costs $ 250,225 3,443 125,822 15-15 v -- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 15-I (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as Amended (Preauthorization) (See Section 17 of Text) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Oelwein, Fayette County, IA $ 5,402 Ottawa, IL 44,362 Raccoon River, Des Moines, IA 93,969 Tama, IA 74 TABLE 15-I Snagging and Clearing Navigable Streams and Tributaries in the Interest of Flood Control (Preauthorization) (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress) (See Section 17 of Text) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs NONE TABLE 15-I Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress) (See Section 17 of Text) Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Des Moines River, Eddyville, IA $ 12,403 South River, Marion County Road 402, MO 19,246 West Fork, Des Moines River, MN 15,735 15-16 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-I FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (Continued) Emergency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting, and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and Antecedent Legislation) (See Section 17 of Text) Project and Location Federal Cost Advance Preparation: $ 210,155 Emergency Operations: 357,048 Flood Control of '93 Rehabilitation: 108,031 O&M Emergency Supplement: 2,839,250 TABLE 15-J ILLINOIS WATERWAY: EXISTING LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 2 of Text) Depth on Dimensions Miter Sills at Low Water Available Lift at Miles Width of Length for Low Above Chamber Full Width Water' Lower Upper Lock Mouth Miles to Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) I,:Grange Lock 80.2 7.8 below l enrdstown, IL 110 600 10.0 13.0 15.5 Peoria Lock 157.7 4.1 below Peoria, IL 110 600 11.0 12.0 15.5 Starved Rock Lock 231.0 Utica, IL 110 600 18.5 14.0 16.8 Marseilles Lock 244.6 Marseilles, IL 110 600 24.45 14.0 18.6 Dresden Island Lock 271.5 8 above Morris, IL 110 600 21.75 12.25 16.85 B3randon Road Lock 286.0 Joliet, 1L 110 600 34.0 13.8 17.85 Lockport Lock 291.1 Lockport, IL 110 600 30.5-39.52 15.0 11.0-20.0' T.J. O'Brien Lock 326.5 Chicago, IL 110 1,000 - 14.0 14.0 1. Lifts and depth on miter sills are those obtained with 2. Variation in lift and depth on upper miter sill at flat pools. Lockport is d(Ie to fluctuation of water surface in the sanitary district canal. TABLE 15-K ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN LOCK AND DAM CONSTRUCTION, FOUNDATIONS, COST (See Section 2 of Text) Lock Dam Estimated Federal Cost Under Type of Character of Type of Character of Year Existing Name Construction Foundation Kind Construction Foundation Complete Project Illinois River, $ 2,733,499' mouth to Utica; channel improvement by dredging in Illinois River below Starved Rock modification of two U.S. locks and (ldams, anid removal of two State dams. 15-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 15-K (Continued) ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN LOCK AND DAM CONSTRUCTION, FOUNDATIONS, COST (See Section 2 of Text) Lock Dam Estimated Federal Cost Under Type of Character of Type of Character of Year Existing Name Construction Foundation Kind Construction Foundation Complete Project LaGrange Peoria Starved Rock Marseilles Dresden Island B13andlon Road Iocklport T''.J. O'Brien Concrete Piles in sand Concrete Piles in sand Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete Rock Concrete and sheet piling Movable (wicket with Aframe- crest) Movable (wicket type) Movable (tainter gates) Movable (tainter gates) Movable (tainter gates) Movable (ta inter gates) Movable (Bear trap) (Bear trap) Piles in clay Fixed Concrete and timber Concrete and timber Concrete and structural steel Concrete and structural steel Concrete and structural steel Concrete a 11nd structural steel Concrete and structural steel Concrete and sheet piling Piles in sand Piles in sand Rock Rock Rock Rock Rock 1939 1939 1933 1933 1933 1933 $ 2,744,592' 3,381,030' 885,315' 1,853,725' 2,503,376' 2,031,683' 19:1:33 Piles in clay 1.960 Lock anid datii - - - (qutipm1ent lIotl locks - - - andc lams 1. Actual cost. 133,608' TABLE 15-L ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST (See Section 2 of Text) Dredging: Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers Calumet-Sag, 3 passing places Starved Rock to Lockport Starved Rock to Grafton Calumet-Sag Channel Peoria small boat harbor $ 2,135,358' 813,318' 6,007,335 2,917,607 19,238,200 24,937' 15-18 6,954,700' 1,250,304' $ 24,471,832 ROCK ISLAND, IL, DISTRICT TABLE 15-L (Continued) ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST (See Section 2 of Text) Protection piers at all locks Calumet-Sag modification engineering and design Calumet-Sag modification, supervision and administration Rehuild highway bridges Rebuild railway bridges: Calumet-Sag Channel Little Calumet and Calumet Rivers Recreation Facilities, Code 711 Removal of Blue Island lock Grand Calumet River controlling works 2 St. Louis District Total additional features Total existing project 1. Actual cost. 77,613' 5,141,474 5,466,804 19,327,850 20,828,435' 18,362,041' 445,000 288,600' 1,081,600' $100,442,142 $124,913,974 2. Placed in iniactive status November 19, 1974. EXISTING PROJECT See Section in Text Project Item Length (feet) Width (feet) Depth (feet) Illinois Waterway, IL and IN Nine locks and six dams Grafton to Lockport, IL Lockport to controlling works Controlling works to junction with Calumet-Sag Channel Calumet-Sag Channel to lock in Blue Island Calumet and Little Calumet Channel, from Blue Island to turning basin 5 Grand Calumet River Channel from junction with Little Calumet River to and in Indiana Harbor Canal to 141st, East Chicago, IN Also, Grand Calumet River Channel from junction of Indiana Harbor Canal and Grand Calumet River to Clark St. in Gary, IN, with a turning basin at Clark St. A channel in Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal and South Branch Chicago River from Sag-Junction to Lake St. in Chicago, IL 15-19 TABLE 15-M 291.1 miles 2.0 miles 10.0 miles 16.0 miles 7.7 miles 9.0 miles 4.2 miles 22.1 miles 300 200-300 225 225 :300 9 160 175-300 ----- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 15-N ILLINOIS WATERWAY, IL AND IN TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (See Section 2 of Text) New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Total Regular Funds $120,886,748 $384,578,070 $150,081,906 $655,546,724 Public Works Funds 3,960,735 - - 3,960,735 Emergency Relief Funds 1,858,936 - - 1,858,936 Total $126,706,419 $384,578,070 $150,081,906 $661,366,395' 1. Includes $1,735,890 expended between 1927 and 1936 on the of the permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. operation and care of the works of improvement under the provisions 15-20 ST. PAUL, MN DISTRICT * District comprises western Wisconsin, major portion of Minnesota, northern and eastern North Dakota, and small portions of northeastern South Dakota and northern and northeastern Iowa embracing drainage basins of Mississippi River and tributaries from its source to mile 614 above mouth of Ohio River; Red River of the North and tributaries; those streams north of Missouri River Basin in North Dakota; and U.S. waters of Lake of the Woods and its tributaries. That section of Mississippi River above mile 614 is included in report on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minnesota. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, MN .................... 16-2 2. Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, MN ........................... 16-2 3. Upper Mississippi River System Environmental Management Program (UMRS-EMP) .......... 16-2 Flood Control 4. Bassett Creek, MN ...................... 16-3 5. Big Fork River, MN ..................... 16-3 6. Chaska, MN .......... ............ 16-3 7. Gilmore Creek, Winona, MN ............... 16-4 8. Hennepin County, CSAH 116, MN ........... 16-4 9. Homme Lake and Dam, ND ................ 16-4 10. Houston, MN .......................... 16-5 11. LaFarge Lake and Channel Improvement, WI ..... 16-5 12. Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, ND ..................... 16-6 13. Mankato and North Mankato, MN ............ 16-6 14. Mankato Township, MN .................. 16-6 15. Marshall, MN ......................... 16-7 16. Melrose, WI .......................... 16-7 17. Minnesota River at Henderson, MN ........... 16-7 18. Portage, WI .. ........................ 16-8 19. Red Lake River, Polk County, Crookston, MN .... 16-8 20. Red River of the North Drainage Basin, MN, SD, and ND ....................... 16-8 21. Rochester, MN ....................... 16-9 22. Sanders Creek, Boscobel, WI ............... 16-9 23. Sheyenne River, ND .................... 16-10 24. Snake River at Alvarado, MN .............. 16-10 25. Souris River Basin, ND .................. 16-10 26. Sterling Center, Maple River, MN ........... 16-11 27. St. Croix River, Stillwater, MN ............. .16-11 28. St. Paul, MN ........................ 16-12 Page 29. Wild Rice River, Hendrum/Lee Townships Norman County, MN ................... 16-12 30. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ... 16-12 Miscellaneous 31. Other Work Under Special Authority ........ 32. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies (FC & CE) ......................... 33. National Emergency Preparedness (NEPP) ..... 34. Regulatory Functions Program ............. General Investigations 35. Surveys ................... ........ 36. Collection and Study of Basic Data .......... 37. Advance Engineering and Design .......... Tables Table 16-A Cost and Financial Statement ........ Table 16-B Authorizing Legislation ........... Table 16-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects . . Table 16-D Not Applicable Table 16-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects Table 16-F Not Applicable Table 16-G Deauthorized Projects ............ Table 16-H Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River ............... Table 16-I Red River of the North Drainage Basin: Active Units in Comprehensive Basin Plan .................... Table 16-J Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ..................... Table 16-K Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................. Table 16-L Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment ................. Table 16-M General Investigations ............ 16-12 16-12 16-12 16-12 16-13 . 16-13 . 16-13 16-14 16-18 16-19 16-20 16-23 16-24 . 16-25 16-26 16-27 16-28 . 16-28 16-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Navigation 1. MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN For report on this improvement see chapter on Mississippi River between Missouri River and Minneapolis, Minnesota. 2. RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN Location. Reservoirs are on the Mississippi River and several of its tributaries in Itasca, Beltrami, Hubbard, Aitkin, Cass and Crow Wing Counties, MN. (See Table 16-H on reservoirs.) Previous projects. For details see page 1888 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1098 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for reconstruction from timber to concrete at Winnibigoshish, Leech Lake, Pokegama, Sandy Lake and Pine River Dams, and construction of a concrete dam at Gull Lake. Pokegama was built on bedrock and the others on pile foundations. A portion of Leech Lake Dam from piers 26 to 39 was replaced with an earth fill. Constructed three dikes at Winnibigoshish, four at Pokegama, two at Sandy Lake, and 16 at Pine River. Sandy Lake Dam includes a lock 160 feet long, 30 feet wide, with a maximum lift of 9.5 feet and a depth of 2.5 feet on lower sill at low water which was converted to use as a spillway. (See Table 16-B for authorizing legislation.) The Pine River Dam main embankment consists of a timber diaphragm core and earth fill. The Pine River Dam control structure is made of reinforced concrete with a wooden sheet pile cutoff and is supported on a timber substructure. The recommended plan for improvements to the Pine River Dam for dam safety assurance includes: rehabilitation of the existing structure to include 13 new gates, concrete replacement and a sheetpile and concrete wall along the current main dam embankment. Estimated cost (1997) to the United States for new Dam Safety Assurance work at the Pine River Dam is $9,190,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None. Operations and results during fiscal year. Reservoirs were operated as required, recreation facilities and equipment maintained, and surveys, repairs, reports and data collection cost $2,658,766. Dam Safety: Engineering and design for dam safety modifications at Pine River Dam cost $754,546. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1937. Flowage rights were acquired on all lands affected by construction, maintenance, and operation of reservoirs. A total of 1,672.26 acres in fee are owned by the United States. The United States has easements, flowage rights, and other rights of use on another 296,334.44 acres. Structures are in fair condition. Recreation facilities for public use are being constructed intermittently at all reservoir areas. (See Table 16-H for capacities and costs by reservoir.) Pine River Dam has been classified as a high hazard dam under the National Dam Safety Program due to inadequate spillway capacity which could lead to dam failure during a flood event. Engineering and design of dam safety modifications is currently underway. 3. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (UMRS-EMP) Location. The program is authorized for the commercially navigable portions of the Upper Mississippi River System. In the St. Paul District, this includes the Mississippi, Minnesota, Black, and St. Croix Rivers in the states of Minnesota, Wisconsin and Iowa. Existing project. The purpose of the UMRS-EMP as stated in the authorizing legislation is to ensure the coordinated development and enhancement of the Upper Mississippi River System, recognizing its several purposes. It is intended to protect and/or enhance the river resources and guide future river management. The primary emphasis of the program is on habitat rehabilitation and enhancement projects. Long term resource monitoring will provide the means for more informed management of the UMRS. Also authorized, was a study of the economic impacts of recreation (completed), navigation traffic monitoring (continuing under other authority), and recreation projects (unfunded). The program was initiated in FY 1986 and is authorized to continue through FY 2002. The execution of the program is being closely coordinated with the Upper Mississippi River Basin Association, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the three affected states in the St. Paul District. See Rock Island District Tables 15-A and 15-B for total program costs and authorizing legislation. In the St. Paul District, fifteen habitat projects have been completed. These are the Guttenberg Waterfowl Ponds (IA), Island 42 (MN), Lake Onalaska (WI), Blackhawk Park (WI), Pool 8 Islands Phase I (WI), Indian Slough (WI), Finger Lakes (MN), Lansing Big Lake (IA), Cold Springs (WI), Pool 9 Island (WI), Spring Lake Peninsula (WI), Bussey Lake (IA), Peterson Lake (MN), Polander Lake Stage I (MN), and East Channel (WI/MN). The projects are being operated and maintained by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, except for Blackhawk Park which is managed by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (DNR). Through FY 1997, funds expended by the St. Paul District have amounted to $27,891,000 for planning, design, construction and monitoring of habitat rehabilitation and enhancement projects; $832,000 for long term resource monitoring; $768,000 for economic 16-2 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT impacts of recreation study; and $1,738,000 for program management. The allocations for the overall program projected over a 15-year period for the St. Paul District are almost $50 million. Local cooperation. Local cooperation agreements are obtained for habitat projects not located on lands managed as a national wildlife refuge, as specified in Section 906(e) of the 1986 WRDA. Operations and results during fiscal year. In the St. Paul District, costs during the year totaled $3,824,521 Federal. The majority of funds were expended on the planning, design, construction and monitoring of habitat projects. Design was continued on five projects. Construction was initiated on two projects and continued on three. Construction was completed on one project and contract awards were made for construction of two projects. Flood Control 4. BASSETT CREEK, MN Location. In Hennepin County and Minneapolis, Minnesota, on Bassett Creek, a tributary of the Mississippi River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The project consists of nonstructural and structural flood control measures. Nonstructural measures include continuation of existing floodplain regulations, flood insurance and forecasting, and flood warning. Principal structural measures consist of six small control structures in the upper watershed to temporarily impound flood waters and a new tunnel (part of which was constructed on a cooperative basis with the Minnesota Department of Transportation) in a highly urbanized area of Minneapolis to replace the existing tunnel outletting Bassett Creek to the Mississippi River. Also included in the project are a limited reach of channel widening, bridge removals, culvert replacements, a weir structure, a flood storage area, and a railroad bridge replacement. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for requirements. Under current cost sharing policies, when the costs of lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and disposal areas (LERRD) are less than 20 percent of total project costs, local interests are required to furnish the standard local cooperation requirements plus a cash contribution, the total of the two to amount to a minimum of 25 percent of the total project costs. On June 27, 1986, the City of Minneapolis entered into a local cooperation agreement with the Department of the Army. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction on the final stage of work was completed. Total Federal costs were $64,795 and non-Federal, $44,400. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction has been completed on all components. The project financial closeout work is currently underway. 5. BIG FORK RIVER, MN Location. Along the left bank of the Big Fork River, Koochiching County, about 300 miles north of Minneapolis- St. Paul, Minnesota. Existing project. The emergency streambank protection project on the Big Fork River involves approximately 500 feet of riverbank and consists of rockfill toe protection laid on geotextile and associated earthwork. The project was approved by the Engineering and Planning Directorate of the North Central Division for construction on May 18, 1995, under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1995 for requirements. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed between the Federal Government and Koochiching County on June 23, 1995. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction was completed in FY 1997. Total Federal costs were $108,758 non-Federal, $-22,819. Condition at end of fiscal year. The emergency streambank protection project on the Big Fork River in Koochiching County, Minnesota is 99 percent complete. 6. CHASKA, MN Location. In Carver County in south-central Minnesota on the Minnesota River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of a levee and interior drainage works along the Minnesota River, flood diversion channels on Chaska Creek and East Creek, and appropriate floodplain regulation measures. Principal project features include: approximately 1.1 miles of upgraded levee, 1.5 miles of new levee, and one pumping station on the Minnesota River; 1.1 miles of diversion channel on Chaska Creek; and 1.0 mile of diversion channel on East Creek. Approximately 2.9 miles of paved recreation trails on top of the levee and around Courthouse Lake are also included in the proposed plan. Estimated Federal cost (1997) for new work is 16-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 $30,397,000 and $12,558,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. (H. Doc. 644, 94th Congress, 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1977 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was executed on Sep. 12, 1988. The agreement included cost sharing provisions in accordance with the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. Stage 3 construction was substantially complete. Stage 3A construction (final stage) continued. Total Federal costs were $2,916,251 and non-Federal, $208,116. Condition at end of fiscal year. Stage 1, Stage 2, Stage 3 and Stage 4 construction is complete. Stage 3A construction contract is nearing completion. 7. GILMORE CREEK, WINONA, MN Location. Gilmore Creek is located in southwestern portion of the city of Winona, Minnesota. Winona is the County Seat of Winona County and is located along the west bank of the Mississippi River about 120 miles south of St. Paul, Minnesota. Existing project. The flood damage reduction project at Gilmore Creek is designed to provide protection from an estimated Gilmore Creek flood having a 1 percent chance of occurring during any one year (100-year flood.) The project involves raising the right bank levee along Gilmore Creek from Boilers Lake upstream to high ground, removing the Gilmore Avenue bridge and left bank approach and an existing left bank levee, reconstructing an existing earth levee along Ditch No. 3 between U.S. Highway 14 and 44th Avenue in Goodview, and constructing a continuous flood barrier from near 44th Avenue westerly to high ground west of Boilers Lake. The flood barrier would consist of a raise of the southbound lanes of Highway 61 east of 54th Avenue and an earth levee adjacent to Highway 61 west of 54th Avenue. Also, the project would involve modifications to the Boilers Lake outlet including replacement of the existing box culvert and construction of a weir at the head of the new box culvert. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction July 13, 1993 under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed between the Federal Government and the city of Winona on July 20, 1993. See Annual Report for 1994 for requirements. Operations and results during the fiscal year. Project was turned over to the local sponsor, the city of Winona, on June 27, 1997. Federal costs were $10,329 and non-Federal $-471. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is complete. 8. HENNEPIN COUNTY, CSAH 116, MN Location. Along the east bank of the Crow River, Hennepin County, Hassan Township, about 30 miles northwest of Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota. Existing project. The emergency streambank protection project on the Crow River involves approximately 600 feet of riverbank and consists of rockfill toe protection laid on the existing bank. The project was approved by the Engineering and Planning Directorate of the North Central Division for construction on 23 Aug. 1996 under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1996 for requirements. A local assurance agreement was adopted by Hennepin County, the local sponsor, on Jan. 7, 1997. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction was completed in March 1997 at a cost of $109,707, all Federal. Condition at end of fiscal year. The emergency streambank protection project on the Crow River in Hennepin County, Minnesota is complete. 9. HOMME LAKE AND DAM, ND Location. Dam is on South Branch of Park River about 4 miles upstream from Park River, ND, and 62.1 miles above mouth of Park River. South, Middle, and North Branches, headwater streams of Park River, rise in Cavalier County in northeastern North Dakota and flow easterly to an almost common confluence near Grafton, ND, forming main stream which flows easterly 35 miles to join Red River of the North about 35 miles south of the international boundary. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. See Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized as Park River Reservoir by 1944 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 194, 78th Cong., 2d sess.), and redesignated Homme Reservoir and Dam by Public Law 435, 80th Congress, 2d session. Project restoration of wetland habitat conditions is taking place under the authority contained in Section 1135 of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act, as amended. Latest published map is in project document. A reconnaissance report was completed in 1994 under the Dam Safety Assurance Program. The report recommended adding a new spillway to increase the dam's discharge capacity to the Probable Maximum flood level. Estimated cost (1997) to the United States for new Dam Safety Assurance work is 16-4 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT $14,297,000 and $97,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Total costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization, including required non-Federal contributions, were $62,800. In addition, local interests contributed $16,220 for construction of a water supply outlet through dam and incurred other costs of $19,600. The North Dakota Game and Fish Department has agreed to serve as the non-Federal sponsor for the environment improvement to the project. According to current Dam Safety cost sharing guidance, the local sponsors are required to fund 15 percent of the dam safety improvement costs in the same proportion as the original construction was cost shared. The local sponsors would therefore pay for 4.5 percent of 15 percent or 0.68 percent of the dam safety costs. The North Dakota Office of the State Engineer has supported the proposed modifications identified in the Reconnaissance Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Structure was operated, maintained, inspected and evaluations were performed at a cost of $176,325. Dam Safety: Engineering and design cost $259,984, all Federal. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in June 1956 except for additional recreational facilities which have been done intermittently since that time. Construction began in April 1948 and major structures completed in May 1951. Structures are in good condition. Government has acquired 395 acres of land in fee and easements over 7.8 acres of land for project. An additional 6.3 acres of land have been donated for recreational development and 3.75 acres have been acquired due to bank erosion bordering the project. Construction of a habitat improvement project (under Section 1 135 authority) was completed and the project was turned over to the local sponsor, the North Dakota Fish and Game Department. Homme Dam has been classified as a high hazard dam under the National Dam Safety Program due to inadequate spillway capacity which could lead to dam failure during a flood event. Engineering and design of dam safety modifications is underway. 10. HOUSTON, MN Location. The project is located in the city of Houston, in Houston County, in southeastern Minnesota. The city of Houston is adjacent to the Root River, which is a tributary to the Mississippi River. The city is bounded by floodplain agricultural land to the west and east, and by steep bluffs to the south and by the Root River to the north. Existing project. The flood control project is designed to provide protection to the city of Houston against the 100-year flood on the Root River. There are currently two levee systems in the vicinity of Houston; neither of which provides adequate protection against the 100-year flood. Proposed measures to provide 100-year flood protection to the city of Houston include: A levee system, two full- height road raises; and a sandbag closure. To ease the constriction at the Hwy 76 bridge, an existing portion of the MnDOT levee will be removed, and a high-flow channel will be constructed on the north bank of the Root River. The project also includes construction of two ponding areas to supplement existing interior ponding, three interior gravity outlets, one exterior gravity outlet and a ditch constructed between the levee and the Root River to carry gravity flow from outlet A-1. The project was approved for construction under Section 401 of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act (PL 99-662), as amended; and is also authorized under Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended; and Section 4 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1995 for requirements. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed between the Federal Government and the city of Houston on Feb. 15, 1995. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Completed work includes the construction of a high-flow channel in the Root River; substantial completion of the levee upstream of the Hwy 76 bridge, including the US Hwy 16 and CSAH 13 road raises; partial completion of ponding area A-1, and substantial completion of the interior drainage outlet ditch to the Root River. Federal costs were $1,308,627 and non- Federal $88,946. Condition at end of fiscal year. Stage 2A (ponding area) construction is complete. Stage 1 (channel work) construction is substantially complete. Stage 2B (levees) construction contract has been awarded and is approximately 35 percent complete. 11. LA FARGE LAKE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, WI Location. On the Kickapoo River which rises in Monroe County in southwestern Wisconsin and flows south and southwest through Vernon, Richland, and Crawford Counties emptying into Wisconsin River about 16 miles above junction of latter stream with Mississippi River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Wisconsin.) Existing project. See Annual Report for 1996 for flood control dam and impoundment project authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (WRDA 96) authorized a modification to the original project to include transfer of approximately 8,569 acres of project lands to the State of Wisconsin and the Secretary of the Interior to be held in trust for the Ho-Chunk Nation. The Ho-Chunk Nation is to receive up to 1,200 acres of lands that are of cultural and religious significance. The modification also includes deauthorizing the construction of the reservoir and dam, while completing other features of the original 16-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 project. Estimated Federal cost for work authorized by WRDA 96 is $17,000,000. Local cooperation. None required for construction of La Farge Lake. See Annual Report for 1967 for requirements for local protection works. A Project Cooperation Agreement is not required for the land transfer. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Project was operated and maintained at a cost of $122,095. New Work: Work associated with WRDA 96 project was accomplished at a cost of $91,637. Condition at end of fiscal year. See Annual Report for 1996 for status of work authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Activities are underway in support of deauthorization of the La Farge project and the transfer of project lands out of Federal ownership. 12. LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM, SHEYENNE RIVER, ND Location. Baldhill Dam is on the Sheyenne River, 16 miles upstream from Valley City, ND, and about 271 miles above mouth. Sheyenne River rises in central North Dakota and flows 500 miles generally southeast to enter Red River of the North about 10 miles north of Fargo, ND. (For general location see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. See Annual Report for 1962. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1944 (S. Doc. 193, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Estimated cost (1997) to the United States for Major Rehabilitation is $7,150,000. Estimated cost (1997) to the United States for new Dam Safety Assurance work is $15,800,000 and $280,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Reservoir above Baldhill Dam was designated as Lake Ashtabula by Public Law 772, 81st Congress, 2d session. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1962. Complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Major Rehabilitation: Stage 2 and Stage 3 construction contracts were completed. Engineering and design on Stage 4 replacement of permanent operation equipment continued. Total Federal costs were $334,098. Dam Safety: Stage 2 construction contract was completed. Total Federal costs were $2,798,322 and non- Federal costs, $22,000. Maintenance: Project was operated, maintained, inspected, investigated, monitored and evaluations were performed at a cost of $928,263. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project completed in March 1956 except construction of recreational facilities which is being accomplished intermittently. United States owns 7,816.5 acres of land in fee and easements on 666.2 acres. Construction initiated in July 1947 and major features completed in November 1950. Dam was placed in permanent operation in spring of 1951. Structures are in good condition. Baldhill Dam has been classified as a large, high hazard dam under the National Program for the inspection of dams. A risk assessment report prepared in June 1986 indicated a serious spillway discharge capacity deficiency. Construction of dam safety and major rehabilitation modifications is currently underway. This work is being accomplished in five stages. In July 1994, the first stage of construction of the dam safety and major rehabilitation modifications was started. Stage 1 was completed in June 1995. Stage 2 was completed in September 1997. Stage 3 was completed in June 1997. 13. MANKATO AND NORTH MANKATO, MN Location. Along Minnesota River between miles 103.5 and 109.5 near Mankato, North Mankato, and Le Hillier, in south-central Minnesota. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. As modified as a result of severe 1965 flood, provides for protection of communities of Mankato, North Mankato, and Le Hillier by means of levees and floodwalls with pumping plants and interior drainage facilities. See page 1090 of Annual Report for 1967 for further details. Additional channel improvement, levees, pumping, and interior drainage features have been included in the Mankato unit of the project for protection from the high flows of Indian Creek. Expansion of Indian Creek improvements were made during detailed studies as a result of updated hydrologic data. Highway bridge relocations made necessary by the project have been authorized at Federal expense. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 437, 84th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) Project was modified by 1965 Flood Control Act, and by the Water Resources Development Acts of 1974 and 1976. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Miscellaneous operation and maintenance manual update costs were $14,648. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. 14. MANKATO TOWNSHIP, MN Location. Along the right bank of the Le Sueur River, Mankato Township, about 70 miles southwest of Minneapolis- St. Paul, Minnesota. Existing project. The emergency streambank protection project on the Le Sueur River involves approximately 300 feet of riverbank and consists of rockfill toe protection placed on 16-6 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT the slope from the channel bottom up to the roadway. The project was approved by the Engineering and Planning Directorate of the North Central Division for construction on Apr. 26, 1995 under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed between the Federal Government and Mankato Township on Nov. 16, 1995. See Annual Report for 1996 for requirements. A local assurance agreement was adopted by Mankato Township, the local sponsor, on Nov. 16, 1995. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Project is complete. Federal costs were $99,375, non-Federal $79,527. Condition at end of fiscal year. The emergency streambank protection project on the Le Sueur River in Mankato Township, Minnesota was turned over to the local sponsor on Aug. 15, 1997 15. MARSHALL, MN Location. In Lyon County in southwestern Minnesota along the Redwood River about 68 miles above its confluence with the Minnesota River at the city of Marshall, Minnesota. (For general location see Geological Survey map for Minnesota.) Existing project. See page 1059 of Annual Report for 1964 for completed channel improvement project authorized by 1960 Flood Control Act. Federal costs amounted to $1,802,866. The existing flood control project was completed in 1963. In response to a need for additional flood control, a feasibility study was completed in 1979. The project recommended in the feasibility report was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, Section 401(a) and reauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1988, Public Law 100-676. Improvements include 4.7 miles of additional levees, 3.8 miles of bank protection, 0.3 mile of new high-flow diversion channel, an interbasin overflow structure, modifications to the existing diversion and drop structures, and a recreation plan. The project would provide protection against a flood having an occurrence interval of about once in 115 years. Estimated Federal cost (1997) for new work is $6,740,000 and $2,580,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Project was transferred to local interests on Dec. 23, 1963. For new work, see Annual Report for 1985 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was executed on Sep. 9, 1996. The agreement included cost sharing provisions in accordance with the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Stage 1 construction contract continued. Engineering and design for Stage 2 (final stage) continued. Federal costs were $1,035,577, Non-Federal $300,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of completed work was initiated August 1962 and completed December 1963. The first stage of construction for new work is near completion. Plans and specifications for the final stage of work are 80 percent complete. 16. MELROSE, WI Location. Along the west side of the Black River, Jackson County, about 120 miles northwest of Madison, Wisconsin. Existing project. The emergency streambank protection project on the Black River involves placing approximately 500 feet of rockfill toe protection on the river bank. The project was approved by the Engineering and Planning Directorate of the North Central Division for construction on Aug. 23, 1996, under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1996 for requirements. A local assurance agreement was adopted by Jackson County, the local sponsor, on Jan. 16, 1997. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction was completed at a cost of $184,519 Federal and $39,999 Non-Federal. Condition at end of fiscal year. The emergency streambank protection project on the Black River near Melrose, Wisconsin is complete and will be turned over to the local sponsor. 17. MINNESOTA RIVER AT HENDERSON, MN Location. In Sibley County in southeastern Minnesota about 50 miles southwest of Minneapolis, Minnesota. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The project at Henderson involves a system of levees to protect the flood prone areas of the city from floods on the Minnesota River. The proposed levee is about 1.6 miles long and has an average height of 12 feet. Appurtenant interior flood control facilities include a system of interceptor storm sewers and ditches, and two ponding areas each with a gravity outlet and a pumping station designed to discharge impounded storm water during flood periods when exterior flood levels would require the gravity outlets to be closed. Provisions for the temporary closure of two state highways and a county highway are also included as project 16-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 features. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction June 26, 1987, under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. A local assurance agreement was adopted by the city of Henderson, the local sponsor, in May 1988. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Federal costs were $-24,090, Non-Federal $22,513. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was complete and turned over to the local sponsor in August 1996. 18. PORTAGE, WI Location. In Columbia County in central Wisconsin along the Wisconsin River about 35 miles north of Madison, Wisconsin. (For general location see Geological Survey map for Wisconsin.) Existing project. The recommended plan provides for improvement to the existing levee system along the left bank of the Wisconsin River at Portage. The plan includes 1.2 miles of existing levee improvement; 1.6 miles of new levee; one highway and one railroad closure; cultural mitigation; and recreation features. The project would protect against a flood having an occurrence interval of about once in 100 years. Estimated Federal cost (1997) for new work is $7,020,000 and $2,550,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662). Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1989 for requirements. A Project Cooperation Agreement between the city of Portage and the Federal Government was executed in October 1996. The agreement included cost sharing provisions in accordance with the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract was awarded in July 1997. Federal costs were $896,555, Non-Federal $101,690. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction to improve the existing levee system is in progress. 19. RED LAKE RIVER, POLK COUNTY, CROOKSTON, MN Location. Along the left bank of the Red Lake River at the city of Crookston municipal sewage ponds approximately one river mile downstream of the Highway 75 bridge in Crookston, Polk County, Minnesota. The area is about 26 miles east of Grand Forks, North Dakota. Existing project. The emergency streambank protection project on the Red Lake River involves approximately 600 feet of riverbank and consists of rockfill toe protection laid on bedding material. The project was approved by the Engineering and Planning Directorate of the North Central Division for construction on June 30, 1994 under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1995 for requirements. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed between the Federal Government and the city of Crookston on July 6, 1995. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The project was closed out and an adjustment credit was made for $-9,091, all Federal. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project was complete at the end of the fiscal year. The project was turned over to local interests in September 1996. 20. RED RIVER OF THE NORTH DRAINAGE BASIN, MN, SD & ND Location. Red River of the North Basin, within the United States, includes northeastern corner of South Dakota and much of eastern North Dakota and northwestern Minnesota. Red River of the North, formed by confluence of Otter Tail and Bois de Sioux Rivers, flows northward through this region, forming boundary between North Dakota and Minnesota. (For general location of basin, see Geological Survey maps of Minnesota and South Dakota.) Previous project. See Annual Report for 1962 for navigation and flood control projects in the basin, not part of this project. Existing project. Project includes improvements for local protection in interests of flood control and major drainage accomplished by channel improvement, levees, etc., in addition to construction of a multiple purpose reservoir on Otter Tail River to control floods and, in conjunction with previously authorized Federal reservoir project at Baldhill site of Sheyenne River and at Red Lake, to increase low flows for water supply and pollution abatement. (See Table 16-I for active units in comprehensive basin plan and Table 16-E for projects completed under separate authorities.) Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1948 and 1950. Public Works Authorization Act, 1957, authorized Chief of Engineers to acquire such lands as were beyond legal authority of the city of Grand Forks to acquire. Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 provided for extension of the expiration date for the East Grand Forks project. The devastating flood of 1997 resulted in renewed interest for permanent flood protection in East Grand Forks and Grand Forks. A new flood control plan and cost estimate are being 16-8 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT developed. Authorization of the Sheyenne River (Kindred Lake) project by the 1970 Flood Control Act provided for the deletion of channel improvement on the lower 48.8 miles of the Sheyenne River authorized under the Flood Control Acts of 1948 and 1950. Latest published map is in House Document 185, 81st Congress, 1st session. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1965. Following the flood of 1965, the city of East Grand Forks requested reactivation of the project and furnished a resolution adopted May 11, 1965, indicating its willingness to meet the requirements of local cooperation. Expiration date for the East Grand Forks project was extended to April 17, 1975, permitting local interests additional time to furnish assurances of local cooperation. A local assurance agreement was passed by the city on Mar. 27, 1975, and accepted by the acting Director of Real Estate, OCE for the Secretary of the Army on April 9, 1975. In a July 9, 1986 letter, the city of East Grand Forks withdrew support for the project presented in the General Design Memorandum. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Federal costs for Section 1135 work were $-1,225 while non- Federal were $4,957. Planning and engineering for a new flood control project in Grand Forks-East Grand Forks is underway (see Table 16-M for costs associated with this effort.) Maintenance: Orwell Lake and Dam were operated as required and miscellaneous inspections, reports, and repairs were made at a cost of $1,253,752. Engineering and design was completed on a tailwater control structure and a contract for construction was awarded in September 1997. Condition at end of fiscal year. Major construction for all active units except for East Grand Forks, MN, is complete. The East Grand Forks project was reclassified from active to inactive status on Aug. 19, 1988; the project was reactivated in June 1997. A total of 1,985 acres of land for Orwell Lake and Dam is owned in fee by the United States. See page 1281 of Annual Report for 1962 for periods of completion at active units of project other than Fargo. Work at Fargo, ND, started in May 1959, was completed in July 1963. Construction of a habitat improvement project (under Section 1135 authority) was completed at Orwell Lake and Dam and plans and specifications for another habitat improvement project were completed in FY 96. The local sponsor is the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. (See Table 16-I at end of chapter for total costs of new work to date.) Planning, engineering and design are underway for a new flood control project at Grand Forks-East Grand Forks. 21. ROCHESTER, MN Location. In Olmsted County in southeastern Minnesota on the South Fork of the Zumbro River. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. Provides for stream channel modifications and levees functioning in combination with a system of seven headwaters reservoirs. Principal features, in addition to the reservoirs, include 5.7 miles of riprapped or gabion-lined channels, 0.7 mile of architecturally-treated concrete channels, 0.5 mile of dredged channel, three drop structures, 1.3 miles of levee, and 6.5 miles of hiking and biking trails and non-structural features. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and reauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (H. Doc. 156, 93rd Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map.) Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1974 for requirements. A local cooperation agreement was signed Aug. 27, 1987 by the city of Rochester. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: The operation and maintenance manual was completed. Total Federal costs were $40,266 and non-Federal costs were $48,610. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction is complete. Project has been transferred to the local sponsor. 22. SANDERS CREEK, BOSCOBEL, WI Location. Boscobel is located in north central Grant County in southwestern Wisconsin, approximately 70 miles west of Madison, Wisconsin. This project addresses flooding problems from Sanders Creek, which flows through the center of Boscobel and enters the Wisconsin River about one mile west of the city. Existing project. The project is designed to increase flow capacity to protect against a one percent flood event on Sanders Creek. Major features of the project include regrading about 1/2 mile of the existing overflow channel, replacement of the Kansas Street bridge, demolition of the Bluff Street bridge, with a drop structure constructed at the old Bluff Street bridge site, and replacement of the railroad bridge timber piers with concrete monoliths. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction in October 1991 under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. In addition, at 100 percent non-Federal expense, a new bridge deck and approaches were added to the Bluff Street drop structure design. Local cooperation. See Annual Report of 1993 for requirements. The city of Boscobel agreed to serve as the non- Federal sponsor for this project. A Local Cooperation Agreement between the Department of the Army and city of Boscobel was fully executed on Dec. 19, 1991. Operations and results during the fiscal year. New Work: Construction was completed at a Federal cost of $24,189. 16-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. The project was turned over to the local sponsor in May 1997. 23. SHEYENNE RIVER, ND Location. The Sheyenne River Basin is included in 16 counties in the southeastern portion of North Dakota and drains an area of 7,140 square miles into the Red River of the North near Fargo, North Dakota. The principal area of flood damages in the basin is located at the lower end within Cass County and the city of West Fargo. (For general location, see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The project as authorized by the 1986 Water Resources Development Act consists of three major components for Federal implementation: 1) 11.9 miles of levee and a 6.7 mile flood diversion channel at West Fargo; 2) 7.5 miles of flood diversion channel from Horace to West Fargo; and 3) a five-foot raise of the Baldhill Dam flood control pool. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 stipulated that the project shall also include a dam and reservoir of approximately 35,000 acre-feet of storage for the purpose of flood protection on the Maple River. There are several items of local cooperation required to implement the plan, and several components identified for non-Federal implementation which would supplement the recommended plan. Estimated cost (1997) to the United States for new work is $27,300,000 and $12,400,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. Project consists of three separable components each requiring a local cooperation agreement. The Southeast Cass Water Resource District is the local sponsor for the West Fargo Unit and the Horace to West Fargo Unit. The local cooperation agreement for the West Fargo Unit was executed on July 25, 1988, and for the Horace to West Fargo unit on Mar. 6, 1990. The Sheyenne River Joint Water Resource District has been formed to serve as the sponsor for the Baldhill Dam flood control pool raise unit. The Maple River Reservoir Unit has been deleted from the project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Engineering and design continued on Baldhill Dam flood control pool raise component. Flood damage repair continued on the West Fargo and Horace components. Total Federal costs were $483,941. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of both the West Fargo and Horace to West Fargo Units are essentially complete. Both of these units were operated during the spring and summer floods of 1993 and the spring floods in 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997 and performed very well although some erosion damage was sustained on both projects. Evaluation of real estate needs, design of the structural modifications and coordination with the Sheyenne River Joint Water Resource District for the raise of the flood pool at Baldhill Dam, is ongoing. The Maple River Reservoir unit has been deleted from the project due to lack of economic justification. 24. SNAKE RIVER AT ALVARADO, MN Location. Alvarado is located in Marshall County in northwestern Minnesota approximately 20 miles north of Grand Forks, North Dakota. For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota. Existing project. The flood control project at Alvarado is designed to protect the city from a Snake River flood having an estimated one percent chance of occurring during any one year (100-year flood). The project involves the construction of about 1.4 miles of earth levees and 600 feet of concrete floodwall, and interior flood control facilities involving four ponding areas with gated outlet pipes, a pumping station and interceptor ditches and conduits. With the project the city would be required to provide temporary sandbag closures of two roadway locations and two railroad relocations during extreme flood events. The project was approved by the Chief of Engineers for construction Apr. 21, 1992 under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1993 for requirements. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed between the Federal Government and the city of Alvarado on Apr. 27, 1992. Operations and results during the fiscal year. New Work: Total Federal costs were $4,153, non-Federal $-2,711. Condition at end of fiscal year. The flood control project at Alvarado is complete and was turned over to the local sponsor on July 24, 1996. 25. SOURIS RIVER BASIN, ND Location. On the Souris River in Ward, Renville, McHenry, and Bottineau Counties in northwestern North Dakota. The existing Lake Darling Dam is located about 20 miles northwest of Minot, North Dakota. The project also includes features at the communities of Sawyer and Velva and at various locations along the 358-mile U.S. portion of the Souris River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of North Dakota.) Existing project. The plan of improvement authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 is the onetime purchase of 377,800 acre-feet of flood storage in Rafferty and Alameda Dams in Saskatchewan, Canada and the operation of these dams with the existing Boundary Dam and Lake Darling Dam to provide 100-year flood protection at Minot, North Dakota. The Act also authorizes those flood control measures upstream and downstream of the dam which 16-10 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT are necessary for effective operation of the project. The 4-foot raise of the Lake Darling design pool (authorized by Section III of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1982, PL 97-88) and the construction of Burlington Dam (authorized by PL 91-611) was deauthorized Mar. 10, 1995, with the completion of the structures in Canada. An International Agreement between Canada and the United States was signed in October 1989. The work under the current plan authorized by PL 99- 662, consists of two reservoirs in Saskatchewan, Canada (known as the Rafferty and Alameda projects); a modified outflow structure at Lake Darling Dam; a flood warning system for Minot; levee and channel improvements at Sawyer and six subdivisions from Burlington to Minot; levee and diversion channel at Renville County Park; flood proofing of about 90 rural homes in the basin and the purchase of flowage easements; modifications to dams 87 and 96 in the Upper Souris National Wildlife Refuge; and modifications to dams 320, 326, 332, 341 and 357 in the J. Clark Salyer National Wildlife Refuge. Estimated Federal cost (1995) for new work is $109,260,000 and $8,180,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1983 for requirements. Representatives of the water resource districts from Ward, Renville, McHenry, and Bottineau Counties area agreed to become members of a Souris River Joint Board for flood control, which would serve as local sponsor for the project. A local cooperation agreement for construction at Velva was signed in November 1984. A local cooperation agreement for the remainder of the project as authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 was signed in October 1989. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Construction continued on the final stage of work at Lake Darling Dam. Repair work on Rural Improvements Stage 2 house raises was completed. Total costs, all Federal, were $1,692,829. Maintenance: Total costs were $329,379. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the channel and levee improvement work at Velva, Sawyer, Renville County Park and Burlington to Minot Stages 1, 2, and 3 is complete. Construction at Rafferty Dam and Alameda Dam is complete. Construction on rural improvements Stage 1 and Stage 2, road raises and acquisitions, is complete. Construction on improvements to Fish and Wildlife Service refuge dams is complete. Lake Darling Dam Stage 1 construction is complete. Lake Darling Dam Stage 2 construction is nearing completion. 26. STERLING CENTER, MAPLE RIVER, MN Location. Along the left bank of the Maple River, Blue Earth County, about 85 miles southwest of Minneapolis, Minnesota. Existing project. Provide for erosion control along the west bank of the Maple River to protect County State Aid Highway No. 1. The project involves constructing a steepened slope and placing riprap along 160 feet of riverbank. The project was approved for construction in July 1994, under the authority contained in Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1994 for requirements. The local cooperation agreement was executed between the Department of the Army and Blue Earth County on Aug. 4, 1994. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Total Federal costs were $33. Condition at end of fiscal year. The Sterling Center project is complete and was turned over to the local sponsor in August 1996. 27. ST. CROIX RIVER, STILL WATER, MN Location. In Washington County in eastern Minnesota along the St. Croix River about 18 miles northeast of St. Paul, Minnesota. (For general location, see Geological survey map of Minnesota.) Existing project. The proposed plan provides for repair of the existing 1000-foot retaining wall system, construction of a 1300-foot extension to the wall and expansion of the wall system to include a new secondary landward seepage wall to aid in flood protection for the downtown area. Estimated Federal cost for new work is $8,700,000 and $2,900,000 is to be contributed by local interests. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (Public Law 102- 580) as amended by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-303). Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1996 for requirements. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed between the Federal Government and the city of Stillwater, Minnesota on Apr. 22, 1996 which covered Stage I of the project. An amendment to the Project Cooperation Agreement to encompass Stages II and III is being negotiated. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Stage I construction work continued. Engineering and design of Stage II was initiated. Total costs were $853,188 Federal, and $358,025 non-Federal. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction to repair the existing retaining wall system, Stage I is nearing completion. Preparation of plans and specifications of the extension of the retaining wall to the north, Stage II, is in progress. 16-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 28. ST. PAUL, MN Location. In Ramsey County at St. Paul, Minnesota, on the Mississippi River. (For general location see Geological Survey map of Minnesota.) Previous project. For details see page 27-20 of Annual Report for 1974. Existing project. Since completion of the St. Paul and South St. Paul flood control project in 1964, the protected area has experienced two floods greater than the previous flood of record. The plan of protection provides for a nominal 4-foot barrier raise along the existing project alignment. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662) and reauthorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-640). Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1988 for requirements. The local cooperation agreement was executed on Aug. 22, 1991. Operations and results during fiscal year. New Work: Completion of the Operation and Maintenance manuals and other project close out activities. Total Federal costs were $208,096. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the project is complete. 29. WILD RICE RIVER, HENDRUM / LEE TOWNSHIPS, NORMAN COUNTY, MN Location. Along a 16-mile reach of the Wild Rice River in Norman County, Minnesota, about 200 miles northwest of Minneapolis, Minnesota. Existing project. Provide for flood damage reduction along the Wild Rice River. The project involves snagging and clearing the Wild Rice River from its confluence with the Red River of the North to a point 16 miles upstream. The project was approved for construction in April 1993, under the authority contained in Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. See Annual Report for 1994 for requirements. The Wild Rice Watershed District agreed to serve as the non-Federal sponsor for this project. A Local Cooperation Agreement between the Department of the Army and Wild Rice Watershed District was executed on Aug. 3, 1993. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Total Federal costs were $89. Condition at end of fiscal year. The flood control project at Hendrum and Lee Townships is complete and was turned over to the local sponsor on Aug. 2, 1996. 30. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood control projects turned over to local interests were inspected to determine that project channels are kept clean and unobstructed, dikes and revetments are in good condition, and structures are in good repair and operable. Deficiencies, if any, were minor unless noted. (See Table 16-J on inspection of completed flood control projects.) Cost for the period was $132,506. Total cost to Sep. 30, 1997 is $1,844,659. Miscellaneous 31. OTHER WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITY In the Aquatic Plant Control program (Section 302, Public Law 298, 89th Congress) there was a credit for $-1,965 in the program management. Emergency work performed in response to the 1993 Midwest flooding (FY 1993 Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act, Public Law 103-75) included riprap and spot dike repair at Mississippi River locks and dams. Cost for work carried out under this authority amounted to $414,814. 32. FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES (FC & CE) Disaster Preparedness Emergency Operations Rehabilitation Advanced Measures Total FC & CE $ 564,663 10,804,097 200,970 9,463.052 $21,032,782 33. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM (NEPP) Local Mobilization Preparedness National Mobilization Total NEPP $6,307 21.374 $27,681 34. REGULATORY FUNCTIONS PROGRAM Permit Evaluation Enforcement Environmental Impact Statements Total Regulatory $2,327,235 1,092,730 425.299 $3,845,264 16-12 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT General Investigations 35. SURVEYS Fiscal year cost was $1,534,727 which included two flood damage prevention studies, two special studies, miscellaneous activities, and coordination with both Federal and non-Federal agencies. Table 16-M provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 36. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year cost was $462,309 which included the items concerning international water studies, flood plain Management services and hydrologic studies. Table 16-M provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 37. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Fiscal year cost was $251,755 which included two local protection projects. Table 16-M provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 16-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 16-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 2. Reservoirs at Headwaters of Mississippi River, MN 4. Bassett Creek, MN (Contributed Funds) 5. Big Fork River, MN (Contributed Funds) 6. Chaska, MN (Contributed Funds) 7. Gilmore Creek, Winona, MN (Contributed Funds) 8. Hennepin County, CSAH 116, MN 9. Homme Lake and Dam, ND (Contributed Funds) 1135 authority New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maj. Rehab: Approp. Cost Dam Safety: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Dam Safety: Approp. Cost - - - - 4,398,628 - - - - 4,398,628' 3,529,305 3,071,000 3,089,500 2,635,416 52,581,576 3,332,614 3,403,215 3,095,096 2,658,766 52,503,4762 - - - - 425,000 - - - - 425,000 - 300,000 340,000 833,000 1,473,000 - 12,901 625,346 754,546 1,392,793 905,000 617,000 1,120,823 767,958 - 150,000 26,782 96,072 248,428 25,000 50,000 -8,000 63,000 156,000 7,369 46,903 146,062 64,200 49,305 80,000 29,419,000 64,795 29,403,1583 50,000 2,135,274 44,400 2,129,674 84,800 108,758 -22,819 325,800 318,180 64,200 26,486 4,785,000 2,104,000 3,537,000 3,066,000 30,664,000 3,575,644 5,261,425 4,043,260 2,916,251 30,504,882 4 700,000 400,000 400,000 185,000 4,280,000 365,534 819,173 355,261 208,116 4,091,624 102,000 1,225,000 100,000 167,204 1,145,265 207,718 28,108 1,971 22,000 20,374 6,249 12,000 14,320 5,000 - 2,352,000 10,329 2,351,553 -471 30,000 134,300 19,289 109,707 - -10,000 5,863 642 13,220 12,749 201,300 165,596 1,419,097 1,419,097 5 350,000 190,000 338,500 177,000 3,964,056 351,592 206,995 336,860 176,325 3,959,593 7,453 7,453 7,453 300,000 500,000 371,000 1,171,000 290,665 508,798 259,984 1,059,447 16-14 -1,697 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 16-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 10. Houston, MN (Contributed Funds) 11. La Farge Lake and Channel Imp., WI 12. Lake Ashtabula and Baldhill Dam, Sheyenne River, ND (Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds) 13. Mankato and North Mankato, MN (Contributed Funds) 14. Mankato Township, MN (Contributed Funds) 15. Marshall, MN (Contributed Funds) 16. Melrose, WI (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost Dam Safety: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost - 264,768 586,400 2,229,600 3,080,768 13,029 256,366 545,566 1,308,627 2,123,5886 155,000 109,024 86,000 88,946 241,000 197,970 94,000 18,736,000 91,637 18,733,637 114,000 36,000 116,079 40,106 41,000 122,000 41,188 122,095 766,457 765,475 - - - - 3,325,638 - - - - 3,325,638 771,000 1,126,000 1,158,000 936,000 23,680,531 945,320 1,144,802 1,141,641 928,263 23,651,763 - - - - 208,000 - - - - 208,000 689,000 2,429,000 1,243,000 331,000 4,692,000 589,309 2,038,691 1,711,516 334,098 4,673,614 1,145,000 6,692,000 376,000 2,837,000 13,931,000 661,346 3,806,561 3,836,569 2,798,322 13,880,793 70,000 69,000 -290,000 5,727 20,000 22,943 25,000 21,612 50,000 50,000 20,000 3,134 44,000 36,772 85,000 81,000 13,876 154,000 62,009 87,000 5,620 18,000 22,000 223,000 222,000 15,000 97,000,500 14,648 96,982,763 - 79,537 - 79,537 99,375 4,218 79,527 223,000 221,240 91,218 85,147 - 850,000 379,000 2,204,000 4,893 190,035 1,035,577 2,198,8257 510,000 300,000 15,000 11,228 14,000 17,561 41,000 201,000 18,880 184,519 84,000 39,999 510,000 300,000 271,000 232,188 84,000 39,999 16-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 16-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 17. Minnesota River at Henderson, MN (Contributed Funds) 18. Portage, WI (Contributed Funds) 19. Red Lake River, Polk County, Crookston, MN (Contributed Funds) 20. Red River of the North Drainage Basin, MN, SD and ND (Contributed Funds) 1135 authority 21. Rochester, MN (Contributed Funds) 22. Sanders Creek, Boscobel, MN (Contributed Funds) 23. Sheyenne River, ND (Contributed Funds) Horace to W. Fargo (Contributed Funds) W. Fargo 24. Snake River, Alvarado, MN (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost 60,000 9,754 26,444 162,000 254,928 75,000 57,158 14,000 -26,700 1,969,800 79,587 -24,090 1,969,800 22,239 22,513 307,239 307,239 -9,000 174,000 889,000 2,982,000 13,683 159,141 896,555 2,971,639 25,000 101,000 60,000 21,644 27,916 112,452 69,000 92,853 33,000 29,000 22,120 33,000 6,820 400,000 101,690 -33,600 -9,091 400,000 101,690 166,400 166,400 33,000 33,000 -2,872 8,322.112 -1,225 8,322,1128 580,000 513,000 709,000 1,912,000 9,882,386 445,127 663,093 701,429 1,253,752 9,213,363 41,688 19,525 13,362 2,604 22,709,000 -3,115,451 -877,000 13,652,648 4,455,595 680,130 -862,134 -1,517,328 35,000 232,742 27,000 160,260 1,578,141 36,103 -2,179 -581 14,656 8,500 1,810 2,357 5,877 4,957 64,775 64,775 40,000 68,227,549 40,266 68,195,2789 0 6,669,202 48,610 6,641,174 21,500 1,441,500 24,189 1,437,46510 175,357 175,262 345,000 546,000 860,000 493,000 22,652,000 443,253 623,164 932,440 483,941 22,640,159" 5,000 550 14 280,000 -35,000 334,616 22,194 15,500 29,346 6,000 - 430,000 - 424,318 - 1,050,000 - 1,002,872 19,500 1,780,500 4,153 1,761,000 -2,711 100,000 97,180 16-16 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 16-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 25. Souris River Basin, ND New Work: Approp. 13,212,000 846,000 -2,245,000 1,953,000 101,495,000 Cost 2,581,107 5,653,524 4,940,269 1,692,829 101,207,83112 Maint: Approp. 96,000 113,000 112,000 337,000 795,000 Cost 97,412 113,375 110,884 329,379 785,304 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. - - - - 5,698,858 Cost 23,923 - - - 5,679,113 26. Sterling Center, MN New Work: Approp. 46,000 100,000 - -5,100 160,900 Cost 50,840 103,003 -3,315 33 160,900 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. 38,000 - 1,815 - 39,815 Cost - 35,806 4,009 - 39,815 27. St. Croix River New Work: Stillwater, MN Approp. 2,400,000 - - 473,000 2,873,000 Cost 285,152 489,875 1,157,838 853,188 2,786,053 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. - - 200,000 300,000 500,000 Cost - - - 358,025 358,025 28. St. Paul, MN New Work: Approp. 4,985,000 400,000 - 210,000 13,244,000 Cost 4,686,200 1,161,832 92,868 208,096 13,241,15513 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. 1,200,000 - 125,000 - 4,024,000 Cost 1,060,872 1,190,980 139,479 - 4,023,829 29. Wild Rice River, New Work: Hendrum/Lee, MN Approp. 269,000 -15,000 55,000 -2,900 383,300 Cost 176,579 80,912 59,060 89 383,300 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Contrib. 97,800 - - - 97,800 Cost 45,000 20,395 32,405 - 97,800 'Includes $681,805 for new work for previous project. 2Includes $100,857 for maintenance for previous projects. 3Excludes $1,004,498 in other contributed funds that have been expended for betterments. 4$744,114 in other contributed funds have been expended for betterments. SExcludes $56,220 contributed funds. Includes $23,000 expended during FY91-FY95 under Section 1135, Public Law 99-662 authority. 6Excludes $249,964 for relocations accomplished under a government contact but which are a non-federal responsibility. 7Excludes $1,802,866 for previous project. Includes $372,000 CP&E funds obligated prior to 1 Oct 85 which remains excluded from the project cost estimate. 8Includes cost of the Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit $11,239, which is classed as "deferred" and the units on which authorization has expired: Maple River, $1,241; Moorhead, $27,700; Sheyenne, $37,956. In addition, $203,874 special deposit funds and $146,160 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under government contract paid for by local interests. Includes $184,352 expended on Orwell Lake between FY 91-FY96 under Section 1135, Public Law 99-662 authority. 9$787,042 in other contributed funds have been expended for betterments and $4,198,445 for relocations accomplished under a government contract but which are a non-federal responsibility. 10$52,643 in other contributed funds have been expended for betterments. "Excludes $1,150,000 sunk costs for deauthorized Kindred Lake unit (see Table 16-G). Excludes $475,000 for costs associated with inactive Maple River unit. 12Excludes $4,919,000 sunk costs for deferred Lake Darling Dam unit (see Table 16-E) '13$383,048 in other contributed funds have been expended for betterments. 16-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 16-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Sec. Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MN March 3, 1899 Reconstruct 4 of the 5 original dams and surveys to determine extent of lands overflowed by reservoirs. March 2, 1907 Reconstruct Sandy Lake Dam and construct Gull Lake Reservoir. June 25, 1910 Construct an equalizing canal between Winnibigoshish and Leech H. Doc. 363, 61st Lake Reservoirs (no work was done and this part of the project Cong., 2nd sess. abandoned in Act of Mar. 4, 1915.) July 27, 1916 Abandonment of ditches connecting Long Lake, Round Lake, and H Doc. 413, 64th Gull Lake. Cong., 1 sess.' June 26, 19342 Operation and maintenance provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. 'Contains latest published map. 2Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 16-18 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 16-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1997 Full Report See Annual Operation Project Status Report for Construction and Maintenance Baudette Harbor, MN Completed 1961 $36,415 $57,768 Black River, WI ' 1950 67,585 - Lake Traverse, MN and SD 3.4 1921 92 - Minnesota River, MN Completed 1996 2,057,7228 - Mississippi and Leech Rivers, MN Completed3 1929 277,615 40,251 Mississippi River between Brainerd and Grand Rapids, MN 5 1925 47,794 3,891 Pine Creek, Angle Inlet, MN Completed 1978 38,700 102,196 Red Lake and Red Lake River, MN Completed3 1923 9,070 Red River of the North, MN and ND 3,6 1921 293,344 76,209 St. Croix River, MN and WI Completed 1991 150,410 1,185,0119 Warroad Harbor and River, MN Completed 1996 86,105 2,113,82410 Wisconsin River, WI 2,3 1888 Zippel Bay Harbor, MN Inactive7 1928 27,941 11,139 Zippel Bay, Lake of the Woods County, MN Completed 1996 515,000 63,941" 'Existing channel adequate for commerce (see Table 16-G for deauthorized portion of project.) 2Originally included in project 'Fox and Wisconsin River, WI'. Abandonment of improvement of Wisconsin River by channel contraction works recommended in 1886 and 1887 (H. Doc. 65, 49th Cong., 2nd sess.) Expenditures included under 'Fox and Wisconsin Rivers, WI'. No breakdown available. 3No commerce reported. 4Abandonment recommended in 1915 (H. Doc. 439, 64th Cong., 1st sess.) and June 24, 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong 1st sess.) 5Abandonment recommended June 24, 1926 (H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. 1st sess.) 6Abandonment recommended in 1915 (H. Doc. 1666, 63d Cong., 3d sess.) 7Abandonment recommended June 24, 1926 (H. Doc., 69th Cong. 1st Sess.) 8 Includes $117,542 for new work for previous project. 9 Includes $1,656 for condition surveys in FY 1997. '0 Includes $5,683 for condition surveys in FY 1997. " Includes $3,000 for condition surveys in FY 1997. 16-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 16-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1997 Full Report See Annual Operation Project Status Report for Construction and Maintenance Big Stone Lake and Whetstone River, MN and SD Black Bear & Miller Lakes, Crow Wing Cty, MN3 Black River at North Bend, WI 2 Bonnes Coulee, Velva, ND2 Cannon River at Faribault, MN2 Cochrane Drainage Ditch, WI Devils Lake, ND3 Dry Run, IA Eau Galle River, WI Elk River, MN Emerson, Manitoba-Noyes, MN3 Enderlin, Maple River, ND3 Grafton Pumping Station, ND2 Grand Mound, State Historic Site, MN 2 Guttenberg, IA Hanover, Hennepin County, MN2 Irving Township, Jackson County, WI 2 Irving Township at Nicols Road, Jackson County, WI 2 Kickapoo River, Gays Mills, WI2 Lac qui Parle Lakes, MN Lake Andrusia, Mississippi River, MN2 Lake Darling Dam, ND Lake Pulaski, Wright County, MN3 Lake Traverse and Bois de Sioux River, SD and MN Lost River, MN Lower Branch Rush River, ND3 Mahnomen, Wild Rice River, MN 2 Middle River at Argyle, MN3 Minnesota River, Belgrade Township, MN2 Minnesota River at LeSueur, MN2 Minneota, MN3 Minot, ND Mississippi River near Aitkin, MN Pembina River, ND Pettibone Park, La Crosse, WI2 Plum Creek, New Haven Township, MN4 Prairie du Chien, WI Red Lake River at Gentilly, MN Red Lake River at Huot, MN 2 Red Lake River at Red Lake Falls, MN 2 Red Lake River, MN including Clearwater River, MN Red Lake River, State Hwy 32, MN2 Red River of the North at Argusville, ND3 Red River of the North at Breckenridge, MN2 Red River of the North at Breckenridge, MN2 Red River of the North at Fargo, ND-Moorhead, MN4 Red River of the North at Halstad, MN3 Red River of the North at Oslo, MN3 Red River of the North at Pembina, ND3 Redwood River below Marshall, MN3 Root River at Hokah, MN2 Roseau River, MN Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Active3 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1996 1988 1985 1991 1992 1966 1996 1970 1992 1990 1990 1992 1974 1988 1984 1986 1987 1996 1989 1987 1991 1996 1967 1974 1993 1995 1986 1963 1983 1957 1983 1989 1991 1991 1984 1984 1996 1993 1990 1990 1992 1986 1984 1979 1960 1992 1996 $12,174,600' $471,000 74,500 58,500 62,5856 37,182 2,732,000 1,790,759' 9,039,250 259,7008 343,000 9 4,000,00010 92,865" 242,00012 2,361,915 259,500 189,600 158,500 33,000 964,873 61,32613 4,919,00014 1,353,47815 1,339,727 517,51916 1,000,00i 85,400 2,360,000 261,00018 250,00019 161,545 21,479,50020 1,675,835 62,76221 31,100 3,529,000 311,00022 64,500 131,000 3,120,07923 151,66524 1,534,000 85,66525 27,500 226,50026 2,012,000 1,960,200 2,000,000 202,400 239,62727 2,341,00028 16-20 $4,530,881 10,928,284 10,842,353 7,897,409 2,767,740 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 16-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1997 Full Report See Annual Operation Project Status Report for Construction and Maintenance Rushford, MN Completed 1980 3,192,333 - Shepard Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN2 Completed 1985 250,00029 - Sheyenne River, Valley City, ND2 Completed 1988 111,000 - Sogn, MN Completed 1996 47,40030 - Souris River, Velva, ND2 Completed 1988 137,500 - State Road and Ebner Coulees, WI Completed 1996 21,617,00031 - St. Hilaire, MN Completed 1996 141,10032 - St. Paul and South St. Paul, MN Completed 1974 8,476,01233 - Twin Valley Lake, MN Inactive 1988 2,115,700 - Upper Iowa River, IA Completed 1964 888,445 - Velva, ND3 Completed 1970 334,628 - Vermillion River, Hastings, MN3 Completed 1980 999,900 - Veteran's Memorial Levee, Mississippi River, Completed 1985 182,000 - Hastings, MN2 Wabasha County, County Hwy 11, MN 2 Completed 1995 273,00034 - Wabasha, Mississippi River, MN2 Completed 1993 113,70035 - Warner Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN2 Completed 1987 250,000 - Warner Road, Sibley Street, Mississippi River, Completed 1992 500,00036 - St. Paul, MN Wild Rice River, Mahnomen County, MN2 Completed 1986 58,500 - Wild Rice River, Mahnomen, MN4 Completed - 86,568 - Wild Rice River, South Branch and Felton Ditch, MN Completed 1989 5,620,700 - Winona, MN Completed 1989 32,741,13137 - Zumbro River at Genoa, MN2 Completed 1992 34,50038 - Zumbro River, MN Completed 1975 1,284,100 - Zumbro River at Jarrett and Millville, MN 2 Completed 1990 141,44039 - 'Excludes $152,492 contributed funds. In addition, $487,491 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under Government contract paid for by the Ottertail Power Company. 2Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Section 14, Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended. 3Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. 4Project authorized by Chief of Engineers under small project authority, Section 208, Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. 5Preconstruction planning has not started. Phase I completed under General Investigations. 6Excludes $18,362 contributed funds. 7Excludes $42,766 contributed funds. 8In addition $87,878 was expended from Public Law 99 funds in the spring of 1969 for emergency protection and incorporation into the permanent project. 9Excludes $201,544 contributed funds. 'tExcludes $150,191 contributed funds. "Excludes $27,583 contributed funds. 12Excludes $77,290 contributed funds. '3Excludes $20,441 contributed funds. 14Advance engineering and design costs only. Project deferred with authorization of Souris River Basin Project (see Section 25 and Table 16-A for costs for active project). ' Excludes $74,225 contributed funds. 1 6Excludes $46,034 for the Ruffy Brook unit for which authorization expired in April 1966 (see Table 16-G). Excludes $246,911 contributed funds. "'Excludes $35,000 contributed funds. '8Excludes $68,421 contributed funds. 1Excludes $130,300 contributed funds. 20Excludes $4,167 contributed funds. 21Excludes $20,920 contributed funds. 22Excludes $92,402 contributed funds. 23Excludes $30,020 contributed funds. 24Excludes $35,430 contributed funds. 25Excludes $26,055 contributed funds. 26Excludes $61,895 contributed funds. 27Excludes $67,014 contributed funds. 28Excludes $65,902 contributed funds. 29Excludes $62,620 contributed funds. 30Excludes $5,253 contributed funds. 31Excludes $225,000 sunk costs for inactive Ebner Coulee unit (see Table 16-E) and $4,175,632 contributed funds. 32Excludes $31,064 contributed funds. 33Excludes $545,637 contributed funds for new work and $38,000 expended by South St. Paul for work in lieu of required cash contribution. Excludes an additional $206,629 expended for work done at request of local interests. 34Excludes $73,619 contributed funds. 16-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 16-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 35Excludes $37,631 contributed funds. 36Excludes $184,709 contributed funds. 37Excludes $589,316 contributed funds. In addition, $717,809 in other contributed funds have been expended for work under Government contract paid for by local interests. 38Excludes $11,066 contributed funds. 39Excludes $38,173 contributed funds. 16-22 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 16-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended Black River, WI' 1950 Aug. 5, 1977 Black River Lake, WI 1950 Aug. 5 1977 Burlington Dam, Souris River, ND 1983 Mar. 10, 1995 $5,568,600 2 Grafton, ND 1983 Nov. 18, 1991 Hudson Harbor, WI3 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 - Kindred Lake, ND4 1987 Nov. 17, 1986 1,150,000 La Crosse, WI5 1983 Nov. 17, 1986 - Lake Darling Dam, ND 1987 Sep. 13, 1994 4,919,0006 Maple River, ND7 1981 Oct. 6, 1961 1,241 Moorhead, MN7 1981 Oct. 30, 1961 27,700 Pembina River Lake, ND 1950 Jan. 1, 1990 50,000 Ruffy Brook, MN 1967 Apr. 1966 46,034 Sheyenne River, ND7 1981 Dec. 31, 1970 37,956 State Road and Ebner Coulees 1981 Jul. 9, 1995 225,000 (Ebner Coulee Unit) Tongue River Lake, ND 1950 Jan. 1, 1990 23,695 Warroad River and Bulldog Creek, MN 1974 Nov. 17, 1986 182,000 Warroad Harbor and River, MN8 1981 Aug. 5, 1977 'Portion of project for removal of obstructions at various points outside the dredged area to clear channel to full project width (see Table 16-C for costs for completed portion of the project). 2Advance engineering and design costs only. The Senate Report 97- 256 states that the Corps is to take no further action to construct Burlington Dam until directed to do so by Congress. 3Part of the St. Croix River, Minnesota and Wisconsin project. 4Previously part of Sheyenne River, ND project (see Section 23 and Table 16-A for costs for active project). 5Authorized for further study by a House Committee on Public Works Resolution dated March 15, 1988. 6Advance engineering and design costs only. (See Section 25 and Table 16-A for costs for active project). 7Part of Red River of the North Drainage Basin (see Section 20 in text and Table 16-I for costs for active units of project). 8Portion of dredging of entrance channel and turning basin to complete project width and depth (see Table 16-C for costs for completed portion of project). 16-23 TABLE 16-H RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER (See Section 2 of Text) Outlet Watershed Area (Square miles) Capacity Previous Projects Existing Projects at Minimum Above Watershed Maximum Stages St. Paul (Square Original Stage Total Reservoir (feet) ' River (miles) miles) Lake Reservoir (acre-feet) Completed Cost Completed Cost Cost Winnibigoshish 6 Mississippi 408 1442 117 179.4 967,930 1884 $214,000 1900 $173,470 $387,470 Leech Lake 0 Leech 410 1163 173 205.9 743,320 1884 171,805 1902 84,380 256,185. Pokegama 6 Mississippi 344 6602 24 35.0 120,750 1884 85,000 1904 126,030 211,030 Sandy Lake 7 Sandy 267 421 8 16.6 72,500 1895 114,000 1909 117,020 231,020 Pine River 9 Pine 199 562 18 23.7 177,520 1886 97,000 1907 133,320 230,320 Gull Lake 5 Gull 168 287 20 20.5 70,820 - - 1913 86,826 86,826 Surveys and flowage rights - - - - 160,939 160,939 Recreational facilities - - - - 2,834,838 2,834,838 Total new work - - 681,805 - 3,716,823 4,398,628 Total operating and care - - 100,857 - 51,435,422 51,536,279 Permanent indefinite - - - 967,197 967,197 appropriation for operation and care, Feb. 1, 1895 to end of fiscal year 1936 Rehabilitation - - - - 425,0) 425,000 Total 2,152,840 - $782,662 - $54,838,637 $57,327,104 'Lower operating limits by regulations approved February 4, 1936, as modified December 29, 1944. 2Exclusive of area controlled by Winnibigoshish and Leech Lake Dams. ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 16-I RED RIVER OF THE NORTH DRAINAGE BASIN: ACTIVE UNITS IN COMPREHENSIVE BASIN PLAN (See Section 20 of Text) Cost to Total Sep. 30, Estimated State Type 1997 Federal Cost Orwell River (Otter Tail River) Minnesota Reservoir $1,916,753 $1,916,700' Wild Rice and Marsh Rivers Minnesota Channel improvement 405,056 405,100 Rush River North Dakota Channel improvement 287,686 287,700 Sand Hill River Minnesota Channel improvement 548,778 548,800 Mustinka River Minnesota Channel improvement 440,788 440,800 Otter Tail River Minnesota Channel improvement 174,768 174,800 Red River at Grand Forks North Dakota Levees and floodwall 948,895 948,900 Red River at East Grand Forks Minnesota Levees, floodwall, 1,698,2002 17,500,000 3 pumping plants Red River at Fargo North Dakota Channel improvement 1,639,924 1,639,900 4 Total Cost to Date $8,060,848 5 Total Estimate Cost $23,862,7006 'Includes $181,713 for lands and $25,045 for recreation facilities. 2Excludes costs for current planning, engineering and design work. See Table 16-M for current year costs associated with this work. 3The East Grand Forks unit was reclassified from active to inactive on August 19, 1988; the project was reactivated in June 1997. The cost of this unit was last revised in 1987. A new flood control plan and cost estimate for a combined Grand Forks-East Grand Forks project are being developed. 4Includes $67,900 for lands. sCosts of $11,239 for the Wahpeton-Breckenridge deferred unit not included. Authorization of the Sheyenne River, Moorhead, and Maple River units has expired. Cost of these units also not included total $66,897. 6The Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit of the project is classed as 'deferred' and is excluded from the estimate. The cost of this unit, last revised in 1955, was estimated to be $666,000. The Flood Control Act approved December 31, 1970 (H. Doc. 330-91-2) provided for deletion of the Sheyenne River unit, and authorization of the Maple River and Moorhead units expired at the end of the 5- year period within which local interests were required to furnish assurances of local cooperation. Authorization of these units, not included, expired on the dates indicated in Table 16-G. In FY 89, the Wahpeton-Breckenridge unit was included as part of the General Investigation program under Restudy of Deferred projects. 16-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 16-J INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 30 of Text) Date Inspected oLVlln, s\l V .,t tlt l i . . . . yes, M N ............... D ................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. � . M inneota, M N ........................... Minnesota River at LeSueur, MN ............... Minnesota River at Mankato, MN ............... Minnesota River at North Mankato, MN ........... Pettibone Park, LaCrosse, WI ................. Red River of the North at Breckenridge, MN ........ Red River of the North at Argusville, ND .......... Red River of the North at Fargo, ND-Moorhead, MN . . Red River of the North at Grand Forks, ND ........ Red River of the North at Halstad, ND ............ Red River of the North at Oslo, MN ............. Red River of the North at Pembina, ND ........... Redwood River below Marshall, MN ............. Root River at Hokah, MN .................... Rushford, MN ........................... Snake River at Alvarado, MN ................. Shepard Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN ...... Southbend Township, LeHillier, MN ............. Upper Iowa River, IA ....................... Warner Road, Mississippi River, St. Paul, MN ...... Warner Road at Sibley Street, St. Paul, MN ........ W inona, M N ............................ ................... June 1997 ................ October 1996 ................... June 1997 ................... June 1997 ..... .. .. ...... June 1997 ................... June 1997 ................... June 1997 ........ .......... June 1997 ................... June 1997 Big Stone Lake and Whet Dry Run, Decorah, IA Emerson, Manitoba - Noy Enderlin, Maple River, N Grafton, ND ........ 16-26 Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . rtnnp R ivPr MN anri C11 October 1996 ...... June 1997 ...... June 1997 ...... June 1997 ...... June 1997 ...... June 1997 ...... June 1997 ...... June 1997 ...... June 1997 . . October 1996 S.. October 1996 ...... June 1997 . . October 1996 ...... June 1997 . . October 1996 . . October 1996 . . October 1996 . . October 1996 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 16-K FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Avoca, W I ..................................... ................ .......... $27,289 Chippewa River at Montevideo, MN ............................... ........... 24,971 Crow River, Rockford, MN .............................................................. 5,719 G ranite Falls, M N ... .... ................................................. .......... 5,000 Kawishiwi River, MN ... ..................................................... ........ 6,143 Morais River, ND ........... .. ........................................... ............ 5,620 Section 205 Coordination ................................................................................ 8,825 Wild Rice, M arsh Rivers, MN ................................. .......... .......... 41,239 Emergency bank protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Granite Falls, MN ..... .................................................... ........... $56,331 Lake Minnewaska, CSAH 17, Glenwood, MN .......... .................................... 2,824 LeSuer River CSAH 28, Blue Earth County, MN ......... ................................... 5,000 Minnesota Highway 169, Mankato, MN ......... ............................................. 7,444 Orwell Lake and Vernon Center, MN ........ ................................................. 912 Paxton Township Road, Lower Sioux Indian, MN ............................................ 7,317 Section 14 Coordination ................ ................... .......................... 9,240 Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in the interest of flood control (Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Lemonweir River, W I ........................................................ ........... $67 16-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1991 TABLE 16-L PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT Modifications of projects for the purpose of improving the quality of the environment in the public interest (Section 1135, Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress, as amended) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs Coordination account funds ..................................... ....................... $1,784 Initial appraisals, general ............................................... ................ 4,437 Orwell Lake, MN ....... ... ............ .................................- 1,224 TABLE 16-M GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Sections 35, 36 and 37 of Text) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs SURVEYS Flood Damage Prevention Studies Crookston, MN .............................................. ..... .......... $50,335' Grand Forks, ND ......................................................... 293,7952 Special Studies Devils Lake, ND ........................................ ......... .......... 699,5563 Environmental Services Partnerships ................... .......... ........................ 30,345 Midtown Dam, ND ........................................................... 119,873 Miscellaneous Activities Special Investigations ........................................................... .. 88,466 FERC Licensing Activities ................................... .......... ........... . 5,011 Inter Agency Water Resources Development ............................................. . 14,985 North American Waterfowl Management Plan .............................................. 2,886 Coordination with Other Agencies Cooperation with Other Water Resource Agencies .......................................... 11,810 Planning Assistance to States4: Minnesota .......... ........... . ........... .... .............. .. 193,336 North Dakota ........................................... ........... ........... -15 Wisconsin................................................................... 24,344 TOTAL SURVEYS .................................................. ............ $1,534,726 16-28 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA DISTRICT TABLE 16-M (Continued) GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Sections 35, 36 and 37 of Text) Study/Project and Location Fiscal Year Costs COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA International Water Studies ............................................................. $70,8595 Flood Plain Management Services Flood Plain Management Services Unit .......... ........ ................... ......... 44,724 Technical Services, General ......................................................... 37,992 Quick Responses ... .... ............................................. ......... 3,882 Special Studies ......... .......... ............................................. 279,491 Hydrologic Studies Stream Flow Data .............. .................... ......................... 25,361 TOTAL COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA ................. ...................... $462,309 ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Crookston, MN .................. ................. ............................. $40,563 East Grand Forks, MN ......................................................... 211,192 TOTAL ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN ........................................ .... $251,755 'Excludes $25,561 contributed funds. 2Excludes $172,464 contributed funds. 3Excludes $168,217 contributed funds 4Excludes $245,936 contributed funds. SIncludes $60,767 for International Water Studies under O&M Appropriation. 16-29 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN Section of river covered in this report is divided into three reaches, under supervision and direction of District Engineers at St. Louis, Rock Island, and St. Paul. Section in St. Louis District extends 105 miles from Mouth of Missouri River to Location. Mississippi River rises in northern Minnesota, flows about 2,360 miles southerly and empties into Gulf of Mexico. Portion included in this report extends about 663 miles from mouth of Missouri River to Soo Line Railroad bridge, Minneapolis. The latest map and profile showing this section of river are in House Document 669, 76th Congress, 3d session. A map showing Lake Pepin is in House Document 511, 79th Congress, 2d session. A map of section Minneapolis to Dubuque is in House Document 515, 79th Congress, 2d session. A map showing location of drainage districts (Bellevue, Iowa, to Missouri River) is in River and Harbors Committee Document 34, 75th Congress, 1st session. Previous projects. See page 1199 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides for a channel of 9-foot depth and adequate width between mouth of Missouri River (1,179 miles from the gulf) and Soo Line Railroad at Minneapolis, by construction of a system of locks and dams, supplemented by dredging. Project also provides for further improvements at St. Paul to provide a 2.7 mile basin extending downstream from Robert Street Bridge, and at Minneapolis to provide adequate terminal facilities, and for other harbor improvements and miscellaneous work. Pertinent data on locks and dams, harbor improvements, additional features entering into cost of project, and authorizing legislation are given in Tables 17-C, 17-D, 17-E and 17-G. All dams are concrete. Three dams (Upper St. Anthony Falls, 1 and 19) are fixed, remainder are movable. See House Document 669, 76th Congress, 3d session, for a report of Chief of Engineers dated February 27, 1940, containing a general plan for improvement of Mississippi River between Coon Rapids Dam and mouth of Ohio River for purposes of navigation, power development, flood control, and irrigation needs. Local cooperation. Small-boat harbors authorized in the River and Harbor Act of 1962 are subject to conditions that local interests make a cash contribution toward cost of construction (except in case of Quincy Harbor which involves maintenance only of an existing harbor); furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction and future maintenance; hold the United States free from damages; provide and maintain mooring facilities and utilities; reserve accommodations for transient small boats; accomplish all necessary relocations and alterations; and establish public bodies empowered to regulate use, growth and development of the harbors. Rectification of seepage damages to privately owned lands in the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL, was contingent upon the conditions that local interests acquire all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for construction and Upper Mississippi River mile 300 above Ohio River; Rock Island District extends about 314 miles from mile 300 to 614; and St. Paul District extends about 244 miles from mile 614 to Soo Line Railroad bridge, Minneapolis (mile 857.6). maintenance of the project; comply with applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970; accept, operate, and maintain the project upon its completion; and hold and save the United States free from damages arising from the construction and operation of the completed project; provided further that the local public entity shall be reimbursed by the Government in the amounts actually expended by it in the acquisition of real estate and for payments required under Public Law 91-646 if said amounts have been previously submitted to and approved by the Government. Local cooperation requirements have been complied with for improvement of commercial harbor at Dubuque, IA; for improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA, for navigation; and for general navigation facilities at small-boat harbors at Rock Island, IL; Hannibal, MO; Fort Madison, IA; Davenport (Lindsay Park), IA; Muscatine, IA (including freight terminal approach channel); Andalusia, IL; Warsaw, IL; Moline, IL; Clinton, IA; and Savanna, IL. Licenses. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission collects from non-Federal licensees annually to recompensate the United States for use of government dams for generation of hydroelectric power. Amounts collected are returned to U.S. Treasury. (See Table 17-F for license fees collected through the end of the fiscal year.) St. Paul District. New Work: None. Maintenance: Government pipeline dredge WILLIAM A. THOMPSON removed 632,561 cubic yards of material at 14 locations. Government derrick barge HAUSER/WADE removed 14,921 cubic yards of material at two sites. Government pipeline dredge DUBUQUE removed 5,095 cubic yards of material at one site. Mechanical dredging contractors removed 446,089 cubic yards of material at 23 sites. Major maintenance projects included completion of structural and electrical rehabilitation at Dams 5, 8, and 9 and completion of lock machinery at Lock 10. The gate painting at Dam 7 and the central control building and controls and engineering for Lock SA dewaterin, bluff stabilization above Lock and Dam 1, bridge painting at Dam 8, and the structural / electrical repair at Dam 10 were accomplished. Supply contracts for sheet piling at Lock 2 and crane carriers and bulkhead hoists at Locks and Dam 2, 4, 5, and 10 were also active. Operating and Care: Locks and Dams were operated as required and necessary repairs were made to those and appurtenant structures. Other studies, reports, and miscellaneous engineering work were also accomplished. 17-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Total Maintenance and operating and care costs were $42,762,624. Rehabilitation: Major rehabilitation projects at Locks and Dam 3 and SA through 9 included the completion of the electrical rehabilitation at Dams 8 and 9 and the initiation of this work at Dam 7. A supply contract for tainer gate chain was started as well as building and control work at Lock and Dam 6. Lock and Dam 5A building and control engineering work was started and the supply of crane carriers and bulkhead hoists is ongoing. Total cost of rehabilitation was $1,725,111. Costs to St. Paul were $42,762,624 for operations and maintenance and $1,725,111 for rehabilitation; for a total cost of $44,487,735. Rock Island District. New Work: None. Maintenance: Channel dredging by Government cutterhead pipeline dredge WILLIAM A. THOMPSON was performed at various locations in Pools 17, 18, 21, and 24 at a cost of $1,798,000 with 250,800 cubic yards of material being removed. Dredging inspection and reports were completed at a cost of $117,200. Dredge material disposal activities and other environmental concerns in connection with dredging cost $218,600. Snagging, clearing and excavation was performed at a cost of $118,300. Repair of channel regulating works structures was performed at a cost of $2,169,200. Structural repairs were performed at a cost of $4,479,300. Costs associated with buyout of land and buildings at the Mississippi River Project Office is $647,800. Continue sandblast, paint, and repairs at Lock and Dam 14 cost $250,000. Chain replacements continued at a cost of $70,300. Sandblast, paint, and repairs to Dam 13 continued at a cost of $811,100. Sandblast, paint and repairs to Dam 15 continued at a cost of $95,600. Repairs to Lock and Dam 11 non overflow section was initiated at a cost of $215,500. Replace incoming electrical at Lock and Dam 11 was initiated at a cost of $64,900. Replacement of air compressors at Locks and Dams 16-18, and 22 was completed at a cost of $9,600. Construct bulkhead slots at Lock and Dam 11 was initiated at a cost of $499,700. Repair upper guidewall at Lock and Dam 12 was initiated at a cost of $79,400. Repair upper guidewall at Lock and Dam 15 was initiated at a cost of $402,800. Repair gate machinery anchors at Lock and Dam 22 cost $98,200. Rehab of Lock and Dam 22 control station was continued at a cost of $186,300. Rehab at Lock and Dam 17 was initiated at a cost of $383,700. LeClaire Base redevelopment, utility corridor Stage I, was inititated at a cost of $846,200. Maintenance of roads and bridges, buildings, grounds, and utilities cost $254,200. Maintenance of public use areas was performed at a cost of $552,000 and maintenance and purchase of permanent operating equipment cost $222,500. Maintenance of levees cost $171,200. Data Collection Platform equipment cost $269,800. Environmental compliance continued at a cost of S44,400 . Engineering and design work was performed at a cost of $1,535,700 and as built drawings continued at a cost of $17,800. Supervision, administration, and inspection for the maintenance features cost $1,011,800. Total maintenance costs were $17,641,100. Net credits to the project were $574,700, primarily as a result of collection from towboat companies for damages to lock and dam structures. Operating and care: Operation of the locks and dams and routine maintenance and minor repairs thereto were performed at a cost of $12,685,100. Real Estate management services were performed at a cost of $218,600. Natural and cultural resource activities were performed at a cost of $353,500. Public use areas and Mississippi River Visitors' Center were operated at a cost of $1,980,700. Surveys, various condition and operation studies and structural inspections cost $2,040,200. Water control management costs were $890,900 and the amount of $23,100 was expended on the Master Plans. Supervision and administration for operations features cost $228,600. Total operation costs were $18,420,700. Total Operation and maintenance costs were $36,061,800. Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation was continued at Locks and Dams 13, 14, and 15 for a total cost of $491,290, $1,258,982, and $40,872, respectively. Total rehabilitation costs were $1,791,144. Costs to the Rock Island District were $36,061,800 for operations and maintenance and $1,791,144 for major rehabilitation for a total cost of $37,852,944. St. Louis District. New Work: Costs incurred for Melvin Price Locks and Dam, formerly Lock and Dam 26 Replacement, were $11,586 for real estate acquistion; -$999 for reservoirs, $483,526 for the dam, $199,252 for the lock, $131,595 for channels, $1,483,562 for buildings, grounds and utilities, $361 for permanent operating equipment, $526,793 for engineering, $340,087 for supervisions and administration. Cost for Melvin Price totaled $3,175,765. Costs incurred for the second lock were -$54,923 for the lock, $19,935 for engineering; and $22, 958 for supervision and administration for a total of -$12,030. Total cost of new work was $3,163,733. Rehabilitation: Major rehabilitation continued in FY 1997 at Lock and Dam 25 with construction contracts and the preparation of contract documents at a cost of $283 for real estate, $948,200 for the dam, $1,647,694 for the lock, $450,892 for engineering, and $91,416 for supervision and administration. Costs for Lock and Dam 25 totaled $3,138,575. Major rehabilitation also continued at Lock and Dam 24 at a cost of $6,756 for real estate; $1,880,000 for the dam, $200 for the lock; $246 for channels; $565,009 for engineering; and $137,124 for supervision and administration. Costs for Lock and Dam 24 totaled $2,589,335. Total rehabilitation cost $5,727,910. Operating and care: The locks and dams were operated as required and necessary repairs were made thereto. Other work accomplished was management of natural resources, operation of recreation areas, condition and operation studies, water control management, and other studies and reports for a cost of $4,993,520. Maintenance: Total maintenance cost $12,120,843. Costs to the St. Louis District were $3,163,733 for new work on the Melvin Price Locks and Dam and Second Lock; $5,727,910 for major rehabilitation, $17,1 14,363 for operations and maintenance for a total cost of $26,006,006. Total Federal costs of existing project to the end of fiscal year for the three Districts were $3,163,733 for new work; $95,938,787 regular funds for operation and maintenance; and $9,244,165 regular funds for rehabilitation. Total costs for FY 97 were $108,346,685. 17-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN * Condition of the channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling depths of nine feet at low water and minimum widths suitable for long-haul common carrier service were maintained in all pools. St. Paul District. Work completed: Locks and Dams at St. Anthony Falls and 1 to 10, inclusive, except for relatively minor appurtenant work; major improvements of channels and harbors at St. Paul and Minneapolis; commercial harbors at Lake City, Red Wing, and Winona, MN; and Prairie du Chien, WI; small-boat harbors at St. Paul, Hastings, Red Wing, Wabasha, Lake City and Winona, MN; Lansing, IA; and Bay City, Pepin, and Prairie du Chien, WI; a remedial drainage ditch at Cochrane, WI; miscellaneous channel dredging and realignment; channel markers; pool clearing; and construction of various facilities for recreation use. Seepage damages totaling $90,027 were paid to 210 claimants. Status of land and flowage acquisition; Approximately 50,293.54 acres of land in fee, including 47,305 acres used by the Department of the Interior in accordance with a cooperative agreement and general plans, and easements of 15,549.63 acres of land are owned or controlled in pools I to 10, inclusive, at end of fiscal year. In addition, fee title to 12.46 acres and perpetual easements on 2.98 acres of land for St. Anthony Falls and perpetual easements over 244.39 acres of land for harbors have been obtained and Department of the Army holds special rights over 62,954.74 acres owned by the Department of the Interior in pool Nos. 3 to 10, inclusive. Land acquisition is complete. Work remaining to complete portion of project in St. Paul District: None. Condition of channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling depths of nine feet at low water and minimum widths for long-haul common carrier service were maintained in all pools. Rock Island District. Work completed: Major construction items including all locks and dams, are completed and in operation. The following related work has also been completed: construction of small-boat harbors at Rock Island, IL; Moline, IL; Andalusia, IL; Warsaw, IL; Fort Madison, IA; Davenport (Lindsay Park), IA; Muscatine, IA; Clinton, IA; and Hanibal, MO; improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA, for navigation; improvement of commercial harbor at Dubuque, IA; rehabilitation of old auxiliary lock at Lock and Dam 14; permanent closure of old Lock 19 and drydock; rock and conglomerate excavation in Pools 15 and 16; rectification of seepage damage in the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL; recreational facilities; and construction of visitor center at Lock and Dam 15. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Acquisition of land in Pools 11 to 22, inclusive consisting of 92,660.06 acres in fee and 11,576 acres in flowage easement, has been completed. Condition of the channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling depths of nine feet at low water and minimum widths suitable for long-haul common carrier service were maintained in all pools. Work remaining to complete portion of project in Rock Island District: None. St. Louis District. Work completed: Locks and Dams 24, 25, and Melvin Price Locks and Dam, except for guidewall extensions at Locks 24 and 25, have been completed as have recreation facilities at the three pools. Payments for rectification of damages have been completed. Other work remaining consists of constructing guidewall extensions at Locks 24 and 25. Melvin Price Locks and Dam is under construction. Status of land and flowage acquisition: Acquisitions of land in Pools 24, 25, and 26, involving 4,448 acres of land in fee and flowage easements over 6,600 acres, is complete. A total of 4,201 acres has been acquired for the Melvin Price Locks and Dam project. Condition of channel at end of fiscal year: The controlling depth of nine feet at low water and generally suitable widths for long-haul common carrier services were maintained in all pools and between Melvin Price Locks and Dam and Missouri River. Work remaining to complete portion of project in St. Louis District: Work remaining in the Melvin Price Locks and Dam project is a visitor center. 17-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 17-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to Project Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 September 1997 Mississippi River New Work' between Missouri River Approp.2 $21,611,108 $ 7,433,000 $ 3,831,000 $ 3,462,000 $1,184,258,629 and Minneapolis, Cost' 11,611,108 15,031,229 5,212,518 3,163,733 1,142,688,544 Minnesota (Federal Maint.' Funds) Approp. 86,092,674 91,103,358 88,898,905 98,145,565 1,582,503,518 Cost 90,511,256 93,362,913 89,613,822 95,938,787 1,565,829,496 Rehab. Approp. 19,140,256 19,037,308 8,319,000 6,637,000 197,288,621 Cost 18,392,607 18,593,748 7,782,163 9,244,165 196,901,152 (Contributed Funds) New Work:' Approp. 9,861,000 9,457,785 1,693,000 4,289,000 27,965,785 Cost 9,705,891 6,517,000 5,453,084 3,588,035 27,093,805 1. Includes $149,863,492 for new work on previous projects. 2. Includes Melvin Price Locks and Dam funds $933,371,900. 3. Includes Melvin Price Locks and Dam funds $932,787,865. 4. Includes $22,149,133 for maintenance on previous project. 5. Funding from Inland Waterways Trust Fund. TOTAL COSTS OF EXISTING PROJECT TABLE 17-B TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 Regular Public Work Emergency District Cost Funds Funds Relief Funds Total St. Paul New Work' $108,940,7902 24,210,071 $9,071,214 $142,222,075 Maintenance3 675,151,369 - - 675,151,369 Rehabilitation 78,995,910 - - 78,995,910 Total 863,088,069 24,210,071 9,071,214 896,369,354 Rock Island New Work' 71,307,945' 17,403,322 11,338,865 100,050,132 Maintenance 6 574,219,686 - - 574,219,686 Rehabilitation 101,864,065 - - 101,864,065 Total 747,391,696 17,403,322 11,338,865 776,133,883 St. Louis New Work' 961,880,6757 10,282,566 2,440,266 974,603,507 Maintenance 290,008,878 - - 290,008,878 Rehabilitation 11,042,385 - - 11,042,385 Total 1,262,931,938 935,713,506 2,440,266 1,275,654,770 1. Excludes $2,041,140 contributed funds. Includes $7,673 expended in pool No. 11. 2. Includes $159,359 transferred from Rock Island District covering pro rata share of cost of derrick boat Hercules. 3. Includes $762,196 expended between 1930 and 1936 on operating and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. Excludes $797,670 contributed funds. 4. Excludes $58,999 contributed funds. 5. $687,709 was transferred to St. Louis District in fiscal year 1958. Excludes $201,167 transferred to St. Paul and St. Louis Districts covering their pro rata share of cost of derrick boat Hercules. 6. Costs subsequent to FY 1953 included with operating and care. Includes the sum of $395,442, expended between 1930 and 1934 on the operating and care of the works of improvement under the provisions of the permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 7. Includes $47,800 transferred from Rock Island District covering pro rata cost of derrick boat Hercules and $687,709 transferred from Rock Island District. 8. Includes $897,758,208 for Melvin Price Locks and Dam. 17-4 TABLE 17-C LOCKS AND DAMS Lock Dimensions Greatest Depth on Character of Foundation Percent Width Length Upper Miter Sill Complete Miles of Available Normal Locks, Year Estimated Cost of Above Cham. for Full Pool Dams, and Opened Each Lock and Ohio Miles from ber Width Lift Eleva- Upper Lower Work in to Navi- Dam Including Lock and Dam River Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) tion' (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Pool gation Work in Pool St. Anthony 853.9 In city of 56 400 49.2 799.2 15.7 13.7 Some lime- Limestone. 100 - S 18,203,000P Falls. upper Lock St. Anthony Falls, lower Lock and dam Lock and dam 1 Lock and dam 2 Lock and dam 3 Lock and dam 4 Lock and dam 5 Lock and dam - 5A Lock and dam 6 Lock and dam 7 Lock and dam 8 Lock and dam 9 Lock and dam 10 Lock and dam 11 Lock and dam 12 Lock and dam 13 Lock and dam 14 Le Claire Lock Canal Lock and dam 15 Lock and dam 16 Minneapolis, MN 853.3 In city of Minneapolis, MN 847.6 Minneapolis- St. Paul, MN 815.2 1.3 above Hastings, MN 796.9 6.1 above Red Wing, MN 752.8 Alma, WI 738.1 Minneiska, MN 728.5 3 above Winona, MN 714.3 Trempealeau, WI 702.5 Dresbach, MN 679.2 Genoa, WI 647.9 3.3 below Lynxville. WI 615.1 Guttenberg, IA 583.0 3.7 above Dubuque, IA 556.7 Bellevue, IA 522.5 4.3 above Clinton. IA 493.3 3.7 below Le Claire. IA 493.1 3.9 below Le Claire. IA 482.9 Foot of Arsenal Island, Rock Island, IL 457.2 1.8 above Muscatine. IA stone, mainly sandstone. No piles. 56 400 26.9' 750.0 13.7 10.3 Sandstone. No Sandstone. piles. 56 400 35.94 725.1 13.5' 10.1 Rock and piles Piles in gravel. 56 400 35.9 - 12.57 7.6 in gravel. 110 500 12.2 - 16.0 15.1 Piles in sand, Piles in sand, 1108 6008 12.2 687.2 22.2 13.0 silt and clay. silt and clay. 110 600 8.0 675.0 17.0 14.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand. silt and clay. 110 600 7.0 667.0 17.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel, and gravel. 110 600 9.0 660.0 18.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand. and gravel. 110 600 5.5 651.0 18.0 12.5 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 110 60) 6.5 645.5 17.0 12.5 Piles in sand, Piles in sand gravel and and clay. silt. 110 600 .0 639.0 18.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand. and gravel. 110 600 11.0 631.0 22.0 14.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand gravel and and gravel. broken rock. 110 600 9.0 620.0 16.0 13.0 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 110 600 3.0 611.0 15.0 12.0 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 110 600 11.0 603.0 18.5 12.5 Piles in sand, Piles in sand. gravel and silt. 110 600 9.0 592.0 17.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel, and gravel. 110 600 11.0 583.0 19.0 13.0 Piles in sand, Piles in sand clay and and gravel. gravel. 110 600 11.0 527.0 20.5 13.5 Rock. Rock. 80 320 11.0 - 17.6 10.9 Rock. Rock. 110 600 16.0 561.0 24.0 11.0 Rock. Rock. 110 360 16.0 - 17.0" 11.0 110 600 9.0 545.0 17.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand and gravel, and gravel. 100 1959 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 99 99 100 92 100 100 1917 1930 1948 1938 1935 1935 1936 1936 1937 1937 1938 1936 1937 1938 1938 1939 1922 1934 l l 12.382,000' Cl 2,358,000' 6,492.000' 5,596,000 4,865,000 5,081,000 4,549,000 Z 4,874,000 5,574,000 6,061,000 Z 6,539,000 Z Z 4,750,000 7,428,000 O 5,580,000 7,502,000 6,284,000 ,o 14,201,000 98 1937 9.788,000 TABLE 17-C (Cont'd) LOCKS AND DAMS Lock Dimensions Greatest Depth on Character of Foundation Percent Width Length Upper Miter Sill Complete Miles of Available Normal Locks, Year Estimated Cost Above Chain- for Full Pool Dams, and Opened Each Lock and Ohio Miles from ber Width Lift Eleva. Upper Lower Work in to Navi- Dam Including Lock and Dam River Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) tion' (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Pool gation Work in Pool Lock and dam 437.1 4.2 above New 110 600 8.0 536.0 16.0 13.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand. 99 1939 $ 5,843,00 17 Boston, IL and gravel. Lock and dam 410.5 6.5 above 110 600 9.8 528.0 16.5 13.7 Piles in sand. Piles in sand. 90 1937 10,308,00 18 Burlington, IA Lock and dam 364.2 Keokuk, IA 110 358 38.2 518.2 4.5 9.2 Rock. Rock. 100 1913 19 110 1,200 5.0 13.0 99 1957 14,813,00 Lock and dam 343.2 0.9 above 110 600 10.0 480.0 15.0 12.0 Rock. Rock and 97 1936 6,281,00 20 Canton, MO piles in sand and gravel. Lock and dam 324.9 2.1 below 110 600 10.5 470.0 16.5 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand 95 1938 8,065,00 21 Quincy, IL and gravel, and gravel. Lock and dam 301.2 1.5 below 110 600 10.2 459.5 18.0 13.8 Rock. Rock. 99 1938 5,275,00 22 Saverton, MO Lock and dam 273.4 Clarksville, MO 110 600 15.0 449.0 19.0 12.0 Rock and piles. Piles in sand. 991 1940 10,337,00 24 Lock and dam 241.4 Cap Au Gris, 110 600 15.0 434.0 19.0 12.0 Piles in sand Piles in sand 99" 1939 13,694,00 25 MO and gravel, and gravel. Lock and dam 202.9 Alton, IL 110 600 24.0 419.0 19.0 10.0 Piles in sand. Piles and 100 1938 12,824,00 26 (Henry T. 110 360 24.0 - 16.0 10.0 sand. Rainey Dam)" Melvin Price 200.8 Alton, IL 110 1,200 24.0 419.0 23.0 18.0 Piles to Piles to 97 1990 745,009,00 Locks and Dam bedrock. bedrock. Melvin Price 200.8 Alton, IL 110 600 24.0 419.0 42.0 18.0 Piles to Piles to 93 1994 226,000,00 Locks and Dam bedrock. bedrock. (2nd Lock) Total, Locks and dams $ 1,196,556,00 of 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1. Elevation of pools I to 22 and at St. Anthony Falls are mean sea level 1912 adjustment: pools 24, 26 are mean sea level 1929 adjustment. 2. Includes existing dam, owned by Northern States Power Co. 3. Includes dredging above upper lock. (Federal cost only.) 4. Based on pool elevation 723.1 in pool I which is crest of dam. Pool is normally maintained at elevation 725.1 by flashboards. 5. Includes lower approach dredging and dredging between upper and lower rock. (Federal cost only.) 6. In addition $1,948,000 expended from previous projects and $1,349,600 from O & M appropriation for first of twin locks. Excludes lock and dam rehabilitation program. 7. Old upper guard sill. 8. Landward lock. 9. In addition, $1,965,300 expended from previous projects. 10. Existing Le Claire Canal lock is used as auxiliary to lock 14; previous project cost $540,000. 11. Depth over upper poiree sill. Depth over upper miter sill is 27 feet, at lock 15. 12. $640,868 for first lock was reported by Mississippi River Power Company, transferred to Government free in lieu of improvements destroyed. (Annual Report, 1928, pp. 1118-1119.) Present estimate includes $13,132,600 for main lock and appurtenant work. 13. Includes cash contribution of $4,900,000. 14. Complete except for guidewall extensions. 15. Lock and Dam 26 has been replaced by the Melvin Price Locks and Dam at which full pool was raised 1 February 1990. Lock and Dam 26 has been removed. 0S ti 0.4) rP a, Aat TABLE 17-D HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS Miles above Project Approximate size (feet) Actual or Name OhioRive Location Type depth Percent Estimated (feet) Width Length Complete Cost St. Paul Harbor, MN Hastings Harbor, MN Red Wing Harbor, MN Red Wing Harbor, MN Bay City Harbor, WI Lake City Harbor, MN Pepin Harbor, WI Wabasha Harbor, MN Alma Harbor, WI Winona Harbors, MN Lansing Harbor, IA " Prairie du Chien v, Harbor, WI Dubuque Harbor, IA Savanna Harbor, IL Clinton Harbor, IA Moline Harbor, IL Davenport Harbor, IA (Lindsay Park) Rock Island Harbor, IL Andalusia Harbor, IL Muscatine Harbor, IA 836.5-839.2 In city of St. Paul, MN 839.7 Channel improvement, Small-boat harbor and channel enlargement. 813.2 Lower end of city of Hastings, MN 791.4 In city of Red Wing, MN 791.1 In city of Red Wing, MN 785.9 Upper end of Bay City, WI 773.0 In city of Lake City, MN 767.1 In city of Pepin, WI 760.0 Upper end of city of Wabasha, MN 751.3 Upper end of Alma, WI 726.0 In city of Winona, MN Latsch Island 726.2 Crooked Slough 663.3 Upper end of city of Lansing, IA 635.5 Upper end of city of Prairie du Chien, WI 635.0 In Marais de St. Friol East Channel below Hwy bridges. 579.4 537.3 519.0 488.0 484.2 At Dubuque, IA At Savanna, IL At Clinton, IA At Moline, IL At Lindsay Park 479.8 At Rock Island, IL 473.0 455.5 455.6 Fort Madison Harbor, IA Andalusia Slough At Muscatine, IA 383.7 At Fort Madison, IA Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Commercial' Small-boat' Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Commercial Commercial Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Small-boat Entrance channel small-boat harbor Small-boat Small-boat Freight terminal approach channel Small-boat 2.7(mile) 400 100 100 500 100 400-1,000 300 200 300 450 50-100 400 500 500 50 175-400 300 200 200 170 400 1,200 800 5,990 600 1,000 850 600 800 500 1,000 6,000 500 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 $ 217,100 230,200 74,300 146,800' 8,700 39,4002 93,500 1,077,000� 205,500' .41,700 56,300 89,800 84,700 95,300 85,500 93,100 55,200 310,000 101,912 110,328 262,100 31,000 21,000 353,000 800 100 1,000 frontage v, O z Z Z Zz z r O rn z 9 12 5 55 5 6 5 9 5 340 280 400 230 200 100 40 150 200 250 100 100 0 78 100 100 100 100 100 1,500 910 1,400 660 1,150 1,100 435 950 1,890 900 100 184,200 TABLE 17-D (Cont'd) HARBOR IMPROVEMENTS Project Approximate size (feet) Actual or Name Miles above Location Type Depth Percent Estimated Ohio River (feet) Width Length Complete Cost Warsaw Harbor, IL 359.1 At Warsaw, IL Small-boat 5 100 600 100 $ 73,000 Quincy Harbor, IL 327.3 In Quincy Bay, IL Small-boat 5 200-300 9,000 0 Hannibal Harbor, MO 308.8 At Hannibal, MO Small-boat 5 180-260 600 100 129,000 Total $4,269,640 1. In addition, local interests contributed $3,455. 2. In addition, local interests contributed $9,533. 3. Commercial harbor converted to small-boat harbor under authority of Section 107 of 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Primary use is small-boat, although some commercial activity exists. 4. In addition, local interests contributed $812,599. 5. In addition, local interests contributed $32,344. 6. Maintenance only, estimated at $5,000 annually. WV 0 0 Ib O O 0 0 3$ Fl y d m dd a OI 0 C r O cit r A yb y1 a r J TABLE 17-E MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN ADDITIONAL FEATURES ENTERING INTO COST OF PROJECT Facilities for public use, convenience and safety Rectification of damages caused by seepage and backwater Regulating works between Melvin Price Locks and Dam and Missouri River Improvement of Beaver Slough at Clinton, Iowa, for navigation Miscellaneous Total additional features Total existing project (new work) $ 22,710,000 9,114,000' 545,000 193,600 11,716,9002 18,705,900' $ 516,183,512 1. Includes a lump-sum payment of $2,146,800 (O&M appropriation) paid to the Sny Island Levee Drainage District, IL, for rectification of seepage damages. Also includes $140,000 Construction General funds for project studies, evaluation, and report preparation. 2. Includes $686,500 for repairs to Stone Arch Bridge, Minneapolis, MN. (FY 1969) 3. Excludes $227,000 (1965) for inactive remedial measures at Sandy Slough, MO. LICENSE FEES COLLECTED TABLE 17-F THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 1997 Annual Collections to Dam Licensee Charge Sept. 30, 1997 St. Anthony Falls Lower Nothern States Power $ 3,300 $ 116,377 Lock and Dam Co. (No. 2056) Lock and Dam No. 1 Ford Motor Co. 95,400 6,870,840 Lock and Dam No. 2 City of Hastings, MN. 24,163 229,188 TOTAL $ 7,216,405 17-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 17-G AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized )ocumentls Sep. 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 as amended by P.R. No. 10, Feb. 24, 1932 June 26, 1934 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 19137 I)vc. 22, 191.1 Mar. 2, 19,15 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 19.15 Mar. 2, 19.15 None Mar. 2, 1915 Mar 2. 1915 Mar. 2. 1915 July 21, 1916 July 21, 19146 .July 2-11,9 .16 July 21, 1916 ,July 24, 1916 June 30. 1918 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 M1:,y 17, 1950) May 17. 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1951 July 3, 1958 July 3, 1958 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER AN) MINNEAPOLIS, MN Dredging channels to landing places. Project adopted fiom Illinois River to Minneapolis; Chief of Engineers granted discretionary authority to make such modification in plan as may be deemed advisable. 4 Operation of snag boats and operation and care of locks and dams to be provided for with funds fiom Department of the Army appropriations for rivers and harbors. Missouri River established as lower limit of project. Extension of 9-foot channel above St. Anthony Falls, MN, including adequate terminal facilities for Minneapolis, MN St. Paul, MN harbor. I)etermine damages to drainage and levee (list ricts caused by seepage and backwater, and cost of making rectification thereof'. Public park and recreational facilities. ied Wing, MN harbor. Remedial works to correct damages caused by seepage and backwater at Cochrane, WI Such changes or additions to payments, remedial wiorks, or land acquisitions authorized by River and tlarbor Act of Aug. 26. 1937 (River and Harbor Committee I)oc. 34, 75th Cong., 1st sess.), as Chief of Engineers deems advisable. St. Paul, MN channel enlargements, small boat harbor, and roadway. Vertical bridge clearance at Minneapolis to 26 feet above estimated stage lr dlischarge of 40,000 c.'.s. Winona, MN basin. Futl ure modification of lock and( dain No. 2 for power development. Provides for cash contribution by local interests in lieu of alteration of privately owned bridges and utilities for St. Anthony Falls project. Lake City, MN harbor. Wahasha, MN harbor. Payment of damages caused by backwater and seepage, pools 3 to 11. Hlastings, MN harbor. Lansing, IA harbor. Fort Madison, IA harbor. Payment of damages caused by pool No. 14 at Clinton, IA. Davenport, IA harbor. Muscatine, IA harbor. Alma, WI harbor. Hannibal, MO harbor. Prairie du Chien, WI harbors. Opposite lilamnburg, II, harbor.' Permits such change in location of Winona, MN small boat basin authorized by River and IIarbor Act of Mar. 2, 1915 (II. I)oc. 263, 77th Cong., 1st sess.). as Chief of Engineers dleemis advisable. Construction of Crooked Slough Harbor at Winona, MN, in lieu of previously authorized commercial harbor. Payment of damages caused by pool No. 24 at Louisiana, MO. Permits modification of vertical bridge clearances and authorizes completion of St. Anthony Falls project. Small boat and commercial harbors at Alton, IL.2 None 11. Doc. 290. 71st Conig., 2d sess. None II. Doc. 137. 72nd Cong.. 1st sess. I. Doc. 137, 72nd Cong. 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 44, 74th Cong., Ist sess. Rivers and (1 larbors Conmittee Doc. 34, 75th Cong., 1st sess. None 11. I)oc. 103, 7611th ('ong.. 1st II. Doc. 137, 76th Cong., 1st sess. None II.De oc. 547, 76th Cong., 3rd sess. S. Doc. 54, 77th Cong., Ist sess. 11. Deoc. 263, 77th Cong., 1st sess. II. 1)oc. X132, 77th Cong.. Ist sess. II. Doc. 449, 78th Cong., 2d sess. II.D oc. 511, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 11. Doc. 514, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 1I. Doc. 515, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 1H.D oc. 559, 79th Cong., 2(1se ss. S. Doec. 192, 79th Cong., 2d sess. II. Doc. 661, 80th Cong. 2d sess. S. Doc. 197, 80th Cong., 2(1 sess. 11. Doc. 642, 80th Cong., 2d sess. 1H. Doec. 733, 80th Cong., 2(d sess. H. Doc. 66, 81st Cong., 1st sess. II. Doc. 67, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 1!. Doc. 71, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Ii. I)oc. 254, l8sCton g., Ists ess. None H. Dec. 347, 83rd Cong., 2d I. Doc. 251, 82nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Dec. 33, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Dec. 136, 84th Cong., Ist sess. 17-10 MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI AND MINNEAPOLIS, MN TABLE 17-G (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1958 Payment of lump sum amounts for damages to drainage and levee H. Doc. 135, 84th Cong., 1st sess. districts caused by operation of navigation pools. July 3, 1958 Improvement and maintenance of Beaver Slough at Clinton, IA. H. Doc. 345, 84th Cong., 2d sess. Mar. 3, 1959 Reconstruction of structures as may be necessary to provide None adequate facilities for existing navigation. July 14, 1960 Construction of Industrial Harbor at Red Wing, MN. H. Doc. 32, 86th Cong., 1st sess. Oct. 23, 1962 Construction of small-boat harbors at Savanna 2, Moline, H. Doc. 513, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Andalusia, New Boston5, Warsaw, Quincy, and Grafton, IL; Bellevue', Clinton, Davenport, and Keokuk', IA; St. Paul (Harriet Island), MNS; and Bay City, Pepin, and Cassville', WI. Oct. 23, 1962 Payment of damages caused by pool 24 at Clarksville, MO. H. Doc. 552, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Oct. 23, 1962 Remedial works at Sandy Slough, MO. H. Doc. 419, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Nov. 7, 1966 Repair of Stone Arch Bridge at Minneapolis, MN. None Oct. 21, 1978 Replacement of Lock and Dam 26 Public Law 95-502 Dec. 29, 1981 Change name of Lock and Dam 26 to Melvin Price Locks and Dam Public Law 97-118 effective on the date of Melvin Price's death. (Apr. 22, 1988 - date of death) 1. Deauthorized FY 75. 2. Inactive. 3. Deauthorized FY 87 (WRDA of 1986). 4. Guidewalls at Locks 3, 4, 5, SA, 7, 8, 9, and 10 deauthorized FY 87 (WRDA of 1986). 5. Deauthorized FY 90 (WRDA of 1986). 6. Guidewall extensions at Locks 16, 18, and 21; construction of mooring facilities at Locks and Dams 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18; upper approach improvement at Lock 19 and Lock and Dam 20; and rock and/or conglomerate excavation in Pools 14, 18, and 21 deauthorized FY 90 (WRDA of 1986). 17-11 PITTSBURGH, PA DISTRICT * This District comprises part of eastern Ohio, western Pennsylvania, southwestern New York, northern West Virginia, and northwestern Maryland embraced in drainage basin of Ohio River and Tributaries above mile 127 (below Pittsburgh), immediately upstream from New Martinsville, W. Va. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation - Locks and Dams .......... Page 1. Allegheny River, PA................. 18-2 2. Construction of locks and dams,Ohio River... . 18-2 3. Monongahela River, PA and WV.......... 18-2 4. Open-channel work, Ohio River.......... 18-3 5. Tygart Lake, WV.................. 18-3 6. Other authorized navigation projects. ..... 18-4 Flood Control - Local Protection 7. Chartiers Creek, PA.... ............. .18-4 8. Elkins, WV.... ................. . 18-4 9. Johnstown, PA... ................ 18-4 10. Punxsutawney, Ohio River Basin, PA... .... 18-5 11. Saw Mill Run, Pittsburgh, PA ......... 18-5 12. South Central, PA Environment Improvement Program ......... .......... . 18-5 13. Turtle Creek, PA ................ 18-6 Flood Control - Reservoirs 14. Berlin Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH... ... . . 18-6 15. Conemaugh River Lake,Ohio River Basin, PA. 18-7 16. Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA.. . 18-7 17. East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA................ 18-7 18. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, PA and NY. ......... 18-7 19. Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA.... . .18-8 20. Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18-8 21. Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, OH . . . . . . . . . .. . . 18-8 22. Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH . 18-9 23. Ohio River Basin (Pittsburgh District). .... 18-9 24. Shenango River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and OH .......... ........ 18-9 25. Stonewall Jackson Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV.... ...... . . . . .18-10 26. Tionesta Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA. .... 18-11 27. Union City Dam, Ohio River Basin, PA. . . . 18-11 28. Woodcock Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA. 18-11 29. Youghiogheny River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA and MD. .................... 18-12 30. Inspection of completed flood control projects. 18-12 31. Other authorized flood control projects . ... 18-12 32. Flood control work under special authorization. .................. 18-12 General Investigations 33. Surveys.... .................. 34. Collection and study of basic data... . . . . 35. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design... 36. Research and development... ........ 37. Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment. ............... Tables Table 18-A Cost & Financial Statement . . . Table 18-B Authorizing Legislation . . . . . . Table 18-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects........ ...... Table 18-D Not Applicable. Table 18-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . Table 18-F Not Applicable. Table 18-G Deauthorized Projects . . . . . . Table 18-H Allegheny River Statistics ..... Table 18-I Monongahela River Statistics .. . Table 18-J Monongahela River Total Costs.. . Table 18-K Ohio River Basin Reservoirs . . . Table 18-L Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects........... Table 18-M Flood Control Work Under Special 18-12 . 18-12 . 18-12 18-13 18-13 18-14 18-18 18-22 18-23 . 18-25 18-26 . 18-27 18-29 18-29 .18-30 Authorization................18-31 18-1 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 Navigation - Locks and Dams 1. ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA Location. The Allegheny River is 321 miles long. It rises in northern Pennsylvania, flows northwestward into New York, thence generally southwestward to Pittsburgh, PA, where it joins with Monongahela River to form the Ohio. (See Geological Survey Charts for western Pennsylvania and southwestern New York.) Existing project. The project consists of eight locks and dams to afford slack-water navigation for a length of 72 miles from Pittsburgh, PA to above East Brady, PA. Controlling depth through canalized portion is 9 feet at normal pool level. Channel width varies from a minimum of 200 feet to full width of river at mouth. Existing project is complete, the last lock, No. 9, was placed in service in 1938. All locks and dams are in fair condition. Navigation channel has been widened at certain points and, in general, maintained to project depth, thus affording adequate depth for passage of commercial tows. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. City of Pittsburgh constructed a modern wharf for river freight. There are numerous privately maintained terminals and docks, consisting of tipples, various types of hoists, chutes, and pipelines for use in loading and unloading coal, stone, sand, gravel, petroleum products, steel products, and other commodities. Transshipment of freight between river and railroads is handled at privately owned river-to-rail terminals. Existing private terminals are adequate for shipments and receipt in Pittsburgh District of type of commerce now in existence. Operations & Maintenance, General: During FY 97 there were no major maintenance and repair contracts on the Allegheny River. Major work accomplished by Government hired labor on the Allegheny River included the renovation of eight filling and four emptying circular valves at Lock 4 for $1,268,802. 2. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Ohio River portion. 3. MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV Location. Formed by junction of Tygart and West Fork Rivers about 1 mile south of Fairmont, WV, and flows northerly for 128.7 miles to its junction with Allegheny River, forming Ohio River at Pittsburgh, PA (See Geological Survey Charts for southwestern Pennsylvania and northern West Virginia.) Previous project. For details see Annual Report for 1963, page 1070. Existing project. Provides for improvement of river by 9 locks and dams to afford slack-water navigation for its entire length from Pittsburgh to above Fairmont, WV. Original locks and dams 7, 8 and 9 were replaced by new locks and dams 7 and 8 in 1925. Increased traffic necessitated enlargement and improvement of locks and dams 1 to 6 between Pittsburgh and Rices Landing, PA, by building two parallel chambers and fixed concrete dams during 1905 and 1932. Locks and dam 1 were eliminated in 1938 by raising Emsworth Dam, Ohio River. Reconstruction of lock 2 was completed in 1953 to provide two modern navigation chambers. The existing locks and dam 2 were originally completed in 1907; major modifications were made in 1923 and 1924, and in 1926 the upper guard and guide walls were extended. Construction of Maxwell locks and dam and the reconstruction of dam 4 have allowed for removal of obsolete locks and dams 5 and 6. Small and antiquated original locks and dams 10 to 15, inclusive, have been replaced by three modern structures. Morgantown lock and dam, initial step in replacement program, was completed in 1950 replacing locks and dams 10 and 11. Hildebrand lock and dam, next upstream, was completed in 1959 replacing locks and dams 12 and 13. Raising crest of dam 8 was also completed in 1959 as part of upper river improvement and eliminates restricted depth in upper reach of pool. Opekiska lock and dam was completed in 1967 replacing locks and dams 14 and 15. Completion of this link in upper river replacement program provides for entire river length of minimum channel depth of 9 feet, varying in width from a minimum of 250 feet to practically full width at mouth. Locks and dam 3 showed advanced stages of deterioration and, because of its strategic location and its importance to industry throughout the Greater Pittsburgh area and the nation, emergency remedial work had to be done in 1977. Major rehabilitation of locks and dam 3 was completed on Oct. 27, 1980. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the replacement of Lock and Dam 7 with Grays Landing Lock and Dam and the construction of a new lock landward of the existing lock at Lock and Dam 8 (renamed Point Marion Lock and Dam). In accordance with the provisions of this act, 50% of the total cost of construction for the Grays Landing and Point Marion projects was derived from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Construction of a new lock at Point Marion was competed and put into service in December 1993. Construction of a new lock at Grays Landing was completed and put into service in May 1993. Construction of the dam at Grays Landing was completed in December 1995. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. City of Pittsburgh constructed a modern wharf for freight. Boat landings are maintained by some municipalities along the river. A large number of tipples at mines and various types of hoists at manufacturing plants and sand and gravel supply companies are maintained for private use in loading and unloading coal, coke, billets, steel products, sand, gravel, and other commodities. These terminals and docks are not available for general commerce. A number of docks and pipelines are also privately maintained for petroleum and acid products. Marine ways are maintained by some of the larger industries. These are also several terminals for rail-toriver and river-to-rail transfer. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the new Grays Landing dam was completed 18-2 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT in December 1995 at an approximate cost of $25,000,000. Construction of the lock was completed in May, 1993 at a contract cost of approximately $80,000,000. Removal of the old fixed crest dam and river lock wall at Lock and Dam 7 was completed in FY 96 at a cost of $2,800,000. Work continues on cultural resources and the acquisition of real estate for the remainder of the project. The present project consists of 84 acres of fee land and 403.3 acres of easement. The estimated total cost of the project, which is scheduled to be complete in September 2000, is $181,000,000. Construction of the new lock for the Point Marion Project was completed in December, 1993 at a cost of $78,800,000. Land acquired for the project consists of 58 acres of fee land and 77.4 acres of easement. The estimated total cost of the Point Marion project is $111,700,000. Approximately $300,000 of closeout work remains to be completed and two outstanding contractor claims must be resolved. The Water Resources Development Act of 1992 authorized the District to proceed with navigation improvements on the Lower Monongahela River. The project includes replacement of the fixed crest dam at Locks and Dam 2 with a gated dam; raising the existing pool 2 by 5 feet, construction of twin 84' x 720' locks at Locks and Dam 4, and the elimination of Locks and Dam 3; lowering the existing pool 3 by 3.2 feet. The changes in pool elevations will adversely affect numerous municipally-owned facilities, which the Corps will adjust at project cost. The FY 1996 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Bill includes $15 million for the project. In February 1996, a $606K contract was awarded for the procurement of 750 tons of PS31 sheet pile for the renovation and extension of the Locks 2 upper guardwall. In April 1996, a $3.4 million contract was awarded for this upper guardwall work. The Fiscal Year 1997 appropriation of $16.2 million was used to continue design and construction activities and the upper guardwall work which was completed in December 1997. Approximately $5.5 million of FY 97 funds were surplus for use in Fiscal Year 1998. The Fiscal Year 1998 Appropriation Act contains $12.7 million for the project, which will allow the first two construction contracts for the new gated Dam 2 to begin in the spring of 1998. Operations and Maintenance, General: Major work accomplished by contract and substantially completed during FY 97 included bulkhead repairs and reinstallation at Point Marion L/D at a cost of $511,190 and construction of a wastewater treatment plant at Maxwell L/D at a cost of $206,201. Major work accomplished by hired labor in FY 97 included dewatering the 56'x720' land lock chamber at Lock 3, replacing all miter gates, miter sills, quoin seals, filling valves, hydraulic and air systems for $954,535; and dewatering 84'x720' land lock chamber at Maxwell, renovating miter and quoin bearing blocks, replacing pintles, structural repairs to lock gates and renovating miter sill and bubbler system for $1,473,590. 4. OPEN-CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER See this heading under Ohio River portion. 5. TYGART LAKE, WV Location. Tygart Lake is located on the Tygart River in Taylor and Barbour Counties, northcentral WV. The lake is approximately 26 road miles due east of Clarksburg, WV and 30 road miles south of Morgantown. The dam is situated 22.7 river miles above the mouth of the Tygart River at Fairmont, or 2.25 miles upstream from Grafton, WV, and about 78 miles south of Pittsburgh, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Fairmont, Thornton, and Belington, WV.) Existing project. A reservoir for low water regulation and flood control. Dam is concrete gravity type with an uncontrolled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides. Project was authorized by Public Works Administration January 11, 1934, and adopted by 1935 River and Harbor Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low water control in Monongahela River and for purpose of flood protection in Monongahela and Ohio Valleys. Construction of dam was started in 1935 and placed in operation in 1938. Present project lands consist of 2,662.9 acres in fee, flowage easements over 1,216.9 acres and 1,731.9 acres of other easements. Local cooperation. The State of West Virginia has assumed responsibility for the development and operation of hunting and fishing areas as well as the Tygart Lake State Park. Controlled releases for downstream navigation and recreation are also coordinated with others to the extent feasible. No local cooperation is required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. A cost-sharing agreement was executed with the West Virginia Department of Recreation in May 1981. Licenses. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission granted a license to the City of Grafton for construction of a non-Federal hydropower facility at this project (FERC license 7307). Details of the design and other issues are still being finalized. The deadline for the start of project construction expired on April 15, 1995; however, the developer has requested an extension. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance, General: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low water regulation, as required, and project structures were operated and maintained in a serviceable condition throughout the year. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for FY 97 were $92,168,000; total benefits through September 30, 1997, revised to reflect damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were $992,372,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as the State of West Virginia has jurisdiction over most of the recreation in the reservoir area. 18-3 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 Tygart Dam is a candidate for the Dam Safety Program. An Evaluation Report was initiated in March 1994 to address spillway capacity and structural stability in relation to the probable maximum flood event. The report was approved in March 1996. Findings of the report concluded that under present conditions, the probable maximum flood would overtop the dam and cause failure. The report recommends protecting the dam from failure to include downstream erosion protection and stilling basin modifications. A hydraulic model was constructed in conjunction with the Design Memorandum which is being prepared. Findings of the model study established the limits of required downstream erosion protection. Estimated cost of the project is $8 million. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 18-C on other authorized navigation projects. Flood Control - Local Protection 7. CHARTIERS CREEK, PA Location. Within Washington and Allegheny Counties, southwestern Pennsylvania, a tributary of Ohio River. (See Geological Survey Chart for Carnegie, PA) Existing project. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1965 and provides for channel widening, deepening and realignment, construction of a major channel cutoff, and relocations in two separate and independent reaches. James G. Fulton project in Allegheny County would be about 13.4 miles long and Canonsburg- Houston reach in Washington County about 4.7 miles long. Completed improvements would contain within banks, all floods up to the 1912 maximum of record, but with some residual damage, and would greatly reduce flood stages and damages resulting from higher floods. James G. Fulton Flood Control Project-Construction of Unit 1 was started in July 1968, completed in September 1970, and turned over to local interests for operation and maintenance on June 25, 1971. Construction of Unit 2 was started in April 1970, completed in April 1973, and turned over to local interests on November 22, 1974. Construction of Unit 3 was started in July 1971 and was completed in December 1974. Construction of Unit 5 was started in June 1972 and was completed in December 1973. Construction of Unit 4 channel improvement was started in July 1978, completed in June 1981 and turned over to local interests on 18 November 1981. A contract for Environmental Improvement, Unit 4, James G. Fulton, was awarded in Sep 1981 and completed in Dec 1981. Canonsburg-Houston Reach-Construction of Unit 1 was started in December of 1968, completed in March 1970, and turned over to local interests for operation and maintenance on August 10, 1970. Construction of Unit 2A was started January 17, 1976, completed December 16, 1976, and turned over to local interests on June 9, 1977. Construction plans and specifications for Unit 2B, the remaining unit of the reach, were 99% complete. Remaining work on the original project was not completed due to the inability of local cooperating agency to provide the necessary rights-of-way. Major flooding in Houston, PA in September, 1990 has generated renewed interest in completion of the project. Estimated cost for new work (1985) is $41,850,000 of which $32,750,000 is Federal cost and $9,100,000 non- Federal cost. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperating agency (Washington County) has been unable to provide the necessary rights-of-way for the remaining Unit 2B. Direct non-Federal contributions have been made in the amount of $4,225,188. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The district re-evaluated the previously designed Unit 2B channel improvement project and determined that the project, as originally designed, was no longer economically feasible. After consideration of alternative plans, the district determined that the erection of floodwalls around the areas most susceptible to damages was an economically feasible option. A General Reevaluation Report is being completed. Regular inspections were made at completed units. Cumulative flood control benefits achieved through FY 97 were estimated to be $51,773,000. 8. ELKINS, WV Location. On Tygart River in north-central Randolph County, WV, about 155 miles south of Pittsburgh, PA. It is at downstream end of a long, broad reach of upper Tygart Valley, about 75 miles above mouth of river. (See Geological Survey Chart for Elkins, WV). Existing project. Provides flood protection by diverting flood discharges from upstream arm of loop of natural river channel into an artificial cutoff channel, thereby bypassing City of Elkins. Improvement is designed to accommodate discharges equivalent to maximum flood of reasonable expectancy. Project construction was started in May 1946 and completed in May 1949. Completed works, except that portion of.channel maintained by Federal Government, has been operated and maintained by City of Elkins since March 31, 1949. Present project lands consist of 32.04 acres in fee and 526.01 acres in easements. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1222. Federal cost of completed project was $1,772,627; estimated non-Federal cost for lands, easements, and rights-of-way was $40,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Routine investigations and inspections were made. Project was last inspected in October 1996. Flood damages prevented through FY 96 were estimated to be $19,534,000. 9. JOHNSTOWN, PA Location. Project is located in southwestern Cambria County, PA, about 58 miles east of Pittsburgh. PA. It is in a deep and comparatively narrow valley at junction of Stoney Creek and Little Conemaugh River, which unite to form Conemaugh River. (See Geological Survey Chart for Johnstown, PA.) 18-4 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT Existing project. Provides for increased channel capacity by enlarging and realigning channels and protecting banks with concrete pavement. Improvement designed to accommodate discharges equivalent to those of March 1936 flood, maximum natural flow of record, minimum of overbank flow and to practically eliminate damages therefrom. Project construction began in August 1938 and was completed in November 1943. Footer protection for Unit 4 was completed in November 1949. Present project lands consist of easements over 199 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1937. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1215. Local cooperation. The rules of local cooperation for the rehabilitation of the existing project are governed by the FY 91 Energy and Water Resources Appropriations Act. Pursuant to this Act, the City of Johnstown will have a limited role in securing the needed rights of access to non-federal structures included in the line of protection and will hold and save the United States from damages due to construction or operation and maintenance of the work on the non-federal structures, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: The FY 1991 Energy and Water Resources Development Appropriations Act authorized and directed the Corps to undertake a major rehabilitation of the existing project. The Project Design Memorandum was approved in June 1995. The major rehabilitation work is to be accomplished under the Construction, General appropriation at an estimate cost of $32.5 million. Contract plans and specifications were initiated in July 1995. The first construction contract was awarded in January 1997. The project is scheduled to be physically complete in September 2002. The work consists of the repair of 54 exisiting wall sections, slope paving and replacement of balustrade (safety) wall. Also included in the major rehabilitation during FY 97 is the acquisition of approximately 1.30 acres of land for permanent channel improvement, subsurface anchor easements and temporary work easements within Units 3, 5 and 6. Twenty-eight tracts of land were affected by the acquisition of these easements. Additional easements were acquired prior to awarding the first construction contract in June 1997. Flood damages prevented by the project through September 30, 1997 were estimated to be $800,971,000. 10. PUNXSUTAWNEY, PA Location. Borough of Punxsutawney is on Mahoning Creek in Jefferson County, PA, about 85 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. It is on a comparatively wide, alluvial flood plain about 52 miles above mouth of stream and 30 miles above Mahoning Creek flood control dam. (See Geological Survey Charts for Punxsutawney and Smicksburg, PA.) Existing project. Provides flood protection by channel enlargement, dikes, and walls. Improvement is designed to accommodate discharges 20% greater than that of maximum flood of record. Construction was accomplished by construction of four units. Construction started in May 1946 and was completed in June 1950. Present project lands consist of perpetual easements over 72.6 acres. Completed works, except that portion of channel maintained by the Federal Government have been operated and maintained by Borough of Punxsutawney since July 31, 1950. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1209. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general. Operation Activities continued and routine investigations and inspections were made. Total flood damages prevented through FY 97 were estimated to be $71,045,000. 11. SAW MILL RUN, PITTSBURGH, PA Location: The project is located within the City of Pittsburgh, Allegheny County, at Ohio River Mile 0.7 and traverses upstream from the mouth of Saw Mill Run approximately 4,700 L.F. Existing Project: The proposed project was authorized in WRDA of 1986 in accordance with the Chief of Engineers report dated 30 January 1978. The WRDA 1996 increased the project estimate to $12,780,000, the current project estimate in 1994 dollars. In FY 97 this project was included in the FY 97 appropriations as a new construction start. Local Cooperation: The City of Pittsburgh is the local sponsor for this project and is responsible for real estate acquisition and relocation design and construction. The project will be cost shared 75% Federal and 25% nonfederal in accordance with the requirements of WRDA 86. Operations during fiscal year: During FY 97, the District initiated the preparation of the plans and specifications for the project and entered into negotiations for a Project Cooperation Agreement with the City of Pittsburgh. These negotiations resulted in the District executing a Project Cooperation Agreement with City of Pittsburgh on 23 October 1997. Also during FY 97, the City indicated that they would be interested in entering into a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the District for the purpose of allowing the District to acquire the real estate and completed relocation work on behalf of the City. This MOA is expected to be executed in March 1998. 12. SOUTH CENTRAL, PA ENVIRONMENT IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Location. Projects under this program in the Pittsburgh District are located in the South Central, PA counties ofArmstrong, Cambria, Clearfield, Fayette, Indiana, Somerset and Westmoreland. Projects currently identified consists of the Forest Hills Municipal Authority Wastewater Treatment project, located at the confluence of the Little Conemaugh and South Fork Rivers and the Burrell Township Sanitary Authority Sanitary Sewer project, located on the Conemaugh River, 14 miles upstream from Saltsburg where the Conemaugh River and Loyalhanna Creek join to form the Kiskiminetas River. 18-5 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 Existing Project. The proposed project was authorized under Section 313 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992. Section 313 authorizes the Secretary of the Army to establish a pilot program to provide design and construction assistance to non-Federal interests in south central Pennsylvania. The Forest Hills Municipal Authority (FHMA) was identified by Congress as a non- Federal interest to receive high priority under the program. The Forest Hills project consists of the fast track planning, design and construction of a wastewater treatment plan, pump stations, interceptor lines and collection systems. The treatment system will provide service to four boroughs and five townships that currently are not serviced. Total project cost is estimated at $40,000,000 ($8,150,000 Federal cost; $31,850,000 non- Federal cost). The second project identified for participation under this program is the Burrell Township Sanitary Authority project consisting of the installation of gravity sanitary sewers and pump stations. Total project costs are estimated to be $4,700,000 ($1,750,000 Federal cost; $2,950,000 non-Federal cost). Other projects identified for participation under this program are Blacklick Valley Municipal Authority, potable water transmission and distribution lines; Redstone Township Sewer Authority, design of a wastewater treatment plant and conveyence system; Westmoreland Distribution Center, waterline and sanitary sewer extensions; and White Township, Wastewater Treatment Plant and Interceptor Sewer. Local Cooperation. Legislation requires the project to be cost shared at 75% Federal funds and 25% non- Federal funds. Project Cooperation Agreements between the Corps of Engineers and the Non-Federal Sponsors. Sanitary Authority are required prior to design and construction efforts. Operation and maintenance of the project will be at 100% non-Federal cost. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: In FY 97 the District substantially completed the design for the Forest Hills Municipal Authority project and executed design PCA's for the Burrell Township Sanitary Authority project, the Blacklick Valley Municipal Authority project and the Redstone Township Sewer Authority project. Design for these efforts are all underway and are between 30% and 50% complete. Negotiations for a design PCA will be initiated in FY 98 with White Township and negotiations for construction PCA's for Forest Hills, Burrell and Blacklick Valley will be initiated in FY 98. 13. TURTLE CREEK, PA Location. In Allegheny and Westmoreland Counties, adjacent to Pittsburgh, PA, along lower reaches of Turtle Creek and Thompson Run, a tributary of Turtle Creek. (See Geological Survey Chart for Pittsburgh, PA). Existing project. The existing channel improvement project was constructed during the period 1962-1967 and provided for flood protection by widening, deepening, and streamlining channel of lower Turtle Creek for about 6.3 miles and channel of Thompson Run for about 1 mile above its mouth. Appurtenant work consists of channel streambed and side slope protection where required, retaining walls, drop structures, floodgates, alteration, removal or reconstruction of restrictive structures and adjustments of affected utilities. Project was designed to accommodate a design flood corresponding to an estimated 100 year frequency. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Federal cost for completed project was $15,350,000; non-Federal cost was $1,840,000. The Fiscal Year 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act specified that the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, is authorized and directed to repair and restore the Turtle Creek, Pennsylvania, local protection project. Estimated Federal cost for repair and restoration work is $7,185,000; non-federal cost is $2,415,000. Local Cooperation. The Turtle Creek Flood Control Authority was the local sponsor for the existing project. However, they were not financially able to sponsor the project restoration, nor to subsequently perform any required project maintenance. Allegheny County is the local sponsor for the project rehabilitation and all other requirements for local cooperation for the future maintenance of the project. A local cooperation agreement was executed with the county on August 4, 1992. Operations during fiscal year. New work: The project consists of debris and sediment removal from the Turtle Creek and Thompson Run channels and debris basin; clearing trees and brush from channel side slopes, restoration of channel side slopes, repairs to concrete retaining walls, debris dams, trashracks, spalled concrete joints and drainage appurtenances; and removal of vegetative growth from weepholes. In December 1996 the repair and rehabilitation of the project was completed. The completed project was then turned over to Allegheny County for operation and maintenance in January 1997. Total estimated flood damages prevented by the project through FY 97 were $84,364,000. Flood Control - Reservoirs 14. BERLIN LAKE, OH Location. Dam is on Mahoning River about 73 miles above its confluence with Shenango River. It is about 10 miles above existing Milton Reservoir Dam and 35 miles upstream from Warren, Ohio. Reservoir is in Portage, Mahoning and Stark Counties, OH. (See Geological Survey charts for Warren, Ravenna, and Alliance, OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and water supply. Dam consists of a partially controlled, concrete gravity, center spillway flanked by rolled-earthfill abutment sections joining valley sides. Authorized project is complete and in operation for flood control and low water regulation purposes in industrialized Mahoning Valley below. Construction of dam was started in January 1942 and completed in June 1943. Present project lands consists of 6,885.3 acres in fee and 1,098.7 acres in easements. For further project description, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1233. Local cooperation. None required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. 18-6 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated as required and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. A contract for Service Bridge Concrete Repairs in the amount of $210,000 was accomplished in FY 97. Estimated flood control benefits achieved in FY 97 were $27,074,000; total benefits through September 1997, revised to reflect damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were $429,341,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 15. CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on Conemaugh River in Indiana and Westmoreland Counties, PA, 7.5 miles above junction of Conemaugh River and Loyalhanna Creek, which form the head of the Kiskiminetas River. It is about 2 miles northeast of Tunnelton, PA, and about 42 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Westmoreland and Indiana Counties, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Latrobe, New Florence, and Elders Ridge, PA.) Existing Project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides and an earth embankment ending in right abutment. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir system is designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Present project lands consist of 7608.7 acres in fee and 522.8 acres in easements. Project authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1217. Local cooperation. None required by law. Licenses. A non-Federal hydropower project utilizing Conemaugh Lake was constructed downstream of the dam under FERC Licenses 3207. The 15-megawatt project began commercial operation on February 6, 1989. It is owned by National Renewable Resources, Inc. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. A contract for Retention Dike-Bow Ridge Disposal Site in the amount of $921,075 was accomplished in FY 97. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for FY 97 were $25,118,000; total flood control benefits through September 1997, revised to reflect damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were $1,477,755,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public use facilities were continued. 16. CROOKED CREEK LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on Crooked Creek 6.7 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River near Ford City, PA, and about 32 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Freeport and Elders Ridge, PA.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earth-fill type with separate uncontrolled saddle spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in March 1938 and completed in October 1940. Present project lands consist of 2,561.7 acres in fee and 100.22 acres in easements. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1213. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for FY 97 were $2,834,000; total benefits achieved through September 1997, revised to reflect damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were estimated at $272,793,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 17. EAST BRANCH, CLARION RIVER LAKE, PA Location. Dam is in Elk County, PA on East Branch of Clarion River above Middle Fork, 7.3 miles above junction of East and West branches of Clarion River at Johnsonburg, PA, and about 105 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Elk County, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Mount Jewett, PA.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and low-water regulation. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with gate-controlled concrete tunnel under right abutment and a paved uncontrolled spillway on left abutment slope. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for low-water regulation purposes in Clarion River Valley below and for flood control as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for protection of Pittsburgh and upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in June 1947 and completed in July 1952. Present project lands consist of 287.2 acres in fee and 1,296.7 acres in easements. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in Flood Control Acts of 1938 and 1944. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1206. Local Cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for flood control and low-water regulation, as required; and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir through September 30, 1997 revised to include damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District were $68,350,000. Some reservoir management activity was performed throughout the year comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation of public-use facilities. Work 18-7 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 was limited in scope as bulk of reservoir lands are owned by Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 18. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, PA AND NY Location. Dam site is on Allegheny River 9 miles above Warren, PA, and 198 miles above mouth of river at Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Warren and McKean Counties, PA., and Cattaraugus County, NY. (See Geological Survey Charts for Warren and Kinzua, PA-NY, and Randolph and Salamanca, NY.) Existing project. Reservoir provides flood control, low water regulation, and recreation. Dam consists of a combination concrete gravity structure and rolled earth embankment with gate-controlled spillway and discharge conduits controlled by slide-gates in gravity section. Construction of project, initiated in February 1960, is complete. Construction of dam was started in September 1960 and completed in December 1965. Development of recreation area at Onoville under a cost-sharing agreement with Cattaragus County was completed in June 1978. Present project lands consist of 2,646 acres in fee and easements over 22,420.0 acres. For further details see Annual Report for 1962, page 1202. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936, 1938 and 1941. Local cooperation. None required by law. Licenses. The Federal Power Commission granted a license to Pennsylvania Electric Company and Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company on December 28, 1965, for the joint construction, operation and maintenance of a 325-megawatt pumped-storage installation (FPC Project No. 2280). The project is complete. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low water regulation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. A contract for Boat Launching Improvement in the amount of $171,014 was accomplished in FY 97.Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir through September 30, 1997, revised to include damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were $840,914,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 19. LOYALHANNA LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on Loyalhanna Creek, 4.5 miles above junction of creek with Conemaugh River at Saltsburg, PA, and about 29 miles east of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Westmoreland County PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Latrobe, PA). Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides, and an earth embankment section ending in left abutment. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in October 1939 and completed in June 1942. Present project lands consist of 3,330.8 acres in fee and easements over 86.7 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1219. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for FY 97 were $7,726,000; total benefits through September 1997, revised to reflect damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were $310,567,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 20. MAHONING CREEK LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on Mahoning Creek in Armstrong County, PA, 22.9 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River. It is about 6.50 miles southeast of New Bethlehem, PA, and about 51 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Armstrong, Indiana, and Jefferson Counties, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Rural Valley and Smicksburg, PA). Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of concrete gravity type with a gate-controlled center spillway flanked by abutment sections joining valley sides. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam started in February 1939 and was completed in June 1941. Present project lands consist of 2,519.36 acres in fee and easements over 83.5 acres. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1210. Local cooperation. None required at completed project. On November 4, 1977 a contract for Wildlife development at Mahoning Creek Lake was executed between the U.S. Government and the Pennsylvania Game Commission. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood damages prevented by this project for FY 97 were $2,384,000; total benefits through September 30, 1997, revised to reflect damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were $407,057,000. Activities under reservoir management and maintenance for public-use facilities continued. 21. MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH Location. Dam site is on West Branch of Mahoning River which joins Mahoning River at Newton Falls, OH. 18-8 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT It is 11 miles above mouth of branch and about 15 miles upstream from Warren, OH. Reservoir is in Portage County, OH. (See Geological Survey Charts for Ravenna, Garrettsville, Chagrin Falls, and Kent, OH.) Existing project. Reservoir provides flood control, low-water regulation and recreation. Dam consists of a rolled-earth embankment structure with gate-controlled outlet works and an uncontrolled side-hill spillway through left abutment. Authorized project is completed and in operation for flood control and low water regulation purposes. Present project lands consist of 6,298.9 acres fee and easements over 27.9 acres. For further description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1231 (West Branch Reservoir, Mahoning River, Ohio). Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 191, 85th Cong. 1st sess.), with local contribution requirements modified by Flood Control Act of 1960. Federal costs of completed project is $17,370,000. Local interests contributed $3,230,000 during period of construction bringing initial project cost to $20,600,000. The State of Ohio has a lease from the Secretary of the Army for development and operation of recreation facilities in the reservoir area. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute $5,200,000 for water pollution abatement and for municipal and industrial water supply purposes, of which $3,230,000 was paid in cash during construction. Unpaid balance at time project is placed in operation, $1,970,000, will be paid in cash at that time or on an annual basis. Of the unpaid balance of contributed funds due and payable, payment in full of Trumbull County's share in the amount of $663,040 has been received. Mahoning County elected to pay their share ($1,306,960) in 50 annual installments of $50,323.32, including interest. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. A contract for the Pavement of Rehab Dam Area Roads in the amount of $106,065 was accomplished in FY 97. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this project for this FY 97 were $12,815,000. Total benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1997 were $154,993,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management, and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as state of Ohio has jurisdiction over most of the recreation in reservoir area. 22. MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OH Location. Dam is on Mosquito Creek, 12.6 miles above junction of creek with Mahoning River at Niles, OH, and about 18 miles northwest of Youngstown, OH. (See Geological Survey Charts for Bristolville and Kinsman, OH, and Pennsylvania.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control, lowwater regulation and water supply storage. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with outlet facilities through dam, and an uncontrolled natural wasteway to discharge overflow from reservoir. Authorized project is complete and in operation for flood control and low-water regulation purposes in industrialized Mahoning and Beaver Valleys below. Construction of dam was started in July 1943 and was ready for beneficial use in January 1944. Present project lands consist of 11,180.4 acres in fees and easements over 276.0 acres. State of Ohio has a license from Secretary of the Army for development and operation of recreation facilities in reservoir area. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1228. Local cooperation. None required at completed project; however, future recreational developments are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow regulation as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this project for this fiscal year were $6,374,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1997 were $107,379,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of certain public-use facilities continued. This work was limited in scope as State of Ohio has jurisdiction over most of the recreation in reservoir area. 23. OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT) Location. A series of dikes, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs/lakes in Ohio River Basin within Pittsburgh District. Existing project. Individual projects considered in comprehensive plan within Pittsburgh District. (See Tables 18-B, 18-E and 18-K on Acts authorizing existing projects, local protection projects and reservoirs.) Operations during fiscal year. New work: None by the United States except as stated in individual projects. Completed local protection projects operated and maintained by local interests, including those projects for which individual reports have been included. 24. SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, PA AND OH Location. Dam is on Shenango River about 0.8 mile above Sharpsville, PA, and about 33 miles above junction of river with Mahoning River, which unite near New Castle, PA, to form Beaver River. Reservoir is in Mercer County, PA and Trumbull County, Ohio. (See Geological Survey Chart for Kinsman, Ohio, and Shenango, PA.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control, lowflow augmentation and recreation. Dam consists of a concrete gravity structure with gate-controlled outlet works and an uncontrolled center spillway section. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation for lowwater regulation purposes in Shenango River valley below and for flood control as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system for protection of Shenango River valley and 18-9 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 the Beaver and upper Ohio River Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in March 1963 and completed in May 1965. Present project lands consists of 14,485.94 acres in fee and easements over 198 acres. Approximately 65.94 acres in abandoned railroad right-ofway were acquired for project use. Future work consists of completion of project lands of any additional recreation facilities as required to serve the public needs. For further project description, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1230. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance, general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Contracts were completed for Construction of Additional Parking/Pull-off areas in the amount of $101,884 and Bank Protection, Recreation Area in the amount of $226,590. Estimated flood control benefits achieved through September 30, 1997, revised to reflect damages prevented in downstream districts as well as Pittsburgh District, were $81,493,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance continued. 25. STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV Location. In Lewis County, North Central West Virginia, on the West Fork River, which joins the Tygart River at Fairmont, West Virginia to form the Monongahela River. Damsite is located at Brownsville, West Virginia, about 4 miles south of Weston and 72 miles above mouth of West Fork River at Fairmont, WV. (See Geological Survey Charts for Weston and Crawford, WV.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, area redevelopment and recreation. Dam is concrete gravity type, 95 feet high and 620 feet long. Outlet works consist of five multi-level sluices, spillway is uncontrolled. Storage capacity is 74,650 acre-feet controlling an area of 102 square miles.A station hydropower plant completed in 1995 supplies power to the dam and administration building, with excess power being sold to an electric utility company. Project was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act. Estimated initial Federal cost for new work (1991) is $231,000,000 (includes an estimated $24,900,000 reimbursement by non-Federal interests.) Present project lands consist of 20,451 acres in fee and easements over 398 acres. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to make arrangements for repayment, under the provisions of the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, of that part of the construction cost and annual operation, maintenance and replacement costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply, an amount presently estimated at $4,350,000 for construction; and $15,000 annually for operations, maintenance and replacements. Also, in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act, local interests are required to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement, pay, contribute in kind or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first costs of the reservoir project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement, an amount presently estimated at $24,810,000, bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation and fish and wildlife land and facilities, the amount involved being currently estimated on an average annual basis to be $457,000, exercise to the full extent of their legal capability, control against removal of streamflow made available for water quality control; and contribute to the control of pollution of streams subject to low-flow augmentation by adequate treatment or other methods of controlling wastes at their source. The requirements of Section 221 were amended in 1971 to exempt assurances for future demands for water supply pursuant to the Water Supply Act of 1958 from the contractual requirements of the Act. Accordingly, the city of Weston, West Virginia, has provided assurances that it will enter into a water supply contract with the Department of the Army within a period of time which will permit paying out the costs allocated to the water supply storage within the life of the project. A recreation cost-sharing contract, in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act, P.L. 89-72, was executed by the State of West Virginia on March 27, 1977. Local cooperation assurances for recreation cost-sharing were executed by the Governor and Attorney General of West Virginia on May 29, 1973. In this connection, Section 8 of P.L. 92-222 deleted the requirement that the State of West Virginia "hold and save the United States free from damages resulting from water rights claims due to construction and operation of the project." Legislation relieving Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV, project of the requirements of Section 221, P.L. 96-611 was contained in Water Resources Development Act of 1974 signed by the President on March 7, 1974. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The Corps is working with the State of WV to revise the Master Plan to incorporate higher revenue producing recreation facilities, including a lodge, golf course, cabins and camping. The revised Master Plan was approved by the Corps in June 1992, but with the stipulation that a costsharing contract amendment must be executed prior to the award of a construction contract for the granting of any cost-sharing credits. The FY 1992 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act allows the State costsharing credits for all of these facilities except the golf course. In March, 1994, the State and the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works ASA(CW) executed an amendment to the 1977 Stonewall Jackson Lake Recreation Cost-Sharing Contract to reflect these credits. The State of West Virginia now must design and build the approved remaining recreation facilities within ten years of the executed amendment, or March 2004, in accordance with the timeframes and conditions set forth in the amended contract. The WV State Supreme Court has ruled that the sale of $6 million in revenue bonds for the design and construction of the lodge, additional camping and golf course may not proceed. In 1996, the State issued a solicitation for interest and qualifications to create a public/private joint venture for the purpose of developing recreational facilities at Stone- 18-10 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT wall Jackson Lake Park. In October 1997, the State selected a private firm to design and build the remaining recreational facilities. Section 508 of the FY 1998 Energy and Water Appropriations Act provides for cost sharing credits for this public/private development against the current $21.5 million owed to the government by the State of WV. Estimated flood control benefits achieved for this project for FY 97 were $11,003,000; total flood control benefits through September 30, 1997, revised to include downstream districts, were $85,524,000. 26. TIONESTA LAKE, PA Location. Dam is on Tionesta Creek, 1.25 miles above junction of creek with Allegheny River at Tionesta, PA, and about 78 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is entirely in Forest County, PA. (See Geological Survey Charts for Tionesta, Tidioute and Sheffield, PA.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earthfill type with separate uncontrolled saddle spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. Reservoir is in operation as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in May 1938 and completed in January 1941. Present project lands consists of 2,794.77 acres in fee and easement over 13.1 acres. Approximately 2.53 acres of fee were disposed at the project. Future work consists of provision on project lands of additional recreational facilities as required to serve public needs. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of 1936 and 1938. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1203. Local cooperation. None required by law. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low-flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Contracts were completed for Paint Service Bridge and Install Fuel Line in the amount of $225,350 and Maintenance of Bulkhead System in the amount of $176,063. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this project through September 30, 1997, revised to include downstream districts, were $992,372,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 27. UNION CITY DAM, PA Location. In Erie County, northwestern Pennsylvania, on French Creek, a tributary of Allegheny River. Damsite is 24 miles upstream from Cambridge Springs, PA, and 41 miles upstream from Meadville, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Union City, PA - NY.) Existing project. A flood control reservoir dam of earth embankment non-gated type with uncontrolled side-channel spillway. Outlet works consist of a lower outlet located in valley floor constructed of reinforced concrete conduit 8 feet by 4.5 feet and an upper outlet consisting of an uncontrolled slot 9.5 feet wide through the north end of the ogee weir in the spillway. Dam is 1,420 feet long at top rising 88 feet above streambed and provides gross capacity of 47,640 acre-feet from a drainage area of 222 square miles. Project authorization was modified to provide for a conservation pool and addition of recreation facilities. On November 5, 1974, a referendum proposal was defeated by the constituents of Erie County in regard to the cost-sharing for construction of recreation facilities. In view of the foregoing, all action toward implementation of the authorized project modification was discontinued. Reservoir is operated as one of a two-reservoir system for reduction of flood stages in French Creek Basin between damsite and mouth, Allegheny River from Franklin, PA, to Pittsburgh, PA, inclusive, and upper Ohio River Valley. Initial highway relocations were completed in October 1968 and remaining highway relocations were completed in May 1972. Construction of the dam was started in July 1968 and completed in September 1971. Present project lands consist of 161.4 acres in fee and easements over 2,410.29 acres. Existing project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to inform affected interests in French Creek Basin at least annually, that the system of reservoirs of which Union City Dam is a part, will not provide protection against maximum floods. On November 10, 1964 the Department of Forests and Waters of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania furnished formal assurances of local cooperation in respect to notifying local interests at least annually that the system of reservoirs will not provide protection against maximum floods. A referendum on the ballot during the November 1974 election regarding the approval to cost-share the maintenance of a summer pool was defeated by the local voters. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Maintenance of the structure and appurtenances was performed as required. This dam acted as an uncontrolled detention type dam during the fiscal year. Estimated flood control benefits achieved for this project for FY 97 were $189,000. Total flood control benefits for this reservoir through September 30, 1997, revised to include downstream districts, were $37,331,000. 28. WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA Location. In Crawford County, northwestern Pennsylvania, on Woodcock Creek, a tributary of French Creek. Damsite is about 4.1 miles above mouth of Woodcock Creek and about 5 miles northeast of Meadville, PA. (See Geological Survey Chart for Meadville, PA.) Existing project. A flood-control reservoir dam of rolled-earth embankment type, gate-controlled outlet works with a 6 foot-wide by 7.75 foot-high conduit and uncontrolled saddle spillway on the left abutment. Dam is 4,650 feet long at top rising 90 feet above streambed and provides for gross capacity of 20,000 acre-feet from a drainage area of 46 square miles. Reservoir is operated as one of a two-reservoir system for reduction of flood stages in French Creek Basin between damsite and mouth. Allegheny River from Franklin, PA, to Pittsburgh, PA, inclusive, and upper Ohio River Valley. Authorized project is complete. Construction of dam was started in July 1970 18-11 REPORT OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS FOR CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 and completed in July 1973. Land acquired for project consists of 1,731.5 acres in fee and easements over .56 acres. Project was authorized for flood control and recreation by 1962 Flood Control Act. Storage for water quality control was added to the project during the. preconstruction planning stage. Local cooperation. Local interests must inform affected interests in French Creek Basin at least annually, in a manner satisfactory to District Engineer, that a system of reservoirs of which Woodcock Creek is a part, will not provide protection against maximum floods. Pennsylvania Department of Forests and Waters assumed responsibility of local cooperation for project. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Maintenance of the structure and appurtenances was performed as required. A contract for Sanitary Sewer Line Renovation in the amount of $269,809 was completed in FY 97. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this project for FY 97 were $48,000. Total flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir through September 30, 1997, revised to include downstream districts, were $22,043,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public use facilities continued. 29. YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, PA AND MD Location. Dam is on Youghiogheny River about 74.2 miles above its junction with Monongahela River at McKeesport, PA. It is 1.2 miles upstream from Confluence, PA, and about 57 miles southeast of Pittsburgh, PA. Reservoir is in Fayette and Somerset Counties, PA, and Garrett County, MD. (See Geological Survey Charts for Confluence, PA, Accident, MD, West Virginia and Pennsylvania.) Existing project. Reservoir for flood control, lowflow augmentation, and pollution abatement purposes. Dam is rolled-earthfill type with separate uncontrolled side channel spillway and tunnel outlet works. Authorized project is complete. For flood control, reservoir is operated as a unit of a coordinated reservoir system designed for protection of Pittsburgh and reduction of flood heights in upper Ohio Valley, generally. Construction of dam was started in June 1940 and completed in May 1944. Present project lands consist of 3,914.9 acres in fee and easements over 0.62 acre. Project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. For further project description see Annual Report for 1962, page 1223. Local cooperation. None required. Licenses. A non-Federal hydropower project utilizing releases from Youghiogheny River Lake was constructed in accordance with FERC License 3623. D/R Hydro Company is the authorized representative of the Licensee, Youghiogheny Hydroelectric Authority, and is responsible for operation of the plant. It has a 10- megawatt capacity. The plant began commercial operation on December 7, 1989. Operations during fiscal year. Operations and maintenance general: Reservoir was operated for benefit of flood control and low flow augmentation, as required, and necessary repairs were made to structures and appurtenances. Estimated flood control benefits achieved by this reservoir for FY 97 were $16,690,000. Total flood control benefits achieved by this project through September 30, 1997 revised to include damages prevented in downstream districts, were $385,001,000. Activities under reservoir management program comprising sanitation measures, conservation, land management and operation and maintenance of public use facilities continued. 30. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within boundaries of their respective districts. Inspections were made of completed units transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation and local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain these projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. (See Table 18-L for dates of inspections.) Costs for this fiscal year, $75,251. Total cost to September 30, 1997 was $1,880,498. 31. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 18-E on other authorized flood control projects. 32. FLOOD CONTROL WORKS UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION For flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) See Table 18-M. For emergency bank protection (Sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) See Table 18-M. Flood control and coastal emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Corps Statutory Authorities Activities in Support of Others Facilities Inspections Emergency Operations Rehabilitation Total Cost for Fiscal Year $ 144,738 76,388 12,691 97,999 85,704 1,163,794 $1,581,314 18-12 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT General Investigations 33. SURVEYS Navigation Studies Flood Damage Prevention Studies Special Studies Special Investigations FERC Licensing Activities Interagency Water Resources Development Coordination Studies with Other Agencies Review of Completed Project Total Cost for Fiscal Year $1,970,934 86,301 696,197 95,114 1,727 41,130 1,879 174,834 $3,068,116 34. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs this fiscal year were $137,715 for flood plain management services and $233 for related hydrologic studies. 35. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Chartiers Creek, PA Saw Mill Run, Pittsburgh, PA Mon River, WV (4 sites) Total Cost for Fiscal Year $115,836 4,259 283,332 $403,427 36. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT None. 37. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT Kinzua Cr., Subimpoundment $ 71 Tygart River Lake Wetland 1,951 Coordination Acct Funds 7,207 Initial Appraisals, General 4,857 Ttoal Cost for Fiscal Year $14,086 18-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 18-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section Sept. 30, In Text Project Navigation - Locks and Dams 1. Allegheny River PA 3. Monongahela River, PA and WV 5. Tygart Lake, WV Flood Control - Local Protection 7. Chartiers Creek, PA 8. Elkins, WV 9. Johnstown, PA 10. Punxsutawney, Ohio River Basin, PA 11. Saw Mill Run, PA 12. South Central, PA Environment Improvement Program 13. Turtle Creek, PA Flood Control - Reservoirs 14. Berlin Lake Ohio River Basin, OH Fuiding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 1997 New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 11,254,000 10,928,523 40,134,000 26,408,403 16,228,700 15,815,627 1,564,000 1,133,769 29,000 28,055 21,000 35,376 144,000 347,023 1,200,000 1,135,923 22,000 22,551 5,000,000 248,197 925,000 184,867 13,119,000 13,643,805 19,107,000 27,833,368 12,502,000 12,855,234 12,616,400 12,646,949 13,569,300 16,734,875 14,791,600 14,015,073 - 462,000 - 218,374 918,000 1,468,000 1,303,153 1,548,947 1,146 27 7,239,8 6,921,1 16,525,0 13,881,6 12,680,0 13,086,3 775,0 946,2 953,0 837,7 283 7,000 (10,000) 31,971 2,298 477,000 438,477 1,070,000 994,725 548,000 424,136 1,110,000 1,239,223 200,000 72,( 67,494 156, 3,585,000 442,182 2,331,000 622,426 1,950,C 783,4 4,501,C 6,882,5 )00 946 - 5 )00 3,5 X06 1,1 )00 2 554 4 1,693,800 1,834,000 1,942,000 1,796,224 1,641,919 1,993,851 - 18,157,8601 - 18,157,860 320 155,520,7432 .32 155,130,395 )00 437,326,8353 i11 435,398,649 4 )00 285,942,857 5 392 285,291,1406 - 15,857,000 - 15,857,000 )00 20,314,932 7 51 20,242,5577 )90 19,111,5418 r34 18,983,3978 --- 89,000 --- 88,999 - 30,818,15341 - 30,818,153 - 1,772,627 - 1,772,627 11,000 370,192 1,579 359,417 - 8,865,388 9 - 8,865,388 9 7,000 6,920,190 183,589 6,920,243 357,000 7,819,000 43 770,774 7,704,897 44 - 3,586,10710 3,586,10710 14,000 1,652,59711 75,019 1,651,96211 500,000 500,000 69,322 69,322 500,000 14,035,00042 .83,075 2,656,86042 65,000 26,735,352 38 172,866 26,678,228 S 8,739,98712 - 8,739,98712 2,539,790 33,804,70513 1,936,936 33,020,73413 18-14 1 1,8 1,7 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-A See Section In Text Project 15. Conemaugh River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 16. Crooked Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 17. East Branch, Clarion River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 18. Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, PA and NY 19. Loyalhanna Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) FY 94 FY95 FY96 Total Cost to Sept. 30, FY97 1997 14 --- - - 46,012,411 1,044,800 1,155,000 1,454,000 3,522,910 21,379,886 3 9 1,059,766 1,154,657 1,433,107 2,924,592 20,738,193 - - - - 4,482,933 15 1,367,800 1,783,000 1,441,000 1,454,300 29,885,85816 1,361,958 1,362,632 1,465,523 1,325,143 29,736,15916 Fuknding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 908,000 897,943 1,201,000 1,041,798 9,539,58617 17 - 9,539,586 1,081,740 17,573,72418 1,225,242 17,518,234 - - - - 109,305,07619 - - - - 109,305,076 1,505,800 1,531,000 1,354,000 1,267,860 28,970,803 3 9 1,476,699 1,407,143 1,504,653 1,240,737 28,912,65139 - - - - 2,921,000 - - - - 2,921,000 - - - - 5,727,53120 .-.-- 5,727,531 1,039,900 1,098,000 1,465,000 1,078,660 1,087,599 1,032,286 1,195,260 21,933,553 1,618,063 21,888,633 20. Mahoning Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 21. Michael J. Kirwan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, OH 22. Mosquito Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 23. Ohio River Basin Pittsburgh, PA District Consolidated 24. Shenango River Lake, Ohio River Basin, PA 25. Stonewall Jackson Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - -- -- -- S- 77,,114444,,99773322 933,000 833,000 1,189,000 1,929,100 17,538,062 40 974,295 850,031 1,106,784 1,146,859 16,654,09340 - - - - 47,033 - - - - 47,033 - - - - 17,376,09724 24 - - - - 17,376,097 1,013,000 803,000 868,000 770,280 15,397,51425 880,297 932,871 908,438 732,529 15,343,032 -.--- 4,253,02926 - - - - 4,253,029 1,119,000 785,000 1,016,000 848,330 16,466,90145 1,268,968 778,965 942,077 884,890 16,391,749 -- - - 985,19727 -- - - 985,197 - 40,217,20128 - 40,217,201 2,295,700 2,320,923 1,486,000 1,125,981 858,000 886,640 2,191,000 2,194,229 122,800 185,468 877,000 883,849 2,494,000 2,391,386 250,000 847,092 962,000 932,752 2,329,210 2,523,289 0 69,348 55729 40,044,557 29 39,979,853 211,313,434 211,245,093 994,230 8,426,043 870,392 8,261,492 18-15 898,700 914,340 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 18-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Cost to Section Sept. 30, In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY95 FY96 FY97 1997 26. Tionesta Lake, New Work Ohio River Approp. - - - - 7,792,37830 Basin, PA Cost - - - - 7,792,378 Maint. Approp. 1,623,100 1,708,000 1,701,000 1,392,470 25,661,49832 Cost 1,551,553 1,776,999 1,693,847 1,402,835 25,620,57432 27. Union City New Work Dam, Ohio Approp. - - - - 14,559,800 River Basin, PA Cost - - - - 14,559,800 Maint. Approp. 331,000 382,000 226,000 222,030 6,070,698 Cost 303,173 354,424 283,192 219,336 6,053,324 28. Woodcock Creek New Work Lake, Ohio Approp. - - - - 20,545,06533 River Basin, PA Cost - - - - 20,545,06534 Maint. Approp. 903,000 911,000 977,000 978,810 13,832,96735 Cost 903,892 826,851 976,013 1,062,680 13,801,302 29. Youghiogheny New Work River Lake Approp. - - - - 12,521,16736 Ohio River Cost - - - - 12,521,16736 Basin, PA and Maint. MD Approp. 1,879,000 1,691,000 2,041,300 1,699,770 35,697,233 3 7 Cost 1,944,786 1,690,894 1,873,903 1,840,191 35,625,516 1. Includes $2,453,737 from emergency relief funds and $1,250,049 from public works funds. 2. Includes $64,365 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963) and $191,400 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $995,000 appropriated and expended for major maintenance at IJD's 2, 3 and 4. 3. Includes amounts appropriated to date for; Point Marion, L&D 8, PA - $56,164,400 for CG, $56,450,000 for IWTF, $3,322,057 for raising crest of dam in 1958-9, $2,086,438 for original reconstruction years 1923-26 and $618,758 for AE&D (Total $118,641,653). Grays Landing, L&D 7, PA - $86,070,200 for CG, $83,047,000 for IWTF, and $803,000 AE&D (Total $169,920,200). L&D 2, 3 & 4 - $8,390,700 for CG and $21,113,000 for IWTF (Total $29,503,700). 4. Includes amounts expended to date on; Point Marion, L&D 8, PA - $56,075,683 for CG, $56,325,288 for IWTF, $3,322,057 for raising crest of dam in 1958-9, $2,086,438 for original construction years 1923-26 and $618,758 for AE&D (Total $118,428,224). Grays Landing, L&D 7, PA -$85,962,868 for CG, $86,902,514 for IWTF, and $803,000 AE&D (Total $173,668,382). L&D 2, 3 & 4 - $16,534,556 for CG, $17,506,204 for IWTF (Total $240,040,760). 5. Includes $22,549 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963), $742 for maintenance for previous project and $582,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 6. Includes $22,549 public works acceleration, executive funds (1963), $742 for maintenance for previous project and $464,508 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 7. Includes $1,999,995 emergency relief funds, $10,000,000 public work funds, $234,000 Code 711 funds and $412,088 Code 713 funds, $462,000 appropriated to and $218,374 expended on the Dam Safety Assurance Program - CG; excludes $409,622 contributed by local interest. 8. Includes $89,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations, Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $425,000 appropriated to and $424,493 expended on the Dam Safety Assurance Program O&M. 9. Includes $33,423 from emergency relief funds. 10. Excludes $180,485 for new work expended from contributed funds. 11. Includes $283,988 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. 12. Includes $1,542,500 Code 711 funds, $809,700 Code 712 funds and $99,111 Code 713 funds; excludes $100,000 contributed by local interest. 13. Includes $40,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Includes $7,679 appropriated to and expended from M&O of dams in FY 97 and $703,407 expended to date on M&O of dams. 14. Includes $5,351 from emergency relief funds and $328,000 Code 711 funds. 15. Includes $63,788 from emergency relief funds. Also includes $278,044 Code 711 funds. 16. Includes $45,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Includes $1,918 appropriated to and expended from M&O of dams in FY 97 and $697,646 expended to date on M&O of dams. 17. Includes $156,812 Code 711 funds. 18. Includes $322,000 provided from the Protective Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $6,795 appropriated to and expended in FY 97 and to date on M&O of dams. 19. Includes $2,791 from emergency relief funds, $14,622 Code 711 funds and $568,265 Code 713 funds; excludes $389,370 contributed by local interest. 20. Includes $7,339 from emergency relief funds and $274,669 Code 711 funds. 21. Includes $256,000 provided from the Protective Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $1,133 appropriated to and expended on M&O of dams in FY 97, and $103,733 expended to date on M&O of dams. 18-16 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) 22. Includes $25,671 emergency relief funds, $162,381 Code 711 funds and $561,247 Code 713 funds; excludes $500,086 contributed by local interests. 23. Includes $25,671 emergency relief funds, $162,381 Code 711 funds and $561,247 Code 713 funds; excludes $456,611 contributed by local interests. 24. Includes $74,900 Code 711 funds; excludes $4,585,627.29 for new work contributed by local interest. 25.Includes $315,500 provided from the Protective Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $1,857 appropriated to and expended in FY 97 and to date on M&O of dams. 26. Includes $122,729 Code 711 funds and $94,900 Code 713 funds. 27. Includes $8,914 from emergency relief funds. 28. Includes $1,730,100 Code 711 funds and $1,618,300 Code 713 funds. 29. Includes $152,000 provided from the Protective Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $5,948 appropriated to and expended in FY 97 and to date on M&O of dams. 30. Includes $2,303,076 Code 711 funds ($256,760 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act PL 98-8, 1983 funds), $275,900 Code 712 funds, and $24,201 emergency relief funds. 31. Includes $2,303,077 Code 711 funds, ($256,531 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act PL 98-8, 1983 funds), $275,900 Code 712 funds, and $24,201 emergency relief funds. 32. Includes $203,000 provided from the Protective Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Also includes $4,681 appropriated to and expended in FY 97 and to date on M&O of dams. 33. Includes $1,671,366 Code 711 funds. 34. Includes $1,671,366 Code 711 funds. 35. Includes $85,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds). 36. Includes $2,846,263 Code 711 funds ($293,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act. (PL 98-8) 1983 funds). 37. Includes $591,000 provided from the Protective Employment Appropriations Act (PL 98-8) 1983 funds. Includes $11,120 appropriated to and expended in FY 97 and to date on M&O of dams. 38. Includes $1,840,000 (non-Federal) original construction cost and an additional $4,205,000 (non-Federal) contributed and $4,180,720 (non-Federal) expended to date. 39. Includes $2,888 appropriated to and expended from M&O of dams in FY 97, and 698,616 expended to date on M&O of dams. 40. Includes $1,157 appropriated to and expended from M&O of dams in FY 97, and 103,757 expended to date on M&O of dams. 41. Includes $4,225,188 (non-Federal funds) contributed and expended to date. 42. Includes $285,000 (non-Federal) contributed funds and $252,971 (non-Federal) expended to date. 43. Includes $4,894,000 appropriated to date for Rehab. Operations and Maintenance and $2,925,000 appropriated to date for Rehab. Construction, General. 44. Includes $4,880,202 expended to date for Rehab. Operations and Maintenance and $2,824,695 expended to date for Rehab. Construction, General. 45. Includes $3,828 appropriated to and expended in FY 97 and to date on M&O of dams. 18-17 __ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 See Section in Text 1. 3. TABLE 18-B Date Authorizing Act Aug 5, 1886 June 3, 1896 July 25, 1912 July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 19351 Aug 30, 19351 June 26, 19342 Mar 3, 1899 June 13, 1902 Mar 3, 1905 Mar 3, 1905 Mar 2, 1907 Mar 4, 1913 Sep 22, 1922 July 3, 1930 Jan 31, 19313 June 26, 19342 18-18 AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA. (See Section 1 of Text) For lock and dam 1. (Fixed dam contemplated. Sep 29, 1891 Secretary of War authorized change to a moveable dam.) For locks and dams 2 and 3. For locks and dams 4 to 8 inclusive. For a depth of 9 feet in the lower 61 miles. Replace lock and dam 1 by a dredged channel, 9 feet deep and 200 feet wide up to lock 2, and construct new locks and dams 2 and 3, to replace existing locks and dams 2 and 3. Construct lock and dam 9, raising crest of dam 8, and dredging a navigable channel to head of pool 8. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriation for rivers and harbors. MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV Enlarge and improve lock and dam 6; additional works at lock 3; new repair steamer and new dredge boat with equipment; all at an estimated cost of $185,556. Rebuild lock and dam 2 at estimated cost of $655,961. (Estimate increased in 1910 to $698,961.) Acquisition of land and additional improvements at 5 and 6 at a cost of $7,850. Rebuild lock and dam 3 at estimated cost of $589,196. Reconstruct lock and dam 5 at estimated cost of $756,042. Reconstruct lock and dam 6 at estimated cost of $356,400. (Estimate increased in 1916 to $418,860.) Additional improvements at estimated cost as follows: Guide walls and guard walls, 1 to 6, $1,255,130; Lengthen land chamber of lock 3 to 720 feet, $787,722; New chamber (360 feet long), lock 4, $699,786; Lock and dam 7, $1,161,241; Lock and dam 8, $1,165,758; Lock and dam 7 (second chamber), $419,126; Lock and dam 8 (second chamber), $504,465; Reconstruction dam 4, $397,211; Marine ways, repair plant, office and warehouse, $250,000, for a total of $6,640,439. Construct new locks and dam 2.5 miles below existing structure, at estimated cost of $2,175,000 in lieu of work authorized at old lock and dam 4. Chief of Engineers authorized to locate new locks and dam 4 above existing structure and on such site as they may deem most desirable. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Documents Annual Report 1886, p. 1545, Annual Report 1891, p. 2366 H. Doc. 204, 54th Cong., 1st Sess., and Annual Report 1896, p. 2212 H. Doc. 540, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 356, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 16, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 721, 71st Cong., 3d Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 27,73d Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report 1897, p. 2423 Annual Report 1909, p. 1756 Annual Report 1904, p. 460 H. Doc. 209, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 209, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1217, 62d Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 288, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 22, 70th Cong., 2d Sess. PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-B See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act May 17, 1950 Nov 17, 1986 Oct 31, 1992 5. Jan 11, 1934 Aug 30, 1935 8. Jun 28, 1938 9. Jun 28, 1938 10. Jun 28, 1938 AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION (Continued) Project and Work Authorized Modification of existing project as follows: Provide 2 new locks and dams similar to Morgantown lock and dam to replace existing locks and dams 12 to 15 inclusive. Provide a movable crest on existing dam 8 to raise existing pool-full elevation 4 feet. Provide a navigation channel of 300-foot minimum bottom width and a 9-foot project depth above lock and dam 8. Provide an extension of navigable channel of upper Monongahela River, into lower Tygart River for 2.1 miles at a maximum bottom width of 200 feet and a 9-foot project depth. Construct new lock and dam 7 (Grays Landing Lock and Dam) as follows: The Grays Landing Lock and Dam will be located 3.0 miles downriver from existing Lock and Dam 7. It will consist of a single lock chamber, 84 feet wide by 720 feet long, with a fixed crest dam 576 feet in length. The existing Maxwell Pool at elevation 763.0 will be shortened three miles and the existing Pool 7 at elevation 778.0 will be extended downriver to the new dam. There will be no change in pool elevation above existing Dam 7. Upon completion of the new replacement lock and dam, existing Lock and Dam 7 will be removed. Total authorized cost is $181,000,000. Replace existing 56'x360' lock chamber at Point Marion Lock and Dam (Lock and Dam 8) with new 84'x720' chamber. Existing movable crest dam to remain; no change in pool elevations. Total authorized cost is $53,600,000. Navigation improvements as follows: The project replaces the fixed crest dam at Locks and Dam 2 with a gated dam; raises the existing pool 2 by 5', constructs twin 84'x720' locks at Locks and Dam 4, and eliminates Locks and Dam 3; lowering the existing pool 3 by 3.2 feet. Authorized cost is $705,000,000. Cost of construction is to be paid equally from the general fund of the Treasury and the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. TYGART RIVER LAKE, WV Construction of a dam and reservoir for low water regulation and flood control ELKINS, WV For construction of local flood protection projects. JOHNSTOWN, PA For construction of local flood protection projects. PUNXSUTAWNEY, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA For construction of local flood protection projects. Documents S. Doc. 100, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. 3. Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1985 for Engineering and Design and Land Acquisition and Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 Sec. 301(a). Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1985 for Engineering and Design and Land Acquisition and Water Resources Development Act of 1986; Public Law 99-662 Sec. 301(a). Water Resources Development Act of 1992; PL 102-580 Sec 101 H. Doc. 1792, 64th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 106, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. 18-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Section in Text 14. 15. 16. Date Authorizing Act Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 modified by Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Project and Work Authorized BERLIN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. CROOKED CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. EAST BRANCH CLARION RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND NY Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation and recreation. Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, pollution abatement, low water regulation and recreation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. LOYALHANNA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. MAHONING CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. 18-20 Documents H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 300, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 17. 18. 19. 20. PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT See Section in Text 21. TABLE 18-B Documents Date Authorizing Act Jul 3, 1958 Jul 14, 1960 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Aug 28, 1937 Jun 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Jul 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Dec 30, 1963 Jun 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Aug 13, 1968 Jun 19, 1970 Mar 7, 1974 Oct 22, 1976 18-21 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Project and Work Authorized MICHAEL J. KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, low water regulation and recreation. To define cost-sharing arrangement for municipal & industrial water supply & water for pollution abatement purposes. MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low water regulation and water supply storage. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. OHIO RIVER BASIN- Pittsburgh District Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. Projects to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction. Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50,300,000 for local flood protection works. Additional $45 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including additional projects in tributary basins. Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan including additional projects in tributary basins. Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin. Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $38 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Authorized phase I design memorandum stage of advanced engineering and design of the project for abatement of acid mine drainage in the Clarion River Basin, Pa. 22. H. Doc. 191, 85th Cong. 1st Sess. Pub. Law 86-645 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 Flood Control Committee, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Committee, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 300, 76th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 762, 77th Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong. 1st Sess. S. Doc. 20, 81st Cong. 1st Sess. Public Law 88-253, 88th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 6755, 89th Cong., 90th Cong. 1st Sess. Public Law 90-17. 90th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Law 90-483, 90th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 15166, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 10203, 93rd Cong. River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974. Water Resources Development Act of 1976; Public Law 94-587, Sec. 101(a). 23. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 18-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Date Authorizing Act Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Nov 7, 1966 Jun 22, 1936 amended by Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended Oct 23, 1962 Oct 23, 1962 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 as amended See Section in Text 24. Project and Work Authorized Documents SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND OH Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low water regulation and recreation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, water supply, water quality control, area redevelopment and recreation. TIONESTA LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control and low water regulation. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. UNION CITY DAM, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control. WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, recreation and storage for water quality control. YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, PA AND MD Construction of a dam and reservoir for flood control, low-flow augmentation, and pollution abatement, purposes. Construction, operation & maintenance of recreation facilities. S. Doc. 95, 87th Cong. 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 95, 87th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 Included in the Emergency Relief program April 8, 1935. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. Public Res. 117, 71st. Cong., 3d Sess. Project Allegheny River, PA, open-channel work Buckhannon River, WV 12 Cheat River, WV 12 Pittsburgh Harbor, PA Status Completed Completed Completed Completed For Last Full Report See Annual Report For 1934 1893 1895 1922 Cost to September 30, 1997 Operations and Construction Maintenance 197,000 5,500 12,997 110,663 133,940 81,613 1. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. 2. No Commerce reported. 18-22 H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 S. Doc. 109, 89th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 306, 74th Cong. 1st Sess. FCC Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 1. 2. 3. TABLE 18-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 6 of Text) PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-E Project and Statu Flood Protection Specifically Authorized Projects Completed: Bradford, PA Brookville, PA Buckhannon, WV Butler, PA DuBois, PA Elkins, WV4 Johnsonburg, PA Johnstown, PA4 5 Kittanning, PA, Part I Latrobe, PA Latrobe, PA Olean, NY Portage, PA Portville, NY Punxsutawney, PA4 Reynoldsville, PA Ridgeway, PA (Elk Creek) Salamanca, NY Turtle Creek, PA3 Washington, PA Wellsville, OH, Section I Wellsville, OH, Section II Youngstown, OH Deferred: Benwood, WV Authorized by Chief of Engineers Completed: Amsterdam, OH Big Run, PA Burgettstown, PA Friendsville, MD Girty's Run, Millvale, PA Granville, PA Leetonia, OH Oil City, PA Oil City Ice Control Structures Root Creek, Bolivar, NY Slovan, PA Sykesville, PA Tarentum, PA Tenmile Creek at Marianna, PA West Little Pine Creek, Etna, PA Wilmore, PA OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (All Projects Not Specifically Identified in Text) For Last Cost to September 30, 1997 Full Report See Annual Construction Non-Federal Opel s Report For (Federal Cost) Cost Mai 1962 1963 1972 1970 1979 1958 1949 1951 1970 1954 1965 1954 1959 1964 1972 1972 & 1997 1964 1956 1956 1976 1954 1964 1965 1986 1987 1986 1964 1981 7,601,763 964,976 1,568,661 1,556,181 4,464,607 1,772,627 674,664 14,799,511 130,317 207,659 2,556,652 3,217,531 150,386 2,070,484 3,586,107 385,494 628,888 2,880,535 20,657,508 789,093 483,910 157,633 3,621,134 1,895,000 289,000 75,000 534,000 910,000 40,000 130,000 2,000 44,400 698,000 597,000 14,900 353,000 180,485 26,000 72,000 465,000 4,180,720 323,000 113,000 152,200 81,028 183,072 364,208 83,129 41,529 2,655,934 75,908 89,299 43,595 3,927,792 1,591,436 57,811 184,246 136,591 1,554,428 2,021,852 96,853 22,500 35,900 2,200 701,722 3,000 17,200 25,000 9,000 24,600 86,200 1,300 18-23 ration and intenance REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 18-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) Project and Status For Last Full Report See Annual Report For Cost to September 30, 1997 Construction (Federal Cost) Non-Federal Cost Operation and Maintenance Active: Ridgeway & Vicinity (on Clarion River)2 Inactive: Black Fork at Hendricks, WV Oakdale, PA Rouseville, PA Wallace, WV1 Weston Mills, Olean, NY Weston Mills, Portville, NY Reservoirs Other: Rowlesburg Lake, WV 1. Lacks local support. 2. No longer economically justified. 3. Includes $13,510,352 (Federal) and $1,840,000 (Non- Federal) original construction cost. 4. Reported in detail in an individual report. 5. Includes $5,934,123 Major Rehab. Costs. 18-24 1979 1972 132,464 6,800 14,127 1,642 11,035 50,100 52,100 1977 2,873,799 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Adena, OH (Short Creek) Allegany, NY Unit I (Allegheny River) 1 Allegany, NY Unit II (Five Mile Creek Area) 1 Bellaire, OH Brackenridge, Tarentum and Natrona, PA1 Brilliant, OH Brockway, PA (Allegheny River Basin) Clarington, OH Coraopolis, PA Dillonvale, OH (Short Creek) Eagle Creek Reservoir, OH Empire-Stratton, OH Follansbee, WV Freeport, PA (Allegheny River) Industry, PA Kittanning, PA, part II (Allegheny River) Lake Chautauqua and Chadakoin River, NY2 Lake Erie-Ohip Canal, OH and PA - 1935 Act Leetsdale, PA 1 Martins Ferry, OH1 McKees Rocks, PA Mingo Junction, QH Moundsville, WV Muddy Creek Dan, PA' Neville Island, PA New Cumberland, WV New Kensington and Parnassus, PA1 Pittsburgh, PA (Golden Triangle) Pittsburgh, PA (North Side) Pittsburgh, PA (The Ptrip) Powhaten Point, OH Proctor, WV Redbank Creel Lake, PA Rochester, PA St. Marys, PA (Allegheny River Basin) Smith Ferry, PA Uniontown, P4 Warwood, WV Wellsburg, WV West Bridgewater, PA Wheeling, WV Wheeling, WV (North Wheeling) 1 Wheeling, VV (Wheeling Island) Wilcox, PA 1 Woodlands, WV 1 Youghiogheny River, PA and MD (Canalization) 4 1. Deauthorized under Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL99-662). 2. Local Interests failed to meet requirements of cooperation, authority for project expired Mar. 2, 1970. 1975 1965 1972 1941 1977 1956 1954 1971 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 May 6, 1981 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Jan 1, 1990 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 6, 1977 Mar 2, 1970 May 6, 1981 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Oct 3, 1978 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17,1986 Oct 3, 1978 Oct 3, 1978 Oct 3, 1978 Nov 17 ,1986 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Jan 1, 1990 Nov 17 ,1986 Aug 5, 1977 Aug 5, 1977 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Mar 5, 1955 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 13,452 4,100 64,851 76,487 194 16,884 100,000 33,031 190,722 1,342,000 25,164 402,459 156,377 13,529 6,387 189,067 21,700 16,761 232,863 3. Local interests failed to meet requirements of cooperation, authority for project expired Mar. 5, 1955. 4. Includes $47,195 construction costs expended under previous project and $1,700 O&M costs expended under previous project. 18-25 TABLE 18-H ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA.: LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 1 of Text) Dimensions Upper Avail- Normal Depth on Character Width able Lift at Pool Miter Sills at of Type of Year of Length Normal Elevation Normal Pool Foundation Construction Per Opened Miles Cham- to Full Pool (feet, Level' cent to Above ber Width Level mean sea Lower Upper Kind Com- Naviga- No Mouth Nearest Town (Feet) (Feet) (Feet) level) (Feet) (Feet) Lock Dam of Dam Lock Dam plete tion Actual Cost 2 6.7 Aspinwall, PA 56 360 11.0 721.0 12.0 10.9 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19342 $1,763,485 3 14.5 Cheswick, PA 56 360 13.8 734.8 10.8 11.8 Rock Pile-Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 19342 1,875,665 4 24.2 Natrona, PA 56 360 10.6 745.4 10.0 8.5 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1927 1,707,690 5 30.4 Freeport, PA 56 360 11.6 757.0 10.5 10.3 Piling Crib-Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1927 1;940,537 6 36.3 Clinton, PA 56 360 12.4 769.4 10.6 10.8 Rock Crib-Pile Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1928 1,523,959 7 45.7 Kittanning, PA 56 360 13.0 782.4 9.8 10.9 Piling Steel Sheet Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1930 1,460,008 Piling 8 52.6 Templeton, PA 56 360 17.8 800.2 10.4 13.8 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1931 2,848,920 9 62.2 Rimer, PA 56 360 22.0 822.2 10.5 11.3 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Concrete 100 1938 2,510,373 Total $ 15,630,637 Abandoned lock and daml 591,187 Abandoned lock and dam 2 544,929 Abandoned lock and dam 3 310,103 Demolishing old dam 1 26,001 Dredging channel 1,055,003 Total $18,157,860 1. All depths as shown are on guard sills and are controlling depth. 2. Dates shown represent replacement structures. O 0 0.] C 0 r r 3 C, C C3 CC n 0 r C3 o J) TABLE 18-I1 MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. AND W.V.: LOCKS AND DAMS (See Section 3 of Text) Dimensions Upper Depth on Avail- Normal Miter Sills at Character Width able Lift at Pool Normal Pool of Type of Year of Length Normal Elevation Level' Foundation Construction Per Opened Miles Cham- to Full Pool (feet, cent to Above ber Width Level mean sea Lower Upper Kind Corn- Naviga- No Mouth Nearest Town (Feet) (Feet) (Feet) level) (Feet) (Feet) Lock Dam of Dam Lock Dam plete tion Actual Cost 2 11.2 Braddock, PA 56 110 3 23.8 Elizabeth, PA 563 4 41.5 Charleroi, PA 563 -- 61.2 Maxwell locks 843 and dam, Maxwell, PA -- 82.2 Grays Landing 84 lock and dam, Grays Landing, PA -- 90.8 Point Marion 84 lock and dam, Point Marion, PA -- 102.0 Morgantown lock 84 and dam, o Morgantown, WV -- 108.0 Hildebrand lock 84 and dam, 6 miles above Morgantown, WV -- 115.4 Opekiska lock 842 and dam, 13.4 miles above Morgantown, WV 360 720 360 720 360 720 720 8.7 718.7 16.0 15.95 Rock Crib Pile 8.2 726.9 11.6 11.9 Rock Crib Pile 16.6 743.5 10.7 20.0 Piles Piles 19.5 763.0 15.0 20.5 Rock Rock 720 15.0 778.0 18.0 26.0 Rock Rock 720 19.0 797.0 16.2 16.2 Rock Rock 600 17.0 814.0 14.5 17.8 Rock Rock 600 21.0 835.0 15.0 14.0 Rock Rock 600 22.0 857.0 14.0 17.75 Rock Rock Fixed Concrete Fixed Concrete Gated Concrete Gated Concrete Fixed Concrete Gated Concrete Gated Concrete Gated Concrete Gated Concrete Concrete 100 19532 Concrete 100 19532 Concrete 100 19322 Concrete 100 19642 Concrete 83 1994 Concrete 100 19932 Concrete 100 19502 Concrete 100 19592 Concrete 100 19642 $36,211,203 57 17,638,755 58 19,744,071 56 30,110,889 5 173,668,383 9 118,428,224 4 5 ' 8,778,0005 12,506,829 S 25,179,622 5 Marine ways, etc Abandoned lock and dam 1 Abandoned lock and dam 4 Abandoned lock and dam 5 Abandoned lock and dam 6 Abandoned lock and dam 7 Abandoned lock and dam 8 Abandoned lock and dam 9 Abandoned lock and dam 10 Abandoned lock and dam 11 Abandoned lock and dam 12 Abandoned lock and dam 13 Abandoned lock and dam 14 Abandoned lock and dam 15 Dredging channel Total 250,000 1,019,907 ' 780,816 ' 1,074,812 770,449 2,853,580 10 245,900 191,000 210,445 227,668 200,550 190,691 210,127 175,829 $45$145,215,255,56,64499 l TABLE 18-I MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA. AND W.VA.: LOCKS AND DAMS (see Section 3 of Text) 1. All depths as shown are on guard sills and are controlling depth. 2.. Dates shown for locks and dams number 2 to 8 inclusive, represent reconstruction. 3. 2 Chambers. 4. Includes $3,322,057 for raising crest of dam, (1958-9), $2,086,438 for original reconstruction (1923-1926), $618,758 AE&D costs for replacement of lock, and $112,400,971 for replacement of lock ($56,075,683 CG funds; $56,325,288 from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund). 5. Actual cost: may include estimated costs which have been footnoted as necessary. 6. Includes $2,173,767 for original reconstruction (1931-2), and $15,080,304 for reconstruction of dam (1963-1967). 7. Includes $16,967,114 for reconstruction of locks. 8. Includes $15,857,000 for major rehabilitation. 9. Includes AE&D costs for proposed lock ($803,000) and $86,902,515 expended from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. 10. Includes $213,776 original project and $2,639,804 for reconstruction (1925). 0 0 0 C2 O 0e O z A O d Yt A r+a m m3 v3 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-J MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA AND WV: TOTAL COSTS OF EXISTING PROJECT TO END OF FISCAL YEAR (See Section 3 of Text) Operation and Maintenance, General Total Regular Maintenance and operation Public Works acceleration, executive (1963) Total $451,255,64913 $451,255,6491 3 $284,815,9682 452,623 22,549 $285,291,1402 $736,071,617 12 3 452,623 22,549 $736,546,789123 1. Includes $5,420,541 for new work for previous projects. 2. Includes $20,446,587 expended between July 7, 1897 and June 30, 1937, on operation and care of works of improvement under provisions of permanent appropriation for such purposes and excludes $742 for maintenance of previous projects. 3. Includes $15,857,000 for major rehabilitation of L/D 3; $166,026,462 for replacement of L/D 7 ($83,271,383 provided by Inland Waterways Trust Fund); and $109,552,616 for replacement of the lock at Point Marion Lock and Dam ($54,845,083 provided by Inland Waterways Trust Fund). TABLE 18-K OHIO RIVER BASIN (PITTSBURGH DISTRICT): RESERVOIRS (See Section 22 of Text) Tributary Basin and Reservoir Total Stream Cost Allegheny: Conemaugh River, PA Crooked Creek, PA East Branch Clarion River, PA Kinzua Dam and Allegheny Reservoir, PA and NY Loyalhanna, PA Mahoning Creek, PA Tionesta, PA Union City, PA Woodcock Creek, PA Beaver: Berlin, OH Michael J. Kirwan, OH Mosquito Creek, OH Shenango River, PA and OH Monongahela: Stonewall Jackson Lake, WV Youghiogheny River, PA and MD Conemaugh River Crooked Creek Clarion River Allegheny River Loyalhanna Creek Mahoning Creek Tionesta Creek French Creek Woodcock Creek Mahoning River Mahoning River Mosquito Creek Shenango River West Fork River Youghiogheny River $46,012,411 4,482,933 9,539,586 112,226,07( 5,727,531 7,144,973 7,792,378 14,559,800 20,545,065 8,739,987 17,376,097 4,253,029 40,217,201 $211,245,0932 12,521,167 1. Includes $2,921,000 for dam rehabilitation. 2. Actual cost. Latest cost estimate (1991) is $231,000,000. 18-29 Funds New Work REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 18-L INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 29 of Text) Dates of Inspection Project Dates of Inspection Amsterdam, OH Big Run, PA Bolivar, NY Bradford, PA Brookville, PA Buckhannon, WV Burgettstown-Slovan, PA Butler, PA Chartiers Creek, PA Cannonsburg-Houston Reach James G. Fulton Reach Colliers, WV DuBois, PA Eldred, PA Etna, PA Friendsville, MD Granville, PA Johnsonburg, PA Kittaning, PA Latrobe, PA Leetonia, OH Apr 1996 Aug 1995 May 1997 Apr 1997 Mar 1995 Oct 1997 Jan 1997 Apr 1996 Jan 1997 Nov 1996 Sep 1994 Oct 1996 Apr 1987 Mar 1996 Jan 1997 Jan 1997 Apr 1997 Apr 1997 Sep 1997 May 1996 Marianna, PA Millvale, PA Oil City Ice Control Structure, Allegheny River, PA Oil City LPP-(Dike), PA Olean, NY Portage, PA Portville, NY Reynoldsville, PA Ridgway, PA Salamanca, NY Stonewood-Nutter Fort, WV Sykesville, PA Tarentum, PA Turtle Creek, PA Washington, PA Wellsville, OH Weston, WV Wilmore, PA Youngstown, OH 18-30 Project May 1997 Mar 1996 May 1997 May 1997 May 1997 Dec 1995 May 1997 Apr 1997 Apr 1997 Oct 1995 Jun 1992 Aug 1995 Sep 1997 Sep 1987 Dec 1994 Sep 1997 Oct 1996 Nov 1996 May 1996 PITTSBURGH, PA., DISTRICT TABLE 18-M FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 31 of Text) Flood Control Activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization) Project/Study Identification Cheat River Basin FWS, WV Connellsville, PA (initial appraisal) Connoquenessing Cr, Marion Twp. Connoquenessing Cr, North Sewickley Twp. Coordination Account (Sec 205) Jackson Twp., Butler Co., PA Mahoning River, Struthers, OH Oil City, Titusville, PA Total Cost for Current Fiscal Year: Fiscal Year Costs 260,474 14,785 61,244 9,501 4,358 8,992 7,261 $366,710 Emergency Streambank Protection - Section 14 of the 1846 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress Project/Study Identification Brush Creek, Jeannette, PA (planning & design analysis) Buffalo Creek, Freeport, PA (planning & design analysis) Chubb Run, Franklin, PA (completed) Conneaut Lake, PA (awaiting construction approval) Coordination Account (Sec 14) French Creek, Wattsburg, PA (construction) Mahoning River, Warren, OH (completed) Moundsville, Ohio River, WV (planning & design analysis) Ohio River, Chester, WV (planning & design analysis) Sewage Treatment Plant, Point Marion, PA (planning & design analysis) Fiscal Year Costs 1,587 26,801 636 (103) 3,916 292,236 (1,519) 46,991 12,110 7,165 Total Cost for Current Fiscal Year: $389,820 18-31 OHIO RIVER For actual construction of locks and dams, and operation and care of completed structures, river is divided into three sections under immediate supervision and direction of District Engineers at Pittsburgh, Huntington, and Louisville. Pittsburgh section extends 127 miles from head of river at Pittsburgh, PA, to a point immediately upstream from New Martinsville, WV, and includes Emsworth, Dashields, Montgomery, New Cumberland, Pike Island, and Hannibal Locks and Dams. Huntington section extends 311 miles from mile 127 to 438 immediately upstream from Foster, KY, and includes Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Robert C. Byrd, Greenup, and Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dams. Louisville section extends 543 miles from mile 438 to mouth of river, and includes Markland and McAlpine Locks and Dams (with Louisville and Portland Canal), Cannelton, Newburgh, John T. Myers, and Smithland Locks and Dams, and Locks and Dams 52 and 53. Improvements Navigation 1. Construction of locks and dams on O hio River ...................................................... 19-1 2. Open channel work, Ohio River ................... 19-3 Tables Table 19-A Cost and Financial Statement....... 19-4 Table 19-B Authorizing Legislation .............. 19-5 Table 19-C Not Applicable Table 19-D NotApplicable Table 19-E Not Applicable Navigation 1. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS ON OHIO RIVER Location. Ohio River is formed by junction of Allegheny and Monongahela Rivers at Pittsburgh, PA, and flows generally southwesterly for 981 miles to join Mississippi River near Cairo, IL. For description of river see page 1227, 1932 Annual Report. Previous Projects. For details see page 1907 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for improvement of entire river by construction of locks and dams to provide channel depth of 9 feet and for widening Louisville and Portland Canal at Louisville, KY. Project provides for a lock with usable dimensions of 110 by 600 feet at each of the dams and, in addition, an auxiliary lock 56 by 360 feet is available at Emsworth, Dashields, Montgomery, and McAlpine Locks and Dams with an auxiliary lock at Robert C. Byrd being 110 by 1,200 feet. Dashields and McAlpine are fixed dams, while Emsworth, Montgomery, and Robert C. Byrd are fixed dams with movable crests. Remaining dams are movable type, with navigable pass varying in width from 600 to 1,248 feet. In addition to navigable pass, movable-type dams are also provided with one or more regulating weirs. At McAlpine Locks and Dam, a canal (Louisville and Portland) extends along left bank for 2 miles, with locks at lower end. Modifica- Table 19-F NotApplicable Table 19-G NotApplicable Table 19-H Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River, Total Cost of Existing Project ..................................... 19-6 Table 19-I Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Licenses of Locks and Dams, Ohio River ................... 19-6 Table 19-J Ohio River Locks and Dams Statistics .................................... 19-7 tions to existing project under purview of Section 6, March 3, 1909 Act, provide for fixed dams with movable crests with two locks (110 by 1,200 feet and 110 by 600 feet) at New Cumberland, Pike Island, Hannibal, Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Greenup, Captain Anthony Meldahl, Markland, Cannelton, Newburgh, and John T. Myers; two locks 110 by 1,200 feet at Smithland; 110- by 1,200-foot temporary locks in addition to the existing locks at Locks and Dams 52 and 53, and reconstruction to provide a 110- by 1,200-foot lock in addition to existing locks and a fixed dam with two sections of movable crest at McAlpine Locks and Dam; widening Louisville and Portland Canal to 500 feet. Auxiliary lock 56 by 360 feet at McAlpine Locks and Dam has been inoperative since failure of downstream lock gates in December 1972. Rehabilitation of existing Locks and Dams 52 and 53 was started in September 1979 under the purview of Section 6, March 1909 Act. Mound City was also considered authorized under purview of 1909 Act, and preconstruction planning was performed in the period 1965 to 1972. The ruling of the U.S. District Court, District of Columbia, on September 6, 1974, with reference to Lock and Dam 26, Mississippi River, would also apply to this project. Consequently, it is no longer considered authorized. Operation and care of locks and dams were included in project July 1, 1935, under provisions of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act ofJune 26, 1934. Estimated Federal cost of new work (existing project, 1983), is $1,884,681,262; estimated non-Federal cost is $14,999,000. Foregoing 19-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 estimate does not include expenditures on previous projects. Various items previously included in this project are considered inactive or unnecessary and are excluded from foregoing cost estimate. See page 693, Annual Report, 1968, for items and estimated cost. Under authority of 1910 River and Harbor Act, Louisville and Portland Canal was widened to 200 feet; Locks and Dams 40 and 42 eliminated; Locks and Dams 1 and 2 replaced by Emsworth Locks and Dam; Lock and Dam 3 replaced by Dashields Locks and Dam; and Locks and Dams 4, 5, and 6 replaced by Montgomery Locks and Dam. Locks and Dams 24, 25, and 26 were replaced by Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam authorized by August 30, 1935, Act, and constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River. Locks and Dams 7, 8, and 9 were replaced by New Cumberland Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 10 and 11 were replaced by Pike Island Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 12, 13, and 14 were replaced by Hannibal Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 15, 16, and 17 were replaced by Willow Island Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 18, 19, and 20 were replaced by Belleville Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 21, 22, and 23 were replaced by Racine Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 27, 28, 29, and 30 were replaced by Greenup Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 31, 32, 33, and 34 were replaced by Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 35, 36, 37, 38, and 39 were replaced by Markland Locks and Dam; the Louisville and Portland Canal at McAlpine Locks and Dam was widened to 500 feet. Locks and Dams 43, 44, and 45 were replaced by Cannelton Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 46 and 47 were replaced by Newburgh Locks and Dam; Locks and Dams 48 and 49 were replaced by John T. Myers Locks and Dam, and Locks and Dams 50 and 51 were replaced by Smithland Locks and Dam, as modifications to existing project under purview of Section 6, March 3, 1909 Act, reducing total number of structures to 20. The Water Resources Development Act of 1974 combined the Newburgh Bank Protection Works project with the Newburgh Locks and Dam project. A December 1981 Act established the Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area near McAlpine Locks and Dam to protect and preserve existing fossilized coral and a diversity of wildlife. A November 17, 1988 Act authorized a replacement structure for Locks & Dams 52 & 53 at Olmsted, IL. A November 28, 1990 Act authorized an interpretive center at the Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area near McAlpine Locks & Dam and a replacement of the existing 110 foot x 600 foot lock at McAlpine Locks & Dam, IN & KY. Table 19-J contains data relative to various features of locks and dams included in existing project. For list of principal towns and cities along Ohio River with their mileage below Pittsburgh, PA, see page 1060, 1962 Annual Report. See Table 19-I for licenses. Navigation system of20 locks and dams is in operation and 9-foot navigation throughout length of river is generally available at all times. At certain unstable bars project depth is maintained by dredging, supplemented by contraction works. (See "Open Channel Work, Ohio River.") Table 19-J shows cost and year completion of locks and dams now in operation. Existing project does not provide adequate facilities for present day navigation due to obsolescence of structures. Since repair and modernization of these facilities would be extremely costly, replacement and reconstruction is being accomplished as rapidly as funds are made available for the purpose. Construction of lock and dam replacement program was initiated in Fiscal Year 1955. New Cumberland, Pike Island, Hannibal, Willow Island, Belleville, Racine, Greenup, Captain Anthony Meldahl, Markiand, McAlpine, Cannelton, Newburgh, John T. Myers, and Smithland replacement locks and dams are in operation, replacing 39 old low-lift locks and dams. For total cost of existing project, see Table 19-H. Terminal facilities. Modern public terminals, with warehouses, equipped with operating machinery for transferring materials, have been constructed by private interests at some of the larger cities and towns. A list of terminals on Ohio River is revised annually and can be obtained from Division Engineer, U.S. Army Engineer Division, Ohio River, Cincinnati, Ohio. Operations during fiscal year. New work by contract and hired labor: Willow Island Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated in January 1967. All work is complete. Belleville Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated in May 1962. All work is complete. Racine Locks and Dam: Construction initiated in June 1964 is complete. Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam: The existing project, constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River, was placed in operation in August 1937. The dimensions of the existing locks chambers and poor approach conditions, particularly to downstream traffic, have created a higher than normal accident rate to the structure with corresponding hazards and delays to traffic. The Water Resources Development Act of 1976 authorized Phase I studies for 1,200-foot locks in a bypass canal. These studies are complete. Initial Construction, General funds for the continuation of Engineering activities were received in September 1985. Real estate acquisition is complete. The contract for the Locks was awarded in October 1987 and is complete. The contract for the Dam Rehabilitation was awarded in June 1993 and is 87 percent complete. The total estimated cost of the project is $373 million, which is 50 percent federal cost and 50 percent Inland Waterways Trust Fund cost. Greenup Locks and Dam: Construction was initiated in October 1954. All work is complete. Captain Anthony Meldahl Locks and Dam: Construction work complete. Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area was authorized by Public Law 97-137 on December 29, 1981 and modified by Public Law 101-640 on November 28, 1990 to design and construct an interpretive center. The Conservation Area will protect 1,000 acres which consists of birdlife and other wildlife. Planning consisted of efforts to define facilities to be cost shared with local interests. All Real Estate tracts have been acquired and condemnation trials continue. A construction contract to 19-2 OHIO RIVER constructthe cost-shared recreation facilities was awarded on 30 September 1993, and completed in February 1995. McAlpine Locks and Dam: Project is complete except for alteration of lift section of railroad bridge that spans the upper end ofthe Louisville and Portland Canal which work is presently deferred. A replacement of the existing 110 foot x 600 foot lock with a new 110 foot x 1,200 foot lock was authorized by WRDA of 1990 in Public Law 101- 640. Construction has been initiated. Olmsted Locks & Dam: A replacement structure for Locks and Dams 52 & 53 was authorized by the WRDA of 1988 in Public Law 100-676 on 17 November 1988. Planning Engineering and Design continued. The dam prototype construction contract was awarded 18 March 1994 and is 94 percent complete. A contract to construct the lockwas awarded 6 December 1995 and has advanced to 37 percent completion. A contract to construct the Water Management Facilities at the Ballard Wildlife Management Area was awarded on 6 May 1996 and has advanced to 86 percent completion. In FY97, $70,080,583 was expended on the Olmsted project. Operation and maintenance, general. Locks and dams operated as required and necessary repairs and improvements made thereto and to operators' quarters, grounds and esplanades. Costs were $17,412,392 for Huntington District, $25,456,288 for Louisville District, and $15,731,328 for Pittsburgh District. 2. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER Location. Under jurisdiction of district engineer in whose district work is located. Portion of river included in project extends 974.7 miles from head of river at Pittsburgh, PA, to mouth of Cache River (Mound City, IL). Open channel improvement from mouth of Cache River to mouth of Ohio River is under jurisdiction of Mississippi River Commission. Existing Projects. Before completion of canalization project, no project depth had been fixed by Congress under project for open channel work; but, in order to properly aid packet and barge navigation, it was necessary to secure a low-water channel with a minimum depth of4 to 6 feet, and a width, depending upon difficulty of running channel, of 400-600 feet; also, to permit movement of large coal tows, which movement occurred at stages of water exceeding 10 feet, it was necessary to remove points of projecting bars which formed at various locations along river. Accomplishment of this purpose involved concentration of current by closing back channels at islands with low dams, contraction and straightening wide open channels by low dikes, dredging bars and shoals, and removal of snags and wrecks. Incidental to direct improvement of Ohio River is construction and maintenance of ice piers as required for protection of river craft. Stage of extreme high water on Ohio River varies from 46 feet at Pittsburgh, PA, to 80 feet at Cincinnati, OH, with 57.2 feet at Louisville, KY (head of falls, 53.8 feet at Evansville, IN, and 59.5 feet at Cairo, IL (mouth of river). Estimated cost of new work (1960) is $16.16 million, exclusive of following items which are considered inactive: Ice piers authorized by 1927 River and Harbor Act; reforestation of sloughs of Kentucky Peninsula near Evansville, IN, authorized by 1930 River and Harbor Act; dredging to widen channel at certain points; and placing revetment at various points. Estimated cost of these items (1954 is $6,565,000. Operation of snag boats on Ohio River below Pennsylvania State line was included in project July 1, 1935, under provisions of Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. See Table 19-B for authorizing legislation. New work under this project is substantially complete, since it is not anticipated that work on inactive portion of project will be accomplished. In addition to dredging, local stabilization of channel has been effected at various points by construction of dikes and revetment. Work which remains consists of dredging to widen channels at certain points to project depth. Local cooperation. River and Harbor Act of January 21, 1927, authorizing construction of ice piers for general open channel work, imposes condition that before work is begun on any pier, local interests convey to the United States free of cost such riparian rights as may be deemed necessary in connection with the improvements at locality (H. Doc. 187, 67th Congr., 2nd Sess.). Existing ice piers are adequate for present purposes and local cooperation is not needed since no additional construction is under consideration. River and Harbor Act of July 3, 1930, provides for reforestation of sloughs of Kentucky Peninsula and bank protection and that no expense shall be incurred by the United States for acquiring lands required for purpose of this improvement (H. Doc. 409, 69th Congr., 1st Sess.). However, since no serious overbank erosion has occurred since bank revetment in 1933-34, reforestation is not considered justifiable at this time and no local cooperation is required. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance, general: Dredging was done where required to provide an adequate and dependable channel of project depth at minimum pool conditions. Dikes and revetments were maintained and routine work of maintaining navigation aids, removing snags, making channel studies, hydrographic surveys and mapping was performed as required. Channel soundings, hydrographic surveys, stream gaging operations, channel inspections and aids to navigation, and miscellaneous inspections and reports cost $1,229,539. In FY 97 dredging by hired labor on the Ohio River totaled 3,324 cubic yards at $16,902. Dredging by contract: Huntington District, 689,130 cubic yards at $1,766,925. Louisville District 1,265,080 cubic yards at $2,536,055. 19-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Table 19-A Cost and Financial Statement See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep 30, 1997 (footnotes) 1. Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River 2. Open Channel Work, Ohio River New Work Approp. $110,632,000 Cost 61,329,159 Maint Approp. 52,090,500 Cost 52,213,210 Rehab. Approp. - Cost - Rehab. (O&M) Approp. - Cost - New Work Approp. - Cost - Maint. Approp. 5,328,100 Cost 5,833,128 Rehab. Approp. - Cost - $21,884,436 $47,746,000 64,796,592 65,860,939 54,116,000 53,311,000 53,869,472 53,785,905 - - 5,656,100 5,125,000 5,832,476 5,969,560 $82,267,653 $1,974,707,761 1 a5s1 0 17 21 82,495,874 1,972,405,420 13 6 11 12 5 16 18 22 56,903,026 1,063,421,639 2 4 19 58,600,008 1,061,532,717 2 13 14 19 20 - 82,972,138 - 82,972,138 - 33,914,252 - 33,914,252 - 15,962,260 8 - 15,962,260 8 5,636,283 162,106,264 7 9 5,549,421 161,912,144 7 9 - 944,649 - 944,649 1 Includes $17,003,761 for previous 6-foot canalization project. 2 Includes $36,943,217 expended from 1885 to 1937 on operation and care of work of improvement under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriations for such purposes. a Includes $215,812 public works acceleration, executive 1963. 4 Includes $38,766 public works acceleration, executive 1963. b Excludes $251,769 contributed funds for new work. 6 Excludes $250,102 contributed funds for new work. 7 Excludes $1,621,349 expended in operation of snag boats under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes, and $267 transferred to project without reimbursement. 8 Includes $1,040,236 Public Works funds. 9 Includes $1,000 for removal of obstructions in Licking River under authority of Section 3, R&H Act of 1930. a Includes $100,000 placed in Fiscal Year 1971 Budget Reserve. n Excludes $3,899 transferred from project without reimbursement. 2 Surplus property valued at $3,553 transferred to project without reimbursement. 13 Excludes $2,140 transferred to project without reimbursement. M Excludes surplus property valued at $73,832 transferred to project without reimbursement. Includes $87,724,158 prior construction cost. 16 Excludes surplus property valued at $297,385 transferred to project without reimbursement. 17 Includes $549,392 Code 710 Funds, $572,162 Code 711 Funds, $532,677 Code 712 Funds, and $1,759,812 Code 713 funds. ' Includes $549,392 Code 710 Funds, $342,162 Code 711 Funds, $532,677 Code 712 Funds, and $1,989,812 Code 713 Funds. 19 Includes $2,158,073 Funds provided from The Productive Employment Appropriations Act of 1983 (PL 98-8). ' Includes $920,945 cost for operations and care of previous projects. S1 Includes $296,099,000 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. a Includes $294,450,693 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. 19-4 OHIO RIVER Table 19-B Authorizing Legislation See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. Open Channel Work, Ohio River March 3, 1827 January 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 July 3, 1958 December 29, 1981 November 17, 1988 November 28, 1990 November 28, 1990 October 31, 1992 Project adopted by this act originally covered entire length of Ohio River from its mouth near Cairo to Pittsburgh, a distance of 981 miles. It provided for removal of all obstructions which tend to endanger steamboat navigation. Construct ice piers as a part of allotted from appropriations for general open channel work. Reforestation of sloughs on Kentucky Peninsula near Evansville, IN, and a 200-foot strip along bank and for bank protection, at an estimated cost of $200,000. Act of March 3, 1827, modified to include maintenance of existing Licking River Channel within lower 3-mile limit of river slack water, at an estimated increase of $1,000 in cost of average annual maintenance. Locks and Dams, Ohio River Act of December 29, 1981, established the 1,000-acre Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area, at a cost not to exceed $300,000. Act of November 17, 1988 authorized a replacement structure for Locks and Dams 52 and 53 at Olmsted, Illinois. Act of November 28, 1990, modified PL 97-137 by authorizing an interpretive center at Falls of the Ohio National Wildlife Conservation Area, at a estimated total cost of $3,200,000. Act of November 28, 1990 authorized a modernization of the existing 110 foot x 600 foot lock at McAlpine Locks and Dam, Indiana and Kentucky at a total cost of $219,600,000 with one-half appropriated from the Treasury and one-half from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund. Act of October 31, 1992 renamed the Gallipolis Locks and Dam to the Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam. H. Doc. 187, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 409, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 434, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. H.R. 2241, PL97-137, Title II, 95 Stat. 1710 PL 100-676, 100th Cong., 2nd Sess. PL 101-640, 101st Cong., 2nd Sess. PL 101-640, 101st Cong., 2nd Sess. PL 102-580, 102nd Cong., 2nd Sess. 19-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 19-H Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River Total Cost of Existing Project to September 30, 1997 -(See Section 1 of Text) Operations and Maintenance Funds New Work General Rehabilitation Total Regular $1,880,008,245 $1,020,571,000 $116,886,390 $3,017,465,635 Public Works 3,258,368 0 0 3,258,368 Emergency Relief 1,198,837 19,000 1,217,837 Maintenance & Operation 3,039,789 3,039,789 Public Works Acceleration 215,812 38,766 254,578 Executive 1963 0 Total $1,8884,681,262 3 $1,023,668,555 1,2 $116,886,390 4 $3,025,236,207 1Excludes $36,943,217 expended from 1885 to 1937 under 3Excludes $87,724,158 prior construction cost. permanent indefinite appropriation. 4Includes $33,914,252 cost for O & M Rehabilitation. 2Excludes $920,945 cost for operation and care of previous projects. Note: All other cost variations are listed in the Footnotes of Table 19-A. Table 19-I Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Licenses At Locks and Dams, Ohio River Markland Dam McAlpine Dam Racine Dam Greenup Dam Hannibal Dam F.E.R.C License License Annual Charge Collections to end of Fiscal Year 1997 Public Service Co. of Indiana $ 45,950.00 $1,422,561.64 Louisville Gas and Electric Co. $ 95,000.00 $9,100,353.84 Ohio Power Co. $ 64,232.00 $953,843.00 City of Vanceburg, City of New Kentucky Martinsville, WV $ 261,103.00 $3,629,265.00 -0- $197,589.03 19-6 2,211 289:1,000 2,570 2,614 3,206 Table 19-J Ohio River Locks and Dams (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, Miter Sills Actual Cost Lock Miles of For Full mean Character of Year to Date of and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Foundation Percent Opened to Each Lock Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Dam 1 - Replaced 6.2 EmsworthLocks and Dam, Emsworth, PA 2 - Replaced 3 - Replaced 13.3 Dashields Locks and Dam 1.6 miles below Sewickley, PA 4 - Replaced 5 - Replaced 6 - Replaced 31.7 Montgomery Locks and Dam, 1.4 miles above Industry, PA 7 - Replaced 8 - Replaced 54.4 New Cumberland Locks and Dam, Stratton, OH 9 - Replaced 10 - Replaced 11 - Replaced 84.3 Pike Island Locks and Dam, 2 miles upstream from Warwood, WV 12 - Replaced 13 - Replaced 14 - Replaced 126.4 Hannibal Locks and Dam, 1.6 miles upstream from New Martinsville, WV 15 - Replaced 16 - Replaced 161.7 Willow Island Locks and Dam, 2.7 miles above Waverly, WV 17 - Replaced 110 56 110 56 110 56 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110o 110o 600 360 600 360 600 360 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 600O 18.0 710.0 17.014 12.9 Rock Rock and 15.5 1 5 12.9 a Piles 10.0 692.0 17.5 682.0 20.5 664.5 21.0 644.0 13.41 16.01 17.53 Rock Rock 14.63 Rock Rock and and Piles Piles 7.01 14.83 Rock Rock 17.01 18.01 Rock Rock -- $ 870,034 100 1921 $ 43,347,635 2 14 - - 976,767 - - 1,144,588 100 1929 37,447,328 15 - - 1,071,472 - - 1,080,132 - - 1,123,442 100 1936 37,754,307 16 - - 1,075,000 - - 1,167,456 100 1959 39,099,688 - - 1,177,100 - - 1,138,000 - - 1,162,165 100 1968 56,623,946 1,166,104 1,222,389 1,133,371 21.0 20.0 623.0 602.0 38.0 35.0 17.0 Rock Rock 15.0 Rock and Piles - - Rock 99 1972 87,902,000 - - 1,180,478 - - 1,275,532 100 1972 78,173,881 1,362,591 0 0 Table 19-J (Continued) Ohio River Locks and Dams (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, Miter Sills Actual Cost Lock Miles of For Full mean Character of Year to Date of and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Foundation Percent Opened to Each Lock Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Dam - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 103.9 Belleville Locks and Dam, 0.3 mile below Reedsville, OH - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 237.5 Racine Locks and Dam, 1.5 miles below Letart Falls, OH - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 279.2 Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam, 0.7 mile below 6 Hogsett, WV Robert C. Byrd Modernization 110 110 110 110 1,200 600 22.0 1,200 600 22.0 582.0 560.0 37.0 15.03 Rock Rock and Piles 18.0 15.0 Rock Rock and Piles - - $ 1,362,591 - - 927,091 - - 1,213,848 - - 936,696 100 1968 62,591,255 - - 1,484,562 - - 1,218,798 - - 1,851,488 100 1971 64,922,680 - - 1,187,542 - - 1,925,205 - - 1,307,241 110 1,200 3,452,066 27 Rehab Dam and New Lock 27 - Replaced 28 - Replaced 29 - Replaced 30 - Replaced 341.0 Greenup Locks and Dam, 4.9 miles below Greenup, KY - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 436.2 CaptainAnthony Meldahl Locks and Dam, 2.2 miles 110 110 110 110 110 110 1,200 600 1,200 600 1,200 660000O 23.0 30.0 538.0 515.0 18.0 15.0 Rock Rock 18.01 13.0 Rock Rock 100 1992 326,368,649 17 - - 1,063,133 - - 1,088,802 - - 1,579,618 100 1959 57,464,191 1,359,231 2,951,216 1,937,166 3,437,057 30.0 485.0 18.01 15.0 Rock Rock 100 1962 74,188,216 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 31 32 33 34 0 0 IcmS C O O O Y O ea CI ca 0 Co Co Table 19-J (Continued) Ohio River Locks and Dams (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, Miter Sills Actual Cost Lock Miles of For Full mean Character of Year to Date of and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Foundation Percent Opened to Each Lock Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation and Dam above Foster, KY $ - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced - Replaced 531.5 Markland Locks and Dam, 1 mile above Markland, IN - Replaced - Eliminated Falls of the Ohio, 1 mile above McAlpine 604.0 McAlpine Locks and Dam (Reconstruction of Locks and Dam 41) - Eliminated - Replaced - Replaced 45 - Replaced 720.7 Cannelton Locks and Dam, 3 miles above Cannelton, IN 46 - Replaced 776.1 Newburgh Locks and Dam, 16 miles above Evansville, IN 47 - Replaced 48 Replaced - Replaced 846.0 Uniontown Locks and Dam, 3.5 miles below Uniontown, KY 110 110 N/A 110 110 56 110 110 1,200 600 N/A 1,200 600 360 1,200 600 35.0 455.0 50.0 15.0 Rock N/A N/A N/A N/A - N/A 49.0 37.0 420.0 25.0 383.0 12.0 19.0 19.0 11.0 Rock 11.0 Piles N/A Rock 38.0 13.0 Rock Rock - - 1,894,942 - - 3,704,535 - - 1,297,924 - - 2,857,040 100 1963 63,019,403 N/A 2,222,448 7,658,134 2,360,760 100 1961 59,446,843 " - - 2,592,242 - - 2,819,930 - - 3,202,890 100 1972 99,032,866 10 3,129,028 110 1,200 110 600 110 110 1,200 600 16.0 22.0 358.0 342.0 32.0 34.0 16.0 Rock Pile 99 1975 104,496,840 12.0 Rock Rock - - 4,415,526 - - 3,062,710 - - 3,325,964 99 1975 100,326,373 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 O 0 r 49 Table 19-J (Continued) Ohio River Locks and Dams (See Section 1 of Text) Lock Dimensions Upper Normal Greatest Pool Length Elevation Depth on Width Available (feet, MiterSill Actual Cost Lock Miles of For Full mean Character of Year to Date of and Below Distance From Chamber Width Lift sea Upper Lower Foundation Percent Opened to Each Lock Dam Pittsburgh Nearest Town (feet) (feet) (feet) (level) (feet) (feet) Lock Dam Complete Navigation andDam 50 - Replaced - - - - - - - - - - $ 3,571,762 51 - Replaced - - - - - - - - - -4,370,566 918.5 Smithland Locks 110 1,200 and Dam, 2 110 1,200 22.0 324.0 34.0 12.0 Rock Rock 99 1980 273,725,471 miles above Smithland, KY 52 938.9 1.4 miles below 110 600 12.0 302.0 15.4 11.0 Pile Pile 100 1928 13,337,747 " Brookport, IL 938.9 1.4 miles below 110 1,200 12.0 302.0 15.4 11.0 Pile Pile 100 1969 10,197,516 Brookport, IL (New lock) 964.4 Olmsted Locks & 110 1,200 21.0 300.0 18.0 18.0 Pile Pile 12 2007 241,783,159 " Dam at Olmsted, IL 53 962.6 10.8 miles 110 600 13.4 290.0 15.4 9.6' Pile Pile 100 1929 10,004,240 12 above Mound City, IL 962.6 10.8 miles 110 1,200 13.4 290.0 15.4 9.6 Pile - 100 1982 38,570,920 above Mound City, IL (New lock) 974.2 Mound City - - - - - - - - -1,539,470 Lock and Dam, 1 mile below Mound City, IL TOTAL $2,082,278,405 20 0 1Depths are on emergency dam foundation and recontrolling depths. 2 Change from fixed dam to lift-gate dam completed in 1938. 3 Depths are on poiree dam foundation and are controlling depths. 'Land chamber. 'River chamber. ' Roller-gate dam. Cost not included in total. Constructed under project for improving lower Kanawha River. 7Lock and Dam 41 completed with 110- by 600-foot lock in 1921. Completed with new dam and raised canal and lock wall in 1928. Auxiliary 56- by 360-foot lock constructed in 1929-30. Reconstruction and modernization began 1956, renamed McAlpine Locks and Dam in 1960. Operation of auxiliary lock suspended in 1971. 'Existing structures are complete except for deferred alteration of railroad bridge. Construction of the new 110 foot x 1,200 foot lock has not yet begun. ' Dam below not yet constructed. Depth on lower miter sill at lower water. 1Excludes $2,219,975 payment for settlement of damage to dam caused by barge accident in April 1978. "Major rehabilitation ($8,876,000) initiated in FY 79 is complete. "Major rehabilitation ($4,593,572) initiated in FY 79 is complete. " For preconstruction planning 1965 to 1972. No longer considered authorized. (See Section 1 of Text.) " Includes $37,485,870 for major rehabilitation completed in FY 84 "15Includes $33,914,252 for major rehabilitation completed in FY 90 (O&M funds). 16 Includes $33,016,696 for major rehabilitation completed in FY 89. 17Includes $167,445,756 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. "18Includes $120,904,012 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. "9Includes $6,047,099 Inland Waterways Trust Funds. 20 Exclusive of $7,013,405 details below. Additional FeaturesEnteringinto Cost of Project Louisville and Portland Canal and Indiana chute (under previous project) Examinations, survey contingencies, plants, and miscellaneous Waterfront Development at Huntington, WV (Greenup Pool). Recreation facilities, pool area, Gallipolis Locks and Dam TOTAL GRANDTOTAL $ 5,359,203 966,232 19,170 668,800 7,013.405 $2,089,291,810 0 O I0 C2 i A A1 0 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT * The district comprises OH, northwestern PA and western and northern NY, embracing U.S. waters of Lake Erie exclusive of a small portion of western end, Lake Ontario, and St. Lawrence River, with their tributary drainage basins from boundary between the states of OH and MI to international boundary line east of Frontier, NY. IMPROVEMENTS NAVIGATION Pg. FLOOD CONTROL Ashtabula Harbor, OH Black Rock Chnl & Tonawanda Hbr, NY Buffalo Harbor, NY Cleveland Harbor, OH Conneaut Harbor, OH Dunkirk Harbor, NY Erie Harbor, PA Fairport Harbor, OH Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY Huron Harbor, OH Irondequoit Bay, NY Little Sodus Bay Harbor, NY Lorain Harbor, OH Oak Orchard, NY Olcott Harbor, NY Oswego Harbor, NY Port Clinton Harbor, OH Rochester Harbor, NY Rocky River, OH Sandusky Harbor, OH Toledo Harbor, OH Vermilion Harbor, OH West Harbor, OH Wilson Harbor, NY Envmntl Review Guide for Operations Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys Other Authorized Navigation Projects 20-2 20-2 20-3 20-3 20-4 20-4 20-5 20-5 20-6 20-6 20-6 20-6 20-7 20-7 20-8 20-8 20-9 20-9 20-9 20-10 20-10 20-10 20-11 20-11 20-11 20-11 20-11 32. Mount Morris Lake, NY Genesee River 33. Reno Beach-Howard Farms Area, OH 34. Inspection of Completed Flood Ctrl Projects 35. National Emergency Preparedness 36. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 37. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization URBAN STORM WATER MGMT 38. Onondaga Storm Water Discharge 39. Proj Modifications for Improvement of Environment DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 40. Deauthorized Projects GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 41. Surveys 42. Collection and Study of Basic Data 43. Preconstruction Engineering 44. Advance Engineering and Design SHORE PROTECTION 29. Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, PA 30. Other Authorized Shore Protection Proj 31. Shore Protection Proj Under Special Auth 20-12 20-13 20-13 20-1 Pg. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 20-13 20-13 20-13 20-13 20-13 20-14 20-14 20-15 20-15 20-15 20-15 20-15 20-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 NAVIGATION 1. ASHTABULA HARBOR, OH Location. On the south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Ashtabula River, 59 miles easterly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14836.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1963 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1593 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description see pgs. 1297-99 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost of completed project is $12,240,147. Non-Federal costs of $5,743,000, including contribution of $47,000, were for construction of access roads, docks, storage and handling facilities and dockside dredging. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $47,000 for work authorized by 1936 and 1970 acts. Terminal Facilities. There are sixteen piers and wharves. One facility is owned by Coast Guard. Ten facilities are along banks of Ashtabula River and six are on south side of outer harbor. Eleven terminals have railroad connections and six have mechanical handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $53,711. Environmental activities cost $53,183. Real estate activities cost $20,580. Engineering and design cost $148,786. Operations supervision and administration cost $8,313. Supervision and administration of contracts cost $17,023. Involvement with Ashtabula River Partnership, comprised of local, private and government agencies to address remediation of contaminated sediments in the Harbor and Ashtabula River system, and continuing investigation for the Comprehensive Management Plan/ Environmental Impact Statement (CMP/EIS) regarding dredging and construction of a new Confined Disposal Facility for toxic and non-toxic sediments cost $91,729. 2. BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, NY Location. Improvement is essentially that of upper 13.5 miles of Niagara River from its head at Lake Erie, Buffalo, NY, to and including Tonawanda Harbor, NY. It comprises improvements formerly designated by three titles; viz, Lake Erie entrance to Black Rock Harbor and Erie Basin, NY, Black Rock Harbor and Channel, NY and Tonawanda Harbor and Niagara River, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14832.) Previous Projects. For details see items 5 and 7, pg. 1970 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1612 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description of existing project and Federally owned Black Rock ship lock, see pg. 1548 of Annual Report for 1962. Improvement of guide pier at Black Rock Lock, as authorized by 1935 act was deauthorized by Congress in Aug 1977. Cost for completed portion of new work is $10,457,093. Enlarging of existing 21-foot turning basin and deepening lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda Inner Harbor from 16 to 21 feet, authorized by the 1954 act, was deauthorized by Congress in May 1981, and is excluded from foregoing cost. Non-Federal costs are estimated at $1,540,000 for costs incurred by NY State for construction of Erie Basin and protecting breakwater, and construction and extension of Bird Island Pier, and by other local interest for relocation of utilities. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for existing project. Contract for cost-shared recreation development at completed projects (Code 713 program) was executed by the NY State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY on Apr 16, 1985, and was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army and Chief of Engineers on May 3, 1985. Terminal Facilities. Two facilities are along upstream end of channel. Below Black Rock Lock and at Tonawanda Harbor there are 13 privately owned terminals. There are two State-owned barge canal terminals at Tonawanda, NY, and several marine service and supply docks for recreational and other small craft. The Corps owns a wharf adjacent to Black Rock Lock which is private. Ten terminals have railroad connections and six mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (Port Series No. 41, revised 1971, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Operation and care (Black Rock Lock): Lock was in operation 256 days and closed for annual winter maintenance from Jan 14, 1997 through May 3, 1997. Ordinary maintenance and repair of structures and grounds was accomplished throughout the year by the U.S. Derrickboat McCauley. Total costs of $3,507,832 were distributed as follows: Operation and care of lock, ordinary maintenance and repair and environmental compliance cost $307,003. Real estate activities, project condition sediment surveys, and support of Water Control Center cost $79,903. 20-2 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Operation Supervision and administration cost $21,662. $510,851 was expended for snagging and clearing and repairs to the guardrails and culverts. $216,910 was expended for supervision and administration of contracts. $2,371,503 was expended for maintenance of the lock. Repairs were made to rehabilitate the upper east guide wall, the control houses, and the wharf wall. 3. BUFFALO HARBOR, NY Location. At eastern end of Lake Erie, at head of Niagara River, 176 miles easterly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14820 and 14833.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1967 of Annual Report for 1915 and pg. 1606 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description see pg. 1368 of Annual Report for 1963. In addition, on Dec 15, 1980, OCE authorized the removal of bridge abutments of South Michigan Avenue Bridge. New work for completed project cost $18,837,601. Estimated non-Federal costs were $9,188,000 for deepening, widening, and improving Buffalo River and ship canal, constructing piers, retaining walls, and dikes and performing dock-side dredging. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are 27 piers, wharves and docks of which five are on the Outer Harbor, nine are on the Lackawanna, Union, and Buffalo Ship Canals, and thirteen are located along the deep-draft section of the Buffalo River. Gateway Metroport, Division of Gateway Trade Center, Inc., owns and operates for the former Bethlehem Steel Corp. wharves at Lackawanna for the receipt and shipment of general cargo and bulk commodities. Buildings of the former steel plant are utilized for transit and long-term storage of cargo as required. The Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority owns Terminals A and B in the Outer Harbor used for handling general cargo. Twenty terminals have railroad connections. The city of Buffalo owns a slip on the right bank of Buffalo River just north of Michigan Avenue Bridge for mooring the city fireboat. Coast Guard facilities are at the mouth of Buffalo River along the left bank. (See Port Series No. 41, revised 1991, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, condition sediment surveys, water control management and real estate activities cost $223,661. Environmental activities by contract and hired labor, cost $126,979. Costs for structure repairs were $678,091. $18,900 was expended to begin dredging by contract. The dredging contract will be finalized in FY97. Operations supervision and administration cost $26,551. Survey quantity calculations costs were $23,876. $30,438 was expended for supervision and administration of contracts. $22,697 was expended for engineering and design. 4. CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Cuyahoga River, 176 miles westerly from Buffalo, NY (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14839). Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1962, Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1585, Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description of existing project, as authorized through the 1966 modification, see pg. 1269 of Annual Report for 1967. Further improvements in the interest of commercial navigation and recreational navigation were authorized in the 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (PL 99-88). For details of the commercial navigation portion of the project, see pg. 20-4 of the Annual Report for 1995. For details of the recreational navigation portion of the project, see pg. 20-3 of Annual Report for 1994. The recreational navigation project was also authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) and the FY88 Energy and Water Appropriations Act (PL 100-202). These acts also authorized additional undefined improvements to Cleveland Harbor. A portion of the project was deauthorized by the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991. Estimated total Federal cost of the existing project is $33,852,100 (Oct 1991) exclusive of undefined, inactive and deferred portions of the project. The amount of $29,315,100 is for completed work and the balance of $4,537,000 is for new work. Estimated non-Federal cost is $13,740,000 (Oct 1991) of which $9,203,000 is actual cost for completed work and the balance of $4,537,000 is required for work authorized by PL 99-88, PL 99-662, and PL 100-202. Remaining work authorized by 1946 River and Harbor Act, consisting of widening and deepening the right bank of Cuyahoga River at the downstream end of Cut 4, is considered inactive and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated Federal cost (1966) of this portion is $85,600 and non-Federal cost (1966) $5,000,000. Remaining work authorized by 1958 R&H Act, consisting of planning and replacement of bridges number 19 (E.L.R.R.) and 32 (B. & O.R.R.) and widening Cuyahoga and Old 20-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 River channels, and remaining work authorized by the 1960 R&H Act, consisting of deepening the remainder of Cuyahoga River from bridge number 1 to and including the Old River to a depth of 27 feet, has been classified as deferred and is also excluded from foregoing estimate. Estimated Federal cost (Oct 1976) of this portion is $18,033,300 and estimated non-Federal cost (Oct 1976) is $21,251,000. The 1989 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act (PL 101-101) authorized the Corps to begin a Reconnaissance study of the Cuyahoga River, to address the concerns of boat traffic congestion and related risks, accidents and safety of the public. Preliminary plans were studied to alleviate the commercial navigation problem and inadequate width and depth, in the Old and Cuyahoga Rivers. The cost of this Reconnaissance study was $250,000. The Reconnaissance Report recommended a feasibility study for one plan which has three structural features and the potential for yielding commercial (priority) outputs. The non-Federal sponsor did not commit to provide its total share of the cost of the feasibility phase of the study. Therefore, the study was reclassified as "inactive". See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. The city of Cleveland has been requested to provide assurances regarding items of local cooperation required for the construction of the new CDF. For details of local cooperation, see pg. 32-4 of FY87 Annual Report. Terminal Facilities. Fifty-one piers, wharves, and docks are situated in the Port of Cleveland. Eleven are located in the east and west basins of the outer harbor; 7 along the banks of the Old River and 17 and 16 along the right and left banks of the Cuyahoga River, respectively. Twenty-two terminals have both railroad connections and mechanical-handling facilities. The Corps owns a wharf at the foot of East 9th Street. The city of Cleveland owns and operates a wharf for mooring the city fireboat. U.S. Coast Guard vessels are moored east of the foot of 9th Street in the east basin. (See Port Series No. 43, revised 1989, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results During FY. New Work: In FY97, $240 was used to box records and close out project. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection services, condition sediment surveys, environmental activities, and real estate activities cost $385,579. $882,696 was expended to repair 250 l.f. of east breakwater, and east arrowhead. Approximately 114,883 cubic yards of shoaled material were removed from the Cuyahoga River, by contract, cost $781,621 contract to be finalized in FY98. Finalization of the FY96 dredging contract cost $168,745. Costs for the CDF Site 10B were $11,307,555. Operations supervision and administration cost $49,400. Supervision and administration of contracts cost $598,842. Engineering and design cost was $252,722. 5. CONNEAUT HARBOR, OH Location. On the south shore of Lake Erie, at mouth of Conneaut River, 73 miles easterly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14824.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1964, Annual Report for 1915. Existing Project. For description see pg. 1274 of Annual Report for 1967. Actual costs for new work for completed portion of the project were $7,541,369. For completed work, non-Federal costs were $200,000 for dockside dredging and removal of existing dolphins. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Terminal Facilities. There are seven piers and wharves. Six are privately owned and operated and located in inner harbor. Remaining facility is city owned on the south side of outer harbor. Six terminals have railroad connections and four mechanical - handling facilities. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: $25,031 was expended for harbor surveys. $46,585 was expended to finalize the FY96 dredging contract. Engineering and design cost -$133. 6. DUNKIRK HARBOR, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, 37 miles southwesterly from Buffalo, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14823.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1966 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1604 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description of completed portion of existing project see pg. 32-8 of Annual Report for 1976. For description of small boat harbor project as authorized under Section 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965, see pg. 32-8 of Annual Report for 1978. Actual costs for completed work are $3,010,024. Actual non-Federal costs are $1,961,000. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. 20-4 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Terminal Facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $59,713. $127,003 was expended to dredge 15,114 cubic yards of shoaled material. Finalization of the contract will be reflected in the FY98 Annual Report. Environmental testing in support of dredging cost $11,264. Real estate activities cost $2,520. Operations supervision and administration cost $2,140. Engineering and design cost $14,408. $23,771 was expended for supervision and administration of contracts. 7. ERIE HARBOR, PA Location. On southerly side of bay formed by Presque Isle Peninsula, on south shore of Lake Erie, 78 miles westerly from Buffalo, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14835.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1965 of Annual Report for 1915 and pg. 1600 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Projects. For description see pgs. 1363-64 of Annual Report for 1963. The FY93 Appropriations Act (PL102-377) authorized the planning, design and dredging of an access channel and berthing area. Entire project modification authorized by 1945 River and Harbor Act, providing for deepening channel and basin, both 23 feet deep, to Penn Central Company coal docks at westerly end of harbor, was deauthorized by Congress in Aug 1977. Actual costs for new work for completed portion of project were $2,860,906. Extension of north pier portion, authorized by 1899 Act was deauthorized in Nov 1981. A portion of work authorized by 1960 Act, deepening strips adjacent to north and south piers, was deauthorized in Aug 1982. Non- Federal costs for completed work were $51,000 for providing ore dock and dredging slip adjacent thereto. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Sixteen piers and wharves, of which twelve are privately owned and operated. Erie International Marine Terminal No. 1 owned by Port Commission, city of Erie, is along main waterfront on south side of Presque Isle Bay and Coast Guard facilities are on north side. Two offshore oil docks are on Lake Erie. Eight terminals have railroad connections and six mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Result During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $14,449. Environmental activities cost $39,413. Supervision and administration of contracts cost $298,925. Real estate activity and breakwater inspections cost $7,393. Engineering and design and preliminary assessments related to dredging cost $128,026. Removal of 125,069 cubic yards of shoaled material cost $60,210. Contract to be finalized in FY97. Operations supervision and administration cost $24,33. Completion of design memorandum and plans and specifications regarding construction of an access channel and berthing area for the vessel Niagara cost $3,425,674. 8. FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Grand River, 33 miles easterly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14837.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1963 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1590 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description of existing project, see pg. 1526 of Annual Report for 1962. Total Federal cost of $2,591,000 is actual cost for completed portion of project. Total non-Federal cost is $101,000 for bulkheads and dockside dredging for completed portion of project. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. See pg. 32-11 of 1976 Annual Report regarding assurances of local cooperation for work authorized by R&H Act of 1927. Terminal Facilities. Sixteen piers and wharves, all along banks of Grand River. One facility is owned by Coast Guard. Nine terminals have railroad connections and ten mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $30,778. Environmental studies in support of dredging cost $6,353. $621,190 was expended to remove 211,822 cubic yards of shoaled material. Final costs for dredging will be reflected in the FY98 Annual Report. After dredge soundings cost $16,265. Operations, supervision and administration cost $8,720. Engineering and design cost $23,399. Supervision and administration of contracts cost $60,575. Real estate and survey quantity calculations cost $6,958. Approximately 225 l.f. of the west breakwater was repaired by the U.S. Derrickboat McCauley at a cost of $1,248,487. 20-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 9. GREAT SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY Location. On Sodus Bay, which is a nearly landlocked indentation on south shore of Lake Ontario, 29 miles westerly from Oswego, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14814.) Previous Project. For details, see pg. 1972 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1526 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description, see pg. 1380 of Annual Report for 1963. Improvements authorized by 1962 act, consisting of deepening lake approach channel, entrance channel and inner approach channel were deauthorized by Congress in Aug 1977. Actual costs of new work for completed portion of project were $249,187. Costs incurred by local interests are not available. See Table 20-B for authorization legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $5,765. Real estate cost $70. $6 was expended on operations supervision and administration. 10. HURON HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Huron River, 47 miles westerly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14843.) Previous Project. For details, see pg. 1961 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1576 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description, see pg. 1347 of Annual Report for 1963 and pg. 32-12 of Annual Report for 1978. Cost of completed portion of existing project was $4,834,006. Construction of detached breakwater as authorized by 1962 R&H Act was deauthorized Jan 1, 1990. Non-Federal costs of $163,000 were incurred by local interests in 1963 for dockside dredging of areas between Federal improvement and terminal facilities. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Six privately owned wharves and docks, one along left bank of Huron River and remainder along right bank. Four terminals have railroad connections and four mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are regarded as adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $35,885. Environmental assessments, real estate activity, and economic studies cost $10,595. Operations supervision and administration cost $9,267. Approximately 75 l.f of the east outer end of the breakwater was repaired using the U.S. Derrickboat Simonsen at a cost of $191,266. Approximately 178,423 cubic yards of shoaled material were dredged at a cost of $456,486. Engineering and design cost $21,319. Supervision and administration of contracts cost $91,024. 11. IRONDEQUOIT BAY, NY Location. On south shore of lake Ontario, 4 miles east of Rochester, NY at mouth of Irondequoit Creek, Monroe County, NY (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14804 and 14815). Existing Project. For details of existing project, see pg. 32-7 of Annual Report for FY87. Total estimated project cost is $15,363,000 (Oct 1994) including $3,582,000 Federal (which includes the COE $3,536,000 and the USCG $46,000) and $11,781,000 non-Federal, including a cash contribution of $2,661,000, lands and damages $290,000 and the cost of a movable highway bridge $8,830,000. Existing project was authorized by 1958 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 332, 84th Cong., 2nd sess.). Local Cooperation. The Buffalo District has a Local Cooperation Agreement with New York State, executed April 20, 1983. Terminal Facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Engineering and design cost $651. Harbor surveys cost $9,766. Supervision and administration of contracts cost $1,761. $10,927 was expended on environmental activities. 12. LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY Location. Little Sodus Bay, on south shore of Lake Ontario, 15 miles west of Oswego, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14803.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1973 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1628 of Annual Report for 1938. 20-6 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Existing Project. For description see pg. 1378 of Annual Report for 1958. New work included a $1,287,528 contract for the rehabilitation of Little Sodus Bay East Breakwater. Approximately 1, 600 lineal feet of parallel steel sheet pile encasement was placed around the deteriorated existing concrete and wooden crib breakwater. The breakwater was capped off with a concrete walkway. Supervision and administration costs amounted to approximately $105,000. All costs incurred were Federal. Local Cooperation. Not required. Terminal Facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Environmental testing cost $708. Operations supervision and administration cost $6,809. Real estate expenses were $1,487. Engineering and design costs were $47,391. Miscellaneous costs related to structure repairs were $82. Supervision and administration of contracts cost $77,211. Repaired approximately 1,600 l.f of the east breakwater by contract using the U.S. Derrickboat Simonsen at a cost of $1,146,464. 13. LORAIN HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Black River, 25 miles westerly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14841.) Previous Projects. For details, see pg. 1961 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1580 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description see pgs. 1319-22 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost of new work is $20,475,000. Deepening and widening remainder of Black River Channel at Cut 1 and construction of bank stabilization, authorized by 1960 Act and modified by 1965 Act was deauthorized Jan 1, 1990. A portion of work authorized by 1960 act, dredging of 15-to-25 foot wide strips adjacent to the U.S. East and West piers were also deauthorized Jan 1, 1990. Total non-Federal cost is $3,000 contributed by local interests towards construction of west shore arm. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. The Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986 (PL 99-662) authorized construction of commercial navigation improvements consisting of two bend cuts on the Black River to widen and straighten the channel between the Norfolk and Western Railroad Bridge and the 21st Street Bridge. These cuts are to be excavated to the existing channel depth of 27 feet. The authorized plan also includes widening the Upper Turning Basin at the existing depth of 21 feet. Estimated costs for this work are $2,290,000 Federal and $1,510,000 non-Federal (Oct 1989). This portion of the project has been classified deferred. On Mar 12, 1986, the Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbors Act, as amended, authorized construction of a small boat harbor which was completed in Jul 1987. The project consists of a 225-foot detached rubble mound breakwater and an 800-foot long rubble mound breakwater attached to the east breakwater shorearm in the east basin of the outer harbor. Construction costs for this project, including supervision and administration, were $775,025 Federal and $775,025 non-Federal. Local Cooperation. For completed work, local interests contributed $3,000. Work authorized by 1960 Act (and modified by 1965 Act) is deauthorized. All other conditions fully complied with. On Mar 25, 1986, the city of Lorain, OH signed the Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA), for the Section 107 project. For details see pg. 32-7 of Annual Report for 1986. For details of LCA for deferred project authorized by the 1986 WRDA, see pgs. 32-9 of Annual Report for FY87. Terminal Facilities. There are 23 piers and wharves, of which three are on outer harbor and remainder are along banks of Black River. Two are owned by the city. Eight terminals have railroad connections and 15 mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $19,703. Environmental activities and economic studies cost $5,282. Real estate activity cost $1,120. Removed approximately 800 l.f. of dredged disposal pipeline across the inner harbor and repaired approximately 125 1.f. of the west breakwater adjacent to the Lorain Lighthouse using the U.S. Derrickboat Simonsen at a cost of $664,508. Operations supervision and administration cost $25,850. The FY96 dredging contract was finalized at a cost of $323,926. Approximately 67,484 cubic yards of shoaled material were removed. Engineering and design costs were $37,312. Supervision and administration of contracts cost $59,873. Costs to complete repairs to the Lorain Lighthouse were $26,607. 14. OAK ORCHARD, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Oak Orchard Creek, 33 miles westerly of Rochester, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14805.) 20-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 Previous Project. For details see pg. 628 of Annual Report for 1905. Existing Project. For description of completed existing project see pg. 32-14 of 1975 Annual Report Actual Federal cost for completed project was $1,613,500. Estimated non-Federal cost is $270,000 (Jul 1971) including cash contribution of $170,700 and $54,002 for recreational facilities and remainder for lands and construction of wharf Existing project was authorized by the 1945 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2nd sess.) Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $224,702. Terminal Facilities. There are no commercial navigation at Oak Orchard Harbor. Terminal facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft. Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $14,429. Real estate costs were $140. Removal of 11,407 cubic yards of shoaled material cost $89,510. Miscellaneous dredging costs were $1,171. Operations supervision and administration cost $654. Environmental activities cost $19,469. $10,575 was expended on supervision and administrative contracts. 15. OLCOTT HARBOR, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Eighteen Mile Creek, about 18 miles east of mouth of Niagara River and 63 miles by water west of Rochester, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14806.) Previous Project. For details see pg. 1971 of Annual Report for 1915 and pg. 1621 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description, see pg. 1555 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of new work for completed project was $1,500 exclusive of amount expended on previous projects, all of which was contributed by local interests. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. The authorized modification to the existing project consists of breakwaters to provide optimum harbor protection, a stone jetty and recreational fishing facilities including a foot bridge, walkways and guardrail, access facilities, sanitary facilities and parking areas. The estimated cost of the authorized modification is $17,300,000 (Oct 1991) of which $8,860,000 is Federal and $8,440,000 is non-Federal. Modification of the existing project was authorized by the 1986 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) (PL 99-662). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed project. Local interests contributed $1,500. Modifications authorized by the 1986 WRDA will require local interests to pay 50% of project cost including lands, easements, rights-of-way and dredge disposal areas. They are also responsible for construction of necessary docks and berthing spaces, construction of launching ramp, parking areas, sanitary facilities, and necessary access roads. After construction, non-Federal responsibilities would include fishing facility maintenance, except for the aids to navigation. Terminal Facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and Results During FY. New Work: In-house engineering costs for Advance Engineering and Design of the authorized modification were $190,040. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $26,479. Environmental compliance assessments and related activities cost $36,150. Real estate costs were $840. $75,583 was expended on the maintenance dredging of 9,874 cubic yards of shoaled material. Miscellaneous costs related to dredging totaled $547. Operations supervision and administration costs were $3,601 and $5,957 for supervision and administration of contracts. Engineering and design cost $1,106. Quantity calculations cost $7,247. 16. OSWEGO HARBOR, NY Locations. On South shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Oswego River, 59 miles easterly from Rochester, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14813.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1973 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1630 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description see pgs. 1383-84 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed portion of project cost $7,242,039 and non-Federal costs for completed work were $4,440,000 for lands, dockside dredging, construction of terminal wharves, and cargo handling facilities. Deepening a 200-foot wide strip along harbor line east of mouth of Oswego River, remaining feature of work authorized by the 1930 Act, was deauthorized Jan 1, 1990. Deepening to 22 feet a 150-foot wide strip along harbor line in west outer harbor, remaining feature of work authorized by 1940 Act, was deauthorized in May 1981. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are seven piers and wharves in the harbor and along the river channel. The Port of Oswego owns and operates a general cargo terminal at the mouth of the Oswego River. The Port 20-8 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT Authority also operates a grain elevator west of the mouth of the river. The U.S. Coast Guard moors patrol and environmental research vessels west of the mouth of the river. Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $33,489. Operations supervision and administration cost $688. Environmental activities and engineering and design related to dredging cost $36,964. Real estate costs were $70. Approximately 75 l.f. of the west breakwater and west shore arm were repaired by the U.S. Derrickboat McCauley at a cost of $206,702. $288,215 was expended on maintenance dredging to remove 50,000 cubic yards of shoaled material. Supervision and administration of contracts cost $5,077. Survey quantity calculations cost $2,118. 17. PORT CLINTON HARBOR, OH Location. Comprises lower half-mile of Portage River. River empties into Lake Erie 72 miles westerly from Cleveland, OH (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14820). Existing Project. Provides for parallel jetties at river mouth and a channel in Lake Erie and Portage River with a project depth of 10 feet. For additional details, see pg. 1899 of Annual Report for 1951. (See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation.) Terminal Facilities. There is one public fish dock, one private sand dock, one private fuel, lumber, and coal dock and five additional private docks. A dock at foot of Madison Avenue is owned by the village of Port Clinton and open to the public. A shipyard builds small boats. Terminal facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $9,704. Real estate cost $70. Engineering and design associated to dredging cost $4,537. Operations supervision and administration cost $445. $3,000 was expended on miscellaneous maintenance. Miscellaneous survey costs were $223. 18. ROCHESTER HARBOR, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario, at mouth of Genesee River, 59 miles westerly from Oswego, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14815.) Previous Project. For details see pg. 1471 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1623 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description see pg. 1556 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual cost for new work for completed project is $2,191,514. Non-Federal costs are estimated at $2,260,000, all for 1960 Act, for lands, relocation of submarine cable crossing, relocations of small docks and boathouses, dockside dredging, structure modifications, and replacement of Baltimore & OH coal loader. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Complied with except provision for replacement of coal loading facility as required by River and Harbor Act of Jul 14, 1960. Terminal Facilities. There are 3 docks at Rochester Harbor. 7, city of Rochester owns an 830-foot long wharf at the entrance to the Genesee River. Three storage buildings at the terminal, formerly used as transit sheds, have approximately 100,000 square feet of storage space. Approximately 3 acres of open storage area is located at the upper end of the facility. The facility has not been used for handling cargo for over 10 years. The U.S. Coast Guard moors search and rescue vessels at the mouth of the Genesee River. Another private facility is located 1.6 miles above the Stutson Street Bridge. Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $31,610. Environmental testing, by contract cost $1,576. Real estate costs were $1,470. Supervision and administration of contracts cost $59,788. $716,605 was expended on maintenance dredging of 248,544 cubic yards of shoaled material. Engineering and design costs were $22,428. Operations supervision and administration cost $5,703. Survey quantity calculations cost $24,538. 19. ROCKY RIVER HARBOR, OH Location. At mouth of Rocky River which empties into Lake Erie 7 miles westerly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) Existing Project. For description see pg. 1329 of Annual Report for 1966. Federal cost for completed project was $343,494 and non-Federal cost was a cash contribution of $249,346. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $249,346 for new work. Terminal Facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately-owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $12,036. Real estate cost $70. Miscellaneous costs were $84. 20-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 20. SANDUSKY HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, in southeastern portion of Sandusky Bay, 50 miles westerly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14845.) Previous Project. For description see pgs. 1511-12 of Annual Report for 1962. Actual costs for new work for completed project were $6,250,121, excluding $325,000 contributed by local interests. Non-Federal costs for completed project are estimated at $675,000, including $325,000 cash contribution and the remaining $350,000 is for dockside dredging adjacent to deepening channels authorized by 1960 Act. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $325,000 for new work. Terminal Facilities. Fourteen piers and wharves, three at west end of harbor and remainder along dock channel. One is a base for State-owned fish research and patrol boats. One publicly owned and six privately owned used for mooring tishing boats and recreational craft and for ferry service. Five terminals have railroad connections and five mechanical-handling facilities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 42, revised 1972, Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $21,896. Environmental activities cost $13,112. Real estate cost $210. Operations supervision and administration costs $8,884. Engineering and design cost $20,970. Supervision and administration of contracts cost $61,729. 220,420 cubic yards of shoaled material were dredged at a cost of $570,550. $11,401 was expended for quantity calculations. 21. TOLEDO HARBOR, OH Location. Comprises lower 7 miles of Maumee River and channel through Maumee Bay to Lake Erie. Maumee River has its source in northern Indiana and empties into Lake Erie. Harbor is at the westerly end of Lake Erie, 99 miles westerly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 1959 of Annual Report for 1915, and pg. 1565 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. For description of existing project see pgs. 32-18 and -19 of Annual Report for 1978. Cost of completed existing project was $15,567,147. See table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Thirty-five piers, wharves and docks are located in the Port of Toledo. Seven are located on Maumee River; and 28 are equally divided along the right and left banks of the lower 7 miles of the Maumee River. The Toledo-Lucas County Port Authority Facility No. 1 Wharf handles conventional and containerized general cargo as well as an increasing amount of miscellaneous bulk materials. Fifteen of the terminals have railroad connections and mechanical handling facilities. (See Port Series No. 44, revised 1989, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.) Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys and inspections cost $123,503. $45,434 was expended for environmental and economic studies. Real estate cost $1,470. Operations supervision and administration cost $43,502. Costs to continue the Long-Term Management Strategy were $848,846. CDF maintenance and repairs by contract including engineering and design cost $69,985. Repaired the interior cross-sectional structure of the existing CDF and created interior drainage ditches within the CDF. Removal of 146,575 cubic yards of shoaled material from the Maumee Bay Channel cost $400,666. $397,187 was expended to finalize the FY96 dredging contract. Survey quantity calculations cost $22,315. Engineering and design related to dredging cost $106,561. Supervision and administration of contracts cost $340,670. 22. VERMILION HARBOR, OH Location. On south shore of Lake Erie at mouth of Vermilion River, 37 miles westerly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14826.) Existing Project. For description of existing project see pgs. 32-17 and 32-18 of Annual Report for 1975. Actual Federal cost for the completed existing project was $1,156,118. Estimated non-Federal cost for new work is $754,679 including cash contribution of $740,679 and remainder for relocation of submarine cable and construction of public wharf. See Table 20- B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $740,679. Terminal Facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. A reconnaissance study to alleviate the ice-jam and free-flow flooding of the river was completed in 1986 at a cost of $180,000. The proposed project was an ice-retention structure. The 20-10 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT non-Federal sponsor did not commit to provide its total share of the cost of the feasibility study; the project was therefore reclassified as "inactive". Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $21,938. Real estate $70. Environmental activities and miscellaneous dredging cost $34,452. Engineering and design cost $249. Operations supervision and administration cost $152. 23. WEST HARBOR, OH Location. On southwest shore of Lake Erie, 13 miles northwest of Port Clinton, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847.) Existing Project. For description of existing project, see page 32-10 of Annual Report for 1983. Total Federal cost for new work was $3,303,898. Total non- Federal cost for new work was $3,922,000 including cash contribution of $3,795,000. Existing project was authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 245, 88th Cong., 2nd sess.) Local Cooperation. See pg. 32-20 of 1978 Annual Report for requirements of local cooperation. By letter dated Jan 31, 1978, State of OH stated its intent to furnish assurances of local cooperation, and executed LCA was received on Mar 9, 1981. Terminal Facilities. Commerce at the harbor presently consists of recreational boating and affiliated activities. Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $28,843. $20,417 was expended for environmental activities. Approximately 9,090 cubic yards of shoaled material was removed at a contract cost of $33,000. Related engineering and design cost $1,256. Supervision and administration of the contract cost $43,722. Real estate activity cost $444. Miscellaneous cost related to dredging were $336. 24. WILSON HARBOR, NY Location. At mouth of east branch of Twelve Mile Creek, which enters Lake Ontario 12 miles easterly of mouth of Niagara River, and 67 miles westerly of Rochester Harbor, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14806.) Previous Projects. For details see pg. 2395 of Annual Report for 1889, and pg. 628 of Annual Report for 1905. Existing Project. For description of existing project see pg. 32-18 of Annual Report for 1975. Actual Federal cost for completed existing project was $477,904. Estimated non-Federal costs are $774,000 which includes cost of $16,000 for previously completed work. Remainder of non-Federal costs are for work required for 1968 R&H Act including cash contribution of $166,988. See Table 20-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Facilities consist of private docks for recreational craft and privately owned servicing and storage handling facilities for recreational and other small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Harbor surveys cost $32,093. Environmental dredging cost $18,952. Real estate cost $2,300. 12,760 cubic yards of shoaled material was dredged at a cost of $154,803. Engineering and design related to dredging cost $230. Supervision and administration of contracts cost $8,380. Operations supervision and administration cost $728. Survey quantity calculating cost $4,133. Miscellaneous costs associated with dredging were $82. 25. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW GUIDE FOR OPERATIONS $1,915 was expended to complete environmental compliance assessments and associated corrective action plans for the Buffalo District. 26. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Condition surveys were performed by the Buffalo District at a cost of $60,167. Miscellaneous costs and real estate costs were $2,097. Remaining costs for reconnaissance and condition surveys are reported in individual project writeups. Project Barcelona, NY Cattaraugus, NY Niagara River, NY Ogdensburg, NY Port Ontario, NY Date of Survey Aug 1997 Sep 1997 Dec 1997 Jul 1997 Jun 1997 27. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 20-C. 20-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 ROCHESTER WAVE SURGE Location. On south shore of Lake Ontario at mouth of Genesee River, 59 miles westerly from Oswego, NY. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14815). Existing Project. Project was approved for construction by the Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbors Act, as amended, as authorized by the 1990 Water Resources Development Act. The recommended plan of improvement consists of a partial segmented rubble mound lining of the interior walls of the existing piers. Total estimated Federal cost of the project is $3,850,000. Total estimated non-Federal cost is $3,850,000. Local Cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement was executed with the local sponsor, the City of Rochester, on Feb 27, 1996. Operations and Results During FY. New Work: FY97 Federal costs were $2,188 for real estate activities, $330,568 for construction contract, $155,222 for contract supervision and administration and $45,594 for in-house engineering effort. Non-Federal costs were $79 for real estate activities, $765,626 for construction contract and $22,214 for contract supervision and administration. STURGEON POINT, EVANS, NY Location. On south shore of Lake Erie, 17 miles southwest of Buffalo, NY and 22 miles northeast of Dunkirk, NY. (See Geological Survey map of Angola, NY.) Existing Project. For description of existing project, see pg. 20-11 of Annual Report for FY91. Federal project cost is $1,460,000. Non-Federal project cost is $1,475,000. In addition, the local sponsor provided associated costs for upland development of $1,000,000. Local Cooperation. The Buffalo District has a properly executed Local Cooperation Agreement with the Town of Evans, NY, signed Oct 26, 1987. Operations and Results During FY. New Work: Financial closeout resulted in a credit of $560. Maintenance: Reimbursement to the Town of Evans, NY, for Federal share of maintenance dredging cost $6,640. Navigation workpursuant to Section 107. Public Law 86-645. Lake Erie, Cooley Canal, Lucas Co., OH - Federal costs of $157,577 and non-Federal costs of $2,146 were incurred for preauthorization studies. Section 107 Coordination Account - Federal costs of $1,421 were incurred for preauthorization studies. SHORE PROTECTION 29. PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, ERIE, PA Location. At Erie, PA., on south shore of Lake Erie, 78 miles southwest of Buffalo, NY and 102 miles eastnortheast of Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14824 and 14835.) Existing Project. For description of completed portion of existing project see pg. 1393 of Annual Report for 1963. For details of project authorized by the 1974 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA), 1976 WRDA and 1986 WRDA, see pg. 32-14 of Annual Report for FY87. Actual Federal cost for the authorized beach nourishment project modifications through FY92 is $16,879,000 which includes $5,646,000 for completed work authorized by the 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRDA Act and $11,233,000 for completed work authorized by the 1976 WRDA Act. Actual non-Federal cost for the authorized project and modifications through FY92 is $8,798,000 which includes $3,983,000 for completed work authorized by 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRDA Act and $4,815,000 for completed work authorized by the 1976 WRDA Act. Beach nourishment as authorized by the 1976 WRDA was completed in FY91. The estimated Federal cost (Oct 1997) for the 55 breakwater project is $58,835,000. This estimate includes $13,435,000 for the initial construction and $45,400,000 for 50 years of postconstruction beach nourishment. The estimated non- Federal cost (Oct 1997) for the breakwater project is also $58,835,000. See Table 32-B for authorizing legislation. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed project as authorized by 1954 and 1960 R&H Acts and 1974 WRDA Act. An agreement between the United States of America and the Commonwealth of PA, acting through the Department of Environmental Resources was entered into on Feb 21, 1979 for the annual nourishment which was extended by the 1976 WRDA Act. A Local Cooperation Agreement between the United States of America and the local sponsor for construction of the 58 breakwater project was executed by the Secretary of the Army on Jun 22, 1989. See pg. 20-10 of Annual Report for FY89 for details of local cooperation. 20-12 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 Operations and Results During FY. New Work: Annual nourishment for a fifty-year period, beginning in FY93, continued in FY96 for the fifth year of this fifty-year period. Federal expenditures were $394,599 for the nourishment contract, $25,003 for contract supervision and administration and $222,800 for inhouse engineering and design. Non-Federal costs were $386,195 for the nourishment contract, $10,695 for contract supervision and administration, and $240,498 for in-house engineering and design. 30. OTHER AUTHORIZED SHORE PROTECTION PROJECTS See Table 20-D. 31. SHORE PROTECTION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Shore Protection Work Pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874. County Route 127, Hamburg, NY - Federal costs of $15,900 were incurred for preauthorization studies. FLOOD CONTROL 32. MT. MORRIS LAKE, GENESEE RIVER, NY Location. Dam is on Genesee River 66.9 miles above river mouth and about 32 miles southwesterly of Rochester, NY. Reservoir is in Livingston and Wyoming Counties, NY. (See ecological Survey maps of Nunda and Portage, NY). Existing Project. For description of existing project, as authorized by 1944 Flood control Act, see pg. 1575 of Annual Report for 1962. New work for completed project cost $23,365,559. In addition, $5,000 contributed funds were expended for new work. Local Cooperation. None required. Local interests contributed $5,000 for new work. Operations and Results During FY. Maintenance: Operation of the dam, reservoir and service facilities, condition and operation studies, real estate activities and miscellaneous reports, were accomplished by hired labor at a cost of $999,281. Operation of the Water Control Center cost $280,188. $675,478 was expended to continue converting an existing building to a Visitor Center. Maintenance costs for the dam were $325,710. Repairs included trash boom rehabilitation, bank stabilization, and stair replacement within the dam. Inhouse engineering and design cost $45,051. Supervision and administration of contracts cost $139,277. 33. RENO BEACH-HOWARD FARMS AREA, OH Location. Area is located in Lucas County, on the south shore of Lake Erie about 15 miles east of Toledo, OH. (See U.S. Geological Survey map for Reno Beach and Metzger Marsh, OH.) Existing Project. For description of existing project, see pg. 20-14 of Annual Report for 1991. Local Cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was executed with the local Sponsor on Jul 22, 1988 and by the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works on Sep 30, 1988. Availability of lands, easements, and rights-of-way was received on Jun 5, 1990 from the local sponsors. A decision was reached with the local sponsors on credit for LERRD's, based on independent appraisals and the amount of cash contribution, on Apr 23, 1997. Operations and Results During FY. New Work: Construction is 100% complete, total cost $7,308, 255.57. Balancing of Federal and non-Federal shares resulted in a Federal reimbursement of $5,782.61 to the local sponsor. 34. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed flood control works for compliance with Federal requirements were made during the period at a cost of $209,563. This includes updating the hydraulics and hydrology of various local flood control projects. Total cost to Sep 30, 1997 is $2,797,212. 35. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FY97 costs were $100,211. 36. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 20-E. 20-13 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT 37. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies (Public Lawv 89, 84th Congress, as amended by Sec. 206 of Flood ControlA ct of 1962). FY97 costs for the Disaster Preparedness Program were $257,415. Costs to support Emergency Operations totaled $93,233 for activities related to Winter and Spring flood fighting in Central and Northern NY and Northern OH. These activities included flood reconnaissance, liaison activities and providing technical advice to local response agencies in flood flight operations. Program activities included inhouse program administration, project inspection activities and the purchase and transportation of flood protection materials. FY97 costs for the Emergency Rehabilitation Program totaled $3,104,880 and included rehabilitation of Federal flood control projects at Cayuga Inlet, Ithaca, NY, Dyke Creek and Genesee River, Wellsville, NY, and Keshequa Creek, Livingston County, NY. Costs for Advance Measures assistance were $156,919. SWAN CREEK, TOLEDO, OH Location. Swan Creek is located at Toledo, OH, at the westerly end of Lake Erie, 99 miles westerly from Cleveland, OH. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14847). Existing Project. Project was approved for construction by the Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended, on May 15, 1991. The project provides for construction of approximately 3,100 feet of a combination levee and flood wall system along the left bank of Swan Creek, extending from the Detroit Avenue Bridge, downstream to the South Avenue Bridge. In addition, a 540-foot long section of the Creek will be relocated about 75 feet. Total estimated Federal cost of the project is $1,950,000. Total estimated non-Federal cost is $650,000. Local Cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement was executed with the local sponsor, the City of Toledo, on Aug 30, 1991 and requires the local sponsor to provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas and relocations and make contributions up to 25% of the total project cost. Operations and Results During FY. New Work: FY97 Federal costs were $15,617 for in-house engineering and design effort, a credit of $4,418 for construction contract and $7,836 for contract supervision and administration. Flood Control work pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858. Limestone Creek, Fayetteville, NY -A credit of $80 was incurred for preauthorization studies. Cross Lake, NY - A cost of $131,485 Federal and $14,358 non-Federal was incurred for preauthorization studies. Mill Creek, Garfield Heights, OH - A cost of $16,545 was incurred for preauthorization studies. URBAN STORM WATER MGMT 38. ONONDAGA STORM WATER DISCHARGE, NY Location. Onondaga Lake is located in Central NY State, northwest of the city of Syracuse, within the Oswego River Basin, which is tributary to Lake Ontario. It is also part of the NY State Barge Canal System. (See Geological Survey map of Syracuse, NY.) Existing Project. Existing project is authorized under Section 307 of the Waters Resources Development Act of 1992 (P.L. 102-580) and will demonstrate the effectiveness of using swirl concentrator system technology for combined Sewer Overflow abatement at Hiawatha Boulevard to improve water quality in Onondaga Lake. The project has three separate components: interceptor sewers; a treatment and storage facility; and outfall pipe and force main which will be designed and constructed by others. Federal cost will $3,645. Non-Federal cost is estimated to be $3,715. Local Cooperation. The project will be cost-shared 75% Federal, 25% non-Federal up to the maximum Federal contribution ($4,000,000). Operations and Results During FY. New Work: FY97 costs were $12,523 for real estate activities, $557,811 for in-house engineering effort and a credit of $3,051 for contract activities. 20-14 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 39. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT Project Modification work pursuant to Section 1135, Public Law 99-62. Coordination Account Funds - Funds in the amount of $6,609 were spent on preauthorization investigations. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS 40. DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS See Table 20-I. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 41. SURVEYS During FY97, $539,863 was expended for surveys. These costs are shown below: Navigation Studies $138,539 Flood Damage Prevention Studies 87,756 Shoreline Protection Studies 13,9991 Special Studies 102,257 Miscellaneous Investigations 62,829 Coordination Studies 133,3732 'Does not include $9,704 contributed funds. 2Does not include $115,627 contributed funds. 42. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the period, costs of $134,227 were incurred in connection with International Water Studies under the General Investigations appropriation and $655,564 incurred under the Operations and Maintenance appropriation for a total cost of $799,791. Flood plain management services were performed during the year at a Federal cost of $152,995. Non-Federal costs were $419. During the year, flood hazard elevation studies were performed for Tannery Brook, NY, Big Sister Creek, NY, and Skaneateles Creek, NY. The results of these studies will enable local officials to encourage and enforce prudent use of the identified flood plains. Also, hundreds of technical assistance requests regarding flood plain matters were completed during the year responding to individuals, corporations, real estate companies, insurance agents, engineering firms and local agencies. Costs for General Hydrologic Studies were $5,119. 43. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (NOT FULLY AUTHORIZED) FY97 Federal costs were $54,399 for PED effort on the Onondaga Lake, NY demonstration projects. These demonstration projects will be constructed by others. Non-Federal costs were $36,694 for in-house engineering effort. 44. ADVANCE ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Costs during the period were $197,734 for Advance Engineering and Design projects. For details of project, see section 15 in text, and Erie County Sewer District No. 5, below. ERIE COUNTY SEWER DISTRICT NO. 5, SLUDGE TREATMENT FACILITY, AMHERST, NY Section 219 of WRDA 1992 authorized the Corps to provide technical and engineering services to Erie County Sewer District No. 5 for the installation / integration of a sludge treatment process into the existing wastewater treatment facility located in Amherst, NY. The cost sharing required under this Section is 75% Federal and 25% non-Federal and will be accomplished by an A/E contract as required in Section 219. FY97 Federal costs were $7,693. Non- Federal costs were $3,465. 20-15 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to See Section in Project Text Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sept 30, 1997 1. Ashtabula Harbor, OH 2. Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib.Funds) 3. Buffalo Harbor, NY 4. Cleveland Harbor, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 5. Conneaut Harbor, OH 6. Dunkirk Harbor, NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib.Funds) 7. Erie Harbor, PA 8. Fairport Harbor, NY New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost Rehab. Approp. Rehab. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost Rehab. Approp. Rehab. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost Rehab. Approp. Rehab. Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost Maint. Contrib. Maint. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost Rehab. Approp. Rehab. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost Rehab. Approp. Rehab. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost 981,850 876,691 1,450,400 1,432,794 1,095,750 1,101,812 -81,000 22,342 3,280,250 3,429,017 -267,822 22,323 864,374 912,654 146,720 194,682 157,840 76,216 340,000 544,925 1,805,000 1,791,596 510,000 571,662 3,351,000 3,217,508 420,500 428,465 3,591,548 3,546,506 - 611,850 613,471 5,390,500 5,440,472 390,600 393,325 3,491,845 3,507,832 1,198,891 1,151,193 240 14,615,585 14,427,160 150,000 1,127,000 119,360 158,089 1,005,000 1,000,123 364,000 359,055 878,000 519,631 661,150 649,436 349,800 262,101 5,449,736 899,173 26,314 72,904 176,752 240,818 -689,605 3,999,053 803,200 51,440 461,800 2,187,663 803,248 51,286 329,964 2,022,725 20-16 12,805,339' 12,805,339' 16,911,275 17,242,201 11,135,120 11,135,1202 56,294,781 56,169,266 620,000 620,000 23,115,187 23,115,187� 63,449,434 63,383,695 36,550,2996 36,550,2996 195,516,668 195,241,662 1,083,178 1,083,178 8,346,641' 8,346,641' 14,199,321 14,199,323 3,010,02410 3,010,02410 4,347,941 4,318,984 1,950,000" 1,950,000" 3,597,8731 3,597,87312 23,306,401 23,008,766 2,959,611" 2,959,61114 20,230,782 19,933,329 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to See Section in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sept 30, 1997 9. Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY 10. Huron Harbor, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 11. Irondequoit Bay, NY (Contrib. Funds) 12. Little Sodus Bay Harbor, NY 13. Lorain Harbor, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 14. Oak Orchard, Harbor, NY 16. Oswego Harbor. NY 17. Port Clinton Harbor, OH 18. Rochester Harbor, NY New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost Rehab. Approp. Rehab. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost Rehab. Approp. Rehab. Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost Rehab. Approp. Rehab. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint Approp. Maint. Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint Approp. Maint. Cost Rehab.Approp. Rehab. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint Cost 1,097,100 1,055,488 307 310,362 143,642 -4,000 970,100 1,298,324 - -86,200 25,461 62,467 62,459 164,339 213,299 211,000 223,101 2,642 2,790 196,000 361,960 600 4,444 1,682,400 1,684,221 47,000 8,981 999,000 998,734 318,599 297,619 1,226,875 1,229,989 - -15,165 5,841 789,311 815,841 23,356 23,104 230,567 219,860 456 2,334,900 2,089,375 563 573 439,901 413,563 33,030 38,057 1,283,713 1,280,153 869,026 1,164,182 161,063 135,949 610,959' 610,959" 2,904,107 2,904,101 5,103,79516 5,103,79516 21,487,590 21,487,525 63,079 63,079 3,535,651 3,535,651 651,162 650,804 2,718,077 2,718,077 301,39417 301,394" 5,404,507 5,389,471 22,240,6701' 22,240,670" 36,373,219 36,371,336 845,551 845,551 1,586,99619 1,586,99619 603,520 578,406 - 8,430,016" - 8,430,016" 531,926 8,836,246 573,323 8,813,236 19,997 17,979 878,023 863,718 71,950 71,950 1,034,966 1,032,940 2,439,308" 2,439,30823 23,939,717 23,925,017 20-17 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to See Section in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sept 30, 1997 19. Rocky River Harbor, OH 20. Sandusky Harbor, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 21. Toledo Harbor, OH 22. Vermilion Harbor, OH 23. West Harbor, OH (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 24. Wilson Harbor, NY 28. Lake Erie, Sturgeon Pt., NY (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 28. Rochester Hbr., NY (Wave Surge) (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 29. Presque Isle Peninsula, Erie, PA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 32. Mt. Morris Lake, NY Genesee River New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost Rehab. Approp. Rehab. Cost Maint. Contrib. Maint. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost Rehab. Approp. Rehab. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost New WorkContrib. New Work Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost New Work Contrib. New Work Cost New Work Approp. New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Maint. Cost 22,020 22,195 307,500 104,499 2,797,617 2,940,126 1,000 735 263,640 273,814 -o 1,763 11,250 11,437 -1,763 290,000 158,120 320,000 336,580 410,000 548,132 385,000 344,925 1,643,000 1,842,703 5,142,000 4,505,181 200,000 181,417 29,168 69,245 109,100 109,756 2,257,000 2,973,534 152,423 159,235 12,188 12,188 706,616 708,753 343,494 343,494 3,087,799 3,087,799 6,727,27027 6,727,27027 21,802,533 21,801,752 15,445 15,445 - 17,191,842" - 17,191,842" 2,395,459 115,547,352 2,400,139 115,528,231 44,835 56,864 290,548 128,018 - - - - 5,932 223,977 5,960 221,701 56,000 53,955 10,360 10,273 -57,850 -53,955 520,000 634,872 313,451 428,295 420,583 426,458 -24,200 6,552 6,640 3,190,000 714,748 750,000 461,518 450,036 452,010 450,000 441,364 -560 533,572 3,254,292 787,918 659,000 641,682 685,000 637,389 1,938,961 2,014,628 1,772,300 2,562,880 1,833,294 2,055,536 1,786,848 2,464,985 1,156,118 1,156,11872 2,835,872 2,835,827 3,303,898 3,303,898 1,933,945 1,771,412 3,795,000 3,795,000 535,24631 535,24631 952,545 950,249 1,718,700" 1,718,140" 57,416 57,415 1,299,008 1,299,008 4,000,000 2,041,312 4,004,292 1,249,436 32,587,049 32,558,662 23,415,867 23,346,441 23,365,559" 23,365,559" 27,162,051 26,914,987 20-18 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 TABLE 20-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost to See Section in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sept 30, 1997 33. Reno Beach-Howard Farms New Work Approp. - - - - 5,532,594 Area, OH (Federal Funds) New Work Cost 13,292 - 12 -49,371 5,483,192 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. - 50,000 - -5,783 476,717 New Work Cost 3,948 7,865 -12 53,872 475,994 37. Swan Creek Toledo, OH New Work Approp. 480,000 1,176,600 14,000 31,000 1,994,615 (Federal Funds) New Work Cost 40,260 1,378,414 251,500 19,035 1,977,778 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. 513,500 - - - 513,500 New Work Cost 49,078 447,269 17,145 - 513,492 38. Onondaga Storm Water New Work Approp. 1,723,000 1,683,000 - - 3,406,000 Discharge, NY New Work Cost 11,462 60,292 338,305 567,284 977,343 15. Includes $361,722 for previous projs. 1. Includes $565,192 for previous projs. Excludes $47,000 contributed funds. 2. Includes $58,027 for previous projs. 3. Includes $4,922 emergency relief authority administrative costs transferred for new work to maintenance upon conversion to programming & budgeting system Jul 1, 1953, by direction of Office, Chief of Engineers. Also includes appropriations & costs under appropriation titles 96X3123 Operations and Maintenance & 96X5125 Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 4. Includes $4,277,586 for previous projs. Excludes expenditures of $239,305 for work authorized by Sec. 107. 5. Includes $1,883,647 for previous projs. Excludes $446,805 contributed funds. 6. Includes $1,564,154 for previous proj. & appropriations & costs of $16,596 for modification authorized for construction under authority of Sec. 107, 1960 R&H Act. 7. Includes appropriations & costs under appropriation titles 96x3123 Operations and Maintenance & 96x5125 Maintenance and Operations of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. Excludes $201,960 contributed funds. 8. Includes $805,272 for previous projs. 9. Includes $39,784 for previous projs. 10. Includes $811,250 for previous projs. Excludes $11,000 contributed funds. 11. Includes $176,520 for previous projs. 12. Includes $736,967 for previous projs. 13. Includes $104,900 for previous projs. Excludes $154,500 contributed funds. 14. Includes $368,940 for previous projs. 16. Includes $269,789 for previous projs. 17. Includes $232,328 for previous projs. 18. Includes $292,203 for new work for previous projs. Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. Also excludes appropriation and cost of $29,570 under authority of Sec. 107, 1960 R&H Act.18. Excludes $224,702 contributed funds. 19. Excludes $224,702 contributed funds. 20. Includes $140,210 for previous projs. Excludes $1,500 contributed funds. 21. Includes $38,959 for previous projs. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 22. Excludes $186,000 Public Works Acceleration Act. 23. Includes $1,187,977 for previous projs. 24. Includes $945,684 for previous projs. 25. Includes $247,794 for previous projs. 26. Includes $617,529 for previous projs & $478 emergency relief authority administration costs transferred from new work to maintenance upon conversion to programming and budgeting system, Jul 1, 1953, by direction of Office, Chief of Engineers. 27. Includes $477,149 for previous projs. Excludes $325,000 contributed funds. 28. Includes $1,624,695 for previous projs. 29. Includes $16,914 for previous projs. 30. Excludes $740,679 contributed funds. 31. Includes $57,342 for previous projs. Excludes $166,998 contributed funds. 32. Includes $16,914 for previous projects. 33. Includes $341,900 study funds under authority Sec. 107, 1960 R&H Act. 34. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds. 35. Includes study costs of $117,000 under authority Sect. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act. Excludes $17,493 in contributed costs. 20-19 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun 3, 1896 ASHTABULA HARBOR, OH Construction of breakwater. Mar 3, 1905 Enlarge outer harbor by extending west breakwater and Jun 25, 1910 constructing new east breakwater pierheads on lakeward ends of breakwaters; remove part of old east breakwater. Mar 2, 1919 Extend west breakwater to shore; dredge outer harbor to a depth of 20 feet. Aug 30, 1935 Remove portion of east breakwater to, extend breakwaters to present dimensions and dredging restrictions in portion of west basin. Aug 26, 1937 Dredge channel through outer harbor, channel of approach to Penn Central Co. slip, channel Ashtabula River, to and in turning basin all to present project dimensions; remove portion of old east inner breakwater and maintenance to 24-foot depth of portion of outer harbor. Mar 2, 1945 Extend river channel to present project limit. Sep 3, 1954 Dredging approach channel and turning basin in east outer harbor 25-foot depth. Jul 14, 1960 A depth of 29 feet in soft and 30 feet in hard material in entrance channel to just inside outer ends of breakwaters, thence 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in a channel to inner breakwater, thence 27 feet in soft and 28 feet in hard materials in a channel extending to Penn Central Co. slip and extending 2000 feet up Ashtabula River, 22 feet in hard material in turning area; and 28 feet in soft and 29 feet in hard material in areas adjacent to 250-foot section of inner breakwater when that section is removed as now authorized. Oct 27, 1965 Dredging approach, channel and turning basin in east outer harbor to 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material. BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR, NY Aug 11, 1888 Dredging channel throu .h horseshoe reef at outlet of Lake Erie Jun 3, 1896 and Tonawanda Inner Harbor to 16 feet. Jun 13, 1902 Deepening Tonawanda Creek to 16 feet. Jun 13, 1902 Dredging channel from Buffalo outer harbor to foot of Aug 8, 1917 Maryland St., Buffalo, to 21 feet. Mar 3, 1905 Dredging channel from foot of Maryland St., Buffalo, to natural deep water pool upstream from Tonawanda Harbor to 21 feet; construction of ship lock and bridge; and repair of Bird Island pier towpath wall. Annual Report, 1895, p. 2132 H. Doc. 654. 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 997, 64th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 43, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 78, 74th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 321, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 486, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 148, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 269, 89th cong., 1st sess.4 H. Ex. Doc. 83, 50th Cong., 1st sess. Annual Report, 1888, p.2066, and Annual Report, 1897, pp. 3116-3120. H. Doc. 143, 56th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Report, 1900 p.4152. H. Doc. 125, 56th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report 1901, p.3 3 4 3 . H. Doc. 428, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. 20-20 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Jul 27, 1916 Dredging channel along Tonawanda Island, with turning basin at its downstream end at the foot of the Island, to 21 feet. Mar 2, 1919 Dredging triangular area at junction with Buffalo north entrance Mar 2, 1945 channel. Sep 22, 1922 Widening channel at foot of Maryland St., Buffalo. Mar 3, 1925 Widening canal south of International Bridge and removal of westerly end of Rattlesnake Island shoal. Jun 26, 19343 Operation and care of improvements provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Aug 30, 1935' Removal of rock shoals in Lake Erie entrance to canal, and in canal south of Ferry Street Bridge, to 22 feet; enlargement of North Tonawanda turning basin; extension of Bird Island Pier improvement of guide pier at the lock; and elimination of upper 150 feet of Tonawanda Creek channel from the project.' Mar 2, 1945 Widening Lake Erie entrance to canal. Sep 3, 1954 Deepen lower 1,500 feet of Tonawanda inner harbor and enlarge turning basin. May 20, 1826 Jun 23, 1866 Jun 23, 1874 Jun 3, 1896 Mar 3, 1899 Mar 3, 1909 BUFFALO HARBOR, NY Construction of south pier (extended in 1868) 9. Construction of old breakwater.9 Extension of old breakwater.' Stony Point and south breakwater.9 TABLE 20-B See Section 2 Annual Report, 1868, pp. 222 and 232. Annual Report, 1868, pp. 232 and 236. Annual Report, 1876, pt. 2, pp. 569 and 573. Annual Report, 1895, p. 3153. H. Doc. 72, 55th Cong., 1st sess., and Annual Report, 1897, p. 3245. North breakwater.' Jun 6, 1900 Deepening entrance channel to inner harbor and removing rock Jun 13, 1902 shoal therein. Mar 2, 1907 Dredging at entrance to canals at South Buffalo in outer harbor.' Mar 2, 19071t South entrance breaxwater.' Jun 25, 1910 Extension of Federal project to Commercial St. and removal of Watson elevator site.' Jul 25, 1912 Deepening areas A, B, D, in outer harbor to 21 feet, C in north entrance to 23 feet. Mar 2, 1919 Deepening areas F and G in outer harbor to 21 feet. Specified in acts. Specified in act. H. Doc. 240, 59th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 298, Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 550, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 1139, 64th Cong. 1st sess. 20-21 _ Documents H. Doc. 658, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 1004, 65th Cong., 2nd sess. and H. Doc. 92, 79th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 981, 66th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 289, 68th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 28, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 92, 79th Cong., Ist sess.4 H. Doc. 423, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess.4 ' BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Acts Work Authorized Documents 3 Jan 21, 1927 Removal of shoal between entrance channel to Buffalo River and Erie Basin to 21 feet. Jul 3, 1930 Deepening areas H, I, and K in outer harbor 21 feet. Aug 30, 193511 Extension of south entrance and south breakwaters, deepening outer harbor to present project dimensions, and removal of shoals on approach to south entrance. Aug 30, 1935 Maintenance of channels in Buffalo River and Buffalo ship Mar 2, 1945" canal to 21 feet in cooperation with city of Buffalo. Deepening North and Buffalo River entrance channels, and deepening and maintaining Buffalo River and Buffalo ship Jul 14, 1960 canal to present project dimensions. Deepening approach to south entrance channels, and deepen to 30 feet in outer area and 29 feet in inner area of Oct 23, 1962 southerly part of outer harbor. Deepening portion of outer harbor to 27 feet over a width of 500 feet for 2,500 feet northward from 28-foot project area, widening within 1,700 feet to limits within 150 feet of breakwater axis and 75 feet from harbor line and continuing within these limits for 7,000 feet. Elimination of 25-foot wide strip between presently authorized and proposed easterly dredging limits. Elimination of easterly 50-foot wide undredged strip in existing 23-foot depth project area, extending northerly from 27-foot depth to Buffalo River entrance channel. Previously authorized but uncompleted portions of work authorized by 1935 act, combined within this act as a single improvement. Jul 14, 1960 as amended Removal of abandoned abutments of South Michigan bridge. CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH Mar 3, 1875 West breakwater. Aug 5, 1886 Part of east breakwater.' Aug 11, 1888 Extension of east breakwater. Jun 3, 1896 Reconstruction of piers.' Mar 3, 1899 Dredging channel between piers and outer harbor to depth of 19 feet; dredging to depth of 23 feet in any portion of harbor is discretion of Secretary of War. Jun 13, 1902 Arrowhead breakwater and extension of east breakwater. H.Doc. 481, 68th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe. 1, 71st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 46, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 54, 74th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doec. 352, 78th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 151, 86th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 451, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. Sec. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Dec 15, 1980. Annual Report, 1876, p.558. H. Ex. Doc. 116, 48th Cong., 2nd sess, and Annual Report, 1886, p. 1865.H. Ex. Doc. 189, 50th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report, 1888, p. 2005. H. Doc. 326, 54th Cong., Ist sess., and Annual Report, 1896, p. 2949. H. Doc. 156, 55th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report, 1899, pp. 3075 and 3078. H. Doc 118, 56th Cong, 2nd sess. 20-22 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 TABLE 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Acts Work Authorized Documents 4 Mar 2, 1907 Removal of deflecting arm of old east breakwater and closure of Jun 25, 1910 gap between old and new east breakwaters. Jul 27, 1916 Pierhead at easterly end of east breakwater. Aug 8, 1917 Maintenance and improvement of channels in Cuyahoga and Old Aug 29, 1937 Rivers to a depth of 21 feet to a point 2,000 feet upstream from Clark Ave. viaduct and 18-foot turning basin. Aug 30, 19351 Deepening outer harbor and channel between piers to present project dimensions, construction of 400-foot spur breakwater at gap in shore arm of west breakwater, removal of easterly 150 feet of west breakwater, elimination from project of a 298-foot southerly extension on west pier, and abandonment of inner 932 feet of shore arm of west breakwater. No printed report. H. Doc 891, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 707, 63rd Cong., 2nd sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe. 84, 74th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 477, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess. Aug 30, 193511 Maintenance dredging in Cuyahoga and Old Rivers for 1 year as Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 39, an emergency measure. 74th Cong., 1st sess. Mar 2, 1945"4 Maintenance of extension of Cuyahoga River channel. Extension, maintenance, and improvement to a depth of 21 feet of Cuyahoga River channel to present project limit.' " Jul 24, 1946 Improvement of Cuyahoga and Old Rivers to a depth of 23 feet and replacement or pier construction of 7 railroad bridges.2 Jul 3, 1958 Deepening channel 25 feet through east basin of outer harbor; replacement of Erie-Lackawanna Railroad bridge over Cuyahoga River at mile 4.1 and widening of channel at that point, with elimination of reconstruction of east pier of bridge as previously authorized; and replacement of Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Bridge over Old River near its mouth and Willow Avenue Highway Bridge about 800 feet above mouth and widening channel at four locations along lower, 2,000 feet of river.' Jul 14, 1960 Depth of 29 feet in lake approach to main entrance; 28 feet in entrance channel to lakeward ends of piers at mouth of Cuyahoga River; 27 feet in river to a point just above its junction with Old River, and in Old River to upstream limit of present 23-foot project; 28 feet in west basin within existing project limits as modified to eliminate a triangular area at west end and to extend limits to a line parallel to and 75 feet from harbor line; and 28 feet in westerly 800 feet of east basin Oct 23, 1962 An area in east basin 27 feet deep extending 3,800 feet easterly of 28-foot area with project limits 380 feet from east breakwater and on landward side generally by a line 75 feet lakeward of and parallel to harbor line. A dock channel to Nicholson Cleveland Terminal Co. pier, at easterly end of east basin, from 25-foot contour to a limit 75 feet north of pierhead line, 400 feet wide at shoreward end and flared toward the lake. Jul 14, 1960 as amended Deepening upper end of Old River channel from 21 to 27 feet. Specified in act. H. Doc. 95, 79th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 629, 79th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 107, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 152, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 527, 87th Cong., 2nd sess.4 Sec. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Dec 6, 1966. 20-23 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Acts Work Authorized Documents 4 Oct 22, 1976 Preparation of Phase I design memorandum for improvements consisting of removal of portions of entrance breakwater; construction of breakwater; construction of breakwater extension of east entrance; deepening approach and entrance channels; construction of diked disposal area; and installation of recreational fishing facilities on west breakwater. Aug 15, 1985 Deepening and widening east entrance and approach channels, deepening the east basin channel and disposing of dredge material in an existing disposal site, as described in the Report to the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors Jan 22, 1985, including bulkheading and other necessary repairs at Pier 34 and approach channels and necessary protective structures for mooring basins for transient vessels in the area south of Pier 34 and including such modifications as may be recommended by the Chief of Engineers at a cost not to exceed $36,000,000. Nov 17, 1986 Bulkheading and other necessary repairs at Pier 34 and approach channels and necessary protective structures for mooring basins for transient wells in the area south of Pier 34. Dec 21, 1987 Appropriates and directs the Secretary of the Army to use the sum of $11,000,000 which is to remain available until expended to carry out the provisions for the harbor modifications contained in PL 99-662. CONNEAUT HARBOR, OH Jun 25, 1910 Extension of east breakwater, construction of new west breakwater, removal of portion of old west breakwater, and dredging of outer harbor to 19 feet. Aug 8, 1917"' Realignment of west breakwater, removal of remainder of old west breakwater, and deepening outer harbor to 20 feet. Removal of Bessemer & Lake Erie R.R. Co. of inner 635 feet of west pier." Aug 30, 1935" Removal of portion of west breakwater, extension of breakwaters to present project dimensions, construction of pierheads on outer ends of breakwaters, deepening outer harbor to present project dimensions; removal of portions of river pier, and elimination from project of a 255-foot shoreward extension of west breakwater. Oct 23, 1962 Deepening easterly part of outer harbor to 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material; deepening remaining triangular area of outer harbor to 22 feet in soft material and 23 feet in hard material; deepening inner harbor for 2,450 feet upstream of outer end of west pier to 27 feet in soft material and 28 feet in hard material; removal of east pier, extension of east breakwater to shore; and an access channel 8 feet deep in outer harbor to city dock. Previously authorized, but uncompleted portion of work authorized by 1917 and 1935 acts combined with this act for accomplishment as a single improvement. Sec. 175, PL 94-587 PL 99-88 Sec. 202, PL 99-662. PL 100-202. Doc. 653, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 983, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 48, 73rd Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 415, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. 20-24 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 TABLE 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar 2, 1827 DUNKIRK HARBOR, NY Construction of west pier.'" Mar 2, 1867 Breakwater and evacuation of entrance channel to 13 feet.' Jun 3, 1896 Deepening of entrance channel and harbor basin to a depth of suitable for vessels of 16-foot draft. Jun 25, 1910 Removal of rock reef bordering the inner entrance channel. Jun 30, 1948 Deepening outer entrance channel to present project depths; removal of rock shoal on the west side of the entrance channel to a depth of 17 feet, and changed limits of the inner entrance channel and basin to present project dimensions. Dec 15, 1970 (House Public Works Committee) Jun 22, 1971 (Senate Public Works Committee) Sec. 201 of F.C. Act of 1965 Construction of small-boat harbor. ERIE HARBOR, PA May 26, 1824 Breakwaters and piers; dredging entrance channel; and brushwood protection of beach of Presque Isle peninsula.9 Mar 3, 1899 Deepening channel and harbor basin too 18 feet; repair and extension of piers; and plant growth and emergency protection of work on peninsula. Jun 15, 1910 Deepening channel and part of harbor to 20 feet Nov 28, 19202 Reconveyed Presque Isle Peninsula to the State of Pennsylvania for park purposes. Aug 30, 1935 Deepening, widening, and straightening entrance channel, dredging channel at easterly end of harbor basin, all to present project dimensions; elimination of north breakwater from project; and limitation of south breakwater to a length of 1,200 feet Mar 2, 1945 Protection of the peninsula south of the watervorks settling basin. Sep 3, 1954 Widen 25-foot deep approach channel to ore dock. S. Ex. Doc.42, 35th Cong., Ist sess. and Annual Report 1866 pt. IV, p.155 Annual Report, 1871, p. 214 H. Doc. 63, 54th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 720, 61st Cong. 2nd sess.4 H. Doc. 632, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 91-423, 91st Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report, 1915, p. 1965. H.Doc.70, 55th Cong., Ist sess. and Annual Report, 1896, p. 3 2 3 7. 19 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 52, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 345, 83rd Cong., 2nd sess. 20-25 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul 14, 1960 Depth of 29 feet in the entrance channel to a point opposite the inner end of the north pier, thence 28 feet in soft material and 29 feet in hard material in the remainder of the entrance channel, within the general limits of the 25-foot basin and inner channel opposite the ore dock except as modified to eliminate from the project a triangular area along the easterly side; and a depth of 28 feet over 300-foot westward extension of the 25- foot basin.2 Oct 23, 1962 Depth of 27 feet in soft material and 28 feet in hard material in approach area to Duquesne Marine Terminal. Previously authorized but uncompleted portion of work authorized by 1935 act is combined with this act as a single improvement. FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH Mar 3, 182521 Construction of piers. Jun 3, 1896 Mar 3, 1905 Mar 2, 1919 Breakwaters and dredging outer harbor to a depth of 18 feet. 1,400-foot extension of east breakwater, present project dimension of east pier, and deepening of to 19 feet. Jan 21, 1927 4,000-foot extension of east breakwater at limit of cost to the Jul 3, 1930 United States of $715,000. Aug 30, 193522 Deepening of outer harbor and entrance channel to present dimensions; extending the west breakwater to present project dimensions with pierhead at its outer end; removal of west pier, and construction of bulkhead on west side of river channel. Aug 26, 1937 Dredging of 21- and 24-foot river channels and turr-ing basin in Grand River to present project dimensions. Jul 24, 1946 Dredging of 8-foot river channel. GREAT SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY Mar 2, 1829 Construction of piers and breakwater.9 Aug 2, 1882 Extension of piers to 15-foot contour in the lake. Mar 3, 1925 Deepening and widening of channel to 18-foot depth and 150- foot width. Jul 3, 1930 Widening channel lakeward of piers to 250 feet. Aug 30, 1935 Dredging channel to present project dimensions. H. Doc. 199. 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 340, 87th Cong., 2nd sess.4 Annual Report, 1889, pp. 2147-2153. H .Doc. 347, 54th Cong., 1st sess. and Annual Reports, 1896, p.2956; 19 03, p. 2084; 1905, p. 2349. H. Doc. 206, 63rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 592, 69th Cong., 2nd sess., Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 70th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 472, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 79, " 74th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 706, 79th Cong., 2nd sess.' Annual Report, 1876 pt. II p. 589. Annual Report, 1881, p. 2442. H. Doc. 192, 68th Cong., Ist sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 17, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 23, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. 20-26 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 TABLE 20-B AUTHORIZING TTST ,ATION Work Authorized HURON HARBOR, OH Mar 2, 1905 Extension of west pier, construction of east breakwater, removal of part of old east pier, deepening of channel to 19 feet; and dredging of sheltered area. Mar 2, 1919 Widening river to 200 feet; removal of remainder of old east pier, construction of new spur pier, enlargement of sheltered area; and closure of beach at shore end of west pier. Aug 30, 193522 Extension of west pierhead at its outer end; removal of outer end of east breakwater and construction pierhead on new outer end; widening and deepening channel to present project dimensions; enlargement of turning basin at head of channel; shore protection west of west pier, and elimination from project construction of spur pier and dredging sheltered area outside channel limits. Oct 23, 1962 Depths of 29 feet in approach channel, 28 feet in entrance channel, 27 feet in river channel, 21 feet in turning basin and abandonment of lakeward end of existing approach channel. Jul 3, 1958 IRONDEQUOIT BAY, NY Construction entrance channel 9 feet deep and 100 feet wide, extending from 9-foot depth in Lake Ontario to junction with inner bay channels, a distance of about 1,300 feet; inner channel, 8 feet deep and 100 feet wide, from entrance channel to deep water in bay, a distance of about 3,035 feet, access channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 500 feet in length from the inner bay channel to the w -st; two stone rubblemound structures 1,350 feet and 750 in length at the natural entrance; and recreational facilities. LITTLE SODUS BAY HARBOR, NY Aug 30, 1852 West entrance pier.9 Jun 23, 1866 Extension of west pier and construction of west breakwater, and dredging channel to 12 feet deep, 400 feet wide.9 Mar 3, 1871 East pier and east breakwater.' Mar 3, 1881 Extension of piers lakeward to 15.5-foot contour, and dredging channel to 15.5 feet. Jun 13, 1902 Extension of east pier 300 feet lakeward. LORAIN HARBOR, OH Mar 3, 1899 Breakwaters and extension of piers to present dimensions. Mar 2, 1907 Extend 18-foot channel from inner end of piers to Erie Avenue Bridge. Jun 25, 1910 Extend breakwaters and dredge to depth of 19 feet in outer harbor. H. Doc. 122, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 5, 63rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 478, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 165, 87th Cong., ist sess.' H. Doc. 332, 84th Cong., 2nd sess Annual Report, 1874, p.256 Annual Report, 1874, p.256 Annual Report, 1871, p.2 3 4 Annual Report, 1881, pp. 2444 and 2446. Annual Report, 1901, p. 3364. H. Doc. 131, 55th Cong., 2nd sess., and Annual Report 1898, p. 2718. H. Doc. 560, 60th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 644, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. 20-27 See Section Acts Documents 10 11 12 13 a s ra~a~r v fi ' . a ai " JJ V i .. j i V 1 I - BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Acts Work Authorized Documents 13 Aug 8, 1917 Extend breakwaters to present dimensions. Aug 8, 1917 Deepen outer harbor and river channel of Eric Avenue Bridge to 20 feet. Jul 3, 1930 Extend 20-foot channel to American Shipbuilding Co. drydock. Aug 30, 1935 Widen 2 bends in river and enlarge turning basin opposite National Tube Co. dock.'2 Aug 30, 1935 Approach channel to municipal pier. Aug 30, 1935 Deepen outer harbor and river channel to American Shipbuilding Co. drydock 2 present project dimensions and extension of river channel to upper end of National Tube Co. dock with turning basin opposite that dock. Maintenance dredging in Black River from American Shipbuilding Co. drydock 2. Upper end of National Tube Co. dock was authorized Apr 7, 1934, by Public Works Administration. Enlarging turning basin opposite NationaltTube Co. dock to present project dimensions. - Mar 2, 1945 Turning basin in bend of Black River immediately upstream from Baltimore & Ohio RR coal dock. Jul 14, 1960 Replace Norfolk and Western Railway swing bridge with a vertical lift bridge; construct two detached arrowhead breakwaters lakeward of existing breakwaters; construct extension of east breakwater, to shore; remove 300 feet of lakeward end of west breakwater, remove outer 1,100 feet east pier, deepen lake approach to 29 feet, 800-foot wide outer harbor channel to 27 feet; widen river channel at bends; and construct a new turning basin 21 feet deep near upstream limit of existing project.27 Jul 14, 1960 as Construction of a 225 foot detached rubble mound breakwater amended and an 800 foot long rubble mound breakwater attached to the east breakwater shore arm in the east basin of the outer harbor. Nov 17, 1986 Two bed cuts on Black River between the Norfolk and Western Railroad Bridge and 21st Street Bridge, excavated to existing channel depth of 27 feet. Widening Upper Turning Basin at existing authorized depth of 21 feet.' OAK ORCHARD, NY Mar 2, 1945 Harbor of refuge. H. Doc. 980, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 985, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 587, 69th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 469, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess. Senate Committee print, 73rd Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 51, 74th Cong., Ist sess. Specified in act. H. Doc. 161, 77th Cong., Ist sess. H. Doc. 166, 86th Cong., 1st. sess. Sec. 107, PL 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Mar 12, 1986 H. Doc. 124, 99th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2nd sess. 20-28 14 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 TABLE 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Acts Work Authorized Documents OLCOTT HARBOR, NY Mar 2, 1867 Dredging a channel 11 feet deep between parallel piers.9 Mar 4, 1913 Deepening channel to 12 feet and maintenance of west pier. Nov 17, 1986 Construct the project for Navigation, Report of the Chief of Engineers dated Jun 11, 1980. OSWEGO HARBOR, NY Jul 11, 1870 Construction of outer west breakwater.' Mar 2, 1907 Repair of outer west breakwater under Plan (A).' Jul 3, 1930 Construction of arrowhead breakwaters; deepening outer harbor between arrowhead breakwaters; west outer harbor east of Erie- Lackawanna coal dock, and Oswego River north of Seneca St., to 21 feet; and deepening west outer harbor, west of Erie- Lackawanna coal dock, to 16 feet. 29 Aug 30, 1935 Widening channel to harbor line in Oswego River north of Seneca Street. Oct 17, 1940 Closing gap in west breakwater, deepening west outer harbor, west of east line of Erie-Lackawanna coal dock, to project depth." Jun 30, 1948 Construction of east outer breakwater; removal of the inner end of east arrowhead breakwater; and dredging channel and basin in east outer harbor." Sep 3, 1954 Construction of detached breakwater at harbor entrance and removal of shoals in approach to harbor entrance to 25 feet deep. Oct 23, 1962 Depth of 27 feet in lake approach channel; 25 feet deep in outer harbor channel 800 feet wide from entrance gap to a turning basin 25 feet deep about 750 by 1,100 feet, at mouth of Oswego River, depth of 24 feet in earth and 25 feet in hard material in river channel from turning basin to upstream end of Port of Oswego Authority's east side terminal, a distance of about 1,600 feet; relocation of Federal project limits in Oswego River upstream of 24-foot channel to Federal project limit at north line of West Seneca St, on lines parallel to 50 feet channel ward of established harbor lines; elimination of maintenance of inner west breakwater and elimination of modification authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1948. PORT CLINTON HARBOR, OIHIO Jun 10, 1872 Parallel stone and pile jetties at mouth of river, east jetty 2,200 feet long and west jetty 1,980 feet long extending to 10-foot contour in lake Channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide for outer 4,200 foot length and 200 feet wide for inner 800 foot length to Highway Bridge. Annual Report, 1866, pt. III, p. 15 pt. IV, p. 158. H. Doc. 780, 62nd Cong., 2nd sess.' Sec. 601, PL 99-662 Annual Report, 1870, pp. 54, 220 and 221. H. Doc. 55, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 24, 71st Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 7, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 96, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 722, 80th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 487, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 471, 87th Cong., 2nd sess. Annual Report, 1875, p. 295 20-29 15 16 17 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Acts Work Authorized Documents 18 & 28 2, 1945 Maintenance of Bay Channel to 22 feet; and elimination from project of portion of turning basin and rock dike. ROCHESTER, HARBOR, NY Mar 2, 1829 Construction of piers.' Aug 2, 1882 Extension of piers to 15 foot contour in the lake. Concrete superstructure on piers.' Jun 25, 1910 Deepening channel to 20 feet. Aug 30, 19356 Dredging of the entrance channel and turning basin, and the elimination of the inner ends of the east and west piers, all to present project dimensions. Mar 2, 1945 Maintenance of existing channel upstream of the Penn Central Co. bridge. Jul 14, 1960 Depth of 24 feet in the channel from the lake to the west Pier, a depth of 23 feet between the piers and in the lower river to the Penn Central Co. bridge, including the existing turning basin; a depth of 21 feet from the bridge to the upstream project limit, with suitable widening at the bends; and, stream turning basin 21 feet deep and 650 feed wide adjacent to the improved channel, with two mooring dolphins. Nov 28, 1990 A navigation project for the mouth of the Genesee River in Rochester, New York, by development and implementation of wave surge control measures. Project to be carried out under Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577). ROCKY RIVER HARBOR, OH Jun 10, 1872 East pier and dredging of channel. Aug 26, 1937 Extension of east pier and deepening channel to present project dimensions. Oct 27, 1965 Realign and extend channel and construct an anchorage basin. SANDUSKY HARBOR, OHi Mar 3, 1899 Construction of channel protection works. Jun 13, 1902 Widening of Straight and Dock channels and deepening to 19 feet. Mar 2, 1919 Extension of east jetty to total length of 6,000 feet, with pierhead on outer end; deepening of the outer, straight, and easterly portion of Dock channel to 20 feet. Jan 21, 1927 Deepening of Dock Channel to 22 feet Aug 30, 1935 Enlargement of turning basin and construction rock dike. 20-30 Annual Report, 1874, p. 247 Annual Report, 1881, p. 2437; Annual Report, 1905, p. 2383. H. Doc. 342, 61st Cong., 2nd sess. H.Doc. 484, 72nd Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 139, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 409, 86th Cong., 2nd sess.' P.L. 101-640 Annual Report 1871, p.211 H. Doec. 70, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 352, 88th Cong., 2nd sess.' H. Doc. 362, 55th Cong., 2nd sess. and Annual Report 1898, p. 2708. H. Doc. 120, 56th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 982, 64th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 584, 69th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 73rd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 328, 76th Cong., 1st sess. 19 20 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 TABLE 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Acts Work Authorized Documents 20 Jul 14, 1960 Extending Moseley Channel and deepening that channel and the outer end of Straight channel to 26 feet, from deep water in the lake to the vicinity of Cedar Point dock; widening the bend at the junction of the Moseley and Straight channels to 25 feet from the vicinity of Cedar Point dock to Junction Bay channel; deepening the Bay channel from the junction with the Straight channel to the outer end of the Pennsylvania Coal dock no. 3 to 24 feet, thence from outer end of the coal dock to the turning basin to 24 feet in soft material and 25 in hard, with no Federal dredging within 50 feet of the dock; and enlarging the turning basin, including removal of approximately 300 feet of the rock dike, and deepening to 24 feet in soft material and 25 feet in hard. TOLEDO HARBOR, OH Mar 3, 1899 A channel 400 feet wide and 21 feet deep from 25-foot contour in Maumee Bay to fassett Street Bridge, 200 feet wide and 19 feet deep above that point and a 500-foot turning basin at Upper End. A stone revetted earth dike in Maumee Bay Channel. Act 1899 modified to insure a navigable channel to 21 feet from Jun 25, 1910 fassett Street Bridge to Lake. Channel 25 feet deep and 500 feet wide from 25-foot contour to Aug 30, 1935 mouth of Maumee River (300 feet wide onneach side of center dike in Bay Channel), thence 400 feet wide to fassett Street Bridge, 200 feet wide above that point and a turning basin at Upper end 18 feet deep. May 17, 1950 Widening at bend of mouth of River opposite Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Dock. Sept 3, 1954 Removal of center dike in Maumee Bay Channel. Jul 3, 1958 Enlarge widening at bend opposite Chesapeake and Ohio dock and turning basin opposite American Shipbuilding Co. dock. Jul 14, 1960 Deepening Bay Channel including widening to 28 feet, deepen River channels to NY Central Railroad Bridge to 27 feet and construct new turning basin below Anthony Wayne Bridge.2' 22 Jul 4, 1836 VERMILION HARBOR, OH Parallel piers and dredging channel to 8 feet deep. Mar 3, 1875 Deepening of channel to 12 feet. Mar 3, 1905 Reconstruction of piers. Jul 3, 1958 New entrance formed by two overlapping arrowhead breakwaters and extension of existing river channel upstream to Liberty St. Bridge. WEST HARBOR, OH Oct 27, 1965 Construction of arrowhead breakwaters, entrance channel and access channel. H. Dec. 198, 55th Cong., 2nd sess. & Annual Report 1898, p. 2693. H. Doc. 865, 60th Cong., 1st sess. River and Harbors Committee Doc 21, 72nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 189, 81st Cong., Ist sess. H. Doec. 620, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doec. 436, 84th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 153, 86th Cong., 1st sess.' Annual Report, 1880. Annual Report, 1874, p.2 1 9 H. Doec. 252, 58th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doec. 231, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 245, 88th Cong., 2nd sess. 20-31 21 23 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Acts Work Authorized Documents WILSON HARBOR, NY Mar 2, 1945 Entrance channel 80 feet wide and 8 feet deep; and restore east and west piers. Aug 3, 1968 Extend existing channel 300 feet; and construct new channel 3,800 feet long through Tuscarora Bay. STURGEON POINT, EVANS, NY Jul 14, 1960 Rehabilitate existing breakwater, construct rubble mound west breakwater extension, construct rubble mound east breakwater, a shore revetment and dredging. Sep 3, 1954 PRESQUE ISLE PENINSULA, ERIE, PA Construction of groin system, seawall, bulkhead, placement of beach material at waterworks reservation and along remainder of peninsula; removal of portions of existing structures. Jul 14, 1960 Periodic nourishment of shores for a 10-year period. Mar 7, 1974 Periodic nourishment of shore for a 5-year period. Oct 22, 1976 Preparation of Phase I design memorandum for improvements consisting of construction of five sections of spaced offshore breakwaters and replenishment of beach area with sand fill. Nov 17, 1986 Construct offshore breakwaters and restore beaches. MT. MORRIS LAKE, GENESEE RIVER, NY Dec 22, 1944 Construction of a concrete gravity dam and reservoir. Construct a visitor center at Mt. Morris Dam to be known as the "William B. Hoyt II Visitor Center". RENO BEACH - HOWARD FARMS AREA, OHIO Jun 30, 1948 Construction of dike and levees. SWAN CREEK, TOLEDO, Oil Jun 30, 1948 Construction of levee and flood wall system. Relocate 540 foot section of creek. ONONDAGA LAKE, NY Nov 16, 1990 The Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Governor of the State of New York, acting jointly, shall convene a management conference for the restoration and management of Onondaga Lake. The purpose of the conference shall include the development, in the 2-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this fact, for a comprehensive restoration, conservation, and management plan for Onondaga Lake that recommends priority corrective actions and compliance scheduled for the cleanup of the Lake and the coordination of the implementation of the plan by the State of New York, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the H. Doc. 679, 76th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 112, 90th Cong., Ist sess. Sec.107, PL86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Oct 21, 1987 H. Doc. 231, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 397, 86th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 796, 93rd Cong., 2nd sess. Sec. 101, PL 94-587 Sec. 501, PL 99-662. H. Doc 615, 78th Cong., 2nd sess. Sec. 103, PL 102-580 H. Doc 554, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec 205, PL 80-858 Authorized by Chief of Engineers May 15, 1991 PL 101-596 20-32 24 28 29 32 33 37 38 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 TABLE 20-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Acts Work Authorized Documents 38 Environmental Protection Agency and all local agencies, governments and other groups participating in the management conference. Not later than 120 days after the completion of the plan, and after providing for public review and comment, the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works and the Administrator of the Environmental Protft;on Agency shall approve the plan if it meets the requirements of this section and if the Governor of the State of New York concurs in such approval. Upon approval of the plan, the plan shall be implemented. The Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency are authorized to make grants to the State of New York to perform activities authorized under this section or to contract for such performance, provided that such grants shall not exceed 70% of the costs of such activities and that the non- Federal share of such costs are provided from non-Federal sources, The Governor of the State of New York may, using funds provided above, make grants for research, surveys, administrative services and studies approved by the management conference, and gathering data and retaining expert consultants in support of litigation undertaken by the State of New York to compel cleanup or obtain cleanup and damage costs from parties responsible for the pollution of Onondaga Lake, including adminstrative services. Nov 28, 1990 Reaffirmation ofPL 101-596. PL 101-640 Oct 31, 1992 The Secretary is authorized to design and construct projects to PL102-580 address water quality problems associated with storm water discharges from large storm events for... the watershed areas of Onondaga County and Syracuse, New York, from which waters discharge into Onondaga Lake, New York. The design of Projects shall ensure the deelopment of effective Federal and non-Federal actions which will contribute toward compliance with the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. Total project cost shall be shared at 75% Federal and 25% non-Federal. Operation and maintenance cost shall be 100% non-Federal. 20-33 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT 1. Authorized by Public Works Administration, Sep 6, 1933. 2. Widening Cuyahoga River downstream at end of Cut 4 classified inactive. 3. Replacement of bridges 19 and 32, widening Cuyahoga and Old River Channels, classified deferred. i. Contains latest published map. 5. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 6. Authorized May 28, 1935 by Emergency Relief Administration Act of 1935. 7. Improvement of guide pier at Black Rock Lock was deauthorized by Congress in Aug 1977. 8. Classified deferred. 9. Completed under previous projects. 10. Also Sundry Civil Act of Mar 3, 1905. 11. Authorized in part by Public Works Administration, Sep 6, 1933. 12. Authorized by Public Works Administration, Sep 6, 1933. 13. Previously authorized by Public Works Administration. 14. First Deficiency Appropriations Act approved Apr 1, 1944. 15. Authorized by Defense Plant Corp., May 19, 1942. 16. Deepening left half of channel extension was eliminated from project by 1962 R&H Act. 17. Permit of Secretary of War, Aug 5, 1927. 18. Modified 1828 and 1852. 19. Extension of north pier portion of this modification was deauthorized Nov 1981. 20. Public Law 366. 21. Modified 1830, 1881, and 1890. New work completed under previous projects. 22. Partly included in Public Works Administration program, Nov 15, 1933. 23. First Supplemental National Defense Appropriation Act, 1944 approved Dec 23, 1943. 24. Deepening remainder of Cuyahoga River from bridge 1 to and including Old River, classified deferred. 25. Included in Public Works Administration program, Nov 15, 1933. 26. Deepening strips adjacent to north and south piers was deauthorized Aug 1982. 27. Deepening and widening remainder of Black River channel at Cut 1 has been deauthorized. 28. The 27-foot project extended 2,800 feet an turning basin relocated under authority of Chief of Engineers. 29. Deepening a 200-foot strip along harbor line east of mouth of Oswego River is deauthorized. 30. Deepening to 22 feet a 150-foot wide strip in west outer harbor deauthorized in May 1981. 31. Modification eliminated by River and Harbor Act of Oct 26, 1962. 32. Modification classified inactive. 20-34 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 TABLE 20-C 1. No commerce reported. 2. Only information available is in index to reports of Chief of Engineers. 3. Amount includes maintenance; not separable. 4. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong., 1st sess. 5. Abandonment recommended in Ex. Doc. 16, 35th Cong., 1st sess. 6. Channel improved by local interests. 7. Includes local interests contribution of $25,742. 8. Costs of operation and maintenance of this project will be settled directly by concerned power agencies. No further appropriations will be made to this project 9. Includes local interest contribution of $27,563. 10. Includes local interests contribution of $5,000. 11. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 375, 64th Cong., 1st sess. 12. Annual Report for Detroit District. 13. Construction of compensating works as authorized by 1930 R&H Act w authorized by Congress in Aug 1977. 14. Includes $271,380 for previous projects. Excludes $57,000 contributed funds. 15. Includes $130,512 for previous projects. 16. Includes $56,616 for previous projects. Excludes $181,500 contributed funds. 17. Excludes $3,261,375 contributed funds. 18. Excludes $593,216 contributed funds. 19. Excluded $2,566,529 contributed funds. 20. Includes $50,000 for previous projects. Excludes $1,299,008 contribut funds. 20-35 See Section of Text 27 OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Annual Project Status Report For Barcelona Harbor, NY Completed 1989 Big (Cunningham) Creek, OH Completed -2 Black River Harbor, NY - -2 Buffalo Small Boat Harbor, NY Completed 1994 Cape Vincent Harbor, NY Completed 1962 Cattaraugus Creek, NY - -2 Cattaraugus Harbor, NY Completed 1996 Geneva-on-the-Lake, OH Completed 1990 Grasse River (Massena),NY - 1891 Kelleys Island, OH Active 1974 '2 Little River at Cayuga Island, NY Completed 1969 Morristown Harbor, NY Completed 1949 Niagara Remedial Works, NY' Completed 1966 Niagara River, NY" Completed 1964 Ogdensburg Harbor, NY Completed 1987 Port Ontario Harbor, NY Completed 1995 Pultneyville Harbor, NY" - 1934 Put in Bay, OH Completed 1951" Sackets Harbor, OH Completed 1982 Sandusky River, OH - 1894 Construction $1,185,85316 19,763' 42,401 602,016" 275,082 57,410 4,804,06019 3,145,17617 9,000' 129,874 46,804' 6,221 6,069,395 559,4579 1,720,4661" 2,369,62120 68,219 51,609 25,010 58,000' Cost to Sep 30, 1997 Operations & Maintenance $1,958,238 1,569,056 325,833 9,627 6,580 13,218 510,819 290,845 1,423,038" 40,961 20,087 14,357 28,617 557 _ BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 20-D OTHER AUTHORIZED SHORE PROTECTION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to Sep 30, 1997 See Section of See Annual Operations & Text Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance 30 Hamlin Beach State Park, NY Completed 1976 $1,769,600 - Lakeview Park, Lorain, OH Completed 1987 1,741,1252 - Maumee Bay State Park, OH Completed 1995 2,780,9753 - Selkirk Shore State Park, Lake Completed 1963 58,978 $307 Ontario, NY' 1. Federal participation was limited to one-third of first cost when project was authorized by 1954 River and harbor Act. Federal participation was changed from one-third to 70 percent of remaining work under Public Law 87-874. 2. Does not include $739,700 contributed funds. 3. Does not include $199,845 contributed funds. 20-36 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 TABLE 20-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Cost to Sep 30, 1997 See Section Annual Operations & of Text Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance 36 Auburn, NY, Owasco Outlet Completed 1962 $371,985' Batavia and vicinity, Tonawanda Completed 1957 335,385 Creek, NY Camp Perry, OH Completed 1967' 275,000' Cayuga Creek, Cheektowaga, NY2 Completed 1984 1,404,500 Cuyahoga River Basin, OH Active 1985 1,117,000 Dansville and vicinity, Canaseraga Active 1985 490,300 Creek, NY Fremont, OH, Sandusky River Completed 1976 8,589,824' Ithaca, Cayuga Inlet, NY Completed 1978 3,929,300' Lackawanna, NY, Smokes Creek Completed 1971 3,542,068' Lancaster, Cayuga Creek, NY Completed 1954 797,300 Marsh Creek, Geneva, NY Completed - 226,429 Montour Falls, Oswego River Completed 1954 1,681,785 Basin, NY Onondaga Creek, Nedrow, NY2 Completed 1964 330,231 Ottawa, OH Deferred 1989 374,000 Owasco Inlet and Outlet, Montville Inactive and Dry Creek, State Ditch and Deferred 1950 281,559 Crane Brook, NY1 Point Place, Toledo, OH Completed 1990 9,885,733 1 - Scajaquada Creek, NY Completed 1985 4,944,852 Syracuse, Oswego River Basin, NY Completed 1954 3,349,248 Warsaw, NY, Oatka Creek2 Completed 1969 558,317' Wellsville, NY, Genesee River Completed 1978 3,145,30310 1. In-active portion of work for State Ditch has been done by local interest and work on Crane Brook has been deferred at the request of local interests. 2. Project authorized by Chief of Engineers. 3. Excludes costs of $188,732 under Public Law 88-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, Jun 1972. 4. Includes local interests contribution of $50,000. 5. Excludes costs of $26,807 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, Jun 1972. 6. Includes local interests contribution of $6,944. Excludes cost of $383,786 under Public Law 84-99. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, for emergency restoration of levees damaged during 1973. 7. Includes local interest contribution of $125,000. 8. Annual Report for Detroit District 9. Includes local interests contribution of $99,000. Excludes costs of $104,005 under Public Law 84-99. Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storm Agnes, Jun 1972. 10. Includes local interests contribution of $50,000. Excludes costs of $374,042 under Public Law 84-99, Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Appropriation, incurred for project rehabilitation as a result of damages due to storms. 11. Excludes $1,871,631 in contributed funds. 20-37 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report See See Section of Annual Date Dec Text 40 Report For Authorize 1962 Aug 1977 Project Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY 1935 R&H Act' Black Rock Channel and Tonawanda Harbor, NY 1954 R&H Act Buffalo Harbor Drift Removal, NY Buffalo Ship Canal, Buffalo, NY Caledonia, Genessee River, NY 1950 FC Act Cape Vincent Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act Chittenango Creek and Tributaries, NY 1944 FC Act Conneaut Harbor, OH 1966 R&H Act, 1990 WRDA Crane Creek State Park, OH 1962 R&H Act Dunkirk Harbor, NY WRDA 1986 Eastlake, Chagrin River, OH 1965 FC Act Edgewater Park, OH 1954 R&H Act Elk Creek Harbor, PA 1966 R&H Act Erie Harbor, PA 1899 R&H Act Erie Harbor, PA 1945 R&H Act Erie Harbor, PA 1960 R&H Act Fairhaven Beach State Park, NY 1958 R&H Act Fairport Harbor, OH 1960 R&H Act 1978 1963 1963 1963 1995 Federal Funds Expended Contributed Funds Expended 1962 1950 1962 1948 1995 1968' 20-38 TABLE 20-G May 1981 Dec 1992 Dec 1992 Jan 1990 Nov 1986 Jan 1990 Nov 1995 Nov 1979 Dec 1992 Jan 1990 Jan 1990 Dec 1992 Nov 1981 Aug 1977 Aug 1982 Jan 1990 Nov 1995 $12,464 506,344 101,500 67,000 1976 ed REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 TABLE 20-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report See See Section of Annual Date De- Federal Funds Contributed Text Project Report For Authorized Expended Funds Expended 40 Fairport Harbor, OH 1995 Nov 1995 Sec. 201 1965 FC Act Fort Niagara State Park, NY Sec. 201 1965 FC Act Grandview Bay Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act Great Sodus Bay Harbor, NY 1941 R&H Act Hamlin Beach Harbor, NY 1968 R&H Act Hammondsport, Oswego River Basin, NY 1941 FC Act Huron Harbor, NY 1962 R&H Act' Ithaca, NY - Cascadilla Creek 1941 FC Act Ithaca, NY - Fall Creek 1941 FC Act Lorain Harbor, OH 1960 R&H Act, modified by 1965 R&H Act' Maumee River, above Toledo, OH 1872 Act Niagara River, Compensating Works, 1930 R&H Act Ogdensburg Harbor, NY 1935 R&H Act Oswego Harbor, NY 1930 R&H Act Oswego Harbor, NY 1940 R&H Act4 Port Bay, NY 1950 R&H Act Red Creek, NY 1966 FC Act Sackets Harbor, NY 1945 R&H Act Selkirk Shores State Park, OHG 1954 R&H Act s Jan 1990 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Jan 1990 Nov 1983 1948 1963 1973 1951 1963 1950 1950 1966 19713 1964 1986 1963 1963 Jan 1990 Aug 1977 Aug 1977 Jan 1990 Nov 1977 Aug 1977 Nov 1986 Jan 1990 May 1981 Jan 1990 Nov 1986 May 1981 Jan 1990 1975 1948 1963 1,524 72,052 29,000 8,159 12,300 12,000 361,241 19,010 20-39 BUFFALO, NY DISTRICT TABLE 20-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report See See Section of Annual Date De- Federal Funds Contributed Text Project Report For Authorized Expended Funds Expended 40 Sheffield Lake Community - Aug 1977 Park, Oh 1962 R&H Act Watkins Glenn, NY 1941 FC 1958 Aug 1977 43,182 Act White City Park, OH 1954 - Jan 1990 R&H Act 1. Extension of guide pier only; other improvements completed. 2. Deepening of west outer harbor, other improvements completed. 3. Annual Report for Detroit District. 4. Uncompleted portion. 5. Breakwater. TABLE 20-H FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Bank Protection (Sec. 14 of 1986 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) See Section of Text Study Identification FY Cost S 37 Auglaize River, Paulding County, OH 826 Canaseraga Creek, Dansville, NY 504 Cattaraugus Creek, Village of Arcade, NY 14,4601 Coordination Account Funds 6,844 Cuyahoga River, Brecksville Rd. OH -873 Niagara Riverwalk. Buffalo, NY 80 Lake Ontario, Sodus Point, Wayne County, NY 45,290 Seneca Falls, NY 12,2543 Tonawanda Creek, Niagara Co., NY 35,291 1. Does not include $14,460 contributed funds. 2. Does not include $965 contributed funds. 3. Does not include -$12,254 contributed funds. 20-40 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT * The District is composed of the upper and lower peninsulas of Michigan and portions of Indiana, Wisconsin and Minnesota, which border the lakes. It includes U.S. waters of Lakes Superior, Michigan, Huron, St. Clair and western Lake Erie. Unless otherwise indicated, all depths stated in this report are referred to low water datum as follows: Lake Superior, 601.1 feet; Lake Michigan-Huron, 577.5 feet; Lake Erie, 569.2 feet; and Lake St. Clair, 572.3 feet. These elevations are in feet above the mean water level at Great Lakes Datum, 1985 (IGLD 1985). The IGLD 1985 is a datum or reference system used to define water levels within the Great Lakes - St. Lawrence River system. This datum was implemented in January 1992, officially replacing IGLD 1955. At the time IGLD 1955 was established, it was recognized that this datum would have to be periodically revised due to isostatic rebound. Isostatic rebound is the gradual rising or bouncing back of the earth's crust from the weight of the glaciers that covered the Great Lakes region during the last ice age. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Arcadia Harbor, MI ............................. 21-2 2. Ashland Harbor, WI ......................... 21-2 3. AuSableHarbor,MI ....... ............ 21-3 4. Black River (Port Huron), MI ................... .. 21-3 5. Black River Harbor (U.P.), MI .................... 21-3 6. CedarRiver,MI ................. 21-3 7. Charlevoix Harbor, MI .......................... 21-4 8. Cheboygan Harbor, MI ...... ........... 21-4 9. Clinton River, MI .......................... 21-5 10. Cornucopia Harbor, WI ........................ 21-5 11. DetroitRiver,MI .................... ........ 21-5 12. Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN and WI .............. 21-6 13. FoxRiver, WI ......... .............. 21-7 14. Frankfort Harbor,MI .......................... 21-8 15. GrandHavenHarbor, MI ...................... 21-8 16. Grand Marais Harbor, MI ...................... 21-9 17. GreenBayHarbor, WI ....................... 21-9 18. HammondBayHarbor, MI ................... 21-10 19. Harbor Beach Harbor, MI ...................... 21-10 20. Harrisville Harbor, MI ...................... 21-10 21. HollandHarbor,MI ........................... 21-11 22. InlandRoute,MI .................. 21-11 23. Kenosha Harbor, WI ......................... 21-11 24. Kewaunee Harbor, WI ...................... 21-12 25. Keweenaw Waterway Harbor, MI ................ 21-12 26. Lac Labelle Harbor, MI ...................... 21-13 27. Lake St. Clair, MI, Channels .................. 21-13 28. Leland, M I .................................. 21-13 29. Lexington Harbor, MI ................... ....... 21-14 30. Little Lake Harbor, MI ......................... 21-14 31. LudingtonHarbor, MI......................... 21-14 32. Manistee Harbor, MI .......................... 21-15 33. Manistique Harbor, MI ......................... 21-15 34. Manitowoc Harbor, MI ...................... 21-16 35. Menominee Harbor & River, MI & WI ............ 21-16 36. Milwaukee Harbor, WI ......................... 21-17 37. MonroeHarbor,MI .......................... 21-18 38. Muskegon Harbor, MI ......................... 21-18 39. New Buffalo Harbor, MI ....................... 21-19 Navigation (Continued) Page 40. OcontoHarbor, WI ......................... 21-19 41. Ontonagon Harbor, MI ........................ 21-19 42. Pentwater Harbor, MI ........................ 21-20 43. Petoskey Harbor, MI ........................ 21-20 44. Point Lookout Harbor, MI ...................... 21-20 45. Port Austin Harbor, MI ....................... 21-21 46. Port Sanilac Harbor, MI ........................ 21-21 47. Port Washington Harbor, WI ................... 21-21 48. Portage Lake Harbor, MI ..................... 21-21 49. Presque Isle Harbor, MI ....................... 21-22 50. Rouge River,MI .............................. 21-22 51. Saginaw River, MI ........................... 21-23 52. St. Clair River, MI ......................... 21-23 53. St. Joseph Harbor,MI ......................... 21-24 54. St. Marys River, MI ........................ 21-24 55. Saugatuck Harbor and Kalamazoo River, MI ... 56, Saxon Harbor, WI ........ 57. Sebewaing River, MI ..... 58. Sheboygan Harbor, WI .... 59. Silver Bay Harbor, MN ... 60. South Haven Harbor, MI .. 61. Sturgeon Bay and ..................... 21-26 .......... ......... 21-27 ................... . 21-27 ........... ........ 21-27 .... ...... ......... 21-28 ........... ........ 21-28 Lake MI Ship Canal, WI..................... 21-28 62. Two Harbors, Harbor, MN .................... 21-29 63. Two Rivers Harbor, WI ...................... 21-29 64. White Lake Harbor, MI ........................ 21-29 65. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ............ 21-30 66. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ............. 21-30 67. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ........ .................... 21-30 Beach Erosion Control 68. Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ........ 21-30 69. Emergency Shore Protection .................... 21-30 70. Beach Erosion Work Under Special Authorization ... 21-30 71. Mitigation of Shore Damage ................... 21-30 72. Project Modification for Improving the Quality of the Environment ..................... 21-31 21-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Flood Control 73. Clinton River Spillway, MI ..................... 21-31 74. Fort Wayne Metro Area, IN ................... 21-31 75. Kawkawlin River, MI .................... : ... 21-32 76. Saginaw River, MI ............................ 21-32 77. Sebewaing River, MI .......................... 21-34 78. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .......................... 21-34 79. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ........................... 21-34 80. Flood Control Under Special Authorization ............................ 21-34 81. Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters and International Water Studies ................ 21-34 General Investigations 82. Surveys .................................... 21-37 83. Preconstruction Engineering and Design .......... 21-37 Navigation 1. ARCADIA HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 193 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 15 miles northerly from Manistee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907). Existing project. Provided for maintenance dredging of the existing harbor built by private interests, for a period of five years. The five years covered by this project were the calendar years 1905 to 1909, inclusive. Funds were also appropriated and maintenance was performed in calendar years 1911, 1912, 1913 and 1915, inclusive. There is at present no approved project for the improvement of this harbor. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Dock facilities are considered adequate for existing recreational traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $6,438. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $8,770. Materials purchased and stockpiled for future repairs cost $49,540. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging, removing 4,230 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $23,058. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $51,466. General Investigations 84. Collection and Study of Basic Data .............. 21-37 Tables Table 21-A Cost & Financial Statement .............. 21-39 Table 21-B Authorizing Legislation ................. 21-62 Table 21-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .............................. 21-79 Table 21-D Not Applicable ............................ Table 21-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................... .......... 21-80 Table 21-F Multiple Purpose Projects, i 'uding Power, St. Marys River, MI: Existing Project .......................... 21-80 Table 21-G Deauthorized Projects ................. 21-81 Table 21-H Features of Existing Project .............. 21-84 Table 21-I Fox River, WI: Locks & Dams ............ 21-85 Table 21-J Reconnaissance & Condition Surveys ...... 21-86 Existing project was completed in 1909. Varying depths of 5-12 feet exist in the channel at present. Maintenance of the harbor is based on providing a 9-foot depth. Piers and revetments are in poor condition and are scheduled for major repairs. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $4,873,687. 2. ASHLAND HARBOR, WI Location. At head of Chequamegon Bay, on south shore of Lake Superior, about 65 miles east of Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14974.) Existing project. A west channel 20 and 21 feet deep and an east basin 25 and 27 feet deep, both all protected by an 8,000-foot breakwater. For additional details see page 1008 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. City of Ashland owns 4,150 feet of waterfront for future public needs. Wharves for handling coal, ore, limestone, logs and pulpwood are served by railroads. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Handling of ore and logs has been discontinued for the present. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $29,890. Work authorized prior to 1960 Act was completed in 1950. Work authorized by 1960 Act was completed in November 1962. Total 21-2 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT cost of the existing project to end of FY was $5,884,523, of which $1,695,645 was for new work and $4,188,878 was for maintenance. 3. AUSABLE HARBOR AT AUSABLE RIVER (OSCODA), MI Location. The AuSable River and village of Oscoda, MI are on the west shore of Lake Huron, 8 miles north of AuSable Point, northeast limit of Saginaw Bay. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Previous project. For details see pages 336 and 2453 of Annual Report for 1892. Existing project. Riprapping outer 200 feet of north pier at mouth of AuSable River, dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep and dredging between piers and upstream to State highway bridge 10 feet deep. (See Table 21B for authorizing legislation.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $41,437. Existing project was completed in 1962. Piers and revetments are inf air condition, iti sa nticipated repairs will be required within the next several years. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $3,081,072, of which $209,776 was for new work (includes $16,400 contributed funds) and $2,871,296 for maintenance. 4. BLACK RIVER (PORT HURON), MI Location. This river has its source in the northern part of Sanilac County, MI, is about 60 miles long, and flows in a southeasterly direction into the St. Clair River. (See NOAA Nautical chart 14852.) Previous project. For details see page 1441 of Annual Report for 1916, and page 1554 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for a channel 20 feet deep from deep water in St. Clair River to the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge, 160 feet wide at the mouth, decreasing to 100 feet, about 800 feet from the mouth, thence 100 feet wide for 2,600 feet, decreasing to 75 feet for a distance of 4,800 feet; widening two bends to 100 feet, one at the foot of 12th Street, and the other below the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge; for a settling basin 75 feet wide and 20 feet deep, beginning at the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Bridge in Port Huron and extending upstream a distance of about 2,300 feet; and then for a distance of 2.6 miles as a 100-foot wide river channel, 8 feet deep to the I-94 bridge where it decreases to 6 feet deep and continues to the vicinity of the Black River Drainage Canal with suitable widening where required at bends in the channel. The project modification authorized by the Act of Aug. 30, 1935, is considered to be inactive and is excluded friom the foregoing cost for new work. The cost of this modification was last revised in 1954 and was estimated to be $194,000 exclusive of $194,000 to be contributed by local interests (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are docks on both sides of Black River near -its mouth, and between these docks and the upper limit of imprcvement there are 5 other docks varying in length from 100 to 500 feet. All docks are privately owned and are restricted to the use of the owners. The facilities are considered adequate for existing -amerce. Public recreational boating facilities constructed by the State and local agencies are available, as are privately owned and operated marinas. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces and contract cost $29,947. All work, except that authorized by Act of August 30, 1935, and the latest modification, has been completed. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $2,308,295, of which $830,165 was for new work (includes $349,921 contributed funds) and $1,478,130 for maintenance. 5. BLACK RIVER HARBOR (UPPER PENINSULA), MI Location. At mouth of Black River on south shore of Lake Superior 39 miles westerly from Ontonagon, MI, and 47 miles easterly from Ashland, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Existing project. Two converging breakwaters, an entrance channel between breakwaters, an inner channel, and an irregular harbor basin. For additional details see page 1092 of Annual Report for 1966. Project depths are 12 feet in the approach channel and 8 feet in the river channel and basin (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. furnished easements on 0.85 acre of land. Local interests Terminal facilities. Wharves constructed on both sides of river. Wharf on east bank has frontage of 400 feet; on west bank, a frontage of 750 feet. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Environmental studies were performed by Government forces at a cost of $8,878. Project was completed in June 1958. Navigation structures range from fair to good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $1,388,924, of which $383,350 was for new work and $1,005,574 was for maintenance. The new work cost does not include $30,000 contributed funds. 21-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 6. CEDAR RIVER HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Cedar River on west shore of Green Bay, an arm of Northern Lake Michigan, about 68 miles north of City of Green Bay. Nearest harbors are Menominee, MI, 27 miles southwest and at Escanaba, MI, 20 miles northeast. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14909.) Existing project. Two parallel entrance piers, a west pier 230 feet long and a rubblemound east pier 875 feet long with a sport fishing walkway; an entrance channel 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep from that depth in Green Bay to mouth " Cedar River about 900 feet long; and inner channel in Cedar River 1,400 feet long, 80 feet wide, and 8 feet deep upstream to about 150 below State Route 35 bridge; and a turning basin 150 feet wide near upstream end of inner bridge channel. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. No local sponsor has been identified. The State of Michigan is awaiting completion of the limited Reevaluation Report. Terminal facilities. There are no permanent docking, mooring or handling facilities. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: A total of $733 was expended this FY to finalize a limited Re-evaluation Report to re-evaluate project cost and economic justification. Based on the analysis, it was determined that the project is not economically justifiable and it was recommended that the project be terminated. Maintenance: Engineering and design for repair of the East Breakwater was initiated at a cost of $122,573. Total cost to end of FY was $530,573 of which $408,000 was for new work and $122,573 for maintenance. 7. CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 276 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 75 miles northerly from Frankfort, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14942.) Existing project. A channel 24 feet deep in Lake Michigan and a river channel 23 feet deep in the lower and upper channels connecting Lake Michigan with Lake Charlevoix via Round Lake. The channels are protected where needed by piers and revetments. For additional details see page 1476 of Annmual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Section 25 of the WRDA of 1988 provides authorization pertaining to the South Pier to Charlevoix Harbor. It states, "The Secretary shall take such action as may be necessary to restore recreational uses established prior to May 1, 1988, or provide comparable recreation uses at the South Pier to Charlevoix Harbor project, Charlevoix, Michigan in order to mitigate any adverse impact on recreational uses resulting from reconstruction of the South Pier..." Local cooperation. None required except the latest project modification is subject to the following: Provide without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-ways required for construction and subsequent maintenance of the modified project upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of excavated materials and any necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments, therefor, or the cost of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the constructing and maintenance of the modified project, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; provide and maintain without cost to the United States depths in berthing areas and local access channels serving the terminal commensurate with the depths provided in the related project areas; accomplish, without cost to the United States, such alterations of submarine utility crossing as are required by the modified project; establish regulations prohibiting discharge of pollutants into the waters of the harbor by users thereof which regulations shall be in accordance with applicable laws or regulations of Federal, State and local authorities responsible for pollution prevention and control; if acquiring lands, easements and rights-of-ways for construction of the project, local interests will comply with the applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1971; PL 91-646, approved January 2, 1971; contribute all costs in excess of $1,000,000 should the total cost of construction of the general navigation facilities exceed that amount, in accordance with provisions of Section 107 of the 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. The total first cost of construction (1975) is estimated at $625,000. Terminal facilities. Several small landing places in Round Lake at Charlevoix for handling fish and miscellaneous commodities, a wharf for petroleum products at west end of Lake Charlevoix, and coal wharves at Advance and Boyne City. Charlevoix, Boyne City, and East Jordan provide public docks for small craft. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $52,211. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $3,806. Reparis to the South Revetment were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $157,979. Engineering and design for repair of North Pier, Sections A1-A2 & B, North Revetment, Sections C&D, continued at a cost of $29,818. Existing project was completed in 1939 except for the latest modification. Navigation structures are in fair condition and are scheduled for repairs. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $11,287,125, of which $180,623 was for new work, $9,977,106 for maintenance (Bank Stabilization $46,352), and $1,129,396 for rehabilitation. 21-4 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT 8. CHEBOYGAN HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Cheboygan River which empties into Western Lake Huron about 16 miles southeast of the Straits of Mackinac Bridge. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14881 and 14886.) Previous project. For details see page 1956 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1546 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A channel 21 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 21-foot contour in Lake Huron to outer end of west pier; thence, between lines parallel to and 25 feet from the docks, 21 feet deep from this point to East First Street and thence 18.5 feet deep and 60 feet wide from this bridge to the lock Cheboygan River; a turning basin 21 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 420 to 770 feet long on east side of existing project channel just below East First Street; and rubblemound breakwater about 775 feet long on the site of existing west pier at mouth of river. Project is 12,000 feet long, of which about 6,000 feet are in Straits of Mackinac. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned wharves used for receiving coal, stone and petroleum products. Public recreational boating facilities constructed by the Sate and local agencies are available. These facilities satisfy existing commerce and vessel traffic. Operations (luring fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $16,932. Real estate cost $2,822. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total costs to end of FY were $1,529,737 of which $504,236 was for new work and $1,025,501 for maintenance. 9. CLINTON RIVER, MI Location. Has its sources in Oakland County, MI, flows easterly about 60 miles and empties into Anchor Bay in northwestern part of Lake St. Clair. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14850.) Previous project. For details see page 1958 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1556 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel in Anchor Bay 8 feet deep, 300 feet wide at 8-foot depth contour in the bay, gradually decreasing to 50 feet wide at about 1,000 feet upstream from mouth of Clinton River, a length of about 4,600 feet; a channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide in the river about 38,700 feet long from entrance channel upstream to Mt. Clemens at Cass Avenue; closing old channel and making a cutoff at Shoemakers Bend; closing Catfish Channel; construction of revetments as needed in the river; and a harbor basin, 5 feet deep and 11 acres in area at entrance along bay channel, protected by breakwaters on north and south sides. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. River is used exclusively by recreational craft. There are numerous public and private wharves along the river below the city. They are considered adequate. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports performed by Government forces and contract cost $104,456. Maintenance of the disposal area performed by hired labor cost $3,707. Existing project was completed in 1966. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $7,963,759, of which $549,798 was for new work (includes $289,752 contributed funds), $3,617,781 for maintenance and $3,796,180 for diked disposal. 10. CORNUCOPIA HARBOR, WI Location. At mouth of Siskiwit River on south shore of Lake Superior, 49 miles east from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14973.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel between piers; an irregular-shaped turning basin; two inner channels, and reconstruction and Federal maintenance of deflection dike and entrance piers constructed by local interests. Project depths are 10 feet between piers and 8 feet in turning basin and inner channels For additional details see page 1010 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. About 1,000 linear feet of privately owned docking space is available. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $5,551. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY, removing approximately 6,459 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $52,620. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $44,657. Work authorized by earlier Act was completed in 1939. Work authorized in 1954 was completed in 1963. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $1,641,309, of which $462,653 was for new work and $1,178,656 for maintenance. 21-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 11. DETROIT RIVER, MI Location. One of the Great Lakes connecting channels, 31 miles long, flows south from Lake St. Clair to Lake Erie. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14848.) Previous project. For details see page 1958 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1541 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Improving Detroit River main channels to provide 25.5-foot draft navigation; improving certain auxiliary and side channels; and construction of various water level and crosscurrent control structures. Details are in accompanying Table 21-H. Project depths are referred to local low water datum planes which correspond to low water datums for Lakes St. Clair and Erie, 572.3 and 569.2 feet above mean water level at Rimouski, Quebec, IGLD 1985. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. No local cooperation is required for modifications authorized by Acts of July 1946 and March 1956. The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1946 and the 1956 R & H Acts, construction of the Compensating Works, with the uncompleted portion of the Trenton Channel modification approved Aug. 13, 1968, were deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). Terminal facilities. Numcrous commercial installations used for handling coal, iron ore, limestone, steel products, petroleum products, and other items such as overseas general cargo. Detail on actual port and harbor facilities is in Port Series No. 45 (revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, support of water control center, miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $1,290,820. Location and removal of obstructions was performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MICHIGAN and the U.S. Cranebarge VELER at a cost of $2,467,210. Maintenance of disposal area performed by hired labor cost $67,454. Liquidated damages in the amount of -$93,076 was assessed the FY93 Pointe Mouillee maintenance dredging contract. An adjustment of $1 was made in contract cost to close-out FY96 maintenance dredging contract completed last FY. Engineering, design, surveys, real estate, and supervision and administration cost $137,387. Latest modification of connecting channels project in the Detroit River is complete except for compensating works. Pertinent data concerning channels covered by project at end of FY are set forth in Table 21-H. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $238,583,277, of which $76,877,357 was for new work ($75,346,669 regular funds and $1,530,688 Public Works Funds), $119,235,335 (includes $361,235 Section 150 contributed funds) for maintenance and $42,470,585 for diked disposal. 12. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN AND WI Location. At extreme western end of Lake Superior. Cities of Duluth, MN, and Superior, WI, are on north and south sides, respectively. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14975.) Previous projects. See page 1246 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Provides for rebuilding canal piers at Duluth entry, replacement or construction of piers and breakwater at Superior entry and dredgir, ,pproaches and channels within harbor, St. Louis Bay, and St. Louis River. Channels vary in depth from 32 to 28 feet in entrances, are 27 feet deep in iron-ore route channels, and are from 20 to 23 feet deep in inner channels. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) For details of authorized channel dimensions and dimensions of structures, see pages 1246 and 1247 of Annual Report for 1962 and page 1011 of Annual Report for 1965. Portion of project for deepening Twenty-first Avenue West channel was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). The WRDA of 1986 authorized modifications to the project to deepen the western portions of North and South Channels, the entire Upper Channel and the Minnesota Channel to 27 feet LWD; widen the Cross Channel to provide a minimum turning basin of 1,500 feet; widen the bend at the Arrowhead Bascule Bridge to 600 feet; and construct an upland confined disposal facility. The current recommended plan involves only the mechanical dredging of the Cross Channel Turning Basin with disposal at the Erie Pier CDF. The remainder of the project is now unscheduled. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662), are as described in House Document 150, 86th Congress, 1st Session and also includes, as a result of PL 99-662, construction cost sharing. Terminal facilities. There are 113 docks or terminals including some 54 major ones; all but one privately owned. Facilities for handling iron ore, coal, limestone, petroleum, steel and scrap iron, cement, general cargo, and grain are believed adequate for most existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operation and maintenance of the museum was performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $418,035. Operation and maintenance of service facilities and park pier performed by hired labor cost $217,966. Condition surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, support of water control center, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $458,884. Development of dredged material management plans continued at a cost of $173,583. Duluth and Superior Entry Breakwater repairs were 21-6 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT performed using the U.S. Derrickbarge SCHWARTZ at a cost of $987,337. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $30,716. Maintenance of the disposal area performed by hired labor cost $5,073. Engineering and design for repair the South Pier, Sections RI -R4, continued at a cost of $128,208. Engineering and design to repair the roof of the administration building was completed at a cost of $9,307. A contract for this work was awarded and completed this FY at a cost of $51,580. An adjustment of -$791 was made in contract cost for the FY96 maintenance dredging contract completed last FY. A contract for dredging the outer harbor was awarded and completed this FY, removing 120,232 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $676,487. Engineering, de :{', real estate, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $367,3 17. Work authorized prior to 1960 Act was completed in June 1956. Under the 1960 Act, work on the outer harbor, included in House Document 150, was completed in June 1965. Work in the inner harbor, included in House Document 196, started in May 1963, was completed in November 1968 except for 21st Avenue West channel portion which was deauthorized December 31, 1989. Of the work authorized in WRDA 1986, only the Cross Channel dredging has been completed (September 1994). All other authorized improvements are unscheduled. The United States owns 34.90 acres of land in fee in Minnesota and Wisconsin of which 2.15 acres are used for a vessel yard. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $99,107,525, of which $17,226,343 was for new work (includes $331,685 contributed funds), $68,769,523 for maintenance, $1,556,249 for diked disposal and $11,555,410 for rehabilitation. 13. FOX RIVER, WI Location. Rises in Columbia County, WI, and flows about 176 miles northerly into Green Bay. Wolf River, physically a main river but by designation a tributary of Fox River, rises in central part of Fort County, WI and flows southerly. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14916 for Lake Winnebago and lower Fox River.) Previous projects. See page 1368 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Deepening and widening channel of Fox River from DePere 7 miles above mouth to confluence of Wolf River, a total length of 59 miles, to 6 feet, with 9.6 feet in rock cut below DePere lock and 7 feet in other rock cuts on lower river below Menasha lock; construction and reconstruction of 19 locks and 9 dams, a concrete retaining wall at Kaukauna; construction and maintenance of harbors having depths of 6 feet on Lake Winnebago; widening Neenah Channel to 100 feet, with a 6-foot depth for about 1 mile; and dredging, snagging, and otherwise improving Wolf River 47 miles from its mouth to New London, depth to be 4 feet. Cost of completed portion of project is $513, 424 for the lower river exclusive of previous projects. The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1925, was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). Section 332 of the WRDA of 1992 authorized the transfer of the navigation system to the State of WI subject to agreement; however, water regulation and dam operation will be continued by the Federal government. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Wharf and landing facilities are, in general, adequate for existing needs. (See Table 21-I on locks and dams, Fox River, WI.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental activities, safety training, miscellaneous inspections and reports, and plans for flood emergencies were performed at a cost of $524,211. Water control studies, monitoring and regulation of water levels were performed at a cost of $295,143. Real Estate activities were performed at a cost of $34,872. Federal canal banks at various locations were repaired at a cost of $19,864. The operation and maintenance of nine (9) dams and ten (10) overflow weirs and caretaker status maintenance of seventeen (17) locks and two (2) guard locks totaled $621,144. Supervision and administration costs were $167,113. Analysis of eroded concrete top at Kaukauna Dam cost $13,778. Correction of design deficiencies identified by periodic inspections at Upper Appleton, Cedars, DePere, Kaukauna, and Little Chute Dams, and Little Kaukauna Lock cost $65,586. An adjustment of $1 was made in contract cost for steel sheet piling repairs at DePere Dam awarded and completed last FY. The contract awarded last FY for replacement of armor stone at Kaukauna Dam was completed this FY at a cost of $111,676. Engineering and design for repairs to the Upper Appleton Dam was completed at a cost of $74,639. A contract for this work was awarded in the amount of $245,656.50. The contract was 45% complete at the end of FY at a cost of $109,400. Engineering and design for new gate hoist and electrical rehabilitation at nine (9) dams was completed at a cost of $78,368. A contract for this work was awarded in the amount of $1,745,772.98 to renovate Cedar Lock and Dam and Little Chute Locks and Dam. The contract was 2% complete at the end of the FY at a cost of $34,000. Supervision and administration of these contracts cost $47,996. Existing project is complete except for the inactive portion. Nineteen original locks and nine original dams have been rebuilt. (See Table 21-I for year of completion of each). Structures and dredging in pools have increased original depths generally about 2 feet. Work remaining to complete project consists of dredging in upper portion of Wolf River, and rock removal and deepening of Neenah Channel on lower Fox River, which are no longer considered necessary. The dams tainter gates are scheduled to receive new hoist mechanisms. Existing dams are generally fair to good; but many of the locks are in extremely poor condition. Repairs are not scheduled because the project is in caretaker status. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $59,594,223, of which $3,753,334 was for new work and $55,840,889 for operation and maintenance. Funds in the amount of $3,706,187 were expended between July 5, 1884, and June 30, 1935, on operation and care of works of improvement 21-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 under provisions of permanent indefinite appropriation for such purposes. 14. FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 204 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 28 miles northerly from Manistee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907.) Existing project. Provides for constructing an exterior basin in Lake Michigan formed by two breakwaters, 450 feet apart at the outer ends, diverging . an angle of about 90 degrees, the main arm and shore connection on north breakwater are 972 and 1,000 feet long, respectively, and the main arm and shore connection of south breakwater 1,188 and 1,400 feet long, respectively; for removing 801 feet of north pier and 1,172 feet of south pier; dredging basin 20 feet deep and 800 feet wide at entrance, decreasing toward new pier heads to 600 feet wide, dredging approach and entrance channel through outer basin to a depth of 24 feet from deep water in Lake Michigan to a point 500 feet landward of opening between breakwaters, over the entire width outside the breakwaters; thence to maximum width of 500 feet inside the breakwaters and to 23 feet deep through inner portion of outer basin to outer end of north pier, over widths decreasing from 500 to 160 feet; and thence to 22 feet deep between the piers to the inner basin in Lake Betsie; dredging an 18-foot deep interior basin in Lake Betsie from within 50 feet of existing structures on the west and extending eastward about 1,550 feet to easterly boundary and from within 50 feet of existing structures on the north and extending southward 800 feet to the southerly boundary; dredging a recreational craft anchorage area 10 feet deep and 300 feet wide, extending 600 feet eastward of the east limit of the interior basin, with its north side in line with the north limit of the basin. Breakwaters and shore connections are built of concrete caissons and piling capped w\ith concrete. Inner piers and revetments are built of stonefilled timber cribs and piling, all capped with concrete, except for 476 feet of south revetment which consists of steel sheet piling. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two car ferry slips on south shore and several docks along north shore of Lake Betsie. The City and State provide a recreational docking facility on north side of Lake Betsie which is open to all on equal terms. There is also a marine railway capable of handling small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $42,937. Safety repairs cost $406. Existing project was completed in 1939, with exception of the latest modification which was completed in 1969. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1474 of Annual Report for 1962. Navigation structures are in fair condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $13,319,670, of which $1,955,159 (includes $31,709 contributed funds) was for new work, $9,885,235 for maintenance, $1,204,500 for diked disposal and $274,776 for rehabilitation. 15. GRAND HAVEN HARBOR AND GRAND RIVER, MI Location. Harbor is on east shore of Lake Michigan, 108 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 23 miles northerly from Holland, MI. River rises in Jackson County, MI, and flows 260 miles westerly into Lake Michigan. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14933, and Geological Survey Grand Rapids quadrangle.) Previous project. For details see page 1949 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1481 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel protected by parallel piers and revetments at mouth of Grand River, a deep draft channel in river extending to Spring Lake, a turning basin, and a shallow draft channel in river extending 14.5 miles upstream to Bass River. Project depths are 23 feet in entrance channel, 21 feet in river to turning basin, 18 feet in turning basin and channel to Spring Lake, and 8 feet in upper Grand River channel. For additional details see page 1461 of Annual Report for 1962. Dredging on northerly side of inner channel is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this portion (1954) is $38,600. The WRDA of 1986 authorized modifications to deepen the harbor entrance and river channels to 29 and 27 feet, respectively; and provides for a new and larger turning basin. Estimated cost (Oct 90) is $20,400,000, which includes $11,754,000 Federal and $8,646,000 non-Federal. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portions of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662), are as described in House Document 661, 76th Congress, 3d Session, and also includes, as a result of PL 99-662, construction cost sharing requirements as follows: a. Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at $4,246,000. The estimated cash contribution of $4,246,000 to be paid in lump sum, prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments during the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; and b. Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount presently estimated at $2,040,000. The Secretary of the Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent repayment, the amount of the local contribution of 21-8 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT lands, easements, rights-of-ways, dredged/demolition material disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs to count against the cash payment during construction, and in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of project cost. Terminal facilities. Several wharves exist for handling coal, limestone, sand and gravel, petroleum products, fish, and miscellaneous commodities. There is also a car ferry slip which is inactive. The State and local agencies provide recreational boating facilities which are open to all on equal terms. Facilities are considered adequate for existing cormmunerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, confined disposal facility monitoring, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $313,078. Development of dredged material management plans continued at a cost of $190,187. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $22,664. The FY95 contract for maintenance dredging of the Grand River was completed at a cost of $469,925, removing 55,997 cubic yards of shoal material. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging the outer harbor, removing 46,229 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $165,391. This contract was also for Section 111 beach nourishment. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, supervision and administration cost $148,907. Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 was performed at a cost of $47,837. Beach nourishment in conjunction with above maintenance dredging outer harbor contract cost $54,097. Supervision and administration under Section 111 cost $2,074. Existing project was substantially completed in 1949. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1463 of Annual Report for 1982. Structures are in a general state of deteriorating condition and are scheduled for repairs. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $35,961,253, of which $1,458,469 was for new work, $32,908,771 for maintenance (includes $15,585 contributed funds), $780,400 diked disposal and $813,613 for rehabilitation. 16. GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MI Location. On the south shore of Lake Superior, 93 miles west of Sault Ste. Marie, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14962.) Existing project. Provides for a channel protected by parallel piers and for closing natural entrance channel with a pile dike. Project depths are 18 feet between piers and 20 feet in lake approach. For additional details see page 1449 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Several small piers, a Coast Guard Station, and a small boat pier and launching ramp built by the State of Michigan provide facilities adequate for present traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $21,463. Existing project is complete except for widening a portion of channel from 250 to 300 feet. Project now being maintained to 19 and 15 feet below I.G.L.D., in lieu of 20 and 18 feet, which is adequate for current usage. The Pile Dike Breakwater is severely deteriorated and no longer maintained, major repai" is required. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $3,679,078, of which $1,055,871 was for new work and $2,623,207 for maintenance. 17. GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI Location. At mouth of Fox River, at head of Green Bay, about 180 miles from Milwaukee, WI, via Sturgeon Bay Canal, and about 49 miles southwest of Menominee Harbor, MI and WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14918.) Previous projects. See page 1366 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District 1979 Annual Report, Table 30-C, page 30-30. For more detailed description of project see page 1216 of Annual Report for 1963. Cost of completed portion of project is $9,335,000 Federal, and non-Federal cost is $490,000 including $100,000 .contributed funds. Local interests requested that the inactive portion of the 1962 River and H-Iarbor Act, consisting of dredging the reach from 150 feet downstream of the Chicago & Northwestern Railway Bridge to 1,700 feet upstream of this bridge, be reactivated and the authorization modified to include deepening the adjacent turning basin and modifying the Chicago & Northwestern Railway Bridge to provide increased horizontal clearance. Estimated cost of this portion (1990) is $6,130,000; $4,030,000 Federal and $2,100,000 non-Federal which includes $1,970,000 local contribution. Section 601 c of the WRDA of 1986 authorized deepening the Fox River Channel, Green Bay, WI, to 27 feet. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for existing project. Terminal facilities. There are 16 wharves for handling coal, petroleum products, cement, limestone, general overseas cargo and miscellaneous commodities. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $370,160 Maintenance of the disposal area cost $6,459. Development of dredged material management plans was initiated at a cost of $70,204. The contract awarded last FY for maintenance dredging 21-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 the outer harbor was completed this FY at a cost of $594,014, removing approximately 56,634 cubic yards of shoal material. A contract was awarded this FY for maintenance dredging the outer harbor in the amount of $1,276,933. The contract was 51% complete at the end of FY, removing approximately 50,350 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $645,000. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, supervision and administration cost $191,560. Engineering and design for construction of a confined disposal facility continued at a cost of $57,843. Existing project is complete. The 1962 modification was started in November 1966 and completed in September 1973, except for dredging the reach from 150 feet downstream of the Chicago & Northwestern Railway Bridge to 1,700 feet upstream of this bridge. Dredging of the turning basin above C & N.W. Railway Bridge was commenced in August 1938. The turning basin was enlarged under authority of Section 5 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of March 4, 1915, in order to provide sufficient area for the large ships that use it. The work was performed as part of a maintenance dredging contract in September and October 1973. East revetment at Grassy Island was entirely removed in July 1935. Dredging Fox River and entrance channel to Tail Point Light was completed in September 1967. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $54,948,528 ($54,007,728 regular funds and $940,800 Public Works Funds), $9,946,395 for new work, $37,097,918 for maintenance and $7,904,215 for diked disposal. The new work cost does not include $100,000 contributed funds. 18. HAMMOND BAY HARBOR, MI Location. On northwest shore of Lake Huron, 35 miles southeast of Straits of Mackinac. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14881.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge, protected by breakwater structures, extending to 12-foot depth contour in the lake; for dredging a harbor basin 10 feet deep; and for dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Public facilities being planned by State and local agencies. Plans and specifications are complete, but construction has not started. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and environmental studies were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $35,282. The existing project was completed in 1965. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $2,152,042, of which $1,092,366 was for new work, and $1,059,676 for maintenance. 19. HARBOR BEACH HARBOR, MI Location. On west shore of Lake Huron about 60 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Harbor of refuge protected by three breakwaters; a main entrance 23 feet deep; and an anchorage area 21 feet deep. For additional details see page 1485 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Tab: 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Coal and limestone are received at a private wharf. In addition, there is a public recreational craft pier, a Coast Guard pier, and several small installations engaged in docking and servicing light-draft commercial and recreational vessels. These facilities satisfy current commerce and traffic requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $70,583. Engineering and design for maintenance contract to be awarded next FY cost $13,193. Existing project was completed in 1928. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1485 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $16,457,935, of which $1,200,598 was for new work, $14,819,733 for maintenance, $243,100 for diked disposal and $194,504 for rehabilitation. 20. HARRISVILLE HARBOR, MI Location. On the west shore of Lake Huron, 20 miles north of Oscoda and 30 miles south of Alpena. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14864.) Existing project. A harbor of refuge protected by breakwater structures, and dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep and a harbor basin 10 feet deep. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Dockage facilities built by State and local agencies for recreational craft; considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and environmental studies were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $35,749. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $4,045,324, of which $2,639,392 was for new work (includes $287,454 contributed 21-10 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT funds) and $1,405,932 for maintenance. 21. HOLLAND HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan 95 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 23 miles southerly from Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14932.) Previous project. For details see page 1948 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1478 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An outer breakwl - protected approach channel in Lake Michigan, an entrance channel to Lake Macatawa protected by piers and revetments, a channel through Lake Macatawa into Black River, and a turning basin. Project depths are 23 feet in outer portion of approach channel decreasing to 21 feet at outer end of inner piers, 21 feet to upper end of project, and 18 feet in turning basin. For additional details see page 1458 of Annual Report for 1962. The uncompleted portion of the project, widening bend of entrance channel into Lake Macatawa, was deauthorized Dec, 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portions of project. Terminal facilities. Wharves are at inner end of Lake Macatawa and used for handling coal, building materials, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. Two shipbuilding yards are on south shore of the lake. Holland provides a public wharf for small craft. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $214,849. Development of dredged material management plans continued at a cost of $49,812. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $12,577. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging the outer harbor, removing 23,960 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $84,692. This contract was also for beach nourishment. The contract awarded last FY for dredging the inner harbor was completed this FY in the amount of $972,101, removing approximately 72,483 cubic yards of shoal material. Confined disposal facility repairs performed by hired labor cost $83,321. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $153,487. Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 was performed at a cost of $46,773. Miscellaneous inspections and reports cost $25. Beach nourishment in conjunction with the above maintenance dredging outer harbor contract cost $22,580. Supervision and administration under Section 111 cost $2,422. Existing project, with exception of widening bend in revetted entrance channel authorized by Act of September 3, 1954, was completed in 1957. For additional details on completion of existing project, see page 1460 of Annual Report for 1962. Navigation structures are in fair condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $30,380,219, of which $1,392,827 was for new work ($1,180,502 regular funds, $176,620 for previous project and $35,705 contributed funds), $26,821,640 for maintenance, $1,663,300 for diked disposal and $502,452 for rehabilitation. 22. THE INLAND ROUTE, MI Location. A series of interconnected lakes and streams stretching across northern tip of Lower Peninsula of Michigan, and extends from Conway near Lake Michigan to Cheboygan on Lake Huron; a distance of 35 miles. Crooked and Indian Rivers are connecting channels in the waterway. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14886.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 30 feet wide and 5 feet deep, with necessary widening at bends, through Crooked and Indian Rivers, and Crooked, Burt, and Mullett Lakes, and from Conway (west end of Crooked Lake) to navigation lock at Cheboygan; in Pickerel Channel from Pickerel Lake to Crooked Lake. It also provides for suitable jetties at head of Indian River. The addition of a lock and dam was approved by the Chief of Engineers on Sep. 2, 1964, to correct a design deficiency. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. None exist for commercial cargo-handling along the Crooked and Indian Rivers. Numerous small privately owned timber piers and wharves, some equipped with covered boat wells for serving and storing recreational craft, have been constructed. Landings maintained by hotel and resort operators are open to the public for transfer of passengers. Public docks are at Conway and Oden on Crooked Lake; the village of Indian River. Topinabee, and Mullett Lake Village on Mullett Lake; and at Cheboygan. About 30 highways dead end at water's edge, permitting public access for various marine activities. Dock facilities are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The navigation lock was operated and maintained by the State of Michigan at no cost to the Government. In FY 97, the lock was operated from 9:00 a.m to 5:00 p.m. April 26-27, May 3,10-11, 17 & 18, September 15-28. The lock was operated 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. May 24-26, June 1-30, September 1-14. The lock was operated from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. July I - August 31. In October, the lock was open on weekends only from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The lock closed for the season on October 12. Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $14,634. 21-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 The existing project was completed in 1958. The lock and dam was completed in FY 1968. For additional details see page 1382 of Annual Report for 1960. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $4,102,037, of which $918,222 was for new work (includes $148,000 contributed funds), $2,779,515 for maintenanct, and $404,300 for diked disposal. 23. KENOSHA HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 35 miles south of Mi; '-akee and about 54 miles north of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) Previous project. See page 1390 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. For detailed description see page 1237, Annual Report for 1963. Estimated (1986) Federal cost is $455,000 exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects, and $195,000 non-Federal which includes $155,000 local contribution. (See Table 21-B for authorization legislation.) The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act, dredging of 25-foot wide strips adjacent to the north and south piers, was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL, 99-662). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Three wharves used for miscellaneous foreign overseas commodities and autos, and also several fish wharves. While these facilities are considered generally adequate for existing commerce, more efficient use of existing terminals and utilization of available frontage for development of additional terminals should be made. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $51,381. Repairs to the South Pier, Section A-A, were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $106,646. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging contract was initiated at a cost of $21,584. Dredging was cancelled due to non-availability of disposal site. Real estate and supervision and administration cost $7,316. Existing project is complete except for dredging 25-foot strips adjacent to the north and south piers which was deauthorized December 31, 1989. The north and south piers were completed in 1900 and the breakwater in 1909. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $13,449,922 ($13,422,264 were regular funds and $27,658 Emergency Relief Funds), of which $988,969 was for new work, $6,812,078 for maintenance, $4,378,600 for diked disposal and $1,270,275 for rehabilitation. The new work cost does not include $3,000 contributed funds. 24. KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan, about 105 miles north of Milwaukee, WI, and about 78 miles from Green Bay, via Sturgeon Bay Canal. Harbor is at mouth of Kewaunee River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14908.) Previous projects. See page 1375 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District 1979 Annual Report, Table 30-C, page 30-31. Costs of completed project are $603,021 Federal, and $9,000 non- Federal, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. Uncompleted portion (estimated $200,000, July 1965) of 1935 River and Harbor Act is considered inactive, and excluded from present cost estimate. The portion authorized by the 1960 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two car-ferry slips, a petroleum tank farm, a Corps of Engineers project office, and several fish wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $81,211. Repairs to the North Detached Breakwater, Section H, were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $102,514. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $5,232. Maintenance of the diked disposal facility was performed by hired labor and contract at a cost of $955. Real estate and supervision and administration cost $15,879. Active portion of existing project is complete. The north pier was completed in 1897 and the remaining portion is in generally good condition. Rehabilitation of the south pier was completed in June 1967. Construction of north breakwater and shore connection, except for a gap of 150 feet about 830 feet from shoreward end, and removal of outer 706.5 linear feet of north pier was commenced in September 1935 and completed in June 1937. Removed 500 linear feet of north pier in April/May 1963 and widened and deepened the adjacent channel in 1965. Outer end of the north pier was struck and severely damaged by car ferry vessel in October 1973 and a 24-foot section at outlet end was subsequently removed, thus reducing the structure to a length of 626 feet. Dredging entrance channel in interior basin to existing project depth was commenced in April and completed in October 1938. Kewaunee River is navigable to about 6.5 miles above mouth for craft drawing not more than 4 feet. Navigation structures range from fair to good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $11,609,393, of which $758,333 was for new work ($338,333 regular and $420,000 21-12 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Emergency Relief Funds) $7,272,299 for maintenance, $2,961,461 for diked disposal and $617,300 for rehabilitation. 25. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI Location. In Lake Superior across Keweenaw Peninsula in upper peninsula of Michigan. The west entrance is 169 miles east of Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14972.) Existing project. A navigable channel, minimum width 300 feet, 25 miles long, partially natural and partially artificial, across Keweenaw Peninsula via Portage Lake. For details see page 1121 of Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) The uncompleted portion of the project for navigation at Keweenaw Waterway, Houghton County, MI, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of Aug. 30, 1935, PL 409, 73rd Congress, which consists of extending the lower entrance breakwater by 2,000 feet, including the necessary alteration or replacement of structures due to channel deepening, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Six coal docks, a petroleum dock, and several general merchandise and miscellaneous wharves, all privately owned. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Also present is a government constructed recreational area with facilities to include a picnic area and small boat landing range. Operations during the fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $48,061. Upper Entry Breakwater repairs were performed using the U.S. Derrickbarge SCHWARTZ at a cost of $224,225. Real estate and supervision and administration cost $13,491. Active portion of the project is complete. Lower entry piers are in fair condition, it is anticipated repairs will be required within the next ten years. Upper entry breakwaters are in good condition, but require annual stone maintenance due to severity of the wave climate. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $34,103,126, of which $5,974,141 was for new work, $26,605,485 for maintenance and $1,523,500 for diked disposal. 26. LAC LA BELLE HARBOR, MI Location. On the south shore of Lake Superior on the eastern shore of Keweenaw Peninsula, 41 miles northeasterly from Portage entry to Keweenaw Waterway. Lac La Belle, Bete Grise Bay, and Mendota Ship Canal combine to form the harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14964.) Existing project. Provides forconstruction of two parallel piers at the entrance having lengths of 484 and 682 feet for north and south piers, respectively; for an entrance channel between the piers to feet wide and 12 feet deep, about 820 feet long with a flared approach; and for an inner canal 50 feet wide and 10 feet deep, about 730 feet long. For additional details see page 1039, Annual Report for 1964. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied vith. Terminal facilities. Several small, privately owned wharves are available in the harbor for use of "mall craft engaged in fishing and recreational activities. A State owned dock for small craft is located at the northwest corner of Lac La Belle Bay. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $14,680. The existing project was completed in 1960. Controlling depths are about 11 feet in the approach channel and 10 feet in the inner channel. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $990,716, of which $269,270 was for new work and $721,446 for maintenance. The new work does not include $38,190 contributed funds. 27. LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI, CHANNELS IN Location. Lake St. Clair, a section of Great Lakes connecting channels, is an expansive shallow basin having a vessel track length of about 15 miles from mouth of St. Clair River to head of Detroit River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14850.) Previous project. For details see page 2882, Annual Report for 1896; pages 1957-58, Annual Report for 1915; and page 1539, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An improved channel through Lake St. Clair 800 feet wide, 27.5 feet deep, and about 14.5 miles long; extending from mouth of Southeast Bend cutoff channel at lower end of St. Clair River to head of Detroit River Channel. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, support of the water control center, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $67,264. Real estate cost $10,008. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $21,515,573, of which $7,675,357 was for new work ($6,666,762 regular funds and $1,008,595 Public Works for diked disposal.Funds), $8,720,416 for 21-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 maintenance and $5,119,800 for diked disposal. 28. LELAND HARBOR, MI Location. A light-draft harbor on eastern shore of Lake Michigan at mouth of Carp River, about 40 miles north of Frankfort, MI, and 40 miles southwest of Charlevoix, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14912.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge consisting of a breakwater about 1,200 feet long, a protected anchorage and maneuver area about 3 acres in extent and 10 feet deep, a 12-foot deep flared approach channel decreasing in width to 90 feet, an existing south pier 440 feet long, a 35-foot long cellular extension to south pier, an entrance channel 6 feet deep and 40 feet wide extending to mouth of Carp River, and for elimination of existing north pier. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves on each side of river below the dam which is 400 feet above the river mouth. These wharves serve the local fishing interests and recreational craft. Public facilities are operated by the State and local agencies. All available dockage space is utilized. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $15,295. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $17,621. A contract was awarded and completed for maintenance dredging, removing 9,714 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $41,407. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $45,560. The existing project was completed in 1932 except for the 1962 authorization which was completed in 1967. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $4,294,957, of which $1,027,089 was for new work (includes $354,139 contributed funds), $3,197,190 for maintenance and $70,678 for rehabilitation. 29. LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI Location. On southwest shore of Lake Huron, 20 miles north of Port Huron, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) E.xisting project. Provides for two offshore breakwaters opening to the southeast and totaling about 2,400 feet long with provisions for recreational fishing on the main breakwater; an anchorage and maneuver area of about 5 acres, 8 feet deep; and a flared appro'ach channel 10 feet deep, decreasing to 160 feet in width through the breakwvaters. Project also provides for recreational fishing facilities. Estimated (1979) Federal cost of new work is $1,647,306 excluding $1,088,888 to be contributed by local interests. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation were furnished by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources to the Secretary of the Army. The cash contribution was $1,088,888. Terminal facilities. An existing public fishing pier of open pile construction is not adequate for existing and prospective commerce. Complete boating facilities are planned by State and local agencies in connection with the harbor construction. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of x29,893. The contract awarded last FY for maintenance dredging was completed this FY at a cost of $1,603. This contract was also for beach nourishment. Engineering, design, and supervision and administration cost $1,604. Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 was performed by government forces and contract at a cost of $18,062. Beach nourishment in conjunction with the above maintenance dredging contract cost $15,309. Supervision and administration under Section 111 cost $4,253. The existing project was completed during FY 1977. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $5,829,184, of which $3,107,192 (includes $1,088,888 contributed funds) was for new work and $2,784,992 for maintenance. 30. LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior 21 miles west of Whitefish Point and 30 miles east of Grand Marais, MI. (See NO.AA Nautical Chart 14962.) Existing project. Provides for a small-craft harbor of refuge by dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep from Lake Superior into Little Lake, suitably protected by breakwaters and revetments. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Only terminal facility at project consists of a public dock built by the State of Michigan for light-draft craft. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, and environmental studies were performed by Government forces at a cost of $12,378. An adjustment of $1 was made in option year two (2) of the FY95 maintenance dredging contract terminated for the government's convience last FY. Option year three (3) of the FY95 maintenance dredging contract cost $90,520, removing 21,510 cubic yards of shoal material. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $26,346. This project is considered complete; however, because of shifting sand, the harbor entrance shoals rapidly with the result that full project depth is not usually available. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $5,027,258, of which $600,478 was for 21-14 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT new work (includes $57,670 contributed funds) and $4,426,780 for maintenance. 31. LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 156 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 67 miles northerly from Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14937.) Previous project. For details see page 1951 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1491 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 1307 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. Provides for an exterior basin in Lake Michigan protected by north and south breakwaters, north breakwater is 1,800 feet long and south breakwater 1,700 feet long, 550 feet apart at outer ends, diverging at an angle of 90 degrees, with shore connections, 1,103 and 2,004 feet long, respectively; for dredging exterior basin to 18 feet deep with a maximum width of 1,500 feet; for a channel with a depth of 29 feet from deep water in Lake Michigan decreasing to 27 feet at the west end of the north pier, over a maximum width of 600 feet; thence a channel with a depth of 27 feet, over a minimum width of 230 feet with necessary widening at Pere Marquette Lake; and for inner piers and revetments, 1,649 feet long on north and sufficiently long on the south for turn at Pere Marquette Lake. The estimated (1977) Federal cost for new work is $8,250,000. Estimated total cost fbr local interests is $147,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. In addition to main terminal of Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company consisting of three car ferry slips, a wharf, and warehouses, there are several wharves which handle coal, limestone, and miscellaneous commodities. Facilities adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $104,007. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $8,193. Engineering and design for repair of the North Breakwater, Section B, was initiated at a cost of $20,736. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging contract to be awarded next FY cost $6,913. Monitpring in connection with Section III of P.L. 90-483 was performed at a cost of $9,927. Existing project was completed in 1918. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1469 of Annual Report for 1962. Navigation structures range from fair to good condition and are programmed for repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $26,831,575, of which $8,532,202 was for new work, $17,941,460 for maintenance, and $357,913 for rehabilitation. The maintenance cost does not include $136,286 contributed funds. 32. MANISTEE HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 179 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 26 miles northerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14938.) Previous project. For details see page 1952 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1493 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel in Lake Michigan protected by a breakwater, piers, and revetment; a channel in Manistee River to Manistee Lake; and Federal participation in cost of replacing Maple Street Bridge. Project depths are 25 feet in entrance channel and 23 feet in river channel. For additional details see page 1470 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Installations are on both sides of river and on Manistee Lake. Commerce handled includes coal, sand, salt, and general cargo. In addition, there is a Government wharf and a State and City owned recreational craft pier which is open to the public. These facilities satisfy current commerce requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $49,651. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $481. An adjustment of $1 was made in contract cost for FY95 repair of the South Connector and South Pier completed last FY. Supervision and administration to close-out the contract cost $2,164. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging contract to be awarded next FY cost $14,097. Existing project was completed in August 1967. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1470 of Annual Report for 1962. Navigation structures range from generally fair to good condition. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $15,346,782, of which $2,696,522 was for new work, $11,276,096 for maintenance, and $1,374,164 for rehabilitation. 33. MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MI Location. On the north shore of Lake Michigan, 135 miles northeasterly from Green Bay Harbor, WI, and 220 miles northerly from Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14908.) Previous projects. For details see page 1933 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1422 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A breakwater protected entrance channel in Lake Michigan, a channel in Manistique River, and a pier at river mouth. Project depths are 19 feet in outer portion of entrance channel, 18 feet in inner portion of entrance channel, and 18 feet in 21-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 river channel. For additional details see page 1452 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A car ferry slip, two coal and building material wharves, two fishing wharves, and numerous lumberyard slips. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $13,992. Engineering and design for repair of East and West Breakwater, Sections F,E,C & D was initiated at a cost of $75,204. Repairs to the East and West Breakwater, Sections C-F, began using the cranebarge MANITOWOC at cost of $34,246. Real estate cost $297. Navigation structures are in generally poor condition and are scheduled for major repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $3,996,410, of which $1,299,355 was for new work, $2,380,722 for maintenance and $316,333 for rehabilitation. 34. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 79 miles north of Milwaukee, WI, and about 106 miles friom Green Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14922.) Previous projects. See page 1379 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. The total estimated (Oct. 1981) project cost is $3,080,000; the Federal cost is $1,085,000 and non-Federal cost is $1,995,000, which is a cash contribution. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C. For detailed description see page 1228 of Annual Report for 1963. Estimated costs (1970) of new work for 1968 modification are $81,000 Federal and $30,000 non-Federal which includes a cash contribution of $18,000. Work on the 1968 modification was postponed until 1982. The portion authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, June 26, 1979, and 720-foot channel extension affirmed in July 1982, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed modifications. For 1968 modification local interests must make an annual cash contribution equivalent to 50% of the annual costs associated with construction and maintenance of the channel extension until such time that a second user utilizes the channel extension. Such a contribution is presently estimated at $9,206; additional assurances require that the sponsor provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way required for construction and subsequent maintenance, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and subsequent disposal of dredged materials, and the necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads and embankments therefor or the costs of such retaining works; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works and subsequent use, operation, and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the Uni'.d States or its contractors; provide and maintain without cost to the United States adequate berthing areas at the docks adjacent to the improvement; accomplish at no cost to the United 'At"qs all relocations and alterations of utilities necessary for the project; assume full responsibility for all project first costs in excess of the Federal cost limitation of $2,000,000; and comply with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970. Terminal facilities. Three car-feny slips, a grain elevator, one shipbuilding yard, and three other wharves used for handling coal, building materials, cement, and miscellaneous commodities. While these facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce, it is believed the city should provide a suitable wharf with warehouse and railway connection open to the general public. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $85,103. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $1,490. Minor confined disposal facility repairs cost $941. An adjustment of $49,094 was made in cost for repairs to the North Breakwater, Sections C & D, performed last FY using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC. Materials purchased and stockpiled for future repairs cost $25,359. Existing project is complete except for the 1962 and 1968 modifications. The 1962 modification was deauthorized December 31, 1990. Work on the 1968 modification was essentially completed in FY 83. The Federal modification, adopted July 15, 1985, included the expansion of the new entrance channel to the Section 107 project and extension of the rubblemound breakwater. Dredging a channel through the outer basin to existing project depth and removal of a portion of old north stub pier at the river entrance were completed in December 1937. Dredging river channel was completed in July 1942. South Breakwater, Section E, is in fair condition and is scheduled for repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $15,636,993, of which $3,960,044 was for new work (includes $1,911,130 contributed funds), $8,595,193 for maintenance (includes $47,860 contributed funds), and $3,081,756 for diked disposal. 35. MENOMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, MI AND WI Location. On Lake Michigan at the mouth of Menominee River on the western shore of Green Bay, 16 miles northwest of the mouth 21-16 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT of Sturgeon Bay, and 49 miles northeast of Green Bay Harbor, about 155 miles from Milwaukee via Sturgeon Bay Canal. The river forms the boundary between the commercial harbors at Marinette, WI, and Menominee, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14917.) Previous projects. See page 1361 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-26. For detailed description see page 1214, Annual Report for 1963. The portion authorized by 1960 River and Harbor Act is inactive and estimated (1964) at $442,000 Federal, and $105,000 non-Federal. Costs of completed new work, exclusive of inactive work and amount expended on previous projects, are $221,053 Federal and $40,762 non-Federal, which includes a cash contribution of $36,762. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. Terminal facilities. There are 9 wharves for handling coal, limestone, pulp and miscellaneous conunmmodities. City of Marinette, WI, provided a public wharf. Facilities are considered fairly adequate for existing commerce, except that there is need for a public wharf owned by city of Menominee, with warehouse and railway connection. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $62,405. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $18,544. Repairs to South Pier, Section D, were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $66,922. The project in effect prior to the modification of March 2, 1945, was completed in 1938. No additional work was necessary under the modification of March 2, 1945, to provide a depth of 12 feet in the extension of the channel to the vicinity of the Marinette Yacht Club, as project depth or more was available. The entrance piers were completed in 1884, were rehabilitated (1954-1964) and are in excellent condition. Dredging of the channel below the Marinette municipal wharf, together with enlarging the turning basin to existing project depth, was commenced in May 1938. Modification of the project authorized by the 1960 River and Harbor Act is inactive. Construction for the 1967 modifications was started August 17, 1968, and completed in October 1968. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $5,431,205, of which $570,238 was for new work (includes $36,762 contributed funds), $2,915,455 for maintenance, $593,660 for diked disposal and $1,351,852 for rehabilitation. 36. MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 85 miles north of Chicago, IL, and about 83 miles west of Grand Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14924.) Previous projects. See page 1385 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979. Table 30-C, page 30-26. For detailed description see page 1232 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed new work costs are $6,934,804 Federal and $478,000 non-Federal, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. The uncompleted portio n authorized by the 1935 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). Uncompleted portion of 1945 River and I '"bor Act was deauthorized in 1977. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with for Acts of March 2, 1945, October 23, 1962, and July 14, 1960, except deauthorized portion of 1945 Act. Act of Aug. 30, 1935, provided that original dredging of outer harbor area be done by city of Milwaukee and city of Milwaukee be reimbursed at actual cost but not to exceed 10 cents per cubic yard, place measurement, for original dredging done subsequent to authorization of work by Congress. Agreement covering dredging was executed by Secretary of War, Feb. 23, 1934, after this work was originally authorized as part of public works program. City was reimbursed for 10 percent of dredging. Terminal facilities. There are 4 car-ferry slips, and 57 other wharves, private and municipal, used for handling coal, grain, building materials, cement, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. As facilities in inner harbor were inadequate for existing commerce, Milwaukee Harbor Commission has constniructed nine docks in the outer harbor for handling general cargo. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, CDF monitoring and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $313,577. Development of dredged material management plans continued at a cost of $280,377. Engineering and design for repair of the South Breakwater, Section E, Riprap, was completed at a cost of $38,398. A contract was awarded for this work in the amount of $1,563,460. The contract was 49% complete at a cost of $763,000. Engineering and design during construction cost $9,301. The FY95 repair contract for the North Breakwater, Section D, was completed at a cost of $950,614. An adjustment of -$5,440 was made in the FY 94 repair contract cost (completed last FY) for Spalling, South Breakwater, Section E. Repairs to the North Breakwater, Section Cl and South Breakwater, Section F, were performed using the U.S. Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $410,410. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $8,184. Confined disposal facility maintenance performed by hired labor cost of $3,902. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, supervision and administration cost $205,460. Existing project is complete except for inactive portions. The 1962 modification was completed in July 1967. North breakwater and shore connection, 9,954 feet long, was completed in August 1925. 21-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 North pier was completed in 1905 and construction of south pier was completed in November 1910. Construction of south breakwater and shore connection was completed in October 1929. Before modification of August 30, 1935, City of Milwaukee also dredged most of the area in the outer harbor south of inner entrance piers and lakeward of pierhead line to more than 21 feet below datum without cost to the United States. City of Milwaukee also dredged a portion of the area of the outer harbor north of inner entrance piers to provide an approach channel to the passenger and auto pier opposite East Claybourn Street. Work on the 1945 modification was completed in August 1957, except for the uncompleted portion which consists of dredging the Milwaukee River from Buffalo Street to '"ner limit of the project at Humboldt Avenue. The uncomplete portion of the project authorized by the 1945 Rivers and Harbors Act was deauthorized in 1977. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $71,676,046, of which $8,231,024 was for new work, $44,348,537 for maintenance (includes $322,471 contributed funds), $6,380,925 for diked disposal and $12,715,560 for rehabilitation. 37. MONROE HARBOR, MI Location. On lower reach of River Raisin, which empties into Lake Erie and is 36 miles south of Detroit, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14830.) Existing project. Provides for a channel in Lake Erie and River Raisin to city of Monroe, for a turning basin, and for riprapping protecting dikes at river mouth. Project depths are 21 feet to turning basin, 18 feet in turning basin, and 9 feet to upstream end of project. For additional details see page 1490 of Annual Report for 1962. Project feature for riprapping protecting dikes is considered inactive. Estimated cost of this feature (1954) is $90,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) The WRDA of 1986 authorized modifications to deepen the River Raisin portion of the existing 200-foot navigation channel from 21 to 27 feet between existing turning basin and the river's mouth; deepen the lake channel from 21 to 28 feet, and widen the channel from 200 to 500 feet, for a distance of approximately 47,000 feet from the river's mouth to the Maumee Bay Entrance Channel; dredge a new turning basin 24 feet deep, with a diameter of at least 1,600 feet, at the river's mouth; and construct a 190 acre confined disposal area in Plum Creek Bay behind which would enable the creation of a 700 acre marsh. Estimated total cost (Oct. 88) is $150,200,000; $59,000,000 Federal and $91,200,000 non-Federal, which includes a cash contribution of $19,650,000. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662), are as described in the Rivers and Harbors Committee Document 22, 71st Congress, Ist Session; R & H Comm. Doc. 12, 72d Congress, Ist Session, and 45, 75th Congress, I st Session, and also includes, as a result of PL 99-662, construction cost sharing as follows: a. Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at $19,650,000. The estimated cash contribution of $19,650,000 to be paid in lump sum prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments during the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; b. Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount presently estimated at $7,860,000. The Secretary of the Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent repayment, the amount of the local contribution for lands, easements, rights-of-way, dredged/demolition material disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs to count against the cash payment during construction, and in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of project cost; and c. The confined dike area construction is a non-Federal responsibility and is estimated to cost $70,156,000. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned docks and a municipal terminal. Port of Monroe Authority built a steel and concrete wharf on southeast side of turning basin for commercial use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, Hi-Fix surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $62,697. Maintenance of the confined disposal facility performed by hired labor cost $2,845. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY, removing approximately 118,000 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $533,200. Engineering, design, surveys, real estate, and supervision and administration cost $74,641. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $60,032,807, of which $987,340 was for new work (includes $300,000 contributed by the Port Commission of Monroe), $20,355,885 for maintenance (includes $166,667 contributed funds: $125,000 by Consolidated Paper Company and $41,667 by River Raisin Company) and $38,689,582 for diked disposal (includes $83,182 contributed funds). 38. MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 114 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 80 miles easterly from Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical chart 19434.) 21-18 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Previous project. For details see page 1950 of Annual Report for 1915; page 1399, Annual Report for 1924; and page 1484, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A breakwater protected outer basin in Lake Michigan and an entrance channel from Lake Michigan to Muskegon Lake protected by piers and revetments. Project depths vary from 29 feet in the lakewa d portion of the outer basin to 27 feet in the channel between the inner piers to Muskegon Lake. For additional details see page 3 .03 of Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperaton. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several privately owned wharves primarily for commercial use. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are in Port Series, No. 48 (revised 1981) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing conunerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $75,162. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $12,895. Supervision and administration to close-out FY95 maintenance dredging contract completed last FY cost $818. Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 was performed at a cost of $41. Existing project, including latest project modification, was completed in 1965. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1465 of Annual Report for 1962. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $29,812,285, of which $3,017,110 was for new work, $12,970,875 for maintenance, and $13,824,300 for rehabilitation. 39. NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MI Location. At mouth of Galien River on southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Berrien County, about 45 miles easterly from Chicago, IL. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14905.) Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 10 feet deep by 80 feet wide and 850 feet long, to mouth of Galien River; new north and south breakwaters 1,305 and 740 feet long, respectively, and deepening inner channel to Galien River to 8 feet and 80 feet wide and 1,250 feet long. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One village owned boat ramp and three privately operated marinas, and a private boat club facility. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $26,864. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $7,955. Supervision and administration to close-out FY95 beach nourishment contract completed last FY cost $1,265. Existing project is complete. The South Breakwater is in falir condition, it is anticipated repairs will be required within the next five years. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $7,686,957, of which $2,472,183 was for new work (includes $1,186,467 contributed funds) and $5,214,774 for maintenance. 40. OCONTO HARBOR, WI Location. On the west shore of Green Bay, about 31 miles northeasterly from Green Bay Harbor, WI, and about 25 miles southwesterly from Menominee Harbor, MI and WI, at mouth of Oconto River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14910.) Previous project. For details see page 1 187 of Annual Report for 1958. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. For detailed description see page 1187, Annual Report for 1958. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Two municipally owned wharves of 400 and 100 feet frontage, respectively, for miscellaneous freight, open to general public use Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and environmental studies were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $50,529. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $2,385,708, of which $130,754 was for new work and $2,254,954 for maintenance. 41. ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI Location. About 140 miles east of Duluth, MN, on south shore of Lake Superior, at mouth of Ontonagon River; provides the only refuge for small craft between the Keweenaw Waterwvay upper entrance and Black River Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Previous project. For details see page 1931 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1406 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for approach channel 16 feet deep, a charnmel between piers with 17- and 15-foot depths, an inner basin 12 feet deep, and maintenance of channels, basin, and entrance piers. Completed project cost $19,619. See page 1100 of Annual Report 21-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 for 1966 for details. A modification authorized by 1962 River and Harbor Act provides for increasing depths of channels, construction of an inner basin and a sedimentation basin. (See Table 21-B for authorized legislation.) The turning basin feature of the project for navigation at Ontonagon Harbor, Ontonagon County, MI, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1962, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 99-662 (Section 1002) Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. The channel modification project authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are no publicly owned wharves. There are three coal wharves, an oil receiving facility, and a few small fish wharves. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $71,650. Repairs to the East Breakwater, Extension of Section A, were perfonnmed using the U.S. Derrickbarge SCHWARTZ at a cost of $1,034,819. The channel bank erosion study initiated last FY was completed this FY at a cost of $13,799. An investigation of the East Pier, Section A, Tie Rod was performed at a cost of $19,432. Engineering and design for repair of the East Pier, Section B, and Wave Attenuator, was initiated at a cost of $58,481. Option year I of FY96 maintenance dredging contract was awarded and completed this FY, removing approximately 56,283 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $241,566. Engineering, design, surveys, real estate, and supervision and administration cost $47,624. All work authorized under previous Acts was completed in 1938. Navigation structures range from fair to good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $22,349,521, of which $953,903 was for new work, $21,374,618 for maintenance and $21,000 for diked disposal. 42. PENTWATER HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 146 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 14 miles southerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14907.) Existing project. Provides for widening old entrance channel to 150 feet between parallel piers and revetments, channel to extend from Lake Michigan to Pentwater Lake, with a depth of 16 feet. Piers and revetments are built of stone filled timber cribs and piling and capped with concrete. The 200-foot extension to south pier portion of project is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1954) of this portion is $65,100. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Several small privately owned wharves on wei lldof Pentwater Lake. The City and Michigan Waterways Commission jointly constructed a dock on northwest side of Pentwater Lake for public use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintennrce: Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost c~ 49,214. Engineering and design for repair of the North Pier and Revetrent, Sections A-D, F, Fl, (Phase II) was initiated at a cost of $73,115. Work began on the contract awarded last FY for repair of the South Pier and South Revetment, Sections B, F-H, J, (Phase I) at a cost of $2,324,001. Engineering and design during construction for this work cost $25,432. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $3,334. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed, removing 10,598 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $46,780. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $288,469. Existing project was completed in 1959 except for a 200-foot extension to the south pier which is not considered necessary under present conditions. For additional details see page 1468 of Annual Report for 1962. North Pier and Revetment is in poor condition and is scheduled for major repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $8,239,673, of which $179,899 was for new work, and $8,059,774 for maintenance. 43. PETOSKEY HARBOR, MI Location. This harbor is on the east shore of Lake Michigan about 50 miles south of the Straits of Mackinac. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14913.) Previous project. For details see page 1954 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1547 of Annual Report for 1931, and page 2024 of Annual Report for 1949. Existing project. Provides for a breakwater extending from shore 1,345 feet long of stone-filled timber crib, concrete capped, and rubblestone construction which protects the municipal pier. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There is a municipal pier which is about 635 feet long plus several recreational craft piers. These installations satisfy current commerce and traffic requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $2,502. Safety maintenance was performed by hired labor at a cost of $644. Materials purchased and stockpiled for future repairs cost $38,500. 21-20 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT The existing project was complete in 1938. Total cost of the existing project to the end of FY was $735,173 of which $123,839 was for new work and $611,334 for maintenance. 44. POINT LOOKOUT HARBOR (AU GRES RIVER), MI Location. At Au Gres River on westerly shore of Lake Huron at entrance to Saginaw Bay, about 17 miles northeast of mouth of Saginaw River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a small boat harbor having a 12-foot deep, 100-foot wide, 2,800-foot long outer entrance channel; a 5,600-foot long, 100-foot wide inner entrance channel having a 10-foot depth; an 8,270-foot long, 6-foot deep river channel ending just downstream from U.S. 23 highway bridge and having a width of 60 feet; a 4,000-foot long north breakwater and a 3,800-foot long south breakwater. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Small boat marina facilities are under construction by the State of Michigan. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $74,551. Existing project was completed in 1974. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $6,707,378 of \hich $2,642,584 was for new work, $3,943,194 for maintenance (includes $9,257 contributed funds) and $121,600 for diked disposal. 45. PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MI Location. On west shore of Lake Huron at extreme southeastern limit of Saginaw Bay, and 29 miles south of AuSable River (Oscoda). (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. A harbor of refuge at the mouth of Bird Creek, consisting of a harbor basin dredged to a depth of 10 feet protected by a breakwater structure, and for dredging an entrance channel to the harbor basin to a depth of 12 feet. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year: Maintenance: Condition surveys and environmental studies were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $6,664. Engineering and design for maintenance dredging contract to be awarded in the future cost $81,867. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $5,423,276, of which $3,363,334 was for new work (includes $172,100 contributed funds), $1,900,942 for maintenance and $159,000 for diked disposal. 46. PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI Location. On southwest shore of Lake Huron, 30 miles north of Port Hu.on, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14862.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge protected by b , water structures extending to 12-foot depth contour in lake; for dredging a harbor basin 10 feet deep; for dredging an entrance channel 12 feet deep; a 70-foot extension of the south breakwater; a 300-foot arm added to the north breakwater; and riprap placed at the lakeward side of the breakwater addition. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one privately owned dock used principally as a fishing terminal by owner and a municipally owned Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $8,192. Safety repairs performed by hired labor cost $1,696. An adjustment of -$16,269 was made in contract cost which completes maintenance dredging contract awarded last FY. This contract was also for beach nourishment. Supervision and administration cost $922. Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 was performed at a cost of $9,860. Beach nourishment in conjunction with the above maintenance dredging contract cost $761. The project was completed in 1951 except for latest modification which was completed in FY 76. The breakwaters are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $5,324,004, of which $1,733,071 was for new work (includes $487,108 contributed funds), $3,581,775 for maintenance (includes $115,000 contributed funds) and $9,158 for diked disposal. 47. PORT WASHINGTON HARBOR, WI Location. On the west shore of Lake Michigan, about 53 miles south of Manitowoc and about 29 miles north of Milwaukee, WI (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14904.) Previous project. For details, see page 1938 of Annual Report for 1915, page 1459 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 30-14 of Chicago District Annual Report for 1975. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. 21-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Construction of a small boat harbor within the existing harbor was authorized by the Chief of Engineers, June 12, 1975, under authority of Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one coal wharf, a petroleum tank farm and several fishing wharves. City provided a wharf which is open to public use. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Mai -',-lance: Condition surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $30,469. The existing project was completed in 1936. The 1958 modification was deauthorized in 1977. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $7,310,093, of which $4,206,204 was for new work (includes $1,624,000 contributed funds), $3,093,268 for maintenance and $10,621 for diked disposal. 48. PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan about 186 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and about 37 miles northerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14939.) Existing project. Provides for a harbor of refuge with an entrance channel from Lake Michigan to Portage Lake protected by piers and revetments. Project depth is 18 feet. For additional details see page 1297 of Annual Report for 1958. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are landing places and marinas at inner end of Portage Lake. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $34,700. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $4,991. Engineering and design for repair of the North and South Piers, Sections A&B, continued at a cost of $129,567. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY, removing 28,438 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $181,920. Engineering, design, surveys and supervision and administration cost $51,327. Existing project was substantially completed in 1912. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1298 of Annual Report for 1958. Navigation structures are in generally poor condition and are scheduled for major repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $3,040,252 of which $256,129 was for new work and $2,784,123 for maintenance. 49. PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI Location. On south shore of Lake Superior at Marquette, MI. It is an indentation about 1.5 miles long and one-half mile wide in shore behind Presque Isle Point. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14970.) Existing project. A breakwater off Presque Isle Point and dredging harbor to depth of 28 feet at inner portion with 30 feet at entrance. For details see page 1021 of 1965 Annual Report. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One merchandise and petroleum receiving wharf and one ore dock. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and environmental studies were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $60,278. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $3,163,061, of which $1,252,192 was for new work, $1,817,869 for maintenance, $16,500 for diked disposal and $76,500 for rehabilitation. 50. ROUGE RIVER, MI Location. Rises in Oakland and Washtenaw Counties, MI, 30 miles long, flows southeasterly through Wayne County, and joins Detroit River at westerly limit of city of Detroit. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14854.) Previous project. For details see page 1530 of Annual Report for 1932, and page 1558 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for: (a) Main channel from Detroit River through Short Cut Canal extending to upstream limit of the project, a distance of 3.5 miles. Project depths are 25 and 21 feet in navigation channel, 21 feet in turning basin, and 13 feet in upper reach of project. (b) Old Channel from Detroit River extending to junction of Old Channel with Short Cut Canal. Project depths are 25, 18, 17, and 21 feet. For additional details see page 1324 of Annual Report for 1963. In 1973, work authorized by the 1962 River and Harbor Act was reclassified from the active to inactive category. Estimated cost (1972) of this work is $880,000. Except for dredging 25-foot channel 1,150 feet upstream from mouth of Old Channel, work authorized in Act of Aug. 30, 1935, is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1958) of inactive portion is $255,000. Work authorized by Act of July 3, 1958, is considered inactive. Estimated cost (1960) of this work is $210,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Act of Oct. 23, 1962, requires local interests to provide lands and rights-of-way for construction upon request of 21-22 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT the Chief of Engineers, hold the Uiucd States free from damages; provide terminal facilities to accommodate prospective commerce considered in report of District Engineer; dredge and maintain areas between the Federal improvement and terminal facilities to depths commensurate with improved Federal channel; make alterations in docks, bulkheads and other structures, and take such other measures as may be necessary to assure stability of banks adjacent to channel; and orovide bridge protection. The assurances of local cooperation for :he River and Harbor Act of 1962 were furnished by the Michigan State Waterways Commission and accepted on Jan. 7, 1965. Fulfillment of all items of local cooperation has not been "ccomplished. Terminal facilities. Numerous large commercial docks for handling various type cargo. Details on actual port and harbor facilities are contained in the Port Series No. 45 (revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $75,135. An adjustment of -$44,624 was made in contract cost for FY93 maintenance dredging substantially completed in FY94. A contract for maintenance was awarded this FY in the amount of $401,000. The contract is 63% complete removing approximately 30,673 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $253,000. Engineering, design, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $73,856. Work authorized before 1962 modification is complete or deauthorized. For additional details on completion of existing project see Annual Report for 1962. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $37,704,016, of which $675,251 was for new work ($29,563 was expended from Emergency Relief Act Funds), $22,121,447 for maintenance and $14,907,318 for diked disposal. 51. SAGINAW RIVER, MI Location. Formed by union of Tittabawassee and Shiawassee Rivers, 22 miles long, and flows northerly into extreme inner end of Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron. Cities of Saginaw and Bay City are on the river. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14867.) Previous project. For details, see page 1957 of Annual Report for 1915; and page 1550 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 27 feet deep and 350 feet wide from 27-foot contour in Saginaw Bay to river mouth; thence a channel 26 feet deep and 200 feet wide to New York Central Railroad Bridge at Bay City; thence 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide to C&O Railroad Bridge in Saginaw; thence 16.5 feet deep and 200 feet wide to upstream limit at Green Point. Project also provides for five turning basins; one 25 feet deep at Essexville, 600 feet wide with a maximum length of 1,850 feet; one 22 feet deep on east side of channel about 1 mile upstream from Cass Avenue in Bay City, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; one 20 feet deep at Carrollton, 100 to 300 feet wide and 900 feet long; one 20 feet deep downstream from C&O Bridge in Saginaw, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; and one 15 feet deep between Bristol Street Bridge and New York Central Railroad Bridge in Saginaw. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Numerous large commercial docks for handling a great variety of cargo. Details on actual port and hart r facilities are in Port Series No. 45 (revised 1984) prepared and published by the Water Resources Support Center. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, support of water control center and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $481,956. Development of dredged material management plans continued at a cost of $161,492. An adjustment of $124,616 was made in contract cost and 46,772 in cubic yards for maintenance dredging awarded last FY. A contract for maintenance dredging of the Bay and River was awarded this FY in the amount of $1,844,0749. The contract was 85% complete at the end of FY, removing approximately 220,000 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $909,864. Engineering, design, real estate, surveys, and supervision and administration cost $165,818. Construction of a diked disposal area for Upper Saginaw was dropped from the diked disposal program due to the decline in PCB levels. Project no longer requires confinement. Existing project is complete except for small part of the work authorized by the Act of October 23, 1962. Section D (Sixth Street Turning Basin) of the 1962 Act is complete except for the channel portion, which is pending modification. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $91,479,480, of which $14,930,727 was for new work (includes $13,600 for contributed funds), $55,596,865 for maintenance, and $20,951,888 for diked disposal. 52. ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI Location. A 40 mile long section of Great Lakes connecting channels which flows southerly from Lake Huron and discharges into Lake St. Clair. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14852.) Existing project. Provides for channels through St. Clair River, which, at low water datum, are suitable for vessels drawing 25.5 feet. Project also provides for improvement of North Channel outlet, 100 feet wide and 10 feet deep, for recreational craft. Project depths are referred to low water datums for Lakes Huron and St. Clair; 577.5 and 572.3 feet above mean water level at Rimouski, Quebec, IGLD 1985. (See Tables 21-B and 21-H for authorizing legislation and features of existing project.) Act of July 24, 1946, provides for widening and deepening of southeast bend and improvement of outlet 21-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 of north channel at an estimated cost (1986) of $870,000; $435,000 Federal and $435,000 non-Federal. On June 16, 1969, the Director of Civil Works approved substitution of the middle channel of the St. Clair River for the authorized north channel. Subsequently, however, the work authorized by the River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. This improvement serves through commerce, between the upper and lower Great Lakes, and has not materially influenced terminal facilities along its route. A number of privately owned piers and wharves are at Port Huron, Marysville, St. Clair, and Marine City, MI, which handle coal, limestone, petroleum products, wood-pulp, salt and general cargo. These installations satisfy present commerce requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys, environmental studies, support of water control center and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $139,229. Location and removal of obstructions was performed using the U.S. Derrickbarge HURON at a cost of $309,204. Real estate and supervision and administration cost $4,823. Existing project is complete. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $45,008,792, of which $19,213,246 was for new work and $25,795,546 for maintenance. 53. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 60 miles easterly from Chicago, IL, and 24 miles southerly from South Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14930.) Previous project. For details see page 1945 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1470 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Provides for protecting mouth of St. Joseph River by two piers, 250 to 325 feet apart at their inner and outer ends, respectively, having lengths of 2,758 feet on north side and 2,603 feet on south side; for a channel 21 feet deep from Lake Michigan to mouth of Benton Harbor Canal, a length of about 6,900 feet with widths of 265 feet at outer end of piers, 190 feet at inner end of piers and revetments, thence generally 215 feet to lower end of turning basin, increasing to 250 feet above the turning basin to mouth of Paw Paw River, thence generally 110 feet in Paw Paw River to mouth of Benton Harbor Canal; for dredging channel in Benton Harbor Canal up to west line of Riverview Drive extended northerly, to 18 feet deep and 80 feet wide; and a turning basin 18 feet deep on north side of channel above mouth of Morrison Channel and a turning basin 18 feet deep near mouth of Paw Paw River. Public Law 88-88 declared a portion of Benton Harbor Canal a nonnavigable stream. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several commercial wharves for handling coal, building materials, petroleum products, and miscellaneous commodities. A package freight terminal and a public docking facility is also available. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal ye r. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies, confined disposal facility monitoring, and miscellaneou; inspections and reports were performed by Government fc-c s and contract at a cost of $132,642. Safety maintenance performed by hired labor cost $38,002. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for maintenance dredging the inner harbor, removing 55,857 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $374,137. A contract for maintenance dredging the outer channel was awarded and completed this FY, removing 35,042 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $135,224. This contract was also for beach nourishment. Engineering, design, surveys, real estate, and supervision and administration cost $205,513. Environmental activities for a disposal area and polluted dredged material continued at a cost of $150,967. Monitoring in connection with Section 111 of P.L. 90-483 cost $48,415. Beach nourishment in conjunction with the above maintenance dredging of the outer channel contract awarded and completed this FY cost $27,696. A contract for beach nourishment (trucking) was awarded and completed this FY in the amount of $316,037. Engineering, design, surveys and supervision and administration under Section 111 cost $55,259. Existing project was completed in 1956. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1454 of Annual Report for 1962. The structures are in generally good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $29,977,477, of which $1,804,485 was for new work, $26,572,700 for maintenance, $638,076 for diked disposal and $962,216 for rehabilitation. 54. ST. MARYS RIVER, MI Location. A Great Lakes connecting channel about 63 miles long, flows southeasterly between State of Michigan and Providence of Ontario, Canada, from eastern end of Lake Superior into northern end of Lake Huron. (See NOAA Nautical Charts 14882, 14883, and 14884.) At Sault Ste. Marie, MI, about 14 miles downstream from Lake Superior, there are four parallel locks and a hydroelectric powerplant. Previous project. For details see page 1955, Annual Report for 1915; and page 1529, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Channels permitting 25.5-foot draft navigation in St. Marys River and Lake Superior and Lake Huron approaches thereto; constructing and operating four locks and two canals; constructing an electric plant of 14,000 kilowatt capacity (45,000 kilowatt ultimate capacity) constructing anchorage areas in river 21-24 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT above and below locks; and constructing various other works in conjunction with project. Subseqtintly, in 1932, the Unit 10 powerhouse was installed raising the capacity to 18,400 kilowatts (45,000 ultimate capacity). Original State Locks were operated and maintained under permanent indefinite appropriation from Jun. 9, 1881, to Nov. 2, 1886, after which they were destroyed by excavation for the Poe Lock in 1896. Weitzel Lock, destroyed in 1942 by excavation for the MacArthur Lock, was operated and maintained under the same appropriation from Sep. 1, 1881, to Jun. 30, 1935. Poe Lock was operated and-maintained under the s ame appropriation from Aug. 3, 1896, Davis Lock from Oct. 21, 19! 4, and Sabin Loc from Sep. 18, 1919, to end of FY 1935. Th 1 200- foot by 1 10-foot new Poe Lock was authorized in 1962 and put into operation in 1968. Details of existing project are set forth in Table 21-F. Project depths are referred to low water datum corresponding to sloping surface of river as follows: Above locks: When water surface of Lake Superior is at elevation 601.1 feet and at upstream side of locks is 600.6 feet above mean water level at Rimouski, Quebec, IGLD 1985. Below locks: When water surface at downstream side of locks is at elevation 578.4 feet and Lake Huron is 577.5 feet above mean water level at Rimouski, Quebec, IGLD 1985. Estimated (1974) cost for new work is $163,087,000. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) The WRDA of 1986 authorized construction of a second lock 1,294 feet in length, 115 feet in width, and 32 feet in depth, adjacent to the existing lock. The replacement lock is to be located in the North Canal of the St. Marys Falls Canal at Sault Ste. Marie, MI, on the site of the existing Davis and Sabin Locks. Material removed during construction of the replacement lock will be placed on the Northwest Pier to serve as a windbreak for downbound vessels approaching the lock. Estimated cost (Oct. 90) is $174,200,000 Federal and $93,800,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project. Local cooperation items for the newly authorized project in the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662), are as follows: (a) Provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for implementation and later maintenance of the proposed project, and for aids to navigation upon the request of the Chief of Engineers, including suitable areas determined by the Chief of Engineers to be required in the general public interest for initial and later disposal of dredged/demolition material and including necessary retaining dikes, bulkheads, and embankments therefor, or the costs of such retaining works; (b) Hold and save the United States free from damages due to the implementation and maintenance of the project, not including damages due to the fault or negligence of the United States or its contractors; (c) Accomplish wvithout cost to the United States such alterations and relocations of pipelines, powerlines, cables, sewer, water supply, drainage, and other utilities, structures, and improvements made necessary by the project. (Any such costs of the items on Federal property at the locks, would be part of the total construction cost and not separable local sponsor cost.); (d) Contribute in cash 25 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, exclusive of aids to navigation, a contribution presently estimated at $67,000,000. The estimated cash contribution of $67,000,000 to be paid in lump sum prior to initiation of construction, or in annual installments during the construction period at a rate proportionate to the proposed or scheduled expenditure of Federal funds as required by the Chief of Engineers, or under another arrangement satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army, the final apportionment of cost to be made after actual costs have been determined; (e) Repay, with interest, over a period of up to 30 years following project completion, 10 percent of the total cost of construction of general navigation facilities, an amount presently estimated at $26,800,000. The Secretary of the Army may count against all or part of the 10 percent repayment, the amount of the local contribution for lands, easements, rights-of-way, dredged/demolition material disposal sites and relocations. In no case are these costs to count against the cash payment during construction, and in no case would the amount waived exceed 10 percent of project cost; and (f) Any construction needed to prevent/mitigate for erosion or shoaling attributed to the lock would be cost shared in the same proportion as the project. Terminal facilities. This improvement serves through commerce between Lake Superior and lower lakes and has not materially influenced terminal facilities at localities along its route. Three piers at Sault Ste. Marie receive coal and petroleum products. Limestone is shipped from a pier at Drummond Island. Vessel refueling stations are at Lime Island and village of DeTour; they receive coal and petroleum products. Present terminals satisfy current traffic requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Operations, maintenance, and care of locks: Two canals and three locks were operated (the fourth lock, Sabin, was out of service) as required. Necessary repairs and improvements were made thereto and to appurtenant structures and equipment. Canals were open to navigation 297 days during the period 1 October 1995 through 30 September 1996. A total of 11,025 vessels, aggregating 88,796,585 short tons of freight and 216,546 passengers passed through the MacArthur, Poe and Davis Locks. Total cost for operation, maintenance, and care of the locks during the FY was $7,832,625, which includes; $231,062 for MacArthur Lock stoplog repairs, of which $176,035 was performed by contract; $186,096 to continue preparation of plans and specifications for major repairs to the MacArthur Lock; $14,297 for supervision and administration to close-out FY96 Poe Lock automation contract (Phase II) completed last FY; $2,633 for supervision and administration to close-out FY94 Sabin Lock 21-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 dewatering contract; and $315,132 for extended season operation and maintenance. Powerhouse and equipment: A total of 139,284,100 kilowatt-hours of power was generated this FY. Income from the sale of power, sent to the U.S. Treasury, amounted to $1,699,340. Total cost of operation and maintenance for two hydroelectric powerhouses during the FY was $2,534,256, which includes a deduction of $57,711 for interdepartmental electricity sold but not paid for. Total cost also includes assistance from the Hydroelectric Design Center for continued benchmark testing of the generators and turbines, a powerhouse rehabil'i t;on report, preparation of plans and specifications for 3A runne.r, unit #10 shaft runner, installation of automated governor, excitation & fire suppression system, and footbridge repairs all at a cost of $750,268; supervision and administration for FY93 generator rewind of Units 1 thru 3 contract cost $29,994; FY94 rehabilitation of hydroelectric Unit 3A contractcontinued at a cost of $460,799 with $42,164 for supervision and administration of the contract; and repair of unit #10 shaft runner was performed by contract at a cost of $444,999. Other operation and care items: Buildings and grounds were operated and maintained, condition surveys, operations studies, environmental activities, real estate, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed at a cost of $1,732,911, which includes a custodial, snow removal and grounds upkeep contract for $314,258 and a service contract for security measures for $408,455. Supervision and administration to close-out FY95 contract for elevator upgrade in the Administration building cost $1,842. Engineering and design for rehabilitation of the Administration and Davis buildings was initiated at a cost of $146,496. Winter and extended navigation season studies, ice measurements, and weather monitoring cost $73,947. Channels and canals: St. Marys River channels and canal approach depths were surveyed by sweeping. Removal of shoals in the St. Marys River channels and canal approaches was performed by hired labor using the U.S. Derrickbarge NICOLET and the U.S. Cranebarge HARVEY at a cost of $2,005,395. Work performed by hired labor on the Compensating Gates cost $10,136. Supervision and administration cost $146,492. Other miscellaneous items: Supervision and administration to close-out the FY95 contract for emergency replacement of the steam plant cost $118,326. Supervision and administration to close-out the FY95 repair contract for unit #10 closure south dike cost $3,649. A contract was awarded and completed this FY for switch gear assembly "B&F" replacement in the amount of $155,005. Engineering, design, and supervision and administration for this contract cost $58,113. Repair of armor old disposal sites was performed by hired labor at a cost of $418,434. Preparation of plans and specifications for this work cost $39,612. Engineering and design for repair of Pier 17 compensating works (to be awarded next FY) was initiated at a cost of $40,567. Engineering and design for major repair of the Rock Cut, East Guide Wall, was initiated at a cost of $65,077. Review of plans and specifications, and supervision and administration in support of Edison Soo construction contract for repair of compensating works cost $62,484. Plans and specifications for various other repair contracts to be awarded in the future cost $79,123. Recreational facilities: Information center, visitors center, comfort stations, park fountain, and observation and overlook platforms were operated and maintained at a cost of $113,633 which includes a custodial contract for the Information Center at a cost of $26,847. Visitors entering the Soo Locks Visitors Center numbered 470,021. Visitors to the observation platforms overlooking the locks numbered 469,988. Total visitors to the Soo Locks park numbered 639,184. A grand total of 845,722 people (includes tour boat visitors of 206,538) visited the Soo Locks. Total project costs in FY 97 amounted to $15,638,123. Project in effect prior to modification of March 21, 1956, is complete and work authorized by 1956 modification to provide a safe draft of 25.5 feet for both upbound and downbound traffic is also complete. Public Works Acceleration Funds used for maintenance were $118,000. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $492,494,843, of which $160,657,071 was for new work and $331,837,772 for maintenance (includes $340,399 contributed funds). 55. SAUGATUCK HARBOR AND KALAMAZOO RIVER, MI Location. Harbor is on east shore of Lake Michigan, 90 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 22 miles northerly from South Haven, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14906.) Previous project. For details see page 1947 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1475 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Entrance channel protected by parallel piers at mouth of Kalamazoo Riyer and a river channel to village of Saugatuck, MI. Project depths: 16 feet in entrance channel, 14 feet in river channel. Additional details on page 1456 of 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At village of Saugatuck, MI, there are several landing places for recreational craft and one for small commercial vessels. At village of Douglas, MI, there is a landing pier. Facilities are considered adequate for present traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, environmental studies and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $61,186. Safety repairs performed by hired labor cost $1,194. Engineering and design for repair of the North and South Pier, Sections A - G, was completed at a cost of $27,417. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed 21-26 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT this FY, removing 25,612 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $93,161. Engineering, design, surveys and supervision and administration cost $77,456. Existing project was completed in 1903. Navigation structures are in generally poor condition and are programmed for major repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $4,718,256, of which $364,527 was for new work and $4,353,729 for maintenance. 56. SAXON HARBOR, WI Location. On the south shore of Lake Superior in Wisconsin at the mouth of Oronto Creek, 27 miles southeast of the harbor at Bayfield, WI, and 21 miles westerly of the harbor at Black River, MI; 99 miles east of Duluth-Superior Harbor and 60 miles west of Ontonagon Harbor, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14965.) Previous project. For details see page 1254 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Provides for east and west breakwaters, an outer channel 10 feet deep, an inner basin and side channel 8 feet deep, and diversion of Oronto Creek to Parkers Creek by three short reaches of channel excavation and a levee. For detailed dimensions of features see pate 1025 of Annual Report for 1965. (See Table 21- B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. One wharf 300 feet long on the east side of present harbor basin constructed by local interests. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and real estate were performed by Government forces at a cost of $3,465. Safety maintenance cost $273. The project was completed in March 1968. A reconnaissance report was completed in August 1971 concerning erosion of the shoreline west of the harbor. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $1,559,992, of which $7 1 1,777 was for new work and $848,215 for maintenance. The new work cost does not include $50,193 contributed funds. 57. SEBEWAING RIVER, MI Location. At mouth of Sebewaing River on south shore of Saginaw Bay about 10 miles south of Bay Port, MI. (NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Previous project For details see page 1007 of Annual Report for 1912. Existing project. Provides for an entrance channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide, and about 15,000 feet long in Saginaw Bay. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Terminal facilities. A number of small wharves used by fishing vessels and other light-draft craft are along the river. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspection and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $4,246. An adjustment of $1 was made in contract cost for the maintenance dredg;ng contract completed last FY. Engineering, design, and sup-rvision and administration for close-out of the contract cost $10,357. Existing project was completed in 1903. Total " " of the exisiting project to end of FY was $4,030,383, of which $35,57? was for new work and $3,994,810 for maintenance. 58. SHEBOYGAN HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 26 miles south of Manitowoc and about 55 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14922.) Previous project. See page 1381 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-27. For detailed description see page 1230 of Annual Report for 1963. New work for project as completed cost $648,271, exclusive of amounts expended on previous projects. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Three wharves for handling coal, petroleum products and miscellaneous commodities. City provided a public wharf. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $34,363. Repairs to the North Breakwater, Sections E & F and South Pier, Sections M & N, were perfonned using the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $63,455. Safety repairs performed by hired labor cost $7,957. Existing project was completed in 1904. Construction of north breakwater was commenced in October 1913 and completed in October 1915. Dredging entrance channel to existing project depth was commenced in June and completed in July 1938. Work on 1954 modification was completed in December 1956. Inner 260 feet of south pier was replaced with a revetment by private interests under permit granted July 16, 1931, by the Secretary of War. Piers, therefore, are maintained only for a length of about 2,490 feet. Sheboygan River is navigable about 2.4 miles above its mouth for craft drawing not more than 2 feet. Navigation structures range from fair to good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY 21-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 was $10,732,064, of which $1,136,088 was for new work, $8,079,156 for maintenance, $907,792 for diked disposal and $609,028 for rehabilitation. 59. SILVER BAY HARBOR, MN Location. The city of Silver Bay, MN, is situated on the north shore of Lake Superior about 50 miles northeast of Duluth, MN. The proposed harbor of refuge is located between the Northshore Mining taconite processing facility and the city's water intake plant. The project site includes approximately 21.5 acres and includes over 2,000 feet of shoreline. Existing Project. The project was authorized under the River & Harbor Act 1945, House Document 446-78-2. The project is a Harbor of Refuge for small boats navigating the north shore of Lake Superior. This harbor will be part of a system of small craft harbors of refuge at 30 to 40 mile intervals between Duluth and Grand Marais, Minnesota. The 1994 Appropriations Act for Energy and Water Development provided $2.6 Million Federal funds for the project. The State of Minnesota will provide the funds for the non- Federal share. The project will repair/improve an existing breakwater and construct an additional adjacent breakwater. Local cooperation. The State of Minnesota is the non-Federal sponsor, acting through the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MDNR). The state provided all the required documentation and plans and specifications to the Detroit District for review, and the district awarded and is managing the construction. Operations during fiscal year. A total of $2,454,526 was expended this FY to complete the design of the project and to initiate construction. Of the funds expended, $531,352 was contributed by the MDNR. Total cost to end of FY was $2,634,890. 60. SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI Location. On east shore of Lake Michigan, 77 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 24 miles northerly from St. Joseph, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14906.) Previous project. For details see page 1947 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1473 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. An entrance channel protected by parallel piers and revetments at mouth of Black River, a river channel and a turning basin. Project depths are 21 feet in entrance channel and 19 feet in river channel and turning basin. For additional details see page 1455 of Annual Report for 1962. The turning basin feature was subsequently deauthorized by Section 116 of the WRDA of 1992 (PL 102-580). (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Several wharves for handling coal, building materials, wood-pulp, fish, and miscellaneous commodities; two have warehouses. Facilities satisfy current commerce requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and environmental studies were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $29,525. Repairs to the North and South Revetment were performed using the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $55,905. Existing proicect was completed in 1960. Project now being maintained to 14-foot and 12-foot depths, respectively (in lieu of the 21 feet and 19 feet authorized), which is adequate for current usage. For additional details on completion of existing project see page 1456 of Annual Report for 1962. Navigation structures range from poor to good condition and are scheduled for repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $10,327,522, of which $984,426 was for new work, $7,668,639 for maintenance, $42,381 for diked disposal and $1,632,076 for rehabilitation. 61. STURGEON BAY AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 52 miles northeast of Green Bay and about 128 miles north of Milwaukee, WI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14919.) Previous project. See page 1373 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 31-C, page 30-27. For detailed description, see page 1223, Annual Report for 1963. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. As the canal and connecting channel is a through waterway, only terminal facilities are in city of Sturgeon Bay, 4 miles from west end of revetted portion of canal. These facilities consist of two wharves for handling coal, petroleum products and miscellaneous commodities, and four shipbuilding yards. City of Sturgeon Bay provided a public wharf about 5 miles northwesterly from city of Sturgeon Bay. Two major shipyards are located in Sturgeon Bay where repair facilities are available including dry: docks, marine railways and hoists. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $78,543. Repairs to North and South Breakwaters, Sections B,C & D, were performed using the Cranebarge MANITOWOC at a cost of $224,059. Safety repairs cost $88. 21-28 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Navigation structures are in fair condition, the South Revetment, Section N, is in poor condition and is scheduled for major repair. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $12,531,456, of which $1,059,722 was for new work, $10,275,716 for maintenance, $311,119 for diked disposal and $881,899 for rehabilitation. In addition, $235,940 was expended between April 25, 1893, and June 30, 1917, on operating and care of works of improvements under provision of permanent indefinite appropriations for such purposes. 62. TWO HARBORS, MN Location. Harbor is on north shore of' -':e Superior, 27 miles northeasterly from Duluth, MN. (See NOAA Nauiical Chart 14966.) Existing project. Narrowing natural entrance by construction of two breakwaters, 1,628 and 900 feet long, from eastern and western points of bay, respectively; and dredging a maneuvering area on north side of harbor to 28 and 30 feet deep. A walkway on east breakwater is provided for public recreational use. For details see page 1026 of Annual Report for 1965. Dredging to deepen areas along easterly and northerly edges of channel was completed in 1980. This portion of project was reclassified from the "inactive" to "active" category in 1973. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. A section 221 Local Cooperation Agreement was entered into with the city of Two Harbors on Aug. 14, 1978. Terminal facilities. No publicly owned \wharves. Three ore docks, tug wharf, an unused coal dock, and merchandise wharf are privately owned. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed by Government forces at a cost of $6,396. The existing project is complete. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $9,415,845, of which $4,170,710 was for new work and $5,245,135 for maintenance. 63. TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI Location. On west shore of Lake Michigan about 82 miles north of Milwaukee and about 101 miles from Green Bay, WI, via Sturgeon Bay Canal. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14903.) Previous project. See page 1377, Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. See Chicago District Annual Report for 1979, Table 30-C, page 30-28. For detailed description see page 1226 of Annual Report for 1963. Completed project cost $147,463, exclusive of the amount expended on previous projects. The 1935 River and Harbor Act portion of project is essentially complete, except for dredging a 10-foot width along each side of the entrance channmel between the piers. The uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1935 R & H Act was deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with Section 1001 of the WRDA of 1986 (PL 99-662). (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A coal wharf and several fishing wharves. City provided a wharf for receipt of petroleum products and public use. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition and structure surveys, and environmental studies were performed by Government forces and contract at a cost of $66,442. Supervision and administration to close-out FY96 contract for repair of the South Pier and Revetment, Sections E and F, cost $3,938. Safety repairs cost $2,639. A contract for maintenance dredging was awarded and completed this FY, removing 49,035 cubic yards of shoal material at a cost of $168,988. Engineering, design, surveys, real estate, and supervision and administration cost $63,398. Existing project is complete except for portion deauthorized in December 1989. Present width of channel is considered adequate for present and reasonably prospective commerce. North Pier was completed in 1908. North Revetment, completed in 1917, was rebuilt in May to August 1962. Dredging entrance channel and inner basin to existing project depth was commenced in March and substantially completed in May 1937. Navigation structures are in good condition. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $9,345,210, of which $360,320 was for new work, $7,739,361 for maintenance, $1,187,472 for diked disposal and $58,057 for minor rehabilitation. 64. WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI Location. On the east shore of Lake Michigan 120 miles northeasterly from Chicago, IL, and 45 miles southerly from Ludington, MI. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14935.) Existing project. Parallel piers, revetments, and a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, 1,950 feet long, extending from Lake Michigan to White Lake. For additional details see page 1465 of Annual Report for 1962. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. A privately owned chemical shipping dock on the north side of the lake about 3 miles from the inner end of revetted entrance channel. Across the lake, at village of Whitehall, there are several installations serving light draft vessels. These terminals satisfy present recreational and commercial traffic requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Condition surveys, environmental studies, and miscellaneous inspections and reports were perform by Government forces and contract at a cost of $36,289. Safety 21-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 maintenance performed by hired labor cost $4,848. Engineering and design continued for repair of the North & South Pier and Revetment, Sections C-H & J (Phase II), at a cost of $53,106. Engineering and design for repair of the North & South Piers, Sections A-D (Phase I), was completed at a cost of $37,332. A contract for this work was awarded this FY in the amount of $4,198,765. The contract was 41% complete at the end of the FY at a cost of $1,723,100. Engineering and design during construction for this wcrk cost $9,997. Real estate and supervision and administration cost $68,754. Exist',o project was completed in 1908. Stone was placed on the north and south revetments in FY 1972. Navigation structures are in generally poor condition and are scheduled for major repairs. Project now being maintained to 14-foot depth authorized, which is adequate for current usage. Total cost of the existing project to end of FY was $6,494,846, of which $457,562 was for new work and $6,037,284 for maintenance. 65. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS See Table 21-J. 66. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 21-C. 67. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to section 107. Public Law 86- 645 (pre-authorization.) Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 directed the Corps of Engineers to untertake investigations to determine the feasibility of and need for channel improvements and associated modifications for the purpose of providing a harbor of refuge at Huron River, Michigan. By letter dated 12 December 1996, the Charter Township of Brownstown Township made a formal request under Section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended. Funds were provided by Congressional Add in FY97 to complete an initial assessment to determine Federal interest. Results indicated no Federal interest and the study was terminated 7 November 1997. Funds in the amount of $15,436 were expended in FY97. Beach Erosion Control 68. AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS River and Harbor Act of 1962, as amended, Beach Erosion Control. None. 69. EMERGENCY SHORE PROTECTION Authority for emergency streambank and shoreline protection of public works and non-profit services (Section 14 Flood Control Act of 1946, as amended). Berrien County, Lake Charter Township, MI - A request for construction approval for placement of stone revetment (approximately 240 feet) along Lake Michigan to protect a water pump station from further erosion damage was forwarded to the Great Lakes & Ohio River Division, Great Lakes sub-office (LRDGL) on 19 December 1997 for approval. Funds in the amount of $36,697 were expended in FY97 for planning and design analysis efforts. Oconto River, McDonald Street, Oconto, WI - A request for construction approval for placement of stone revetment (approximately 640 feet) along the Oconto River, to protect McDonald Street from further erosion damage was forwarded to the Great Lakes & Ohio River Division, Great Lakes sub-office (LRDGL) on 24 December 1997 for approval. Funds in the amount of $51,003 were expended in FY97 for planning and design analysis activities. River Raisin, Monroe County, Ellis Library, MI - Funds in the amount of $42,753 were expended in FY 97 for construction of approximately 400 feet of streambank erosion along the River Raisin, adjacent to Monroe County's library system (Ellis). Project closeout activities are expected to be completed by 31 December 1998. 70. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion activities pursuant to Section 103 of the 1962 River and Harbor Act. None. 71. MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGES Mitigation of Shore Damages pursuant to Section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968. Minnesota Point, Duluth Ship Canal, MN - Funds in the amount of $7,203 were expended in FY97 to investiate structural and non-structural measures to reduce erosion along Minnesota Point, as a result of the interruption of alongshore littoral transport process by the Federally maintained navigation structures at Duluth Entry and 21-30 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Superior Entry. This intial evaluation report is expected to be completed by March 1998. 72. PROJECT MODIFICATION FOR IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF THE ENVIRONMENT Project modification activities pursuant to Section 1135(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended. Sea Lamprey Barrier, Paw Paw Lake, MI - Funds in the amount of $21,806 were expended in FY97 to initiate a feasibility study of Paw Paw River, Michigan. The feasibility study addresses potential solutions to control sea lamprey in the Paw Paw River by use of either fixed-crest or variable crested dam alternatives. Sea Lamprey Trap at Unit 10, Sault Ste. Marie, MI - Construction of 6 permanent sea lamprey traps at the hydroelectric plant, Unit 10 Complex, Sault Ste. Marie, MI was completed 12 September 1997. Closeout activities of the project are underway. Funds of $70,521 were expended in FY 97. Ecosystem Restoration - Section 204 beneficial use of dredged material in connection with dredging. Projects in connection with dredging use of dredged material activities pursuant to Section 204 of Water Resources Development Act of 1992, as amended. Cat Island Chain, MI - Funds in the amount of $45,920 were expended in FY 97 to initiate feasibility phase activities addressing alternatives for use of dredged material to restore the Cat Island Chain. The Cat Island Chain is located 1-1/4 miles north of the entrance to Green Bay Harbor, with its easterly boundary about 150 feet west of the deep-draft navigation channel extending into Green Bay. Historically, the Cat Island Chain had an average width of about 500 feet and extended northwest for approximately 1-1/2 miles. It has dissipated over the years, such that, it only has an area with a diameter of 400 feet above normal water levels. Flood Control 73. CLINTON RIVER SPILLWAY, MI Location. Clinton River Basin including its tributaries drains an area of 760 square miles in southeastern Michigan and empties into Lake St. Clair. Existing Project. The project consists of a two-mile long spillway channel connecting the Clinton River with Lake St. Clair and a weir at the upstream end of the project, about 9 miles upstream of the river's mouth, in Mount Clemens, MI. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. Clinton River Spillway Inter-County Drainage Board operates and maintains the project. Operations during fiscal year. The Corps completed construction of an inflatable dam to correct a Congressionally determined design deficiency at the weir. The purpose of this project modification is to improve the overall environment and associated beneficial uses of the lower Clinton River. Expenditures during FY 97 totaled $600,581. Total cost to end of FY was $3,261,600. 74. FORT WAYNE METRO AREA, IN Location. Fort Wayne, which is located in northeastern Indiana in Allen County, is in the Maumee River drainage basin. In all, the Maumee basin covers an area o^ ' 586 square miles. Of this area, 4,856 square miles are in northwest Ohio, 1,260 are in northeast Indiana and 470 are in southeast Michigan. This basin is one of the largest and most important tributaries in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River system. There are four main tributary streams to the Maumee River: the Auglaize, Tiffin, St. Joseph and St. Marys Rivers. The St. Joseph and Tiffin Rivers originate in the hills of southern Michigan and flow southerly to the Maumee. The St. Marns and Auglaize originate in Ohio and flow northward. In the City of Fort Wayne, the St. Joseph and St. Marys Rivers join to form the headwaters of the Maumee River. From this point, the Maumee flows northeasterly and empties into Lake Erie at Toledo, Ohio. The central business district is located on the south side of the Maumee and the St. Marys Rivers. The St. Joseph River bisects primarily residential areas on the north side of the central business district. While some portions of the central business district are prone to flooding in the immediate vicinity of the St. Marys River, the majority of the business district is sufficiently elevated to avoid flood damages. The residential areas, however, are generally low lying and are prone to frequent flooding. Existing Project. The Fort Wayne and Vicinity, Indiana, Flood Control Study was authorized by resolution of the Committee on Public Works, House of Representatives on October 12, 1972. The authorization requested that the Corps determine the advisability of providing improvements for flood control and allied purposes at and in the vicinity of Fort Wayne, Indiana. The study authorization resulted in completion of a Final Feasibility Report entitled "Fort Wayne and Vicinity, Indiana Flood Control Study," dated September 1987, and revised in April 1988, which identified and evaluated a number of different alternatives to flood control in the Fort Wayne area. The Final Feasibility Report also contained the "Final Environmental Impact Statement" for this project. Preparation of the General Design Memorandum began in August 1989 and was approved in December 1993. Construction was authorized in Section 101 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (Title 1 Public Law 101-640). This project was a Congressionally added new construction start in FY 1994. The Project Cooperative Agreement (PCA) was executed in August 1994 and construction was initiated in September 1995. The project will provide a 100- year level of flood protection to a large part of the central area of the City of Fort Wayne, Indiana which has experienced numerous flooding events in the past. The project is located along the north side of the St. Marys River, the east and west banks of the St. Joseph River, and the north bank of the Maumee River. Junk Ditch and Spy 21-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Run Creek, which are tributary to the St. Marys River, will also have protection installed or improved along their north and east banks respectively. The project area has been broken into four (4) segments which provide flood protection to various areas within the project limits. The West Segment is located along the St. Marys River and the Junk Ditch Tributary. The Central Segment is located along the Spy Run Tributary to the St. Marys River, a short section of the St. Marys River itself (at the confluence with the St. Joseph River), and along the west bank of the St. Joseph River. The East- North Segment is located along the east bank of the St. Joseph River and the East-South Segment is located along the north bank of the Maumee River. The total project length is approximately 54,000 feet. The project consists of several types of flood protection improvements. The most common type of flood protection improvements proposed are earth levees. The levees proposed are to have turf or rock protected slopes depending on the available space for their construction. Levees account for approximately 63 percent of the total project length. Concrete floodwalls are proposed in those areas where insufficient space exists to construct levees due to site constraints. Concrete flood walls account for 20 percent of the project length. An additional eight percent of the project length consists of a combination of a 1/2 Reduced levee and concrete LWall. The remaining length is composed of various types of road closures (stoplogs, clay dikes and high curbs), and 3,000 feet in several areas which do not require improvements due to adequate existing surface grades. The fully funded total project cost estimate is $48,614,000. The Federal cost is $37,239,000 and the non- Federal cost is $1 1,375,000. Local Cooperation. The non-Federal sponsors for the project are the City of Fort Wayne and Allen County. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed with the Mayor of Fort Wayne and the Allen County Board of Commissioners on 22 August 1994. Under the terms of the PCA, the non-federal sponsors shall contribute a minimum of 25 percent, but not to exceed 50 percent, of the total project costs attributed to flood control purposes. This shall consist of all required lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations for the project; and a cash contribution equal to a minimum of five percent of the total project flood control cost. The Assistant Secretary of the Army (CW) has approved a credit in the amount of $1,123,500 under Section 104 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. This will be applied to the non-Federal share of the project flood control cost. In addition to the above, the non-federal sponsor shall provide 50 percent of the total project recreation costs, 100 percent of all betterment costs, and shall operate and maintain all works after completion. Cash contributions totalling $2,701,000 have been provided through the end of FY 97. Real estate requirements for the East-South Segment were completed on 27 July 1995, and the East-North Segment on 19 July 1996. Operations during fiscal year. Expenditures of $7,605,639 were made to complete construction for the East-South Segment; continue construction for the East-North Segment; award a construction contract for the Central Segment and complete a Design Memorandum and initiate plans and specifications for the West Segment. Of the funds expended, $1,252,707 was contributed by the City of Fort Wayne and Allen County. Total cost to end of FY was $17,749,906. 75. KAWKAWLIN RIVER, MI Location. River drains an irregularly shaped area of about 220 square miles in Bay, Gladwin, Midland, and Saginaw Counties in east-central Michigan and discharges into Saginaw Bay 2 miles no)rthwest of Saginaw River. (See Geological Survey Bay City quadrangle and NOAA Nautical Charts 14867 and 14863.) Existing project. Provides for deepening about 1.8 miles of river ;hannel between the river mouth and Euclid Street Bridge; altering Detroit and Mackinac Railway Bridge by addition of two 45.9 foot spans; protecting by riprapping the channel bottom through Euclid Street Bridge, existing piers at Henry Street Bridge and Detroit and Mackinac Railway Bridge; and a number of utility relocations. The Water Resources Development Act (W.R.D.A.) of 1986, dated Nov. 17, 1986, Section 837, modified the flood control project on the Kawkawlin River, MI, that was authorized by Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, to provide that the Federal share of the cost of operation and maintenance of the project shall be 50 percent. (See Table 21-b) for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Engineering and design for maintenance dredging contract to be awarded next FY cost $53,669. This contract includes a Memorandum of Agreement with Local Sponsors to provide 50% of the cost to perform maintenance dredging. Total cost for existing project to end of FY was $1,727,891 of which $1,204,559 was for new work (includes $204,559 contributed funds) and $523,332 for maintenance (includes $113,963 contributed funds). 76. SAGINAW RIVER, MI Location. Saginaw River Basin including its tributaries, Tittabawassee, Shiawassee, Flint and Cass Rivers, drains an area of 6,260 square miles in the east central part of Michigan and empties into Saginaw Bay, an arm of Lake Huron. Bay City, near mouth of river, and Saginaw, 22 miles upstream from mouth, are on Federally improved deep-draft Saginaw River navigation channel (See Saginaw and Flint Geological quadrangles and NOAA Nautical Chart 14867). Existing project. Provides for improvements in Saginaw River Basin for flood control and other purposes: (a) at Sanilac Flats, MI, Middle Branch and South Branch, Cass River, to provide for major drainage improvements by channel improvements on Middle and South Branches, including a short reach of East Branch. This feature of the project for flood control, Saginaw River, MI, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; 21-32 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT PL 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X; (b) at Vassar on Cass River, to provide for flood protection of areas on north and south sides of river by channel improvement, levee construction floodwalls, modifications of Moore Drain, and related work at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct. 1984) of $8,620,000 and non-Federal cost of $579,000 for construction; (c) at Frankenmuth on Cass River, to provide for flood protection of areas on north side of river by channel improvement, levee construction, and related work, at an estimated U.S. cost (July 1974) of $410,9(0 for construction; (d) at Flint on Flint River, to provide for flood protection of areas on both sides of main stem of Flint River and its tributaries, Swartz and Thread Creeks by channel improvement, bridge alterations, floodwall and levee construction, and relLen work, at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct. 1984) of $18,251,600 and non-Federal cost of $2,580,000 for construction; provided local interests contribute in cash 1 percent of first cost of project, exclusive of cost of rights-of-ways; (e) at Corunna on Shiawassee River, to provide for flood protection by channel improvement, levee construction, and related work. This feature of the project for flood control, Saginaw River, MI, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986; PL 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X; (f)at Owosso on Shiawassee River, to provide for flood protection by channel improvement. This feature of the project for flood control, Saginaw River, MI, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958, was deauthorized by the WRDA of 1986, PL 99-662 - Nov. 17, 1986, 99th Congress, Title X; (g) at Midland on Tittabawassee River, to provide for flood protection through nonstructural (permanent evacuation) measures at an estimated U.S. cost (Apr. 1982) of $5,125,000 and non-Federal cost of $1,611,500 for implementation; however, project was reclassified to the "inactive" category on Dec. 15, 1982; (h) at Shiawassee Flats along lower reaches of the four principal tributaries of Saginaw River, to provide for flood protection, including fish and wildlife areas; by channel improvement, levees, lateral reservoirs with control structures and related work at an estimated U.S. cost (Oct. 1984) of $23,417,500 Federal and non-Federal cost of $2,705,000 which includes a cash contribution of $1,237,000; provided local interests contribute in cash 5 percent of cost of rights-of-way for flood control and other work required as local cooperation, and furnish one-half of land required for fish and wildlife areas; provided that the Federal allocation for conservation does not exceed amount obtained by taking 28 percent of project cost for Shiawassee Flats unit and subtracting therefrom one-half cost of lands for conservation; and provided further that before starting work for flood control to Shiawassee Flats, Chief of Engineers and Director, Fish and Wildlife Service, prepare a plan mutually acceptable to Secretary of the Army and Secretary of the Interior for operation of fish and wildlife areas to required degree of controlled storage of flood waters while preserving the maximum fish and wildlife benefits. Total estimated cost for new work, for active portion (1984) is $50,700,000 Federal and $1,421,000 to be contributed by local interests. Total estimated cost (1984) to local interests is $5,870,000. Local cooperation. Responsible local interests must make cash contributions as called for above; furnish lands, and rights-of-way, including removal of buildings, for construction; hold the United States free from damage; maintain and operate all works after completion; establish and enforce regulations designed to prevent encroachments in improved channels; and bear expense of constructing highway relocations and highway bridges, alter bridge approaches and existing highway bridge approaches and existing highway bridges (except underpinning and bridge raising), and alter utilities. Required assurances for Flint River at Flint were furnished by city of Flint and accepted by the United States on Nov. 23, 1962. Estimated required cash contribution for Flint ($56,000) was furnished Feb. 20, 1963. An additional $117,000 was furnished by the City to cover increased construction costs. Required assurances for Cass River at Frankenmuth were accepted on Sep. 8, 1964. All necessary lands, easements, and rights-of-way have been provided. The Midland City Council adopted a resolution on Jun. 7, 1982, declaring its intent not to sponsor the Flood Control project on the Tittabawassee River at Midland. The Vassar City Council, in a letter dated Jan. 26, 1982, indicated a willingness and capability to provide the assurances of local cooperation for the Vassar Flood Control Project. Saginaw County, in a resolution dated Aug. 11, 1982, indicated a willingness and capability to provide the assurances of local cooperation for the Shiawassee Flats Flood Control Project. Operations during the fiscal year. Maintenance: The FY95 repair contract for heaved concrete slabs near the Stevenson Bridge and in Section A, was completed this FY at a cost of $90,793. An adjustment of $25,155 was made in contract cost for FY96 Shoal excavation and riprap repairs completed last FY. Engineering and design during construction for this work cost $1,173. An adjustment of -$13,849 was made in contract cost for maintenance dredging at Hamilton Dam completed last FY. Engineering and design during construction for this work cost $384. Supervision and administration for close-out of these contracts cost $18,324. Work began on an O&M manual at a cost of $4,862. The Frankenmuth and Flint portions of the project are complete. The Flint River Segment at Flint, MI, was originally authorized under the Flood Control Act of 1958 (PL 85-500). The flood protection project was completed September 5, 1979. In accordance with the 1962 Local Cooperation Agreement, the city of Flint is responsible to operate and maintain the project. Due to the lack of maintenance, the project requires extensive repairs. Revised total cost of repairs is estimated at $5.2 million. A total of $5.5 million has been authorized under the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Acts of 1992, 1993 & 1994 ($1 million, $2 million and $2.5 million respectively). These authorizations were intended to provide funds for a one-time repair and rehabilitation of this project to restore the project to original design dimensions. Total cost of the existing project to the end of FY was $30,416,306, of which $24,928,359 was for new work (includes $173,000 contributed funds) and $5,487,947 for maintenance. 21-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 77. SEBEWAING RIVER, MI Location. Sebewaing River drains an area of 105 square miles in Huron and Tuscola Counties on the westerly side of Thumb area of Lower Peninsula of Michigan and discharges into Saginaw Bay, an arm of Lake Huron, 20 miles northeast from mouth of Saginaw River. Village of Sebewaing is near mouth of River. (See NOAA Nautical Chart 14863.) Existing project. Enlarging present channel of Sebewaing River through village of Sebewaing, MI, to a capacity of 7,500 cubic feet per second from junction of Columbia and State drains to a point 4,500 feet lakeward from railroad bridge near mouth; altering railroad bridge and three highway bridges to permit free passage of ice; and removal of present dike on south side of channel lakeward from railroad bridge. Project is designed to provide protection for village of Sebewaing from floods with a frequency of once in 15 years and with a magnitude greater than the maximum flood of record. (See Table 21-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Complied with except for furnishing easements and rights-of-way for removal of remaining portion of dike on south side of channel lakeward from railroad bridge. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspection and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $3,582. Total costs to the end of FY were $812,261. 78. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS NAME OF PROJECT Mt. Clemens, MI, Clinton River Spillway NAME OF PROJECT Red Run, Clinton River, MI Saginaw River & Tributaries Frankenmuth Sebewaing River, MI DATE OF INSPECTION 80. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Flood Control Activities, Flood Fighting (Public Law 84-99 and PL 93-288 and Antecedent Legislation). Project and Location Disaster Preparedness Emergency Operations Advance Measures FY Costs for Sep. 30, 1997 $ 253,288 29,4'6 1,353,089 Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of "i" 1948 Flood Control Act. None. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act. Snagging and clearing activities pursuant to Section 208 of the Flood Control Act of 1954, as amended. Galien river, Berrien County, MI - Funds in the amount of $3,326 were expended in FY97 to investivate for feasibility of undertaking a Section 208 study in Galien River, Berrien County, MI. The initial evaluation was to determine the magnitude of log and debris jams in the river and the extent of flood damages caused by these problems. A request to undertake a full Planning and Design Activities (PDA) phase was made to LRD-GL on 7 January 1998. Aquatic plant control activities pursuant to Section 302 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (PL 89-298). None. 81. SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY WATERS AND INTERNATIONAL WATER STUDIES Field Operations. As a continuing and ongoing mission, the Apr 1997 Detroit District conducts hydraulic flow measurement surveys throughout the Great Lakes Connecting Channels and St. Lawrence DATE OF River system. These capabilities are unique within the Corps INSPECTION Districts (and other U.S. federal agencies) on the Great Lakes. During FY 97, the Detroit District conducted current velocity and Apr 1997 discharge measurements on the St. Marys, St. Clair, Detroit, Niagara and St. Lawrence Rivers. Aug 1997 Sep 1997 Operations during the fiscal year. Maintenance: Miscellaneous inspections and reports were performed by Government forces at a cost of $193,428. Total cost to the end of FY was $2,768,603. 79. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 21-E. During FY97 the District continued gathering hydraulic data using the ADCP (Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler) instrumentation at several sections on the upper and lower Detroit River. These hydraulic data sets are currently being used to develop one- and twodimensional flow models of the river system, and to help refine the flow retardation estimates for weed conditions through the growing season. Between June and September 1996-1997, the District gathered hydraulic data using the ADCP at several sections on the St. Clair River, including the delta area. These hydraulic data sets are also being used to develop a two-dimensional flow model of the river system. 21-34 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT As an ongoing mission, during the winter months the District monitors the extent of ice in the St. Marys, St. Clair, and Detroit Rivers. Water levels are monitored continuously at key gages in these rivers to detect possible ice jams and potential flooding. This information can be used to provide advance warning to area residents and to trigger emergency actions by the Corps and other governmental agencies, including the National Weather Service and the Coast Guard. Currently, data are obtained through phone line interrogation of these gages or from a satellite downlink station using portable lap-top personal computers. These systems provide water level information to the District office within minutes of data collection. International Activities. The Detroit District has successfully supported the International Joint Commission (IJC) for many years. This has included numerous engineering and scientific assignments supporting the Commission's boards of control, working committees, and study boards. The following activities were conducted by the Detroit District, specifically for the IJC Boards and Committees: a. Members of the Detroit District staff attended the semi-annual meetings of the three Great Lakes Boards of Control. They also attended the spring appearances of the Boards before the IJC, in Washington, D.C. in April 1997, and the fall appearances, in Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario in October 1997. b. IJC Levels Reference Study. As a result of record high Great Lakes water levels in 1985-86, the governments of the United States and Canada issued a Reference to the IJC, on August 1, 1986, to initiate a new study to examine various methods of alleviating the adverse consequences of fluctuating water levels in the Great Lakes-St.Lawrence River basin. The Detroit District played a crucial role throughout the study. The District's contribution to these efforts included: identifying possible crises measures for alleviating adverse impacts of water level extremes; reviewing and proposing improvements to the existing operating plan for the regulation of Lake Superior; developing and testing hypothetical regulation plans to manage all or additional parts of the Great Lakes system; assessing and improving water level forecasts and statistics; preparing an inventory of coastal land uses and trends; identifying existing land use management practices and assessing their relative effectiveness to problem resolution; mapping shoreline geomorphology and off-shore conditions, as well as the existing extent of structural protection; cataloging long-term coastal erosion and recession measurements; and estimating potential damages caused by existing lake levels and potential future extremes. The Levels Reference Study Board sent their report to the IJC in March 1993. The report contained a set of 42 reconmmendations. Most of these recommendations were endorsed by the IJC, with slight modification, and forwarded in December 1993 to the governments of the United States and Canada for review and action. Many of these recommendations, if carried out to the extent outlined, would affect the way the Detroit District provides support to the nation under the Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters and International Water Studies appropriations. In response to one of these recommendations, in FY97, the Detroit District initiated a potential damage study of the Lake Michigan shoreline. The ultimate goal of this 3-year study is to develop an economic assessment method for determining the local risks for various alternate hydrologic scenarios. This study will serve as a framework for similar efforts to be conducted basin-wide. c. International ake Superior Board of Control. The Detroit District Engineer is the United States Regulation Representative of this Board. In support of the U.S. section of the Board, the District provided monthly Lake Superior outflow recommendations based upon a review of the hydrologic factors which influence the future regulation of Lake Superior. These recommendations were based upon the use of probability forecasts of water supplies routed through the lakes using the approved operating rule, Plan 1977-A. Plan 1977-A has been in operational use since June 1990. Further proposed modifications of the regulation plan were explored by the Detroit District under the IJC Levels Reference Study. In response to recommendations from this study, the IJC requested that the Superior Board formally review the Orders of Approval and the regulation plan. This review has been deferred pending completion of a similar review of the Lake Ontario regulation plan by the International St. Lawrence River Board of Control. In FY 97, the District continued a program to perform repairs on the U.S. portion of the Compensating Works in the St. Marys River. The repairs include repainting of the gates, concrete repairs to the piers, and replacement of gate sills and seals. This program is expected to be completed in FY 98. The District's continuing program to evaluate the hydraulic rating of the Compensating Works in the St. Marys River will be reinitiated in FY99. d. International Niagara Board of Control and International Niagara Working Committee. The District provides direct technical support and consulting engineering services to this Board and Committee. The Chief of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch is a member of the Committee. Under the auspices of the Committee, the Detroit District, with Canada, computes, coordinates, and publishes the monthly flows in the Niagara River. During FY 95, the Detroit District and the Water Survey of Canada conducted a series of discharge measurements in the upper Niagara River at the International Railway Bridge Section for verification of Lake Erie outflow equations. Information to date indicates that the existing equations are adequate during average flow ranges, but still require verification at the very high and very low extremes. Future measurements are scheduled for this section in FY 98, in accordance with the Board's recommendation to continue making them every three years. Based upon the results of the FY 98 measurements, the equations may be reevaluated. 21-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Due to the dynamic nature of the Niagara River at the Falls, the District is involved with periodic verification of the rating curves for the Ashland Avenue and American Falls gages. The Ashland Avenue relationship measures the total flow over the"American and Canadian Falls to ensure that the Board operates within the terms of the Niagara Treaty. Discharge measurements for the Ashland Avenue rating curve are scheduled every three years. Measurements were made in FY 95, and the next series is scheduled for FY 98. Based upon the analysis of these data, the 1981 relationship will be reviewed. The American Falls Channel relationship provides a measure of the flow over the American Falls. Measurements .'. taken in the American Falls Channel every five years. Measurements were made in FY 95, and the next series is scheduled for FY 00. The District also assisted Water Survey of Canada in conducting flow measurements in the Welland Canal in FY97, as part of the ongoing responsibility of verifying flow usage in the canal. e. International St. Lawrence River Board of Control. In May, June, and November 1993, the Detroit District conducted current velocity measurements in the St. Lawrence River for this Board and the St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation. The May/June measurements were made when flows in the river were at record highs. Measurements were conducted at several critical locations in the river, using conventional techniques and also with new acoustic Doppler current profilers. Additional measurements were made, in November 1993, at a much lower flow rate. The data gathered have been used to calibrate a computer model developed for a critical section of the river, near the Copeland Cut. Further flow distribution measurements are scheduled, to recalibrate the mathematical model of the river, whenever flows are at very high or very low extremes. Coordinating Committee on Great Lakes Basic Hydraulic and Hydrologic Data. In FY 97, the Chief of the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch was the U.S. Secretary to this Committee. Other Branch personnel also held membership on the three subcommittees: The Vertical Control-Water Levels, Hydraulics, and Hydrology. The District continued its support of Committee operations pertaining to the coordination of basic hydraulic and hydrologic data with Canada. District efforts have also continued to closely coordinate the formats of the U.S. and Canadian water level bulletins in order to avoid confusion and to better inform the public. In addition, the District continued working with NOAA's Great Lakes Environmental Research Lab (GLERL) with regard to improving the computational procedures currently employed in the Great Lakes 6-month water level forecast. In FY 94, District personnel finalized a Coordinating Committee report which documents all U.S. and Canadian discharge measurements made on the Great Lakes Connecting Charnnels and St. Lawrence River during the period 1860 to 1993. Appendix B, "Chronologic Summaries of Construction and Dredging," to the report is pending, and is expected to be completed in FY 98. LRD Master Plan for the Water Control Data System. In FY 97, the Water Control Data System consisted of a network of Unix workstations and Windows-based PC's. Presently, a PC collects water level data from the District's own Data Collection Platforms (DCP's) and from NOS/NOAA and Canadian MEDS computer systems. In FY 97, the Detroit District continued to provide an extensive variety of water control products, based on the water level gage network, on its Internet home page. Weather information and meteorological data are received and processed within the District using a 586 PC and Windows software. The District is also in the process of building a database of the NEXRAD data it collects from the Automated Family of Services (AFOS) line. The District plans to incorporate this data in its water level forecasting missions as well as the development or improvement of other District publications. Once guidance is developed by HEC, Oracle database linkages will be developed during FY 98 to provide relational database management capabilities. The District has 31 active DCPs and plans to upgrade and possibly expand the network, based upon an on-going reviews of its water level gaging program. Great Lakes Information Management. The District has continued the development of a Geographic Information System (GIS) for the U.S. portion of the Great Lakes. The GIS contains multiple information layers on the physiographic, economic, sociologic, environmental, and hydrologic characteristics of the Great Lakes region. The GIS is designed to create a "corporate data base" to support various District operations and studies. The District has completed a comprehensive GIS containing current U.S. shoreline land uses, under the IJC Levels Reference Study. Historical recession rate data, shore-type classification, shore protection and sub-aqueous material profiles support shoreline damage estimates and erosion modeling. In support of the USEPA/USACE Interagency Agreement for the Southeast Michigan Initiative (SEMI), the District has developed a desktop GIS to provide a multi-agency decision support system for environmental planning and restoration. To date the SEMI GIS covers eight major watersheds, and contains all contaminated sediment data sets collected by all U.S. and Canadian agencies for the last 20 years. Great Lakes Hydrology. Water supply forecasts are used routinely by the Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch in forecasting water levels and regulating the outflows from Lakes Superior and Ontario. Studies to improve the existing Great Lakes water level forecasting system, including investigations into the factors affecting the Great Lakes water balance relationship (i.e., runoff, over-water precipitation, evaporation, ice retardation, etc.) and use of real-time hydrologic data were continued by the staff of the Branch. 21-36 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT Great Lakes Water Levels. The Great Lakes Hydraulics and Hydrology Branch continued to make routine short-term (15 days to one month) and long-term (six months) Great Lakes still water level forecasts. These forecasts are distributed in the form of weekly, bimonthly and monthly news releases and bulletins. The Monthly Bulletin of Lake Levels for the Great Lakes, containing a six month projection of Great Lakes water levels, has a circulation of about 10,000 copies per month. Included with the monthly bulletin on a quarterly basis is an informational enclosure entitled "Great Lakes Update," which consists of various topics of interest pertaining to the Great Lakes, such as frequently asked questions, information on water regulation plans, and incidental information on Great Lakes hydraulics and hydrology. With water levels on the Great Lakes approaching near record high levels in FY97, Branch personnel provided extensive technical information and expertise regarding recorded lake levels and still water lake level forecasts to many interested parties, such as members of Congress, State and local officials, news media, navigation and power interests, concerned property owners, and recreational boaters. Upon request, water level information was supplied to the public in the form of the District's web page, telephonic and written responses to inquiries, presentations to various interest groups, and interviews with the news media. Daily reports on present water levels, precipitation and significant events on the Great Lakes basin, are currently available on the District's Internet home page. Forecasted and historical water level data are also available on this system. Interested agencies and individuals can retrieve this information at any time via an Internet service provider. The total cost for FY 97 under the Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters was $2,788,309, and under the International Water Studies, $279,026. General Investigations 82. SURVEYS FY 97 funds in the amount of $227,028 were expended to continue the Section 216 restudy of Federal interest for Fox River, WI. Coordination Studies with other Agencies include: Special Investigations, $40,228 which includes engineering and technical assistance given to local citizens because of fluctuating lake levels of the Great Lakes; FERC, $2,562; and Interagency Water Resources Development, $10,271; North American Water Fowl Management Planning, $3,026; National Estuary Studies, $5,549; and Cooperation with other Water Resource agencies, $5,049. Great Lakes Remedial Action, $9,985; and Section 22, Planning Assistance to States and Tribes: Federal amount shown, studies cost shared equally with partner include: Oneida Tribe, GIS, WI - $77; Oneida Tribe, Watershed, WI - $40,018; Menominee Tribe, WI - $23,910; Douglas County GPS, WI - $5,922; Lake St. Clair Aquatic Vegetation Study, MI - (-$42); Big Muskego Lake, WI - $39,897; Lake Huron Shoreline, MI - $11,656; McLain State Park, MI - $16,650; State Flood Plain Mapping, MI - $7,862. 83. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN ST. JOSEPH RIVER, SOUTH BEND, IN Funds in the amount of $101 were expended in FY 97 to close out the Preconstruction Engineering and Design (PED) work activities. The project involves bank stabilization along the north and south banks of the St. Joseph River at and adjacent to the Indiana University South Bend campus, development of athletic facilities on the south side of the river, development of a multi-use trail on the north side of the river and construction of a pedestrian bridge to link the main campus with the south side expansion. The work was authorized by a Congressional Add to the 1995 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, which provided $300,000 toward PED activities. GREAT LAKES CONNECTING CHANNELS AND HARBORS, REPLACEMENT LOCK Funds in the amount of $295,009 were expended in FY97 on preconstruction engineering and design work activities. The project, as authorized in the WRDA of 1986 and the WRDA of 1990, calls for constructing a second lock able to accommodate the largest vessels engaged in Great Lakes commerce. The authorized dimensions are 1,294 feet in length, 115 feet in width, and 32 feet in depth. The authorized cost (1985) is $227,428,000. The new lock would replace two existing locks that are only 80 feet in width and 23 feet in depth. The project had not been funded earlier due to lack of a local sponsor. The WRDA of 1996 eased the costsharing requirements for a non-Federal sponsor. Given the delay in initiating preconstruction engineering and design, the initial work effort is preparing a limited re-evaluation report to assure that the project remains economically justified. 84. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood Plain Management Services. Fiscal Year 97 costs in the amount of $338,427 were associated with the following tasks under the Flood Plain Management Services Program; Unit - $90,063, Technical Services - $44,499, National Flood Proofing Committee - $23,742, Quick Responses - $4,105, Special Studies for; Menominee Tribe, WI, Flood Plain Study - $84,471, Menominee Tribe, WI, Ice Boom Study - $14,574, Little Rice Lake Wisconsin Dam Break Analysis - $14,894, Midland County Michigan Flood Profile Study - $633, HEC I Basic Workshop in Indiana - $1, HEC RAS Advanced Workshop in Michigan - $1, HEC I Basic Workshop for Native Americans at Oneida Tribe, WI - $1, HEC II Basic 21-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Workshop for Native Americans at Oneida Tribe, WI - (-$38) Hermantown Minnesota Flood Plain Study - $11,964, HEC WEAP Workshop, MI - $24,983, and the continuation of the Flood Plain Geographical Information System Data Base for Michigan - $24,534. Flood Insurance Studies. No Flood Insurance Studies were completed in FY 97 for the Detroit District. No Flood Insurance Studies for Wayne County were initiated in FY 97. FY 97 ongoing coordination costs for other studies at Oakland and Wayne Counties, Michigan were $60,519, and $146,097, respectively. Costs in FY 97 in support of the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Community Assistance Program for Handy Township, MI, amounted to $5,919. In FY 97, Hydrologic Studies cost $5,154, and International Water Studies, $25,268. 21-38 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 1. Arcadia Harbor, MI 2. Ashland Harbor, WI New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 0 0 98,000 101,136 0 0 76,000 125,000 144,000 4,880,029 77,320 124,331 139,272 4,873,687 1,695,645 1,695,645 320,000 338,894 100,431 95,460 1,075 5,623 39,000 4,198,411 29,890 4,188,878 3. Ausable Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 4. Black River Harbor, MI (P.H.) Contributed Funds New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,703 4,765 0 0 0 0 267 267 193,376' 193,376' 0 16,400 0 16,400 44,012 2,873,871 41,437 2,871,296 0 0 0 0 0 0 45,972 36,718 85,000 86,291 (4,000) 3,528 480,2442 480,2442 349,921 349,921 29,284 1,478,3773 29,947 1,478,1303 21-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 5. Black River Harbor, MI (U.p.) (Continued) 6. Cedar River Harbor, MI New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 0 0 39,000 40,011 New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 0 0 134,012 136,723 178,000 172,339 0 0 912 2,147 15,000 19,928 0 0 383,3504 383,3504 8,878 1,005,844 8,878 1,005,574 0 408,000 733 408,000 123,000 123,000 122,573 122,573 7. Charlevoix Harbor, MI New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Rehabilitation Approp. Cost 0 0 82,000 106,938 180,623 180,623 247,051 222,018 244,000 9,979,637 245,822 223,271 243,814 9,977,106 0 0 1,129,396 1,129,396 8. Cheboygan Harbor, MI 0 0 9,704 17,454 504,236 504,236 20,000 1,025,933 19,754 1,025,501 New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 65,047 57,112 21-40 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 9. Clinton River, MI Contributed Funds 10. Cornucopia Harbor, WI New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Diked Disp. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 0 0 0 0 48,000 47,771 0 0 40,000 42,443 0 0 260,0465 260,0465 v 289,752 0 289,752 1,696 124,000 3,634,076 3,647 108,163 3,617,781 3,796,180 3,796,180 462,653 462,653 22,305 22,350 58,000 50,368 10,586 112,006 1,188,481 17,571 102,828 1,178,656 11. Detroit River, MI Contributed Funds 12. Duluth-Superior Harbor, MN & WI New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Contrib. Cost Diked Disp. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 0 0 0 0 76,877,3576 76,877,3576 3,227,000 3,999,000 4,976,000 3,907,000 118,935,900 3,421,098 4,022,825 4,980,579 3,869,796 118,874,100 340,000 337,990 0 0 0 0 83,400 85,425 0 0 0 0 0 0 361,235 361,235 42,470,585 42,470,585 16,894,6587 16,894,658' 21-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 12. Dul-Sup Hbr, MN & WI (Continued) Contributed Funds 13. Fox River, WI Maintenance Approp. Cost Diked Disp. Approp. Cost Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 2,936,000 , ,1 4,500 3,298,000 3,499,000 68,824,442 2,835,586 2,901,586 3,264,326 3,523,702 68,769,523 0 0 0 143 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,556,249 1,556,249 11,555,410 11,555,410 3,753,3348 3,753,3348 1,772,000 2,240,000 2,185,000 2,384,000 56,169,7259 1,792,894 2,271,569 2,117,297 2,197,791 55,840,8899 14. Frankfort Harbor, MI Contributed Funds New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Diked Disp. Approp. Cost Rehabilitation Approp. Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,278,000 791,000 1,251,635 838,728 1,923,450 1,923,450 0 0 25,707 26,778 0 31,709 0 31,709 44,122 9,886,660 43,343 9,885,235 1,204,500 1,204,500 274,776 274,776 21-42 New Work Contrib. Cost 298,000 113,328 34,i)00 2 ~8,357 (315) 0 331,685 331,685 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 15. Grand Haven Harbor, MI Section 111 Ne' v Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 0 0 0 0 907,000 836,806 835,000 1,244,000 1,305,000 30,376,910" 892,197 1,262,814 1,310,152 30,371,719" Contributed Funds Section 111 16. Grand Marais Harbor, MI 17. Green Bay Harbor, WI Maintenance Contrib. Cost Diked Disp. Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 0 0 0 0 72,000 73,875 0 0 0 0 64,000 66,623 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15,585 15,585 780,400 780,400 68,000 105,000 2,527,861 64,204 104,008 2,521,467 0 0 0 0 12,274 26,505 12,274 21,463 813,613 813,613 1,055,871 1,055,871 2,628,249 2,623,207 9,946,3951213'14 9,946,39512.13'14 21-43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,283,46910 1,283,46910 175,000 175,000 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 17. Green Bay Harbor, WI (Continued) Maintenance Approp. Cost 2,429,000 1,037,000 1,502,000 1,874,000 37,102,692's 2,437,809 1,054,603 1,515,671 1,877,397 37,097,91815 60,000 145,000 59,450 144,280 54,663 7,904,409 57,843 7,904,215 18. Hammond Bay Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 19. Harbor Beach Harbor, MI New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Diked Disp. Approp. Cost Rehabilitation Approp. Cost 0 0 0 0 1,015,366 1,015,366 77,000 77,000 307,750 307,287 0 0 0 0 15,000 29,563 12,507 18,657 0 0 0 0 37,073 35,679 0 0 0 0 6,027 6,167 0 0 0 0 6,645 9,681 0 0 0 0 41,000 1,015,540 35,282 1,009,676 0 0 0 0 50,000 50,000 1,200,598 1,200,598 97,090 14,834,046 83,776 14,819,733 243,100 243,100 194,504 194,504 21-44 Diked Disp. Approp. Cost 47,000 47,686 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 20. Harrisville Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Section 111 Section 111 21. Holland Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Section 111 Section 111 New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Diked Disp. Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Rehabilitation Approp. Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0 78,861 88,081 29,225 33,029 0 0 0 0 2,895 2,856 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,849,938 1,849,938 287,454 287,454 502,000 502,000 56,001 1,338,517 35,749 1,317,932 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 88,000 88,000 736,12216 736,12216 35,705 35,705 621,000 621,000 426,000 465,000 516,000 1,567,000 24,690,103" 426,674 452,240 530,203 1,570,839 24,686,527" 0 0 91,000 89,314 1,663,300 1,663,300 58,000 59,569 0 0 54,000 56,002 0 0 74,000 2,140,915 71,800 2,135,113 502,452 502,452 21-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 22. Inland Route, MI Contributed Funds 23. Kenosha Harbor, WI 24. Kewaune I- arbor, WI New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Diked Disp. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Diked Disp. Approp. Cost Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Diked Disp. Approp. Cost Rehabilitation Approp. Cost 0 0 77,000 57,884 102,000 129,075 39,000 38,179 0 0 0 0 770,222 770,222 148,000 148,000 27,000 2,793,116 14,634 2,779,515 0 0 0 0 46,723 46,970 0 0 143,587 142,035 0 0 0 0 0 0 404,300 404,300 988,96918�19 988,96918,19 48,000 193,000 6,819,7990 47,903 186,927 6,812,0780 4,378,600 4,378,600 1,270,275 1,270,275 0 0 0 0 758,33321 758,333' 126,000 206,000 242,000 200,000 7,275,16922 138,042 201,626 240,319 205,791 7,272,29922 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,961,461 2,961,461 617,300 617,300 21-46 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 25. Keweenaw Waterway, MI 26. Lac La Belle Harbor, MI 27. Lake St. Clair, MI, Channels 28. Leland Harbor, MI Contributed Funds New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Diked Disp. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Diked Disp. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Rehabilitation Approp. Cost 5,974,141 5,974,141 1,243,000 644,000 485,000 282,000 26,624,21523 1,240,744 651,567 481,965 285,777 26,605,48523 95,286 93,698 42,955 43,973 0 0 161,000 157,838 6,307 6,307 15,000 14,680 0 0 1,523,500 1,523,500 269,27024 269,27024 722,336 721,446 7,675,35725 7,675,35725 193,000 110,000 102,000 8,746,87026 177,119 127,387 77,272 8,720,41626 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,119,800 5,119,800 0 0 0 0 672,950 672,950 354,139 354,139 108,000 233,974 289,000 146,126 3,225,622 109,348 236,051 288,797 119,883 3,197,190 0 0 0 0 70,678 70,678 21-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 29. Lexington Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Section 111 Section 11 30. Little Lake Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 31. Ludington Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,152 5,479 526,000 518,964 0 0 0 0 0 0 22,900 190,430 20,273 178,746 67,000 69,039 99,000 97,004 0 0 141,000 141,141 123,000 121,518 0 0 0 0 63,000 69,239 0 0 0 0 44,000 33,100 1,64( ,304 ' X46,304 1,088,888 1,088,888 372,000 372,000 833,641 808,430 40,000 1,985,987 37,624 1,976,562 542,808 542,808 57,670 57,670 135,000 4,433,972 129,245 4,426,780 0 0 7,912,20227 7,912,2027 620,000 620,000 2,093,000 1,499,000 349,000 210,000 17,287,74728 2,090,122 1,499,488 349,771 139,849 17,214,19328 0 0 0 0 10,000 9,927 727,340 727,267 21-48 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 31. Ludington Harbor, MI (Continued) 32. Manistee Harbor, MI Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Rehabilitation Approp. Cost 0 0 0 0 1,051,000 1,593,000 277,000 1,090,603 1,590,316 277,029 0 0 0 0 357,913 357,913 2,696,52229 2,696,52229 73,961 11,289,65230 66,394 11,276,09630 0 0 1,374,164 1,374,164 33. Manistique Harbor, MI New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Rehabilitation Approp. Cost 0 0 0 0 9,400 11,345 0 0 1,299,35531 1,299,3553' 186,000 2,442,983 123,739 2,380,722 0 0 316,333 316,333 34. Manitowoc Harbor, WI Contributed Funds Contributed Funds New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Contrib. Cost Diked Disp. Approp. Cost 0 0 546,000 563,129 3,700 21,572 2,048,91432 2,048,91432 1,911,130 1,911,130 800,000 149,000 129,000 8,551,66433 793,371 120,781 161,987 8,547,33333 3,700 25,888 0 0 0 400 7,399 0 55,493 47,860 3,081,756 3,081,756 21-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 35. Menominee Harbor & River, MI & WI Contributed Funds 36. Milwaukee Harbor, WI Contributed Funds 37. Monroe Harbor, MI Contributed Funds New Work Apprep. New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Diked Disp. Approp. Cost Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Contrib. Cost Diked Disp. Approp. Cost Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 0 0 0 0 130,000 135,544 0 0 0 0 39,459 39,951 0 0 0 0 0 0 533,47634 533,47634 36,762 36,762 28,042 153,000 2,922,21.935 26,451 147,871 2,915,45535 593,660 593,660 1,351,852 1,351,852 8,231,02436 8,231,02436 0 0 772,000 2,985,000 4,212,000 3,003,000 44,074,3123 788,697 2,965,150 4,247,207 2,977,783 44,026,0663' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 322,471 322,471 6,380,925 6,380,925 12,715,560 12,715,560 687,340 687,340 300,000 300,000 21-50 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 37. Mot roe Harbor, MI (Continued) Contributed Funds Contributed Funds Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Contrib. Cost Diked Disp. Approp. Cost Diked Disp. Contrib. Cost 783,000 799,882 0 0 0 0 0 0 68,000 149,000 672,000 20,190,151 88,211 155,351 673,383 20,189,218 0 0 0 0 0 0 166,667 166,667 38,606,400 38,606,400 83,182 83,182 38. Muskegon Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 39. New Buffalo Harbor, MI Contributed Funds New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Diked Disp. Approp. Cost 0 0 0 0 869,000 872,681 200,000 269,336 2,912,11038 2,912,11038 105,000 105,000 540,000 660,000 518,168 681,616 324,000 168,000 332,267 168,780 0 0 0 0 0 0 537,000 534,022 93,000 9,874,44139 88,875 9,865,75039 0 41 0 0 0 0 130,000 331,000 95,412 359,887 0 0 0 0 3,106,700 3,105,125 13,824,300 13,824,300 1,285,716 1,285,716 1,186,467 1,186,467 38,000 5,043,895 36,084 5,033,274 0 0 181,500 181,500 21-51 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 40. Oconto Harbor, WI 41. Ontonagon Harbor, MI 42. Pentwater Harbor, MI 43. Petoskey Harbor, MI 44. Point Lookout Harbor, MI New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Diked Disp. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 0 0 58,000 60,941 0 0 32,326 33,536 17,434 18,176 130,75440 130,75440 59,059 2,264,00041 50,529 2,254,95441 0 0 953,90342 953,90342 2,510,000 1,922,000 724,000 1,475,000 21,386,88543 2,246,034 2,125,775 769,352 1,487,371 21,374,61843 0 0 21,000 21,000 0 0 299,000 293,861 179,899 179,899 212,000 424,000 2,835,000 8,093,267 214,181 421,189 2,810,345 8,059,774 123,839 123,839 1,169 1,169 0 0 13,000 37,546 1,977 1,977 0 0 10,984 13,121 50,000 619,688 41,646 611,334 0 0 9,304 10,681 2,642,584 2,642,584 87,000 3,947,032 74,551 3,933,937 21-52 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 44. Point Lookout Harbor, MI (Continued) Contributed Funds 45. Port Austin Harbor, MI Contributed Funds 46. Port Sanilac Harbor, MI Contributed Funds Section 111 Contributed Funds Section 111 Maintenance Contrib. Cost Diked Disp. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Diked Disp. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Contrib. Cost Diked Disp. Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37,792 33,190 1,574 4,699 0 0 9,257 9,257 121,600 121,600 3,191,234 3,191,234 172,100 172,100 87,089 1,900,977 88,531 1,900,942 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,949 6,959 36,811 135,780 31,147 140,277 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 838 159,000 159,000 909,963 909,963 487,108 487,108 336,000 336,000 0 2,327,271 (5,459) 2,320,645 115,000 115,000 9,158 9,158 72,000 61,258 6,000 1,152,250 10,621 1,146,130 21-53 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 47. Port Washington Harboi., WI Contributed Funds 48. Portage Lake Harbor, MI 49. Presque Isle Harbor, MI Section 111 New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Diked Disp. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Diked Disp. Approp. Cost Rehabilitation Approp. Cost 0 0 0 0 73,789 61,888 111,000 122,067 0 0 0 0 5,718 7,072 0 0 0 0 140,749 157,302 2,582,20444 2,582,20444 1,624,000 1,624,000 33,265 3,096,08643 30,469 3,093,26845 0 10,621 0 10,621 0 256,129 0 256,129 29,903 130,079 406,829 2,790,749 27,416 131,414 402,505 2,784,123 0 0 0 0 14,000 24,013 25,000 28,658 0 0 0 0 502 3,347 1,190,492 1,190,492 61,700 61,700 74,000 1,832,499 60,278 1,817,869 0 0 0 0 50. Rouge River, MI New Work Approp. Cost 16,500 16,500 76,500 76,500 0 0 21-54 675,25146 675,25146 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 50. Rouge River, MI (Continued) 51. Saginaw River, MI (Federal Funds) Contributed Funds 52. St. Clair River, MI 53. St. Joseph Harbor, MI Section 111 Maintenance Approp. Cost Diked Disp. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Diked Disp. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Diked Disp. Approp. Cost 191,000 418,000 196,116 436,535 0 0 0 0 0 0 99,000 352,000 22,121,941"7 102,572 357,367 22,121,47';; 0 0 14,9G,,1; 14,907,318 14,917,12748 14,917,12748 13,600 13,600 1,474,000 2,032,000 1,861,000 1,902,000 55,705,363 1,529,323 2,027,624 1,831,009 1,843,746 55,596,865 227,000 236,413 195,000 187,106 0 8,720 20,951,888"9 20,951,88849 19,213,246 19,213,246 0 0 866,000 866,269 0 0 0 0 720,000 753,469 0 0 593,000 829,000 442,000 25,817,108 618,607 812,184 453,256 25,795,546 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 976,485 ~� 976,485s0 828,000 828,000 540,000 825,000 1,009,000 18,795,737 531,891 801,974 1,036,485 18,788,124 638,076 638,076 21-55 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 53. St. Joseph Harbor, MI (Continued) Section 111 54. St. Marys River, MI Contributed Funds 55. Saugatuck Harbor & Kalamazoo River, MI 56. Saxon Harbor, WI Section 111 Maintenance Approp. Cost Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Contrib. Cost Diked Disp. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 268,000 1,024,000 12,000 448,000 7,795,451 264,576 1,020,925 719,334 447,407 7,784,576 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 962,216 962,216 160,657,07 15 160,657,0715' 17,837,000 19,287,800 17,362,700 16,075,300 332,007,221 17,809,409 19,381,994 17,630,563 15,638,123 331,484,273 340,000 0 0 0 0 0 67,000 69,782 0 169,999 0 0 0 0 0 170,400 0 0 0 0 0 0 340,400 340,399 13,100 13,100 364,52752 364,52752 149,000 223,000 272,000 4,377,178"3 143,120 220,807 260,414 4,353,729'3 0 0 0 0 83,296 78,596 19,730 21,238 (862) 2,238 19,110 3,738 507,5075" 507,50754 204,270 204,270 863,678 848,215 21-56 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 57. Sebewaing River, MI 58. Sheboygan Harbor, WI 59. Silver Bay Harbor, MN Contributed Funds 60. South Haven Harbor, MI Section 111 New Work Approp. Cost Mainte . .e Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Diked Disp. Approp. Cost Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Diked Disp. Approp. Cost 0 0 6,955 7,039 33,654 476,968 33,654 471,879 0 0 289,000 314,633 0 35,573 0 35,573 20,000 4,005,095"5 14,804 3,994,810" 0 0 1,136,08856 1,136,08856 393,000 83,000 106,000 8,081,87857 397,399 87,167 105,775 8,079,15657 0 0 0 0 2,600,000 43,780 0 76,530 0 0 0 0 0 60,054 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,199,000 536,000 1,226,670 538,563 0 0 38,933 40,632 0 0 907,792 907,792 609,028 609,028 0 2,600,000 1,923,174 2,103,538 1,775,000 1,775,000 531,352 531,352 452,42658 452,42658 532,000 532,000 99,003 6,067,161"9 85,430 6,053,588"9 42,381 42,381 21-57 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 60. South Havr;n Harbor, MI (Continued) Section 111 61. Sturgeon Bay, WI, and Lake Michigan Ship Canal, WI 62. Two Harbors, MN 63. Two Rivers Harbor, WI Maintenance Approp. Cost Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Diked Disp. Approp. Cost Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Diked Disp. Approp. Cost 185,000 273,000 178,969 277,111 0 0 0 0 272,000 276,233 0 38 1,616,933 1,615,051 1,632,076 1,632,076 1,059,72260 1,059,72260 0 0 793,000 114,000 305,000 10,279,45261 823,504 117,970 302,690 10,275,71661 0 0 0 0 311,119 311,119 884,899 884,899 0 0 11,479 14,901 71,787 68,319 0 0 792 4,059 0 0 4,170,71062 4,170,71062 16,496 5,255,436 6,396 5,245,135 0 0 360,32063 360,32063 27,000 221,000 1,119,000 294,000 7,747,75664 32,202 218,220 1,103,450 305,405 7,739,36164 0 0 1,187,472 1,187,472 21-58 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 63. Two Rivers Harbor, WI (Continued) 64. White Lake Harbor, MI Section 111 Section 111 Rehabilitation Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0 139,863 98,016 0 200 84,333 122,683 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58,057 58,057 207,862 207,862 249,700 249,700 122,703 1,929,037 4,880,594 108,482 1,933,426 4,867,265 57,000 190,000 33,314 210,090 0 0 73. Clinton River Spillway, MI 74. Fort Wayne Metro Area, IN Contributed Funds 75. Kawkawlin River, MI Contributed Funds New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 2,000,000 229,978 0 155,684 0 1,139,347 150,000 3,286,008 600,581 3,261,600 431,000 1,138,000 4,600,000 6,474,000 15,959,000 388,339 1,168,633 4,568,246 6,352,932 15,794,150 0 0 271,000 780,000 1,150,000 2,201,000 52,419 650,630 1,252,707 1,955,756 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 204,559 204,559 157,000 512,700 53,669 409,369 21-59 1,173,615 1,170,019 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 75. Kawkawlin River, MI (Continued) Contributed Funds 76. Saginaw River-1958 Act Flint, MI Contributed Funds 77. Sebewaing River, MI 81. Surveillance of Northern Boundary Waters Maintenance Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maintenance Approp. Cost 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 113,963 113,963 24,755,359 24,755,359 173,000 173,000 0 0 474,000 2,606,000 1,000,000 0 5,500,000 524,881 1,634,967 1,874,167 126,842 5,487,947 0 0 5,000 6,894 4,000 1,238 10,000 4,441 10,000 3,582 365,642 365,642 461,455 446,619 0 0 2,505,000 2,662,500 1,945,000 3,030,316 62,071,65165 2,596,064 2,707,075 1,916,808 3,067,335 61,998,02165 21-60 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 'Includes $114,786 for previous projects. 2Includes $85,849 for previous proji ts. 'Includes $12,008 for maintenance ofp';evious projects. 'Excludes $30,000 contributed fun's. SIncludes $25,500 for previc - r'qojects. 'Includes $2,097,254 for pl Cvios projects. 'Includes $1,547,195 for new work for previous projects. 'Includes $3,239,910 for previous projects. 'Includes $89,309 for previous projects. OlIncludes $311,329 for previous projects. "Includes $13,437 for previous projects. '2Includes $396,974 for previous projects. "Includes $109,463 for previous projects. "Excludes $100,000 contributed linds. "Includes $8,918 for previous projects. 1"Includes $176,620 for previous projects. "Includes $127,598 for previous projects. "Includes $453,839 for previous projects. "gExcludes $3,000 contributed funds. Z"Includes $21,818 for previous projects. "Includes $149,312 for previous projects. "Includes $88,364 for previous projects. "Includes $402,242 for previous projects. "Excludes $38,190 contributed funds. 'Includes $656,000 for previous projects. "Includes $235,346 for previous projects. "Includes $491,416 for previous projects. "Excludes $136,286 contributed thnds. "Includes $354,999 for previous projects. "'ncludes $150,910 for previous projects. "Includes $3,955 for previous projects. "Includes $400,126 for previous projects. "Includes $54,288 for previous projects. "Includes $312,423 for previous projects. "Includes $36,194 for previous projects. 'Includes $1,293,220 for previous projects. "Includes $459,305 for previous projects. S"Includes $613,408 for previous projects. "Includes $446,183 for previous projects. "Includes $84,569 for previous projects. "Includes $8,161 for previous projects. 42Includes $284,802 for previous projects. "Includes $113,326 for previous projects. "Includes $188,495 for previous projects. 4"Includes $15,123 for previous projects. 'Includes $50,084 for previous projects. "Includes $56,608 for previous projects. 4'Includes $962,556 for previous projects. 49Includes $1,671,660 public works funds and $49,419 emergency relief funds. soIncludes $503,113 for previous projects. "Includes $2,904,807 for previous projects. "Includes $90,232 for previous projects. "Includes $117,554 for previous projects. "Excludes $50,193 contributed funds. "Includes $15,000 for previous projects. 56Includes $487,817 for previous projects. "Includes $87,131 for previous projects. S"Includes $187,233 for previous projects. "9Includes $131,239 for previous projects. 60Includes $323,419 for previous projects. "'Includes $219,730 for previous projects. 6"Includes $48,404 National Recovery Act for new work funds. 63Includes $212,857 for previous projects. "Includes $33,113 for previous projects. "'Includes $3,973,897 for previous projects. 21-61 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1905 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 11, 1888 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 6, 1990 Aug. 8, 1917 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 19, 1890 Jul. 13, 1892 Sep. 22, 1922 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Apr. 23, 1970 Mar. 2, 1945 ARCADIA HARBOR, MI (See Section 1 of Text) Maintenance of existing 12-foot channel. ASHLAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 2 ot Text) Breakwater 7,900 feet long and dredging to remove a shoal. Appropriation of $60,000 for 'Continuing improvements on enlarged project' (On completion of Poe Lock in 1896, with available depth of 20 feet, dredging at Ashland Harbor was carried to a similar depth.) Detached breakwater extending 4,700 feet out from shore at a point 2,600 feet east of main breakwater (prolonged) and parallel thereto. Project modified by omitting detached breakwater and defining depth and extend of channel to be dredged. Widening part of present channel for entrance channel and for basin in eastern part of harbor. Deepening east basin to 25 feet and west channel, as far as 8th Ave. West, extended to 21 feet. Widening west channel to 750 feet at its westerly end Deepening portions of east basin and west channel to 27 and 21 feet, respectively. AU SABLE HARBOR AT AU SABLE RIVER (OSCODA), MI (See Section 3 of Text) Dredging channels 12 and 10 feet deep and riprapping North Pier. BLACK RIVER (PORT HURON), MI (See Section 4 of Text) Channel from mouth of Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge. Channel from Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge to Washington Ave. Consolidation of projects for Black River at Port Huron and Mouth of Black River. Settling Basin. Deepening channel and settling basin to 20 feet, and widening to 100 feet 2 bends; 1 at the foot of 12th St., the other below the Grand Trunk R.R. Bridge. Extension of existing channel. BLACK RIVER HARBOR, MI (UPPER PENINSULA) (See Section 5 of Text) Two converging breakwaters, an entrance channel between breakwaters, an inner channel, and an irregular harbor basin. Project depths 12 feet in approach channel and 8 feet in the river channel and basin. H. Doe. 194, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. HI. Ex. Doe. 89, 48th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Reports, 1886, p. 1674; and i'87, p. 1966. H. Ex. Doe. 89, 48th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Reports, 1886, p. 1674; and 1887, p. 1966. H. Doe. 1698, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 133, 71st Cong., 2d Sess Rivers and Harbors Committee Doec. 46, 82d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 337, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doe. 165, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report, 1889, p. 2291. No Printed Report. H. Doc. 436, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 162, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 54, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. Section 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' 21-62 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 2, 1882 Oct. 28, 1965 Aug. 14, 1876 Aug. 2, 1882 Jun 13, 1902 Jun. 20, 1938 Nov. 17, 1988 Mar. 29, 1977 Jun. 2, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 26, 1937 May 17, 1950 Oct. 21, 1964 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 19, 1963 Aug. 26, 1937 Sep. 3, 1954 CEDAR RIVER HARBOR, MI (See Section 6 of Text) Dredge an entrance channel (datum at 580.69 feet above mean tide at New York) and construct two parallel piers extending lakeward from mouth of Cedar River. Modification of project to provide for two parallel entrance piers including a new rubblemound east pier with a sport fishing walkway; an entrance channel from Green Bay t< outh of Cedar River, and a turning basin. CHARLEVOIX HARBOR, MI (See Section 7 of Text) Channel from Lake Michigan to Round Lake protected where needed by piers and revetments. Channel from Round Lake to Lake Charlevoix. Project depth increased to 15 feet. Project depth increased to 18 feet. Restore recreational uses or provide comparable recreational uses at the South Pier. Project depth increased to 24 and 23 feet, and construction of revetment upstream of Highway Bridge. CHEBOYGAN HARBOR, MI (See Section 8 of Text) 18 1/2 foot channel. 8 1/2 foot channel. Turning Basin. 21-foot channel to East 1st St., Enlarge Turning Basin deepen to 21 feet. Breakwater. CLINTON RIVER, MI (See Section 9 of Text) Channel in River and Lake St. Clair, Pile Dike, Closing channels and making Cutoff, and revetments as needed. Widening entrance channel and constructing protected harbor basin. CORNUCOPIA HARBOR, WI (See Section 10 of Text) Entrance channel 50 feet wide and 10 feet deep between existing piers from bay to a turning basin 200 feet long, 8 feet deep, with maximum width of 180 feet, with 150- and 300-foot inner channels each 50 feet wide and 8 feet deep. Reconstruction and Federal maintenance of ease and west entrance piers, a 25-foot extension of west pier and a 300-foot extension of existing westerly inner channel at a depth of 8 feet and a width of 50 feet. S. Ex. Doec. 12, 47th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 248, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Ex. Doc. 16, 44th Cong., 1st Sess. and Annual Report 1876, p. 523. No Prior Survey of Estimates. No Prior Survey of Estimates. S. Doc. 163, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.' H. Doec. 1098, 100th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 25 of the WRDA of 1988. Section 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act. Annual Report, 1895, p. 2823 H. Doec. 357, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 134, 75th Cong., I1st Sess. H. Doc. 269, 81st Cong., I1st Sess. Section 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. S. Doc. 199, 46th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1880, p. 2062, and H. Doc. 210, 44th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1886, p. 219. Section 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act. S. Committee, 75th Cong., I1st Sess. H. Doec. 434, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess.' 21-63 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 3 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 22 May 17, 1950 4 Mar. 21, 1956 22 Jul. 14, 1960 Aug. 13, 1968 22 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 DETROIT RIVER, MI (See Section 11 of Text) Amherstburg Channel and removal of Grosse Ile Shoal. Fighting Island Channel. Li vingstone Channel. Channel Depths of 26 and 25 feet. Channel to Wyandotte 21 feet deep and 300 feet wide through Middle Ground opposite Head of Fighting Island. Trenton Channel and Turning Basin (West of Grosse lie). American Channel North of Belle Isle between Windmill Point and Fairway Slip, Detroit. Deepen Westerly 300 feet of Amherstburg Channel and Ballards Reef Channel below Livingstone Channel to 27 feet to provide depths adequate for 24-foot draft navigation when governing Lakes are at Datum, with necessary widening at approaches and bends and construction of necessary compensating works, Detroit River. Extend Turning Basin in Trenton Channel 600 feet. Dredge through East Draw of lower Grosse Ile Bridge and extend 300-foot width of Channel North of lower Grosse Ile Bridge. Channel Depth of 28.5 feet throughout downbound and Two-Way Channels, except in upper (27.7-foot depth) and lower (29-foot depth), Livingstone Channel, and in upbound Channel; 27-foot depth in Ballards Reef Channel below junction with Livingstone Channel, 27.5- foot depth in westerly 300-foot width of Limekiln Crossing and Amherstburg Reaches, and 28.5-foot depth in westerly 300-foot width of Hackett Beach, with necessary compensation works. Also 28.5-foot depth in Lake Erie from Detroit River to Pelee Passage Shoal, inclusive. Trenton Channel: Deepen to 25 feet, where necessary, Wyandotte Reach from Detroit River to Upper Grosse Ile Bridge, about 5.5 miles, deepen to 28 feet and widen to 300 feet below Upper Grosse Ile Bridge to and including a Turning Basin 28 feet deep and 15 feet across in area outside project limits. Trenton Channel: Deepen to 28 feet and widen to 300 feet from Upper Turning Basin at Trenton to Gibraltar, about 20,500 feet from downstream: Construct a Turning Basin at Gibraltar at a depth of 28 feet, width of 830 feet, and length of 1,500 feet: Build compensating works to maintain water levels. DULUTH-SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN AND WI (See Section 12 of Text) Dredging. Rebuilding piers at Superior Entry. Enlarge plan for Superior Entry and additional dredging near draw span of Burlington Northern railway bridge. H. Doe. 712, 56th Cong., 1st. Sess. and 40, 58th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doe. 17, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doe. 266, 59th Cong., 1st Sess.; 676, 61st Cong., 2d Sess.; and 322, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doe. 253, 70th Cong., 1st. Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doe. 205, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doe. 734, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doe. 30, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doe. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 319, 86th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doe. 338, 90th Cong., 2d Sess.' H.Ex. Doe. 59, 53d Cong., 3rd Sess. and Annual Report, 1895, p. 2538. H. Doc. 82, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. 21-64 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 28, 1908 s Jul. 27, 1916 Mar. 2, 1919 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 30, 1930 3 Aug. 30, 1930 3 Jul. 16, 1952 4,6 Jul. 14, 1960 7,22 Oct. 4, 1961 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 5, 1886 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 3, 1925 8,22 Jun. 26, 1934 9 Jul. 3, 1958 10 Oct. 31, 1992 Jun. 23, 1866 " Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 27, 1965 Dredging additional area of basin inside Duluth entrance to 22-foot depth. Enlarging Superior Harbor Basin. Removal of shoal point at southerly end of East Gate Basin. Howards Bay Channel, 20 feet deep. Deepening and widening channels and basins. Deepen Superior Front Channel and a portion of East Gate Basin to 25 feet. Present project dimensions of channels and basin. Abandons northerly portion of 21st Avenue West Channel. Deepen portions of the North and South Channels, the entire Upper Channel and Minnesota Channel to 27 feet; widen the Cross Channel turning basin to 1,500 feet; widen the bend at the Arrowhead Bascule Bridge to 600 feet, and construct an upland CDF. FOX RIVER, WI (See Section 13 of Text) Improvement of Fox River. Dredging Fond du Lac Harbor on Lake Winnebago. Improvement of Wolf River. Improvement of Stockbridge, of Calunet and Miller Bay, and of Brothertown Harbor, on Lake Winnebago. Increased depth in rock cuts on lower river, widen Neenah Channel, and a concrete retaining wall at Kaukauna. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Sec. 108, that Federal project structure, appurtenances, and real property of Upper Fox River, WI, be disposed of to State of Wisconsin. Sec. 332 authorized transfer of navigation system to Wisconsin subject to agreement, Federal government to continue water regulation/dam operation. FRANKFORT HARBOR, MI (See Section 14 of Text) A New Outlet 12 feet deep protected by Piers and Revetments. Exterior Breakwaters, removal of portions of Piers, Project Dimensions of Outer Basin. Dredge the area in Lake Betsie. Deepen approach and entrance channels. Extend Inner Basin and Dredge recreational anchorage area. H. Doc. 221, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doe. 651, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doe. 1018, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doe. 145, 69th Cong 1st Sess., and Rivers and Harboi s Committee Doe. 32, 71st Cong., 2c' Sess. H. Doe. 482, 72d "*:g., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 374, 82d Cong, 2d Sess. H. Doec. 150, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.; H. Doe. 196, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 204, 99th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 202a of WRDA of 1986. Annual Report, 1885, pp. 2041- 2045 (plan of a board approach Dec. 10, 1884, as modified by Corps of Engineers, May 14, 1886). H. Ex. Doe. 24, 51st Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1890, p. 2390. No prior survey or estimates. No prior survey or estimates. No prior survey or estimates. H. Doe. 294, 68th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Bill 3910, 85th Cong., 2d Sess. Public Law 102-580 (WRDA of 1992). H. Doe. 482, 5th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 208, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doe. 511, 74th Cong., 2d Sess., S. Doc 16, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' 21-65 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 23, 1866 Jun. 14, 1880 Sep. 19, 1890 Jul. 13, 1892 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 14, 1880 Jun. 14, 1880 May 17, 1950 Jun. 23, 1866 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 26, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 2 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 17, 1986 GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI (See Section 15 of Text) Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Piers and Revetments. Present Project dimensions of Harbor channel to Grand Trunk Car Ferry Slip and River Channel. Eliminating all of that portion of ' and River above Bass River, Consolidation of Projects for Harbor and Ri er. Channel to Spring Lake. Present Project Dimensions of Harbor Channel from Car Ferry Slip to Grand Trunk Railway Bridge and Turning Basin. Deepen the harbor entrance channel and harbor river channel to 29 and 27 feet, respectively; provide a new and larger turning basin, trapezoidal in shape, 1,200 feet long at the channel, 300 feet long at the shore, 800 feet at a right angle to the channel, and 18 feet deep. GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MI (See Section 16 of Text) Existing project, except for pile dike. For pile dike. 800-foot extension of West Pier. GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI (See Section 17 of Text) Outer Channel and revetment at Grassy Island.12 Inner channel."3 Turning basin at DePere. Maintenance of turning basin at DePere. Increasing depth of inner channel and turning basin to 18 feet. Deepen outer channel to 22 feet with widening and straightening inside of Tail Point Bend, widen channel in Fox River through city of Green Bay to 22 feet. Turning basin above Chicago & North Western R.R. Bridge. Turning basin at mouth of East River. Deepen and widen 9 miles of entrance channel to 26 by 500 feet; 3.6 miles of entrance channel to 24 by 300 feet; and 3.2 miles of existing Fox River to 24 feet deep. Deepen the Fox River channel at Green Bay, WI, to 27 feet. S. Ex. Doc 42, 35th Cong., 1st. Sess. S. Ex. Doc 42, 35th Cong., 1st. Sess. S. Ex. Doc 42, 35th Cong., 1st. Sess. S. Ex. Doc 42, 35th Cong., 1st. Sess. S. Doe. 88, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe. 1, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess.' H. Doec. 661, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess.' H. Doec. 227, 98th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 202a of WRDA of 1986. Specified in Act, Annual Report 1881, p. 2050 Annual Report, 1895, p. 351 H. Doe. 751, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. Annual Report, 1867, p. 70. Unpublished report approved Aug. 3, 1892. H. Doe. 222, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doec. 1017, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doec. 294, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 40, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 73, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 95, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doe. 470, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' H.R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986, Sec. 601c). 21-66 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 3, 1871 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 16, 1984 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 30, 1852 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 3, 1905 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Sep. 3, 1954 22 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 2, 1964 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 1935 2 HAMMOND BAY HARBOR, MI (See Section 18 of Text) Harbor of Refuge, breakwaters, 10-foot depth in harbor basin, 12-foot depth in entrance channel. HARBOR BEACH, LAKE HURON, MI (See Section 19 of Text) Adopted Site and made provision for harbor. Closing North Entrance and dredging Mai Entrance and Anchorage Area. Removal of portion of B:eakwater in interest of sanitation. Deepen the waterway within the Marina facility. HARRISVILLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 20 of Text) Harbor of Refuge, Breakwaters; 12-foot depth entrance channel 10-foot depth in harbor basin. Extend north end of south breakwater 100 feet; extend southeast end of north breakwater 145 feet; install two navigation light structures. HOLLAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 21 of Text) Artificial channel between Lakes Macatawa and Michigan. 12 Piers and Revetments.' 2 Extending Inner Piers. Converging Breakwater. Channel to Holland and Turning Basin at Holland. Present Project Dimensions of Channels at Turning Basin. Widen Bend in Revetted Entrance Channel into Lake Macatawa, Dredge Channel in Black River, and Widen and Extend Turning Basin. THE INLAND ROUTE, MI (See Section 22 of Text) Channel 30 feet wide and 5 feet deep through Lakes and Rivers with suitable jetties. Lock and Dam. KENOSHA HARBOR, WI (See Section 23 of Text) Parallel piers and 600 feet of breakwater."2 Extending Breakwater 200 feet. Present project dimensions of entrance channel and basin. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1873, p. 282; H. Doc. 1700, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. H.R. 5653, 98th Cong., 2d Sess.; P.L. 98-360 (98 Stat. 405) Sec. 105. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 107, 1960 River and Harbor Act. S. Ex. Doc. 42, 35th Cong., 1st Sess. Annual Report, 1866, p. 106. H. Doc. 272, 51st Cong., 2d Sess.; and Annual Report 1887, p. 2950. Annual Report, 190 5 , p. 2176; H. Doc. 588, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 48, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 282, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 142, 82d Cong., 1st Sess.' Chief of Engineers. H. Doc. 328, 54th Cong., 2d Sess.; Annual Report, 1897, p. 2772; H. Doc. 164, 55th Cong., 3rd Sess.; Annual Report, 1899, p. 1817. H. Doe. 62, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 5th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe. 19, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 21-67 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents May 17, 1950 Oct. 23, 1962 22 Mat ', 1881 Jun. 25, i910 Aug. 30, 1935 2,14 Jul. 14, 1960 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 2, 1919 Aug. 30, 1935 "s Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 3, 1930 Channel northwesterly from basin. Deepen lake approach channel to 27 feet and 800 feet wide; deepen approach channel to 26 feet, entrance channel and inner basin to 25 feet. KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI (See Section 24 of Text) Entrance piers. Turning basin. North breakwater, remove old north pier, widen and deepen entrance channel and turning basin to 20 feet and remove outer south shoal. Enlarge existing turning basin, extend existing project into north basin, and increase depth of north basin to 20 feet at a maximum width of 500 feet and eliminate removal of outer shoal. KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI (See Section 25 of Text) Acquision of waterway; for a 16-foot channel of 70-foot bottom width, renew canal revetments, reconstruct and extend piers at upper entrance to 30-foot depth of water, and at proper time for increase of channel depth to 20 feet with bottom width of not less than 120 feet (increase in width and depth of channel approved May 15, 1898). Anchorage basin just within lower entrance about one-half mile long, 800 feet wide; a mooring pier on its westerly side 2,000 feet in length, and for purchase of necessary land. Princess Point Cutoff channel. General deepening, widening and straightening of channels and basins to provide 25-foot depth with additional overdepth at entrances, extend lower entrance breakwater, and necessary alteration or replacement of structures due to deepening channels. Deauthorization of the uncompleted portion of the project authorized by the 1935 Rivers and Harbors Act. LAC LA BELLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 26 of Text) Two parallel piers at the entrance, 584 and 682 feet; an entrance channel between the piers 50 feet wide and 12 feet deep, 820 feet long with a flared approach and inner canal 50 feet wide, 10 feet deep, and 730 feet long. LAKE ST. CLAIR, MI, CHANNELS (See Section 27 of Text) Two Dikes. Deepening Canal and dredging Channel at Grosse Pointe. Second Canal for downbound vessels. 21-foot depth in Grosse Pointe Channel for about 5.25 miles. 25-foot depth through Canals and Channel through Lake St. Clair. Removal of Center Dike and widening Channel to 700 feet. H. Doe. 750, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 496, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report, 1881, p. 2082. H. Doe. 324, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe. 43, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doe. 19, 86th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Ex. Doe. 105, 49th Cong., 2d Sess.; and Annual Report, 1887, p. 1977. H. Doe. 325, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doec. 835, 63rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 55, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess.' H.R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). H. Doe. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1961, p. 1039. Annual Report, 1885, p. 2150. H. Doe. 297, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 234, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 188, 65th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doe. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee 21-68 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1933 Mar. 21, 1956 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1899 Mar. 2, 1907 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 2, 1867 Sep. 19, 1890 Jul. 25, 1912 Jul. 3, 1920 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Deepening Channel to 27.5 feet and abandonment of Channel above mouth of Southeast bend cutoff Channel. LELAND HARBOR, MI (See Section 28 of Text) Entrance Channel protected by Piers. Outer Breakwater, Anchorage Area, Approach Channel and removal of North Pier. LEXINGTON HARBOR, MI (See Section 29 of Text) Approach Channel and Maneuver Area Protected by Breakwaters.' LITTLE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 30 of Text) 12-foot deep Channel from Lake Superior into Little Lake Breakwaters and Revetments. LUDINGTON HARBOR, MI (See Section 31 of Text) Entrance Piers. Pier Extension, Reconstruction and repairs to existing structures and present project dimensions of Channel. Breakwaters, Shore Connections, and Removal of outer ends of the two inner piers. Deepen Channels and widen opening between breakwaters. MANISTEE HARBOR, MI (See Section 32 of Text) Entrance Piers. Extending Channel 8,000 feet to connect with Manistee Lake, and further Pier extension. Depth of 20 feet in Outer Harbor 570 feet wide to Outer end of South Pier 18 feet deep in river, South Breakwater with shore connection, and extend North Pier if required. 23-foot depths in entrance channel and 21-foot depths in River Channel. Remove old South Revetment, Construct new South Pier and Revetment, and widen river entrance Channel. Present project dimensions of Channel through Outer Basin and River, and Federal participation in cost of replacing Maple Street Bridge. Doc. 3, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee CP 23, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc 413, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 301, 88th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report, 1867, p. 114.16 H. Doe. 273, 54th Cong., 2d Sess.; and Annual Report, 1897, p. 2951. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess.; and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess.' 6 H. Doc. 342, 91st Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report, 1867, p. 115. Annual Report, 1891, P. 2678. H. Doc. 599, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 131, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 380, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 358, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. 21-69 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 1935 "7 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 23, 1962 29 Dec. 31, 1968 (Sec. 107 of 1960 R & H) Jun. 26, 1979 Mar. 3, 1871 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 4, 1913 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Jun. 27, 1967 (Sec. 107) MANISTIQUE HARBOR, MI (See Section 33 of Text) Breakwaters and Outer Harbor. Present location of West Breakwater and Pier at River Mouth. MANITOWOC HARBOR, WI (See Sectiol: 34 of Text) Breakwaters. Present project dimensions of channel through outer basin, removal of old north stub pier, and approach channel to a proposed city terminal south of shore end of south breakwater. Channel in river. Deepen Lake approach to 25 feet by 800 feet wide, deepen outer harbor to 25 feet, river channel to 23 feet to 8th Street, and Upper River Channel to 22 feet to Soo Line R.R. Dredge River Channel to 12 feet from Soo Line R.R. 720 feet upstream. Construct 765-foot long stone Breakwater, and rubblemound bulkhead; construct 360-foot long entrance Breakwater; dredge 16,500 cubic yards for entrance channel. MENOMINEE HARBOR AND RIVER, MI AND WI (See Section 35 of Text) Entrance piers. Consolidation of project for harbor and river, and a channel 18 feet deep. Partial restoration of work above bridge which had been eliminated by Act of May 3, 1905. 20-foot depth in channel and 18-foot depth in turning basin. 21-foot depth in channel and turning basin and enlarge turning basin. Extend channel 12 feet deep to vicinity of Marinette Yacht Club. Deepen existing approach channel to 26 feet, entrance and river channels to 24 feet and enlarge turning basin. Deepen 1,100 feet of river channel generally north of Marinette Corp. facilities to 19 feet. H. Doe. 429, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1908, p. 648, and Unpublished Report of Mar. 13, 1908; Approved by Secretary of War, Apr. 3, 1908. H. Doec. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess., as modified by Rivers and Harbors Comm. Doe. 3, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe. 39, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 80, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 479, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Jun. 1967 Detailed Project Report Apr. 1982 Supplement.' Sec. 107, 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act. Annual Report, 1867, p. 132. H. Doc. 419, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doe. 171, 70th Cong., Ist Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe. 28, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doec. 228, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doe. 113, 86th Cong., Ist Sess. Detailed Project Report, Dec. 1966. 21-70 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1852 Mar. 3, 1883 Mar. 2, 1907 Sep. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 1935 22 Mar. 2, 1945 18 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 23, 1962 Feb. 24, 1835 19 Jul. 3, 1930 Jul. 14, 1932 21 Nov. 17, 1986 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1925 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 23, 1962 Aug. 2, 1882 Jun. 25, 1910 MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI (See Section 36 of Text) North Pier. 12 Inner 7,600 feet of breakwater."2 South pier. Extending north breakwater 1,000 feet. Extend north breakwater; a south breakwater; present project di '-nsions of inner entrance channel. Dredging a portion of outer harbor to 21 -foot depth. Dredging river channels to 21-foot depth. Deepen South Menominee and Burnham Canals to 21 feet. Deepen an approach channel to 30 feet by 800 feet wide and 300 feet wide through breakwater; deepen entrance channel 28 feet through piers, outer harbor to 28 feet south of entrance channel, and a channel to 27 feet in Milwaukee River to Buffalo Street, and in Kinnickinnic River to Chicago & North Western R.R. bridges. MONROE HARBOR, MI (See Section 37 of Text) 9-foot channel, protecting Revetments and Piers. 21-foot channel, dikes and turning basin.20 Modified Conditions of Local Cooperation imposed by Act of Jul. 3, 1930. Deepen portion of existing navigation channel to 27 feet; deepen lake channel to 28 feet; widen the channel from 200 to 500 feet; dredge a new turning basin 24 feet deep, 1,600 feet wide at river's mouth; and construct a 190 acre CDF in Plum Creek Bay to enable creation of a 700 acre marsh behind the CDF. MUSKEGON HARBOR, MI (See Section 38 of Text) Piers and Revetments. Breakwaters. Repairing Revetments around Car Ferry Slip. Channel deepening and present project dimensions of channel. Piers and Revetments. NEW BUFFALO HARBOR, MI (See Section 39 of Text) Entrance channel 10 feet deep by 80 to 180 feet wide and 850 feet long to mouth of Galien River, new north and south breakwaters 1,305 and 740 feet, respectively, deepening inner channel to Galien River to 8 feet and 80 feet wide and 1,250 feet long. OCONTO HARBOR, WI (See Section 40 of Text) Piers, except for inner 300 feet of south pier and 250 feet north pier built by city.2 Present project dimensions of channel and turning basin. S. Doe. 175, 25th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1881, p. 2122. Annual Report, 1906, p. 1752 (No prior survey or estimate affecting breakwater extensions). H. Doe. 804, 66th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 289, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doec. 29, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doe. 285, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 134, 87th Cong., 1st Sess.' Annual Report, 1872, p. 237. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doec. 22, 71st Cong., Ist Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doec. 12, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.; 45, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). H. Doc. 104, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 494, 67th Cong., 4th Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe. 64, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doe. 474, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 474, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1881, p. 2066. H. Doe. 538, 61st Cong., 2d Sess., Plan C.' 21-71 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 23, 1962 29 Nov. 17, 1986 Jan. 3, 1996 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1873 Jul. 5, 1881 Jul. 13, 1892 Mar. 25, 1907 Aug. 18, 1894 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 16, 1984 Jul. 11, 1987 Mar. 2, 1945 ONTONAGON HARBOR, MI (See Section 41 of Text) Channel 17 feet deep and 150 feet wide through bar and 15 feet deep and 100 feet wide between piers, and pier maintenance. Modified project widths and provide inner basin. Enlarging and deepening the existing harbor basin. Deauthorization of the turning basin feature of the project authorized by the 1962 Rivers and Harbors Act. Reauthorization of the turning basin feature which was deauthorized (Sec. 1002) in WRDA 86. PENTWATER HARBOR, MI (See Section 42 of Text) Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Piers and revetments, dredging. Present project depth of channel. PETOSKEY HARBOR, MI (See Section 43 of Text) Breakwaters according to larger of two projects. Removal of north breakwater and extension of west breakwater if cost did not exceed $170,000 POINT LOOKOUT HARBOR, (AU GRES RIVER), MI (See Section 44 of Text) Breakwater, Anchorage Area, Channel Dredging. PORT AUSTIN HARBOR, MI (See Section 45 of Text) Breakwater, Anchorage Basin, Channel Dredging. Construct a breakwater access for recreation purposes. Breakwater. PORT SANILAC HARBOR, MI (See Section 46 of Text) Entrance Channel 12 feet deep, Anchorage Basin, Breakwater. H. Doc. 602, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Committee print, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 287, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). Sec. 363 (e) of WRDA 1996 H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doc. 70, 39th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 181, 39th Cong., 2d Sess.' Annual Report 1890, p. 2673 Annual Report 1895, p. 2819 Annual Report 1896, p. 2722 H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. R. 5653, 98th Cong., 2d Sess. P. L. 98-360 (98 Stat. 405) Sec. 106 P. L. 100-71. H. Doc. 446, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. 21-72 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Jul. 11, 1870 Aug. 14, 1876 Aug. 30, 1935 27 Jul. 3, 1958 28 Jan. 3, 1996 Mar. 3, 1879 Jun. 3, 1896 Jun. 13, 1902 Aug. 30, 1935 Jul. 14, 1960 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug.30, 19352,24,25 Jul. 3, 1958 2 Oct. 23, 1962 2 Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 PORT WASHINGTON HARBOR, WI (See Section 47 of Text) North pier and south basin.'" North basin. North breakwater, removal of 650 feet of north pier, outer turning ba:;n, present project dimensions of channel and basin and extension of south breakwater. Extending and raising of north breakwater and placing rubble a" --.g sides; removing 456 feet of south breakwater and dredging in outer basin. Deauthorization of portion of the navigation project. PORTAGE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 48 of Text) Entrance channel 18 feet deep protected by piers and revetments. PRESQUE ISLE HARBOR, MI (See Section 49 of Text) Breakwater, 1,000 feet long. Shore extension, 216 feet long. For dredging and rubblemound extension to breakwater 1,600 feet long; Changed designation of project. Deepening harbor from 26 and 28 feet to 28 and 30 feet, respectively. ROUGE RIVER, MI (See Section 50 of Text) 21-foot channel via the Shortcut Canal. 25-foot channel at mouth of Old Channel, 1,425 feet long and adjacent to latter; 21-foot channel extending from jtunction of Old Channel and Shortcut Canal into Old Channel to Detroit, Toledo & Ironton R.R. Bridge. Old Channel; 100 feet wide from Peerless Cement Corp. to Junction with Shortcut Canal widened to 150 feet at 2 bends. 25-foot channel over modified limits from Detroit River to Jefferson Avenue (via Shortcut Canal). SAGINAW RIVER, MI (See Section 51 of Text) Channel 200 feet wide, with depth of 18.5 feet in Bay and 16.5 feet in River. Project Depth of 18.5 feet extended up River to Saginaw. Turning Basin. Present project channel dimensions from Bay to Sixth Street Bridge in Saginaw. New Channel in Bay, 350 feet wide and 24 feet deep from 24-foot contour to River Mouth, Project Depth of 24 feet in River Channel up to Detroit & Mackinac Railway Bridge, Project Depth of 22 feet in River H. Ex. Doc. 28, 41st Cong., 2d Sess. and Annual Report, 1879, p. 119. Annual Report, 1876, pt. 2, p. 379. H. Doc. 168, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 41, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 446, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess.' Sec. 501(17) of WRDA of 1996. Annual Report 1879, p. 1634 30 H. Doc. 318, 54th Cong., 1st. Sess.; Annual Report, 1903, pp. 474, 1823 H. Doc. 473, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 145, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 1063, 64th Cong., 2d Sess.2 3 H. Doc. 125, 85th Cong., 1st. Sess. H. Doc. 509, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 740, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 30, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 576, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doe. 500, 83rd Cong., 2d Sess. 21-73 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 13, 1892 Jul. 8, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 22 Mar. 21, 1956 22 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar. 3, 1875 Jun. 14, 1880 Mar. 3, 1899 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 2, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 11, 1870 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 Jun. 13, 1902 Channel up to Sixth Street Bridge, Turning Basins at Essexville and Carrollton, and elimination of present Channel in Bay. Deepen Bay Channel, Deepen River Channel to Detroit & Mackinac Bridge, Extend 22-foot project above Sixth Street Bridge, Deepen Essexville Turning Basin, and Construct 2 new Turning Basins.3 Deepen River Channel to 25 feet, from Detroit & Mackinac Bridge to New York Central Railroad Bridge. ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI (See Section 52 of Text) 20-foot Channel in the River. Deepen Channel to 25 and 26 feet, and Compensating Works. Widening Channel at Southeast Bend to 700 feet. Widen and deepen Southeast Bend and improve Outlet of North Channel, St. Clair River. Deepen and further improve Channels in St. Clair River between limits of 27.1 to 30 feet to provide safe navigation by vessels with drafts of 25.5 feet. A cutoff Channel in Canada at Southeast Bend and abandon old Southeast Bend Channels. Deauthorization of the work authorized by the Rivers and Harbors Act of Jul. 24, 1946. ST. JOSEPH HARBOR, MI (See Section 53 of Text) Interior Revetments. 26 Benton Harbor Canal.2 6 Present project dimensions of piers and a turning basin. Present project dimensions of the channel and turning basin near mouth of Paw Paw River. Abandon easterly 1,000 feet of canal above west line of 9th Street. Turning basin above mouth of Morrison Channel and eliminate turning basin near mouth of Paw Paw River. Maintenance of turning basin near mouth of Paw Paw River. ST. MARYS RIVER, MI (See Section 54 of Text) Weitzel Lock (Replaced in 1943 by MacArthur Lock), widen and deepen existing State Channel.26 Poe Lock.' Dredging through shoals above falls and shoals below falls between lower end of Canal and upper entrance Channel into Lake Nicolet (formerly Hay Lake). Enlarging the Old Channel. Lake Nicolet and Neebish Channels work in that section of River below Locks. H. Doc. 554, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 240, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doe. 207, 51st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 309, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). H. Ex. Doc. 160, 43rd Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1875, pt. 1, p. 162. Annual Report, 1880, pp. 2030, 2031, 2049, and 2055. H. Doc. 307, 55th Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1898, p. 2496. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 52, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 129, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 95, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' Report by Maj. O.M. Poe, Corps of Engineers, not published. H. Ex. Doe. 72, 49th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doe. 207, 51st Cong., 2d Sess., and Annual Report, 1891, p. 2810. H. Doc. 138, 56th Cong., 2d Sess., and 215, 58th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 128, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. 21-74 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 2, 1905 Mar. 3, 1907 Mar. 3, 1909 Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 4, 1 1'5 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Jun. 26, 1934 9 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 7, 1942 Jun. 15, 1943 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Mar. 21, 1956 Jul. 9, 1956 Nov. 17, 1986 Davis Lock Second Canal, and Emergency Dam. Lease of Waterpower at Falls, Lease entered into with Michigan Northern Power Company provided for construction of remedial and compensating works. Fourth Lock (Renamed 'Sabin' Lock in 1943). Deepen Tailrace of Power Plant. Widen upper approach to Canals through Vidal Shoals, extend anchorage and maneuver area below locks. Remove Round Island, middle ground extension of Northwest Canal Pier, and widen Channels Middle Neebish Route. Deepen Channels throughout downbound Route. Operation and Care of Canal and Locks provided from War Department Appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Widen Brush Point Turn and Channel from Brush Point to Point Louise. Construct new (MacArthur) Lock on site of former Weitzel Lock, deepen approach Channels to 27 feet, and reconstruct approach Piers. Name 'MacArthur' Lock and changed name of 'Fourth' Lock to 'Sabin' Lock. Remove Bridge Island and construct new Hydroelectric Power Plant. Replace Poe Lock at St. Marys Falls Canal with a new structure 800 feet long, 100 feet wide and 32 feet deep with necessary construction of Nose and Center Piers, and widen and deepen Channel across Point Iroquois Shoals and in Lake Nicolet to provide wider anchorage and maneuver areas in St. Marys River. Deepen to provide a Project Safe Draft of 25.5 feet over full width to downbound and 2-way Channels (including anchorage areas) and over Westerly 300-foot width of upbound Middle Neebish Channel, when levels of Lakes Superior and Huron are at their respective LWD's. Repeal Authorization of Bridge as a part of Project, authorize alteration with cost to be apportioned by Sec. 6, Truman Hobbs Act, Jun. 21, 1940. Construct a second large lock 1,294 feet in length, 115 feet in width, and 32 feet in depth, adjacent to the existing lock. The replacement lock is to be located in the North Canal of the St. Marys Falls Canal at Sault Ste. Marie, MI, on the site of the existing Davis and Sabin Locks. H. Doc. 215, 56th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 333, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. (Plan 3). H. Doc. 65, 62d Cong., 1st Sess. District Engineer Report, Oct. 29, 1920. H. Doc. 270, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 253, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 53, 74th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 218, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 679, 78th Cong., 2d Sess., and 339, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 71, 84th Cong., 1st Sess.' None. H. R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (WRDA of 1986). SAUGATUCK HARBOR AND KALAMAZOO RIVER, MI (See Section 55 of Text) Entrance Channel, Piers and Revetments. Deepening entrance to 16 feet. H. Doc. 912, 54th Cong., 1st Sess.; Annual Report, 1896, Vol. 2, Pt. 5, p. 2739. 21-75 Jun. 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Deepening Channel in River to 14 feet. Annual Report, 1907, p. 6416. H. Doc. 635, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. Jul. 3, 1958 Jun. 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 31, 1992 Aug. 11, 1888 Mar. 3, 1905 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 31, 1992 Mar. 3, 1873 Jul. 13, 1892 Jun. 13, 1902 SAXON HARBOR, WI (See Section 56 of Text) Provides for east and west breakwaters, an outer channel 10 feet deep, an inner basin and side channel 8 feet deep, and diversion of Oronto Creek to Parkers Creek by 3 short reaches of channel excavation and a levee. SEBEWAING RIVER, MI (See Section 57 of Text) Entrance Channel 8 feet deep, 100 feet wide and 15,000 feet long in Saginaw Bay. SHEBOYGAN HARBOR, WI (See Section 58 of Text) North breakwater. Preserving south pier as part of project, providing turning basin, and elimination of proposed south breakwaters. Present project dimensions of channel. Widen and deepen outer harbor entrance channel to 450 feet, widen and deepen river channel from present project limit to north side of Jefferson Avenue. SILVER BAY HARBOR, MN (See Section 59 Text) Provides for a Harbor of Refuge for small craft. SOUTH HAVEN HARBOR, MI (See Section 60 of Text) Channel from Inner End of Piers to Highway Bridge. 2 Present dimensions of Piers and for a Turning Basin. Present project dimensions of Channel and Turning Basin. Turning Basin deauthorized. STURGEON BAY AND LAKE MICHIGAN SHIP CANAL, WI (See Section 61 of Text) Breakwaters. 12 Acquision of the canal. Canal revetments and consolidation of canal and harbor works. River and iarbors Act, H. Doc. 169, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.,' Annual Report "- 1965, p. 1025. H. Doc 71, 54th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 62, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 475, 68th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 47, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 554, 82d Cong., 2d Sess.' Sec. 104 (7), P.L. 102-580 (WRDA 1992) No Prior Survey or Estimate. H. Doc. 119, 58th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess.' and Unpublished review Report of Chief of Engineers, dated Dec. 21, 1934. Public Law 102-580 (Section 116 of WRDA of 1992). H. Ex. Doc. 34, 42d Cong., 2d Sess.; Annual Report, 1872, p. 171. H. Ex. Doc. 106, 49th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doe. 117, 56th Cong., 2d Sess. 21-76 Jun. 25, 1910 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 5, 1886 Aug. 30, 1935 Nov. 7, 1945 Jul. 14, 1960 Mar. 3, 1871 Mar. 2, 1907 Aug. 30, 1935 22 Jul. 3, 1958 Mar. 2, 1867 Mar. 3, 1873 Jul. 5, 1884 Jul. 13, 1892 Mar. 2, 1907 Jul. 24, 1946 Nov. 5, 1990 Oct. 30, 1990 Apr. 7, 1966 Present project dimensions of channels and elimination of turning basin immediately west of revetted canal. Turning basin between city and Bushman wharves. TWO HARBORS, MN (See Section 62 of Text) Breakwater and dredging. Construction of two breakwater piers. Shore connection to east breakwater and dredging raneuvering area. Construct new east breakwater and enlargement of maneuvering basin. Deepen harbor project depths from 26 and 28 feet to 28 and 30 feet, respectively. TWO RIVERS HARBOR, WI (See Section 63 of Text) South pier, 750 feet of north pier, and about 44 feet of north revetment.' 2 Remainder of north pier and stilling basin. Deepening entrance channel and inner basin to 18 feet. Extend existing project in West Twin River to 18 feet deep and in East Twin River to 10 feet deep to 22nd Street Bridge. WHITE LAKE HARBOR, MI (See Section 64 of Text) New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. New Channel, with Piers and Revetments. Present project depth of Channel. CLINTON RIVER SPILLWAY, MI (See Section 73 of Text) Construction of a cutoff canal with control weirs. Completed project review due to significantly changed physical conditions. FORT WAYNE METRO AREA, IN (See Section 74 of Text) Provides 100-year level of flood protection to part of central area of city of Fort Wayne, IN. KAWKAWLIN RIVER, MI (See Section 75 of Text) Deepening River Channel, altering Railway Bridge. Riprapping portions of Channel bottom, and utility relocations. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doec. 421, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Ex. Doec. 94, 48th Cong., 2d Sess. Annual Report, 1887, p. 1952. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doe. 17, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doe. 805, 78th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doec. 146, 86th Cong., Ist Sess.' Annual Report, 1871, p. 123 (as modified by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 27, 1897). H. Doe. 730, 59th Cong., 1st Sess., Modification of Plan A. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 25, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 362, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. Unpublished Survey Report of 1868. No Prior Survey or Estimate.3" H. Doc. 694, 79th Cong., 2d Sess.' Section 216 Reconnaissance Report, September 1991. Public Law 101-640 (Section 101 of WRDA of 1990) Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act. 21-77 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 21-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1986 Provides that the Federal share of the cost of operation and maintenance H.R. 6 (formerly S. 1567), of the project shall be 50 percent. 99th Cong., 2d Sess. (Sec. 837 of W.R.D.A. of 1986) SAGINAW RIVER, MI, FLOOD CONTROL (See Section 76 of Text) Jul. 3, 1958 Flood t rtrol improvements to Saginaw River and its tributaries H. Doc. 346, 84th Cong., 2d Sess.' including Ti'tabawassee, Shiawassee, Flint, and Cass Rivers. Aug. 17, 1991 One-time O&M repairs at Flint Unit to restore project to original Energy and Water Development dimensions. Appropriation Act of 1992, Oct. 8, 1992 Provides funding for continuing O&M repairs at Flint Unit. (P.L. 102-104). Jan. 3, 1996 Project is modified to include as part of the project the design and Energy and Water Resources construction of an inflatable dam. Appropriation Act of 1993, H.R. 5373, (P.L. 102-377). Sec. 329 of WRDA 1996. SEBEWAING RIVER, MI (See Section 77 of Text) Aug. 18, 1941 Enlarging present Channel of Sebewaing River, altering Railroad and H. Doc. 286, 76th Cong., 1st Sess.' Highway Bridges, removal of Dike. 'Contains latest published map. 2Including Emergency Relief Administration Work authorized May 28, 1935. 3Included in Public Works Administration Program September 6, 1933. 4This modification deauthorized August 5, 1977, under Section 12, Public Law 93-251. 5Administrative Act, Section 4. 6Public Law 568, 82d Congress. 'Public Law 388, 87th Congress. 8This portion inactive. 9Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 'tTransfer completed June 1962. "Amended 1868, 1879, 1892. 12Completed under previous project. "3Included in Public Works Administration Program January 3, 1934. 14Inactive portion; removal of 200 linear feet of north pier, widening inner 200 feet of channel through outer basin, and closing gap in north shore connection of breakwater. 'SLatest published map is in Annual Report, 1914, p. 2974. '6Latest published map in Annual Report, 1914, p. 2914. "7Superseded by Act of October 23, 1962. '8Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (dredging Milwaukee River from Buffalo Street Bridge to North Humboldt Avenue Bridge). '~Modified by Act of June 10, 1872. 20Riprapping of protecting dikes portion of project is inactive. 2'War Department Appropriations Act. 22Uncompleted portion deauthorized December 31, 1989, under Section 1001, P.L. 99-662. 23Contains latest published maps. See also map with Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 19, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. 24Except for dredging 25-foot channel to 1,150 feet upstream of mouth of old channel, work authorized in this Act is considered inactive. 25This modification deauthorized August 5, 1977, under Section 12, Public Law 93-251. 26Completed under previous projects. Public Law 130, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. 27Work recommended in H. Doc. 588, 64th Cong., Ist Sess. 2 Deauthorized in 1977. 29This modification deauthorized December 31, 1989, under Section 1001, P.L. 99-662. 3"Latest published map is in H. Doc. 588, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. 3"Latest published map is in H. Doc. 2053, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. 21-78 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 30, 1997 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation Project Report for Construction & Maintenance Status Algoma Harbor, WI Completed 1996 292,010' 1,589,213 Alpena Harbor, MI Completed 1994 337,3942 1,071,524 Bayfield Harbor, WI Completed 1979 183,855 161 , Bayport Harbor, MI Completed 1996 93,597 581,716 Bell River, MI Completed 1980 24,301 130,611 Beaver Bay, MN Active 1982 293,000 2,818 Big Bay Harbor, MI Completed 1996 396,9433 1,501,810 Big Suamico River, WI Completed 1996 20,243 1,211,818 Black River (Icona Co), MI Inactive 1907 0 878 Bolles Harbor, MI Completed 1996 472,916 3,625,892 Caseville Harbor, MI Completed 1996 587,314 1,715,379 Channels in Straits of Mackinac, MI Completed 1991 2,832,629 237,351 Chippewa Harbor, Isle Royale, MI Completed 1959 125,629 17,555 Cross Village, MI Active 1983 364,000 0 DeTour Harbor, MI Completed 1989 2,559,346 163,763 Eagle Harbor, MI Completed 1996 205,1644 125,461 Grand Marais Harbor, MN Completed 1996 450,972 2,380,357 Grand Traverse Bay Harbor, MI Completed 1996 329,565 2,027,402 Grays Reef Passage, MI Completed 1970 190,521 826,443 Greilickville Harbor, MI Completed 1996 369,557' 297,970 Knife River Harbor, MN Active 1986 412,945 300,255 La Pointe Harbor, MI Completed 1994 139,874 168,320 Les Cheneaux Island Channels, MI Completed 1980 399,478 349,691 Little Bay De Noc, Gladstone Harbor, MI Completed 1966 332,832 105,634 Lutsen Harbor, MN Active 1982 357,000 0 Mackinac Island Harbor, MI Completed 1989 334,089 1,816,577 Mackinaw City Harbor, MI Completed 1986 136,2866 112,869 Marquette Harbor, MI Completed 1996 1,282,893' 3,369,5058 Northport Harbor, WI Inactive 0 0 Pensaukee Harbor, WI Completed 1996 34,035 677,096 Pine River, MI Completed 1980 13,649 95,527 Port Wing Harbor, WI Completed 1996 63,393 1,189,759 St. James, Beaver Island, MI Completed 1957 49,1719 569,688 St. Joseph River, MI Completed 1975 54,555 19,185 Tawas Bay Harbor, MI Completed 1996 2,110,745 88,449 Washington Island, WI Completed 1950 62,838 103,169 Whitefish Point Harbor, MI Completed 1991 771,639 438,443 'Includes $92,774 for previous projects. 2Includes $18,889 for previous projects. 3Includes $56,500 Contributed Funds. 4Excludes $27,800 for previous projects. 'Excludes $127,000 Contributed Funds. 6Excludes $210,500 Contributed Funds. 7Includes $312,423 for previous projects. 'Includes $36,194 for maint. of previous proj. 9Excludes $7,500 Contributed Funds. 21-79 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 21-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep. 30, 1997 For Last Full Report See Annual Construction Operation & Project Status Report for Maintenance Kalamazoo River (Battle Creek) MI'S Deferred 1975 4,471,235 -- Paw Paw Lake, MI Completed 1989 3,589,000 - Upper River Rouge, MI3 Inactive 1968 7,935 -- River Rouge, MI Completed 1981 31,960,332"- 'Includes $108,335 Contributed Funds. 'Uncompleted portion deauthorized Dec. 31, 1989, in accordance with 'Planning usdefinitely suspended due to lack of Section 1001 of the W.R.D.A. of 1986 (PL 99-662). local cooperation. TABLE 21-F MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER ST. MARYS RIVER, MI: EXISTING PROJECT (SEE SECTION 54 OF TEXT) Lock Davis Sabin MacArthur New Poe Miles Above Mouth 47 47 47 47 Clear Width of Chamber Feet 80 80 80 110 Length Between Gate Quoins Feet 1,350 1,350 800 1,200 Lifts Feet 21.7 21.7 21.7 21.7 Depth Over Upper Breast Walls' Feet 24.3 24.3 31 32 Depth Over Lower Breast Walls' Feet 23.1 23.1 31 32 Foundation Rock Rock Rock Rock Type of Construction Concrete Concrete Concrete Concrete Estimated Cost $6,200,0002 $3,275,0003 $12,909,440 $39,000,000 Actual Cost $2,200,000 $1,750,0006 $12,718,806 ' $34,813,066 Completed (Open to Commerce) Oct. 21, 1914 Sep. 18, 1919 Jul. 11, 1943 Jun. 26, 1969 Emergency Dam for South Canal North Canal Miles Above Mouth 47 47 Estimated Cost -' $300,000 Type St eel Stoolos Recessed Steel Sto lo s Recessed Into L6ck Masonry Into Lack"Masonry Cost Completed -' $169,224' Year Completed 1943 1922 (Modified 1963) 'At low water datum 600.6 above and 578.4 below. 2Includes cost of North Canal. 'Includes cost of canal excavations to provide necessary approaches to lock, canal walls, piers, and emergency dam, $662,919. 'Excludes cost of deepening and enlarging South Canal, $1,653,378. 'Excludes cost of North Canal, $2,572,611. Note: Limiting draft to locks is determined by depth over breast walls. 6Excludes cost of canal excavation to provide necessary approaches to lock, canal walls, piers, and emergency damn, $662,919. 'Excluding cost of lower guard gates which were never installed. 'Including engineering office, and inspection. 9Not separate from cost of locks. 21-80 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Project Beaver Bay, MN (Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act) Berrien County, MI (St.Joseph Shore) beach erosion control (1958 Flood Control Act) Black River Harbor, Alcona County, MI (Authorized Dec.17, 1979, under Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act) Black River Harbor, MI (Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act) Detroit River, Trenton Chnl., MI (May 17, 1950 R&H Act) Detroit River, Trenton Chnl., MI (Uncompleted portion) (Aug. 13, 1968 R&H Act) Duluth-Superior Inner Harbor, MN and WI (Jul. 14, 1960 R&H Act) Forestville Harbor, MI (1968 R&H Act) Grand Haven Harbor, MI (Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act) Grand River at Grandville, MI (Oct. 27, 1965 Flood Control Act) Great Lakes Connecting Channels, MI' (Uncompleted portion) (R&H Acts of 1946 and 1956) Harbors of Washington Island, WI (R&H Act of 1937) Holland Harbor Entrance Channel, MI (Uncompleted portion) (Sep. 3, 1954 R&H Act) Kalamazoo River, Battle Creek, MI (Uncompleted portion) (1954 Flood Control Act) Kalamazoo River, Kalamazoo, MI (Jul. 3, 1958 Flood Control Act) Kenosha Harbor, WI (Uncompleted portion) (Oct. 23, 1962 R&H Act) Kewaunee River, WI (1960 R&H Act) 1982 1963 1971 1976 1976 1976 1990 1969 1976 1966 1990 1950 1962 1975 1975 1990 1976 Jul 1995 Nov 1986 Dec 1989 Nov 1977 Aug 1977 Dec 1989 Dec 1989 Nov 1986 Nov 1977 Nov 1977 Dec 1989 Dec 1989 Dec 1989 Dec 1989 Dec 1989 Dec 1989 Aug 1977 295,818 0 0 0 0 159,300,000 14,562,100 0 0 0 93,993,349 62,838 0 6,656,668 416,822 552,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 108,332 43,000 0 21-81 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 21-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds PRreopjoerctt F or Deauthorized Expended Expended Project Lansing (Grand Rivet), MI 1971 Jun 1981 7,000 0 (Jul. 3, 1958 Flood Control Act) Lower Fox River, \HI 1990 Dec 1989 3,753,334 0 (Uncompleted A-tion) (Mar. 3, 1925 R&H Act) Lutsen Harbor, MN 1990 Jul 1995 357,000 0 (Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Act) Manitowoc Harbor, WI 1990 Dec 1989 0 0 (Oct. 23, 1962 R&H Act) Milwaukee Outer Harbor, WI 1990 Dec 1989 6,937,804 478,000 (Uncompleted portion) (R&H Act of 1935) Northport Harbor, WI -- Dec 1989 132,000 0 (Authorized in 1972 under Section 201 of the 1965 Flood Control Act) Ontonagon Harbor, MI 1990 Dec 1989 27,482 0 (R&H Act of 1962) Pentwater Harbor, MI 1976 Nov 1977 0 0 (Jul. 13, 1892 R&H Act) Racine Harbor, WI 1963 May 1986 9,441,554 0 (Mar. 2, 1907; Aug. 26, 1937; and Mar. 2, 1945 R&H Acts, and Section 107 of the 1960 R&H Act) Red Run Drain, Lower Clinton River, MI 1983 Nov 1986 3,823,000 0 (1970 Flood Control Act) Rogers City Harbor, MI 1926 Aug 1977 5,892 0 (Jun. 25, 1910 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI 1976 Aug 1977 22,000 0 (Oct 23, 1962 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI 1976 Aug 1977 12,000 0 (Jul. 3, 1958 R&H Act) Rouge River, MI 1976 Aug 1977 0 0 (Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act) Saginaw River, MI 1983 May 1997 5,125,000 1,611,500 (Midland on Tittabawassee River) St. Clair River Compensating Works, MI J 976 Aug 1977 0 0 (Jul. 3, 1930 R&H Act) South Milwaukee Harbor, WI 1906 Aug 1977 0 0 (1836 Flood Control Act) 21-82 TABLE 21-G (Continued) DETROIT, MI DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Project St. Marys River (MacArthur Lock Guard Gates), MI (Mar. 7, 1942 R&H Act) Two Rivers Harbor, WI (Uncompleted portion) (Aug. 30, 1935 R&H Act) 'Includes Detroit and St. Clair Rivers. 1977 1990 Oct 1978 Dec 1989 147,463 21-83 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 21-H FEATURES OF EXISTING PROJECT Miles Upbound Project Length of from or Down- Project Project Datum Planes Year Channel River bound Width Depth IGLD 1985 Com- Name of Channel (Feet) Mouth Vessels (Feet) (Feet) (Feet) plete DETROIT RIVER, MI (SEE SECTION 1 ' OF TEXT) Channel north of Belle Isle' Channel at head of Detroit River Misc. shoals and obstructions Belle Isle to Fighting Island Channel Fighting Island Channel Ballards Reef Channel north of junction with Livingstone Channel Livingstone Channel Upper Livingstone Channel Lower: CS 260+00 to 368+87 CS 368+87 to 492+00 East Outer Channel Misc. shoals and obstructions, Detroit River to Pelee Passage Pelee Passage Shoal Amherstberg Channel: Upper Section, Ballards Reef Channel Middle Section Lower Section, Hackett Range West Outer Channel Trenton Channel: Wyandotte Reach Trenton Channel (Upper) Trenton Reach (Lower) Grosse Ile Shoal 2 38,800 44,500 30 32 25 24,800 17 12,200 12 26,000 10 Down 450 10,887 12,313 42,000 .-- 6,500 12,000 24,000 21,000 31,500 5,100 600 600 5 -"-- --- 10 --- --- 17 14 --- 14 ST. CLAIR RIVER, MI (SEE SECTION 52 OF TEXT) Channel at foot of Lake Huron Channel north of Blue Water Bridge Port Huron to Stag Island: Widening at Upper and Lower Ends of Stag Island St. Clair to Russell Island Russell Island to Southeast Bend Southeast Bend: CS 324+00 to 250+00 Cutoff Channel North Channel Outlet 26,500 44 Both 800 4,100 39 Both 800 38,000 37,600 77,000 20,600 7,400 30,300 8.000 38 31 24 11 5 --- Both Both Both Both Both Both Small Craft 1,000-1,400 900-1,000 1,000 700-1,000 700 700 100 'This is a side channel. 2Extends from deep water near Windmill Point to a point opposite Fairview Slip, about 3,000 feet. 'Project depth 29.5 feet over Rock Shoals and 28.5 feet over other than Rock Shoals. 4Project depth 21 feet in easterly 300-foot width of channel and 27.5 feet in westerly 300-foot width. 5Project depth 21 feet in easterly 300-foot width of channel and 28.5 feet in westerly 300-foot width. 6Project complete except for work authorized by Rivers and Harbors Act of 1950. 21-84 Both 230 Both 80f Both - - Both 80u Both 600 Down Both Both Both --- --- Both 21.0 28.5 28.5 28.5 28.5 27.7 29.0 29.0 28.5 28.5-29.53 29.5 27.5 21-27.54 21-28.55 22.0 27.0 28.0 28.0 20.0 571.9 572.1-571.5 571.5-570.9 570.4 570.4 570.4-569.2 569.2 569.2 569.2 569.2 569.2 570.4-570.1 570.1-569.5 569.5-569.2 569.2 570.3-570.2 570.2-569.4 570.4 450-800 800-1,200 1,200 600 600 600 800 300 300 250-300 1964 1964 1964 1962 1964 1964 1961 1961 1964 1964 1960 1960 1960 1929 19646 1964 1941 1904 Up Up Up Down Local Local Local Local 30.0 30.0 27.4 27.3 27.3 27.2 27.1 27.1 10.0 577.5-577.1 577.1-576.5 577.1-575.3 575.3-574.3 574.3-572.6 572.6-572.3 572.3-572.2 572.2 572.2 1961 1962 1961 1962 1962 1962 1962 1962 DETROIT, MI DISTRICT TABLE 21-I FOX RIVER, WI: LOCKS AND DAMS (SEE SECTION 13 OF TEXT) Depth at Normal Pool Name of Lock and Dam DePere lock' DePere dam' Little Kaukauna lock2 Little Kaukauna damn2 Rapide Croche lock Rapide Croche dam2 Kaukauna fifth lock2 Kaukauna fourth lock2 Kaukauna thirdlo ck' Kaukauna second lock2 Kaukauna first lock2 Kaukauna dam2 Kaukauna guard lock Little Chute combined lock: Lower Upper Little Chute second lock2 Luttle Chute first (guard) lock' Little Chute dam' Cedars lock2 Cedars dam' Appleton fourth lock2 Appleton lower dam2 Appleton third lock 2 Appleton second lock2 Appelton first lock2 Appleton upper dam Menasha lock2 Menasha dam Miles from Green Nearest Bay Town 7.1 DePere 7.2 DePere 13.0 DePere 13.1 DePere 19.2 Wrightstown 19.3 Wrightstown 22.8 Kaukauna 23.1 Kaukauna 23.3 Kaukauna 23.4 Kaukauna 23.6 Kaukauna 24.0 Kaukauna 24.0 Kaukauna 24.4 Little Chute 25.4 Little Chute 26.4 Little Chute 26.5 Little Chute 26.6 Little Chute 27.3 Little Chute 27.4 Little Chute 30.7 Appelton 30.9 Appleton 31.3 Appleton 31.6 Appleton 31.9 Appleton 32.2 Appleton 37.0 Menasha 37.8 Menasha Distance (miles) 6622 ---. --- --- --- -- --- ---. Clear Width (feet) 36.0 36.0 36.0 35.6 36.6 30.6 35.0 35.1 40.0 35.4 36.3 35.0 35.4 35.0 35.0 3355..00 35.1 35.0 35.4 Available Breast Length Lift Wall' (feet) (feet) (feet) 146.0 8.9 10.3 146.0 7.2 8.0 146.0 8.3 8.8 144.0 9.1 6.7 144.1 10.2 6.9 144.0 10.2 6.9 144.0 9.6 6.0 144.4 11.0 6.9 -- --- 9.4 146.5 10.9 6.0 144.1 10.6 7.6 144.2 13.8 8.0 - -- 6.6 144.0 9.8 6.8 144.0 7.6 8.1 144.0 8.7 6.0 144.6 9.6 6.9 144.7 10.0 6.6 144.0 8.5 7.2 Lower Miter Sill Character of Kind of Type of (feet) Foundation Dam Construction 12.0 Rock -- Concrete --- Rock Fixe " Concrete 9.5 Clay - Concrete - Clay and gravel Fixed3" PIers and concrete 9.3 Rock --- Coitcae -- Rock Fixed3' Concrete 9.3 Rock - Composite 6.0 Rock - Stone masonry 6.3 Rock - Stone masonry 6.0 Rock -- Stone masonry 6.0 Rock - Stone masonry --- Rock Fixed'' Concrete --- Rock -- Stone masonry 8.6 Rock 6.0 Hardpan 6.1 Rock -- Rock --- Rock 7.3 Rock - Rock 7.9 Rock --- Rock 8.6 Rock 6.0 Clay 6.0 Rock - Rock 8.0 Clay - Hardpan -- Stone masonry -- Stone masonry -- Stone masonry -- Stone masonry Fixed '4 Concrete --- Stone masonry Fixed ' " Concrete - Stone masonry Fixed' Concrete --- Stone masonry -- Stone masonry --- Stone masonry Fixed' Concrete - Composite Fixed' Concrete Year Corn- Actual plete Cost 1936 $229,308 1929 209,536 1938 362,427 1926 179,398 1934 228,738 1930 118,975 1898 13,310' 1879 37,536 1879 39,948 1903 24,313 1883 38,704 1931 123,763 1891 12,630 1879 102,304 1879 - 1881 48,555 1904 7,817' 1932 82,554 1888 34,972 1933 84,973 1907 40,893 1934 73,903 1900 32,238 1901 22,940 1884 36,004 1940 151,558 1899 19,326 1937 84,686 'Depth shown is on breast wall, which is controlling depth for upper pool. zOriginal structure built prior to assumption of control by United States on Sep. 18, 1872. 'Provided with sluices. 'Flash boards used. 'Partially rebuilt. 21-85 _ Depth at Normal Pool REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 RECONNAISSANCE & CONDITION SURVEYS Date Survey Conducted ALGOMA HARBOR, WI ALPENA HARBOR, MI BAYFIELD HARBOR, WI BIG BAY HARBOR, MI BIG SUAMICO RIVER, WI BOLLES HARBOR, MI CASEVILLE HARBOR, MI DETOUR HARBOR, MI EAGLE HARBOR, MI GRAND MARAIS HARBOR, MN GRAND TRAVERSE BAY HBR, MI GREILICKVILLE HARBOR, MI KNIFE RIVER, MN LA POINTE HARBOR, WI LES CHENEAUX HARBOR, MI MACKINAW CITY HARBOR, MI MARQUETTE HARBOR, MI PENSAUKEE HARBOR, WI PORT WING HARBOR, MI TAWAS BAY HARBOR, MI WASHINGTON ISLAND, WI WHITEFISH POINT HARBOR, MI JUNE 1997 OCTOBER 1996 JUNE 1997 AUGUST 1997 JUNE 1997 APRIL, MAY 1997 SEPTEMBER 1997 JUNE 1997 JULY 1997 OCTOBER 1996 JULY 1997 SEPTEMBER 1997 JUNE 1997 JULY 1997 JULY 1997 JULY 1997 APRIL 1997 JULY 1997 JUNE 1997 JULY 1997 SEPTEMBER 1997 JUNE 1997 21-86 TABLE 21-J Name of Proiect u - - ......... v. a avvv, N CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT * CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT The district comprises Cook, McHenry, Lake, Kane, DuPage, and Will Counties in Illinois, and Lake and Porter Counties in Indiana, and a portion of La Porte County along Lake Michigan in Indiana. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Burns Waterway Harbor, IN 2. Burns Waterway SBH, IN 3. Burns Waterway Harbor (Major Rehab), IN 4. Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN 5. Chicago Harbor, IL 6. Chicago River, IL 7. Indiana Harbor, IN 8. Lake Michigan Diversion 9. Michigan City Harbor, IN 10. Waukegan Harbor, IL 11. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys 12. National Emergency Preparedness Alterations of Bridges 13. Other Authorized Bridge Alterations Beach Erosion Control 14. Casino Beach, IL 15. Chicago Shoreline, IL 16. Illinois Beach State Park, IL 17. Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore Bank Protection, Beverly Shores, IN 18. Indiana Shoreline Erosion, IN 19. Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects 20. Beach Erosion Control Under Special Authorization 22-10 Flood Control 21. Chicago River, IL (North Branch) 22. Kankakee River Ice Management 23. Lake George, Hobart, IN 24. Little Calumet River, IN 25. Little Calumet River Basin, Cady Marsh Ditch, IN 26. McCook and Thornton Reservoirs, IL 27. North Branch, Chicago River, IL 28. O'Hare Reservoir, IL 29. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 30. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization 22-14 General Investigations 31. Surveys Page 22-3 22-3 22-4 22-4 22-4 22-5 22-6 22-6 22-7 22-7 22-8 22-8 22-8 22-8 22-9 22-9 22-9 22-10 22-10 22-10 22-11 22-11 22-11 22-12 22-12 22-13 22-14 22-14 Page 22-15 32. Collection and Study of Basic Data 22-1 22-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLES Table Title Number Cost and Financial Statement Authorization Legislation Existing Projects Other Authorized Bridge Alterations Other Authorized Beach Erosion Projects Other Authorized Flood Control Projects Deauthorized Projects 22-D 22-A 22-B 22-C 22-E 22-F 22-G 22-27 Pages 22-16 thru-19 22-20 thru 24 22-25 thru 26 22-27 22-27 22-28 22-2 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT Navigation 1. BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana on the southern shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, 28 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14905 and 14926.) Previous Projects. None. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a rubblemound north breakwater 4,630 feet long and a rubblemound breakwater west arm 1,200 feet long, for a total breakwater length of 5,830 feet; (b) an approach channel 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide; (c) an outer harbor 28 feet deep; (d) an east harbor arm 27 feet deep and 620 feet wide; and (e) a west harbor arm 27 feet deep and 620 feet wide. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of October 27, 1965 (Public Law 89-298; House Document Number 160, 88th Congress, 1st Session). The authorizing act also provided the Secretary of the Army with the authority to reimburse the State of Indiana for expenditure of funds used to construct such portions of the project as approved by the Chief of Engineers and constructed under the supervision of the Chief of Engineers (See tables 22-B,C). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Eleven berths are available at the facilities owned and administered by the Indiana Port Commission. One berth, committed to grain, is located on the outer harbor. Four berths on the East Harbor Arm are dedicated to handling dry and liquid bulk commodities. The East Harbor Arm also includes a small-boat harbor designed to accommodate working tugs for vessel assistance and barge movement. On the West Arm there are six berths. Although one berth is available for dry bulk cargoes, these berths are primarily used for the shipment and receipt of general cargo. Additionally, the Indiana Port Commission, through a lease, administers the west side of the West Harbor Arm for barge fleeting. The remaining available harbor berthing on the east side of the East Harbor Arm is privately owned. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Sediment surveys and studies were performed at a cost of $6,377, including costs of monitoring beach nourishment dredging disposal site, Major Rehabilitation reports were continued at a cost of $15,023. Engineering and design costs were 30,774. Breakwater maintenance costs were $24,007 for hired labor, $3,622 by other Corps of Engineers, and $569,646 by contract. Channel maintenance dredging was conducted at a cost of $310,000 by contract. Project administration and real estate costs were $45,499 and $4140, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project is complete. Total costs to September 30, 1997 were $24,651,976 of which $13,599,900 was for new work ($13,584,000 federal and $15,900 non-federal) and $11,052,076 ($10,943,714 federal and $108,362 non-federal) for was maintenance. 2. BURNS WATERWAY SBH, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, at the mouth of the Burns Waterway, approximately 27 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14905 and 14926.) Previous Projects. None Existing Project. Provides for (a) a rubblemound west breakwater 1,043 feet long; (b) a rubblemound north breakwater 678 feet long; and (c) channel improvements of 5,200 linear feet with 145,000 cubic yards of dredged material used for beach nourishment (See table 22-C). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are several marinas located along Burns Waterway and Burns Ditch. The commodities handled at this harbor are fresh fish caught as a result of charter boat fishing. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Breakwater maintenance costs were $1308 for hired labor. Engineering and design, and project management costs were $208 and $618 respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1997 were $5,040,319 of which $3,770,558 was for new work ($2,000,000 federal and $1,770,558 non-federal), and $1,269,76 for maintenance. 3. BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR (MAJOR REHAB), IN 22-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Location. The project is located in northwestern Indiana on the southern shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County. Existing Project. The rehabilitation project consists of constructing a segmented reef breakwater system, 75 feet lakeward of the northern section of the existing rubblemound breakwater. The project provides for seven reef segments, one 1,575 feet long and six 375 feet long with 25 feet spacing between segments. Estimated federal cost (1997) for new work is $13,800,000. Local Cooperation. None required. Operations and Results During the Period. New Work: Construction was continued at a cost of $3,357,825. Engineering and design costs were $13,499. The construction and project management costs were $105,819 and $22,225, respectively, and real estate costs were $1,270. Condition at the End of Fiscal Year. Work on the construction contract was continued. The total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1997 was $9,427,809. 4. CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL and IN Location. Northeastern Illinois, on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Cook County, 15 miles south of Chicago Harbor, within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago, except for breakwaters, and approach channel and an anchorage area which are in Indiana. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926 and 14929.) Previous Projects. For details see page 1400 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone-filled timber crib breakwater 6,714 feet long; (b) a stonefilled double-row steel sheet pile detached breakwater 5,007 feet long; (c) an approach channel 29 feet deep and 3,200 feet wide; (d) an outer harbor anchorage area 28 feet deep and 3,000 feet wide; (e) an entrance channel 27 feet deep and 230 to 290 feet wide; (f) a channel in the Calumet River 27 feet deep and at least 200 feet wide to the north side of 130th Street; (g) three turning basins designated as numbers, 1, 3, and 5; and (h) a channel extending into Lake Calumet at a width of about 1,000 feet. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1899, June 13, 1902, August 30, 1935, July 14, 1960, October 23, 1962, and October 27, 1965 (See tables 22-B,C). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Thirty six docks, wharves, and terminals are available. The Illinois International Port District owns four wharves, two grain elevators, one dock, and one terminal. The United States Government owns one stone dock. The most important cargoes handled are grain, iron ore and concentrates, coal, and lignite. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Repair of the garage was continued at a cost of $4,274. Sediment surveys and studies were performed by hired labor at a cost of $34,288 and project condition surveys at a cost of $45,316. Environmental dredging studies and environmental compliance inspections were conducted at costs of $62,954 and $10,640 respectively. Confined Disposal Facility (CDF) water quality monitoring was continued at a cost of $20,158. CDF maintenance costs were $58,368 for hired labor, $13,935 by contract and $37,242 by other Corps of Engineers. Repair of the CDF dike was performed by other Corps of Engineers at a cost of $140,000, and costs for routine operation of the CDF were $49,193. Costs for breakwater maintenance were $12,787 for hired labor, $6,275 by contract, and $140,000 by other Corps of Engineers. Engineering costs for monitoring the CDF were $2,186. Project management and real estate costs were $36,207 and $517, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project is 100 percent complete. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1997, were $61,492,295 of which $22,578,567 was for new work ($19,541,964 federal funds and $3,036,603 public works funds), $32,649,060 for maintenance, $836,667 non-federal funds for maintenance, and $5,428,001 federal funds for rehabilitation. 5. CHICAGO HARBOR, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Cook County, within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926, 14927, and 14928.) Previous Projects. See page 1396 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone-filled timber crib shore and extension breakwater 2,250 feet 22-4 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT long; (b) a stone-filled timber crib exterior breakwater 5,421 feet long; (c) a rubblemound and stone-filled concrete caisson southerly extension to the exterior breakwater 4,944 feet long, exclusive of a 582-foot entrance gap enclosing an outer basin of about 970 acres; (d) a stone-filled timber crib north pier 960 feet long; (e) a stone-filled timber crib north inner breakwater 4,034 feet long with a 304-foot shore return and a 754-foot gap; (f) a stone-filled timber crib south inner breakwater 2,544 feet long, enclosing an inner basin of approximately 224 acres; (g) a lake approach channel 29 feet deep and 800 feet wide; (h) a channel and maneuver area inside the exterior breakwater and southerly extension breakwater 28 feet deep with a maximum width of 1,300 feet; (i) an entrance channel 21 feet deep and (j) the Chicago Harbor Lock. The Chicago Lock was constructed in 1938 by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. The deep-draft lock is 600 feet long, 80 feet wide, and 23 feet deep over the sill and is of steel cellular design. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of July 11, 1870, June 14, 1880, March 3, 1899, July 25, 1912, March 2, 1919 and October 23, 1962 (See table 22-B). Operation and maintenance responsibilities in the interest of navigation were transferred to the Federal Government pursuant to Public Law 98-63 approved July 30, 1983; Section 107 of the Public 97-88; and the Memorandum of Agreement between the Department of Army and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are five docks with 18 berths for passenger excursion boats and 10 berths for visiting large vessels. The most important cargoes handled through the lock are petroleum products, in addition to sugar and non-metallic minerals. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Formal periodic inspections and project condition surveys were conducted at costs of $131,915 and $22,785 respectively. The lock was operated by contract at a cost of $778,362. Other costs associated with the lock operation were $490,259. Operation of the lock property cost $11,145. Lock maintenance costs to include slot construction, bulkhead fabrication, lifting beam construction, gate parts and wave gage were $102,478 for hired labor and in-house resources, $2,151,166 by contract, $608,396 by other government agencies and $381,884 by other Corps of Engineers. Supervision and administration costs were $193,157. Engineering and design costs for the lifting beam, slot construction, bulkhead construction, test dewatering and gate roller were $241,873. Breakwater maintenance costs were $54,743. Continuing data evaluation of the wave gage was performed at $12,011 hired labor and $62,617 by other Corps of Engineers. Project management and real estate costs were $124,442 and $9,097, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project is complete. Total costs to September 30, 1997 were $41,815,249 of which $4,788,827 was for new work, $35,539,822 was for maintenance, $1,326,600 for rehabilitation and $160,000 Harbor and Dams funds. 6. CHICAGO RIVER, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois, in Cook County within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926, 14927 and 14928.) Previous Projects. See page 1394 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a channel 21 feet deep in the main river from its mouth at Rush Street to the junction of the North and South Branches (0.7 miles); (b) a channel 21 feet deep in the North Branch from the junction to North Avenue (2.22 miles); (c) a channel 21 feet deep on the North Branch Canal (1.04 miles); (d) a 21-foot deep North Branch Turning Basin just south of North Avenue; and (e) a channel 9 feet deep in the North Branch from North Avenue to Addison Street (authorized but not constructed). The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1899, June 13, 1902, March 2, 1907, and July 24, 1946 (See tables 22-B, C). The portion of the project authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1946 is presently being restudied to confirm economic feasibility. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed modifications. The River and Harbor Act of July 24, 1946, which provided for the improvement of the channel, is subject to the condition that local interests furnish assurances that they will hold the United States government free from damages which may result from construction and maintenance of the improvement. Requirement has not been complied with. 22-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Terminal Facilities. Six docks are available. The most important cargoes handled are sand, gravel and crushed rock, non-metallic minerals and scrap iron. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Sediment surveys and other studies were performed by hired labor at a cost of $1,660. Water quality activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $3,557. Water control activities were performed by hired labor at a cost of $78,695, by other Corps of Engineers at a cost $21,000 and by other federal agency at a cost of $176,353. Program management cost was $21,063. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The project is complete except for dredging the channel between North Avenue and Addison Street as authorized by the 1946 River Harbor Act. Channel maintenance for the reach from Clark Street to head of navigation has been deferred pending location and approval of suitable dredged material disposal site. Head of navigation for deep-draft vessels is North Avenue, 5.97 miles from the Michigan Avenue bridge. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1997 were $16,990,863 of which $1,500,565 was for new work and $15,490,298 was for maintenance. 7. INDIANA HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Lake County, 19 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926 and 14929.) Previous Projects. For details see page 1943 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1520 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a northerly rubblemound breakwater 1,120 feet long; (b) an easterly concrete capped caisson breakwater 201 feet long with a rubblemound extension 2,324 feet long; (c) a lake approach channel 29 feet deep and 800 feet wide; (d) an anchorage and maneuver basin 28 feet deep; (e) a main canal entrance channel 27 feet deep and 280 feet wide; (f) a main canal 22 feet deep; (g) a turning basin 22 feet deep; (h) the Forks Turning Basin 22 feet deep; (i) the Lake George Branch 22 feet deep; and (j) the Calumet River Branch 22 feet deep. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of March 4, 1913, March 2, 1919, March 20, 1922, July 3, 1930, August 30, 1935, August 28, 1937, and July 14, 1960 (See tables 22-B, C). Local Cooperation. Substantially complied with. See FY 1986 Annual Report for full requirements. Terminal Facilities. Fifteen docks and wharves are available. Six docks handle iron ore and limestone. Six docks are for handling petroleum products and three docks for handling gypsum, scrap metal and steel, and bulk products. However, not all docks are presently being used for the shipment or receipt of waterborne commodities. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Environmental studies were performed by hired labor at a cost of $31,920, and by contract at a cost of $30,759 and sediment surveys costs were $36,121. Maintenance of the breakwater was performed by hired labor at a cost of $25,813. Engineering and design costs of Confined Disposal Facility were $345,325 for hired labor, $44,625 by other Corps of Engineers, $10,260 by other federal agency, and $58,818 by contract. Program management and real estate costs were $23,882 and $2,993, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal year. The existing project is complete. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1997 were $17,703,578 of which $4,909,648 ($4,897,148 federal and $12,500 nonfederal contributed funds) was for new work and $12,793,930 was for maintenance. Channel maintenance has been deferred pending location and construction of suitable Confined Disposal Facility. 8. LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION Location. Northeastern Illinois on the southwest shore of Lake Michigan in Cook County, within the corporate limits of the City of Chicago. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14926, 14927, and 14928.) Previous Projects. See page 22-3 of Annual Report for 1988. Operations and Results During Period. Operations: Water accounting studies and preparation of reports were performed at costs of $323,153 by hired labor, $110,450 by other federal agency, $54,498 by other Corps of Engineers and $12,296 by AE contract. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1997 was $3,083,742. 22-6 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT 9. MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan in La Porte County, 38 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14905 and 14926.) Previous Projects. See page 1407 of Annual Report for 1992. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a stone-filled timber crib detached breakwater 1,304 feet long; (b) a pile and steel sheeting west pier 835 feet long; (c) a stone-filled timber crib, pile and steel sheeting east pier 2,276 feet long; (d) a stone-filled timber crib east breakwater 1,000 feet long; (e) an entrance channel 18 feet deep and 425 feet wide; (f) a turning basin No. 1, 18 feet deep; (g) a channel in Trail Creek 18 feet deep; (h) an outer basin 12 feet deep in the northerly portion and 8 feet deep in the southerly portion; and (i) a channel in Trail Creek 6 feet deep and 50 feet wide from turning basin No. 2 to the E Street bridge. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of March 3, 1899, March 3, 1905, January 21, 1927, August 30, 1935, and Section 107 of July 14, 1960, River and Harbor Acts, September 30, 1966 (See tables 22-B, C). Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. There are several marinas in the lower mile of Trail Creek. The commodity handled at this harbor is fresh fish. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Sediment surveys and studies were continued by hired labor at a cost of $4,611 and by other federal agency at a cost of $3,446. Breakwater maintenance was performed at a cost of $13,344 and Confined Disposal Facility maintenance costs were $5,940 Program management and real estate costs were $17,823 and $784, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total costs of existing project to September 30 1997 were $15,003,611, of which $1,574,158 was for new work ($1,543,646 federal and $30,512 non-federal funds), $11,755,783 for maintenance, $1,618,670 for rehabilitation and $55,000 contributed funds. 10. WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois on the west shore of Lake Michigan in Lake County, 38 miles north of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14904 and 14905.) Previous Projects. See page 1392 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing Project. Provides for (a) a northerly stonefilled timber crib breakwater 588 feet long; (b) a stonefilled reinforced concrete caisson shore connection 270 feet long; (c) a stone-filled double-row steel sheeting shore connection 640 feet long; (d) a single-row steel sheeting shore connection 398 feet long; (e) a stonefilled timber crib north pier 998 feet long; (f) a singlerow steel sheet piling north pier 444 feet long; (g) a steel piling revetment 632 feet long; (h) a stone-filled timber crib pier 1,399 feet long; (i) a stone-filled double-row pile and sheeting south pier 1,712 feet long; (j) an entrance channel 22 feet deep and 390 feet wide; (k) a channel between the piers 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide; (1) an inner basin 18 feet deep; and (m) an anchorage area in the southwest corner of the inner basin 8 feet deep. An authorized, but as yet unconstructed project modification provides for (a) an entrance channel 27 feet deep, (b) a channel between the piers 23 feet deep and (c) an inner basin and channel extension 23 feet deep. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Acts of June 3, 1902, July 13, 1930, and March 2, 1945, and on December 17,1970 by delegated authority under Section 201 of the Rivers and Harbor Act of October 27, 1965. (See tables 22-B, C). The portion of the project authorized by the 1970 modification is being restudied to confirm economic feasiblity. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portions. The Dec. 17, 1970 modification, which provides for modifications to the channel, is subject to the conditions that local interests furnish assurances that they will hold the United States government free from damages from construction and maintenance of the improvement and that certain lands, easements and rights-of-way be provided. Terminal Facilities. Four docks are available. The commodities handled at this harbor are gypsum and building cement. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: Sediment surveys and environmental studies were performed at costs of $14,010 and $28,871 respectively. Environmental studies for the Confined Disposal Facility (CDF) were conducted at a cost of$160,603. Plans and specifications for dredging the outer harbor were performed by hired labor at a cost of $79,491. Dredging was performed at a contract 22-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 cost of $196,381 and supervision and administration costs were $28,304. Other costs associated with the dredging were $13,744. Breakwater maintenance costs were $58,388. Project management and real estate costs were $94,537 and $599, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project is complete except for the 1970 modification, which is being restudied. Maintenance of the channel between the pier to the head of navigation has been deferred pending location, approval and probable construction of a suitable dredged material disposal site. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1997 were $14,673,554 of which $823,026 was for new work and $13,850,538 was for maintenance. 11. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Work on the Little Calumet River Basin, Dyer, ($24,713); Kankakee River Basin, Illinois ($82,267); and the Southeast Chicago, Illinois ($34,876) reconnaissance reports were completed at a cost of $141,856. Condition surveys were performed at a cost of $106,765. 12. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS Fiscal Year 1997 costs for management and mobilization planning were $35,354. Alteration of Bridges 13. OTHER AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATIONS See table 22-D. Beach Erosion Control 14. CASINO BEACH, IL Location. Casino Beach is located along the Lake Michigan shoreline at Jackson Park in Chicago, Illinois. Existing Project. The Casino Beach project was authorized by Section 501 (a) of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. The project consists of rehabilitating 1,800 feet of the Casino jetty by encasing the existing timber pile and stone structure in steel sheet piling and a concrete cap. The estimated cost (1997) for new work is $8,720,000 of which $4,280,000 is federal and $4,440,000 is nonfederal. Local Cooperation. The local project sponsor is the Chicago Park District. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-ofway; complete all necessary relocations; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction or operation of the project; operate and maintain the completed project; and make cash contribution toward the cost of construction. Operations and Results During Period. New Work: Construction activities were completed on the contract for the base bid plus two options for 1,000 feet of the breakwater at a construction cost of $1,062,206 of which $455,515 was federal and $606,691 nonfederal. Real estate management costs were $7,671 (federal). Engineering and design costs were $14,600 ($7,491 federal and $7,109 non-federal). Construction management costs were $171,421 ($108,488 federal and $62,973 non-federal). Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction was continued. The total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1997 was $4,567,152 of which is $2,610,245 federal and $1,956,907 non-federal. 15. CHICAGO SHORELINE, IL Location. The project area includes 24 miles of publicly owned shoreline along Lake Michigan in Chicago, Illinois. Existing Project. The Chicago Shoreline project is not authorized. The Federally supportable plan consists of constructing rubblemound revetments along 16,500 and 21,500 feet of the shoreline in the Lincoln Park and Burnham Park areas, respectively. Other project features include: revetments near the Adler Planetarium and at Meigs Field; a low concrete floodwall with detachable flashboards along Lake Shore Drive in the Oak Street Beach area; a breakwater to protect the South Filtration Plant near 78th Street; 22-8 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT and nourishment of a short reach of shoreline near Fullerton Avenue and 31st Street. The estimated fully funded project cost for this plan (1997) is $269,000,000. The local sponsor prefers to substitute steel sheet pile step stone revetments for the rubblemound revetments in the Lincoln and Burnham Park areas. They have agreed to pay the increased cost above the federally supportable plan. Local Cooperation. By letters dated February 2, 1993 and March 1, 1993, the Chicago Park District and the City of Chicago, respectively indicated their willingness to be the local project sponsors. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; complete all necessary relocations; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction or operation of the project; operate and maintain the completed project; and make cash contribution toward the cost of construction. Operations and Results During Period. New Work: Construction on Reach 5, South Water Purification Plant breakwater, was initiated by the local sponsor. A total of $2,200,000 was spent to reimburse the local sponsor for Reach 5 construction; $38,681 was expended for construction management for district oversight of local sponsor construction. Engineering and design costs of $1,338,148 were expended on Reaches 3 and 4, incluing $305,336 for A-E contracts; real estate costs were $18,749 and project management costs were $5,115. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction was initiated on Reach 5 and engineering and design continue on Reaches 3 and 4. The total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1997 was $5,553,693. 16. ILLINOIS BEACH STATE PARK, IL Location. Northeastern Illinois on the west shore of Lake Michigan along the 9-mile reach of shoreline immediately south of the Illinois-Wisconsin State line. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14901 and 14904.) Previous Projects. None. Existing Project. Provides for (a) construction of 46 rubblemound, offshore breakwaters approximately 150 feet long and spaced about 300 feet apart; (b) initial beach nourishment consisting of placement of 100,000 cubic yards of coarse graded beach material; and (c) periodic renourishment of 100,000 cubic yards approximately every five years. The project was conditionally authorized in Section 501 (b) of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act subject to a report by the Corps of Engineers and approval by the Secretary of the Army. A Feasibility Review Conference was held in April 1991. As a result, the District Engineer was directed to terminate work on this project and to submit a letter report to the Congress summarizing the feasibility study and the results of the Washington level review. Work on the feasibility report was resumed in FY 1994 as directed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works in response to a letter from Congressman John Porter, 10th Congressional District of Illinois. Local Cooperation. The local project sponsor would be required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; accomplish all required relocations; hold and save the United State free from damages; and provide a cash contribution. Operations and Results During Period. No work effort was accomplished on this project due to lack of funding. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1997 was $11,908. 17. INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE BANK PROTECTION, BEVERLY SHORES, IN Location. Northwestern Indiana, on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan in Porter County, about 35 miles southeast of Chicago Harbor. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14095 and 14926.) Existing Project. Provides for placement of 13,000 feet of stone revetment and periodic repair of riprap to maintain the full length of Lake Front Drive in Beverly Shores, Indiana. The current project was authorized by Public Laws 97-88 and 98-63. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Project lands are held by the National Park Service. Operations and Results During Period. There was no activity on this project in FY 1997. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1997 were $1,264,000 of which $660,000 was for new work and $604,000 was for maintenance. 18. INDIANA SHORELINE EROSION, IN 22-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Location. On the south end of Lake Michigan along a two-mile reach of shore west of Michigan City Harbor, Indiana. (See NOAA Nautical Chart Numbers 14095 and 14926.) Existing Project. The project consists of beach nourishment along approximately two miles of beach between Michigan City Harbor and Beverly Shores, Indiana, requiring an initial placement of 264,500 cubic yards of sand. Periodic replenishment of about 264,500 cubic yards of sand at five year intervals would be required throughout the life of the project. The project was authorized for construction by Section 501 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Estimated federal cost (1996) for new work is $184,000,000, including future beach nourishment. Local Cooperation. None required. Operations and Results During Period. New Work: The construction contract for the initial placement was completed. The construction cost was $1,513,027. Engineering and design costs totaled $252,048. Construction management cost was $77,818. Real estate costs were $3,159. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction was initiated. The total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1997 is $2,627,603. 19. OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS See table 22-E. 20. BEACH EROSION CONTROL UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1962, as amended. None. Flood Control 21. CHICAGO RIVER, IL (NORTH BRANCH) Location. Northern Illinois, in Cook and Lake Counties. Existing Project. Provides for clearing the channel of the North Branch of the Chicago River of fallen trees, roots, and other debris and objects which contribute to the flooding, unsightliness, and pollution of the river. The project extends from Wolf Point in Chicago, Illinois, to its source just south of Rockland Road east of Libertyville, Illinois. The project was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of December 31, 1970 (Section 116) and amended by the River and Harbor Act of March 7, 1974 and the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local Cooperation. The 1970 Act provided that local interests furnish without cost to the United States all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and disposal areas necessary for construction of the project; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction; maintain and operate all works after completion without cost to the United States; and agree to bear all costs in excess of $200,000 for completing construction. The 1974 Act provided that the United States will maintain the channel free of trees, roots, debris and objects at a cost not to exceed $150,000 per year with non-federal interests paying 25 percent of the cost of maintenance. The 1986 Water Resources Development Act changed the cost sharing to require that non-federal interests pay 50 percent of the cost of maintenance plus the cost of disposal. The requirements are fully complied with. Operations and Results During Period. Maintenance: FY 1997 contract costs were $3,550 (federal funds) and $4,315 (non-federal funds). Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1997 was $4,440,584 of which $231,884 was for new work ($191,884 regular funds and $40,000 contributed funds), and $4,208,700 was for maintenance ($2,607,269 federal funds and $1,601,431 non-federal contributed funds). 22. KANKAKEE RIVER ICE MANAGEMENT Location: Northern Illinois in Will County about 3 miles downstream of the City of Wilmington. Existing Project. The project consists of over 1000 lineal feet of triple pipeline running from a cooling pond at the Dresden Island Nuclear Power Station to the Kankakee River; a trailer mounted siphon system consisting of a gas engine and a vacuum pump; a fish screen support structure at the location of the pipe inlets within the cooling pond; and a fish screen. The siphon system is designed to withdraw warm water from the cooling pond and discharge it into the Kankakee River to prevent the build up of ice which results in ice jams that cause flooding of residential property. The demonstration project construction was completed in October 1987 at a construction cost of 22-10 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT $517,116. Engineering and design costs were $146,467 including $69,467 for A-E contracts and $77,000 for hired labor. These funds were provided by CRREL from the River Ice Management Demonstration Research and Development funds. Construction of a permanent fish screen converted the RIM demonstration project into to a permanent project. Local Cooperation. Will County is the local sponsor, having signed the Project Cooperation Agreement in FY 1993. The local sponsor is required to pay twenty-five percent of the cost of the installation of the permanent fish screen. All items of local cooperation have been complied with. Operations and Results During Period. None. The project was turned over to local interests in FY 1994. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The project is 100 percent complete. Total costs of existing project to September 30, 1997 were $59,676 ($45,997 federal funds and $14,679 non-federal) for maintenance. 23. LAKE GEORGE, HOBART, IN Location. Lake George in Hobart, Indiana and Deep River watershed upstream of the lake through Lake Station, Indiana. Existing Project. The project consists of the removal of silt, aquatic growth and other material and the construction of silt traps or other devices to prevent and abate the deposition of sediment. Project was authorized by Section 602 of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986. Local Cooperation. Section 602(b), Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. By letter dated March 9, 1987 the City of Hobart, Indiana indicated that it was a potential local project sponsor and applied for credit for previous work applicable to the project under the provisions of Section 104 (d) of the 1986 WRDA. Operations and Results During Period. New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design was continued at a cost of $98,460. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Preconstruction engineering and design is in progress. Total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1997 is $994,862. 24. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN Location. The Little Calumet River project is located in northwest Indiana between the Illinois- Indiana State line and the Conrail Railroad in east Gary, Indiana. Existing Project. The project consists of replacing 9.5 miles of existing spoil bank levees with 12.2 miles of new levees, floodwalls, closure and appurtenant structures between the Illinois-Indiana State line and Cline Avenue; construction of 9.7 miles of set-back levees in Gary; a diversion structure at Hart Ditch; permanent evacuation of 29 structures in the Black Oak area of Gary; flood proofing 38 residential structures in Gary; modifying 7 miles of channel and 3 accompanying bridge culvert modifications; modifying one highway bridge; construction of 16.8 miles of hiking trails and accompanying recreation support facilities; and preservation of 788 acres of wetlands with wildlife mitigation measures. Estimated federal cost (1997) for new work is $163,000,000; $119,000,000 federal and $44,000,000 is to be contributed by local interests. The project was authorized by Section 401 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The construction contract for Stages II-3A, III and V-1 levee segment and the Stage I-4 demolition contract were completed in FY 1995. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is the Little Calumet River Basin Development Commission. The local cooperation agreement was signed on August 16, 1990. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-ways; provide all required relocations; and hold and save the United States from any damages due to construction or operation of the project. In addition, the local sponsor is required to pay a five percent cash contribution for structural flood control measures, fifty percent for recreation features and twenty-five percent for fish and wildlife enhancements. A memorandum of agreement with the local sponsor to design non-federal improvements was signed on May 20, 1992. Operations and Results During Period. Four contracts for demolition of structures completed; stage I-1 & 2, III and IV; five levee contracts (Stages II-1, II- 2, II-3A, III, V-1) completed; completed Landscaping and 2-3C trench in FY 1996. Continuing construction of Stages II-3B Harrison to Georgia, II-4 Broadway to King, IV-2A Burr St. to Clark, IV-2B between Clark and Chase, II-3c(2) between Grant and Harrison, and Rec. I Design Memorandum completed for West Reach (Cline Ave. to the IL/IN state line) in February 1994. 22-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Continue FDM work on Burr Street betterment levee and pump station contract No. 1. Real estate management costs were $204,747 ($188,716 federal and $16,031 non-federal). Engineering and design costs were $2,498,149 ($2,294,876 federal and $203,273 non-federal) which includes $2,316,854 hired labor ($2,133,145 federal and $183,709 non-federal); $50,903 performed by other Corps of Engineers ($49,804 federal and $1,099 non-federal); $32,873 performed by other federal agency ($32,873 federal and $0 non-federal) and $97,519 by A-E contract ($79,054 federal and $18,465 non-federal). Construction contract costs were $7,075,836 ($6,545,624 federal and $530,212 nonfederal), including $56,995 completed by other federal agency. Construction management costs were $627,699 ($577,367 federal and $50,332 non-federal). Operations and maintenance costs during construction were $50,110. Total federal and non-federal costs were $9,656,693 and $799,848 respectively. The work for the non-federal improvements was continued at a cost of $30,487 for engineering and design and $23,737 for real estate. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Construction is in progress. Total cost of existing project to September 30, 1997 was $53,085,545 for new work. Federal costs total $48,931,805; required non-federal costs total $3,551,535; and non-federal improvements costs total $602,205. 25. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER BASIN, CADY MARSH DITCH, IN Location. Cady Marsh is located in Lake County, Indiana. The Ditch is a tributary of the Little Calumet River system in northwest Indiana and flows through the Towns of Griffith and Highland, Indiana. Existing Project. The Cady Marsh Ditch flood control project was authorized by Section 401 (a) of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. The project provides for diverting flood flows from Cady Marsh Ditch to the Little Calumet River through a diversion system under Arbogast Avenue in Griffith. Specifically, the project consists of improving 1,290 feet of Cady Marsh Ditch between Colfax and Arbogast Avenues in Griffith, constructing approximately 5,000 feet of large conduct pipes under Arbogast Avenue, excavating an open channel approximately 2,850 feet long from the north end of Arbogast Avenue to the Little Calumet River, and constructing interior drainage improvements. Local Cooperation. The local project sponsor is the Town of Griffith, IN. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; complete all required utility relocations; hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction or operation of the project; provide the required interior drainage improvements; operate and maintain the completed project; and make a cash contribution toward the cost of construction. Operations and Results During the Period. New Work: Preconstruction engineering and design was continued at a cost of $17,815. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Preconstruction engineering and design is in progress. The total cost of the existing project to September 30, 1997 was $1,037,813. 26. McCOOK AND THORNTON RESERVOIRS, IL Location. The McCook Reservoir will be located within the communities of McCook and Hodgkins, Illinois at the existing McCook Quarry. The Thornton Reservoir will be located in the community of Thornton, Illinois at the existing Thornton Quarry. Existing Project. The project consists of converting two quarries into flood storage reservoirs. The McCook Reservoir will have a storage volume of 32,100 acre-feet (10.5 billion gallons); the Thornton Reservoir will have a volume of 14,600 acre-feet (4.8 billion gallons). The reservoirs will store floodwater from tunnels constructed or under construction by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago as part of the Tunnel and Reservoir Project (TARP). Estimated project cost (1997) is $654,000,000, including a federal cost for new work of $491,000,000, and $163,000,000 to be contributed by non-federal interests. The project was authorized by Section 3 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988. Local Cooperation. The Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago will be the local sponsor and provide the required local cooperation. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide all required relocations; and hold and save the United States government free from any damages due to construction or operation of the project. In addition, local sponsors are required to pay a cash contribution to bring the total non-federal share of the flood control improvements to twenty-five percent of the total project cost. 22-12 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT Operations and Results During Period. New Work: Engineering and design was continued at a cost of $1,545,463, with $262,149 in hired labor; $1,173,680 for A-E contracts; $52,994 performed by other Corps of Engineers; and $56,640 performed by other federal agency. Real estate and project management costs were $298,926 and $174,458, respectively. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Engineering and design was continued. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1997 were $17,753,217. 27. NORTH BRANCH, CHICAGO RIVER, IL Location. The North Branch Chicago River Basin is located north of the City of Chicago in suburban Cook and Lake Counties. Existing Project. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and consists of constructing two excavated floodwater storage reservoirs on the West Fork and one excavated reservoir on the Middle Fork. Section 401 of the 1986 Act also included authorization to reimburse nonfederal interests 50 percent of the costs of planning and construction for three existing reservoirs on the West Fork, known as Techny Reservoirs, and the existing Mid Fork Reservoir on the Middle Fork. In July 1990, the federal government reimbursed the non-federal interests $4,467,298 for the Techny and Mid Fork Reservoirs. The total federal cost was $4,537,435 for these reservoirs. Reservoir 27 in the Village of Bannockburn, is located on the West Fork, 12.7 miles above its confluence with the North Branch Chicago River. It has a floodwater storage capacity of 525 acrefeet. Reservoir 29A is located 9.6 miles above the mouth of the West Fork and 3.1 miles south of Reservoir 27. The floodwater storage capacity is 575 acre-feet. Two project features, channel relocation and construction of two bridges, are a non-federal responsibility. Reservoir 15 is located near the City of Green Oaks on the Middle Fork, 22.1 miles above its confluence with the North Branch Chicago River. The floodwater storage capacity is 500 acre-feet. The reservoir is approximately 42 feet deep except in the sedimentation pool area which is about 15 feet deeper. Construction of Reservoir 15 was completed in May 1992. Estimated federal cost (1997) for new work is $21,100,000. An additional $13,300,000 will be the required contribution by local interests. The local sponsor has contributed $550,100 for the non-federal improvements for Reservoir 29A. The non-federal clean-up of soils contaminated with lead shot pellets at Reservoir 29A may cost between $6.0 and $8.0 million. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide all required relocations; and hold and save the United States government free from any damages due to construction or operation of the project. In addition, local sponsors are required to pay a cash contribution to bring the total non-federal share of the flood control improvements to twenty-five percent of the total project cost. Operations and Results During Period. New Work: The total FY 1997 cost for Reservoir 29A was $108,255 which included $34,458 for the construction contract, $5,115 ($5,087 federal and -$28 non-federal) for construction management, and $68,682 ($68,682 federal and $0 non-federal) for engineering and design; $28,566 in non-federal funds betterment expended to identify alternatives and develop a letter report for an impact assessment of Reservoir 29A; and the lead shot clean-up cost totaling $8,119 for construction management. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. The existing project is 99 percent complete. Construction of Reservoirs 27 and 29A is complete, except for some limited reservoir side slope stabilization which will be completed once additional funding is obtained. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1997 were $22,606,898, of which $20,309,646 was federal and $2,297,252 was non-federal, excluding the $4,493,298 non-federal cost for the Techny and Mid Fork Reservoirs. A total $549,022 in non-federal funds has been expended on bridge and channel betterments at Reservoir 29A. An additional $6,272,044 in non-federal funds has been expended on investigations in connection with the clean-up of soils contaminated with lead shot pellets at Reservoir 29A. Non-federal betterment funds in the amount of $38,500 were expended for work on an impact assessment. For Reservoir 27, $9,718 was spent to analyze storaage capabilities for additional run-off from the Illinois Tollway Project. 28. O'HARE RESERVOIR, IL Location. The reservoir will be located in an unincorporated portion of Elk Grove Township in Northwestern Cook County, Illinois about 1 mile northwest of Chicago O'Hare International Airport. Existing Project. The project consists of a 1,050 22-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 acre-foot capacity reservoir, excavated to a depth of 80 feet. The reservoir would be constructed at the terminus of the existing system of 6.6 miles of deep tunnels, constructed under the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago Tunnel and Reservoir Project (TARP). Estimated project cost (1997) is $40,000,000 including a federal cost for new work of $30,100,000 and $10,000,000 to be contributed by local interests. The project was authorized by Section 401 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor is the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago. The local cooperation agreement for the first construction contract, creek relocation, was signed on July 31, 1990. The local sponsor is required to provide all lands, easements and rights-of-way; provide all required relocations; and hold and save the United States government free from any damages due to construction or operation of the project. In addition, the local sponsor is required to pay a cash contribution of five percent of the total project costs. The local cooperation agreement for the remainder of the project, reservoir excavation and lining, was signed July 29, 1991. Operations and Results During Period. Construction was continued at a cost of $3,686,889 ($3,156,838 federal and $530,051 non-federal). Real estate management costs were $9,228 ($8,783 federal and $445 non-federal). Engineering and design costs were $539,355 ($516,143 federal and $23,212 nonfederal) which included $781 ($781 federal and $0 non-federal) performed by other Corps of Engineers and $195,436 ($183,038 federal and $12,398 nonfederal) for A-E contract, and $343,138 ($332,324 federal and $10,814 non-federal) for hired labor. Construction management costs were $391,744 ($391,744 federal and $0 non-federal). Total federal and non-federal costs were $4,073,508 and $553,708, respectively. Non-federal improvement costs were $512,189. Condition at End of Fiscal Year. Preconstruction planning and engineering is completed. Construction is in progress. Total costs of the existing project to September 30, 1997 were $30,842,253 for new work. Federal costs total $26,324,867; non-federal costs total $3,990,325; non-federal improvement costs total $527,061. 29. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See table 22-F. 30. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities, repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congressional antecedent legislation). Fiscal Year Costs Program to September 30, 1997 Disaster Preparedness Disaster Assistance (FEMA) $ 136,115 267,985 Emergency bank protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946, Public Law 526, 79th Congress: A total of $10,000 was spent on the Section 14 coordination account. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of Flood Control Act of 1965, as amended: Fiscal year costs were $660,844 federal and $26,487 non-federal for flood control activities. The Kankakee River, Lake and Newton Counties, IN (Sumava Resort) feasibility phase was initiated at a cost of $77,361 federal and $13,516 non-federal. The feasibility phase was initiated for Deer Creek, IL, at a cost of $3,818 and for Stoney Creek, IL, at a cost of $1,790. Construction was initiated for North Libertyville Estates, IL, at a cost of $383,721 federal and $12,971 non-federal. The feasibility phase was continued for Valley View, IL, at a cost of $56,606. The feasibility phase was completed for Fox River, McHenry County, IL, at a cost of $137,548 federal. General Investigations 31. SURVEYS Fiscal Year 1997 costs were $796,785 federal and $252,548 non-federal itemized as follows: Federal Non-federal Flood Damage $ 411,872 $ 68,723 Prevention Studies Shoreline Protection 20,622 Special Studies 0 Review of Authorized Projects 0 Miscellaneous Activities 46,572 Coordination Studies 317,719 (RAP/PAS) 0 0 0 0 183,825 32. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal Year 1997 costs were $47,973 federal and 22-14 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT $2,188 non-federal itemized as follows: Federal Non-federal Flood Plain Management $ 45,973 $2,188 Services Hydrologic Studies 2,000 0 22-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 22-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sept. 30, 1997 1. Burns Waterway Harbor, IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 2. Burns Waterway Small Boat Harbor, IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 3. Burns Waterway Harbor (Major Rehab), IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Chicago Harbor, IL (Federal Funds) TABLE 22-A New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 0 0 13,584,000 13,584,000 797,000 1,628,000 766,000 1,020,000 10,990,104 819,056 1,507,047 890,810 1,009,088 10,943,714 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 125,900 (17,538) 108,362 0 0 0 205,555 80,000 141,000 5,000 221,703 81,794 137,500 2,134 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,747,000 3,518,000 3,675,000 0 1,992,823 3,934,348 3,500,638 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15,900 15,900 108,362 108,362 2,000,000 2,000,000 1,276,935 1,269,761 1,770,558 1,770,558 9,940,000 9,427,809 0 0 22,578,567 1/ 22,578,567 1/ 1,015,562 1,400,000 565,000 672,000 32,662,799 2/ 1,005,599 1,424,681 571,699 674,340 32,649,060 2/ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,035,000 1,815,000 5,505,000 5,409,000 2,075,188 1,783,944 5,405,143 5,376,330 5,428,001 3/ 5,428,001 3/ 836,667 836,667 4,788,827 4/ 4,788,827 4/ 35,775,546 35,539,822 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT 22-16 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT See Total Cost Section To in Text Project (Harbor and Dam Funds) 6. Chicago River, IL (Federal Funds) 7. Indiana Harbor, IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 8. Lake Michigan Diversion, IL (Federal Funds) 9. Michigan City Harbor, IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 10. Waukegan Harbor, IL (Federal Funds) 14. Casino Beach, IL (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) TABLE 22-A See Funding Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sept. 30, 1997 0 0 160,000 152,464 0 0 0 7,536 0 0 160,000 160,000 1,500,565 5/ 1,500,565 5/ 287,000 365,000 395,000 284,000 15,502,394 6/ 298,930 366,910 370,087 302,328 15,490,298 6/ 0 0 0 0 359,000 402,000 525,000 642,000 357,931 377,951 486,192 610,516 0 0 0 0 4,897,148 7/ 4,897,148 7/ 12,905,988 8/ 12,793,930 8/ 12,500 12,500 434,000 469,000 397,000 488,000 3,089,000 442,839 451,026 406,306 500,397 3,083,742 0 0 0 0 1,543,646 9/ 1,543,646 9/ 792,000 226,000 617,000 61,000 11,776,054 784,221 246,715 613,881 45,948 11,755,783 0 0 0 0 55,000 55,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,618,670 1,618,670 30,512 30,512 55,000 55,000 823,026 10/ 823,026 10/ 2,030,000 502,000 670,000 743,000 13,957,768 11/ 1,892,577 661,789 644,950 674,928 13,850,528 11/ 820,000 1,000,000 291,476 1,089,216 1,970,000 1,140,650 0 152,000 204,972 579,125 80,000 350,000 139,484 676,773 2,677,000 2,610,245 2,400,000 1,956,907 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost 22-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Section To in Text Project 15. Chicago Shoreline, IL (Federal Funds) 16. Illinois Beach State Park, IL (Federal Funds) 17. Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Beverly Shores, IN (Federal Funds) 18. Indiana Shoreline Erosion, IN (Federal Funds) 21. Chicago River North Branch, IL (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 22. Kankakee River Ice Mgmt (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 23. Lake George, Hobart, IN (Federal Funds) 24. Little Calumet River, IN (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds Required) (Non-Federal Improvements) 25. Little Calumet River, Cady Marsh Ditch, IN (Federal Funds) TABLE 22-A See Section Funding New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sept. 30, 1997 291,000 612,000 300,000 8,000,000 616,743 953,778 339,837 3,600,693 0 (12,800) (90,000) 548 812 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 43,000 51,000 35,000 33,229 58,324 37,447 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12,800 1,500,000 2,200,000 10,665 56,672 358,037 1,846,052 0 0 0 0 147,000 92,000 179,647 86,896 0 0 0 0 175,000 165,362 180,196 185,038 0 1,322 (321) (317) 0 0 0 0 200,000 200,000 148,425 179,312 0 0 0 10,964 0 0 0 72,396 0 0 0 0 0 242,835 0 0 9,953,000 5,553,693 (67,800) 11,908 660,000 660,000 604,000 604,000 4,131,800 12/ 2,627,603 12/ 191,884 191,884 5,000 2,612,350 3,550 2,607,269 0 0 40,000 40,000 0 1,737,441 4,315 1,601,431 0 0 0 0 100,000 98,460 13,842,700 1,569,600 3,848,000 9,639,000 6,314,587 5,868,097 7,509,912 9,656,693 380,000 420,000 685,000 800,000 331,028 354,383 605,611 799,848 140,000 50,000 328,000 57,500 84,443 51,355 401,424 54,224 310,000 150,000 43,575 207,811 0 468,230 200,000 17,815 45,000 44,997 14,679 14,679 1,304,000 994,862 49,139,300 13/ 48,931,805 13/ 3,843,000 3,551,535 625,500 602,205 1,220,000 1,037,813 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Total Cost To 22-18 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sept. 30, 1997 26. McCook and Thornton New Work: Reservoirs, IL Approp. 13,000,000 0 0 0 22,374,000 (Federal Funds) Cost 3,659,467 1,336,903 2,086,810 2,018,847 17,753,217 27. North Branch New Work: Chicago River, IL Approp. 199,000 0 0 300,000 20,552,500 (Federal Funds) Cost 200,450 53,228 8,974 108,255 20,309,646 (Contributed New Work: Funds Required) Contrib. 207,987 0 0 0 2,297,254 Cost 251,779 5,516 (4) 28 2,297,252 (Non-Federal New Work: Improvements) Contrib. 0 0 0 0 550,100 Cost 7,320 8,196 0 0 549,022 (Non-Federal Lead New Work: Shot Clean-up) Contrib. 2,354,303 200,000 0 0 6,335,170 Cost 2,622,451 234,569 330,653 8,119 6,272,044 (Non-Federal New Work: Impact Assessment) Contrib. 0 0 38,500 0 38,500 Cost 0 0 9,934 28,566 38,500 (Non-Federal New Work: Res. 27 IL Tollway) Contrib. 0 0 0 20,000 20,000 Cost 0 0 0 9,718 9,718 28. O'Hare Reservoir, IL New Work: (Federal Funds) Approp. 5,000,000 0 3,503,000 4,615,000 27,000,000 Cost 3,310,947 5,311,401 5,171,047 4,073,508 26,324,867 (Contributed New Work: Funds Required) Contrib. 100,000 150,000 0 0 4,191,200 Cost 352,689 (605,688) 158,972 553,708 3,990,325 (Non-Federal New Work: Improvements) Contrib. 0 600,000 0 0 600,000 Cost 0 0 14,872 512,189 527,061 1 Includes $855,973 for previous projects. 2 Excludes contributed funds in settlement pursuant to 11 decree (NO. 54-c-1608) regarding removal of flue dust and includes $45,230 for previous projects. 3 Includes $689,001 in steelement pursuant to decree regarding removal of flue dust. 4 Includes $446,005 for previous projects. 5 Includes $955,886 for previous projects. 6 Includes $109,463 for previous projects. 7 Includes $60,668 for previous projects. 8 Includes $2,509 for previous projects. 9 Includes $287,389 for previous projects. 10 Includes $218,233 for previous projects. Includes $15,711 for previous projects. 12 Includes $107,000 of CP&E funds obligated prior to 1 Oct 1985 which are excluded from total project costs lAW EC 1105-2-159, 25 Sep 1985. 13 Includes $670,529 of CP&E funds obligated prior to 1 Oct 1985 which are excluded from total project costs IAW EC 1105-2-159, 25 Sep 1985. 14 Includes $670,529 of CP&E funds obligated prior to 1 Oct 1985 which are excluded from total project costs IAW EC 1105-2-159, 25 Sep 1985. 22-19 14/ 14/ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 22-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN (See Section I and 3 of Text) Provides for breakwater and channel to present dimensions and Public Law, 89-298, depths, a north breakwater, west bulkhead, approach channel and H. Doc. 160. 88th Cong., outer harbor, east and west harbor arms. 1St Sess. Jul. 14, 1960 Section 107 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Jun. 25, 1910 Sep. 22, 1922 Aug. 30, 19351.2 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 19453 Jul. 14, 196013 Oct. 23, 196213 Oct 27, 196513 BURNS WATERWAY SBH, IN (See Section 2 of Text) Provides for a 700-foot north breakwater, a 950-foot west breakwater an entrance channel 11 -feet deep, a harbor-of-refuge area 10 feetdetailed deep and a channel in Burns Waterway 6 feet deep. CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL AND IN (See Section 4 of Text) Outer harbor protected by breakwaters. Five turning basins. Provided for shape and dimensions of turning basins. Consolidated the two projects for Calumet Harbor and Calumet River. Detached breakwater, dredging outer harbor to existing project depth and dimensions; deepen river entrance channel and river to existing project depths; widen and straighten river channel; five turning basins to same depth as adjacent channel. Dredging area A and B in south end of Lake Calumet and an entrance channel 300 feet wide and 21 feet deep. An approach channel to harbor 3,200 feet wide and 28 feet deep through shoals outside breakwater and closing existing gap between breakwaters. Depth of 29 feet in lake approach to 28 feet in outer harbor, and 27 feet in river entrance up to E.J. & E. Ry. Bridge. Deepen, widen and straighten channel in Calumet River from E.J. and E. Ry. Bridge, to and including turning basins 1, 3 and 5 to 27 feet; enlarge turning basins 3 and 5; channel into Lake Calumet to 27 feet deep for 3,000 feet and a width of 1,000 feet; and eliminate turning basins 2 and 4 from project. Modification of Act of Oct 23, 1962. Protection for Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Bridge over the Calumet River, to permit dredging to full width of the south draw to depth of 27 feet, and temporary protection for center pier and south abutment of the New York, Chicago and St. Louis Railroad Bridge (Nickel Plate) to permit dredging of full width of south bridge draw to depth of 27 feet prior to its replacement. Detailed Project Report February 1983. Annual Report, 1896, pp. 2584 et Seq. and H. Doc. 277, 54"' Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 172, 54th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 346, 6 0th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 494, 7 2 " d Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 180, 7 3 rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doe. 233, 76 th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 149, 86"' Cong., 1st Sess.8 H. Doc. 87"' Cong., 2nd Sess. 5 H.R. 973, 89"' Cong., 1 st Sess. 22-20 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT TABLE 22-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents CHICAGO HARBOR, IL (See Section 5 of Text) Inner breakwaters and inner basin. Exterior breakwater. Present project depth in basin and entrance to Chicago River. Shore-arm and southerly extension of exterior breakwater Modification of area to be dredged in inner basin. Mar 3, 1931 Shore-arm extension of exterior breakwater transferred to Lincoln Park Commissioners. Mar. 2, 1945 Resumption of jurisdiction over shore-arm extension breakwater and over certain navigable waters in Lake Michigan which lie in northwestern part of outer harbor. Oct. 23, 1962 Deepen a lake approach channel to 29 by 800 feet wide for 6,600 feet; deepen channel and maneuver area inside harbor entrance to 28 by 1,300 feet wide. Dec. 4, 1981 Provides for lock operations and maintenance responsibilities in the Jul. 30, 1983 interests of navigation. H. Ex. Doc. 114, 41st Cong. 2nd Sess. and Annual Report 1870, pp. 1562-1567 Annual Report 1870, pp. 1562-1567 Annual Report 1897, pp. 2790-2791 H.Doc 710, Cong, 2d Sess H.Doc 1303, 64th Cong, 1 t Sess. Public Law 797, 71st Cong Public Law 14, 79 t h Cong. H.Doc. 485, 87t Cong., 2 nd Sess.4 Sec. 107 of P.L. 97-88 P.L. 98-63 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1919 Jul. 24, 1946 Jun 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 CHICAGO RIVER, IL (See Section 6 of Text) For project depth of 21 feet in lieu of that fixed by act of Jun 3, 1896. Turning basins Interpreted by Chief of Engineers, April 11, 1908, as adopting new work of the then existing project for 21-foot depth. Eliminated all work except maintenance of main river. H. D Dredging channel 9 feet deep to within 30 feet of existing bulkheads and river banks from North Ave. to Belmont Ave., thence 9 feet deep and 50 feet wide to Addison St. INDIANA HARBOR, IN (See Section 7 of Text) Maintenance of outer harbor. Maintenance of inner harbor channel when deeded free of cost to and accepted by the United States. Breakwaters. Mar 2, 1919 Lighthouse crib, present length and alignment easterly and northerly breakwaters. TABLE 22-B Specified in act. Specified in act. H. Doc. 95, 56th Cong. 1st Sess. (Annual Report, 1900, p. 3863 and Annual Report 1909, p. 709) oc. 1294, 64th Cong. 1 st Sess. H. Doc 767, 78 th Cong., 2nd Sess.6 H. Doc. 1113, 60"' Cong., 2n d Sess. H. Doc. 690, 6 2 nd Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doec. 6, 65th Cong., 2 "nd Sess. AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION 22-21 Jul. 11, 1870 Jun. 14, 1880 Mar. 3, 1899 Jul. 25, 1912 Mar. 2, 1919 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Acts Work Authorized Documents Mar. 20, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 Mar. 2, 1929 July 3, 193010 Jul. 30, 1932 Aug. 30, 193511 Aug. 28, 1937 Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 196512 Nov. 17, 1986 Mar, 3, 1889 Reduce channel length to be maintained in extension to Lake George Authorized Secretary of War to modify project so far as relates to length and alignment of breakwaters and to sell Youngstown Steel and Tube Co. about 1,180 linear feet of shoreward end of existing north breakwater. Accept 2.3 acres of land for construction of the Forks Turning Basin. Existing project channel width and depth in Lake George Branch and turning basin at the Forks Public Law 176, 67t Cong Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 71 t Cong., 2"d Sess. Authorized Secretary of War to sell to Inland Steel Co., about 1,903 Public Law 219, linear feet of southerly end of existing east breakwater. 7 2 nd Cong. Extended easterly breakwater, dredge entrance channel and outer Rivers and Harbors harbor, deepen channel between bulkhead fills, widen main stem of Committee Doc. 29, canal and portion of Calumet River Branch to 14 1st St. 7 2 nd Cong., 1i' Sess. Modified conditions of local cooperation required before enlargement Rivers and Harbors of Indiana Harbor Canal is undertaken by United States. Committee Doc. 13, 75th Cong., lit Sess. Increase authorized depths of 29 feet in outer harbor entrance channel, 28 feet in outer harbor and 27 feet in canal entrance channel to first E. J. and E. Ry. Bridge. Deepen main canal from landward end of canal entrance channel to a point lakeward of Dickey Place Bridge over a modified channel width of 190 feet, except through bridge openings. LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION (See Section 8 of Text) Responsible for monitoring of Lake Michigan Diversion. MICHIGAN CITY HARBOR, IN (See Section 9 of Text) East breakwater and old east pier enclosing the outer basin. Extension of east pier. Extend east pier and construct detached breakwater. Mar 3, 1905 Lower turning basin. Rebuild west pier as at present location. Present project dimensions of entrance channel. Jun. 21, 1927 Existing project depth in channel, and in lower and middle turning basins, eliminated improvement of Trail Creek above middle turning basin and uncompleted portion of detached breakwater, abandonment of old east breakwater and old east pier enclosing outer basin. TABLE 22-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION H. Doc. 195, 86t" Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 227, 89 th Cong. 1 st Sess. Section 1142, WRDA of 1986 Recommendations of a Board of Engineers, Annual Report 1870, p. 123. Reports of Boards of Engineers, Annual Rpt 1851, pp. 2187-2189; Annual Report 1882, p. 2264-2266. Annual Report 1897, pp. 2903-2904. Joint Resolution of Cong. approved May 13, 1908. Public Law 23. H. Doc. 279, 69 th Cong., 1 st Sess. 22-22 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug. 30, 1935 Restore and repair westerly 1,000 feet of east breakwater, dredging outer basin and enlarging entrance to basin through east pier. Jul. 14, 1960 Dredge river channel 50 feet wide and 6 feet deep from upper turning Sec. 107 basin to E. Street Bridge. WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL (See Section 10 of Text) Jun. 14, 1880 Parallel piers and basins. Aug. 3, 1882 Modified location of harbor entrance. Jun. 13, 1902 Detached breakwater, extend piers, increase width of harbor at inner end of north pier and dredge channel and basin to depth of 20 feet. Jul. 3, 1930 Extension of breakwater to shore, dredging near outer end of north piers and enlarging inner basin. Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 17, 1970 Sec. 201 Oct. 27, 1965 Dredge an entrance channel to existing project dimensions from outer end of north pier to project depth in lake and dredge an anchorage area in southwest corner of inner basin to existing project depth. Abandonment of dredging triangular area in southwest corner of inner basin to 18 feet deep. Provides for deepening the existing entrance channel in the outer harbor to 25 feet and extending to the depth in Lake Michigan, at2nd Sess. widths varying from 380 feet to 500 feet; deepening the channel between piers to a depth of 23 feet at a width of 180 feet and deepening the inner basin to 23 feet and extending its limits approximately 275 feet northward. l Nov. 17, 1986 CASINO BEACH, IL (See Section 14 of Text) Provides for encasing approximately 1,800 feet of the existing Casino Feasibility Report Beach jetty in steel sheet piling and a concrete cap and replacing dated Feb. 1983. beach fill. Nov. 17, 1986 Dec. 4, 1981 Jul. 30, 1983 TABLE 22-B Acts ILLINOIS BEACH STATE PARK, IL (See Section 16 of Text) Provides for 46 offshore breakwaters approximately 150 feet long, initial beach nourishment of 100,000 cubic yards and periodic nourishment of 100,000 cubic yards at 5-year intervals. INDIANA DUNES NATIONAL LAKESHORE, BEVERLY SHORES, IN (See Section 17 of Text) Provides for emergency shore protection repairs to stone revetment initially constructed in 1973. Provides for operations and maintenance of shore protection measures. Feasibility Report dated June 1982. Public Law 97-88 Public Law 98-63 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Work Authorized Documents INDIANA SHORELINE EROSION, IN 22-23 River and Harbors Committee Doc 34, 74th Cong., 1' Sess. Detailed Project Report dated June 19658. Annual Rpt 1880, p. 142 Annual Report 1882, pp. 277, 2162. H. Doc. 343, 56 th Cong., 1 st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc 27, 71st Cong., 2 "d Sess. H. Doc. 116, 77 t h Cong., 1 st Sess. H. Doc. 368, 90" Cong., REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 NOv. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Nov. 17, 1986 Dec. 31, 1970 Nov. 17 1986 (See Section 18 of Text) Beach nourishment of 2-mile reach of shore west of Michigan City Harbor, Indiana LAKE GEORGE, HOBART, IN (See Section 23 of Text) Removal of silt, aquatic growth and construction of silt traps. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, IN (See Section 24 of Text) Provides for levee construction, a diversion control structure at the mouth of Hart Ditch. Permanent evacuation of a portion of the Black Oak area of Gary and non-structural flood proofing measures in Gary. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER BASIN, CADY MARSH DITCH, IN (See Section 25 of Text) Widening and deepening 1,250 feet of Cady Marsh Ditch, installing 4,880 feet of pipe and excavating 2,850 feet of open channel. McCOOK AND THORNTON RESERVOIRS, IL (See Section 26 of Text) Provides for construction of two floodwater storage reservoirs in the quarries of the same name. NORTH BRANCH CHICAGO RIVER, IL (See Sections 21 and 27 of Text) Construction of three reservoirs and reimbursement to locals for 50% of the costs of Techny and Mid-Fork Reservoirs Clearing fallen trees, roots and other debris and objects which contribute to flooding. O'HARE RESERVOIR, IL (See Section 28 of Text) Provides for a 1,050 acre-foot excavated reservoir. Sec. 501, WRDA 1986 Sec. 602, WRDA 1986. Sec. 401, WRDA 1986 Feasibility Report dated April 1984 Sec. 3, WRDA 1988 H. Doc. 100-72, 100t Cong., 1St Sess., Sec. 401, WRDA 1986. River and Harbor Act (Sec. 116) Sec. 401, WRDA 1986 1. Included in Public Works Administrative Program Sep. 6, 1943 and Dec. 16, 1933. 2. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (dredging in front of U.S. Steel Corp.) 3. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (breakwater closure). 4. Contains latest map of harbor. Uncompleted portion is inactive. 5. Contains latest map of river. 6. Latest published map is in Annual Report for 1914, opposite p. 2928. TABLE 22-C EXISTING N! 7. Contains latest published map of North Branch above North Ave. 8. Contains latest published map. 9. Completed under previous project. 10. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (widen and deepen Lake George Branch). 11. Include in Public Works Administration Program Sep. 6, 1933 and Jul. 25, 1934. Uncompleted portion was deauthorized in 1977 (widen and deepen main canal and Calumet River Branch). 12. Project deauthorized in 1977. 13. Project deauthorized in 1989. AVIGATION PROJECTS 22-24 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT See Section Length Width Depth In Text Project Item (feet) (feet) (feet) 1. Burns Waterway North Breakwater 4,630 Harbor, IN 2. Burns Waterway SBH, IN West Breakwater Approach Channel Outer Harbor East Harbor Arm West Harbor Arm North Breakwater West Breakwater Approach Channel Burns Waterway 4. Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN 5. Chicago Harbor, IL Northerly Crib Breakwater 6,714 Southerly Steel Breakwater 5,007 North Pier Chicago Confined Disposal Facility 2,979 Approach Channel Outer Harbor River Entrance Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Bridge to turning basin No. 3 Turning Basin No. 3 to Turning Basin No.5 Approach into Lake Calumet Extension in Lake Calumet 3,000 Turning Basins 1, 3 and 5 Shore Arm Extension Exterior Breakwater Exterior Breakwater Southerly Extension North Inner Breakwater South Inner Breakwater North Pier Approach Channel Channel and maneuver Lock Inner Basin Entrance Channel 2,450 9,700 3,200 10,500 3,000 3,000 290 21,000 200 and variable 8,000 4,000 1,000 2,250 5,421 4,944 4,034 2,544 960 6,600 2,200 600 1,270 7,300 Variable 400 27 800 1,300 80 740 190-470 6. Chicago River, IL Main Branch of Chicago River North Branch of Chicago River North Branch Canal North Branch Turning Basin 3,800 190-390 11,100 5,500 22-25 3,800 678 1,200 2,200 3,700 2,100 620 1,043 1,200 5,593 400 Varies 620 27 200 100 30 28 27 11 9 29 28 27 27 earth 28 rock 27 27 27 29 28 23 21 21 21 91-390 56-210 21 21 21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 22-C EXISTING NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Section Length Width Depth In Text Project Item (feet) (feet) (feet) 7. Indiana Harbor, IN Northerly Breakwater 1,120 Easterly Breakwater 2,525 Approach Channel 7,200 800 29 Outer Harbor 7,200 Varies 28 Entrance Channel 3,600 65-280 27 Main Channel 7,400 61-210 22 Turning Basin 22 Lake George Branch 3,700 64-160 22 Calumet River Branch 2,500 160-260 22 9. Michigan City Harbor Detached Breakwater 1,304 22 IN West Pier 835 East Pier 2,276 East Breakwater 1,000 Entrance Channel 1,900 150-425 18 Main Channel 2,400 120-150 18 Outer Basin 900 900 8-12 Trail Creek 3,000 50-100 8 Trail Creek 2,300 50 6 10. Waukegan Harbor, IL North Breakwater and Shore Connection 1,896 North Pier into North Revetment 2,074 South Pier 3,111 Entrance Channel 3,250 390 22 Channel to Inner Basin 1,700 200 18 Inner Basin 1,650 375-500 18 Anchorage Area 1 1 8 'Area of about 6 acres. 22-26 CHICAGO, ILLINOIS, DISTRICT TABLE 22-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BRIDGE ALTERATION (See Section 13 or Text) Cost to September 30, 1997 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Calumet River Bridges' 1967 $1,625,068 'Transferred to Department of Transportation in accordance with Section 6(g) of the Act of October 16,1966. P.L. 89-670 TABLE 22-E OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1997 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Mt. Baldy, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, IN 1984 $1,500,000 Hollywood-Ardmore Beach, Chicago, IL 1982 237,271 Evanston, IL 1979 766,052 Lake Michigan-Lake Bluff, IL 1976 244,889 Lake Michigan-Lake Forest, IL' 1975 65,611 Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Kenilworth, IL2 1975 5,200 Authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1954. 2Uncompleted portion deauthorized in 1977. TABLE 22-F OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to September 30, 1997 For Last Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Lake Michigan, Edgewater/Rogers Park Communities, Chicago, IL 1989 $2,062,347 Little Calumet River, IL 1984 583,000 22-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 22-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Winnetka, IL 1975 1977 Illinois Shore of Lake Michigan, Chicago, IL 1975 1977 Kankakee River, IL and IN Levee between Shelby Bridge and Baum's Bridge in IN 1938 Nov 17, 1986 Little Calumet River, IL and IN Little Calumet River and Tributaries, IL and IN 1968 Nov 17, 1986 53,136 Calumet Harbor and River, IL and IN Widening and straightening the Calumet River in the vicinity of 106 th Street and closing the gap between breakwaters, and dredging minor shoals in the outer harbor. 1990 Jan 1, 1990 Wilmington Ice Control Demonstration ---- Nov 18, 1991 22-28 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT * This district comprises portions of southern Kentucky, southwestern Virginia, western North Carolina, northern Georgia and Alabama, northeastern Mississippi and practically all of Tennessee except western portion, and embraces drainage basins of Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers and their tributaries. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Cumberland River, TN and KY ................... 23-2 2. Kentucky Lock ....................................... 23-3 3. Tennessee River, TN, AL and KY .................. 23-3 4. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS ........................................ .... 23-4 5. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ....................... 23-4 Alteration of Bridges 6. Authorized Alteration of Bridges ...... ....... 23-4 Flood Control 7. Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, KY and TN.......................23-4 8. Martins Fork Lake, KY ........................ 23-5 9. Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, KY ..23-5 10. Tug and Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy River and Cumberland River, W VA, VA and KY .............................................. 23-5 11. Ohio River Basin (Nashville Dist.) .............. 23-6 12. Inspection of completed flood control projects ........................... .......................... .23-6 13. Flood control work under special authorization ... .. .................. 23-6 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 14. Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN ....... 23-6 15. Dale Hollow Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN and KY ................................ .................... 23-7 16. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN ......................................... ..23-7 17. Laurel River Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY ..... 23-7 18. Wolf Creek Dam - Lake Cumberland, Ohio River Basin, KY ..................... ................... 23-8 General Investigations 19. Surveys ..................................... ....... 23-8 20. Collection and study of basic data ........... 23-8 21. Preconstruction Engineering and Design .... 23-8 Tables Page Table 23-A Cost & Financial Statement...........23-9 Table 23-B Authorizing Legislation ................ 23-11 Table 23-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........................... 23-13 Table 23-D Not Applicable ..................................... Table 23-E Table 23-F Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ......................................... .23-13 Other Authorized Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power...........23-14 Table 23-G Deauthorized Projects .................. 23-14 Table 23-H Cumberland River, TN & KY, Principal Features ........................ 23-15 Table 23-I Tennessee River Lock Dimensions .23-16 Table 23-J Table 23-K Tennessee River Total Cost of Existing Project.......................23-17 Ohio River Basin (Nashville District) Local Protection ....... 23-17 Table 23-L Reservoirs.......................................23-17 Table 23-M Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ...................... .. 23-18 Table 23-N Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization . ............... 23-18 23-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1997 Navigation 1. CUMBERLAND RIVER, TN AND KY Location. Formed by junction of Poor and Clover Forks in Harlan County, KY, about 694.2 miles above its mouth, and flows west to Burnside, KY, from whence it makes a loop southwestward into Tennessee, passes Nashville, and returns northwestward to Kentucky, emptying into Ohio River near Smithland, KY (See Geological Survey base maps of Tennessee and Kentucky.) Previous projects. For details see pages 1898 and 1901 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1208 of Annual Report for 1938, and pages 1069 and 1070 of Annual Report for 1962. Existing project. Below Nashville: Improvement of Cumberland River between mouth and Nashville was authorized for 9-foot navigation; increased project depth to be obtained by construction of three moderate height dams with lockage facilities, designated as Kuttawa (Eureka), Dover, and Cheatham, to replace existing locks A to F inclusive below Nashville and lock 1 above Nashville. (See table 23-B for authorizing legislation.) Subsequent authorities provide for construction of hydroelectric power-generating facilities at Cheatham Dam, rivermile 148.7, and modification of project for navigation on Cumberland River, TN and KY, to provide, in lieu of previously authorized works at Kuttawa, mile 32.2, and Dover, mile 100.1, for construction of a multiple-purpose improvement consisting of a dam, lock, and powerplant near mile 30.6 on lower Cumberland River and a canal for navigation and other purposes connecting this reservoir with reservoir formed by Kentucky Dam on the Tennessee River. The project is known as Barkley Dam and Lake Barkley. Provision of interconnecting canal, involving excavation of a channel through narrow watershed divide about 2.5 miles upstream from damsite, permits alternatives routes available for navigation between either Cumberland or Tennessee Rivers and Ohio River, and affords integrated operation of Barkley and Kentucky Reservoirs through diversion of flows in interests of flood control and power production. Cost of modified project for 9-foot navigation and multiple-purpose development is $178,181,406 Federal funds and $102,966 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. (See table 23-H for listing of principal features.) Under flood conditions as regulated by upstream reservoirs, extreme fluctuation in stage of river below Nashville, TN, varies at different localities from about 16 to 55 feet above minimum pool levels. Ordinary fluctuations vary with power flows from as much as the allowable 3-foot drawdown below normal pool elevation 385 at Cheatham Lock and Dam to a range of about 7 feet at Nashville. Seasonal variation in normal headwater levels at Lake Barkley is 5 feet, which in combination with power flows produces fluctuations up to 10 feet below Cheatham Lock and Dam. Above Nashville: See pages 1693 thru 1696 of Annual Report for 1950 for information including statistical data on locks and dams 1 to 17 and 21. Completion information is shown on pages 1454 of the report for 1951. See Table 23-B for Authorizing Legislation. Construction of Old Hickory, Carthage, and Celina Dams above Nashville was also authorized for navigation and power. The dam and reservoir authorized for construction on Cumberland River near Carthage, TN, has been redesignated as Cordell Hull Dam and Reservoir. Cost of Old Hickory and Cordell Hull projects, including locks, is $131,985,912. (See table 23-H at end of chapter for listing of principal features.) Celina Dam was deauthorized in 1995. Under flood conditions as presently regulated, including effect of surcharge operation of Old Hickory project, extreme fluctuations of stage in this section of river vary from a range of 35 feet at Nashville (mile 191) to a maximum of 46 feet immediately below Old Hickory Dam (mile 216.2), and from an 8-foot variation in headwater at dam to 36 feet in vicinity of Carthage, TN, (mile 313.5), present head of navigation; with variations up to 35 feet at Celina, TN (mile 380.8) and 29 feet in tail water at Wolf Creek Dam (mile 460.9). Maximum fluctuations under ordinary conditions from power flows vary from about 7 feet at Nashville to 14 and 3 feet, respectively, in tailwater and headwater of Old Hickory Dam, and at other key points as follows: 13 feet at Carthage; 18 feet at Celina; and 19 feet at Wolf Creek Dam. Further details on project authorization for river sections below and above Nashville as shown on Table 23-B. Local cooperation. Under modified project for 9- foot navigation and multiple-purpose development, recreation features of reservoir components are subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Terminal facilities. There are 42 terminals on the Cumberland River (5 Municipally owned and open for public use; 5 government owned facilities and 32 privately owned facilities). A total of 18 terminals have railroad connections. Principal commodities handled are petroleum products, stone, sands, gravel, coal, coke, iron, steel, chemicals and grain. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. For further information see page 695 of Annual Report for 1969. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance improvements included completion fo rewedging of generator windings at Barkley Power Plant, continued work on replacement of the larm system at Cheatham, Cordell Hull, and Old Hickory Power Plants and the replacement microwave systm at Cheatham power Plant was purchased. The lock emergency dam wickets were repaired and painted at Cheatham and Old Hickory Locks. Construction was betgun on comfort stations at Bumpus Mills on Barkley and at Laguardo 23-2 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT on Old Hickory Lake. Two new mooring cells were constructed at mile 125.7. A contract was awarded to repair concrete cracks at the lock gates on Barkley Lock. Approcimately 160,000 cubic yards of material was removed by hired labor channel maintenance dredging on the Cumberland River. An estimated 18 million tons of commodities were locke through the Cumberland River Locks. Commercial locaktes were approximately 4,800 and 5,700 recreational craft were also locked through. Total net energy generated at Barkley Dam (810,088,000kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to the Tennessee Valley Authority. Southern Illinois power Cooperative, Big Rivers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation, and Indianan a Statewide Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc, Hosier energy Division. Total net energy generated at Cheatham Dam (192,978,000kw-hr), Cordell Hull (454,212,000 kw-hr), and Old Hickory (621,963,000 kwhr) was made available for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program comprising malaria control, shoreline sanitation, land management and disposal, and maintenance of public-use facilities continued. 2. KENTUCKY LOCK ADDITION, KY Location. Kentucky Lock and Dam is located in western Kentucky at Mile 22.4 of the Tennessee River between Livingston and McCracken Counties. Existing Project. Kentucky L&D was completed in 1945 by the Tennessee Valley Authority. TVA continues to operate the dam and powerhouse while operation of the 110'x600' navigation lock is the reponsibility of the Nashville District. Products from 20 states pass through the system of Kentucky and Barkley Locks, the lower-most locks on the Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers, respectively. Theoretically, upbound and downbound tows can use either lock since their waterways are connected by a canal on the upstream side and by the Ohio River on the downstream end. However, over 80% of the commercial tows using the system pass through KY Lock because of difficult and costly navigation on the Cumberland River below Barkley. Since most of the tows are 1200' in length, they must perform a time-consuming "double cut" to transit through the existing 600' long KY Lock. This resulted in average delays of over 6.5 hours per tow at KY Lock in FY 1997. Since the traffic levels for the KY-BAR system are expected to grow significantly in the near future, the delays at KY Lock will also increase dramatically. The last traffic forecast developed in 1995 estimated that 43.6M tons of products would be transported through the Kentucky-Barkley system in the year 2000. Actual tonnage for the system in 1997 was 43.5M tons. The next traffic forecast, scheduled for the summer of 1998, will include 6.5M tons added to the sytem because of a new steel mill in Decatur, AL Project Description. The 1992 Kentucky Lock Addition Feasiblity report recommended a new 110 x 1200' lock adjacent and landward of the existing lock. Average annual benefits attributed to a new lock are $52.5M. Most of these benefits are associated with improving the performance of the lock by reducing traffic delays and disruptive lock outages for maintenane and major rehabilitation work. Based on an estimated construction cost of $395M (OCT '97), the new lock has a B:C ratio of 2.5. Other project features in addition to the new lock itself are three major relocation efforts: 1) 4 large TVA transmission towers, 2) about 2 miles of the Paducah and Louisville Railroad, including a major river bridge, and 3) about 2 miles of U.S. Highway 62, also probably on a new major river bridge. The project was authorized for construction in the WRDA '96. Operations during fiscal year. FY 1997 funds of $3M were used primarily to advance the design of the new lock. Significant activities include: 1)constuction completion and major testing of the lock model at the Waterways Experiment Station that resulted in finalizing the footprint and all hydraulic features of the new lock; 2) initiation and significant advancement of costsaving design studies for the downstream guidewall and the lock walls; 3) initiation and significant advancement of the site development plan including the transportation relocations; 4)continuation of work on the Lock DM including completion of stability analyses for the existing lock; 5) initation of design on the relocation of the 4 TVA transmission towers; 6)initiation and significant advancement of refining the projects's schedule, work package identification, and construction laydown arrangement; and 7) continuation of geotechnical exploration including overwater drilling for the proposed railroad bridge piers. 3. TENNESSEE RIVER, TN, AL AND KY Location. Formed by junction of French Broad and Holston Rivers in eastern Tennessee, 4.4 miles above Gay Street Bridge at Knoxville, flows southwest into northern Alabama, thence in a generally westerly course across north Alabama, to northeast boundary of Mississippi, thence nearly due north across Tennessee and Kentucky, entering Ohio River at Paducah, 652.1 miles from junction of French Broad and Holston Rivers. (See Geological survey base map of Tennessee River Basin.) Previous projects. For details see pages 1902- 1906, Annual Report for 1915; pages 1190-1194, 1196- 1216, and 1220-1222, Annual Report for 1929; and page 1216, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Originally provided for permanent improvement of river for a navigable depth of 9 feet at low water from mouth about 650 miles to Knoxville, TN. Only work performed by the Corps was construction of lock at General Joe Wheeler Dam and miscellaneous appurtenant improvements at a new work cost of $2,244,236. Tennessee Valley Authority program provided for obtaining authorized 9-foot pro- 23-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1997 ject by construction of high dams and locks and utilization of certain locks and dams previously constructed under jurisdiction of the Corps. (See Table 23-B for Authorizing Legislation.) Subsequent construction by the TVA of Melton Hill Dam extends navigable channel of Tennessee River system up the Clinch River about 38 miles above damsite (mile 23.1) to vicinity of Clinton, TN. (See table 23-I on Tennessee River.) In accordance with general navigation laws placing control and supervision over navigable waters under direction of Secretary of the Army, the Corps of Engineers operates and maintains all locks, and maintains navigation channels and safety harbors by performing all necessary maintenance dredging and snagging operations. For information concerning other functions of the Corps under division of responsibilities for Tennessee River since adoption of Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933, see page 1084 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. Authorization requires no local cooperation in construction of alternate system of low dams. It does, however, provide that if high dams are built before the United States builds projected locks and low dams which are to be replaced, the United States shall contribute to cost of substituted structures an amount equal to estimated cost of works of navigation for which substitution is made. Terminal facilities. There are 150 terminals on the Tennessee River (13 municipally owned, 15 government owned facilities and 122 privately owned facilities). A total of 79 terminals have railroad connections. Principal commodities handled are petroleum products, stone, sand, gravel, coal, coke, grain, chemicals, iron, and steel. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. A list of terminals is revised annually and can be obtained from Division Engineer, Ohio River Division, Corps of Engineers, Cincinnati, Ohio. For further information see page 698 of Annual Report for 1969. Operations during fiscal year. Channel work by government plant and hired labor consisted of dredging and snagging at various locations, and maintenance of mooring facilities and safety harbors. Cost of channel maintenance was $74,879. Maintenance: All locks were operated and lock appurtenances and standby plant maintained as required. Major maintenance included dewatering and repairs to Wheeler Main, Pickwick Main and Auxiliary, and Kentucky Locks, and completion of installation of electrical control system at Wilson Main Lock. Work continued on inspection and repair of all dewatering closures. The operations building was repaired at Kentucky Lock and the operations building room was replaced at Chickamauga Lock. Miter gate anchor bars were procured for Ft. Loudoun and Watts Bar Locks. An estimated 50 million tons of commodities were locked through the Tennessee River Locks. Commercial lockages were approximately 23,400 and 19,900 recreational craft were also locked through. 4. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL AND MS Location. West Central Alabama and Northeastern Mississippi; in Marengo, Sumter, Greene and Pickens Counties, Alabama, and Noxubee, Lowndes, Clay, Monroe, Itawamba, Prentiss and Tishomingo Counties, Mississippi. Existing project. Provides for a waterway 234 miles in length, connecting the Tombigbee and Tennessee Rivers by way of the East Fork of Tombigbee River, Mackeys and Yellow Creeks, affording a channel not less than 9 feet deep and 280 feet in bottom width, with 10 locks each having clear chamber dimensions of 110 x 600 feet. Construction for the divide section, including Bay Springs lock and dam, is assigned to the Nashville District; whereas, the prosecution of work on the river and canal sections is under the jurisdiction of the Mobile District. Only activities of the Nashville District are reported herein. Local cooperation. Authorization requires local interests to construct, maintain and operate all highway bridges, construct and maintain all highway relocations or alterations, make and maintain alterations as required to sewer, water supply and drainage facilities, assume cost of operation and maintenance of utility crossings, provide and maintain as required suitable and adequate river and canal terminals in accordance with plans approved by the Secretary of the Army and the Chief of Engineers. Operations during fiscal year. The Mobile District is responsible for operation and maintenance of the entire Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway. The project is 100% complete. 5. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended (preauthorization). During the period $14,040 was expended for a study for a port project in Bridgeport-Jackson County, Al. Alteration of Bridges 6. AUTHORIZED ALTERATION OF BRIDGES Work on Woodland Street bridge, under Truman- Hobbs Act, was initiated in 1965 and completed in 1966. Costs were $987,632. For details see page 922 of Annual Report for 1967. Flood Control 7. BIG SOUTH FORK NATIONAL RIVER AND RECREATIONAL AREA, KY AND TN 23-4 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT Location. The project is located in Northeastern Tennessee and Southeastern Kentucky along the Big South Fork River and its tributaries in Pickett, Scott, Fentress, and Morgan Counties, Tennessee, and McCreary County, Kentucky. Existing project. A National Recreation Area was established in accordance with the concept included in the interagency report prepared pursuant to section 208 of Flood Control Act of 1968. Total acreage was not to exceed 125,000 acres. The act specifically established the National Area for the purpose of preserving and interpreting the scenic, biological, archeological and historical resources of the river gorge area and developing the natural recreational potential of the area. The project was authorized by the Water Resource Development Act of 1974, 1976 and Water Resources Development Act of 1986. (See table 232B for authorizing legislation). The authorized cost (ceiling) for the project was $156,122,000. $112,588,920 was appropriated to The Corp of Engineers for design and construction of park facilities. The first construction contract was awarded in June 1981. 72% of the authorized project is complete. By Memorandum of Agreement dated 1 October 1990 jurisdiction of the area was transferred to The Department of Interior. Local cooperation. None required. Operation during fiscal year. The Memorandum of Agreement between the Department of Army and the Department of Interior, transferring jurisdiction of the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, itemized activities to be completed by the Army. In accordance with this agreement, miscellaneous minor construction items were completed. 8. MARTINS FORK LAKE, KY Location. Dam located at mile 15.6 on Martins Fork of Clover Fork, Cumberland River, about 10 miles southeast of city of Harlan, with reservoir extending about 6 miles upstream within Harlan County, southeastern Kentucky. Existing project. Multiple-purpose improvement combining flood control with water quality control and recreation development adopted by 1965 Flood Control Act (H. Doc.244, 89th Cong.), in general accordance with recommendations. Dam is concrete type, 504 feet long and rising 97 feet above streambed. Outlet works provide for release of water from reservoir at varying levels. Drainage area above damsite is 55.7 square miles. At full pool level, spillway crest at elevation 1341 above mean sea level, reservoir will cover 578 acres and contain 21,120 acre-feet of storage capacity. Provision is made for 17,450 acre-feet of reservoir capacity between elevations 1341 and 1300 for control of floods in winter and spring season, and 14,360 acrefeet (El. 1341-1310) during summer and fall, in conjunction with which storage of 3,090 acre-feet would be available on a seasonal basis to meet streamflow requirements for water quality control and fish life below the dam. A minimum permanent pool of 3,670 acre-feet, 274 acres in extent, is available during the potential flood seasons; and during late spring and summer when flood storage can be reduced, the lake is operated generally at a higher level (El. 1310) to maintain a larger surface area of 340 acres for recreation and provide the required seasonal storage for releases of water during critical low-flow periods. Project prevents a major portion of average annual flood losses at Harlan and results in significant stage reductions with related benefits along rural reaches and to other urban areas downstream. Actual cost of project including $95,000 code 710 funds is $20,479,911. First construction contract awarded in December 1972. Project completed for beneficial use in September 1978. Local cooperation. Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 (P.L. 89-72) applies in regard to non-Federal participation in recreation development, in addition to which local interests are to provide certain safeguards to ensure functioning of reservoir as intended. In May 1981 a final recreation cost-sharing contract with Harlan County was approved and certain recreation facilities have been jointly developed by the Corps and the County. These facilities, consisting of a swimming beach and a picnic area are now operated and maintained by Harlan County. Recreation investment to date (Corps and Local) is about $100,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures operated as required. 9. MIDDLESBORO, CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN, KY Location. At Middlesboro, Ky., on Yellow Creek, a tributary entering Cumberland River about 660 miles above its mouth. Existing project. A system of canals and levees around one side of town, arranged so as to divert most headwaters of Yellow Creek away form present channel through heart of city. Protection is thus afforded in large measure to life and property within business district and a large part of residential section. For project details, see page 1088 of Annual Report for 1962. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Work on levees, canals, and appurtenances was accomplished by hired labor. 10. TUG AND LEVISA FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY RIVER AND UPPER CUMBERLAND, WV, VA AND KY Location. The project is located in the State of West Virginia and the Commonwealths of Kentucky and Virginia. The Cumberland portion consists of the Upper Cumberland River Basin, above Cumberland Falls, KY. The basin is approximately 100 miles in 23-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1997 length, averaging 30 miles in width at the lower portion and 10 miles in width upstream at Harlan KY. The Big Sandy Basin is within the Huntington District and the Cumberland within the Nashville District. Existing project. Provides for flood control measures for communities in the Tug and Levisa Forks and Upper Cumberland River Basins. The Cumberland portion has been assigned to the Nashville District. Only activities of the Nashville District are reported herein. Estimated Federal cost of new work under jurisdiction of the Nashville District is $390,000,000. The project was authorized by the Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1981, Section 202 of PL 96-367. Local cooperation. Authorizing legislation requires that non-Federal interests shall hold and save the United States free from damages due to construction works and maintain and operate all such works after their completion in accordance with regulations by the Secretary of the Army. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering continued. Various relocation contracts associated with the flood protection project continued. A contract for a cutoff and levee at Loyall/Rio Vista continued, and a contract for a floodwall and closure structures continued. A contract continued for a levee at Williamsburg, KY. Nonstructural evacuations and floodproofings continued at Harlan Barbourville, Williamsburg and Middlesborough, KY 11. OHIO RIVER BASIN (NASHVILLE DISTRICT) Location. A series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs in Ohio River Basin within Nashville District. Existing project. The general comprehensive plans approved for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin is set forth in legislation listed in Table 23- B. Individual projects, local protection projects and lakes, considered in comprehensive plan within Nashville District are listed in Table 23-K. 12. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts, requires local interests furnish assurances they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within their respective districts. Maintenance inspections were made during fiscal year of completed protective works in localities transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation. Local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. Fiscal year cost was $17,806. Total cost to September 30, 1997 was $461,796. For project inspection data see table 23-M. 13. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control and coastal emergencies (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Actual Federal cost for the fiscal year was $177,444 for disaster preparedness. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 14. CENTER HILL LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TN Location. Dam is on Caney Fork River, 26.6 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 309.2) at Carthage, TN. It is in DeKalb County, TN., about 55 miles east of Nashville, and 14 miles southeast of Carthage, TN. Reservoir extends about 64 miles up main stream and about 10 miles up Falling Water River and lies within DeKalb, Putnam, White, and Warren Counties, TN. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production, with a permanent pool for public use and conservation purposes. In addition to main dam structure, provision was made for a rolled-earth dike to close a saddle in reservoir rim near damsite. For further details, see page 1099 of 1962 Annual Report. Actual cost of project including $8,940,642 code 710 funds is $53,412,022. Local cooperation. None required on completed project. Recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structure and its appurtenance maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Total net energy generated (824,934,000 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management involved land management, public relations, and maintenance of public use facilities. Work continued on replacement of the power plant alarm systm, and the replacement microwave system at Center Hill Power plant was purchased. construction was begun on a comfort station at Center Hill Recreation Area. Dam Safety: $56,368 was expended in FY 97 to complete remedial measures for the main dam and increased spillway capacity at Center Hill Dam. The 23-6 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT work is to prevent sudden failure of the dam as a result of catastrophic flooding on the Caney Fork and Cumberland Rivers. Work this year completed construction of a 600 foot wide by 38 foot deep weir in the saddle dam with an erodible fuse plug embankment. This allows normal operation of the project up to a 75 percent probable maximum flood (PMP). Remaining RE activities include condemnation at two tracts downstream of the fuse plug. The project is fully operational 15. DALE HOLLOW LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, TN AND KY Location. Dam is on Obey River, 7.3 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 380.9) at Celina, TN. It is in Clay County, TN, and about 80 miles northeast of Nashville, TN 28 miles north of Cookeville, TN, and 3 miles east of Celina, TN. Reservoir extends about 51 miles up main stream, 10 miles up East Fork, and 6 miles up West Fork of Obey River, and lies within Cumberland and Clinton Counties, KY, and Clay, Pickett, Overton, and Fentress Counties, TN. Existing project. A concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production with a permanent pool for public use an conservation purposes. See page 1096 of 1962 Annual Report for project details. Cost of project including $2,195,600 code 710 funds and $150,000 non-Federal funds recreation facilities under the completed projects program is $28,317,746. Local cooperation. None required on completed project; future recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Total net energy generated (156,488,000 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved public relations, and management and maintenance of public-use facilities. Work continued on replacement of the power plant alarm system. 16. J. 'PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO, RIVER BASIN, TN Location. Damsite is on Stones River, 6.8 miles above its confluence with Cumberland River (mile 205.9); in Davidson County, TN.; and about 7 miles east of Nashville, TN. Reservoir extends southeasterly from dam about 32 miles along main stream, 10 miles up East Fork, 6.5 miles i.p West Fork, and for shorter distances up other tributaries of Stones River; and lies within Davidson, Rutherford, and Wilson Counties, TN. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control, power production and recreation. For further details see page 703 of 1969 Annual Report. Cost of project including $3,260,400 under code 710 funds and $46,000 non- Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program is $56,914,039. Local cooperation. Recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Total net energy generated (94,725,000 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior to Tennessee Valley Authority for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved public relations, fish and wildlife management,and maintenance of public-use facilities. A contract was awarded to rewind the power plant generator. 17. LAUREL RIVER LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. Damsite is at mile 2.3 on Laurel River, a tributary of Cumberland River, in southcentral Kentucky. The two streams meet about 9 miles below Cumberland Falls, a prominent physiographic feature at head of Lake Cumberland which is formed by Wolf Creek Dam. Reservoir extends 19.2 miles upstream to site of Corbin, KY water-supply dam and lies within Laurel and Whitley Counties. Existing project. Project approved in general accordance with recommendations of House Document 413, 86th Congress, by 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended by Public Law 88-253, was designed for purposes of flood control, power, and recreation as an integral unit of a coordinated plan for development of water resources of Cumberland River Basin. With the view of net gain in power potential on a system basis, the plan of improvement incorporated appropriate flood control storage in the proposed project and corresponding adjustment in operations of Wolf Creek Dam - Lake Cumberland for flood control and power, which in effect constituted a transfer of reservoir capacity without entailing a change in flood control benefits. Further detailed study giving full consideration to power capabilities and marketing arrangements indicated the advantage of maintaining present storage allocation at Wolf Creek and use of all available storage capacity of Laurel River Lake for power. The power plant is complete. Recreation was completed in FY 1986. Total cost is $56,741,232. 23-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1997 Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Total net energy generated (81,145,000 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior for distribution. Construction began on a rest4oom and fishing access at the dam site. 18. WOLF CREEK DAM - LAKE CUMBERLAND, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Location. Wolf Creek Dam is on Cumberland River at mile 460.0 (above mouth) in Russell County, KY, about 10 miles southwest of Jamestown and 12 miles north of Albany, KY. Lake Cumberland extends 101 miles up main stream, 48 miles up South Fork of Cumberland River, in Russell, Clinton, Wayne, Pulaski, McCreary, Laurel, and Whitley Counties, KY. Existing project. A combination earth and concrete gravity-type dam, hydroelectric powerplant, and reservoir for primary purposes of flood control and power production, with a permanent pool for public-use and conservation purposes. See page 1094 of 1962 Annual Report for project details. Cost of project is $188,267,195. This cost includes $3,259,3472 code 710 funds, $880,000 non-Federal funds for recreation facilities under the completed program, and $104,999,237 for major rehabilitation. WRDA 96 authorized a Uprate Project of the hydroelectric powerplant. Local cooperation. None required on completed project; future recreation development subject to certain conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Activity involving the integrity of the structure began in 1968 when a leak or seepage developed in the embankment. The major rehab embankment contract was physically completed in September 1982. Maintenance: Dam was operated and structures and appurtenances maintained as required. Operation of powerplant was continuous except for normal interruptions and necessary shutdowns for inspection and maintenance purposes. Total net energy generated (1,185,093,000 kw-hr) was made available through Department of the Interior for distribution. Activities under reservoir management program involved land management activities, public relations, and maintenance of public-use facilities. Work continued on replacement of the alarm system. Work was begun on replacement of the power plant generator leads. A contrct was awarded for replacement ceiling tiles and lighting in the power plant. General Investigations 19. SURVEYS Costs for this period were $765,067 for which $94,316 was for Navigation Studies, $187, 392 for Flood Damage Prevention Studies, $96,203 for Shroeline Protection Studies, $232, 297 for Special Studies, $93,915 for Miscellaneous Activities and $60,944 for Coordination With Other Agencies and Non-Federal Interests 20. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Costs for this period were $155,927 for which $155,927 was for floodplain management services. 21. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Costs for this period were $3,300,821 for which $249,765 was for Watershed/Ecosystem Projects (Black Fox/Oakland Springs), $2,784,980 for Navigation Projects (Kentucky Lock) and $266,075 for Flood Control Projects (East Ridge). 23-8 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 23-A See Section in Text Project 1. Cumberland River TN and KY 2. Kentucky Lock TN and KY 3. Tennessee River, TN, AL, and KY 4. Tenn.-Tombigbee Waterway, AL and MS 7. Big South Fork National River and Rec. Area, KY and TN 8. Martins Fork Lake, KY 9. Middlesboro, Cumberland River Basin, KY 10. Tug & Levisa Forks of the Big Sandy & Cumberland River, WV, VA and KY 14. Center Hill Lake, Ohio River Basin, TN 15. Dale Hollow Lake Ohio River Basin, TN and KY 16. J. Percy Priest Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN 17. Laurel RiverLake, Ohio River Basin, KY COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Total to FY 94 FY 95 FY96 FY97 Sep 30, 1997 20,912,900 21,014,184 2,000,000 23,203,955 23,412,171 2,000,000 24,045,808 23,823,240 2,000,000 23,354,000 23,798,538 2,726,000 2,030,415 1,843,065 2,253,535 2,784,980 12,132,000 12,840,000 14,185,000 13,053,000 12,496,695 12,983,789 14,059,643 *12,996,888 39,993 0 19,098 575,000 613,810 -100,00 61,759 -200,000 6,912 714,000 601,498 42,000 30,000 23,237 53,525 21,637,000 25,158,000 19,695,774 22,688,568 0 17,704 -75,000 55,402 762,000 883,715 60,000 56,803 18,462,026 26,818,757 00 0 81,775 785,000 767,093 38,000 42,402 25,523,000 23,048,466 320,252,240 12,3 320,252,240 1,2,3 422,828,926 4 422,182,610 5 9,226,000 9,209,316 16,251,428 6 16,251,428 6 264,374,048 7 263,887,894 8 400,000 400,000 749,013,050 749,013,050 112,588,920 9 112,543,981 10 20,479,911 20,479,911 10,246,340 10,197,664 817,830 11 817,830 11 2,307,166 2,307,041 288,258,526 12 279,610,895 13 - - - - 53,412,022 14 - - - - 53,412,022 15 5,482,900 4,812,000 5,039,000 4,770,000 89,778,876 16 5,539,713 4,815,135 5,016,033 4,851,338 89,672,642 17 - - - - 28,317,746 18 - - - - 28,317,746 19 3,992,400 3,943,000 3,895,000 4,206,000 79,372,027 20 3,974,955 3,949,667 3,940,177 4,180,726 79,262,425 21 - - - - 56,914,039 22 - - - - 56,914,039 23 3,399,400 3,739,000 3,392,000 4,160,000 61,047,651 24 3,207,786 3,977,040 3,392,833 3,805,105 60,538,804 25 - - - - 56,741,232 - - - - 56,741,232 1,266,500 1,649,000 1,501,000 1,283,000 19,608,943 26 1,295,454 1,620,747 1,244,690 1,574,973 19,558,761 26 23-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1997 TABLE 23-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY97 Sep 30, 1997 18. Wolf Creek Dam and New Work Lake Cumberland, Approp. - - - - 83,267,958 27 Ohio River Basin, KY Cost - - - - 83,267,958 27 Maint. Approp. 4,709,500 4,944,000 5,036,000 7,676,000 111,211,733 28 Cost 4,783,364 4,965,926 5,104,269 7,374,806 110,792,642 29 Rehab. Approp. - - - - 104,999,237 30 Cost - - - - 104,999,237 30 1. Includes $9,707,354 for abandoned and/or replaced works under the old Cumberland River system. (Amount includes $826,253 for new work and $3,266,706 for maintenance on previous project.) 2. Includes $61,733 public works acceleration funds, and $102,966 contriubted by the State of Kentucky and $6,750 contributed by metropolitan Nashville, TN. 3. Includes $298,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 4. Includes $955,889 for special recreation use fees, and $2,628,257 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $1,892,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 5. Includes $955,889 for special recreation use fees, and $2,628,257 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $1,892,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 6. Includes $14,007,193 for new work and excludes $4,005,175 for maintenance on previous projects. 7. Includes $495,763 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $764,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 8. Includes $495,763 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $764,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 9. Includes $300,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 10. Includes $300,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 11. Includes $33,876 Emergency Relief Funds. 12. Includes $20,291,026 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 13. Includes $19,652,546 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 14. Includes $35,896 public works acceleration funds, and $148,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 15. Includes $35,896 public works acceleration funds, and $148,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 16. Includes $292,280 funds for special recreation use fees, and $1,083,678 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $91,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 17. Includes $292,280 funds for special recreation use fees, and $1,083,678 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $91,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 18. Includes $51,789 public works funds and $150,000 contributed by the State of Tennessee, and $341,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98- 8) of 1983. 19. Includes $51,789 public works funds and $150,000 contributed by the State of Tennessee, and $341,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98- 8) of 1983. 20. Includes $339,480 funds for special recreation use fees, and $1,083,678 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $482,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 21. Includes $1,083,678 funds for special recreation use fees, and $884,178 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $482,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 22. Includes $46,000 contributed by the Metropolitan Government, Nashville, TN. 23. Includes $46,000 contributed by the Metropolitan Government, Nashville, TN. 24. Includes $260,680 for special recreation use fees, and $1,226,978 for maintenance and operations of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $40,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 25. Includes $260,680 for special recreation use fees, and $1,226,978 for maintenance and operations of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $40,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 26. Includes $66,678 for maintenance and operations of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 27. Includes $96,920 public works acceleration funds, and $880,000 contributed by the State of Kentucky. 28. Includes $82,048 public works acceleration funds, and $198,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $278,780 funds for special recreation use fees, and $293,000 fund provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 29. Includes $82,048 public works acceleration funds, and $198,578 for maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters, and $278,780 funds for special recreation use fees, and $293,000 funds provided from the Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 30. Includes $203,757 for claim paid on initial construction of switchyard. 23-10 NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 23-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorized Project and Work Authorized in Text Act Jul 13, 1892 Jun 25, 1910 Aug 30, 1935 Jul 24, 1946 Jun 19, 1952 Sep. 3, 1954 Jul 14, 1960 Oct 12, 1996 Aug. 5, 1886 Mar 2, 1907 Mar 2, 1919 Jun 5, 1920 Jul 3, 1930 Jun 26, 19342 Jul 24, 1946 Oct 1, 1980 Oct 17, 1996 Oct 12, 1996 Jul 3, 1930 May 18, 1933 Oct 12, 1996 L Documents Annual Report, 1890, p. 2151 H. Does. 758, 60th Cong., 1st sess.; and 1481, 60th Cong., 2d sess. 1 H. Doc. 38, 73d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 761, 79th Cong., 2d sess. CUMBERLAND RIVER BELOW NASHVILLE Provision made for lock A Provision made for locks B to F, and for dredging below lock F. Repairing dams A to F, inclusive, and surmounting same with movable crests Provision of 9-foot channel by the construction of 3 moderate height dams below Nashville, via, Kuttawa (Eureka), Dover, and Cheatham. Provision for hydroelectric power production as a function of Cheatham Dam. Construction of Barkley (Lower Cumberland) dam and reservoir project for navigation, flood control, hydroelectric power, and related purposes in lieu of Kuttawa and Dover navigation-only structures. Authorized change in alignment of Illinois Central Railroad. Authorized construction of Kentucky Lock for navigation only. CUMBERLAND RIVER ABOVE NASHVILLE Provision made for locks and dams; the Secretary of War to determine the final plan of improvement. Dimensions of the locks fixed in accordance with reports of Mar. 30, 1887, and Nov. 25, 1890. Adoption of the report of the Board of Engineers, dated Feb. 26, 1906, limiting the lock and dam construction to locks and dams 1 to 7, and 21. Provision made for locks and dams 8 to 17. Authorizes work to proceed in Tennessee without waiting for action of local interests in Kentucky. Raising dam 1, 3 feet. Operation and care of locks and dams provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for rivers and harbors. Construction of Old Hickory, Cordell Hull (Carthage), and Celina Dams above Nashville for navigation and the development of power resources. Design and construct flood control measures for communities in the Upper Cumberland River basins. Authorized ecosystem restoration at three wetlands and historic sites in Murfresboro, TN. Authorized hydropower update at Wolf Creek Dam TENNESSEE RIVER Authorized navigable depth of 9 feet from mouth about 650 miles to Knoxville, Tennessee to be obtained by construction of low dams. Authorized TVA to construct such dams in the Tennessee River as will provide a 9 foot channel. Authorized flood damage reduction by nonstructure methods in Hamilton County, TN. WRDA 96 Annual Report 1884, p. 1663 Annual Report 1888, p. 1622, and Annual Report 1892, p. 1933. H. Doc. 699, 59th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 63d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 26, 70th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 761, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 202, PL 96-367 WRDA 96 WRDA 96 H. Doc. 328, 71st Cong., 2d sess. WRDA 96 23-11 S. Doc 81, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 56, 86th Cong., 2d sess. L 3. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1997 TABLE 23-B (continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Authorized Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct 12, 1996 Oct 12, 1996 Aug 28, 1937 Jun 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Jul 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Dec 30, 1963 Jun 18, 1965 Aug 13, 1968 Jun 19, 1970 Mar 7, 1974 Mar 7, 1974 Jul 24, 1946 11 WRDA 96 WRDA 96 Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Flood Control Committee Doc. 761, 75th Cong., 3d sess. Authorized a study for a bank stabilzation project on the Tennessee River in Hamilton County, TN. Authorized assistance to non-Federal interests for enviromental activities in Jackson County, AL. OHIO RIVER BASIN, NASHVILLE DISTRICT Construct levees, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin. Project to be selected by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War at a cost not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction. Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable at discretion of Secretary of War and Chief of Engineers and for initiation and partial accomplishment of plan, authorized $75million for reservoirs and $50,300,000 for local flood protection works. Additional $45 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Ohio River Basin. Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Authorized Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, KY and TN. Total area not to exceed 125,000 acres. Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY Construction of waterway to connect above rivers and provide a 9 foot channel and minimum bottom width of 170 feet in river and canal sections and 150 feet in the divide cut, with locks 110 by 600 feet clear inside dimensions. H. Doc. 6755, 89th Cong., 1st sess. S. 3710, 90th Cong., 2d sess. H. R. 15166 91st Cong., 2d sess. H. R. 10203 93rd Cong. Water Resources Develop. Act of 1974 Amended by PL 94-587, 94th Cong. H. R. 10203 93rd Cong. River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974. H. Doc. 486, 79th Cong. 2d sess. Subsequent studies determined most practical plan consists of channel with bottom width of 300 feet (280 feet in divide cut), fewer locks with higher lifts resulted in reducing number of lifts from 18 to 10 and reduced length from 260 to 253 miles. Page 1343, Part I, FY 1968 House Hearings 1. Contains latest published maps. Included in Public Works Administration program Sept. 6, 1933. 2. Permanent Appropriation Repeal Act. 23-12 H. Doc. 762, 77th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 506, 78th Cong., 1st sess. 4. NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 23-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (All Projects not Specifically Identified in Text) For last Full Cost to Sept, 1997 Report see Operation and Project Status Annual Report Construction Maintenance Caney Fork River, TN abandoned 1895 $ 27,828 Clinch River, TN and VA abandoned 1923 53,949 $ 7,873 Duck River, TN abandoned 1887 13,000 Elk River, AL and TN abandoned 1904 4,000 French Broad and Little Pigeon Rivers, TN abandoned 1931 249,605 33,554 Holston River, TN abandoned 1911 5,714 Little Tennessee River, TN abandoned 1888 5,510 Obey River, TN abandoned 1887 11,500 Red River, TN abandoned 1884 5,000 South Fork of Cumberland River, KY abandoned 1892 11,967 TABLE 23-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (All Projects not Specifically Identified in Text) For last Full Cost to Sept, 1997 Report see Operation and Project Status Annual Report Construction Maintenance Barbourville, KY completed 1963 $2,088,147 Coal Creek and Tributaries (Lake City), TN completed 1962 460,134 Corbin (Lynn Camp Creek), KY completed 1969 567,703 Middlesboro (Yellow Creek), KY completed 1949 26,309 Paint Rock River, AL completed 1967 544,173 Pineville, KY completed 1963 1,679,126 1. Includes $9,950 contributed funds. 23-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1997 Project Status Barkley Dam and Lake beneficial use Barkley, KY and TN Celina Dam, KY inactive Cheatham Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use Cordell Hull Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use Old Hickory Lock and Dam, TN beneficial use 1. Includes $883,240 cost for Cross Creek. TABLE 23-G For la Repo Annua ist Full Cost to Sept, 1997 )rt see Operation and 1 Report Construction Maintenance $147,381,884 1 $137,011,034 2 - 222,575 - 31,682,762 101,276,689 2 - 79,874,492 69,207,4442 - 52,266,412 114,687,473 2 2. Details given under "Cumberland River, TN and KY" See Table 23-H Project Three Islands Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, TN For last Full Report see Annual Report 1970 Middlesboro, Yellow Creek Bell County, KY Cumberland River above Nashville, TN Hiwassee River, Polk and Bradley Counties, TN 1923 Rossview Lake, Tennessee and Kentucky Celina Lake, Kentucky and Tennessee Date and Authority Authorized: FC Act 1938, PL 761, 75 Cong., 3rd sess.; FC Act 1946, PL 525, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Deauthorized: 5 Aug 1977. Authorized: FC Act, Dec 22, 1944, PL 534, 78th Congress. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Authorized: River & Harbor Act, Aug 5, 1886. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Authorized: River & Harbor Act Aug 14, 1876. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Authorized: FC Act, Jan 28, 1938, PL 76175th Congress. Deauthorized: 17 Oct 1986. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662, 99th Cong., 2d sess. Authorized: Rivers and harbors Act of 1946. PL 79-522. Deauthorized: July 9, 1995, Section 1001 (B) (2) of PL 99-662. Federal Funds Expended $111,855 Contributed Funds Expended 123,065 6,779 23-14 TABLE 23-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE-PURPOSE PROJECTS (Including Power) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS --- ---- NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 23-H CUMBERLAND RIVER, TN AND KY: PRINCIPAL FEATURES (See Section 1 of Text) Dam and Reservoir Nearest town Miles above mouth of rjver Lock dimensions (feet)l Lift at normal pool levels (feet) Depths on guard-sills at minimum pool levels (feet) Character of foundation Dam: Type Height Length, exclusive of lock section (feet) Spillway: Gross length (feet) Net length opening (feet) Crest gates: Type Number Size (feet) Operating levels at dam (feet, mean sea level): Maximum regulated Normal operation: Full pool Minimum pool Minimum pool in advance of floods Reservoir area (acres) Reservoir capacity (acre-feet): Flood control Power drawdown Dead storage Total Canel: Length (mile) Bottom width (feet) Depth a minimum pool level (feet) Power development: Number of units Generator rating (kilowatts) Total installation (kilowatts) Percent of project completion Year opened to navigation Cost 9 Barkley Kuttawa, KY 11 miles. 30.6 110 by 800 57 11, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 157 9,959 804 660 Tainter 12 55 by 60 Cheatham Ashland City, TN, 9 miles 148.7 110 by 800 26 14, upper; 17, lower Rock Concrete gravity 75 800 480 420 Tainter 7 60 by 27 375 359 354 346 93,430 Old Hickory Old Hickory TN, 3 miles 216.2 84 by 400 60 14, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 98 3,6052 325 270 Tainter 6 45 by 41 4503 385 382 7,450 1,213,0003, 4 259,000 610,000 2,082,00 1.75 400 11 4 32,500 130,000 8 1964 $147,381,884 10 19,8007 84,200 104,000 3 12,000 36,000 1952 $213,000,000 442 27,450 125,0005 63,000 357,000 545,000 4 25,000 100,000 8 1952 $52,111,000 Cordell Hull Carthage, TN 5 miles 313.5 84 by 400 59 14, upper; 13, lower Rock Concrete gravity and earthfill 93 1,1382 291 225 Tainter 5 45 by 41 5083 508 501 499 13,920 85,6005,6 20,500 204,800 310,900 3 33,333 100,000 8 1973 $79,874,500 1. Clear width and length available for full width. 2. Exclusive of lock section. 3. Surcharge. 4. Normal operation (elev. 375-359) during nonflood season; flood control allowance to be increased to 1,472,000 acre-feet (elev. 375-354) during season of major floodflows. 5. Surcharge storage 6. During flood season (elev. 508-501); minimum 51,800 acre-feet (elev. 508-504) with normal operation during non-flood season. 7. Daily pondage allowance; run-of-river project. 8. Completed for full beneficial use. 9. Includes recreation facility costs. 10. Includes $883,240 cost for Cross Creek. 23-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY OF CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES, FY 1997 TABLE 23-I TENNESSEE RIVER (SEE SECTION 2 OF TEXT) Lock Dimension Project1 Miles Above Mouth Kentucky Pickwick Landing: Auxiliary lock Main lock Wilson: Auxiliary lock Main lock General Joe Wheeler: Auxiliary lock Main lock Guntersville: Auxiliary lock Main lock NAicukxaijlaiacrky: lock Main lock Chickamauga Watts Bar Fort Loudon Melton Hill (Clinch R.) Miles from Nearest Town Length Minimum Depth Width Avail- Lift on Guard Sills of able for Cham- Full Nor- Maxiher Width mal mum Lower Upper (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) (feet) 22.4 0.5 above Gilbertsville, KY 110 600 206.7 4.4 above Hamburg, TN 206.7 4.4 above Hamburg, TN 259.4 2.9 above Florence, AL 259.4 2.9 above Florence, AL 274.9 18.4 above Florence, AL 274.9 18.4 above Florence, AL 349.0 9.1 below Guntersville, AL 60 360 349.0 9.1 below Guntersville, AL 110 600 424.7 39.4 below Chattanooga, TN 110 600() 424.7 39.4 below Chattanooga, TN 110 800 471.0 6.9 above Chattanooga, TN 60 360 529.9 6.8 above Breedenton, TN 60 360 602.3 1.3 above Lenoir City, TN 23.1 22.1 above Kingston, TN 56 73.3 12.7 11.0 110 600 55 63.0 12.8 10.0 110 1000 55 63.0 12.8 10.0 60 292 94 100.0 11.04 11.2 300 110 600 94 100.0 13.0 13.0 60 400 48 51.5 13.2 14.7 110 600 48 51.5 13.0 13.0 39 45.0 11.8 13.0 39 45.0 12.7 13.0 39 41.0 13.0 13.0 39 41.0 13.0 13.0 49 53.0 13.0 10.0 58 70.0 11.8 12.0 60 360 72 80.0 11.8 12.0 75 400 54 60.0 13.0 13.0 Year Opened Character of avi- Foundation gation Limestone 1942 Limestone 1937 Limestone 1984 Limestone 1927 Limestone 1959 Limestone 1934 Limestone 1963 Limestone 1937 Limestone 1965 Limestone 1967 Limestone Limestone 1939 Shale 1941 Limestone 1943 Limestone 1963 Cost of Kind Type of Each Lock of Dam Construction and Dam Fixed Concrete and 2 earthfill Fixed Fixed Concrete and earthfill Concrete and earthfill Fixed Concrete and $46,973,5405 earthfill 7 Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Fixed Concrete and 1,796,2956 earthfill Concrete and earthfill Concrete and earthfill Concrete Concrete Concrete and earthfill Fixed Concrete and earthfill Fixed Concrete 3&7 7 7 7 3&7 3 64th Cong.. 1st 23-16 1. H. Doc. 328, 71 Cong., 2d sess, contains table, pp. 98 and 99, giving pertinre nt information concerning low dams cortemplaled 5. Constructed by the Corps under authority of sec. 124, National Defen Act of June 3. 1916, (H. Doc. 1262. under 1930 project. Annual Report tfir 1938, pp. 1218 and 1219. contains similar inroirmation pertaining to low dams in addition to seas.). Actual cost of lock and dam. existing locks and dams. including those constructed or under conrstructiorr by Tennessee Valley Authnrity. 6. Actual cost of lock only as constructed by the Corps; dams costructed by Tennessee Valey Authority. 2. Lock and dam constructed by Tennessee Valley Aut hority. 7. Constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. 3. Lock and damr constructed by Tennessee Valley Authority. )cesign ftr lock prepared with Corps fices and fumds. 4. Tailwater in canal: flight of2 locks. V -. -. NASHVILLE, TN, DISTRICT TABLE 23-J Funds TENNESSEE RIVER, TN, AL, AND KY TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECTS TO SEP 30, 1997 (See Section 2 of Text) Channel Operation & New Work Maintenance Maintenance Regular $2,244,2361,2 $14,898,510 $248,977,714 $266,120,460 Maintenance 11,665 11,665 Increase of compen- - 5 - 5 sation, rivers and harbors, 1919 (certified claims) Total $2,244,2361,2 $14,898,515 $248,989,379 $266,132,130 1. In addition, surplus property valued at $54,336 was ation and care of works of improvement under provisions of transferred from the project without reimbursement. Excludes appropriation for such purposes. $4,005,175 expended betweenl890 and June 30, 1935, on oper- 2. Excludes $14,007,192 previous construction cost. TABLE 23-K OHIO RIVER BASIN (NASHVILLE DISTRICT) LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECTS Type of Estimated Cost Location Protection Federal Non-Federal Total Cumberland, KY Channmel Improvement 520,000 240,000 760,000 1 TABLE 23-L RESERVOIRS Tributary Basin and Reservoir Center Hill Lake Dale Hollow Lake, TN and KY J. Percy Priest Dam & Reservoir, TN Laurel River Lake, KY Martins Fork Lake, KY Steam Caney Fork Obey River Stones River Laurel River Martins Fork Total Federal Cost 53,412,0221 28,167,7461 56,868,039 1,2 56,741,232 3 20,479,911 1. Details of this project are in individual report. 2. Formerly Stewarts Ferry Reservoir. 3. See "Other authorized multiple-purpose projects." 23-17 Total Y s aV TABLE 23-M INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 10 of Text) Project Date of Inspection Barbourville, KY Oct 1996 - Apr 1997 Corbin, KY Oct 1996 - Apr 1997 Lake City, TN Oct 1996 - Apr 1997 Middlesboro, KY (Yellow Creek) Oct 1996 - Apr 1997 Middlesboro, KY (Diversion Canal) Oct 1996 - Apr 1997 Pineville, KY Oct 1996- Apr 1997 Spring City, TN Oct 1996 Sunbright, TN (Whiteoak Creek) Oct 1996 - Apr 1997 TABLE 23-N FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205 P.L 858, 80th Congress, as amended Project FY 97 Cost Little Limestone Creek, TN $ 11,821 Clark Spring Branch, Decatur, AL 59,150 Muscle Shoals, AL 349,763 Sinking Creek,Murfreesboro, TN 22,700 First Creek, Knoxville, TN 39,284 Dallas Branch, Huntsville, AL 161,557 Huntsville Spring Brand, AL 79,711 Emilty Ave / Tim. St., AL 48,784 Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, P.L. 526, 79th Congress) Project FY 97 Cost Duck River, Hickman Co., TN 8,509 McGregor Park, Montgomery Co., TN 681 South Holston River, Kingsport, TN 98,130 Sequoyah Hills Park Phase II, Knoxville, TN 11,231 Clinch River, Kingston, TN 20,164 Ditto Landing, Huntsville, AL 58,947 Tennessee River, Mile 496-470, Chattanooga, TN 355,062 Cumberland River, Ted Rhodes Golf Course, Nashville, TN 16 Clifton, Wayne Co., TN 7,910 Ross's Landing, Chattanooga, TN 81,929 Tennessee River, UT Experiment Station, Knoxville, TN 152,082 Tennessee River Mile 645-6473 31,659 Clarksville Fairground 62,059 Cumberland River Mile 193-197.5 105,601 Water Treatment Plant 44,684 Interceptor Sewerline 74,931 Tennessee Riverpark - Frye Fish 57,346 23-18 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT * This district encompasses southwestern Ohio, all of Central Kentucky and portions of western and eastern Kentucky, the southern 3/4 of Indiana, and southeastern Illinois , all included in the drainage basin of the Ohio River and its tributaries (exclusive of Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers) from mile 438 (below Pittsburgh) immediately upstream from Foster, KY., to the mouth of the Ohio. All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation - Channels and Habors Page 1. Open Channel Work, Licking River, KY ...... 24-2 Navigation - Locks and Dams 2. Construction of Locks and Dams, Ohio River ................................ ........ 24-2 3. Green and Barren Rivers, KY ...................... 24-2 4. Kentucky River, KY ................................ 24-2 5. Open Channel Work, Ohio River ................. 24-3 6. Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........ 24-3 7. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ..................................... 24-3 Flood Control - Local Protection 8. Duck Creek, OH ......................................... 24-3 9. Evansville, IN ............................................. 24-3 10. Holes Creek, OH ........................................... 24-4 11. Frankfort, South Frankfort, KY................... 24-4 12. Mill Creek, OH ..................................... 24-4 13. Ohio River Flood Protection ...................... 24-5 14. Pond Creek, KY .................................... 24-5 15. Salyersville, KY ..................................... 24-5 16. Southwestern Jefferson County, KY ........... 24-6 17. White River, Indianapolis Central Waterfront, IN ................................. 24-6 Flood Control - Reservoirs 18. Barren River Lake, KY .............................. 24-6 19. Brookville Lake, KY ................................... 24-7 20. Buckhorn Lake, KY....................................... 24-7 21. Caesar Creek Lake, OH ............................. 24-7 22. Cagles Mill Lake, IN ................................... 24-7 23. Carr Creek Lake, KY ................................. 24-8 24. Cave Run Lake, KY ................................ 24-8 25. Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN ....................... 24-8 26. Clarence J. Brown Dam & Reservoir, OH ... 24-9 27. Green River Lake, KY ................................ 24-9 28. J. Edward Roush Lake, IN ...................... 24-10 29. Mississinewa Lake, IN ............................. 24-10 30. Monroe Lake, IN ................................. 24-10 31. Nolin Lake, KY ............................................ 24-11 32. Ohio River Basin (Louisville District)........ 24-11 Page 33. Patoka Lake, IN ........................................ 24-11 34. Rough River Lake and Channel Improvement, KY ..................................... 24-12 35. Salamonie Lake, IN .................................. 24-12 36. Taylorsville Lake, KY.................................. 24-12 37. Wabash River Basin .................................... 24-13 38. West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH ......... 24-13 39. William H. Harsha Lake, OH .................. 24-14 40. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ........... .... 24-14 41. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects.. 24-14 42. Flood Control Works Under Special Authorization ....................... ......... ........... 24-14 General Investigations 43. Surveys ..................................... 24-14 44. Precontruction Engineering and Design .... 24-14 45, Coordinattion with other Agencies ............. 24-15 46. Collection and Study of Basic Data ............ 24-15 Tables Table 24-A Cost and Financial Statement .... 24-16 Table 24-B Authorizing Legislation ............ 24-21 Table 24-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..................................... 24-24 Table 24-D Not applicable Table 24-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................................... 24-25 Table 24-F Not applicable Table 24-G Deauthorized Projects ................. 24-27 Table 24-H Principal Features of Green and Barren Rivers and Kentucky River Navigation Systems .......... 24-29 Table 24-I Ohio River Basin - Total Cost of Basin Plan .... ................... 24-30 Table 24-J Wabash River Basin - Total Cost of Basin Plan .................... 24-34 Table 24-K Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ........................ 24-34 Table 24-L Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ............................... 24-37 Table 24-M General Investigations ........... 24-39 24-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Navigation - Channels and Harbors 1. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, LICKING RIVER, KY Location. The Licking River originates in southeast ern Kentucky and flows generally northwesterly to its confluence with the Ohio River at Covington, KY, mile 470.2 below Pittsburgh, PA. The Licking River Basin includes the drainage area of the Licking River, and all other left bank tributaries of the Ohio River from Markland Locks and Dam (Ohio River Mile 531.5) upstream to Meldahl Locks and Dam (Ohio River Mile 436.2). Existing project. There are no locks and dams on the Licking River. However, a navigable depth of 9 feet is maintained up to mile 7.0 on the Licking River. Local cooperation. None. Terminal facilities. Facilities for bulk commodities, oil products, and coal are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Dredging was done where required to provide an adequate and dependable channel. Navigation - Locks and Dams 2. CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER For report on this improvement, see the heading under Ohio River. 3. GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY Location. Green River rises in Casey County, KY, flows northwesterly 370 miles, and empties into the Ohio River about 8 miles above Evansville, IN. Barren River rises in Monroe County, KY, flows northwesterly 130 miles, and empties into Green River 1/2 mile above Lock 4 and 149.5 miles above the mouth of Green River. Existing project. Six locks and dams on Green River and one on Barren River to provide, were constructed in pools of dams, a navigable depth of 9 feet and width of 200 feet from the Ohio River to mile 103 Green River, 3.2 miles upstream from Paradise, KY and a navigable depth of 5.5 feet from mile 103 Green River to Mammoth Cave, KY, mile 197.8 Green River, and from mouth of Barren River mile 149.5 Green River, to Bowling Green, KY, mile 30.1, Barren River. Of these facilities, only Green River L&D 1 and 2 are still operational. Green River L&D 3, 4, 5, 6 and Barren River L&D 1 are maintained by the Corps in a caretaker status. Fluctuations in stage vary considerably at different locks. At Lock 3, Green River, ordinary high stages are from 12 to 15 feet above pool level, and at Lock 1, Barren River, from 7 to 10 feet above pool. Maximum stages of record are 34 feet above normal pool stage at Lock 3, Green River, and 29 feet at Lock 1, Barren River, obtained during floods of 1937 and 1913, respectively. (See Table 24-B for authorizing legislation and Table 24- H for principal features of the locks and dams.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Coal handling facilities located on the Green River between miles 81.5 and 108.1 near South Carrollton, Rockport, Paradise and Rochester, Kentucky, are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Consisted of operation and maintenance of Locks and Dams 1 and 2 and Green River. Maintenance of fencing at the properties of Green River L&D 3, 4, 5, and 6 and Barren River L&D 1. A mooring facility at Green River L&D 3 is also maintained. Condition at end of fiscal year. Locks and Dams 1 and 2, Green River, are in good condition. Dam 3 on the Green and Dam 1 on the Barren are in fair condition and the locks at those locations are in poor condition. Lock 4, Green River, is in poor condition. Dam 4, Green River, failed May 24, 1965, when 120 feet washed out. Breach later widened, and repairs have been permanently deferred. Pool of Dam 1, Barren River, is maintained for local small boat use, but navigation through lock is suspended because of loss of lower pool. Operation activity was discontinued at Lock 4 Green River and Lock and Dam 1 Barren River in January 1974 and at Lock 3, Green River in September 1981. The residences and associated buildings and certain real estate at Lock 4 Green River and Lock and Dam 1 Barren River were disposed of in January 1975. Operation of Locks 5 and 6, Green River, was discontinued August 1951, as they were no longer used by river traffic. Controlling project depth in lower 103 miles of Green River is 9 feet; controlling depth from mile 103 to Bowling Green, KY, is 5.5 feet. Channel of Green River above Lock 3 is no longer maintained. 4. KENTUCKY RIVER, KY Location. Formed by confluence of its North and Middle Forks about 4 miles east of Beattyville in east central Kentucky, (South Fork joins the main stream at that location), flows northwesterly and empties into Ohio River at Carrollton, KY, mile 545.8 below Pittsburgh, PA. Existing project. Provides for 14 locks and fixed dams to give, in connection with improvement of Ohio River, slack water navigation of 6 feet minimum depth from Ohio River to places on the three forks that are short distances above Beattyville, KY. Length of6-footdepth project on main stem of Kentucky River is 258.6 miles to confluence of Middle and North Forks. Cost of completed new work is $4,176,749. River frequently rises to 35 feet or higher. Extreme height at Lock 1 due to flood backwater from Ohio River is 60.3 feet, while extreme floods reach height of 47.6 feet at Lock 4, and 35.5 feet at Lock 14. At some intermediate locks extreme height of floods exceeds 40 feet. All flood heights refer to upper pool gages. Existing project was adopted by 1879 River and Harbor Act (H. Ex. Doc. 47, 45th Cong., 3d Sess., and Annual Report, 1879, p. 1398). Operation and care of locks and dams were included in project July 1, 1935, under provision of Permanent 24-2 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT Appropriations Repeal Act of June 26, 1934. (See Table 24-H for principal features of the locks and dams.) On December 19, 1976, the lock operation schedules for commercial traffic and recreational craft on the Kentucky River System were reduced from continuous 24-hour year-round operation to two-shift year-round operation of Locks 1 through 4, intermittent daily operation of Locks 5 through 10, and intermittent operation five days weekly of Locks 11 through 14. Since that time the hours for operation of Locks 5 through 14 have been reduced in several increments. On October 1, 1981, Locks 5 through 14 were closed to traffic and placed in caretaker status. Locks 5, 6, 8, 9, and 10 were in operation for 15 weekends during fiscal year 1982 and closed at the end of this period. Locks 5 through 14 were leased to the Commonwealth of Kentucky on May 21, 1985. The Commonwealth of Kentucky operated these locks on weekends during the summer boating seasons through the Fiscal Year. The lease expired on October 15, 1989, and Locks 5 through 14 were closed to traffic and placed in caretaker status. The Commonwealth of Kentucky continued operation again under a lease agreement signed in 1990 with several extensions that allow the Commonwealth to operate the Locks until 2019. The Corps continues to operate Locks 1 through 4 on a twoshift, year-round operation. In Fiscal Year 1993 the Corps began repairs to dams 5 through 14 in preparation for transfer to the Commonwealth. Dam repairs were physically completed in fiscal Year 1998. In December 1996 the Assistant Secretary of the Army (CW) signed the quitclaim transfer deed for Lock and Dam 10 for direct transfer from the Corps to the Commonwealth. The Corps continues efforts to transfer Locks and Dam 5-9 and 11-14 to the Commonwealth. Licenses. Federal Regulatory Commission License No. 539, to Kentucky Utilities Co., at Dam 7, Kentucky River, Annual charge, $4,400; total collections through September 30, 1997, $328,405. Terminal facilities. Facilities for bulk commodities are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Consisted of operation and maintenance of Locks and Dams 1 through 4 and removal of shoals, snags, and slides as required to maintain an adequate channel for existing traffic between mouth of river and Dam 5 at mile 82.2 Kentucky River. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Condition at end of fiscal year. Existing project was completed in 1917. Work accomplished was rehabilitation of the five old State locks and dams and construction of new Locks and Dams 6 to 14 inclusive. Repairs have been made to deteriorated locks and dams as required to keep locks in operation and maintain pool levels above dams except in extreme dry weather, when some pools fall below normal levels, details in Annual Reports for 1963, 1964, and 1965. Channel work was performed as required to provide for existing river traffic. Controlling navigable depth in length of river covered by existing project was 6 feet at end of fiscal year. 5. OPEN CHANNEL WORK, OHIO RIVER For report on this improvement, see this heading under Ohio River. 6. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS See Table 24-C. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION None. Flood Control - Local Protection 8. DUCK CREEK, OH Location. The project area is located in the City of Cincinnati and the Village of Fairfax in Hamilton County, Ohio. The project encompasses 3.2 miles of the stream and begins approximately 2 miles upstream of the confluence of Duck Creek with the Little Miami River. Existing project. The project consists of approximately 7,100 feet of concrete flood wall, 3,300 feet of earth levee, 8,500 feet of riprapped stream bank, 1,200 feet of channel relocation, 1,100 feet of culvert, demolition of an abandoned highway bridge, widening of a railroad bridge, widening of a railroad bridge, a pump station, and automatic road closure, and an emergency access road. Estimated cost of new work (1997) is $16,765,000 of which $12,574,000 is Federal and $4,191,000 is non- Federal. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. Local cooperation. The non-Federal sponsors are the City of Cincinnati and the Village of Fairfax. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) has been negotiated with them and is scheduled to be executed in December 1997. Operations during fiscal year. Work this year includes preparation of plans and specifications for the first two construction contracts and finalization of the PCA. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project is about 10 percent complete overall with design approximately 35 percent complete. 9. EVANSVILLE, IN Location. In Vanderburgh County, IN, on right bank of Ohio River, 792.2 miles below Pittsburgh, PA. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Evansville-South, IN.) Existing project. Construction of a system of levees and concrete floodwalls, together with pumping plants for disposal of interior drainage, at Evansville. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1127. Project will provide protection for City of Evansville, IN, against Ohio River floods equal to 1937 flood (maximum of record), with a 3-foot freeboard. Estimated total cost ofnew work(1997) is $44,654,000 Federal, and $5,500,000 non-Federal. Existing project selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin 1937 Flood Control Act. 24-3 7. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Local cooperation. Section 3 of Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, as amended, applies. Fully complied with for Howell Unit 1, Knight Township sections, and Pigeon Creek Section, Unit 1 and Unit 2, Parts 1, 2, 3, and 4. Operations during fiscal year. During the 1997 flood season estimated damages of $2,263,000 were prevented. Condition at end of fiscal year. Howell Unit 1, Knight Township, Pigeon Creek Unit 1, and Pigeon Creek Unit 2, Parts 1, 2, 3, and 4 have been completed. Howell Section, Unit 2 was reclassified from the "active" category to the "inactive" category July 7, 1977 based on studies that indicated this part of the project is not economically justified. This part was deauthorized by Congress under authority of Public Law 99-662, effective July 1992. Project is 100 percent complete overall. Project was turned over to Local Sponsor October 1996. 10. FRANKFORT, SOUTH FRANKFORT, KY Location. The project area of South Frankfort lies along the south bank of the Kentucky River in Frankfort, KY, Franklin County in the Bluegrass Region of central Kentucky. Existing Project. The project consists of approximately 3,811 feet of concrete floodwall and earthen levee, interior pumping facilities, and bank protection; and, will provide protection to 390 properties in South Frankfort. The Kentucky River drains an area of about 6,966 square miles in the central part of Kentucky and empties into the Ohio River at mile 545.8. Estimated cost of new work (1997) is $11,510,000, of which $8,630,000 is Federal, and $2,880,000 is non-Federal. The project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1938, as modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1990. Local Cooperation. The non-Federal cost sharing partner is the City of Frankfort, Kentucky. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed in July 1993 and the City has completed all necessary real estate acquisition. They have provided all necessary financial contribution pending final audit. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Work on the second construction contract for 1,250 feet of floodwall and the 150 cfs pump station was completed in FY 96 work on the final contract for the remaining 2561 feet of protection continued in FY 96. The Project is 99 percent complete. Maintenance: During the 1996 flood season, no benefits were realized. 11. HOLES CREEK, OH Location. Project area is located on Holes Creek in West Carrollton, Montgomery County, Ohio. West Carrollton is situated in the southwestern portion of Ohio and is a suburb of Dayton. Holes Creek drains 28.2 square miles and empties into the Great Miami River at river mile 72.6. Existing project. Project consists of approximately 4,300 feet of channel widening (80 foot bottom width) with associated bank protection. The existing box culvert type Conrail bridge will be replaced with a 70 foot clear span structure. Project will provide protection to 428 structures in West Carrollton and Moraine. Estimated total cost of new work is $4,085,000 Federal and $1,498,600 non-Federal. Location cooperation. The non-Federal cost sharing partner is the Miami Conservancy District (MCD). MCD formed the Holes Creek/Owl Creek Conservancy Subdistrict to act as formal sponsor for this project. The Conservancy Court of Montgomery County approved the Subdistrict in December, 1994. An official plan and an appraisal record prepared by the Subdistrict were approved in November, 1995, enabling the Subdistrict to enter into the Project Cooperation Agreement with the Government in September 1996. Funds will be provided to the Subdistrict by Montgomery County, the City of West Carrollton, the City of Moriane, and Miami Township. Operations during fiscal year. Work this year includes the sponsor acquiring the right-of-way for the entire project, completion of Phase I (1,000 feet of channel widening) plans and specifications, and continuation of plans and specifications for Phase II (bridge and 3,300 feet of channel widening). Conditions at end of fiscal year. Project is about 25 percent complete overall. Design is 90 percent complete. 12. MILL CREEK, OH Location. Project is located along the 18-mile length of Mill Creek and three-fourths mile length of East Fork in Hamilton County, OH. Lower Mill Creek is in the commercial and industrial heart of the Cincinnati metropolitan area in the southwestern portion of the State. Existing project. Eighteen miles of channel improvement, 2 miles of levees, two pumping plants, modification of 29 bridges, and the addition of two pumping units at the present Mill Creek Barrier Dam, located near the Ohio River, are included in the project. Acquisition and development with appropriate landscaping of 620 acres along the creek will be provided for high-density urban oriented recreational use. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 as amended, applies. In addition, local interests must provide without cost to the United States all modifications and relocations of buildings, utilities, street and foot bridges, sewers, and related and special facilities as necessary for construction of project; prevent encroachment on improved channels and onponding areas which would impair capacities; at least annually inform interests affected as to degree of protection afforded by project, and provide guidance and leadership in preventing unwise and uneconomical development of flood plain areas by encouraging prudent use of floodproofing, land regulation planning, or other flood plain management techniques to reduce flood losses. Further, with respect to the recreational aspects of the project, local interests are required to furnish assurances that they will, if necessary, pay or contribute in kind, a portion of the cost of recreational facilities which, when added to the cost of recreation land, would 24-4 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT amount to at least 50 percent of the total first cost of the recreation land and recreational facilities, and assure access to the recreation facilities to all on equal terms. An assurance agreement covering local cooperation requirements for the project consistent with Section 221 of the 1970 Flood Control Act and the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 was executed by the Millcreek Valley Conservancy District February 6, 1975, and for the Secretary of the Army March 28, 1975. A recreation cost sharing contract was executed by the Conservancy District February 25, 1975, and approved by the Secretary of the Army May 28, 1975. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: At the direction of the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, the Corps has initiated a study to evaluate the consequences of terminating further Federal activity on the project. All further design and construction activities are unprogrammed. Maintenance: During the 1997 flood season estimated damages of $107,000 were prevented. Condition at end of fiscal year. DM #1, Hydrology & Hydraulics; DM #2, Phase 1, Plan Formulation; DM #3, Phase II, General Project; DM #4, Construction Materials; DM #5, Railroad Relocations, and DM #6, Barrier Dam Pumps are complete. DM#7, Public Use was completed in FY 1992. Construction channel and levee-Sections 2,3,4A, and 7A, Phase 1, are complete. Project is about 52 percent complete overall. 13. OHIO RIVER FLOOD PROTECTION (INDIANA SHORELINE), IN Location. The six existing local flood protection projects are located along the Indiana shore from Ohio River mile 492 in Lawenceburg downstream to mile 792 in Evansville. They are in the communities of Evansville, Tell City, Cannelton, New Albany, Jeffersonville- Clarksville, and Lawrenceburg. Existing project. Each of the six local flood projects were constructed by the Corps and have been locally operated and maintained. All six projects were constructed to protect against the 1937 flood plus three feet of freeboard. Rehabilitation measures are necessary at each of the six sites in order to maintain their integrity and to insure that they continue to provide the benefits for which they were designed. Rehabilitation would consist of sliplining (or where necessary replacement) of all pipes and culverts which are part of the flood protection facilities, replacing aging pump station equipment, restoring expansion joints and closures, and repairing, as needed, floodwalls and other structures. Estimated cost of new work is $3,998,000 Federal and $1,333,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Each of the six communities have continued to express their desire to participate in the project during negotiations of the Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) Packages. Operations during the fiscal year. Work this year includes preparation of a Supplement to the Reconnaissance Report and preparation and negotiation of PCA's. Conditions at the end of fiscal year. Project is about 20 percent overall with design approximately 25 percent complete. 14. POND CREEK, LOUISVILLE, KY Location. The project is located in the central and eastern portions of the 126 square mile Pond Creek watershed in southern Jefferson County, Kentucky. Existing project. The project consists of constructing a 1500 acre-feet detention basin storage facility along Northern Ditch. An existing abandoned rock quarry adjacent to Fishpool Creek will be converted to a detention basin. Approximately 2.4 miles of the Pond Creek channel will be enlarged as well as 1.5 miles of Northern Ditch. A multi-purpose maintenance road/recreation trail will be constructed along the length of the Pond Creek channel improvement. In addition, three inactive settling basins owned by the local sponsor will be converted into an environmental restoration site. Estimated cost of new work (1997) is $17,325.000 of which $12,083,000 is Federal and $5,242,000 is non-Federal. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. Local cooperation. The non-Federal cost sharing partner is the Louisville and Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer District (SD). MSD has included all funds necessary for their cost share of the project in their capital budget plan. They have provided all necessary financial documentation to support execution of the Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA). The PCA is currently being reviewed by the ASA(CW). Operations during fiscal year. Work this year includes finalizing the plans and specifications for three construction contracts and executing the PCA. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The project is about 25 percent complete. Design is 80 percent complete and construction has not been initiated. 15. SALYERSVILLE, KY Location. Project is located along the banks of the Licking River from approximately mile 266 and 271 in Magoffin County, Kentucky along the Mountain Parkway about 75 miles southeast of Lexington, Kentucky. Existing project. The most cost-effective and feasible plan to provide the authorized level of protection (1978 flood protection) is called the "Cut-Thru Plan" and includes two channel cut-thrus, a barrier dam at the upstream cut-thru, and an 0.8 mile reach of channel improvement connecting the two cut-thrus. Estimated total cost of new work (1997) is $9,500,000 of which $8,597,500 is Federal and $902,500 is non- Federal. Local cooperation. The local sponsor qualifies for an "ability to pay" reduction pursuant to Section 103(m) of the 1986 Water Resource Development Act. Based on current costs and economics, the local sponsor share would be 9.5 percent of the total project cost. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed in August 1995 and the construction contract was awarded in September 1996. 24-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Operations during the fiscal year. Construction is underway and continues. Conditions at the end of fiscal year. Project is about 95 percent complete overall with construction approximately 90 percent complete. 16. SOUTHWESTERN JEFFERSON COUNTY, KY Location. In Jefferson County, KY, on left bank of Ohio River from mile 616 to 628.6. Existing project. Construction of 68,500 feet of levee, 1,550 feet of concrete wall, four pumping plants, and other necessary appurtenances. Project provides protection for 24,100 acres against Ohio River floods equal to 1937 flood of record with 3-foot freeboard. Cost of new work is $70,058,867, of which $60,199,867 is Federal, and $9,859,000 is non-Federal. Project was authorized under Flood Control Act of August 1968. Recreation as a project purpose has been deferred until such time as a water quality problem on Pond Creek is corrected. Local cooperation. Section 3 Flood Control Act of 1936 as amended applies. In addition, local interests agree to administer project land and water areas for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and to pay, contribute in kind or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of lands and facilities for recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. Jefferson County Fiscal Court expressed intent to fulfill requirements by resolution dated April 4, 1967. Formal assurances of local cooperation for the flood protection portion of the projectwas executed by resolution ofJefferson County Fiscal Court, adopted September 17, 1971, and assurances for the recreation portion of the project were executed by similar resolution, adopted September 14, 1971. Authorization-of-entry for levee and floodwall sections 1,2,3,4,4A,5 and Pond Creek Pump Plant have been furnished. Project was transferred to local interest on September 8, 1989. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Expenses to collect a judgement from a contractor who installed pumps and motors at the Pond Creek Pumping Station continued. Project is 99 percent complete overall. During the 1997 flood season estimated damages of $12,376,000 were prevented. 17. WHITE RIVER, INDIANAPOLIS CENTRAL WATERFRONT, IN Location. Project is located along the White River in the City of Indianapolis, IN. Existing project. Project consists of infrastructure improvements such as public access parking, walkways, pedestrian bridges, landscaping, lighting, and water features. The project also includes continuous public access along both sides of the White River waterfront through the construction ofwalkways, bike paths, landscaped promenades, and the rebuilding and reconfiguring of the existing concrete slopewalls. Estimated cost of new work is $39,975,000 Federal and $43,779,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. The non-Federal sponsors are the White River State Park (State of Indiana) and the City of Indianapolis. All lands for the project have been acquired by the sponsors. By the end of 1997 approximately $31,000,000 of construction funded by the sponsors will have been completed. The terms of the Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) have been finalized and the PCA is scheduled for execution in December 1997. Operation during fiscal year. Work this year includes execution of the Project Cooperation Agreement and preparation of three sets of plans and specifications. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is about 50 percent complete overall with design approximately 70 percent complete and construction about 40 percent complete. Flood Control - Reservoirs 18. BARREN RIVER LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Barren River, 79.5 miles above its confluence with Green River and 10 miles northeast of Scottsville, KY. At flood control pool reservoir extends upstream about 40 miles in Barren and Allen Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Lucas, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earth and rockfill, 146 feet high and 3,970 feet long, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open-cut spillway. Total storage capacity is 815,200 acre-feet (768,000 for flood control and 46,600 for water supply storage). For further details, see page 1125 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of the completed project is $27,479,717 including $2,335,055 Federal funds and $108,418 non- Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1938. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Under provision of Water Supply Act of 1958, contract with City of Glasgow for water supply storage was approved by Secretary of Army on October 4, 1965. Terms require City to pay $23,433, which is project cost allocated to water storage plus capitalized prepayment of proportionate share of operation, maintenance, and major replacement costs. A contract, with the Common wealth of Kentucky for development of additional campsites, shoreline protection and breakwater extension at Barren River Lake State Park under the cost-sharing category of the completed projects program was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 4, 1977. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. During the 1997 flood season estimated damages of $11,868,000 were prevented. Recreational benefits were $42,172,885. 24-6 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in March 1960 and all major construction and relocation items were completed in October 1964. Project was placed in operation in March 1964. Land acquisition is complete. 19. BROOKVILLE LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Whitewater River, 2.4 miles above confluence with West Fork, and about 1-1/2 miles north of Brookville, Indiana. The reservoir lies in Franklin and Union Counties, Indiana. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Brookville, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earthfill, 182 feet high and 3,004 feet long, with gate-controlled outlet works, and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 359,600 acre-feet (214,700 for flood control, 89,300 for water supply, and 35,500 for conservation). A minimum pool of 20,100 acre-feet is maintained. Cost of completed new work is $45,402,565 of which $37,905,073 is Federal cost and $7,497,492 is non-Federal contribution for water supply storage. Project was authorized by 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Contract with State of Indiana for water supply storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958 was approved by Secretary of Army, August 5, 1965. Under terms of contract, State paid initial costs allocated to water supply feature of project plus capitalized prepayment of proportionate share of operation and maintenance costs. Operation during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: During 1997 flood season estimated damages of $3,115,000 were prevented. Routine maintenance was performed. Recreational benefits were $25,260,493. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in November 1965 and project was placed in operation January 1974. Construction and land acquisition are complete. 20. BUCKHORN LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Middle Fork of Kentucky River, 43.4 miles above mouth, and 0.5 mile upstream from Buckhorn, Perry County, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 34 miles and lies in Leslie and Perry Counties, Kentucky. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Buckhorn, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam is earth and rockfill type, with gate controlled outlet works. Total storage capacity is 168,000 acre-feet, of which 157,600 is for flood control. For further details, see page 1120 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of completed new work is $11,766,206 including $386,707 for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Department of Parks of the Commonwealth of Kentucky has undertaken management of lands and recreational facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on June 29, 1962. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during 1997 flood season prevented damages of$3,379,000. Recreational benefits were $7,149,076. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in September 1956 and project was placed in operation in August 1960. All construction and land acquisition is complete. 21. CAESAR CREEK LAKE, OH Location. Damsite is on Caesar Creek, about 3.0 miles above its confluence with Little Miami River, in Warren County, OH, about 3.5 miles southeast of Waynesville, OH, and 10.5 miles northeast of Lebanon, OH. Reservoir lies in Warren, Clinton, and Green Counties, OH. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Oregonia, OH.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earth and rockfill dam, four saddle dams, outlet works and an uncontrolled saddle spillway. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 242,200 acre-feet, of which 148,500 acre-feet is reserved for flood control storage. Cost of new work is $62,881,010 and $5,037,000 non-Federal reimbursement for water supply storage. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1983 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. However, the State of Ohio requested inclusion in the project of storage for future municipal and industrial water supply uses. Contract with State of Ohio for water supply storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, was approved by Secretary of the Army, May 20, 1970. Under terms of contract, State will reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated plus estimated annual amount for cost of operation, maintenance and major capital replacements required for the water supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: A new water intake structure was completed in 1994 to support a regional public water supply system. Flood damages estimated at $8,037,000 were prevented during the 1997 flood season. Recreational benefits were $33,786,817. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in January 1968 and the project was placed in operation January 1978. Land acquisition is complete. All relocation and construction features are complete. 22. CAGLES MILL LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Mill Creek, 2.8 miles above its confluence with Eel River, in Putnam County, IN, and about 25 miles east of Terre Haute, IN. Reservoir extends upstream about 11 miles and is in Putnam and Owen Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Poland, IN.) 24-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam is earth and rockfill embankment. Total storage capacity is 228,100 acre-feet, of which 201,000 acre-feet are for flood control. For details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1136. Cost of new work is $4,369,997 including $155,416 Federal funds, $113,094 contributed funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required. State of Indiana has undertaken development and management of recreation facilities for use of the public in reservoir area in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on January 17, 1952. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources for expanding the boat ramp and parking area at Site 3, Lieber State Park, under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program was signed by the State of Indiana on August 26, 1981 and approved by the Deputy Chief of Engineers on March 26, 1982. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1997 flood season prevented damages of $6,651,000. Recreational benefits were $10,282,851. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in July 1948 and completed in June 1953. Recreation facilities constructed under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program are complete. 23. CARR CREEK LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is 8.8 miles above mouth of Carr Fork, a tributary of North Fork of Kentucky River, 16 miles upstream from Hazard, KY. The reservoir lies entirely within Knott County. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Carrie and Vicco, KY.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rock and earth fill with impervious core, 720 feet long and 130 feet high, with uncontrolled open cut spillway through left abutment. Outlet works has two control gates and 8-foot diameter conduit to stilling basin. Total storage capacity is 47,700 acrefeet (31,600 for flood control and 4,300 for water quality control). A higher level seasonal pool for recreation is provided. Cost of completed work is $50,854,826 including $76,724 for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by the 1962 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for reservoir project. Division of Flood Control and Water Usage of Commonwealth of Kentucky gave assurance that encroachments on downstream channel capacity will be prevented. Under the terms of a new lease, the State of Kentucky will assume operation of the Irishman Creek Beach and Campground in 1996. This establishes a State Park at this lake also providing the impetus for additional resort development. The Kentucky Department of Parks completed the first year of operation of the campground and beach area. The transition to a state park was successful. Project name was changed from Carr Fork Lake, KY to Carr Creek Lake, KY effective 16 February 1997 by Public law 104- 303, 12 October 1996. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1997 flood season prevented damages of $2,836,000. Recreational benefits were $11,875,300. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project was placed in operation January 1976. Construction started in January 1966 is complete. 24. CAVE RUN LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is on Licking River, about 4 miles upstream from U.S. Highway 60 near Farmers, KY, and 7 miles southwest of Morehead, KY. Reservoir will be in Rowan, Bath, Morgan, and Menifee Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Salt Lick and Morehead, KY.) Existing project. Plan provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earthfill, with gate controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 614,700 acre-feet (438,500 for flood control and 28,300 for water quality control). Cost ofnew workis $81,162,282 of which $6,900,000 is U.S. Forest Service cost. Project was authorized by Flood Control Acts of June 22, 1936 and June 28, 1938. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1997 flood season prevented damages of $37,334,000. Recreation benefits were $11,625,050. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project has been in operation since February 1974. Construction was started in June 1965 and is complete. Land acquisition is complete. All relocation and construction features are complete. 25. CECIL M. HARDEN LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Raccoon Creek, 32.4 miles above its confluence with Wabash River, and 25 miles northeast of Terre Haute, IN. At flood control pool, reservoir extends upstream about 15 miles in Parke and Putnam Counties, Indiana. (See U.S. Geological Survey Map of Mansfield, IN.) Existing project. A rolled earth dam and reservoir, for flood control and allied purposes. Total storage capacity is 132,800 acre-feet of which 116,600 acre-feet area for flood control. For details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1132. Cost ofcompleted new workis $6,987,807 made up of $6,260,134 for the initial project and $373,678 Federal cost and $353,995 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was selected for construction under 24-8 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from Mansfield Lake to Cecil M. Harden Lake by Public Law 93-521, December 14, 1974. Local cooperation. State of Indiana has undertaken management of lands and recreational facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on April 19, 1961. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operation during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Flood damages of $861,000 were prevented during the 1997 flood season. Recreational benefits were $32,324,663. The Corps conducted a shoreline protection program in cooperation with local adjacent landowners. The program objectives have essentially been completed in 1997 and there is no effort to extend or continue at this time. Some 54,000 tons of rip rap were applied to protect 21,300 lineal feet of shoreline at a cost of $470,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in October 1956 and all major items of work were completed December 1961. Land acquisition is complete. Project has been in operation since August 1960. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are completed. 26. CLARENCE J. BROWN DAM & RESERVOIR, OH Location. Damsite is just east of Springfield, Clark County, OH, at mile 7.3 of Buck Creek, a tributary of Mad River. (See U. S. Geological Survey maps of New Moorefield and Springfield, OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam, 6,620 feet long and 72 feet high, with gated outlet works and open cut spillway with concrete chute through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 63,700 acrefeet (32,900 for flood control and 20,800 for water quality control). Federal cost of completed project is $22,083,660. Project was authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from Buck Creek Dam and Reservoir to Clarence J. Brown Dam and Reservoir by Public Law 90-46, July 4, 1967. Local cooperation. Assurances from City of Springfield, Springfield Conservancy District, and Clark County, Ohio, covering protection against detrimental channel encroachment below dam to mouth of Buck Creek, were accepted March 5, 1964. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Flood damages of $51,000 were prevented during the 1997 flood season. Recreation benefits were $21,402,056. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in September 1966. Land acquisition and all major project features were completed in November 1973. The project was placed in operation in January 1974. 27. GREEN RIVER LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is 305.7 miles above mouth of Green River in Taylor County, KY, about 8 miles south of Campbellsville. Reservoir lies in Taylor and Adair Counties. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Cane Valley, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth and rockfill, 141 feet high and 2,350 feet long. Outlet works is slide gate-controlled and spillway open and uncontrolled. Total storage capacity is 723,200 acre-feet (560,600 for flood control and 64,500 for low-flow augmentation). Cost of completed new work is $33,462,330, consisting of $33,105,184 initial project funds, $40,001 for water supply, and $317,145 Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was authorized under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required by authorizing act. Taylor County, by lease approved by Secretary of Army February 15, 1968, undertook operation and maintenance of Smith Ridge public access area. In May 1980, the lease was amended to turn back responsibility for maintenance and operation of 99 percent of the site to the Corps, with the County retaining responsibility for the marina area. Under provision of Water Supply Act of 1958, contract with City of Campbellsville for water supply storage was approved by Secretary of Army April 23, 1969. Terms require city to repay, with interest and annual charges for operation, maintenance and major replacement, the investment cost of $85,765 allocated to its water supply storage space. Total payments received through fiscal year 1984 was $21,504. The Department of Parks of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, by lease approved by Secretary of Army, October 4, 1971, has undertaken the management of the Lone Valley public access area. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: A contract to remove underground storage tanks was completed. Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages estimated at $7,977,000 during 1997 flood season. Recreational benefits were $28,363,759. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in August 1965 and all major construction and relocation items were completed in 1972. Project has been in operation since February 1969. Project including all land acquisition complete in 1973. Construction of sanitary dump station for boats at Dam Site in conformance with EPA and State standards and rehabilitation of sewage treatment facilities, washhouses and restrooms at Smith Ridge site is complete. 24-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 28. J. EDWARD ROUSH LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is on Wabash River, about 2 miles from Huntington, IN, and 411.4 miles above mouth. Reservoir is in Huntington and Wells Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Majenica and Mt. Etna, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and recreation. Dam consists of a rolled earth embankment 4,700 feet long and 89 feet high, a concrete spillway and outlet section 155 feet long, and a concrete gravity section 310 feet long. Spillway is controlled by three gates, and outlet works by six sluices. Project also provides local flood protection for Markle, IN. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 153,100 acre-feet, of which 149,000 acre-feet is reserved for flood control storage. Cost for new work is $19,622,258 made up of $19,273,001 Federal cost for the initial project and $193,903 non-Federal contributed funds for low flow augmentation storage, and $155,354 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Project name was changed from Huntington Lake, IN to J. Edward Roush Lake, IN effective 16 February 1997 by Public law 104-303, 12 October 1996. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to one percent of project first cost. State of Indiana has met this obligation. Contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army May 17, 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreational facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost shared category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages estimated at $5,663,000 during 1997 flood control season. Recreation benefits were$10,392,566. Condition at end of fiscal year. Land acquisition and all major construction complete. Project was placed in operation January 9, 1969. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 29. MISSISSINEWA LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is 7.1 miles above mouth of Mississinewa River, which flows into Wabash River about 2 miles upstream from Peru, IN. At flood control pool level, reservoir extends upstream about 28 miles, in Wabash, Grant, and Miami Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Peoria, IN.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam 137 feet high and 8,100 feet long, gate-controlled outlet works, and an uncontrolled open spillway through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 368,400 acre-feet, of which 345,100 acrefeet are reserved for flood control storage. Cost for completed new work is $24,379,800 made up of $23,791,816 Federal costfor the initial project, $239,200 non-Federal contributed funds for low flow augmentation storage. $174,392 Federal cost and $174,392 non- Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to 1 percent of project first cost. State of Indiana assumed this obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages of $9,308,000 during 1997 flood season. Recreation benefits were $18,800,099. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction and land acquisition is complete. Project was placed in operation in May 1968. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 30. MONROE LAKE, IN Location. Dam is on Salt Creek, a tributary of White River, 25.9 miles above mouth, and 2 miles each of Harrodsburg, Monroe County, IN. At flood control pool level, reservoir will extend upstream 44 miles in Monroe, Brown, and Jackson Counties. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Clear Creek, IN.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth core and rock shell, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 441,000 acre-feet (258,800 for flood control and 159,900 for low flow augmentation.) Cost of completed new work is $16,570,774 consisting of $7,032,484 Federal funds, $7,797,604 non-Federal contributed funds for low-flow regulation storage and $870,343 Federal cost and $870,343 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by 1958 Flood Control Act, modifying comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin. Local cooperation. Section 3, 1944 Flood Control Act applies. Local interests must contribute 54.1 percent of project cost, this being the proportion allocated to low-flow regulation feature, plus a capitalized amount representing that part of average annual maintenance and operation cost allocated to low-flow regulation. State of Indiana assumed this cost sharing obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in 24-10 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work. None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control prevented damages of $1,676,000 during 1997 flood season. Recreation benefits were $39,801,627. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete and was placed in operation in February 1965. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 31. NOLIN LAKE, KY Location. Dam is on Nolin River 7.8 miles above its confluence with Green River, about 70 air miles southwest of Louisville, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 57 miles and is in Edmonson, Grayson, Hart, and Hardin Counties, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Nolin Reservoir and Dickeys Mill, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rockfill-earth core type with gate-controlled outlet works, and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 609,400 acre-feet, of which 545,600 acre-feet is for flood control. For further details ofproject, see Annual Report for 1962, page 1124. Cost ofnew work is $17,193,278 including $2,594,274 for construction of recreation facilities. Projectwas selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for authorized project. State of Kentucky contributed $18,195 for increased width of dam for public road. Kentucky has assumed responsibility of the Brier Creek site to establish a State Park in 1996. The Brier Creek campground was successfully operated by Kentucky for the first year as state park. Improvements are planned by Kentucky. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. During the 1997 flood season estimated damages of $11,859,000 were prevented. Recreation benefits were $92,365,884. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in January 1959. Project was completed and placed in operation in March 1963. 32. OHIO RIVER BASIN (Louisville District) Location. Works covered by this project are a series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements, and reservoirs in Ohio River Basin within Louisville District. Existing project. Individual projects considered in comprehensive plan within the Louisville District. (See Table 24-B for authorizing legislation and Table 24-I for cost and listing of projects in the basin plan.) Operations during fiscal year. No costs were incurred except for these projects for which individual reports are given. 33. PATOKA LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is in Dubois County, IN, 118.3 miles above mouth of Patoka River, and 50 miles westnorthwest of New Albany, IN. Reservoir extends into Dubois, Orange, and Crawford Counties. (See Geological Survey map of Cuzco, IN.) Existing project. Reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is earth and rock fill, 1,550 feet long and 85 feet high, with gate-controlled outlet works and uncontrolled open spillway. Total storage capacity is 301,600 acre-feet(121,000 for flood control and 167,500 for water supply and water quality control). Cost of new work is $73,702,816 of which $53,134,447 is Federal cost for other construction, and $20,568,369 is non- Federal contribution for water supply storage and recreation facilities. Project was authorized by 1965 Flood Control Act, and emergency measures and snagging and clearing the Patoka River downstream of Patoka Lake to ensure effective operation of the project for flood control was directed by 1981 Appropriation Act for Energy and Water Development. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage is initiated, presently estimated at 29.316 percent of the joint-use facilities cost, exclusive of interests, plus $287,000 for the cost of operating and maintaining water supply storage for a period of 50 years, plus $42,000 for the cost of major capital replacements required for water supply storage space for a period of 50 years. Local interests are also required to pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest, one-half of the separable first cost of the project allocated to recreation. Present laws of the State of Indiana require that agency to make cash contributions during construction of the project. Local interests must also agree to prevent encroachments on channel of Patoka River from dam to mouth, and to pay allocated initial and annual maintenance and operation costs for water supply storage. Formal assurances of local cooperation, executed by the Indiana Natural Resources Commission, were accepted August 27, 1970. Contracts with State of Indiana for water supply and recreation were approved by the Secretary of the Army November 2, 1970. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Sinkholes in the spillway area that are connected to porous limestone layers continue to be an operational concern. A temporary repair was completed in 1997 at a cost of $100,00. A study was completed and recommended as $7.2 million major rehabilitation of the dam. Operation for flood control during the 1997 flood season prevented damage estimated at $6,595,000. Recreational benefits were $32,103,951. 24-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in July 1972. Engineering studies are complete. Real Estate relocation work is complete. All major features are complete. Permanent impoundment was started in February 1978 and the project was placed in operation about August 1980. 34. ROUGH RIVER LAKE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, KY Location. Dam is on Rough River, 89.3 miles above its confluence with Green River, 160.3 miles above Ohio River, and about 60 miles southwest of Louisville, KY. Reservoir extends upstream about 30 miles and is in Breckinridge, Hardin, and Grayson Counties, KY. Channel improvement work is on Rough River, Barnett Creek, and West Fork of Barnett Creek. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of McDaniels and Falls of Rough, KY.) Existing project. Reservoir is for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is rolled earthfill type, with gatecontrolled outlet works. Storage capacity is 334,380 acre-feet, of which 314,210 acre-feet is for flood control. Project also includes channel clearing of lower Rough River, and channel improvement on Barnett Creek, a tributary of Rough River. For further details, see page 1126 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of completed new work is $10,643,001 including $890,008 Federal funds and $22,612 non-Federal funds for construction of recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project was selected for construction under general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Modification of previously approved plan to include channel improvement items was authorized by the 1944 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. None required for construction of reservoir unit. Provisions of Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936, are applicable to channel improvements. Assurances were obtained from Ohio County for channel improvement. Department of Parks, Commonwealth of Kentucky, has undertaken management of certain lands and recreation facilities in accordance with license granted by Secretary of the Army on August 18, 1961. A contract with the Commonwealth of Kentucky to improve and pave road at the Below Dam Area - State Park under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 4, 1977. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. Operation for flood control during the 1997 flood season prevented damages estimated at $6,569,000. Recreational benefits were $57,280,707. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction started in November 1955 and reservoir was placed in operation in June 1959. Land acquisition and all major items of construction and relocation are complete. 35. SALAMONIE LAKE, IN Location. Damsite is 3.1 miles above mouth of Salamonie River which enters Wabash River about 6 miles upstream from Wabash, IN. Reservoir extends upstream about 27 miles at flood control pool and lies in Wabash and Huntington Counties, IN. (See U.S. Geological Survey maps of Lagro and Majenica, IN.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam with a maximum height of 133 feet and length of 6,100 feet, gate-controlled outlet works with a 16-foot-diameter conduit and an uncontrolled open spillway through right abutment. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 263,600 acre-feet, of which 250,500 acre-feet is for flood control storage. Cost for new work is $17,046,151 made up of $16,244,356 Federal cost for the initial project and $170,697 non- Federal contributed funds for low-flow augmentation storage and $315,549 Federal cost and $315,549 non- Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by Flood Control Act of 1958. Local cooperation. Local interests must contribute in cash an amount equal to one percent of project first cost. State of Indiana assumed this obligation. A contract with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, approved by the Secretary of the Army in May 1974, provided for that agency to design and construct certain additional recreation facilities at Cecil M. Harden, Huntington, Mississinewa, Monroe, and Salamonie Lakes under the cost sharing category of the completed projects program. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. During the 1997 flood season, operation for flood control prevented damages of $7,987,,000. Recreation benefits were $16,613,066. Condition at end of fiscal year. Land acquisition and all major construction and relocation contracts are complete. Reservoir was placed in operation in spring 1967. Cost shared recreation facilities constructed by the State of Indiana under the completed projects program are complete. 36. TAYLORSVILLE LAKE, KY Location. Damsite is in Spencer County, KY, 60.0 miles above the confluence of Salt River and Ohio River, 4 river miles above Taylorsville and 36.9 river miles above Shepherdsville, KY. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Taylorsville, KY.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. Dam is an earth and rock fill structure, 164 feet high and 1,280 feet long. Outlet works are slide gate controlled and spillway is uncontrolled open cut. Total storage capacity will be 291,670 acre-feet (211,230 for flood control, winter months), and 52,245 for water quality and fish and wildlife. Estimated cost ofnew work (1997) is $122,090,000 made up of $92,980,000 Federal cost for the initial project and $17,020,000 non-Federal contributed funds for initial recreation facilities and $6,045,000 Federal cost and $6,045,000 non-Federal contributed funds for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Project was authorized by 1966 Flood Control Act. 24-12 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT Local cooperation. Local interests must agree to administer project land and water areas for recreation; pay, contribute in kind, or repay (which may be through user fees) with interest one-half of the separable first costs of the project allocated to recreation; bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation lands and facilities. Local interests must also agree to prevent encroachments on flow-carrying capacities of stream channels below the reservoir to the extent needed to provide reasonably effective reservoir operation. Commonwealth of Kentucky has indicated intent to fulfill requirements for recreation cost sharing and has assumed responsibility for channel encroachments and pollution control. The Commonwealth furnished assurance agreements covering prevention of encroachment on capacity of stream channels in April and May 1973 and executed the recreation cost sharing contract in April 1973. On April 2, 1980, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky ruled that the 1973 recreation cost sharing contract between the Commonwealth and the United States that provided for repayment after completion was invalid under the Kentucky Constitution which prohibits one General Assembly from obligating future appropriations that would be binding on a subsequent legislature. In response to the Court's ruling, the Commonwealth and the United States entered into a new contract providing for cash contributions. Contract was approved by the Secretary of the Army June 11, 1980. The contract was found to be valid and enforceable by the Court July 14, 1980. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract to remove debris from Taylorsville Lake was completed. Maintenance: Routine maintenance was performed. During the 1997 flood season operation for flood control prevented damages of $14,923,000. Recreation benefits were $18,214,800. Condition at end of fiscal year. Engineering and design studies are complete except for design of a comfort station. Land acquisition is 100 percent complete. Construction was started in June 1974. All major construction items are complete except recreation facilities. The dam gates were closed in January 1983 for permanent impoundment. Dedication ceremony was May 28, 1983. Two sections of county road were washed out by heavy rainfall. Both sections were originally upgraded for project operation prior to washout. The repairs were completed by the Corps in 1996-97 at a cost of$700,000. 37. WABASH RIVER BASIN Location. Works covered by this project are located in the Wabash River Basin, a drainage area of 33,100 square miles, covering parts of Indiana, Illinois, and Ohio. Existing project. One local protection project and five reservoir projects were authorized for this basin plan. (See Table 24-B for authorizing legislation and Table 24-J for project list and total cost of basin plan.) 38. WEST FORK OF MILL CREEK LAKE, OH Location. Dam is on West Fork of Mill Creek 6.5 miles above its junction with Mill Creek and 2 miles northeast of Mount Health, OH, and 10 miles north of downtown Cincinnati. Reservoir extends upstream about 3 miles and is in Hamilton County, OH. (See U. S. Geological Survey map of Glendale, OH.) Existing project. An earth embankment dam and a reservoir for flood control, recreation, and reduction of pumping requirements at Mill Creek barrier dam in Cincinnati. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 11,300 acre-feet, of which 9,850 acre-feet is for flood control. For further details, see page 1119 of Annual Report for 1962. Cost of completed new work is $4,722,463 made up of $3,092,941 Federal cost for the initial project, $520,800 non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and dam, $50,000 non-Federal contributed funds in fulfillment of project authorization and $529,361 Federal cost and $529,361 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Existing project selected for construction under additional authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1946 Flood Control Act. Local cooperation. Local interests were to release necessary land under their control and give assurance that future channel encroachment below damsite would be prevented. For enlargement of reservoir to include a conservation pool, local interests would contribute one-half additional cost of such pool, including one-half cost of relocation of sanitary sewer, and agree to hold the United States free from damages resulting from its provision. Board of County Commissioners of Hamilton County, Ohio, adopted a resolution October 8, 1947, signifying willingness to fulfill requirements including provision of conservation pool. Assurances were executed on same date. A contract with the United States for relocation of sanitary sewer outside reservoir area in order to include conservation pool in project was accepted by Hamilton County, in which the United States paid one-half cost of such relocation work. Hamilton County Commissioners furnished $50,000, required as a local contribution toward additional cost of providing conservation pool. Hamilton County Park District has undertaken development and management of recreation facilities in reservoir area for use of the public in accordance with the license granted by Secretary of the Army on October 31, 1951. Contract for cost shared recreation development under the completed works program was executed by the Board of Park Commissioners, Hamilton County Park District, Ohio, in September 1975 and approved by the Chief of Engineers in December 1975. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Operation for flood control during 1997 flood season prevented damages estimated at $20,000. The Hamilton County Park District began a major water quality project for West Fork in 1995. Over 900,000 cubic years of sediment material were dredged from below summer pool level to improve the water quality and fishery. The 24-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 project was funded by the Hamilton County Park District and dredging was completed in 1997. The combined costs of the dredging and parks improvements was funded (and completed) by Hamilton County Parks. Recreation benefits were $16,305,621. Condition at end offiscal year. Construction started in March 1949 and reservoir was placed in operation in December 1952. Project is complete. Cost shared recreation development under the completed projects program is complete. 39. WILLIAM H. HARSHA LAKE, OH Location. Damsite is on East Fork of Little Miami River between Batavia and Williamsburg, OH, about 6.0 miles above Batavia and 32.6 miles above mouth of the Little Miami River. Entire project lies in Clermont County, OH. (See U.S. Geological Survey map of Batavia,OH.) Existing project. A reservoir for flood control and allied purposes. It includes an earthfill dam, outlet works, an uncontrolled saddle spillway, and a dike to close a saddle north of spillway. Total storage capacity of reservoir is 294,800 acre-feet, of which 210,600 acrefeet is reserved for flood control storage. Cost of complete new work is $52,023,157 and a estimated $3,485,840 non-Federal reimbursement for water supply storage. Existing project was authorized by general authorization for Ohio River Basin in 1938 Flood Control Act. Project name was changed from East Fork Lake to William H. Harsha Lake effective January 4, 1981, by Public Law 96-383, October 6, 1980. Local cooperation. None required. However, the State of Ohio requested inclusion in the project of storage for future municipal and industrial water supply uses. Contract with State of Ohio for water supply storage under provisions of Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, was approved by Secretary of the Army, May 20, 1970. Under terms of contract, State will reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of this storage is initiated plus estimated annual amount for cost of operation, maintenance, and major capital replacements required for the water supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: A new water intake structure was completed in 1995 to support a regional public water supply system. Operation for flood control during 1997 flood season prevented damages estimated at $10,843,000. Recreation benefits were $21,428,656. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was started in May 1970. Project is complete and reservoir was placed in operation in February 1978. 40. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to maintain and operate local protection projects in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. Inspections were made to determine extent of compliance and to advise interests as necessary to measures required to correct deficiencies. (See Table 24-K for the latest dates of inspection performed on the local protection projects, channel improvements, and bank revetments). Fiscal year costs were $318,121. Total costs to September 30, 1997, were $4,681,483. 41. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS See Table 24-E. 42. FLOOD CONTROL WORKS UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities pursuant to Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation. Costs for fiscal year were $264,250 for disaster preparedness, $4,961,455 for emergency operations, and $54,362 for field investigations. Environmental restoration activities pursuant to Section 1135, 1986 Water Resources Development Act, as amended. Costs for fiscal year were $121,420. See Table 24-L. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. Costs for fiscal year were $173,105 for ten feasibility reports, $558,348 for Plans & Specifications on six projects, $431,334 for three projects completing construction, and $68,579 for nine studies that were terminated, and $10,250 for coordination. Reflects Federal cost only, for full costs see table 24-L. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress. Costs for fiscal year were $125,532 for Planning and Design Analysis on seven projects, $256,844 for three projects completing construction, $9,843 for four studies which were terminated. Reflects Federal cost only, for full costs see Table 24-L. General Investigations 43. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs was $2,403,204 for one Navigation Study; $1,176,748 for twelve Flood Damage Prevention Studies; $91,606 for two Special Studies; $178,748 for one Review of Authorized Projects; and $89,373 for four Miscellaneous Activities. Reflects Federal cost only, for full cost see Table 24-M. 44. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Fiscal year costs were $613,819 for two Navigation projects; $998,204 for nine Flood Control Projects. Reflects Federal cost only, for full cost see Table 24-M. 24-14 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT 45. COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES Fiscal year total cost was $13,120 for. Coordination With Other Agencies; and $20,197 for Planning Assistance to States. Reflects Federal cost only, for full cost see Table 24-M. 46. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year total cost was $202,920 for six Flood Plain Management Services; and $7,621 for Hydologic Studies. Reflects Federal cost only, for full cost see Table 24-M. 24-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 24-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Fundng 1994 1995 1996 1997 Sep 30,1997 Navigation - Channels and Harbors 1 Open Channel Work, New Work Licking River Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Navigation - Locks and Dams 3 Green and Barren New Work Rivers, KY Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 4 Kentucky River, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost - $ - $ 19,000 19,000 - $ - $ - $ - $ 7,700 10,000 35,974 172,685 6,991 10,665 36,018 172,685 - - - - 13,808,222 1 - - - - 13,808,222 1 1,670,500 1,957,800 1,302,000 1,737,411 43,478,461 2,3 1,440,566 2,128,204 1,381,129 1,735,685 43,456,249 - - - - 4,176,749 - - - - 4,176,749 3,633,000 4,188,950 2,769,000 2,612,233 74,122,524 4,5,45 5,169,130 4,307,266 3,148,755 3,230,687 74,051,453 4 5,46 - - - - 556,956 - - - - 556,956 Flood Control, Local Protection 8 Duck Creek New Work Approp. Cost - 466,000 466,000 - 259,476 259,476 9 Evansville, IN 10 Frankfort, South Frankfort, KY 11 Holes Creek, OH 12 Mill Creek, OH 13 Ohio River Flood Protection (Indiana Shoreline), IN 14 Pond Creek, KY New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 209,204 (11,000) (107,500) 136,012 33,407 52,889 2,755 43,906,502 6 13,667 43,906,502 6 2,328,000 3,224,579 998,000 891,000 8,143,579 7 1,763,555 2,419,779 2,265,617 1,302,259 7,926,804 8 - 190,500 179,245 369,745 - 125,894 216,331 342,225 1,331,000 (25,000) (320,000) 566,000 97,346,742 898,196 382,865 306,379 663,830 97,293,336 10,000 1,000,000 1,010,000 10,000 151,651 161,651 1,500,000 1,500,000 189,635 189,635 24-16 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-A CONTINUED COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Fundng 1994 1995 1996 1997 Sep 30,1997 15 Salyersville, KY 16 Southwestern Jefferson County, KY 17 White River, Indpls Central Waterfront, IN New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Flood Control - Reservoirs 18 Barren River Lake, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 19 Brookville Lake, IN 20 Buckhorn Lake, KY 21 Caesar Creek Lake, OH 22 Cagles Mill Lake, IN New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost $ 1,156,000 $ - $ 702,519 $4,242,000 $ 226,818 $ 459,544 $ 663,277 $ 4,687,385 15,000 88,900 49,796 134,807 $ 7,024,519 to $6,758,017 11 - 24,000 60,205,083 8,781 46,468 60,199,867 - - 2,000,000 7,000,000 9,000,000 - - 175,318 298,960 474,278 - - - - 27,479,717 12 - - - - 27,479,717 12 1,871,300 1,713,600 1,814,000 1,734,020 30,241,641 13,14.15 1,801,474 1,846,773 1,774,385 1,751,562 30,169,100 13.14, 15 - - - - 45,402,565 - - - - 45,402,565 683,700 641,500 711,000 685,239 10,351,963 649,935 669,835 725,573 689,164 10,339,414 - 11,766,206 17 - 11,766,206 17 1,184,900 1,210,700 1,137,000 1, 072,107 19,003,030 1,055,918 1,309,564 1,150,973 1,106,692 18,925,743 - (12,872) - - - 62,881,010 - 62,881,010 1,135,900 1,101,100 1,416,000 1,338,199 13,994,207 48 1,132,741 1,100,820 1,408,709 1,322,433 13,920,463 48 - 4,369,997 19 - 4,369,997 20 603,000 568,850 565,000 661,977 10,253,644 589,054 608,793 552,757 670,768 10,239,483 24-17 16 16 47 47 (6,281) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 24-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT CONTINUED See Section Total to in Text Project Fundng 1994 1995 1996 1997 Sep 30,1997 23 Carr Creek Lake, KY New Work Approp. $ - $ - $ - $ - $50,854,826 18 Cost $ - $ - $ - $ - $50,854,826 18s Maint. Approp. 1,174,200 1,228,300 1,493,000 1,316,804 18,137,589 19 Cost 1,140,762 1,251,995 1,523,428 1,308,457 18,101,430 19 24 Cave Run Lake, KY New Work Approp. - (2,741) - - 81,159,541 23 Cost - - - - 81,159,541 23 Maint. Approp. 816,400 793,900 989,000 843,428 11,648,649 49 Cost 745,670 848,873 812,394 1,047,916 11,634,473 49 25 Cecil M. Hardin Lake, New Work IN Approp. - - - - 6,987,807 24 Cost - - - - 6,987,807 24 Maint. Approp. 911,500 656,300 763,000 795,221 13,086,861 Cost 889,173 672,147 778,320 765,159 13,032,623 26 Clarence J. Brown New Work Dam & Reservoir, Approp - - - - 22,083,660 OH Cost - - - - 22,083,660 Maint. Approp. 691,000 745,700 920,000 801,407 10,012,752 Cost 677,985 748,984 952,792 777,946 9,981,543 27 Green River Lake, KY New Work Approp. - - - - 33,462,330 25 Cost - - - - 33,462,330 25 Maint. Approp. 1,589,000 1,571,600 1,614,000 1,551,285 25,462,679 26 Cost 1,414,932 1,722,253 1,620,662 1,625,123 25,448,748 26 28 T. Edward Roush New Work Lake, IN Approp (251) - - (481) 19,621,777 27 Cost - - - - 19,621,777 28 Maint. Approp. 589,500 621,400 588,000 700,482 11,041,770 Cost 590,916 619,904 600,828 687,442 11,023,491 29 Mississinewa Lake, IN New Work Approp. (1,329) - - - 24,379,800 29 Cost - - - - 24,379,800 29 Maint. Approp. 903,800 596,250 704,000 723,000 11,027,343 Cost 873,995 569,460 726,627 736,129 10,996,429 30 Monroe Lake, IN New Work Approp. - - - - 16,570,774 30 Cost - - - - 16,570,774 30 Maint. Approp. 793,000 639,900 887,000 747,636 12,503,954 31 Cost 780,242 654,247 881,820 763,458 12,494,852 31 24-18 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-A CONTINUED COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Fundng 1994 1995 1996 1997 Sep 30,1997 31 Nolin Lake, KY 32 Ohio River Basin Louisville District 33 Patoka Lake, IN 34 Rough River Lake & Channel Improvment, KY 35 Salamonie Lake, IN 36 Taylorsville Lake, KY 38 West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH 39 William H. Harsha Lake, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost (103) $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 17,193,278 32 - $ 17,193,278 33 1,820,900 1,962,000 1,571,000 1,848,000 33,978,974 34 1,794,697 1,982,479 1,557,497 1,947,062 33,940,077 34 - - - - 1,526,142 - - - - 1,526,142 38,657 - 73,702,816 35 - 73,316,892 36 506,500 476,600 1,050,000 791,240 8,255,718 482,217 499,318 1,032,937 792,304 8,218,856 - - - - 10,643,001 37 - - - - 10,643,001 37 1,713,500 1,758,450 1,715,000 1,714,947 31,536,364 38 1,435,547 1,911,576 1,861,285 1,690,318 31,451,342 38 - - - (6,830) 17,039,321 39 - - - - 17,039,321 40 711,000 548,400 602,000 659,483 10,223,203 688,567 550,204 628,418 646,972 10,191,332 (13,715) 292,000 30,000 (104,159) 87,018,435 41 (624) 76,381 338,572 7,949 87,024,780 42 1,286,750 1,507,550 985,000 921,905 10,857,579 1,028,646 1,475,546 919,276 1,283,284 10,817,268 - - - - 4,722,463 43 - - - - 4,722,463 43 504,500 469,500 456,000 445,935 7,927,338 475,741 477,211 464,920 456,745 7,911,225 - - - - 52,023,157 44 - - - - 52,023,157 44 678,350 734,850 1,152,000 887,510 10,235,147 60 659,975 704,208 1,162,244 906,896 10,184,080 50 24-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 1 Includes $85,000 public works funds. 2 Includes $2,000 emergency relief funds, $204,444 "maintenance and operation of dams and improvements of navigable waters" and $3,842,667 expended from 1888 to 30 June 1936, for operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation. 3 Includes $725,715 from Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 4 Includes $316,871 under "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters", and $6,405,372 expended between July 5, 1885 and June 30, 1937 on operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation. 5 Includes $149,700 from Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 6 Includes $11,812 emergency relief funds and $63,187 contributed funds. 7 Includes $1,180,579 in contributed non-Federal funds. 8 Includes $1,004,481 in contributed non-Federal funds. 9 No longer applicable. 10 Includes $444,519 Supplemental funds. " Includes $388,771 contributed funds. 12 Includes $2,224,948 Code 711 funds, $110,107 Code 713 Federal funds and $108,418 Code 713 non-Federal funds. '3 Includes $100,000 Supplemental funds. 14 Includes $326,900 Special Recreation Use Fees. 15 Includes $668,025 "maintenance & operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water". 16 Includes $7,497,492 contributed funds and $100,706 Code 711 funds. 17 Includes $61,451 public work acceleration executive 1963 funds, $143,088 Code 711 funds, and $243,619 Code 712 funds. 18 Includes $52,240 Special Recreation Use Fees. 19 Includes $35,814 Code 711 funds, $113,321 Code 713 funds, and $113,094 contributed funds. 20 Includes $35,814 Code 711 funds, $113,321 Code 713 funds, and $113,094 contributed funds. 21 Includes $76,724 Code 711 funds. 22 Includes $51,854 Special Recreation Use Fees. 23 Includes $6,900,000 of U.S. Forest Service Funds. 24 Includes $19,683 Code 711 funds, $353,995 Code 713 funds, & $353,995 non-Federal contributions in kind for recreation facilities. 25 Includes $133,413 Code 711 funds, $183,732 Code 713 funds, and $40,001 contributed funds. 26 Includes $114,280 Special Recreation Use Fees and $664,025 under "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water". 27 Includes $155,354 Code 713 funds and $193,422 contributed funds. 28 Includes $155,354 Code 713 funds and $193,422 contributed funds. 29 Includes $215,000 Code 711 funds, $174,392 Code 713 funds, $239,200 contributed funds and $174,392 non- Federal contribution in kind for recreational facilities. 30 Includes $1,185 Code 711 funds, $869,158 Code 713 funds, $7,797,604 contributed funds and $870,343 non- Federal contribution in kind for recreational facilities. 31 Includes $54,460 from Productive Employment Appropriation Act (PL 98-8) of 1983. 32 Includes $221,897 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds and $2,594,274 Code 711 funds. 33 Includes $21,897 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds and $2,594,274 Code 711 funds. 34 Includes $204,920 Special Recreation Use Fees and $52,000 Supplement Funds, $527,225 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water". 35 Includes $20,568,369 contributed funds. 36 Includes $20,266,598 contributed funds. 37 Includes $196,306 public works acceleration executive 1963 funds and $867,396 Code 711 funds, $22,612 Code 713 funds, and $22,612 contributed funds. 38 Includes $236,640 Special Recreation Use Fees and $668,025 under "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water". 39 Includes $315,549 Code 713 funds, $163,867 contributed funds, and $315,549 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities. 40 Includes $315,549 Code 713 funds, $163,867 contributed funds, and $315,549 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities. 41 Includes $3,992,957 contributed funds. 42 Includes $4,002,581 contributed funds. 43 Includes $529,361 Code 713 funds, $50,000 contributed funds, $529,361 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreation facilities, and $520,000 non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and dam. 44 Includes $58,571 for preconstruction planning, engineering and design completed before FY 1953. 45 Includes $57,000 contributed funds. 46 Includes $17,264 contributed funds. 47 Includes $2,210 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water." 48 Includes $2,738 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water." 49 Includes $4,063 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water." 50 Includes $4,367 "maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable water." 24-20 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Aug 11, 1888 Mar 3, 1893 ' Jul 13, 1892 Jul 13, 1902 Mar 3, 1905 2 Mar 3, 1909 Jul 3, 1930 2 Jun 26, 1934 3 Aug 30, 1935 2 Sep 3, 1954 Aug 28, 1937 Jun 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 Jul 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Jul 3, 1958 GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY (See Section 3 of Text) Purchase of original improvement H. Doc 111, 49th Cong., 2d Sess., Ann. Rept. 1887, p.1 90 3 Construction of Lock 2, Green River Annual Report, 1891, p. 2439 Construction of Lock 5, Green River Construction of Lock 6, Green River Annual Report, 1891, p. 2478 Appropriated $5,000 for continuing improvements of Green River above mouth of Big Barren River, with provision "That the Secretary of War may, in his discretion, expend such portion of said amount as may be necessary for removal of snags in Nolin River." Construct new Lock 1 and new Lock and Dam 2, Green River S. Doc. 82, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. Construct new locks at Dam 5, Green River and Dam 1, Rivers and Harbors Committee Barren River; modification of Dam 5, Green River, Doc. 2, 71st Cong., 1st Sess., widens bends in Bear Creek, KY and H. Doc. 685, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. Operation and care of locks and dams with War Department Appropriations for rivers and harbors Improvement of Nolin River H.D. 480, 72d Cong., 2d Sess. Channel enlargement of lower 103 miles of Green River revocation of S.D. 82, 83d Congress, 2d Sess. authorities for improvement of Bear Creek and Nolin River OHIO RIVER BASIN (Louisville Dist.) (See Section 27 of Text) Construct levee, floodwalls, and drainage structures for protection Flood Control Committee of cities and towns in Ohio River Basin, projects to be selected Document 1, 75th Congress, by Chief of Engineers with approval of Secretary of War, at a cost 1st Session not to exceed $24,877,000 for construction Approved general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes Flood Control Committee in Ohio River Basin as may be advisable in discretion of Secretary Document 1, 75th Congress, of War and Chief of Engineers, and for initiation and partial 1st Session accomplishment of plan, authorized $75 million for reservoirs and $50.3 million for local protection works, individual projects to be selected and approved by Chief of Engineers, subject to provision that authorization shall include diversion of Cache River above Cairo, Illinois, and protection of area north of Cairo drainage district by levees at an estimated cost of $2 million Additional $45 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Additional $70 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan H. Doc. 504, 78th Congress, for Ohio River Basin, including plan of improvement for flood control 2d Session and other purposes in Kentucky River Basin Flood protection works at Taylorsville, KY at an estimated cost of $129,350 S.D. 105, 78th Cong., 1st Sess. Channel improvement of lower Rough River and Barnett Creek at an H.D. 535, 78th Congress estimated cost of $360,000 2d Session Additional $125 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan, H.D. 197, 80th Congress including plan of improvement for flood control in Wabash River 1st Session Basin, Illinois, and Indiana, at an estimated cost of $9,629,000 Also, West Fork of Mill Creek at an estimated cost of $1,527,000. H.D. 198, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. Additional $100 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin, including necessary bank stabilization measures at New Harmony Bridge, Indiana, at an estimated cost of $500,000. Flood control Act of 1958 modified comprehensive plan to provide for H.D. 192, 85th Congress, Monroe Reservoir on Salt Creek, White River Basin, Indiana, at an 1st Session estimated cost to the United States of $4,350,000; cost to local interests, $5,141,000. 24-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 24-B CONTINUED AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Oct 23, 1962 Dec 30, 1963 Jun 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Aug 13, 1968 Jun 19, 1970 Mar 7, 1974 Mar 7, 1974 Aug 13, 1968 Dec 29, 1981 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1988 Nov 28, 1990 Nov 17, 1986 Flood Control Act of 1962 deleted Jessamine Creek Reservoir on Kentucky River, Kentucky, from comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Additional $150 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Additional $89 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Additional $38 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Additional $35 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Additional $69 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Additional $120 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin Fifty-four local protection projects and one reservoir project in comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin were deauthorized August 5, 1977, under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 Two additional local protection projects in comprehensive plan for Ohio River Basin were deauthorized November 6, 1977, under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 Directed use of $1,000,000 of funds appropriated in PL 104-46 for construction of the Ohio River Flood Protection, Indiana Project. WABASH RIVER BASIN (See Section 32 of Text) Construction of five multipurpose reservoirs and one local protection project in Wabash River Basin, IL & IN, with provision that construction of Big Walnut Lake, IN, project must be approved by the President. Authorization of $50 million for initiation of partial accomplishment of project Two multiple purpose reservoirs in Wabash River were deauthorized. MIAMI RIVER BASIN, PLEASANT RUN, VICINITY FAIRFIELD, OH Three dry bed reservoirs and a channel improvement were authorized in Section 401 of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986. HAZARD, KENTUCKY Approximately 6 miles of channel improvement were authorized in Section 3 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988. Flood control measures to prevent a January 1957 flood reoccurrance in the vicinity of Hazard, Kentucky at a total cost of $30,000,000 was authorized for design and construction in Section 108 of the Water Resource Development Act of 1990. HOLES CREEK, OHIO The project for flood control, Miami River, Little Miami River, Interim Report No2, West Carrollton - Holes Creek, Ohio: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 23, 1981, at a total cost of $8,910,000, with an estimated first Federal Cost of $6,230,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $2,680,000. H.D. 423, 87th Congress, 2d Session Pub. Law 88-253, 88th Cong., 1st Session Public Law 89-42, 89th Cong., 1st Session Public Law 90-17, 90th Cong., 1st Session Public Law 90-483, 90th Cong., 2nd Session Public Law 91-282, 91st Cong., 2nd Session Public Law 93-251, 93rd Congress, 2nd Session H.D. 3816, 104th Congress, 2nd Session S.D. 96, 90th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 97-128, 97th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 100-676, 100th Congress, 2nd Session Public Law 101-640, 101st 2nd Session Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress, 2nd Session 24-22 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 16-B CONTINUED AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Acts Work Authorized Documents Nov 17, 1986 Nov 5, 1990 Aug 17, 1991 Sep 12, 1996 Nov 28, 1990 Sep 25, 1996 Sep 25, 1996 Sep 25, 1996 Sep 12, 1996 SALYERSVILLE, KENTUCKY Flood control measures to prevent a December 1978 flood reoccurrence Public Law 99-662, in the vicinity of Salyersville, Kentucky at a total project cost of 99th Congress, 2nd Session $7,000,000 wasauthorized for design and construction in section 401(e)(1) of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986. With respect to the project, Congress has determined that the benefits exceed the cost of such flood control measures. Provided $400,000 to construct the Salyersville, Kentucky cut-through as Public Law 101-514, 101st authorized by PL 99-662 401(e)(1) in accordance with the Special Project Congress, 2nd Session Report for Salyersville, Kentucky, concurred in by the Ohio River Division Engineer on or about July 26, 1989. Provided $600,000 to continue construction of the Salyersville, Kentucky Public Law 102-104, 102nd cut-through as authorized by PL 99-662 section 401(e)(1) in accordance Congress, 1st Session with the Special Project Report for Salyersville, Kentucky, concurred in by the Ohio River Division Engineer on or about July 26, 1989. Additional $3,000,000 to continue construction of the Salyorsville, Kentucky H.D. 3816, 104th cut-through. Congress, 2nd Session FRANKFORT, SOUTH FRANKFORT, KENTUCKY Flood protection in accordance with Plan R-1 of the Louisville District Public Law 101-640, 101st Commander's Re-evaluation Report, dated June 1990 and a executed LCA Congress, 2nd Session no later than October 1991 was authorized in Section 102 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990. POND CREEK, JEFFERSON COUNTY, KENTUCKY Provide $10,993,000 to construct the Pond Creek, Jefferson County, Public Law 104-303, 104th Kentucky project for flood control in accordance with the Report Congress, 2nd Session of the Chief of Engineers dated June 28, 1994. The major components of the Recommended Plan include detention basin storage and channel enlargement, in addition to wetland restoration and recreation. DUCK CREEK, CINCINNATI, OHIO Provide $11,960,000 to construct the Duck Creek, Cincinnati, Ohio Public Law 104-303, 104th flood damage reduction project in accordance with the Chief of Congress, 2nd Session Engineers Report dated June 24, 1994. The project consists of floodwalls/ levees and channel relocation. NEW HARMONY, INDIANA Provide $2,100,000 for streambank erosion protection along the Wabash Public Law 104-303, 104th River at the town of New Harmony, Indiana. Congress, 2nd Session WHITE RIVER, INDIANAPOLIS CENTRAL WATERFRONT, INDIANA Provide $7,000,000 for construction of recreation facilities and H.D. 3816, 104th rehabilititation of existing flood protection features in downtown Congress, 2nd Session Indianapolis along the White River. 1Deficiency act. 2Authorization for Nolin River and Bear Creek revoked by 3Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. Act of Sep. 3, 1954 24-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 24-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See Section 6) For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1997 Full Report See Annual Operation and Name of Project Status Report Construction Maintenance Licking River Rough River, KY Tradewater River, KY White River, IN Completed Completed Completed Completed 1901 1951 1858 1909 $ 13,045 105,500 18,568 119,312 $ 136,667 101,196 33,331 24-24 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1997 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project and Status 1 Report Construction Maintenance Local Protection: Completed: Boone County, KY (Ohio River, Rabbit Hash) Brevoort Levee, IN (Wabash River) Brookport, IL Cannelton, IN Canoe Creek, Henderson, KY 2 Chaplin River, Perryville, KY 2 Cincinnati, OH Covington, KY Dayton, KY Delphi, IN (Wabash River) England Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) English, IN (Little Blue River) 2 Frankfort, KY (North Frankfort) (Kentucky River) 3 8 Gill Township Levee, IN (Wabash River) Golconda, IL Grassy Creek, Jackson County, IN (Muscatatuck River) 2 Harrisburg, IL Hawesville, KY Indianapolis, IN (Fall Creek Section) (White River) Indian Creek, Corydon, IN 2 Jackson, KY (Kentucky River) Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN Lawrenceburg, IN Lebanon Junction, KY (Salt River) 2 Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN Levee Unit No. 8, White River, IN Louisville, KY 4 Lyford Levee Unit, IN (Wabash River) Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN (Wabash River)5 Mill Creek, Jefferson County, KY 2 Mount Carmel, IL (Wabash River) Muncie, IN (White River) Neon-Fleming, KY (Kentucky River) New Albany, IN New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River) 2 7 Newburgh, IN (Ohio River) 6 Newport, KY Paducah, KY Panther Creek, KY (Green River) 2 Portland, IN (Salamonie River) 2 Reevesville, IL (Cache River) Rochester & McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL (Wabash River) Rosiclaire, IL Saline River & Tributaries, IL Shawneetown, IL 7 Sturgis, KY Taylorsville, KY (Salt River) Tell City, IN Terre Haute (Conover Levee), IN (Wabash River) 7 Town Creek, Harrodsburg, KY 2 Triplett Creek, Morehead, KY (Licking River)2 Uniontown, KY Vincennes, IN (Wabash River) 7 West Terre Haute, IN (Wabash River) 1977 1954 1958 1959 1957 1965 1987 1953 1972 1965 1979 1948 1960 1953 1959 1955 1953 1964 1957 1959 & 1996 1953 1967 1987 1952 1975 1944 1987 1973 1972 1956 1963 1957 1959 1974 1959 1959 1970 1962 1954 1972 1954 1981 1972 1952 1956 1965 1967 1972 1956 1964 1977 $ 392,443 1,240,299 597,493 2,068,391 1,206,852 832,700 10,150,935 7,862,937 13,177,345 144,563 734,498 372,353 2,960,970 561,200 565,333 70,304 870,015 969,318 1,788,840 300,143 130,952 4,836,361 2,473,414 130,417 7,517,464 700,534 26,721,438 267,391 4,337,617 292,710 1,980,675 887,835 86,532 5,375,471 297,624 52,061 7,512,987 4,761,551 254,031 237,657 600,300 1,079,236 622,544 7,826,219 91,000 1,826,778 378,050 932,229 14,913 56,505 893,094 1,070,926 3,308,941 1,095,704 24-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 24-E CONTINUED OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep 30, 1997 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project and Status1 Report Construction Maintenance Local Protection: Completed: Vincennes, IN (Wabash River) 7 West Terre Haute, IN (Wabash River) Whitewater River, Hagerstown, IN 2 Active: Greenfield Bayou, IN (Wabash River) Indianapolis, IN (Warfleigh Section) (White River) Louisville, KY 9 Miami River Basin, Pleasant Run, Vicinity Fairfield, OH 9 (Great Miami River) West Fork Mill Creek, OH (Winton Road) 9 Inactive: Blue River, Salem, IN Cache River, Upper Basin, Ill Columbus, IN Island Levee, IN (Wabash River) Kentucky River National Recreation Area Licking River, KY Mount Vernon, IN Southwest Ohio Urban Waterfront Development Vincennes, IL (Wabash River) Wabash River, York Township, Clark County, IL West Fork Drakes Creek, TN & KY West Point, KY Whitewater River & Tributaries, IN & OH Deferred: Grayville, IL Reservoirs: Active: Camp Ground Lake, KY (Salt River) Inactive: Big Pine Lake, IN (Wabash River) Big Walnut Lake, IN (Wabash River) Booneville Lake, KY (Kentucky River) Eagle Creek Lake, KY Falmouth Lake, KY (Licking River) Lafayette Lake, IN (Wabash River) Louisville Lake, IL (Wabash River) Mining City Lake, KY (Green River) Red River Lake, KY (Kentucky River) 1All projects are on Ohio River unless otherwise noted. 2Authorized by the Chief of Engineers under Section 205, 1984 Flood Control Act, as amended. 3 Costincludes $161,098 cash contribution consisting of $105,118 from the City of Frankfort, KY and $55,980 from the Commonwealth of Kentucky. 4 Cost includes $1,716,301 cash contributions from the City of Louisville, KY. 6 Cost shown are for levee and pump plants. 'The Water Resources Development Act of 1974 modified the Newburgh Locks & Dam project to include the bank protection works at Newburgh Locks & Dam project to include the bank protection works at Newburgh, IN. 7 Partially completed to form a useful unit. Remaining portions of project inactive. 8 Partially completed to form a useful unit. Remaining portions of project are active and inactive. 9 Advance Engineering and Design funded with General Investigations Appropriation. o Primarily recreation project with rehabilitation of existing flood control features. " Rehabilitation of existing facilities at six communities along the Indiana shoreline of the Ohio River. "2A uthorized by the Chief of Engineers under Section 14, Streambank Erosion, Flood Control Act, as amended. 24-26 1964 1977 1976 1964 1983 1977 1980 1976 1975 1981 1977 1983 1976 $ 3,308,941 1,095,704 641,398 157,935 153,410 415,000 514,964 477,649 15,000 44,000 283,000 355,963 30,000 58,000 4,490 112,000 235,615 1,270,590 1,009,188 1,038,595 702,471 944,386 1,200,920 2,355,395 350,474 1,794,308 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Flood Control - Local Protection: Adams Levee, IN (Wabash River) - 1978 $ - Alton, IN - 1977 - - Anderson, IN (White River) 1940 1986 5,724 Aurora, IN - 1977 35,420 Bellevue, KY - 1977 19,023 Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River) - 1981 - - Bromley, KY - 1977 - - California (Cincinnati), OH - 1977 16,465 Carrollton, KY - 1977 9,713 Caseyville, KY - 1986 - - Cave-in-Rock, IL - 1977 - - Cincinnati, OH (Unit 2) - 1977 - - Cincinnati, OH (Unit 4) - 1977 - - Cleves, OH - 1977 6,343 Clinton, IN - 1977 6,848 Cloverport, KY - 1986 - - Concordia, KY - 1986 - - Deer Creek, Prairie Levee, IN - 1977 - - Derby, IN - 1977 - - Elizabethtown, IL - 1977 - - Evansville, Howell II - 1992 - - Fletcher & Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN - 1977 3,361 Frankfort, KY (Benson Creek) (Kentucky River) 1979 1992 - - Grandview, IN - 1977 8,497 Honey Creek Levee, IN - 1977 - - Leavenworth, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 1, Eel River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 2, Eel River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 2, East Fork White River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 3, East Fork White River, IN 1938 1977 275 Levee Unit 1, IL (Wabash River) 1973 1986 60,000 Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River, IL - 1977 - - Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, IL - 1977 - - Levee Unit 2, Wabash River, IL - 1977 - - Levee Units 3 and 4, Wabash River, IL 1938 1977 216 Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, IL - 1977 9,922 Levee Unit 17, Wabash River Basin, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 1, White River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 7, White River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 9, White River, IN - 1977 - - Levee Unit 10, White River, IN - 1977 - - Lewisport, KY - 1990 - - Louisville, KY (Partial) - 1986 - - Ludlow, KY - 1977 14,503 Madison, IN - 1977 - - Mauckport, IN - 1977 - - Marion, IN (Wabash River) 1979 1986 209,975 McGinnis Levee, IN 1950 1977 71,049 Metropolis, IL - 1986 10,575 Milton, KY - 1977 - - Moscow, OH - 1977 - - New Amsterdam, IN - 1977 - - New Harmony, IN - 1977 - - 24-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 24-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS CONTINUED For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Flood Control - Local Protection (Cont'd.) New Richmond, OH - 1977 7,104 - Newport-Wilder, KY - 1990 - - Orleans, IN 1972 1977 13,158 - Owensboro, KY - 1990 - - Patriot, IN - 1977 - - Prestonville, KY - 1977 - - Raccoon Creek Levee, IN - 1977 - - Rising Sun, IN - 1977 - - Rockport, IN - 1977 - - Rome, IN - 1977 - - Russell and Allison, IL - 1992 52,088 - Shawneetown, IL - 1986 25,367 - Shoals, IN (East Fork White River) 1938 1977 - - Shufflebarger Levee, IN 1950 1977 64,487 - Smithland, KY - 1992 - - Sugar Creek Levee, IN 1961 1977 28,061 - Terre Haute, IN - 1977 - - Tolu, KY - 1986 - - Tri Pond Levee, IL 1972 1977 65,510 - Troy, IN - 1977 - - Utica, IN - 1978 - - Vevay, IN - 1977 - - Vincennes, IN (Partial) 1964 1986 - - Westport, KY - 1977 - - Wilders, KY - 1990 - - Flood Control - Reservoirs Big Blue Lake, IN 1980 1981 1,079,867 - Clifty Creek Lake, IN 1979 1981 1,016,358 - Downeyville Lake, IN (Wabash River) - 1992 - - Helm Lake, IL 1976 1981 41,616 - Lincoln Lake, IL 1979 1981 1,331,844 - Metomora Lake, IN - 1977 - - 24-28 TABLE 24-H NAVIGATION LOCKS AND DAMS PRINCIPAL FEATURES - GREEN & BARREN RIVERS AND KENTUCKY RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEMS Lock Dimensions Miles Greatest Length Lock above Available Upper Depth of Year and Mouth of Distance from Width of For Full Normal Pool Miter Sills Character of Percent Opened to Cost of Dam River Nearest Town Chamber Width Lift Elevation Upper Lower Foundation Complete Navigation Lock and D (feet) (feet) (feet msl) (feet) (feet) CONSTRUCTION OF LOCKS AND DAMS, OHIO RIVER -For report on this improvement see this heading under Ohio River. GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY (See Section 3 of Text) Green River New 1 9.1 Spottsville, KY 84.0 600.0 11.8 349.1 12.1 11.3 Shale and Coal 100 1956 2 $5,101,978 3 New 2 63.1 0.3 miles below Calhoun, KY 84.0 600.0 14.3 363.4 15.0 11.7 Shale 100 1956 * 4,799,271 s 3 108.5 0.3 miles below Rochester, KY 35.8 137.5 17.0 380.4 7.3 5.6 Rock 100 1836 6 121,377 4 149.0 Woodbury, KY 35.8 138.0 16.4 396.8 7.1 6.5 Rock 100 1839 ' 125,718 5 168.1 0.3 miles below Glenmore, KY 56.0 360.0 15.2 412.0 8 12.0 9.3 Piles and Rock 100 1934 9 1,020,868 1o 6 181.7 2.8 miles above Brownsville, KY 36.0 145.0 9.2 421.1 8.0 8.8 Gravel 100 1905 9 168,415 Barren River 1 15.0 1 0.3 miles above Greencastle, KY 56.0 360.0 15.2 412.0 12.0 9.3 Gravel 100 1841 12 871,565 13 KENTUCKY RIVER, KY (See Section 4 of Text) Kentucky River 1 4.0 3.8 miles above Carrolton, KY 38.0 145.0 8.2 14 430.0 8.2 4.8 Rock and Clay 100 1839 5 2 31.0 Lockport, KY 38.0 145.0 13.9 443.9 7.6 6.1 Rock 100 1839 5 3 42.0 Gest, KY 38.0 145.0 13.2 457.1 8.6 6.5 Rock 100 1844 " 1,350,385 16 4 65.0 1.0 mile below Frankfort, KY 38.0 145.0 13.2 470.3 6.4 6.3 Rock 100 1844 15 5 82.2 2.8 miles below Tyrone, KY 38.0 145.0 15.0 485.3 10.0 6.4 Rock 100 1844 '5 '7 6 96.2 21.6 miles below High Bridge, KY 52.0 147.0 14.0 499.3 9.4 6.4 Rock and Piles 100 1894 17 314,847 7 117.0 0.8 mile below High Bridge, KY 52.0 147.0 15.3 514.6 9.1 6.8 Rock 100 1897 17 290,788 8 139.9 4.7 miles above Camp Nelson, KY 52.0 146.0 18.7 533.6 10.6 6.0 Rock 100 1900 17 275,463 9 157.5 Valley View, KY 52.0 148.0 17.3 550.6 10.0 6.6 Rock 100 1907 '7 237,646 10 176.4 1.0 mile below Ford, KY 52.0 148.0 17.0 567.6 9.0 6.0 Rock 100 1907 " 221,500 11 201.0 17.2 miles below Irvine, KY 52.0 148.0 18.0 585.6 10.0 6.0 Rock 100 1906 " 296,593 12 220.0 Ravenna, KY 52.0 148.0 17.0 602.6 9.6 6.0 Rock 100 1910 17 425,693 13 239.9 2.2 miles below Willow, KY 52.0 148.0 18.0 620.6 9.6 6.0 Rock 100 1915 17 461,476 14 249.0 Heidelberg, KY 52.0 148.0 17.0 637.6 8.6 6.0 Rock 100 1971 17 392,902 1At normal pool Dam 48, Ohio River, Elev. 337.3, Green River datum (Elev. 338.0 Ohio River datum) 2New Lock 1 placed in operation May 25, 1956, old Dam 1, completed 1835-40, replaced with new cellular concrete masonry dam constructed 1970-71 with O&M fund at cost of $822,000. 3 Does not include $179,110 cost of old Lock and Dam 1. 4New Lock and Dam 2, placed in operation June 18, 1956. 5 Does not include $295,696 cost of old Lock and Dam 2. 6 Operation discontinued September 30, 1981. 7 Breaching of dam on May 24, 1965, stopped through traffic to Bowling Green, KY. sWith moveable A-frame crest 3 feet high. 9Operation discontinued August 1, 1951. o Does not include $179,434 cost of old Lock and Dam 5. n Distance from mouth of Green River is 164.5 miles. Lock closed to navigation as the result of loss of pool at Green River Lock and Dam 4 on May 24, 1965. 12 Piles in old gravel dam completed in 1934. '3Includes $729,269 for new large lock completed in 1934. am r 0 r d A H REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (See Section 32 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Estimated Cost Type of Project and Status 1 Construction Federal Non-Federal 2 Total Completed: Barnett Creek, KY (Rough River) 3 4 Boone County, KY Brookport, IL 5 6 Cannelton, IN 5 ' Cincinnati, OH 5 8 Covington, KY 5 9 Dayton, KY Delphi, IN (Wabash River) 5 10 England Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) 11 Frankfort, KY,North Frankfort (Kentucky River) 5 Golconda, IL 5 12 Harrisburg, IL 5 10 Hawesville, KY 5 13 Jackson, KY (Kentucky River) 5 8 Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN 7 Lawrenceburg, IN 5 Louisville, KY 5 14 Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN (Wabash River) 4 5 New Albany, IN 5 8 New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River) 5 7 Newport, KY 5 7 Paducah, KY 5 7 Perryville, KY, Chapin River Reevesville, IL (Cache River) 5 15 Rochester and McCleary's Bluff Levee, IL (Wabash River) 11 Rough River, KY 3 4 Southwest Jefferson County Sturgis, KY (Tradewater River) 11 Taylorsville, KY (Salt River) 5 16 Tell City, IN 5 14 Uniontown, KY Vincennes, IN 5 17 (Wabash River)(completed portion) 5 West Terre Haute, IN (Wabash River) Active: Evansville, IN 4 Frankfort, KY (Kentucky River) South Frankfort 5 Hazard, KY Salyersville, KY Channel improvement Bank Protection Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and barrier dam Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Cutoff channel Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee and pump plants Wall and levee Bank Protection Wall and levee Wall and levee Channel Improvement Levee Levee Channel improvement Wall and Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and levee Wall Channel Improvement Channel Improvement $ 144,000 392,443 597,493 2,068,391 10,150,935 7,862,937 13,117,345 144,563 734,498 2,960,970 565,333 870,015 969,318 130,952 4,226,361 2,473,689 25,005,137 4,337,617 5,375,471 297,624 7,512,987 4,761,551 823,700 600,300 1,079,236 654,000 60,077,183 1,826,778 378,050 932,229 1,070,926 3,308,941 1,095,704 44,654,000 8,630,000 9,348,600 $ 18,000 83,000 8,500 29,105 1,309,146 1,051,102 2,013,000 17,164 107,000 272,100 10,900 20,000 42,593 3,000 590,888 284,725 1,716,301 $ 162,000 475,443 605,993 2,097,496 11,460,081 8,914,039 15,130,345 161,727 841,498 3,233,070 576,233 890,015 1,011,911 133,952 4,817,249 2,758,414 26,721,438 109,200 4,446,817 740,000 6,115,471 298,506 232,000 11,000 40,000 100,000 5,000 9,917,000 93,000 63,309 32,707 72,153 285,000 150,000 297,624 7,811,493 4,993,551 834,700 640,300 1,179,236 659,000 69,994,183 1,919,778 441,359 964,936 1,143,079 3,593,941 1,245,704 5,500,000 50,154,000 36 2,880,000 981,400 11,510,000 36 10,330,000 Inactive: None 24-30 TABLE 24-I LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-I CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (See Section 32 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Estimated Cost Type of Project and Status 1 Construction Federal Non-Federal 2 Total Deauthorized: Adams Levee, IN (Wabash River) 32 Alton, IN 30 Aurora, IN 31 Bellevue, KY 30 Bonpas Creek, IL (Wabash River) 5 33 Bromley, KY 30 California (Cincinnati), OH 31 Carrollton, KY 30 Caseyville, KY 5 34 Cave-in-Rock, IL 30 Cincinnati, OH (Unit 2) 30 Cincinnati, OH (Unit 4) 30 Cleves, OH 30 Clinton, IN (Wabash River) 30 Cloverport, KY 5 34 Concordia, KY 5 34 Deer Creek Prairie Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Derby, IN 30 Elizabethtown, IL 30 Fletcher and Sunshine Gardens Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Frankfort, KY (Kentucky River) Benson Creek 6 Grandview, IN 30 Greenfield Bayou Levee, IN (Wabash River) 635 Honey Creek Levee, IN 30 Island Levee, IN (Wabash River) 5 35 Leavenworth, IN 30 Levee Unit 1, Eel River, IN 30 Levee Unit 1, Little Wabash River,IL 30 Levee Unit 1, White River, IN 30 Levee Unit 17, IN 30 Levee Unit 2, Eel River, IN 30 Levee Unit 2, Little Wabash River, IL 30 Levee Unit 2, White River, IN 30 Levee Unit 6, Wabash River, IL 30 Levee Unit 7, White River, IN 30 Lewisport, KY 5 36 Ludlow, KY 30 Madison, IN 30 Mauckport, IN 30 McGinnis Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Metropolis, IL 5 34 Milton, KY 30 Moscow, OH 30 New Amsterdam, IN 30 New Harmony Bridge, IL & IN (Wabash River) 57 New Harmony, IN (Wabash River) 30 Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Channel Improvement Wall and levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Wall and Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall and levee Levee Levee Levee Wall and levee Wall Levee Levee Bank Protection Levee $ 292,000 255,000 4,300,000 1,570,000 1,080,000 1,250,000 1,750,000 2,220,000 396,000 661,000 16,800,000 14,900,000 1,240,000 77,000 728,000 590,000 213,000 553,000 559,000 548,000 3,340,000 580,000 4,600,000 653,000 4,630,000 1,470,000 204,000 2,850,000 2,180,000 1,580,000 2,090,000 3,410,000 724,000 1,160,000 1,490,000 610,000 2,540,000 3,820,000 506,000 1,820,000 3,070,000 2,480,000 1,170,000 476,000 664,376 616,000 $ 14,000 40,000 1,190,000 400,000 630,000 925,000 720,000 97,000 35,000 125,000 2,900,000 621,000 67,000 9,000 193,000 55,000 10,000 67,000 153,000 26,000 1,150,000 133,000 1,087,000 32,000 528,000 266,000 40,000 164,000 116,000 118,000 715,000 136,000 73,000 56,000 88,000 243,000 745,000 360,000 105,000 104,000 431,000 41,000 372,000 13,000 99,000 25,000 $ 306,000 27 295,000 5,490,000 1,970,000 1,710,000 28 2,175,000 2,470,000 2,317,000 431,000 786,000 19,700,000 15,521,000 1,307,000 86,000 921,000 645,000 223,000 24 620,000 712,000 574,000 24 4,490,000 22 713,000 5,687,000 23 685,000 5,158,000 23 1,736,000 244,000 3,014,000 27 2,296,000 27 1,698,000 28 2,805,000 3,546,000 28 797,000 27 1,216,000 1,578,000 27 853,000 24 3,285,000 4,180,000 611,000 1,924,000 3,501,000 2,521,000 1,542,000 489,000 763,376 25 641,000 24-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 24-I CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (See Section 32 of Text) LOCAL PROTECTION Estimated Cost Type of Project and Status 1 Construction Federal Non-Federal 2 Total New Richmond, OH 30 Wall and levee $ 3,200,000 $ 720,000 $ 3,920,000 Owensboro, KY 5 35 Wall and levee 886,000 195,000 1,081,000 Patriot, IN 30 Levee 753,000 372,000 1,125,000 Prestonville, KY 30 Wall and levee 1,710,000 55,000 1,765,000 Raccoon Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Levee 426,000 37,000 463,000 24 Rising Sun, IN 30 Wall and levee 896,000 280,000 1,176,000 Rockport, IN 30 Wall and levee 466,000 133,000 599,000 Rome, IN 30 Levee 359,000 67,000 426,000 Russell and Allison Levee, IN (Wabash River) 937. Shawneetown, IL 5 34 Wall and levee 1,810,000 361,000 2,171,000 Shufflebarger Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Levee 2,380,000 90,000 2,470,000 Smithland, KY 5 35 Wall and levee 864,000 414,000 1,278,000 Sugar Creek Levee, IN (Wabash River) 30 Levee 418,000 29,000 447,000 24 Tolu, KY 53 Levee 303,000 35,000 338,000 Tri-Pond Levee, IL (Wabash River) 30 Levee 2,050,000 191,000 2,241,000 25 Troy, IN 30 Wall and levee 502,000 133,000 635,000 Utica, IN 5 32 Levee 1,570,000 120,000 1,690,000 Vevay, IN 30 Levee 1,170,000 146,000 1,316,000 Vincennes, IN (Wabash River) (Uncompleted Portion) 5 34 Wall and levee 3,340,000 3,340,000 28 West Point, KY 5 34 Wall and levee 3,283,000 400,000 3,683,000 24 Westport, KY 30 Wall 1,610,000 41,000 1,651,00 Wilder, KY 35 Wall and levee 10,800,000 959,000 11,759,000 26 1All projects are on an Ohio River unless otherwise noted. 2 Latest cost estimate revision 1954 unless otherwise noted. 3 Part of Rough River Reservoir and Channel Improvement Project, KY. 4 Details of this project are in individual report. 5 Also see "Other authorized flood control projects." 6 See Annual Report for 1958 for details. 7 See Annual Report for 1959 for details. 8 See Annual Report for 1957 for details. 9 See Annual Report for 1965 for details. 10 See Annual Report for 1953 for details. n See Annual Report for 1972 for details. 12 See Annual Report for 1960 for details. 13 See Annual Report for 1955 for details. 14 See Annual Report for 1962 for details. 15 Substitute project for Belknap, Karnak, and Ullin, IL, complete. See Annual Report for 1954 for details. 16 See Annual Report for 1952 for details. 17 See Annual Report for 1956 for details. 18 Latest cost estimate revision 1988. 19 Latest cost estimate revision 1986. 20 Latest cost estimate revision 1984. 21 Latest cost estimate revision 1983. 22 Latest cost estimate revision 1976. 23 Latest cost estimate revision 1978. 24 Latest cost estimate revision 1960. 25 Latest cost estimate revision 1971. 26 Latest cost estimate revision 1977. 27 Latest cost estimate revision 1961. 28 Latest cost estimate revision 1973. 29 Latest cost estimate revision 1989. 30 Deauthorized Aug 05, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1971 (P.L. 93-251). 31 Deauthorized Nov 06, 1977 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). 32 Deauthorized Oct 03, 1978 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). 33 Deauthorized May 06, 1981 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). 34 Deauthorized Nov 17, 1986 under Section 12, Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (P.L. 93-251). 35 Deauthorized Jan 01, 1990 under Section 1001 (b)(1), Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). 36 Latest cost estimate revision 1992. 37 Deauthorized Jul 19, 1992. 1 Latest cost estimate revision 1989 unless otherwise noted. 24-32 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-I CONTINUED OHIO RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (See Section 32 of Text) RESERVOIRS Estimated Cost 1 Tributary Basin Reservoirs Status Stream Federal Non-Federal Total Great Miami River: Brookville Lake, IN 2 Metamora Lake, IN Green River: Barren River Lake, KY 2 Green River Lake, KY 2 Mining City Lake, KY Nolin Lake, KY 2 Rough River Kentucky 2 Kentucky River: Booneville Lake, KY Buckhorn Lake, KY 2 Carr Fork Lake, KY 2 Eagle Creek Lake, KY Red River Lake, KY Licking River: Cave Run Lake, KY 2 Falmouth Lake, KY Little Miami River: Caesar Creek Lake, OH 2 William H. Harsha Lake, OH 2 Mill Creek: West Fork of Mill Creek Lake, OH 2 Wabash River: Cagles Mill Lake, IN 2 Cecil M. Harden Lake, IN 2 Monroe Lake, IN 2 Patoka Lake, IN 2 Complete Deauthorized Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Inactive Complete Complete Inactive Inactive Complete Inactive Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete Complete East Fork of Whitewater River West Fork of Whitewater River Barren River Green River Green River Nolin River Rough River South Fork of Kentucky River Middle Fork of Kentucky River North Fork of Kentucky River Eagle Creek Red River Licking River Licking River Caesar Creek East Fork of Little Miami River $ 37,905,073 35,300,000 27,371,299 33,238,597 69,100,000 17,193,278 10,620,389 60,700,000 11,766,206 $ 7,497,492 3 $ 45,402,565 35,300,000 4 108,418 5 27,479,717 223,733 13 33,462,330 69,100,000 4 17,193,278 22,612 10,643,001 60,700,000 8 11,766,206 50,854,826 50,854,826 27,800,000 - 27,800,000 14 38,551,692 1,794,308 40,346,000 81,162,282 81,162,282 7 125,000,000 125,000,000 8 62,893,882 5,037,000 9 67,930,882 52,023,157 3,485,840 9 West Fork of Mill Creek 3,622,302 Mill Creek Raccoon Creek Salt Creek Patoka River 4,256,903 6,633,812 7,902,827 53,095,790 55,508,997 1,100,161 10 4,722,463 113,094 353,995 8,667,947 20,568,369 4,369,997 6,987,807 16,570,774 73,664,159 1Latest cost estimate revision 1989 unless otherwise noted. 2Details of this project given in individual report. 3Cash contributions for water supply storage. 4Latest cost estimate revision 1954. 5For Code 713 recreaton development. 6Latest cost estimate revision 1975. 'Includes $6,900,000 United States Forest Service cost. 8Latest cost estimate revision 1979. 9Reimbursement for water supply storage. 10 Includes $520,800 for non-Federal cost for sewer relocation and dam, $50,000 for contributed funds in fulfillment of project authorization, and $529,361 for Code 713 recreation development. 11 Includes $7,797,604 cash contribution for storage for low-flow regulation and $870,343 non-Federal contribution in kind for recreational facilities. 12 Includes $14,180,677 cash contribution for water supply storage, and $6,387,692 for initial recreation development. 13 For $183,732 Code 713 recreation development and $40,001 contributed funds. 14 Latest cost estimate 1974 24-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 24-J WABASH RIVER BASIN TOTAL COST OF BASIN PLAN (FLOOD CONTROL) (See Section 37 of Text) Type of Estimated Cost Construction Project or Stream Status Federal Non-Federal Total LOCAL PROTECTION Marion, IN Wall and Levee Inactive $ 3,900,000 $ 854,000 $ 4,754,000 2 RESERVOIRS Big Blue Lake, IN Big Blue River Deauthorized 87,200,000 53,836,000 3 141,036,000 4 Big Walnut Lake, IN Big Walnut Creek Inactive 81,800,000 45,069,000 6 126,869,000 4 Downeyville Lake, IN Flatrock and Little Flatrock Rivers Inactive 74,200,000 64,448,000 6 138,648,000 1 Helm Lake, IN Skillet Fork Deauthorized 25,171,000 14,829,000 7 40,000,000 8 Louisville Lake, IL Little Wabash River Inactive 113,000,000 14,435,000 9 127,435,000 10 1Latest cost revision 1984 unless otherwise noted. interests for water supply, $8,749,000 reimbursable for 2Latest cost estimate revision 1977. initial recreation facilities. 3Includes $38,190,000 reimbursable by non-Federal 7Includes $12,696,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $15,656,000 reimbursable interests for water supply and $2,133,000 reimbursable for for initial recreation facilities, initial recreation facilities. 4Latest cost estimate revision 1979. 8Latest cost estimate revision 1975. 6Includes $26,663,000 reimbursable by non-Federal 9Includes $8,402,000 reimbursable by non-Federal interests for water supply and $18,406,000 reimbursable interests for water supply and $6,033,000 reimbursable for for initial recreation facilities, initial recreation facilities. 6Includes $53,084,000 reimbursable by non-Federal 10 Latest cost estimate revision 1982. TABLE 24-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 40 of Text) Date of Projects Inspection Local Protection Projects Brevoort Levee, IN Brookport, IL Cache River Levee, IL Cannelton, IN Cincinnati, OH Covington, KY Dayton, KY Delphi, IN England Pond Levee, IL Evansville, IN Frankfort, KY, North Frankfort Gill Township Levee, IN Golconda, IL Harrisburg, IL Hagerstown, IN Hawesville, KY Indianapolis, IN Jeffersonville-Clarksville, IN Lawrenceburg, IN Lebanon Junction, KY Aug 1997 May 1997 July 1997 Apr 1997 Sep 1995 Sep 1996 Apr 1997 Aug 1997 Sep 1997 Sep 1996 Sep 1997 Sep 1997 Jul 1997 Jul 1997 Sep 1997 Sep 1997 Dec 1995 Sep 1996 Dec 1995 Nov 1995 24-34 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED CONTINUED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 40 of Text) Date of Projects Inspection Levee Unit No. 5, Wabash River, IN Sep 1997 Levee Unit No. 8, Wabash River, IN Aug 1997 Louisville, KY Aug 1997 Lyford Levee, IN Aug 1997 Mason J. Niblack Levee, IN Sep 1997 Mount Carmel, IL Sep 1997 Muncie, IN Aug 1997 New Albany, IN Apr 1997 Newport, KY May 1997 Paducah, KY Sep 1997 Perryville, KY Sep 1997 Reevesville, IL Jul 1997 Rochester-McClearys Bluff Levee, IL Sep 1997 Rosiclare, IL Jul 1997 Shawneetown, IL Apr 1997 Southwestern Jefferson County, KY Aug 1997 Sturgis, KY Sep 1997 Taylorsville, KY Sep 1997 Tell City, IN Apr 1997 Terre Haute (Conover Levee), IN Apr 1997 Uniontown, KY Apr 1997 Vincennes, IN Sep 1997 West Terre Haute, IN Aug 1997 Channel Improvements Canoe Creek, Henderson, KY May 1995 Cypress Creek, McLean County, KY Sep 1995 Eel River, Brazil Waterworks, IN Jul 1996 English, IN (Little Blue River) Jun 1994 Grassy Creek, Jackson County, IN Sep 1995 Harrodsburg, KY (Town Creek) Sep 1995 Indian Creek, Corydon, IN Jun 1994 Jackson, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) Sep 1995 Lick Creek, Hartford City (Blackford County), IN Mar 1995 Mill Creek, Jefferson County, KY Jul 1988 Muscatatuck River, Crothersville, IN Jul 1990 Neon-Fleming, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) Sep 1995 Nicholasville (Town Fork) Vicinity, KY Sep 1995 Panther Creek, Curdsville, KY Oct 1995 Plum Creek, Spencer County, KY Mar 1993 Portland, IN (Salamonie River) Mar 1995 Rough River, Hartford, Ohio County, KY Sep 1995 Salamonie River, Wells County, IN Mar 1995 Saline River and Tributaries, IL Feb 1995 Tripplett Creek, Morehead, KY Sep 1995 Troublesome Creek, Hindman, KY Sep 1995 Wabash River, Adams County, IN Mar 1995 Whitesburg, KY (North Fork Kentucky River) Sep 1995 Bank Revetments Crooked Creek, City Garage, Madison, IN Aug 1995 Crooked Creek, John Paul Park, Madison, IN Aug 1995 East Fork White River, Brownstown, (Jackson County), IN Jun 1993 Eighteen Mile Island, Oldham County, KY Jun 1993 24-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 24-K INSPECTION OF COMPLETED CONTINUED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 40 of Text) Date of Projects Inspection Great Miami River, Ice Jam Flooding, Port Jefferson, OH Aug 1995 Great Miami River, Sidney, OH Aug 1995 Green River, Calhoun, KY (River Mile 63.6) Sep 1995 Green River, Calhoun, KY (River Mile 63.4) Sep 1995 Indian Creek, Burton Lane, Morgan County, IN Apr 1995 Licking River, Butler, KY Aug 1995 Lusk Creek, Golconda, IL Feb 1995 Little Miami River, Indian Hill, OH Apr 1995 Little Miami River, Milford, OH Apr 1995 Nameless Creek, Warren County, IN Jun 1995 Ohio River, Brandenburg, KY Jun 1993 Ohio River, Cloverport, KY Oct 1995 Ohio River, Daviess County, KY Oct 1995 Ohio River, Fort Massac State Park, IL Jul 1995 Ohio River, Hawesville, KY Oct 1995 Ohio River, Lewisport, KY Aug 1995 Ohio River, Madison, IN Aug 1995 Ohio River, Moscow, OH Aug 1995 Ohio River, Mount Vernon, IN May 1995 Ohio River, Newburgh, IN Jul 1994 Ohio River, Ohio Street, Evansville, IN Jul 1994 Ohio River, Otter Creek Park, KY Jun 1993 Ohio River, Owensboro, KY Oct 1995 Ohio River, Owensboro Riverport Authority, KY Feb 1995 Ohio River, Rabbit Hash, Boone County, KY Apr 1995 Ohio River, Rockport/Rockport Landing, IN May 1995 Ohio River, Sellersburg, IN Sep 1986 Ohio River, SR 66, Cannelton, IN Dec 1993 Ohio River, Troy, IN May 1995 Ohio River, Upper River Road, Jefferson County, KY Jul 1991 Ohio River, Vanderburg County, IN Jul 1994 Patoka River, Jasper, IN Oct 1993 Patoka River, Winslow, IN Jul 1995 South Fork of Wildcat Creek, County Road 7 East, Tippecanoe County, IN Apr 1995 Stoner Creek, North Middletown, KY Jul 1994 Wabash River, near Merom, IN Jun 1995 Wabash River, New Harmony, IN Feb 1995 Wabash River, Terre Haute STP Outfall Aug 1997 Wabash River, Vigo County, County Road 83 West Jun 1995 Wabash River, Vigo County, Little Road Jun 1995 White River, Morgan County, Blue Bluff Road, IN Apr 1995 White River, Petersburg (Pike County), IN Jul 1995 Whitewater River, Levee Road, near Brookville, IN Apr 1995 Wastewater Treatment Plant, Great Miami River, Ross, OH Apr 1995 24-36 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-L FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 42 of Text) Fiscal Year Cost Federal Non-Fed Total Environmental Restoration (Section 1135) Coordination Accounting Fund 7 3,009 - 3,009 Falls of Ohio, Wetlands & Fishery 5 2,602 - 2,602 Hovey Lake, IN 7 21,623 - 21,623 Howell Park, Evansville, IN 7 3,188 - 3,188 Initial Appraisals 4,999 - 4,999 Little Pitcher Lake, IN 7 84,850 - 84,850 Monroe Lake Wetland & Fish Spawning Areas ' 1,149 - 1,149 Flood Control (Section 205) Amberley Creek, Cincinnati, OH 2 23,022 - 23,022 Asaph's Creek, Standford, KY 2 17,430 - 17,430 Beech Fork, Bardstown, KY 3 111,280 603 111,280 Bellepoint, Kentucky River, Frankfort 6 19,508 - 19,508 Brushy Creek, Lawrence Co. 2 4,581 - 4,581 City Dam, Brevoort Levee, IN 3 37,474 - 37,474 Crooked Creek, Madison, IN 6 1,582 - 1,582 Coordination Account 10,250 - 10,250 Deshee River, Brevoort Levee, IN 3 31,565 - 31,565 Duck Creek, Elwood, IN 6 168 201 371 Embarras River, Villa Grove, IL 2 21,749 - 21,749 Feather Creek, Clinton, IN 3 22,664 - 22,664 Flatrock River, Rushville, IN 3 254,474 0 254,474 Hanging Fork Creek, Hustonville 6 1,806 - 1,806 Indian Creek, Lawrence Co. 6 21,806 - 21,806 Lancassange Creek, Clark Co., IN 5 5,055 (1,204) 3,851 Muddy Creek, Lawrence Co. 6 22,510 - 22,510 N. Fork, KY River, Jackson, KY 3 100,892 469 101,361 Ohio & Cumberland Rivers, Smithland, KY 2 4,766 - 4,766 Penitentiary Jones Run, KY 5 78,796 24,629 103,425 Pigeon Roost Creek 2 176 - 176 Pipe Creek, Alexandria, IN2 5,392 2,581 7,973 Pleasant Creek, Greenwood, IN 6 896 - 896 Pogues Run, Indianapolis, IN 2 1,979 - 1,979 Rolling Fork River, Lebanon Junction, KY 2 73,253 - 73,253 Salt Creek, Nashville, IN 6 250 - 250 Sugar Creek, Bellbrook, OH 5 347,483 30,995 378,478 West Fork, Blue River, Salem, IN 6 53 - 53 White River, Anderson, IN 2 20,757 - 20,757 Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14) Big Raccoon Creek, Parke County, IN 6 21 - 21 Big Vermillion River, Eugene Coverd Br. ' 15,663 - 15,663 Coordination Account 14,567 - 14,567 Eagle Creek, Indianapolis, IN 5 61,187 18,725 79,912 Mill Creek, Rd 550W, Park Co. 1 29,523 - 29,523 Mt. Vernon Sewer Outfall 6 1,350 - 1,350 North Fork, Kentucky River, River Road, Whitesburg, KY x 8,821 - 8,821 North Fork, Kentucky River, State Hwy 15N, Whitesburg, KY 1 8,977 - 8,977 Ohio River, Carollton, KY 5 20,496 - 20,496 24-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 24-L CONTINUED FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION -(See Section 42 of Text) Fiscal Year Cost Federal Non-Fed Total Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14) Continued Ohio River, Daviess Co. Middle School, Owen 1 7,783 - 7,783 Ohio River, New Richmond, OH 6 175,161 52,508 227,669 Ohio River, Perry County, IN 1 23,778 - 23,778 Whitewater River, Brooksville 6 588 - 588 Whitewater River, Fayette County Rd 4 6 7,884 - 7,884 Whitewater River, Memorial Road, Fayette 1 30,987 - 30,987 1 Planning and Design Analysis (PDA). 2 Feasibility Report. 3 Plans and Specification. 4 Construction Funds Received or Construction Underway. 6 Construction Completed. 6 Study Terminated. ' Preliminary Restoration Plan. 24-38 LOUISVILLE, KY DISTRICT TABLE 24-M GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Sections 43, 44, 45, & 46 of Text) Fiscal Year 1997 Cost Projects Federal Non-Fed Total SURVEYS Navigation Studies Ohio River Mainstem, Uniontown, KY, IL, IN $ 2,403,204 $ - $ 2,403,204 Flood Damage Prevention Studies Metro Indianapolis, IN, Indpls. No. Feas Study 13,141 7,612 20,753 Metro Lexington 238,441 - 238,441 Metropolitan Cincinnati, OH, No. KY Recon 6,109 - 6,109 Metropolitan Louisville, Beargrass Creek, KY 103,711 263,149 366,860 Metropolitan Louisville, Mill Creek, KY 92,569 - 92,569 Ohio River, Southeastern, IL 87,799 - 87,799 Ohio River & Trib Recon St. (Metro Louisville S.W.) 62,271 - 62,271 Panther Creek, KY 91,196 - 91,196 Upper Kentucky River Basin 316,081 - 316,081 Upper Tippecanoe River Basin 0 - 0 Wabash River Basin Comprehensive, IN, IL 159,223 85,805 245,028 Wabash River, New Harmony, IN 6,207 11,893 18,100 Special Studies Environmental Services Partnership 83 - 83 Tippecanoe River, Sedlm, IN 91,523 - 91,523 Review of Authorized Projects Green & Barren Rivers, KY 178,748 - 178,748 Miscellaneous Activities Special Investigation, KY 62,970 - 62,970 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 5,038 - 5,038 Intra-Agency Water Resources Development 19,843 - 19,843 North American Waterfowl Management Plan 1,522 - 1,522 PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Navigation Project - Lock and Dams McAlpine Locks and Dam, IN & KY 3,143 - 3,143 Ohio River Greenway, In 610,676 - 610,676 Flood Control Projects - Local Protection Hazard, KY 4,198 - 4,198 Metro Indianapolis, Indianapolis North, IN 364,511 - 364,511 Metro Region, Duck Creek, OH 8,075 - 8,075 Metro Louisville, Pond Creek, KY 8,721 - 8,721 Metropolitan Louisville, Beargrass Creek, KY 4,938 - 4,938 South Frankfort, KY 235 - 235 Wabash River, New Harmony, IN 5,213 - 5,213 Wabash Scenic Corridor, IN 149 - 149 White River Central Waterfront, IN 602,164 - 602,164 24-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 24-M CONTINUED GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Sections 43, 44, 45, & 46 of Text) Fiscal Year 1997 Cost Projects Federal Non-Fed Total COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES Coordination with other Agencies and Non-Federal Interest Water Resources Agencies $ 13,120 $ - $ 13,120 Planning Assistance to States Dam Safety Plan, Hardy Lake, IN 618 470 1,088 PAS-KY-Jefferson County 17,103 - 17,103 Planning Assistance to States 2,476 - 2,476 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood Plain Management Services Detention/Retention Study 8,053 - 8,053 Flood Plain Management - Louisville, KY 30,181 - 30,181 Jasper Co. TX/ Rising Star 29,850 - 29,850 Rio San Jose 81,809 - 81,809 Technical Service, General 49,000 - 49,000 Quick Responses 4,027 - 4,027 Hydrologic Studies Hydrologic Studies 7,621 - 7,621 24-40 HUNTINGTON, WV, DISTRICT * All cost and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in the text and also appear at the end of this chapter. The Huntington District includes central and southeastern Ohio, all of West Virginia except the northern panhandle and northeastern portion, the eastern portion of Kentucky, a portion of midwestern Virginia, a very small portion of northwestern North Carolina, embraced in the drainage basin of the Ohio River and its tributaries from approximate river mile 127 (below Pittsburgh, PA) to approximate river mile 438, immediately upstream from Foster, KY. The drainage area of the Huntington District is approximately 44,914 square miles. Improvements Page Navigation 1. Construction of Locks and Dams on Ohio River ..................................... 25-2 2. Kanawha River, WV ....................2.5.-2................. 3. Open Channel Work, Ohio River ................... 25-2 4. Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......2.5.-.2.... Flood Control 5. Alum Creek Lake, OH ..................2.5.-.2............... 6. Beech Fork Lake, WV ...................25.-.3............... 7. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ......2.5.-3.... 8. Bumsville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ......2.5.-3... 9. Deer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH ......25.-.3.. 10. Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH .......2.5-.4.... 11. Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY .........2.5.-4....... 12. Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH .........2.5.-.4....... 13. East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV............ 25-5 14. Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY ............. 25-5 15. Grayson Lake, KY .....................2.5.-.5.................. 16. John W. Flannagan Dam and Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, VA ...................2.5.-5................ 17.Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy and Cumberland Rivers, KY, WV and VA ............. 25-6 18. Massillon, OH ..................................... 25-6 19. Muskingum River Lakes, OH ......................... 25-7 20. Newark, OH ..................................... 25-7 21. North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH ....2.5.-8. 22. North Fork of Pound River Lake, VA ............. 25-8 23. Ohio River Basin (Huntington District) .......2.5.-8.... 24. Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH ......... 25-8 25. Paintsville Lake, KY ....................................... 25-9 26. R.D. Bailey Lake, WV .................................... 25-9 27. Roseville, OH ..................................... 25-9 28. Summersville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ..... 25-9 29. Sutton Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV ........... 25-10 30. Tom Jenkins Dam, Ohio River Basin, OH........ 25-10 31. West Columbus, OH ...................................... 25-10 32. Yatesville Lake, KY ........................................ 25-10 33. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ................................... 25-11 34. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ..................................... 25-11 General Investigations 35. Surveys ..................................... 25-11 36. Collection and Study of Basic Data ............... 25-11 Tables Table 17-A Cost & Financial Statement ............. 25-12 Table 17-B Authorization Legislation .................. 25-17 Table 17-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .......................... 25-20 Table 17-D Not Applicable Table 17-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ............................... 25-21 Table 17-F Not Applicable Table 17-G Deauthorized Projects...................... 25-22 Table 17-H Inspection of Flood Control Projects .. 25-24 25-1 Page Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1997 1. Construction of Locks and Dams on the Ohio River See this heading under Chapter 19- Ohio River. 2. Kanawha River, WV Location. The Kanawha River is approximately 97 miles in length and is formed by the junction of the New and Gauley Rivers, a short distance above Kanawha Falls, WV, and flows generally northwesterly to the confluence with the Ohio River at Point Pleasant, WV. Previous projects. For details of previous projects see the Annual Reports for 1875, 1915 and 1938. Existing project. The existing project consists of three navigation structures on the Kanawha River. London Locks and Dam are located approximately 83 miles above the mouth of the Kanawha River and approximately two miles downstream from Montgomery, WV. Marmet Locks and Dam are located approximately 68 miles above the mouth of the Kanawha River at Marmet, WV. Winfield Locks and Dam are located approximately 31 miles above the mouth of the Kanawha River at Winfield, WV. Each structure has twin locks with usable dimensions of 56 feet by 360 feet. Another structure, Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam, is located on the Ohio River at approximate river mile 279 and approximately nine miles below Gallipolis, OH. This structure has two parallel locks, the main lock is 110 feet by 1,200 feet. The existing project was completed at a cost of $27,853,699. Construction was initiated in 1931 and completed in 1937. This system of locks and dams provides a navigable depth of nine feet from the mouth of the Kanawha River to a point approximately 91 miles upstream. For further cost details see Table 17-B, see also, Appendix C. Public Law 99-88 authorized the initiation of Engineering and Design and Real Estate Acquisition for Winfield Locks and Dam Replacement. Feasibility studies for modernization have been completed. The plan includes construction of an additional lock chamber (800'x110') adjacent to the existing locks and continued use of the riverward lock chamber and the navigation dam. The contract for Lock Replacement - Phase I was awarded in April 1990 and is complete. The contract for Construction ofAdditional Lock and Gate Bay, Phase IIA, was awarded in May 1993 and is complete. The contract for lock replacement, Phase IIB, was awarded in January 1994 and is 96% complete. The full funding estimate for new work is $221,600,000, which is 50 percent Federal cost and 50 percent Inland Water Ways Trust Fund cost. Preconstruction engineering and design work for Marmet Locks and Dam was completed in September 1997. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. There are 79 terminals along the Kanawha River located from the mouth of the river to 30 miles east of Charleston, WV. These terminals are constructed principally of steel and wood mooring piles and steel pile mooring cells. Seventeen of these terminals have railroad connections. One terminal, a paved wharf, is owned by the City of Charleston, WV. The remaining terminals are privately owned. The principal commodities handled are coal, chemicals, acids, cement, gasoline and oil, and sand and gravel. For further details see the 1962 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. The Locks and Dams were operated as required and necessary repairs and improvements were made to the locks and dams as well as to the appurtenant structures and grounds. Channel inspections were conducted periodically. There was no dredging by hired labor on the Kanawha River in FY 97. Dredging by contract on the Kanawha River was 61,132 cubic yards at $391,971. 3. Open Channel Work, Ohio River See this heading under Chapter 19 - Ohio River. 4. Other Authorized Navigation Projects See Table 17-C. FLOOD CONTROL 5. Alum Creek Lake, OH Location. The damsite is located in Delaware County, OH, on Alum Creek, a tributary of Big Walnut Creek, approximately 26 miles above the mouth of Alum Creek and 15 miles north of Columbus, OH, and approximately 157 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earthfill dam 93 feet in height and 10,000 feet in length with a gate controlled spillway located in the right abutment. The reservoir provides a total storage of 134,800 acrefeet and controls a drainage area of approximately 123 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was initiated in August 1970 and completed in July 1974. The 405 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. The Federal cost of the project was $56,267,422. The Sponsor will reimburse the Government an estimated $27,880,000, exclusive of interest, for cost allocated to water supply. Local cooperation. For details of required local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. 25-2 Huntington, WV, District Operations and Maintenance. The entire project is complete. The project was operated for the benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $4,550,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $74,687,000 in flood damages. 6. Beech Fork Lake, WV Location. The damsite is located in Wayne County, WV, on Beech Fork Creek, a tributary of Twelvepole Creek, approximately four miles above the mouth of Beech Fork Creek and 20 miles above the confluence of Twelvepole Creek and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam 86 feet in height and 1,080 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway landward of the left abutment of the dam with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides a total storage of 37,540 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 78 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in December 1972 and completed in February 1977. See also Appendix A. A total of 485 tracts of land were acquired for the project. The total cost of the project was $41,987,500. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and maintenance. The entire project is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $13,000,000. To date the project has prevented an estimated $17,486,000 in flood damages. 7. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV Location. The damsite is located on the New River in Summers County, WV, approximately three miles above Hinton, WV, and one mile from the confluence of the New and Greenbrier Rivers. The reservoir is located in Summers County, WV, and Giles County, VA. Existing project. The existing project consists of a concrete gravity dam 180 feet in height and 2,048 feet in length. Appurtenant structures consist ofa gated spillway 790 feet in length located in the channel section of the dam. The stilling pool is formed by a 23-foot-high weir located 364 feet downstream of 16 gated sluices through the spillway section and discharging into the stilling pool. Penstocks were installed at the time of construction to permit the future installation of hydropower. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 631,000 acre-feet. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam was initiated in January 1942 and completed in April 1952. A total of 338 tracts of land was acquired for the project. The Federal cost of the project was $29,458,652, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. For further details see the 1939 and 1962 Annual Reports. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. The entire project is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $77,483,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $1,579,771,000 in flood damages. 8. Burnsville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV Location. The damsite is located in Braxton County, WV, on the Little Kanawha River, approximately two miles above Burnsville, WV, and 124 miles above the confluence of the Little Kanawha River and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth embankment dam 80 feet in height and 1,000 feet in length with a gated spillway in the left abutment. The outlet works is an integral part of the spillway, consisting of five sluice gates and one low flow sluice. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 65,400 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 165 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in June 1973 and completed in February 1976. See also Appendix A. The 357 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. The Federal cost of the project to date has been $57,166,839. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. The project is completed. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $25,300,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $77,378,000 in flood damage. 9. Deer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH Location. The damsite is located in Pickaway County, approximately seven miles south of Mount Sterling, OH, on Deer Creek, a tributary of the Scioto River, approximately 21 miles above the mouth of Deer Creek and approximately 106 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River. 25-3 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1997 Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-filled dam 93 feet in height and 3,880 feet in length, a 741-foot concrete gravity channel section controlled by three tainter gates, an outlet works consisting of five gated sluices through a concrete spillway section discharging into a stilling basin and an earth dike 15 feet by 4,600 feet in a saddle located approximately four miles southwest of the damsite. The reservoir provides a total storage of 102,540 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 278 square miles. Construction of the dam was completed in May 1968. The 138 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. For further project details see the 1965 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost of the project is $20,406,545, including expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. For details of required local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $1,270,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $29,002,000 in flood damages. 10. Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH Location. The damsite is located on the Olentangy River, approximately six miles above and north of Delaware, OH, and approximately 32 miles above the confluence of the Olentangy and Scioto Rivers at Columbus, OH. The reservoir is located in Delaware, Marion and Morrow Counties, OH. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam with a gate controlled ogee type spillway and five outlet conduits in the channel. The dam is 18,600 feet in length and 92 feet in height. The project provides for storage of 132,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 381 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in April 1946 and completed in July 1948. For further details see the 1962 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. Total real estate requirements of 7,703 acres of fee acquisition and 2,428 acres of flowage easements have been completed. The Federal cost for the project was $7,631,821. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $1,400,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $87,147,000 in flood damages. 11. Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY Location. The damsite is located on Johns Creek, approximately seven miles southeast of Paintsville, KY, and approximately six miles above the confluence of Johns Creek and the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earthfill dam 118 feet in height and 913 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging through a channel excavated in the left abutment, and a rolled earth-fill dike blocking a low divide to Brandykeg Creek and the Levisa Fork. The reservoir provides a total storage of 93,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 207 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in March 1946 and completed in July 1949. For further project detail see the 1965 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. Total real estate requirements for the project were 12,458 acres in fee and 1,170 acres in flowage easements. The Federal cost of the project was $7,845,547, including expenditures for recreation under the completed project program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction activities are complete. The reservoir was operated for the benefit of flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $3,645,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $60,554,000 in flood damages. 12. Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH Location. The damsite is located on the Licking River, approximately six miles above the confluence of the Licking and Muskingum Rivers at Zanesville, Ohio. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled earth-fill dam 118 feet in height and 1,400 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging through a 20-foot conduit in the right abutment, and an ungated 280-foot spillway adjacent to the left abutment of the dam, and two rolled earthfill dikes. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 261,110 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 748 square miles. Construction of the dam was completed in July 1959. For further project details see the 1962 Annual 25-4 Huntington, WV, District Report. See also Appendix A. Total real estate required for the project consists of 8,232 acres in fee and 5,380 acres of flowage easements. See also Appendix A. Federal cost of the project was $30,218,135. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Makintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated as required for flood control, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $10,900,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $273,731,000 in flood damages. 13. East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV Location. The damsite is located in Wayne County, WV, approximately six miles southeast of Wayne, WV, 10 miles above the mouth of East Fork and 42 miles above the confluence of Twelvepole Creek and the Ohio River. Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth-fill dam 113 feet in height and 638 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway near the left abutment of the dam, and a 13-foot reinforced concrete tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 82,500 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 133 square miles. The required 552 tracts of land have been acquired. See also Appendix A. The Federal costs of the project was $85,872,963. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $12,300,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $63,037,000 in flood damages. 14. Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY Location. The damsite is located in Pike County, KY, on the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River, approximately 15 miles upstream from Pikeville, KY, approximately three miles above the confluence ofLevisa and Russell Forks and 103 miles above the mouth of the Levisa Fork. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rock-fill dam 195 feet in height and 1,100 feet in length, a controlled spillway containing four tainter gates located in the valley wall adjacent to the left abutment of the dam, the outlet works consists of an intake structure with three conduits controlled by slide gates and discharging into a horseshoe shaped tunnel. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 164,360 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 395 square miles. The dam was completed in February 1969. The 1,301 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. The Federal costs for the project was $54,754,126, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required, and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $6,435,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $287,064,000 in flood damages. 15. Grayson Lake, KY Location. The damsite is located in Carter County, KY, on the Little Sandy River approximately 49 miles above the confluence with the Ohio River, and 11 miles upstream from Grayson, KY. Existing project. The existing project consists of a random earthfill dam 120 feet in height and 1,460 feet in length, a controlled outlet works discharging though a 14-foot spillway beyond the left abutment. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 119,000 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 196 square miles. The dam was completed in January 1968. The 484 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. Federal costs for the project was $19,162,741, which includes expenditures for recreation facilities under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $23,100,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $76,307,000 in flood damages. 16. John W. Flannagan Dam and Rerservoir, Ohio River Basin, VA Location. The damsite is located in Dickenson County, VA, approximately four miles northwest of 25-5 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1997 Haysi, VA, on the Pound River approximately two miles above the confluence of the Pound River and Russell Fork and approximately 150 miles above the mouth of the Big Sandy River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rock-fill dam 252 feet in height and 970 feet in length, an outlet tunnel located near the left abutment of the dam with a control structure at the upstream end, a spillway controlled by six tainter gates located in a saddle just upstream from the damsite. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 145,700 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 222 square miles. The project was modified to include water quality control by adding control gates to the previously uncontrolled spillway, which increased the total storage capacity by 39,000 acre-feet. The dam was completed in December 1963. The 382 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost for the project was $20,444,383, which includes expenditures for recreation under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and apputenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $3,879,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $152,924,000 in flood damages. 17. Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy and Cumberland Rivers, WV, VA, and KY Location. The Levisa and Tug Forks form the Big Sandy River at Louisa, KY. The Cumberland portion is the Upper Cumberland River Basin above Cumberland Falls, KY. The basin is approximately 100 miles in length and averages approximately 30 miles in width in the lower portion and approximately 10 miles in width above Harlan, KY. The Big Sandy Basin is within the Huntington District, and the Cumberland Basin is within the Nashville District. This report covers that portion of the project located in the Huntington District. Existing project. The authorization language directs the Corps of Engineers to design and construct, at full Federal expense, such flood control measures as are determined to be necesssary and advisable for the communities in the Tug and Levisa Forks and Upper Cumberland River basins. The authorization further states that such flood control measures would be located at or in the vicinity of Pikeville, KY, and Grundy, VA, on the Levisa Fork; Pineville, KY, on the Cumberland River; and Williamson and Matewan on the Tug Fork, in order to afford the named communities and other flood damaged locations and their immediate environs a level of protection against flooding at least sufficient to prevent any future losses from the likelihood of flooding such as occurred in April 1977. The full funding estimate for the project is $1,758,487,000, which includes $114,804,000 non-Federal contributions. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Additional engineering studies are now underway to determine what is necessary and advisable to address the flooding problems in both the Levisa Fork Basin and in the Tug Fork tributary stream areas. The contract for construction of the Pump Station at West Williamson, WV, was awarded in April 1983 and is complete. The contract for construction of the floodwall at West Williamson, WV, was awarded in July 1986 and is complete. The contract for the Williamson Area Snagging and Clearing was awarded in September 1987 and is complete. The contract for the Williamson Housing Development, Valley View Site, was awarded in September 1987 and is complete. The contract for the Floodwall and Pump Stations for the Williamson Central Business District was awarded in June 1988 and is complete. The contract for South Williamson Housing Development, Pond Creek Site, was awarded in September 1990 and is complete. The contract for Replacement Cafeteria, South Williamson, was awarded in June 1991 and is complete. The contract for Construction of Local Protection Project, South Williamson, Kentucky, was awarded in December 1991 and is complete. The contract for Construction of Local Protection Project, Matewan, West Virginia, was awarded in August 1992 and is complete. The contract for construction of Magnolia High School Ring Wall Levee was awarded in March 1996 and is 99.5% complete. 18. Massillon, OH Location. The project is located in Stark County, on the Tuscarawas River, approximately 200 miles above the mouth of the Muskingum River. Existing project. The existing project consists of channel improvement to the Tuscarawas River, combined with the construction of drainage facilities, levees and pump stations. For further details see the 1962 Annual Report. Construction was initiated in July 1940 and completed in October 1951. Local cooperation. None required. See the 1962 Annual Report for details of local contribution of work 25-6 Huntington, WV, District beyond the scope of the project. To date, the system has prevented an estimated $5,711,000 in flood damages. Operations during the fiscal year. Routine inspections were conducted to determine that the improved channel was maintained in satisfactory condition. 19. Muskingum River Lakes, OH Location. The Muskingum River lies in Southeast Ohio and including tributaries, drains approximately 8,000 square miles. The headwaters rise about 25 miles south of Lake Erie and flow into the Ohio River at Marietta, OH, 172 miles below Pittsburgh, PA. Existing project. The existing project consists of the construction and operations and maintenance of 14 reservoirs and appurtenant works in the Muskingum River Basin. The existing project originally authorized by the Public Works Administration in February 1934. Construction of the system was initiated in January 1935 and completed in November 1938. The system was initially operated and maintained by the Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District of Ohio, the sponsoring agency, from July 1938 to August 1939 when operation and maintenance became the responsibility of the Corps of Engineers in accordance with the provisions of the 1939 Flood Control Act. For further project details, see the 1962 Annual Report. See also Appendix A. The cost of the project was $41,247,815, which includes expenditures for recreation facilities under the completed project program. A significant Major Rehabilitation program was approved in December 1977 in order to assure the integrity of the existing 14 structures under the originally designed maximum pool conditions. Underseepage and abutment seepage problems are being corrected through the installation of downstream blankets, toe drains and/or relief wells and grouting. A related but separate program entitled Dam Safety Assurance has been initiated. Under current hydrologic design standards, deficiencies exist in the spillways at the 14 projects in the system. Corrective measures include widening present spillways, constructing new spillways and installing parapet walls on top of the dams have been completed at 7 projects. Seven remaining projects with deficiencies need corrective measures. New seismic criteria will require all dams to be evaluated for seismic deficiencies. If deficiencies are found, corrective measures will be required. Local cooperation. All requirements for local cooperation have been met. For further details see the 1942 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: The Major Rehabilitation is continuing as scheduled. Thus far, twenty-one contracts have been awarded and the program is 65% complete. The Dam Safety Assurance program was initiated during FY 1982. Thus far ten contracts have been awarded and the Dam Safety Assurance program is 53% complete. Operations and Maintenance. The reservoirs were operated for flood control as required, and the necessary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. The system prevented an estimated $54,061,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the system has prevented an estimated $1,915,006 in flood damages. 20. Newark, OH Location. The project is located in Licking County at the junction of the North and South Forks of the Licking River, approximately 29 miles above the confluence with the Muskingum River at Zanesville, OH. Existing project. For details of the existing project see the 1981 Annual Report. Construction of the existing project was initiated in July 1940 and completed in November 1941. As a result of the 1968 Flood Control Act the existing project was modified to include improvement of the interior drainage facilities, construction of Log Pond Run diversion channel and modification of the North Fork Channel. Construction of the Log Pond Run diversion channel was awarded in September 1980 and completed in December 1981. The full funding estimate for the project is $11,455,000 Federal cost and $4,215,000 non-Federal. Local cooperation. For details of required and completed local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: North Fork Channel - As a result of withdrawal of State support for the Utica Lake project (now inactive) and the interdependency of the operation of Utica with the North Fork Channel, the North Fork Channel portion of the project required re-formulation. A reanalysis is complete. Engineering studies continued. The contract for construction of North Fork Channel (Phase I) was awarded in September 1986 and is complete. The contract for construction of the remaining portion of North Fork Channel was awarded in February 1988 is complete. The contract for Remedial Treatment for Erosion was awarded in September 1991 and is complete. Operations and Maintenance: Routine inspections were conducted to determine that the improved channel was maintained in satisfactory condition. 25-7 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1997 21. North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH Location. The damsite is located in Knox County, OH, on the North Branch of Kokosing River, approximately nine miles above the confluence of the Kokosing and North Branch Rivers, and two miles northwest of Fredericktown, OH. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled-earth dam, 70 feet in height and 1,400 feet in length with an uncontrolled spillway adjacent to the right abutment, and an uncontrolled, reinforced concrete outlet work located in the right abutment of the dam. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 14,885 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 45 square miles. The 56 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction of the dam was completed in May 1972. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost for the project was $6,665,985, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and the necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. 22. North Fork of Pound River Lake, VA Location. The damsite is located in Wise County, VA, on the North Fork of Pound River, approximately one mile upstream from the confluence of the North and South Forks which form the Pound River and approximately three miles upstream from Pound, VA. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam, 130 feet in height and 600 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway in a saddle upstream from the dam, and an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides a total storage of 11,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 17 square miles. The 127 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction of the dam was completed in January 1966. See also Appendix A. The Federal cost for the project was $6,186,901, which includes expenditures for recreation under the completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction is complete. The project was operated as required for flood control and the necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. The project prevented an estimated $221,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $5,358,000 in flood damages. 23. Ohio River Basin (Huntington District) Location. The work covered by this project consists of a series of levees, floodwalls, channel improvements and dams and lakes in the Ohio River Basin within the Huntington District. Existing project. The existing project consists of the individual projects considered in the Ohio River Basin comprehensive plan within the Huntington District. Operations during the fiscal year. The completed local protection projects, which are operated and maintained by local interests, except for those local protection projects for which individual reports have been included. The project prevented an estimated $143,700,000 in flood damages during the fiscal year. To date the project has prevented flood damages of an estimated cumulative total of $888,513,000. 24. Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH Location. The damsite is located in Ross County, OH, on Paint Creek, a tributary of the Scioto River, approximately 37 miles above the mouth of Paint Creek and 100 miles above the mouth of the Scioto River and approximately four miles east of New Parkersburg, OH. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rock and random earth fill dam, 118 feet in height and 700 feet in length, a gate controlled spillway located near the right abutment, an outlet tunnel located in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end, and a random rockfll dike located at the right abutment of the spillway. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 145,000 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 576 square miles. Construction of the dam was completed in July 1973. The 257 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. See also Appendix A. Federal cost for the project was $26,969,962, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. For details of required local cooperation see the 1981 Annual Report. Operations during the fiscal year. Operations and Maintenance. All construction work is complete. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and the necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented an estimated $19,310,000 in flood damages. To date, the project has prevented flood damages estimated to be $75,437,000. 25-8 Huntington, WV, District 25. Paintsville Lake, KY Location. The damsite is located in Johnson County, KY, on Paint Creek, a tributary of the Levisa Fork of the Big Sandy River, approximately eight miles above the mouth of Paint Creek, and four miles west of Paintsville, KY. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam 153 feet in height and 1,560 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located southwest of the right abutment of the dam, and an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 76,642 acrefeet and controls a drainage area of approximately 93 square miles. The 635 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction of the dam was initiated in September 1976 and was completed in September 1980. See also Appendix A. The total cost of the project to date has been $60,194,985. The local sponsor has reimbursed the Government $377,000 for the cost sharing portion of recreation development. Operations during the fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the project is complete. Operations and Maintenance. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $720,000. To date, the project has prevented flood damages estimated to be $7,241,000. 26. R. D. Bailey Lake, WV Existing project. The damsite is located in Wyoming County, WV, on the Guyandotte River approximately 108 miles above the confluence with the Ohio River and one mile east of Justice, WV. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled rockfill dam with a concrete face, 305 feet in height and 1,330 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located in a saddle in the right abutment of the dam, and an outlet tunnel in the left abutment with a control structure located at the upstream end. The reservoir provides for a total storage of203,700 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 540 square miles. Construction of the dam was initiated in November 1973 and completed in December 1979. See also Appendix A. A total of 2,109 tracts of land were acquired for the project. The total cost of the project to date has been $261,209,148. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and Maintenance. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $7,200,000. To date, the project has prevented flood damages estimated to be $120,682,000. 27. Roseville, OH Location. The project is located in Muskingum and Perry Counties, on Moxahala Creek, approximately six miles the confluence with Jonathan Creek, a tributary of the Muskingum River. Existing project. The existing project consists of 7,291 feet of channel improvement; 6,400 feet of levee and railroad embankment enlargements; and the necessary appurtenances for interior drainage. Total Federal cost of the project was $910,785. Construction was initiated in August 1959 and completed in October 1960. Local cooperation. All requirements for local cooperation have been completed. See also the 1962 Annual Report. Total costs of local requirements were $62,000. Operations during the fiscal year. Routine inspections of the improved portion of the project were conducted to determine that the project was maintained in satisfactory condition. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $15,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $1,197,000 in flood damages. 28. Summersville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV Location. The damsite is located at Ruckers Bend in Nicholas County on the Gauley River approximately 35 miles above the confluence of the Gauley and New River at Gauley Bridge, WV. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rockfill dam having a height of 357 feet and a length of 2,280 feet, an outlet tunnel in the right abutment with a control structure located at the upstream end, an uncontrolled spillway located west of the right abutment and two earthfill dikes. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 413,800 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 803 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam was initiated in March 1960 and completed in March 1966. A total of 9,346 acres of land were acquired for the project. The Federal costs of the project was $48,375,884, which includes expenditures under the recreation at completed projects program. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during the fiscal year. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood 25-9 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1997 control as required and necesssary repairs were made to the structures and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $41,774,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $397,319,000 in flood damages. 29. Sutton Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV Location. The damsite is located on the Elk River in Braxton County approximately one mile above Sutton, WV, and 101 miles above the mouth of the Elk River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a concrete gravity dam having a height of 220 feet and a length of 1,178 feet, a gated spillway in the channel section of the dam, comprised of six tainter gates supported by piers, an outlet works comprised of five gate sluices through the spillway section. The reservoir provides for a storage of 265,300 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of 537 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the dam was initiated in 1949 and completed in June 1960. The total cost of the project was $37,029,585. Local cooperation. None required. See the 1981 Annual Report for contributed funds. Operations during the fiscal year. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. During the fiscal year the project prevented flood damages estimated to be $17,326,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $257,963,000 in flood damages. 30. Tom Jenkins Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, OH Location. The damsite is located in Athens County, on the East Branch of Sunday Creek, a tributary of the Hocking River, approximately three miles north of Glouster, OH, and 57 miles above the mouth of the Hocking River. Existing project. The existing project consists of a rolled-earth dam, 84 feet in height and 944 feet in length, a controlled works discharging through a tunnel in the left abutment, and an uncontrolled spillway in the ridge running south from the damsite. The reservoir, known as Burr Oak Lake, provides for a total storage of 26,900 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 33 square miles. See also Appendix A. Construction of the project was initiated in March 1948 and completed in February 1950. A total of 100 acres of land were acquired for the project. The Federal costs of the project were $2,086,503, which includes expenditure for recreation at completed project. Local cooperation. All requirements of local cooperation have been met. See also the 1962 Annual Report. Contributed funds in the amount of $575,000 have been received from the State of Ohio. Operations during the fiscal year. All construction work is complete. The project was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure andappurtenances. Duringthefiscalyeartheprojectprevented flood damages estimated to be $6,860,000. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $21,058,000 in flood damages. 31. West Columbus, OH Location. The project is located in Columbus, OH, along the Scioto River, adjacent to the downtown area in Franklin County, OH. Existing project. The project under construction consists of a 5.2-mile system including levee, floodwall and high ground: Fourteen gate closures, interior drainage facilities and construction of two new pump stations and reworking two existing pump stations. The protected area contains about 1,200 acres and is completely urban with a mix of residential, industrial and commercial development. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide all lands, easements, and rights-of-way; to verify or relocate buildings; utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities where necessary. Pay a cash contribution of at least 5%, as required by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, of the costs allocated to flood control, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during the fiscal year. Funds to initiate preconstruction engineering and design were appropriated in Fiscal Year 1989 and funds to initiate construction were appropriated in Fiscal Year 1993. The total estimated cost of the project is $111,000,000 of which $28,242,000 is non- Federal. The contract for construction of Dry Run Levee (Phase IA) was awarded in September 1993 and is complete. The contract for construction of Dry Run Levee (Phase IB) was awarded in April 1995 and is complete. The contract for construction of Phase IIA was awarded in March 1996 and is 99% complete. The contract for construction of Dodge Park Pump Station (Phase IIB) was awarded in May 1996 and is 97% complete. The contract for construction of Phase IIC was awarded in August 1997 and is 13% complete. 32. Yatesville Lake, KY Location. The damsite is located in Lawrence County, on Blaine Creek, a tributary of the Big Sandy River, approximately five miles west of Louisa, KY, and 18 miles above the mouth of Blaine Creek. 25-10 Huntington, WV, District Existing project. The existing project consists of an earth and rockfill dam, 104 feet in height and 760 feet in length, an uncontrolled spillway located one-half mile southeast of the right abutment of the dam. The outlet works consists of a 13-foot diameter tunnel through the left dam abutment. The reservoir provides for a total storage of 86,951 acre-feet and controls a drainage area of approximately 208 square miles. The 778 tracts of land required for the project have been acquired. Construction was completed in May 1995. See also Appendix A. The total cost of the project to date has been $99,449,064. Operations during the fiscal year. The reservoir was operated for flood control as required and necessary repairs were made to the structure and appurtenances. To date, the project has prevented an estimated $17,500,000 in flood damages. 33. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects The Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interest to furnish assurances that they will operate and maintain certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for the administration of these regulations within their respective districts. Maintenance inspections were made during the fiscal year of those completed units transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Local interests were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain the projects in accordance with the standards prescribed by regulations. Total costs for fiscal year 1997 were $120,006. Total cost to September 30, 1997, were $2,243,060. The flood control works inspected and the dates of inspection are tabulated in Table H. 34. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization Emergency bank protection activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress are tabulated as follows: Location FY 1997 Cost Hargus Creek, Circleville, OH Greenbrier River Flood Warning System $-14,584 139,616 There were no snagging and clearing activities pursuant to Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress during FY 1997. Work performed under special legislation pursuant to Water Resources Development Act of 1986 as follows: Location Environmental Restoration, WV Kanawha River, St. Albans, WV FY 1996 Cost $242,324 354,830 The costs for miscellaneous activities during FY 1997 were $46,634. Flood control and coastal emergency activities pursuant to Public Law 99, 84th Congress were conducted as required during FY 1997 at a cost of $363,424. National emergency management activities were accomplished by the district as required. The costs for these activities during FY 1997 were $63,832. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 35. Surveys Fiscal year 1997 costs were $6,280,194 itemized as follows: Location Navigation Studies Flood Damage Prevention Studies Special Studies Comprehensive Basin Studies Review of Authorized Projects Miscellaneous Activities Coordination Studies Preconstruction Engineering and Design Advance Engineering and Design 36. Collection and Study of Basic Data Fiscal year costs were $133,925. FY 1997 Cost $3,235,850 84,180 211,862 504,520 0 94,465 57,702 2,091,615 0 Location Kanawha River, St. Albans, WV Ohio River, Boat Levee, Marietta, OH Russell, KY Sewerline, Marietta, OH FY 1997 Cost $ 727 127,640 1,521 48,760 Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 853, 80th Congress are tabulated as follows: 25-11 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1997 Table 25-A Cost and Financial Statement See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 2. Kanawha River, WV (Existing Project) 2. Winfield L&D 5. Alum Creek Lake, OH 6. Beech Fork Lake, WV 7. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 8. Burnsville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 9. Deer Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 10. Delaware Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 11,021,000 8,185,000 9,167,000 7,580,284 10,447,961 8,542,729 9,298,635 7,451,425 27,853,699 1 27,853,699 ' 156,876,752 2 156,383,651 2 130,984 3 130,984 3 74,768,000 19,352,000 15,754,000 32,040,000 18,973,754 42,407,008 53,233,788 31,551,852 702,000 663,000 724,000 864,165 672,158 678,260 707,886 884,012 1,187,500 1,092,000 1,029,000 1,061,333 1,187,719 1,074,138 1,040,178 1,050,172 2,338,000 3,495,000 2,772,100 1,889,601 2,265,346 2,607,353 3,622,657 1,907,565 1,244,000 1,402,000 1,603,000 1,749,019 1,335,460 1,416,959 1,576,218 1,727,904 732,000 1,075,000 903,800 681,562 742,055 950,335 1,024,314 664,818 1,550,700 699,000 901,800 689,237 1,529,360 795,834 939,974 649,172 204,366,000 4 203,541,264 6 56,267,422 56,267,422 11,168,138 6 11,141,256 6 41,987,500 41,987,500 14,244,882 14,203,849 29,458,652 7 29,458,652 7 29,338,417 8 29,173,723 8 57,166,839 57,166,839 20,521,966 9 20,439,829 9 20,406,54510 20,406,54510 12,281,54411 12,245,59511 7,631,821 7,631,821 17,015,19512 16,933,49312 25-12 Huntington, WV, District Table 25-A (cont'd) Cost and Financial Statement See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 11. Dewey Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY 12. Dillon Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH 13. East Lynn Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 14. Fishtrap Lake, Ohio River Basin, KY 15. Grayson Lake, KY 16. John W. Flannagan Dam & Reservoir, Ohio River Basin, VA 17. Levisa & Tug Forks of the Big Sandy & Cumberland Rivers, KY, WV, & VA 18. Massillon, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Dam Safety Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,301,800 1,563,000 1,305,633 1,501,082 335,000 307,026 1,428,000 1,447,981 532,000 655,608 1,434,454 1,386,026 800,000 727,532 455,000 636,500 1,547,000 866,890 470,770 583,538 1,444,813 953,056 1,730,000 1,523,000 1,493,000 2,102,837 1,650,770 1,565,442 1,499,173 2,075,019 -66,000 209 2,097,000 1,604,000 1,457,500 1,515,767 2,115,933 1,565,705 1,487,401 1,467,710 918,700 1,021,500 926,000 793,867 926,715 1,003,257 921,212 769,099 1,483,400 1,595,000 1,488,600 1,381,273 1,469,849 1,596,951 1,551,480 1,274,821 37,339,000 24,490,000 4,629,000 17,338,232 25,986,852 28,892,121 28,930,431 22,473,326 5,000 1,492 -2,000 532 2,000 -1,056 1,231 811 7,845,54713 7,845,54713 25,993,67714 25,903,05514 1,772,000 1,691,351 30,218,13515 30,218,13515 11,218,54516 11,146,83516 85,872,963 85,872,963 24,075,38817 23,985,16117 54,754,12618 54,754,12618 20,206,52719 20,096,62119 19,162,74120 19,162,74120 16,748,509 16,689,868 20,444,38321 20,444,28321 22,887,70522 22,751,128" 338,840,23223 332,938,6792 8,139,40624 8,139,40624 350,192 350,192 25-13 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1997 Table 25-A (cont'd) Cost and Financial Statement See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 19. Muskingum River Dams & Lakes, OH 20. Newark, OH (Previous Project) (Existing Project) 21. North Branch of Kokosing River Lake, OH 22. North Fork of Pound River Lake, Ohio River Basin, VA 23. Ohio River Basin 24. Paint Creek Lake, Ohio River Basin, OH New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. (Rehab.) Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost Dam Safety Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 6,740,300 7,484,000 7,169,400 6,179,000 6,857,419 6,239,207 8,225,879 6,348,250 -64,000 9,073 33,450 26,000 205,000 241,000 229,890 155,548 234,000 8,641 244,586 37,000 49,537 224,000 164,000 203,000 219,487 220,209 162,153 199,896 221,997 306,000 395,000 383,300 413,193 314,233 364,950 405,561 394,676 638,200 675,000 802,900 1,044,601 630,010 675,240 794,418 1,050,060 41,247,81525 41,247,81525 114,920,10326 114,522,62726 982,300 982,300 22,172,94527 22,172,94527 27,676,000 27,589,438 845,916 845,916 758,673 758,673 11,140,51228 11,140,12928 6,665,98529 6,665,98529 3,587,529 3,575,868 6,186,90130 6,186,90130 8,278,53931 8,248,12831 355,86132 355,86132 26,969,96233 26,969,96233 11,682,485" 11,622,640" 25-14 Huntington, WV, District Table 25-A (cont'd) Cost and Financial Statement See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 25. Paintsville Lake, KY 26. R. D. Bailey Lake, WV 27. Roseville, OH 28. Summersville Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 29. Sutton Lake, Ohio River Basin, WV 30. Tom Jenkins Dam, OH 31. West Columbus, OH 32. Yatesville Lake, KY New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 50,000 - -55,000 -1,162 954,000 1,092,000 996,000 1,094,643 989,180 1,068,291 1,021,816 1,024,466 - - -40,000 .-. - -108,085 1,461,300 1,566,000 1,406,000 1,520,494 1,459,313 1,536,372 1,414,289 1,490,472 -1,700 3,094 4,000 1,342 1,265 -927 542 1,470,000 1,613,000 1,736,000 1,469,498 1,484,739 1,578,347 1,792,752 1,444,416 2,437,000 1,784,000 2,439,695 1,796,001 1,667,500 1,643,421 1,658,618 1,604,404 368,000 378,000 249,900 313,568 371,280 358,797 275,347 274,161 10,000,000 6,734,000 979,000 7,562,000 3,769,160 4,013,541 10,251,533 8,304,497 1,206,000 1,301,727 1,172,000 1,121,282 716,000 520,806 1,177,000 1,150,118 -488,000 139,948 967,000 1,002,464 -7,000 22,526 1,255,122 1,240,913 60,194,985 60,194,986 11,572,275 11,475,699 261,277,233 261,209,148" 23,497,8013 23,394,7983 910,785 910,785 242,650 242,649 48,375,88437 48,375,88437 29,826,66438 29,761,5423 37,029,58539 37,029,58539 34,663,06640 34,564,56340 2,086,50341 2,086,50341 6,693,807 6,642,523 28,615,00042 28,296,88742 99,450,500 99,449,064 7,083,572 7,007,212 See page 25-16 for footnotes. 25-15 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1997 1Includes $4,294,612 for new work for previous projects, $4,498,636 Emergency Relief funds, $9,004,800 Public Works funds and $686,317 Code 713 funds. 2Includes $3,883,513 for maintenance of previous projects and $546,090 Maintenance and Operation funds. 3Public Works Acceleration funds. 4Includes $88,163,000 Inland Waterways Trust funds. 6Includes $86,159,954 Inland Waterways Trust Fund. 6Includes $1,063 Maintenance and Operation funds. 7Includes $543,960 Emergency Relief funds, $9,698 Public Works Acceleration funds, $211,850 Code 711 funds and $75,000 Code 713 funds. Includes $2,795 Maintenance and Operation funds. 9Includes $748,281 Maintenance and Operations Funds. '�Excludes $225,090 contributed funds. Includes $590,000 Code 711 funds. "Includes $130,000 provided by the Productive Employment Act of 1983. 12Includes $240,000 provided by the Productive Employment Act of 1983. 3Includes $23,087 Public Works Acceleration funds, $1,089,940 Code 711 funds and $231,105 Code 713 funds. '4Includes $82,900 Special Recreation Use Fee Funds and $747,028 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 1Includes $100,000 provided from the Productive Employment Act of 1983. 16Includes $1,924 Maintenance and Operations funds. 17Includes $209,918 Special Recreation Use Fee Funds and $747,028 Maintenance and Operations Funds. sIncludes $362,649 Code 711 funds and $10,000 Code 712 funds. 19Includes $38,000 Special Recreation Use Fee Funds and $748,714 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 20Includes $406,919 Code 711 funds and $2,317 Code 713 funds. 21Includes $422,983 Code 711 funds. 22Includes $88,710 special recreation use fees. 2Includes Cost from Ohio River Division of $696,000. 24Includes $477,813 contributed funds. 25Includes $27,190,000 National Industrial Recovery funds and $528,288 Code 711 funds. 26Includes $206,815 Maintenance and Operations funds. 2TIncludes $61,945 Public Works Acceleration funds. 28Excludes $160,082 contributed funds. 9Includes $45,177 Code 711 funds. 30Includes $64,233 Code 711 funds. 31Includes $68,200 special recreation use fees. 32Includes $10,920 Emergency Relief funds. 33Includes $14,153 Code 711 funds. 34Includes $31,496 special recreation use fee funds. 35Includes $5,534 Consolidated Army funds. 36Includes $60,000 provided from the Productive Employment Act of 1983, and $85,233 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 37Includes $300,062 Code 711 funds. 38Includes $214,112 special recreation use fee funds, $300,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act of 1983, and $82,875 Maintenance and Operation Funds. 39Includes $1,837,337 Code 711 funds and $287,843 Accelerated Public Works funds. Excludes $62,800 contributed funds. 40Includes $267,634 special recreation use fee funds, $215,000 provided from the Productive Employment Appropriations Act of 1983, and $144,562 Maintenance and Operations Funds. 41Includes $8,064 Code 711 funds and $30,000 Public Works Acceleration funds. Excludes $575,000 contributed funds. 42Excludes $3,749,324 contributed funds. 25-16 Huntington, WV, District Table 25-B Authorizing Legislation See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 15, 1985 Oct. 12, 1996 5. Oct. 23, 1962 6. Oct. 23, 1962 7. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 8. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 9. Jun. 28, 1938 10. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 11. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 12. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 KANAWHA RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV Construction of three locks and dams on the Kanawha River and one on the Ohio River. Engineering and Design and Land Acquisition for Winfield Locks and Dam. Construction of 110' x 800' replacement lock to replace 56' x 360' twin lock chambers at Marmet Locks and Dam. ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. BEECH FORK LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation Deleted Power BURNSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation DEER CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. DELAWARE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation DEWEY LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation DILLON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation H. Doc. 31, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 88, 99th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 303, 104th Cong. (WRDA '96) H. Doc. 587, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 520, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 91, 74th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. 25-17 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1997 Table 25-B (cont'd) Authorizing Legislation See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 13. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 14. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 15. Jul. 14, 1960 16. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 17. Oct. 1, 1980 18. Jun. 28, 1938 19. Feb. 20, 1934 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 11, 1939 20. Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 13, 1968 21. Oct. 23, 1962 EAST LYNN LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation. FISHTRAP LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation. GRAYSON LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. JOHN W. FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OHIO RIVER BASIN, VA Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation. LEVISA AND TUG FORKS OF THE BIG SANDY RIVER, AND CUMBERLAND RIVER, KY, WV Construction of such Flood Control Measures as deemed Necessary and Advisable. MASSILLON, OHIO Construction of Channel Improvement Project. MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH Construction of 14 Flood Control Reservoirs. Reimbursement to the Muskingum Conservancy District a sum not to exceed actual expenditures for project construction. Operations and Maintenance assigned to the Corps of Engineers. NEWARK, OHIO Construction of Channel Improvement Project. Modification to Existing Project and Additional Channel Improvement and Drainage Facilities. NORTH BRANCH OF KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 440, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sect. 202, P.L. 367, 96th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Public Works Admin. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 396, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 337, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 220, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. 25-18 Huntington, WV, District Table 25-B (cont'd) Authorizing Legislation See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 22. Jul. 14, 1960 24. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 25. Oct. 27, 1965 26. Oct. 23, 1962 27. Jun. 28, 1938 28. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 29. Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 30. Dec. 22, 1944 31. Nov. 17, 1986 32. Oct. 27, 1965 33. Jun. 22, 1936 NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. PAINT CREEK LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. It. D. BAILEY LAKE, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. ROSEVILLE, OH Construction of Channel Improvement Project. SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation SUTTON LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WV Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. Added Recreation TOM JENKINS DAM, OHIO RIVER BASIN, OH Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. WEST COLUMBUS, OH Construction of Local Protection Project. YATESVILLE LAKE, KY Construction of Flood Control Reservoir. INSPECTIONS OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of Local Maintenance of Federally Constructed Local Protection Projects. H. Doc. 645, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 246, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 569, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. Flood Control Comm. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 534, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 762, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 662, 99th Congr. H. Doc. 246, 89th Cong., 2nd Sess. P.L. 738, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. 25-19 -- Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1997 Table 25-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Big Sandy River WV and KY including Levisa and Tug Forks2 1952 1,586,236 1,569,8111 131,473 Elk River, WV3 1903 30,259 Gauley River, WV4 1903 14,761 Guyandotte River, WV5 1915 27,500 Little Kanawha River, WV6 1960 470,536 1,023,854 Muskingum River, OH7 1955 301,912 6,171,897 6,041 New River, WA and VA5 1899 109,691 Scioto River at Portsmouth, OH 8 1953 10,951 16,593 1In addition, $140,068 expended from funds transferred from Department of Commerce, under accelerated public works program, for repairs of eroded bank at lock 3 on Big Sandy River, at Louisa, KY. 2Operation and Maintenance suspended June 30, 1952. 3Work closed September 1902. Property transferred to Kanawha River improvements. 4Work closed September 1902. Abandonment recommended in H. Doc. 467, 69th Congress. 5Work suspended. 60Operation and maintenance suspended June 30, 1951. 7Collections from license non-Federal hydroelectric utilities for use of dams on Muskingum River for fiscal years 1923-1953 were $79,154. 8Private Law 954, August 31, 1954, authorized Secretary of Treasury to pay Portsmouth Sand and Gravel Co. $75,000 in full settlement of claims against Government for damages resulting from change in Scioto River Channel. 25-20 Huntington, WV, District Table 25-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects For Last Full Report Operation Contributed See Annual and Funds Project Report For Construction Maintenance Expended Completed Local Protection Projects Ashland, KY 1954 3,718,839 --- --- Athens, OH 1979 5,313,700 --- --- Cattletsburg, KY 1963 3,854,361 --- --- Ceredo-Kenova, WV 1955 2,753,551 --- --- Chillicothe, OH 1986 20,373,314 --- --- East Rainelle, WV 1962 614,598 --- --- Galax, VA 1953 480,536 --- --- Huntington, WV 1956 7,172,840 --- --- Ironton, OH 1952 2,604,646 --- --- Maysville, KY 1959 6,493,747 --- --- Parkersburg, WV 1955 6,652,827 --- --- Pt. Pleasant, WV 1955 2,919,578 --- --- Portsmouth-New Boston, OH 1956 9,806,424 --- --- Princeton, WV 1962 808,750 --- --- Russell, KY 1953 552,493 --- --- Williamson, WV 1964 1,056,166 --- --- Inactive Local Protection Projects Augusta, KY --- 11,577 --- --- Coal River, WV 1979 472,229 --- --- Vanceburg, KY --- --- --- Deferred Local Protection Projects Newark, OH (Interior Drainage) 1983 --- --- --- Oceana, WV 1981 611,000 --- --- Inactive Reservoirs and Lakes Haysi, VA --- 2,656 Deferred Reservoir and Lakes Kehoe Lake, KY 1981 1,272,740 Active Authorized Projects with no current year expenditures. Martin, KY 1983 212,048 25-21 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1997 Table 25-G Deauthorized Projects All projects listed in this table have been deauthorized in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974, P.L. 251, 93rd Congress. For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Local Protection Projects Report For Date Expended Expended Aberdeen, OH --- May 1981 1,334 --- Athalia, OH --- Aug 1977 ----- Belpre, OH --- Nov 1977 --- --- Brooklyn, WV --- Nov 1979 ----- Buena Vista, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Chambersburg, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Chesapeake, OH --- Nov 1986 --- --- Cheshire, OH --- Nov 1977 --- _-- Chilo, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Clifton, WV --- Aug 1977 11,237 --- Coal Grove, OH --- Jan 1990 3,389 --- Columbus, OH --- Aug 1977 -- Dover, KY --- Jan 1990 --- --- Friendly, WV --- Aug 1977 --- Fullerton, KY --- Jan 1990 --- Gallipolis, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Greenup, KY --- Jan 1990 4,962 --- Hanging Rock, OH Aug 1977 --- --- Hartford, WV --- Aug 1977 --- Henderson, WV --- Aug 1977 --- --- Higginsport, OH Oct 1978 --- --- Hockingport, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Letart, WV--- Aug 1977 --- --- Letart Falls, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Lower Guyandotte River Basin, WV --- Nov 1986 17,721 --- Manchester, OH --- May 1981 --- --- Mapleshade, OH --- Oct 1978 ------ Marietta, OH --- Nov 1981 --- --- Mason, WV--- Aug 1977 --- --- Middleport, OH --- May 1981 9,783 --- Miller, OH--- Aug 1977 --- --- Millwood, WV --- Aug 1977 -- New Martinsville, WHV --- Nov- -1-9-79 New Matamoras, OH --- Aug 1977 -- Newport, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Normal, KY Jan 1990 --- --- Pomeroy, OH --- Aug 1977 --- Portland, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Proctorville, OH --- Nov 1986 --- --- Racine, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Ripley, OH --- Oct 1978 7,523 --- Riverview, WV --- Aug 1977 St. Mary's, WV --- Aug 1977 Sardis, OH --- Aug 1977 --- --- Sciotoville, OH --- Aug 1977 -- Sistersville, OH --- Aug 1977 South Point, OH --- Nov 1986 -- South Portsmouth, KY --- Jan 1990 -. Syracuse, OH --- Aug 1977 -- Waverley, WV --- Aug 1977 -. Williamstown, WV --- Nov 1979 -- Zanesville, OH --- May 1981 -- 25-22 Huntington, WV, District Table 25-G (cont'd) Deauthorized Projects All projects listed in this table have been deauthorized in accordance with Section 12 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974, P.L. 251, 93rd Congress. For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Local Protection Projects Report For Date Expended Expended Reservoirs and Lakes Big Bend, WV --- Aug 1977 --- --- Big Darby, OH 1969 Nov 1979 3,349,568 --- Birch, WV --- Nov 1986 ------ Frazeysburg, OH --- May 1981 5,000 --- Leading Creek, WV 1974 Jan 1990 272,880 -- Logan, OH --- Oct 1985 --- --- Millersburg, OH --- May 1981 --- --- Mill Creek, OH 1981 Nov 1981 1,602,702 --- Moores Ferry, VA --- Nov 1986 22,879 --- Mud River, WV --- Nov 1979 --- --- Panther Creek, WV 1976 Nov 1986 --- --- Poca, WV --- May 1981 --- --- Rocy Fork, OH 1950 Aug 1977 91,321 --- Salt Creek, OH 1975 Nov 1986 1,089,943 --- Utica, OH 1975 Jan 1990 757,550 --- West Fork, WV 1974 Jan 1990 663,192 --- White Oak Creek, OH --- Nov 1981 --- --- 25-23 Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1997 Table 25-H Inspection of Flood Control Projects (See Section 33 of Text) Flood Control Works Inspected Dates of Inspection Ashland, KY Athens, OH Berwind, WV Bramwell, WV Cairo, WV Canton (Nimishillen), OH Catlettsburg, KY Ceredo-Kenova, WV Chillicothe, OH East Rainelle, WV Fishing Creek, Pine Grove, WV Fourpole Creek, Huntington, WV Galax, VA Grahn, KY Griffithsville-Yawkey, WV Hargus Creek, Circleville, OH Hitchins, KY Huntington, WV Inez, KY Ironton, OH Jacksonburg, Fishing Creek, WV Massillon, OH Matewan, WV Maysville, KY Montcalm, WV Mount Vernon, OH Newark, OH Olive Hill, KY Paint Creek at Chillicothe, OH Paint Creek at Washington Court House, OH Parkersburg, WV Pax, WV Point Pleasant, WV Portsmouth-New Boston, OH Prestonsburg, KY Princeton, WV Richwood and Fenwick, WV Right and Left Forks of Beaver Creek, KY Ripley, WV Roseville, OH Russell, KY Smithfield, WV South Williamson, KY South Williamson (Hospital), KY Spencer, WV Utica, OH West Columbus, OH West Union, Middle Island, WV West Williamson, WV Williamson, WV May 97 Aug 97 May 97 Dec 97 Sep 97 Sep 97 Nov 97 May 97 Aug 97 Apr 97 Sep 97 Jun 97 Nov 97 Sep 97 Sep 97 Dec 97 Sep 97 Oct 97 NOT INSPECTED Jun 97 NOT INSPECTED Jun 97 Nov 97 Nov 97 May 97 Nov 97 Sep 97 Jun 97 Dec 97 Oct 97 Sep 97 Sep 97 Nov 97 Jul 97 Dec 97 Oct 97 Oct 97 Oct 97 May 97 Sep 97 Sep 97 May 97 Aug 97 Jun 97 Oct 97 Mar 97 Oct 97 Sep 97 Oct 97 NOT INSPECTED Sep 97 Nov 97 May 97 Aug 97 Sep 97 Sep 97 Sep 97 Sep 97 Nov 97 Oct 97 Sep 97 Sep 97 Sep 97 25-24 r OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT * This district comprises portions of Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Colorado, Nebraska, Iowa, and Missouri, all embraced in the drainage basin of the Missouri River along the main stem and tributaries to Rulo, NE. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE 2. Missouri River Fish & Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE, KS, & ND 3. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization Page 26-3 26-3 26-3 Flood Control 4. 5. 6. 7 8. Aberdeen and Vicinity, SD Bear Creek Lake, CO Bowman-Haley Lake, ND Chatfield Lake, CO Cherry Creek Lake, CO 9. Fall River Basin, SD 10. Logan Creek, Pender, NE 11. Milk River, Malta, MT 12. Missouri National Recreational River, NE and SD 13. Missouri River, Kenslers Bend, NE to Sioux City, IA 14. Nishnabotna River, Hamburg, IA 15. Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, NE 16. Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE 17. Perry Creek, IA 18. Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program (Omaha District) 19. Pipestem Lake, ND 20 Salt Creek & Tributaries, NE 21. South Platte River Basin, CO 22. Thurman to Hamburg, IA 23. Van Bibber Creek, CO 24. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Works 25. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 26. Flood Control Activities Under Special Authorization 26-3 26-4 26-4 26-4 26-4 26-5 26-5 26-5 26-6 26-6 26-6 26-7 26-7 26-7 26-8 26-8 26-8 26-8 26-8 26-9 26-9 26-9 26-9 Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment 27. Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment Under Special Authorization 28. Boyer Chute, NE 29. California Bend, NE 30. Deroin Bend, MO 31. Hidden Lake/Great Marsh, NE 32. Lower Decatur, NE 33. Wehrspann Lake Aquatic Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 34. Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, SD 35. Fort Peck Lake, MT 36. Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, Missouri River Basin, SD 37. Garrision Dam Major Rehabilitation, Lake Sakakawea, ND 38. Garrison Dam-Lake Sakakawea, Missouri River Basin, ND 39. Gavins Point Dam-Lewis and Clark Lake, Missouri River Basin, NE and SD 40. Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin, SD and ND 41. Missouri River Between Ft. Peck Dam, MT and Gavins Point Dam, SD & NE Miscellaneous 42. Missouri River Master Water Control Manual Review and Update 43. National Emergency Preparedness (NEPP) 26-1 Page 26-10 26-10 26-10 26-11 26-11 26-11 26-12 26-12 26-12 26-13 26-13 26-13 26-14 26-14 26-14 26-15 26-15 Miscellaneous (continued) 44. Flood Control and Coastal Emergency (FC&CE) 26-15 45. General Regulatory Functions 26-16 46. General Investigations (See Table 26-K) 26-16 Tables 26-A Cost and Financial Statement 26-17 26-B Authorizing Legislation 26-24 26-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects 26-29 26-D Not Applicable 26-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 26-30 26-F Other Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 26-32 26-G Deauthorized Projects 26-33 26-H Missouri River Levee System, Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE 26-35 26-I Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program 26-36 26-J Inspection of Completed Local Protection Projects 26-37 26-K Active General Investigations 26-41 26-L Flood Control Activities Under Special Authorization 26-43 26-M Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment 26-44 26-2 Page OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT NAVIGATION 1. MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA TO MOUTH (SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE) Location. Channel of the Missouri River extending from Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE. Previous projects. For details see page 1893, Annual Report for 1915, and page 1175, Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. A navigation channel of 9-foot depth and width not less than 300 feet, obtained by revetment of banks, rock dikes to contract and stabilize waterway, cutoffs to eliminate long bends, closing minor channels, and removal of snags and dredging as required. Construction was initiated on this section of the project (Sioux City to Rulo) in FY 1928, the bank stabilization work was completed in April 1979, and the navigation feature was completed in September 1980. A reliable channel suitable for navigation is available through this section. Controlling depth at ordinary stages of the river is 9 feet, with additional depths available during high stages. Commercial navigation was inaugurated on this section in May 1939, and common carrier transportation service was inaugurated in October 1946. Seven riverside recreation sites are complete and in operation. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-2 of FY 1988 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities for loading and unloading grain, liquids and dry bulk products are maintained by private interests at various locations on this section of the river. A complete list of terminal facilities is included in the Missouri River navigation maps and can be obtained from the Omaha District for a small fee. Operations during FY. District personnel accomplished channel reconnaissance, surveys and mapping, engineering and design, surveys and layouts of construction, and supervision and administration. Local interests operate and maintain the recreation sites. Government Hired Labor Forces completed maintenance, which consisted of placing stone on damaged structures and placing structure markers to aid navigation. 2. MISSOURI RIVER FISH & WILDLIFE MITIGATION, IA, NE, KS, & MO Location. The project extends along the Missouri River from Sioux City, IA, to the mouth near St. Louis, Mo. Existing project. To mitigate a portion of the fish and wildlife habitat losses resulting from the construction and operation of the Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation project. Estimated total cost of the project is $79.1 million federal funds. Local cooperation. This project has no cost-sharing sponsor. The entire project is being borne by the Federal government with no cost to either local governments or the affected states. Therefore, no Project Cooperation Agreement is required. Although the four affected states are not participating financially in the project, the states are very actively involved in the planning and design of the project. The states also are participating in the project by furnishing perpetual easements for construction and operation on existing state-owned lands. The states of Missouri and Iowa are the primary donors of such easements. Operations during FY. One mitigation site, Winnebago Bend, located between River Miles 711 and 708 (leftbank) will be started. Efforts continued on acquiring land rights on 29,900 acres of land and agreements with the states for development on 18,200 acres of stateowned land. 3. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Small Navigation Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960, as amended, Public Law 645, 86th Congress). No work during the period. FLOOD CONTROL 4. ABERDEEN, SD Location. This project is in the Moccasin Creek subbasin in the city of Aberdeen, Brown County, South Dakota. Aberdeen is located in the James River Valley in 26-3 1iFPADT Al Till Cl?'1ilTADV AlF Til? A MV AN ('rivTIi Wli(Q ACTiVINICF A lV 1007 the northeast quarter of South Dakota. Haley, ND. Existing Project. The selected alternative is a 100- year event levee 2.9 miles long on the northeast side of Aberdeen that will prevent 49 percent of the average annual flood damages to structures and contents in that area. The proposed levee will essentially block existing drainage to Moccasin Creek, and a combination of culverts with gates and detention ponds were incorporated into the design to mitigate this interior drainage problem. A two foot road raise at Fairgrounds Road is also included. Local cooperation. Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended applies. The city of Aberdeen and Brown county will be paying the local share of the project. Operations during FY. Preparation of the plans and specifications continued and were nearly completed. 5. BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO Location. A dam site is on Bear Creek in Jefferson County, CO, about 8 miles above the confluence of Bear Creek with the South Platte River at Denver. Existing project. Earthfill dam 180 feet high, with a crest length of about 5,300 feet; and a supplementary earthfill dike with a height of 65 feet and a crest length of 2,100 feet, to the south of the main dam, and an uncontrolled earth and rock-cut emergency spillway. The lake provides storage capacity of 28,831 acre-feet for flood control and 1,979 acre-feet for sediment and recreation. Construction of the project was initiated in October 1973 and was completed in September 1982, exclusive of recreation facilities. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 21-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations during FY. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. 6. BOWMAN-HALEY LAKE, ND Location. A dam site is on North Fork of Grand River in southwestern North Dakota, about 6 miles above Existing project. An earth-fill dam 79 feet high, with a crest length of 5,730 feet, and a reservoir with a flood storage capacity of about 72,700 acre-feet, plus 19,780 acre-feet for sediment storage, fish and wildlife conservation, recreation, and future water supply for communities of Bowman, Reeder, Scranton, and Gascoyne, ND. Construction was initiated in July 1964, and the project was completed in 1970. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-2 of FY 1988 Annual Report. Operations during FY. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. 7. CHATFIELD LAKE, CO Location. A dam site on the South Platte River, just below the mouth of Plum Creek, about eight miles upstream from Denver, CO. Existing project. Consists of rolled earth-fill dam with a maximum height of 148 feet and a crest length of 12,500 feet; a reservoir with flood control capacity of 204,737 acre-feet and sediment capacity of 26,692 acrefeet, which will be used for recreation; and an enlarged channel from the dam downstream to Denver to accommodate reservoir flood releases. The Corps participated with local interests in acquisition of lands and development of recreation facilities immediately downstream of the Chatfield Dam in lieu of a portion of the channel improvement. Construction of the project was initiated in August 1967 and was physically completed in 1992. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local Cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-3 of FY 1993 Annual Report. Operations during FY. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. 8. CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO Location. A dam site on Cherry Creek in Arapahoe County, CO, approximately 6 miles southeast of Denver, 26-4 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT CO, just outside of city limits. Cherry Creek joins South Platte River within city limits of Denver, Existing Project. A rolled earth-fill dam with maximum height of 141 feet above streambed and a crest length of 14,300 feet. Project includes a reinforced concrete outlet works and an uncontrolled side channel spillway canal discharging into adjacent Toll Gate Creek. Cherry Creek project provides reservoir storage capacity of 93,920 acre-feet below spillway canal invert and, in addition, a surcharge storage of 134,470 acre-feet. Plan of operation in ultimate development for multiplepurpose uses includes 13,960 acre-feet for sediment storage and 79,960 acre-feet for conservation purposes. Construction began in FY 1946 and was completed in June 1961, exclusive of recreation facilities. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during FY. Maintenance: Continued routine operation and maintenance activities. 9. FALL RIVER BASIN, SD Location. In Custer and Fall River Counties, in and near the town of Hot Springs, SD. Hot Springs unit is in the town of Hot Springs, immediately south of the junction of Cold Brook and Hot Brook which combine to form the Fall River. Cold Brook Lake unit is approximately 1.25 miles north of the town of Hot Springs on Cold Brook, and Cottonwood Springs Lake unit is approximately 4.5 miles west of the town of Hot Springs on Cottonwood Springs Creek, one-half mile upstream from its confluence with Hot Brook. Existing project. The general plan of improvement provides flood protection for Hot Springs, SD. The Hot Springs channel improvement unit consisted of widening, deepening and straightening 6,000 feet of channel of Fall River. The Cold Brook Lake unit, an earth-fill dam with appurtenant structures, controls an area of 70.5 square miles. The Cottonwood Springs Lake unit consists of an earth-fill dam with appurtenant structures and controls an area of 26 square miles. Construction of Hot Springs unit was completed during FY 1951. Construction of Cold Brook unit dam and appurtenances was completed in FY 1953 with the exception of a road and parking area, which were completed in FY 1955. Construction of the Cottonwood Springs Dam was completed in FY 1970, with the exception of the recreation facilities, which were completed in FY 1972. (See Table 26-A for total cost of construction.) Local cooperation. Local cooperation requirements have been fully complied with. Operations during FY. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance activities were continued on the Cottonwood Springs and Cold Brook Dams and structures. 10. LOGAN CREEK, PENDER, NE Location. This project is located in northeastern NE, approximately 75 miles north-northwest of Omaha, NE. Pender is located along the right bank of Logan Creek, about midpoint in the Logan Creek basin. Existing Project. The selected plan is a combination levee and floodwall with a detention storage feature. It provides flood protection from Logan Creek as well as incidental benefit from Stage Creek flooding to the Village's residential and industrial area as well as its central business district. The levee extends approximately 15,000 feet in length along the north, east, and south edge of the community, averaging 10 feet in height. Local Cooperation. Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended; Flood Damage Reduction applies. The Village of Pender will be participating in the project's costsharing requirements including real estate interests valued at approximately $1,227,000 and cash of approximately $265,000. Operations during FY. Completion of plans and specifications with scheduled award of construction contract in April of FY 98. 11. MILK RIVER, MALTA, MT Location. This project is located in Phillips County in North Central MT. The city of Malta is located approximately 170 miles northeast of Great Falls, MT. Existing Project. The selected plan is a levee/floodwall constructed along the right bank of the Milk River to provide protection for the area immediately upstream from the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad (BNSF) bridge. The project consists of an earthen levee that is 1,800 ft in 26-5 Uf1iPADT AF(1 Tfll Fl'DilFTAIV AFl Tfl APMV A!NND'~ilVR I W!lII( aCA' TiViTiFl llal llV lO07 length, combined with a floodwall that extends 1,040 ft. The height of the levee ranges from 4 to 10 ft above natural ground along its entire length. The levee/floodwall requires a tie-off with the existing BNSF grade on the downstream end. Local Cooperation. Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended; Flood Damage Reduction applies. The city of Malta participated in the project's costsharing requirements utilizing a $176,500 grant from the State of MT combined with real estate interests of approximately $282,000. Operations during FY. Construction phase is essentially complete with remaining requirements directed toward project management, coordination with local sponsors and project closeout. 12. MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER, NE AND SD Location. On the Missouri River between Gavins Point Dam and Ponca State Park, NE. This includes Cedar and Dixon Counties in Nebraska, and Yankton, Clay, and Union Counties in South Dakota. Existing project. The designation as a National Recreational River will preserve outstanding and important scenic values and will provide additional opportunities for river access and recreation use. The project provides erosion control, consisting of bank stabilization and river management techniques designed to preserve the existing environment, and at the same time preserves high bank flood plain lands. Estimated total cost of construction is $21,640,000 (1996) of which $21,000,000 is the Federal cost of construction and $640,000 is the non-Federal contributed funds - other costs. Local cooperation. All recreational construction on this project will be done in accordance with the costsharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. A cost-sharing contract with the state of South Dakota for the Myron Grove access site was signed on June 24, 1986; and the Yankton-Riverside Park Section 215 Agreement was signed on April 24, 1989. Construction was completed in June 1987 and June 1991, respectively. Operations during FY. Efforts to protect Federally listed threatened and endangered species and the drafting of a new General Management Plan (GMP) for this area continued. The GMP, and an accompanying EIS, is scheduled for public release by the National Park Service (NPS) in a draft form in late spring 1998. The Corps and NPS are co-leads for the EIS; the NPS is writing the GMP with assistance from the Corps and other agencies on the Planning Team. 13. MISSOURI RIVER, KENSLERS BEND, NE, TO SIOUX CITY, IA Location. Project is along Missouri River between Ponca Bend, NE, and combination bridge at Sioux City, IA. Existing project. Construction of dikes, revetments and channel improvement along Missouri River from Miners Bend and vicinity, SD and NE, to Sioux City, IA. Project was started in June 1946 and completed in June 1961. (See Table 26-A for total costs.) Operations during FY. Routine operation and maintenance activities continued. 14. NISHNABOTNA RIVER, HAMBURG, IA Location. This project, the Nishnabotna River and Main Ditch 6 at Hamburg, IA is located in Fremont County, 40 miles south-southeast of Omaha, NE. Existing Project. The selected plan determined in the feasibility investigations is the construction of a levee approximately 8,300 ft in length along the left bank of Main Ditch No. 6. A range of economically feasible plans were identified from which the city of Hamburg selected and is supported by the Corps. A levee will be constructed along Main Ditch 6 with a levee top, referenced as the 911.0 m.s.l. plan having an accedence equivalent to a 300- year event and a 46 percent reliability passing 500-year event. Selection of a levee height was constrained by the elevation of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad mainline tracks. The BNSF has raised its mainline track approximately 1.5 ft to accommodate the new levee. Local cooperation. Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended; Flood Damage Reduction applies. The city of Hamburg is participating in the project's cost- sharing requirements utilizing a Community Development Block Grant Cash to help fund real estate interests of approximately $160,000 and cash contributions 26-6 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT of $104,000. Operations during FY. Completion of plans and specifications with scheduled award of construction contract in April of FY 98. 15. PAPILLION CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES LAKES, NE Location. The Papillion Creek basin is located in Washington, Douglas, and Sarpy Counties, NE. Big Papillion Creek rises west of Blair and flows southeasterly through metropolitan Omaha. It is joined by the Little Papillion Creek just above Offutt AFB, forming Papillion Creek. The combined creeks flow along the side of Offutt AFB to its confluence with the Missouri River. Existing project. The active project consists of a series of four dams and reservoirs, channel improvements, an effluent storage facility, and a flood warning system on tributaries of Papillion Creek. Construction was initiated in FY 1972. Completed projects include Standing Bear Lake, Glenn Cunningham Lake, and Wehrspann Lake. Estimated total costs for the project is $68,659,000 consisting of $64,334,000 in Federal funds ($1,367,000 to be reimbursed by the non-Federal sponsor) and $2,958,000 non-Federal other costs and cash contributions. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 21-6 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations during FY. Construction was completed on recreation facilities at Ed Zorinsky Lake, and on the Big Papillion Creek Channel flood control project. The recreational facilities at Zorinsky Lake have been transferred to the City of Omaha for operations and maintenance. The Big Papillion Creek channel flood control project has been transferred to the Papio Natural Resource District for operation and maintenance. 16. PEBBLE CREEK, SCRIBNER, NE Location. Scribner, NE, is located in Dodge County about 47 miles northwest of Omaha. Pebble Creek is a right-bank tributary to the Elkhorn River. Existing project. The project includes a 3.6 milelong levee along the Elkhorn River with a maximum height of 5 ft (a modification to the original Pebble Creek project), one closure structure at U.S. HWY 275 at the northern edge of Scribner, and several ramps over the two levees. An automated flood warning system was installed that will allow adequate time to operate the closure structure. Both levees are completed which essentially is one ring levee that provides protection for the entire City of Scribner. Local cooperation. The city of Scribner strongly supported the entire Pebble Creek levee project, including the Elkhorn River levee and its modification. The City obtained cost-sharing assistance from the Nebraska Natural Resources Commission and the Lower Elkhorn Natural Resources District. Operations during FY. Construction of the Elkhorn River levee was initiated in March 1994 with the original contract being completed in December 1995. A modification to the Elkhorn River levee was completed in July 1996. The total cost of the project was $3,232,000. The non-Federal portion of this totaled was $807,000 which includes $363,000 for lands, easements, and rights-of-way. Final audit and project closeout will occur in FY 98. 17. PERRY CREEK, IA Location. The Perry Creek basin is located in Woodbury and Plymouth Counties in northwestern Iowa. The downstream five miles of the basin lie within the corporate limits of Sioux City, IA, and drain the central portion of the city. Existing project. The project consists of 14,800 linear feet of grass and rock lined channel, 1,500 linear feet of new conduit, modification of 710 linear feet of existing conduit, and a concrete stilling basin, to provide capacity for the 100-year event. Also included are 4.25 miles of hiking/biking trail and a basin-wide flood warning system. Estimated project cost is $66,200,000, of which $41,873,500 is Federal cost and $24,326,500 is non- Federal cost. Local cooperation. The project is authorized under the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. The city of Sioux City, IA, is the local sponsor. Operations during FY. The Phase III contract has 26-7 i?1?PADT A? TJW CQIi~iTA1DV Al'i TWil?? ANT 'ivnA(W K KAIIaAM C TTVITTIlIAh Y 100'7 been awarded, and the contractor is anticipated to start construction by 1 May 1998. Phase II plans and specifications are 90 percent complete, and the contract is scheduled to be awarded by August 1998. The sponsor is finishing the relocation of a sanitary sewer located within the Phase II construction R-O-W. 18. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (OMAHA DISTRICT) Location. Flood control improvements in this project are along the Missouri River and several of its principal tributaries and in states comprising the Missouri River Basin. Existing project. A general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin provides for levees along Missouri River between Sioux City, IA, and mouth and reservoirs on the Missouri River main stem and tributaries. See individual reports and Table 26-I for projects in the Omaha District included in the program. 19. PIPESTEM LAKE, ND Location. On Pipestem Creek in Stutsman County, ND, three miles upstream from where Pipestem Creek joins the James River at Jamestown, ND. Existing project. The project consists of a rolled earthfill dam approximately 108 feet high with a crest length of 4,000 feet and outlet works of a gated reinforced concrete conduit. The reservoir provides 146,880 acre-feet of storage. The multipurpose pool provides space for silt storage and 885 acres of water surface for fish, wildlife and recreation needs. Construction of the project was initiated in FY 1970 and completed in FY 1977. (See Table 26-A for total construction costs.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-6 of FY 1988 Annual Report. Operations during FY. Routine operation and maintenance activities continued. 20. SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE Location. Salt Creek Basin comprises an area of about 1,627 square miles in and around Lincoln in southeastern Nebraska. Existing project. The authorized project consists of a system of 10 dams and reservoirs, channel clearing, enlarging and realignment, levees and necessary bridge alternations. Pursuant to Senate Resolution adopted August 7, 1964, which authorized a review of the Salt Creek survey report, additional units were placed in "inactive" classification. Construction of the project began in the spring of 1962. All work under the active portion of the project, consisting of the 10 dams and reservoirs and the channel improvements and levees through Lincoln, was completed in 1969. Funds were transferred to the project in FY 1980 with concurrence of Congressional Committees. These funds were used to determine an effective method of correction for the dispersive clay problem in the completed downstream levees through Lincoln. (See Table 26-A for total construction costs.) Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 26-6 of FY 1988 Annual Report. Operations during FY. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance activities continued. 21. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, CO Location. Flood control improvements in this project are along the South Platte River and its tributaries in Colorado. Existing project. General plan for flood control and other purposes to provide for construction of Chatfield Lake on the South Platte River, Bear Creek Lake on Bear Creek, and levee and channel improvements on the South Platte River. (See individual reports and Table 26-B for authorizing legislation). 22. THURMAN TO HAMBURG, IA Location. The project area is approximately 110 square miles. It extends from Thurman, IA, on the north to the mouth of the Nishnabotna River on the south and from the Missouri River on the west to the bluffs on the east. Existing project. The flood problem is caused by flood waters backing up behind the existing levees when drainage structures are closed during high flows on these 26-8 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT rivers. Two pump stations have been built to alleviate this flooding in the southern half of the study area. The cost through construction was $1,038,900 Federal and $346,300 non-Federal. Local cooperation. Fremont County, IA and five drainage districts were the cost-sharing sponsors. Operations during FY. The project was completed in April 1997. Final audit and project closeout will occur in FY 98. 23. VAN BIBBER CREEK, CO Location. Van Bibber Creek is a right bank tributary of Ralston Creek with the confluence in Arvada, CO. The potential project area includes approximately one mile of the downstream portion of the creek located partially in Arvada and partially in Jefferson County. Existing project. The proposed project would include channel improvements including an underground conduit to convey Van Bibber Creek flood waters to Ralston Creek. Local cooperation. Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended, applies. Operations during FY. Preparation of Plans and Specifications continued this FY. 24. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL WORKS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion, in accordance with regulations prescribed by Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within the boundaries of their respective districts. Inspections of completed local protection projects which have been turned over to local interests for maintenance and operation during the FY are set forth in Table 26-J, Inspections of Completed Local Protection Projects. FY 97 costs were $251,864. 25. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Under Sections 7 and 9, Flood Control Act of December 22, 1944, Corps of Engineers is responsible for detailed scheduling of operations involving storage capacity reserved for or assigned to flood control in reservoirs constructed by the Bureau of Reclamation as well as those constructed by the Corps of Engineers. Costs for FY 1997 were $473,101; and total through September 30, 1997 were $8,710,245. 26. FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency Response Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting and Rescue Work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) Disasters. The Omaha District Emergency Operations Center (EOC) was activated at Level II, Emergency Watch, on February 12, 1997. The activation was to preparation for the potential of widespread flooding within the states of MT, ND, SD, CO, NE and IA. The EOC activation level shifted to Level III, Emergency Operations on February 21, 1997. On March 28, 1997 conditions worsened resulting in the level of activation was elevated to Level IV, Crisis Manage- ment through April 8, 1997. The level of activation was decreased to Level II on April 9, 1997 and remained at that level through June 5, 1997. The district's response to the Midwest Floods - 1997 were in Advance Measures, Emer- gency Operations, and Recovery. During that time frame the district received Mission Assignments for ND from Federal Emergency Management (FEMA) Region VIII. Operational Program Areas. FY costs as follows: Preparedness: Statutory Authorities...............$ 152,265 Support to Others................ 51,866 Facilities.......................... 28,683 Inspection of Non-Federal Flood Control Projects........ 114,274 Emergency Operations: Flood Fight.......................... 724,737 After Action.......................... 26,098 Field Investigation................... 42,720 Post Flood Fight...................... O Rehabilitation of Flood Control Waters: Federal.................................... 350,335 26-9 R 4Pl'EI WhI1i 3 13-334 %I4( IU4U V CM11?YI1I 3 &Ui I- VIN.IV I I W11I(%A At I3 U 4U 3n4 WV UP'�1'7 Non-Federal............................. Field Investigations.................. Emergency Water: Contaminated Source............... Drought Distressed.................. Advance Measures: Advance Measures Asst........... Field Investigations.................. Hazard Mitigation: SD ............................................. N D ............................................ 4,810 96,429 0 0 1,336,931 507,541 2,674 1,875 Emergency Work in Support of Other Federal Agencies. The Omaha District provided support to FEMA under Public Law 93-288 during 1997. Missions included Damage Survey Report preparation, Structural Inspections, Support to Prime Power and Hazard Mitigation. Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act as amended, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., June 30, 1948 as amended.) Federal costs for FY 1997 were $46,436 for feasibility studies, $3,266,876 for plans and specifications and construction measures, and $1,835,832 for reimbursement to the U. S. Department of Justice's Judgement Fund on a completed project. See Table 26-L for detailed breakdown by project. Emergency Bank Protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., July 24, 1946 as amended.) Operations under this heading were as follows: Federal costs for FY 1997 were $30,333 for projects in the Planning and Design Analysis Phase and $3,122 for projects in the construction phase. See Table 26-L for detailed breakdown by project. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT 27. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION These project modifications are accomplished under the authority of Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662) as amended. Environmental modification efforts during FY 1997 were as follows: California Bend, NE, project cost (Feasibility Phase) $24,499; Hidden Lake, NE, project cost (completion of construction) $514,370; Lower Decatur, NE project cost (Feasibility Phase) $166,005; Boyer Chute, NE, project cost (Post-Construction Monitoring) $2,904; Deroin Bend, MO project cost (Feasibility and Plans and Specs Phases) $107,215; Wehrspann Lake, NE project cost (Feasibility Phase) $123,269. 28. BOYER CHUTE, NE Location. The side channel connecting river mile 633.5 to 637.7 on the Missouri River in Washington County, NE, about 7 miles north of Omaha, NE. Existing project. The project was constructed from October 1992 to April 1993. Its purpose is to restore flows from the Missouri River into an old river channel, Boyer Chute. This has restored fish breeding, brood rearing, resting and feeding habitat, and will benefit the riverine ecosystem as a whole. The part of the old channel that was previously filled with sediment and grown up in young trees was cleared of vegetation, and a pilot channel for new inflows was excavated through it. Soil excavated from the pilot channel was placed along the channel to be washed away by restored chute flows over time. A 180-foot wide notch in the upstream river bank was constructed for new inflows, and the chute's old outlet at the downstream end was widened. The culvert crossing of a road across the chute was replaced by a bridge, which passes adequate flows to prevent backwater effects and sedimentation. The total cost of about $2.3 million was 25 percent costshared by a non-Federal sponsor. Local cooperation. Section 1135 of 1986 WRDA applies. The Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources District provided all needed cost-sharing, including real estate interests valued at approximately $527,000 and cash of about $56,000. Operations during FY. A final project inspection was performed on May 3, 1995; and the project was turned over to the local sponsor. The channel restoration restored three miles and 50 acres of flowing water area for river fish spawning, rearing, feeding, and resting. The restored chute is providing a restored waterfowl and wading bird habitat as well as a turtle and furbearer habitat. The adjacent 26-10 � tr7m"rm rrl rT. l ! " 1I ' 1Tt1/lt1T l1Y TiT C T/171T T " 'f[1 1'\T 'f~ ?T " 1t /t7 r1T IltIT OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT lands are being restored into forest and prairie, and are now under management by USFWS as a National Wildlife Refuge. 29. CALIFORNIA BEND, NE Location. The remnant river channel and floodplain land along river miles 648.5 - 650.0 along the Missouri River, in Washington County, about one mile east of Blair, NE. Existing Project. The project to be modified is the Missouri River Navigation and Bank Stabilization Project. The California Bend modification would restore river flows through the historic river channel adjacent to the navigation channel, to restore fish breeding, brood rearing, resting and feeding habitat, and to benefit the riverine ecosystem as a whole. The downstream end of a 1.5-mile long backwater would be enlarged to provide a permanent connection to the navigation channel, and about 1 mile of excavation would connect its upstream end to the river. This would create permanent flows through about 2.5 miles of channels. Some of the surrounding farmland would be restored to floodplain forest. Also several of the spur dikes along the navigation channel would be lowered to enable navigation flows to create shallow margins along the river. Local cooperation. Section 1135 of 1986 WRDA applies. The Papio-Missouri Natural Resources District would provide all needed cost-sharing, including real estate interests valued at approximately $255,000, and cash of about $240,000. Operations during FY. Feasibility Studies were continued and will be completed in FY 1998. 30. DEROIN BEND, MO Location. The floodplain land and watered areas riverward of Levee L-536, river mile 516.5 to 521.0 along the Missouri River, in Holt and Atchison Counties, about 2.5 miles west of Corning, MO. Existing project. The project to be modified is the Missouri River Navigation and Bank Stabilization Project. The Deroin Bend modification would restore a diversity of river flows along this reach of the Missouri River floodplain, to restore fish breeding, brood rearing, resting and feeding habitat, and to benefit the riverine ecosystem as a whole. A flow-through chute would be excavated through the site along remnant channel alignments. This would create permanent flows through about 4 miles of channels. An existing 1 mile long scour lake would be connected to this chute, enabling river fish to access both the restored chute and the lake year-round. The surrounding lands would be restored to floodplain forest. Local cooperation. Section 1135 of 1986 WRDA applies. The Missouri Department of Conservation would provide all needed cost-sharing, comprised entirely of real estate interests valued at approximately $750,000. The sponsor has already purchased all of the necessary tracts. Operations during FY. Feasibility Studies were completed land Plans and Specs were initiated. The sponsor pursued land acquisitions on its own initiative. 31. HIDDEN LAKE/GREAT MARSH, NE Location. A historic backwater adjacent to Missouri River miles 602.5-603.5, and a nearby marsh, in Sarpy County, about 1 mile south of Omaha and adjacent to Bellevue, NE. Existing project. The project being modified is the Missouri River Navigation and Bank Stabilization Project. The Hidden Lake modification is restoring a historic backwater of the river to restore fish breeding, brood rearing, resting and feeding habitat, and to benefit the riverine ecosystem as a whole. A one mile long backwater lake which was filled with sediment in a rare flood event has been excavated and reconnected at its downstream end to the river. The Great marsh modification has removed sediment and encroaching plants to deepen and expand a marshy wetland, extending its life and benefiting the aquatic community. The wetland was excavated at an average of two feet deeper and increased in an area by 44 percent. Total project costs are $3,092,000, with a Federal share of $2,319,000. Local cooperation. Section 1135 of 1986 WRDA applies. Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources District provided all needed cost sharing including real estate interests. Operations during FY. Construction was essentially completed and post-construction monitoring was initiated. 26-11 RflPADT (IF Thu' QCI rTA1IV (W Til A1MV (N nTVii WIAlliC f TVI1TTl VAkl VY 1007 32. LOWER DECATUR, NE Location. The Missouri River's right (west) overbank including side channels, from river mile 684.5 to 689 on the Missouri River in Burt County, NE, about 2 miles southeast of Decatur, NE. Existing project. Modification of the Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project (MRBSN), constructed from 1935 to 1982. Lower Decatur Bend is one of many bend cutoffs (straightenings) created by the Corps during channelization of the Missouri River for navigation and bank stabilization. The proposed project modification includes 3 main off-stream aquatic components: sidechannel restoration, i.e. flowing chutes with inlets, and possibly outlets, connected to the river and leading to the lowlands; closure dike lowering to enable these flows to act upon the site's lowlands to encourage aquatic habitat development there; and revetment lowering over an extended length to allow river flows to erode the river bank behind the revetment, thereby increasing the top width of the channel over an extended area. An opportunity exists at Lower Decatur Bend to restore the physical habitat to configurations more similar to those that existed prior to the channelization of this reach of the river. Total Project costs are estimated at $4,712,000, with a Federal share of $3,534,000. Local cooperation. Section 1135 of 1986 WRDA applies. The Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources District would provide all needed costsharing, including real estate interests valued at approximately $720,000 and cash of about $485,000. Operation during FY. Feasibility studies were initiated. 33. WEHRSPANN LAKE Location. The existing Papio Dam #20 and its Wehrspann Lake are located on a tributary to the South Branch Papillion Creek, West Branch Papillion Creek Basin, Sarpy County, NE, about 4 miles southwest of Omaha. The proposed subimpoundment would be located in the headwaters of Wehrspann Lake, within the lake's flood control pool, and within the existing project's boundaries. Existing project. Wehrspann Lake Aquatic Improvement Project - Modification of Wehrspann Lake, completed in 1984 as Papio Dam #20 for flood control and recreation; Congressional District: NE-2. Wehrspann Lake site is located within Omaha, NE metropolitan area, and as such it is highly visible, heavily utilized and important ecological, recreational, and educational resource. The proposed modification, a subimpoundment in the lake's flood control pool, would play an essential role in maintaining water quality and fish habitat within Wehrspann Lake, by decreasing the amounts of influent nutrients and especially sediment. Total project costs are currently estimated at $1,244,000 with a Federal share of $933,000. Local cooperation. Section 1135 of 1986 WRDA applies. Papio-Missouri River Natural Resources District would provide all needed cost sharing including real estate interests. Operations during FY. Feasibility studies were initiated. MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER 34. BIG BEND DAM-LAKE SHARPE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD Location. On the Missouri River, 987.4 miles above the mouth, near Fort Thompson, SD, and approximately 20 miles upstream from Chamberlain, SD. Dam is located in the upstream reach of Fort Randall reservoir (Lake Francis Case). Big Bend reservoir (Lake Sharpe) extends upstream to Pierre, SD. Existing project. A rolled earth-fill dam 95 feet high, with a crest length of 10,570 feet, a hydroelectric generating plant consisting of five 58,500 kilowatt units, three 67,276 kilowatt units, and a chute-type gated spillway. Reservoir provides gross storage of 1,859,000 acre-feet. Federal cost of the project was $107,498,000. Construction began in September 1959 and was completed in September 1977, except for Code 710 recreation facilities. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operation during FY. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, power production and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the FY. During the 26-12 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT period, 1,491,267,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity were produced. 35. FORT PECK DAM AND LAKE, MT Location. The reservoir is in the Missouri River Valley in McCone, Valley, Garfield, Phillips, Petroleum, and Fergus Counties, MT. Dam is approximately 1,771.6 miles above the mouth of the Missouri River. Nearest towns are Glasgow, 17 miles northwest; and Nashua, nine miles north. Existing project. A hydraulic earthfill dam with a maximum height of 251 feet, with a crest length of 21,026 feet, and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 18,688,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. Work started on the original project in October 1933 and on the second power plant in August 1956. The project was completed in 1965. The power installations at the project were uprated in FY 1979. The five generators have a total output of 185,250 KW: two generators at 40,000 KW each, two generators at 43,500 KW each and one generator at 18,250 KW. See page 818 of 1965 Annual Report and page 905 of 1958 Annual Report for project details. Federal cost of the project was $158,428,000, Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during FY. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with the other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the FY. Generating facilities produced 1,336,358,000 net kilowatt hours of electricity. 36. FORT RANDALL DAM-LAKE FRANCIS CASE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD Location. Located on the Missouri River in Charles Mix and Gregory Counties, SD, about 82 miles above Yankton, SD. Site is 880 miles above the mouth of the Missouri River and 148 miles above Sioux City, IA. Existing project. A rolled earth-fill dam with a maximum height of 165 feet; a crest length of 10,700 feet; and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 5,494,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. The power installation consists of eight units rated at 40,000 kilowatts each. Construction began in May 1946 and was completed in 1969, except for Code 710 recreation facilities. Federal cost of the project was $199,066,000. Non-Federal contribution for constructing approaches to the Platte-Winner Bridge was $720,000. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing and bridge approaches. Operations during FY. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the FY. Generating facilities produced 2,542,313,000 net kilowatthours of electricity. 37. GARRISON DAM MAJOR REHABILITATION, LAKE SAKAKAWEA, ND Location. Located on the Missouri River in McLean and Mercer Counties, ND, about 11 miles south of Garrison, ND, and 9 miles west of Coleharbor, ND, 1,389.9 miles about the mouth and 75 miles above Bismarck. Existing project. Garrison Dam is a multi-purpose project consisting of a rolled earth-filled dam with a sheet pile cutoff, a hydroelectric power plant, and a reservoir with storage capacity of 23,821,000 acre feet for flood control, navigation, power, recreation, irrigation, and municipal water supply. This major rehabilitation project will replace the turbine runners on all 5 existing units with new runners designed to improve reliability and maximize efficiency over a broad range of operating conditions. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during FY. Initiated design and model testing for anticipated award of construction contracts in FY 98. 38. GARRISON DAM-LAKE SAKAKAWEA, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, ND Location. Located on the Missouri River in McLean and Mercer Counties, ND, about 11 miles south of Garri- 26-13 i PflT (W TM? CUC1IITAIIV (W TI-HZ ARMYIV (N CIVTTl WARTVC ACTIITTTT ViaR i 191 son, ND, and 9 miles west of Coleharbor, ND. 1,389.9 miles above the mouth and 75 miles above Bismarck, ND. Existing project. A rolled earth-fill dam 11,300 feet long with a maximum height of 210 feet, and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 23,821,000 acre-feet. It provides five power units (three units rated at 109,250 kilowatts each and two units rated at 95,000 kilowatts each), three flood control tunnels, and a gated spillway. Federal cost of the project was $299,938,000, including $4,208,000 for major rehabilitation. Non-Federal contribution in connection with widening Snake Creek Embankment was $687,000. Construction of the project was initiated in April 1946 and completed in 1966, except for recreational development using Code 710 funds. Local cooperation. None required except costsharing with the state of North Dakota for widening the Snake Creek Embankment and recreation cost-sharing. Operations during FY. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the FY. Generating facilities produced 3,090,295,000 net kilowatt-hours of electricity. 39. GAVINS POINT DAM-LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, NE AND SD Location. On the Missouri River in Yankton County, SD, and Knox County, NE, about four miles upstream from Yankton, SD, and 811.1 miles above the mouth. Existing project. A concrete and rolled earth-fill dam with a maximum height of 74 feet, and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 492,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. The power installation consists of three units rated at 44,099 kilowatts each. Federal cost of the project was $49,617,000. Construction of the original project was initiated in March 1952 and completed in 1964. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during FY. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the FY. Generating facilities produced 821,248,000 net kilowatthours of electricity during FY. 40. OAHE DAM-LAKE OAHE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD AND ND Location. Dam is on the Missouri River in Hughes and Stanley Counties, SD, about six miles northwest of Pierre, SD, and 1,072.3 miles above the mouth. Existing project. A rolled earth-fill dam with maximum height of 245 feet; a crest length of 9,300 feet; and a reservoir for flood control, irrigation, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes, with a gross storage capacity of 23,137,000 acre-feet at maximum operating pool. It contains seven power units rated at 112,290 kilowatts each. Federal cost of the project was $346,521,000. Construction was initiated in August 1948 and the project was placed in operation in June 1963. Local cooperation. None required except for recreation cost-sharing. Operations during FY. Maintenance: Project was operated in conjunction with other Missouri River reservoirs for flood control, navigation, power production, and other multiple purpose uses. Normal operation and maintenance procedures were accomplished during the FY. Generating facilities produced 4,601,510,000 net kilowatthours of electricity. 41. MISSOURI RIVER, BETWEEN FT. PECK DAM, MT AND GAVINS POINT DAM, SD, NE Location. The project is located along the Missouri River between Fort Peck Dam, MT, and a point 58 miles downstream of Gavins Point Dam, SD and NE. Existing project. Consists of undertaking measures, including maintenance and rehabilitation of existing structures, to alleviate bank erosion and related problems associated with releases from the six Missouri River main stem dams that the Secretary determines will be needed. In lieu of structural measures, lands may be acquired in 26-14 OMAHA, NE, DISTRICT affected areas from willing sellers. The costs of the measures shall be apportioned among project purposes as a joint-use operation and maintenance expense. Estimated Federal cost of the project is between $112 million for construction or $12 million for the land requisition alternative. Cost is limited to no more than $3 million per FY. Local cooperation. Non-federal funds are not required for this project. One reach, the Missouri National Recreational River downstream from Gavins Point Dam, requires, under its separate authorization, that the landowners make available appropriate land interests to maintain the recreational and scenic qualities of the river and adjacent lands. In the other river reaches, lands can be acquired on a willing-seller basis if land acquisition is the recommended measure for erosion control at a given river site. Operations during FY. Continued coordination for sloughing easements in pursuit of real estate acquisitions in response to requests from landowners. Monitored previously constructed Section 33 projects. Initiated plans and specificaitons for the Conventional Erosion Control at Buford Trenton Irrigation District, ND. 42. MISSOURI RIVER MASTER WATER CONTROL MANUAL REVIEW AND UPDATE Location. The area being studied is the Missouri River basin, to include the Missouri River main stem system. States included in the study area include Nebraska, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa, Kansas, and Missouri. Existing project. During 1987 through 1992, the Missouri River basin experienced a moderate to severe drought, impacting upon the Missouri River main stem projects for the first time since filled in 1967. The drought has had severe impacts on people and industries who use the Missouri River and the main stem reservoirs for navigation, hydropower, water supply, and recreation. Some of the people impacted by the drought have stated that the current Master Water Control Manual for the Missouri River main stem system of reservoirs does not adequately take into consideration the contemporary needs of the basin. The purpose of the Missouri River Master Water Control Manual Review and Update study is to determine the water control plan that best meets the needs of the Missouri River basin. Local cooperation. None required. Operations/Activities during FY. The Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Missouri River Master Water Control Manual Review and Update was released for public review in September 1994. A public comment period was initiated with the release of the DEIS. As a result of the comments received during the DEIS public comment period and comments received at a series of 24 public hearings throughout the Missouri River Basin and at Quincy, IL; Memphis, TN; and New Orleans, LA, it was determined that additional or revised technical analyses was necessary. During the FY 97, work continued on additional or revised technical analyses for interior drainage and groundwater impacts landward of levees, cumulative impacts of bank stabilization, daily flow model, flood control, regional economics, Missouri and Mississippi river navigation, and Missouri River native river fish. In FY 1998, the results of these additional or revised analyses will be documented and an alternative reevaluation completed. A Preliminary Revised DEIS (PRDEIS) is scheduled to be completed in August 1998. The PRDEIS will identify multiple alternatives and all maximum opportunity for both consensus building and public comment within the Basin. A public comment period will be allowed subsequent to the release of the PRDEIS, during which public workshops will be held. A Revised Draft EIS (RDEIS), which is scheduled for completion in October 1999, will present a preferred alternative. A second public review and comment period will be allowed following release of the RDEIS. A Final EIS (FEIS) is scheduled for completion in December 2000. Following release of the FEIS, a Washington level review will be conducted and a Record of Decision (ROD) signed. No substantial change in the operation of the mainstem reservoir system will be implemented until the ROD is signed and the Master Manual is revised. MISCELLANEOUS 43. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM (NEPP) AND SUPPORT FOR FEMA P.L. 93-288 (and Antecedent Legislation) Local Preparedness (510) National Preparedness (520) Emergency Facilities (530) $ 132,724 42,548 (2.960) 26-15 DiPflDT Ai TIu I11cf'!F TAlV1 i TUF? AMV N!1('IV!i WA1SC A('TIViTTii VA1R fIIV 1007 Total NEPP $ 172,312 44. FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES (FC&CE) Flood control work under Authorization Emergency Flood Control Activities, Flood Fighting. P.L. 84-99. Disaster Preparedness Emergency Operations Rehabilitation and Inspection Program Advance Measures Hazard Mitigation Reimbursable Activities Total FC&CE $ 347,088 793,555 451,574 1,849,021 0 467.025 $ 3,908,263 45. GENERAL REGULATORY FUNCTIONS Permit Evaluation Enforcement Studies Environmental Impact Studies Reimbursable Activities Total Regulatory $ 3,270,606 311,607 1,914 137,086 10.000 $ 3,731,213 46. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS FY 1997 costs totaled $1,082,859 for all General Investigation activities. See Table 26-K which covers Surveys, Collection and Study of Basic Data, Research and Development, Preconstruction Engineering and Design (projects not fully authorized), Planning and Engineering under Proposed Program Legislation, and Preconstruction Engineering and Design (fully authorized projects). 26-16 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30, in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 1997 1. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Mouth (Sioux City, IA to Rulo NE) 2. Missouri River Fish & Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE, KS, MO 4. Aberdeen & Vicinity, SD Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 5. Bear Creek Lake, CO 6. Bowman-Haley Lake, ND 7. Chatfield Lake, CO (Required Contributed Funds) (Consolidated Summary) New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. 1,288,000 1,571,000 1,376,494 1,745,893 6,133,000 4,008,041 3,510,000 4,807,055 110,000 32,957 110,000 32,957 293,000 277,154 221,000 231,368 -28,690 -9,927 -3,596 12,729 -32,286 2,802 990,000 915,234 320,000 342,890 160,000 171,298 988,000 1,058,269 1/ Includes $18,325,581 National Industrial Recovery Act funds, $8,625,718 Emergency Relief Funds, and $1,181,125 for previous project. 26-17 1,802,000 1,803,264 1,584,000 1,208,461 187,000 128,231 189,225,991 ' 189,225,991 ' 123,405,450 123,385,743 16,839,000 16,355,148 428,067 362,176 187,000 128,231 428,067 362,176 1,671,000 1,685,956 2,779,000 3,905,783 130,957 200,988 130,957 200,988 394,000 334,567 205,000 201,345 929,000 1,019,185 345,700 352,123 164,000 161,906 773,000 791,429 62,018,608 62,018,608 4,938,309 4,931,247 4,372,174 4,372,174 3,729,270 3,722,539 95,444,010 95,444,010 1,315,328 1,315,328 96,759,338 96,759,338 12,242,230 12,230,315 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 26-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30, in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 1997 8. Cherry Creek Lake, CO 9. Fall River Basin, SD 10. Logan Creek Pender, NE Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 11. Milk River, Malta, MT Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 12. Missouri National Recreational River NE& SD 13. Missouri River Kenslers Bend, NE, to Sioux City, IA New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. 506,000 602,318 468,000 510,420 133,000 121,242 85,000 218,000 121,242 19,600 19,752 1,516 19,600 21,268 107,000 84,626 45,000 172,845 54,000 46,829 984,000 485,003 392,000 434,549 50,100 46,931 44,300 117,644 94,400 164,575 170,800 147,491 170,800 147,491 84,000 106,653 346,000 36,312 1,000 10,621 525,000 504,082 424,000 402,063 142,713 144,220 11,654 142,713 155,874 574,500 571,354 85,900 53,502 660,400 624,856 38,459 45,887 192,000 406,340 59,000 57,772 771,000 781,224 324,000 344,833 229,200 222,084 229,200 222,084 604,268 555,205 61,700 76,486 665,965 631,691 105,000 110,890 196,000 174,245 88,000 88,349 15,220,364 15,220,364 12,354,474 12,341,101 5,538,432 5,538,432 6,683,625 7,138,981 643,013 622,471 129,300 129,298 772,313 751,769 1,522,818 1,446,196 222,720 204,999 1,745,538 1,651,195 2,099,259 2,090,866 2,433,000 2,290,855 11,294,414 11,294,414 4,924,419 4,923,005 26-18 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30, in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 1997 14. Nishnabotna River, Hamburg, IA Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 15. Papillion Creek and Tributaries Lakes, NE Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 16. Pebble Creek Scribner, NE Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 17. Perry Creek, IA 19. Pipestem Lake, ND New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. 46,700 78,046 75,000 3,675 121,700 81,721 5,351,453 5,876,663 250,000 446,198 5,601,453 6,322,861 612,000 628,210 534,000 486,314 144,500 136,135 678,500 622,449 69,000 59,448 66,675 69,000 126,123 2,507,519 120,000 221,611 120,000 2,729,180 556,000 583,738 273,000 135,041 126,400 81,221 399,400 216,262 905,547 4,398,700 573,904 388,253 324,000 333,125 494,000 535,194 2/ Does not include $1,854,338 cost of inactive sites. 26-19 83,000 19,117 33,450 23,130 116,450 42,247 325,073 37,614 362,687 571,000 586,413 -65,000 116,079 39,277 -65,000 155,356 1,354,000 5,524,584 494,000 491,921 151,900 188,774 4,600 17,413 156,500 206,187 18,070 5,857 23,927 615,000 605,775 3,221 444 3,665 4,650,000 4,850,900 619,000 617,114 464,600 424,082 133,050 130,892 597,650 554,974 66,612,215 2 66,596,022 2 955,000 884,680 67,567,215 67,480,702 8,541,444 8,530,438 2,725,728 2,716,149 435,656 419,880 3,161,384 3,136,029 11,872,248 11,783,464 9,277,545 9,277,545 7,098,404 7,090,743 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 26-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30, in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 1997 20. Salt Creek and Tributaries, NE 22. Thurman to Hamburg, IA 23. Van Bibber Creek, CO Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 24. Inspections of Completed Local Protection Projects 25. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 28. Boyer Chute, NE Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. 743,000 782,635 711,000 171,076 15,361 6,000 31,458 6,000 46,819 216,000 237,014 390,000 408,698 -33,000 109,590 16,000 22,153 -17,000 131,743 664,000 706,138 40,357 13,700 3,679 674,000 679,123 449,612 213,889 217,319 778,000 772,287 360,000 399,998 355,000 261,285 2,200 1,248 15,900 4,927 364,000 364,757 365,000 382,945 85,000 64,388 9,377 85,000 73,765 213,889 217,319 188,000 188,151 377,000 375,283 10,000 35,495 2,453 10,000 37,948 355,000 261,285 253,000 251,864 470,000 473,101 2,898 6 2,904 12,197,621 3 12,197,621 3 14,454,276 14,445,986 1,071,000 1,061,044 807,589 707,259 125,200 124,170 932,789 831,429 4,995,476 4,992,483 8,710,684 8,710,245 1,739,500 1,738,047 82,000 81,993 1,821,500 1,820,040 3/ Includes $123,000 of government cost applicable to that portion of the project which is currently being carried in a deferred status. 26-20 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30, in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 1997 29. California Bend, NE Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 30. Deroin Bend, MO Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary Funds 31. Hidden Lake/ Great Marsh, NE Required Contributed Consolidated Summary 32. Lower Decatur, NE Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary Funds New Work Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. 2,500 2,256 2,500 2,256 2,500 2,491 2,500 2,491 67,000 73,333 67,000 73,333 2,500 2,188 2,500 2,188 90,000 89,229 90,000 89,229 77,000 70,856 77,000 70,856 118,000 98,267 118,000 98,267 274 274 165,000 156,120 165,000 156,120 115,000 110,419 115,000 110,419 1,550,000 1,550,425 548,000 427,837 2,098,000 1,978,262 2,500 1,311 2,500 1,311 16,000 24,499 16,000 24,499 140,000 107,215 140,000 107,215 359,000 377,295 102,000 137,075 461,000 514,370 263,000 166,005 273,500 272,104 273,500 272,104 334,500 290,983 334,500 290,983 2,206,000 2,204,939 650,000 564,912 2,856,000 2,769,851 268,000 169,778 268,000 166,005 268,000 169,778 26-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 26-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30, in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 1997 33. Wehrspann Lake Aquatic Required Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary Funds 34. Big Bend Dam- Lake Sharpe, Missouri River Basin, SD 35. Fort Peck Lake, MT 36. Fort Randall Dam-Lake Francis Case, Missouri River Basin, SD 38. Garrison Dam Lake Sakakawea, Missouri River Basin, ND Federal Funds Contributed Funds New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint. Approp. Cost. New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint Approp. Cost. Major Rehab: Approp. Cost. Major Rehab: Approp. Cost. 65,000 44,784 65,000 44,784 5,818,169 5,183,660 3,722,411 3,807,697 7,591,035 7,892,167 8,226,915 8,401,057 5,752,000 6,641,604 3,897,000 3,931,300 7,354,000 8,218,957 9,115,000 9,606,252 5,527,000 5,504,991 4,481,000 3,859,970 9,122,000 8,951,889 8,141,000 8,111,952 110,000 123,269 110,000 123,269 5,692,300 5,595,713 3,459,000 3,469,804 8,943,500 9,149,872 8,491,000 8,113,054 175,000 168,053 175,000 168,053 107,497,597 107,497,597 102,479,573 4 102,334,214 4 158,428,080 158,428,080 92,137,834 4 91,217,775 4 199,065,883 199,065,883 162,109,134 4 162,024,989 4 295,729,613 295,729,613 176,739,673 4 176,217,454 4 4,208,310 4,208,310 686,961 686,961 4/ Includes Special Recreation Use Fees. 26-22 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-A (continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost to Section September 30, in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 1997 39. Gavins Point Dam-Lewis & Clark Lake, Missouri River Basin, NE and SD 40. Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, Missouri River Basin, SD & ND 41. Missouri River Between Ft. Peck Dam MT & Gavins Point Dam, SD and NE 42. Missouri River Master Water Control Manual Review and Update New Work: Approp. Cost. Maint: Approp. Cost. 5,070,657 4,754,001 8,560,000 9,124,583 New Work: Approp. ------ Cost. Maint: Approp. 10,033,904 9,010,000 Cost. 10,275,626 9,587,527 Maint. Approp. Cost. 350,000 202,702 2,079,000 484,314 Maint: Approp. 979,000 3,240,000 Cost. 1,406,113 3,242,717 4 Includes Special Recreation Use Fees. 26-23 6,244,000 6,170,067 8,723,000 8,737,237 366,000 1,568,739 3,094,000 3,351,586 5,933,500 5,931,717 9,148,000 9,246,349 735,000 242,223 2,549,000 2,566,603 49,617,239 49,617,239 118,664,412 4 118,537,961 4 346,520,603 346,520,603 176,281,500 4 176,218,445 4 3,735,000 2,682,550 20,728,000 20,696,059 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 26-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents Jan 12, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 2, 1945 Water Resources Development Act Of 1986 Flood Control Act of 1948 Aug 13, 1968 Flood Control Act of 1962 Flood control Act of 1950 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Aug 18, 1941 MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA TO MOUTH (SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE) Appropriation of $12 million authorized for securing a 6 foot depth from Quindaro Bend (Kansas City, MO to Sioux City, IA). Appropriation of $15 million additional allotments totaling $29,153,108 made by Public Works Administration under provisions of National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933, and $9,669,791 allotted under provisions of Emergency Relief Appropriations Act of 1935. For completion of project from mouth to Sioux City, IA. For a channel of 9-foot depth and 300-foot width. H. Doc. 1120, 60th Cong. PL 71-520 PL 73-67 H. Doc 238, 73rd Cong. PL 74-409 H. Doc. 214, 76th Cong. PL 79-14 MISSOURI RIVER FISH & WILDLIFE MITIGATION, IA, NE, KS, MO Mitigate fish and wildlife losses resulting from the construction and operation of the Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation project. ABERDEEN & VICINITY, SD Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 as amended; flood damage reduction BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO A flood control reservoir for protection of metropolitan Denver, CO. BOWMAN-HALEY LAKE, ND Flood Control reservoir and water supply. CHATFIELD LAKE, CO Flood control reservoir and channel improvements to provide downstream protection for Denver, CO. Modified 1950 Flood Control Act to operate dam and other Federal improvements to achieve authorized level of protection, beginning at dam and ending 82 miles downstream. Reassigns a portion of the storage space in the lake project to joint flood control-conservation purposes. Modified 1974 WRDA to exempt prohibition of encroachment for Mineral Ave/ Ken Caryl Rd. ext & transmission line. CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO Initiation and partial accomplishment of project. Section 601, PL 99-662 S. Doc. 87, 90th Cong. PL 90-483 H. Doc. 574, 87th Cong. PL 87-874 H. Doc. 669, 80th Cong. PL 81-516 H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong. PL 99-662 H. Doc. 426, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 26-24 1. 2. 4. 5. 6. 8. OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents Dec 22, 1944 Dec 22, 1944 Aug 18, 1941 Flood Control Act of 1948 Flood Control Act of 1948 National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 Aug 18, 1941 June 30, 1948 Flood Control Act of 1948 Flood Control Act of 1968 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 June 30, 1948 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Completion of plan approved in Act of Aug 18, 1941. General comprehensive plan, Missouri River Basin. FALL RIVER BASIN, SD Provide flood control to the town of Hot Springs, SD. LOGAN CREEK, PENDER, NE Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 as amended; flood damage reduction MILK RIVER, MALTA, MT Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 as amended; flood damage reduction MISSOURI NATIONAL RECREATIONAL RIVER, NE AND SD Preservation and enhancement of the Missouri River between the reaches from Gavins Point Dam, NE & SD to Ponca State Park, NE. MISSOURI RIVER, KENSLERS BEND, NE , TO SIOUX CITY, IA Construction of dike, revetments. H. Doc. 426, 76th Cong. PL 78-534 H. Doc. 475, and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 H. Doc. 655, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 PL 95-625 H. Doc. 821, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 PL 80-858 NISHNABOTNA RIVER, HAMBURG, IA Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 as amended; flood damage reduction PAPILLION CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES LAKES, NE Series of flood control reservoirs, providing protection for the metropolitan areas of Omaha, NE. Authorized additional $4.8 million for channel improvement on Big Papillon Creek, and to Union Pacific RR bridge, rec trail and flood warning system. PEBBLE CREEK, SCRIBNER, NE Levee and channel improvement for local protection - Section 205. PERRY CREEK, IA Provide flood protection for Perry Creek, Iowa. H. Doc. 349, 90th Cong. PL 90-485 H. Doc. 1013, 99th Cong. PL 99-662 858, 80th Cong. Section 401, PL 99-662 26-25 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents June 28, 1938 Aug 18, 1941 Dec 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sep 3, 1954 Sep 3, 1954 May 2, 1956 July 3, 1958 July 14, 1960 Dec 30, 1963 June 18, 1965 Aug 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec 24, 1970 Dec 31, 1970 Dec 23, 1971 Mar 7, 1974 July 8, 1976 Nov 16, 1977 Flood Control Act of 27 Oct 1965 18. PIPESTEM LAKE, ND Provide flood control for Jamestown, ND and downstream areas. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (OMAHA DIST.) Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE and authorized additional $7 million. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized additional $200 million. Authorized additional $150 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $250 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized additional $217,710,000. Authorized $5,384,014 to compensate Sioux Indians for reservation lands required for Oahe, South Dakota project. Modified general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin by deletion of construction of Red Willow Dam and Reservoir, NE, and addition of construction of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, KS. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized additional $200 million. Authorized additional $207 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $80 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and modified the plan to include work protection and rectification works below Garrison Dam. Authorized additional $116 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $38 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Authorized additional $109 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Changed comprehensive plan name to Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Oahe Dam and Reservoir, ND. Authorized additional $101 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $72 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $85 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. Authorized additional $59 million for prosecution of Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program. 26-26 Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong. PL 75-761 H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong. PL 77-228 H. Doc. 475, and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 PL 79-526 PL 81-516 H. Docs. 549 and 642, 81st Cong. PL 83-780 PL 83-776 PL 84-505 H. Doc. 409, 84th Cong. P. L. 85-500 P. L 86-645 P. L. 88-253 P. L. 89-042 P. L. 90-483 H. Doc. 91-748 and S. Doc. 91-895 P. L. 91-282 S. Doc. 91-1100, 91st Cong. P. L. 91-576 H. Doc. 91-23 and P. L. 91-611 P. L. 92-222 P. L. 93-251 P. L. 94-347 P. L. 95-189 H. Doc. 266, 89th Cong. P. L. 89-298 19. OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents July 3, 1958 May 17, 1950 May 12, 1967 Aug 13, 1968 Jun 19, 1970 Dec 23, 1971 Mar 7, 1974 Jul 8, 1976 Nov 16, 1977 Water Resources Development Act of 1986 Flood Control Act of 1948 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Nov 17, 1986 Dec. 22, 1944 20. 21. H. Doc. 396, 84th Cong. P. L. 85-500 H. Doc. 669, 80th Cong. P. L. 81-516 P. L. 90-17 P. L. 90-843 P. L. 91-282 P. L. 92-222 P. L. 93-251 P. L. 94-347 P. L. 95-189 Section 1152 P. L.. 99-662 SALT CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, NE Series of dams and channel improvements for flood control around Lincoln, NE. SOUTH PLATTE RIVER BASIN, CO Adopted plan of improvement for South Platte River Basin and authorized $26.3 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Authorized additional $2 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $12 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $21 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $37 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $15 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $22 million for prosecution of plan. Authorized additional $3 million for prosecution of plan. THURMAN TO HAMBURG, IA Install pumping facilities to prevent flooding in the Thurman to Hamburg area of the Missouri River in western Fremont County, IA. VAN BIBBER CREEK, CO Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 as amended; flood damage reduction BOYER CHUTE, NE Section 1135 (b) of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986, as amended; environmental improvement CALIFORNIA BEND, NE Section 1135 (b) of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986, as amended; environmental improvement DEROIN BEND, MO Section 1135 (b) of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986, as amended; environmental improvement HIDDEN LAKE/GREAT MARSH Section 1135 (b) of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986, as amended; environmental improvement LOWER DECATUR, NE Section 1135(b) of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986 as amended; environmental improvement WEHRSPANN LAKE AQUATIC, NE Section 1135(b) of the Water Resource Development Act of 1986 as amended; environmental improvement BIG BEND DAM - LAKE SHARPE, SD Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. H. Doc. 475 and S. Doc. 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 26-27 P .L. 99-662 P. L. 99-662 P. L. 99-662 P. L. 99-662 P. L. 99-662 P. L. 99-662 22. 23. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 26-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing Project and Work in Text Act Authorized Documents 35. June 16, 1933 Aug 30, 1935 May 18, 1938 36. 38. Dec 22, 1944 Dec. 22, 1944 PWA 1968 Dec. 22, 1944 39. 40. Dec. 22, 1944 41. Water Resources Development Act of 1988 42. Dec 22, 1944 FORT PECK LAKE, MT Construction of earth dam, as recommended by Chief of Engineers Sep 30, 1933, was approved by Executive Order by the President and included in Public Works Administration program, Oct 14, 1933 as authorized by the National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933 and adopted by the River and Harbor Act of 1935 (PL 74-409). Completion, maintenance, and operation of a hydroelectric power plant, subject to certain provisions in act respecting transmission and sale of electric energy. Also authorizes installation of additional power-generating facilities by Secretary of War when deemed necessary in judgment of Bureau of Reclamation. FORT RANDALL DAM - LAKE FRANCIS CASE, SD Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. GARRISON DAM - LAKE SAKAKAWEA, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, ND Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. GAVINS POINT DAM - LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, NE AND SD Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. OAHE DAM - LAKE OAHE, MISSOURI RIVER BASIN, SD & ND Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. MISSOURI RIVER BETWEEN FT. PECK DAM ,MT & GAVINS POINT DAM, SD & NE Undertake measures to alleviate bank erosion and related problems associated with releases along the Missouri River from the six main stem dams. MISSOURI RIVER MASTER WATER CONTROL MANUAL REVIEW AND UPDATE Expanded general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin. H. Doc. 238, 73rd Cong. P .L. 74-409 P. L. 75-529 H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. P.L. 78-534 H. Doc. 475 and S. Doc. 247, 78th Cong. PL 78-534 H. Doc. 475 and S. Doc. 247, 78th Cong. P. L. 78-534 H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. Section 33, PL 100-676 H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. P. L. 78-534 26-28 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost Cost to September 30, 1997 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Fort Benton, MT Complete 1948 3,123,141 644,863 Small Navigation Project at Sioux City, IA Complete 1970 43,582 88,716 26-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 26-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost Cost to September 30, 1997 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Belle Fourche, Cheyenne River, SD" Complete 1940 37,410 Big Sioux River at Sioux City, IA Complete 1982 7,458,934 Blackbird Creek Near Macy, NEV Complete 1970 262,479 Buffalo Creek, Meadow Grove, NE2/ Complete 1974 293,016 Buffalo Creek, Scranton, ND2/ Complete 1960 102,980 Cedar Canyon Dam, Rapid City, SD Complete 1960 120,482 City of Aurora, Westerly Creek, CO Complete 1955 150,000 Clarkson, NE, Maple Creek Complete 1967 191,282 Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1936) Complete 1939 Council Bluffs, IA (Act of 1944) Complete 1954 2,557,680 Deadman's Gulch, Sturgis, SD2' Complete 1981 3,000,000 Dry Creek, Hawarden, IA Complete 1964 400,000 East Nishnabotna River at Red Oak, IA2/ Complete 1986 2,154,016 Floyd River, Sioux City, IA Complete 1970 11,556,667 Forsyth, MT Complete 1950 255,177 Frazer-Wolf Point, MT Complete 1982 435,000 Gering Valley, NE Complete 1971 5,989,663 Glasgow, MT Complete 1939 16,832 Great Falls, MT Complete 1991 11,905,000 Greybull, WY Complete 1960 248,507 Havre, MT Complete 1958 1,825,881 Herreid, Spring Creek, SD Complete 1954 50,216 Hooper, NE2/ Complete 1968 326,667 Ida Grove, IA2' Complete 1972 522,344 Indian Creek at Emerson, IA2' Complete 1986 333,000 Jamestown Reservoir, ND Complete 1950 Linton, ND2/ Inactive 1973 Little Papillion Creek, NE Complete 1976 3,643,111 Little Sioux River, IA Complete 1992 20,630,000 Loup River, Columbus, NE2/ Complete 1973 1,000,000 Lower Heart River, ND Complete 1964 1,961,173 Lower Heart River, Mandan, ND2/ Complete 1991 1,153,430 Madison, NE, Union and Taylor Creeks2' Complete 1967 234,839 Mandan, Heart River, ND Complete 1960 676,916 Marmarth, ND Complete 1960 169,498 McCook Lake, SD Complete 1958 147,627 Miles City, MT Inactive 1956 Missouri River, Aten, NE Complete 1951 578,791 1/ Completed as a Public Works Administration project. 2/ Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 26-30 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-E (Continued) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30, 1997 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS and MO Complete 1993 37,964,177 Missouri River, Niobrara, NE Complete 1945 99,370 Mott, ND Deferred - - - Mud Creek, Broken Bow, NEV Complete 1976 1,000,000 Nishnabotna River at Hamburg, IA Complete 1948 236,000 Norfolk, NE Complete 1971 3,400,504 Omaha, NE Complete 1954 5,903,640 Pierce, NE Complete 1967 296,597 Platte River Near Schuyler, NE2/ Complete 1948 74,940 Platte River and Lost Creek, Schuyler, NE Complete 1971 257,398 Platte River and Tributaries, NE Inactive - 1,538,269 Rapid Creek, Rapid City, SD Complete 1980 1,004,000 Saco, MT Complete 1958 67,793 Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton, SD Complete 1978 184,380 Sheridan, WY3" Complete 1976 2,618,809 Shields River, Near Clyde Park, MT2' Complete 1951 25,747 Sioux Falls, SD Complete 1966 5,288,707 Vaughn, MT, Sun River2" Complete 1971 457,582 Waterloo, NE Complete 1970 237,883 West Point, NE Complete 1966 149,596 Yellowstone River, W. Glendive, MT Complete 1960 230,294 Z/ Authorized by Chief of Engineers. 3/ Includes inactive segment. 26-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 26-F OTHER MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to September 30, 1997 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Gavins Point Dam - Lewis and Clark Lake, Relocation of Niobrara, NE Complete 1980 13,516,459 Williston, ND Water Intake Complete 1981 988,583 26-32 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT TABLE 26-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Deauthorization Funds Funds Project Report For Document Expended Expended Billings, MT (Western Unit) Boulder, CO Buffalo, Johnson County Diversion Channel, WY Castlewood Lake, Douglas County, CO Davids Creek Lake, IA Dayton, WY Giles Creek, Elkhorn, NE Indian Creek Lake, IA Lake Herman (Dredging), SD Little Nemaha River, Nemaha County, NE Milk River, Havre, MT Miles City, MT Morrison, Bear Creek, CO Oahe Dam - Lake Oahe (Wildlife Restoration), ND Redwater River and Hay Creek, Bell Fourche, SD 1976 1976 1961 1943 1972 1956 1952 1969 N/A 1973 N/A 1982 1950 N/A 1966 Sec. 201, FC Act 1950 23 Mar 81 FC Act 1950 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 FC Act 1950 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 PL 77-228 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Sec. 203, PL 90-483 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 5 Aug 77 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 6 Nov 77 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 4 Jan 74 Sec. 1001(a), PL 89-298 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Sec. 204, PL 89-298 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Sec. 1001(a), PL 89-298 WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 FC Act of 1950 Section 1001(b) WRDA 1986 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 5 Aug 77 FC Act of 1970 Section 1001(b) WRDA 1986 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 WRDA of 1974 4 Jan 74 26-33 75,000 142,666 135,000 282,200 30,000 0 1,000 The following investigations for flood control called for by Flood Control Acts and committee resolutions were deauthorized by WRDA of 1986, 17 Oct 86; Aowa & South Creek, NE; Bow Creek, NE; Cannonball River, ND; James River, ND & SD;,Judith River Basin, MT; Niobrara River Basin, NE, SD & WY; Omaha Creek, NE; South Dakota Lakes, SD; Weeping Water Creek, NE; Windpower at Ft. Peck Lake, MT; Yellowstone River below Billings, MT; South Platte River, Denver-Ft. Lupton-Ft. Morgan, CO; Lower Big Sioux River IA & SD; Eagle Bay Highway Bridge, Missouri River Basin, ND; Sheridan, WY (Stage III); Missouri River Levee System Units: R531, R540, R553, R555, R577, R589, R603, R610, R623, R644, R645, R652, R661, R669, R676, R682, R686, R703, R717, R719, R725, R728, R742, R750. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 26-G (continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Deauthorization Funds Funds Project Report For Document Expended Expended Shell Creek, NE 1962 Sec. 12, PL 93-251 71,000 WRDA of 1974 3 Oct 78 Upper Missouri River, SD N/A Sec. 1001(a), PL 89-298 Streambank Erosion Control Project WRDA of 1986 17 Oct 86 Vermillion River and Tribs, SD 1968 Sec. 12 PL 93-251 208,000 WRDA of 1974 4 Jan 74 The following investigations for flood control called for by Flood Control Acts and committee resolutions were deauthorized by WRDA of 1986, 17 Oct 86; Aowa & South Creek, NE; Bow Creek, NE; Cannonball River, ND; James River, ND & SD;,Judith River Basin, MT; Niobrara River Basin, NE, SD & WY; Omaha Creek, NE; South Dakota Lakes, SD; Weeping Water Creek, NE; Windpower at Ft. Peck Lake, MT; Yellowstone River below Billings, MT; South Platte River, Denver-Ft. Lupton-Ft. Morgan, CO; Lower Big Sioux River IA & SD; Eagle Bay Highway Bridge, Missouri River Basin, ND; Sheridan, WY (Stage III); Missouri River Levee System Units: R531, R540, R553, R555, R577, R589, R603, R610, R623, R644, R645, R652, R661, R669, R676, R682, R686, R703, R717, R719, R725, R728, R742, R750. 26-34 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, SIOUX CITY, IA TO RULO, NE TABLE 26-H Miles of Unit Levee Status L627-624 L601 L594 R580 L575 R573 R562 L561-550 R548 L536 R520 R613 R616 L611-614 L627, L624, L561-550 Comprehensive Mosquito Creek Levee Watkins-Waubonsie Ditch Levees Pleasant Valley Levee Nebraska City Levee Thurman-Hamburg Levee Otto County Drainage District No. 2 Peru Dike Atchison County Levee District No. 1 Brownville-Nemaha Levee Mill Creek Levee Richardson County Drainage District No. 8 Papillion Creek-Platte River Levee Bellevue-Papillion Creek Levees Mosquito-Keg Creek Levees Remedial Studies on Completed Units Restudy of Levee System 14.2 15.0 11.4 0.2 45.8 5.9 7.6 41.3 19.5 13.6 6.3 14.0 4.5 22.0 Complete 1950 Complete 1966 Complete 1964 Complete 1950 Complete 1950 Complete 1950 Complete 1950 Complete 1952 Complete 1952 Complete 1952 Complete 1960 Complete 1971 Complete 1987 Complete 1988 Studies Complete Studies Complete 26-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM TABLE 26-I (See Section 18 of Text) Estimated Estimated Project Federal Cost Non-Federal Cost Fort Peck Lake, MT"' 2 158,428,000 1,103,000 Garrison Dam, Lake Sakakawea, ND" 2 299,938,000 1,516,000 Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS and MO (Sioux City, IA to Rulo, NE)"3 37,931,000 4,618,000 Oahe Dam-Lake Oahe, SD and ND"'2 346,521,000 2,320,000 Big Bend Dam-Lake Sharpe, SD"2 107,498,000 302,000 Fort Randall Dam, Lake Francis Case, SD"'2 199,066,000 1,609,000 Gavins Point Dam, Lewis & Clark Lake, SD & NE"2 49,617,000 137,000 Gavins Point Dam, Lewis & Clark Lake, SD & NE-Relocation of Niobrara, NE 2 13,516,000 Omaha, NE2 5,904,000 362,000 Council Bluffs, IA2 2,558,000 146,000 Missouri River, Garrison Dam to Lake Oahe, ND2 9,413,000 270,000 Cherry Creek Lake, CO" 2 15,220,000 285,000 Details presented on individual report. 2 Completed. 3 Active portion of project. 26-36 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT INSPECTION OF COMPIFTED ,LOCALP, ROTECTION PROJECTS TABLE 26-J (See Section 24 of Text) Location Month Inspected Montana Beaver Creek, Saco Sep 97 * Clyde Park, Shields River Aug 92 Glasgow, Milk River Sep 97 Havre, Milk River Jun 97 Havre, Scott Coulee-Bull Hook Dam Jun 97 Three Forks, Lower Madison River Sep 92 Forsythe, Yellowstone River Sep 97 West Glendive, Yellowstone River Sep 97 Sun River,Vaughn Jun 97 * Yellowstone River, Water Plant, Livingston Oct 96 Sun River, Great Falls Jun 97 * Milk River, Malta (Sewer Line) May 96 * Yellowstone River, Livingston (N.E. Livingston Bridge) Sep 97 * Milk River, Chinook (Finley Bridge) Oct 96 * Battle Creek, Chinook (Uhruh Bridge) May 96 * East Gallatin, Near Bozeman (Intst Bridge) May 96 * Yellowstone River, Near Livingston (Hwy 89 - 7 Miles East of Livingston) Sep 97 * Shields River, Near Livingston (Hwy 89) Sep 97 * Teton River, Near Choteau (Hwy 89) May 96 * Madison River, Quake Lake Sep 94 * Milk River, Malta May 94 Missouri River, Bank Stabilization Project, Frazer Sep 94 * Dearborn River - Hwy 287, Wolf Creek Jun 94 * Muddy Creek - Int Hwy 15 - Frontage Road, Vaughn Jun 97 * Badger Creek - Hwy 89, Browning Jun 94 Wyoming * Baldwin Creek, Lander (Sewage Lagoons) Sep 96 Greybull, Big Horn River Sep 97 Sheridan, Big and Little Goose Creeks Sep 97 * Shoshone River, Bank Protection, Lovell Aug 92 * Shoshone River, Byron Aug 92 * Powder River, Arvada Oct 96 * Medicine Bow River, Elk Mountain Nov 96 North Dakota Mandan, Lower Heart River Oct 96 Marmarth, Little Missouri River May 97 Scranton, Buffalo May 97 * Denotes Section 14 Projects ** Denotes PL-84-99 Projects 26-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 INRPETTON OF COMP I.RTED Lin A. PROTr.CTION PROFIT S TABLE 26-J (Continued) (See Section 24 of Text) Location Month Inspected South Dakota Big Sioux River, Union County Aug 97 Big Sioux River, North Sioux City Aug 97 Sioux Falls, Big Sioux River Aug 97 Belle Fourche, Belle Fourche River May 95 Rapid City, Cedar Canyon Dam Jun 95 Hot Springs, Fall River Channel Oct 95 Herreid, Spring Creek Sep 95 * Missouri River, Bank Protection, Greenwood Sep 93 * Bad River, Bank Protection, Fort Pierre * Big Sioux River, Schofield Bridge, Near Flandreau Jun 96 * Rapid Creek, Rapid City Aug 97 * Missouri River, Sacred Heart Hospital, Yankton Aug 97 * Vermillion River, Vermillion Jun 96 * Big Sioux River, Harrisburgh Jun 96 * Big Sioux River, Jefferson Jun 95 Deadman Gulch, Sturgis Sep 96 * Marne Creek, Yankton Aug 97 * White River, Winner Oct 96 * James River, Yankton Jun 96 * Missouri River, White Swan & Sunshine Bottoms Sep 96 * Big Sioux River, Plymouth County Aug 97 Colorado Aurora, Westerly Creek-Kelley Road Dam Jun 97 * South Platte River, Kersey Sep 96 * South Platte River, Merino Sep 96 * South Platte River, Iliff Sep 96 * South Platte River, Platteville Sep 96 * Big Thompson River, Johnstown Aug 95 * Cache La Poudre River, Ft. Collins (Water Treatment Plant) Sep 92 * South Platte River, Fort Lupton Hwy 85 Sep 96 * South Platte River, Logan County (Bridges 175A & 173) Sep 96 Nebraska * Blackbird Creek, Burt County May 97 Omaha, Missouri River Sep 97 Waterloo, Elkhorn River May 97 West Point, Elkhorn River Jun 97 Pierce, Elkhorn River May 97 Clarkson, Middle Fork, Maple Creek May 97 Hooper, Elkhorn River Jul 97 Norfolk, North Fork, Elkhorn River May 97 Madison, Union & Taylor Creeks Sep 96 Schuyler, Lost Creek & Platte River Aug 97 Little Papillion, Little Papillion Creek Aug 96 * Denotes Section 14 Projects ** Denotes PL-84.99 Projects 26-38 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT INSPECTION OF COMP1E TFID I.OCA. PROTFCTION PRO IFCTS TABLE 26-J (Continued) (See Section 24 of Text) Location Month Inspected Nebraska (continued) Macy, Blackbird Creek Aug 96 Lincoln, Salt Creek & Tributaries Sep 96 Meadow Grove, Buffalo Creek May 96 Columbus, Loup River Aug 96 Broken Bow, Mud Creek Aug 96 * Platte River, Brady Feb 95 * Elm Creek, Decatur Apr 95 * Nebraska City South Table Creek Aug 95 * Wigle Creek, Homer Jul 95 * South Elkhorn River, near Ewing, NE Apr 95 * Elk Creek, Jackson Jul 95 * Elk Creek, Willis Jul 95 Flood Control Project, Lost Creek, Columbus Aug 96 * Middle Pebble Creek, Snyder Jun 95 * Elm Creek, Burt County Apr 95 * Platte River, Camp Ashland Sep 95 * West Branch Papillion Creek, Omaha, NE May 95 * Logan Creek, Near Bancroft Jul 95 * Platte River, Near North Bend Aug 96 * Elkhorn River, Near Beemer Jul 95 * East Bow Creek, Wynot Jun 96 * Cedar River, Spalding Nov 95 ** Ames Diking District near Ames Jul 96 ** North Bend Diking District Jul 96 ** Cottrelle Diking District Jul 96 ** Fremont County Bd of Sup Winslow Levee Jul 96 ** Fremont County Bd of Sup Bowman, Zach, Roth Jul 96 ** Fremont County Bd of Sup Peterson Jul 96 ** Clear Creek Diking District Aug 96 ** SID #1 Lake Waconda Jul 96 ** SID #97 Hawaiian Village Jul 96 ** SID #101 Hansen Lake Jun 96 ** PMRNRD Western Feb 95 ** PMRNRD Cape-L Str May 94 ** LPSNRD Omaha Fish Jan 94 ** PMRNRD Union Dike Jun 93 ** PMRNRD No Name Nov 93 ** Corning Levee Dist #2 Mill Creek D.D. Jul 94 ** Fremont Co. Bd. of Sup. Whitehead Levee Oct 94 * Denotes Section 14 Projects ** Denotes PL-84-99 Projects 26-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TNSPEr.CTTON nOF C OMPIETED ,lOCAAl. PROTFiCTTON PRO 1F.CTS TABLE 26-J (Continued) (See Section 24 of Text) Location Month Inspected Iowa Council Bluffs, Missouri River Oct 96 Ida Grove, Maple River-Odebolt Creek Jul 96 Sioux City, Floyd River Aug 96 Hawarden, Dry Creek Aug 96 Hamburg L575, Nishnabotna River Nov 96 Intercounty D.D., Little Sioux River Sep 96 Nagel D.D., Little Sioux River Sep 96 Bennett-McDonald-Smithland D.D., Little Sioux River Jul 96 * West Nishnabotna River, Mills County Bridge, Near Malvern Jun 95 * East Nisbnabotna River, Page County Bridge, Near Essex May 94 East Nishnabotna River, Red Oak Jul 96 * Mucky Creek, Mapleton, IA Sep 95 Emerson, Indian Creek, Mills County Jul 96 Monona-Harrison Ditch Control, Monona County Sep 95 * Little Sioux River, Anthon Jul 95 * Keg Creek, Minden Feb 92 * Soldier River, Near Ute Sep 95 Missouri River Levees L624 & L627, Mosquito Creek & Sieck Levees Oct 96 L601, Watkins Levee District Sep 96 L601, Miller-Sturgeon Levee District Sep 96 L601, Missouri River Levee District #1 Sep 96 L594, Waubansie Drainage District Sep 96 L594, Pleasant Valley Levee District Sep 96 L575, Benton-Washington Levee District Nov 96 L575, Northwest Atchison Levee District Nov 96 L575, McKissock Island Levee District Nov 96 L575, Bucbannan Levee District Nov 96 L561, L550, L536, Atchison County Levee District Nov 96 L611-614, M & P Missouri River Levee District May 96 R613, Papio Natural Resources District Aug 96 R548, Little Nemaha Levee District Oct 96 R520, Richardson Co. Levee Dist. #8 Sep 96 R573, Otoe County Drainage Dist. #2 Sep 96 R616, Sarpy County Papio Natural Resources District Aug 96 R562, Peru Levee District Sep 96 R548, Brownville-Nemaha Levee District Oct 96 * Denotes Section 14 Projects ** Denotes PL-84-99 Projects 26-40 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS TABLE 26-K (See Section 46 of Text) Federal Cost Totals By Item Fiscal Year 97 Subtotal and Category SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Control Studies (120) Antelope Creek, Lincoln, NE 84,148 Lower Platte River and Tribs., NE 135,957 Subtotal 220,105 Special Studies (140) None in FY 97 Review of Authorized Projects (160) None in FY 97 Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations (171) 130,422 Interagency Water Resources Development(173) 22,247 North American Waterfowl Management Plan(176) 3,554 Subtotal 156,223 Coordination Studies with Other Agencies (180) Cooperation With Other Water Resources Agencies (181) 19,789 Cooperation with States (186) 231,614 Subtotal 251,403 TOTAL (Category 100) 627,731 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management, Omaha, NE 28,937 National Flood Proofing Cmet (NFPC) 10,012 Quick Responses (250) 6,007 SS -May Creek, Bismarck, ND 17,747 SS -Big Sioux River, Esteline, SD 20,414 SS - Lincoln, CO., SD (250) 55 SS - Monona Co., IA 50 SS -Weld County, CO 85 SS - N. Fork, Elkhorn River, CO 19,395 SS - Cache LaPoudre Riv., Greeley, CO 33,973 SS - St. Vrain & Boulder Creek, CO 19,960 SS - Montgomery County, IA 14,968 SS - Butler County, NE 9,976 SS -Polk, NE 9,935 Technical Services, General (250) 45,148 Hydrologic Studies (260) General Hydrologic Studies (262) 47,170 TOTAL (Category 200) 283,832 26-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS TABLE 26-K (Continued) (See Section 46 of Text) Federal Cost Totals By Item Fiscal Year 97 Subtotal and Categories PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN - PROJECTS NOT FULLY AUTHORIZED (Category 400) Wood River, Grand Island, NE (451) Big Sioux River, Sioux Falls, SD (451) Watertown and Vicinity, SD (451) TOTAL (Category 400) GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 17,250 83,366 70,680 171,296 1,082,859 26-42 OMAHA, NE DISTRICT FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 26-L (See Section 24 of Text) Fiscal Year 97 Project Name Stage Cost Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies Disaster Preparedness (100) - 347,088 Emergency Operations (200) - 793,555 Rehabilitation & Inspection Program (300) - 451,574 Emergency Water Supplies & Drought Assistance (400) - 0 Advance Measures (500) - 1,849,021 Hazard Mitigation (600) - 0 Total (FCCE) 3,441,238 Section 205: Lost Creek at Columbus, NE L 1,835,832 Logan Creek, Pender, NE P 222,084 Aberdeen & Vicinity, SD P 128,231 Maple Creek East Fork, Howells, NE C 48,221 Milk River, Malta, MT C 555,206 Nishnabotna River, Hamburg, IA P 188,774 Pebble Creek, Scribner, NE P 3,221 Salt Creek, Levees, Lincoln, NE C 24,022 Van Bibber Creek, Arvada, CO P 261,285 Box Elder Creek, SD F 42,138 James River, Jamestown, ND F 4,298 Total (Section 205's) 3,313,312 Section 14: Four-Mile Creek Bridge, Cass County, NE C (3,122) Tongue River, Sheridan, WY PDA 4,329 MO River, Richland County Road 152, MT PDA 23,952 White River, Jones County, SD PDA 2,052 Total (Section 14's) 27,211 Total Flood Control Activities $6,781,761 L = Litigation R = Recon P = Plans & Specs C = Construction F = Feasibility - = Does Not Apply PDA = Planning & Design Analysis (Section 14 only) 26-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 26-M PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT Modifications of projects for the purpose of improving the quality of the environment in the public interest. (Section 1135, Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress, as amended.) Fiscal Year 97 Fiscal Year 97 Study/Project and Location Federal Funds Expended Contributed Funds Expended California Bend, NE 24,499 Hidden Lake Restoration, NE 377,295 137,075 Lower Decatur Bend, NE 166,005 Missouri River Dike Lowering, NE Boyer Chute, NE 2,898 6 Missouri River Levee Unit L536 Deroin Bend, MO 107,215 Wehrspann, Lake Aquatic, NE 123,269 Coordination Account Funds 14,823 Initial Appraisals, General, NE 5,602 - 26-44 1997 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT * The district comprises a portion of southwestern Iowa; northwestern, central, and western Missouri; northern Kansas; southern Nebraska; and a portion of northeastern Colorado embraced in drainage basin of the Missouri River and tributaries from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth. Report on navigation project for section of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to Rulo, Nebraska, is in report of Omaha District. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Mouth (Rulo, NE, to Mouth) ................. 27-2 2. Missouri River Fish and Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE, KS, and MO .............. 27-2 Flood Control 3. Blue River Basin, Kansas City, MO ........... 27-2 4. Blue River Channel, Kansas City, MO ......... 27-3 5. Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO ............... 27-3 6. Clinton Lake, Wakarusa River, KS ............ 27-3 7. Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE .............................. 27-3 8. Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS ............ 27-4 9. Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS ......... 27-4 10. Little Blue River Lakes, MO ................. 27-4 11. Long Branch Lake, Little Chariton River, MO ............................... 27-4 12. Melvern Lake, Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, KS .......................... 27-5 13. Milford Lake, Republican River, KS ........... 27-5 14. Missouri River Levee System, IA, NE, KS, and MO (Rulo, NE, to Mouth) ............. 27-5 15. Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS .............. 27-6 16. Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program (Kansas City Dist.) ....................... 27-6 17. Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO ........................... ... 27-6 18. Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, KS .............................. 27-6 19. Rathbun Lake, Chariton River, IA ............ 27-7 20. Smithville Lake, Little Platte River, MO ....... 27-7 21. Tuttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, KS ......... 27-7 22. Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS ............... 27-7 23. Scheduling of Flood Control Reservoir Operations ...................... 27-8 24. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............................ 27-8 27-1 Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power Page 25. Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO ......................... 27-8 26. Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO ............... 27-8 Work Under Special Authorities 27. Continuing Authorities Program .............. 27-9 Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment ............................ 27-9 28. Emergency Response Activities ............... 27-9 General Investigations 29. General Investigations ..................... 27-10 Other Activities 30. Mississippi River Main Stem Model Development ...................... 27-10 31. National Emergency Preparedness ........... 27-10 32. Missouri River Basin Collarborative Effort .... 27-10 33. Regulatory Program ....................... 27-10 Tables Table 27-A Cost & Financial Statement ........ 27-11 Table 27-B Authorizing Legislation ............. 27-14 Table 27-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ........................... 27-17 Table 27-D Not Applicable Table 27-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ......................... 27-18 Table 27-F Not Applicable Table 27-G Deauthorized Projects ............... 27-19 Table 27-H Missouri River Levee System ......... 27-21 Table 27-I Kansas City District Projects Included in Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program ..................... 27-22 Table 27-J Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................... 27-22 Table 27-K Work Under Special Authorities Continuing Authorities Program ...... 27-23 Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment .................... 27-23 Emergency Response Activities ....... 27-24 Table 27-L Active General Investigations ........ 27-25 Table 27-M Regulatory Program ................ 27-26 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Navigation 1. MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA, TO MOUTH (RULO, NE. TO MOUTH) Location. Jefferson, Madison, and Gallatin Rivers conjoin at Three Forks, Montana, to form the Missouri River, which flows southeasterly 2,315 miles (1960 mileage) across or along seven states to the Mississippi River, 17 miles above St. Louis. For description see page 1149, Annual Report for 1932. The river is commercially navigable from Sioux City, Iowa, to the mouth, a distance of 732 miles. The portion of project in Kansas City District extends from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth, a distance of 498 miles. Previous Projects. For details see page 1891 of Annual Report for 1915, and pages 1153 and 1175 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing Project. A channel of 9-foot depth and width not less than 300 feet, obtained by revetment of banks, construction of permeable dikes to contract and stabilize the waterways, cutoffs to eliminate long bends, closing minor channels, removal of snags, and dredging as required. The improved reach within the Kansas City District extends from the mouth to Rulo, Nebraska, a distance of 498.4 miles. The Bank Stabilization and Navigation features of the project were completed in September 1980. For the reach from Rulo, Nebraska, to the mouth, the total construction cost was $237,942,190 including $8,665,594 for previous project. River access sites have been completed at 11 locations. Ordinary and extreme stage fluctuations are 16 and 38 feet, respectively. Local cooperation. Cooperation from benefited localities may be required where any improvement may confer special benefit. The receipt of contributions from private parties are to be expended along with Government funds upon authorized work where such work would be in the interest of navigation, as authorized by 1915 Rivers and Harbors Act. Secretary of the Army approved general principle of cooperative construction on Missouri River below Kansas City on basis that 25 percent of cost of any special installation shall be paid by the United States and 75 percent by local interests. Total contributed by local interests in cooperation with the United States from 1918 to June 30, 1964, was $675,663, of which $8,647 was returned to contributors. Local interests must share in cost of recreation facilities in accordance with provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Local interests have contributed $171,816 for cost sharing on construction of recreation in addition to constructing portions of the facilities. Terminal facilities. A listing of terminal facilities are included in Missouri River Navigation Charts and can be obtained from Kansas City District Engineer for a small fee. Operations during fiscal year. Routine maintenance of dikes and revetments along the lower river was accomplished by contract. Field hired labor accomplished emergency repair of dikes and revetments on the upper reach of the river within the district. District personnel also accomplished other work items: channel reconnaissance, stream gauging condition studies, surveys and mapping, engineering and design, surveys and layouts of construction, and supervision and administration. Project tonnage on the river for CY 1997 is estimated at 6.6 million tons, excluding waterway improvement materials. District estimates the recreation use on the Missouri River (MRK) at 1.2 million recreation days annually. 2. MISSOURI RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE MITIGATION, IA, NE, KS, and MO Location. This project extends along the Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to the Mouth near St. Louis, a river distance of 732 miles. This location is conincident with the Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project on the river. Existing project. The project is to mitigate losses of fish and wildlife habitat resulting from construction and operation of the Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project. The four major components of the plan are restoration of aquatic habitat on public and non-public lands (2,500 acres), preservation of aquatic habitat on public and non-public lands subject to the effects of riverbed degradation (700 acres), acquisition and development of existing undeveloped habitat on private lands (28,000 acres), and development of terrestrial wildlife habitat on existing undeveloped public lands (16,900 acres). Estimated fully funded cost of the project (1997) is $79,100,000, all Federal. Both the Kansas City and Omaha Districts are involved in the implementation of the project, with Kansas City District involvement directed mainly to sites in Kansas and Missouri. Local cooperation. There is no non-Federal sponsor for the project. The states of Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, and Missouri are voluntarily serving on a coordinating team which is actively involved in ongoing project activities. Operations during fiscal year. Funding was continued for land acquisition and construction of mitigation features. Land was purchased at the following sites: Blackbird-Tieville-Decatur, Iowa and Nebraska; and Nottleman Island, Iowa; and Lower Hamburg, Missouri. Construction activities took place at Benedictine Bottoms and Hamburg Bend, Nebraska. Design activities were also carried out at Winnebago Bend, and California Bend, Iowa; Blackbird-Tieville-Decatur, Iowa and Nebraska; Weldon Spring and Overton Bottoms, Missouri. Flood Control 3. BLUE RIVER BASIN, KANSAS CITY, MO Location. Along the left bank of the Blue River from U.S. Highway 71 upstream for a distance of about 11/4 miles in Jackson County, Missouri, to the Bannister Federal Complex levee. Existing project. The recommended project includes construction of approximately 11/4' miles of levee to provide flood protection to 280 acres in the Dodson Industrial Area and surrounding area in Kansas City. Estimated Federal cost through construction of the project (2003) is 27-2 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT $12,000,000, and estimated non-Federal cost of lands, damages and relocations is $5,100,000. Local Cooperation. The city of Kansas City provided a letter of assurance, dated November 17, 1995, officially stating its intent to cost share the project. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction engineering and design continues with preparation of the design memorandum and plans and specifications. 4. BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO Location. Along the Blue River and tributaries in Jackson County, Missouri. Existing project. Preliminary plans consist of 12.5 miles of improved channel along the Blue River within Kansas City, Missouri. Estimated Federal cost through construction of the project (1997) is $196,000,000, and estimated non-Federal cost of lands, damages and relocations is $32,400,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 applies. The City of Kansas City, Missouri, passed a resolution of intent on December 9, 1975 to provide the required assurances of local cooperation when requested. The Section 221 agreement was signed by the Kansas City District Engineer on September 8, 1983. Operations during fiscal year. Preconstruction planning is complete and final designs are underway. The first and second channel construction contracts, the pile stabilization, contaminated sediments, and the paved reach contracts are complete. Railroad relocations are completed in the reach of Stages 1 and 2. Plans and specifications for the 12th-19th Streets contract are complete, and construction is ongoing. Preparation of plans and specifications for the 19th Street to Stadium Drive contract are complete. Preparation of the plans and specifications for the Stadium Drive to Brush Creek and Brush Creek to 63rd Street contracts have been initiated. The railroad relocation contracts with the Kansas City Southern, the Missouri Pacific, and the Burlington Northern Railroad Companies have been awarded. Construction of the Kansas City Southern Railroad Bridge is complete. Plans and specifications for the Burlington Northern Railroad Bridges are complete. Plans and specifications for the Missouri Pacific Railroad Bridges have been initiated. 5. BRUSH CREEK, KANSAS CITY, MO Location. A major tributary of the Blue River in Kansas City, Missouri, and Johnson County, Kansas, draining a highly urbanized 29-square-mile area in the two states. Existing project. The authorized project consists of improving about 7,500 feet of the channel from near Roanoke Parkway downstream to near Troost Avenue in Kansas City. At the request of the sponsor, Kansas City, Missouri, a modified project was built which provides identical flood protection, but which also accommodates park and recreation development in the authorized reach. Estimated fully funded Federal cost of the modified project (1996) is $14,464,000; and estimated non-Federal cost of lands, damages, relocations, and cash is $19,526,000. Local cooperation. The City of Kansas City and the Corps of Engineers entered into a Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) on the project in March 1991. Operations during fiscal year. The Stage 2 contract completed all remaining structural features. Procurement of equipment for the Flood Warning System is complete. All city bridges have been completed and are open to traffic. The dedication of the project was in June 1995. The project was turned over to the local sponsor in January 1997. 6. CLINTON LAKE, WAKARUSA RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Wakarusa River about 4 miles southwest of Lawrence, in Douglas County, Kansas. The lake extends into Shawnee and Osage Counties, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 9,250 feet long constructed to a height of about 114 feet with an uncontrolled spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity 397,200 acre-feet (258,300 for flood control, 28,500 for sediment reserve, and 110,400 of multipurpose storage for municipal and industrial waste supply and recreation). Cost of constructing the completed project was $57,415,433. Construction was initiated in January 1972, and the project was placed in operation in November 1977. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Reimbursement in the estimated amount of $6,768,000 is required for water supply storage in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958. A contract was signed by the State on September 6, 1978 and was approved by the Secretary of the Army on October 30, 1978. Utilization of storage was initiated in December 1979. Repayment also began at that time. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1997 was 6,719,100 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 7. HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, NE Location. Dam is on main stem of Republican River about 235 miles above confluence of stream with Smoky Hill River. Site is in Harlan County, 1'/2 miles south of Republican City and 13 miles west of Franklin, Nebraska. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 107 feet above streambed with a total length of 11,827 feet, including a gate-controlled, concrete, gravity-type spillway section near the center of dam. Reservoir provides storage capacity of 850,000 acre-feet (500,000 for flood control and 350,000 for irrigation and sedimentation allowance). Initial cost of constructing the project was $45,279,532. Total Federal cost of project, including $1,017,623 for major rehabilitation work and $1,832,394 supplemental recreation development (Code 710), is $48,129,549. Construction of the project was initiated in August 1946. 27-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 The project was placed in operation in December 1952. Major rehabilitation work was completed in FY 1968. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1997 was 7,249,500 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. Study of future operation. The Study of Future Operation at Harlan County Lake was delayed in FY 1996 and FY 1997 pending receipt of revised hydrology analyses from the Bureau of Reclamation. The purpose of the study is to develop an operting plan to serve the best public interest for Harlan County Lake under depleted inflow conditions. The study remains on hold; however, coordination with the Bureau of Reclamation continues. 8. HILLSDALE LAKE, BIG BULL CREEK, KS Location. The project is located approximately 12 miles above the mouth of Big Bull Creek, a tributary of the Marais des Cygnes River and about 21/2 miles west of Hillsdale, in Miami County, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill embankment about 11,600 feet long (including approximately 3,300 feet of dike section) about 75 feet above rising valley flood plain. The spillway is gravity type uncontrolled and the outlet works are controlled. The total reservoir storage capacity is 160,000 acre-feet (81,000 for flood control, 11,000 for sediment reserve, and 68,000 for multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Construction was initiated in December 1974, and the project was placed in operation in October 1981. Federal cost of construction was $64,161,400. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act 1938, applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $21,145,338 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. The Kansas Water Resources Board signed a contract in January 1974, approved by the Secretary of the Army in April 1974, for the entire 53,000 acre-feet of water supply storage. The Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks has a 50-year lease on 12,880 acres for management of land and water areas for public park, recreational, and fish and wildlife purposes. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1997 was 944,400 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance and resurfacing access and road across dam. 9. KANOPOLIS LAKE, SMOKY HILL RIVER, KS Location. The dam is on the Smoky Hill River about 184 river miles above the mouth of the stream, and about 11 miles northwest of Marquette, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 131 feet above streambed, having a total length of 15,360 feet, including 4,070 feet of dike section on the left abutment and 2,550 feet of dike section on right abutment. The reservoir provides storage capacity of 450,000 acre-feet, (400,000 for flood control and 50,000 for recreation and streamflow regulation). Outlet works and spillway are in right abutment. 27-4 Initial cost of constructing the project was $12,327,735. Total Federal cost of project, including $249,492, supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $12,577,227. Construction was initiated in June 1940, and project was placed in operation in May 1948. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1997 was 2,344,500 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance and maintenance of the elevator intake tower. 10. LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO Location. This project consists of two lakes in Jackson County, Missouri, located in Kansas City, Missouri, and suburban communities. The Blue Springs Lake site is on the East Fork of the Little Blue River about '/2 mile south of U.S. Highway 40, and the Longview Lake site is on the main stem at approximately 109th Street. Existing project. The Blue Springs dam is an earthfill embankment about 2,500 feet long and rising about 78 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled service spillway and uncontrolled outlet conduit. The total reservoir storage capacity is 26,600 acre-feet (15,700 for flood control, 10,600 for multipurpose storage for water quality and recreation, and 300 for sedimentation). The Longview dam is an earthfill embankment about 1,900 feet long and rising about 120 feet above the streambed, with an uncontrolled service spillway and an uncontrolled outlet conduit. The total reservoir storage capacity is 46,900 acre-feet (24,300 for flood control and 20,600 for multipurpose storage for water quality and recreation, and 2,000 for sedimentation). Federal cost (1992) for both lakes through construction of the project was $140,809,200. Construction was initiated in September 1977, and the project became operational in September 1988. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Local interest must share in separable costs allocated to recreation in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. The Jackson County Legislature approved a recreation costsharing contract on July 5, 1974 which was approved by the Secretary of the Army on June 24, 1976. A supplemental agreement, signed by Jackson County officials on June 5, 1978, and approved by the Secretary of the Army January 10, 1979, revised the existing contract to include additional costs involved in raising the multipurpose pool elevation at the Blue Springs Lake. Reimbursement for recreation was $15,047,000 of which $450,000 was accomplished during construction by local interests. Operations during fiscal year. Project is complete. Land acqusition is complete. Visitation for FY 1997 was 3,969,500 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 11. LONG BRANCH LAKE, LITTLE CHARITON RIVER, MO Location. The damsite is on the East Fork Little Chariton River in north-central Missouri about 2 miles west of Macon in Macon County. KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT Existing project. An earthfill dam about 3,800 feet long and about 71 feet high with an uncontrolled outlet conduit and an uncontrolled service spillway in the right abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 65,000 acre-feet (29,000 for flood control, 4,000 for sediment reserve, and 32,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, fish and wildlife, and recreation). Estimated Federal cost (1997) is $20,288,000, and estimated non-Federal cost is $3,605,000. Construction was initiated in March 1973. The project was placed in useful operation for flood control on September 1, 1980. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $5,567,000 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958 and share in separable cost of $3,589,000 allocated to recreation in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. On September 15, 1972 the Secretary of the Army approved a contract signed by the City of Macon, Missouri, for water supply and recreation development. Missouri state agencies indicated their intent to sponsor future water supply and signed a contract on June 17, 1977 to sponsor recreational development in lieu of the City of Macon. After review by the Office of the Secretary of the Army, the state signed the contract in December 1979, and it was approved by the Secretary of the Army on April 18, 1980. Supplemental Agreement No. 1 to this contract was approved December 28, 1993 to provide for additional recreational facilities. Additional facilities have been designed. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1997 was 1,494,100 visitor hours. Project is 100 percent complete on scheduled work. The remaining unscheduled work is construction of recreation facilities. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 12. MELVERN LAKE, MARAIS DES CYGNES (OSAGE) RIVER, KS Location. Damsite is on Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River in Osage County, Kansas, about 4 miles west of Melvern, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 9,700 feet long and about 98 feet high with an uncontrolled chute-type spillway in the left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 363,000 acre-feet (200,000 for flood control, 26,000 for sediment reserve, and 137,000 for multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Cost of constructing the completed project was $37,436,530. Construction was initiated in July 1967, and the project was placed in operation in August 1972. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Project storage was reallocated in 1989 to include municipal and industrial water supply in accordance with provisions of the Water Supply Act of 1958. In accordance with the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding between the State of Kansas and the Department of the Army dated 1985, payment in full of $7,131,834 for 50,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was made in March 1995. Utilization of storage for water supply was initiated in September 1993 under an interim contract and continues under the current contract signed in January 1995. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1997 was 6,248,551 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 13. MILFORD LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, KS Location. The damsite is on the Republican River near the village of Alida about 10 miles above confluence of Republican and Smoky Hill Rivers which form Kansas River; and about 4 miles northwest of Junction City, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 6,300 feet long and 126 feet high with an uncontrolled service-chute spillway in a saddle on right abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 1,160,000 acre-feet (700,000 for flood control, 160,000 for sediment reserve and 300,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Water supply storage is included in the project at the request of the Governor of Kansas under provisions of the Federal Water Supply Act of 1958. Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $48,268,843. Total Federal cost of project, including $1,297,649 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $49,566,492. Construction was initiated in July 1961. The project was placed in operation in June 1965. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $12,162,134 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. Utilization of storage for water supply was initiated in October 1984. Reimbursement was initiated, at the option of the State, in September 1976. Operations during fiscal year. The lake project experienced record flooding during 1993 that required large flood releases through the outlet works and several days of uncontrolled flows over the spillway. Repairs to the damaged outlet channel and spillway were completed with regular operations and maintenance funds. Visitation for FY 1997 was 5,417,900 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included ordinary operation and maintenance and relief well renovation. 14. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IA, NE, KS, AND MO (RULO, NE, TO MOUTH) Location. On both banks of the Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, about 760 miles to the mouth near St. Louis, Missouri. The portion of the project in Kansas City District extends from Rulo, Nebraska, 498 miles to mouth. Existing project. A series of levee units and appurtenant works along both sides of Missouri River from Sioux City, Iowa, to the mouth, for protection of agricultural lands and small communities against floods. Estimated fully funded cost (1997) for the active portion of the project from Rulo, Nebraska, to mouth is $128,818,000, including $93,553,000 Federal and $23,799,000 non-Federal contributions, and costs of $11,466,000 for lands and damages are to be borne by local interests. Remaining portion of project consists of units on which planning and construction are being delayed pending restudy to assure that additional levee construction is economically justified. Current 27-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 cost estimate for deferred, inactive, and deauthorized portion of project Rulo, Nebraska, to mouth is $168,865,000 (1964, 1986, and 1987 price levels), of which $153,233,000 is Federal cost for construction and $15,632,000 for lands and damages to be borne by local interests. Construction of the project was initiated in June 1948. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 applies. Fully complied with for all completed units and units under construction. Local sponsors provide all operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Status of individual units of active portion of project at end of fiscal year is shown in Table 27-H on Missouri River Levee System. Unit L385 was approved for construction in FY 1994. Planning on Unit L142 continued. The Project Cooperation Agreement on Unit L385 was executed September 23, 1997. 15. PERRY LAKE, DELAWARE RIVER, KS Location. The damsite is on the Delaware River about 5 miles above the mouth in Jefferson County, and about 3 miles northwest of Perry, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 7,750 feet long constructed to an elevation about 95 feet above valley floor with grated-outlet works and an uncontrolled spillway in left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 770,000 acre-feet (480,000 for flood control, including 140,000 for sediment reserve and 150,000 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Water supply storage is included in the project plan at the request of the State of Kansas under provisions of the Federal Water Supply Act of 1958. Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $48,371,706. Total Federal cost of project, including $724,212 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $49,095,918. Construction was initiated in March 1964, and the project was placed in operation in January 1969. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Local interests must make reimbursement of $8,551,805 for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958. Utilization of storage for water supply was initiated in October 1991. Reimbursement was initiated at the option of the State in September 1978. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1997 was 6,494,600 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included ordinary operation and maintenance. 16. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (KANSAS CITY DIST.) Location. Flood control improvements included in this project are on and along the Missouri River and several of its principle tributaries, in states comprising the Missouri River Basin. Existing project. The Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program for flood control and other purposes in Missouri River Basin provides for levees along Missouri River between Sioux City, Iowa, and the mouth, flood-protection works at certain municipalities, and reservoirs on main stem of Missouri River and on tributaries for control of flooding. (See Table 27-B for authorizing legislation and Table 27-I on Kansas City District projects included in Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin program.) See individual project reports. 17. POMME DE TERRE LAKE POMME DE TERRE RIVER, MO Location. The dam is on the main stem Pomme de Terre River, about 44 miles above the mouth in Hickory County, Missouri. The lake extends upstream into Polk County, Missouri. The site is about 4 miles south of Hermitage, Missouri, and 20 miles north of Bolivar, Missouri. Existing project. An earth and rockfill dam about 4,630 feet long constructed to about 155 feet above riverbed and a dike section on left abutment about 2,790 feet long, providing storage capacity of 650,000 acre-feet (407,000 for flood control and 243,000 for sedimentation and multi-purpose). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $14,946,784. Total Federal cost of project, including $329,140 area redevelopment and $2,089,529 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), is $17,365,453. Construction was initiated in January 1957, and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1961. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1997 was 14,625,700 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 18. POMONA LAKE, ONE HUNDRED TEN MILE CREEK, KS Location. The dam is on One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, a tributary of Marais des Cygnes (Osage) River, 7 miles above mouth of stream in Osage County, Kansas, about 8 miles northwest of Pomona, Kansas, and 34 miles upstream from Ottawa, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam 7,750 feet long constructed to an average height of about 85 feet above streambed, with gated-outlet works and an ungated chute-type spillway near left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 230,000 acre-feet (160,000 for flood control, 14,000 for sediment reserve, and 56,000 of multipurpose storage for water quality control, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $13,272,108. Total Federal cost of project, including $731,130 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $14,003,238. Construction began in July 1959, and the project was placed in operation in October 1963. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Pomona has water supply reimbursement under Water Supply Act of 1958 totaling $862,923. 27-6 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1997 was 3,466,700 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. 19. RATHBUN LAKE, CHARITON RIVER, IA Location. The damsite is on the Chariton River about 7 miles north of Centerville and 1 mile north of Rathbun, Appanoose County, Iowa. Existing project. An earthfill dam 10,600 feet long constructed to an elevation about 86 feet above valley floor, with gated-outlet works and an uncontrolled service chute with paved sill spillway about a mile upstream from left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 552,000 acrefeet (339,000 for flood control, 24,000 for sediment reserve and 189,000 of multipurpose storage for navigation, water quality control, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the project was $27,033,210. Total Federal cost of project, including $588,948 supplemental recreation development (Code 710), was $27,622,158. Construction of the project was initiated in September 1964 and completed in November 1969. The operating plan for this project was revised to reduce flood control releases during critical times of the year to allow local farmers better access during planting and harvesting and to facilitate field drainage and drying out. The revised plan has resulted in more frequent high pool elevations than anticipated, which has inundated roads and recreation facilities. A shoreline erosion study was accomplished; and a supplement to the master plan was approved, which resulted in relocation of recreation facilities and bank stabilization work to compensate for the higher lake levels. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1997 was 5,892,400 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included ordinary operation and maintenance. 20. SMITHVILLE LAKE, LITTLE PLATTE RIVER, MO Location. The damsite is on the Little Platte River about 1 mile northeast of Smithville and about 5 miles north of Kansas City, in Clay and Clinton Counties, Missouri. Existing project. Earthfill dam about 4,200 feet long and 95 feet high with an uncontrolled service spillway. A dike about 2,400 feet long crosses a saddle in the left abutment. Total reservoir storage capacity is 246,500 acre-feet (92,000 for flood control, 52,300 for sediment reserve, and 102,200 of multipurpose storage for water supply, water quality control, and recreation). Cost of constructing the project was $87,685,314. Construction was initiated in November 1973, and the project was placed in operation in March 1982. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applies. Reimbursement of $24,000,000 will be required for water supply storage in accordance with Water Supply Act of 1958, and reimbursement of $7,500,000 will be required for recreation development in accordance with Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Additional non-Federal contribution for recreation amounts to $737,000. All contracts for local cooperation were approved by the Secretary of the Army on November 27, 1972. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1997 was 7,376,500 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance and roof replacement on the visitor center. 21. TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, BIG BLUE RIVER, KS Location. The dam is on the main stem of the Big Blue River, about 12 miles above the stream mouth in Riley and Pottawatomie Counties, Kansas. Site is about 5 miles north of Manhattan, Kansas. Existing project. An earth and rock dam 7,500 feet long and 157 feet high. Total reservoir storage capacity is 2,346,000 acre-feet (1,933,000 for flood control, 228,000 for sediment reserve and 185,000 for multipurpose storage, for low-flow regulation, navigation, and recreation). Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $80,051,031. Total Federal cost of project, including $533,048 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $80,584,079. Construction began in October 1952. Project was placed in operation in July 1962. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations during fiscal year. Tuttle Creek Lake experienced record flooding in 1993 at the same time as Milford Lake. Prolonged flows (for the first time in the project's history) through the spillway produced a new project visitor attraction, the Tuttle Creek "Grand Canyon." Repairs were completed with regular operation and maintenance funds. Visitation for FY 1997 was 2,493,900 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activities included ordinary operation and maintenance, completion of intake tower/service bridge painting, and replacement of emergency gate guides. 22. WILSON LAKE, SALINE RIVER, KS Location. The dam is on the Saline River about 130 miles above its mouth, near the eastern edge of Russell County, Kansas, about 50 miles west of Salina, 10 miles north of Wilson, and 20 miles east of Russell, Kansas. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 5,600 feet long and 160 feet high with a gated-outlet works, chute spillway, storage capacity is 776,000 acre-feet (511,000 for flood control, 40,000 for sediment reserve and 225,000 multipurpose storage for irrigation, navigation, and lowflow regulation). Initial cost of constructing the project was $20,015,023. Total Federal cost of project, including $448,344 supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $20,463,367. Construction began in April 1961, and the project was placed in operation in December 1964. 27-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1997 was 1,953,600 visitor hours. Maintenance: Activity included ordinary operation and maintenance. 23. SCHEDULING OF FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Under sections 7 and 9, 1944 Flood Control Act, the Corps is responsible for detailed scheduling of operations concerning storage capacity reserved for or assigned to flood control in reservoirs constructed by Bureau of Reclamation as well as those constructed by the Corps. 24. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, P.L. 738, and subsequent acts require local interests to furnish assurances that they will maintain and operate certain local protection projects after completion in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. District Engineers are responsible for administration of these regulations within boundaries of their respective district. (See Table 27-J on inspection of completed flood control projects.) Multiple Purpose Projects Including Power 25. HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OSAGE RIVER, MO Location. The damsite is on the main stem of the Osage River about 1.5 miles northwest of Warsaw, Benton County, Missouri. Reservoir extends into Bates, Henry, Hickory, St. Clair, and Vernon Counties, Missouri. Existing project. An earthfill dam about 5,000 feet long constructed to an average height of about 96 feet above streambed, including a gate-controlled overfall spillway and a power installation consisting of six inclined pumpgenerating units with a combined generating capability of 160,000 kilowatts. Total reservoir storage capacity is 5,202,000 acre-feet (3,918,000 for flood control, 244,000 for sediment reserve, and 1,040,000 multipurpose storage for power, low-flow regulation, and recreation). The operating purposes of the project are flood control, hydroelectric power, water supply, recreation, and fish and wildlife. Public Law 91-267, approved May 26, 1970, authorized a change in project name from Kaysinger Bluff Dam and Reservoir, Osage River Basin, Missouri, to the Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir. Estimated cost (1997) through construction of the project is $550,909,900. Construction of relocated Missouri Highway M-13 was initiated September 1964 and completed May 1966. Construction of the dam and reservoir was initiated in October 1964. The project was operational for flood control in October 1979, and multipurpose pool was reached in November 1979. The first power unit was placed on line on December 22, 1979. Subsequent problems with the turbine bearings required remedial design on the bearings. Restricted commercial power production began in April 1982. Through September 1997, power generation totaled 4,506,126,000 kilowatt hours. Of the gross income from the sale of power by Southwestern Power Administration, $103,532,349 was allocated to the Corps of Engineers for project power operating costs, interest, and investment recovery. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operation during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1997 was 13,955,900 visitor hours. Project is complete. During FY 1997, 307,353,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power were generated. Maintenance activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance, continuation of turbine repair and, payment to City of Clinton for relocation of sewer facilities. 26. STOCKTON LAKE, SAC RIVER, MO Location. The damsite is on the Sac River about 49.5 miles above its confluence with the Osage River, and about 1 mile east of Stockton, Cedar County, Missouri. The lake extends into Dade and Polk Counties. Existing project. A rock-shell dam with impervious core about 5,100 feet long constructed to an average height of about 128 feet, with a gated overfall spillway and a 45,200-kilowatt power installation. Total reservoir storage capacity is 1,674,000 acre-feet (774,000 for flood control, 25,000 for sediment reserve and 875,000 multipurpose storage for power and recreation). The authorized project purposes are flood control, hydroelectric power, water quality, water supply, recreation, and fish and wildlife. Initial cost of constructing the completed project was $75,715,300. Cost of the project, including $3,758,000 for downstream channel work and $502,057 for supplemental recreational development (Code 710), was $79,975,357. Construction was initiated in October 1963, and the project was placed in operation in December 1969. Power operation problems were encountered with the initial operation in March 1973 because the downstream channel did not have the capacity which earlier observations and computations indicated. As a result, it has been necessary to restrict the power operation to about the 30,000 kilowatt level. Right-of-way for construction of a channel cutoff and bridge at Horseshoe Bend were acquired, and construction completed. Sloughing easements downstream to Caplinger Mills were acquired. Completion assured downstream channel capacity to Caplinger Mills of 8,000 c.f.s. for powerplant operation. Discharge in this range will accommodate power operations at a 39,500-kilowatt level. Through September 1997, power generation totaled 1,553,658,000 kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from the sale of power by Southwestern Power Administration, $30,124,986 was allocated to the Corps of Engineers for project operating costs, interest, and investment recovery. 27-8 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Visitation for FY 1997 was 7,429,700 visitor hours. The project is complete and in operational status. During FY 1997, 67,602,000 kilowatt- hours of electrical power were generated. Maintenance: Activities consisted of ordinary operation and maintenance. WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITIES 27. CONTINUING AUTHORITIES Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Sec. 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Cong., June 30, 1948, as amended). Each project selected must be complete in itself, economically and environmentally justified, and limited to a Federal cost of not more than $5 million. The local sponsoring agency must agree to provide without cost to the Department of the Army, all lands, easements, and rightsof- way, including highway, highway bridge, and utility relocations and alterations; hold and save the Department of the Army free from damages; maintain and operate the project after completion; assume all project costs in excess of the Federal cost limit; and prevent future encroachments on improved channels. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 requires the non-Federal sponsors of Section 205 projects to pay 50 percent of all feasibility study costs over $100,000. For structural flood control projects, the sponsor must pay in cash during the construction at least 5 percent of the construction cost. The sponsor's cash and other contributions must equal 35 percent of the total construction cost, but will not be required to exceed 50 percent. There were no Section 205 projects under construction in Fiscal Year 1997. See Table K for expenditures under Section 205 during Fiscal Year 1997. Emergency Streambank Protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong., July 24, 1946) as amended. Each project selected must be complete in itself, engineering feasible, economically justifiable, environmentally acceptable, and limited to a Federal statutory cost of not more than $1,000,000. The local sponsoring entity must agree to provide without cost to the Department of the Army, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including highway, highway bridge, and utility relocations and alterations required for project construction; provide over the period of construction, an amount equal to not less than 35 percent or more than 50 percent of total project cost, at least 5 percent of which will be cash; operate, maintain, repair, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion; hold and save the Department of the Army free from damages arising from the construction, operation, and maintenance of the completed project; and assume all project costs in excess of the Federal statutory cost limit. Construction was completed on three projects in FY 1997 that will be financially completed in FY 1998, as follows: One Hundred Two River, Nodaway County, MO, Hopkins Bridge - Project was completed in November 1996 and was turned over to the sponsor in February 1997. One Hundred Two River, Pickering, MO, Nodaway County Bridge - Project was completed in November 1996 and was turned over to the sponsor in February 1997. Osage River, City of Lake Ozark, MO, Sewermain - Project was completed in October 1996 and was turned over to the sponsor in January 1997. See Table 27-K for Emergency Streambank Protection expenditures during FY 1997. Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment (Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 662, 99th Cong., November 17, 1986). Section 1135 authorizes review of the operation of completed water resources projects to determine need for modifications for the purpose of improving environmental quality. No projects were completed in FY 1997. See Table 27-K for Section 1135 studies status and expenditures for FY 1997. 28. EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTIVITIES A. Disaster Preparedness Program. The Disaster Preparedness Program (DPP) involves planning, training, inspection, supplies and equipment, and personnel. Planning activities involve development of District response and recovery plans in support of natural disasters. Current plans within the District include the District's Response Plan, Emergency Operations Center Plan, Emergency Alert and Dismissal Plan, Emergency Operations and Disaster Assistance - Deployment Plan, as well as the District Corrective Action Plan. Training activities to support disaster preparedness this year included both internal District employee training on maintaining flood fighting expertise and the Corps' role under the Federal Response Plan as well as training and conferences with State and local officials. During this FY in-house District training in preparation for potential flood fighting efforts was conducted during the Spring 1997. This training proved to be worthwhile, since the District responded to one flood event during April 1997. This flood event resulted in three levee units requesting rehabilitation assistance due to damages sustained during these flood events. Disaster preparedness includes maintaining the necessary supplies and equipment to support disaster response. To support flood fighting efforts and technical assistance to the state and local officials, an inventory is maintained of over 1.5 million sandbags and over 40 pumps for flood fighting. 27-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 B. Public Law 84-99. Rehabilitation of Flood Control Works. The bulk of the District's efforts during this FY have continued to focus on levee rehabilitation following flood events over the past four years. C. Catastrophic Disaster Response Planning. New Madrid Seismic Zone Earthquake Planning. In accordance with The Federal Response Plan and USACE response planning guidance, the Kansas City District has responsibility for overall coordination for Corps of Engineers support to the state of Missouri. This past year the Kansas City District has actively participated in the development of a Corps of Engineers catastrophic disaster response plan for the New Madrid Seismic Zone (NMSZ). The NMSZ is an earthquake zone that could potenitally cause a disaster of catastrophic proportions with national security implications. The deliberate planning process is being used to integrate the response and recovery phases of a NMSZ event for all impacted Corps districts and divisions within the NMSZ. General Investigations 29. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS Fiscal year 1997 costs totaled $1,665,442 for all General Investigations activities. See Table 27-L which covers Surveys, Collection and Study of Basic Data and Preconstruction Engineering and Design expenditures in FY 1997. Other Activities 30. MISSISSIPPI RIVER MAIN STEM MODEL DEVELOPMENT FY 1997 activities of Kansas City District (KCD) for the Mississippi Basin Model System (MBMS) included participation in graphical user interface development; installation of graphical user interface and the UNET model on SUN Workstation in KCD water control; UNET model maintenance and development; support of UNET computer program source code maintenance; UNET model geometry and data files forwarded to Missouri River Region Reservoir Control Center; coordination with Corps districts, HEC, CRREL, and other Corps offices involved in the project; data acquisition on the Kansas River; and acquisition of Scientific Assessment and Strategy Team survey data of the Missouri River. The KCD Appendix for MBMS Final Report, "Mississippi Basin Model System Development and Application" was written, and other information was submitted as requested for the report. 31. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM FY 1997 expenditures of $174,065 provided for activities required for local and national preparedness. 32. MISSOURI RIVER BASIN COLLABORATIVE WATER RESOURCES, PLANNING/ PARTNERING PROCESS Missouri River Basin Association and the Corps will manage and facilitate the process of collaboration for some limited studies. The collaborative effort allows input from the states, tribes, and Federal agencies economic and environmental interest groups and the general public on both the operation issues, i.e. Master Manual, and nonoperational issues. In addition, the collaborative process could address recreation industry development, ecosystem management, streambank erosion, project mitigation, structural changes for endangered species, environmental monitoring tribal water rights, tribal cultural rights, and support to navigation and agriculture. 33. REGULATORY PROGRAM Statutes. The Corps of Engineers is charged with protecting the public interest in all waters of the United States, including wetlands. This is accomplished through a Department of the Army permit program pursuant to � 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 and � 404 of the Clean Water Act. Operations during Fiscal Year 1997. Kansas City District completed 2,186 permit actions during the year. Of the 59 violations reported and evaluated this year, plus some carried over from last year, 63 were resolved by permits or voluntary restoration. Special projects or emphases during the year included reviewing all commercial dredgers on the Kansas River (18 sites); continued monitoring of impacts to endangered species from 7 permits issued for gravel excavation on the Neosho River; continuing substantial coordination of the highly controversial South Lawrence Trafficway in Kanas and Page Avenue in Missouri; development of a proposed general permit for dead tree removal at Harry S. Truman Lake, and a programmatic general permit at the Lake of the Ozarks. Fiscal Year 1997 costs totaled $2,579,985 for all regulatory activities. See Table M which shows expenditures for Permit Evaluation, Enforcement, and Studies. 27-10 TABLE 27-A KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sept. 30, 1997 1. Missouri River, Sioux City, IA to Mouth (Rulo, NE, to Mouth) (Federal Funds) Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 2. Missouri River Fish & Wildlife Mitigation, IA, NE, KS & MO 3. Blue River Basin Kansas City, MO 4. Blue River Channel Kansas City, MO (Federal Funds) Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 5. Brush Creek, Kansas City, MO (Federal Funds) Contributed Funds Authorized Project Expanded Project" Consolidated Summary 6. Clinton Lake, Wakarusa River, KS 7. Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE 8. Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - -- $237,942,190' - - - - 237,942,190' 9,891,000 5,491,000 5,418,000 4,370,000 327,066,7742 10,419,287 5,185,248 5,460,049 5,006,345 326,494,729 - - - - 816,190 - - -- 816,190 --- - 22,642 --- - 22,642 - - -- 238,758,380' - - -- 238,758,380' 9,891,000 5,491,000 5,418,000 4,370,000 327,089,4162 10,419,287 5,185,248 5,460,049 5,006,345 326,517,370 1,159,000 4,991,000 2,648,000 1,734,000 2,894,174 3,082,885 4,503,381 1,860,790 7,000 6,914 312,000 309,974 15,686,000 15,638,628 319,000 316,888 4,155,000 2,807,000 9,517,000 7,623,000 91,762,171 1,446,862 1,772,387 13,672,495 7,598,503 91,734,417 - 30,891 7,035,000 121,085 32,887 1,611,274 4,155,000 3,137,891 16,552,000 1,567,947 1,805,274 15,283,769 4,480,000 1,711,000 4,016,538 2,150,100 684,077 1,350,000 3,350,444 5,655 704,522 5,830,000 1,711,000 8,051,059 2,860,277 1,347,400 1,409,000 1,347,400 1,397,900 1,423,300 1,534,000 1,377,918 1,563,550 628,000 641,929 27-11 730,000 730,000 -50,000 -78,417 60,000 -233,000 96,569 -283,000 78,152 1,597,981 7,623,000 9,196,484 176,000 196,529 10,455 -35,482 176,000 171,502 1,421,000 1,374,000 1,414,590 1,391,356 1,529,000 1,477,000 1,538,711 1,449,128 1,333,000 1,128,655 774,000 978,231 7,738,041 3,511,713 99,500,212 95,246,130 14,390,000 14,353,555 1,342,000 1,225,767 6,429,000 5,933,918 22,161,000 21,513,240h 57,415,433 57,415,433 22,673,000 22,672,846 47,111,926 47,111,926 32,582,984 32,548,991 1,017,623 1,017,623 64,161,400 64,161,400 11,593,870 11,593,756 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 27-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sept. 30, 1997 9. Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS 10. Little Blue River Lakes, Little Blue River, MO 11. Long Branch Lake Little Chariton River, MO Contributed Funds Consolidated Summary 12. Melvern Lake Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS 13. Milford Lake, Republican River, KS 14. Missouri River Levee System IA, NE, KS and MO 15. Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS 17. Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO 18. Pomona Lake, One Hundred Ten Mile Creek, KS 19. Rathbun Lake, Chariton River, IA New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,612,400 1,189,700 1,587,801 1,214,524 739,000 755,000 739,000 749,555 859,000 778,000 720,321 910,044 - 31,380 - 41,905 - 31,380 - 41,905 1,495,100 1,782,000 1,482,197 1,799,057 1,748,000 1,524,000 1,615,900 1,644,406 898,000 874,775 722,000 724,290 ' 44,707 44,707 715,000 741,235 736,000 697,100 1,348 1,348 1,598,000 1,623,000 1,596,101 1,606,853 $12,577,227 12,577,227" 31,852,312 31,823,453 140,809,200 140,809,200'" 8,203,784 8,201,349 18,216,177 18,216,177 10,315,112 10,271,867 1,139,455 1,139,3321' 19,355,632 19,355,509 37,436,530 37,436,530 28,009,154 27,988,662 - - - - 49,566,492 - - - - 49,566,492 2,363,500 1,983,000 2,091,500 4,594,000 38,479,940 1,939,775 2,318,324 2,193,483 4,413,833' 38,289,902 275,000 291,109 421,000 308,814 115,000 316,089 298,000 249,182 1,493,170 1,792,000 1,629,000 1,757,000 1,513,056 1,823,555 1,627,100 1,758,054 1,602,360 2,227,000 1,823,000 1,849,000 1,561,307 2,273,500 1,805,557 1,850,621 1,523,150 2,127,500 1,509,751 2,153,924 5,306,000 2,369,000 4,787,486 2,825,988 2,173,000 1,704,000 2,171,733 1,698,224 65,378,851 65,313,749 49,095,918 49,095,918 36,049,343 36,046,052 17,365,452 17,365,452 34,261,461 34,245,639 14,003,238 14,003,238 30,722,070 30,714,027 27,622,159 27,622.159 2,062,500 1,928,000 39,784,211 2,126,882 1,948,639 39,776,688 27-12 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sept. 30, 1997 20. Smithville Lake, Little Platte River, MO 21. Tuttle Creek Lake Big Blue River, KS 22. Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS 23. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 24. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 25. Harry S. Truman Dam & Reservoir Osage River, MO 26. Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO 30. Mississippi River Main Stem Model Development 31. National Emergency Preparedness Program 32. Missouri River Basin Collaborative Effort New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost $87,685,314 87,685,314 984,000 1,171,400 951,051 1,204,270 1,013,000 920,636 969,000 16,088,848 1,051,859 16,079,264 - - -- 80,584,079 S- - - 80,584,079 1,866,000 1,813,800 3,196,000 3,306,000 39,620,232 1,662,050 1,912,339 3,033,190 3,448,551 39,482,079 - - -- 20,463,367 - - - - 20,463,367 1,490,500 1,507,600 1,385,000 1,382,000 1,867,355 1,518,460 1,380,235 1,341,516 247,000 247,000 397,000 397,000 300,000 1,485,853 9,236,000 9,572,781 266,000 266,000 531,000 531,000 2,900,000 2,350,806 8,027,000 8,039,973 282,000 282,000 576,000 576,000 713,442 8,200,000 8,235,466 28,113,604 28,067,775 308,000 56,604,452 308,000 56,604,452 521,000 517,635 8,592,431 8,589,066 - 550,909,000 -935 550,908,965 7,833,000 108,396,162 7,650,016 108,144,041 - 79,975,357 79,975,357 3,336,488 3,545,000 3,413,000 3,467,000 3,818,636 4,063,067 3,281,209 3,096,906 182,000 182,000 182,000 182,000 40,000 40,000 110,000 110,000 50,000 49,659 174,500 174,065 229,000 228,717 55,529,159 55,006,274 90,000 89,659 3,634,350 3,633,915 229,000 228,717 1. Includes $8,665,595 cost of new work for previous project. 2. Includes $738,109 for maintenance of previous project. 3. Includes funds appropriated under FY 1993 Emergency Flood Supplemental Appropriation, 96 3/7 3123: Missouri River, Rulo, NE to Mouth, $-40,000; and Milford Lake, KS, $40,000. 4. Includes funds expended under FY 1993 Emergency Flood Supplemental Appropriation, 96 3/7 3123: Missouri River, Rulo, NE to Mouth, $1,119,854; Milford Lake, KS $45,526; and Tuttle Creek Lake, KS $53,087. 5. Excludes $35,296 non-Federal contribution not required for authorized Blue River Channel project (Blue River Channel Mobay Chemical 1984-1987). 6. Corps is building Brush Creek Expanded Project requested by sponsor, City of Kansas City, MO, with all costs of betterments and enhancements not required by Authorized Project funded by sponsor. Excludes sponsor's contributions of $2,548,121 for Kansas City, MO, PED (FWKCM) 1987 through 1997; $2,159,888 for Park Features Design; $1,071,274 for Water Pollution Control during construction; and $1,729,155 for Public Works Department. 7. Excludes $118,805 non-Federal contribution not required for authorized Clinton Lake project (1973-1979). 8. Excludes cost of materials furnished Harlan County project without charge in the amount of $24,198. 9. Excludes cost of materials furnished Kanopolis Lake project without charge in the amount of $7,885. 10. Excludes $2,732,554 thru FY 1990 non-Federal contributions not required for authorized Little Blue River Lakes project. 11. Corrected total. Excludes $42,149 interest during construction at Long Branch Lake project, and $500,000 workin- kind. 27-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 27-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Mar. 3, 1925 Jan. 12, 1927 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 12, 1996 Dec. 31, 1970 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 28, 1990 Oct. 23, 1962 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 MISSOURI RIVER, SIOUX CITY, IA, TO MOUTH (RULO, NE, TO MOUTH) Project adopted for securing a permanent navigable channel of 6-foot depth from Kansas City, MO to mouth. Fixed upstream limit of improvement at upper end of Quindaro Bend (374.8 miles from mouth) and provided for dredging. For a minimum width of 200 feet and depth of 6 feet, with a reasonable additional width around bends, mouth to upper end of Quindaro Bend, Kansas City, MO. Appropriation of $12 million authorized for securing a 6-foot channel depth between Kansas City, MO, Quindaro Bend, and Sioux City, IA. Appropriation of $15 million additional authorized; additional allotments totaling $29,153,108 were made by Public Works Administration under provisions of National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933, and $9,669,791 allotted under provisions of Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935. Completion of improvement from mouth to Sioux City, IA. Securing a navigable channel of 9-foot depth and a minimum width of 300 feet. MISSOURI RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE MITIGATION MO, KS, IA, & NE Project for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project, MO, KS, IA, & NE: April 24, 1984, Report of Chief of Engineers, authorized at estimated cost of $51,900,000. BLUE RIVER BASIN, KANSAS CITY, MO Project for flood control along the left bank of the Blue River from U.S. Highway 71 upstream for a distance of about 1'/4 miles in Jackson County, MO, to the Bannister Federal Complex levee: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated Sept. 5, 1996, at a total cost of $17,082,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $12,043 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,039,000. BLUE RIVER CHANNEL, KANSAS CITY, MO Adopted plan for Blue River Basin and authorized $40,000,000 for initiation and partial accomplishment. BRUSH CREEK, KANSAS CITY, MO Project for flood control on Brush Creek, a tributary of the Blue River, Kansas City, MO, authorized at estimated total cost of $16,100,000. Modified to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct the project substantially in accordance with the Post Authorization Change Report, dated April 1989 (revised January 1990), at a total cost of $26,200,000. CLINTON LAKE, WAKARUSA RIVER, KS The project for the Kansas River, KS, NE, and CO is authorized at an estimated cost of $88,070,000. HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, NE Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. 27-14 2. 5. 6. 7. H. Doc. 1287, 61st Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 241-62. H. Doc. 463, 64th Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 585-68. H. Doc. 1120, 60th Cong., P.L. 560-70. P.L. 67-73 H.R.11781 P.L. 520-71 H. Doc. 238, 73d Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 409-73. H. Doc. 214, 76th Cong., (contains latest published map). P.L. 14-79. Title VI, Section 601(a), Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662. Title I, Section 101(a), Water Resources Development Act of 1996, P.L. 104-303. H. Doc. 91-332, 91st Cong. Sec. 401(a), Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662. Water Resources Development Act of 1990, P.L. 101-640. 1962 Flood Control Act S. Doc. 122, H. Doc. 578, 87th Cong., P.L. 87-874. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., P.L. 761. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; P.L. 77-228. TABLE 27-B (Continued) KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Dec. 22, 1944 Sep. 3 1954 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Aug. 13, 1968 Oct. 27, 1965 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Sep. 3, 1954 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. HILLSDALE LAKE, BIG BULL CREEK, KS The comprehensive plan for the Missouri River Basin, approved by the Act of June 28, 1938, and as amended and supplemented is further modified to include the project for flood protection on the Kansas River and tributaries. It is further modified to include the project for flood protection on the Osage River and tributaries. KANOPOLIS LAKE, SMOKY HILL RIVER, KS Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO Additional $38,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. LONG BRANCH LAKE, LITTLE CHARITON RIVER, MO The project for flood protection on the Chariton and Little Chariton Rivers and tributaries, IA and MO, is authorized at an estimated cost of $9,167,000. MELVERN LAKE, MARAIS DES CYGNES (OSAGE) RIVER, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. MILFORD LAKE, REPUBLICAN RIVER, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 for additional expenditure. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM, IA, NE, KS, AND MO Levees along both side of river from Sioux City to Kansas City. Extended project from Kansas City to the mouth and provided for increased protection. PERRY LAKE, DELAWARE RIVER, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (KANSAS CITY DIST.) Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. H. Doc. 475 and S. Docs. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534. P.L. 780, 83rd Cong., H. Doc. 549, 81st Cong. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 7th Cong., P.L. 761. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; P.L. 77-228. H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534. P.L. 90-483 (H. Doc. 169, 90th Cong. 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298, (H. Doc. 238, 89th Cong. H. Does. 642, 549', and 561, 81st Cong.; 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. H. Doc. 549', 81st Cong.; 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. H. Doc. 821, 76th Cong. P.L. 77-228. H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. H. Does. 642, 549', and 561, 81st Cong.; 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; P.L. 77-228. 27-15 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 27-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Section Date of in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Dec. 22, 1944 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 May 2, 1956 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 14, 1960 Dec. 30, 1963 Jun. 18, 1965 May 12, 1967 Aug. 13, 1968 Dec. 24, 1970 Dec. 23, 1971 Mar. 7, 1974 Jun. 28, 1938 Dec. 22, 1944 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Additional expenditure of $150 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional expenditure of $250 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 for additional expenditure. Modified general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin by deletion of construction of Red Willow Dam and Reservoir, NE, and addition of construction of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, KS. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Additional expenditure of $207 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional expenditure of $80 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and modified plan to include bank protection or rectification works below Garrison Dam. Additional $116 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional $20 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Additional $38,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. Change comprehensive plan name to Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program. Additional $101,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program. Additional $72,000,000 for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program. POMME DE TERRE LAKE, POMME DE TERRE RIVER, MO Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. POMONA LAKE, ONE HUNDRED TEN MILE CREEK, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. RATHBUN LAKE, CHARITON RIVER, IA Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong. H. Does. 642 and 549', 81st Cong.; 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. H. Doc. 409, 84th Cong. S. Doc. 91-1100, 91st Cong. S. Doc. 92-222, 92nd Cong. Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., P.L. 761. H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 and 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534. H. Does. 642, 549', and 561, 81st Cong.; 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. H. Doc. 549', 561, 81st Cong.; 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. H. Doc. 561, 81st Cong., 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. 27-16 17. 18. 19. TABLE 27-B (Continued) See Section Date of in Text Act KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized 20. Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 Dec. 22, 1944 Jul. 14, 1960' Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 23, 1962 SMITHVILLE LAKE, LITTLE PLATTE RIVER, MO The project for flood protection on the Platte River and tributaries, MO and IA, is authorized at an estimated cost of $26,889,000. TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, BIG BLUE RIVER, KS Adopted general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $9 million for initiation and partial accomplishment. Modified general comprehensive plan to include Harlan County Dam and Reservoir on Republican River, NE, other supplemental flood control works on upper Republican River, and authorized $7 million additional expenditure. Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. WILSON LAKE, SALINE RIVER, KS Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $200 million additional expenditure. Additional expenditure of $207 million for prosecution of general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin. HARRY S. TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OSAGE RIVER, MO Expanded general comprehennsive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. The Kaysinger Bluff Reservoir is hereby modified in accordance with recommendations of the Chief of Engineers in H. Doc. 578, 87th Cong., at an estimated additional cost of $43,245,000; provided, that nothing in this Act shall be construed as authorizing the acquisition of additional lands for the establishment of a national wildlife refuge at the reservoir. STOCKTON LAKE, SAC RIVER, MO Expanded general comprehensive plan for Missouri River Basin and authorized $217,710,000 additional expenditure. 1. Contains latest published maps of Missouri River. 2. Report of Chief of Engineers on justification of Wilson Dam and Reservoir, submitted in compliance with Public Law 505, 84th Congress, published as Senate Document 96, 86th Congress, was approved July 14, 1960 (Public Law 645). TABLE 27-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30. 1997 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Fort Leavenworth Bridge removal Complete 1965 270,393 Gasconade River, MO '" Complete 1931 139,003 85,077 1. Improvement, adequate for existing needs. Project for maintenance only. Curtailment of project in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. 2. Inactive portion of project deauthorized Jan. 1, 1990 in accordance with Section 1001(b)(1) of Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986 (P.L. 99-662). 27-17 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298 (H.Doc. 262, 89th Cong.) Flood Control Committee Doc. 1, 75th Cong., P.L. 761. H. Doc. 842, 76th Cong.; P.L. 77-228. H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 & 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 645. H. Doc. 475 and S. Does. 191 & 247, 78th Cong., P.L. 534. S. Doc. 96, 86th Cong., P.L. 645. H. Doc. 5491, 81st Cong.; 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. 1962 Flood Control Act, H. Doc. 578, 87th Cong., P.L. 87-874. H. Doc. 549', 81st Cong.; 83rd Cong., P.L. 780. 21. Documents 22. 25. 26. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 27-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30. 1997 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Abilene, KS Atchison, KS Barnard, KS' Bartley, NE Bedford, East Fork, 102 River, IA' Big Blue River, Seward, NE' Big Stranger Creek, KS' Blue River Basin, Overland Park, KS, Indian Creek Channel Modification' Braymer Lake, Shoak Creek, MO' Brookfield Lake, Yellow Creek, MO: Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, MO (1965 Act)' Chariton River, MO (1944 Act) East Muddy Creek, MO' Elk Creek, Clyde, KS' Fairbury, Little Blue River, NE Fort Scott Lake, Marmaton River, KS Frankfort, Black Vermillion River, KS Gypsum, Gypsum Creek, KS' Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, MO (Downstream Fish and Wildlife Mitigation) Indianola, NE Kansas City, Kansas River, KS (62 Mod) Kansas Citys on MO and KS Rivers, MO and KS Lawrence, Kansas River, KS Little Blue River Channel Improvement, Little Blue River, MO Lower Grand River, MO:' Manhattan, Kansas River, KS Mercer Lake, Weldon River, MO:' Missouri River at New Haven, MO (Sec 212, 1950 Act) Osawatomie, Pottawatomie Creek, KS Ottawa, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO;:' Perry Lake Area (Road Improvements), KS Platte River, MO, Channel Improvement Rathbun Lake Fish Hatchery Salina, Smoky Hill River, KS Seward, NE' Smithville Channel, Little Platte River, MO Stonehouse Creek, Jefferson Co., KS' Topeka, Kansas River, KS Trenton Lake, Thompson River, MO' Trimble Wildlife Area, Smithville Lake, MO Upper Grand River, MO' 1. Authorized by the Chief of Engineers under Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. 2. Required non-Federal contributions $129,680. 3. Grand River Basin reconnaissance study (authorized by resolution of Committee on Public Works and Transportation, U.S. House of Representatives on July 3, 1987) reviewed and updated costs for these projects authorized in the Flood Control Act of 1965, and found no economically feasible plan. 4. Inactive units Little Chariton River (East and Middle Fork) and Mussell Fork were deauthorized Jan. 1, 1990 by Section 1001(b)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662. Construction cost includes $481,106 cost of completed Shoal Creek Unit and $211,600 cost of deauthorized Little Chariton River and Mussell Fork units. 5. Includes $130,841 non-Federal contributions. 6. Inactive units Kansas Avenue Bridge and Approach, and Lower Argentine Units were deauthorized July 9, 1995 in accordance with Section 1001(b)(2) of WRDA of 1986, P.L. 99- 662. Construction cost above includes $67,500 for deauthorized Bridge and Approach Unit; does not include $1,181,000 non- Federal contributions. 7. Includes $619,787 non-Federal contributions for work desired by local interests, but not required under the project. The project as a whole is complete except for Turkey Creek facilities in Central Industrial District Unit. 8. Includes $153,377 non-Federal contributions. 9. Pattonsburg Lake Highway Relocation and Town Relocation portions of the project were deauthorized Jan. 1, 1990 in accordance with Section 1001(b)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662. 27-18 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Inactive Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Inactive Completed Inactive 1961 1973 1953 1974 1994 1966 1976 1977 1973 1966 1984 1973 1976 1966 1984 1950 1984 1980 1985 1989 1966 1967 1976 1973 1966 1976 1982 1973 1975 1967 1973 1972 1974 1966 1990 1966 1,099,350 4,099,590 127,860 118,269 652,414 126,887 337,131 269,2882 451,400 692,706 8,052,990 989,015 726,966 757,500 1,271,025 2,782,7936 67,275 25,010,500" 42,434,197 8,773,488 25,530,083 2,488,585 432,245 139,883 2,036,624 4,462,661 5,315,168 222,193 700,000 3,878,668 126,887 6,896 246,995 21,174,593 1,570,000 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report. Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Date Project Report For Date and Authority Expended Expended Deauthorized Arlington Lake, MO Beatrice, Big Blue River, NE Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, MO (1965 Act) - Inactive Units Little Chariton River (East and Middle Fork) and Mussell Fork Units only' Dry Fork and East Fork Lakes, Fishing River, MO Garnett Lake, Pottawatomie Creek, KS Gasconade River Navigation, MO Grove Lake, Soldier Creek, KS Hackleman Corners Lake, Cedar Creek, MO Hays, Big Creek, KS Indian Lake, Blue River, KS Kansas City, Kansas River, KS (62 Mod)- Inactive Units Kansas Avenue Bridge Approach, and Lower Argentine Units Only Kansas River Navigation Marysville, KS Melvern Lake and Pomona Lake (Road Improvements) KS (1974 Act) Merriam, Turkey Creek, KS Mill Lake, Blue River, MO Missouri River Levee System, IA, KS, MO, and NE Deauthorized by Section 1002 Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662, Section 1002: Units R402; R393-395; and R414 Deauthorized in accordance with WRDA Section 1001(b)(1): Units L36; R42; L51; R55-59-61; L68-92; R70; L78; R87; L94; L99; L103; R104; R107; R112; L117; L121; L124; L129; L134; L137-139; L145; R150; L154; L157; R161; L164; R169; L175; R179-184; L191-196; L205; L217; R226; R240; R251; L256; R259; L263-270; R272; R284; R302; R336; L353; L357; R361; L362; L392; L419-426; L435; R512-513, Section III Onaga Lake, Vermillion Creek, KS 1948 Flood Control Act approved June 28, 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act approved August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Control Act approved December 22, 1944 1965 Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 1977 1965 Flood Control Act P.L. 89-298 (H. Doc. 238, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) 1974 1965 Flood Control Act P.L. 89-298 (H. Doc. 281, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) 1973 Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 1931 Curtailment of project in H. Doc. 467, 69th Cong. 1928 1977 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 122, 87th Cong. 2d sess.) Authorized by Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 1974 Flood Control Act of 1965 approved October 27, 1965 1976 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332, 91st Cong., 2d sess.) 1984 1962 Flood Control Act, S. Doc. 122, 87th Cong., P.L. 87-874 1980 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298, Sec. 201 Flood Control Act of September 3, 1954 Water Resources Development Act of 1974, Section 17 1970 Flood Control Act approved September 3, 1954 1971 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332, 91st Cong., 2d sess.) Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, P.L. 228, 77th Cong. Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, P.L. 228, 77th Cong. Flood Control Act of 1962, October 23, 1962 (P.L. 87-874) 27-19 $8,651 16,317 211,600 51,989 71,466 1,754,019 499,200 127,297 67,500' 259,900 133,682 39,708 57,5000 1,631,700 2,178,261 - Aug. 5, 1977 - May 6, 1981 Jan. 1, 1990 Jan. 1, 1990 Nov. 17, 1986 Jan. 1, 1990 Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 5, 1997 Jan. 18, 1978 - Nov. 17, 1986 Jul. 9, 1995 - Nov. 17, 1986 Jan. 1967 Jan. 1, 1990 Nov. 27, 1973 Nov. 17, 1986 - Nov. 17, 1986 - Jan. 1, 1990 Nov. 17, 1986 TABLE 27-G REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 27-G (Continued) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Funds Funds Date Project Report For Date and Authority Expended Expended Deauthorized Osage River Navigation, MO, 1952 Original lock and dam authorized lock and dam Mar. 3, 1899; improvement autho- $658,0766 - Jan. 1, 1990 rized in 1928; placed in standby status Jul. 1952 and operation and maintenance discontinued. Pattonsburg Lake, Grand River, MO' I-35 Highway Relocation 1976 1965 Flood Control Act, P.L. 89-298 393,623 - Jan. 1, 1990 Town Relocation 1976 (H. Doc. 241, 89th Cong., 1st sess.) 91,929 - Jan. 1, 1990 Pioneer Lake, KS 1952 Flood Control Act approved June 28, 95,692 - Aug. 5, 1977 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act of August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Control Act approved December 22, 1944. Pomme de Terre Lake 1954 Flood Control Act of 1954 - Nov. 17, 1986 (Power Addition), MO 1974 (H. Doc. 549, 81st Cong., 2d sess.) Richland Lake, MO 1948 Flood Control Act approved June 28, 8,548 - Aug. 5, 1977 1938, as modified by Flood Control Act approved August 18, 1941, and expanded by Flood Control Act approved December 2, 1944. Tomahawk Lake, 1976 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332, 77,189 - Nov. 17, 1986 Blue River, KS 91st Cong., 2d sess.) Tuttle Creek Lake, KS (Road 1977 Sec. 18 of Water Resources 3,000 - Nov. 17, 1986 Improvement - 1974 Mod.) Development Act of 1974 Tuttle Creek Lake, KS - Water Resources Development Act of - Jan. 1, 1990 Road and Bridge (1976 Act) 1976, Section 189, P.L. 94-587 Wolf-Coffee Lake, Blue River, 1976 1970 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 332, 1,095,020 - Nov. 17, 1986 KS 91st Cong., 2d sess.) 1. For completed Shoal Creek unit of Chariton-Little Chariton Basin, MO, see Table 27-E. 2. For completed project see Table 27-C. Deauthorized under Sec. 1001(b)(1) WRDA of 1986, P.L. 99-662. 3. Hays, Lincoln Draw, KS, Section 205 feasibility study terminated in March 1991 due to lack of identifiable project that would meet dam safety concerns. 4. For completed Argentine, Amourdale, and Central Industrial Units of project, see Table 27-E. 5. Incorrectly shown as R263-270 in the deauthorization act. 6. Option and maintenance costs $850,495. Deauthorized under Sec. 1001(b)(1) of WRDA, P.L. 99-662. 7. Pattonsburg Lake portion of project is inactive. See Table 27-E. 27-20 TABLE 27-H KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM (See Section 13 of Text) Miles of Unit Levee Status R 512-513 Richardson Co. D. D. No. 7 R 500 Iowa Point D. D. No. 4 Kimsey Holly Creek L 497 Forest City L. D. L488 Holt Co. D. D. No. 7 R 482 Burr Oak D. D. No. 3 L 476 Amazonia L. D. R 460-471 Elwood-Gladden L. D. L 455 S. St. Joseph L. D. L 443-448 Halls L. D. R 440 Atchison & Doniphan Co. D. D. L 408 Farley-Beverly D. D. L 400 Waldron L. D. L 385 Riverside-Quindaro D. D. R 351 Atherton L. D. L 330-345 Orrick L. D. L 319-325 Henrietta-Crooked River D. D. L 246 Brunswick-Dalton D. D. L 142 L 15 North County L. D. Remaining units 19.1 4.1 4.4 16.0 11.5 8.2 10.8 13.8 15.6 17.3 10.7 12.2 7.6 6.5 15.9 43.4 35.0 20.0 6.0 40.0 Complete - 1958 Complete - 1954 Complete - 1970 Complete - 1962 Complete - 1955 Complete - 1954 Complete - 1956 Complete - 1968 Complete - 1967 Complete - 1957 Complete - 1959 Complete (Levee raise modification) - 1972 Complete - 1957 Planning underway Complete - 1966 Inactive Inactive Complete - 1983 Active Active Detailed planning not initiated 27-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 27-I KANSAS CITY DISTRICT PROJECTS INCLUDED IN PICK-SLOAN MISSOURI BASIN PROGRAM (See Section 16 of Text) Federal Non-Federal Non-Federal Project Status' Cost2 Cost' Reimbursable4 Abilene, Smoky Hill River, KS C $1,099,350 $287,000 Bartley, Republican River, NE C 118,269 9,500 Fort Scott Lake, Marmaton River, KS I 71,186,000 19,314,000 $44,800,000 Garnett Lake, Pottawatomie Creek, KS D 71,466 - Harlan County Lake, Republican River, NE C 48,129,549 - Harry S. Truman Dam and Reservoir, Osage River, MO C 550,908,965 - 138,385,000" Hillsdale Lake, Big Bull Creek, KS C 64,161,400 - 21,145,338 Indianola, Republican River, NE C 67,275 7,592 Kanopolis Lake, Smoky Hill River, KS C 12,577,227 - Lawrence, Kansas River, KS C 8,620,111 2,130,000 Manhattan, Kansas River, KS C 2,488,585 265,000 Melvern Lake, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS C 37,436,530 - 7,131,834' Melvern Lake and Pomona Lake (Road Improvement), KS (1974 Authorization) D - Milford Lake, Republican River, KS C 49,566,492 - 12,162,134 Missouri River Levee System, Rulo to the Mouth" A 93,553,000 35,265,000 Osawatomie, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS C 2,036,624 348,300 Ottawa, Osage (Marais des Cygnes) River, KS C 4,462,661 876,000 Perry Lake, Delaware River, KS C 49,095,918 - 8,551,805 Pomme de Terre Lake, Pomme de Terre River, MO C 17,365,453 - Pomona Lake, Osage River Basin, KS C 14,003,238 - 862,923' Salina, Smoky Hill River, KS C 3,878,668 1,960,000 Stockton Lake, Sac River, MO C 79,975,357 - 24,206,593' Topeka, Kansas River, KS C 21,174,593 10,383,492 Tuttle Creek Lake, Big Blue River, KS C 80,584,079 - 2,333,916' Tuttle Creek Lake, KS - Road and Bridge (1976 Act) D Tuttle Creek Lake (Road Improvement), KS (1974 Modification) D 3,000 Wilson Lake, Saline River, KS C 20,463,367 - 1. Status: A = Active; C = Completed; D = Deauthorized; 7. In accordance with the Memorandum of Understanding I = Inactive. between the State of Kansas and the Dept. of the Army dated 2. Actual appropriations for completed and deauthorized 1985, payment in full of $7,131,834 for 50,000 acre-feet of water projects; estimated appropriation requirements for active and supply was made in March 1995. inactive projects. 8. Active portion of project. Currently estimated cost 3. Estimated cost during construction. (1997): Deferred portion of project - $46,753,000 Federal and 4. Future reimbursement of initial Federal cost. $4,336,000 non-Federal; Inactive portion of project - 5. Estimated reimbursement costs allocated to water $104,791,000 Federal and $11,296,000 non-Federal. Actual cost supply. of deauthorized units (1990) is $1,689,200 Federal. 6. Estimated reimbursement costs allocated to power. 9. Includes $22,116,864 estimated reimbursement costs allocated to power, and $2,089,729 estimated reimbursement costs allocated to water supply. TABLE 27-J INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 24 of Text) Location Month Inspected Missouri River Main Stem Missouri River Levees: R512-513, R500, Kimsey Holly Creek, L497, L488, R482, L476, R460-471, L455, L443-448, R440, L408, L400 and R351, L246 Kansas Citys, Missouri and Kansas: Argentine, Atchison, Armourdale, Birmingham, CID (MO & KS), East Bottoms, Fairfax-Jersey Creek, North Kansas City Units, and GSA Federal Complex Osage River. Kansas and Missouri Ottawa, KS Osawatomie, KS Kansas River and Minor Tributaries Lawrence, KS; Topeka, KS; Auburndale, North Topeka, Oakland, Soldier Creek, South Topeka, and Waterworks Units Smoky Hill, Saline, and Solomon Rivers Abilene, KS 27-22 Mar and Apr 97 May 97 Aug 97 Aug 97 Apr 97 Jun 97 KANSAS CITY, MO, DISTRICT TABLE 27-K WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITIES (See Section 27 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Status' Cost FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES Continuing Authorities Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, June 30, 1948, as Amended Section 205 Coordination Account - $6,423 Mitchell and Pearson Creeks, Waynesville, MO F 0 TOTAL FOR COORDINATION AND ONE ACTIVE PROJECT: $6,423 TERMINATED (1) Cross Creek, Rossville, KS 0 (2) Mill Creek, Olathe, KS -32,820 TOTAL ALL SECTION 205 ACTIVITIES $-26,397 Emergency Streambank Protection - Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, July 24, 1946, as Amended Section 14 Coordination Account - $9,985 Delaware River Water Intake, Kickapoo Reservation, KS C 92,973 East Fork Big Creek, Bethany, MO D 8,618 Grand River, Chariton County, MO, Salt Creek Bridge C 31,251 Marmaton River, Vernon County, MO C 16,981 Muddy Creek, Grundy County, MO D 2,489 One Hundred Two River, Nodaway County, MO, Hopkins Bridge 0 78,228 One Hundred Two River, Pickering, MO, Nodaway County Bridge 0 49,020 Osage River, City of Lake Ozark, MO, Sewermain 0 196,569 West Creek, Topeka, KS D 3,316 West Fork, Grand River, Route H Bridge, Gentry County, MO D 2,102 TOTAL FOR COORDINATION AND 11 ACTIVE PROJECTS: 491,532 One Section 14 project was terminated in FY 1997. 258 TOTAL ALL SECTION 14 PROJECTS $491,790 Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment Section 1135, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 662, 99th Congress, November 17, 1986 Coordination Account Funds - $3,990 Initial Appraisals, General I 1,456 Blue Springs Lake Habitat, MO D 0 Milford Lake Habitat Restoration, KS F 100,166 Rathbun Lake Habitat Restoration, IA P&S 72603 TOTAL ACTIVE SECTION 1135 $178,215 1,147 TERMINATED Missouri River Levee System, Unit L246, Chariton County, MO $179,362 TOTAL ALL SECTION 1135 ACTIVITIES 1. Status: I = Initial; D = Planning and Design Analysis; F = Feasibility; P = P&S; C = Construction; O = Operational 27-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 27-K WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITIES (Continued) FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES Emergency Response Activities (See Section 28 of Text) Emerency Flood Control Activities - Repair, Flood Fighting, and Rescue Work - Public Law 99 84th Congress and Antecedent Legislation Activity FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES Disaster Preparedness Program - 100 Corps Statutory Activities Activities in Support of Others Facilities Inspections Total Disaster Preparedness Program Emergency Operations - 200 Flood Fight and Rescue Operations - 210 Rehabilitation - 300 Federal Flood Control Works Non-Federal Flood Control Works Field Investigation Total Rehabilitation FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES TOTAL FEDERAL NON-REIMBURSEABLE ACTIVITIES Approp 96X3125 FY 97 Expenditure Emergency Supplemental Approp 96 3/7 3125 FY 97 Expenditure $92,723 71,444 99,072 96,776 $360,015 $69,894 1,534,597 855,896 66,690 $2,457,183 $2,887,092 $573,533 46,216 18,067 $637,816 $637,816 SPONSOR'S CONTRIBUTED FUNDS Maintenance - 300 Non-Federal Flood Control Works - 320 TOTAL ALL EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTIVITIES EXPENDITURES Rivers and Harbors Contributed Funds Approp 96X8862 Expenditures $162 $3,525,070 27-24 TABLE 27-L ACTIVE GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Section 29 of Text) Federal Cost Total By Item and PWI Number FY 97 Category SURVEYS (Category 100) Flood Damage Prevention Studies (120) Blue River Basin, Kansas City, MO - 012563 $ - 20,000 Turkey Creek Basin, KS & MO - 012381 196,599 Swope Park Industrial Area, Kansas City, MO (012821) 99,380 Subtotal $275,979 Review of Authorized Projects (160) MRLS, Units L455 and R460-471 (013267) $92,393 Salina, KS - 013199 230,084 Topeka, KS - 013200 270,830 Wilson Lake, KS - 020060 155,780 Subtotal $749,087 Miscellaneous Activities (170) Special Investigations - 017250 $101,000 Interagency Water Resources Development - 014713 8,000 North American Waterfowl Mgmt - 053904 4,000 Subtotal $113,000 Coordination with Other Agencies and Non-Federal Interests (180) Coop with Other Water Resources Agencies (181) - 053907 $18,000 Planning Assistance to States (186) Neosho River Basin Yield - 020004 32,000 Subtotal $50,000 TOTAL SURVEYS (Category 100) $1,188,066 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) Flood Plain Management Services (250) Flood Plain Management Service Unit - 082030 $29,400 Technical Services - 082040 22,600 Quick Responses - 082045 5,000 Flood Plains Management Study - 082500 - 1,430 Special Studies Jackson County, MO - 083040 10,000 Buchanon County, MO - 083055 15,000 Prairie Sand, Potawatomie, KS - 083060 4,000 Liberty, MO - 083070 6,000 Turkey Creek, Kansas City, KS - 083075 11,500 Clay County, MO - 083080 11,500 Johnson County, KS - 083260 9,235 Subtotal $122,805 Hydrologic Studies (260) General Hydrology Studies - 053820 $44,597 TOTAL COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA (Category 200) $167,402 PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Flood Control Projects (Project Not Fully Authorized) (Category 450) Blue River Basin, Kansas City, MO - 012563 $86 Flood Control Projects (Fully Authorized Project) (Category 600) Blue River Basin, Kansas City, MO - 012563 309,888 TOTAL PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN $309,974 GRAND TOTAL GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS $1,665,442 27-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 27-M REGULATORY PROGRAM (See Section 33 of Text) Federal Cost Item and PWI Number FY 97 PERMIT EVALUATION (100) REG - Permit Evaluation - 008204 ENFORCEMENT (200) REG - Enforcement - 008205 STUDIES (300) 088890 GRAND TOTAL REGULATORY PROGRAM $1,827,724 744,761 7,500 $2,579,985 27-26 PORTLAND, OR DISTRICT The territorial limits of the Portland District include the Pacific coastal drainage area of the State of Oregon, the portions of the States of Oregon and Washington which lie within the Columbia River watershed downstream of the Umatilla Bridge below McNary Dam, and south central Oregon west of the Malheur River and the Steens Mountains, but not including that part which drains into the Klamath Lake and River. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Bonneville Navigation Lock, Bonneville Dam, OR and W A ...................................................... . 28-2 2. Chetco River, OR ................................. ....... 28-2 3. Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR .............. 28-2 4. Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA .................... 28-3 5. Columbia River between Chinook, WA and Head of Sand Island ..................................... 28-4 6. Columbia River at the Mouth, OR and WA ........... 28-4 7. Columbia River between Vancouver, WA and The Dalles, OR .................................... 28-4 8. Columbia River, Seafarers Memorial Hammond, OR ........................................ 28-5 9. Coos Bay, OR ..................................... 28-5 10. Coquille River, OR .................. ............. 28-6 11. Depoe Bay, OR ...................................... 28-6 12. Port Orford, OR ....................... ....... ...... .. ... 28-7 13. Project Condition Surveys ................................. 28-7 14. Rogue River Harbor at Gold Beach, OR ............... 28-7 15. Siuslaw River, OR ..................................... 28-7 16. Skipanon Channel, OR ................................. 28-8 17. Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR ................................. 28-8 18. Umpqua River, OR ......................................... .. 28-9 19. Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR ............. 28-9 20. Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR ............................ 28-9 21. Yaquina River, OR ..................................... 28-10 Flood Control 22. Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR ............ 28-10 23. Blue River Lake, OR ......... ................. 28-11 24. Cottage Grove Lake, OR ................................. 28-11 25. Dorena Lake, OR ..................................... 28-11 26. Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR ............ 28-12 27. Fall Creek Lake, OR ....................................... 28-12 28. Fern Ridge Lake, OR ...................................... 28-13 29. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects. 28-13 30. Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection, OR and W A. ....................................................... 28-13 31. Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA ............... 28-14 32. Scappoose Drainage District, OR .................... 28-14 33. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations . 28-14 34. Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR ..... 28-14 35. Willow Creek Lake, Heppner, OR ................... 28-15 Page Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 36. Bonneville Lock and Dam Lake Bonneville, OR and WA ......................... 28-15 37. Columbia River Fish Mitigation, OR and W A ..................................................... 28-16 38. Columbia River Treaty Fishing Sites, OR and W A ....................................................... 28-17 39. Cougar Lake, OR ........................ ................ 28-17 40. Detroit Lake - Big Cliff, OR ......................... 28-17 41. Green Peter-Foster Lakes, OR ............................ 28-18 42. Hills Creek Lake, OR ...................................... 28-18 43. John Day Lock and Dam - Lake Umatilla, OR and WA ............................. 28-19 44. Lookout Point-Dexter Lakes, OR .................... 28-19 45. Lost Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR........... 28-20 46. The Dalles Lock and Dam Lake Celilo, WA and OR .................................... 28-20 Work Under Special Authorities 47. Projects Not Specifically Authorized ............... 28-21 48. Emergency Response Activities ....................... 28-24 General Investigations 49. Surveys ..................................... 28-24 50. Collection and Study of Basic Data ................. 28-24 51. Preconstruction Engineering and Design ........... 28-24 Tables Table 28-A Cost & Financial Statement ................... 28-26 Table 28-B Authorizing Legislation ...................... 28-33 Table 28-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ..................................... 28-39 Table 28-D Not Applicable Table 28-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ..................................... 28-40 Table 28-F Other Authorized Multiple Purpose Projects, Including Power ................... 28-42 Table 28-G Deauthorized Projects ........................ 28-42 Table 28-H Columbia and Lower Willamette River Below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR ...................................... 28-43 Table 28-I Project Condition Surveys .................. 28-43 28-1 __ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Page Table 28-J Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR, Principal Features of Existing Canal and Locks ................................. 28-43 Table 28-K Flood Control Reservoir Operations ...... 28-44 Table 28-L Work Under Special Authorities, Projects Not Specifically Authorized ............... 28-45 Page Table 28-M Work Under Special Authorities, Emergency Response Activities ............. 28-46 Table 28-N Principal Data Concerning Navigation Lock, Spillway Dam, and Powerplant .... 28-47 Navigation 1. BONNEVILLE NAVIGATION LOCK, BONNEVILLE DAM, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River 40 miles east of Portland, OR about 146 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. The existing lock chamber is 76 feet wide and 500 feet long with 24.2 feet depth of water over the sill. Construction of a new navigation lock just south of the existing lock was authorized in the FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act, Public Law 99-88, August 15, 1985. Inland Waterways Trust Fund will fund 50 percent of the project cost in accordance with the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. The new lock chamber will be 86 feet wide and 675 feet long with 19 feet depth of water over the sill. Estimated cost for construction of the new navigation lock is $348,100,000. Construction of the lock is completed. The lock opened to shipping on March 26, 1993. Restoration of the grounds and historic buildings is complete. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Continued real estate activities to obtain title to project lands. 2. CIHETCO RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Siskiyou Mountains of Coast Range at an elevation of 4,000 feet, flows for about 51 miles in a circuitous route, and empties into Pacific Ocean at Brookings, OR, 300 miles south of entrance to Columbia River and 345 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Charts 18600 and 18203.) Existing project. Provides for two jetties at the mouth of the river. Modification of 1965 authorized an entrance channel 120 feet wide by 14 feet deep; a barge turning basin about 250 feet wide, 650 feet long, and 14 feet deep; and a small boat access channel 100 feet wide by 12 feet deep. Also authorized was a 450-foot extension of north jetty with an increase in elevation of existing portion and a protective dike about 1,800 feet long with a top elevation of 18 feet. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 6.9 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. Construction ofjetties was completed December 1957. Removal of rock pinnacles and an abandoned bridge structure was accomplished in June 1959. Under authorized modification of October 1965, two contracts were completed. Construction of entrance channel and extension of north jetty was completed in July 1969. Construction of a protective dike, turning basin and small boat access channel was completed in March 1970. The authorization was modified by WRDA 92 to "direct the Secretary of the Army to assume maintenance of the approximately 200-foot long access channel to the south commercial boat basin consistent with authorized project depths". This channel will be maintained in lieu of the small boat access channel. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Port of Brookings has developed two large boat basins, one for commercial fishing boats and the other for sport boats, and a public boat launching ramp. There are four fish receiving docks and a sea-going barge dock for lumber loading and storage. There is also a privately owned marina and a Coast Guard Station. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 36,638 cubic yards of material was removed by the contract hopper dredge Westport. The material was placed in a near shore berm adjacent to the south jetty. The sand bypasser Sandwick worked five days. 3. COLUMBIA AND LOWER WLLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WA, AND PORTLAND, OR Location. The Columbia River rises in British Columbia, through which it flows for 425 miles. It enters the United States in northeastern Washington, and empties into the Pacific Ocean 645 miles north of San Francisco Bay and 160 miles south of Strait of Juan DeFuca. Total length of river is 1,210 miles. (See NOAA Charts 18520, 18521, 18522, 18523, 18524, 18526, and 18531; also Geological Survey Map of Washington.) Willamette River rises in Cascade Range in western Oregon, flows northerly, and empties into Columbia River about 100 miles from the sea. Its length from source of Middle Fork is about 294 miles. Project embraces 103.5 miles of Columbia River below Vancouver, WA, and 14.6 miles of Willamette River below Portland, OR. (See NOAA Chart 18526 and Geological Survey Map, State of Oregon.) Existing project. Provides for a channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide from River Mile 106.5 to 105.5, the distance between existing highway and railroad bridges; a channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Vancouver, WA, River Mile 105.5 to mouth of Columbia River, River Mile 3; a turning basin at Vancouver, WA, 40 feet deep, 800 feet wide, and about 5,000 feet long; a turning basin at Longview, WA, 40 feet deep, average width of 1,200 feet, and about 6,000 feet long; and a channel 40 feet deep in the Willamette River with varying widths of 600 to 1,900 feet from the mouth (River Mile 0) to Broadway Bridge (River Mile 11.6) which encompasses 28-2 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Portland Harbor area, subject to provisions that channel from mouth of Willamette River to turning basin at Vancouver, WA, be limited to 500 feet in width until need for additional width is demonstrated by developed traffic. Existing project also provides for auxiliary channels 10 feet deep and 300 feet wide near Cathlamet, WA; 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide in St. Helens, (Oregon); and 30 feet deep and 500 feet wide connecting upper end of St. Helens Channel with main ship channel of Columbia; 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide along frontage of town of Rainier, OR, extended to its upper and lower ends to deep water in Columbia River, 8 feet deep and 150 feet wide from this depth in Columbia River through old mouth of Cowlitz River to a point about 3,000 feet upstream from present terminus of harbor line; a channel from Longview Port dock downstream along pierhead line and past Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. plant at Longview to a connection with main ship channel below Mount Coffin, the downstream 2,400 feet of this channel to be 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide and remainder to be 28 feet deep and 250 feet wide; construction of a small boat mooring basin at Astoria, OR, to include a sheet pile, sand-filled breakwater about 2,400 feet long with a 30- foot roadway along its full length, and steel pile shore wings totaling about 1,460 feet long and for stone-and-pile dikes and revetments. Plane of reference in estuary from mouth of Harrington Point is mean lower low water; thence to Portland and Vancouver, adopted low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth of Columbia is about 8 feet, and at Portland and Vancouver, about 3 feet at low stage of rivers. Extreme tidal ranges are about 13 and 3 feet, respectively. Annual freshets have little effect on stage of tide at mouth of Columbia; at Portland and Vancouver, they average about 12 feet, while highest know reached a stage of 33 feet above water at Portland. Work on the 40-foot channel in Columbia River from Portland, OR, and Vancouver, WA, to the sea was completed in 1976. Auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview was completed in 1949, and improvement of mouth ofCowlitz River and small boat mooring basin at Astoria were completed in 1950. Project depths are maintained all year except for the period immediately following the annual freshet in May-June when shoaling occurs at several locations. Timing of vessel movement with tidal fluctuations permit maximum draft conditions. In Columbia and Willamette Rivers between mouth and Broadway Bridge at Portland a depth of 40 feet at low tide and 42 feet at high tide is practicable all year. In Columbia River between mouth of Willamette river and Vancouver, WA, depths of 40 and 42 feet at low and high tide, respectively, are practicable all year. (For details relating to previous project, see pages 1995 and 1998 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1746 of Annual Report for 1938.) A feasibility study for deepening the Columbia and Lower Willamette navigation channel is being conducted in cooperation with the Association of Lower Columbia River Ports. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At Portland, OR, there are six Port of Portland terminals consisting of 43 berths equipped to handle general cargo, bulk cargo, lumber, automobiles, lift-on-lift-off and roll-on-roll-offcontainers, and breakbulk vessels. The Port of Portland owns and operates a major ship repair yard, which includes the west coast's largest, and the world's third largest, floating dry dock. Also available in the harbor area are privately operated facilities for receiving, storing and outloading petroleum, wood chips, grain, logs, sand and gravel, cement, and steel products. At Astoria, OR, there is a terminal with facilities for receiving and handling all types of general cargo. At Vancouver, WA, there are municipal facilities capable of berthing five ships simultaneously. Each berth is completely outfitted with mechanical and lift facilities for receiving and handling all types of cargo. The port has a low dock to handle roll-on-roll-off and side-port discharging vessels. The grain terminal has a storage capacity of 4,500,000 bushels. Port of Longview has a public terminal on Columbia River and a privately owned grain elevator with a capacity of 6,900,000 bushels. This port also has a heavy lift facility, with a capacity of 600 tons. Port of Kalama has two berthing areas, one port owned and one private. At other locations on Columbia River between Portland and Columbia River entrance there are sufficient private facilities to accommodate river vessels and fishing craft. These facilities, with planned extensions, are considered adequate for existing commerce. (For details, see Port Series Nos. 33 and 34, Corps of Engineers, published in 1974 and 1975 respectively.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Channel maintenance was heavily impacted by the winter floods. A total of 11.5 million cubic yards of material was removed. The U.S. hopper dredge Essayons removed 5.8 million cubic yards, the U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 639,000 cubic yards, the pipeline dredge Oregon removed 4.7 million cubic yards, and the contract hopper dredge Newport removed 283,000 cubic yards. The sand bypasser Sandwick worked 55 days in the Cowlitz Old Mouth and Wahkiakum Ferry Channels. 4. COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA Location. Baker Bay is a shallow body of water about 15 square miles in extent on the north side of Columbia River near its mouth. The bay is separated from the river by Sand Island, a low-lying sand bar only a few feet above high tide level. (See NOAA Chart 18521.) Existing project. A mooring basin 10 and 12 feet deep, about 20 acres in extent with protecting breakwaters; and a west channel 16 feet deep and 200 feet wide for the first 2,000 feet, then 16 feet deep and 150 feet wide to the boat basin; a channel east of Sand Island to Port of Ilwaco, a distance of about 4 miles. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and extreme about 13 feet. Channel extending through easterly passage of Sand Island was completed in 1934. This portion of authorized project is not passable and is not maintained at the present time. Dredging west channel to 8 feet was accomplished September 1948. 28-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Deepening west channel to 10 feet, and boat basin and breakwater construction at Ilwaco, WA, was finished December 1957, and again, deepening of the west channel to 16 feet completed in August 1985 under Section 107, finished the project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Wharves, floats, ramps, and berths, for fishing craft, barges and tow-boats. Small-boat basin and protecting breakwater provides moorings for numerous fishing and recreational craft all year. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Performed condition surveys. 5. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK, WA, AND HEAD OF SAND ISLAND Location. At easterly end of Baker Bay, lying on north side of Columbia River near mouth. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 6151.) Existing Project. Channel 10 feet deep and 150 feet wide, extending from head of Sand Island to Chinook; a turning and mooring basin at upper end of channel, 10 feet deep, 660 feet long, and ranging from 275 to 500 feet wide; reconstruction of easterly 393 feet of existing breakwater; and extension of existing breakwater easterly and thence northerly to connect with shore in vicinity of Portland Street, Chinook, WA. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet and extreme about 13 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1940. The 10-foot channel depth modification was accomplished September 1958. Rehabilitation of existing breakwater was completed September 1962. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Chinook Packing Company owns a wharf for receiving fresh fish, and one additional fish buying company is located at Chinook. A portion of wharf is also used as a public landing. At upper end of channel there is a turning and mooring basin with facilities for mooring 350 fishing and recreational craft. Adequate terminal and mooring facilities include a public launching ramp, hoist with 10-ton capacity and suitable supply facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Performed condition surveys. 6. COLUMBIA RIVERAT THE MOUTH, OR AND WA Location. The Columbia River entrance is 645 miles north or San Francisco Bay. Project is about 120 miles downstream of Portland, OR and Vancouver, WA. For description of Columbia River see Section 3. Existing project. Provides for a one-half-mile-wide channel across a bar 55 feet deep (mean lower low water) for the northernmost 2,000 feet, and 48 feet deep (mean lower low water) along the southern 640 feet, to be secured by two rubblemound jetties, spur jetty "A" on the north shore and by dredging. The north jetty is about 2.5 miles long and the south jetty about 6.6 miles long, spur jetty "A" is about 0.3 miles long. Tidal range on bar between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, and extreme about 13 feet. The originally authorized project depth of 40 feet was completed in 1918; south jetty completed in 1914 and north jetty in 1917. A spur jetty (jetty "A') was completed in 1939 (repaired in 1961) for the purpose of channel stabilization. Spur jetty "B" currently is classified "inactive." Dredging of the 48-foot bar channel started April 1956 was completed in September 1957. South jetty rehabilitation started June 1962 was completed September 1964. North jetty rehabilitation started January 1965 was completed April 1965. Additional rehabilitation of the south jetty was initiated in May 1982 and completed in September 1982. Deepening bar channel to 55 feet completed September 1984. In FY 95 a 500 foot section of the south jetty was removed to allow unimpeded access by fisheries resources to 603 acres of intertidal habitat under Section 1135 authority. Project dimensions were available at end of fiscal year. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1999, Annual Report for 1915 and page 1740 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local interests contributed $500,000 toward construction of the north jetty which was completed in 1917. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A total of 1.7 million cubic yards of material was removed. The U.S. hopper dredge Essayons removed 473,000 cubic yards of material, and the contract hopper dredge Newport removed 1.2 million cubic yards. 7. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA, AND THE DALLES, OR Location. On Columbia River, between Interstate Bridge at Vancouver, WA, 106.5 miles above mouth and The Dalles, OR, mile 191, a distance of 84.5 miles. For description of Columbia River, See Section 3, "Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Below Vancouver, WA, and Portland, OR." Existing project. Channel 27 feet deep at low water and 300 feet wide between Vancouver, WA, and The Dalles, OR, 84.5 miles; a channel 10 feet deep at low water and 200 feet wide at upstream entrance to Oregon Slough, OR; a suitable turning basin adjacent to site of port development in vicinity of Camas and Washougal, WA; a boat basin at Hood River, OR, 500 by 1,300 feet and 10 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, with a connecting channel of same depth to deepwater, and a protecting breakwater on easterly side; a barge channel to waterfront at Bingen, WA, 10 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, 200 feet wide and about 1 mile long, and an access channel 7 feet deep at normal Bonneville pool level, 100 feet wide and about 1,000 feet long, to a natural mooring basin for small boats near east end of channel; and construction of The Dalles small boat basin, to provide a breakwater and shear boom protected basin about 400 by 800 feet in size with depth of 8 feet below a pool elevation of 72.5 feet at mean sea level. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at Vancouver is about 3 feet 28-4 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT and at Bonneville about 0.2 foot at low stages of the river. Extreme tidal ranges are about 4 feet and 0.4 foot, respectively. Existing project is complete. Construction of The Dalles small boat basin, was completed in 1949. Channel dredging at upper end of Oregon Slough was accomplished in 1957. Project depth of 27 feet between Bonneville and The Dalles, OR, was achieved April 1959. The 27-foot channel depth between Vancouver, WA, and Bonneville, OR, was completed May 1938. Improvement of lower entrance of Bonneville Dam lock was completed in May 1961. At the present time, the channel is maintained to a depth of 17 feet, which is adequate for user traffic. Construction of a boat basin at Hood River, OR, and of Camas-Washougal, WA, turning basin was accomplished February 1962. Construction of a barge channel in Columbia River near Bingen, WA, was completed September 1963. Small boat recreation channel 100 feet wide 6 feet deep at South Channel Government Island completed 1985 under section 107. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. At Vancouver, WA, upstream of Interstate Highway bridge at River Mile 108.1 on site of former shipyard are numerous ship-building facilities equipped with railway and river moorage facilities. Also in this area are a paper-storage warehouse with barge slip, two boat building businesses, and a storage dock with gantry crane. Sites are available for development to suit lessee. At Camas, WA, about 13.5 miles upstream from Vancouver, there is a private wharf used for transfer of paper-mill supplies and paper to and from barges, and facilities for discharging bulk oils from barges. At Port of The Dalles (mile 44 above Bonneville) there is a municipal wharf 125 by 1,100 feet for use by tugs and barges. There is a one-story timber and corrugated iron warehouse, 94 by 461 feet, on this wharf. A private elevator with a capacity of 40,000 bushels and a public elevator of 1,113,800-bushel capacity for handling bulk grain to barges are also at The Dalles. Public elevator has rail, truck, and water connections. There is a port owned rail connection about three-fourths mile below municipal wharf where certain types of cargo may be handled between railroad cars and barges. At numerous locations along the entire waterway there are facilities for transfer of logs to water from trucks and public and private boat basins. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition survey was performed. U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 226,000 cubic yards. 8. COLUMBIA RIVER, SEAFARERS MEMORIAL, HAMMOND, OR Location. The memorial will be located at Point Adams, in the City ofWarrenton, OR, at River Mile 8.5 on the Columbia River approximately 50 yards off shore and adjacent to an existing Corps of Engineers pile dike. Existing project. None. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) with the local sponsor, City of Warrenton, OR, is being developed. This LCA will require the sponsor to pay for all costs above the authorized $150,000 for engineering, design, acquisition and construction of a support structure to serve as the foundation for the Seafarers Memorial. In addition, the sponsor is providing the statue for which the foundation structure is being built. Operations during fiscal year. All work has been suspended until the LCA has been approved by all parties and the local sponsor has raised sufficient funds for purchase of the statue and any costs above the $150,000 limit for the support structure. 9. COOS BAY, OR Location. On Oregon coast 200 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 445 miles north of San Francisco Bay. It is about 13 miles long and 1 mile wide, with an area at high tide of about 15 square miles. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18587.) Existing project. Two rubblemound, high-tide jetties at entrance; a channel across the outer bar 45 feet deep and 700 feet wide, reducing gradually to 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide near River Mile 1 and continuing to about mile 9; thence a channel 35 feet deep and generally 400 feet wide to mile 15; an anchorage area 35 feet deep, 800 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at Empire (River Mile 5.5); turning basins at North Bend (River Mile 12.5) and Coalbank (River Mile 14.7) 35 feet deep, 650 feet wide and 1,000 feet long; a channel 22 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Smith's Mill (River Mile 15) to Millington (River Mile 17); a small boat basin, about 500 by 900 feet at Charleston, with a connecting channel, 16 feet deep, 150 feet wide and 6,200 feet long, to deep water in Coos Bay, and construction of a protecting breakwater and bulkhead. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 7 feet and extreme is about 11 feet at both the entrance and at Coos Bay. South jetty was completed in 1928, north jetty in 1929, and 24-foot channel in 1937. The south jetty was restored in 1941 and 1942 by construction of a concrete cap for full length of the jetty. Excavation of channel to 30 feet deep and generally 300 feet wide from entrance of Isthmus Slough was completed in 1951. Dredging outer bar channel to a depth of 40 feet, decreasing to 30 feet at Guano Rock was completed in 1952. Construction of the Charleston Channel and small-boat basin was completed in September 1956. Rehabilitation of south jetty was started in June 1962 and completed December 1963. Repair of north jetty was completed in August 1989. Construction of the deeper and wider channel to mile 15 was completed in 1979. Deepening of Charleston channel and turning basin completed in 1985 under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1987 to Annual Report for 1915 and page 1728 of Annual Report for 1938.) A modification to the existing project was authorized in the FY 1996 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, Public Law 104-46, November 13, 1995. This authorization provided for deepening the channel by 2 feet to 47 feet below mean lower low water (MLLW) from the entrance to Guano 28-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Rock (river mile 1) and to 37 feet below MLLW from river mile 1 to 15. Public Law 104-46 also provided for deepening by two feet and expanding the turning basin at river mile 12 by 100 feet from 800 by 1000 feet to 900 by 1000 feet. The excavation material for the channel deepening will be transported to the ocean for disposal. The estimated cost for preparation of the plans and specifications and the construction of the project is $11,852,000, of which $8,935,000 is federal and $2,917,000 is non-federal. In addition, the sponsor will pay 100 percent of the estimated costs of $183,000 for dredging the berth areas. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-5 of FY 1981 Annual Report. The sponsor, International Port of Coos Bay, signed a Project Cooperation Agreement on May 8, 1996 for the project modification to deepen the channel as authorized in Public Law 104-46. In accordance with cost sharing requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the Federal Government will initially provide 75 percent of the costs associated with the general navigation features of the project. The non-federal sponsor is required to provide 25 percent of the total construction cost of the general navigation features up front. The sponsor is also required to provide an additional 10 percent of the cost of the general navigation features of the project in cash over a period not to exceed 30 years. Terminal facilities. At North Bend there is a municipal dock 649 feet long fronting on channel, about 2,380 feet of privately owned mill docks, and three oil receiving terminals in vicinity. At Coos Bay there is a privately owned dock with a frontage of 1,345 feet, open to the public on equal terms; several small landings for fishing and harbor craft; and three lumber docks with 1,300-foot, 576-foot and 500-foot frontages, respectively. In the North Spit industrial area, there is one woodchip loading facility having a frontage of 1200 feet and a smaller Tdock operated by the Port of Coos Bay. At Eastside, on Isthmus Slough, there is a 200-foot dock. At Empire there is a privately owned lumber dock with frontage of 510 feet, and an oil terminal, owned by Port of Coos Bay, for receipt of petroleum products by barge. A barge slip also owned by the Port was completed in 1986. At Charleston there are wharves, for receipt of fresh fish and shellfish and a large seafood receiving and processing plant. There are also two municipally owned small-boat basins, open to all on equal terms, capable of mooring 250 fishing and recreation craft. Servicing facilities for small craft are available at all facilities, and public launching ramps have been constructed in Charleston area by private interests. A privately owned floating moorage on Joe Ney Slough has facilities for mooring about 50 fishing vessels. At Jordan Cove area there is a dock, 248 feet long, for wood chip ships. Operations during fiscal year. New work: A contract to deepen the channel was awarded on May 23, 1996 and was completed in March 1997. A second contract was awarded in June 1997. The project is anticipated to be completed in the first quarter of fiscal year 1998, except for post construction monitoring which is scheduled to continue through fiscal year 2000. Maintenance: A total of 795,000 cubic yards of material was removed. U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 67,000 cubic yards, the contract dredge Newport removed 413,000 cubic yards, and the contract dredge Seattle removed 296,000 cubic yards. The sand-bypasser Sandwick worked 11 days in Charleston entrance channel. 10. COQUILLE RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Coast Range, flows generally westerly for about 100 miles, and empties into Pacific Ocean at Bandon, OR, 225 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 420 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18186.) Existing project. Two rubblemound high-tide jetties at river mouth, south jetty 2,700 feet long and the north, 3,450 feet long; and a channel 13 feet deep at mean lower low water and of suitable width from the sea to a point 1 mile above old Coquille River Lighthouse, and snagging to State highway bridge at city of Coquille. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth is 7 feet and extreme about 10 feet. Jetties were completed in 1908 and entrance channel in 1933. North jetty was reconstructed in 1942 and a 750-foot extension to easterly end was constructed in 1951. South jetty was repaired in 1954 and north jetty in 1956. Coquille Lighthouse rehabilitation was completed June 21, 1976. Port of Bandon constructed boat basin facility in conjunction with protective breakwater and entrance channel construction in 1985, under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1986 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1727 of Annual Report for 1938.) A plan to deepen the entrance channel of the Coquille River from 13 feet to 18 feet was approved in May 1988. The economics were reevaluated in FY1993 and the project was not economically feasible at this time. Local cooperation. Restoration of lighthouse using Code 710, Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects funding, required 50 percent cost sharing with non-Federal sponsor (Oregon State Parks). Terminal facilities. At Bandon: A publicly owned wharf, and a small-boat basin open to all on equal terms. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract hopper dredge Westport removed 24,500 cubic yards of material from the entrance channel. A contract pipeline dredge removed 4,712 cubic yards from the boat basin entrance channel. 11. DEPOE BAY, OR Location. Harbor on Oregon coast 100 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5902.) 28-6 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Existing project. Two breakwaters north of entrance; an entrance channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide; an inner basin 750 feet long, 390 feet wide and 8 feet deep with retaining wall along easterly side; and a stone spending beach. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in 1939 and project modifications, enlarging the basin and deepening to 8 feet, were accomplished in June 1952 and August 1966. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities, in inner basin, consist of landings and floats to accommodate operators of excursion and commercial fishing boats. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. A project condition survey was performed. 12. PORT ORFORD, OR Location. On Oregon coast 250 miles south of Columbia River entrance and 390 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (NOAA Chart 18203 and Geological Survey Quadrangle, Port Orford, OR) Existing project. Improvement of harbor by 55-foot extension of existing locally constructed breakwater and dredging of a turning basin, 340 feet long, 100 feet wide and 16 feet deep. Breakwater was completed October, 1968. Turning basin was completed September 1971. The authorization was modified by WRDA 92 to allow the Corps to maintain the authorized navigation channel within 50 feet of the port facility. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. A dock which is a timber piling structure about 210 by 70 feet, equipped with hydraulic crane for lifting boats from the water to dock for repairs and/or storage and removing fish catches from boats. Expansion of the dock structure to 210 x 220 feet is complete. The installation of the second hydraulic crane was completed in FY 1986. About 150 fishing and private boats use this dock each year. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: During the summer months the sand-bypasser Sandwick worked 47 days. A contractor sub-pump dredged 4,400 cubic yards. 13. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Surveys were conducted during the fiscal year at a cost of $127,831; (See Table 28-I). 14. ROGUE RIVER HARBORAT GOLD BEACH, OR Location. Rises in Cascade Range in southwestern Oregon; flows westerly through Coast Range, and empties into Pacific Ocean 264 miles south of mouth of Columbia River and 381 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Chart 18202.) Existing project. Two jetties at entrance, and a channel 13 feet deep and 300 feet wide from ocean to a point immediately below State highway bridge, about 1 mile, including widening channel at a point about 0.25 mile below bridge to form a turning basin 13 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 650 feet long. At request of local interests, turning basin was located in south portion of estuary downstream from a point 0.25 mile below bridge. This change was effected to permit adequate terminal facilities to be constructed adjacent to turning basin. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Range of tide between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 7 feet, and extreme about 14 feet. Project as authorized has been completed. Construction of two jetties at entrance was completed September 1960. Dredging river channel by contract and entrance bar by government plant was completed October 1961. North jetty rehabilitation along channel side was completed October 1966. Breakwater construction and dredging, under contract awarded in September 1964, was 17 percent accomplished when flood of December 1964 destroyed all completed works. Contract was terminated as further construction at that location was considered unfeasible. Bank protection work at Wedderburn location was completed in October 1972. A breakwater, constructed by Port of Gold Beach, was completed during 1973. In 1985, three pile dikes, located on the south side of channel oceanward of the boat basin entrance, were completed. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are various landings for fishing and recreational craft. At Wedderburn, across river from Gold Beach, is a facility to accommodate excursion passengers and small freight items destined for various private landings between Wedderburn and Agness, OR. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The contract hopper dredge Westport removed 71,100 cubic yards, contract pipeline removed 14,700 cubic yards, and the sand-bypasser Sandwick worked 9 days. 15. SIUSLAW RIVER, OR Location. Rises in coast range, flows about 110 miles westerly and empties into Pacific Ocean about 160 miles south of entrance of Columbia River and 485 miles north of San Francisco Bay, CA. (See NOAA Charts 19583 and 18580.) Existing project. Provides for 2 high-tide, rubblemound jetties 750 feet apart at the outer end, the north jetty 8,390 feet long (600 feet unconstructed) and the south jetty 4,200 feet long; an entrance channel 18 feet deep and 300 feet wide from deep water in ocean to a point 1,500 feet inside the outer end of existing north jetty; thence a channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide with additional widening at bends, and about 5 miles long, to a turning basin, 16 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and 600 feet long, opposite Siuslaw dock at Florence; a channel 12 feet deep, 150 feet wide from Florence to mile 16.5; and at River Mile 15.5 a turning basin 12 feet deep, 300 feet wide, and 500 feet long. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at mouth of river is 7 feet and extreme about 11 feet. During low stages of river, tidal effect extends to Mapleton, 20.5 miles 28-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 above mouth. (For details relating to previous project, see page 1988 of Annual Report for 1915.) A modification to the existing project was authorized by Public Law 96-367, October 1, 1980. North and south jetty modifications were completed in FY 86. Modifications provide for extending the north and south jetties by 1,900 and 2,300 feet respectively. The jetty extensions terminate at approximately the minus 25-foot contour. Spur jetties were constructed on each jetty extension to reduce longshore currents from transporting material around the heads of the jetties. Each spur jetty is 400 feet long and originates approximately 900 feet shoreward of the jetty head. The north jetty spur is oriented 45 degrees to the north of the existing jetty alignment and the south jetty spur 45 degrees to the south of the jetty alignment. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Port dock at Florence, 150 feet wide and 350 feet long, is about 5.3 miles above river entrance and accommodates a fish-receiving station at east end of wharf which maintains a 2-ton capacity winch and supplies gasoline, oil and ice to fishermen. Other facilities at Florence consist of various floatways which provide docking facilities for fishing vessels and other small craft and a floating dock with accommodations for 75 commercial fishing vessels. Adjacent to commercial basin is mooring basin with accommodations for 200 sport boats of all sizes. Modemrn docks for loading ocean-going barges with packaged lumber is maintained at Mapleton and owned by the Davison Lumber Company. There are also a number of private landings and log booms between Cushman and Mapleton to accommodate river traffic. These facilities are considered adequate for existing traffic. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 40,000 cubic yards of material. 16. SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR Location. In tidal waterway extending south 2.7 miles from deep water in Columbia River. Channel enters Columbia about 10 miles above mouth and 4 miles below Astoria, OR. (See NOAA Chart 18523.) Existing project. Channel 30 feet deep and generally 200 feet wide extending from deep water in Columbia River to railroad bridge at Warrenton, OR, distance of 1.8 miles, turning basin of same depth, mooring basin 12 feet deep at mean lower low water at Warrenton, OR, and channel 7 feet deep, generally 40 feet wide, with increased widths at log dumps and terminals, for 4,500 feet via cutoff channel above railroad bridge. Channel is maintained to 16 feet which is adequate for user traffic. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is about 8 feet, extreme is about 13 feet. Project as authorized is complete. Dredging river channel and turning basin was completed in 1939. Construction of small-boat mooring basin at Warrenton, OR, was completed October 1957, and fill stabilization work was accomplished in August 1958. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. City of Warrenton owns wharf with a 300-foot frontage open to pubic on equal terms. One privately owned cannery wharf with a 300-foot frontage is used for unloading fish and handling fish nets. One privately owned boatyard has floats and moorage facilities for use by a maximum of 80 small boats. Small-boat basin has facilities for numerous fishing and recreation craft, and a privately owned lumber mill has a barge loading facility for chips and lumber. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 13,625 cubic yards of material from the outer channel. 17. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR Location. Bay is on Oregon coast about 50 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18520 and 18558.) Existing project. Provides for a jetty about 5,700 feet long on north side of entrance and a jetty 8,000 feet long on south side; a channel through bar 18 feet deep and of such width as can be practically and economically obtained; for a channel 200 feet wide and 18 feet deep from deep water in bay to Miami Cove; and for initial dredging to 12 feet deep of a small-boat basin and approach thereto at Garibaldi, OR. Project also provides for improvement of Bayocean Peninsula, OR, by construction of sand and rockfill dike 1.4 miles long, on alignment extending between Pitcher Point and town of Bayocean. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet, extreme is about 14 feet. Hobsonville Channel portion of project is inactive. Except for construction of Hobsonville Channel portion, classified inactive, channels were completed in 1927, north jetty in 1933, improvement of Bayocean Peninsula in 1956 and small-boat basin in 1958. The north jetty was rehabilitated in 1965 and again in 1991. South jetty construction was initiated in 1969, extended in 1974, and completed to the authorized 8,000 feet in 1978. 18 foot channel to Miami Cove is inactive due to mill closure. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1989 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1474 of Annual Report for 1936.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 37-9 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. At Garibaldi: A facility owned by the Port of Bay City, for shipping lumber and receiving logs, a public landing suitable for mooring fishing vessels, towboats, and other craft. Small-boat basin has adequate facilities for mooring fishing and recreational craft. A privately owned boat ramp and moorage is available for recreational craft. At Bay City: A privately owned wharf used exclusively for receipt of fresh fish and shellfish. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys and miscellaneous inspections performed. 28-8 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 18. UMPQUA RVER, OR Location. Rises in Cascade Range, flows westerly about 120 miles, and empties into Pacific Ocean 180 miles south of Columbia River and 465 miles north of San Francisco Bay. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18584.) Existing project. A jetty on north side of entrance about 8,000 feet long, a south jetty 4,200 feet long extending to a point 1,800 feet south of outer end of north jetty; dredging to provide a usable entrance channel 26 feet deep, and a river channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide, from mouth to Reedsport, a distance of about 12 miles with a turning basin at Reedsport 1,000 feet long, 600 feet wide, and 22 feet deep; deepening of channel at Winchester Bay to 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 3,100 feet, then adding 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 500 feet, and 12 feet deep by 75 feet wide for 950 feet beyond boat basin making up the East Boat Channel. A new West Boat Channel was added 16 feet deep by 100 feet wide for 4,300 feet and completed in 1984. Project was modified in 1951 to provide a channel in Scholfield River, but this portion of the project is currently inactive. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at river mouth is 7 feet, and extreme range is about 11 feet. North jetty was completed in 1930. Extension to original south jetty was completed in 1938. Dredging a 22-foot channel from mouth of river to Reedsport was completed in 1941. Gardiner Channel and turning basin was completed in 1949 and Winchester Bay Channel and mooring basin in 1956. Rehabilitation of south jetty was completed August, 1963. Extension of training jetty was completed October 9, 1980. Deepening Winchester Bay East Channel and new West Channel completed 1984 under Section 107. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 2967 of Annual Report for 1898 and page 1732 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At Gardiner there is about 650 feet of wharf frontage. Also there is an oil unloading facility owned by International Paper Co. for exclusive use of tanker barges. Port of Umpqua owns one wharf with 456 feet of water frontage, of which 228 feet is usable for vessels and another with about 75 feet of water frontage which has not been used generally for commercial shipping. On Bolon Island across the river from Reedsport a wharf was constructed which has about 5 acres of open storage for lumber and available to all on equal terms. At Winchester Bay, 2 miles from river entrance there is a major sports and commercial fishing harbor. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredge Yaquina removed 115,000 cubic yards of material, and the sand-bypasser Sandwick worked 8 days at Winchester Bay. 19. WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR Location. Locks and dam covered by this project are at Willamette Falls, a rocky reef in Willamette River at Oregon City, OR, about 26 miles above mouth of river. Existing project. Canal and locks were originally constructed by private interest in 1873 and were purchased by the United States in April 1915 for $375,000. Final report on purchase and rehabilitation of canal and locks is in the Annual Report for 1923, when project was reported 98 percent complete. The project includes four locks a canal basin and an extra guard lock used to prevent flooding when river levels are high. The system acts as a fluid staircase between the upper and lower reaches of the Willamette River. Total length of existing canals and locks is about 3,500 feet. Principal features of existing canal and locks at Willamette Falls are set forth in Table 28-J. Ordinary fluctuation of stage of water above locks is 12 feet and extreme, due to flood conditions, 20 feet. Below locks, ordinary fluctuation is 15 feet and extreme 50 feet. Until the 1940's, the gates were opened manually. Now, the gates are operated by hydraulic pumps controlled by switches in two control stations with the aid of closed-circuit television and radio communication. All the gates have been replaced under minor rehabilitation funds. Existing locks and grounds are in good condition and in continuous operation. New service building was completed in 1988 costing $523,000. The project was placed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1974, and was established as an Oregon Civil Engineering Landmark in 1991. As a result of the mill closure in 1996, one of two shifts was eliminated and hours of operation reduced. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Simpson Paper closed the mill in 1996 after over 100 years of operations. The mill was sold to West Linn Paper. West Linn Paper has a timber wharf about 850 feet long, extending to and supported by a concrete division wall built in lock canal by the United States. The use of the wharf for operations purposes by the mill may be changed due to shipping changes by the new owner. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Upstream and downstream docks were rehabilitated. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 20. YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR Location. Yaquina Bay is on Oregon coast, 113 miles south of mouth of Columbia River. (See NOAA Charts 18580 and 18581.) Existing project. Two high tide rubblemound jetties at entrance, north jetty 7,000 feet, and south jetty 8,600 feet long; a spur jetty on channel side of south jetty 4,700 feet from its sea end, 800 feet long; five groins channelward from south jetty; channel 40 feet deep for a general width of 400 feet across bar and at outer end of entrance channel; a channel 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide to a turning basin of same depth, 900 to 1,200 feet wide and 1,400 feet long, and a channel 18 feet deep and 200 feet wide from 30-foot channel at about mile 2.4, thence upstream to abandoned railroad terminus at Yaquina, a distance of about 4.5 miles. Project also provides for two small boat 28-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 mooring basins at Newport, OR. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme is about 12 feet. At mile 1.2 a 1,300 foot long breakwater protecting the Port of Newport South Beach Marina together with an entrance channel 8 feet long by 100 feet wide for a distance of 2,035 feet. Project as originally authorized was completed in May 1952. Restoration of jetties was completed in 1934 and extension of north jetty 1,000 feet seaward was completed in 1940. Construction of mooring basin at Newport and dredging of channel and turning basin to project dimensions were completed during fiscal year 1949. Restoration of north jetty was again accomplished in 1956. Under modification of July 3, 1958, extension of north jetty was completed in September 1966, dredging of 40-foot bar channel and 30-foot river channel was completed in October 1968, and extension of south jetty was completed in June 1972. The north jetty was rehabilitated in 1978 and again in 1988. (For details relating to previous projects see Annual Report for 1893, part 4, page 3314, and Annual Report for 1938, page 1736.) Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. At McLean Point, on north side of bay, about 2 miles from entrance, Port of Newport has two berths capable of serving ocean-going vessels, one 435 feet long, the second 520 feet long. At the time the second berth was dredged, a retaining wall and fill of 6 acres were constructed adjacent to deep water. There now is 40 acres of filled land adjacent to deep water, and of this total, 7 acres were constructed in 1956- 57. This facility has necessary carriers and lift trucks for handling lumber cargoes, warehouse for covered cargo storage, and is open to all on equal terms. Port of Newport also has a public wharf with 300 feet of frontage for servicing fishing boats. In addition, Port of Newport maintains 510 berths for mooring commercial and sport fishing vessels. There are several seafood companies on the bay which have their own facilities for handling fresh fish and crab. Supplies and petroleum products are readily available for small vessels. On south side of bay about 1.2 miles above entrance, Port of Newport has constructed South Beach Marina which can handle approximately 600 pleasure craft and shallow draft fishing boats. Public facilities include public automobile and boat trailer parking, boat launching ramp, fuel dock, fishing pier, and picnic area. A dry boat moorage of 120 boats, is completed. A swing hoist with 3-ton capacity is currently available and one with 60-ton capacity is planned. About 1.5 miles above entrance, Oregon Aqua Foods, subsidiary of Weyerhaeuser Company, maintains a commercial fish farm facility. About 2.0 miles above entrance, Oregon State University, in conjunction with the Marine Science Center on 52 acres, maintains a 220-foot pier for docking large and small research vessels and a 100-foot float for docking small boats. Docking facilities are restricted to research vessels and State of Oregon small boats. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: U.S. hopper dredgeYaquina removed 370,000 cubic yards. Contract pipeline removed 5,100 cubic yards from the South Beach marina. 21. YAQUINA RIVER, OR Location. Rises in Coast Range, flows about 50 miles in a westerly direction, and empties into Yaquina Bay, on Oregon Coast. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 5802 and 6058.) Existing project. Provides for two controlling half-tide dikes of piling, brush, and stone, each about 1,100 feet long (constructed by local interests), and for a channel 10 feet deep and generally 150 feet wide on Yaquina River and 200 feet wide in Depot Slough, extending from town of Yaquina near RM 4.0 to Toledo at RM 14.4. Mean lower low water is plane of reference. Tidal range between lower low water and mean higher high water is 8 feet and extreme about 12 feet. Freshet heights are about 12 feet at mouth of Depot Slough. Channel work authorized March 1913 was completed in 1914. Additional work authorized in 1960 was completed in 1969. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Near town of Yaquina at river mouth, which is also head ofYaquina Bay, there is a moorage for small vessels and a small-craft shipyard. The Port of Toledo has public-terminal facilities for accommodation of local craft. There are also privately owned facilities for loading lumber barges, receipt of bunker fuel, and log rollways for receipt of logs. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition surveys were performed. Flood Control 22. APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. In Jackson County, OR, on Upper Applegate River, a tributary of Rogue River, at River Mile 46, about 23 airline miles southwest of Medford, OR. Existing project. A gravel-fill embankment dam, 242 feet high from streambed to crest with an overall length of 1,300 feet. A gate-controlled concrete chute-type spillway on the left abutment, and a regulating outlet conduit, and intake tower with multilevel intakes on the left side of valley floor. Lake, 5 miles long, provides 75,000 acre-feet of usable storage for flood control and water conservation utilization. Project controls runoff from a drainage area of 223 square miles. In addition to flood control, reservoir is operated to provide irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control, and recreation benefits. Recreation facilities were provided by the Corps of Engineers with operation and maintenance by the USFS under a memorandum of agreement. Project is complete and operating. Local cooperation. Authorizing act requires that State of Oregon insure maintenance of stream flow released for fishery. 28-10 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT In addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife made filing May 31, 1962 with State Engineer for water rights for use of stored water and natural flows for fish habitat improvement in amounts and at times specified in project authorization. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation has made a feasibility study of Applegate Irrigation Division. The results of the study indicate that at present there does not appear to be a feasible Federal irrigation project for the Applegate River valley. Local interests have furnished all local cooperation specified by the 1970 Flood Control Act. The assurances were approved by the Secretary of the Army on May 8, 1975. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance was performed. Freshets regulated by Applegate Lake on Applegate River and Rogue River are shown in Table 28-K. 23. BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR Location. On Blue River, a major tributary of McKenzie River, 1.8 miles above confluence of the two streams at the confluence of Quartz Creek and Blue River and about 42 miles easterly of Eugene, OR. Existing project. A gravel-fill embankment dam 1,329 feet long at crest including spillway and 319 feet above the lowest point of the general foundation. A concrete gravity chute-type spillway with two gates is located on left abutment. Outlet works are in left abutment. On left shore of reservoir an earth-andgravel fill embankment, about 1,535 feet long and 70 feet high, closes a low saddle between Blue River and McKenzie River. Project controls runoff from drainage area of 88 square miles. Reservoir provides 85,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service under a Memorandum of Agreement. Project is complete. Construction of dam and appurtenant works was initiated in May 1963 and operation for flood control was effective in October 1968. Settlement of claims was completed in May 1974. Eugene Water and Electric Board (EWEB) was granted a FERC license in November 1989 to install two small hydropower units at Blue River Lake project. EWEB has delayed their plans for hydropower units pending the conclusion of a Corps proposal to add water temperature control to the regulating outlet tower. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance work performed. Freshets regulated by Blue River Lake project on Blue River, a major tributary of McKenzie River, are shown in Table 28-K. 24. COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR Location. On Coast Fork ofWillamette River. 29 miles from mouth. Coast Fork rises in Douglas County, OR, on western slope of Cascade Range and northern slope of Calapooia Range, flows north for 49 miles, and unites with Middle Fork to form main Willamette River. Existing project. An earthfill dam, 1,750 feet long at crest, 114 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation, a concrete gravity free overflow spillway 264 feet long near the right abutment, and a concrete gravity non-overflow section 96 feet long forming the right abutment. Total length of dam is 2,110 feet. Outlet works, consisting of three gate-controlled conduits, pass through spillway section. Reservoir provides 30,060 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of drainage area of 104 square miles. Project is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflow for navigation and for other purposes. Recreational development consists of day use and overnight facilities at five sites operated by the Corps of Engineers. Construction of project initiated August 1940 was completed April 1952. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since September 1942. Local cooperation. Development of additional recreation facilities will require a local sponsor willing to cost share and assume all operation and maintenance of park facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance work continued. Freshets regulated by Cottage Grove Lake on Coast Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 28-K. 25. DORENA LAKE, OR Location. On Row River, OR, 7 miles from mouth. Row River rises in Lane County on western slope of Cascade Range, flows northwest for 19 miles, and enters Coast Fork of Willamette River 19.5 miles above mouth. Existing project. An earthfill embankment dam, 3,352 feet long at crest and 145 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation. Concrete gravity free-overflow spillway, 200 feet long, forms right abutment. Outlet works on five slide-gatecontrolled conduits pass through spillway section. Reservoir provides 70,500 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of 265 square miles. The Project is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigational and other purposes. Construction of project initiated June 1941 was completed October 1952 except for construction of additional recreation facilities that were funded under the Code 710 program. Future recreation facility construction will be accomplished in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane County, OR. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since November 1949. Local cooperation. A multiple project cost sharing agreement has been in force with Lane County since Sept. 1976. It includes 4 projects and 14 parks. At Dorena Lake, 6 parks included in the agreement are managed by Lane County under a lease agreement. Future recreation development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Cooperated with Bureau of Land Management on establishing rails-to-trails route along the north shore of the lake. Freshets regulated by Dorena Lake project on Row and Coast Fork Willamette Rivers are shown in Table 28-K. 28-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 26. ELK CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. In Jackson County, OR at River Mile 1.7 on Elk Creek, a tributary of Rogue River, about 26.5 miles northerly from Medford, OR. Existing project. Construction work for the 249-foot high roller compacted concrete gravity dam, 2,600 feet long at the crest, with a gate controlled concrete chute spillway, regulating outlet conduits, power penstock and multiple use intake tower attached to the upstream face of the dam has been stopped due to a court injunction. The project would control runoff from a drainage area of 135 square miles, and provide future municipal and industrial water supply, irrigation, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control, and recreation benefits. Construction of the project was initiated in February 1971. Work completed to date includes construction of roads and the main dam structure and outlet works to elevation 1563 (approximately 1/3 proposed height). All lands for the project have been acquired with the exception of the clearing of water rights for a seemingly abandoned irrigation canal which originates within the project boundaries. Environmental statements were filed with Council of Environmental Quality June 15, 1972 and Supplement No. 1 addressing water quality and social/demographic information was filed with EPA on December 24, 1980. Estimated federal cost of project is $174,000,000. In October 1985, the Corps was advised by Oregon Natural Resources Council (ONRC), an environmental group, they intended to file suit against the government to halt construction of Elk Creek, on specific environmental issues. A hearing on the motion for a preliminary injunction was scheduled before Oregon Federal District Court December 16, 1986. On that date, the Court refused to grant the injunction to halt construction and bids were opened and the contract subsequently awarded to Ohbayashi Corp. An appeal was filed by ONRC in March, 1986 and heard by the 9th Circuit Court in July, 1986. On June 23, 1987, the Circuit Court reversed the decision of the District Court and returned the case to the District Court for appropriate injunctive relief. The resulting District court order issued in August and September 1987 allowed construction of the dam to El. 1563 ft. (approximately 1/3 the height of the dam), backfilling of the foundation key trench, aggregate processing, quarry restoration, and other miscellaneous work. The construction of the main dam to elevation 1563 was reached in mid-January 1988. The Department of Justice petitioned the 9th Circuit Court for a rehearing. On December 10, 1987 the 9th Circuit Court rejected the petition for a rehearing, requiring the termination of the existing main dam and reservoir clearing contracts. The Department of Justice petitioned with the U.S. Supreme Court for a review of the decisions made by the 9th Circuit Court. The hearing before the U.S. Supreme Court was held May 1, 1989. The U.S. Supreme Court remanded the case back for injunctive relief. In September 1989, the District Court was requested by the Corps to remand the case back to the Corps for preparation of a supplemental EIS. To lift the injunction against the dam a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (EISS) has been prepared to address cumulative effects. Additional studies have been conducted in water temperature and turbidity, and fish and wildlife. The EISS identified a preferred interim operating alternative of operating the project without a conservation pool. The reservoir would only temporarily store water during flood control operations. On July 22, 1992, the Department of Justice filed a motion with the court to remove the injunction. A hearing was held on May 20, 1993. The ONRC and Department of Justice filed appeals with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals over the issues of the legal sufficiency of the EISS and on the authority of the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management to issue a determination of impacts under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. The Ninth Circuit Court ofAppeals ruled on the two cases on April 21, 1995. In a unanimous decision, the Court ruled that the U.S. Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management do not have a veto authority over purely Federal projects under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act where Congress makes the decision to authorize and fund their development. In a 2-1 decision, the Court also reversed the District Court decision that EISS #2 met the requirements of the earlier Ninth Circuit opinion and awarded attorney fees to the plaintiffs. The case was remanded with instructions to prepare a third supplement adequately addressing all issues raised under the NEPA process. In FY 1993, Congress added $2,500,000 for design necessary to complete the project pending removal of the injunction. In FY97 Congress made the remainder of these funds available to plan and implement long term management measures. Due to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision, the Corps will not perform the environmental studies under NEPA necessary to remove the Federal court injunction. The Corps notified Congress of its intention to begin studies of options for long term management of the project in its uncompleted state. Local cooperation. Authorizing act requires that State of Oregon take action prior to construction to insure maintenance in stream of flow to be released for fishery. In addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in a manner and to an extent consistent with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation laws and policies. On February 24, 1966, State of Oregon Water Resources Board filed for withdrawal rights of 25 cubic feet per second to maintain a minimum flow for fish. Development of recreation facilities require a local sponsor willing to cost share in recreation development and assume operations and maintenance of park facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Operation and maintenance during the construction phase of the project, fishery evaluation studies, and water quality analysis. Initiated plans and specifications for passive fish passage. 27. FALL CREEK LAKE, OR Location. On Fall Creek, a tributary of Middle Fork Willamette River, about 7 miles above confluence of the streams and about 19 miles southeasterly of Eugene, OR. Existing project. An earth-and-gravel fill embankment about 5,100 feet long at crest and 193 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation. A gated concrete gravity 28-12 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT spillway is in left abutment. Outlet is in right abutment. Reservoir provides 115,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley and increase low waterflows for navigation and other purposes. Construction of project began May 1962 and was essentially complete November 1965. Reservoir storage for flood control was effective October 1965. Sky Camp Lodge was completed October 1978. Future recreation facilities will be provided in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Bethel School District. Bethel School District has a sub-agreement with the Springfield Kiwanis Club for management of this facility. The Corps manages one park at the project. Local cooperation. Fall Creek Lake is included in the Lane County multiple project cost sharing agreement. Two parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreement. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Freshets regulated by Fall Creek Lake project on Fall Creek, a tributary of the Middle Fork, Willamette River are shown in Table 28-K. 28. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR Location. On Long Tom River, 23.6 miles from the mouth. Long Tom River rises in Lane county, OR, on eastern slope of Coast Range, flows north for 50 miles, and enters Willamette River 147 miles above its mouth. Existing project. A main dam 6,624 feet long at crest and 49 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation and two auxiliary dikes, 915 and 3,929 feet long, along northeasterly boundary of lake. Main dam consists of an earthfill embankment dam 6,330 feet long, a concrete gravity spillway near left abutment with a non-overflow structure 46 feet long, containing outlet works, and an overflow structure, 248 feet long, controlled by six automatic gates. Project includes rectification of channel of Long Tom River downstream of dam. Reservoir provides 110,000 acre-feet of usable flood control storage and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 275 square miles. Reservoir protects Long Tom River Valley and is operated as a unit of coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette River Valley generally and to increase low water-flows for navigation and other purposes. Dam was originally constructed in 1941 to height of 47 feet. Provision of additional storage for flood control was obtained in 1965 by raising embankments 2 feet to 49 feet above lowest point of the general foundation. Construction of project initiated April 1940 was completed August 1951, except for provision of additional storage for flood control authorized in 1962 and completed April 1965, and construction. of additional recreation facilities funded through the Code 710 program. Construction of three waterfowl impoundments was completed in 1994 under Section 1135 authority. Dam and reservoir have been in continuous operation since December 1941. Development of future recreation facilities will be in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane county, and requires a 50 percent contribution by the county. Development is subject to availability of funds by the Government and the county. Local cooperation. Fern Ridge Lake is included in the Lane County multiple project cost sharing agreement. Three parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreements. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife manages 5,000 acres of land and water for migratory waterfowl under a lease agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Initiated embankment repair and regulating outlet discharge repair. Estimated completion FY98. Freshets regulated by Fern Ridge Lake project on Long Tom River are shown in Table 28-K. 29. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Funds appropriated for inspection of completed local flood protection works are used to determine maintenance condition of completed works and to ascertain whether those works are being properly maintained by local interests. Numerous leveed areas and 213 bank protection works were inspected at various locations along both banks of Lower Columbia River below Bonneville Dam, along Oregon Coast, in eastern Oregon, in southern Oregon and in Willamette River Basin. Aerial inspection of revetments in Willamette River Basin are supplemented by an onsite inspection at locations requiring maintenance. A representative of sponsoring districts accompanied the Portland District representatives performing the levee inspections. Deficiencies in maintenance and need for repairs were discussed with sponsoring districts' representatives and a report was made to each sponsor with recommendations for improving maintenance. The program to improve maintenance of completed Federal projects initiated by House Appropriations Committee on Civil Functions was continued. Fiscal year costs were $191,454. 30. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, ORAND WA Location. On Columbia River and tributaries between Sandy River, OR, and mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. Provides for construction of 224,000 linear feet of bank protection works at 96 locations along Lower Columbia River below River Mile 125 and along principal tributaries in this reach, to protect existing improvements such as levees and developed industrial lands from further erosion. Existing project is a unit of general comprehensive plan for flood control, navigation, and other purposes in Columbia River Basin. Construction of project began in July 1961 and is 88 percent complete. A total of 191,000 linear feet of bank protection work at 84 locations has been completed. Estimated Federal cost is $25,600,000. Local cooperation. Flood Control Act of 1950 provides local interests furnish lands and rights-of-way; make necessary highway, highway bridge, and utility alterations; hold the United States free from damages; and maintain and operate completed works. Under Section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Local Interests will also be required to make a cash contribution for construction of each site. Estimated costs for all requirements of local cooperation are $1,500,000. 28-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Coordination with sponsors and evaluation of local erosion problems continued. 31. MOUNT ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA Location. On the North Fork Toutle River, 2 miles upstream from its confluence with the Green River, in Cowlitz County, southwest Washington. The river systems impacted by the project include Toutle, Cowlitz and Columbia Rivers. Most of the population affected by the problems reside in the communities ofLongview, Kelso, Lexington, and Castle Rock, Washington. Existing project. The project was authorized by the Supplement Appropriations Act, 1985 (Public Law 88, 99th Congress, August 15, 1985). The Act includes authorization "... to construct, operate and maintain a sediment retention structure near the confluence of the Toutle and Green River, Washington, with such design features and associated downstream actions as are necessary, in accordance with the Feasibility Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 1984." The project will provide a permanent solution to potential flooding on the Cowlitz River from sedimentation problems created by the eruption of Mt. St. Helens. The Decision document recommended construction of a single sediment retention structure (SRS) with a 125-foot high spillway at the Green River site on the North Fork Toutle River, improvements to the levee system at Kelso, Washington, and dredging downstream from the SRS. Local cooperation. Local interests were responsible for provision of all lands, easements, and rights-of-way for the sediment retention structure, dredging disposal areas, and levee improvements. Local interests were also responsible for all alterations and relocations of buildings, roads, bridges and other structures or utilities made necessary by implementation of the project. In addition, operation and maintenance of fish facilities, the levee system at Kelso and dredged material disposal sites are the responsibility of local interests. Cowlitz County offers visitor services in their viewpoint area. Nonfederal cash contribution is $3,690,000 and the estimated nonfederal land, easements, right-of-ways, and relocations costs are $21,000,000. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Coordination with Federal and local agencies continued. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance performed. 32. SCAPPOOSE DRAINAGE DISTRICT, OR Location. Scappoose Drainage District is located in Columbia County, Oregon, along the left bank of Multnomah Channel opposite Columbia River Miles 90.3 to 97.0. Project Description. The project, as originally authorized by the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, provided for reconstruction of the existing levee system. Additional improvements, as provided for in the Flood Control Act of May 17, 1950, consisted of raising and strengthening 52,000 feet of levee, construction of toe drains, and additional pumping capacity. The project as originally authorized was completed in 1941. The additional improvements were completed in September 1980. The main pumping plant was constructed by the Corps of Engineers as part of a comprehensive plan for upgrading the flood protection works to provide protection against the Standard Project Flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second as measured at The Dalles, Oregon. This equates to a flood level of 27.8 feet and 26.2 at the upstream and downstream ends, respectively, of the drainage district. The four pumps at the main pumping plant did not operate properly during the February 1996 flood. The problem began when the Columbia River exceeded the ordinary high water level of 14 feet. At that point, the pumps started to overheat and shut down. When the river stage reaches approximately 22.5 feet, the motor overload protection trips out. Emergency measures were taken by rotating the operation of the pumps. All pump motors overheated and only one pump at a time in rotation could be operated. The reduced pumping capability induced interior flooding that caused extensive damage to a large plant nursery, flooded residential properties, and cut off access to interior drainage channel pump stations. The pumps were designed to operate with river stages from +1.0 to 26.6 feet. The river crested at 26.6 feet during the flood. During the February 1996 flood the pumps were tested under major flooding conditions for the first time. Corrective action will be to replace the existing pump impellers having a 17 degree pitch with impellers having 14.5 degree pitch. In addition, other items will be replace as required. The estimated cost for this corrective action is $161,000, which is 100% Federal. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Initiated preparation of design plans and specifications. 33. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Corps of Engineers monitored flood control operations at four Bureau of Reclamation projects (Prineville, Ochoco, Emigrant, and Scoggins), one local project operated by Douglas County (Galesville), and one municipal power project operated by Tacoma City Light (Mossyrock). The projects were partially constructed with flood control funds, thereby subjecting project operation to monitoring by the Corps of Engineers under Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944. The four Bureau of Reclamation projects, Douglas County project and Mossyrock project were operated during the fiscal year within the flood control regulations specified for each project. Total cost of monitoring the six projects during the fiscal year was $54,736. 34. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR Location. On Willamette River and tributaries, between Cascade Range and Coast Range, from a point south of Eugene to Portland, OR. Existing project. Provides for clearing, sloping, and reveting riverbanks; construction of pile and timber bulkheads and drift barriers; minor channel improvements; and maintenance of 28-14 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT existing works for control of floods and prevention of erosion at various locations along Willamette River and its tributaries. The current scope of the project is a total of 510,000 linear feet of bank protection at 236 locations. Estimated Federal cost is $30,700,000. Construction of project began in 1938 and is 96 percent complete. A total of489,795 linear feet of bank protection work at 230 locations consisting of revetment of riverbanks, pile and timber bulkheads, drift barriers, and channel improvements, have been completed on Willamette River and tributaries. Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of 1936 and Section 103, Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Estimated costs for all requirements of local cooperation under terms of project authorization were $2,300,000. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Coordination with potential sponsors and evaluation of local erosion problems continued. Maintenance: Continued coordination and evaluation of local erosion problems. 35. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, HEPPNER, OR Location. On Willow Creek immediately upstream from Heppner and just downstream from junction of Balm Fork and Willow Creek in Section 35, Township 2 South, Range 26 East, Willamette Meridian. Existing project. Project provides flood protection to the city of Heppner and downstream area by controlling runoff from a drainage area of 96 square miles. The dam is a roller compacted concrete structure 160 feet high at crest elevation 2,130. Ancillary features include a center uncontrolled spillway with a maximum flood capacity of 93,300 cfs (cubic feet per second), an outlet works with a capacity of 500 cfs, a minor flow works and diversion works. Gross storage capacity of the project is 13,250 acre-feet, consisting of 7,750 acre-feet for exclusive flood control, 1,750 acre-feet for joint flood control and irrigation, 1,750 acre-feet exclusive irrigation, and 2,000 acre-feet dead storage for fish, wildlife, recreation, sediment accumulation, and aesthetics. Limited recreation facilities are being provided. Willow Creek Parks and Recreation District has leased recreation facilities at Willow Creek Lake. A courtesy handling dock was constructed by the Recreation District utilizing Oregon State Marine Board funds. A playfield area below the dam has been leased to the City of Heppner. The final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Environmental Protection Agency on December 20, 1979. The provisions of the Clear Water Act were met by a Section 404(b)(1) Evaluation and a public notice issued January 12, 1980, and a section 401 certification from the State of Oregon on February 15, 1980. Land acquisition is about 99 percent complete. Local cooperation. Development of additional recreation facilities will require a local sponsor willing to cost share and assume all operation and maintenance of facilities. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance performed. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 36. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM - LAKE BONNEVILLE, ORAND WA Location. Project is on Columbia River, 40 miles east of Portland, OR, about 146 miles above mouth of river. For description of Columbia River, see Section 3. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, and lock for power and navigation. Spillway dam extends across main channel from Cascade island shore to Bradford Island. Overflow crest at 24 feet above mean sea level is surmounted by 18 verticallift steel gates, 10 with remote control hoists placed between piers which extend to elevation 99 feet where a service roadway provides access, and two 350-ton gantry cranes for regulating gates. Powerhouse No. 1 extending across Bradford Slough to the Oregon shore has an installation of 10 units, consisting of one unit of 48,000 kilowatts, one unit of 59,500 kilowatts, and eight units of 60,000 kilowatts each, totaling 587,500 kilowatts. Ordinary and extreme fluctuations of river at lower lock gate are about 21 and 47 feet respectively. Project includes fish ladders to serve both main channel, Bradford Slough Channel, and Powerhouse II channel. Navigation lock and powerhouses are founded on andesite, and main dam rests on solidified sedimentary rock of volcanic origin. The pool created by dam provides a navigable channel 27 feet deep between Bonneville and The Dalles Dams, a distance of 47 river miles. Principal data concerning navigation lock, spillway dam, and powerplant are set forth in Table 28-N. Dam, navigation lock, 10-unit power generating installation, fishways, and attendant buildings and grounds cost $83,239,395, of which $6,072,480 is for navigation facilities, $39,350,824 for power facilities and $37,816,091 for joint facilities, consisting of dam, fishways, buildings and grounds, and headwall section of power units 0 to 6, cost of which $2,106,000 is allocated to dam and lake facilities. In response to flow regulations and peakings from upstream plants operating under conditions of Canadian storage and Pacific Northwest-Southwest Intertie, two modifications were undertaken at the Bonneville project. The modification for peaking project was undertaken to minimize adverse environmental effects under rapidly changing flow conditions from upstream dams. The project was completed in 1978 at a cost of $27,195,000. The second modification provided for increased power installation by building a second powerhouse located on the Washington shore adjacent to the end of the existing spillway. The new powerhouse contains eight units of 66,500 kilowatts each and two fish attraction turbine generator units of 13,100 kilowatts each for a combined capacity of 558,200 kilowatts, bringing the entire Bonneville capacity to 1,145.7 megawatts. Additional fish facilities consist of the powerhouse collection system, second fish ladder on the Washington shore, transportation channel connecting the Cascade Island fish ladder with new exit control section, and fingerling bypass facilities which include fish screens in both the powerhouses. To provide for the anticipated increased visitor use, onsite visitor facilities are included. Under authority of the Bonneville Project Act (August 20, 1937), a letter from Bonneville Power Administration to North Pacific Division 28-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 dated January 21, 1965, requested construction of a second powerhouse. Construction of project started October 1933, was completed February 1943. Modification of powerhouse control equipment started March 1957, was completed September 1958. First two power units were placed in operation during fiscal year 1938. Powerhouse with complete installation of 10 units, was in operation December 1943. Construction of modification for peaking work commenced in September 1970 and was completed in September 1978. Construction of second powerhouse is near completion. Final environmental impact statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in April 1972. In response to increasing visitation which now exceeds 800,000 a year at the dam site itself and 2,700,000 project wide, a visitor center with windows into the fish ladders, a 60-seat theatre, exhibits and displays was completed in 1975. Units 11 through 18 were on-line by October, 1982. The visitor facility for the new powerhouse (which does not require cost-sharing) is an integral part of that structure. The total cost for construction of the second powerhouse is estimated at $678,857,000. In June 1993 work began on the rehabilitation of the First Powerhouse. In the first phase the existing circuit breakers and ten transformers were replaced and the switchyard was rehabilitated. Circuit breaker work was completed in 1995. The remaining work was completed in 1997. Phase I will cost an estimated $27,100,000. The second phase consists of replacing the windings of five generators and replacing ten turbines. Second phase work was contracted in 1994 and is scheduled to be completed in 2005. Phase II will cost an estimated $89,100,000. The first powerhouse, spillway, navigation lock and associated facilities have been designated as a National Historic District. Development of recreation facilities at Home Valley was completed in FY 1989. Through September 1997, power generation totaled 245.0 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $648.2 million was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required, except for non-federal cost-sharing for development of recreational facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Real estate actions regarding highway, railroad, and City of North Bonneville relocations continued. A contract for restoration work on Hamilton Island was awarded and completed. Maintenance: Increased activities to protect and enhance the anadromous fisheries in the Northwest were performed. Unit 11 rewedge was accomplished. Completed purchase of powerhouse I exciters. Initiated navigation lock gate retensioning. Completed dredging of the forebay. Routine operation and maintenance was performed with enhanced maintenance on the turbines. During the fiscal year 5,808,524,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated, of which 5,779,685,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Major Rehabilitation: A contract to rehabilitate the generators and turbines is in progress. 37. COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION, OR AND WA Location. At Bonneville, The Dalles, and John Day Dams on the Columbia River in the states of Oregon and Washington. This project encompasses work at five other locations within Walla Walla District. Existing project. The eight Corps hydroelectric projects on the lower Columbia and Snake Rivers have been identified as a major contributing factor in causing mortality to migrating salmon and steelhead. Without adequate bypass facilities to guide juvenile fish away from the power turbines at the dams, mortalities incurred through project passage severely impact the commercial, recreational, and Indian fisheries. The Corps has recognized the need to reduce juvenile mortality and has undertaken bypass measures that include mechanized fish bypass systems with barge and truck transportation. Spill as an additional bypass route over the spillways has been used to divert fish from entering turbine units, but it is a signi ficant adverse economic factor due to lost power revenues. Congress passed and the President signed the FY 1989 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act (PL 100-371) which mandated the expenditure of funds for the design, testing, and construction of new or improved fish bypass facilities for the Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation projects. Completion of the bypass and transportation facilities will significantly increase the survival of migrating downstream juvenile fish. The mitigation study will determine the overall scope of the juvenile and adult fish bypass facilities for these Columbia and Snake River dams. The plan of improvement within Portland District includes the following: (a) Bonneville - new juvenile fish monitoring facilities, and outfall relocation; (b) The Dalles - submerged extended fish screens and bypass system, new gantry crane and maintenance facility; (c) John Day - new juvenile fish monitoring facility, and planning and design for potential drawdown of the reservoir to minimum operating pool; (d) a mitigation study that analyzes long-term alternatives including surface bypass technology, gas abatement and improved turbine passage to improve fish passage and survival through Corps dams on the Columbia and Snake Rivers. The current fully funded total estimated Federal project cost is $1,386,000,000 which includes $778,400,000 for improvements in Walla Walla District, $597,817,000 in Portland District and $9,783,000 provided by the Bonneville Power Administration for design of the Bonneville juvenile fish monitoring facility. For information on the planned improvements in the upper Columbia and Snake Rivers, see Walla Walla District's Annual Report. 28-16 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: General: Continued to collect biological and hydraulic data at all projects, and develop alternatives to improve existing anadromous fish bypass methodology and systems, to reduce excess dissolved gas entrainment associated with use of the spillways and to improve turbine passage survival. Bonneville Dam: Awarded a contract for construction of new juvenile bypass outfall for the second powerhouse. Continued preparation of plans and specifications for the main contract for bypass improvements and outfall flume. Awarded a contract for construction of a surface bypass prototype for the first powerhouse for testing in FY98. The Dalles Dam: Initiated sluiceway and spillway juvenile survival studies in conjunction with development of future bypass system alternatives. Developed alternatives for relocating sluiceway outfall and for provision of emergency auxiliary water for adult fishways. John Day Dam: Neared completion of construction of a new juvenile fish monitoring facility. Continued construction of spillway flow deflectors. Continued testing of extended length (40 ft.) bypass screens for potential replacement of existing 20 ft. screens associated with the existing juvenile bypass system. 38. COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY FISHING ACCESS SITES, OR & WA Location. This project provides for construction of 31 sites along the Columbia River on Bonneville pool, John Day pool, and The Dalles pool. Existing project. Congress has provided authority through public law to implement a wide range of land management, transfer, acquisition and development actions to provide fishing access for Indian tribes who exercise treaty fishing rights on the Columbia River. The law designates certain federal sites on Bonneville, John Day, and The Dalles pools for fishing access. The improvements required at the access sites are specified in the authorizing legislation. They will include all weather access roads, camping facilities, boat ramps, docks, sanitation, and fish cleaning facilities. Construction of these facilities will greatly improve access by the four tribes which have fishing rights along this reach of the Columbia River. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Construction of the first four sites was completed. Land acquisition and work on plans and specifications for Phase II sites continued. Construction of the second phase commenced. 39. COUGAR LAKE, OR Location. At mile 4.4 on South Fork McKenzie River which joins McKenzie River about 56.5 miles above its confluence with Willamette River. Project is about 42 miles east of Eugene, OR. Existing project. A rockfill dam with an impervious earth core, about 1,738 feet long at crest and 445 feet high above the streambed. Reservoir is 6 miles long with storage capacity at full pool of 219,000 acre-feet and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of210 square miles. Spillway is on right abutment and outlet and power tunnels in left abutment. Outlet tunnel is provided with a chute and stilling basin. Powerplant consists of two 12,500 kilowatt units with minimum provisions for installing a third unit of 35,000 kilowatts for future peaking capacity. Improvement functions as a unit in coordinated system of reservoirs for multiple-purpose development of water resources in Willamette River Basin. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service. Also authorized (but unconstructed) is a reregulating dam, Strube Lake, below Cougar Lake, which would permit Cougar to operate as a peaking powerplant. The Strube dam would contain two units totalling 4,600 kilowatts. Estimated Federal cost of Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Units is $114,000,000. Construction of project initiated June 1956 is complete, excluding Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit for which planning is essentially complete. Also, plans and specifications for the first construction contract (relocations) have been completed. Generating units 1 and 2 were placed in commercial operation March 23 and February 4, 1964, respectively. Physical in-service date for flood control was November 29, 1963. Through September 1997 power generation totaled 4.5 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $25,756,530 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. The addition of water temperature control to the intake tower is authorized. Water temperature control will enhance fish passage and incubation in the McKenzie River. Work on the PreEngineering and Design Phase continued. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. Completed environmental cleanup of Strube site. During fiscal year, 179,603,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project, of which 178,648,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Cougar Lake on South Fork McKenzie River are shown on Table 28-K. 40. DETROIT LAKE - BIG CLIFF, OR Location. On North Santiam River with dam 50 miles from mouth 40 miles southeast of Salem, OR. North Santiam River flows north and west for 85 miles, and unites with South Santiam River to form Santiam River, which 10 miles downstream enters Willamette River 108 miles above its mouth. Existing project. Main dam and a reregulating dam, both with power-generating facilities. Detroit Dam is a concrete gravity structure about 1,522 feet long and 454 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to roadway deck. Spillway is a gate-controlled overflow section, and outlet works are gate-controlled conduits through dam. Powerhouse with two units having a capacity of50,000 kilowatts each is in right abutment immediately below dam. Reservoir has a storage capacity at full pool of 454,900 acre-feet and controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 438 square miles. It is being operated as a unit in coordinated reservoir system to protect Willamette Valley from floods, to increase low water flows in 28-17 , - REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 interest of navigation and irrigation, to generate power, and for other purposes. Reregulating dam 3 miles downstream at Big Cliff site is concrete gravity type, about 191 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to roadway deck. Power installation consists of one unit with a capacity of 18,000 kilowatts. Reservoir has a storage capacity of 5,930 acre-feet at full pool. Project is a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Willamette Basin. Recreation facilities are provided by the U.S. Forest Service, Oregon State Park System and the town of Detroit. Construction of project begun in May 1947 was completed December 1960. The two powerhouse generating units were placed in commercial operation June and October 1953. At Big Cliff powerhouse, single generating unit was placed online June 1954. Use of Big Cliff Dam for reregulating fluctuating flow from Detroit units was effected October 1953. Through September 1997 power generation totaled 21.5 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $77,061,137 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 599,605,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project of which 596,604,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by the Detroit Lake project on North Santiam River are shown in Table 28-K. 41. GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OR Location. At approximate mile 5.5 on Middle Santiam River which joins South Santiam River about 56.8 miles above its confluence with Willamette River. Dam is about 30 miles southeast of Albany in Linn County, OR. Existing project. Main dam and a reregulating dam, both with power-generating facilities. Green Peter Dam is a concrete gravity structure, 1,400 feet long and 385 feet high above the lowest point of the general foundation with a gate-controlled spillway. Outlet works consist of two conduits through spillway, discharging into a stilling basin. Powerplant, on right bank adjacent to spillway stilling basin, consists of two units with an installed capacity of 80,000 kilowatts. Reservoir provides storage capacity at full pool of 430,000 acre-feet, extending 6.5 miles up Quartzville Creek and some 7.5 miles up Middle Santiam River above creek junction, forming a Y-shaped pool. Reservoir controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 277 square miles. Foster Dam, 7 miles downstream from Green Peter Dam is located on South Santiam River about 38 miles above its confluence with Santiam River and 1.5 miles below its confluence with Middle Santiam River. Foster Dam consists of an earth, gravel, and rock-filled embankment, 146 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation and a concrete gravity gate controlled spillway and stilling basin for a total length of 4,800 feet. Power installation consists of two units with capacity of 20,000 kilowatts. Foster Lake has a storage capacity, at full pool, of 61,000 acre-feet. Project functions as a unit in coordinated system of reservoirs for multiple-purpose development of water resources in Willamette River Basin. All construction on Green Peter-Foster Lakes project initiated June 1961 is completed. Green Peter Lake was placed in operation for useful flood control June 1967 as a unit of coordinated reservoir system for protection of the Willamette River Basin. First power-generation unit was placed on the line June 9, 1967 and second, June 28, 1967. Use of Foster Lake for reregulating fluctuating flows from Green Peter units was effective December 1967. First power generation unit was placed on-line August 22, 1968 and second, September 6, 1968. Through September 1997 power generation totaled 10.3 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $64,423,222 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Future recreation development at Foster or Green Peter will require cost sharing. Recreation facilities at Foster Lake includes 4 parks and 2 parks at Green Peter Lake. Five of these parks were developed by the Corps and are operated by Linn county under lease agreement. One park is operated by the Corps. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. During the fiscal year 367,624,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project of which 365,318,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Green Peter Lake project on Middle Santiam River are shown in Table 28-K. 42. HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR Location. On the Middle Fork, Willamette River, 47.8 miles from mouth and 26.5 miles upstream from Lookout Point Dam. Middle Fork, Willamette River rises on west slope of Cascade Range and flows northwesterly to its junction with Coast Fork, Willamette River. Dam is about 45 miles southeast from Eugene, OR. Existing project. An earth-and-gravel-fill dam about 2,150 feet long at the crest and 338 feet above lowest point of the general foundation. A gate-controlled concrete gravity chutetype spillway is in right abutment. Diversion tunnel, outlet tunnel and power tunnel are in same abutment. Powerhouse with two 15,000 kilowatt units is located next to spillway. Hills Creek Lake is about 8.5 miles long and provides storage capacity at full pool of356,000 acre-feet. Project controls runoff of drainage area of 389 square miles and is an integral unit of comprehensive plan for development of water resources of Willamette River Basin. Hills Creek Lake and Lookout Point Lake are operated as a unit for control of floods and generation of power on Middle Fork Willamette River. These projects, in conjunction with Dexter reregulating dam and Fall Creek Lake flood control system, will effectively control floods on Middle Fork and provide maximum efficient generation of hydroelectric power. Recreation facilities are provided by the 28-18 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT U.S. Forest Service. Hills Creek power units are remote controlled from Lookout Point. Construction of project, initiated May 1956,was completed June 1963. The project was placed in service for useful flood control in November 1961. On May 2, 1962, the two power units were placed on-line. Through September 1997, power generation totaled 5.5 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $23,970,396 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year, 176,907,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were generated at project, of which 176,328,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Hills Creek Lake on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 28-K. 43. JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM - LAKE UMATILLA, OR AND WA Location. On Columbia River about 3 miles downstream from mouth of John Day River and about 215 miles above mouth of Columbia River. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladders, and appurtenant facilities with a slack-water lake about 75 miles long extending to McNary Lock and Dam. Included is relocation of railroads, highways, utilities, and communities affected by the impoundment. The project as originally authorized would have provided 2,000,000 acre-feet of flood control storage. As modified, the project provides 500,000 acrefeet of flood control storage between elevations 257 and 268. The structure is 5,900 feet in length and stands about 161 feet above streambed. Powerhouse has space for 20 generating units of 135,000 kilowatts each; 16 units have been installed for a present capacity of 2,160,000 kilowatts. Principal project data are set forth in Table 28-N. A detailed description of project as authorized and modified is on pages 1992 and 1993 of Annual Report for 1962 under the Walla Walla District. Construction began July 1958 and the project was opened to navigation April 1968. The main dam contract is complete. Lock rehabilitation work begun in FY 1980 was completed in FY 1986. Through September 1997 power generation totaled 304.4 billion kilowatt-hour. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $445,560,418 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Recreation facilities at 5 parks are operated and maintained by local agencies under lease agreement with the Corps. Six developed recreation areas are operated and maintained by the Corps of Engineers. Any future recreation development will require cost sharing. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Increased activities to protect and enhance the anadromous fisheries in the Northwest were performed. Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 13,705,641,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power were generated by the 16 generating units of which 13,685,570,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Rehabilitation: Final major contract for rewinding of 5 generators continued and is scheduled for FY 1999 completion. 44. LOOKOUT POINT - DEXTER LAKES, OR Location. On Middle Fork, Willamette River at Meridian site, 21.3 miles from mouth. Middle Fork, Willamette River, rises in Lane County on western slope of Cascade Range and flows northwesterly to its junction with Coast Fork, which is head of mainstem Willamette River. Dam is about 22 miles southeast from Eugene, OR. Existing project. A main dam at Meridian site and a reregulating dam 3 miles downstream at Dexter site. Both dams are earth-and-gravel-fills with concrete spillways and have power generating facilities. Main dam is 258 feet high from lowest point of the general foundation to deck and is 3,381 feet long at crest forming a reservoir 14.2 miles long providing storage of 456,000 acre-feet at full-pool level. Reservoir controls runoff of tributary drainage area of 991 square miles. Spillway, 274 feet long, is a gate-controlled overflow type, forming right abutment. Outlet works consisting of slide-gatecontrolled conduits pass through spillway section. Powerhouse has three main generating units with a capacity of 120,000 kilowatts. Dexter reregulating dam has a maximum height of 107 feet above lowest point of the general foundation and is 2,765 feet long at crest, forming a full pool of 27,500 acre-feet extending upstream to main dam and providing pondage to regulate Lookout Point powerhouse water releases to a uniform discharge. Spillway consists of a gate-controlled overflow section 509 feet long forming right abutment. Flow regulation is accomplished by use of spillway gates and releases through powerhouse, which contains one 15,000- kilowatt unit. Lookout Point and Dexter Lakes are operated as a single unit of a coordinated system of reservoirs to protect Willamette River Valley against floods, to provide needed hydroelectric power, and to increase low water flows for navigation, irrigation, and other purposes. Existing project authorized as a unit of comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in Willamette River Basin. Construction of project initiated May 1947 was completed June 1961, except for construction of additional recreation facilities funded through the Code 710 program. Future recreation facilities will be provided in accordance with the cost-sharing contract with Lane County and will require a 50 percent contribution by Lane County and is subject to funding availability by the Government and the County. At Lookout Point powerhouse, generating units 1,2, and 3 were placed in 28-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 commercial operation December 1954, February 1955, and April 1955, respectively. At Dexter powerhouse the single unit was placed on-line May 1955. Dexter was placed in operation for reregulation in December 1954. Through September 1997 power generation totaled 17.2 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $86,570,096 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. A multiple project cost sharing agreement has been in force with Lane County since September 1976. It includes 4 projects and 13 parks. All these parks are managed by Lane County under lease agreement. Recreation opportunities are provided at 2 parks on Dexter Lake which are operated by Lane County via the multi-project cost-sharing agreement and lease instruments. The north shore of Lookout Point Lake is also leased to Lane County for recreation purposes; there is essentially no development. Future development will require a supplement to the cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract work continued to supply new generator windings for Lookout Point and Dexter. Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 472,039,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 469,839,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville PowerAdministration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Lookout Point Lake project on Middle Fork Willamette River are shown in Table 28-K. 45. LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Location. On Upper Rogue River at mile 153.6 about 30 miles northeasterly from Medford, OR. Existing project. A rock and gravel-fill embankment dam about 327 feet high from streambed to crest, with an overall length of 3,750 feet with an impervious earth core and a gatecontrolled concrete spillway. Powerhouse is on right abutment and houses two Francis-type turbines with installed capacity of 24,500 kilowatts each. Regulating outlet facility was provisions for temperature regulation for releases in interest of fishery enhancement is also on right bank. Reservoir 10 miles long provides 315,000 acre-feet of usable storage. Project provides control of runoff of drainage area of 674 square miles. In addition to hydroelectric power generation, project provides flood control, irrigation, future municipal and industrial (M&I) water supply, fish and wildlife enhancement, water quality control and recreation benefits. Construction of project initiated July 1967 is complete. Generating units 1 and 2 were placed in commercial operation July 6 and July 13, 1977, respectively. Physical in-service date for flood control was February 18, 1977. Final environmental statement was filed with Council on Environmental Quality in June 1972. Recreation opportunities are provided by 4 parks at the project. The State of Oregon operates 2 parks, including a 200 unit campground, part of Stewart State Park. Through September 1997, power generation totaled 5.8 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $33,866,892 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Authorizing act required that local agencies furnish assurances prior to construction that demands will be made for future use of water supply storage within a period that will permit repayment of costs, including interest, allocated to water supply within life of the project; that State of Oregon take action, prior to construction to insure maintenance in stream of flows to be released for fishery; in addition, costs allocated to irrigation would have to be repaid in manner and to an extent consistent with reclamation laws and policies; and costs allocated to power will be repaid on a system basis by revenue from sales of power in Pacific Northwest Federal system by Bonneville Power Administration. A survey in September, 1980 of M&I water supply needs showed nine communities with water supply needs. A contract for M&I supply has been completed with one of the communities. Assurances for municipal and industrial water supply were obtained from six communities in Rogue River Valley. On February 26, 1966 Oregon State Department of Fish and Wildlife agreed to operate Cole M. Rivers Fish Hatchery for mitigation and enhancement of fish. The Corps provides full funding for the operation and maintenance of the hatchery. The hatchery became operational in 1972. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 366,044,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated by the project of which 362,171,000 kilowatt-hours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Freshets regulated by Lost Creek Lake on Rogue River are shown in Table 28-K. 46. THE DALLES LOCK AND DAM - LAKE CELILO, WAAND OR Location. On Columbia River at head of pool behind Bonneville Dam, about 192 miles above mouth of river and 88 miles east of Portland, OR. Existing project. A dam, powerplant, navigation lock, and appurtenant facilities. Improvement provides for navigation and hydroelectric power generation. Dam is designed for a normal pool at elevation 160 feet at mean sea level. Normal pool forms a reservoir extending upstream about 23 miles providing slackwater to John Day Dam site. The Dalles Dam is 8,700 feet long and consists of a rock, gravel, and sand river closure section from Oregon shore connecting to a nonoverflow section which in turn joins powerhouse, then concrete nonoverflow sections connecting spillway with powerhouse and spillway with navigation lock at right abutment on Washington shore. Fish-passing facilities including two ladders and a fish lock are provided. Powerhouse was constructed for 14 units initially with substructure for eight additional units, an ultimate total of22 units. Initial installation, excluding two 13,500 kilowatt fish-water units, is 1,092,000 kilowatts. With eight units installed for a capacity of 687,800 kilowatts. The total generating capacity is 1,806,800 kilowatts. Structures are founded on Columbia River basalt. Principal data concerning lock, spillway, and powerhouse are set forth in Table 28-N. 28-20 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Major construction of project initiated February 1952, was completed October 1960 when unit No. 14 was placed in commercial operation. Initial contract for additional units 15- 22 was awarded in September 1967. Additional 8-unit phase was completed when unit 22 was placed in commercial operation in November 1973. Basic recreation facilities were developed with construction funds at 4 parks on Lake Celilo. These parks were further expanded with code 710 funds in the late 60's and early 70's. Two parks are operated by Washington State Park Commission under a lease agreement. Studies for adding power generation facilities to the North Shore Fish LadderAuxiliary Water supply System were initiated in October 1979 and completed in December 1980. These facilities would provide baseload generation (3.5 megawatts) and would not impact the present operation of the North Fish Ladder. However, it was determined that it was not within the Chief of Engineer's authority to add these power facilities. A local interest, North Wasco County Public Utility District pursued the construction of these power facilities through the FERC license processes and awarded a construction contract in September 1989. Seufert Visitor Center was completed in September 1980. In October 1996 work began on major rehabilitation of powerhouse units 1-14. Work includes rewind of nine generators, replacement of blades on twelve turbine units, refurbishment of blades on two turbine units, and refurbishment of two bridge cranes. The total cost for major rehabilitation is estimated at $94,000,000 with completion in September 2007. Through September 1997, power generation totaled 284.4 billion kilowatt-hours. Of the gross income from sale of this power by Bonneville Power Administration, $408,232,509 was reimbursed to the U.S. Treasury to recover Corps of Engineers project investment and operating costs. Local cooperation. Further recreation development will require cost sharing and assumption of operation and maintenance by local, non-federal sponsor. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Completed rewind of unit 7 with funds provided by Bonneville Power Administration. Increased activities to protect and enhance the anadromous fisheries in the Northwest were performed. Routine operation and maintenance continued. During fiscal year 7,980,991,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical power energy were generated at project of which 7,955,551,000 kilowatthours were delivered to Bonneville Power Administration, the marketing agency. Major Rehabilitation: Exercised an optional bid item under an ongoing contract to initiate rewind of unit 11. Awarded a contract to initiate work on the bridge cranes. Continued preparation of plans and specifications for the main unit contract. Work Under Special Authorities 47. PROJECTS NOT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED A. Continuing Authorities Program (CAP): General Requirements: Individual projects have specific requirements pursuant to the statutes which provide their authorization. In general, however, each project selected must be complete in itself, technically feasible, economically justified, environmentally acceptable, and limited to a federal statutory cost. The local sponsor must agree to provide without cost to the Department of Army, all lands, easements, and rights-ofway, including highway, highway bridge, and utility relocations and alterations required for project construction; provide a cash contribution; operate, maintain, repair, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion; hold and save the Department of the Army free from damages arising from the construction, operation, and maintenance of the completed project; and assume all project costs in excess of the federal statutory cost limit. Specific requirements by statute for the authorization of each type of CAP project are discussed in detail below: See Table 28-L for expenditures under CAP during the fiscal year. Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107 of the 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act, Public Law 645, 86th Congress, as Amended: In addition to the above general requirements, each project selected is limited to a federal statutory cost of not more than $4,000,000. The local sponsor must agree to provide an amount, in cash, not less than 10 percent or more than 50 percent of total project cost for navigation depending upon the planned depth of channel or basin; pay an additional 10 percent of the construction costs in cash over a period not to exceed 30 years after project completion. The non-federal sponsor must also agree to provide, maintain, and operate an adequate public parking, landing or wharf, service facilities, berthing areas, floats, pier, slips and similar marina and mooring facilities. The remaining portion of the project, such as the access channel or breakwater structure, is maintained by the Corps of Engineers at Federal expense within a limited amount. Federal expenditures for operation and maintenance under the Section 107 authority are administratively limited to the greater of $4,500,000, or 2.25 times the Federal costs of the project including costs for the feasibility through the construction phases. Three projects are under construction as follows: Columbia River Deep Draft Anchorage, Vancouver, WA: Location. The deep draft anchorage, which includes the U.S. Coast Guard designed anchorage area near Hayden Island, is located on the Oregon side of the existing federally authorized 40-foot Columbia River channel, near Vancouver, Washington, between river miles 102 and 103. Project Description. The existing procedure being used is for the Columbia River Pilots to decide where to anchor a vessel. The vessel drops either one or two bow anchors at the recommendation of the pilots. At the onset of anchoring, the vessel is outside of the boundary of the 40-foot navigation channel. As wind conditions change, the probability of a vessel tending to swing on its anchor increases. This then creates a hazardous condition for vessels navigating the main channel as they attempt to maneuver around anchored vessels that are partially in the channel. Safe anchoring in the Columbia River is dependent upon a combination of several factors: water and 28-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 wind currents, tides, vessel size (overall length, draft, and cargo volume), and the level of congestion in the anchoring area. The project which was constructed, consists of two anchorage areas in the Columbia River by placement of two stern anchor buoys, one at each location. The downstream one is designated as a deep site for a loaded or fully laden vessel. A buoy was placed in the river 300 feet off the existing channel. The second buoy was placed 725 feet off the existing channel, which would be designated for light laden vessels or empty vessels. The cost for preparation of plans and specifications and the construction of the project was $376,791, of which $282,593 is federal and $94,198 cash is non-federal. The nonfederal sponsors, Port of Portland and Port of Vancouver, provided $53,698 and $40,500, respectively. Local cooperation. The Ports of Portland and Vancouver, the non-federal sponsors, signed Project Cooperation Agreements on January 3, 1994. Operations during fiscal year. Fiscal closeout. Newport, OR: Location. The project is located at Newport in Lincoln County, Oregon, parallel to the north shore of Yaquina Bay. Yaquina Bay is located on the Oregon Coast, 113 miles south of the Columbia River mouth and 87 miles north of Coos Bay. Project Description. The existing timber breakwater was constructed in 1946 to provide wave and surge protection for moorage facilities in the North Marina. Although severe storms have cause some damaged to the breakwater, it still provides protection to boats in the marina. However, waves enter the North Marina through the western end and cause damage to vessels and dock facilities. Existing docks and commercial fishing boats need additional protection against wave and tidal surge entering from the west entrance. This project consists of constructing a 180-foot rubblemound extension to the existing Federal Breakwater. The crest elevation is 15 feet, mean lower low water (MLLW) with side slopes of 2-vertical to 3-horizontal. The foundation depth of the structure will vary from -12 to -20 MLLW. The alignment of the new structure will extend from the existing breakwater to the northwest and provide a 125-foot entrance into the marina. Waves will be reduced from 2.8 feet to 1.3 feet at the westernmost dock (#3) for a one percent probability of exceedence. Waves at Dock (#5) will also be reduced. The estimated cost for preparation of plans and specifications and construction of the project is $1,421,740, of which $1,299,500 is federal and $122,240 cash non-federal. Local cooperation. The Port of Newport, Oregon, the nonfederal sponsor, executed a Project Cooperation Agreement with the Corps of Engineers on April 23, 1997. Operations during fiscal year. A contract for construction of the project was awarded on July 29, 1997 and is scheduled to be completed in fiscal year 1998. Westport, OR - Puget Island, WA (Wahkiakum Ferry): Location. The Wahkiakum Ferry route extends across the Columbia River at approximately River Mile 43, between Westport, in Clatsop County, Oregon and Puget Island, Wahkiakum County, Washington. These counties are located about 70 miles west of Portland, Oregon. Project Description. Shoaling occurs directly offshore of the ferry dock at Puget Island and cannot be circumnavigated, causing delays and unsafe operation conditions for the ferry, especially at low tide. The ferry has been restricted to half capacity during part of the year. The project consists of a channel extending 1,900 feet from the Wahkiakum County Ferry ramp at Puget Island to the existing federally authorized Columbia River navigation channel. This newly dredged channel is 9 feet deep (Columbia River Datum), 200 feet wide and 900 feet long: the remaining 1,000 feet extending to the existing authorized channel is in a naturally deep area and did not require dredging. The cost for preparation of the plans and specifications and the construction of the project was $215,853, of which $194,268 is federal and $21,585 cash is non-federal. Local cooperation. Wahkiakum County, Washington, the non-federal sponsor, executed a Project Cooperation Agreement with the Corps of Engineers in October 1993. Operations during fiscal year. Fiscal closeout. Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as Amended: In addition to the above general requirements, each project selected is limited to a federal statutory cost of not more than $5,000,000. The local sponsor must agree to provide an amount not less than 25 percent or more than 50 percent of total project cost, at least 5 percent of which will be cash; and operate, maintain, repair, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion. One project was under construction as follows: Peninsula Drainage District No. 1, OR: Location. Peninsula Drainage District is located in Portland, Oregon along the Columbia River near river mile 106. Project Description. The Peninsula Drainage District is surrounded by 6.8 miles of levees, flood walls, and railroad and highway embankments. The weak links in the flood protect works are the railroad embankment and the outlet pipe of the pumping plant located on the Columbia Slough levee. The project consists of reinforcing the flood protective system in order to protect against the 100-year reoccurrence frequency flood event. This will be accomplished by reinforcing 2,000 linear feet of the landward side of the railroad embankment at the southwest corner of the drainage district and raising the outlet pipes of the pumping station to above-design flood level of 28.7 feet Portland Datum. The railroad embankment will be reinforced by constructing a sand embankment structure against the landward slope of the railroad embankment having a 12-foot wide crown and 1 vertical to 5 horizontal side slopes. The catch point along a portion of this fill is in a golf course 28-22 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT water hazard and the embankment will cover existing golf course tees. As a consequence, a 200 linear foot gabion retaining wall will confine the fill and allow construction of a flat bench so the tees can be re- established. The height of the retaining wall will vary from 2 to 9 feet. The estimated cost for preparation of plans and specifications and construction of the project is $1,484,000, of which $1,113,000 is federal and $371,000 is non-federal. Local cooperation. The Peninsula Drainage District Number 1, Oregon, the non-federal sponsor, signed a Project Cooperation Agreement on July 3, 1997. Operations during fiscal year. A contract for construction of the project was awarded on September 29, 1997 and is scheduled to be completed in fiscal year 2000. Emergency Streambank Protection Activities Pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as Amended: In addition to the general requirements, each project selected is limited to a federal statutory expenditure of not more than $500,000 in any one year. The local sponsor must agree to provide an amount not less than 25 percent or more than 50 percent of total project cost, at least 5 percent of which will be cash; and operate, maintain, repair, replace, and rehabilitate the project upon completion. One project is under construction as follows: Albany, OR : Location. The project is located on the right bank of the Calapooia River at river mile 5.4, near the City of Albany, Oregon. Project Description. The project consists of a riprap revetment along 550 linear feet of eroding bankline to prevent encroachment of the Calapooia River into a landfill containing hazardous wastes. Both hazardous and non-hazardous wastes were deposited at the site, including mildly radioactive material, combustibles, petroleum products, and debris. The construction cost of the project was $274,476, of which $205,857 was federal and $68,619 was non-federal. The planning and design costs were federally financed through the Willamette River Basin Bank Protection Program as authorized by the Flood Control Acts of 1936, 1938, and 1950, as amended, and are not subject to cost sharing under the Section 14 authority. Local cooperation. The sponsor, the City of Albany, Oregon, signed a Project Cooperation Agreement on August 2, 1996. Operations during fiscal year. Fiscal closeout. B. Modifications to Structures and Operations of Constructed Corps Projects to Improve the Quality of the Environment, Pursuant to Section 1135 of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act, Public Law 662, 99th Congress, as Amended. The Section 1135 program provides the authority for the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers to modify existing civil works projects to restore the environment. A non-federal entity is required to sponsor the project. The project must accomplish restoration by modifying a Corps project or operation of a Corps project, or be located on Corps project lands. The project must be feasible and consistent with the authorized purpose. The non-federal sponsor generally must assume responsibility of the operation and maintenance associated with the project. Planning studies, detailed design, and construction costs are shared by the Corps 75 percent and non-federal sponsor 25 percent. Total project costs cannot exceed $5 million with the federal share limited to $3,750,000 without specific congressional authorization. See Table 28-L for expenditures under Section 1135 during the fiscal year. Two projects are under construction as follows: Coos Bay Western Snowy Plover Habitat Restoration, OR: Location: The project modification is located on the North Spit of Coos Bay, adjacent to river mile 2 of the Coos River. The Coos River Entrance is located on the southern Oregon coast, approximately 200 miles south of the Columbia River. Project Description. The coastal population of the western snowy plover in California, Oregon, and Washington, listed as federally threatened in 1993, has declined primarily because of loss of open beach habitats caused by the spread of European beachgrass. The Coos Bay North Spit has provided the most important remnant breeding habitat for western snowy plovers on the Oregon coast. European beachgrass was introduced for sand stabilization in the early 1900's and is the dominant vegetation on much of the Oregon coast including the Coos Bay North Spit. The project restores western snowy plover habitat and reintroduces pink sandverbena, a native plant species. European beachgrass will be eradicated by irrigation with salt water, cultivation, application of herbicide, and prescribed fire on approximately 71 acres on Coos Bay North spit. A fence will be constructed to limit predation and restrict human and vehicular access to the project area. The estimated total project cost, including planning and design, is $224,000, of which $168,000 is federal and $56,000 is non-federal. Local cooperation. The sponsor, the Oregon International Port of Coos Bay, signed a Project Cooperation Agreement on April 11, 1996. Operations during fiscal year. Construction of the project was initiated on May 16, 1996 and is schedule to be completed in the third quarter of fiscal year 1998. Trestle Bay Restoration, OR: Location. The modification is located at river mile 7 on the Columbia River. Project Description. The project consists of lowering (removal) of a 500 foot section of the Columbia River South Jetty to -5.6 mean sea level. The lowered section allows for 28-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 unimpeded access by fisheries resources to 603 acres of intertidal habitat and increases nutrient availability for the support populations ofestuarine, marine, and anadromous fish stocks. Construction was completed on September 25, 1995, except for post construction monitoring which is scheduled to continue through fiscal year 1998. The modifications will not increase the operation, maintenance, repair, replacement and rehabilitation cost for the Columbia River at the Mouth navigation project. The total cost for this modification, including all design and construction is estimated at $237,650, of which $178,240 is federal and $59,410 is non-federal. Excluded is the costs for the feasibility report which was prepared under the authority of Section 216 of the Rivers and Harbors Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611, and for which funding was provided in the Energy and Water Appropriations Act of 1994, Public Law 103-126. Local Cooperation. The non-federal sponsor, the State of Oregon Parks and Recreation Department signed a Project Cooperation Agreement on May 24, 1995. Operations during fiscal year. Post-construction monitoring continued. 48. EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTIVITIES PROGRAM Disaster Preparedness Program. This program encompasses all the activities associated with preparedness, which includes preparation of plans and policy documents, exercises, training, coordination with outside agencies and governments, maintaining supplies and equipment, and the like. The district developed and published an Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Standard Operation Procedure which codified the many procedures and processes attendant to EOC operations. The district also compiled the information for revisions to its Flood Response and Earthquake Response Plans. Training sessions were held by the district (with State and National Weather Service representation) at most of the counties (within our civil works boundaries) to prepare them for the winter season. Emphasis was placed on what government assistance was available to them in the event of flooding and what they should do for themselves. Public Law 84-99. The only significant flood related event occurred over the period December 27, 1996 to January 6, 1997. The district distributed slightly over 100,000 sandbags to Jackson, Josephine, Grant, Lake and Wasco counties to assist local flood fight efforts. The district provided technical assistance to Lewis County, WA; to the city of Clatskanie, OR; and to the City ofAshland, OR. Pumps were provided (loaned) to the Deer Island Drainage District to help control internal flooding due to a local power failure. The only flood fight activities undertaken occurred at Sauvie Island, where a partially completed levee repair was washed away by the Columbia River. Rehabilitation of Damaged Flood Control Structures. The district completed repairs on those levees damaged in 1996 (and not repaired that year) and those few levees damaged during this event. Initial Eligibility Inspections. The district received several requests for inspections to determine whether levees could be entered in the Corps' Inspection Program. All but two were denied for not meeting the criteria. Those two are pending acceptance awaiting final analysis. Continuing Eligibility Inspections. The district completed all scheduled annual inspections of flood control works. Public Law 96-288. Although several Oregon Counties received Federal Disaster Declarations as a result of flood and storm damage, no FEMA missions were tasked to the district as a result. See Table 28-M for expenditures during the fiscal year. General Investigations 49. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,604,368 of which $638,865 was for navigation studies, $25,963 for flood damage prevention studies, $89,221 for Environmental Services Partnerships, $369,810 for comprehensive studies, $413,219 for miscellaneous activities, and $67,290 for coordination with other agencies. Contributed funds in the amount of $852,283 were expended of which $580,072 was contributed by the Association of Lower Columbia River Ports for the Columbia River Channel Deepening Study, $226,658 was contributed by the State of Oregon for the Willamette River Basin Review study, and $45,553 was contributed for the Planning Assistance to States Program. 50. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services. Flood Plain Management Services Program comes under Section 206 of the 1960 Flood Control Act, PL 86-645, as amended. Through technical services and planning guidance, the program encourages comprehensive flood plain management planning at all levels to reduce the potential for losses to life and property from floods. Federal and non-Federal agencies and the private sector are assisted with planning and development information for flood hazard areas. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, Federal Insurance Program requirements, and Executive Order 11988 guidelines. Such assistance may include factual flood information (available or determined) and interpretation on flood frequencies, extent of flooding, floodwater velocity, duration of flooding and floodway limits. Fiscal year costs totaling $148,303 were associated with the following tasks under the Flood Plain Management Services Program: FPMS Unit $27,539; Technical Services $30,536; Quick Responses $5,632; National Flood Proof Committee $6,283; and special studies $78,313. Contributed funds in the amount of $6,156 were expended for Flood Plain Management Services. 28-24 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT 51. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Columbia River Treaty Fishing Access Sites, OR and WA The authorized plan includes land management, acquisition, and river access facility development for Indian tribes who exercise treaty fishing rights on the Columbia River, Oregon and Washington. Public Law 100-581 Title IV designates 21 sites on Bonneville, The Dalles, and John Day pools for treaty fishing use and authorizes the acquisition of 6 additional sites on Bonneville pool from willing sellers. The law specifies the construction of access roads, boat ramps, dock sanitation, fish cleaning facilities, and others at these locations and provides additional authority for facility improvements at five sites currently administered for treaty fishing access resulting from construction of Bonneville Dam. Plans and specifications for Phase I which consists of four early action sites on Bonneville pool and of the Phase II Evaluation Report were completed. Fiscal year expenditures were -$3,000. Willamette River Temperature Control, OR The project plan consists of improving downstream water temperatures by modifying the existing intake towers at Cougar and Blue River projects. Restoring pre-project temperatures will improve survival rates and increase populations of three important native fish species: the wild stock of Willamette spring chinook salmon, the bull trout, and the rainbow trout. These fisheries once provided important recreational and commercial benefits to the region. Preconstruction engineering and design is estimated to cost $4,433,000 and be completed by March 1999. The construction phase is estimated to cost approximately $63 million. The Feature Design Memorandum was completed. Initiated design and geotechnical explorations work in support of the water bypass system. Fiscal year expenditures were $1,139,242. 28-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 28-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 to In Text Sep.30, 1997 1. Bonneville Navigation Lock, Bonneville Dam, OR and WA (Federal Funds) (Inland Waterway Trust Fund) 2. Chetco River, OR 3. Columbia and Lower Willamette Rivers Below Vancouver, WA and Portland, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Columbia River at Baker Bay, WA 5. Columbia River Between Chinook, WA, and Head of Sand Island 6. Columbia River at The Mouth, OR and WA 7. Columbia River Between Vancouver,WA and The Dalles, OR 8. Columbia River, Seafarers Memorial, Hammond, OR New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 5,021,000 1,605,000 275,000 250,000 4,789,539 1,945,123 265,846 459,423 5,021,000 1,605,000 275,000 250,000 4,737,777 1,945,123 265,846 353,704 801,000 385,000 350,000 400,000 249,262 833,173 463,980 393,612 10,993,000 10,691,000 17,039,000 22,278,000 10,350,493 11,475,425 17,041,834 20,387,161 641,000 -27,000 632,010 -13,912 6,000 1,599 31,000 774,000 882,000 10,402 638,715 1,037,172 14,000 17.973 13,000 12,526 6,576,000 4,760,000 6,651,000 2,880,000 6,397,432 4,852,373 6,661,664 3,006,465 95,000 207,000 247,000 636,000 88,958 236,752 249,834 635,048 84,000 175,429,307 50 175,396,322 50 175,429,000 175,396,016 2,043,713 ' 2,043,713 ' 9,371,673 9,363,427 28,349,304 2 28,349,304 2 376,122,296 3 374,200,693 3 665,954 4 665,954 4 941,252 941,252 4,656,087 4,655,311 220,283 5 220,283 5 7,620,877 7,616,399 24,913,661 6 24,913,661 6 153,515,835 7 153,513,630 7,322,878 7,322,878 5,989,509 8 5,989,509 8 14,248,359 9 14,246,292 9 150,000 52,024 9. Coos Bay, OR (Federal Funds) New Work Approp. Cost 2,860,000 4,407,000 2,810,065 4,413,093 28-26 37,017,092 10 36,973,250 10 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-A (CONTINUED) See Section Project In Text (Contributed Funds) 10. Coquille River, OR 11. Depoe Bay, OR 12. Port Orford, OR 14. Rogue River Harbor At Gold Beach, OR 15. Siuslaw River, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 16. Skipanon Channel, OR COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding Maint Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Contrib Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 3,095,000 4,426,000 2,545,000 3,006,000 3,215,052 4,403,212 2,635,306 3,018,236 1,133,000 1,730,000 1,131,911 1,724,174 515,000 223,000 154,000 329,000 499,311 230,600 160,933 325,948 629,000 630,082 -12,000 43,000 6,611 39,365 3,000 10,925 359,000 342,000 495,000 411,000 265,572 450,372 465,941 439,767 1,069,000 1,032,000 1,007,000 898,000 1,063,197 1,031,808 998,183 909,712 772,000 427,000 420,000 198,000 752,569 468,581 394,964 230,940 117,000 524 116.756 41,000 132,000 15.893 158.565 28-27 Total Cost to Sep.30, 1997 105,729,718 " 105,723,619 11 2,335,966 2,335,966 3,349,680 3,342,765 693,366 12 693,366 12 8,603,987 13 8,599,779 13 367,364 367,364 1,715,717 1,713,988 758,692 14 758,692 14 5,905,217 5,898,090 4,156,252 15 4,156,252 15 18,127,394 16 18,119,221 16 635,783 635,783 29,502,212 17 29,502,212 17 16,717,384 18 16,715,255 18 879,285 879,285 493,611 493,611 280,854 280,854 3,795,064 3.793.985 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 28-A (CONTINUED) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 to In Text Sep.30, 1997 17. Tillamook Bay and Bar, OR 18. Umpqua River, OR 19. Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR 20. Yaquina Bay and Harbor, OR 21. Yaquina River, OR 22. Applegate Lake, Rogue River Basin OR 23. Blue River Lake, OR New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 30,000 30,812 8,000 6,716 13,000 7,209 3,000 4,981 1,070,000 1,110,000 714,000 436,000 1,008,564 1,190,934 707,807 443,911 1,247,000 760,000 1,303,000 786,000 1,253,840 745,193 1,242,935 696,184 1,477,000 1,634,000 1,688,000 2,487,000 1,495,491 1,652,656 1,725,476 2,499,188 30,000 548,000 481,000 -278,000 22,856 545,822 328,104 -118,579 563,000 613,000 583,000 837,000 570,193 605,587 601,219 835,902 334,000 200,000 240,000 230,000 336,866 201,904 224,466 250,095 28-28 22,434,827 '" 22,434,827 '" 6,780,082 20 6,774,851 20 2,839,799 2,839,799 17,718,877 21 17,718,877 21 32,281,093 32,279,006 2,500,677 2,500,677 520,005 22 520,005 22 23,162,818 23 22,971,504 23 234,794 234,794 19,242,046 24 19,242,046 24 41,903,758 25 41,900,766 25 12,005 12,005 28,800 28,800 1,530,694 s' 1,527,897 51 91,642,489 91,642,489 8,755,115 48 8,748,423 48 32,038,225 26 32,038,225 26 4,212,299 53 4,201,214 53 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-A (CONTINUED) See Section Project In Text COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 24. Cottage Grove Lake, OR 25. Dorena Lake, OR 26. Elk Creek Lake, Rogue River Basin, OR 27. Fall Creek Lake, OR 28. Fern Ridge Lake, OR (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 30. Lower Columbia River Basin Bank Protection OR & WA 31. Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control, WA (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 32. Scappoose Drainage District, OR 34. Willamette River Basin Bank Protection, OR 35. Willow Creek Lake, OR New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost 666,000 718,000 691,000 931,000 681,923 723,951 667,752 954,616 476,000 433,000 425,000 458,000 471,695 432,081 416,996 482,749 2,985,000 421,000 700,000 473,000 533,812 769,155 987,398 1,203,214 581,000 467,000 507,000 583,000 554,509 499,144 496,088 601,053 -65,200 -56,400 961,000 946,000 1,024,000 1,324,000 982,043 937,460 1,012,831 1,343,905 -22,334 52,666 11,442 -8,519 53,872 53,872 -35,000 8,370 -50,000 3,820 50,000 130,000 32,203 111,318 -310 25,000 10,160 4,013,123 27 4,013,123 27 15,564,288 28 15,549,189 28 14,568,262 29 14,568,262 29 9,871,460 9,854,006 109,023,579 107,886,675 22,118,264 30 22,118,264 30 9,366,671 9,361,472 8,685,635 31 8,685,635 31 21,474,198 32 21,459,959 32 52,666 52,666 21,212,745 21,160,334 111,694,000 111,669,310 3,703,112 3,703,112 372,000 343,000 515,000 1,364,000 347,114 355,445 478,952 1,390,176 161,000 2,517 4,939 40,000 51,750 12,000 9,041 86,000 80,337 30,000 18,600 45,000 257,000 805,000 45,355 176,742 881,075 3,684,000 3,656,634 4,152,558 3,994,075 24,981,816 33 24,961,308 33 5,162,709 5,145,074 37,260,114 37,260,114 28-29 FY97 Total Cost to Sep.30, 1997 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 28-A (CONTINUED) See Section Project In Text COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 36. Bonneville Lock and Dam - Lake Bonneville OR and WA 37. Columbia River Fish Mitigation, OR and WA 38. Columbia River Treaty Fishing Access Sites, OR & WA 39. Cougar Lake, OR 40. Detroit Lake - Big Cliff, OR 41. Green Peter-Foster Lakes, OR 42. Hills Creek Lake, OR 43. John Day Lock and Dam - Lake Umatilla, OR and WA Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost 463,000 462,000 563,000 528,000 450,911 490,266 552,081 536,019 4,701,000 3,459,000 5,654,549 3,487,431 6,324,051 6,309,287 25,000 718,000 789,734,604 34 400,129 676,103 789,680,174 34 15,798,000 17,480,000 18,889,000 15,894,000 15,819,748 17,469,742 19,131,888 15,966,594 5,875,000 14,487,000 7,299,000 7,140,000 2,565,983 17,369,493 8,125,408 6,944,705 7,200,000 20,003,000 21,536,000 47,391,000 5,468,865 20,986,593 22,663,087 44,279,324 3,360,000 -593,000 2,970,000 2,729,000 21,608 686,392 4,664,175 2,538,734 1,351,900 1,255,000 1,142,000 1,443,000 1,366,112 1,267,831 1,134,127 1,456,129 1,885,900 1,873,000 2,293,000 2,107,000 1,896,191 1,900,949 1,989,106 2,410,295 2,633,900 2,414,000 2,398,000 2,828,000 2,464,234 2,595,529 2,405,634 2,823,012 819,000 657,000 678,000 668,000 783,167 698,043 676,849 672,351 7,913 283,237,663 35 282,974,747 35 36,091,000 35,789,828 107,977,000 52 104,460,167 52 8,466,000 7,910,909 58,636,393 36 58,636,393 36 21,135,196 49 21,107,550 49 62,729,698 62,729,698 43,273,607 47 43,237,545 47 363,086 363,086 84,005,788 7 84,005,788 37 44,150,703 38 44,116,718 38 45,700,619 45,700,619 14,103,375 39 14,099,754 39 512,400,246 40 159 512,400,246 40 14,008,000 13,087,000 11,881,000 11,850,000 13,986,274 13,007,116 12,202,888 12,122,437 6,100,000 2,840,000 2,534,000 1,591,000 5,514,311 3,417,551 2,551,108 720,230 207,470,727 4' 207,383,338 41 44,005,128 43,110,904 28-30 FY97 Total Cost to Sep.30, 1997 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-A (CONTINUED) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section Project Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 to In Text Sep.30, 1997 44. Lookout Point - Dexter New Work Lakes, OR Approp. 88,238,395 42 Cost 88,238,395 42 Maint. Approp. 6,670,900 4,062,000 6,274,000 6,109,000 78,246,532 43 Cost 4,296,520 6,457,631 5,881,268 5,593,477 77,241,010 43 45. Lost Creek Lake, New Work Rogue River Approp. 136,408,150 Basin, OR Cost 136,408,150 Maint Approp. 3,817,900 3,730,000 3,876,000 3,831,000 52,327,618 44 Cost 3,779,970 3,831,988 3,865,540 3,864,327 52,304,503 44 46. The Dalles Lock and New Work Dam - Lake Celilo, Approp. 303,260,288 45 WA and OR Cost 303,260,288 45 Maint. Approp. 11,771,000 11,769,000 12,865,000 11,820,000 189,600,670 46 Cost 11,975,161 11,824,943 12,243,654 12,609,899 189,443,950 46 Major Rehab. Approp. 1,893,000 1,893,000 Cost 1,741,337 1,741,337 1. Excludes $17,742 contributed funds for new work. 2. Includes $1,529,413 for previous project. 3. Includes $150,955 allotted from deferred maintenance funds, Code 700, $62,296 for public works accelerated program repair, and $1,214,865 for previous project.Excludes $24,320 expended from contributed funds prior to 1964. 4. Excludes $31,636 contributed by city of Astoria and Bumble Bee Sea Foods, Astoria, OR (not part of regular project). Includes $223,026 expended from contributed funds prior to 1964 and $428,136 contributed by Port of Portland and $14,792 by Port of Vancouver. 5. Includes $84,930 rehabilitation funds. 6. Includes $1,986,253 for previous project and $608,111 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. Excludes $500,000 contributed funds. 7. Includes $2,186,000 for previous project and $1,188,625 under deferred maintenance, Code 700. 8. Includes funds under Code 721 (small authorized projects) $30,393. Entrance to Oregon slough; $161,897, Camas-Washougal Turning Basin; $227,908, Hood River Small Boat Basin; $157,470, Bingen, WA, Barge Channel; and $140,619, The Dalles Small Boat Basin. 9. Includes $2,033,408 under code 700 (Deferred Maintenance). 10. Includes $802,096 for previous project, Excludes contributed funds. 11.Includes $178,801 for previous project and $1,444,640 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. Excludes $8,387 contributed funds. 12. Includes $340,726 for previous project. Excludes $72,891 contributed funds. includes $36,000 under Code 711. 13. Includes $41,467 for previous project and $78,500 under Code 700, Deferred Maintenance. 14. Excludes $9,900 contributed funds. 15. Excludes $13,779 (other funds) contributed for additional landfill and extension of drainage lines. 16. Includes $21,000, Wedderburn Study Funds. 17. Includes $1,159,357 for previous project. 18. Includes $10,611 for previous project and $188,000 under code 700, Deferred Maintenance. 19. Includes $77,209 for previous project and $57,767 under Code 720 (Small Authorized Projects) Garibaldi Boat Basin. Excludes $592,622 contributed funds and $300,000 channel dredging by local interest. 20. Includes $71,498 for previous project. Excludes $6,450 expended from contributed funds. 21. Includes $39,242 for previous project. Excludes $6,450 expended from contributed funds. 22. Excludes $300,000 contributed funds. 23. Includes $452,110 on operation and care from permanent indefinite appropriation and $150,000 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 24. Includes $707,313 for previous project and $170,000 appropriated from public works acceleration program for north jetty rehabilitation. 25. Includes $6,026 for previous project. 26. Includes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. 27. Includes $1,639,828 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 28. Includes $167,878 special recreation use fees. Includes $79,818 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements to navigable waters. 29. Includes $1,038,790 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 30. Includes $1,026,264 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project. 31. Includes $3,894,673 allotted and expended under Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project and $136,482 allotted under 721 (small authorized project) reservoir modification. Excludes $2,100 (other funds contributed). 32. Includes $9,750 allotted under Code 700, deferred maintenance. Includes $66,678 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements to navigable waters. 33. Excludes $93,733 contributed funds. 34. Includes $12,200,000 Public Works Administration funds, $20,240,700 National Recover Act Funds, $27,195,400 modification for peaking funds, $136,457 Code 710, recreation facilities at completed project funds and $627,593,352 allotted and $642,322,501 expended second powerhouse funds, $6,000 allotted, $6,000 expended power units funds. 35. Includes $540,000 deferred maintenance funds, Code 700 and $1,692,148 maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes $472,393 allotted and $277,758 expended Bonneville Power Administration funds. 28-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 36. Includes $96,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. Includes $1,789,988 allotted and $1,789,954 expended for Strube Lake and Cougar Additional Unit. 37. Includes $113,000 pro rata share of site selection costs in lieu of Quartz Creek Lake. 38. Includes $983,934 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes $56,410 allotted and $12,124 expended Bonneville Power Administration funds. 39. Includes $82,408 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes $19,205 allotted and $7,544 expended Bonneville Power Administration funds. 40. Includes $25,984 allotted and expended under 710, recreation facilities at completed projects. 41. Includes $1,361,900 for O&M and fish evaluation of Spring Creek Hatchery (funds revoked and paid to USFWS at OCE level, but a cost to project); includes $423,800 special recreation use fees. Includes $933,438 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes $445,128 allotted and $154,465 expended Bonneville Power Administration funds. 42. Includes $457,611 allotted and expended under 710, recreation facilities at completed projects. 43. Includes $991,562 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes $62,624 allotted and $15,694 expended Bonneville Power Administration funds. 44. Includes $978,478 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes $12,205 allotted and $702 expended Bonneville Power Administration funds. 45. Includes $1,140,747 allotted and expended under 710, recreation facilities at completed projects, and $52,997,220 allotted and expended additional units 15 - 22 funds. 46. Includes $721,490 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes $5,472,546 allotted and $4,108,310 expended Bonneville Power Administration funds. 47. Includes $936,376 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes $113,784 allotted and $13,116 expended Bonneville Power Administration funds. 48. Includes $66,678 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 49. Includes $861,852 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. Excludes $19,205 allotted and $6,558 expended Bonneville Power Administration funds. 50. Includes $24,307 under code 422 General Investigation. 51. Excludes $3,000 contributed funds. 52. Excludes $6,000,000 allotted and expended Bonneville Power Administration funds. 53. Includes $5,694 under maintenance and operation of dams and other improvements of navigable waters. 28-32 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized Documents BONNEVILLE NAVIGATION LOCK, BONNEVILLE DAM, OR AND WA Construction of a new navigation lock just south P.L. 99-88 of existing lock. Construction to be funded 50% from fuel taxes paid P.L. 99-662 into Inland Waterways Trust Fund. 2. H. Doc. 817, 77th Cong., 2d Sess S. Doc. 21, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 10, 96th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 102-580, 102nd Cong. Aug 15, 1985 Nov 17, 1986 Mar 02 , 1945 Oct 27, 1965 Dec 04, 1981 Oct 31, 1992 28-33 TABLE 28-B See Section in Text 1. CHETCO RIVER, OR To provide for the stabilization of the channel, by constructing jetties and dredging. Modification of channel entrance and channel improvements. Deepen channel 2 feet to 16 feet, extend the existing jetty system 750 feet for the North, and 1,250 feet for the South jetty. Assume responsibility for O&M of the approximately 200-foot-long access channel to the south commercial boat basin consistent with authorized project depths. COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS BELOW VANCOUVER, WA AND PORTLAND, OR 2 pipeline dredges and accessories. Increasing main channel to 30 feet. Consolidating improvement below Portland, OR and between Vancouver, WA and mouth of Willamette. For the Cathlamet channel. Construct an additional dredge (dredge was not built) and accessories for better maintenance, and construct contraction works. Channel from deep water in Willamette Slough to deep water in Columbia River. Depth of 25 feet and width of 300 feet from mouth of Willamette River to Vancouver, WA. Closing east channel at Swan Island in Willamette River on condition that main channel to be opened to project dimensions on west side of island by Port of Portland. For a 35-foot channel 500 feet wide from Portland to the sea. A channel 28 feet deep and 300 feet wide from mouth of Willamette River to Vancouver, with 2 turning basins, each generally 28 feet deep by 800 feet wide by 2,000 feet long. A channel in Columbia River from mouth of Willamette to interstate highway bridge at Vancouver, WA, 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide, with 2 turning basins at Vancouver. Maintenance of not to exceed 35 foot depth at low water in Portland Harbor and Willamette River between its mouth and Broadway Bridge at Portland. Auxiliary channels, 30 feet deep, 300 feet and 500 feet at St. Helens. Extension of lower turning basin at Vancouver, WA, 1,000 feet downstream. An auxiliary channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide along waterfront at Rainier, OR. Improvement of old mouth of Cowlitz River. An auxiliary channel in vicinity of Longview, WA. A small-boat mooring basin at Astoria, OR. A channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide from mouth of Willamette River to interstate highway bridge at Vancouver, WA, with 2turning basins of same depth. A channel 40 feet deep and 600 feet wide from Vancouver, WA, to mouth of Columbia River; a turning basin at Vancouver, WA, a turning basin at Longview, WA, and a channel 40 feet deep in Willamette River from mouth to Broadway Bridge which encompasses Portland Harbor area. Date Authorizing Act H. Doc. 1278, 61st Cong., 3d Sess.' H. Doc. 1278, 61st Cong., 3d Sess.' No Prior Report H. Doc. 120, 63d Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 1009, 66th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 156, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc 126, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10 69th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 195, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 8, 71st Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 249, 72d Cong., 2d Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 1, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 6, 73d Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 235, 72d Cong., 1st Sess.' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 81, 74th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 203, 75th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 341, 77th Cong., 1st. Sess.' H. Doc. 630. 77th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 692, 79th Cong.,2d Sess.' H. Doc. 203, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 452, 87th Cong., 2d Sess.' 3. Feb 27, 1911 Jul 25, 1912 Jul 27, 1916 Aug 08, 1917 Sep 22, 1922 Mar 04, 19232 Mar 03, 1925 Mar 03, 1927 Jul 03, 1930 Sep 06, 19333 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 26, 1937 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 02, 1945 Mar 02, 1945 Jul 24, 1946 Oct 23, 1962 Oct 23, 1962 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 28-B (CONTINUED) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 4. COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY. WA East Channel Main channel West channel 8 feet deep. West channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin with protecting breakwaters. Public Works Administration H. Doc. 44, 73d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 443, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 95, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN CHINOOK, WA AND HEAD OF SAND ISLAND Channel 8 feet deep. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 50,75th Cong., 2d Sess. Channel 10 feet deep and mooring basin. S. Doc. 8, 83d Cong.,lst Sess.' Dec 11, 1933 Aug 30, 1935 Mar 02, 1945 May 17, 1950 Jun 20, 1938 Sep 03, 1954 Mar 03, 1905 Dec 22, 1944 Sep 03, 1954 Jul 30, 1983 May 24, 1995 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 02, 1945 Jul 24, 1946 Jul 24, 1946 Jul 24, 1946 Jul 24, 1946 Nov 5, 1990 H. Doc. 94, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Flood Control Act of 1944 as amended H. Doc. 249, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.' P.L. 98-63 Sec. 1135, P.L. 99-662, as amended COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA, AND THE DALLES, OR Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet from H. Committee Doc. 94, Vancouver, WA, to Bonneville, OR. 74th Cong., 2d Sess.' Construct Camas-Washougal turning basin. H. Doc. 218, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. Construct a channel 27 feet deep by 300 feet wide H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. from Bonneville, OR, to The Dalles, OR. Construct a boat basin at Hood River, OR, 10 feet deep, H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. 500 feet wide, by 1,300 feet long. Construct a barge channel at Bingen, WA, 10 feet deep, H. Doc. 704, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. 200 feet wide, by 1 mile long, and an access channel 7 feet deep, 100 feet wide, by 1,000 feet long to natural mooring basin. Construct The Dalles Harbor 8 feet deep, 400 feet wide S. Doc. 89, 79th Cong., 1st Sess.' by 800 feet long. COLUMBIA RIVER, SEAFARERS MEMORIAL, HAMMOND, OR Engineering, design, acquisition and construction of a P. L. 101-514; H. R. 101-889, 101st support structure to serve as the foundation for the Cong, 2d Sess. Seafarer's Memorial in the Columbia River, in cooperation with the City of Hammond, Oregon. COOS BAY, OR Dredging the Ocean Bar Channel. A channel 22 feet deep to Smith's Mill. Restore North Jetty 9,600 feet long, construct a South Jetty about 3,900 feet long, extend 22-foot bay channel from Smith's Mill to Millington. Extend jetties to such lengths as may be practicable within estimate of total cost of jetties, $3,250,000 given in H. Doc. 150, 67th Cong. A channel 24 feet deep and 300 feet wide, through Pigeon Point Reef, following a location along westerly side of bay. For 24-foot channel from Pigeon Point Reef to Smith's Mill and a turning basin above Marshfield. Increased dimensions of channel across bar and to Isthmus Slough and turning basin opposite Coalbank Slough and at city of North Bend; anchorage basins at mile 3.5 and near mile 7. A mooring basin and connecting channel at Charleston. Increase dimensions to provide for bar channel 45 feet deep, inner channel 35 feet deep to mile 15, and deepening and widening existing turning basins and anchorage area. Deepening the authorized channel by 2 feet and expanding one turningbasin. The entrance would be 47 feet deep to River Mile (RM) 1 and the inner channel 37 feet between RM 1 and 15. H. Doc. 958, 60th Cong.,1st Sess. H. Doc. 325, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 150, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 320, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 110, 70th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d Sess.' S. Doc. 253, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc 646, 80th Cong.,2nd Sess. H. Doc. 151, 91st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 104-46 28-34 COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR AND WA Extend South Jetty and construct North Jetty and dredging. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Bar channel of 48-foot depth and spur jetty on north shore. 9 Deepening the northernmost 2,000 feet of the channel cross section to 55 feet. Lower a 500' section of south jetty at river mile 7. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Jun 25, 1910 Mar 02, 1919 Sep 22, 1922 Jan 21, 1927 Jul 03, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Jul 24, 1946 Jun 30, 1948 Dec 31, 1970 Nov 13, 1995 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized 10. Jun 25, 1910 Mar 02, 1919 Jul 03, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Dec 22, 1944 Mar 02, 1945 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 2, 1945 July 14, 1960 Oct 27, 1965 Dec 31, 1970 Oct 31, 1992 Sep 03, 1954 Sep 19, 1890 Jun 25, 1910 Mar 03, 1925 Jul 03, 1958 Oct 22, 1976 Oct 01, 1980 Jul 03, 1930 Aug 26, 1937 Jun 30, 1948 Jul 26, 1912 Mar 04, 1913 Mar 02, 1919 Mar 03, 1925 Mar 02, 1945 28-35 TABLE 28-B (CONTINUED) See Section in Text Date Authorizing Act COQUILLE RIVER, OR Dredging shoals between mouth and Riverton, and removing obstruction between mouth of North Fork and Bandon. For a 13-foot channel from ocean to Bandon. Deepen channel to 16 feet between sea and eastern end of North Jetty. Present project depth between sea and eastern end of North Jetty. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. For 13-foot depth from sea to a point 1 mile above Coquille River Lighthouse and snagging to State Highway Bridge. DEPOE BAY, OR Construction of an inner basin 375 feet long, 125 feet wide and 5 feet deep, with an entrance channel of same depth and 30 feet wide. Construction of an inner basin 750 feet long, 390 feet wide and 8 feet deep, with entrance channel at same depth and 30 feet wide. Construction of entrance channel 8 feet deep and 50 feet wide, concrete breakwater and stone spending beach. PORT ORFORD, OR Extension of existing breakwater by 550 feet. Dredging of turning basin 340 feet long, 100 feet wide, 16 feet deep. Maintain the authorized navigation channel including those portions of the channel within 50 feet of the port facility. ROGUE RIVER HARBOR AT GOLD BEACH, OR Two jetties at entrance and improvement of channel. SIUSLAW RIVER, OR Build two high-tide stone jetties. Extends North Jetty 3,700 feet from old work constructed under previous project and provides for 4,200 foot south jetty. 12-foot deep channel. 18-foot bar channel and 16-foot river channel and a 600-foot extension of north Jetty. (600-foot extension classified deferred.) Phase I advance engineering and design for north and south jetty extensions. Extending north and south jetties about 2,000 and 2,500 feet, respectively. SKIPANON CHANNEL, OR Channel from deep water in Columbia River to railroad bridge, 30 feet deep. Channel extending upstream from railroad bridge a distance of 4,500 feet. Mooring basin 12 feet deep at Warrenton. TILLAMOOK BAY AND BAR, OR Construct North Jetty 5,700 feet long and dredging channel 16 feet deep, 200 feet wide, to Bay City. Abandon that portion of project above Bay City. Abandon Bay City Channel and present project dimension of channels and turning basins with regulating works as needed. Repair damage and check erosion on Bayocean Peninsula caused by storm Jan. 1939. Documents 11. 12. 14. 15. H. Doc. 673, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 207, 65th Cong.,lst Sess.' H. Doc. 186, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Committee Print, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 4, Food Control Act of 1944 as amended H. Doc. 672, 76th Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 202, 75th Cong. 1st Sess. H. Doc. 350, 77th Cong. 1st Sess. Sec. 107 of R&H Act 1960, approved Feb. 1965. S. Doc. 62, 88th Cong.,2d Sess H. Doc 151, 91st Cong.,2d Sess. P.L. 102-580, 102nd Cong. S. Doc. 83, 83d Cong. 2d Sess. H. Doc. 71, 51st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 648, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. S. Committee Print, Serial, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 204, 85th Cong.,lst Sess.' Final Report of Chief of Engineers P.L. 96-367 H. Doc. 278, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 201, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 93, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. 1' H. Doc. 349, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 760, 65th Cong., 2d Sess H. Doc. 562, 68th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 35, 79th Cong., 1st Sess.4 16. 17. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 28-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (CONTINUED) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 18. Jun 30, 1948 Sep 03, 1954 Oct 27, 1965 Sep 22, 1922 Jan 21, 1927 Jul 03, 1930 Aug 30, 1935 Jun 20, 1938 Mar 02, 1945 Mar 02, 1945 Jun 30, 1948 Sep 03, 1954 Jun 25, 1910 Aug 08, 1917 Jun 26, 19346 Mar 02, 19458 Mar 02, 1919 Aug 26, 1937 Mar 02, 1945 28-36 Dredging small-boat basin and approach at Garibaldi, OR, to depth of 12 feet. Closure of breach in Bayocean Peninsula. Construct South Jetty, 8,000 feet long. UMPQUA RIVER, OR North Jetty, 7,500 feet long Present project dimensions of North Jetty and dredging ocean bar. A short south jetty A full length south jetty and maintenance dredging to a 26-foot depth. Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from mouth to Reedsport. Channel 22 feet deep and 200 feet wide from river channel to Gardiner, and turning basin 22 feet deep, 500 feet wide and 800 feet long. Channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel to dock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 10 feet deep, 175 feet wide , and 300 feet long at inner end. Channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide from river channel to dock in Winchester Bay with mooring and turning basin 12 feet deep, 175 feet wide, and 300 feet long at inner end. Channel 12 feet deep, Scholfield River.5 WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR For purchase and rehabilitation of system and construction of concrete division wall. Deepening of locks. Operation and care of canal and locks provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Construction of New Willamette Falls Locks. YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR Restoration and extension of jetties constructed under previous projects, rock removal at entrance, and dredging in bay up to railroad terminus at Yaquina. Extension of north jetty seaward 1,000 feet. 26-foot channel of suitable width across entrance bar, as far as rock bottom will allow, a 20-foot channel 300 feet wide along south side of bay to and including a turning basin 22 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 1,200 feet long. Construct a small-boat mooring basin at Newport, OR. 40-foot bar channel and 30-foot river channel extension of jetties at entrance. A small boat basin, south shore. YAQUINA RIVER, OR Construction of channel 10 feet deep and generally 150 feet wide on Yaquina River and 200 feet wide in Depot Creek. APPLEGATE LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Authorizes a rockfill embankment dam. Authorizes construction of project but no operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR Authorizes gravel-filled embankment dam. Authorizes Construction of hydroelectric power facilities COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR Earthfill dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. H. Doc. 650, 80th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 128, 83d Cong., 2d Sess.' S. Doc. 43, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' H. Doc. 913, 65th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 320, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 317, 70th Cong., 1st Sess' Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9,72d Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 158, 75th Cong.,3d Sess.' S. Doc. 86,76th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 191,77th Cong., 2d Sess.' S. Doc. 154, 80th Cong., 2d Sess.' S. Doc. 133, 81st Cong., 2d Sess.' H. Doc. 202, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. and Annual Report, 1900, P. 4374 H. Doc. 1060, 62d Cong., 3d Sess.' H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong.,3d Sess. H. Doc. 109, 65th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Committee Print, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 119, 77th Cong., 1st Sess.' S. Doc. 246, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. S. Doc. 8, 85th Cong., 1st Sess.' Section 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Mar. 4, 1977 Doc. 579, 62d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 93-251 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 99-662 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended 19. 20. 21. 22. Jul 24, 1946 Jul 03, 1958 Jul 14, 1960 Mar 4, 1913 Oct 23, 1962 Mar 07, 1974 May 17, 1950 Nov 17, 1986 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 23. 24. PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (CONTINUED) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 25. DORENA LAKE, OR Earthfill dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. ELK CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Roller compacted concrete dam. Authorized construction but not operation for irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. FALL CREEK LAKE, OR Earth and gravel fill embankment dam. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR Earthfill embankment dam Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Raise height of dam to obtain additional storage. Construction of waterfowl impoundments. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong.,2d Sess. P.L. 91-439 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong. 3d Sess. Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended H. Doc 403, 87th Cong. 2d Sess. Sec 1135, P.L.99-662 as amended Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 Oct 23, 1962 Oct 07, 1970 May 17, 1950 Dec 22, 1944 Jun 28, 1938 Dec 22, 1944 Oct 23, 1962 Jun 4, 1993 May 17, 1950 Aug 15, 1985 Jun 22, 1936 May 17, 1950 Jun 22, 1936 Jun 28, 1938 May 17, 1950 Oct 27, 1965 MT. ST. HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA Authorized construction of sediment and retention structures. SCAPPOOSE DRAINAGE DISTRICT, OR Construction of levee system. Raising and strengthening levee. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR Bank protection works, with channel clearing. Provide additional protection against flooding. Addition of 77 locations to scope of projects. WILLOW CREEK LAKE, HEPPNER, OR Storage project for flood control, recreation, and fish and wildlife. BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM -- LAKE BONNEVILLE, OR Existing project was originally authorized Sep. 30, 1933, by Federal Emergengy Administration of Public Works. Existing project authorized by congress. Completion, maintenance, and operation of Bonneville project under direction of Secretary of War and supervision of Chief of Engineers, subject to certain provisions herein relating to powers and duties of Bonneville Power Administrator. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Authorizes relocation of town of North Bonneville to new town site. Acquisition of Steigerwald Lake wetland area. Authorizes transfer of lands to town of North Bonneville, COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION, OR and WA Design, test, and construct fish bypass facilities. P.L. 99-88 F.C. Act 1936 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong.,2d Sess. F.C. Act 1936 H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong.,2d Sess. H. Doc. 233, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. AND WA S. Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d Sess., (Report of Chief of Engineers dated Aug 21, 1933) Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, as amended P.L. 93-251 P.L. 98-396 P.L. 102-396, Sec. 9147 P. L. 100-371 COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY FISHING ACCESS SITES, OR & WA Authorizes project for mitigation of lost treaty fishing Title IV of P.L. 100-581 access resulting from construction of Bonneville Dam. 28-37 26. 27. 28. 30. 31. 32. 34. 35. 36. 37. 38. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN BANK PROTECTION, OR AND WA Provides bank protection on Columbia River below H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. river mile 125 and along principal tributaries. Aug 30, 1935 Aug 20, 1937 Dec 22, 1944 Mar 07, 1974 Aug 22, 1984 Oct 1992 Jul 19, 1988 Nov 1, 1988 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 28-B (CONTINUED) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 39. COUGAR LAKE, OR May 17, 1950 Rockfill dam. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Sep 03, 1954 Addition of power P.L. 83-780. Oct 23, 1962 Strube Lake reregulating dam. P.L. 87-874 40. DETROIT LAKE - BIG CLIFF, OR June 28, 1938 Authorizes concrete gravity structure. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong.,3d Sess. Jun 30, 1948 Addition of power and regulating Big Cliff Dam with power. P.L. 858, 80th Cong.2d Sess. 41. GREEN PETER-FOSTER LAKES, OR May 17, 1950 Authorized Green Peter Dam in lieu of originally H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. authorized Sweet Home Lake (1938). Sep 03, 1954 Addition of power at Green Peter and White Bridge P.L. 83-780, F. C. Act 1954 Reregulating Dam. Jul 14, 1960 Changes location of reregulating dam from White S. Doc. 104, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. Bridge location to Foster. 42. HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR May 17, 1950 Earth and gravel fill dam. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. 43. JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM -- LAKE UMATILLA, OR AND WA May 17, 1950 Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation and power. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, facilities, as amended Mar 24, 1965 John Day waterfowl management area. S. Doc. 28, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. 44. LOOKOUT POINT - DEXTER LAKES, OR Jun 28, 1938 Earth-and-gravel filled dam. H. Doc. 544, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, facilities, as amended May 17, 1950 Addition of power and authorization of Dexter Lake H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. as reregulating dam. 45. LOST CREEK LAKE, ROGUE RIVER BASIN, OR Sep 21, 1962 Rock and gravel fill embankment dam, including power. H. Doc. 566, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. Oct 15, 1966 Authorizes construction of project but not operation for P.L. 89-689, Public Works irrigation until local interests agree to repay cost allocated. Approp. Act, 1967 46. THE DALLES LOCK AND DAM -- LAKE CELILO, WA AND OR May 17, 1950 Multiple-purpose dam, flood control, navigation and power. H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. Dec 22, 1944 Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation Sec 4, Flood Control Act of 1944, facilities. as amended 1. Contains latest published maps. as needed. 2. Public Resolution 105, 67th Cong. 3. Public Works Administration 4. Includes following work, classified inactive. A channel to Hobsonville 200 feet wide and 16 feet deep, with a turning basin 500 feet wide at Hobsonville, and regulating works 5. Inactive. 6. Permanent appropriations Repeal Act. 7. Flood Control Act 8. Classified Deferred. 9. Spur Jetty "B" classified inactive. 28-38 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT Project Status Alsea River, OR AstoriaTurning Basin, OR' Bandon Small Boat Basin, Coquille, OR' Bridges, Columbia River, Cascade Locks and Hood River, OR (Alteration) Cathlamet, WA' Charleston Channel, Coos Bay, OR' Clatskanie River, OR 2 Columbia River, Illwaco, WA' Coos & Millicoma Rivers, OR Cowlitz River, WA Cushman-Mapleton Channels (Siuslaw River), OR' Deep River, WA2 Depoe Bay, OR' Elochoman Slough, WA2 Grays River, WA 2 Hammond Small Boat Basin, OR' Interstate Bridge, Columbia River, Portland, OR to Vancouver WA (Alteration) Interstate Highway Bridge(Barge Channel), OR' Kalama Turning Basin, Kalama, WA' Lake River, WA Lewis River, WA Long Tom River, OR Mooring for Battleship Oregon, OR Multnomah Channel, OR2 Nehalem Bay, OR Nestucca River, OR Oregon Slough, (North Portland Harbor), OR 2 Salmon River, OR 2 Smith River, OR2 Skamokawa Creek, WA South Channel, Government Island, OR' South Slough (Charleston), OR' The Cascades Canal, Columbia River, Or'" The Dalles-Celilo Canal, Or and WA' 3 Tongue Point, OR' Umatilla Harbor, OR' 4 Westport Slough, OR 2 Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, OR Winchester Bay, Umpqua River, OR Yaquina Bay and Harbor Small Boat Basin, Or' Yaquina River, OR' Youngs and Claskanie River, Or Youngs Bay and Youngs River, OR 2 7.5 MCY Standby Time Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Abandoned Abandoned Completed Abandoned Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed For Last Full Report See Annual Report for 1977 1985 1944 1971 1985 1969 1986 1991 1985 1975 1963 1971 1990 1941 1977 1961 1963 1986 1983 1985 1982 1987 1963 1949 1974 1991 1985 1970 1939 1957 1992 1952 1966 1985 1985 1979 1971 1979 1996 Cost to Sep. 30, 1997 Construction 2,000 870,139 1,173,524 1,081,806 171,467 1,197,300 19,240 3 1,589,231 350,238 '8 277,436 6 329,423 15,384 145,588 5 18,641 17 2,500 519,090 7 1,154,162 8 15,281 302,000 2,700 58,132 437,669 9 302,006 'o 16,881 2,145 143,120 2,400 119,800 " 26,821 3,903,780 4,716,205 2,807,876 '" 16,276 862,918 1,616,369 891,695 '" 195,313 16 2,000 9,348 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (sec. 107). 2. Channel adequate for present commerce. 3. Includes $15,537 for previous project 4. Includes $23,489 for previous project. 5. Excludes $42,000 contributed funds. 6. Includes $239,529 for Sec. 107 project. 7. Excludes $75,000 contributed funds. 8. Non-Federal funds, $1,204,100. 9. Includes $419,557 for Sec. 107 project. 10. Excludes $304,826 contributed funds. 11. Excludes $102,000 contributed funds. 12. Project abondoned due to flooding by Bonneville Dam pool. 13. Project abandoned due to flooding by The Dalles Dam pool. 14. Project transferred to Portland District from Walla Walla District FY 1974 and abandoned due to flooding by the John Day Dam pool. 15. Excludes $969,342 contributed funds. 16. Excludes $50,565 contributed funds 17. Excludes $86,586 contributed funds. 18. Excludes $80,000 contributed funds; includes $8,000 for previous project. 19. Excludes $1,776,008 contributed funds. 28-39 TABLE 28-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Operation and Maintenance 26,237 16,648 194,896 4 2,152,914 1,474,036 32,768 196,864 35,670 58,127 685,677 4,000 25,000 55,195 6,000 90,514 205,130 436,185 559,858 2,833,888 171,909 17,900,293 34,449 4,314,000 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 28-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1997 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN Blind Slough Diking District, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1939 163,397 Consolidated Diking and Improvement District 1, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1941 163,291 Deep River Area, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed 1942 69,724 Deer Island Area, Columbia County, OR Completed 1943 574,123 Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 25,609 Diking District 5, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 25,609 Diking and Improvement District 5, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1940 161,381 Diking District 1 and 3 (Puget Island) and Little Island, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed 1941 258,795 Diking Improvement District 1, Pacific County WA Completed 1941 26,810 Diking and Improvement District 4, Wahkiakum County, OR Completed 1951 169,542 Drainage District 1, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1939 240,939 John Day River Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 33,080 Karlson Island, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1941 25,773 Knappa Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 18,789 Lewis and Clark River Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 158,419 Lower Cowlitz River Area, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1961 91,652 Magruder Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 61,186 Marshland Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 39,475 Midland Drainage District Columbia County, OR Completed 1939 77,774 3 Multnomah Drainage District 1, OR Completed 1951 593,034 4 Peninsula Drainage District 1, Multnomah County, OR Completed 1942 241,148 Port of Kalama, WA' Completed 99,844 Rainier Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1942 47,662 Sauvie Island Areas A and B, Multnomah County, OR Completed 1951 1,623,505 Skamokawa Creek Area, Wahkiakum County, WA Completed 1946 178,885 Wahkiakum County Consolidated Diking District No. 1, WA Completed 1985 5,289,833 Tenasillahe Island, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1939 133,778 Upper Grays River Area, WA Completed 1947 61,263 State Hwy 101 & 401, Columbia River, WA' Completed 1985 504,642 " Walluski River, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 66,932 Warrenton Diking District, 1, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 69,503 Warrenton Diking District 2, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1940 74,596 Webb District Improvement Co.,Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 84,592 Westland District Improvement Co., Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 205,531 Westport District Columbia and Clatsop Counties, OR Completed 1943 40,658 Woodson Drainage District, Columbia County, OR Completed 1940 22,797 Youngs River Dikes, Clatsop County, OR Completed 1942 248,802 LEWIS RIVER BASIN Diking and Improvement District 11, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1943 172,521 COWLITZ RIVER BASLN Cowlitz County Drainage Improvement District 1,WA Completed 1939 42,978 Diking Improvement District 13, Cowlitz County, WA Completed 1939 28,592 Huntington Avenue, Castle Rock, WA' Completed 1985 250,000 Mt. St. Helens and Vicinity, WA Completed 1995 42,036,000 LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN Beaver Drainage District, OR Completed 1984 3,131,944 Cowlitz County Consolidated Diking Improvement District No. 2, WA Completed 1977 1,661,367 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 2, WA Completed 1967 363,000 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 13, WA Completed 1967 65,345 Cowlitz County Diking Improvement District 15, WA Completed 1967 304,794 Cowlitz River, Hopkins Creek, WA' Completed 236,860 Hayden Island, OR Inactive Midland Drainage District, OR Completed 1971 304,511 28-40 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-E (CONTINUED) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1997 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Multnomah County Drainage District 1, OR Peninsula Drainage District 2, OR Rainier Drainage District, OR Sandy Drainage District, OR Sauvie Island Drainage District, OR Vancouver Lake Area, WA Wahkiakum Co. Diking District 4, WA Washougal Area Levees, Clark County, OR Woodson Drainage District, OR WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN Amazon Creek, OR Mill Creek, Salem, OR Sandy River and Sleepy Hollow, OR' Whelton Ditch, OR ALL OTHER FLOOD CONTROL Arlington, Alkali Canyon, OR7 Bear Creek, Medford, OR' Beaver Creek Near Tillamook, OR 2 Castle Rock, Cowlitz River, WA Catching Inlet Drainage District Coos River, OR2 Chewaucan River, Paisley, OR' Clackamas River at Dixon Farm Location, OR Days Creek Lake, OR (Phase I) Depoe Bay, Lincoln County, OR' Deschutes River, Bend, OR2 John Day River (West), OR' Johnson Creek, OR McDonald Dike Road, Nehalem River, OR' McKenzie River Near Walterville, OR2 Miami River, OR' Mill Four Drainage District, Yaquina River, OR Molalla River at Milk Creek Location, OR2 Molalla River at Ressel Location, OR2 Nestucca River, Condor Road, OR' Nestucca River, Vicinity Pacific City, OR' Pendleton Levees, Umatilla River, OR9 (a) Riverside Area Units (b) State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 1) (c) State Hospital and City Areas (Zone 2)2 Pendleton, Umatilla River, OR9 Reedsport Levees, Umpqua River, OR 2 Rogue River, OR' Salmon Creek at Oakridge, OR2 Salmon Creek Near Vancouver, WA' Sandy River, City of Troutdale, OR' Siuslaw River, Lane County, OR' Stillwell Drainage District, Tillamook Bay, OR2 Sumner Parker Airport, OR' Trask River, Tillamook County, OR' Tualatin, OR Umatilla River, Stanfield, OR' Umatilla River, Thorn Hollow, OR' Umpqua River and Tributaries, OR Vicinity of Nehalem, Nehalem River, OR West Makinster Rd., Wilson River, OR' Wilson River, Vicinity Highway 101, OR' 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 14). 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205). 3. Includes $26,241, Emergency Relief Act Funds 4. Excludes $25,000 contributed funds 5. Previous completed project, $138,956; $15,056 engineering costs project constructed by local interests. 6. Excludes $154,751 contributed funds. 7. Project transferred from Walla Walla District FY 1974 and abandoned due to flooding by the John Day Dam pool. Includes $3,328 FY 1960 preauthorization costs, Sec. 205, P.L. 80-85. See FY 1960 Annual Report, page 1887 8. Excludes $2,520 contributed funds 9. Reported by Walla Walla District prior to 1974 10. Excludes $230,070 contributed funds for new work and $31,284 Government furnished sheet steel pile. 11. Includes $254,642 contributed funds. 12. Includes $185,000 contributed funds. 13. Excludes $5,822 contributed funds. 14. Excludes $31,031 contributed funds. 15. Excludes $98,313 contributed funds. 28-41 Completed Active Completed Completed Completed Deferred Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Abandoned Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Active Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Deferred Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1964 1961 1967 1954 1966 1981 1971 1973 1964 1960 1993 1967 1950 1967 1957 1959 1952 1982 1988 1986 1981 1985 1966 1948 1955 1952 1960 1959 1960 1939 1971 1960 1985 1994 1961 1984 1985 1985 1952 1952 1986 1,499,186 35,265 593,945 154,012 5 674,137 889,391 48,619 1,803,488 162,500 1,214,3006 175,800 '14 276,700 39,624 23,439 23,050 106,198 104,921 182,655 42,761 70,845 8 1,307,216 22,963 106,250 '1 127,800 170,245 29,500 148,358 15,321 118,433 55,007 55,189 11,690 16,000 9,100 267,748 161,540 143,263 968,716 10 86,230 288,447 435,000 12 365,000 '5 215,939 176,351 92,500 121,273 1,803,094 33,835 154,600 428,881 45,677 176,000 30,000 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 28-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1997 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Status Report for Construction Maintenance Restoration of Indian Fishing Grounds Completed 1969 185,000 Bonneville, OR Columbia and Snake Rivers Ports Inactive 1994 5,799,926 Dredging, OR & WA TABLE 28-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended Area East of Albany, OR 1977 Bachelor Island, WA 1977 Bear Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1966 1971 4,559 Calapooya River, OR 1959 1965 11,595 Cascadia Lake, OR 1987 954,114' Clatskanie River Area, Columbia County, OR 1960 1965 268 Clatskanie Drainage Dist. 1, OR 1964 1978 18,543 Clatsop County Drainage District 1, OR 1960 1974 4,472 Clatsop County Diking District 3, OR 1938 1961 258 Clatsop County Diking District 4, OR 1978 Clatsop County Diking District 6, OR 1961 1978 8,824 Columbia Drainage District No. 1, OR 1987 Columbia Slough, OR 1953 1978 21,352 Coquille River, OR 1948 1953 908 Cowlitz County Consolidate Diking Improvement District 1, OR 1977 Cowlitz River at Randle, WA 1962 1977 11,095 Coyote and Spencer Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1960 1970 6,819 Deer Island Drainage District, OR 1987 East Muddy and Lake Creek, OR 1959 1970 6,465 Ferguson Creek Long Tom River, Or 1978 Flat Creek, Long Tom River, OR 1977 Floodwall and Levees at Portland, OR 1977 Gate Creek Lake, OR 1987 745,001 2 Holley Lake, OR 1963 1987 241,992 3 John Drainage District, OR 1961 1979 23,754 John Day River, OR 1974 1974 210,220 Kalama River (South Area) Levee, Cowlitz County, WA 1969 1978 55,594 Lake River Delta Area, WA 1977 Lewis River Area, WA 1978 Magruder Drainage District, OR 1940 1974 774 Mud and Basket Slough Rickreall Creek, OR 1977 Pendleton Levees, Riverside Area, OR 1987 9,000 Peninsula Drainage District 1, OR 1942 1977 43,292 Pilot Rock, Birch Creek, OR 1963 1968 4,558 Prescott Area, Columbia County, OR 1941 1978 125 Prineville Area, Crooked River and Ochoco Creek, OR 1962 1977 11,318 Pudding River, OR 1950 1979 5,000 Shelton Ditch, Marion County, Or 1967 1987 39,624 Skamokawa (Steamboat Slough), WA 1939 1979 Soap Creek, WA 1977 Turner Prairie, Mill Creek, OR 1978 Umatilla River (Echo), OR 1960 1964 24,145 Umpqua River-Scholfield River, OR 1987 4,000 Waldo Lake Tunnel, OR 1958 West Muddy Creek and Mary's River, OR 1962 1970 4,056 Westport Slough, OR (Modification for 32-foot channel) 1966 1977 Wiley Creek Lake, OR 1960 112,000 Willamette River above Portland and Yamhill River, OR (uncompleted portions) 1987 Willamette Falls Fishladder, OR 1961 Willamette River at Willamette Falls, OR 1948 1987 142,883 1. Excludes Pro-rata share of $112,000 for Sweet Home Reservoir. 3. Excludes $100,000 preauthorization study costs. 2. Excludes Pro-rata share of $95,000 for Quartz Creek Reservoir 28-42 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-H COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVER BELOW VANCOUVER, WA, AND PORTLAND, OR TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECT TO SEP. 30, 1997 (SEE SECTION 3 OF TEXT) Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular Public Works Emergency Relief Administration Total U.S. Contributed Prior to 1964 Contributed (1975) 35 to 40-foot Channel Total Contributed Total All Funds TABLE 28-I PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS (SEE SECTION 13 OF TEXT) Project Date Survey Conducted Columbia River, Chinook-Sand Is., WA Oct 1996 Depoe Bay, OR Mar 1997 Willamette River, OR Mar 1997 Yaquina River, OR Jul 1997 TABLE 28-J WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF EXISTING CANAL AND LOCKS (SEE SECTION 19 OF TEXT) Usable Lock Dimensions Series of 4 locks, each 175 feet by 37 feet' Lift of each lock Lock 1 (Lower), 22,5 feet; Lock 2, 8.7 feet; Lock 3, 10.9 feet and Lock 4 (Upper), 8.1 feet 2 Depth of Miter Sills at Lower Water Lower Lock, 8.4 feet; Upper Lock, 6 feet Character of foundation Rock Kind of Dam Fixed 3 Type of Construction Concrete Year of Completion 1873; Purchased by United States Apr. 26, 1915 Cost Unknown; purchase price $375,000 l. A guard lock 210 by 40 feet, which is used only at higher states of water, is at upper end of canal basin. 2. A concrete division wall, 1,227 feet long, extending from Lock 4 to Guard Lock, separates upper basin of canal from head race, which formerly led directly from basin and supplied water for powerplants operated by Crown Zellerbach Corp., and Portland Ry., Light & Power Co., which is now being operated by Portland General Electric Co. 3. The dam is owned by private parties. 28-43 28,349,304 446,296 138,449 28,934,049 223,026 442,928 665,954 29,600,003 374,200,693 14,414 98,668 374,313,775 24,320 24,320 374,338,095 402,549,997 460,710 237,117 403,247,824 247,346 442,928 690,274 403,938,098 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 28-K FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS See Section Date of Peak Inflow Storage Used in Text Project Peak Inflow Cu. FtJSec. Acre/feet 22. Applegate Lake, OR Jan 1, 1997 25,900 64,300 23. Blue River Lake, OR Nov 19, 1996 13,700 28,500 24. Cottage Grove Lake, OR Nov 18, 1996 16,000 20,200 39. Cougar Lake, OR Nov 18, 1996 16,100 43,200 40. Detroit Lake, OR Nov 19, 1996 34,200 85,600 25. Dorena Lake, OR Nov 18, 1996 45,500 59,600 27. Fall Creek Lake, OR Nov 18, 1996 25,000 50,000 28. Fern Ridge Lake, OR Nov 19, 1996 18,600 52,400 41. Foster Lake, OR Nov 19, 1996 23,700 21,100 41. Green Peter Lake, OR Nov 19, 1996 32,200 86,500 42. Hills Creek Lake, OR Nov 18, 1996 35,900 75,200 44. Lookout Point Lake, OR Nov 19, 1996 46,200 124,600 45. Lost Creek Lake, OR Jan 1, 1997 26,400 159,900 28-44 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-L WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITIES PROJECTS NOT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED (SEE SECTION 47 OF TEXT) Fiscal Year Costs Project Status' Federal Non-Federal Total Mitigation of Shore Damages Attributable to Navigation Projects Pursuant to Section 111 of the 1968 Rivers and Harbors Act, Public Law 483, 90th Congress, As Amended Siuslaw River, Florence, OR F 6,115 - 6,115 Total Section 111 6,115 6,115 Navigation Activities Pursuant to Section 107 of the 1960 Rivers and Harbors Act, Public Law 645, 86th Congress, as Amended Columbia River, Vancouver, WA C 633 -260 373 Newport, OR P/C 292,821 0 292,821 Port of Brookings (Chetco) F 30,255 - 30,255 Port of Morrow, OR F 14,662 - 14,662 Westport, OR - Puget Island, WA C -2,160 2,168 8 Coordination 3,845 - 3,845 Total Section 107 340,056 1,908 341,964 Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as Amended Keizer, OR F 10,126 - 10,126 Nehalem River, Sunset Drainage Dist, OR F 1,292 - 1,292 Peninsula Drainage Dist #1, OR P/C 177,884 2,922 180,806 Salem, OR F 10,436 - 10,436 Coordination 9,981 - 9,981 Total Section 205 209,719 2,922 212,641 Emergency Streambank Protection Activities Pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as Amended Albany, OR C 7,746 2,221 9,967 Wilson River, McKinster Rd, Tillamook, OR D 1,932 - 1,932 Coordination 11,314 - 11,314 Total Section 14 20,992 2,221 23,213 Project Modifications for Improvement of the Environment Pursuant to Section 1135 of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act, Public Law 662, 99th Congress, as Amended Amazon Creek Wetlands, OR F 20,285 - 20,285 Coos Bay Western Snowy Plover, OR C 3,331 18,209 21,540 Dairy Creek, Sturgeon Lake, OR P 32,748 - 32,748 Fern Ridge Lake Marsh, OR F 11,636 - 11,636 Fox Creek, OR D 24,468 - 24,468 Lower Columbia Slough, OR F 19,117 - 19,117 Port of Brookings, OR D 17,819 - 17,819 Trestle Bay, OR C 28,650 11,932 40,582 Initial Appraisals 10,998 - 10,998 Coordination 6,227 - 6,227 Total Section 1135 175,279 30,141 205,420 Status: C = Construction; D = Planning and Design Analysis; F = Feasibility; P = Plans and Specifications 28-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 28-M FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITIES EMERGENCY RESPONSE ACTIVITIES '(SEE SECTION 48 OF TEXT) Emergency Supplemental Appropriation for FY97 Flood Repair Contributed 96X3125 Appropriation 963/73125 Funds Disaster Preparedness Program (Category 100) Corps Statutory Activities 209,407 0 Activities in Support of Others 80,696 0 Facilities 41,846 0 Inspections 39,809 0 Total Disaster Preparedness Program 371,758 0 0 Emergency Operations (Category 200) Flood Fight and Rescue Operations 1,398,274 0 After Action Reports 10,453 0 Field Investigations 38,296 0 Post Flood Response 55,045 0 Total Emergency Operations 1,502,068 0 0 Rehabilitation (Category 300) Federal Flood Control Works 6,063,978 103,350 12,800 Non-Federal Flood Control Works 435,815 0 69,850 Field Investigations 516,811 145,054 0 Total Rehabilitation 7,016,604 248,404 82,650 Advance Measures CowlitziToutle Operations 0 0 Total Advance Measures 0 0 0 Reimbursement Activity Other Agencies 482,845 0 Other Corps Offices 0 0 Total Reimbursement Activity 482,845 0 0 28-46 PORTLAND, OREGON DISTRICT TABLE 28-N PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, AND POWERPLANT Project Bonneville Lock and Dam OR and WA -- Lake Bonneville (See Section 36 of Text) John Day Lock and Dam, OR and WA -- Lake Umatilla (See Section 43 of Text) NAVIGATION LOCK (NEW) Dimensions: Clear Width of Chamber Greatest Length Available for Full Width Lift (Vertical): At Extreme Low Water and Normal Pool Level At Normal River Stage At Extreme High Water Depth Over Miter Sills at Adopted Low Water Character of Foundation Open to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Capacity Elevation of Gate Sills on Crest of Spillway Height above Lowest Foundation Length of Dam Proper Length of Dam Overall Width at Base Gate Openings Crest Overflow (Above Mean Sea Level) Elevation(Normal)(Above Mean Sea Level) POWERPLANT Length (First Powerhouse) Length (Second Powerhouse) Width (First Powerhouse) Width (Second Powerhouse) Height (Roof to Bedrock) (First Powerhouse) Height (Roof to Bedrock)(Second Powerhouse) Generator (Station Unit) Generators (First Powerhouse) Generators (Second Powerhouse) Fishwater Supply Units (Second Powerhouse) Total Rated Capacity Speed NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Space for Additional Rating, Each Total Installed Capacity Total Potential Capacity 86 Feet 675 Feet 66 Feet 59 Feet About 30 Feet 19 Feet Andesite March 1993 Concrete Gravity 1938 1,600,000 CFS 23.3 Feet About 170 Feet 1,090 Feet 1,230 Feet 200 Feet 18 24 Feet Pool 72 Feet 1,027 Feet 953 Feet 190 Feet 235 Feet 190 Feet 200 Feet 1 @ 5,000 kw 1 @ 48,000 kw 1 @ 59,500 kw 8 @ 60,000 kw each 8 @ 66,500 kw each 2 @ 13,100 kw each 1,145,700 kw 75 Revolutions per Minute 86 Feet 669 feet 97 Feet 105 Feet 113 Feet 15 Feet April 1968 Concrete Gravity March 1968 2,250,000 cfs 210 Feet Tainter 50 ft. by 58.5 Ft. 20 1,975 Feet 243 Feet 16 4 135,000 kw 2,160,000 kw 2,700,000 kw 28-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 28-N (Continued) PRINCIPAL DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, AND POWERPLANT Project Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line The Dalles Lock and Dam, OR and WA -- Lake Celilo (See Section 46 of Text) IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Flood Control Storage Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area At Elevation 268 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Type Lift Normal Net Clear Length Net clear Width Normal Depth Over Upper Sill Minimum Depth Over Lower Sill Opened To Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type Elevation of Crest Top of Crest Gates Number of Gates Size of Gates Height (Foundation to Crest) Design Flood POWERPLANT Powerhouse Dimensions Generators Main Units Fishwater Supply Units Total Rated Capacity Station Service Units 268-257 Feet 276 Feet 500,000 Ac.-ft. 76.4 Miles 55,000 Acres 15 Ft. by 250 Ft. 200 miles Single Lift 87.5 Feet 675 Feet 86 Feet 20 Feet 15 Feet March 17, 1957 Controlled 121 Ft. msl 162 Ft. msl 23 50 by 43 Feet 120 Feet 2,290,000 cfs 240 by 2,150 feet 14 @ 78,000 kw each 8 @ 86,000 kw each 2 @ 13,500 kw each 1,807,000 kw 2 @ 3,000 kw each 28-48 235 Feet July 1968 SEATTLE, WA, DISTRICT * This District comprises Washington State except southern and southeastern portions, northern Idaho, and northwestern Montana, embraced in drainage basins tributary to Pacific Ocean south of international boundary to Cape Disappointment, and to the Columbia River above Yakima River, inclusively. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. Ediz Hook, WA .......................................... 29-2 Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA.............. 29-2 Friday Harbor, WA ............................................... 29-2 Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA ................... 29-2 Grays Harbor, Point Chehalis, WA....................... 29-3 Kenmore Navigation Channel, WA ...................... 29-3 Lake Crockett, WA............................................... 29-4 Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA .......................... 29-4 Neah Bay, WA (Section 107) .................................. 29-4 Neah Bay, WA................................. ...... 29-5 Olympia Harbor, WA ........ ..................... 29-5 Project Condition Surveys ...................................... 29-5 Puget Sound and its Tributary Waters, WA............. 29-5 Quillayute River, WA........................................... 29-6 Seattle Harbor, WA ................................................. 29-6 Swinomish Channel, WA......................................... 29-7 Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, WA ..................................................... 29-7 Beach Erosion Control 18. Lincoln Park Beach, Seattle, WA ............................ 29-7 Flood Control 19. Chehalis River at South Aberdeen and Cosmopolis, WA................................................... 29-8 20. Horseshoe Bend, WA ............................................. 29-8 21. Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA ................................. 29-8 22. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................................................................... 29-9 23. Mud Mountain Dam, WA .................................... 29-9 24. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations...................... 29-9 25. Stillaguamish, River, WA........................................ 29-9 26. Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA............................... 29-10 Multiple Purpose Power 27. Albeni Falls Dam, ID ......................................... 29-10 28. Chief Joseph Dam - Rufus Woods Lake, WA .......... 29-10 29. Libby Dam - Lake Koocanusa, MT .......................... 29-11 Miscellaneous 30. Miscellaneous Work under Special Authorization ...29-11 31. National Emergency Preparedness Program (NEPP).............. ........................................................ 29-11 32. General Regulatory Functions Program....................29-12 General Investigations 33. Surveys .... ............................... ............................ 29-12 34. Collection and Study of Basic Data.......................29-12 35. Preconstruction Engineering and Design..................29-12 Tables Table 29-A Cost & Financial Statement.....................29-13 Table 29-B Authorizing Legislation....................... 29-19 Table 29-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects.............................. ........................ 29-24 Table 29-D Not Applicable Table 29-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects.....................................................29-25 Table 29-F Other Authorized Multiple Purpose Power Projects .............................. 29-28 Table 29-G Other Authorized Miscellaneous Activities ...................... 29-28 Table 29-H Other Preconstruction Engineering and Design Projects .................................... 29-29 Table 29-I Deauthorized Projects ............................. 29-29 Table 29-J Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA, Principal Features of Double Lock and Dam.............29-30 Table 29-K Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858 ........... 29-30 Table 29-L Miscellaneous Activities Pursuant to Section 1135, Public Law 99-662 ..............29-31 -29-1- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 Navigation 1. EDIZ HOOK, WA Location. Ediz Hook and city of Port Angeles are on the Strait of Juan de Fuca in Clallam County, WA, about 100 miles northwest of Seattle. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18468.) Existing project. Provides for about 16,400 linear feet of rock revetment, together with initial beach replenishment and periodic nourishment. Project was completed in October 1978. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1979.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Of the 27 waterfront facilities at Port Angeles Harbor, 3 are located along the inner side of Ediz Hook. Functional uses of the piers include placing logs into the water from trucks for shipment by rafting; mooring harbor pilot boats, U.S. Coast Guard vessels, Naval Reserve vessels, and occasionally, oceanographic research vessels; and fueling government vessels. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, revised 1987.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Inspection and coordination with local sponsor, and monitoring of construction contract Maintenance, contract: Revetment toe nourishment with 45,000 tons of gravel and cobble and 500 armor rocks - all were rekeyed at a total cost of $563,950. Local sponsor contributed 10 per cent. 2. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA Location. On Port Gardner Bay, at northern end of Possession Sound, an arm of Puget Sound at Everett, in northwestern Washington; and Snohomish River for 6.3 miles above mouth. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18444.) Existing project. Training dike extending from a point opposite 23rd Street northward 12,550 feet to outlet of Snohomish River, with spur dike extending 400 feet to pierhead line from north end of main dike; spur dike extending 1,410 feet westward from Preston Point; removal of a section of training dike north of Snohomish River outlet; channel 150 to 425 feet wide and 15 feet deep from deep water in Port Gardner Bay to 14th Street dock; thence a settling basin 700 feet wide, 1,200 feet long, and 20 feet deep, thence a channel 150 feet wide and 8 feet deep upriver to head of Steamboat Slough, a total distance of about 6.3 miles; settling basin within upper channel reach about 1 mile long with a capacity of 1 million cubic yards and maintaining East Waterway to 30 feet deep. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.1 feet. Extreme tidal range is about 19 feet. Project was completed in April 1963. (For further details, see page 1683 of Annual Report for 1963. For details relating to previous projects, see page 704 of Annual Report for 1905, page 2005 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1883 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-3 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. There are 42 piers and wharves in the Port of Everett, 17 in Port Gardner and 25 on the Snohomish River. These include: 19 publicly owned terminals with 4 berths handling ocean-going vessels and 1 publicly owned terminal and small-boat basin handling fishing and pleasure craft. A portion of the East Waterway has been deepened and modified by the U.S. Navy for a Homeport. (See Port Series No. 37 - Ports of Port Angeles, Port Townsend, Everett, Anacortes, and Bellingham, WA, revised 1987.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout the year. Aerial survey of the Jetty Island habitat development site was performed. Prepared plans and specifications for maintenance dredging and awarded contract. Monitored maintenance dredging contract. Maintenance, contract: A continuing contract for pipeline maintenance dredging was awarded and work initiated. 3. FRIDAY HARBOR, WA Location. Friday Harbor is located on the eastern shore of San Juan Island on the inland waters of northwestern Washington, about 28 nautical miles east of Victoria, British Columbia, and 60 nautical miles north of Seattle, WA. San Juan Island is one of over 170 islands in the San Juan Archipelago. Friday Harbor is the San Juan Island county seat and a United States Customs Port of Entry. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18425.) Existing project. Concrete floating breakwater (1,600 feet) to protect the existing port facilities and to allow the Port of Friday Harbor to provide 294 additional permanent moorage spaces and 44 additional transient spaces. Construction was completed in March 1984. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Requirements are described in full on page 38-4 of FY 1981 Annual Report. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Routine coordination with the Port of Friday Harbor, U.S. Coast Guard, and navigation users. Conducted a complete annual inspection of the breakwater. The inspection findings were used to prioritize and schedule breakwater maintenance. 4. GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA Location. Harbor lies at mouth of Chehalis River, in southwestern part of Washington, 45 miles north of entrance to Columbia River. Chehalis River rises in southwestern part of Washington about 40 miles east of Pacific Ocean, flows generally northwesterly and empties into eastern part of Grays Harbor. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18502.) -29-2- SEATILE. WASHINGTON DISTRICT Existing project (including navigation improvements to date). Provides for an entrance channel across the bar and through entrance 600 to 1000 feet wide and 38 to 46 feet deep, to be secured by a south jetty 13,734 feet long and a north jetty 17,200 feet long, and by dredging; maintenance of channel 36 feet deep and 350 feet wide from deep water in Grays Harbor 14 miles to Cow Point; thence 30 feet deep and 200 feet wide, suitably widened at bends, to a point 13,700 feet upstream from Union Pacific Railroad bridge at Aberdeen, a distance of 4.125 miles; a turning basin 30 feet deep, 550 feet wide, and 1,000 feet long at upstream end of 30-foot channel near Cosmopolis; three breakwaters at, and maintenance of entrance channel to Westhaven Cove; protection of Point Chehalis for an exposed length of about 7,500 feet; and removal of 350-foot southwestern extension of the breakwater, replacing it with an 865-foot northeastern extension, and adding a 200-foot spur breakwater along the southerly entrance, constructed under authority of Section 107, P.L. 86- 645. Construction cost for this feature is recorded in Table 38- C. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.9 feet at Point Chehalis, 10.1 feet at Aberdeen, and 8.1 feet at Montesano. Extreme range is 17.5 feet at Point Chehalis, 17.8 feet at Aberdeen, and 23.8 feet at Montesano (river flood of 1935). (For details relating to previous projects, see pages 2002-03 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1863 of Annual Report for 1938.) Improved project. Authorized by Section 202 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Project construction was started in April 1990. Completed project features are: deepen and widen 20 miles of existing 30-foot channel across ocean bar (46 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide), through the harbor entrance (46-38 feet deep and 1,000-600 feet wide), through South to Cow Point Reaches (36 feet deep and 350 feet wide); expand and deepen Cow Point turning basin; deepen two downstream local berths; and construct fish and initial crab mitigation. Modification of Union Pacific Railroad bridge was deleted from project scope in 1995. Remaining project features are: deepen remaining upstream channel and construct final crab mitigation. Completion of project is currently unscheduled, pending resolution of local issues affecting remaining scope and availability of Federal funds to continue construction. Estimated project cost is $41,300,000 ($26,100,000 Federal; $15,200,000 non-Federal). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local Cooperation Agreement with Port of Grays Harbor, local sponsor for improvement project, was executed on February 16, 1990. The Port is contributing 35 per cent of improved project cost. In complying with terms of local cooperation, the Port is required to furnish lands and diked disposal areas and assure relocation of utility lines. Terminal facilities. There are 20 waterfront facilities (piers, wharves, and docks), exclusive of those available to recreational craft, at Grays Harbor, of which 5 are publicly owned. In foreign and domestic trade, they serve various purposes which include the receipt and/or shipment of: logs and lumber, woodchips, conventional and containerized general cargo, seafood and fishing supplies, sand and gravel, and construction materials. Other uses include: mooring and icing fishing boats, mooring small vessels for outfitting and repair, and mooring company owned tugs. Those piers operated by the U.S. Coast Guard moor government owned vessels. (See Port Series No. 35 - Ports of Tacoma, Olympia, and Grays Harbor, WA, revised 1993.) Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Coordinated with Port of Grays Harbor (local sponsor), resource agencies, and Grays Harbor pilots. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted throughout the year. The Corps hopper dredge Yaquina dredged in the entrance channel and in Cow Point in May, with 135,686 cy dredged at a cost of $450,000. Sandy material from the entrance channel was deposited at Half Moon Bay as offshore nourishment to reduce erosion adjacent to the south jetty and at Westport. A study, directed by the ASA for Civil Works, for long-term erosion control at the south jetty was continued under O&M. Maintenance, contract: Maintenance dredging of the inner harbor by clamshell dredge was completed at a cost of $2,834,789 with 1,319,298 cy of material being removed. Maintenance dredging of the outer harbor by hopper dredge was completed at a cost of $807,640 with 391,589 cy of material being removed, of which 172,923 cy was deposited in Half Moon Bay to combat erosion. Crab mitigation for the incremental increase in crab entrainment due to the higher post-improvement channel maintenance dredging volume was completed in April. This was accomplished by spreading 9,500 cy of oyster shell over 25 acres to create enhanced crab habitat at a cost of $298,974. 5. GRAYS HARBOR, POINT CHEHALIS, WA Location. Point Chehalis is located on the south side of the mouth of Grays Harbor, adjacent to the federally authorized navigation project. Point Chehalis is about 30 miles from the city of Aberdeen, in the community of Westport, WA. Existing project. Shoreline erosion has been occurring along the Point Chehalis shoreline for a number of years. The Point Chehalis erosion protection project was authorized in 1948 and constructed in 1954. Current erosion threatens Westport's sewage treatment plant and outfall line. Plan of improvement consists of beach nourishment with periodic renourishment over a 10-year period. Approximately 300,000 cy of maintenance dredging has been placed on the beach to control erosion. Initial project was completed in December 1995. Mitigation contract is scheduled for FY 1998. Federal project cost estimate is $2,000,000. Local cooperation. The local sponsor (city of Westport) is responsible for operation and maintenance of the project after the 10th year. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on September 1, 1995. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: None. 6. KENMORE NAVIGATION CHANNEL, WA Location. The Kenmore Navigation Channel lies at the northern end of Lake Washington adjacent to the Sammamish River. Kenmore, an unincorporated industrial and business center in King County just north of Seattle, WA, encompasses the lands to the north of the channel. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18447.) -29-3- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 Existing project. The construction of a navigation channel to serve the Kenmore industrial area involved a 15- foot-deep channel which consists of a 100-foot-wide inner channel 900 feet long, an 800-foot-long transition channel with a 24 degree 30-foot bend and a maximum width of 190 feet, and a 120-foot-wide outer channel, 1,200 feet long. The project also consists of the installation of a goose nesting area on property adjacent to the new channel as mitigation for the removal of goose nests during construction. Project was completed in March 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Monitored dredging contract. Maintenance, contract: A continuing contract for clamshell dredging was awarded and work initiated. 7. LAKE CROCKETT, WA Location. The harbor is on the west side of Whidbey Island, about 35 nautical miles north of Seattle, WA. The lake lies parallel to Admiralty Bay and is separated from it by a narrow strip of gravel beach. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18441.) Existing project. Provides for a basin in Lake Crockett with an area of about 6 acres and 25 feet deep at mean lower low water, connected with Admiralty Bay by a channel of the same depth and 200 feet wide, protected by a breakwater; and navigation improvement by dredging, constructed under authority of Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Construction cost for this feature is recorded in Table 38-C (Keystone Harbor, Admiralty Inlet). The diurnal tidal range in Admiralty Bay is 8.4 feet and the extreme range is about 16.5 feet. Project was completed in March 1993. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1993.) Recreational facilities at project under costsharing agreement with Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission include the following construction and improvements: construct a 35-unit camping loop and restroom, new boat ramp handling facility, breakwater, a restroom in the day-use area and porto-potti dumps for boats; and expand dayuse facility and add riprap at the construction site. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. One publicly owned passenger and automobile ferry landing within the dredged basin is open for public use, and is adequate for existing commercial traffic. The basin contains two publicly owned boat ramps open for public use. The ramps are adequate for recreational craft. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Channel condition surveys were conducted during the year. 8. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA Location. Entirely within city of Seattle and extends from Puget Sound through Shilshole Bay, Salmon Bay, Lake Union, Portage Bay, and Union Bay to deep water in Lake Washington. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18447.) Existing project. Provides for a double lock and fixed dam from gated spillway and necessary accessory works, including fishladder, at the Narrows at entrance to Salmon Bay, about 1.25 miles from deep water in Puget Sound; for a channel 34 feet deep and 300 feet wide from Puget Sound to Burlington Northern Railway bridge, about 5,500 feet, with a passing basin 34 feet deep and log basin 8 feet deep at turn below railway bridge; then 34 feet deep and 150 feet to 200 feet wide to locks, about 900 feet; and a guide pier 600 feet long; for revetment of canal banks between locks and Lake Union and between Lakes Union and Washington; and for a channel 30 feet deep with a width of 100 feet from locks to Lake Union, 200 feet thence to Portage Cut, 100 feet through Portage Cut, and thence 200 feet wide through Union Bay to Lake Washington. Section included in project is about 10 miles long. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Extreme tidal range is 19.3 feet. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.3 feet, and between mean lower low water and extreme low water is 4.6 feet. Ordinary fluctuation in upper pool is 24 inches; extreme fluctuation has been 3.6 feet. Principal features of double lock and dam are set forth in Table 29-J. Project was completed in 1934. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1935. For details relating to previous projects, see page 2003 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1880 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The 18 waterfront facilities at Lake Washington Ship Canal are used for fuel oil, seafood, marine repair, drydocking, outfitting, mooring fishing vessels and repairs to the locks' equipment. Project is a part of Seattle Harbor's inner harbor. (See Port Series No. 36, revised 1993.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Locks were operated and maintained all year, conducting 16, 507 lockings, passing 10,493 commercial vessels, 52,861 pleasure vessels, and 1,719,420 tons of commerce. The fishladder passed more than 225,000 fish and there were 1,366,893 project visitors. Maintenance, contract: Contracts for large lock machinery upgrade and exterior concrete repair continued. 9. NEAH BAY, WA (SECTION 107) Location. On the southern shore of the Strait of Juan de Fuca about 6 miles east of Cape Flattery on the Olympic Peninsula, and about 150 miles northwest of Seattle, WA. Existing project. Neah Bay is an artificially created harbor, authorized by Congress in 1938 to provide a harbor of refuge at the mouth of the Strait of Juan de Fuca. The original project, completed in 1944 by the Corps of Engineers, consists of an 8,000-foot-long rubblemound breakwater between Waadah Island and the westerly shore of Neah Bay, and reinforcement of a rock revetment extending approximately 2,200 feet west from Baadah Point. An 800-foot-long westward extension of the revetment was completed in 1956. This breakwater protects both the U. S. Coast Guard facilities and the Makah Tribe headquarters complex. New work, under authority of Section 107, consisting of a 1,450-foot-long rubblemound breakwater offshore, a 350-foot-long rubblemound breakwater -29-4- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT on the nearshore, entrance channel authorized to -15 mean lower low water (MLLW), a fish mitigation site, and aids to navigation, has been completed. Local cooperation.Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (Makah Indian Nation) is responsible for 20 per cent of the federally authorized work. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on May 2, 1995. In addition, the Makah Indian Nation has agreed to perform 100 per cent of the following work: construct a sixteen-acre moorage basin with a depth of -15 MLLW to accommodate commercial fishing vessels at all tides; dredge and dispose 50,000 cy of material for sand blanket and beach nourishment; provide moorage facilities to serve 200 commercial fishing boats; improve surface of east rubblemound breakwater to provide a work surface approximately 56 feet wide; plant native vegetation; zone the mitigation beach for restricted use; and provide a public education program. Non-Federal work associated with the project was completed in FY 1997. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Completed operation and maintenance manual. 10. NEAH BAY, WA Location. On south side of the Strait of Juan de Fuca, about 6 miles east of Cape Flattery, at the entrance to the Strait from the Pacific Ocean, and about 60 miles west of Port Angeles, WA. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18480, 18484 and 18485.) Existing project. Provides for a rubblestone breakwater about 8,000 feet long between Waada Island and the westerly shore of the bay, reinforcement of existing rock revetment extending approximately 2,200 feet west from Baada Point, and about an 800-foot extension of the revetment westward. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher water is 8.2 feet. Project was completed in July 1956. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1957.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are six wharves at Neah Bay, including two owned by the United States which are used by the Coast Guard, and four privately owned wharves, three of which are open to general public use to accommodate small commercial fishing vessels. In addition to the wharves, there is a facility for dumping and rafting logs. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Inspection of ocean breakwater for needed repair. 11. OLYMPIA HARBOR, WA Location. Near southern end of Puget Sound at head of Budd Inlet, about 45 miles southwest of Tacoma. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18456.) Existing project. Provides for a channel between deep water in Budd Inlet and port terminal, 30 feet deep at mean lower low water and 500 feet wide, with suitable additional width at bend; a turning basin adjacent to port terminal 30 feet deep, 3,350 feet long, and 500 to 960 feet wide; and construction of a 656-foot concrete floating breakwater and dredging of the entrance and access channels and turning basin, constructed under authority of Section 107, P.L. 86-645. Construction cost for this feature is recorded in Table 38-C (East Bay Small Boat Basin). Extreme tidal range is 22.5 feet. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.4 feet. Existing project was completed in 1985. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1369 of Annual Report for 1934 and page 1873 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Five port facilities are located in Olympia at Budd Inlet, exclusive of the numerous waterfront facilities in the ports used by recreational craft. The industrial docks are used for conventional general cargo, logs, timber products and miscellaneous mooring. (See Port Series No. 35 - Ports of Tacoma, Olympia, and Grays Harbor, WA, revised 1993.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Maintained project coordination. Performed continuous water quality monitoring at East Bay Marina during the seasonal periods of poor water quality. A surface inspection of the floating concrete breakwater was performed and confirmed the breakwater and anchor pile system to be in good condition. 12. PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Hydrographic surveys and inspections to determine navigation conditions at boat basins, small navigation projects, and channels not funded on a project basis for the current fiscal year. Soundings and visual inspections in subject areas are conducted in order to evaluate shoaling conditions. Hydrographic charts are prepared and distributed. Fiscal year costs were $102,029. Total costs to date are $3,693,846. SURVEYS CONDUCTED Anacortes Harbor, WA Neah Bay, WA Shilshole Bay, WA Tacoma Harbor, WA September 1997 April 1997 December 1996 December 1996, May 1997 13. PUGET SOUND AND ITS TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA Location. Puget Sound is in the western part of Washington. Cities of Seattle, Tacoma, Olympia, Everett, Bellingham, and many small towns are on its bays and inlets. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18440, 18441, and 18448.) Existing project. Maintenance of Puget Sound and its tributary waters by snagging and dredging; and removal, in cooperation with the U.S. Coast Guard and city of Seattle, of floating debris from the Seattle Harbor area. Work consists of collecting large pieces of drift, waterlogged pilings, logs and other debris considered hazardous to navigation from Puget Sound and federally authorized channels. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 2003 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1869 of Annual Report for 1938.) -29-5- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 Local cooperation. None required. Cities of Seattle, Tacoma, Olympia, Everett and Bellingham and the State of Washington are cooperating in a program for control of floating debris in their harbors and setting up collection sites for our debris vessel. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities at numerous localities on Puget Sound and its tributary waters are, in general, considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: The debris vessel Puget operated continuously throughout Puget Sound and its tributary waters and removed approximately 3,300 tons of floating debris and hazards to navigation. Debris was disposed of locally or loaded aboard barges and disposed of by contract. Snagging operations were accomplished at Blaine Harbor, Bellingham Harbor, Swinomish Channel, Skagit River, Everett Harbor, Snohomish River (upstream to town of Snohomish), Lake Washington Ship Canal, Lake Washington, Tacoma Harbor, Olympia Harbor, Duwamish River, and Elliott Bay. Maintenance, contract: One thousand tons of harbor debris were disposed of at a cost of $95,000. Contractor continues to recycle much of the debris, reducing the cost of disposal by contract. Remainder of debris is placed in a demolition landfill or recycled through other government agencies. 14. QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA Location. River is formed by junction of Soleduck and Bogachiel Rivers, in northwestern Washington, and flows westerly 5 miles to Pacific Ocean at La Push, about 30 miles south of Cape Flattery. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18480.) Existing project. Provides for: jetty 15 feet high on easterly side of river mouth and a dike on westerly side, with a view of stabilizing entrance; channel 10 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending 2,000 feet upstream from deep water; basin 10 feet deep, 300 to 425 feet wide, and 2,400 feet long upstream of channel; and, maintenance of an ocean spit. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water at La Push is 8.3 feet. Extreme range is about 15 feet. The spit is nourished with dredged material in conjunction with channel dredging. The spit was rehabilitated with quarry rock in 1974, in 1979-80, and in 1982; in addition, a 500-foot breakwater section paralleling the channel and extending the spit was constructed. In 1995, the revetment on the downstream end of the ocean spit was extended 200 feet. In 1996, after the river breached the natural spit, the revetment on the ocean spit was extended approximately 1,700 feet to the north and the boat basin training wall was raised from elevation +9.0 to elevation +16.0 - all under O&M authority. Project was completed in February 1997. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There is one Quileute Tribe-owned dock at La Push, near the mouth of the Quillayute River. There is also a protected boat basin owned by the Quileute Tribe Port Authority which is used by fishing boats, pleasure craft, and the Coast Guard, which has a separate pier. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of the river channel. Prepared plans and specifications for contract work. Advertised and awarded a dredging contract. Maintenance, contract: Continuing contracts were completed for the following: Vertical extension of boat basin training wall and shoreline revetment at La Push; ocean spit breach repair with revetment, Quillayute River; and maintenance dredging and spit breach fill at La Push. 15. SEATTLE HARBOR, WA Location. Harbor at Seattle, WA, includes all waterways within city limits. Chief anchorage basin is Elliott Bay, an arm of Puget Sound. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18450.) Existing project. Maintenance of East and West Waterways, 34 feet deep and 750 feet wide for 6,500 and 5,200 feet, respectively, from pierhead line in Elliott Bay; the 30-foot by 200-foot wide channel from West Waterway to 1st Avenue South Bridge, and the 20-foot by 150-foot-wide channel from 1st Avenue South Bridge to 8th Avenue; dredging Duwamish Waterway 150 feet by 15 feet from 8th Avenue to a point about 1.4 miles above 14th Avenue South Bridge, and turning basin 500 by 250 feet and 15 feet deep at the upper end of the waterway; maintenance of East Waterway between upper end of 750-foot section and Spokane Street, 34 feet deep, 700 feet long and 400 feet wide, and a turning basin, including head of East Waterway at junction of waterways south of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad bridge, to 30 feet deep, after these sections of waterway are dredged by local interests to full project dimensions. Total length of all waterways included in project is about 7.5 miles. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.3 feet. Extreme tidal range is 19.3 feet. Project was completed in 1931, excluding maintenance of East Waterway above the 750-foot section. Turning basin, constructed under authority of R&H Act of Mar. 3, 1925, in 20-foot deep waterway was deauthorized by P.L. 99-662 dated Nov. 17, 1986. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1932.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local sponsor has no maintenance responsibility. Terminal facilities. There are 203 piers, wharves, and docks located on the inner and outer harbors at Seattle, WA. Salmon Bay, Lake Union, Portage Bay and Lake Washington form the inner harbor; Elliott Bay and East, West and Duwamish Waterways form the outer harbor. (Lake Washington Ship Canal, a part of the inner harbor, is a separate project in this report.) These terminals serve a variety of purposes which include cargo handling, bunkering vessels, ferry service (vehicular, passenger and rail car), marine repair/ outfitting/ drydocking/ conversion, shipbuilding, handling supplies and equipment, and mooring company owned equipment, excursion vessels, fire boats, fishing vessels, government equipment, harbor craft/tugs, and oceanographic research vessels. The numerous waterfront facilities in the port used exclusively by recreational craft are not included. (See Port Series No. 36, revised 1993.) Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Condition surveys were made of channels. A Congressional- -29-6- SEATTLE. WASHINGTON DISTRICT directed study was initiated to deepen the East Waterway up to elevation -51.0 under O&M authority, if feasible. Maintenance, contract: Dredging removed 89,000 cy from the upper navigation channel at a cost of $283,930. Twenty thousand cy of the sandy material was used to cap an old (1975) Waterways Experiment Station test deep water disposal site with contaminated material. 16. SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA Location. An inland passage, 11 miles long, between Saratoga Passage and Padilla Bay, in northwestern part of Washington, about 60 miles north of Seattle. (See NOAA Survey Charts 18400, 18427 and 18421.) Existing project. A channel 100 feet wide and 12 feet deep for 11 miles from deep water in Saratoga Passage to deep water in Padilla Bay, by dredging and dike construction where necessary; and removal of protecting rocky points of McGlinn and Fidalgo Islands obstructing navigation at "Hole-in-the- Wall". Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 11.5 feet at south end of channel, 8.4 feet at north end, and 10 feet at La Conner. Extreme tidal range is about 19.5 feet at south end of channel and about 16 feet at north end. Project was completed in March 1965. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1965.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 18 wharves, docks, and piers on Swinomish Channel, all but 3 of which are privately owned. Of these, one is used for handling general cargo; five are used exclusively for moorage, unloading and servicing of fishing vessels; two are used for handling petroleum products; three facilities are used for log dumps; and two for handling nonmetallic minerals. Three publicly owned facilities for launching, mooring, and servicing small craft are within the city limits of La Conner. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Maintained project coordination with Port of Skagit County, Port of Anacortes, U.S. Coast Guard, and navigation users. Channel condition surveys were conducted. Prepared plans and specifications for maintenance dredging and monitored dredging contract. Maintenance, contract: A continuing contract for clamshell maintenance dredging was awarded and work initiated. 17. WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR AND NASELLE RIVER, WA Location. Willapa Harbor consists of lower reaches of Willapa River and Bay, an inlet of Pacific Ocean about 30 miles north of mouth of Columbia River in Washington. Willapa River rises about 30 miles east of harbor, flows generally westerly, and empties into the bay. Naselle River enters the bay near its southerly end. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18504.) Existing project. Provides for: channel over bar at mouth of Willapa Bay, 26 feet deep and at least 500 feet wide; channel 24 feet deep and 200 feet wide from deep water in Willapa Bay to foot of Ferry Street at South Bend, thence 300 feet wide to westerly end of narrows, thence 250 feet wide to forks of river at Raymond, including a cutoff channel 3,100 feet long at narrows and a closing dike at Mailboat Slough; channel 24 feet deep and 150 feet wide up south fork to deep basin above Cram Lumber Mill, and up north fork to 12th Street, with a turning basin 250 feet wide, 350 feet long, and 24 feet deep at latter point; channel 10 feet deep and 40 feet wide from deep water in Palix River to Bay Center dock, with widening at shoreward end to provide a small mooring basin; mooring basin 15 feet deep, 340 feet wide, and 540 feet long adjacent to port wharf at Tokeland; entrance channel at Nahcotta 10 feet deep and 200 feet wide, and mooring basin 10 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 1,150 feet long, protected by a rubblemound breakwater about 1,500 feet long; and removal of snags, piles, and other obstructions in navigable channel of Naselle River between Naselle and mouth. Project includes about 26 miles of channel from entrance through Willapa River forks, 2,800 feet of Palix River-Bay Center channel, and 9 miles of Naselle River upstream of U.S. Highway 101 Bridge. Plane of reference is mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 8.9 feet at Toke Point, 9.9 feet at Raymond, 8.9 feet at Bay Center, and 10.8 feet near Naselle. Extreme range is 18 feet at Toke Point, 19.3 feet at Raymond, 16 feet at Bay Center, and 18 feet near Naselle. Project was completed in November 1958. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1959. For details relating to previous projects, see page 968 of Annual Report for 1910, page 2001 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 1861 of Annual Report for 1938.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are 24 wharves on Willapa River and Harbor, including 5 in Willapa Bay, 4 in Bay Center, 12 in Raymond and South Bend, and 1 in Tokeland. Two of the wharves at Raymond and South Bend are suitable for use by ocean-going vessels. One of these is publicly owned and operated as a general cargo terminal, and one is located at a sawmill. The other wharves, including three which are publicly owned and operated, are used by shallow-draft vessels. These facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Frequent condition surveys on the Willapa bar channel were performed at the request of the U.S. Coast Guard. The alignment of the Willapa bar thalweg continues to be a problem for safe navigation. The Government hopper dredge Yaquina performed test dredging on the Willapa bar in August. Approximately 80,000 cy of material were agitationdredged with sidecast disposal at a cost of $334,350. 18. LINCOLN PARK BEACH, SEATTLE, WA Location. Project is located within the city of Seattle, at Williams Point, and adjacent to the East Passage of Puget Sound. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18449.) Existing project. Initial beach nourishment consisted of the placement of 34,000 tons of sand, gravel, and cobble fill seaward of the existing seawall, a distance of 2,300 feet along the southwest beach. Two hundred fifty feet of rock revetment, -29-7- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 at Williams Point, consisting of 2 layers of 1,500-pound to 4,000-pound armor rock were placed on a 2-foot thick filter bed of quarry spalls. The revetment is fronted by 2,000 tons of gravel and cobble fill, with the same top elevation, slope and seaward extent as the beach nourishment on the southwest beach. Periodic beach nourishment, consisting of placement of beach material to replenish the erosion loss approximately every 5 years, is an authorized part of the construction project. Monitoring of beach nourishment consists of initial and periodic profile surveys, estimates of alongshore/offshore volumes of material, periodic beach sediment sampling, and pre- and post- construction environmental monitoring. Initial construction was completed in December 1988. The first periodic nourishment was performed during September- November 1994. Local cooperation. Cost sharing requirements for the local sponsor (city of Seattle) provides 35 per cent of total project cost including the cost of periodic nourishment and surveillance. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was executed on June 15, 1988. Amendment No. 1 to the LCA for the periodic nourishment and surveillance was executed in March 1994. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Completed post construction monitoring and prepared final accounting. Flood Control 19. CHEHALIS RIVER AT SOUTH ABERDEEN AND COSMOPOLIS, WA Location. The Chehalis River, about 125 miles in length, rises in the Willapa Hills in west central Washington, flows east, then north and finally west to Grays Harbor on the coast. The cities of Aberdeen and Cosmopolis are located at the mouth of the Chehalis River in Grays Harbor County. The project is located on the left river bank (south side) in Aberdeen and Cosmopolis. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, Aberdeen, WA, 1:24,000.) Existing project. The project, authorized in P.L. 99-662, as refined in the plans and specifications, provides standard project flood protection for most of the left bank flood plain (1,176 acres) at the mouth of the Chehalis River in the cities of Aberdeen and Cosmopolis. The improvement will include segments of earthen embankment levee (2.0 miles) and steel sheet pile floodwall (1.1 miles), joining areas of high ground (1.2 miles). The project roughly follows the left bank of the Chehalis River from Devonshire Slough to Cosmopolis. Tide gates were provided where existing drainage channels cross the project alignment. Closure gates were provided to maintain road and rail access through the levee system. Estimated total project cost is $11,074,000 ($8,283,000 Federal and $2,791,000 non-Federal). All work, including the preparation of an operation and maintenance manual, will be completed in FY 1998. Local cooperation. Under current cost sharing requirements, the local sponsor (city of Aberdeen assisted by the city of Cosmopolis) will pay 25 per cent of project costs. A Project Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was executed March 1, 1994. The local sponsor will provide operation and maintenance of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Conducted engineering during construction support for, and supervised the construction contract. New work, contract: Construction contract was completed. 20. HORSESHOE BEND, WA Location. The project is a part of the Green River Basin, just south of the city of Kent, WA. Existing project. Work consists of a modification to 3,300 feet of the 9,500-foot existing levee to increase the height of the structure and protect the area against a Standard Project Flood (SPF) event. Modified levee has a top width, varying between 16 and 12 feet, with approximately 1 vertical and 2 horizontal side slopes - the side slopes to be planted with grass. Providing SPF level protection will then be consistent throughout the 9,500-foot reach. Local cooperation. The local sponsor (Green River Flood Control Zone District and King County) is responsible for approximately 30 per cent of project costs. A project cooperation agreement (PCA) was executed on April 19, 1996. The local sponsor will provide operation and maintenance of the project. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Completed the operation and maintenance manual and final accounting. New work, contract: Completed equipment rental contract. 21. HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WA Location. Green River, in northwestern Washington, flows westerly for 40 miles to Auburn, thence northerly 32 miles to its mouth in Elliott Bay at Seattle. Dam is at river mile 64, 6 miles southeast of Kanaskat, and 1 mile downstream from mouth of north fork. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, "Cedar Lake Quadrangle, WA".) Existing project. Rockfill dam about 235 feet high, with gated spillway having a concrete weir at elevation 1,176 feet above mean sea level and top of gates at elevation 1,206, creating a reservoir with capacity of 106,000 acre-feet. Dam along crest is about 675 feet long. Project is designed to control flooding in Green River Valley to alleviate agricultural and urban flood damage, and make possible further expansion of Seattle industrial area. It also supplements Tacoma water supply which was included as a betterment. Project was completed in June 1963. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1963.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Operation continued all year. Routine maintenance was accomplished on roads, gages, debris booms, ditches, powerline, and other project features. Stilling basin inspection was accomplished. Work continued on water quality and sediment surveys. -29-8- SEATILE. WASHINGTON DISTRICT Maintenance, contract: A contract was awarded for a debris work boat. Dam Safety Assurance. Project strengthens the reservoir outlet control tower and bridge to withstand the maximum credible earthquake. Estimated project cost is $1,278,000 with $13,700 provided by the local sponsor, King County. Completion is scheduled for FY 1998. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Monitored construction contract. New work, contract: Initiated construction of seismic strengthening of outlet works intake tower and bridge. 22. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections are made of federally constructed local flood protection projects which are maintained by local interests, and agencies responsible for their operation and maintenance are advised of any needed repairs. During the fiscal year inspections were made on Dungeness River at Sequim, Elwha River near Port Angeles, Skykomish and Wallace Rivers at Startup, American Lake near Fort Lewis, and Shelton Creek at Shelton in Washington State; St. Maries and Lightning Creek projects in Idaho; and, Clark Fork River at Missoula in Montana. Fiscal year costs were $125,170. Total costs to date have been $1,532,513. 23. MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA Location. On White River, principal tributary of Puyallup River, near Mud Mountain, 28 miles above its confluence with Puyallup River, and 38 miles above mouth of Puyallup River. Dam is 6 miles upstream and southeast of Enumclaw, in northwestern Washington, and 38 miles east of Tacoma. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet "Cedar Lake Quadrangle, Washington".) Existing project (including dam safety assurance improvements to date). Rockfill dam, 700 feet long at crest elevation, rises 432 feet above bedrock. Reservoir has storage capacity of about 106,000 acre-feet. Flood control outlet works are in right abutment and permit an authorized, controlled discharge of 17,600 cubic feet per second through two concrete-lined tunnels, with a maximum capacity discharge of 21,500 cfs. Uncontrolled discharge over the spillway is maximum capacity for 245,000 cubic feet per second. Project affords flood protection to White and Puyallup River Valleys and protects Tacoma industrial district in conjunction with Puyallup River project at Tacoma against floods about 50 percent greater than maximum discharge of record. Original project was completed in June 1953. To date, the Corps has constructed two vista areas, a picnic area, a wading pool, and playground adjacent to the project office, a reservoir access point for hunters and fishermen, and a 1,760- foot trail leading to the lower vista area. Installation of an approximately 400-foot-deep concrete cutoff wall in the core of the dam was completed in November 1990 under the major rehabilitation program. Under dam safety assurance, spillway walls were raised, the dam crest was heightened, river diversion facilities required for excavation for the new tower were completed, the 9-foot diameter and the 23-foot diameter tunnels were refurbished, and a new reservoir outlet tower was constructed. All work associated with the dam safety assurance effort is complete, with final fiscal accounting remaining. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Project features were operated all year. Maintenance was accomplished on dam facilities, intake structure, gages, debris booms, power lines, roads, ditches, hiking trails, vista observation deck, recreation area, and fish facilities. Approximately 9,800 fish were transported from the fish collection facility to the upstream release point. Maintenance, contract: A contract was awarded and completed for drilling a well to furnish potable water for the project. Dam Safety Assurance. New work, hired labor: Continued engineering work addressing deficiency correction of tunnel and studies in support of warranty items. 24. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Flood control storage space was available in Hungry Horse Reservoir, MT, Flathead Lake, MT (controlled by Kerr Dam), Grand Coulee project, WA, Wynoochee Dam, WA, Upper Baker and Ross Reservoirs, WA. Issues relating to project operations were addressed. Regulation instructions were provided for flood control operations. Guidance forecasts were made during the flood control season, as required. No Lost Valley storage replacement was requested at Rocky Reach, Priest Rapids, and Wells Dams. Daily and/or hourly data were collected and tabulated as required to check compliance with operating criteria. Coordination necessary in preparation or revision of reservoir regulation manuals was carried on during the year with agencies responsible for the operation of these projects. Fiscal year costs were $430,657. Total costs to date have been $4,724,055. 25. STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA Location. Formed by confluence of its north and south forks at Arlington, in northwestern Washington, Stillaguamish River flows westerly 22 miles to Puget Sound, entering Port Susan through Hat Slough and South Pass, and Skagit Bay through West Pass. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18441, and Geological Survey Quadrangles Stanwood, Marysville, and Stillaguamish, WA.) Existing project. Works to reduce bank erosion and channel changes on Stillaguamish River 15 miles between Arlington and head of Hat Slough, and on Cook Slough, 3 miles long, as follows: revetment at 26 places on river and Cook Slough; concrete weir (including a fishway) 275 feet long between steel sheet pile piers at head of Cook Slough to limit flow through slough; and two cutoff channels, each about 900 feet long, to eliminate sharp bends in Cook Slough. Tidal influence extends about 3 miles into improved section. Flood stages of 16 feet above low water at Cook Slough weir have been -29-9- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 observed. Project was completed in July 1939. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1940.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Utilized in-house labor to supervise removal of brush from the entire project along slopes of levee and construct rip rap repair. Maintenance, contract: Awarded equipment rental contracts to achieve removal of brush and repair erosion damage with rip rap. 26. TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA. Location. Puyallup River has its source in glaciers on western slopes of Mount Rainier, flows northwesterly 50 miles, and empties into Commencement Bay, an arm of Puget Sound, at Tacoma, WA. Work covered by this project is on Puyallup River, within city limits of Tacoma. (See NOAA Survey Chart 18453.) Existing project. A channel with a capacity of 50,000 cubic feet per second between East 11th Street Bridge and lower end of inter-county improvement, a distance of about 2.2 miles, by straightening channel, building levees, revetting channel and levees, and making necessary bridge changes. The 11th Street Bridge at lower end of project is 0.75 mile above mouth of Puyallup River. Diurnal tidal range at mouth of river is 11.8 feet and extreme range is 20 feet. Project was planned in conjunction with Mud Mountain Dam and affords protection against floods about 50 percent greater than maximum discharge of record. A real estate design memorandum, approved by Office of the Chief of Engineers on October 2, 1985, changed the project boundary to allow the Port of Tacoma to create a wetland adjacent to the project. This action resulted in the Corps acquiring approximately 2,450 linear feet of setback levee in fee simple. Maintenance funds to cover the increased length of the project have been provided by the Port of Tacoma for the project life. Project was completed in May 1950. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1950.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Utilized in-house labor to supervise removal of brush and noxious weeds from the entire project along slopes of levee. Coordinated annual clean-up with Citizens for a Healthy Bay, a tax-exempt, nonprofit organization.. Maintenance, contract: Awarded equipment rental contracts to achieve removal of brush and noxious weeds. Multiple Purpose Power Projects 27. ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID Location. On Pend Oreille River about 25 miles west of Sandpoint, in northern Idaho, and 50 miles northeast of Spokane, WA. Dam is 838 and 90 miles upstream from mouths of Columbia and Pend Oreille Rivers, respectively. -29-10- (See Geological Survey topographic sheets, Sandpoint, ID, and Newport, WA.) Existing project. Provides flood control, hydroelectric power, and related water uses on Pend Oreille River as a part of the multiple purpose plan for development of Columbia River Basin, including recreation development. At the dam, the river channel was formerly divided by an island and a low waterfall of about 7 feet. Dam is a gated, gravity-structure spillway in left channel and a powerhouse having an installation of 42,600 kilowatts in right channel, creating a reservoir with a usable storage capacity of 1,153,000 acre-feet. Project was completed in June 1957. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1957.) Recreational facilities for public use have been provided at Albeni Cove, Priest River, Riley Creek, Johnson Creek, Trestle Creek, Strongs Island, and Springy Point. (Strongs Island was closed in FY 1982 to reduce O&M costs.) (Refer to Albeni Falls Master Plan dated June 1981 for further planned development.) Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Reservoir was operated through its annual cycle of storage and release. Routine structural, mechanical, and electrical maintenance was performed on spillways, dam, powerhouse, and equipment. Prescribed testing for power system reliability improvements was initiated with funds provided by Bonneville Power Administration (Section 2406). Maintenance, contract: Contracts for audio-visual interpretative exhibits program, construction of a replacement visitor center, transformer blast oil containment, and powerhouse HVAC renovation were completed. Contracts were awarded for spillway gate corrosion control, 13.8KVA cable replacement, and paving of the transformer area, vista parking, and resource yard. Emergency flood funding was received which allowed for the commencement of repairs to the Clark Fork debris area and bank protection in areas of reservoir encroachment. 28. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM - RUFUS WOODS LAKE, WA Location. On Columbia River in north central Washington, at River Mile 545, just upstream from mouth of Foster Creek, 1.5 miles upstream from town of Bridgeport. (Geological Survey topographic sheet, Okanogan, WA, shows general locality.) Existing project. A concrete gravity structure which consists of a 19-gate spillway and a 27-unit powerhouse. The powerhouse has sixteen 88,274 kilowatt and eleven 95,000 kilowatt generators with nameplate capacity of 2,457,384 kilowatts. Work was completed to bring turbine efficiency for units 17-27 up to design standards in FY 1992. Estimated cost of current construction project is $396,060,000, with completion scheduled for FY 1998. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. New work, hired labor: Completed deficiency correction of the data acquisition and control system. SEATTLE. WASHINGTON DISTRICT New work, contract: Initiated study of trunnion beam anchorages design criteria. Maintenance, hired labor: Project was operated all year, and routine maintenance work was performed. Prescribed testing for power system improvements was initiated with funds provided by Bonneville Power Administration (Section 2406). Maintenance, contract: Contracts for station service annunciation system, Buckley Bar cemetery bank protection, and powerhouse HVAC system (Phase II) were completed. Contracts for replacement of the turbine lubricating oil and right abutment seepage drain installation were awarded. 29. LIBBY DAM - LAKE KOOCANUSA, MT Location. On Kootenai River in Lincoln County, MT, about 17 miles upstream from Libby, and 219 miles upstream from confluence of Kootenai and Columbia Rivers. (See Geological Survey topographic sheet, Thompson Lakes, MT.) Existing project. Provides storage for local flood control protection in Montana and Idaho, and main stem flood control in Lower Columbia River, hydroelectric power generation atsite and at downstream plants through storage release. Project is operated as a unit of a comprehensive system for improvement of Columbia River basin for flood control, navigation, hydroelectric power, and other purposes. Lake Koocanusa is 90 miles long, backing water 42 miles into Canada and has a usable storage capacity of 4,965,000 acrefeet at 50 percent drawdown. Construction of dam was in accordance with a treaty between United States and Canada relating to international cooperation in water resource development of the Columbia River basin. Dam is a straight concrete gravity overflow type, 420 feet high, 3,055 feet long, with normal full pool at elevation 2,459 feet above mean sea level. Powerhouse has an initial installed capacity of 420,000 kilowatts from four hydroelectric generating units. A fifth generating unit (Libby Additional Units Project) was completed in 1984 with an additional capacity of 105,000 kilowatts. Fabrication of generators for units 6 through 8 is completed and parts have been stored at the site. Projects are completed with units 1 through 5 operational. Units 6 through 8 have been reclassified inactive. The Libby Reregulating Dam Project provides for construction of a reregulating dam about 10 miles downstream of Libby Dam. Funds were allocated for a construction start in 1977; however, courts have found that Congress did not authorize construction of the dam. In FY 1982, all work was terminated due to court direction. The Libby Reregulating Dam - Power Units Project provides for installation of three hydroelectric generating units at the reregulating dam with 78,900 kilowatt installed capacity. (For further details, see Annual Report for 1995). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance, hired labor: Reservoir was operated through its annual cycle of storage and release. Routine structural, mechanical, and electrical maintenance was performed on spillway dam, powerhouse and equipment. Prescribed testing for power system reliability improvements was initiated with funds provided by Bonneville Power Administration (Section 2406). Maintenance, contract: Contracts for Unit #1 stator rewind, audio-visual interpretative program, reroofing of maintenance -29-11- building and powerhouse were completed. Contracts were awarded for enclosure of the visitor center and construction of a project administration building. Miscellaneous 30. MISCELLANEOUS WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were: Nahcotta, WA, $20,469; Oak Harbor, WA, $25,204; Section 107 Coordination, $3,877; Tokeland, WA, $35 (terminated); and Tulalip Bay, WA $17,958, a total of $67,543. Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were: Lummi Shore Road, WA, $52,978. In addition, $16,215 contributed funds were expended. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). See Table 38-L. Flood control activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were: Coeur d' Alene River (South Fork), ID, $27,071; Murden Cove, WA, $20,567; and Section 14 Coordination, $12,264; a total of $59,902. Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation.) Fiscal year costs were $5,552,279. This amount excludes $1,449,657 contributed funds expended. Project modifications for improvement of environment (Section 1135, Public Law 99-662, as amended). See Table 29-L. Aquatic plant control (Section 302, Public Law 89-298). Efforts to discontinue the cost share program resulted in a fiscal year expenditure of $305. 31. NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM (NEPP) Fiscal year costs were $170,137 provided for activities required for local and national preparedness. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 32. GENERAL REGULATORY FUNCTIONS PROGRAM Permit Evaluation Enforcement Studies Other Navigation Regulations Environmental Impact Statements TOTAL $2,453,498 858,138 190 4,583 27,893 $3,344,302 General Investigations 33. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $170,155 for navigation studies, $206,792 for flood damage prevention studies, $550,126 for special studies, $489,851 for review of authorized projects, $168,316 for miscellaneous activities, and $48,690 for coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests, a total of $1,633,930. In addition, contributed funds were expended for the for the following: $23,097 for navigation studies, $26,061 for special studies, $190,626 for review of authorized projects, and $23,475 for coordination with other agencies and non-Federal interests, a total of $263,259. 34. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA The work programmed for collection and study of basic data covers international water studies, flood plain management services, and hydrologic studies. Work on international water studies included checking Kootenay Lake storage computations to determine compliance of West Kootenay Power & Light Co. with orders of International Joint Commission, and coordination with International Kootenay Lake and Osoyoos Lake Boards of Control in enforcement of International Joint Commission orders. Technical assistance was provided other Federal and non-Federal agencies and Indian tribes in flood hazard evaluation, flood reduction methods, and related services as requested. Fiscal year costs were $19,925 for international water studies, $142,564 for flood plain management services, and $7,968 for hydrologic studies, a total of $170,457. In addition, $7,986 contributed funds were expended for flood plain management services. 35. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN See Table 29-H. -29-12- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRII TABLE 29-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total To In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 1. Ediz Hook, WA New Work (Federal Funds) Approp. 5,878,740 (Contrib. Funds) 2. Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 3. Friday Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 4. Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost 157 5,000 569,000 5,315 561,741 87,549 25,988 966,000 173,000 1,052,000 815,117 1,002,982 185,613 912,490 933,473 6,000 3,791 75,000 1,443 70,823 1,954,000 -1,393,000 29,000 447,801 150,878 71,525 6,000 2,624 76,000 45,369 10,270,500 5,750,682 7,385,000 5,731,000 9,945,041 6,030,289 7,560,155 5,802,808 150,000 28,000 25,000 146,698 47,403 25,841 29,000 14,073 -29-13- 5,878,740 2,075,860 2,068,486 385,850 385,850 251,314 185,376 1,723,745 1,723,745 14,967,793 14,945,463 116,618 116,618 548,090 584,090 1,575,500 1,575,500 160,952 152,570 1,267,881 1,267,881 22,303,962 22,265,350 137,888,023 137,875,190 9,592 9,592 4,606,145 4,606,145 6,096,000 6,065,674 55,889 55,889 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total To In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 5. Grays Harbor, New Work Point Chehalis, WA 6. Kenmore Navigation Channel, WA 7. Lake Crockett, WA 8. Lake Washington Ship Canal, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 9. Neah Bay, WA (Section 107) (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 10. Neah Bay, WA 11. Olympia Harbor, WA Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost _ 440,000 835,000 1,801 426,099 845,780 100,000 251,000 95,530 249,289 15,000 8,848 1,822 2,060 14,856 17,270 5,790,000 5,408,000 6,552,000 7,349,000 5,618,589 5,739,774 6,419,843 7,427,043 _ _ 40,000 37,400 1,630,000 1,873,500 46,485 1,425,807 2,045,472 52,000 266,000 152,074 67,584 133,636 269,102 26,248 5,806 _ 20,000 _ 11,273 5,000 3,941 4,000 4,396 16,000 16,223 4,000 2,479 -29-14- TABLE 29-A 1,335,000 1,331,879 946,000 946,000 795,344 789,148 377,990 377,990 963,610 963,610 4,611,436 4,611,436 123,711,095 123,533,676 7,465,230 7,465,230 250,000 250,000 40,000 3,884,900 3,874,920 558,074 548,508 2,057,266 2,057,266 1,874,058 1,865,331 337,709 337,709 788,177 786,205 9 10 11 12 SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total To In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 13. Puget Sound and its New Work Tributary Waters, WA 14. Quillayute River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 15. Seattle Harbor, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 16. Swinomish Channel, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 17. Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 965,000 878,000 771,000 1,000,000 915,665 928,152 756,492 954,534 50,000 824,000 4,426,000 6,663,584 44,449 821,057 4,373,188 6,641,436 452,500 152,000 608,000 529,000 436,566 132,759 622,598 543,729 35,000 32,880 _ -2,120 _ _ 191,000 415,000 117,755 487,395 238,000 728 234,383 379,248 379,248 _ - 77,000 457,624 127,000 546,383 62,602 449,853 137,329 553,263 -29-15- TABLE 29-A 43,337 43,337 24,788,749 24,717,802 521,850 521,850 13 14 23,502,892 23,418,829 20,000 20,000 170,335 170,335 11,230,373 11,222,631 69,333 69,333 94,475 94,475 808,332 808,332 8,297,972 8,293,270 32,000 32,000 379,248 379,248 1,386,955 1,386,955 15,583,743 15,578,548 15 16 17 18 78,372 78,372 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total To In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 18. Lincoln Park Beach, New Work Seattle, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 19. Chehalis River at South Aberdeen and Cosmopolis, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 20. Horseshoe Bend, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 21. Howard A. Hanson Dam, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 23. Mud Mountain Dam, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) 25. Stillaguamish River, WA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor Rehab. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 1,185 136,000 97,048 40,000 66,123 25,625 5,044 2,716 -2,000 4,022 -14,348 -3,737 1,292,000 2,559,000 2,000,000 202,000 573,841 2,505,057 2,918,976 253,896 _ 1,183,907 320,000 851,504 642,562 25,167 33,000 109,000 24,236 100,193 _ 10,100 _ 7,793 60,000 300,000 12,424 260,299 50,000 58,193 4,488 -2,491 900,000 50,399 936,177 947,000 969,000 1,133,000 1,100,000 1,033,691 963,819 1,099,914 1,123,583 13,700 13,700 18,811,000 7,609,000 -695,000 271,000 17,904,166 7,212,186 729,832 181,214 1,629,000 1,763,318 1,908,000 1,909,000 1,630,929 1,846,166 1,891,311 1,857,312 925,500 925,500 391,126 391,126 8,265,000 8,247,041 19 1,553,907 1,552,259 222,000 208,834 10,100 5,302 38,308,061 20 38,307,360 21 19,539,329 19,495,425 22 2,013,700 2,013,700 81,145,848 23 80,990,596 24 34,066,316 33,940,984 25 _ 285,908 _ 285,908 _ 30,437,500 _ 30,437,500 _ 3,928 _ 3,928 134,595 134,595 161,000 156,000 132,000 145,000 137,861 181,145 130,130 146,279 26 3,298,523 3,296,533 21,000 21,000 -29-16- TABLE 29-A (Continued) See Section Total To In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 26. Tacoma, Puyallup River, WA New Work (Federal Funds) Approp. _. 3,947,853 Cost .. _ 3,947,853 27 Maint. Approp. 62,000 59,000 79,000 106,000 1,056,367 Cost 61,270 59,947 77,377 105,642 1,054,323 (Contrib. Funds) Maint. Contrib. _ _ _ _ 54,405 Cost 329 _ 425 7,761 27. Albeni Falls Dam, ID New Work Approp. _ _ _. 31,741,561 Cost _ _ 31,741,561 28 Maint. Approp. 4,949,700 5,595,000 4,567,000 5,366,568 74,686,038 29 Cost 4,809,100 5,767,752 4,330,034 5,277,760 74,220,122 30 28. Chief Joseph Dam- New Work Rufus Woods Lake, WA Approp. 1,954,000 -278,000 182,000 246,000 540,522,235 31 Cost 1,233,919 711,438 774,334 173,193 540,428,865 32 Maint. Approp. 12,186,000 10,361,000 11,953,000 12,592,890 183,855,428 33 Cost 12,324,159 10,533,162 11,718,716 12,285,641 183,118,941 34 Major Rehab. Approp... 297,630 Cost .... 297,630 29. Libby Dam - Lake New Work Koocanusa, MT Approp... -543,726,140 (Federal Funds) Cost .... 543,726,140 35 Maint. Approp. 8,809,700 5,755,000 6,195,000 8,623,021 83,383,723 36 Cost 6,099,356 8,426,342 6,329,562 8,562,756 83,176,422 37 (Contrib. Funds) New Work Contrib. ._ 1,458,252 Cost _... 1,458,252 38 1. Includes $418,209 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $43,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 2. Includes $5,869 for previous project and $120,000 for Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters, appropriated and expended. 3. Includes $1,180,500 expended under Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L.98-8). 4. Includes $3,530,000 for Preconstruction Engineering and Design, $124,945 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710) and $113,134 for previous project, appropriated and expended. Excludes $161,909 Navy funds and $6,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 5. Includes $37,415 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $409,660 Emergency Relief funds and $57,000 Public Works Administration funds expended. 6. Excludes $111,000 Public Works Acceleration Act funds expended. 7. Excludes $3,418,000 contributed by Port of Grays Harbor in fulfilling requirements of local cooperation. 8. Includes $117,750 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 9. Includes $779,655 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710) and $485,002 for previous project, appropriated and expended. Excludes $246,567 expended by State of Washington and $742,071 expended by King County. Excludes $192,516 Public Works Administration funds expended. 10. Includes $1,631,195 (1916 to 1936) and $338,163 subsequently appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 11. Includes $183,257 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $105,467 Public Works Administration funds expended. 12. Includes $14,418 appropriated and expended for previous projects. 13. Includes $64,996 appropriated and expended for previous project. 14. Excludes Navy funds expended on dredging river channel in 1944 and Coast Guard funds expended for channel dredging in 1948 and 1949. 15. Excludes $1,000 Coast Guard funds expended. -29-17- SEATTLE. WASHIINGTON DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMEIENT TABLE 29-A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 16. Includes $228,084 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $40,000 Coast Guard funds and $192,314 Emergency Relief funds expended. 17. Includes $309,177 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $78,532 Public Works Administration funds expended. 18. Includes $6,597 expended for previous projects. 19. Includes $2,212,000 for Preconstruction Engineering and Design, appropriated and expended. 20. Includes $37,048,061 appropriated for original project and $1,260,000 appropriated for Dam Safety Assurance. 21. Includes $37,048,061 expended for original project and $1,259,277 expended for Dam Safety Assurance. 22. Includes $66,678 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 23. Includes $13,182,063 appropriated for original project, $87,785 appropriated for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710) and $67,876,000 appropriated for Dam Safety Assurance. Excludes $26,000 Emergency Relief funds. 24. Includes $13,182,063 expended for original project, $87,785 expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710) and $67,720,714 expended for Dam Safety Assurance. Excludes $26,000 Emergency Relief funds expended. 25. Includes $198,578 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. 26. Excludes $281,000 Works Progress Administration funds and $85,999 Emergency Relief funds expended. 27. Includes $5,035 appropriated and expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 28. Includes $30,769,614 for original project and $971,947 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710), appropriated and expended. Excludes $136,736 Public Works Acceleration Act funds expended for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 29. Includes funds appropriated for project O&M ($72,591,248), Special Recreation Use Fees ($174,776), Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters ($1,875,446), and BPA direct funding ($44,568). 30. Includes funds expended for project O&M ($72,152,682), Special Recreation Use Fees ($174,776), Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters ($1,875,446), and BPA direct funding ($17,218). 31. Includes $144,338,252 appropriated for original project, $396,036,000 for additional units, and $147,983 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). Excludes $58,000 Public Works Acceleration Act funds for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 32. Includes $144,338,252 expended for original project, $395,942,630 for additional units, and $147,983 for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). Excludes $58,000 Public Works Acceleration Act funds for recreation facilities at completed project (Code 710). 33. Includes funds appropriated for project O&M ($182,612,977), Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters ($774,561), and BPA direct funding ($467,890). 34. Includes funds expended for project O&M ($182,322,464), Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters ($774,561), and BPA direct funding ($21,916). 35. Includes $484,753,143 appropriated and expended for original project, $42,221,634 for additional units, $16,276,363 for reregulating dam, and $475,000 for power planning. 36. Includes funds appropriated for project O&M ($80,743,000), Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters ($2,592,702), and BPA direct funding ($48,021). 37. Includes funds expended for project O&M ($80,566,497), Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters ($2,592,702), and BPA direct funding ($17,223). 38. Excludes $161,849 expended by Federal Aviation Agency, $32,000 expended by Lincoln County- City of Libby Joint Airport Board, $8,000 expended by Bonneville Power Administration, and $379,555 expended by U.S. Forest Service. -29-18- TABLE 29-B See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized Mar. 7, 1974 H. Doc. 101, 93d Cong., 1st Sess., P.L. 93-251 H. Doec. 1108, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 377, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doec. 546, 75th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doec. 569, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doec. 348, 86th Cong., 2d Sess. 2. -29-19- June 25, 1910 July 3, 1930 June 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 EDIZ HOOK, WA Construction of 10,000 linear feet of rock revetment, together with initial beach replenishment and annual nourishment. Emergency interim measures necessary to prevent breaching of Ediz Hook prior to construction of authorized project. EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA Training dike 10,500 feet long extending across bar at outlet of old river channel. Raise 6,000 feet of training dike, extend spur dike, widen gap in dike as required, maintain East Waterway and channel to gap. Abandon project for Snohomish River and redesignate as Everett Harbor and Snohomish River. Provide settling basin near 14th Street. Construct spur dike at Preston Point, remove training dike north of river outlet, enlarge channel to 14th Street, and deepen settling basin. Widen channel from settling basin to gap; extend channel to head of Steamboat Slough; and a settling basin within upper channel reach. FRIDAY HARBOR, WA Construction of 1,600 feet of concrete floating breakwater. GRAYS HARBOR AND CHEHALIS RIVER, WA South jetty. A north jetty 9,000 feet long. The 18-foot channel. Extend north jetty 7,000 feet; length of south jetty fixed at 13,734 feet. A 6-foot channel above Cosmopolis. Dredging in bar channel. Dredging in bar channel. Reconstruct north and south jetties to an elevation of 16 feet above mean lower low water. Maintain 26-foot channel below Aberdeen (as authorized by Public Works Administration Dec. 11, 1933) and combining projects for Grays Harbor and bar entrance and Grays Harbor, inner portion, and Chehalis River under a modified project for Grays Harbor and Chehalis River. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Maintain 30-foot depth in channel from deep water in Grays Harbor to Port of Grays Harbor Commission terminal which was deepened from 26 to 30 feet with Navy funds. 14-foot channel to Bay City; breakwater at Westhaven; and maintenance of Westhaven entrance channel. Dredging and maintenance of a 30-foot channel and turning basin from Aberdeen to Cosmopolis. Additional breakwater, 1,400 feet long, at Westhaven Cove. Westhaven Cove small boat basin. Improve project features with accompanying fish mitigation. GRAYS HARBOR, POINT CHEHALIS, WA Periodic beach nourishment to protect the infrastructure of the community of Westport. Documents Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers July 9, 1981. Annual Report, 1895, pp. 3517-3533. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 59th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 507, 59th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doec. 29, 61st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 1125, 60th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doec. 1729, 64th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doec. 582, 69th Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.2, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 53, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 2, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 78-534 Report in Office, Chief of Engineers H. Doc. 635, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doec. 412, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doec. 30, 84th Cong., 1st Sess. Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Feb. 7, 1979 P.L. 99-662 Sec. 111, P.L. 90-483 Authorized by Chief of Engineers Sep. 7, 1995. 3. 4. July 14, 1960 as amended June 3, 1896 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 June 25, 1910 June 25, 1910 Aug. 8, 1917 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended Mar. 2, 1945 June 30, 1948 Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 as amended Nov. 17, 1986 Aug. 13, 1968 5. SEATTLE; WASHINGTON DISTRICT REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents July 14, 1960 as amended Mar. 2, 1945 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended July 14,1960 as amended June 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 June 26, 1934 1 Aug. 30, 1935 2 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended July 24, 1956 July 14, 1960 as amended June 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 Jan. 21, 1927 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 6. KENMORE NAVIGATION CHANNEL, WA Construction of navigation channel 15 feet deep consisting of a 100-foot-wide inner channel 900 feet long, an 800-foot-long transition channel with 24 degree 30-foot bend and maximum width of 190 feet, and a 120-foot-wide outer channel 1,200 feet long. LAKE CROCKETT, WA Small-boat basin. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Change authorized channel depth from -18 mean lower low water to -25 mean lower low water by dredging. LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA Provides for a double lock and fixed dam with gated spillway and necessary accessory works at entrance to Salmon Bay, dredging a channel from locks to deep water in Puget Sound, and excavation by local interests of a channel from locks into Lake Washington. Dredging below locks and revetting canal banks. Increased dimensions of channel between Puget Sound and locks and a 600-foot extension of lower guide pier. Operating and care of locks and dam provided for with funds from War Department appropriations for Rivers and Harbors. Enlarge channel between locks and Lake Washington. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Government Locks to be known as Hiram M. Chittenden Locks. NEAH BAY, WA (Section 107) Construct approximately 1,800 feet of breakwater to provide protection for a commercial fishery marina to be constructed by sponsor. NEAH BAY, WA Rubblestone breakwater. Reinforcement of existing revetment. OLYMPIA HARBOR, WA Channel 22 feet deep and 150 feet wide. Increase channel to 26-foot depth on east side of harbor. Elimination from project of 12-foot channel on east and west sides of harbor, and for a channel 30 feet deep and 300 feet wide between Budd Inlet and port terminal, with turning basin of same depth. -29-20- TABLE 29-B (Continued) Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers Oct. 7, 1980. H. Doc. 303, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 78-534 Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers, Nov. 7, 1988. H. Doc. 953, 60th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 800, 64th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 324, 67th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 140, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 78-534 P.L. 84-779 Sec. 107, P.L .86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers June 29, 1995. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 51, 75th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 404, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 244, 69th Cong. 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 21, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 29-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Aug. 26, 1937 July 14, 1960 as amended July 13, 1892 July 3, 1930 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 July 13, 1892 Aug. 30, 1935 Oct. 23, 1962 July 27, 1916 Aug. 30, 1935 2 Aug. 30, 1935 4 Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 Widen outer portion of channel to 500 feet, and widen entrance to turning basin. 656-foot concrete floating breakwater and dredging of entrance and access channels and turning basin. PUGET SOUND AND ITS TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA Maintenance of the rivers tributary to Puget Sound by snagging and dredging, and removal of floating debris from Seattle Harbor. QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA Jetty (5 feet high) on easterly side of mouth, and a dike on westerly side, to stabilize entrance. Maintenance dredging to provide a channel 6 feet deep and of suitable width from ocean to within river mouth. Raising jetty to 15 feet; channel 10 by 100 feet, 2,000 feet long; moorage basin. 3 SEATTLE HARBOR, WA Maintenance of East and West Waterways 750 feet wide and 34 feet deep, and of Duwamish Waterway 20 feet deep and 150 feet wide as far south as Eighth Avenue South Bridge. Enlargement of Duwamish Waterway. Maintenance of East Waterway between 750-foot section and Spokane Street, and turning basin at junction of East and Duwamish Waterways. SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA Channel 4 feet deep and 100 feet wide, and dike construction. Enlargement of channel to present project dimensions. Removal of navigation hazards at "Hole-in-the-Wall". WILLAPA RIVER AND HARBOR AND NASELLE RIVER, WA Channel 24 feet deep, 200 feet wide, in Willapa River, and 150 feet wide in the forks. Maintenance of channel over bar to a depth of 26 feet and minimum width of 500 feet. For cutoff channel at Narrows. Channel from deep water in Palix River to Bay Center dock. Widen Willapa River channel to 360 and 250 feet between South Bend and the forks; Tokeland and Nahcotta basins; and Naselle River clearance. Willapa River and Harbor redesignated as Willapa River and Harbor and Naselle River. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 75, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. Sec. 107, P.L. 86-645. Authorized by Chief of Engineers May 13, 1981. Annual Report for 1893, page 3425 H. Doc. 125, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 218, 78th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 579, 81st Cong., 2d Sess S. Doc. 313, 65th Cong., 3d Sess. H. Doc. 108, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 126, 71st Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 211, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 31, 52d Cong., 1st Sess. and Annual Report for 1892, p. 2752 S. Committee Print, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 499, 87th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 706, 63d Cong., 2d Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doec. 41, 72d Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doec. 37, 73rd Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 481, 76th Cong., 2d Sess. H. Doc. 425, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. -29-21- 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 18. Sec. 103, P.L. 87-874. Authorized by Chief of Engineers Oct. 18, 1983 P.L. 99-662. Oct. 23, 1962 as amended -29-22- TABLE 29-B (Continued) LINCOLN PARK BEACH, SEATTLE, WA 250-foot rock revetment and 2,550 feet of sand and gravel nourishment. Periodic monitoring and replenishing beach nourishment. CHEHALIS RIVER AT SOUTH ABERDEEN AND COSMOPOLIS, WA Construction of storm damage and high tide reduction/ interior drainage dike, a 4.2-mile levee and tide gate system. HORSESHOE BEND, WA Modification to 3,300 feet of the 9,500-foot existing levee to increase the height of the structure. HOWARD A. HANSON DAM, WA Eagle Gorge flood control dam on Green River. Redesignation of project as Howard A. Hanson Dam. MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA Flood control dam on White River. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA Improvement of flood channel by clearing and bank revetment at 26 sites; concrete weir at head of Cook Slough; and 2 cutoff channels in Cook Slough. Maintenance of improvements. TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA Channel improvement to protect people and industrial section of city of Tacoma. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID Multi-purpose dam with powerhouse. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. CHIEF JOSEPH DAM - RUFUS WOODS LAKE, WA Multi purpose dam and powerhouse on Columbia River at Foster Creek. Redesignation of the project as Chief Joseph Dam. Designation of reservoir as Rufus Woods Lake. Construction, operation, and maintenance of recreation facilities. Sec. 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorized by Chief of Engineers June 14, 1996 H. Doc. 271, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 85-592 S. Committee Print, Puyallup River, WA, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 78-534. H. Doc. 657, 71st Cong., 3d Sess. P.L. 75-761 S. Committee Print, Puyallup River, WA, 74th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 78-534. S. Doc. 9, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. P.L. 78-534. H. Doc. 693, 79th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 858, 80th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 469, 82d Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 78-534. 19. Nov. 17, 1986 20. 21. 23. 25. 26. 27. 28. June 30, 1948 as amended May 17, 1950 Aug. 6, 1958 June 22, 1936 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended June 22, 1936 June 28, 1938 June 22, 1936 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended May 17, 1950 Dec 22, 1944 as amended July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 July 9, 1952 Dec. 22, 1944 as amended SEATTLE. WASHINGTON DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents School facilities for education of dependents of construction personnel. 29. P.L. 94-587 P.L. 95-26 H. Doc. 531, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 89-789 P.L. 90-239 5 P.L. 90-483 6 P.L. 91-282 7 P.L. 91-625 P.L. 91-611 Oct. 22, 1976 as amended May 4, 1977 May 17, 1950 Nov. 7, 1966 Jan. 2, 1968 Aug. 13, 1968 June 19, 1970 Dec. 31, 1970 Dec. 31, 1970 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Mar. 7, 1974 Oct. 22, 1976 Nov. 17, 1988 LIBBY DAM - LAKE KOOCANUSA, MT Multi-purpose dam and powerhouse, and reregulating facilities. School facilities for education of dependents of construction personnel, Libby project. Airport facility at Kelley Flats, MT. Design standards for relocation of Montana State Highway 37 to be those adopted by State of Montana pursuant to provisions of Highway Safety Act of 1966. Participation with State of Montana in construction, operation and maintenance of fish hatchery facilities. Designation of lake formed by the waters impounded by Libby Dam as Lake Koocanusa. Design and construction of sewage collection and sewage treatment facility as part of relocation of municipal facilities of Rexford, MT; and compensation for railroad employees suffering long-term economic injury through reduction of income as result of the relocation of rail transportation facilities due to the construction of Libby Dam. Phase I design memorandum stage for installation of power generating facilities at Libby Reregulating Dam. Construction of fish production measures to compensate for fish losses attributed to the project, and for acquisition of necessary real estate, construction of access roads and utilities (amends P.L. 91-282 by increasing limitation from $750,000 to $4,000,000). Acquisition of land (not to exceed $2,000,000) for prevention of wildlife grazing losses caused by the project. Reimbursement (not to exceed $350,000) to Boundary County, ID, for reconstruction of Deep Creek Bridge made necessary by duration of high flows during drawdown operations at Libby Dam. Compensation (not to exceed $1,500,000) to Drainage Districts and owners of leveed and unleveed lands in Kootenai Flats, Boundary County, ID, for damages caused by duration of higher flows during drawdown operations at Libby Dam. Amends P.L. 93-251 by increasing limitation from $350,000 to $380,000 for reimbursement to Boundary County, ID, for reconstruction of Deep Creek Bridge. Alleviate low water impact on existing facilities and protect Indian archeological sites exposed during course of operations, at an estimated cost of $750,000. P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 P.L. 94-587 H. Doc. 1098, 100th Cong., 2d Sess. P.L. 100-676 -29-23- TABLE 29-B (Continued) S.Doc. 29, 93d P.L. 93-251 P.L. 93-251 Cong., 1st Sess., REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 TABLE 29-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) 1. Permanent Appropriations Repeal Act. 2. Included in Public Works Administration program. 3. Maintenance of these items, as well as sandspit north of James Island, is included in this modification. 4. Included in Emergency Relief program, May 28, 1935. 5. Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1968, Section 502. 6. Flood Control Act of 1968, Section 212. 7. River Basin Monetary Authorization and Miscellaneous Civil Works Amendments Act of 1970, Section 7. TABLE 29-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1997 Full Report Operation See Annual And Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Anacortes Harbor, WA Completed 1995 222,345 5 1,196,499 6 Anacortes Navigation Channel, WA 1 Completed 1977 825,263 7 Bellingham Harbor, WA Completed 1996 1,566,839 8 3,090,256 9 Bellingham Harbor, WA (I&J Street Waterway)1 Completed 1966 125,634 10 - Blaine Harbor, WA Completed 1958 346,650 - Columbia River, Wenatchee to Kettle Falls, WA Completed 1923 274,391 11 7,693 East Bay Small Boat Basin, Olympia, WA1 Completed 1985 1,619,956 12 - Edmonds Harbor, WA2 Completed 1987 - 224,756 Flathead River, MT Completed 1901 9,811 - Hammersley Inlet, WA Completed 1950 9,000 10,683 Hoquiam River, WA Completed 1950 18,921 13 5,316 Keystone Harbor, Admiralty Inlet, WA1 Completed 1993 264,000 14 - Kingston Harbor, WA Completed 1967 262,570 15 5,000 16 Kootenai River, ID and MT Completed 1933 9,255 5,643 Mats Mats Bay, WA1 Completed 1970 137,679 17 - Neah Bay, WA Completed 1982 2,057,266 1,854,058 Okanogan and Pend Oreille Rivers, WA Abandoned 1913 63,879 7,634 Polson Bay, Flathead Lake, MT Completed 1918 4,491 259 Port Angeles Harbor, WA3 Completed 1960 470,873 - Port Gamble Harbor, WA Completed 1953 11,911 18 13,337 Port Orchard Bay, WA4 Completed 1928 42,804 - Port Townsend, WA Completed 1987 480,899 19 78,787 Prototype Breakwater Test Program, WA1 Completed 1985 1,461,590 - Shilshole Bay, Seattle, WA Completed 1962 2,575,091 20 - Skagit River, WA Completed 1950 102,330 21 36,258 Squalicum Small Boat Harbor, Bellingham, WA1 Completed 1981 1,744,025 22 Tacoma Harbor, WA Completed 1992 2,383,891 23 1,537,150 24 Waterway Connecting Port Townsend and Oak Bay, WA Completed 1987 73,322 378,753 Westhaven Cove Small Boat Basin, WA1 Completed 1981 2,000,000 25 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 107, Public Law 86-645. 2. Constructed by local interests at a cost of $415,000. Excludes $1,000 Coast Guard funds expended for new work. Corps of Engineers is responsible for maintenance. -29-24- 3. Maintenance by Port of Port Angeles. 4. No maintenance required. 5. Excludes $59,524 contributed funds and $2,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 6. Excludes $5,000 contributed funds expended. 7. Excludes $457,200 contributed funds expended. 8. Includes $56,582 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $13,000 Coast Guard funds and $29,421 contributed funds expended. 9. Includes $1,092 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $9,103 contributed funds expended. 10. Excludes $2,500 Coast Guard funds expended. 11. Includes $8,005 appropriated and expended for previous project. 12. Excludes $2,184,766 contributed funds expended. 13. Excludes $32,373 Emergency Relief funds expended. 14. Excludes $114,272 contributed funds expended. 15. Excludes $390,753 contributed funds and $3,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 16. Mitigation of shore damages study. 17. Excludes $28,288 contributed funds and $9,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 18. Excludes $21,260 contributed funds expended. 19. Excludes $92,423 contributed funds expended. 20. Excludes $15,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 21. Includes $2,500 appropriated and expended for previous project. 22. Excludes $1,570,886 contributed funds expended. 23. Includes $159,585 appropriated and expended for previous project. Excludes $51,609 Public Works Administration funds expended and $1,147,208 contributed funds expended. 24. Includes $5,347 appropriated and expended for previous projects. Excludes $222,500 contributed funds expended. 25. Excludes $1,230,035 contributed funds expended. TABLE 29-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1997 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Status Report For Construction Funds American Lake, Vicinity of Fort Lewis, WA1 Bear Creek, Flathead CountyBridge, near Essex, MT2 Bitterroot River, Florence, MT2 Blackfoot River, Matt Little Road, MT2 Bogachiel River, Highway 101, near Forks, WA2 Bogachiel River, Undie Road, Forks, WA2 Cedar River, King County, WA3 Cedar River, Renton, WA2 Chehalis River, City of Chehalis Raw Water Pumphouse, WA2 Chehalis River, Independence Road, Thurston County, WA2 Chehalis River, Montesano, WA2 Clallam Bay, Sekiu, WA2 Clallam Bay at Sekiu, Clallam County, WA2 Clallam River, Highway 112, WA2 Clark Fork River, near Garrison, MT2 Clark Fork River, Drummond, MT2 Clark Fork River, Missoula, MT2 Clark Fork River, Superior, MT2 Clark Fork River, Vicinity of Plains, MT2 Clearwater River, Jefferson County Road, WA2 Clearwater River, Queets River Bridge, WA2 Coeur d'Alene, Spokane River, ID Coeur d'Alene River, Springston, ID2 Coffee Creek, WA3 Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, ID, MT, and WA: Clark Fork River, Missoula, MT Lightning Creek, Clark Fork, ID Deschutes River, Gleason Road Bridge near Tumwater, WA2 Deschutes River, Rich Road Bridge, near East Olympia, WA2 Dungeness River, Area 5, WA2 Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1957 1971 1990 1964 1981 1981 1953 1949 1966 1965 1977 1977 1994 1981 1993 1978 1978 1971 1950 1968 1950 1941 1950 1966 1983 1959 1965 1967 1950 59,582 1,424 180,950 17,836 156,000 57,000 3,229 32,264 35,454 47,916 140,080 48,698 178,800 43,500 80,611 18,660 31,548 28,357 27,947 50,000 49,165 152,872 25,452 15,000 384,862 42,726 26,292 22,956 2,155 10,000 49,759 - - - 39,818 16,973 - 24,728 - - - 13,500 2,155 -,5 -29-25- SEATTLE. WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 29-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1997 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Status Report For Construction Funds Dungeness River, Area 8, WA2 Completed 1950 2,895 2,895 Dungeness River, Clallam County, WA1 Completed 1964 52,040 6- Dungeness River, Sequim, WA2 Completed 1981 99,000 - Dungeness River, Clallam County, WA2 Completed 1986 47,500 - Dungeness River, Taylor Cut-off Road, WA2 Completed 1961 14,093 3,314 Elwha Klallam Reservation, Elwha River, WA1 Completed 1991 1,455,023 119,449 Elwha River, Clallam County, WA2 Completed 1951 17,303 - Entiat River, WA3 Completed 1971 49,300 - Entiat River, Chelan County, WA2 Completed 1978 38,000 - Flathead River, MT2 Completed 1972 20,940 Flathead River, Bradley Channel Area, MT2 Completed 1955 26,265 - Flathead River, near Kalispell, MT1 Completed 1995 81,500 13,467 Flathead River, near Kalispell, MT2 Completed 1948 33,347 - Flathead River, Old Steel Bridge, near Kalispell, MT2 Completed 1964 13,438 - Flower and Parmenter Creeks, MT 3 Completed 1950 2,320 - Foster Creek, West Fork, WA 2 Completed 1958 19,513 - Foster Creek Road, Douglas County, WA2 Completed 1962 50,000 - Green River between Kent and Auburn, WA and Allentown, WA2 Completed 1972 24,605 - Green River, State Highway 181, WA2 Completed 1976 27,001 - Henderson Bay, Purdy, WA2 Completed 1977 37,359 - Hoh River, County Road 216, WA2 Completed 1980 143,000 - Hoh River, U.S. Highway 101, WA2 Completed 1980 194,000 - Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1360)2 Completed 1956 22,082 21,807 Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1361)2 Completed 1961 11,916 - Hoh River Road, Jefferson County, WA (HO 1362)2 Completed 1964 41,622 - Hoh River, near Forks, WA2 Completed 1983 173,000 7- Hoko River, Sekiu, WA2 Completed 1977 21,083 - Hood Canal, Hoodsport, WA2 Completed 1977 59,812 - Hoquiam River, WA2 Completed 1977 52,600 - Jackman Creek, Skagit River, WA 3 Completed 1962 24,000 - Kootenai River, Bonners Ferry, ID2 Completed 1950 42,325 - Kootenai River, Kootenai Flats Area, District #1, ID2 Completed 1965 14,885 - La Conner, Swinomish Channel, WA2 Completed 1979 40,525 Lower Green River, King County, WA1 Completed 1993 912,000 120,518 Lummi Shore Road, Whatcom County, WA2 Completed 1995 482,000 134,772 Methow River, WA (MET 1-74)2 Completed 1974 15,700 - Methow River, WA (MET 2-74)2 Completed 1974 11,200 - Methow River, WA (MET 3-74)2 Completed 1974 13,450 - Methow River, Barclay Canal, WA2 Completed 1976 19,810 - Methow River, State Highway No. 16 Bridge, Twisp, WA2 Completed 1949 31,783 - Methow River, Twisp-Carlton Highway, Vicinity of Twisp, WA2 Completed 1951 33,300 6,786 Methow River, Vicinity of Pateros, WA2 Completed 1951 11,726 11,726 Mineral Creek, Lewis County, WA2 Completed 1972 11,836 - Missoula, MT (Sewage Treatment Plant)2 Completed 1965 50,000 - Moclips River, Moclips, WA2 Completed 1977 17,608 - Naches River, Naches, WA2 Completed 1982 59,000 - Neah Bay, Clallam County, WA2 Completed 1991 253,995 78,433 Newaukum River, Lewis County, Hamilton, WA2 Completed 1972 24,792 - Nisqually River, near Elbe, WA2 Completed 1948 37,636 - Nisqually River, Thurston County, WA2 Completed 1960 26,790 - Nisqually River, Vicinity of Elbe, WA2 Completed 1952 19,345 - Nooksack River, WA3 Completed 1948 24,006 - Nooksack River, Acme, WA2 Completed 1985 77,300 - Nooksack River, Guide Bridge Location, WA2 Completed 1950 6,075 6,075 Nooksack River, Middle Fork, Deming, WA2 Completed 1986 79,000 - Nooksack River, above Highway 12 Bridge, WA2 Completed 1960 10,807 - Okanogan River, WA2 Completed 1974 10,100 - Okanogan River at Outlet of Osoyoos Lake, WA3 Completed 1949 52,100 - -29-26- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 TABLE 29-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Continued) For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1997 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Status Report For Construction Funds Okanogan ogan R Tonasket Creek and Osoyoos Lake, WA3 Completed 1953 7,987 - Okanogan River, Omak, WA1 Completed 1981 2,231,030 - Okanogan River, Oroville, WA1 Completed 1982 1,787,630 - Pilchuck River, WA3 Completed 1948 25,401 - Pilchuck River, WA2 Completed 1985 81,000 - Pilchuck River, WA2 Completed 1971 10,713 - Pilchuck River, Everett, WA2 Completed 1980 54,000 - Pilchuck River, State Highway 92, Granite Falls, WA2 Completed 1971 30,973 - Placer Creek, ID Completed 1986 5,865,000 - Powell County High School, Deer Lodge, MT2 Completed 1964 11,291 - Puyallup River, WA Completed 1937 50,000 8 - Pysht River, Sekiu, WA2 Completed 1977 86,160 - Queets River, Jefferson County Sewage Lagoon, WA2 Completed 1981 125,000 - Quillayute River, Quileute Tribal Float and Bridge, WA2 Completed 1972 39,300 - Quinalt River, Grays Harbor, WA2 Completed 1981 208,000 - Quinalt River Road, Jefferson County, WA2 Completed 1961 15,928 4,943 Rock Creek, Granite County, MT2 Completed 1974 49,657 - Rock Creek, Missoula County, MT2 Completed 1973 31,565 - Rock Creek Road, MT2 Completed 1980 50,000 - Rye Creek, MT2 Completed 1973 22,819 - St. Maries, St. Joe River, ID Completed 1942 357,698 - St. Regis River, MT3 Completed 1942 7,234 9 - St. Regis River at St. Regis, MT3 Completed 1951 2,983 - Sammamish River, WA Completed 1967 2,582,536 10 696,923 Sauk River, WA2 Completed 1974 20,860 - Sauk River, Skagit County, WA2 Completed 1989 119,600 32,778 Shelton Creek, WA1 Completed 1979 872,021 - Skagit River at Burlington Bend, WA2 Completed 1949 50,000 - Skagit River, Cape Horn Road, WA2 Completed 1966 46,489 - Skagit River, Deadman's Slough, WA2 Completed 1980 93,000 - Skagit River, Pressentin Creek, WA2 Completed 1980 137,000 - Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA2 Completed 1963 40,753 - Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA (Job 66-1), Completed 1966 17,719 - Skagit River, South Skagit Highway, WA (Job 67-1) Completed 1967 50,000 24,488 Skykomish River, North Fork, Index, WA2 Completed 1981 222,500 - Snohomish River, Lowell-Snohomish River Road, WA2 Completed 1969 44,227 - Snohomish River, Snohomish, WA2 Completed 1970 60,900 14,307 Snoqualmie River, West Snoqualmie, WA2 Completed 1977 15,565 - Soleduck River Bridge, WA2 Completed 1961 16,437 1,960 Soleduck River, near Mora Road Bridge, WA2 Completed 1963 11,433 - Spokane River, Spokane, WA 2 Completed 1989 122,138 79,311 Startup, Skykomish and Wallace Rivers, WA1 Completed 1970 271,713 - Stillaguamish River, South Fork, Mountain Loop Highway, near Robe, WA2 Completed 1964 50,000 46,182 Stillwater River, MT2 Completed 1973 17,457 - Stillwater and Whitefish Rivers, MT2 Completed 1977 34,513 - Strong Creek, Hope, ID2 Completed 1970 8,442 - Tahola, WA2 Completed 1979 223,893 - Upper Puyallup River, WA4 Completed 1938 71,495 11 13,704 Wynoochee Lake, WA Completed 1994 23,494,445 12 - Wynoochee River, County Road 141, WA2 Completed 1976 111,072 - Wynoochee River, near Montesano, WA2 Completed 1969 50,000 21,311 Wynoochee River, near Montesano, WA (WR-1-72)2 Completed 1972 50,000 13 - Yakima, Yakima River, WA Completed 1948 381,961 - Yakima River, Cle Elum, WA2 Completed 1949 8,047 - Yakima River, below mouth of Teanaway River near Cle Elum, WA2 Completed 1947 48,272 - Yakima River, West Richland, WA2 Completed 1977 36,768 - Yakima River, Yakimrna WA2 Completed 1983 125,500 14 - -29-27- SEATTLE. WASINGTON DISTRICT REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 TABLE 29-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (Cntin )Al For Last Cost to Sep. 30. 1997 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Status Report For Construction Funds 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 8. Emergency Relief funds, Works Progress Administration. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended. 9. Excludes amount expended by Works Progress 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section Administration which is not available. 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended. 10. Excludes $1,000 Coast Guard funds expended. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 11. Emergency Relief funds, Works Progress Administration. 2, Public Law 406, 75th Congress, as amended 12. Includes $102,200 appropriated and expended for recreation 4. Authorized by Works Progress Administration Project No. facilities at completed project (Code 710). Excludes OP 65-93-917. $17,070,670 for project maintenance and $66,678 for 5. Includes $7,850 appropriated and expended for recreation Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other facilities at completed project (Code 710). Improvements of Navigable Waters, appropriated and 6. Excludes $340,066 Public Works Acceleration Act funds expended. expended. 13. Excludes $17,988 Office of Emergency Planning furds 7. Productive Employment Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L. 98- expended. 8). Excludes $189,000 Federal Highway Administration 14. Includes $118,000 expended under Productive Employment funds expended. Design, appropriated and expended. Appropriation Act of 1983 (P.L. 98-8). TABLE 29-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE POWER PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1997 Full Report Operation See Annual and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Priest Rapids Dam, Columbia River, WA 1954 350,000 1 1. For partnership planning. Excludes funds expended for acquisition of lands under partnership arrangement for Priest Rapids and Wanapum Dams, in accordance with Public Law 544, 83d Congress. Project constructed by Grant County Public Utility District. TABLE 29-G OTHER AUTHORIZED MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1997 Full Report See Annual Contributed Project Status Report For Construction Funds La Conner, WA 1 Completed 1996 955,000 2 246,889 Sammamish River Restoration, WA 1 Completed 1995 326,900 64,333 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 1135, Public Law 662, 99th Congress. 2. Includes $183,000 for Preconstruction Engineering and Design, appropriated and expended. -29-28- SEATTLE, WASHINGTON DISTRICT TABLE 29-H OTHER PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal See Annual Funds Project Status Report For Expended Blair and Sitcum Waterways, Tacoma Harbor, WA Inactive 1989 1,310,000 Centralia, WA Inactive 1993 1,543,000 Chehalis River at South Aberdeen and Cosmopolis, WA Under 1993 2,706,000 2 Construction East, West and Duwamish Waterways, Seattle Harbor, WA Deferred 1988 663,000 Grays Harbor, Chehalis and Hoquiam Rivers, WA Under 1989 5,670,000 3 Construction La Conner, WA Construction 1993 183,000 4 Complete Yakima River at Union Gap, WA Deferred 1988 502,000 1. Includes $300,000 appropriated and expended under Section 3. $3,530,000 of which is included in construction costs. 101(c). 2. $2,212,000 of which is included in construction costs. 4. Included in construction costs. TABLE 29-I DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Calispell Creek, WAI 1968 1968 25,000 14 - Columbia River Basin, Local Protection Projects, ID, MT, and WA Crab and Wilson Creeks, WA2 1958 1964 9,000 14 - Entiat River, WA3 1958 1986 - - Methow River, WA3 1958 1986 - - Okanogan River, WA3 1958 1986 1,100 14 - St. Regis River, MT4 1958 1978 1,400 14 - Wenatchee River, WA4 1958 1978 - - Yakima River at Ellensburg, WA3 1980 1986 44,300 14, 15 - Everett Harbor and Snohomish River, WA (RH 68) 6 1973 1990 52,000 14 - Flathead River at Kalispell, MT7 1981 1995 300,000 14 - Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (RH 48) (Unconstructed Portion) 6,8 1962 1990 - - Grays Harbor and Chehalis River, WA (RH 30) 6,9 1933 1990 35,834 Hammersley 35,834 Inlet, WA (RH 30) (Unconstructed Portion)4,10 1950 1978 - - Hoquiam,Aberdeen, and Cosmopolis, Chehalis River, WAS 1948 1952 83,631 14 - Olympia Harbor, WA (RH 45) 6 1973 1990 21,606 14, 16 - Port Angeles Harbor, WA (RH 45)4 1960 1977 - - Port Gamble Harbor, WA) (RH 35)4 1953 1977 - - Quillayute River, WA(RH 30) (Unconstructed Portion)3,11 1986 1986 - - Seattle Harbor, WA (RI 30) (Unconstructed Portion) 3,12 1986 1986 - - Skagit River, WA (RH 10) (Unconstructed Portion) 4,13 1950 1978 - - Skagit River, WA (RH19) 4 1950 1978 - - Skagit River, WA (Avon Pass) 6 1968 1990 54,468 14 - Skagit River, WA (Levee and Channel Improvements)7 1982 1995 1,934,792 - Spokane River, Spokane, WA3 1939 1986 2,944 14 - Stillaguamish River, WA (RH 45)3 1946 1986 4,234 17 - Wenatchee, Canyons 1 and 2, WA 6 1978 1990 544,331 14 - Willapa River at Raymond, WA7 1982 1995 508,130 14, 18 - 1. Authority for project expired October 27, 1968. 3. Deauthorized under authority of Section 1002, P.L. 99-662 2. Authority for project expired July 1964. dated November 17, 1986. -29-29- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 4. Deauthorized under authority of Section 12, P.L. 93-251 dated March 7, 1974. 5. Authority for project expired in October 1952. 6. Deauthorized under authority of Section 1001i (b) (1), P.L. 99-662 dated November 17, 1986. 7. Deauthorized under authority of Section 1001 (b) (2), P.L. 99-662 dated November 17, 1986. 8. 2200 linear feet of revetment at Point Chehalis. 9. 16-foot channel from Cosmopolis to Montesano. 10. Deepening shoal area near Cannery Point from 10 to 13 feet. TABLE 29-J LAKE WASHINGTON 11. Groin feature of the project. 12. Settling basin at upper end of existing Duwamish Waterway, about 1.4 miles above 14th Avenue South Bridge. 13. 5500-foot extension of training dike. 14. Preconstruction planning only. 15. Includes $14,300 expended for restudy, FY 1970. 16. Includes $18,700 expended for restudy, FY 1968-1973. 17. Economic restudy only. 18. Includes $8,888 expended for restudy, FY 1967-1972. SHIP CANAL, WA PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF DOUBLE LOCK AND DAM (SEE SECTION 8) Section Large Lock Small Lock Miles above mouth 1 1 Clear width of chamber Feet 80 28 Maximum available length Feet 760 123 Lift Feet 26 26 Depth on upper miter sill 1 Feet 33 /2 16 Depth on intermediate miter sill 2 Feet 29 Depth on lower miter sill 2 Feet 29 16 Character of foundation Clay Clay Kind of dam Fixed dam with Fixed dam with gated spillway gated spillway Type of construction Concrete Concrete Year completed 1916 1916 Cost 3 3 1. Low water in upper pool. 3. Cost of double lock and dam was $2,382,200 and the 2. Mean lower low water in Puget Sound. emergency gates, completed in 1923, $262,300. TABLE 29-K FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 858, 80TH CONGRESS, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs (1997) Cedar River, Renton, WA 88.897 1 Lincoln County, MT Long Road, F.C. District, Chehalis River, WA Milo Creek, Kellogg, ID Section 205 Coordination Snoqualmie River, WA Upper Cedar River, WA TOTAL 22,516 5,717 32,540 11,846 40,825 0 202,341 1. Excludes $137,287 contributed funds expended. 2. Excludes $6,745 contributed funds expended.. 3. Excludes $6,777 contributed funds expended. 4. Terminated. -29-30- TABLE 29-L MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 1135, PUBLIC LAW 662, 99TH CONGRESS (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs (1997) Bear Creek Restoration, WA 127,379 Hanson Anadromous Fish and Wildlife, WA 18,947 Initial Appraisals, General 10,994 Kootenai River Pond, MT 0 1 Sammamish River Weir, WA 64,299 Section 1135 Coordination 5,771 Thornton Creek, WA 39,472 Turning Basin #3 Restoration (Duwamish R), WA 122,067 Wynoochee Anadromous Fish, WA 52,809 TOTAL 441,738 1. Terminated. -29-31- SEATTLE WVASHINGTON DISTRICT WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT * This District consists of all Columbia River (river mile 8.4) near Richland, Washington. The drainage and tributaries thereto between the head of primary tributary drainage area is the Snake River the McNary pool (river mile 345.4) and Umatilla which includes more than 107,000 square miles in six Bridge (river mile 290.5) below McNary Dam, states: Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Wyoming, and except the Yakima River Basin above the Van Giesen small portions of Nevada and Utah. Street Bridge IMPROVEMENTS Flood Control 1. Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Protection Projects ......................................... 30-1 2. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................. ...................... 30-1 3. Jackson Hole, W Y ....................................... 30-1 4. Lucky Peak Lake, ID ..... ................. 30-2 5. Mill Creek, Bennington Lake, WA...................... 30-2 6. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations .................. ................ .. 30-3 Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 7. Columbia River Juvenile Fish Mitigation Program (Walla Walla Projects). OR. W A , & ID ............. .................................... 30-3 8. Dworshak Dam and Reservoir, ID....................... 30-4 9. Ice Harbor Lock and Dam, Lake Sacajawea, W A ................ ................... 30-6 10. Little Goose Lock and Dam, Lake Bryan, WA ........................ ................ 30-6 1 1. Lower Granite Lock and Dam, Lower Granite Lake, WA ....... ....................... 30-7 12. Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, Lake Herbert G. West, WA.......... .................. 30-8 13. Lower Snake River Fish and Wildlife Compensation Plan, WA, OR, and ID.......... .................................. 30-8 14. McNary Lock and Dam, Lake W allula, OR and W A ........................................... 30-9 15. Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, OR, WA, and ID ................... ............... 30-10 16. Miscellaneous Work Under Special Authorization ........................................ 30-10 General Investigations 17. Surveys .............................................................. 30-1 1 18. Collection and Study of Basic Data...................30-11 19. Preconstruction, Engineering and D esign ..................................... ................. 30-11 Tables Table 30-A Cost and Financial Statement ................. 30-12 Table 30-B Authorizing Legislation.......................30-15 Table 30-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects .............................. ... ............. 30-19 Table 30-D Not Applicable Table 30-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects....................................30-20 Table 30-F Other Authorized Multiple- Purpose Projects, Including Pow er ...................................................... 30-2 1 Table 30-G Deauthorized Projects ......................... 30-21 Table 30-H Columbia River Basin, Local Flood Control Projects ........................... 30-22 Table 30-I Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ........................... 30-22 Table 30-J Principal Data Concerning Navigation Lock, Spillway Dam, Powerplant and Impoundment ............... 30-23 Table 30-K Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, OR, W A , and ID .................. .................. 30-28 30-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 97 Flood Control 1. COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS Location. Improvements included in this project are along the Columbia River and its tributaries. Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1950 approved a general comprehensive plan for the Columbia River Basin for flood control and other purposes based on plans in H. Doc. 531, 81st Congress, 2nd Session, and authorized $75 million to be appropriated for partial accomplishment of certain projects. From that authorization, an amount (not to exceed $15 million) was allotted for construction of local flood protection works throughout Columbia River Basin, subject to conditions that all work undertaken pursuant to authorization would be economically justified prior to construction, and local cooperation specified in the Flood Control Act of 1936, as amended, should be required (see Tables 39- B and -H, for projects in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Walla Walla District). Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22. 1936, applies. Operations during the fiscal year. No projects were deauthorized. 2. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Federal law requires local interests to maintain and operate completed local protection projects in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Inspections were made to determine the extent of compliance and to advise local interests, as necessary, of measures required to correct deficiencies (see Table 39-I for inspections made during the fiscal year). Fiscal year costs were $15,699. Total costs to September 30, 1997 were $2,851,355. 3. JACKSON HOLE, WY Location. On the banks of the Snake River, Teton County, west of Jackson, WY. Existing project. On the Snake River, approximately 23.5 miles of Federally constructed levees consisting of the following: 1) On the right bank - a series of levees, off-set levees, and bank protection structures, all with full riprap protection from 10 miles upstream of the Jackson-Wilson Bridge to 3.5 miles below the bridge for a total of 13.5 miles. 2) The left bank - a series of Federally constructed levees and bank protection structures, all with full riprap protection, extending from 10 miles upstream of the Jackson-Wilson Bridge to 5 miles upstream and extending 1.5 miles immediately upstream of the same bridge to 3.5 miles below the bridge for a total of 10 miles. In addition, a series of Federal and non-Federal constructed levees, with a total length of approximately 5 miles, most having some or full riprap protection, are interspersed along both banks of the Snake River from Highway 26 Bridge to 4 miles downstream of the Jackson-Wilson Bridge. On the Gros Ventre River, approximately 2 miles of riprap protected levees on the left bank from 1.5 miles west of Cattlemen's Bridge and extending to 0.5 miles east of the same bridge. On the right bank, a series of levees extending from 0.5 miles west of Cattlemen's Bridge to approximately 0.3 miles east of the same bridge. Project authorized by PL 81-516, Flood Control Act of 1950. for flood control protection by channel improvements consisting of channel rectification, levees, and revetments along the Snake River in the vicinity of Wilson. WY. The PL 104-303 modified the original PL 81-516 to ensure the operation, maintenance, modifications. and additions to the project become Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. Non-Federal sponsors shall pay the initial $35,000 in cash or materials of any such costs expended in any one year, plus inflation as of the date of enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Since 1978, $47.600,000 (adjusted to October 1997 price index) in potential flood damage has been prevented by the levees. Operations during fiscal year. Teton County, under their Local Cooperative Agreement, worked with the Corps during spring runoff performing emergency levee maintenance. Average daily flows exceeded 30,000 cubic feet per second, which is exceeds a 1:100-year frequency. After the flows receded, an inspection of the project was made and 30-2 WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT maintenance contracts were awarded. Fiscal year costs were $851,718. 4. LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID Location. On the Boise River in southwestern Idaho about 10 miles southeast of the city of Boise, ID. Existing project. The project includes a rolled-earthfill dam about 250 feet above the streambed and 1,700 feet long at the crest, with a lake providing a total storage at upper operating lake level of 306,000 acre-feet. Project provides for flood control, irrigation, and recreation (for details, see page 2,000 of the 1962 Annual Report). Construction of the existing project was initiated in November 1949 and completed in June 1961. Since 1961, $402,623,000 (adjusted to October 1997 price index) in potential flood damages have been prevented by the project. During a detailed study of outlet capacity and potential for adding hydropower to the existing project, a need for an auxiliary outlet became apparent. Construction of an auxiliary outlet was authorized in the Water Resource Development Act of 1976. In fiscal year 1978, an "Interim Feasibility Report on Modification of Lucky Peak Dam and Lake" (power facilities) was submitted to the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors and approved. States, agencies, and the Chief of Engineers have commented on the report to the Secretary of the Army. The report was forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget in February 1982. A license to construct and operate powetr facilities at the project was issued by the Federatl Energy Regulatory Commission (Project #2832) to the Boise Project Board of Control on June 10, 1980. and modified on October 9, 1980 and in 1982. Construction of the auxiliary outlet facility began in May 1984 and was completed in August 1986. Construction of modifications to the existing outlet tunnel and powerhouse excavation began in August 1986 and was completed January 1987. Powerhouse general contract construction began in April 1986. The project was completed and dedicated on October 7, 1988. Power on-line for all units was August 18, 1988. Federally authorized 2nd outlet was deauthorized in FY 90. Recreation facilities at Lucky Peak Lake consist of 20 picnic/day-use areas, 4 boat launch ramps and 3 swimming areas. Fiscal year visitation to Lucky Peak Lake was 789,300. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance, which included the dam structures and recreation areas continued. Fiscal year costs were $846,762. 5. MILL CREEK-BENNINGTON LAKE, WA Location. In and upstream from Walla Walla, WA, on Mill Creek, a tributary of the Walla Walla River. Existing project. The project includes an offstream earthfill storage dam, about 125 feet above the streambed and 3,200 feet long at the crest, two concrete-lined outlet channels, an earthfill diversion dam, and diversion structures. Project provides for flood control and recreation. Authorizing legislation to provide a channel through the city of Walla Walla was added to the project in 1941. Recreation was added to the project purposes through the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. Construction of the dam and appurtenant works was completed in 1942. Paving of the channel through the city of Walla Walla was completed in 1966 (for details, see page 2,005 of the 1962 Annual Report). Since 1942, $45,717,000 (adjusted to October 1997 price index) in potential flood damage has been prevented by the combined storage and channel operation. Rehabilitation of the existing project was initiated in FY 78 and completed in FY 79. The plan of rehabilitation included action to correct the seepage and internal erosion which has occurred during each subsequent filling of the reservoir. A cutoff wall was constructed, but did not alleviate the seepage problem, thus requiring limited flood control use of the project. The seepage and internal erosion create a high vulnerability for dam failure. Mill Creek/Bennington Lake offers visitors three day-use/picnic areas and one boat launch ramp. Visitation to Mill Creek/Bennington Lake for FY 97 was 239,400. 30-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 97 Local cooperation. Fully complied with (for details, see page 2,006 of the 1962 Annual Report). Operations during fiscal year. Operation and Maintenance: Normal operation and maintenance continued, which included regulation of water control structures and care of recreation areas. Completed diversion forebay silt removal. Fiscal year costs were $818,871. 6. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS Functional regulation of non-Corps projects was accomplished under several authorities. Regulation of Palisades, Little Wood, and Anderson Ranch Reservoirs in ID, and Bully Creek, Warm Springs, Agency Valley, and Mason Reservoirs in OR, was accomplished as authorized under Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, and coordinated with the Bureau of Reclamation. Flood control operations at Jackson Lake, WY; Arrowrock Reservoir, and Lake Lowell, ID were in accordance with formal agreements with the Bureau of Reclamation. Regulation of Owyhee Reservoir, OR, and American Falls, Magic, Mackay, Cascade, and Deadwood Reservoirs, ID, for flood control were accomplished under informal agreements. Brownlee, Oxbow, and Hells Canyon Reservoirs provided flood control regulation in accordance with provisions of the Federal Power Commission license to Idaho Power Company. Fiscal year costs were $359,803. Multiple-Purpose Projects, Including Power 7. COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION PROGRAM (WALLA WALLA PROJECTS) OR, WA, & ID Location. At Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite Dams on the Snake River in the State of WA and McNary Dam on the Columbia River in the States of OR and WA. Existing project. The eight Corps hydroelectric projects on the Columbia and Snake Rivers have been identified as a major contributing factor in causing mortality to downstream migrating juvenile salmon and steelhead. Without adequate bypass facilities to guide these juvenile fish away from the power turbines at the dams, mortalities incurred through project passage severely impact the commercial, recreational, and Indian fisheries. The Corps has recognized the need to reduce juvenile mortality and has undertaken bypass measures that include mechanized fish bypass systems with barge and truck transportation. Spill as an additional bypass route over the spillways has been used to divert fish from entering turbine units, but it is a significant adverse economic factor due to lost power revenues. Congress passed and the President signed the FY 89 Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act (PL 100-371), which mandated the expenditure of funds for the design, testing, and construction of new or improved fish bypass facilities for the Columbia River Fish Mitigation projects. Completion of bypass and transportation facilities will significantly increase the survival of migrating downstream juvenile fish. The mitigation study will determine the overall scope of the fish mitigation facilities for these Columbia and Snake River dams. The mitigation study project was added to the President's FY 91 budget. The plan of improvement includes the following facilities: 1) Ice Harbor: screens, new gantry crane, collection by-pass facility, intake gate raise, spillway deflectors, surface bypass, fish ladder temperature control; 2) Little Goose: screens, gantry crane modification, collection bypass facility, outfall pipe, remaining double-length submerged traveling screen/submerged bar screen, prototype vertical barrier screens, remaining vertical barrier screens, fish ladder temperature control, fallout fences, gate raise, deck screen modifications, and surface bypass; 3) Lower Granite: juvenile fish facility, gantry crane. gate raise, outfall pipe, fish barges, screens. remaining double-length submerged traveling screens/submerged bar screens, additional moorage facility, fish slot closures, juvenile facility improvements, barge exit modifications, deck screen modifications fish ladder temperature control, surface bypass, fallout fences; 4) Lower Monumental: hold/load and collection bypass facility, screens, pit tag facility, barge load facility modifications, barges. gate raise modifications, gantry crane, screen repair pit, fish ladder temperature control, surface bypass; 5) McNary: gantry crane, screens, hold/load facility, gate raise modifications, submerged vertical barrier screens remaining, submerged double-length screens remaining, debris/screens, tilted weirs fish ladder, maintenance facility, fish ladder exits, hold/load facility, gantry crane modifications; 6) In response to the 1995 Biological Opinion issued by the National Marine Fisheries Service, the Walla Walla District is conducting a feasibility study (Lower Snake River Juvenile Salmon Migration) to evaluate salmon 30-4 WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT migration problems on the Lower Snake River. The objective of the study is to improve salmon migration conditions through the four Corps operated dams and reserviors on the Lower Snake River. The study focuses on how these dams can be changed to improve survival and recovery prospects for Sanke River salmon stocks under the Endangered Species Act. The total estimated cost of the study is $20 million. Expenditures to date are $8.2 million. 7) Walla Walla District is currently managing a surface bypass and collection technology development effort which focuses on improving juvenile fish passage for endangered and threatened salmon migration past all corps hydroelectric projects on the Lower Snake and Columbia Rivers. It is an aggressive, non-traditional approach to prototype development which involves fast-track design, construction, testing, and evaluation. The fully-funded Federal project cost is estimated at $778,400,000 for Walla Walla projects. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. A contract was awarded and completed for the construction of fallout fences at Little Goose and Lower Granite Dams. At McNary Dam contracts were completed for the gantry crane, fish holding/loading facility and vertical barrier screens. At Ice Harbor Dam work continued on spillway deflectors phase I, and the completion contract. At Lower Monumental Dam the fish barge exit modification were completed. An interim status report was issued in December 1996, for the Lower Snake River Juvenile Salmon Migration Feasibility Study. A regional economic work group was established, and a plan of study was developed for a comprehensive social and economic analysis. A regional system hydroregulation group was also established. This group developed specifications and ran system reservoir regulation models for the various alternatives. A comprehensive Public Outreach Plan was developed and implemented. Coordination efforts continued with a number of established regional recovery groups. Numerous contracts were initiated for data collection and analysis in the areas of economics, engineering, and environmental work associated with this study. Work continued in many other study areas, which included cultural resources, NEPA, and wildlife and water quality. The 1996 Lower Granite surface bypass and collection prototype was modified and successfully retested in 1997. The construction cost was approximately $2,300,000 and the cost for associated testing and evaluation was approximately $3,000,000. Plans for testing the new Behavioral Guidance Structure/Simulated Wells Intake technology in 1998 are proceeding on schedule. Fiscal year costs were $39,338,812. project costs are $240,182,149. Total 8. DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID Location. The dam is on North Fork Clearwater River, 1.9 miles above its junction with Clearwater River, near Orofino, ID, and about 35 miles east of Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, and appurtenant facilities. Project provides for flood control, navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and area redevelopment. The reservoir has a normal operating range between the elevations of 1,600 and 1,445 Mean Sea Level (msl). The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 3,468,000 acre-feet (2 million acre-feet of which are effective for both local and regional flood control and for at-site and downstream power generation). In addition, the reservoir, extending 53 miles into rugged and relatively inaccessible timberland, provides important transportation savings in connection with movements of marketable logs. The reservoir is habitat for elk, deer, and other wildlife. The dam structure is about 3,287 feet long and about 717 feet above the streambed. Fish passage is not feasible due to the height of the dam. A hatchery has been built below the dam to assure continuance of anadromous fish runs. The powerhouse has two 90,000 kilowatts (kw) and one 220,000 kw generating units in operation for a capacity of 400,000 kw. Provisions had been made for three additional 220,000 kw generating units for an ultimate installed capacity of 1,060,000 kw and a reconnaissance report justifying the feasibility and cost benefits for the addition of a 200,000 kw fourth generating unit was completed in FY 78. However, environmental and economic studies on additional generating units have been curtailed due to public opposition. Unit 4 is undeveloped. Units 5 and 6 were deauthorized FY 90, Unit 4 was deauthorized in FY 95. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. 30-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 97 Construction of the project started in July 1966, was placed in operation in 1972, and was completed in 1986. Since the project became operational in June 1972, it has prevented about $2,836,000 (adjusted to October 1997 price index) in potential flood damages. Power generation through September 1997 was 41.13 billion kw hours. At Dworshak Reservoir recreation facilities consist of 12 day-use/picnic areas, 6 camp areas, 6 boats launches and 2 swim areas. Total visitation to Dworshak Reservoir in FY 97 was 111,100. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and Maintenance: Management of wildlife habitat browse continued on project lands to provide winter browse for elk and deer. Continued work on foundation grouting. During the fiscal year, 2.2 billion kw hours of electrical power were generated by the three generating units. Dworshak National Fish Hatchery (DNFH). Brood Year 1996 Steelhead. Approximately 2.49 million brood year (BY) 96 steelhead smolts released in April/May 1997. This release was nearly 200,000 above the mitigation goal of 2.3 million. These smolts averaged 188 mm in total length, still under the 200 mm target size. Reduced size was due to cold water releases from Dworshak Dam in the summer. Because 1996 was a high water year, low losses to Infectious Hematopoietic Necrosis Virus (IHNV) occurred in only two burrows ponds and four raceways. A total of 398,461 pounds of steelhead were releases in 1997 compared with 392,845 pounds in 1996 and 332,000 pounds in 1995. Brood Year 1997 Steelhead: A total of 2,980 adult steelhead returned to DNFH in the fall of 1996 and spring of 1997 compared with 4,480 the previous BY. A total of 2.88 million eggs went into the DNFH production program. The DNFH provided 805,100 eyed eggs to Clearwater Hatchery, and 1.5 million green eggs were air-shipped for rearing at Magic Valley Hatchery. The Nez Perce Tribe (NPT) was provided with 280,000 eyed eggs for their production program. No problems with IHNV were reported, the sixth year since 6,400 gpm water supply from the reservoir was installed. At the end of FY 97, 2.32 million BY 97 steelhead were on hand at an average total length of 121 mm. The DNFH projected release for the spring of 1998 is 2.2 to 2.3 million steelhead smolts. Brood Year 1995 Spring Chinook Salmon: The DNFH released 53,078 BY 95 spring chinook salmon on April 7 and 11, 1997. This was well below the 1.3 million target due to low numbers of returning adults (165 to DNFH and Kooskia NFH combined). Low egg survival (62 percent green-egg to smolt) contributed to the low release number. There were 4,187 pounds of BY 95 spring chinook released in FY 97. Brood Year 1996 Spring Chinook Salmon: Adult returns in BY 96 included 963 fish to DNFH and 202 fish to Kooskia NFH. These adults produced approximately 1.1 million eyed eggs. At the end of FY 97, there were 787,000 BY 96 spring chinook fingerlings at DNFH averaging 103 mm in total length. With the addition of 195,000 Dworshak stock spring chinook fingerlings to be transferred from Kooskia NFH in the spring, the projected release from DNFH is 965,000 BY 96 spring chinook in 1998. Brood Year 1997 Spring Chinnok Salmon: Adult spring chinnok returns to DNFH were the largest in recent history with 3,150 adults returning to DNFH, and 1.657 returning to Kooskia NFH. After culling for Bacterial Kidney Disease, 2.3 million eyed eggs were being held at the two hatcheries for release in the spring of 1999. Brood Year 1996 Coho Salmon: In a cooperative agreement with the NPT, DNFH is rearing 220,000 BY 96 coho salmon. The NPT is developing a Production Plan for the reintroduction of coho into the Clearwater Basin. Brood Year 1995, 1996 Rainbow Trout: Approximately 6,000 BY 95 and 6,000 BY 96 rainbow trout were stocked into the settling pond at DNFH for Open House 97. The BY 95 trout were reared at DNFH and the BY 96 trout were supplied by the Idaho Department of Fish and Game. The BY 95 trout were about 1 fish per pound and 15 inches in total length. Approximately 10,000 of these fish not caught during Open House were stocked into various Tribal waters after the Open House was over. Brood Year 1996, 1997 Rainbow Trout: Due to concerns about disease (IHNV), the USFWS plans to rear 90,000 5-inch rainbow trout at Hagerman NFH to be stocked into L. Camas Reservoir, 20,000 9-inch 30-6 WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT trout to be stocked into Oxbow Reservoir, and 20,000 5-inch trout to be stocked into Hells Canyon Reservoir. In exchange, Idaho Department of Fish and Game will rear 30,000 10 to 12-inch rainbow trout to be stocked into Dworshak Reservoir in May. 9. ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM-LAKE SACAJAWEA, WA Location. On the Snake River, 9.7 miles above river mouth at head of Lake Wallula (McNary Reservoir) and 12 miles east of Pasco, WA. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, two fish ladders, and appurtenant facilities. The project provides navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between elevations 440 and 435 msl. Lake Sacajawea extends upstream about 31.9 miles and provides slack water to Lower Monumental Lock and Dam. The dam structure is about 2,822 feet long and about 130 feet above the streambed. The fish passage facilities include two fish ladders. Powerhouse has three 90,000 kw units and three 111,000 kw generating units in operation for a capacity of 603,000 kw. The spillway dam is 590 feet long and overflow crest at elevation 391 msl is surmounted by 10 tainter gates, 50 feet wide and 52.9 feet high, which provide the capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cubic feet per second. The deck is at elevation 453 msl and provides a service road and track for a gantry crane. The navigation lock is a single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 675 feet and a 16-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide, 14 feet deep, and 41.6 miles long is provided from the mouth of the Snake River to the dam and from the dam to Lower Monumental Lock and Dam. Principal data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction of the original project started in December 1955, was placed in operation in 1961, and completed in 1971. Construction of the additional generating units was started in 1971 and completed in 1981. Power generation through September 1997 was 76.71 billion kw hours. Recreation areas on Lake Sacajawea include 11 picnic/day-use sites, 4 camping areas, 7 areas with boat launching, and 4 swimming areas. Total visitation on Lake Sacajawea for FY 97 was 433,800. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Continued repair contracts for navigation lock gate and Unit 5. Completed repair work on Unit 6. Operation and Maintenance: During the fiscal year 2.9 billion kw hours of electrical power were generated by the six generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock, consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo and amounted to 3,563,319 tons during calendar year 1996. 10. LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM-LAKE BRYAN, WA Location. The dam is 70.3 miles above the mouth of the Snake River and at head of Lake Herbert G. West (Lower Monumental Reservoir), about 40 miles northerly of Walla Walla, WA, and 50 miles westerly of Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladder, and appurtenant facilities. The project provides for navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between elevations 638 and 633 msl. Lake Bryan extends upstream about 37.2 miles and provides slack water to Lower Granite Lock and Dam . The dam structure is 2,655 feet long and about 165 feet above the streambed. Fish passage facilities include one ladder with entrances on both shores with a fish channel through the spillway, which connects to the powerhouse fish collection system and south shore ladder. The powerhouse has six 135,000 kw generating units in operation for a capacity of 810,000 kw. Spillway dam is 512 feet long and the overflow crest at elevation 581 msl is surmounted by eight tainter gates, 50 feet wide and 60 feet high, which provide the capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cfs. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 668 feet, and a 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide, 14 feet deep, and 37.2 miles long is provided from the dam to Lower Granite Lock and Dam. Relocations along the lake included 32 miles of Camas Prairie Railroad, 6.8 miles of county roads, 2.2 miles of state highways, and Central Ferry Bridge. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 97 Construction of the original project started in 1963, was placed in operation in 1970 and completed in 1976. Construction of additional generating units started in 1974 and was completed in 1984. Power generation through September 1997 was 67.18 billion kw hours. Lake Bryan provides seven day-use sites, five campgrounds, five boat launching areas, and two swimming areas. Total FY 97 visitation was 245,600 for Lake Bryan. Location cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and Maintenance: During the fiscal year, 3.9 billion kw hours of electrical power were generated by the six generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo and amounted to 2,911,889 tons during calendar year 1996. ii. LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WA Location. At river mile 107.5 on the Snake River at the head of Lake Bryan (Little Goose Reservoir) and about 33 miles downstream from Lewiston, ID. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, fish ladder, appurtenant facilities, and required about 8 miles of slackwater levees along the Snake and Clearwater Rivers at Lewiston, ID. The project provides for slackwater navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between elevations 738 and 733 msl in Lewiston, ID, and Clarkston, WA. Lower Granite pool extends upstream about 38 miles and provides slackwater to the confluence of the Snake and Clearwater Rivers. The dam structure is about 3,200 feet long and about 146 feet above the streambed. Fish passage facilities include one ladder with entrances on both shores with a fish channel through the spillway which connects to the powerhouse fish collection system and south shore ladder. The powerhouse has six 135,000 kw generating units in operation for a capacity of 810,000 kw. Spillway dam is 512 feet long and the overflow crest at elevation 681 msl is surmounted by eight tainter gates, 50 feet wide and 60 feet high, which provide the capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cfs. Navigation lock is single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 674 feet and 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide, 14 feet deep, and 39.3 miles long is provided from the dam to the confluence of the Snake and Clearwater Rivers. Principal data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction of the original project started in July 1965, was placed in operation in 1975, and completed in 1984. Construction of additional generating units was started in 1974 and completed in 1979. Power generation through September 1997 was 58.39 billion kw hours. Approximately $14,699,000 (adjusted to October 1997 price index) in potential flood damage has been prevented since the levees became functional. Lower Granite Lake offers visitors 16 dayuse/ picnic sites, 6 sites with camping, 12 boat launch ramps, and 4 swimming areas. Total recreation visitation to Lower Granite Lake in FY 97 was 1,047,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Contract initiated and completed for dredging the confluence area and the entrance to the navigation lock. Operation and Maintenance: During the fiscal year, 3.6 billion kw hours of electrical power were generated by the six generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo and amounted to 1,778,193. tons during calendar year 1996. Juvenile Fish Transportation Program: As the first collector dam on the Snake River, Lower Granite is a primary component of the Juvenile Fish Transportation Program. Transport began in the late 1960's as a research program on how to bypass juvenile salmon and steelhead around dams and reservoirs of the Corps' Snake and Columbia River dams. Transport became an operational program in 1980 with collection and transport from Lower Granite, Little Goose, and McNary dams. Transport was expanded in 1992 to include Lower Monumental Dam. Development and improvement of collection and bypass systems continues with a new collection system completed at McNary Dam in 1994, and a new bypass system completed at Ice Harbor Dam in 1996. 30-8 WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT The 1997 juvenile fish transport season was marked by a second year of high flows following 10 years of drought. Snake River flows in 1997 were approximately 166 percent of the 30-year average. Juvenile fish collection at Lower Granite dam was 4,700,325 compared with 5,227,672 in 1996, and 9,733,482 in 1995. Collection was drown for the past 2 years because of forced spill (above powerhouse capacity), and voluntary spill requested by the fishery agencies. In 1996 and 1997, a surface bypass system was being tested which also diverted fish away from turbine intakes and over the spillway. A total of 116,565 fish were bypassed back to the river, and 4,575,415 were transported. At Little Goose Dam, 2,184,859 juvenile salmon and steelhead were collected in 1997 compared to 1,889,552 in 1996. A total of 1,567,009 were bypassed back to the river, most to satisfy fishery agency requirements that not more than 50 percent of the Snake River juvenile salmon would be transported in 1997. In 1996, about 5,000 fish were bypassed at Little Goose Dam. At Lower Monumental Dam, 1,929,045 juvenile salmon and steelhead were collected compared to 1,334,693 in 1996. Numbers were higher due in part to fish bypassed at Little Goose, but 1,196,882 were bypassed at Lower Monumental to satisfy fishery agency requirements. In 1996, 68,230 fish were bypassed at Lower Monumental Dam. At McNary Dam, all fish were bypassed until mid June in keeping with fishery agency requirements. From mid-June through mid- November 6,721,341 juvenile salmon and steelhead were collected and compared with 4,642,979 in 1996. A total of 1,288,903 of the fish collected were bypassed back to the river for research projects or to meet fish agency requirements. A grand total of 15,535,570 juvenile salmon and steelhead were collected in 1997 compared to 13,094,896 in 1996. and the record of 24,556,390 collected in 1995. A total of 11,220,731 fish were transported in 1997, 72 percent of those collected. Of fish transported, 3,844,250 were transported by truck (34 percent), and 7,376,481 were transported by barge (66 percent). 12. LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM-LAKE HERBERT G. WEST, WA Location. On the Snake River at the head of Lake Sacajawea (Ice Harbor Reservoir), about 45 miles northeast of Pasco, WA, and 41.6 miles above river mouth. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, two fish ladders, and appurtenant facilities. The project provides for navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between elevations 540 and 537 msl. Lake Herbert G. West extends upstream about 28.7 miles and provides slack water to Little Goose Lock and Dam. The dam structure is about 3,791 feet long and about 135 feet above the streambed. The fish passage facilities include two fish ladders, one at each end of the dam. The powerhouse has six 135,000 kw generating units in operation for a capacity of 810,000 kw. The spillway dam is 572 feet long and the overflow crest at elevation 483 msl is surmounted by eight tainter gates, 50 feet wide and 60 feet high, which provide capacity to pass a design flood of 850,000 cfs. Deck is at elevation 553 msl and provides a service road and track for a gantry crane. The navigation lock is a single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 666 feet and a 15-foot minimum depth of the sills. A navigation channel 250 feet wide, 14 feet deep, and 28.1 miles long is provided from the dam to Little Goose Lock and Dam. Relocations along the lake included railroads and highways. Principal data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction of the original project started in June 1961. placed in operation in 1969 and completed in 1976. Construction of the additional generating units started in 1975 and was completed in 1981. Power generation through September 1997 was 80.60 billion kw hours. Lake West offers seven day-use areas, five areas offering camping, five boat launch areas and one designated swimming beach. Total visitation on Lake West for FY 97 was 172,500. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Operation and Maintenance: During the fiscal year 3.8 billion kw hours of electrical power were generated by the six generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock consisted of grains, petroleum products, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo and amounted to 3,097,396 tons during calendar year 1996. 13. LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE COMPENSATION PLAN, WA, OR, AND ID 30-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 97 Location. At various locations within the Columbia and Snake River drainages in the States of ID, OR, and WA. Existing project. The project consists of a series of fish hatcheries, wildlife development areas, and purchase of off-site project lands for fishing and hunting access. The project will compensate for loss of wildlife habitat and anadromous and resident fishery inundated as a result of construction of four multiple purposes dams and reservoirs on the Lower Snake River (Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite). The real estate design memorandum, and feature design memorandums on all hatcheries and satellites, the off-project wildlife lands, and the site selection report have all been approved. A final Environmental Impact Statement was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality on November 2, 1977. The DNFH Expansion; Irrigon, Hagerman, Lyons Ferry, Lookingglass, McCall, Sawtooth. Magic Valley, Tucannon, Wallowa, and Clearwater hatcheries including their respective satellite facilities are all in operation. Transfer actions have been completed for a majority of the facilities with the remaining scheduled to be transferred by the end of 1998. Fencing is nearly complete at all wildlife development areas. Off-project land acquisition is 100 percent complete. Habitat development continues at many of these sites. Development of fall chinook acclimation facilities and Lookingglass Hatchery water treatment in accordance with Senate Conference Report (103-672, page 7) has progressed. The compensation plan is scheduled for completion in FY 02. Estimated Federal cost for the project is $232,000,000. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Wildlife habitat development continued at the Windmill, Revere, Shumaker, Pintler Creek, Hartsock, Fisher Gulch, and Campbell off-project land sites. Development of on-project sites occurred at Wallula, John Henley, and Kelly Bar. Fisherman access land development occurred at Donald Road, McDonald Complex, Ferry Road, Swegle Complex, Sulphur Creek, Whitstran, Naches Road, and Benton City. Transfer of Lyons Ferry and Lookingglass facilities were delayed due to issues with underground storage tanks. The Big Canyon acclimation facility was completed. Design of the third site (Captain John Rapids) was completed with construction scheduled to be complete in the spring of 1998. The Value Engineering study of the Lookingglass Hatchery water treatment facility was completed in the fall of 1996. The estimated cost was still too high, so the scope has been reduced to a smaller treated flow. An amendment to the design memorandum is expected to be completed in the spring of 1998 14. McNARY LOCK AND DAM, LAKE WALLULA, OR AND WA Location. On the Columbia River, 292 miles above mouth, near Umatilla, OR, and 3 miles above the mouth of the Umatilla River. Existing project. The project includes a dam, powerplant, navigation lock, two fish ladders, appurtenant facilities, and a system of levees and pumping plants. The project provides for slack water navigation, hydroelectric power generation, recreation, and incidental irrigation. The reservoir has a normal operating range between elevations 340 and 335 msl. Lake Wallula extends upstream about 64 miles and provides slack water to Ice Harbor Lock and Dam. The dam structure is 7,365 feet long and about 183 feet above the streambed. Fish passage facilities include two fish ladders. The powerhouse has 14 - 70,000 kw generating units in operation for a capacity of 980,000 kw. The spillway dam is 1,310 feet long and the overflow crest is at elevation 291 msl and is surmounted by 22 vertical lift gates, 50 feet wide and 51 feet high, which provide the capacity to pass a design flood of 2.2 million cfs. The navigation lock is a single-lift type with clear plan dimensions of 86 by 683 feet and a 15-foot minimum depth over the sills. A navigation channel (250 feet wide, 14 feet deep, and 32 miles long) is provided from the dam to the mouth of the Snake River. Relocations along the lake included railroad bridges over the Columbia and Snake Rivers in order to eliminate hazards to navigation. Principal project data are set forth in Table 39-J. Construction started May 1947, was placed in operation in 1953, and was completed in 1982. Power generation through September 1997 was 259.89 billion kw hours. Local cooperation. None required. 30-10() WALLA WALLA, WA, DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance: During the fiscal year 6.4 billion kw hours of electrical power were generated by the 14 generating units. Traffic through the navigation lock consisted of grains, petroleum projects, fertilizer, wood products, and miscellaneous cargo and amounted to 7,885,948 tons during calendar year 1996. Recreation areas on Lake Wallula include 19 sites offering day-use or picnicking, 5 campgrounds, 14 boat launching ramps, and 9 swimming areas. The Pacific Salmon Visitor Information Center at McNary Dam, staffed by park rangers, provides a regional overview of Corps efforts in salmon recovery issues. Total visitation on Lake Wallula in FY 97 was 4,281,900. 15. SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM JOHNSON BAR LANDING, OR, WA, AND ID Location. On the Snake River downstream from Johnson Bar Landing, river mile 230. The Snake River, which is the largest tributary of the Columbia River, rises in Yellowstone National Park in western WY, flows generally westerly for about 1,000 miles, and empties into the Columbia River. near Pasco, WA, 324 miles from the Pacific Ocean. Existing project. The River and Harbor Act of 1945 authorized construction of dams, as necessary. for power, incidental irrigation, and open channel improvements for purposes of providing slack water navigation and irrigation between the mouth of the Snake River and Lewiston, ID. That authorization modified previous authorizations only for the portion of improvement below Lewiston, ID. Acts of June 13, 1902, and August 30, 1935, as they pertain to open river improvement from Lewiston, ID, to Johnson Bar Landing, remain part of the existing project. Improvements included in existing project are Ice Harbor Lock and Dam, Lake Sacajawea; Little Goose Lock and Dam, Lake Bryan; Lower Granite Lock and Dam; Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, Lake Herbert G. West; and open-river improvement, Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing. Each of the four locks and dams is described in an individual report, and cost and financial data for the entire project are shown on Table 39-A and 39-K. Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose. and Lower Granite are in full operation (see individual reports for details). For further details, see the following Annual Reports: page 2,246 for 1903; page 1,986 for 1906; page 1,991 for 1915: and page 1,981 for 1962. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal Facilities. On Snake River from the mouth to Johnson Bar Landing there are 18 privatelyowned barge terminals in use for shipping grain, petroleum products, fertilizers, wood products, cement, and other general cargo. There are also 5 marinas and 28 small-boat launching ramps, all open to the public. The facilities serve slack-water navigation to river mile 140, the site of Lewiston, ID. That slack-water reaches the Lewiston, ID and Clarkston, WA area since the lake behind Lower Granite Dam was filled in February 1975. Operations during fiscal year. See individual report for Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose, and Lower Granite Locks and Dams. On Snake River from Lewiston. ID, to Johnson Bar Landing, reconnaissance and condition surveys were conducted and survey markers were maintained. No costs were incurred this fiscal year. 16. MISCELLANEOUS WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, PL 858, 80th Congress, as amended: Fiscal year costs were $120,487 with four new flood control activities: 1) Section 205 coordination ($1 1,557); 2) Jarbidge River, NV ($29,408); 3) Palouse River, WA ($78,562); 4) South Fork. Palouse River, WA($960). Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (PL 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation): There were no Federal costs this fiscal year. Emergency Bank Protection (Section 14, Flood Control Act of 1946, PL 526, 79th Congress): Fiscal year costs were $42,775 for continuation of four feasibility studies and two new studies (Section 14 Coordination and South Fork, Palouse River): 1) The Snake River upstream of Blackfoot, ID ($8,436); 2) Fort Hall Landmark, ID ($9,574); 30-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 97 and 3) Willow Creek downstream of LaCrosse, WA ($1,274); 4) Little Weiser River, near Gladhart Lane, ID ($3,783); 5) Section 14 Coordination ($5,690); and 6) South Fork, Palouse River, Pullman, WA ($14,018). Snagging and clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (Section 208, Flood Control Act of 1954, PL 780, 83rd Congress): There were no Federal costs this fiscal year. Project modification for the Improvement of the Environment pursuant to Section 1135(b), PL 99-362, as amended: Fiscal year costs were $194,900 for continuation of four studies and one new study (Grande Rhonde River, OR) and initial appraisal and coordination funds including: 1) Initial Appraisals, General ($4,979); Coordination Account ($5,640); Little Weiser River, ID ($617); Portneuf River Pocatello, ID ($746); Soldier Creek, ID ($44,722); and Walla Walla River, OR and WA ($42,213); Grande Rhonde River, OR ($95,983). General Investigations 17. SURVEYS Jackson Hole River and Wetland Restoration and Flood Control, ID. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the Corps to operate and maintain a system of Federal and non- Federal levees along the Snake River in the vicinity of Jackson Hole, WY. A draft reconnaissance study of the potential for improving the system with levee raises, extensions, or re-locations was completed in FY 90. The final reconnaissance study was combined with the Jackson Hole Restoration study. The Jackson Hole River and Wetland Restoration and Flood Control Reconnaissance Study was initiated to restore fish and wildlife habitat in the 500-year floodplain of the leveed reach of the Snake and Gros Ventre Rivers at Jackson, WY. The study evaluated losses resulting from levee construction over the past 30-years and determined restoration measures for these losses. The report was approved in FY 94. A four-year feasibility study was initiated in FY 96. Lower Boise River and Tributaries, ID. A reconnaissance study was initiated for the Lower Boise River and Tributaries in June 1994. An interim reconnaissance report was completed in May 1995. Although the report included economically feasible alternatives for flood control and environmental restoration, the Sponsor (Idaho Department of Water Resources) opted to pursue non-Federal actions. Until an appropriate sponsor is identified, the study has been reclassified to "inactive" status, as of September 6, 1995. Walla Walla River Watershed Study, OR and WA. A reconnaissance study was initiated on August 29, 1996. The study objectives are riparian and wetland restoration, fish and wildlife restoration and enhancement, flood damage reduction, water quality improvements, water supply, erosion control, low flow augmentation, and recreation. Total cost of survey's was $505,198 for FY 97, including Special Studies (Jackson Hole Restoration, and Walla Walla River Watershed, - $394,197); Miscellaneous Activities, (Special Investigations, FERC Licensing Activities, North American Waterfowl Management Plan, Interagency Water Resource Development - $93,039); Coordination with other Federal Agencies ($15,980); and Planning Assistance to States ($1,979). In addition, $59,387 contributed funds were expanded for Jackson Hole Restoration (59,307). Planning assistance to state ($11) and floor plan management service ($69). 18. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA During the fiscal year, flood hazard data for a number of locations in the District were collected and analyzed. Flood information was provided to several Federal agencies; to the States of ID, OR, and WA; to various cities and counties in those states, and to some private organizations. Total cost of collection and study of basic data during fiscal year was $139,240, which included: Flood Plain Management Services ($27,691), Technical Services ($38,996), Quick Responses ($5,820), and Special Studies ($66,733). 19. PRECONSTRUCTION, ENGINEERING, AND DESIGN No Preconstruction, Engineering, and Design studies were conducted during the fiscal year. 30-12 WALLA WALLA, WA. DISTRICT TABLE 30-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section In Text Project 3. Jackson lole. WY (Contributed funds) 4. Lucky Peak ILake. ID 5. Mill Creek Lake, WA 7. Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. OR. WA. and 1D 8 DI\orshak Dam and Reservoir. ID 9 Ice Harbor Lock and Dam. WA 1() little Goose Lock and Dam. WA Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab Approp. Cost Nesw Work Approp. Cost Ness Work Approp Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Nes\\s ork Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost FY 94 $21.000 23.349 439,000 666.406 45.365 53.902 1,121.000 1.081,880 632,000 659.917 FY 95 $26,600 19,204 462,000( 585.860 44,598 44,168 969,000 987,954 634.000 611,523 FY 96 $-5,800 1.620 741,00() 732.877 29,200 15,925 998,000( 974.531 907.000 805.150 Total to FY 97 Sep 30, 1997 1.047.000 851.718 47.822 $2.525.070 2.525.069 5.023.500 5.510.780 281.710 315,821 19,652.081' 19.648.981' 806.417 21,489.281 846.762 21.476.946 - 2.258,495' - 2.258.495 1.140.500 14.660.440 818.871 14.204.323 - - - - 17.714.102 - - - - 17.714.102 35.294.000 35,289.000 52,490,000 42,149.000 243.336,000"' 27.347.817 43.396.226 53.665.872 39.338.812 240.182.149'' - - - - 327.482.196 - - - - 327.482.197' 7.588.500 8.309.000 7.287.364 8.509.425 9.369.000 13.877.500 132.941.530" 9.108.391 11.009.351 129.669.379" - - - - 168.028.757 - - - - 168,029.756 8.362.0()0() 10.691000 13.255.000 7.844.600 135,945,005 s 7.978.901 11.061.492 12.918.690 8.233.742 135.791.748x - - - - 233.361.021 - - - 233.361.010' 7.920.429 5.601.000( 6.991.605 7.188.670 4.740.000 4.275.800 94.853.358'" 4.534.634 4.468.078 94.705.296 ' ' 30-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 97 I'ABLE 30-A ((ont.) Sce Section in Text Project 1 1. Lover Granite Lock and Dam. WA 12. Lower Monumental Lock and Dam. WA 13. Lower Snake Fish and Wildlife Compensation. ID, OR, and WA (Contributed Funds) 14. McNary Lock and Dam. Lake Wallula, OR and WA (Contributed Funds) 15. Snake River Downstream from Johnson Bar Landing. OR. WA. and ID (OST ANI) FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost FY 94 1Y 95 FY 96 lotal to FY 97 Sep 30. 1997 - - - - 374.836,315'' - - - - 374.836,315'' 6,647,000 7,674,000 8,723,000 8,960.400 128,132.868' 5,987,998 8,332,600 8,602,507 8,990,729 127,921,918" - - - - 20.00 - - - - 20.0(00 - - - - 238,612.732' - - - - 237.222.733' 8.522,571 4,062,000 6,956,000 4.791.900 95,986.909" 5,341,359 7,697,929 6.546,960 5,165,048 95.917.956 7.308.000 6.450,000 5.917,000 4.238,000 224,518,241 4.994.517 8.565,913 6,524,909 4.162,680 224.062.600 --- 223,965 - - - - 223.965 - - - - 326.293.705" - - - - 360.103.408" 10.309.500 11.903.000 12.353.935 11,958.900 243,628.904' " 10,614.411 12.009.399 12.398,730 11.990.155 243,381.035"'' -- - - 43.707 - - - - 43.707 9.912.219 19.676.000 18,645,000 11.266.000 1.114.485.589' 9.850.017 20.270,019 17.672.647 12.057.266 1.113.998.587' 31.449.500 26.302.538 28.028.000 33.706,066 25.872,702 455.510.6431 34,280,690 32.606,119 26,857.597 454.925,336x SThirty-nine thousand dollars of the cost-sharing funds from county w\ere received in FY 90. but were not expended until FY 91. Includes $570.831 appropriated and expended for Code 710. Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Includes $66.700 allotted and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. Excludes $80,000 contributed funds, but includes $96,340 appropriated and expended for Code 710. Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Includes $2,046,100 regular project construction funds appropriated for and expended by Department of Interior in FYs 69 through 72 for hatchery operations. Includes $655,000 appropriated and expended for additional unit. Includes $20,137.847 regular project operation and maintenance funds expended by Department of Interior starting FY 72 for hatchery operations. FYs 72 through 78. funds of $6.097,000 were charged to project as a cost. but not as an expenditure for accounting purposes. Includes $48.182 appropriated and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees. After FY 92. special recreation use fees included with O&M. Includes $1,310.750 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. Excludes $82,500 contributed for artificial spawning channel. Includes $36.748.021 appropriated and expended for additional Units 4 through 6. Includes $914.256 appropriated and expended for Code 710. Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Includes $789,000 appropriated and $788.999 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. " Includes $48.919 appropriated and expended under Special Recreation Use Fees. After FY 92. special recreation fees included with O&M. Includes $641.063 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. Excludes $178,000 appropriated and expended - Bonneville Power Administration funds. ' Includes $60.941.807 appropriated and expended for additional Units 4 through 6. Includes $12,006,000 appropriated and $12,006.000 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. '" Includes $621.063 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. Excludes $31.000 appropriated and expended - Bonneville Power Administration tifunds. " Includes $46.212.534 appropriated and expended for additional Units 4 through 6 Excludes $405.819 contributed funds on lock and dam project. Includes $63,800 appropriated and expended for Code 710. Recreation Facilities at Completed Projects. Includes $10.645,966 appropriated and $7.056,001 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. 30-14 WALLA WALLA, WA. DISTRICT '' Includes $338.163 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of D)ams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. I1xcludes $32,0()()0 appropriated and expended - Bonneville Power Administration ftiunds. Includes $51661,371 appropriated and expended for additional Units 4 through 6. Includes $2.239.000 appropriated and $2.239,000() expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. " Includes $372.376 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. I xcludes $36,000 appropriated and expended - Bonneville I'ower \dministration lifunds. Includes $1,976.586 appropriated and expended for Code 710, Recreation I:acilities at Completed PIrojects. Includes $3,778,000 appropriated and $3.778.00() expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. Includes $28,851 appropriated and expended under special recreation use fees and $1.035.860 appropriated and expended under Maintenance and Operation of Dams and Other Improvements of Navigable Waters. After I:Y 92. Special Recreation Use Fees included with O&M. Excludes $505.500()(a)p propriated and $30)1.258 expended - Bonneville Power Administration futinds. Includes $400.150 for new work on previous projects (Pasco to .cewiston). and $34.613 for new work appropriation used for maintenance prior to 1953 Excludes $167,500 contributed funds for ne ,work consisting of $85,000 for new work on existing projects (Pasco to Riparia), plus $82,500 for new work on existing artificial spawning channel. 0 Includes $186.570 appropriated and expended for maintenance of previous projects (Pasco to Lewiston) and $401,019 appropriated and $390.527 expended open river Pasco to Lewiston and Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing. Adjusted to correct FY 89 appropriation from $2.140.000 to $2.120.000. Shlis does not include the appropriations and cost from the mitigation anali sis under the Columbia River Fish Program. \\'which \\'ill be allocated at the conclusion of the analysis. _ Excludcs $782.5()0 appropriated and $578.258 expended - Bonncville Powcr \dministration tunds. 30-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 97 TABLE 30-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS 17 May 50 Blackfoot Area, Snake River, Idaho. Levee left bank. Blackfoot River, Idaho. Levees, channel improvement. and rectification works. Boise Valley, Boise River, Idaho. Channel improvement and enlargement, levees, and revetments in Ada County. Canyon County unit was deauthorized April 18. 1967. Ada County Unit was deauthorized in 1986. Camas Creek. Idaho. Channel deepening and rectification of a 20-mile reach of Camas Creek. Deauthorized in 1965. Gooding Area, Little Wood River. Idaho. Channel improvement. Grande Ronde Valley. Oregon. Levees and channel clearing, straightening and realignment: would complement stream regulation by upstream storage projects. Deauthorized in 1986. Heise-Roberts Extension, Snake River. Idaho. Channel clearing and rectification, levees. and bank protection. Henrys Fork Unit deauthorized in 1986. Jackson Hole, Snake River. Wyoming. Flood protection. Kendrick, Potlatch River, Idaho. Revetted levee. Little Wood River, Idaho. Flood protection in immediate area. Deauthorized in 1965. Malheur River, Oregon. Channel rectification. levees. and bank protection at Vale. Willow\ Creek unit was deauthorized on October 14. 1969. Mud Lake. Idaho, Idaho Falls Area. Flood protection. Deauthorized in 1990 Palouse River. Washington. Flood protection for urban and rural areas at Garfield and near Malden. Deauthorized in 1986. Payette Valley. Idaho. Channel rectification. levees. and bank protection along 38 miles of Payette River below\ Black Canyon Dam. Payette Valley \was deauthorized on October 3. 1978. Portneuf River and Marsh Creek. Idaho. Concrete-lined channel through Pocatello. Inkom-Marsh Creek unit was deauthorized on October 14. 1969. Shelley Area. Snake River. Idaho. Bank protection. South Fork Clearwater River. Idaho. Emergency construction of levees and revetments. Deauthorized in 1986. Teton River, Idaho. Flood protection. Deauthorized in 1986. Tomanovich-Salmon City. Salmon. Idaho. Channel improvement. Weiser River. Weiser Area, Idaho. Intermittent channel realignment and improvement levees, and bank protection, lower river area. Project deauthorized in 1990. Whitebird Creek, Idaho. Flood protection. Deauthorized in 1986. H. Doc 53 1. 81st Congress. 2nd Session 30-16 WALLA WALLA, WA DISTRICT TABLE 30-B (Cont.) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section In Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents CATHERINE CREEK LAKE, OREGON 27 Oct 95 Flood control and multipurpose dam on Catherine Creek near Union. Oregon. Project deauthorized in 1990. CATHERINE CREEK, OREGON 24 Sep 54 Organic debris removal along Catherine Creek. CLEAR AND BURNT RIVER, OREGON 24 Jul 46 Construction of riprap bank protection at citio f Huntington Waste Water Lagoon. COLFAX, PALOUSE RIVER, WASHINGTON 22 Dec 44 Provides for flood control works in vicinity of and through Colfax. Washington. by channel enlargement and modification. levees. floodivalls. revetments. and modification of railroad bridges. LUCKY PEAK LAKE, IDAHO 24 Jul 46 Dam for flood control. irrigation. and recreation. 22 Oct 76 Second outlet for streamlloxw maintenance. Ieauthorized in 1990 22 Dec 44 Construction. operation. and maintenance of recreation as amended facilities. MILL CREEK LAKE, WALLA WALLA, WASHINGTON 28 Jul 38 Off-stream storage project upstream from Walla Walla. is amended 18 Aug 41 Channel improvement through Walla Walla: concrete-lined channel. 31 Oct 92 Redesignation of reservoir to the Virgil B. Bennington Iake OWYHEE RIVER, OREGON 24 Sep 54 Gravel. brush and small tree remoi al from 12 miles of O� \hbee as amended River. ZINTEL CANYON DAM, WASHINGTON 27 Oct 65 Local protection reservoir to provide flood protection to portions of the City of Kennevick. W\ashington COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION PROGRAM 19 Jul 88 Design. test and construction of fish bypass facilities at Low\er Monumental. Little Goose. Lo\\ er (iranite and McNar Dams. I able 30-G I able 30-I I able 30-E fable 30-E 4. 5. 30-17 H. Doc. 280. 89th Cong.. I st Session. 27 Oct 65 Sec 208. P 83-780. Authorized by Chief Engineers. 3 Sep 85 Sec 14. PL 79-526. Authorized b\ Chief of Engineers. 10 Jul 85 Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 888, 77th Cong.. 2nd Session PL 79-526. Chief of Engineers Report. dated 13 Ma\ 46. PL 94-587 Sec. 4. Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 578. 75th Cong.. 3rd Session H. Doc. 719. 76th Cong. Sec 377. PL 77-228. Cong. 3rd Session Sec. 118 PL 102-580 102nd Cong. Sec. 208. PL 83-780 Authorized b\ Chief of Engineers. 11 Feb 85 PL 89-298. Sec. 201 PL 100-371 Table 30-E Table 309-E 7. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 97 TABLE 39-B (Cont.) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section in Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. McNARY LOCK AND DAM, LAKE WALLULA, OREGON AND WASHINGTON 2 Mar 45 Lock and dam for navigation. pow\\er. recreation. and irrigation 22 Dec 44 Construction. operation. and maintenance of recreation is amended facilities. 17 Nov 86 Construction. operation. and maintenance of a second powerhouse. McNary Second Pow\erhouse automaticall\ deauthorized on 16 Nov 91 (BRUCES EDDY) DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, IDAHO 3 Jul 58 Preparation of detailed plans. 23 Oct 62 Bruces Eddy Dam and reservoir for flood control. navigation. power. recreation. and area redevelopment. 15 Aug 63 Redesignation of project as DI)orshak Dam and Reservoir 23 Oct 62 D\vorshak Added Units 4. 5. and 6. Idaho. Units 5 and 6 were deauthorized in Fiscal Year 1990 ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM, LAKE SACAJAWEA, WASHINGTON 2 Mar 45 Unit 1 of 4. Lower Snake River P'roject. lock and dam for navigation, power. recreation. and incidental irrigation. 22 Dec 44 Construction. Operation. and maintenance of recreation as amended facilities. LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM, LAKE BRYAN, WASHINGTON 2 Mar 45 Unit 3 of 4. Lower Snake River Project. Lock and dam for navigation, power. recreation, and incidental irrigation. 31 Dec 70 Designation of reservoir as Lake Bryan. LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WASHINGTON 2 Mar 45 Unit 4 of 4. Lower Snake River Project. Lock and dam for navigation. power. recreation. and incidental irrigation. LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM, LAKE HERBERT G. WEST, WASHINGTON 2 Mar 45 Unit 2 of 4. Lower Snake River project. Lock and dam for navigation. pow er. recreation. and incidental irrigation. 25 May 78 Designation of reservoir as i.ake Herbert G West LOWER SNAKE RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE COMPENSATION PLAN, WASHINGTON, OREGON, AND IDAHO 22 Oct 76 Fish hatcheries and replacement of wildlife habitat. as amended 17 Nov 86 Changes to land acquisition authority. 30-18 S. Doc. 51. 84th Cong.. Ist Session H. Doc. 403. 87th. PL 87- 874 Cong.. 2nd Session PL 88-96 PL 87-874 HI. Doc. 704. 75th Cong.. 3rd Session Sec. 4. Flood Control Act of 1944 H. Doc. 704. 75th Cong.. 3rd Session PL 91-638 H. Doc. 704. 75th Cong.. 3rd Session H. Doc. 704. 75th Cong.. 3rd Session P1 95-285 PL 94-587 H.R. 6 PL. 99-662 11. l)oc. 704. 75th Cong.. 3rd Session Sec. 4. Flood Control Act of 1944 lH.R. 6. PIL 99-662 Sec. 1()01. PL 99-362 14. a WALLA WALLA, WA DISTRICT TABLE 39-B (Cont.) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section In Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Tabie !F 15. LEWISTON-CLARKSTON BRIDGE, IDAHO AND WASHINGTON 22 Oct 76 Four-lane highway bridge and approaches. 29 Dec 81 Increase of authorized amount to $23,20,0()0. 30 Jul 83 Approach roadway from bridge to Sixteenth Avenue in Clarkston. Washington. Increase of authorized amount to $24,000.000 SNAKE RIVER MOUTH TO JOHNSON BAR, OREGON, WASHINGTON, AND IDAHO 13 Jun 02 Open-river navigation Riparia to Pittsburg Landing. 25 Jun 10 Mouth to Riparia. 30 Aug 35 Pittsburg Landing to Johnson Bar 2 Mar 45 Supersedes previous legislation mouth to Lewiston. Idaho only. See Ice Harbor. Loxwer Monumental. Little Goose. and Lower Granite Locks and Dams. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Table E 18 Aug 41 Dayton. Touchet River. Washington. Flood protection Milton-Freewater. Walla Walla River. Oregon flood protection. 17 Nov 86 Malheur Lake. Oregon. Flood Damage Iable 1 22 Dec 44 Heise-Roberts Area. Snake River. Idaho. Channel improvement. Malheur Improvement District. Snake River. Oregon. Flood protection Table E 11 Jul 56 Esquatzel Coulee. Connell, Washington. Ievees and protective work Lower Dry Creek, Lowden. Washington. Channel improvement. Mission and Lapwai Creeks. Idaho Construction of levee. Fable E 23 Oct 62 Bear Creek, Kendrick. Idaho. Channel improvement. Lapwai Creek Culdesac. Idaho. Construct left bank levee Lyman Creek near Rexburg. Idaho. Channelization Tucannon River. Camp Wooten. Washington. Levee and channel x ork. 23 Oct 62 Ririe Lake. Willow Creek. Idaho. Storage for flood control. 3. and 17 May 50 Jackson Hole. Wyoming. Flood control protection by Table E channel improvement consisting of channel rectifiction. levees. and revetment along Snake Rixer in vicinity of Wilson. 17 Nov 86 Wyoming. Also operation. maintenance. modifications. and additions are Federal responsibility. 17 Nov 86 Little Wood River, Idaho. Flood protection. P1. 94-587 PL 97-140 PL. 98-63 H. Doc. 127. 56th Cong. 2nd Session H. Doc. 411. 55th Cong. 2nd Session Rivers and Harbors Committee, Doc. 25. 72nd Cong., st Session H. Doc. 704. 75th Cong.. 2nd Session H. Doc. 662. 76th Cong.. 3rd Session H. Doc. 719. 76th Cong.. 3rd Session PL 99-662 H. Doc. 452. 77th Cong.. I st Session PL 87-685 PL 87-874 PL 87-874 PIL 81-188 PL 99-662 PL 99-662 30-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 97 TABLE 30-B (Cont.) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section In Authorizing Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents "lable G 23 Oct 62 Blackfoot Reservoir, Blackfoot River, Idaho. Modification to PL 87-874 increase spillway capacity. Authorized in Oct 62 and 27 Oct 65 Deauthorized in 1986. PL 89-298 17 Nov 86 Grande Ronde Lake, Oregon. Flood control, irrigation. P 99-662 water 23 Oct 62 supply, anadromous fish, downstream and resident trout PL 89-298 fishery, recreation and downstream power. Deauthorized in 1986. Table ( 17 Nov 86 Cottonwood Creek Dam. Idaho. Protection to highly- PL 99-662 developed urban and suburban areas against flash floods. Authorized Oct 62. PL 89-298. Deauthorized in 86. IFable G 22 Dec 44 Pullman, Palouse River. Washington. Flood protection. H.D. 452. 77th Cong.. 1Ist Authorized Dec 44. Deauthorized in 86. Session Table G 7 Nov 66 Stuart Gulch Dam, Idaho. Protection to highly-developed PL 89-789, Section 201 urban and suburban areas against flash floods. Authorized 7 Nov 66. Deauthorized in 79. OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 30-C NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to Sep 30, 1997 Report See Operation and Project Status Annual Report Construction Maintenance For: Columbia River and Tributaries above Celilo Falls to Kennewick. Washington 1. Obviated by The Dalles. John Day, and MlcNarx Projects. Completed 1968 $1.851.195 30-20 WALLA WALLA, WA DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 30-E FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Cost to Sep 30, 1997 For I ast Full Report Operation and Project Status See Annual Report Construction Maintenance For: Asotin Creek. Asotin, ID)' Completed 1951 $12,019 Bear Creek. Kendrick, ID' Completed 1970 133,518 Big Wood River, ID Completed 1985 784,930 Boise River. ID; Completed 1985 236.500 Catherine Creek. OR Completed 1990 28.800 Clear and Burnt River. OR Completed 1990 99.500- Collax. Palouse River. WA Completed 1990 5.810.240 - Connell. WA' Completed 1967 60.000 Cottonwood Creek Community Church. Completed 1984 23.400 - Culdesak. ID' D)ayton. louchet River. WA Completed 1966 380.617 Dr, Creek. WA' Completed 1961 384,426 Esquatzel Coulee. Connell. WA' Completed 1967 293.092 Lsquatzel Coulee. Mesa. WA' Completed 1969 38.631 Gooding Area. ID' Completed 1954 86.126 Graves Creek. ID' Completed 1953 75.469 Hleise-Roberts Area. Snake River. ID Completed 1955 1.586.439 Jackson Hole. Snake River. WY Completed 1978 2.504,245 Lapwai Creek. Culdesac, ID' Completed 1972 176.833 Lava Hot Springs. Portneuf River. ID' Completed 1973 113,296 Little Wood River. ID' Active 1993 353.534 Lo\ver Dry Creek Lowden. WA' Completed 1972 17.600- L\man Creek. ID' Completed 1971 230.315- Malheur Lake Project, OR Completed 1990 4.729.348 Malheur Improvxement District. Snake River. Completed 1957 138.608 OR Milton-Freevater. Walla Walla River. OR Completed 1968 2.327.578 Mission and Lapwai Creeks. ID' Completed 1965 54.538 Orofino Creek and Clearwater River. Inactive 1949 23.050 Orofino. ID' O\w\hee River. OR Completed 1990 69.316 Rapid Creek. ID' Completed 1985 19.500 Pataha Creek. Pomeroy. WA' Completed 1977 110.815 Pataha Creek at Pomeroy. WA' Completed 1993 308.51 1 Pay ette River. Emmett Se\,age Lagoon. ID2 Completed 1967 39.172 Ri erside Area. Pasco. WA' Completed 1972 28.839 - Ririe Lake. ID Completed 1983 39.677.448 Sewvage Lagoon. Vale. OR' Completed 1985 75.000 Shobe Canyon. Heppner. OR' Completed 1970 5.000 Snake River. Blackfoot. ID' Completed 1980 131.700 Snake River. Heise Bridge Location, ID' Completed 1952 8.501 Snake River. Stevens. Blackfoot. ID' Completed 1968 32.425 South Fork. Boise River, ID' Completed 1985 44.400 South Fork Clearwater River. Completed 1973 61.055 Kooskia-Sites. ID Tomanovich-Salmon City. ID' Completed 1955 128.635 Touchet River, Waitsburg. WA' Completed 1973 72.140 Iucannon River. Wooten. WA' Completed 1971 74.305 Ulmatilla River. OR' Completed 1961 161.540 Wallowa River. Weaver Bridge. OR' Completed 196( 1 6. 118 Weiser River. ID' Completed 1985 293.739 30-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 97 OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (continued) Cost to Sep 30. 1997 For Last Full lReport Operation and Status See Annual Report Construction Maintenance 1or: Willow Creek. ID)' Completed Willow Creek Lake, OR Completed Yakima River. West Richland. WA' 4 Completed Zintel Canyon D)am. WAX Completed I Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 205. Pl. 80-858. 2 Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 14. PLI 79-526. 3 Exclusive of $6.300 contributed funds. 4 Exclusive of $9.000 contributed funds. 1963 976 1985 37,231,33 1964 229,89 1995 6,801,78 5 Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 208. PL 83-780. 6 Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to P1. 99-662. No funds authorized until Fiscal Year 1990. 7 Exclusive of $853.712 contributed funds. 8 Authorized by Chief of Engineers pursuant to PL 89-298. Construction began in 1992. OTHER AUTHORIZED TABLE 30-F MULTI-PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER For Last Full Report See Annual Cost to Sep 30, 1997 Project Report For: Operation and Construction Maintenance Lcviston-Clarkston Bridge. ID 199() 23,409.832 TABLE 30-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Project Report See Annual Federal Funds Contribute Report For: Date Expended d Funds Deauthorized Expended Asotin Dam. Snake River, ID and WA Blackfoot Reservoir. ID Boise Valley. ID Ada County Unit Canyon County Unit Camas Creek. ID Catherine Creek Lake. OR Cottonwood Creek Dam. Boise. ID Dvorshak Units 5 and 6. ID Grande Ronde Lake. OR Grande Ronde Valley. OR Heise-Roberts Extension, ID Henrys Fork Unit Little Wood River, ID Lower Walla Walla River. WA Lucky Peak 2nd Outlet. ID Malheur River. OR Willow Creek Unit McNary Second Powerhouse, OR and WA Mill Creek, WA TABLE 30-E Project 1964 1980 1963 1963 1960 1978 1972 1990 1966 1958 1968 1960 1953 1988 1961 1991 1958 1975 1986 1986 1967 1965 1990 1986 1990 1986 1986 1986 1965 1986 1990 1969 1991 1977 267.626 46.084 10.600 9.080 1.552.000 195.686 655.000 169.195 21.334 4.000 13.000 3.537 30-22 WALLA WALLA. WA DISTRICT TABLE 30-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS (continued) For Last Full Project Report See Annual Federal Funds Contribute Report For: Date Expended d Funds Deauthorized Expended Mud Lake Area, ID 1957 1990() 5,994 - Palouse River. WA 1958 1986 2.000 - Payectte Vallee. ID 1960 1978 23,178 - Iortneuf River. Inkom-Marsh Creek. II) 1969 1969 - - Pullman. Ialouse Riv er. WA 1964 1986 289,109 - S. lork Clearwater River. 11) 1973 1986 3.899 - Stuart Gulch Dam. Boise. ID 1974 1979 234.100 - Teton Ri er. II) 1955 1986 10,387 - louchet Ri\er. WA 1957 1977 11,198 - \'eiser River. Weiser Area. 1I) 1960 1990 112,757 - Whlitebird Creek. ID 1957 1986 1,896 - COLUMBIA RIVER BASIN, LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION TABLE 30-H PROJECTS (SEE SECTION 1 OF TEXT) Estimated Federal Cost to Project Status Cost Sep 30, 1997 Blackfoot Area. Snake Rier. ID Completed - $209.403 Blackfoot River. ID Completed - 391.143 lceise-Roberts Extension. ID Snake River init Completed - 3.402.958 Kendrick. Potlatch River. ID Completed - 85.873 Malheur River. OR Vale [Init Completed - 333.581 Mud LIake. ID Inactive 1.187.000 5.996 Portncuf River and Marsh Creek. ID Pocatello FUnit Completed - 6.456.032' Shelley Area. Snake River. ID Completed - 32.348 TOTAL 10.917.334 Exclusixve of $36,800 contributed funds. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL TABLE 30-1 PROJECTS (SEE SECTION 3 OF TEXT) Inspection Project Complete Big Wood River. ID August 1997 Blackfoot River. ID September 1997 Boise River. ID August 1997 Clearwater River. ID Februar 1996 Columbia River. WA August 1997 Little Wood River. ID August 1997 Palouse River. WA August 1997 Payette River. ID August 1997 Portneuf River. ID September 1997 IPotlatch River. ID April 1996 Salmon River. ID August 1997 Snake River. ID September 1997 louchet River. WA uly 1997 Tucannon River, WA September 1996 Walla Walla River. OR August 1997 Walla Waila River. WA August 1997 Wallowva River. OR August 1997 Yakima River. WA August 1997 30-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 97 PRINCIPLE DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, TABLE 30-J SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project I)v\orshak Dam and Reservoir. ID (see Section 8 of text) SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT L ength Generating Units: Number Installed Rating. Each Total Capacity Installed Space for Additional Rating. Each 'otal Potential Capacity Maximum Structural Height First Povwer-On-Line Concrete (iravitx September 1974 150.500 cfs 1,545 feet Tainter 50 ft by 56.4 ft 2 428 feet 3 2 ( 90,000 kx\ 1 a 220.000 kx 400.000 kit 3 3 ci, 220.000() k 1.060.000 k\ 717 feet March 1973 IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Flood Control Storage lake length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 1.600 Length of Shoreline Ice Harbor Lock and Damn. WA (see Section 9 of Text) 1.600 - 1.445 feet 1.605 feet 2.000.000 ac-ft 53.6 miles 17.090 acres 175 miles NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Open to Navigation 86 feet 675 feet 97 feet 100 feet 105 feet 16 feet May 1962 SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Ele\at ion Control Gates: Type Size. Width by Height Number Concrete Gravity January 1962 850.000 cfs 391 feet Tainter 50 ft by 52.9 ft 10 30-24 WALLA WALLA, WA DISTRICT TABLE 30-J (Cont.) Project PRINCIPLE DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAV DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT POWERPLANT L ength Generating Units: Number Installed Rating, Each 671 feet 6 3 a 90.000 kiy 3 a 111,000 ki 603.000 kv 226 feet December 1961 Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First IPo\ver-On-Line Little Goose Lock and Dam. WA (see Section 10 of text) IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 440 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear ILength lift: Mininmun Average Maximum Minimumn Water l)epth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity, Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size. Width by leight Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating. Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line 440-437 feet 446 feet 31.9 miles 8.375 acres 14 ft by 250 ft 80 miles 86 feet 668 feet 93 feet 98 feet 101 feet 15 feet Ma\ 1970 Concrete Gravity January 1970 850.00() cfs 581 feet Tainter 50 ft b\ 60 ft 8 656 feet 243 feet 6 135.000 kv 810.000 k\ 226 feet March 1970 3()-25 -- . .. , REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 97 TABLE 30-J (Cont.) Project PRINCIPLE DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Lower (;ranite Lock and )am. WA (see Section 1 1 of text) IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 738 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size. Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating. Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Po\ver-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operation Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 738 Navigation Channel. Depth by Width Length of Shoreline 638-633 feet 646.5 feet 37.2 miles 10,025 acres 14 ft b\ 250 1t 92 miles 86 feet 674 feet 95 feet 100 feet 105 feet 15 feet Ma 1975 Concrete Gravity February 1975 850.000 cfs 681 feet Tainter 50 ft by 60 ft 8 656 feet 243 feet 6 135.000 kit 810,000 k�\ 228 feet April 1975 738-733 feet 746.5 feet 39.3 miles 8.900 acres 14 ft by 250 ft 91 miles 30-26 WALLA WALLA, WA DISTRICT TABLE 30-J (Cont.) PRINCIPLE DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT Project Lower Monumental Lock and Dam, WA (see Section 12 of text) McNary Lock and Dam. OR and WA (see Section 14 of text) NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth Over Sills Opened to Navigation SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Width Generating Units: Number Installed Rating. Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 540 Navigation Channel. Depth by Width Length of Shoreline NAVIGATION LOCK Clear Width Clear Length Lift: Minimum Average Maximum Minimum Water Depth O\ver Sills Open to Navigation 86 feet 666 feet 97 feet 98 feet 103 feet 15 feet April 1969 Concrete Gravitx March 1969 850,000 cfs 483 feet Tainter 50 ft by 60 ft 8 656 feet 243 feet 6 135.000 k\ 810,000 k\ 242 feet May 1969 540-537 feet 548 feet 28.7 miles 6.590 acres 14 ft b\ 250 ft 78 miles 86 feet 683 feet 67 feet 75 feet 83 feet 15 feet November 1953 30-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 97 TABLE 30-J (Cont.) Project PRINCIPLE DATA CONCERNING NAVIGATION LOCK, SPILLWAY DAM, POWERPLANT, AND IMPOUNDMENT SPILLWAY DAM Type of Construction Completed Maximum Capacity Crest Elevation Control Gates: Type Size, Width by Height Number POWERPLANT Length Generating Units: Number Installed Rating. Each Total Capacity Installed Maximum Structural Height First Power-On-Line IMPOUNDMENT Elevations: Normal Operating Range Maximum Lake Length Lake Water Surface Area at Elevation 340 Navigation Channel, Depth by Width Length of Shoreline Concrete Gravity October 1953 2,200.000() cfs 291 feet Vertical Lift 50 ft by 51 ft 22 1.348 feet 14 70.000 kis 980.000 kis 220 feet November 1953 340-335 feet 356.5 feet 64 miles 38.800 acres 14 ft b\ 250 ft 242 iniles 30-28 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 97 SNAKE RIVER DOWNSTREAM FROM JOHNSON BAR LANDING OREGON, WASHINGTON, AND IDAHO (SEE SECTION 15 OF TEXT) New Work to September 30, 1997 Cost Maintenance to September 30, 1997 Approp. Cost Ice ilarbor Lock & Dam Initial Project Code 710 Rec Facilities Power Units 4-6 Fish Bypass Program Totals Little Goose Lock & Dam Initial Project Po er Units 4-6 Fish Bypass Program Totals Lower Granite Lock & Dam Initial Project Code 710 Rec Facilities Power Units 4-6 Fish Bypass Program Totals Lower Mon Lock & Dam Initial Project Po\wer Units 4-6 Fish Bypass Program Totals Open River Lewiston to Johnson Bar Landing Open River Pasco to Le\viston Totals Existing Project Previous Projects Pasco to Lexw iston Totals Authorized Project $129,578,480 914,256 36.748,021 133,418,000' 300,658,757 160.4 13.215 60.941.807 127.266.000' 348.621.022 321,503.981 63.800 46.212.534 152,702.000' 520.482.315 184.712.361 51.661.371 124.370.000' 360.743,732 34.613 0 1.530.540.439 400.150 1.530,940.589 $129,578.480 914,256 36,748,021 30,841,000 198,081,757 160,413,215; 60.941.807 31.627.000 252,982,022' 321,503,981" 63,800 46,212,534 27,681.000 395,461,315^' 184.712.36 1 ' 51.661.371 31.152.000' 267.525,732 34.613' 0 1,1 14.085.439 400.150 1.114,485.589' I Newv \work appropriations used for maintenance prior to 1953. 2 Includes $2,064 appropriated and $3.180 expended in FY 96 for project condition survey cost. 3 Does not include mitigation analysis. 4 Includes $203.000 appropriated and $201.931 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. $129,578,480 914,256 36,748,021 30,756,000 197,996,7574 160,413.215 60.941.807 31,560,000 252.915.022' 321,503.979' 63.800 46,212.534 27,354,000 395,134,313" 184.712.361 51,661.371 31.144,000 267.517.732 34.613 0 1.1 13.598.437 400.150 1.113.998.587 $135,945,005 0 0 0 135.945.005 94.853,358 0 0 94,853,358 128,132,868 0 0 0 128.132.868 95.986.909 0 0 95.986.909 401.583 $135,791,748 0 0 0 135.791,748 94.705.296 0 0 94.705,296 127,921,918 0 0 0 127.921,918 95.917.956 0 0 95.917.956 100 100 100 23 65 100 100 24 72 100 100 100 17 75 100 100 25 74 Constr. Started FY 56 FY 57 FY 71 FY 91 FY 63 FY 74 FY 89 FY 65 FY 84 FY 74 FY 88 FY 61 FY 75 FY 90 397.498 4.350 4,350 455.324.073 454.738.766 186.570 455.510.643 72 186.570 454.925.336 5 Includes $370.000 appropriated and $358.589 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. 6 Includes $1.628.000 appropriated and $1.626.084 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. 7 Includes $11,132,000 appropriated and $10.949.493 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. 8 Includes $13,333.000 appropriated and $13.136.097 expended for Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program. 30-29 Project TABLE 30-K Estimated Cost (Corps of Engineers Funds Only) Approp. Percent Completed HONOLULU ENGINEER DISTRICT The civil works responsibilities of the Honolulu District encompasses the State of Hawaii, the Territory of Guam, the Territory of American Samoa, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. The division is unique in that its area of responsibility is totally comprised of islands dispersed over an ocean environment exceeding 6 million square miles. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Kawaihae Small Boat Harbor, Hawaii, Hawaii...................................... ... 31-2 2. Maalaea Harbor, Maui, Hawaii ................ 31-2 3. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys...... 31-2 4. Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ................................. 31-2 Erosion Control 5. Beach Erosion Work Under Special A uthorization .................... ..................... 31-2 Flood Control 6. Alenaio Stream, Hawaii, Hawaii ................ 31-2 7. Kawainui Marsh, Oahu, Hawaii ............... 31-3 8. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization .................................... 31-3 General Investigations 9. Surveys........................ .... .................. 31-3 10. Collection and Study of Basic Data ........... 31-3 General Investigations (Contd.) Page 11. Preconstruction Engineering and Design .... 31-4 Tables Table 31-A Cost and Financial Statem ent..................................... 31-5 Table 31-B Authorizing Legislation ............. 31-6 Table 31-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects........................................ 31-7 Table 31-D Other Authorized Beach Erosion Control Projects ......... 31-8 Table 31-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ...................... 31-9 Table 31-F Other Authorized Multiple Purpose Projects, Including Power........... 31-9 Table 31-G Deauthorized Projects ................. 31-10 Table 31-H Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection Activities Pursuant to Section 14 ................................ 31-11 Table 31-I Flood Control Activities Pursuant to Section 205 .......................... 31-11 31-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Navigation 1. KAWAIHAE SMALL BOAT HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII Location. Kawaihae Harbor is located on the west coast of the island of Hawaii, approximately 85 nautical miles northeast of Hilo, County of Hawaii. (See NOAA Chart 19320) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-2 of the FY89 Annual Report. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed on August 17, 1995. Requirements are described in full on page 36-1 of the FY95 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. There is an 850-foot long breakwater constructed in 1970. Operations during fiscal year. Work during the Fiscal Year included award of the construction contract in November 1995 for $3,718,103 of which $3,346,293 is Federal cost and $371,810 is non-Federal cost. The estimated completion date of construction is in February 1998. Construction was approximately 77% complete as of September 30, 1997. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $2,257,921. 2. MAALAEA HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII Location. Maalaea Bay is situated on the southwest coast of Maui, approximately 7 miles south of Wailuku, the county seat of Maui. (See NOAA Chart 19350) Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-3 of the FY89 Annual Report. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) is delayed due to resolution of environmental concerns as a result of the Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement. The PCA is being coordinated with the local sponsor for execution prior to construction. Terminal facilities. There is an existing 1,000-foot long south breakwater, a 870-foot long east breakwater, 300-foot long wharf, 90-foot wide entrance channel, and a single lane launch ramp, all constructed by the State of Hawaii. Operations during fiscal year. Work during the Fiscal Year included continuation of plans and specifications, continued coordination of environmental issues, and coordination with the local sponsor for continued support of the project. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $412,454. The plans and specifications phase was approximately 90% complete as of September 30, 1997. 3. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Condition surveys were conducted by the Portland District at Hilo Harbor, Hawaii; and Manele Small Boat Harbor, Lanai in February 1997. Total cost to conduct the above surveys was $15,000. Additional surveys were conducted by contract at Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor, Oahu, Hawaii for $9,413 in February 1997. 4. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (Preauthorization). Fiscal Year costs were $48,235 for Kahului Small Boat Harbor, Maui; and $1,054 in coordination costs. Mitigation of shoreline erosion damage caused by Federal navigation projects pursuant to Section 111, Public Law 90-483 (Preauthorization). Fiscal Year costs were $34,403 for Lahilahi Beach, Oahu. Beach Erosion Control 5. BEACH EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency streambank and shoreline protection activities pursuant to Section 14, Public Law 79-526 (Preauthorization). See Table 31-H. Beach Erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (Preauthorization). Fiscal Year costs were $67,717 for Commercial Port Road, Guam; $44,881 for Makaha Coast, Oahu; and $19,848 for Micro Beach, CNMI. Flood Control 6. ALENAIO STREAM, HAWAII, HAWAII Location. The Alenaio watershed is located in the South Hilo District on the island of Hawaii. Hilo is the principal urban center in the South Hilo district and the County seat for the County of Hawaii. (See NOAA Chart 81408) 31-2 HONOLULU DISTRICT Existing project. For a description of the existing project, see page 36-4 of the FY89 Annual Report. (See Table 36-B for Authorizing Legislation) Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on April 27, 1992. Requirements are described in full on page 36-3 of the FY92 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. None Operations during fiscal year. Work during the Fiscal Year included continued construction and completion of the project. Construction was completed in September 1997. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $1,435,071. 7. KAWAINUI MARSH, OAHU, HAWAII Location. Kawainui Marsh is located in Kailua on the windward coast of the island of Oahu, Hawaii. It is bounded by the Mokapu Saddle Road on the north, Kailua Road on the south, and the community of Coconut Grove on the east. (See USGS Quadrangle for Mokapu, HI) Existing project. The authorized project provides a combination of concrete floodwalls on a raised levee. The floodwall would vary in height to a maximum of 4 feet along the total levee length of about 6,300 feet. A flood warning system is an integral part of this plan. The existing project is authorized under Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Local cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was executed on October 3, 1993 between the Department of the Army and the City and County of Honolulu. Requirements are described in full on page 36-2 of the FY92 Annual Report. Terminal facilities. None. Operations during fiscal year. Work during the Fiscal Year included continued construction and completion of the project. Construction was completed in April 1997. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $136,118. 8. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 80-858. (Preauthorization). See Table 31-I. Project Modifications for Improvements of Environment pursuant to Section 1135, Public Law 99-662, as amended. (Preauthorization) Fiscal Year costs were $32,640 for Kaunakakai Stream, Molokai; $21,717 for Kawainui Marsh, Oahu; $3,582 to conduct initial appraisal reports; and $7,824 for coordination with local agencies. Emergency flood control activities pursuant to Public Law 84-99. Federal cost during the fiscal year for Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies appropriation was $382,737 of which $305,354 was for disaster preparedness; and $77,383 for rehabilitation. General Investigations 9. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $758,837 of which $463,984 was for navigation studies; $192,122 was for flood damage prevention studies; $56,071 for miscellaneous activities; and $46,660 for coordination with other agencies. In addition, $945 in non-Federal funds for coordination with other agencies; $172,174 for cost-shared flood damage prevention studies; and $3,389 for cost-shared navigation studies. 10. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood plain management services. The Flood Plain Management Services Program is authorized and implemented under Section 206, PL 86-645, 1960 Flood Control Act, as amended. Through technical services and planning guidance, the program provides information on floods and flood related information to improve planning for the careful use of the nation's flood plains, thereby reducing the potential for losses to life and property from floods and wave actions. Non- Federal agencies are assisted with flood hazard evaluation and planning information for flood and coastal hazard areas without charge. As of November 1991, Federal agencies and private entities were also offered these services on a cost recovery basis. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, National Flood Insurance 31-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 requirements, and Executive Order 11988 requirements for federal agencies. Such assistance may include flood information and timing, floodwater velocity, extent of flooding, duration of flooding, flood frequency and regulatory floodway limits. Services accomplished during fiscal year. Requests and responses for technical services and planning assistance totaled 2,139, which included services to Federal agencies, state and local government agencies, individuals, realtors, corporations, lending institutions, engineers, architects and other private parties. Costs for providing these services during the fiscal year were $174,978. Hydrologic Studies. Storm studies cost was $6,000. Total costs for collection and study of basic data during the fiscal year were $180,978. 11. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Kaumalapau Harbor, Lanai, HI - As directed by the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1993, preconstruction engineering and design studies were initiated in Fiscal Year 1993. The Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1994 also directed the continuation of preconstruction engineering and design in Fiscal Year 1994. Work during the Fiscal Year consisted of continued coordination with local sponsors and other interested parties concerning the results of the Special Design report. Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor, Kauai, HI - The project was authorized by Section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (PL 90-483). A General Design Memorandum (GDM) and Final Environmental Impact Statement were completed in September 1980 and approved by the Director of Civil Works in September 1981. Work accomplished during the Fiscal Year included completion of numerical model testing of harbor configurations and revision of the hydraulic appendix as required; updating of the economic appendix and cost estimates; completion and submission of the General Reevaluation report for HQUSACE review; and initiation of plans and specifications; and initiation of PCA activities with the local sponsor. Total costs incurred during the Fiscal Year were $286,100. 31-4 HONOLULU DISTRICT TABLE 31-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to In Text Project Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Sept. 30, 1997 1. Kawaihae Small New Work: Boat Harbor. Approp. 3,560,000 -578.000 -174,000 2,005,000 5,771,200 Hawaii. HI Cost 188,585 209,677 1,187,958 2,257,921 4,793,666 (Federal Funds) (Contributed Contrib. 0 0 200,000 50,000 250,000 Funds) Cost 0 0 200,000 32,085 232,085 2. Maalaea Harbor New Work: Maui. HI Approp. 3.575.000 -2,812,000 35,000 359,700 2.244,700 (Federal Funds) Cost 260,194 236,822 262,036 412,454 2,199,571 6. Alenaio Stream. New Work: Hawaii. HI Approp. 2,995,000 2.829,000 2,851,000 1,075,000 11,245,000 (Federal Funds) Cost 223.821 3.286,398 4,820,283 1,435,071 11,210,547 (Contributed Contrib. 0 50,000 709,000 28,000 787,000 Funds) Cost 0 347 625,801 143,407 769,554 7. Kawainui Marsh. New Work: Oahu, HI Approp. 74.000 2.039,000 2,167.000 146,000 4,942,000 (Federal Funds) Cost 67.308 1.612,695 1.999.468 136,118 4,328,280 (Contributed Contrib. 0 585,000 258.000 469.000 1.232.000 Funds) Cost 0 140,886 268,897 804,077 1,213.860 31-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 31-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents KAWAIHAE SMALL BOAT HARBOR, HAWAII, HAWAII An 850-foot long, 120-foot wide, and 12-foot deep entrance channel; a 1.2 acre and 12-foot deep existing turning basin: a 640-foot long, 80-foot wide, and 8-foot deep access channel; a 1.225-foot long west protective revetment structure: a 1.050-foot long east protective revetted structure a 400-foot long wave absorber; and a 2.5 acre, 650-foot long revetted offshore island. MAALAEA HARBOR, MAUI, HAWAII A 620-foot long extension of the south breakwater. a new 610-foot length, 150 to 180-foot width, 12 to 15-foot depth entrance channel, a 1.7 acre and 12-foot depth turning basin and a 720-foot length, 80-foot width and an 8-foot deep access channel. ALENAIO STREAM, HAWAII, HAWAII Project consists of approximately 1.640-feet of concrete-lined channel: floodproofing five individual structures, relocation of one public and six residential structures and incorporating floodplain management regulations for undeveloped areas. Modified by the General Design Memorandum and Environmental Assessment dated March 1990. at a total cost of $12.060.000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $7.730.000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $4.330.000. Sec 301. PL 89-298 Cong., Ist sess. Sec 101, PL 90-438 Cong., 2nd sess. Sec 401. PL 99-662 Sec 102. PL 101-640 31-6 Oct. 27. 1965 2. Aug. 3. 1968 Nov. 17. 1986 Nov. 28. 1990 HONOLULU DISTRICT TABLE 31-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 1997 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Agana Small Boat Harbor. Guam Completed 1978 $ 937,798 ' $ 52,555 Agat Harbor, Guam Completed 1989 2,000,000 2 Auasi Harbor, American Samoa Completed 1982 1,033,015 ' 96,884 Aunuu Harbor, American Samoa Completed 1982 1,783,129 4 1.176,956 Barbers Point Harbor, Oahu. Hawaii Completed 1990 53,519,193 5 798,217 Haleiwa Small Boat Harbor. Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1978 527,047 6 247.243 Hilo Harbor. Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1991 5,512,440 4.091,308 Honokohau Small Boat Harbor. Hawaii. Hawaii Completed 1971 781,036 7 63,693 Honolulu Harbor. Oahu. Hawaii Completed 1985 16,044,095 8 3.434,972 Kahului Beach Road. Maui. Hawaii Completed 1976 751,867 9 Kahului Harbor. Maui. Hawaii Completed 1984 7.203,221 10 7.287.654 Kalaupapa Harbor, Molokai. Hawaii Completed 1968 157,997 9 3,127 Kaulana Bay Boat Harbor. Hawaii. Hawaii Inactive 1990 171,400 --- Kawaihae Harbor. Hawaii, Hawaii Completed 1981 5,983,501 " 61,800 Keehi Lagoon, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1956 3,348,000 12 41,857 Kikiaola Small Boat Harbor. Kauai. Hawaii Active 1981 193.000 --- Laupahoehoe Harbor. Hawaii. Hawaii Completed 1990 3.623,450 ' --- Manele Bay Small Boat Harbor. Lanai. Hawaii Completed 1986 372,000 14 495,256 Nawviliwili Harbor, Kauai. Hawaii Completed 1987 2.127,724 15 10,116,779 Nawiliwili Small Boat Harbor, Kauai. Hawaii Completed 1976 584,513 16 30,707 Ofu Small Boat Harbor. American Samoa Completed 1976 980.018 17 5,054.918 Pohoiki Bay. Hawaii. Hawaii Completed 1979 432,523 9 --- Port Allen Harbor. Kauai. Hawaii Completed 1984 752.645 18 2.794.411 Rota Harbor, CNMI Completed 1985 2.000.000 19 436.200 Saipan Small Boat Harbor. CNMI Deferred 1982 194.000 --- Tau Small Boat Harbor, American Samoa Completed 1985 1.991,569 20 546.600 Waianae Small Boat Harbor. Oahu. Hawaii Completed 1979 1.940,011 21 121.574 Welles Harbor. Midway Island Completed 1950 2.448.056 2" 2, 11 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition. Contributed Funds of $282.474 for Construction. 21n addition. Contributed Funds of $1.239.364 for Construction. 3Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition. Contributed Funds of $86.563 for Construction. 4Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition. Contributed Funds of $231.437 for Construction. 51In addition. Contributed Funds of $2.402.909 for Construction. 6Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition. Contributed Funds of $410.077 for Construction and $84.388 for Operation and Maintenance. 71n addition. Contributed Funds of $630.568 for Construction. 8In addition, Contributed Funds of $201.282 for Construction. 9Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 1�In addition. Contributed Funds of $30.200 for Construction. Iln addition. Contributed Funds of $62.102 for Construction. 12 Abandonment authorized by R & H Act of 1965 (HD 98. 89th Congress, 1st Session). '3Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition. Contributed Funds of $364.757 for Construction. 41n addition. Contributed Funds of $370.845 for Construction. '51n addition. Contributed Funds of $223.261 for Construction. '6Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and completed in November 1974. In addition. Contributed Funds of $405.471 for Construction. 7Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition. Contributed Funds of $61.953 for Construction. '81n addition. Contributed Funds of $200.000 for Construction. 19Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition. Contributed Funds of $774.373 for Construction. 20Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition. Contributed Funds of $54.034 for Construction. 211n addition. Contributed Funds of $1.791.068 for Construction. 2 Completed in 1941 and Maintenance transferred to Department of Navy. 31-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 31-D OTHER AUTHORIZED BEACH EROSION CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 1997 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Afono Area and Aoa Area. American Samoa Completed 1978 $ 254.015 ' $ Asquiroga Bay, Guam Completed 1986 227, 181 - Haleiwa Beach, Oahu. Hawaii Completed 1967 240.148 --- Kaaawa Beach, Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1976 176,488 - Kapaa Tow\n. Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1977 158.916 --- Kekaha Beach, Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1981 999.996 6 Kihei Beach. Maui, Hawaii Completed 1972 154.313 7 Kualoa Regional Park, Oahu. Hawaii Terminated 1982 355,472 8 Lepua Area. American Samoa Completed 1992 1,706,225 9 Masefau Bay. American Samoa Completed 1992 500.000 2 Matafao Shoreline. American Samoa Completed 1984 225.000 2 Ofu Airstrip. American Samoa Completed 1987 189.500 --- Pago Pago Airport. American Samoa Completed 1984 174.941 2 Pago Pago to Nuuuli. American Samoa Deferred 1978 394.187 10 Poloa Area. American Samoa Completed 1978 136,040 " Saipan Beach Road. CNMI Completed 1992 176.000 2 Sand Island. Oahu. Hawaii Completed 1981 301.879 12--- Sand Island Shore Protection. Oahu. Hawaii Completed 1992 1.313.400 1'--- Vatia Area. American Samoa Completed 1978 154.309 14 Waikiki Beach. Oahu. Hawaii Deferred 1979 729.087 '1 183.000 'Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition. $209,549 in Contributed Funds. 2Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 3In addition. $160.098 in Contributed Funds. 4Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition. $97.075 in Contributed Funds. 5Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition. $56.916 in Contributed Funds. 6Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition. $1.672.524 in Contributed funds. 7Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition. $1.672.524 in Contributed Funds. 8Authorized by the Chief of Engineers and terminated in April 1980 as a Circuit Court ruled sand mining to be illegal. In addition. $177.300 in Contributed Funds. 9Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition. $485,371 in Constibuted Funds. '0 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition. $312.480 in Contributed Funds. 'IAuthorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition. $101.547 in Contributed Funds. 12 Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition. $255.728 in Contributed Funds. 'Authorized for construction by Public Law 100D71. In addition. $1.226.486 in Contributed Funds. '4Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition. $132.075 in Contributed Funds ''In addition $82.000 in Advanced Funds and $17.640 in Contributed Funds. HONOLULU DISTRICT TABLE 31-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 1997 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Agana River, Guam Inactive 1989 $ 250,000 $ --- Asan Village, Guam Completed 1986 1,275,500 --- Hanapepe River. Kauai, Hawaii Completed 1967 784,867 --- lao Stream. Maui. Hawaii Completed 1985 12,459,891 356,523 Kahawainui Stream. Oahu, Hawaii Completed 1990 3,923,821 2 Kahoma Stream. Maui. Hawaii Completed 1990 10,988,750 3 Kaneohe-Kailua Area. Oahu. Hawaii Completed 1985 25,552,400 4 Kaunakakai Stream, Molokai. Hawaii Completed 1950 73,478 5--- Kawainui Swamp, Oahu. Hawaii Completed 1967 1,265,567 --- Kuliouou Stream. Oahu. Hawaii Completed 1971 1,000,000 6 Namo River. Guam Completed 1982 2,416,314 5--- Paauau Stream. Hawaii. Hawaii Completed 1985 1,978,514 --- Wailoa Stream and Tributaries. Hawaii. Hawaii Completed 1966 1,044,888 --- 'In addition. $11.953 in Contributed Funds. 4lncludes Non-Federal reimbursement of recreation 2Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition. $464,205 construction cost of $5.668,300. In addition, $8,175 in in Contributed Funds. Contributed Funds. 3In addition. $645.992 in Contributed Funds. 5Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. 6Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. In addition. $540,335 in Contributed Funds. TABLE 31-F OTHER AUTHORIZED MULTIPLE PURPOSE PROJECTS, INCLUDING POWER For Last Cost to September 1997 Full Report See Annual Operations and Project Status Report for: Construction Maintenance Nanpil River Hydropower. Pohnpei. Completed 1994 $ 8.000.000 $ --- Federated States of Micronesia 31-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 31-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report for: Authority Expended Expended Ala Wai Harbor. Oahu. Hawaii 1976 November 1986 $ 40.117 $ PL 99-662 Hana Small Boat Harbor. Maui. Hawaii 1967 November 1977 HD #94-413 Hanalei Small Boat Harbor. Kauai. Hawaii 1967 November 1981 HD #97-59 Hanapepe Bay. Kauai. Hawaii 1965 November 1986 PL 99-662 Heeia-Kea Small Boat Harbor. Oahu. Hawaii 1972 January 1990 1.481 PL 99-662 Kailua Small Boat Harbor. Oahu. Hawaii 1967 January 1990 PL 99-662 Kaimu Black Sand Beach. Hawaii. Hawaii 1975 July 1981 86.235 Director of Civil Works Kapaakea Homestead Flood Control. 1979 July 1981 221.500 Molokai. Hawaii Director of Civil Works Kaunakakai Deep Draft Harbor. 1966 January 1990 133.188 292.441 Molokai. Hawaii PL 99-662 Kaunakakai Small Draft Harbor. --- January 1990 Molokai. Hawaii PL 99-662 Kewalo Harbor. Oahu. Hawaii 1976 September 1975 98.800 Director of Civil Works Lahaina Small Boat Harbor. Maui. Hawaii 1977 January 1990 186.937 PL 99-662 Maunalua Bay Small Boat Harbor. 1972 January 1990 30.378 Oahu. Hawaii PL 99-662 Nawiliwvili Deep Draft Harbor. Kauai. Ha\waii --- January 1990 PL 99-662 Rainmaker Hotel. American Samoa --- November 1991 PL 99-662 Reeds Bay Small Boat Harbor. Hawaii. Hawaii 1967 January 1990 --- PL 99-662 31-10 HONOLULU DISTRICT TABLE 31-G (Contd.) DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report for: Authority Expended Expended Saipan Harbor. Northern Marianas --- November 1991 PL 99-662 Talofofo Bay Shore Protection. Guam --- August 1981 80.764 Director of Civil Works Waimea Beach. Kauai. Hawaii --- November 1986 PL 99-662 Wake Island Harbor. Wake Island 1950 November 1986 PL 99-662 TABLE 31-H EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 14, PUBLIC LAW 79-526, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Fiscal year Costs Alii Drive. Hawaii. Hawaii Garapan Beach Road. CNMI Haaula Highway. Oahu. Hawaii Kaaawa Highway. Oahu. Hawaii Launiupoko, Maui. Ha~waii Power Plant Road. Guam Punaluu Highway, Oahu. Hawaii South Agat (Route 2) Shoreline. Guam Coordination Account TOTAL $ 13.783 12.689 14.731 10.712 5.727 15.902 13.884 15.247 2.754 $105.429 31-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 31-I FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Haleiwa-Wailua Area. Oahu. Hawaii Kahawainui Stream. Oahu. Hawaii Palai Stream, Hawaii. Hawaii Waianae District. Oahu. Hawaii Wailele Stream. Oahu. Hawaii Coordination Account TOTAL 31-12 Fiscal year Costs $ 24,801 13,821 8.880 3,352 9,974 2.581 $63.409 ALASKA DISTRICT * This District consists of the State of Alaska. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Anchorage Harbor, AK ......... ...... ......... 2. Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK ............................. 3. Dillingham Harbor, AK.................. .................. 4. Douglas Harbor, AK.................. ................ 5. Homer Harbor, AK ...................................... 6. Kake Harbor, AK........................................ 7. Ketchikan-Bar Point Harbor, AK ...... ......... 8. Kodiak Harbor, AK ..................... ................ 9. Metlakatla Harbor, AK..... .......... 10. Ninilchik Harbor, AK................ 11. Nome Harbor, AK ................. ................ 12. Sitka Harbor, AK ..... ....................... 13. St. George, AK ......... ................ 14. St. Paul Island Harbor ........ ........ .................. 15. W rangell Harbor, AK ................. ................. 32-2 32-2 32-2 32-2 32-3 32-3 32-3 32-4 32-4 32-4 32-5 32-5 32-6 32-6 32-6 Flood Control 16. Bethel Bank Stabilization, AK .............. ................. 32-6 17. Chena River Lakes, AK ...................... 32-7 18. Dillingham Emergency Bank Stabilization ........... 32-7 19. Homer Spit Erosion, AK ...................................... 32-7 20. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization ................... ................... 32-7 21. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Project ................ ............... 32-8 General Investigations 22. Surveys ........................................ 32-8 23. Collection and Study of Basic Data ............ 32-8 24. Preconstruction Engineering and Design 32-8 Tables Table 32-A Cost & Financial Statement ................... 32-10 Table 32-B Authorizing Legislation ............... ........ 32-14 Table 32-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ....... 32-17 Table 32-D Not Applicable Table 32-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects ................................... 32-18 Table 32-F Not Applicable Table 32-G Deauthorized Projects ............................. 32-18 Table 32-H Navigation Work Under Special Authorization ................. ................. 32-19 Table 32-I Project Condition Surveys .................... 32-19 Table 32-J Stream Bank Erosion Work Under Special Authorization.................. . ................. 32-20 -32-1- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 Navigation 1. ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK Location. Anchorage is in south-central Alaska on the southeast shore of Knik Arm, north of Turnagain Arm near its junction with Cook Inlet. (See NOAA Charts 16660 and 16664.) Existing project. Provides for dredging along 3,300 foot baseline adjacent to the port of Anchorage dock to a depth of 36 feet below mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 29 feet and the extreme range is 42 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The Port of Anchorage facility consists of two POL terminals at the southern end and three general cargo terminals northward. The northernmost terminal, completed during 1976 and 1977, was outside the Federal project limits. Extension of the limits from 2,070 feet northward to 3,000 feet was authorized by Public Law 94-587 and funded in FY 1978. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Dredging dredging was conducted in two phases: Phase I removed 196,162 cubic yards from May through mid-August, and Phase II conducted from October to mid -November increased the cumulative volume to 312,133 cubic yards. An optional contract is in place, year one of the five year contract was successfully carried out by J.E. McAmis of Chico, California. 2. BETHEL SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK Location. Bethel is located in southwestern Alaska on the north bank of the Kuskokwim River 65 miles upstream from the river mouth and approximately 400 air miles from Anchorage. (See USGS Quadrangle Map, Bethel D8.) Existing Project. The federal navigation project, at 4 feet below mean lower low water, consists of an entrance channel 31 feet wide by 1270 feet long, a maneuvering and turning channel 94 feet wide by 418 feet long, and a portion of the boat basin 160 feet wide by 519 feet long. The average tide range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 4.0 feet; the extreme tide range is 10.0 feet. Local Cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. The protected boat basin is accessed by two concrete ramps and served by 5 removable finger floats. The numerous small craft are often beached around the basin perimeter. Road access and parking are available. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging was conducted throughout the federal project in April with land-based equipment while the water was solidly frozen. Faulkner Walsh Constructors carried out the operation; the entrance channel was widened to 51 feet and the project dredged to at least 2 feet over project depth. Inadequate preand post-dredge surveys prevented an accurate assessment of the volume of material actually removed. The contractor was paid a lump sum for the work as specified in the contract, but close out is still pending because of the contractor's claim for additional quantity. 3. DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK Location. Dillingham Harbor is located at the head of Nushagak Bay, an arm of Bristol Bay, on the right bank of Nushagak River, just below its confluence with Wood River; about 470 miles northeast of Dutch Harbor and 300 miles southwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16660.) Existing project. A small-boat basin 230,000 square feet in area with a depth of 0.0 feet mean lower low water along Scandinavian Creek with an entrance channel 250 feet long and 40 feet wide in Scandinavian Creek and a rock sill across its outlet. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 19.8 feet. Extreme range is 30 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are four docks at the city of Dillingham; three privately owned, one owned by the city. Four publicly owned small boat floats located in the Harbor basin were installed in June 1982. They are removed before fall freezeup and replaced each spring. Facilities are inadequate for the number of boats using the harbor. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Annual maintenance dredging was carried out by Swalling Construction in May with the removal of 95,283 cubic yards. This was year 1 of a 2 year optional contract. 4. DOUGLAS HARBOR, AK Location. The City of Douglas is located about 2 miles southeast of Juneau along the Gastineau Channel on Douglas Island in southeast Alaska. (See NOAA charts 17315, 17300, and 16016.) Existing Project. Provides for a 5.2 acre small boat basin with an entrance channel both to a depth of 12 feet below -32-2- ALASKA DISTRICT MLLW. A rock jetty 105 feet in length protects the project from wave damage. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The small boat basin has three main floats with power, lighting, and water; a launch ramp is available for public use. The city dock is located at the harbor entrance. Fuel, repair facilities, and lodging are available in Juneau. Operations during fiscal year. The first maintenance dredging since project inception was accomplished by J.E. McAmis in August-September. The entrance channel was widened, straightened, and dredged to 2 feet over project depth; 24,242 cubic yards were removed from the project. 5. HOMER HARBOR, AK Location. In Kachemak Bay, on Kenai Peninsula, 152 miles by water, southwest of Anchorage. The harbor site is near the extremity of Homer Spit, which varies to one-quarter mile in width and extends 4.5 miles southeasterly from the mainland. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16645.) Existing project. Provides for a sheltered small-boat harbor, relocated and based within Homer Spit, about 50 acres in area. Project depth varies from 10 feet mean lower low water in the west end of the harbor to 20 feet below mean lower low water in the entrance channel and the east end. The entrance channel is protected by a main rock breakwater 1,018 feet long and secondary rock breakwater 238 feet long. Tidal range between mean lower low and mean higher high water is 18.1 feet, with an extreme range of 30.4 feet. (For details relating to previous projects, see page 1593 of Annual Report for 1964.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. The facilities consist of one publicly owned and operated wharf capable of handling oceangoing vessels for passengers and general cargo. Small boat facilities in the basin include publicly owned mooring floats, a publicly owned wharf, and an industrial wharf. Construction has tripled the size of the harbor. The city of Homer has tripled the size of its fish dock located at the southern end of the harbor. Operation during fiscal year. Maintenance: Annual maintenance dredging was conducted by Swalling Construction of Anchorage, Alaska during September. Removed from the project entrance were 6,122 cubic yards of material, and 2,085 cubic yards were dredged from the Coast Guard berth. 6. KAKE HARBOR, AK Location. Kake a community of 700, is located in Southeastern Alaska about 40 miles west of Petersburg and 800 miles northwest of Seattle. Existing project. Commercial fishing and logging are the primary industries in the area. A feasibility report was completed in 1968, and the recommended project was authorized for construction. The authorized project, adjacent to the city, was estimated to cost $13.2 million in 1986 dollars. The project includes construction of two rubblemound breakwaters and dredging of an entrance channel and mooring basin with a design depth of 18 feet. The average annual benefits amount to $785 thousand, all for commercial navigation. The benefit to cost ratio is 1.5, based on the authorized interest rate. Expansion of an existing harbor at the Portage Cove site, located about 3 miles southeast of town, would have a benefit to cost ratio of 1.2 at the current interest rate. The city of Kake is the local sponsor, with financial support from the State. Detailed designs for the authorized harbor adjacent to Kake were completed in 1982, but the high cost of the required breakwaters could not be economically justified at the current interest rate used to evaluate Federal projects. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation during fiscal year. Work continued on preconstruction engineering and design. Fiscal year expenditures were $269,130. 7. KETCHIKAN-BAR POINT HARBOR, AK Location. Ketchikan, the first major Alaskan port north of Seattle, is located on the Inside Passage of Southeast Alaska about 600 miles north of Seattle and 235 miles south of Juneau. (See NOAA Charts 17430, 17420, and 16013.) Bar Point is located about 1-1/2 miles northwest of Thomas Basin along the Tongass Narrows. Existing project. The federal project consists of a 17.9 acre mooring basin maintained to depths of 10 and 15 feet below MLLW. The basin is protected by two stone breakwaters of 700 and 1100 linear feet. Two floating breakwaters of 120 and 963 linear feet protect the remainder of the harbor. -32-3- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. The federal basin (Bar Harbor South) provides floating moorage for 520 vessels; facilities include power, water, and lighting on the floats. Repair facilities, drydock, fuel, travel lifts, food and lodging are all available. Operations during fiscal year. The US Navy was contracted to rehabilitate the floating breakwaters. The work is physically completed; contract close out is still pending. 8. KODIAK HARBOR, AK Location. The port of Kodiak is located at 242 and 175 nautical miles south of Anchorage and Seward, respectively, and approximately 1,258 nautical miles northwest of Seattle. St. Herman Harbor is located at Near Island across Near Island Channel from Kodiak. Existing project. The completed constructed project will consist of three rubblemound breakwaters. The 170-foot wide main entrance channel is located between the 1480-foot and 433-foot breakwaters with crest elevations of 22 feet or 20 feet above mean lower low water (MLLW) depending on the location. Since the natural water depth of the main entrance channel is deeper than the 20 feet below MLLW design depth, no dredging is required in this channel. At the north end of the harbor, the third breakwater is a 100-foot stub breakwater next to a 100-foot wide secondary entrance channel with a dredged depth of 12-foot below MLLW. The current estimated cost of $18,360,000, of which $16,424,000 would be the Federal first cost and $1,836,000 is the non-Federal first cost (cash and land easement rights of way). Local interests will pay 10 percent initially plus 10 percent during a period of up to 30 years, resulting in an ultimate non-Federal cost of $3,672,000. Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on 6 July 1992. Terminal facilities. Thirty-one piers, wharves, and docks are located in the port of Kodiak. Four are located in Women's Bay and two in Gibson Cove, west of the main part of the city. Twenty-four facilities are along the main waterfront of Kodiak, with thirteen on St. Paul Harbor and eleven on Kodiak Harbor, respectively. The remaining facility is the St. Herman Small Boat Harbor between Uski and Near Islands, directly south of Kodiak Small Boat Harbor. Operations during fiscal year. The main breakwater was completed in June 1997. 9. METLAKATLA HARBOR, AK Location. Metlakatla is located in the southern portion of Port Chester, a small bay on the northwest coast of Annette Island in southeastern Alaska, 18 miles south of Ketchikan. (See Coast and Geodetic Charts 8074, 8075, and 8102.) Existing project. Consists of two small boat basins. The existing basin is 2.18 acres in extent with a depth of 10 feet below mean lower low water, protected by a rubblemound breakwater 900 feet long. The new basin consists of two rubblemound breakwaters , 1,255 and 1,150 feet long, and an entrance channel and maneuvering area, 1,100 feet long, 100 feet wide, dredged to a depth of 15 feet below mean lower low water and a basin area of 6.25 acres dredged to a depth of 15 feet below mean lower low water. Tidal range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 14.7 feet, with an extreme range of 24 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Publicly owned facilities consist of one general cargo dock, one barge ramp, and a small boat float system in existing basin. Privately owned facilities are one oil pier and one industrial wharf. Facilities are not adequate for mooring the commercial fishing vessels operating from Metlakatla. The existing protected harbor area is fully utilized. Operations during fiscal year. The project is physically complete; contractor claims are pending. 10. NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK Location. Ninilchik Harbor is located at the mouth of Ninilchik River in Cook Inlet, at the village of Ninilchik. The community of Ninilchik, AK, is about 40 miles upcoast from Homer and 112 miles southwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16640.) Existing project. A small-boat basin 400 feet long by 150 feet wide is dredged to an elevation of 2 feet above mean lower low water, with an approach channel 400 feet long and 50 feet wide dredged to an elevation of 9 feet above mean lower low water; protected by two rock jetties. Modifications for, river channel diversion, the 2 armor rock jetties, and beach protection were accomplished in 1967 and 1969. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 19.1 feet, with an extreme range of 29.3 feet. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. -32-4- ALASKA DISTRICT Terminal facilities. Facilities, which are limited to shallowdraft vessels and accessible from Cook Inlet only at half-tide or higher, are a cannery dock along Ninilchik River available for offloading fish, and small boat floats in the project basin, provided by the state of Alaska. Other supplies are landed on beach or brought by road from deep draft ports in the vicinity. Facilities are extremely inadequate for the number of boats presently using the harbor. Expansion of facilities would require construction of additional protected harbor area. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging of the harbor and entrance channel was accomplished during May 1996 by Tango Construction of Homer, Alaska. During that time 9,000 cubic yards of material was removed. 11. NOME HARBOR, AK Location. Nome Harbor is located at the mouth of the Snake River at the city of Nome, AK, on the northerly shore of Norton Sound, an arm of the Bering Sea. It is a shallow open roadstead, 581 nautical miles north of Dutch Harbor and 545 air miles northwest of Anchorage. (See NOAA/NOS Chart #16206.) Existing project. The federal navigation project, at 8 feet below mean lower low water, consists of a dogleg entrance channel 75 feet wide by 1550 feet long running form Norton Sound to a turning basin 250 feet wide by 600 feet long, located at the confluence of the Snake River with Dry and Bourbon Creeks. The entrance is flanked to seaward by a 400 foot eastern jetty and a 240 foot western jetty and is further protected through its length by a steel sheet pile revetment on both sides. The eastern waterfront is protected by a 3350 foot long seawall that extends from the eastem jetty. Range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 1.6 feet aid extreme tidal range is 7.5 feet, but water levels are influenced more by wind than tide. Levels of 5 feet below mean lower low water have been observed during offshore winds, and a level of 14 feet above mean lower low water has been observed during a southerly storm. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Cargoes and passengers from ocean vessels are lightered to and from shore, a distance of about 2 miles. Traffic enters the dredged channel and is handled over revetment, where a lighterage company has transfer facilities which are open to the public. Facilities are considered inadequate for existing commerce. In July 1984, the city of Nome received Department of Army authorization (permit) to construct a 3,600-foot gravel filled causeway. Construction of the causeway began in July 1985. Due to lack of complete funding, the length of the causeway was shortened to 2,700 feet. Construction was completed in May 1987. Use of this causeway for off-loading petroleum products was delayed until the September 1987 arrival of a required berthing barge. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Annual maintenance dredging was carried out in the north-south portion of the entrance channel in June with the removal of 4,461 cubic yards. The work was accomplished by Dennis Josephson of Vancouver, Washington. 12. SITKA HARBOR, AK Location. The city of Sitka is located in southeastern Alaska, about 95 miles south-southwest of Juneau. It is situated on the western coast of 1,600 square mile Baranof Island. Sitka is about 20 miles from the open Pacific Ocean on the east side of Sitka Sound. Existing project. The recommended plan, also known as the Channel Rock plan, consists of three rubblemound breakwaters constructed across the northern end of the western anchorage, and an inner harbor facility placed adjacent to Thomsen Harbor. This project created a large protected harbor in which moorage basins could be developed using minimal or no wave protection structures. The three breakwaters are 480 feet, 1,200 feet, and 320 feet long. Navigation openings in the breakwater, 325 feet and 190 feet wide at the design depth, are located at natural channels where water depths are 50 to 55 feet at mean lower low water. Two gaps allow for vessel traffic separation, which may be particularly important when log rafts or barges are being towed through the western anchorage. The two breakwaters forming the southern opening overlap to minimize ocean swell in Thomsen Harbor. The breakwaters are placed directly on the submerged rock reefs forming the northern boundary of western Anchorage. Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on 7 December 1993. Operations during fiscal year. The Channel Rock Breakwaters were physically completed in 1995. During construction 192,318 cubic yards of core rock, 65,330 cubic yards of secondary rock, and 52,867 cubic yards of armor stone were placed. Construction was completed in June 1996. A study on the breakwater effect on the herring population will be completed in 1998. 13. ST. GEORGE,AK -32-5- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 Location. The city of St. George is located on St. George Island, the southernmost island of the Pribilof Islands, near the edge of the southwest Bering Sea shelf. Existing project. The project was authorized in the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1993, P.L. 102- 377. The work consists of excavating the St. George Harbor entrance channel to 20 feet below mean lower low water in accordance with cost-sharing provisions in P.L. 99-662. Local cooperation. The portion of the project was done by the Local Sponsor under Section 215, P.L. 90-483 with reimbursement to the Local Sponsor by the Government for its share on completion. Operations during the fiscal year. The Local Sponsor completed the portion of the project under the Section 215 agreement. Work on the remainder of the project is scheduled to be initiated in FY 1997. 14. ST. PAUL ISLAND HARBOR, AK Location. St. Paul Island Harbor is located on the shore of Village Cove, the southern side of St. Paul Island, the largest and most populated island of the Pribilof group in the central southeast Bering Sea. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during the fiscal year. Congress authorized improvements to the breakwater, the entrance channel, and the maneuvering area in WRDA of 1996. Model testing and design work on these improvements continued during 1997. Some rock was replaced. Design was initiated for harbor improvements with construction to start in FY 98. 15. WRANGELL HARBOR, AK Location. Wrangell Harbor is located on the northwest side of Wrangell Island, 824 miles from Seattle and 160 miles from Juneau. (See U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts Nos. 8164, 8161, and 8201.) Existing project. The project consists of a rubblemound breakwater 300 feet long to protect the southern portion of the outer harbor; a mooring basin 600 feet long, 400 feet wide, and 10 feet deep below mean lower low water within the protected area; an inner basin in the tide flat area east of Shakes Island, 325 feet wide and 550 feet long; a connecting channel 120 feet wide and approximately 530 feet long; a connecting channel 120 feet wide and approximately 530 feet long from the outer mooring basin all at a depth of 10 feet at mean lower low water; and construction of a rock mound breakwater 320 feet long on the reef north of Shakes Island. The range between mean lower low water and mean higher high water is 15.7 feet. The extreme tidal range is 26 feet. Heavy swells, dangerous to small fishing boats, are caused by the wind, which causes an additional rise of about one foot. Construction of the breakwater north of Shakes Island was placed on inactive status as material to be used from the inner basin was unsuitable and the breakwater considered unnecessary for safe moorage of vessels. The cost of this portion was last revised in 1956 and estimated to be $6,500. (See table 40-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. There are eight wharves and floats in Wrangell Harbor. Two privately owned wharves serving general cargo and passenger terminals, one of which includes a cold storage facility, are open for public use. The remaining wharves serve various industrial purposes. One of the floats is publicly owned and is open for public use for mooring and servicing of small craft, and two privately owned floats serve oil handling facilities. Operations during fiscal year. A feasibility study for a new harbor was initiated in FY 97. Flood Control 16. BETHEL BANK STABILIZATION, AK Location. Bethel, AK is located in southwestern Alaska on the north bank of the Kuskokwim River 400 miles west of Anchorage. Existing project. The project consists of rock riprap toe protection to be installed on the unprotected river bank and at locations where existing city construction bulkheads are threatened by erosion. This includes 4,000 feet of unprotected riverbank and 4,200 feet of previously installed bulkheads. The construction contract was awarded on 26 May 1995. Emergency erosion protection for the Bethel Cargo Dock and the Mission Road Bulkhead began in July 1995 and continued through FY 1995 due to accelerated erosion that accumulated after spring runoff. Location cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on 3 March 1994. Terminal facilities. The POL tank farm is situated at the downstream end of the project and the city's general cargo dock is at the upstream end of the project. Operations during fiscal year. The project was physically complete in September 1997, except for seeding the stopped -32-6- ALASKA DISTRICT riverbanks. The total project cost was $24,000,000 of which Bethel contributed $6,000,000. 17. CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK Location. Chena River Lakes is located in the vicinity of Fairbanks, AK, and encompassing the Tanana River, Chena River, Little Chena River, and their tributaries. (See USGS map Fairbanks, Cl, DI, D2, and Big Delta D6.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Existing project. Moose Creek is located 17 miles east of Fairbanks with control works on the Chena River. The dam itself extends from a bluff one mile north of the Chena River and south past the control works for approximately six miles to the Tanana River. The dam connects with a completed 22 mile levee system along the north boundary of the Tanana river to a point south and west of Fairbanks. Estimated Federal cost is $210,000,000 for Little Chena Dam, which was submitted for deauthorization in September 1990. Operations during fiscal year. Both the Phase II contract for the bike path and the trash rack modification contract at the outlet works of the dam are successfully completed. In addition, 15 relief wells were installed on the downstream side of the dam. The old Nike landfill site was officially capped and closed. 18. DILLINGHAM EMERGENCY BANK STABILIZATION, AK Location. Dillingham is located 350 miles southwest of Anchorage, Alaska. The project is located along the southeastern edge of Dillingham adjacent to the Nushagak River. Erosion of the toe of the bluff in this area is endangering critical utilities and numerous buildings and homes. Existing project. The authorized project consists of a 1,600-foot long steel sheetpile bulkhead along the toe of the bluff from the Dillingham City Cargo dock to Snag Point. The sheetpile wall will be constructed to an elevation of 28 feet MLLW. Mitigation measures including emergency access ladders and eyebolts for anchoring setnets used for by subsistence fishermen are included in the project. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal Facilities. Dillingham has a general cargo dock adjacent to the authorized project. Operations during fiscal year. The plans and specifications were completed and a Project Cooperation Agreement was negotiated and submitted for approval. Construction is scheduled for 1998. 19. HOMER SPIT, AK Location. The project is located near the town of Homer, Alaska, 120 miles southwest of Anchorage. Part of the city is located on a 4.5 mile long finger of land that varies in width from 30 to 500 yards wide extending into Kachemak Bay. Existing Project. The authorized project, which was constructed in 1994, consists of 1,400 feet of rock revetment. The revetment was extended an additional 3,700 feet along the road by the Fiscal Year 1996 Appropriation Bill.. Local Cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed detailing cost sharing of the project. Operations during fiscal year. Repair and a southerly extension of the existing project is estimated as 77% complete. The contractor had difficulty obtaining the proper stone to complete the work this fiscal year. 20. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Emergency flood control activities--repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Federal costs for the fiscal year were $257,025 for disaster preparedness, and field investigations. 21. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspections were made of the following flood control works: Tanana River Levee at Fairbanks, Talkeetna River at Talkeetna; Lowell Creek at Seward; Klutina River at Copper Center; Skagway River at Skagway; Gold Creek at Juneau; and Yukon -32-7- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 River at Galena. An inspection was made of the shore protection works at Nome. General Investigation 22. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $1,861,941 of which $1,253,573 was for navigation studies, $119,582 for flood damage prevention studies, $252,588 for special studies, $99,084 for miscellaneous studies, and $137,113 for coordination studies with other agencies. In addition contributed funds in the amount of $136,573 were expended: $6,728 from the local share for St. Paul Harbor navigation studies, $1,681 for preconstruction engineering and design works under Cook Inlet, and $9,208 for coordination studies with other agencies. 23. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Technical assistance, information, flood plain manage-ment guidance, and other flood plain management services have been provided to military and nonmilitary Federal agencies, local communities, state agencies, Architectural Engineering firms, lending institutions, and private individuals at a fiscal year cost of $126,853. Fiscal year costs for Hydrologic Studies were $20,285. 24. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN CHIGNIK HARBOR, AK Detailed designs for a harbor at Chignik have been prepared under the Section 107 navigation authority of the 1960 River and Harbor Act. However, the costs of harbor construction are currently estimated at $10.7 million. The statutory Federal funding limit for a Section 107 project is $4 million, including costs of planning and design. Both the city of Chignik and the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (ADOT/PF) believe the local cost share of $7.7 million for Section 107 project is beyond their ability to fund. If the project were authorized by Congress, in a Water Resources Development Act, costs sharing would be in accordance with the provisions of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Accordingly, the initial local cost share would be 10 percent of the general navigation facility costs, or about $1 million. This combined with the moorage system cost would yield a local share of $2.3 million which is achievable with State support. The estimated project benefits of 42 million annually are all for commercial navigation and produce a benefit-cost ratio of 1.9 based on the latest economic analysis dated December 1991. Work on preconstruction engineering and design completed on 30 September 1997. Fiscal year expenditures were $156,594 which included non-Federal contributions. COOK INLET, AK The Port of Anchorage facility consists of a POL terminal at the southern end and three general cargo terminals northward. The authorized navigation channel would be dredged to a reliable depth of 11.5 meters and a width of 310 meters. An additional 1.5 meters in depth and 30 meters in width on each side of the channel would be provided for uncertainties in the analysis of channel stability. The channel will be about 2,000 meters in length. The range between mean lower low water and mean high water is 7.9 meters, with the extreme range of 10.5 meters. Pre-Construction engineering and design work was initiated in 1996 and continued in 1997. A hydrographic survey of the project area and dredged material disposal site was obtained. Ship tracking studies during the winter of 1996-1997 confirmed that the authorized channel dimensions were appropriate. Plans and specifications were initiated. Fiscal year expenditures were $79,666. ST. PAUL HARBOR, AK St. Paul is the northernmost of the Pribilof Islands, located in the southeastern Bering Sea approximately 800 air miles west southwest of Anchorage. The Pribilof Islands are located in the middle of the extensive Bering Sea fisheries for groundfish and crab. A federally authorized harbor was constructed at St. Paul in 1989 by the city of St. Paul under authority Section 204 (e) of the 1986 WRDA, in which the city was reimbursed for the Federal share after construction was completed. The project consists of two breakwaters and a dredged maneuvering channel. It provides shelter for Bering Sea consumer goods and industrial supplies also use cargo transfer facilities protected by the breakwaters. The waves from large winter storms on the Bering Sea overtop the main breakwater more frequently than expected which limits cargo transfer and fish processing potential of the harbor. Deeper draft small cargo vessels want to use the harbor but it needs to be deepened and the maneuvering area enlarged. The waves overtopping the breakwater also need to be significantly reduced. Harbor use has been much greater than anticipated due to several processing plants moving in to receive the vessels catches. -32-8- ALASKA DISTRICT Because of the increased traffic and the need for deeper draft vessels, the city of St. Paul has requested that the Federal entrance channel be enlarged. Engineering, economic and environmental evaluations included extending the Federal entrance channel approximately 500 feet outside the harbor, enlarging the maneuvering area within the harbor, constructing a wave spending beach within the harbor, building three submerged reefs to reduce wave action on the main breakwater, and dredging of the channel into the Salt Lagoon for environmental restoration purposes. Congress authorized construction of the recommended improvements in WRDA 1996. Reconstruction engineering and design work continued during 1997. Fiscal year expenditures for PED were $2,859. -32-9- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 TABLE 32-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 30 Sep 97 Anchorage Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) Bethel Small Boat Harbor, AK Dillingham Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) Douglas Harbor, AK Homer Harbor, AK New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Contrib. Cost 533,235 533,235 1,095,0000 1,150,500 1,493,955 986,000 31,109,162 1,451,211 1,171,503 1,494,192 967,277 31,083,936 638,080 638,080 476,800 468,498 423,000 319,000 459.008 338.244 533,235 533,235 476,800 468,498 548,790 580,209 356,200 364,500 10,026,982 362.066 357.989 10.035.014 1,700 1,700 46,000 44,456 44,456 670,411 44,456 657,850 1,112,411 722,222 3,512,350 3,512,350 188,000 160,000 182,617 164,633 186,000 158,000 5,648,113 186,663 161,980 5,345,499 67,974 67,974 -32-10- 2. 3. 4. ALASKA DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 30 Sep 97 Kake Harbor, AK Ketchikan - Bar Point Harbor, AK Kodiak Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 9. Metlakatla Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 10. Ninilchik Harbor, AK 11. Nome Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 294,658 250,469 98,000 89,686 -2,800 137,900 5,483 136,594 -4405 -3068 294,658 250,469 228,695 228,695 220,000 1,250,817 4,842,000 4,600,649 16,682,956 457,183 1,788,611 4,855,634 4,411,775 16,419,925 40,000 250,000 565,000 380,000. 1,840,000 38,354 262,618 435,000 561,817 1,839,663 -2,029 100,000 43,116 68,500 5,243,941 76,666 5,195,156 148,520 148,520 890,144 -20,550 724,651 428,720 428,720 191,000 160,000 165,400 152,000 5,155,439 191,331 153,598 171,619 150,531 5,152,845 144,000 237,230 1,729,470 133,668 195,920 1,677,828 66,500 776,906 522,800 333,000 11639,206 182,261 795,544 523,399 327,227 11,714,606 276,961 21,419 276,961 21,419 -32-11- TABLE 32-A (Continued) 7. 8. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 TABLE 32-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 30 Sep 97 12. Sitka Harbor, AK (Contributed Funds) 13. St. George, AK (Contrib. Funds) 14. St. Paul Island Harbor, AK (Contrib. Funds) 15. Wrangell Harbor, AK 16. Bethel Bank Stabilization, AK (Contributed Funds) 17. Chena River Lakes, AK (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost. New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 5,120,000 1,083,000 3,383,795 2,540,487 1,250,000 -11,600 400,000 254,256 2,797,000 865,187 53,241 173 383 227,000 225,977 -109,000 100,000 6,639,144 163,324 104,333 6,567,219 0 1,238,400 380,088 182,888 1,217,232 3,252 -23,765 0 7,000,000 29,176 5,017,749 0 3,004,000 -23,278 2,777,128 19,635,200 19,593,945 -1,523 -500 226,386 218,632 0 0 6,728 82,500 178,219 81,368 173,840 62,157 331,701 8,185,000 137,381 225,477 225,477 226,386 225,360 260,719 255,208 1,239,380 6,646,173 -2,017 5,898,000 2,384,000 18,548,854 4,300,238 9,523,085 2,406,578 18,287,966 1,500,000 3,190,000 1,097,556 3,177,444 25,000 6,572 4,690,000 4,275,000 214,063,928 0 214,054,134 1,871,744 1,880,400 1,243,213 2,229,725 11,833,082 2,113,055 2,279,275 1,262,375 2,150,698 11,889,362 2,182,300 2,145,929 -32-12- ALASKA DISTRICT COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 30 Sep 97 Dillingham Emergency Bank Stabilization New Work Approp. Cost 221,000 57 80,974 89,000 2,130,946 2,446,515 206,968 259,967 553,345 Homer Spit Erosion, AK New Work (Contrib. Funds) Approp. 910,000 Cost 2,442,672 New Work Approp. Cost -270,000 3,800,000 92,028 308,798 -344,478 1,568,520 -94,478 100,000 7,540,000 4,053,257 0 1,605,522 24,870 1,506,194 -32-13- TABLE 32-A (Continued) 18. 19. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 Table 32-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Jul. 3. 1958 Oct. 22. 1976 Jul. 14. 1960 H.Doc. 34. 85th Cong.. 1st Sess. 2 P.L. 94-587 Section 107 (P.L. 86-645) as Authorized by the Chief of Engineers. Jun. 29. 1978 H. Doc. 390. 84th Cong.. 2d Sess. 2 ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK Deep winter harbor. adjacent to docks, dredge to 35 feet below mean lower low water, protected by two jetties.' Extension of project limits. BETHEL SMALL BOAT HARBOR, AK Protected harbor in the Kuskokwim River Delta area that provides beach moorage for about 1,200 small boats with the possibility of a future medium-draft mooring basin. DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK Basin 230.000 square feet in area with depth of 2 feet above MLLW along Scandinavian Creek, with entrance channel 1.100 feet long and 40 feet wide. DOUGLAS HARBOR, AK Basin 5.2 acres with entrance channel both to a depth of-12 feet MLLW and protected by a rock jetty about 90 feet long off the northerly shore of Juneau Isle adjacent to the basin entrance. HOMER HARBOR, AK Basin 2.7 acres in area with depth of 12 feet below mean lower low water, and rock breakwater 1.260 feet long. Relocation and rehabilitation of project destroyed by March 27. 1964 earthquake. by construction of basin 10 acres in area with 12-foot depth over 2.75 acres and 15-foot depth over 7.25 acres protected by rock breakwvaters. 1.018 feet and 238 feet long. Increased width and depth of entrance channel and an enlarged staging area. Basin enlarged from 16.5 to 50 acres. KAKE HARBOR, AK Provides for a 1.580 foot long w\est breakwater and a 900 foot long south breakwater enclosing a 7 acre berthing area at -15 feet MLLW. KETCHIKAN-BAR POINT HARBOR, AK Provides for the dredging of an additional small boat basin at Bar Point. 17.91 acres in area. to depths of -10 and -15 feet MLLW. and construction of three rock breakwaters 700. 1.100 and 450 feet in length, topped by concrete gravity walls. KODIAK HARBOR, AK Breakwater 1.900 feet long with an entrance channel 930 feet long and 20 feet deep to serve 45 acres of moorage in St. Herman's Bay. H.Doc. 501. 82nd Cong.. 2nd Sess. Section 202. P.L. 99-662 S.Doc. 6. 96th Cong.. 1st Sess. Section 102. Water Resource Development Act of 1990. P.L. 101-640. 101st Cong. -32-14- H. Doc. 286. 84th Cong.. 2d Sess. 2 H.Doc. 34. 85th Cong.. 1st Sess. 2 P.L. 88-451 Section 107. P.L. 86-645 Authorized by Chief of Engineers. Nov. 13. 1981 S. Doc. 249. 75th Cong.. 1st Sess. Jul. 3. 1958 Jul. 3. 1958 Jul. 2, 1958 Aug. 19. 1964 Jul. 14. 1960 Aug. 13. 1968 Sep. 2. 1954 Nov. 17. 1986 Nov. 28. 1990 ALASKA DISTRICT Table 32-B (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized METLAKATLA HARBOR, AK Dredging small boat basin 2.18 acre in extent to a depth of 10 feet below plane of mean lower low water; construction of rubblemound breakwater 900 feet long. Entrance channel and two rubblemound breakwaters enclosing a 7.0 acre basin. NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK Basin 320 feet long by 150 feet wide with depth of 2 feet above mean lower low water, approach channel 400 feet long and 50 feet wide with depth of 9 feet above mean lower low water. protected by 410 foot jetty. NOME HARBOR, AK Two jetties. easterly 335 feet and westerly 460 feet long revetment. channel and basin 200 feet wide and 250 feet long. Extension of the jetties and enlarging basin to 250 feet wide and 600 feet long.3 Seawall SITKA HARBOR, AK Boat harbor consisting of 3 rubblemound breakwaters. ST. GEORGE, AK Dredging the maneuvering area from an average depth of 3 feet above mean lower low water to 18 feet below mean lower low water and dredging the entrance channel from an average depth of 14 feet below mean lower low water to 20 feet below mean lower low water. ST. PAUL ISLAND, AK Add 1.050 feet of breakwater at existing crest height. 37 below feet mean lower low \ater and 1.000 feet long with a crest height of 18 above mean lower low water. Deepen the entrance channel to -30 feet. Enlarge and deepen the maneuvering basin to -29.0 feet with an area of 415 by 830 feet. Wave spending beach to +4 feet. Three offshore reefs each. 1.300 feet long. constructed to a depth of-12 feet. Wave energy channel 100 feet wide with bottom elevation of +2 feet. WRANGELL HARBOR, AK Breakwater 300 feet long to protect southern portion of harbor. Mooring basin 600 feet long. 400 feet wide, and 10 feet deep. Inner basin and connecting channel from the existing mooring basin, both 10 feet deep at mean lo~wer low water, and breakwater 320 feet long on the reef north of Snakes Island. Mar. 2. 1945 Oct. 27. 1965 H.Doc. 161. 67th Cong.. 2d Sess. H.Doc. 202. 72nd Cong.. 1st Sess. H.Doc. 284. 76th Cong.. 1st Sess. -32-15- H.Doc. 138, 76th Cong., 91st Sess. Section 201, P.L. 89-298 S. Doc. 92-64, 92d Cong., 2d Sess. 2 Authorized Oct. 12, 1972 H.Doc. 34. 85th Cong.. 1st Sess. 2 H.Doc. 1932. 64th Cong., lst Sess. 2 H.Doc. 404, 71st Cong., 2d Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 38. 73d Cong., 2d Sess. Reports of Chief of Engineers dated March 8, 1948 Water Resource Development Act of 1992. H.Doc. 103-37. 103rd Cong., Ist Sess. Section 107 of The Rivers and Harbors Act of 1960. Public Law 86-645. as amended. Section 202. P.L. 99-662 Section 101(b)(3). P.L. 104-303 Water Resources Development Act of 1996. Documents 10. Jul. 3. 1958 Aug. 8. 1917 Aug. 30. 1935 Jun. 16. 1948 Oct. 31. 1992 12. .13. Nov. 17. 1986 14. Nov. 17. 1986 Oct. 12. 1996 15. Sep. 22. 1922 Aug. 30. 1935 Mar. 2. 1945 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 Table 32-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 16. BETHEL BANK STABILIZATION, AK Nov. 17, 1986 Streambank protection by placing riprap along 8.500 feet of Section 202. P.L. 99-662 riverbank. 17. CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK Aug. 13. 1968 Provides for construction of adam and floodway for the Chena H. Doc. 148. 90th Cong.. 2nd Sess. River (17 miles east of Fairbanks) for a dam and reservoir on the P.L. 90-483 Little Chena River. and for a 27 mile long levee system with interior drainage works on the north side of the Tanana River. 18. Dec. 19, 1985 DILLINGHAM EMERGENCY BANK STABILIZATION, Sec. 114 P.L. 99-190 AK Install 1.600 feet of steel sheetpile bulkhead along the toe of the bluff from the Dillingham city cargo dock to Snag Point. 19. HOMER SPIT, AK Nov. 28. 1990 Extension of an existing rubblemound revetment along an Sec. 101, Water Resource Development existing sheetpile wall to provide protection and nourishment Act of 1990. along a 1400 foot portion of State highway. P.L. 101-640, 101st Cong. 1. Purchase of dredge and deepwater jetties deauthorized November 6. 1977 under section 12. Public Law 93-251. 2. Contains latest published map. 3. Extension of jetties classified "inactive". 4. Little Chena Dam deauthorized in 1991. -32-16- ALASKA DISTRICT -32-17- TABLE 32-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS Project Apoon Mouth of Yukon River. AK i Bar Point Harbor. AK2 Bethel Small Boat Harbor. AK Cook Inlet Shoals, AK Cordova Harbor. AK2 Cordova. AK Craig Harbor. AK Douglas Harbor. AK Dry Pass. AK Egegik River. AK Elfin Cove, AK Gastineau Channel. AK Haines Harbor. AK2 Homer Harbor. AK2 Hoonah Harbor. AK Humboldt Harbor. AK Iliuliuk Harbor. AK Juneau Harbor. AK Kake Harbor. AK Kasilof Harbor. AK 2 Ketchikan Harbor, AK Kodiak Harbor. AK Mekorykuk. AK Myers Chuck Harbor. AK Naknek River. AK Neva and Olga Straits. AK Old Harbor. Kodiak Island. AK2 Pelican Harbor. AK Petersburg Harbor. AK Port Alexander. AK Port Lions. AK2 Rocky Pass. AK St. Michael Canal. AK Seldovia Harbor. AK Sergius Whitestone. AK Seward Harbor. AK Sitka Harbor. AK Skagwvay Harbor. AK Stikine River. AK Valdez Harbor. AK Wrangell Narrows, AK 1. Abandonment recommended in H.Doc. 467. 69th Cong.. 1st Sess. 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107). 3. In addition. $272.779 of State funds. 4. Includes $656,240 for Sec. 107 project. 5. In addition. $925,500 of State funds. 6. In addition. $973,875 of State funds. Status Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed For Last Cost to Sep. Full Report O See Annual Report for Construction Mair 1920 128.896 1983 2,000,0003 1985 1,520,272 1977 1,220,000 1978 843,534 1986 9,642,000 1983 1,033,5004 1963 282.019 1983 943.351 1972 4.441 1959 154,191 1964 789,461 1977 1,000,0005 1987 2.000.000 1983 4.255.0006 1977 3.679.6837 1941 66,037 1974 1.381,150 1991 870.700 1975 109.848 1979 1.602.417 1973 1.891.2128 1986 1.372.139 1970 9.700 1961 20.789 1960 155.009 1972 370.415 1964 369.683 1972 252.932 1949 17.000 1986 1.825.311 1960 337.668 1916 377.062 1974 1.051.8839 1973 1.798.010 1973 712.36910 1973 1.611.009 1972 133.180 1987 1968 649.74011 1979 3.562.343 7. In addition. $857.000 of State funds. 8. Includes $594.163 for rehabilitation. 9. Includes $400.000 for rehabilitation. 10. Includes $90.026 for rehabilitation and $2.528 Code 710. Recreation facilities at Completed projects. S1II. ncludes $73.000 for rehabilitation and $2.713 Code 710. Recreation facilities at Completed projects. 30, 1994 peration and itenance 2.154 5,000 488,156 72.500 23.466 3.107 102.701 260.991 331.256 37.946 132.946 18.973 26.800 560 5.518 1.934 219.789 15.400 32.665 8.804 221.498 309.260 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 TABLE 32-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Project Bethel Bank. Kuskokwim Riverl Fairbanks. Tanana River & Chena Slough. AK Gold Creek. AK Klutina River, Copper Center. AK3 Lowell Creek. AK4 Salmon River. AK Talkeetna River. AK 1. Section 14. 2. In addition. $25.000 expended from contributed funds. 3. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 205). 4. During FY88. $551.690 was expended from FC and CE. Status Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed For Last Cost to S Full Report See Annual Report for Construction 1985 553.970 1943 557,000 1975 876.0062 1973 260.681 1945 416.3825 1963 37,7706 7 1981 516,694 5. In addition $25,000 expended from contributed funds. 6. Includes $34.197 of PWA funds. 7. In addition, $7.000 expended from contributed funds. 8. In addition, $27,400 expended from contributed funds. Sep. 30, 1994 Operation and Maintenance 4,301 30.771 162.9258 TABLE 32-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report for Deauthorized Expended Expended Allison Lake. AK (Valdez Hydropower) 1992 Anchorage Harbor. AK (Uncompleted Portion) 1967 1977 Bradley Lake. AK 1983 1983 1982 46.701.000 Ketchikan Harbor. AK (West Breakwater) 1979 1979 Port Alexander. AK (Inner Harbor) 1949 1977 Tolovana River. AK (Snagging) 1931 1977 Little Chena River Dam 1983 1990 Long Lake Dam 1975 1990 Myers Chuck Harbor. AK 1970 1991 9.700 Scammon Bay, AK 1992 Skagway River, AK 1966 1991 26.385 -32-18- I ALASKA DISTRICT TABLE 32-H NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION NAVIGATION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 107, PUBLIC LAW 86-645, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs King Cove. AK 64,296 Larsen Bay. AK 85.744 Metlakatla. AK 76.666 Ouzinkie. AK 322.931 Tatitlek. AK 102.071 TOTAL 651.708 TABLE 32-I PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS Name of Project Date Date Survey Conducted Sergius and Whitestone Narrows March 1997 Sitka. Western Channel March 1997 Sitka. Crescent Bay Harbor March 1997 Wrangell Narrows (Mi. 13-13.5. 15-16. 20) April 1997 Petersburg. North Harbor April 1997 Haines Harbor April 1997 Seldovia Harbor and Deep Draft Channel May 1997 Kodiak. Near Island Channel May 1997 Valdez Small Boat Harbor June 1997 Cordova Harbor June 1997 -32-19- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR 1997 TABLE 32-J STREAM BANK EROSION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION EROSION ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 14, PUBLIC LAW 79-526, AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) Study Identification Fiscal Year Costs Deering. AK 310.128 Emmonak. AK 20.769 TOTAL 330.897 -32-20- LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT * This district (total area about 230,000 square miles) comprises those drainage basins tributary to the Pacific Ocean that are in California between the Mexican boundary and Cape San Martin (about 265 Miles north of the entrance to the Los Angeles Harbor). The lower Colorado River drainage basin (below Lee Ferry, AZ.) which is southeastern California, southeastern Nevada, southwestern Utah, and all of Arizona, except the northeastern corner; that part of the Great Basin that is in southern Nevada and southeastern California; and the southern Arizona that drain southward into Mexico. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Channel Islands Harbor, CA 2. LA-LB Harbor (LA Harbor), CA 3. Marina Del Rey, CA 4. Morro Bay Harbor, CA 5. Newport Bay Harbor, CA 6. Oceanside Harbor, CA 7. Oceanside Harbor Sand By-Pass, CA 8. Port Hueneme, CA 9. Redondo Beach Harbor (King Harbor), CA 10. San Diego Harbor, CA 11. San Diego River and Mission Bay, CA 12. Santa Barbara Harbor, CA 13. Surfside, Sunset and Newport Beach, CA 14. Ventura Harbor, CA Page 33-02 33-02 33-02 33-03 33-03 33-03 33-04 33-04 33-04 33-04 33-04 33-05 33-05 33-05 Flood Control 15. Alamo Dam, AZ 33-05 16. Clifton, AZ 33-06 17. Hansen Dam (Recreation Development), CA 33-06 18. Holbrook, AZ 33-06 19. Lake Elsinore, CA 33-06 20. Los Angeles County Drainage Area, CA 33-06 21. Los Angeles River Recreation Development, CA 33-07 22. Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, CA 33-07 23. Nogales Wash, AZ 33-07 24. Painted Rock Dam (Gila River), AZ 33-07 25. Phoenix, AZ, and Vicinity (Stage 2) 33-08 26. Pine and Mathews Canyons Dam, Colorado RB, NV33-08 27. Rillito River, AZ 33-08 28. Santa Ana River Mainstem, CA 33-08 29. Santa Ana River Basin and Orange County, CA 33-09 30. Santa Paula Creek, CA 33-09 31. San Luis Rey River, CA 33-09 32. Sepulveda Dam (Recreation Development), CA 33-09 33. Sweetwater River, CA 33-09 34. Tropicana and Flamingo Washes, NV 33-10 35. Tucson Diversion Channel Recreation Development), AZ 33-10 36. Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek, AZ 33-10 37. Whitewater River and Floodwarning, San Bernardino and Riverside County, CA 33-10 38. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects 39. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 40. Flood Control work under Special Authorization General Investigations 41. Surveys 42. Collection and Study of Basic Data 43. Preconstruction Engineering and Design 43A. Carneros Creek, CA 43B. Lower Santa Cruz, AZ 43C. Port of Long Beach, CA 43D. Santa Monica Breakwater, CA 43E. Tucson Drainage Area, AZ 33-11 33-11 33-11 Page 33-11 33-11 33-11 33-11 33-12 33-12 33-12 33-12 Tables Table 33-A Cost and Financial Statement 33-13 Table 33-B Authorizing Legislation 33-19 Table 33-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects 33-31 Table 33-D Other Authorized Shore Protection (formerly Beach Erosion Control) Projects 33-32 Table 33-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 33-33 Table 33-G Deauthorized Projects 33-35 Table 33-H Reconnaince & Condition Surveys 33-36 33-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 NAVIGATION 1. CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA Location. On the coast of southern California about a mile northwest of Port Hueneme, 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor, and 345 miles south of San Francisco. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Charts 5007 and 5202). Existing project. For details see page 33-2 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. For details see page 33-2 of Annual Report for 1989. Operations during fiscal year. Normal maintenance dredging was performed and Hueneme Beach was nourished with 1,300,000 cubic yards of dredge material. Project condition is good. 2. LOS ANGELES AND LONG BEACH HARBORS (LA HARBOR), CA Location. On the coast of southern California in San Pedro bay about 25 miles south of the City of Los Angeles, about 96 miles northwest of San Diego Harbor, and about 410 miles southeast of San Francisco Harbor. Previous projects. For details see page 1977 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1646 of Annual Report 1984. Existing project. The recommended Federal project will include project increments 2 through 5 for the Port of Los Angeles. Estimated cost (October 1997) for existing project is $401,000,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $116,500,000 is Federal ($116,200,000 Corps and $300,000 U.S. Coast Guards) and $284,500,000 is non-Federal. Local cooperation. All items of local cooperation required under the terms of the previous authorizing acts have been fully complied with. See page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1981 for requirements under the terms of the 1976 Water Resources Development Act. The revised recommended project has changed due to the withdrawal of the Port of Long Beach on October 1, 1991. The Port of Los Angeles will receive credit, contingent upon the Secretary of the Army's approval for advance work (Stage 1) performed per WRDA 1988. Project Cooperation Agreement was executed March 18, 1997. Terminal Facilities. In Los Angeles Harbor, 82,553 feet of wharves, of which 75,729 feet are owned by the city and 6,824 feet are owned by private interest. The Final Report presented and recommended four project increments. Increment No. 2 would deepen the existing Los Angeles Harbor approach and entrance channels to Pier 300 to provide better access to dry bulk facilities. Increment No. 3 would further deepen the Los Angeles approach and entrance channel to Pier 300 and part of Pier 400, and deepen a south channel to provide access to the eastern side of Pier 400 and liquid bulk facilities. Increments No. 4 and 5 would extend Increment No. 3 of Los Angeles to provide access to container terminals that would be located on part of Pier 300 and Pier 400. The material obtained from the dredging will be used to create new landfill within the port and shallow water habitat for the least tern. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance dredging of the Los Angeles Harbor (East and West Basins) is affecting navigability of these waterways. A Comprehensive Condition Survey of San Pedro Breakwater (west) indicated that the structure's elevation is below project design. It is expected that the current elevation for the Middle Breakwater (detached) and Long Beach Breakwater (east-detached) will also be lower than the original elevation. Project condition is fair. Record of decision was issued on 21 January 1994. The Port began advance construction of Stage 1, September 1994 with completion planned for May 1997. Actual Federal construction of Stage 2 to begin June 1997. 3. MARINA DEL REY, CA Location. Marina Del Rey is located on Santa Monica Bay, 15 miles west of downtown Los Angeles, 29 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor and 390 miles southeast of San Francisco Bay. Existing project. For details see page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1981. Existing Federal navigation project consists of two jetties a breakwater and navigation channels. A severe shoaling problem in the harbor is complicated by contaminated materials, causing a potential threat to navigation and costly maintenance. Local cooperation. Fully complied with County of Los Angeles Department of Beaches and Harbors requested a new study, and local support expressed by letter dated August 5, 1992. Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement signed February 21, 1997. Terminal facilities. There are over 6,000 berths servicing recreational craft within the Harbor and 28 additional transient slips located at Chase Park. A Coast Guard Station with a permanently assigned 82-foot cutter; a fire fighting detachment with a fire boat, a pumper, a ladder truck; and a Sheriffs Harbor Patrol with five patrol boats and five auxiliary vessels are on 24- 33-2 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT hour duty. A fuel dock is located on the west side of the main channel. A 10-lane public launching ramp with parking for 740 cars and trailers; dry storage for 396 trailer-borne boats; and several commercial hoists are in operation as well as two haulout yards, one containing a 100-ton and a 60-ton marine travel lift. Six hotels, 14 public parking lots, 26 restaurants, 19 apartment complexes, a ship chandlery, a fisherman's village shopping and tourist center, 26 restaurants, several snack bars, five coffee shops, and eight yacht clubs call the marina home port. Also included are sailing instruction, boat rental, repair and storage, harbor tours, sport fishing, yacht clubs, and retail facilities. Operations during fiscal year. There are elevated levels of contaminants contained within the Marina's sediments. Portions of the Marina's sediments unsuitable for unrestricted open disposal. Efforts were underway to identify suitable disposal areas for these sediments and investigate potential source of contaminants and establish necessary control measures. Project condition is fair. 4. MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA Location. On coast of southern California 110 miles south of Monterey Bay, 120 miles northwest of Santa Barbara Harbor, and nearly midway between San Francisco and Los Angeles. (see Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5387). Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1980. Local cooperation. PCA executed on April 7, 1995. Terminal facilities. Facilities which are adequate for existing commerce, comprise 640 feet of existing piers and 150 feet of floating docks constructed by San Luis Obispo County; 263 feet of floating docks constructed by California Department on Parks and Recreation; 1,396 feet of floating docks constructed by the city of Morro Bay; 1,398 feet of privately owned piers; and 5,435 feet of privately owned floating docks. Operations during the fiscal year. Approximately 49,000 cubic yards were removed from the Modified Entrance Channel, 12,000 cubic yards were removed from the Main Channel, and 2,000 cubic yards from the Morro Channel. This work was performed by the Portland District's dredge "Yaquina". Project condition is good. 5. NEWPORT BAY HARBOR, CA. Location. Forty miles southeast of Los Angeles. Existing project. Provides rubblemound entrance jetties, 920- foot deep and 500 foot wide entrance channel and main channel, inner channels, a turning basin, and anchorage areas. Upper Newport is a shallow 800 acre Marine Estuary. Navigation project maintained by Corps of Engineers. Pursuant to Section 841 and subject to Section 903 (b) of WRDA, 1986 the project for navigation for the Harbor is modified to dredge and maintain a 250-foot wide channel in Upper Newport Bay to boundary of Upper Newport Bay State Ecological Preserve to a depth of 15- feet. Local cooperation. Orange County by letter dated March 25, 1987. Letters of support dated March 3, 1993 and December 1994. Letter dated March 1, 1995 expressed sponsor's interest in proceeding to feasibility phase. In a resolution dated August 20, 1996, Orange County Board of Supervisors indicated strong support of feasibility study and understanding of cost sharing requirements. Operations during fiscal year. Repairs to the East West Jetties were completed in March 1997. Wording in the FY97 Congressional Add directed the Corps to replace the concrete cap on the East Jetty. However, funds provided were barely adequate to cover the basic part of the contract, so the cap replacement was nto accomplished. Project condition is good. 6. OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA Location. On the coast of southern California at Oceanside, about 30 miles north of City of San Diego and 80 miles south of Los Angeles. Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Oceanside Small Harbor Craft District sent letter of support dated April 1985 and Letter of intent in March 1989. Project Cooperation Agreement, executed in January 1993. Terminal Facilities. Berthing for 957 boats, single-tie slips, 38 double-tie slips and 136 side-ties, of which 54 are visitors' slips; 12 dry storage spaces at Oceanside Marine Center; a fuel dock; a boat hoist; a launching ramp, which can accommodate 4 launchings at the same time; parking for 1,732 cars; with temporary parking for about 141 boat trailers; a boat-repair facility; a pump-out facility; a Coast Guard cutter; restaurants; retail stores; yacht brokers; a hotel/motel; condominiums; and a sport-fishing facility. Navigation improvements includes new dredging and biannual dredging of expanded entrance channel area. Operations during the fiscal year. Routine annual maintenance dredging was performed including associated hydro surveys. Project condition is completed in August 1994. 33-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 7. OCEANSIDE HARBOR SAND BYPASS, CA Location. On the coast of southern California along Oceanside Beach near jetty, about 30 miles north of city of San Diego and 80 miles south of Los Angeles. Existing project. Underwater experimental pumping system with the pumps, fluidizers, and submerged pipeline to remove sand from harbor entrance and deposit it to down coast beaches, on a continual basis. Phase I and Phase II have both been completed and successfully tested. The experiment is complete and we have determined the bypass technology can be installed with a successful operation but, not at Oceanside. Local cooperation. City of Oceanside officials are in full support of the closure of the experimental bypass project. Operation during fiscal year. A contract to dismantle the System was awarded. Dismantling and demobilization have been completed. 8. PORT HUENEME, CA Location. On the coast of southern California about 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, about one mile southeast of Channel Islands Harbor, immediately west of the City of Port Hueneme, four miles southwest of the City of Oxnard, and 10 miles southeast of the City of Ventura. Existing project. Authorized in 1970 for restudy of completed project. The harbor serves both military and commercial uses with port facilities consisting of terminals, wharves, and warehouses servicing a wide variety of products. The existing Federal project consists of an approach channel, entrance channel, central basin, and two rubblemound jetties. The Navy has plans to utilize the harbor more extensively for vessel berthing and repair; effectively reducing maneuverability in the harbor. Harbor District would like to use deeper draft wood pulp carrier vessels and possibly tankers. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1976. The Oxnard Harbor District reviewed and agreed to sign the Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement on January 3, 1996. Operations during the fiscal year. Hydrographic survey performed July 1997. Project condition is fair. 9. REDONDO BEACH HARBOR (KING HARBOR), CA Location. On the coast of southern California on the southern portion of Santa Monica Bay, about 17 miles southwest of Los Angeles. Existing project. For details, see page 33-4 of Annual Report for 1981. WRDA of 1986 (H.R. 6) Conference Bill, Title VIII - Project Modification, Section 809 - King Harbor, Redondo Beach, CA modifies the King Harbor project in order to carry out maintenance dredging and for breakwater construction, and authorized the Secretary to restore the breakwater to a height of 22 feet and maintain breakwater at such height to provide greater protection from heavy wave action. Local cooperation. City of Redondo Beach officials are in full support of the study and have indicated desire to construct improvements to reduce continued storm related damages. Operations during fiscal year. Repairs to breakwater with modifications were completed in September 1992. A condition survey of the North Breakwater has indicated structural support failure to the armor stone in areas along the landward side (inner harbor) and a sloughed area on the seaward side in the middle of the breakwater. Neither condition jeopardizes the structure and both will be monitored closely. Project condition is good. 10. SAN DIEGO HARBOR, CA Location. On the coast of southern California just north of the Mexican border, about 109 miles southeast of Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Chart 5107). Previous projects. For details, see page 1976 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1642 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For details, see pages 33 and 34 of Annual Report for 1980. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on pages 33 to 35 of Annual Report for 1980. Terminal facilities. Consist of 45,070 feet of wharves, exclusive of Government-owned and 24,000 feet are privately owned. Government-owned wharves at North Island are restricted to military use only. Operations during fiscal year. Project condition is good and there is some minor shoaling of the entrance channel. Normal maintenance was performed. 11. SAN DIEGO RIVER AND MISSION BAY, CA 33-4 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT Location. The project is located at the mouth of the San Diego River about six miles northwest of the San Diego business district, San Diego County, California. Existing project. For details, see page 33-3 of Annual Report for 1991. Authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1944, the existing project consists of a leveed channel, entrance channel, main channel, altered railroad bridge, anchorage basins (West Anchorage and Quivira) and three jetties. Construction of a 1,200-foot long weir restored design conveyance capacity at the mouth of the San Diego River. A sand plug in mouth of river reduced flood carrying capability from 115,000 cfs to 35,000 cfs, equal to a 100-year flood. The temporary timber pile breakwater at Quivira Basin was replaced with a permanent rubblemound breakwater. Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed July 1996 with the city of San Diego. Operations during the fiscal year. The timber pile baffle at the entrance to Quivira Basin was removed and replaced with a permanent rubblemound. The new breakwater will be maintained by the local sponsors, per the cost sharing agreements. 12. SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA Location. On the coast of southern California, 90 miles northwest of Los Angeles Harbor. Existing Project. For details on original, see page 33-4 Annual Report for 1983. For reevaluation details see WRDA, 1986. The recommended plan includes acquiring a permanent dredge for the city and they will assume the operation and maintenance of the channel. Local cooperation. See page 1015 of Annual Report for 1969, for items of local cooperation under 1962 authorized modification of existing project. The city reaffirmed its support on February 8, 1994. Operations during fiscal year. Routine annual maintenance dredging was performed including associated hydro graphic surveys. Project condition is good. 13. SURFSIDE, SUNSET AND NEWPORT BEACH, CA Location. Project extends along Orange County Coast, 17 miles, from San Gabriel River mouth down coast to Newport Bay Harbor entrance. Existing project. Authorization Section 101 of Rivers and Harbors Act 1962. Project is a periodic continuing construction project. Local cooperation. State of California, Orange County, Cities of Newport and Huntington Beach, and Surfside Colony. Letter of Intent dated August 11, 1995 from the State of California Department of Boating and Waterways, coordinating sponsor. Funding aggreement with the State of California was executed on April 30, 1996. Operations during the fiscal year. Stage 10 comprised of nourishment of about 1,600,000 cubic yards of sand at Surfside- Sunset from an offshore borrow site, fronting the northern part of Bolsa Chica State Beach. It also included nourishment at West Newport Beach of about 140,000 cubic yards of sand that will be moved by land-based equipment, just downcoast from the mouth of the Santa Ana River. Stage 10 construction completed in July 1997. 14. VENTURA HARBOR, CA Location. Located 65 miles northwest of Los Angeles and six miles northwest of Channel Island Harbor. Existing project. For details, see page 33-5 of the Annual Report for 1981. Reevaluation under WRDA 1990 consists of modification to the exiting harbor by constructing a separate South Beach groin, extending the offshore breakwater, adding a spur groin to the north jetty and detached breakwater, and deepening and extending the entrance channel and sand trap. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Routine annual maintaince dredging was performed includitn associated hydro surveys. An FY97 Supplemental Appropriations of $5,150,000 was established to fully dredge the Sand Trap and to repair the South Jetty and the Detached Breakwater. $55,000 of these funds were used in FY97 to proceed with engineering and design efforts with the remaining funds witheld in the Office of the Chief of Engineers and carried over into FY98. Project condition is fair. FLOOD CONTROL 15. ALAMO DAM, AZ Location. About 70 miles southeast of Kingman, AZ on the Bill 33-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Williams River, AZ a tributary of the Colorado River. Existing project. For details, see page 33-7 of Annual Report 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance were performed and a periodic inspeciton of the project was conducted. Project condition is good. 16. CLIFTON, AZ Location. Located on San Francisco River Approximtely 170 miles northeast of Tucson in Greenlee County, AZ. Existing project. The project consists of both structural and nonstructural elements, including an earthfill levee about 3,000 feet long, with floodgates and floodwalls. Implementation will involve flood proofing of 11 businesses, flood plain evacuation plans, and recreation development. Estimated cost (October 1997) for existing project is $24,100,000 (includes $2,600,000 cash contribution and $5,400,000 other costs). Local cooperation. The State of Arizona, Division of Emergency Services, is the local sponsor. Project Cooperation Agreement executed on July 30, 1993. Operations during fiscal year. Construction of the levee and floodwall was completed August 1995 and turned over to sponsor December 1996. 17. HANSEN DAM, CA Location. In the San Fernando Valley area of the city of Los Angeles about 20 miles northwest of downtown Los Angeles. Recreation lake and facilities lie within flood control basin boundaries. Existing project. Original project authorized under Flood Control Act 1936, and modified by WRDA 1986, Section 847 Energy and Water Development Act 1992 (PL 102-104). Proposed plan is to construct a 10.5-acre recreation lake, picnic facilities, access roads, and parking lots. Local cooperation. Project is 50/50 cost shared with the City of Los Angeles. Operations during fiscal year. Completed Phase I Recreation Lake Construction; awarded final Phase II in 3rd qtr of FY97. 18. HOLBROOK, AZ Location. Located along the Little Colorado River in the City of Holbrook, AZ, about 150 miles northeast of Phoenix. Existing project. The completed project will provide 100-yearflood protection to 696 residences and 205 commercial, industrial, and public building. Estimated cost (October 1996) for this project is $14,600,000, of which $11,000,000 is Federal and $3,600,000 is non-Federal (includes $1,935,000 cash contribution and $1,665,000 other costs). Local cooperation. The City of Holbrook signed the Project Cooperation Agreement, on August 24, 1993. Operations during fiscal year. Construction initiated July 1995 and completed in December 1996. Final inspection of levee was performed January 22, 1997. 19. LAKE ELSINORE, CA Location. In Riverside County, about 70 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles, and 30 miles southeast of the city of Corona. Existing project. The project consists of an earthen-trapezoid outlet channel about 2.5 miles long, with a 30-foot to 80-foot base and IV on 3H side slopes. The outlet channel will relieve flooding at the 100-year-flood level around the perimeter of the lake. The project included building six bridges and protecting an endangered species habitat. The project was completed in September 1994. Local cooperation. Riverside County Flood Control Water Conservation District signed the LCA on March 27, 1992. Operations during fiscal year. Revised project cooperation agreement to reflect Federal expenditures for the flood control project at $7,500,000. Initiated Sec 205 study report addressing advisability of modifying the project for flood control. 20. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA Location. Along Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers, Rio Hondo, and Compton Creek, CA. Previous Project. For Details, see pages 1768 to 1772 of Annual Report for 1942; page 1602 of Annual Report for 1942; and page 1535 of Annual Report for 1943. For details on units see Annual Report for 1991. Authorized WRDA 1990 Section 101 .B; Chief of Engineers Report 4 June 1992. 33-6 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT Existing project. Project consists of channel improvement to lower Los Angeles, Rio Hondo Rivers, Compton Creek, and modification/replacement of as many as 27 bridges necessitated by the channel improvements. A map of the rehabilitation plan is in "General Design Memorandum, Los Angeles River Rehabilitation under the Major Rehabilitation Program," dated January 1984 and revised in March 1984. Estimated cost (October 1996) for existing project is $240,000,000 of which $180,000,000 is Federal and $60,000,000 is non-Federal (includes $38,460,000 cash contribution and $21,540,000 other costs). Local cooperation. The Los Angeles County, Department of Public Works has actively participated in extensive briefings with representatives of Los Angeles County, Board of Supervisors and most of the affected Congressmen. Project Cooperation Agreement was signed, August 1995. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance were conducted. Periodic inspections at Santa Fe Dam and Whittier Narrows Dam took place. A Hydraulic Fracturing Study for Whittier Narrows Dam was performed. The soft-bottom cleanout of Compton Creek Channel was underway. Relief Well testing at.Whittier Narrows Dam was completed. Project condition of dams and channels is good. 21. LOS ANGELES RIVER RECREATION DEVELOPMENT, CA Location. Upper Los Angeles River from Sepulveda Flood Control Basin (located 25 miles northwest of the city of Los Angeles) to the confluence of the Arroyo Seco channel, a distance of 20 miles. Existing project. The upper Los Angeles River consists primarily of a rectangular channel from the Sepulveda Basin to a point approximately four miles above the Arroyo Seco, thence as a trapezoidal channel of the Arroyo Seco. Local cooperation. Project is 50/50 cost shared with City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation. Operations during fiscal year. This project was created in FY94, funds in the amount of $400,000 were provided to initiate and complete a master plan (MP). 22. MOJAVE RIVER DAM, MOJAVE RIVER BASIN, CA Location. On Mojave River at the Forks site, just downstream from the mouth of Deep Creek and about 14 miles upstream from Victorville, in Mojave River Basin, CA. Existing project. For details, see page 33-8 of Annual Report for 1983. Local cooperation. In a letter dated February 20, 1996 San Bernardino County Flood Control District expressed support for the study. In a September 1997 letter, Mojave Water Agency expressed willingness to cost share feasibility. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance was conducted. Project condition is good. Local agencies have indicated interest in operating and maintaining recreational development immediately upstream and downstream of the dam. This will help considerably in controlling access. 23. NOGALES WASH, AZ Location. At the Mexican Border, in extreme southern Arizona in central and northern portions of the city'ofNogales, about 60 miles south of Tucson. Existing project. Plans include a lateral collector channel to capture Overland Street flow and divert in into the existing covered channels; a 3,300-foot-long grouted stone/concrete channel system in the Chula Vista community, and a flood warning system and recreation component associated with Chula Vista channels. Current plan includes a flood warning system in Mexico and United States. Estimated cost (October 1997) for existing project is $525,000, $309,000 of which is Federal and $131,000 is non-Federal. Local cooperation. Project Cooperation Agreement scheduled for execution in May 1998. Operation during fiscal year. Chula Vista channel and levee portion of project was reclassified to "inactive" category because of local sponsor's inability to cost-share. Reclassification approved by SPD 31 October 1995. 24. PAINTED ROCK DAM (GILA RIVER), AZ Location. About 20 miles northwest of Gila Bend, and 120 miles southwest of Phoenix, AZ. Existing project. For details, see page 33-9 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on 33-9 of Annual Report for 1981. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance were performed. Some reparis for damages caused 33-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 by spillway flow in 1993 will be accomplished in FY98. Project condition is fair. 25. PHOENIX, AZ, AND VICINITY (STAGE 2). Location. Project located in Maricopa County, AZ, adjacent to metropolitan Phoenix, AZ. Existing Project: For details see Annual Report FY91 page 33- 7. Map of modified plan is in "Design Memorandum No. 3, General Design Memorandum Phase I, plan Formulation for New River and Phoenix City Streams, Arizona," Prepared by Los Angeles District in March 1981. Plan of improvement provides for construction of 2 detention basins and recreation facilities; ACDC, 16.5 miles long of which 4,300 linear feet (LF) is covered at Paradise Valley and Alta Vista (locals withdrew support for Central Ave), total levees about 4.0 miles, flowage easement about 19.5 miles long; 3.1 mile channel along new and Agua Fria River's; and bank stabilization about 2.2 miles along Skunk Creek and New River. Adobe Dam Cave Butte Dreamy Draw. Local cooperation. Requirements are described in full on page 33-9 Annual Report for 1981. Project Cooperation Agreement relating to covered channel executed on July 8, 1992 by Flood Control District of Maricopa County. Operations during fiscal year. Prepared an O&M Manual for the project. Project is completed. Project close out is in progress. 26. PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS DAMS, COLORADO RIVER BASIN, NV Location. In Lincoln County, NV, about 100 miles north of Hoover Dam and about 17 and 20 miles, respectively, east of Caliente, NV. Existing project. For details, see page 33-13 of Annual Report for 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance were performed. Project condition is good. 27. RILLITO RIVER, CA Location. The project is located in Tucson metropolitan area of Pima County, AZ. Existing project. Plan of improvement includes: building a soil cement bank for erosion control and grade-control structures in the channel bottom to prevent degradation along 13.2 miles of the river. Estimated cost (October 1997) for existing project is $33,500,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $25,000,000 is Federal and $8,500,000 is non-Federal (includes $6,243,000 credit in lieu of cash for advance work and $2,257,000 other costs). Local cooperation. Pima County Transportation and Flood Control District submitted letters of assurance on February 24, 1986 and May 6, 1987. Project Cooperation Agreement was executed in June 1994. Operation during fiscal year. Construction for first increment from North Campbell to Shannon Road was completed in May 1995. The second increment from Camino De La Tierra to Santa Cruz River was initiated November 1995 and completed October 1996. 28. SANTA ANA MAINSTEM, CA Location. Along a 75-mile reach of the Santa Ana River in San Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange Counties, emptying into the Pacific Ocean between the cities of Newport Beach and Huntington Harbor, 50 miles south of Los Angeles, and 90 miles north of San Diego. Existing project. For details, please see page 33-9 of the Annual Report for 1987. Plan of improvement: Seven Oaks Dam, management of overflow area - Seven Oaks to Prado; raise Mill Creek Levee; additional storage at Prado; improvements along: Oak Street Drain/Riverside Co., Santiago Creek/Orange Co., San Timoteo Creek/San Bernardino Co., and Lower Santa Ana River; recreation development: mitigation and preservation. Estimated cost October 1996 for existing project is for $1,333,000,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period, of which $778,000,000 is Federal and $555,000,000 is non-Federal includes $68,000,000 cash contribution and $487,000,000 other costs). Local cooperation. Counties of San Bernardino, Riverside, and Orange. Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on December 14, 1989. Operations during fiscal year. Engineering and design continue on the Lower Santa Ana River, Santiago Creek, Prado Dam and San Timoteo Creek. Complete Construction Reach 5 and Lower Santa Ana River (September 1997), Reach 1 San Timoteo (October 1996). 33-8 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT Continue Construction: Reach 2 San Timoteo, 7 Oaks Embankment/Spillway. .Awarded Construction: Reach 7, Reach 3A San Timoteo (July 1997). As a consequence of the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District (SBVWCD) study of a soft-bottom alternative, the San Timoteo Creek non-Federal Sponsor is evaluating future actions to take in addressing the study results. 29. SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN AND ORANGE COUNTY, CA Location. On the Santa Ana River and tributaries and on other streams in Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, CA. Existing project. For details on units, see Annual Report for 1968. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Orange County Water District advocated an increase in water conservation at Prado Dam up to elevation 505'. Prado Basin includes significant riparian wetlands, including nesting areas of the endangered least Bell's vireo. The Basin is currently under review as proposed critical habitat for the vireo. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance were performed and periodic inspections of Prado Dam and San Antonio Dam were conducted. Project condition of dams and channels is good. 30. SANTA PAULA CREEK, CA Location. Santa Paula Creek is a tributary of the Santa Clara River in the vicinity of the city of Santa Paula, Ventura County, about 16 miles from the ocean and approximately 60 miles northwest of downtown Los Angeles. Existing project. Authorized by Flood Control Act of 1970, Public Law 91-611 (HD 443/80/1), for details see Annual Report FY91, page 33-10. Estimated cost (October 1997) for existing project is $23,700,000, of which $22,100,000 is Federal and $1,600,000 is non-Federal (includes $0 cash contribution and $1,600,000 other costs). Local cooperation. Ventura County Flood Control District. No authorization is required; therefore, the existing Sec 221 Agreement is still binding and was amended in Sep 1996. Operations during fiscal year. Debris due to storms of 1991- 1992 and 1992-1993 caused damage to existing phase one channel. First channel repair completed in May 1993, second repair contract initiated in January 1994. Conference held in May 1993 identified some justifiable alternatives for the reevaluation study regarding deteriorating reach of original project. 31. SAN LUIS REY RIVER, CA Location. Along the lower 7.2 miles of the San Luis Rey River, in and around the city of Oceanside, San Diego County, about 86 miles south of Los Angeles. Existing project. A double levee, 5.4 miles long; stone protected channel with a soft bottom; 1,330 feet of parapet walls at the ocean on the north and south levees; six interior drainage ponds; and a five-mile bike trail. The Water Resource Development Act of 1996 reauthorized the project. Estimated cost (October 1997) $81,600,000 of which $61,100,000 is Federal and $20,500,000 is non-Federal (including $4,100,000 cash contribution). Local cooperation. The city of Oceanside has met all financial requirements to date. Operations during fiscal year. No construction scheduled in FY 97. Project was reauthorized in WRDA 1996. 32. SEPULVEDA DAM (RECREATION DEVELOPMENT), CA Location. The project is located between the communities of Encino and Van Nuys, 15 miles northwest of Los Angeles. Existing project. Flood Control Act 1936 and Public Law 77- 387 1941, and 1989-1972. Primary project purpose is flood control. Subsequent Act of Congress authorized a secondary project purpose for park and recreation. Local cooperation. The recreation project is 50/50 cost shared with the City of Los Angeles. Federal funds will complete Lake Balboa and park with comfort station, trails, fencing, irrigation, childrens play area and revegetation and develop an additional wildlife area. The city will continue reclaimed water distribution and develop several park areas. Operations during fiscal year. Will complete recreation area work and begin wildlife area work in FY97. 33. SWEETWATER RIVER, CA Location. The project empties into San Diego Bay in the city of Chula Vista and National City and unincorporated San Diego County, four miles south of the city of San Diego, and eight 33-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 miles north of the Mexican Border. Existing project. Construction of 3.2 miles of channel improvements along the Sweetwater River from Interstate 805 to San Diego Bay, in combination with State Route 54 and Interstate 5 construction; and construction of two railroad bridges and 188 acres of preservation and mitigation land. Local cooperation. San Diego County signed 221 Agreement in December 1984. Operations during fiscal year. The required environmental monitoring is being performed and expected to continue for the next 2 years. 34. TROPICANA AND FLAMINGO WASHES, NV Location. The project area is located west of and through urbanized Las Vegas community along both Tropicana and Flamingo Washes in southern Nevada. Existing project. The recommended plan will provide urban flood reduction, erosion control and wildlife enhancement for portions of Las Vegas and the surrounding areas to the west and southwest, including the rapidly developing alluvial fan immediately west of Las Vegas. The plan recommends construction of four debris basins, two detention basins, modifications to two existing detention basins, 28 miles of channels connecting these project elements, 43 miles of lateral collectors, environmental mitigation, and recreation facilities. The estimated cost (October 1997) for existing project is $243,000 (includes $42,100 cash contribution and $22,400 other costs.) Local cooperation. The Clark County Regional Flood Control District and the Department of Public Works are the local sponsors for flood control. The Clark County Recreation Department is the potential local sponsor for the recreation feature. The Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed on February 7, 1995. Operations during fiscal year. Continued construction of Tropicana Dam; continue design work for Flamingo Diversion Channel, Upper Red Rock Channel, Blue Diamond Dam, R-4, F- 1, F-2 and F-4 Debris Basins and Channels; and complete design of Tropicana Outlet Channel, Lower Red Rock Channel and Lower Blue Diamond Channel. 35. TUCSON DIVERSION CHANNEL (RECREATION DEVELOPMENT), AZ Location. The Tucson Detention Basin and Diversion Channel is in southeast Arizona. The project area initiates within the basin and proceeds approximately five miles downstream, until it meets Interstate 19. Existing project. The recreational development will consist of a bicycle and hiking trail; four rest areas at the basin's inlet and outlet areas, near the intersection of Park Ave. and Ajo Way, across the street from Wakefield Middle School and the near Interstate 19, where the project ends; four channel undercrossing areas at Ajo Way (near the basin's outlet), Interstate 10; Kino Parkway; and Benson Highway; a restroom facility and five to seven car parking area located near the end of the project area; lighting at rest areas; benches; pedestrian bridges; and landscaping. The flood control channel maintains a 30-40 foot width, with a average 30 foot right-of-way on each side of the channel. The trail system will primarily be located along the north bank of the channel. Local cooperation. Pima County is the local sponsor. Operations during fiscal year. Completed the master plan, public workshop, and Environmental Assessment. Initiated plans and specifications and PCA. Construction is scheduled to start in summer 1997. 36. WHITLOW RANCH DAM, QUEEN CREEK, AZ Location. Fifty miles southeast of Phoenix, AZ in Pinal County, on Queen Creek, AZ a tributary of Gila River, about 10 miles west of Superior, AZ. Existing project. For details see page 33-10 of Annual Report 1981. Project element earthfill Dam, circular conduit outlet works and reservoir. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance were performed. Project condition is good. 37. WHITE WATER RIVER BASIN FLOODWARNING SYSTEM, CA Location. The Coachella Valley area of San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, about 100 miles east of the city of Los Angeles. Existing project. Rain and stream gages have been installed in appropriate locations in the Whitewater River tributary basin. Receiving and processing stations are operational at two local 33-10 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT emergency agency offices. Local cooperation. The Coachella Valley Water District signed the local cooperation agreement in August 1989. The Feasibility Cost Sharing Agreement was signed in July 1994. Operations during fiscal year. Installation of equipment complete. 38. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of 24 completed local flood control projects consisting of the following: 375 miles of channels, six dams, and appurtenances, and 23 debris basins. Inspection costs for FY97 were $631,218. 39. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with Section VII, Flood Control Act of 1944, studies of reservoir operations for flood control were conducted; and preparation of regulations for the use of storage allocated for flood control was continued. The flood control structures were Hoover, Twitchell, and Tat Momolikot Dams. Scheduling costs for FY97 were $150,110. 40. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended (preauthorization) Federal cost for fiscal year was $283,465. Emergency bank protection (sec. 14 of 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Federal cost for fiscal year was $205,921. Emergency flood control activities - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation) Federal cost for fiscal year was $842,471 for disaster preparedness program. There were no flood disasters within the LA District during FY96. Planning and preparedness funding was used to continue coordination with state and local emergency agencies, training, and emergency exercise. This funding was also used to maintain the database for the Emergency Rehab Program and Review approximately 600 sites for future eligibility. Flood insurance activities (sections 1301-1377, 1968 Housing and Urban Development Act, Public Law 90-448, as amended) In coordination with flood control activities, flood insurance studies were continued in accordance with Inter-Agency Agreements under Housing and Urban Development reimbursable order. Total reimbursable in FY97 was none. GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS 41. SURVEYS Total fiscal year costs were $7,508,492 of which $597,925was for navigatgion studies; $2,145,183 was for flood damage prevention studies; $513,670 was for shoreline protection studies; $3,682,549 was for special studies; $32,009 for review of completed projects; $75,654 for special investigations; $1,874 for FERC licensing activities; $6,670 for National Estuary Studies; $7,004 for North American Waterfowl Management Plan; $8,850 for coordination studies with other agencies; and $84,035 for Planning Assistance to States ( $26,088 for Arizona, $3,788 for Utah, and $54,159 for California). 42. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Technical assistance was performed for other Federal agencies as well as non-Federal agencies in connection with Flood Plain Management Services Program at fiscal year costs of $332,267 and $1,945 for hydrologic studies. 43. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Fiscal year expenditures were $395,405 of which $287,916 was for projects not yet fully authorized for construction and $107,489 was for projects fully authorized. 43A. CARNEROS CREEK, CA Location. Located in Goleta Valley area, 6 miles west of Santa Barbara, and 90 miles northwest of Los Angeles. Description. Carneros Creek is one of several streams in the 48- square mile area of Goleta Valley which flow from southern slopes of Santa Ynez Mountains through residential, commercial 33-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 and industrial areas of the Goleta into the Pacific Ocean at Goleta Beach property to be protected is primarily industrial. Local cooperation. Santa Barbara County, Flood Control and Water Conservation District. Under WRDA of 1992 H.R. 6167, the recommended project consists of an off-line excavated debris basin in combination with a diversion channel connecting to an existing borrow pit that will be modified slightly to become a detention basin north of U.S. Highway 101. Operations during fiscal year. Project reclassified to in active status. 43B. LOWER SANTA CRUZ, AZ Location. Study area in lower reach of Santa Cruz River in Pinal County about 50 miles south Phoenix, AZ and lies between town of Red Rock and confluence of Gila River. Damage area is experiencing accelerated urbanization as a result of growth pressure from the Phoenix and Tucson metro areas. Local cooperation. Authorized under Flood Control Act 28 June 1938 (Gila River and Tributaries). Local Sponsor Pinal County Flood Control District reaffirmed support in letter dated, October 26, 1993. Operations during fiscal year. Project is being closed out. 43C. PORT OF LONG BEACH, CA Location. On the coast of southern California along the Pacific Coast in San Pedro Bay about 20 miles south of downtown Los Angeles. Existing Project. The project plan consists of deepening the approach channel to -76 MLLW, from breakwater seaward, a distance of about 2 miles to accommodate deep draft crude tankers. WRDA 1996 authorized project in accordance with the July 1996 Chief of Engineers Report.. Local cooperation. Port of Long Beach expressed support by letter dated April 30, 1995. Operation during the fiscal year. Continue wave gage monitoring. Completed plans and specifications for dredging. 43D. SANTA MONICA BREAKWATER, CA Location. Santa Monica Breakwater is located seaward of the Santa Monica Pier, approximately 15 miles west of downtown Los Angeles. Existing breakwater is 2,000 feet long and lies 1,300 feet from the shoreline. Existing project. The project plan comprises reconstruction of 900 feet of the southern end of the existing breakwater to prevent storm damage and provide shelter to commercial fishing vessels. WRDA 1996 authorized project. The Chief of Engineer did not recommend a new start as a construction project for Federal participation, because storm damage prevention projects are consider to be low priority. Local cooperation. City of Santa Monica. Operations during fiscal year. None. 43E. TUCSON DRAINAGE AREA, AZ Location. Located along Tucson Arroyo/Arroyo Chico Watershed, within the Tucson city limits in Arizona. Existing project. Both the recon report and the feasibility study identified the Tucson Arroyo/Arroyo Chico watershed area (approx. 11.4 sq. Miles) as the major drainage channel within downtown Tucson. The recommended plan has two main features. Consisting of two detention basin complexes - one on Arroyo Chico in the headwaters of the drainage (referred to as Randolph Golf Course Detention Basin Complex), and one on Tucson Arroyo/Arroyo Chico in the approximate center of the watershed (referred to as Park Avenue Detention Basin Complex). The Randolph Golf Course Detention Basin Complex was completed by the local sponsor in May of 1996 using Section 104 credit consideration. Local cooperation. Local sponsor, Pima County Department of Transportation and Flood Control District, expressed support for environmental restroation component in letter dated May 96. Operations during fiscal year. None. 33-12 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 97 TABLE 33-A See Section in Text Project COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Funding FY 94 FY 95 Channel Islands, CA Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbor, CA Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Model Study Marina del Rey, CA (Regular Funds) Morro Bay Harbor, CA 5. Newport Bay Harbor, CA 6. Oceanside Harbor, CA Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 987,000 1,902,000 976,000 1,912,234 485,000 2,391,000 324,000 2,166,477 1,576,000 1,206,823 152,000 151,830 364,000 730,806 156,000 106,602 440,000 4,406,858 642,760 4,431,939 100,000 1,300,000 38,371 100,995 2,191,000 2,157,041 1,580 293,000 1,562,849 1,342,000 1,010,685 794,000 827,115 12,000 12,014 261,162 595,000 599,077 1,921,000 1,875,330 637,000 1,001,053 350,000 314,735 154,000 205,602 1,174,000 1,177,225 124,000 1,300,305 1,671,000 1,672,065 141,000 140,676 (238,000) (122,393) 325,000 317,659 1,699,000 39,974,120 1,650,614 39,880,011 1,569,000 12,045,842 1,104,714 11,457,819 15,000,000 19,440,0002/ 14,858,465 19,006,423 162,000 136734 9,239,887 9,213,969 -30,000 10,269,774 -44,286 10,241,585 0 9,052 1,524,000 1,448,722 970,000 18,167,471 973,031 18,155,054 1,654,000 1,654,991 -62 -62 2,364,700 2,364,236 3,734,9386/ 284,938 531,000 11,878,787 400,307 11,738,664 33-13 FY 96 Total FY 97 Cost 30 Sep 97 New Work: Approp. Cost 2. 5,123,345 5,123,345 3. 4. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 97 TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sec- Total tion in Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Cost Text 30 Sep 97 7. Oceanside Harbor Sand By- Pass, CA 8. Port Hueneme CA 9. Redondo Beach (King Harbor) 10. San Diego Harbor, CA 11. San Diego River and Mission Bay, CA New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 735,000 4,730,000 452,850 1,361,946 155,000 148,337 401 132,000 131,289 300,000 715,450 291,400 285,963 721,000 655,221 70,000 68,032 0 24,756,900 766,469 21,715,540 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 129 122,000 116,966 177,491 4,488 646,000 650,458 1,542,000 401,124 142,000 139,732 -400,000 913,897 19,000 16,820 1,185,000 1,186,000 1,481,165 1,472,534 5,235,343 5,235,295 18,501,990 18,501,990 5,470,191 5,461,279 7,884,345 7,849,195 3,580,689 3,577,546 12. Santa Barbara Harbor, CA Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost: 1,268,500 2,102,000 1,395,554 2,136,128 360,000 165,347 13. Carlsbad Boulevard New Work: Carlsbad, CA Approp Cost (26,000) 143,488 50,000 40,00 1,558,000 1,543,576 40,000 61,678 150,000 153,538 1,318,000 20,737,774 1.239.512 20.637.017 10,000 19,316 1,800,000 1,805,493 941,000 105,829 2,000,000 1,999,431 33-14 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 97 TABLE 33-A See Section in Text Project Funding COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT FY 94 FY 95 14. Surfside, Sunset and Newport Beach, CA 15. Ventura Harbor (Ventura Marina), CA 16. Alamo Dam, AZ New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 200,000 1,000,000 167,224 369,830 996,000 1,283,000 1,010,685 1,277,364 4,838,000 4,805,995 190,370 (508,000) 187,378 2,050,000 1,968,562 (10,000) 1,807 5,804,000 21,409,100 5,505,594 21,079,418 2,095,000 32,701,332 1,973,632 32,490,574 0 5,280,000 -6,633 5,273,367 Maint: Approp. Cost 17. Clifton, AZ 18. Hansen Dam, CA 19. Holbrook, AZ 20. Lake Elsinore, CA 21. Los Angeles County Drainage Area, CA New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 782,000 854,837 916,000 824,529 2,092,000 4,141,000 723,015 5,413,097 100,679 12,557 2,079,000 3,900,000 426,902 3,631,076 3,330,000 3,389,114 183,000 337,421 1,920,000 2,896,000 2,163,630 2,394,814 3,091,000 2,645,400 3,066,494 2,747,049 887,000 968,906 2,463,000 2,616,117 3,488 2,361,000 3,790,129 16,437 4,741,000 4,949,317 4,186,000 3,823,778 1,328,000 15,737,859 857,414 15,184,179 604,000 11,900,00016/ 651,722 11,894,745 00 1,252,000 1,252,000 0 10,800,00018/ 461,526 10,748,526 (500,000) 5,000,000 0 5,000,000 14,424,800 29,615,80020/ 14,392,147 29,154,385 5,612,000 85,057,702 4,791,637 83,536,358 33-15 FY 96 Total FY 97 Cost 30 Sep 97 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 97 TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sec- Total tion in Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Cost Text 30 Sep 97 Los Angeles River, CA (Sepulveda to Arroyo Sec) 23. Mojave River Dam, Mojave River Basin, CA 24. Nogales Wash, AZ 25. Painted Rock, AZ (Gila Rvr) 26. Phoenix, AZ and Vicinity (Gila Rvr) 27. Pine & Mathews Canyons Dam, Colo River 28. Rillito River, AZ 29. Santa Ana River Mainstem, CA (Federal Funds) 30. Santa Ana River Basin OC, CA 31. Santa Paula Creek, CA Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 115,000 108,569 172,000 169,815 2,673,000 2,559,145 300,000 3,034,663 250,000 252,909 254,000 250,243 205,000 107,420 950,000 1,146,834 160,872 254,000 253,642 4,200,000 8,081,000 1,288,643 6,318,272 109,000 99,670 68,000 57,072 4,272,000 4,293,862 39,046 187,000 180,857 6,088,000 10,055,413 3,409,000 5,844,100 67,439,000 3,333,037 5,287,178 71,093,106 1,861,000 1,938,400 2,272,000 1,817,987 1,961,607 2,303,725 1,041,000 1,094,479 800,000 839,848 1,209,000 776,660 181,000 5,612,536 189,578 5,595,713 -66,800 42,509 17,838,198 17,838,198 378,20023/ 376,816 1,494,000 24,077,183 913,109 23,384,647 -190,000 234,041,000 -188,053 234,003,191 106,000 2,419,329 111,531 2,413,711 6000 22,000,00027/ 1,004,659 22,068,581 65,346,000 493,801,000 64,794,411 477,575,895 2,461,000 44,081,494 2,287,217 43,814,612 1,923,000 11,629,020 1,802,238 11,065,277 33-16 22. Maint. Approp. Cost 235,000 120,761 165,000 149,439 0 64,438 0 0 400,000 336,595 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 97 TABLE 33-A See Section in Text Project Funding COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 Total FY 97 Cost 30 Sep 97 32. San Luis Rey River, CA Sepulveda Dam, CA Sweetwater River Basin, CA 35. Tropicana! Flamingo, NV 36. Tucson Diversion Channel (Recreation), AZ 37. Whitlow Ranch Dam, Queen Creek, AZ New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 11,052,000 6,270,000 9,663,873 6,376,513 458,620 458,258 441,484 60,558 122,456 (18,000) 139,346 5,144,000 5,892,000 2,460,985 3,410,635 200,000 139,282 2,850,000 343,088 1,000,000 334,752 1,975,587 2,400,000 2,517,011 3,668,000 8,816,175 0 321,128 -1,000,000 52,676,000 354,927 51,767,194 1,961,000 17,460,940 1,319,802 14,241,001 -100,000 36,363,503 -73,499 36,340,233 9,709,061 9,531,822 24,413,061 24,235,890 0 3,050,000 396,738 1,200,236 1,867,963 1,867,963 Maint: Approp. Cost 38. Whitewater River Floodwarning System, CA 43A. 43B. 43C. New Work: Approp. Cost 94,000 94,691 110,000 102,262 107,000 107,622 310,000 208,391 93,000 92,188 193,000 253,836 65,000 1,685,850 63,606 1,681,685 0 1,038,000 25,398 1,013,695 PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Carneros Creek, New Work: CA Approp. 432,000 93,000 0 Cost 327,325 188,746 8,632 Lower Sta Cruz, New Work: AZ Approp. - - (3,000) Cost 15,664 671 928 Port of Long New Work: 525,000 525,000 902,000 902,000 33-17 33. 34. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 97 TABLE 33-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Sec- Total tion in Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Cost Text 30 Sep 97 Beach, CA Santa Monica Breakwater, CA Tucson Drainage Area, AZ Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 70 10 506 453 155 213 244 245 750 698 225 223 30,000 302 30,000 302 FOOTNOTES: 2/ Excludes non-Federal funds and costs; includes PED appropriation of $4,090,000 and cost of $3,833,223. 6/ Excludes non-Federal sponsors funds $1,913,000 and cost of $1,685,758; includes PED Work Allowanceof $647,000 and cost of $647,000. 16/ Excludes non-Federal funds $376,000 and cost of $367,712; includes PED appropriation $1,600,000 and cost of $1,600,000. 18/ Excludes non-Fed funds $1,470,000 and cost of $1,278,871; includes PED appropriation $2,146,000 and cost of $2,146,000. 20/ Includes PED Work Allowance of $9,650,000 and cost of $9,648,146. Excludes non-Federal Work Allowance of $6,191,000 and cost of $4,299,586. 23/ Excludes non-Federal funds and costs. Excludes PED appropriation and cost due to portions of the project reclassified to "Deferred" and "active" categories. 27/ Excludes non-Federal funds and cost; includes PED appropriation $3,825,000 and cost of $3,825,000. 33-18 43D. 43E. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. Sep. 3,1954 2. June 3, 1988 June 25,1896 July 25, 1912 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA Harbor for light-draft vessels and shore protection works. LOS ANGELES AND LONG BEACH HARBORS, CA A breakwater 8,500 feet long, east of Point Fermin. Extend said breakwater to shore, making a total length of 11,152 feet from Point Fermin. Dredge Los Angeles outer harbor west of entrance channel. For silt-diversion works. Triangular area approach to Los Angeles inner harbor entrance channel. Dredge Los Angeles Harbor main channel and entrance 35 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide; dredge inner harbor turning basin 35 feet deep; and reclamation of Reservation Point. A detached breakwater 12,500 feet long in prolongation of existing breakwater (authorized by act of 1896). Widen fairway on east side of entrance to Los Angeles inner harbor; dredge a channel 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide in Cerritos channel from U.S. station 406 to Long Beach turning basin; entrance channel to Long Beach Harbor 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide; and maintenance of the Long Beach breakwater south of outer end pier A. This act provides that in no case shall dredging be done within 50 feet of established pierhead lines of existing piers and wharves. Dredge 1,000-foot wide entrance channel to Los Angeles outer harbor to 40-foot depth and a turning basin 3,500 feet long and 1,500 feet wide to same depth; and enlarge entrance to inner harbor by dredging to 35-foot depth a triangular area at its junction with turning basin. H.Doc.362,83d Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc.18, 55th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc. 969, 60th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.8, 62d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.9, 64th Cong.,2d sess. H.Doc. 1013, 66th Cong.,3d sess. H. Doc.349, 68th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.33, 71st Cong., 2d sess. S.Doc.130, 71st Con.,2d sess. S.Committee print, 74th Cong., 1st sess. 33-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 17, 1940 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Oct. 22, 1976 Oct. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Dredge to a depth of 40 feet area A and B adjacent to 40-footdepth entrance channel; construct and maintain a rubblemound breakwater of composite type 21,000 feet long in eastward therefrom to Belmont pier;maintenance dredging of A and B, and at mouth of Los Angeles River diversion channel; all subject to such modifications as in discretion of the Chief of Engineers may be advisable to meet requirements of the Navy. Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in West Basin as a modification of existing project. This act provides that the Secretary of the Army is authorized to reimburse local interests for work they have done upon this project prior to July 1, 1953, at actual cost to local interests so far as same shall be approved by Chief of Engineers and found to have been done in accordance with the project hereby adopted and that such reimbursement shall be subject to appropriations applicable thereto or funds available therefore and shall not take precedence over other pending projects of higher priority for harbor improvements; and that such payments shall not exceed $500,000. Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in West Basin as a modification of existing project. Dredge Los Angeles Harbor entrance channel 45 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide, and about 5,500 feet long; Los Angeles channel 45 feet deep, 750 feet wide, and about 12,500 feet long; inner harbor turning basin 45 feet deep, 1,350 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long; East Basin channel 45 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long; West Basin 45 feet deep, from 350 to 1,350 feet wide, and about 3,800 feet long; and East Basin 45 feet deep, from 400 to 950 feet wide, and about 2,000 feet long. This act provides that no dredging shall be done within 125 feet of established pierhead lines, wharves, or other structures. Deepen the entry channel to the Los Angeles Harbor and Long Beach Harbor to 70 feet and 76 feet respectively, including the creation of 800 acres of land from the project. If non-Federal interest carry out any work associated with such project which is later recommended by the Chief of Engineers and approved by the Secretary, the Secretary may credit such non-Federal interest an amount equal to the Federal share of the cost of such work, without interest. 33-20 H.Doc.843, 76th Cong., 3d sess WRDA 86 Sec 201 H.Doc.401,86th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.401,86th Cong., 2d sess WRDA 86, Sec 201. Public Law 100-676. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Nov. 28, 1990 Sep. 25, 1996 3. Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 28, 1994 4. Mar. 2, 1945 5. May 22, 1991 Oct. 27, 1965 6. Oct. 27, 1990 7. May 22, 1991 Section 4(d) of WRDA 1988 (102 Stat. 4015) is amended by inserting after "approved by the Secretary" in the first sentence the following: "or which is carried out after approval of the final report by the Secretary and which is determined by the Secretary to be compatible with the project". The sewer outfall relocated by the Port of Los Angeles at a cost of approximately $12,000,000 shall be considered to be a relocation. The cost of such relocation shall be credited as a payment provided by the non-Federal interest. MARINA DEL REY, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA Harbor for light-draft vessels. Determine advisable modifications in interest of navigation, hurricane and storm damage reduction, environmental restoration and disposal of contaminated sediments from the entrance channel at Marina Del Rey Harbor MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA Adoption and improvement of existing entrance channel to bay, a breakwater extending south by west from Morro Rock, and bay channels and basins at locations and of dimensions substantially as shown on the Navy Department map on file in the Office of the Chief of Engineers. NEWPORT BAY HARBOR (& REVIEW), CA Maintenance and improvement of main and inner channels. Initiate feasibility phase studies re-environmental preservation benefits associated with modification of existing Federal project to extend channels into the Upper Newport Bay. OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA Maintenance of general navigation features of Del Mar Boat Basin and of Oceanside Harbor. OCEANSIDE HARBOR, SAND BY-PASS, CA Navigation and storm damage reduction repair, operate, and maintain the extension of south jetty. WRDA 96 Sec 307 H.Doc.389, 83d Cong., 2d sess. Sec 216, Flood Control Act of 1970, supp. by House Resolution Sep. 28, 1994. H.Doc.283, 77th Cong., 1st sess. Doc.PL99-662 (WRDA 1986, Sec 841). R&H Acts 1937 & 1945 S. Doc. 138 78th Cong. WRDA 1986, Sec.. 841 (PL-9962) H.Doc.76, 89th Cong., 1st sess. PL 101-640 (WRDA 1990) WRDA 1992. 33-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 8. Aug. 13, 1968 9. Mar. 21, 1950 Oct. 17, 1986 Oct. 1988 10. Mar. 3, 1875 Sep. 19, 1890 Jun. 25, 1910 Mar. 4, 1913 Jul 27, 1916 Aug. 8, 1917 Aug. 8, 1917 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 3, 1925 PORT HUENEME, CA Adoption and maintenence of existing harbor for deep-draft vessels; dredged central basin to 35 feet deep, and extend southern-most interior channel. REDONDO BEACH HARBOR (KING HARBOR), CA Maintain harbor dredging and breakwaters. Construct and maintain breakwater to height of 22 feet. SAN DIEGO HARBOR, CA Diversion dike. Jetty on Zuniga Shoal. Dredge channel through outer bar 30 feet deep and 600 feet wide, and a channel through middle ground to 30 feet deep. Dredge channel through outer bar 570 feet wide and 35 feet deep, and a channel through middle ground 32 feet deep. Widen approach (area B) to San Diego municipal pier by dredging area C (north of area B). Dredging area A (south of area B). Dredge 35-foot channel through middle ground. Dredging areas D and E. Widen approach (area C) to San Diego municipal pier 1 by dredging an portion of area F (north of area C). H.Doc.362, 90th cong., 2d sess. R&H Act 1950 (H.Doc 303 81st Cong.) PL99- 662 (WRDA 86, Sec 809), Amended in WRDA 1988. Authorized by Chief of Engineer. Annual Report. 1873; p.1142 H.Ex.Doc. 177, 50th Cong., 1st sess. (Annual Report, 1888; p.2 1 14). H.Doc.961, 60th Cong., 1st session. H.Doc.1309, 62d Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc.648, 64th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.8, 64th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.140, 65th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.1000, 66th Cong., 3d sess. River and Harbors Committee Doc.2, 68th Cong., 1st sess. 33-22 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents July 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Oct. 17, 1940 Mar. 2, 1945 Aug. 13, 1968 11. July 24, 1946 12. Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2, 1945 Oct. 23, 1962 Deepen to 40 feet channel through outer bar; along south and north banks, main channel; dredge turning basin, widen area H, and dredge a chennel to National City and Chula Vista. Widen bay channel to 2,200 feet with depth of 35 feet from the vicinity of Whalers Bight in lower bay to Naval Air Station opposite turning basin. Dredging areas Q.Q-1, M, N, and O. Dredge a seaplane basin (area S.) of about 3,000 acres, 10 feet deep, and fill an area of about 110 acres adjacent to southern end of basin. Dredge triangular approaches to 26-and 35-foot anchorages, area M. Deepen and extend existing navigation channels, delete uncompleted parts, and extend maintenance. SAN DIEGO RIVER AND MISSION BAY, CA Modification of existing flood control project for San Diego River, CA, to include a multiple-purpose project for flood control on San Diego River and small-boat navigation on Mission Bay. SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA Maintenance dredging present depths into harbor formed by breakwater constructed by local interests. Permits maintenance by means of a fixed sand-intercepting plant to be provided and operated by and at expense of local interests. United States to contribute to operating ex pense an amount not to exceed $30,000 annually, whenever funds are allotted therefore; funds thus contributed to be reduced by actual cost of harbor maintenance if and when intercepting plant has been installed. Project for navigation; report of the Chief of Engineers, dated April 26, 1994 Modification of existing project. S.Doc.81, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.223, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc.89, 74th Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.844, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc.390, 77th Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.365, 90th Cong., 2d sess. 1 H.Doc.760, 79th Cong., 2d sess. 1 S.Committee Print, 73d Cong., 2d sess. H.Doc.348, 77th Cong., 1st sess. WRDA 1996 H.Doc.518, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 1 33-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Dec. 31, 1970 Sep. 25, 1996 13. Dredging and maintenance by United States. Complete plans and specs. CARLSBAD BLVD, CARLSBAD, CA 14. Oct. 23, 1962 15. Aug. 13, 1968 Nov. 17, 1988 16. Dec. 22, 1944 Sep.25, 1996 17. Sep. 25, 1996 SURFSIDE, SUNSET & NEWPORT BEACH, CA Beach erosion. Protective measures that comprise a protective and feeder beach at Surfside, and on offshore breakwater at Newport Beach to provide and impounding area from which sand would be dredged and returned periodically to the feeder beach, all substantially in accordance with the plan of the DE. VENTURA HARBOR (VENTURA MARINA), CA Adoption and maintenance of existing general navigation features of harbor, excluding interior basins; construction of an offshore breakwater; dredging a sand trap in lee of breakwater; repairing existing north and middle jetties; and construction of recreational fishing facilities on jetty crests. The Harbor commonly known as Ventura Marina, located in Ventura County, CA, and adopted and authorized by section 101 of Public Law 90-483, shall hereafter be known and designated as "Ventura Harbor". ALAMO LAKE, BILL WILLIAMS RIVER, AZ Multiple-purpose dam and reservoir. Alamo Dam, Arizona-The project for flood control and other purposes, Alamo Dam and Lake, Arizona, authorized by section 10 of the Act entitled "An Act authorizing the construction of certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood control and for other purposes", approved December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 900), is modified to authorize the Secretary to operate the Alamo Dam to provide fish and widlife benefits both upstream and downstream of the Dam. Such operation shall not reduce flood control and recreation benefits provided by the project. CLIFTON, AZ Reauthorized the flood control project at a total cost of $21,100,000. None. Sec 101., H Doc 1160, Water Resources Project Authorization Sec 101 of R&H Act 1992. H.Doc.356, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 100-676. H.Doc.625, 78th Cong., 2d sess. WRDA 96, Title III, Section 301(b)(1) WRDA 1996 Sec 301. modified WRDA 1986. 33-24 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 18. Oct 2, 1992 19. May 22, 1991 20. Feb. 24, 1948 21. June 22, 1936 May 15, 1992 June 28, 1936 Aug. 18, 1937 Dec. 22, 1944 July 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Sep. 3, 1954 HANSEN DAM, CA Develop water conservation on existing spreading grounds HOLBROOK, AZ Flood prevention and protection. LAKE ELSINORE, CA Flood Control in downtown area as well as around perimeter of lake. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA Reservoirs and flood channels for flood control and related purposes at an estimated construction cost not to exceed $70 million. Added flood channels on Ballona Creek and tributaries to project. Provision of lands, easements, and rights-of-way and relocations by Federal Government instead of by local interests. (Resultant Additional cost to the United States, $12,541,000). Project extended to include additional flood control reservoirs, flood control channels, and debris basins for flood control and related purposes. Also authorized to be appropriated $25 million for further accomplishment of plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $25 million for prosecution of comprehensive plan approved in Flood Control Act of Aug. 18, 1941. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $25 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Rio Hondo channel improvement, Whittier Narrows Reservoir to Los Angeles River (in lieu of enlarging channel and bridges on San Gabriel River Downstream from reservoir). Also authorized to be appropriated an additional $40 million for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $12,500,000 for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. PL 102-377 Energy & Water Appropriation Act, 1993. WRDA 1986, PL 99- 662, SEC 401. Sec 205, 1948 Flood Control Act (1). None. None. H. Doc. 838, 76th Cong., 3d Sess. None. None. None. None. None. 33-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 22. July 14, 1960 23. May 17, 1950 24. June 20, 1989 25. July 6,1949 26. Oct. 27, 1965 27. May 17, 1950 $3,700,000 for further prosecution of comprehensive plan. Authorized modifications of Hansen Dam by removing and selling dredged material to facilitate flood control, recreation, and water conservation. The Secretary may convey to the city of South El Monte, CA, approximately 7.778 acres of real property, together with improvements thereon, located within the Whittier Narrows Flood Control Basin. LOS ANGELES RIVER (SEPULVEDA DAM TO ARROYO SECO), CA Recreation development for bicycle/hiking trails along the upper Los Angeles River MOJAVE RIVER DAM, MOJAVE RIVER BASIN, CA Dam and reservoir, and an earthfill dike. Evaluate opportunities for water conservation, environmental restoration, and enhanced flood control, along the Mojave River and Tributaries downstream of the dam. NOGALES WASH Flood Control Protection & Flood Warning System. PAINTED ROCK DAM (GILA RIVER), GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ Dam and flood control basin. PHOENIX, AZ., AND VICINITY (INCLUDING NEW RIVER), GILA RIVER BASIN Detention basins, diversion channels, and channel improvements. PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS DAMS, COLORADO RIVER BASIN, NV Dams and flood control basins. None. None. Flood Control Act 1936, PL 77387 1941, PL 8972 and EWDA 199 H.Doc.164, 86th Cong., 1st sess. HR 2479, Mar. 7, 1996 Energy and Water Development Appropriation Bill 1990., H. Doc. 2696, 101st cong, 1st session H.Doc.331, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.216, 89th Cong., 1st sess H.Doc.530, 81st Cong., 2d sess. 33-26 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents September 26,1997 28. June 20, 1989 September 26, 1997 29. May 20, 1991 30. June 22, 1936 June 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 Dec. 22, 1944 July 3, 1958 Bank erosions control and flood protection. RILLITO RIVER, AZ Flood damage protection. Section 114 of Public Law 101-101, the Energy & Water Development Appropriations Act, 1990, is amended by striking "total cost of $19,000,000" and inserting in lieu thereof, "total cost of $40,000,000." SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, CA Flood control along 75 miles reach of Santa Ana River, recreation development, and mitigation and preservation. SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN (AND ORANGE COUNTY), CA Reservoirs and flood channels for flood control and related pruposes for protection of metropolitan area of Orange County, at an estimated construction cost not to exceed $13 million. San Antonio and Chino Creeks channel portion of improvement. Authorized to be appropriated $6,500,000 for initiation and partial accomplishment of plans for those creeks. 1936, providing that local interests pay for relocations, lands, easements, and rights-of-way. (Estimated resultant additional cost to United States. $3,500,000). Authorized to be appropriated an additional $2,500,000 for prosecution of projects approved in above flood control acts. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $10 million for prosecution of projects adopted in above-mentioned flood control acts, including projects on Lytle and Cajon Creeks for local flood protection at San Bernardino and Colton, CA. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $8 million for prosecution of projects approved in abovementioned flood control acts. WRDA 1986, PL99- 662, Sec 601(a). Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1990. Energy and Water Development Approriations Act 1998 WRDA 1986, PL 99- 662, Energy and Water Appropriation Act 1988, and WRDA. H. Doc. 688, 75th cong., 3d sess. H.Doc.688, 75th Cong., 3d sess None. H. Doc. 534, 78th Cong., 2d sess.1 None. 33-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 17, 1940 Sep. 3, 1954 July 14, 1960 Oct. 22, 1976 Dredge to a depth of 40 feet area A and B adjacent to 40-footdepth entrance channel; construct and maintain a rubblemound breakwater of composite type 21,000 feet long in eastward therefrom to Belmont pier; maintenance dredging of A and B, and at mouth of Los Angeles River diversion channel; all subject to such modifications as in discretion of the Chief of Engineers may be advisable to meet requirements of the Navy. Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in East Basin as a modification of existing project. This act provides that the Secretary of the Army is authorized to reimburse local interest for work they have done upon this project prior to July 1, 1953, at actual cost to local interests for so far as same shall be approved by Chief of Engineers and found to have been done in accordance with the project hereby adopted and that such reimbursement shall be subject to appropriations applicable thereto or funds available therefore and shall not take precedence over other pending projects of higher priority for harbor improvements; and that such payments shall not exceed $500,000. Dredge to a depth of 35 feet in West Basin as a modification for existing project. Dredge Los Angeles Harbor entrance channel 45 feet depth, 1,000 feet wide, and about 5,500 feet long; Los Angeles channel 45 feet deep, 750 feet wide, and about 12,500 feet long; inner harbor turning basin 45 feet deep, 1,350 feet wide, and about 1,650 feet long; East Basin channel 45 feet deep, 400 feet wide, and about 6,000 feet long; West Basin 45 feet deep, from 350 to 1,350 feet wide, and about 3,800 feet long; and East Basin 45 feet deep, from 400 to 950 feet wide, and about 2,000 feet long. This act provides that no dredging shall be done within 125 feet of established pierhead lines, wharves, or other structures. The project for flood control, Santa Ana Mainstem, including Santiago Creek, CA, is modified to authorized the Secretary to develop recreational trails and facilities on lands between Seven Oaks Dam and Prado Dam, including flood plain management areas. 33-28 H.Doc.843, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H.Doc.161, 83 Cong., 1st sess. H.Doc.401, 86th Cong., 2d sess H.Doc 94-594, 94th Cong., 2d sess. 1 Nov. 28, 1990 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 31. Oct. 22, 1976 32. Dec. 17, 1970 Sep. 25, 1996 33. Oct. 22, 1976 34. June11, 1964 35. Oct. 31, 1992 Oct 1, 1996 36. Oct. 22, 1976 37. Jul. 24, 1946 SANTA PAULA CREEK, CA Flood control improvements and prevention. Authorize for flood control. SAN LUIS REY RIVER, SAN LUIS REY RIVER BASIN, CA Channel and levee, and beautification features. The project for flood control of the San Luis Rey River, California, authorized pursuant to section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (42 U.SC. 1962d-5; 79 Stat. 1073-1074) is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project substantially in accordance with the report of the Corps of Engineers dated May 23, 1996, at a total cost of $81,600,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $61,100,00 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $20,500,000). SEPULVEDA DAM, CA RECREATION FACILITIES SWEETWATER RIVER BASIN, CA Channel improvement, as part of a combined flood control and highway project. TROPICANA AND FLAMINGO WASHES, NV Flood reduction, erosion control, and wildlife enhancement. The non-Federal, upon favorable recommendation of the Secretary, may carry out the project and the Secreatary may reimburse the non-Fed for the Federal share of the project, provided the project is authorized, economically justified, environmentally acceptable and that the Secretary approves the plans for construction by the nonFeds. TUCSON DIVERSION CHANNEL (RECREATIONAL DEVELOPMENT), AZ The project for recreational development along the Tucson Diversion channel. WHITLOW RANCH DAM, QUEEN CREEK, GILA RIVER BASIN, AZ Dam and flood control basins. 1948 Flood Control Act, H.Doc.443,80th Cong., Ist sess S.Doc.91-106,91st Cong., 2d sess WRDA 96, Title III, Section 301(a)(3) FC ACT 1936, (Amended 1937, 1941, 1950) and Fed Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 FC ACT 1965.,H.Doc. 240 and 309., 88th Cong., 2d sess WRDA 1992, Sec 101 (13) and WRDA 1996, Sec 211 (0(5) Flood Control Act 1936 (amended 1937) 1941, 1950 and Fed Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. H.Doc.220, 80th Cong., 1st sess. 33-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 TABLE 33-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 38. Aug. 3, 1989 WHITEWATER RIVER & FLOODWARNING, SAN HR.2330, adopted 3 BERNARDINO & RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA Aug 1989, House Flood Control system for Coachella Valley. Committee on Public Works and Transportation. Sep. 25, 1996 PORT OF LONG BEACH, CA WRDA 1996, Sec Navigation project. 101(d)4. Sep. 25, 1996 SANTA MONICA BREAKWATER, CA WRDA 1996, Sec Hurricane and storm damage 101(a)7. reduction project. June 1938 TUCSON DRAINAGE AREA, AZ Flood Control Act 28 Flood control project. 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Date approved by Chief of Engineers under provisions of section 205. Public Law 80-858, as amended. 3. Final date of approval by House of Senate Public Works Committees resolution under provisions of Section 201, Public Law 89-298. 33-30 LOS ANGELES, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 33-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to 30 Sep 1997 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For: Construction Maintenance Dana Point, Harbor, CA Completed 1984 $ 4,737,5501 555,147' Los Angeles and Long Beach Harbors, San Pedro Bay, CA 3 Newport Bay Harbor, CA3 Inactive and 1982 796,8974 2,364,2365 Active (mod) Port San Luis, CA Completed and 1984 1,426,0506 1,042,3527 Active (mod) Redondo Beach Harbor Completed and 1984 4,766,8989 5,235,29510 (King Harbor), CA8 Active (mod) 1. Excludes $4,777,000 required contributed funds and Coast Guard costs. 2. Includes $45,147 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. 3. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986, subject to favorable report. 4. Public Works Administration funds. Excludes $796,897 required contributed funds and $1,100 preauthorization costs. 5. Includes $137,622 for reconnaissance and condition survey costs since FY1958. Excludes $7,000 other contributed funds. 6. Includes $568,417 for new work prior to modification by 1965 River and Harbor Act. Excludes Coast Guard costs. Includes $104,031 expended in FY1987. 7. Includes $54,715 for maintenance for project prior to modification by 1965, River and Harbor Act, and $18,958 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. Includes $90,130 expended in FY87. 8. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. 9. Excludes Coast Guard costs. 10. Includes $20,517 for reconnaissance and condition survey costs since FY58. Includes $293,167 expended in FY87. 33-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY97 TABLE 33-D OTHER AUTHORIZED SHORE PROTECTION PROJECTS (Formerly Beach Erosion Control Projects) For Last Cost to 30 Sep 1997 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Anaheim Bay Harbor Orange Completed 1967 $ 89,119 County, CA' Bird Rock area, La Jolla Completed 1967 25,8813 San Diego County, CA2 Coast of California, Point Mugu, Completed 1972 1,253,5944 to San Pedro breakwater, CA Doheny Beach State Park (Doheny Completed 1968 578,7175 State Beach), CA Imperial Beach, CA Active 1986 2,555,4976 Las Tunas Beach, San Diego County, CA Active 1976 107,484 Ocean Beach, San Diego County, CA7 Completed 1960 7,912 Oceanside, San Diego County, CA Completed 1982 4,367,4428 San Diego (Sunset Cliffs), CA Active 1979 365,0009 San Gabriel River to Newport Bay Active 1985 9,722,10010 (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Orange County, CA Ventura-Pierpont area, CA Completed (part) 1969 715,819" and Deferred (part) 1. The project authorized by the Act of Congress of October 23, 1962, H.Doc.602, 87th Cong., 2d sess., in lieu of part of the original Anaheim Bay Harbor project is covered under San Gabriel River to Newport Bay (Surfside-Sunset and Newport Beach), Orange County, CA 2. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 103, Public Law 87-874. 3. Excludes 475,614 required contributed funds. 4. Excludes $1,238,418 required contributed funds. 5. Excludes $431,260 required contributed funds. 6. Excludes $919,437 required contributed funds; $66,124 other contributed funds; and Coast Guard costs. 7. Plant in service. 8. Excludes $604,817 other contributed funds. 9. Excludes $180,438 required contributed funds. 10. Excludes $4,626,638 for required contributed funds. Includes $10,772 expended in FY87. 11. Excludes $1117,406 other contributed funds for beach-nourishment betterments and $618,949 required contributed funds. 33-32 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 97 TABLE 33-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to 30 Sep 1997 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Allenville, AZ' City Creek levee, San Bernardino County, CA' Clifton, San Francisco River, AZ Coyote and Berryessa Creeks CA Gila River Basin, AZ: Camelsback Dam (Gila River) Gila and Salt Rivers levee and channel improvements Indian Bend Wash Lower Gila River levee and channel improvements (Gila River and tributaries downstream from Painted Rock Dam) Middle Gila River channel improvements, upper end of Safford Valley to Buttes damsite (Camelsback damsite to Salt River) Pinal Creek channel improvements (Globe) Santa Rosa Wash (Tat Momolikot Dam and Lake St. Clair) Tucson diversion channel Goleta, CA, and vicinity Hansen Dam, Los Angeles County 7 drainage area, CA (mod) Holbrook levee Little Colorado River, Colorado River Basin, AZ Little Colorado River at Holbrook 7 Needles, San Bernardino Co. Nogales Wash and Tributaries, AZ Oceanside Harbor, CA Oro Grande Wash channel improvements, Mojave River Basin, CA' Quail Wash levee, Joshua Tree, San Bernardino Co. CA Ridgecrest, Kern County, CA' Rose Creek channel improvements, San Diego, CA' San Diego River (Mission Valley), San Diego River Basin, CA Santa Ana River Basin, CA: Devil, East Twin, and Warm Creeks channel improvements and Lytle Creek levee Mill Creek levees Riverside levees San Jacinto River levee and Bautista Creek channel Completed Completed Active Active Deferred Active (part) and Deferred (part) Completed Inactive Active Deferred Completed Completed Active Completed Completed Active Active Completed Completed Terminated Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed 1984 1988 1989 1963 1966 1985 1975 1970 1968 1982 1986 1982 1950 1973 1989 1989 1970 1973 1972 1978 1962 1961 1959 1985 $ 3,000,0002 400,0002 12,510,000 56,300,000 73,2014 31,809,294 s 2,413,051 402,867 121,5094 10,218,900 6,922,6336 500,000 335,000 1,000,0008 11,100,000 5,100,000 1,000,0009 212,745 195,194 982,43210 1,708,437 7,753,937" 617,89012 2,104,478 9,258,20713 33-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 97 TABLE 33-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Santa Clara River levee improve- Completed ment, Santa Clara River Basin, CA Santa Maria Valley levees, Santa Completed Maria River Basin, CA Santa Paula Creek channel and Active debris basins (including Mud Creek), Santa Clara River Basin, CA Sespe Creek at Fillmore, Ventura Completed County, CA' South Fork of the Santa Clara Active River, Santa Clarita Valley, CA' Telegraph Canyon Creek, Chula Active Vista, CA' Tijuana River Basin, CA Completed Ventura Harbor, CA Active Ventura River Basin, CA: Stewart Canyon debris basin and Completed channel Ventura River levee Completed Whitewater River, CA: Banning levee-San Gorgonio Completed River, Riverside County' Chino Canyon improvements, Palm Completed Springs' Tahchevah Creek detention basin Completed and channel improvements Tahquitz Creek Inactive Winslow (tributaries of Little Completed Colorado River), Little Colorado and Deferr River Basin, AZ 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Section 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. 2. Excludes $187,965 required contributed funds. 3. Excludes $371,058 other contributed funds. 4. Advance planning only. 5. Excludes $304,720 required contributed funds and $3,130,762 other contributed funds. Includes $31,071 expanded 6. Includes $1,158,006 Code 710 funds since FY77. Excludes $749,058 required contributed funds and $394,364 funds. 7. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. 8. Excludes $619,912 required contributed funds and $91,160 other contributed funds. 9. Excludes $514,806 required contributed funds and $176,295 other contributed funds. 10. Excludes $251,000 required contributed funds and $154,733 other contributed funds. (part) ed (part) 1961 1984 1983 1984 1985 1985 1979 1990 1964 1950 1966 1973 1967 1974 1973 2,126,672 10,079,92714 4,790,17315 4,000,000'6 632,158 844,73217 1,703,03118 6,455,000 939,90819 1,349,63820 97,868 819,87821 1,420,55222 1,063,600 1,831,300 11. Excludes $200,000 required contributed funds and $1,641,668 other contributed funds. 12. Excludes $35,830 other contributed funds. 13. Excludes $712,000 other contributed funds. 14. Excludes $106,364 other contributed funds. Includes $74 expended in FY87. 15. Excludes non-Federal costs of $295,000 for local cooperation items for required and $49,458 16. Excludes $559,525 required contributed other funds. 17. Includes $3,846 expended in FY87. Excludes $104,941 other contributed funds. 18. International Boundary & Water Commission funds funds. 19. Excludes $179,148 other contributed funds. 20. Includes $6,000 Code 710 funds since FY77. Excludes $17,006 other contributed funds. 21. Excludes $8,718 required contributed funds $53,470 other contributed funds. 22. Excludes $74,718 required contributed funds. 33-34 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Date Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report For Authority Expended Expended Hodges Dam, San Dieguito River Basin, CA Las Vegas Wash tributaries, Colorado River Basin, NV Santa Ana River Basin (and Orange County), CA: Aliso Creek Dam San Juan Dam Trabuco Dam Villa Park Dam Sierra Madre Wash channel, Los Angeles County drainage area, CA Lower Mission Creek Santa Barbara, CA University Wash and Spring Brook, Riverside, CA San Diego River, Mission Valley, CA 1958 1964 1950 1978 Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251 1977 Sec. 12, Public Law 93,251 1986 Sec. 1002 Public Law 99-662 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 1978 Sec. 12, Public Law 93-251 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 1988 Sec. 1001(A), Public Law 99-662 1986 Sec. 1002, Public Law 99-662 1995 Sec. 1001(B)(2), Public Law 99-662 1991 Sec. 1001(A), Public Law 99-662 1991 Sec. 1001(A), Public Law 99-662 1986 1988 1975 1978 Harbor Office, Morro Bay, CA Sunset Harbor, CA 33-35 295,191 67,361 1,641,144 213,313 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 - LOS ANGELES DISTRICT TABLE 33-H RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS (See Section 11 of Text) Project Date Channel Islands Harbor Dec. 1996 Dana Point Harbor Jun. 1997 Marina Del Rey, CA Aug. 1997 Oceanside Harbor Mar. 1997 Port Hueneme, CA Jul. 1997 San Diego Harbor, CA Sep. 1997 San Diego River-Mission Bay, CA Oct. 1996 Santa Barbara Harbor, CA Jan. 1997 Ventura Harbor, CA Dec. 1996 33-36 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT * This district comprises the Klamath River Basin in southern Oregon and portions of northern and western California consisting of drainage basins tributary to the Pacific Ocean from the Oregon- California State line on the north to Cape San Martin, CA, on the south except for basins tributary to the San Francisco Bay system which lie east of the Benecia-Martinez Bridge. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Humboldt Harbor. CA.................34-1 2. Oakland Harbor, CA.................. .34-2 3. Richmond Harbor (Deepening), CA...... .34-3 4. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) ....................... 34-4 5. Sonoma Baylands Wetlands Demonstration Project, CA ............ 34-5 6. San Francisco Bay and Delta Model, CA. .34-5 7. San Francisco Bay Long Term Management Strategy (LTMS), CA ...... 34-6 8. Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys ............................ 34-6 9. Navigation Work under Special Authorization ......................... 34-6 10. Beach Erosion Control Work under Special Authorization............... ........ 34-7 Flood Control 11. Corte Madera Creek, CA ............... 34-7 12. Klamath River, Klamath Glen Levee, CA. .34-8 13. Petaluma River, Petaluma, CA.......... 34-8 14. Russian River Basin, including Dry Creek (Warm Springs Lake) and Lake Mendocino (Coyote Valley Dam), CA..... 34-8 15: Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ....................... 34-10 16. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ........................ 34-10 Navigation 1. HUMBOLDT HARBOR, CA Location. The project is located in Humboldt Bay, about 225 nautical miles north of San Francisco. Existing project. Adopted by Acts of March 3, 1881, July 5, 1884, August 5, 1886, July 3, 1892, March 3, 1889, June 25, 1910, July 3, 1930, August 30, 1935, August 26, 1937, July 16, 1952, and August 1968. The project consists of: 1) a Bar and Entrance Channel 40 feet deep, taped from a width of 1,600 feet at seaward mile 0.9 to 500 feet at seaward mile 0.2 and then 500 feet wide to mile 0.8; 2) a North 17. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations .................. 34-10 18. Miscellaneous Work under Special Authorization ........... ........... 34-10 General Investigations Page 19. Surveys ............................. 34-10 20. Collection and Study of Basic Data ...... 34-11 21. Preconstruction Engineering and Design .......................... 34-11 Tables Table 34-A Cost and Financial Statement .................. 34-13 Table 34-B Authorizing Legislation.................34-18 Table 34-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects......... 34-21 Table 34-D Not Applicable Table 34-E Not Applicable Table 34-F Not Applicable Table 34-G Deauthorized Projects....... 34-21 Table 34-H Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects............ 34-22 Table 34-I Russian River Basin, CA: Estimated Cost for New Work .34-23 Table 34-J Russian River Basin, CA: Project Features and Estimated Costs............. 34-23 Bay Channel 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide between mile 0.75 and mile 4.29; 3) an Outer Eureka Channel 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide between mile 4.29 and mile 5.0; 4) an Inner Eureka Channel between mile 5.0 and mile 6.30 which is 26 feet deep and 400 feet wide; 5) a Samoa Channel 35 feet deep and 400 feet wide between mile 4.29 and mile 5.84; 6) a Turning Basin beyond mile 5.84 at the upper end of the Samoa Channel which is 35 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide by 1,000 feet long; 7) an Anchorage Area 35 feet and 1,200 feet wide by 1,200 feet long in the North Bay between the Entrance Channel and Gunther Island (the anchorage area is not maintained); 8) a Fields Landing Channel 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide and a turning basin at mile 3.16 which is 600 feet wide and 800 feet long; and 9) Arcata Channel located in the extreme North Bay 34-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 (18 feet deep and 150 feet wide) is no longer used for commercial navigation and has not been maintained since 1931. The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 authorized deepening the Bar and Entrance Channel to a depth of -48 MLLW; deepening the North Bay Channel, Samoa Channel, and Samoa Turning Basin to a depth of -38 feet MLLW; widening the north side of the Entrance Channel an additional 200 to 275 feet; moving the southern edge of the Entrance Channel away from the South Jetty and to the north by 100 feet; and widening and realigning the entrance to the Samoa Turning Basin. Present estimated total cost for the project is $16,800,000 of which $10,820,000 is Federal cost (includes $200,000 Coast Guard cost) and $5,980,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $1,680,000 non-Federal reimbursements). Local cooperation. The local sponsor is the Humboldt Bay Harbor, Recreation and Conservation District. The Project Cooperation Agreement is scheduled to be signed in June 1998 and would satisfy the requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended, PL 99-662. The agreement includes the following requirements: 1) provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; 2) pay 25 percent of the costs of construction; and 3) pay an additional 10 percent plus interest of the project costs allocated to deep draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction. Terminal facilities. The harbor serves six deepwater breakbulk terminals with storage space for 120,000,000 FBM of logs/lumber and 100,000 MT of woodchips and warehouse space for 1,000,000 FBM of lumber and 51,000 MT of woodpulp and particle board. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction is scheduled to begin in September 1998. Maintenance: Operations and maintenance includes engineering and design for spring and fall dredging espisodes. The Corps' hooper dredge "Yaquina" performed spring dredging of the interior channels (North Bay, Eureka, Samoa and Field's Landing Channels), removing 179,991 cubic yards of shoaled material at a cost of $1,350,000. Fall dredging (Bar & Entrance Channels) was conducted by a contractor's self-propelled hopper dredge. Before termination of the contract due to an oil spill, 458,693 cubic yards were removed at a cost of $823,870. All dredged material was deposited in the permanently designated, Government-furnished, Humboldt Open Ocean Disposal Site (HOODS). 2. OAKLAND HARBOR, CA Location. Oakland Harbor is located in the City of Oakland, California, on the eastern shore of central San Francisco Bay immediately south of San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. Existing project. Adopted by Acts of June 23, 1874, June 25, 1910, September 22, 1922, January 21, 1927, April 28, 1928, July 3, 1930, March 2, 1945 and October 23, 1962. The project was completed February 1975, except for deepening the tidal canal to 35 feet from Fortman Basin to Park Street, and to 25 feet above Park Street which was deauthorized November 1977. Reconstruction of the Fruitvale Avenue Highway Bridge was completed in December 1973 and turned over to local interests for operation and maintenance. Project consists of entrance channel to Oakland Outer Harbor, 35 feet deep from deep water in San Francisco Bay and 800 feet wide across the shoal southeast of Yerba Buena Island, narrowing to 600 feet at Oakland Mole; thence, a channel and turning basin 35 feet deep and from 600 to 950 feet wide in outer harbor to the Army Base. Project also provides entrance channel to Oakland Inner Harbor, 38 feet deep and 600 feet wide to Howard Terminal and 35 feet deep to west end of Government Island, with additional widening to within 75 feet of the pierhead line in front of Grove and Market Street (formerly municipal) piers and along the south side of the channel from Harrison Street eastward to harbor line point 119 in Brooklyn Basin; a channel 35 feet deep and 500 feet wide through Brooklyn Basin; for a triangular area 35 feet deep about 2,700 feet long and maximum width of 300 feet at western end of Brooklyn Basin; a channel along north side of Brooklyn Basin which is 35 feet deep and 300 feet wide for 1,300 feet, thence 25 feet deep and 300 feet wide for 3,700 feet to a turning basin at east end of Brooklyn Basin which is 35 feet deep, 500 feet wide, and 1,200 feet long; a channel in the tidal canal 35 feet deep and 275 feet wide from Brooklyn Basin to Park Street, thence 18 feet deep to San Leandro Bay; a total channel length of 8-1/2 miles from San Francisco Bay to San Leandro Bay. Project also includes parallel rubblemound jetties at entrance to inner harbor, north jetty 9,500 feet long and south jetty 12,000 feet long; three highway bridges across the tidal canal, two of which (at Park Street and High Street) have been replaced by local interests and the Fruitvale Avenue Bridge constructed by Federal Government has been transferred to Alameda County. The railroad bridge has been transferred to the County for operation and maintenance. The Federal Government will 34-2 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT reimburse the County for the cost of operating and maintaining the railroad bridge. Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986 authorized deepening the 4 mile Inner and 3.4 mile Outer Harbors channels to 42 feet deep and widening the entrance channel to 1,000 feet; relocation of the Outer Harbor turning basin 3,000 feet westward; and widening the turning basin to 1,800 feet and constructing a 1,200 foot turning basin in the Inner Harbor, 42 feet deep, at mile 3.7. Section 301 of WRDA 1996 combined the Oakland Outer Harbor and Inner Harbor into one project and designated as the Oakland Harbor, California project. Present estimated total cost for the authorized improvements is $108,520,000 of which $72,990,000 is Federal cost (includes $125,000 Coast Guard cost) and $35,530,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $12,000,000 non-Federal reimbursements. Under WRDA 1986, the Bar Channel and Inner Harbor were deepened in 1992 to 38 feet deep up to Howard Terminal as a separable element of the authorized 42-foot deep project. Local cooperation. The Port of Oakland signed a Project Cooperation Agreement on December 9, 1994 satisfying the requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. The agreement includes the following requirements: (1) provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; (2) pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction; and (3) pay additional 10 percent plus interests of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion of construction. Deepening to 42' MLLW is in progress and is scheduled to be completed in June 1998. The Port of Oakland is conducting a feasibility study to deepen Oakland Harbor to -50' MLLW at 100% Port cost under the authority of Section 203 of WRDA 86. The estimated project cost is $189 million with an average annual navigation benefit of $229 million. Port is seeking project authorization in WRDA 98. Terminal facilities. The port occupies 19 miles on the mainland shore of San Francisco Bay. There are 550 acres of marine terminal facilities, 28 deepwater berths and 25 container cranes, including 5 of the post Panamax type. On-dock covered storage space exceeds 600,000 square feet. Three major railroads, Santa Fe, Southern Pacific and Union Pacific serve the port. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Construction of the 42' MLLW was awarded in December 1994. Deepening at the Inner and Outer Harbors to 42' MLLW started in May 1995. 1,713,000 cubic yards of dredged material was placed at Sonoma Baylands to restore 348 acres of wetlands; 1,524,000 cubic yards were dredged from the Outer Harbor and disposed of into the Ocean Disposal site, SF-DODS; 1,545,000 cubic yards were dredged from the Inner Harbor and disposed of into the Ocean Disposal site, SF-DODS; 704,000 cubic yards were dredged and placed for the construction of the Galbraith Golf course site. Maintenance: Operations and maintenance of Fruitvale Avenue R.R. Bridge including engineering and design by hired labor, cost $180,000; operations and maintenance of Miller-Sweeney Highway Bridge, cost $96,000; and operations and maintenance of Oakland Inner 120,000 cubic yards removed at a cost of $231,480. The Outer Harbor was not dredged. 3. RICHMOND HARBOR, CA Location. Richmond Harbor is located in central San Francisco Bay, in Contra Costa County in the City of Richmond. Existing project. The existing navigation channel extends from deep water in San Francisco Bay into the Port of Richmond. The Southampton Shoal Channel and Long Wharf Maneuvering Area, at the entrance to the harbor channels are maintained to -45 feet MLLW. The Entrance Channel, Potrero Reach Channel, Potrero Sharp Turn, Inner Harbor and about half of the Santa Fe Channel, to -35 feet and the remainder of the Santa Fe Channel to -30 feet. The width of the navigation channel is 600 feet for most of its length to Point Richmond with two maneuvering areas: one in front of the Long Wharf and the other at Point Richmond. At Potrero Reach, the 500 foot width flares to about 600 feet at Point Potrero with a turn at the point. 1,150 feet wide and 35 feet deep except for a depth of 30 feet at the southerly apex of the bend. Thence. the channel continues into the inner harbor at a width of 850 feet in a northerly direction to the entrance of the Santa Fe Channel. The Santa Fe Channel extends northwesterly at a width of 200 feet into the upper basin terminus. A turning basin is provided at Point Richmond, and a rubble-mound training wall extending 10,000 feet westerly from Brooks Island is also provided in the Potrero Reach. For details, see page 1977 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1646 of Annual Report for 1938. Proposed improvements consist of a construction plan involving four and one-half miles 34-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 .... . ... ........ ... ................. . ... .... ........... lll i l .. .. .. ... of channel between Richmond Long Wharf and the Santa Fe Channel. The project would deepen the existing 35-foot channels to 38 feet, and provide a turning basin of 1,200 feet near Point Potrero. Approximately 2,000,000 cubic yards of sediment are to be dredged and transported to aquatic and upland disposal sites, depending on the sediment quality. The estimated cost $43,770,000 of which $29,620,000 is Federal cost (includes $130,000 Coast Guard costs) and $14,150,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $1,310,000 non-Federal reimbursements). The existing project was authorized on October 27, 1965. Previous projects were authorized by Acts adopted in 1917, 1930, 1935, 1938, 1945 and 1954. The proposed improvements are authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. Local cooperation. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the local sponsor must comply with the following requirements: (1) pay 10 percent of the costs to 20 feet below mean lower low water and 25 percent of costs between 20 and 45 feet below mean lower low water and (2) reimburse an additional 10 percent with interest of the costs allocated to general navigation facility of the project within a period of 30 years following completion of construction; and (3) provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocation and dredged material disposal areas necessary for the projects. The value of lands, easements, rights-of-way and dredge disposal areas can be credited toward the payment required under item (2) above. Terminal activities. The Port of Richmond encompasses nine privately-owned terminals and seven terminals owned by the Port. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Continued construction project forecasted to be completed by June 1998. Maintenance: Operations and maintenance of Richmond Outer Harbor including engineering and design and U.S. Hopper dredge Essayons. Essayons removed 361,514 cubic yards of shoal material from the Outer Harbor, cost $1,876,000. 4. SAN FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA (JOHN F. BALDWIN AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNELS) Location. The location is the John F. Baldwin Ship Channel. Navigation channels extending from entrance to San Francisco Bay to Suisun Bay near Martinez through San Francisco, Marin, Contra Costa, and Solano Counties. (See National Ocean Service Charts 18649, 18654 and 18656 for respective areas.) Existing project. Project provides for modification of the existing San Francisco Harbor, Richmond Harbor, San Pablo Bay and Suisun Bay Channels to the vicinity of Pt.. Avon to provide depths of 55 feet for San Francisco Bar Channel, 45 feet (currently 35 feet) for main internal bay channels upstream to the vicinity of Pt.. Avon; enlargement and deepening to 45 feet (currently 35 feet) of maneuvering areas adjacent to major petroleum refinery terminals along the channel route. San Francisco Harbor Main Channel was completed in February 1974. The South Hampton Shoal Channel and the Richmond Long Wharf maneuvering area were completed in December 1986. For the approved cost estimate (1996) of Federal cost (Corps), see Sacramento District Annual Report. Existing project was adopted by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 208, 89th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Estimated volume of dredged material is 9 million cubic yards. A new alternative initially proposed by the sponsor would create a pipeline terminal north of the Richmond/San Rafael Bridge. Dredging of less than 50k CY and a greatly shortened navigation channel 2 miles long by 600 feet wide by 45-foot deep would eliminate or minimize the serious issues facing project construction including salinity intrusion, disposal site selection, air quality, and endangered species preservation. Local cooperation. See Sacramento District Annual Report. The local sponsor. Contra Costa County, supports the project. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 30. revised 1991, No. 31, revised 1991, and No. 32. revised 1986, titled respectively: "The Ports of San Francisco, Redwood City, and Humboldt Bay, Calif."; "The Ports of Oakland, Alameda, Richmond, and the Ports on Carquinez Strait, Calif."; and "The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg, and Antioch, Calif." Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce and will be adequate for future commerce upon completion of new terminal facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Continued planning engineering and design activities. 34-4 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT 5. SONOMA BAYLANDS WETLANDS DEMONSTRATION PROJECT, CA Location. The Sonoma Baylands site is located in Sonoma County, CA, approximately 25 miles north of San Francisco near the mouth of the Petaluma River, on the northern shoreline of San Pablo Bay. Existing project. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1992. The project includes restoration of tidal wetlands on 348 acres of diked lands, including construction of 11,645 feet of replacement levee around the landward periphery of the site, fifteen internal peninsulas for wave protection, three weirs for the discharge of dredged material supernatant, and modification of three existing high voltage electrical towers. Project included placement of 207,000 cubic yards of maintenance-dredged material from the Petaluma River navigation channel in a pilot project area and placement of 1.7 million cubic yards of suitable dredged material from the Oakland Harbor deepening projects on the remainder of the site. Placement of material was completed on November 6, 1995. The estimated project cost is $8,900,000, of which $6,675,000 is Federal cost and $2,225,000 is non-Federal cost. Oakland deepening to -42' MLLW is scheduled to complete in June 1998. Local cooperation. The California State Coastal Conservancy signed a Project Cooperation Agreement on May 6, 1994 satisfying the requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992, PL 102-580 and signed an amendment on December 9, 1994 to include the placement of Oakland Harbor dredged material. The local sponsor must comply with the following requirements: (1) provide lands, easement, and right of ways; (2) modify or relocate utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges) and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project; (pay 25 percent of the total project cost in accordance with Section 106 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992. The local sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Terminal facilities. N/A Operations during fiscal year. The project was restored to tidal action on October 25, 1996. Monitoring of the project is continuing. 6. SAN FRANCISCO BAY-DELTA MODEL STRUCTURE, CA Location. The model, including a Class A regional visitor center, is located in Sausalito, CA, adjacent to San Francisco Bay about two miles north of the Golden Gate Bridge. Existing project. The San Francisco Bay/Delta Model, which covers 17 miles of the Pacific Ocean beyond the Golden Gate, all of San Francisco Bay proper, San Pablo Bay, Suisun Bay, and all of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta east of Suisun Bay to the cities of Sacramento on the northeast and Stockton and Tracy on the south, was constructed in a rehabilitated warehouse at Sausalito, CA, as a part of the San Francisco Bay and Tributaries, CA, Study authorized by the River and Harbor Act of May 17. 1950 (PL 81- 516, Section 110). The model was authorized as an operation and maintenance project in the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 (PL 93-251, Section 8). The model successfully reproduces to the proper scale the rise and fall of the tide, flow and currents of water, salinity intrusion, and trends in disposition of sediments. It is a useful tool to examine forces existing in the bay and estuarine system and to predict results of proposed changes. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations and maintenance of the model continues. Historical summary. Original model construction was initiated 1956 and completed 1957. The addition of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to the original model was initiated 1966 and completed 1969. Annual visitation to the model averages between 100,000 to 150,000 people. The central exhibits were completed in December 1981. Extensive exhibit upgrade for the Visitor Center and development of Cooperative Association completed September 30, 1989. The Cooperative Association provides financial and educational support to visitor center programming. An active volunteer program exists at the Visitor Center providing approximately 80 man-days of effort monthly. Continued testing of proposals affecting the environmental quality of the region including, but not limited to: salinity intrusion, dispersion of pollutants, water quality, 34-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 improvements for navigation, dredging, bay fill, physical structures, and other shoreline changes. Total cost of regional visitor exhibits and model as of September 30, 1996, was $28,832,085 of which $11,463,872 was for the regional visitor center, $1,383,324 for exhibits, and $15,984,888 for maintenance. 7. SAN FRANCISCO BAY LONG TERM MANAGEMENT STRATEGY (LTMS), CA Location. The San Francisco Bay Long-Term Management Strategy (LTMS) for dredged material disposal covers deep and shallow draft navigation channels of the San Francisco Bay region including Central San Francisco Bay, South Bay, San Pablo Bay and Suisun Bay environs. Existing project. The San Francisco Bay region has an annual disposal requirement of approximately 6 million cubic yards (mcy) to maintain navigation channels. The Bay also has a one-time new civil works requirement of approximately 16 mcy for the Oakland Harbor, Richmond Harbor, and John F. Baldwin Phase III ship channel. In January 1990, the Army Corps of Engineers, the Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, the San Francisco Bay Water Quality Control Board and the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission convened with approximately thirty interested agencies and organizations with concerns regarding dredged material disposal in San Francisco Bay. These four agencies have the responsibility for regulation of the waters of the US and California for disposal of dredged material. The four agencies and the concerned navigation interests formed the LTMS to develop technically feasible, economically prudent, and environmentally acceptable long range solutions to the dredging and disposal needs for the San Francisco Bay region over the next fifty years. In determining acceptable dredged material disposal locations, the LTMS is evaluating a broad array of potential ocean, in-Bay and non-aquatic beneficial uses disposal alternatives. Local cooperation. Pursuant to their regulatory responsibilities, the Division Commander of the South Pacific Division, Corps of Engineers; the Regional Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX; the Chair of the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Board and the Chair of the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission agreed to jointly undertake the development and implementation of a Long Term Management Strategy (LTMS) for dredging and disposal of dredged materials from the region. Based on the outputs from the LTMS, the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the Bay Conservation and Development Commission will consider modifications to the dredging elements of their respective Basin and Bay Plans for San Francisco Bay. Regulatory Streamlining: Besides identifying implementable disposal options, the LTMS will: (1) develop coordinated regional disposal policies between federal and state agencies; (2) provide a local decision-making framework for dredging and disposal projects; (3) streamline existing permit and testing procedures; and (4) provide a long term site monitoring apparatus and feedback mechanism. Operations during fiscal year. Environmental Impact Report and Management Plan: A. EPA is Federal lead on a Policy EIS for the LTMS. Work underway on the final EIS. B. The draft Interim Management Plan was released in August 1994. C. The LTMS Management Plan will be revised following completion of the Final EIS. 8. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Reconnaissance and condition surveys of channels to be dredged in years other than Fiscal Year 1997 and jetty structures were conducted on the following projects: Berkeley Harbor, Bodega Bay: Crescent City Harbor; Fisherman's Wharf; Islais Creek; Monterey Harbor; Noyo River; Petaluma River; Pillar Point; Redwood City; Richmond Harbor; San Leandro Marina; San Rafael; Santa Cruz: Sausalito Canal; Shelter Cove and Suisun Channel: all in California. Fiscal year costs were $547,177. 9. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization). None. 34-6 . I I.III . I. I I I ii SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DIISi TRICT li i I i i ii i ii i i i i . . ... I l l Ii Mitigation of shore damages activities pursuant to Section 111, Public Law 90-483 (preauthorization). None. 10. BEACH EROSION CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Beach erosion control activities pursuant to Section 103, Public Law 87-874 (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $7,017 for East Cliff Drive, Santa Cruz, CA. Flood Control 11. CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA Location. Creek and tributaries drain an area of 28 squire miles in Marin County, CA, and flow into west side of San Francisco Bay about 9 miles north of Golden Gate. Existing Project. Provided for about 11 miles of channel improvements, including realignment, enlargement, levees, riprap, rectangular concrete sections, interior drainage facilities, bridge relocations, and debris removal on Corte Madera Creek and lower reaches of its tributaries, and a continuous channel rights-of-way to deep water in San Francisco Bay reserved to assure channel outlet in the event of future tideland reclamation. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 modified existing project to direct construction of Unit 4 from Lagunitas Road Bridge to Sir Francis Drake Boulevard, and to include construction of floopdproofing measures as necessary to individual properties and other necessary structural measures in vicinity of Lagunitas Road Bridge to insure proper functioning of completed portions of authorized project. Portion of project upstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard previously classified inactive was modified on November 17, 1986 to eliminate any channel modification. Current project has 3 miles of channel enlargement and levees, about 1.8 miles of rectangular concrete channel improvements, and 450,000 cubic yards of redredging on lower Corte Madera Creek. Present estimated total cost for new work in Unit 4 and previously constructed features is $37,100,000 of which $21,900,000 is Federal cost and $15,200,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $1,740,000 to be contributed by local interests). Local Cooperation. Local interests must provide lands and rights-of-way, including suitable areas for disposal of waste material, modify or relocate all bridges and utilities necessary for construction and maintenance; hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works; maintain and operate the project after completion in accordance with the regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army, and prevent encroachment on flood channels that would result in decreasing the effectiveness of project for flood control; adjust all claims regarding water rights that might be affected by the project; and contribute in cash 1.5 percent of Federal construction cost of Ross Valley units 1-3 and tidal areas. Construction of Unit 4 and modifications to completed portions of the project, as authorized under WRDA 86, would be subject to cash contribution and 5 percent of cost assigned to flood control during construction of the project. Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District previously furnished resolution of local assurances dated March 29, 1966, March 28, 1967, August 15, 1967, and July 8, 1969, and Marin County Board of Supervisors reaffirmed by letter dated September 28, 1978. Project was authorized by the State of California by 1965 Statute, Chapter 1388. Board of Supervisors of Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District furnished assurances of willingness and ability to meet requirements for portion of project below Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. On December 13, 1983, Marin County Board of Supervisors reconfirmed assurances of local cooperation because a Superior Court judgment ordered that county to take all steps required by law to complete channel downstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard (Unit 4) and maintain entire project as agreed. A Local Cooperation Agreement for redredging the lower reach of Corte Madera Creek was executed on June 29, 1985. Marin County also provided support for Ross Valley Unit 4 by resolution on March 24, 1987 and by the resolution on September 13, 1988. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: Minor coordination on a future plan to complete the project. Resolution 96-26 was passed on February 1, 1996 by the Marin County Board of Supervisors in support of a 40-year project. The project was transferred from Sacramento District in October 1996. Design process began in the San Francisco District to complete Unit 4. 34-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Historical summary. Project responsibility was transferred to Sacramento District on April 1, 1982 and back to the San Francisco District on October 1, 1996. Project is about 77 percent complete considering the portion being held in abeyance upstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. Work remaining: Design construction of the remaining 3,000 feet of channel downstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard and Ross Creek. In lieu of the authorized concrete channel, an alternative plan consisting of wing walls and individual house floodproofing is being recommended in the Significant Post-Authorization Change Report. The portion of Corte Madera Creek upstream of intersection of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard and Corte Madera Creek in Ross, near the city of San Anselmo, was classified as "inactive" on July 11, 1984, due to lack of local support. A Local Cooperation Agreement for redredging lower reach of Corte Madera Creek was executed June 29, 1985. Construction on Lower Corte Madera Creek Channel was completed and transferred to Marin County Flood Control and Water Conservation Disrict by letter of May 28, 1987, San Francisco District monitors maintenance and operation of the project. 12. KLAMATH RIVER, KLAMATH GLEN LEVEE, CA Location. The Klamath Glen Levee, part of the Klamath River Federal Flood Control Project, is located in the community of Klamath Glen, California, at the confluence of Terwer Creek and the Klamath River. Existing project. The levee system consists of about 8,900 feet of riveted levee (15-40 feet in height) and interior drainage facilities. Terwer Creek portion of the levee is immediately adjacent to the town of Klamath Glen and protects about 170 homes and a pumping structure. Local cooperation. The local sponsor (Del Norte County, California), desires cost sharing in accordance with the original agreement when the project was constructed in 1972 (100% Federal), citing the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (Section 414, 104 Stat. 4651) for precedence in reference to design deficiencies in accord with the project's original cost sharing agreement. Operations during fiscal year. The District completed repairs to the Terwer Creek portion of the level with 100% Federal funding per the earlier design deficiency study. Total project cost was $1,350,000. The project replaced 500 feet of eroded levee with 27-inch graded riprap to be placed on the entire slope and extended 6 to 10 feet below the existing channel bottom. 13. PETALUMA RIVER, PETALUMA, CA Location. The Petaluma River Basin is situated in Sonoma and Marin Counties, California, on the northwestern shore of San Pablo Bay. Existing project. The project is authorized by Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948. The project currently under construction consists of a Ushaped channel and an earthern trapezoidal channel from Lynch Creek to Lakeville Street Bridge, replacing two road bridges and one railroad bridge, and eliminating one railroad bridge in the Peyran Street area. Present estimated total cost for the project $18,181,000 of which $3,985,000 is Federal cost and $14,196,000 in non-Federa cost. Local cooperation. City of Petaluma signed a Project Cooperation Agreement in July 1996, satisfying the requirements of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, PL 99-662. Operations during fiscal year. New work: Contract #1 for the U-shaped channel portion of construction was advertised. Design work continues on the trapezoidal section of the channel. The Peyran Street Bridge was raised by the local sponsor and raising of the Lakeville Street Bridge began Maintenance: Operations and maintenance of Petaluma River Channel including engineering and design. Contract dredge removed 164,700 cubic yards, cost $398,312. 14. RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA Location. Russian River rises in Coast Range in northwestern California, flows southerly for 87 miles, and then turns westerly to flow for 23 miles to Pacific Ocean at Jenner, 60 miles northwest of San Francisco, CA. (For general location see Geological Survey map for California.) Existing project. Active authorized project provides for construction of a dam on East Fork of Russian River at Coyote Valley to a height of 160 feet; a dam on Dry Creek at Warm Springs to a height of 319 feet; and channel stabilization works on Russian River between mouth and mile 98, on lower reaches of several tributaries, and on Dry Creek downstream from dam. Project also provides 34-8 . . . . I I I I l l I SAN FRANCl ISCOII, CA, DISTRI ICT I for expansion of fish hatchery capacity at Dry Creek, Warm Springs, to compensate for fish losses on Russian River attributed to operation of Coyote Dam component of project. Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino), completed in 1959, is operated and maintained by the United States. (See tables 34-I and 34-J for latest approved estimated costs.). Local cooperation. Fully complied with for Coyote Valley Dam and channel improvements accomplished to date. For the Dry Creek portion, local interests are required by the authorizing act to comply with the usual a., b., c. requirements for channel improvements and, in addition, prevent any encroachment in the channel of Dry Creek which would interfere with proper functioning of the channel improvement works; adjust all claims concerning water rights arising from the construction and operation of the improvements, including acquisition of water rights needed for preservation of fish and wildlife resources affected by the project; and reimburse the United States in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, for that part of the joint-use construction cost, (30.2 percent currently estimated at $103,760,000) and an ultimate 32.5 percent of the annual operation, maintenance, and replacement joint-use costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply. The estimated annual cost to local interests for maintenance of channel improvement works is $80,000. Sonoma County Water Agency (formerly Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District) provided assurances of willingness and ability to meet requirements by Resolutions No. DR 00793-1, September 25, 1961, No. DR 4770-1, December 17, 1962 and No. DR 45759, August 5, 1974, for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel. By letter dated March 7, 1967, Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District further indicated their interest in optimization of the Dry Creek (Warm Springs) damsite to provide additional water supply storage. Reimbursement to the United States for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel costs allocated to 212,000 acre-feet of water supply storage is specified in a water supply contract with the local sponsor approved in October 1982. Local interests have expended approximately $1,000,000 to provide partial flood protection in project area and have constructed facilities at an approximate cost of $20,000,000 to distribute water from the completed Coyote Valley reservoir. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Coyote Valley Dam: None. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel: Engineering activities continued. The Gualala Redwoods claim that their access to Kelly Road was cut off by Corps project (Warm Springs) went to trial in October 1992. Judgement resulting was a cost of $3,162,000 to the Federal Government. Major items of contract work included: Completion of Liberty Glen wastewater system at fiscal year cost $353,795 and initiation and completion of contaminated soil remediation, $83,000. Maintenance: Coyote Valley Dam: Operation and maintenance continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $14,327. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of East Fork Russian River at Coyote Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 92,961 acre-feet occurred on May 21, 1996. Maximum hourly inflow to reservoir was 9,124 cubic feet per second on January 16, 1996. Maximum release of 3,087 cubic feet per second occurred on February 22, 1996. During the year, 83,364 acre-feet was released for flood control, and 174,898 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel: Operation and maintenance continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Dry Creek at Warm Springs Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 333,000 acre-feet occurred January 4, 1997. Maximum hourly inflow to reservoir was 24,000 cubic feet per second on December 31, 1996. Maximum release of 4,000 cubic feet per second occurred January 6, 1997. During the year, 106,845 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Releases for flood control amounted to 120,715 acre-feet. Historical summary. Entire project, exclusive of recreation facilities at completed project (Lake Mendocino), is about 99 percent complete. Coyote Valley Dam, initiated November 1958, was completed April 1959 (cost $17,550,000, of which $11,952,000 was Federal; and $5,598,000 contributed). Work, including removal of slides resulting from storms in 1958, was completed April 1959. Bank stabilization work on Russian River near Geyserville was completed in 1957 and channel improvements in remaining reaches on Russian River and East Fork of Russian River were completed in 1974 (cost $2,483,900). In April 1982, responsibility was transferred to the Sacramento District. Responsibility for civil works operations & maintenance functions for the two projects was transferred back to San Francisco District October 1. 1996. Warm Spring construction completion include fish hatchery in December 1980, project overlook in 34-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 May 1981, reservoir clearing in July 1981, downstream stabilization sills in October 1981, dam closure in October 1982, spillway repair at Warm Springs Dam in September 1985, boat launching facilities, Phase I, in September 1985, Rockpile Road Upgrade, Yorty Creek Beach, and remedial work at Liberty Glen camping area in September 1990, fish hatchery expansion in September 1992, final control tower grouting, dam access road repair, spillway stabilization, fish hatchery emergency water supply in September 1993, and Liberty Glen wastewater system and contaminated soil remediation. Initial filing of Warm Springs reservoir was commenced on November 1, 1984. Responsibility for construction was transferred to Sacramento District in August 1983. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at Coyote Valley Dam in fiscal year 1984. Responsibility for civil works operations and maintenance functions for the two projects was transferred back to San Francisco District October 1, 1996. 15. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, as amended and supplemented, included a requirement that local interests maintain and operate completed flood control works in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of War. Inspections made throughout the year to determine effectiveness of operation and maintenance by local interests of completed local protection projects and works constructed under emergency and special authorities of Sections 205 and 208 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, and Public Law 99, 84th Congress. Fiscal year cost was $147,972. Total cost to September 30, 1997 was $2,611,051. See Table 34-H for inspections made this fiscal year. 16. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood Control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Fiscal year costs were $485,735 for preauthorization studies of which $405,274 were for Petaluma River, Sonoma County, CA; $24,237 for San Pedro Creek, Pacifica, CA; $54,853 for White Slough, Solano County, CA; and $1,371 for Section 205 Coordination Account. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Fiscal year cost incurred for emergency flood control activities were$3,005,763 of which $1,308,254 were for Disaster Preparedness; $155,651 for Emergency Operations and $1,541,858 for Rehabilitation. Emergency bank protection (Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Congress). Fiscal year total costs were $33,364 of which $28,369 was for Salinas River, Atascadero, CA; and $4,995 for Section 14 Coordination Account. 17. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with sec. 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, summaries of monthly reservoir operations at Del Valle, CA were prepared. No water control manual revisions were completed due to environmental issues. Corps personnel provided advice as requested during flood control operations at the reservoir. Fiscal year cost was $31,069. 18. MISCELLANEOUS WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Project Modification for Improvement of Environment (Section 1135, PL 99-662). Fiscal year total costs were $4,618 of which $3,440 were for Coordination Account funds; and $1,178 for Initial Appraisals, General.. General Investigations 19. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs for surveys were $1,366,311 of which $108,853 were for navigation studies; $552,214 for flood damage prevention; -$26 for shoreline protection studies; $640,975 for special studies; $58,448 for miscellaneous activities; and $5,847 for coordination studies with other agencies. 34-10 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT 20. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Fiscal year total costs of $113,745 were incurred, of which $103,745 was for Flood Plain Management Service Program and, $10,000 for Hydrologic Studies. 21. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN CRESCENT CITY HARBOR, CA Crescent City Harbor is a commerical fishing harbor located approximately 280 miles north of San Francisco and 17 miles south of the Oregon border. Sand accretion in the Inner Harbor area has restricted access for commercial fishing vessels to the Harbor's loading facilities and commercial fishing boat basin. The project would deepen the access channel from the Inner Harbor to the commercial fishing boat basin and Harbor's wharf facilities. The General Reevaluation Report is scheduled for approved by the Assistant Secrectary of the Army of Civil Works on 19 August 1998. The recommended plan includes dredging an access channel to a depth of --14 feet MLLW from the existing Federal Channel to the entrance of the Small Boat Basin. The approximate length of the access channel is 1,200 feet with a channel width varying from 140 feet to a maximum of 210 feet near the existing Federal Channel. An estimated 19,400 cubic yards would be disposed at an upland site. Pre-construction Engineering and Design (PED) was initiated in December 1995 and Plans & Specs are scheduled for completion in August 1998. Total costs during the fiscal year were $326,886. Project total cost is estimated at $1,858,000 of which $1,486,000 is Federdal cost and $372,000 is non-Federal cost. The local sponsor is the Crescent City Harbor District. NOYO RIVER AND HARBOR, CA Noyo River rises in the Coast Range, flows westerly, and empties into Noyo Harbor. Noyo Harbor is a cove on the California Coast about 87 miles south of Humboldt Bay and 135 miles northwest of San Francisco. The 1962 Rivers and Harbors Act, modified by the 1976 Water Resources Development Act, authorized up to two breakwaters as necessary to provide protection. The 1976 Water Resources Development Act, as modified by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, authorized construction of additional channel improvements. Recommended plans of improvement for the breakwater and channel improvement were previously considered as a single project. Due to significant differences in the time required for planning and construction, each part is now reported separately. The plan of improvement for Noyo River and Harbor (Breakwater), CA provides for one detached offshore 400-foot breakwater aligned in a north-south direction along the southern portion of Noyo Cove, west of the entrance channel in Noyo Harbor. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $3,642,000. Total costs during the fiscal year were $194,561 with General Investigation funds. Planning is about 71 percent complete. A Project Management Plan has been prepared to outline the work remaining on this project. The breakwater has an estimated cost of $23,312,000 of which $18,712,000 is Federal cost and $4,600,000 is non- Federal cost. Due to sponsor's inability to fulfill its cost-sharing requirements, preparation of a final GDM was terminated. However, Conference Report on H.R. 1905, Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1996 directs the Corps to investigate the viability of a pre-fabricated steel structure in lieu of a rubble mound breakwater, including modeling. A special report, which documented this evaluation, was completed in January 1997. A meeting with the Local Sponsor, PG&E and the City of Fort Bragg was held 5 February 1997 to discuss Corps findings. Integrating wave power generation to the breakwater does not decrease the Sponsor's annualized cost because the Sponsor is required to pay all costs associated with power generation. As directed by the Noyo Harbor Commission, two letters from the Noyo Harbor District, dated 26 February 1997, requested the Corps to finalize the GDM and discontinue study of integrating wave power generation into the breakwater. The Corps will comply with the Sponsor's requests and will use funds appropriated by Congress in Fiscal Year 1997 to finalize the GDM. The plan of improvement for Noyo River and Harbor (Channel Extension), CA provides for a 60-foot wide channel, 7 feet deep, for a distance of about 3,000 feet upstream from the end of the existing Federal project to the Dolphin Isle Marina. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $580,000. This project has been put in an inactive category at the request of the sponsor. 34-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 PAJARO RIVER AT WATSONVILLE, CA The Pajaro River is the dividing line between Santa Cruz and Monterey County located approximately 100 miles south of San Francisco on Monterey Bay. Flooding in the city of Watsonville, the town of Pajaro, and surrounding agricultural lands prompted a re-examination of flood damage prevention in the Pajaro basin. The project provides for modification of the existing levee system built by the Corps in 1949 and includes 2.5 miles of flood control levees and/or floodwalls on Salsipuedes Creek and Corralitos Creek, tributaries of the Pajaro River, as well as pump systems located outside of existing levees on the Pajaro River. The tributaries are located 6 miles from the river mouth. Since the only alternative with Federal interest was within the existing 1966 Rivers and Harbor Act construction authority, on completion of the reconnaissance study, PED was initiated in March 1995. The General Re-evaluation Report will be completed in September 1998, and construction plans and specifications will be completed in September 1999. Total costs during the Fiscal Year were $561,854 with General Investigations funds. Project total cost is estimated at $20,600,000 of which $10,600,000 is Federal cost and $10,600,000 is non-Federal cost. The local sponsors are Santa Cruz and Monterey Counties. SAN RAFAEL CANAL, CA San Rafael Canal is located on the northwestern shoreline of San Francisco Bay in the city of San Rafael, about 17 miles north of the city of San Francisco. The Canal is surrounded by San Rafael's central business district and dense residential areas. The Study was authorized by a resolution adopted by the Committee on Public Works and Transportation of the United States House of Representatives on August 8, 1984, Section 142 of the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1976 (Public Law 94-587), as subsequently amended in Section 705 of WRDA of 1986 (Public Law 99-662). The project was authorized for construction in Section 101 of WRDA of 1996. The Feasibility Study recommended the South Floodwall Plan. This plan consists of approximately 9,500 linear feet of floodwall constructed along the south bank of the canal and 1,600 feet of sheet-pile floodwall along the crest of the Bayfront levee on the east side of the canalways tract. The South Floodwall Plan has a benefit-to-cost ratio of 2.0 to 1. Total costs during the fiscal year were $42,351 with General Investigations funds. The estimated project cost is $32,200,000 of which $20,930,000 is Federal cost and $11,270,000 is non-Federal cost. Preconstruction Engineering and Design was initiated in October 1992. The Corps is proposing a continuous floodwall design which is estimated to save between $11.6 to $14.1 million compared to the South Floodwall Plan, as recommended in the Feasibility Study. A letter was sent to the City of San Rafael in December 1996 requested Sponsor's agreement with the Corps proposal to finalize the project design based on the continuous flood wall concept. A District Engineer letter to the Mayor, City of San Rafael, dated 25 September 1997, informed the City that the project has been placed in a suspended status. 34-12 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 Bodega Bay, CA 11. Corte Madera Creek, CA ederal Funds) equired Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) Crescent City Harbor, CA Fisherman's Wharf Areas, San Francisco 1. Humboldt Harbor and Bay, CA 12. Klamath River, Klamath Glen Levee, CA Moss Landing Harbor, CA Napa River, CA Noyo River and Harbor, CA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp Cost Major rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost - - - $1,226,765 12 40 - - - - 1,226,765 1340 36,476 55,505 47,132 39,421 2,634,849 440 78,795 55,505 47,132 39,421 2,634,849 440 - - - - 397,779 5 - - - - 397,779 5 -21,551 4,260 4,341 17,840 17,840 2,325 - 89,000 12,547,725 64 7,276 56,750 12,503,520 64 - - 190,355 65 - - 190,213 65 - - - 337,000 - - - 326,886 73,208 41,425 121,063 79,707 213,956 41,427 121,063 79,707 - 125,000 410,000 - 119,652 381,119 3,110,000 2,499,000 2,515,000 3,108,880 2,528,563 2,600,453 - - 690,000 - - 95,959 11,138 69,164 491,648 445,354 203,000 497,317 84,254 105,603 1,170 1,170 2,525,000 352,308 2,655,000 2,285,181 (109,000) 483,298 - 785,000 1,061,475 - 778,984 955,370 10,000 11,310 307,000 359,898 485,700 478,652 94,090 133,314 364,000 249,939 58,155 41,385 975,000 829,180 103,000 194,562 370,997 324,323 804,761 66 804,761 66 9,791,972 64(' 9,781,858 640 24,878,004 740 24,878,004 740 525,000 g 525,000 8 9,199,000 4148 50 9,199,000 4149o50 388,488 " 388,488 "5 12,907,299 940 10,700,378 940 82,553,707 1040 82,178,590 1040 581,000 579,257 338,215 1140 338,215 1140 7,716,105 1240 7,603,984 1240 1,021,274 1340 1,021,274 1340 5,948,763 131440 5,797,183 131440 4,145,000 151640 4,112,032 15 1740 9,341,236 181940 9,270,744 181940 222,810 2040 222,810 2040 34-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 34-A (Cont'd)OST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 2. Oakland Harbor, New Work CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost 2,019,000 15,854,000 2,416,022 15,118,783 1,885,664 1,385,056 2,089,303 1,406,861 - 6,807,295 - (120,495) 9,509,000 9,744,000 9,127,184 10,207,445 750,860 3,041,973 733,078 3,020,151 6,929,971 2,447,239 8,933,227 5,039,611 67,271,684 66,419,682 21 49,585,568 22 49,492,069 22 17,194,505 14,703,133 Pajaro River at New Work Watsonville, CA Approp. Cost 13. Petaluma River, CA New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Pillar Point New Work Harbor, CA Ap prop. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Redwood City New Work Harbor, CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp Cost Removal of Maint. Sunken Vessels Approp. Cost 3. .Richmond Harbor, New Work CA Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Minor rehab. Approp. Cost 14. Russian River Basin, New Work CA, Coyote Valley Approp. Dam (Lake Cost Mendocino) and Maint. Channel Improve-CA Approp. ments (Fed Funds) Cost (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost Dry Creek (Warm New Work Springs) Lake Approp. and Channel Cost Improvements, CA Maint. (Federal Funds) Approp. Cost (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. Cost San Clemente Maint. Creek, CA Approp. Cost - 389,100 580,000 568,000 1,537,100 - 346.274 595.886 561,854 1,504,014 37,000 67,567 1,007,108 917,176 8,429 8,429 495,000 445,131 1,763,825 1,851,037 425,833 978,000 3,388,585 2340 342,860 405,274 2,489,275 2340 429,792 406,102 15,123,538 2440 398,391 458,020 15,123,538 2440 -- 6,697,396 4344 -- 6,697,396 444 1,571 111,251 2,744 2,309,759 4445 1,571 111,251 2,744 2,309,759 4445 - - - - 1,672,722 2540 - - - - 1,672,722 2540 70,445 73,632 4,700,000 (312,476) 18,347,273 2640 90,058 73,632 4,699,998 (362,474) 17,984,799 26 40 - - - - 283,068 - - - - 283,068 1,250,000 1,196,550 1,999,408 2,004,863 1,174,500 1,159,989 3,081,642 3,042,026 803,400 1,235,000 13,378,427 2728 943,132 948,950 12,987,225 2728 2,260,954 4,336,736 2,295,397 4,315,263 2,318,500 2,516,000 2,692,600 2,834,378 2,324,765 2,407,709 2,877,136 2,572,324 313,695 3,400,000 3,877,691 2,588,900 2,599,717 741,000 889,811 3,284,000 2,236,709 41,170,455 2940 41,138,049 2940 164,689 164,689 14,435,869 5 14.435,869 54 47,863,902 55 56 47,590,078 5556 589,911 5 5 570,774 58 55,000 - 333,108,645 9 124,582 - 333,081,773 59 3,338,900 4,295,991 37,490,934 60 3,409,978 3,661,869 35,766,786 61 -- 230,574 62 - - 228,732 63 198,000 198,000 34-14 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 4. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) 6. San Francisco Bay and Delta Model, CA 7. San Francisco Bay Long Term Management Strategy (LTMS), CA San Francisco Harbor, CA San Francisco Harbor and Bay, CA (Removal of Drift) San Leandro Marina, CA Approp. San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, CA San Rafael Canal, CA San Rafael Creek, CA Santa Cruz Harbor, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp.� Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Ap prop. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 946,000 1,175,000 1,450,000 623,000 38,517,200 * 836,146 876,848 1,379,150 1,091,643 38,380,955 42 1,604,000 1,590,169 955,000 1,550,260 1,301,000 1,433,339 320,000 783,067 1,823,000 1,599,752 610,000 711,411 1,990,000 1,970,461 550,000 367,759 31,131,917 30,802,546 11,911,000 11,707,236 - - - - 2,689,356 28 3040 - - - - 2,689,356 2830o 40 1,993,700 889,272 2,064,202 1,384,000 39,458,657 3"140 1,952,625 922,149 2,080,354 1,389,663 39,452,622 3140 2,062,000 1,907,000 1,836,000 1,960,000 2,089,876 1,682,577 2,066,074 2,023,648 100,099 21,099 336,661 87,102 557,666 1,007,848 583,000 619,881 1,137,200 1, 132,458 594,000 749,534 (412,942) (52,369) (66,492) (52,369) 63,062 62,524 538 39,863,580 40 39,782,712 40 917,600 4,581,439 32 837,178 4,501,017 32 - 1,369,372 28 33 40 - 1,369,372 283340 303,000 299,908 458,000 404,344 1,027,000 1.034,130 (37,000) 42,351 66,089 1,222,602 16,744 1,149,852 44,247,509 3440 44,233,981 :3440 2,183,000 2.179,197 32,359 4047 32,359 4047 6,259,851 4046 6,137,756 4046 4,126,808 52 4,126,808 52 160,000 " 160,000 " 18,771 4,690 9,733,449 4053 18,771 4,690 9,733,449 4053 34-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 34-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 5. Sonoma Baylands New Work Wetlands Demo Approp. 4,000,000 1,657,500 (932,400) 500,000 5,600,100 Project, CA Cost 1,687,973 1,756,545 1,026,189 872,566 5,534,390 New Work (Contrib. Funds) Approp - 410,000 319,000 - 729,000 Cost - 396,222 90,193 - 486,415 Suisun Bay New Work Channel, CA Approp. - - - - 200,928 "3 Cost - - - - 200,928 36 Maint. Approp. 1,276,542 598,500 1,101,104 178,400 9,066,744 Cost 826,455 1,048,062 960,823 320,469 9,041,860 Suisun Channel, CA New Work Approp. - - - - 217,677 38 Cost - - - - 217,677 38 Maint. Approp. - - 98,481 75,505 2,891,014 39 Cost - - 98,481 75,505 2,891,014 " 1. Includes $641,800 for jetties, bulkheads, main Bodega Bay Channel and turning basin completed in 1943. 2. Includes $585,000 for Preconstruction Planning ($456,000 Construction, General funds and $129,000 General Investigation funds). 3. Includes $585,000 Preconstruction Planning costs ($456,000 Construction General costs and $129,000 General Investigation costs). 4. Includes $745,299 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1997. Excludes contributed funds of $385,134. 5. Excludes contribution funds of $2,000. 6. Excludes contributed funds of $271,116 and $2,138 surplus material from Corps military activities. 7. Excludes contributed funds of $44,340. Includes $420,704 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1997. 8. Excludes $2,000 contributed funds in lieu of royalty-free rock. 9. Includes $2,261,371 for previous project. Excludes $95,000 contributed funds for existing project. 10. Includes $98,206 for previous project and $26,457 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1997. 11. Excludes $5,337 previous project costs. 12. Excludes $8,539 surplus material from Corps' military activities. Includes $240,236 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1996. Excludes contributed funds of $180,200. 13. Excludes previous project costs. 14. Includes $943,187 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1997. Excludes $492,788 contributed funds. 15. Includes $11,985 for previous project. Excludes $7,180 contributed funds for previous project. 16. Includes $4,145,000 for Preconstruction Planning ($3,565,000 for Breakwater of which $500,000 allocated under Construction, General and $3,065,000 under General Investigations); ($580,000 for Channel Extension of which $165,000 allocated under Construction, General and $415,000 under General Investigations). 17. Includes $4,112,031 Preconstruction cost ($3,532,031 for Breakwater of which $500,000 was under Construction, General and $3,032,031 under General Investigations); ($580,000 for Channel Extension of which $165,000 was under Construction, General and $415,000 under General Investigations). 18. Includes $32,097 for previous project and $123,380 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. FY 1956-1997. Excludes contributed funds of $820 for previous project. 19. Excludes contributed funds of $4,000 in lieu of providing dike disposal areas on existing project. 20. Excludes contributed funds of $1,700. 21. Includes $2,899,232 for previous projects. Excludes $397,266 contributed funds on previous projects. 22. Includes $684,028 for previous projects and $98,781 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. FY 1956-1997. 23. Includes $212,083 for previous project. Excludes contributed funds of $15,559 for previous project. 24. Includes $314,692 for previous project and $366,024 for reconnaissance and condition surveys. FY 1956-1997. Excludes contributed funds of $192,424. 25. Includes previous project costs $31,443. Excludes $119,572 contributed funds for existing project. 26. Includes $591,283 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1997. 27. Excludes contributed funds of $524,778. Includes $105,000 Public Works Administration funds. 28. Excludes modification authorized October 27, 1965, under project "San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)." 29. Excludes $115,536 contributed funds. Includes $140,883 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1997. 34-16 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT 30. Includes $1,030,399 for previous projects. Excludes $134,591 contributed funds for existing project. Includes $193,000 Public Works Administration funds. 31. Includes $475,321 for previous projects and $813,611 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1997. 32. Authorized by FC Act of 1965 (Sec. 201); Maintenance R&H Act of 1970 (Sec. 103). Includes $321,488 for reconnaissance and condition surveys FY 1979-1997. See FY 1977 Annual Report for last full report. Excludes contributed funds of $879,454. 33. Includes $1,086,703 for previous projects. 34. Includes $1,359,380 for previous projects and $32,832 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1956-1997. 35. Excludes $810,046 contributed funds on previous project. 36. See Sacramento District FY 1974 Annual Report for detail. 37. Project maintenance responsibility to Point Edith was transferred to San Francisco District January 1, 1974. Excludes Sacramento District's portion. Includes $48,735 for reconnaissance and project condition surveys, FY 1976-1997. 38. Project maintenance assigned to San Francisco District from Sacramento District January 1, 1974. See Sacramento District 1972 Annual Report for full report. 39. Includes $635,189 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1978-1997. Includes $727,510 for previous project. Excludes $121,386 contributed funds. 40. See FY 1981 Annual Report for last full report. 41. Excludes Contributed Funds of $709,624. 42. See Sacramento District FY 1985 Annual Report for full report. 43. Excludes $100,000 contributed funds and $105,000 contributed in lieu of royalty-free rock. 44. See FY 1979 Annual Report for last full report. 45: Includes $155,959 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1970-1997. 46. Includes $301,443 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1970-1997. Excludes $93,500 contributed funds. 47. Excludes $41,094 contributed funds. 48. Includes $9,199,000 funds of which $8,499,000 was under Construction, General and $700,000 under General Investigations. 49. Includes $9,199,000 costs of which $8,499,000 was under Construction, General and $700,000 under General Investigations. 50. See FY 1987 Annual Report for last full report. 51. Includes $65,458 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1989-1997. 52. See FY 1988 Annual Report for last full report. 53. Includes $84,312 for reconnaissance and condition surveys, FY 1993-1997. 54. Excludes $5,598,000 contributed funds: $400,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Public Works Acceleration Program; and $1,628,411 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Code 711 at Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino. 55. Includes $94,459 special recreation use fees and costs (FY 1982-1983), but excludes prior special recreation fees and cost for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino. 56. Includes $1,658,925 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs at Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino for FY 1985-1997. 57. Includes $251,911 contributed funds, other from City of Ukiah for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino, hydropower studies; and $338,000 from California Department of Boating and Waterways for launching facility at Lake Mendocino. 58. Includes $250,117 contributed funds, other, costs for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino, hydropower studies; and $320,657 for California Department of Boating and Waterways for launching facility at Lake Mendocino. 59. Includes $253,421,793 San Francisco construction funds and costs through August 1983 for Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 60. Includes $964,114 San Francisco maintenance funds and costs through April 1982 for Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 61. Includes $245,661 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs at Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 62. Includes $208,074 contributed funds, other. from Sonoma County for Dry Creek, Warm Springs. hydropower studies; and $22,500 from City of Ukiah for hatchery pump design at Lake Mendocino. 63. Includes $208,074 contributed funds, other. costs for Dry Creek, Warm Springs hydropower studies; and $20,658 costs for hatchery pump design. 64. Includes $6,999,725 San Francisco District construction funds and costs for Corte Madera Creek. 65. $8,695 contributed funds transferred to Sacramento District in FY 1983. Includes $97.400 San Francisco District required contributed funds and costs. 66. Contributed funds, other, and costs, from Marin County including $536,921 for miscellaneous bridge and road relocations and $267,840 for additional expenses for disposal sites at Corte Madera Creek. 34-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 I- I II . . . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TABLE 34-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents HUMBOLDT HARBOR, CA Mar. 3, 1881 Jul. 5, 1884 Aug. 5, 1886 Jul. 3, 1892 Mar. 3, 1899 Jun. 25, 1910 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Jul. 16, 1952 August 1968 Oct. 12, 1996 Channel 10 feet deep by 350 feet wide to be dredged along Eureka waterfront, thence 8 feet deep by 200 feet wide west to natural channel; dredging Mad River Shoal to 8 feet deep. Construct South Jetty and continue channel improvements. $75,000 continued improvement of Harbor with provision for title to 12 acres of land to be conveyed to the U.S. Map and cost estimates for continuing Harbor improvements with provision for two parallel jetties. Continuing Harbor improvements with provision for two parallel jetties. Rebuilding the jetties and channel improvements to Arcata and Hookton. Eureka Channel 20 feet deep and 300 feet wide; Samoa Channel 20 feet deep and 250 feet wide; Arcata Channel 18 feet deep and 150 feet wide; Fields Landing Channel 20 feet deep and 250 feet wide. Entrance Channel 30 feet deep and 500 feet wide. Eureka Channel 26 feet deep and 400 feet wide; Samoa Channel 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide; Fields Landing Channel 26 feet deep and 300 feet wide; Turning Basin (off Fields Landing wharf) channel 26 feet deep, 600 feet wide and 800 feet long. Bar & Entrance Channel 40 feet deep, tapered from 1,600 feet to 500 feet wide; North Bay Channel 30 feet deep and 400 feet wide; Eureka Channel 30 feet deep to mile 5.0; Samoa Channel 30 feet deep. North Bay Channel 35 feet deep; Samoa Channel 35 feet deep; widen turns at mile 0.75 and 2.6; provide a 1,200 by 1,200 foot anchorage in North Bay. Bar and Entrance Channel 48 feet deep; North Bay Channel, Samoa Channel and Samoa Turning Basin 38 feet deep; widen the north side of the Entrance Channel an additional 200 to 275 feet; relocate the southern edge of the Entrance Channel away from the South Jetty and to the north by 100 feet; and widen and realign the entrance to the Samoa Turning Basin. H. Doc. 59 Cong., 3rd sess. River & Harbor Approp Act of 1884 River & Harbor Approp Act of 1886 ChiefofEngrs Annual Report (p. 3120), Annual River & Hbr Approp Acts 1892- 1899 H. Doc. 528, 55th Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 950, 60th Cong., 1st sess.. H. Doc. 204. 61 st. Cong., 2nd sess.. H. Doc. 326, 61st. Cong., 2nd sess. H. Doc. 755, 69th Cong., 2nd sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 14 74th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee, Doc. 11, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers & Harbors Committee. Doc. 143, 82nd Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 330, 90th Cong., 2nd sess. 1996 WRDA, Public Law 104-303. Section 101 OAKLAND HARBOR, CA June 23, 1874 Jetties. June 25, 1910 Sep. 22, 1922 North channel in Brooklyn Basin, 25 feet deep, and tidal canal to 18 feet. Channel across shoal southeast of Yerba Buena Island and thence to Webster St.; South channel in Brooklyn Basin; Turning Basin at east end of Brooklyn Basin; and channel in Annual Report, Part II. 1874, p. 378. H. Doc. 647, 61st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 144, 67th Cong., 2d sess. 34-18 1. 2. .... .... SAN FRANCISCO,? . _ CA, DISTRICTll. . Tidal Canal from Brooklyn Basin to Park St., 30 feet deep. Jan. 21, 1927 2 Channel from Webster St. to Brooklyn Basin, maintain area to within 75 feet of pierhead line south of channel from Harrison St. to Harbor Line Point 119 in Brooklyn Basin; dredge a triangular strip about 2,700 feet long and maximum width of 300 feet at western end of Brooklyn Basin, 30 feet deep. Apr. 28, 1928 Local cooperation requirements modified to provide alteration or replacement of bridges by local interests shall apply only to that feature of project covering deepening tidal canal to 25 feet. Drawbridges across Tidal Canal were required by 1882 Decree of Court in condemnation proceedings whereby title was obtained to rightof- way for tidal canal. July 3, 1930 Entrance channel to outer harbor, 800 to 600 feet wide. Mar. 2, 1945 Eliminated requirement that local interests contribute 10 cents per cubic yard toward deepening tidal canal. Mar. 2, 1945 Maintenance of 35-foot depth in channel to outer harbor and in outer harbor channel and turning basin. Oct. 23, 1962 3 Deepen inner harbor 35-foot channels and lower 1,300 feet of north channel in Brooklyn Basin to 35 feet. Nov. 17, 1986 Deepen Inner and Outer Harbor channels to 42 feet. Widen entrance channel to 1,000 feet; relocate Outer Harbor turning basin 3,000 feet westward and widen turning basin to 1800 feet. Construct 1,200 foot turning basin in Inner Harbor. RICHMOND HARBOR, CA Aug. 8, 1917 Channel 24 feet deep and 600 feet wide from San Francisco Bay to Ellis Slough (Santa Fe Channel); a turning basin at Point Potrero; a training wall. July 3, 1930 A 30-foot channel with lessened widths; a turning basin at head of navigation. Aug. 30, 1935 4 Increase project widths in inner harbor, maintenance of Santa Fe channel to 30 feet; approach areas in outer harbor to 32 feet. June 20, 1938 Widen channel at Point Potrero and north thereof; enlarge and maintain to 30-foot depth turning basin at Terminal No. 1. Mar. 2, 1945 Channel 20 feet deep, 150 feet wide, in San Pablo Bay north of Point San Pablo. Sep. 3, 1954 Channel 35 feet deep and 600 feet wide adjacent to Southampton Shoal; enlarge and deepen to 35 feet approach area to Richmond Long Wharf; widen and deepen inner harbor and entrance channels; deepen turning basin at Point Richmond and southerly 2,000 feet of Santa Fe Channel. Eliminate restriction that widening north of Point Potrero will not be undertaken until local interests furnish assurances industries will avail themselves of improved navigation facilities. and reclamation of Reservation Point. H. Doc. 407, 69th Cong., 1st sess. Public Res. 28, 70th Cong. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 43, 71st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 466, 77d Cong., 1st sess. ReportonFileinOffice, Chief of Engineers H. Doc. 353, 87th Cong., 2d sess. 1 1986 WRDA. Public Law 99-662 H. Doc. 515, 63rd Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16. 70th Cong., 1st sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 7. 73d Cong., 1st sess.. and 10. 74th Cong.. 1st sess. H. Doc 598, 75th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 715, 76th Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 395, 83rd Cong., 2d sess.1 34-19 3. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 . . .. . . . . . I I I I I I I I I I I I " I I I . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . ' ' . . . . . TABLE 34-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 5. Oct. 5, 1992 11. Oct. 23, 1962 Nov. 7, 1966 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 7, 1966 May 17, 1950 Feb. 10, 1956 Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 12. 14. West Richmond channel 45 feet deep, 600 feet wide; enlarge and deepen to 45 feet maneuvering area at Richmond Long Wharf (Sacramento Dist. "San Francisco Bay to Stockton, Calif. (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels)"). Deepen channel to 38 feet between Richmond Long Wharf and Santa Fe Channel. Construct 1,200 feet turning basin. SONOMA BAYLANDS WETLANDS DEMONSTRATION PROJECT, CA Restoration of tidal wetland on a 348-acre site using dredged material and construction of a replacement levee around the landward periphery of the site. CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA Levees and channel improvements, lower 11 miles of Corte Madera Creek and tributaries, as modified by Chief of Engineers. Local cooperation requirements modified to provide 1.5 percent cash contribution toward cost of Ross Valley unit. Modify existing project to direct construction of Unit 4 from Lagunitas Road Bridge to Sir Francis Drake Boulevard, and to include construction of floodproofing measures in vicinity of Lagunitas Road Bridge to insure proper functioning of completed portions of authorized project. Further modify project to eliminate any channel modifications upstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. KLAMATH RIVER, KLAMATH GLEN LEVEE, CA Repair the Klamath Levee which consists of about 8,900 feet of riveted levee (15-40 feet in height) and interior drainage facilities. RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino): Channel improvements on lower 98 miles of Russian River and lower reaches of tributaries. Increased appropriation authorization for initial stage of project development. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake; Channel Improvements on Dry Creek below dam. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and channel; compensate for fish losses on the Russian River which may be attributed to the operation of the Coyote Dam component of the project through measures such as possible expansion of the capacity of the fish hatchery at the Warm Springs Dam component of the project. H. Doc. 208, 89th Cong., 1st sess. 1 1986 WRDA, Public Law 99-662 Section 106, 1992 WRDA, Public Law 102-580 H. Doc. 545, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 204, 1966 Flood Control Act Sec. 823. 1986 WRDA Flood Control Act of 1966, Public Law 89-789, 89th Cong.. 2d sess. H. Doc. 585. 81st Cong., 2d sess. PL 404, 84th Cong.. 2d sess. H. Doc. 547, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 95, 1974 WRDA 1. Contains latest published map. 2. Included deepening of tidal canal above Park Street Bridge to 25 feet, which was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 3. Reconstruction of Fruitvale Avenue Highway Bridge (S. Doc. 75, 87th Cong., 2d sess.) which was deauthorized November 6, 1977. 4. Included in part in Public Works Administration Program, September 6, 1933. 34-20 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30 1997 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Berkeley Harbor, CA' Completed 1966 $ 155,550 2 $58,118 9 Berkeley Marina, CA' Completed 1979 505,201 - Monterey Harbor, CA Completed 1971 1,108,1824 1,794,387 " San Francisco Harbor (Islais Creek), CA 1 Completed 1976 848,227 7 111,410 San Francisco Marina (Gas House Cove), CA Completed 1974 180,472 6 88,174 10 San Leandro Marina (Breakwater), CA' Completed 1976 210,3908 56,367 1 Sausalito Canal, Richardson Bay, CA Inactive 1963 103,095 121,056 13 1. Authorized by Chief of Engineers (Sec. 107, 7. Includes $94,550 preauthorization costs. Public Law 86-645). 8. Includes $72,000 preauthorization costs and 2. Excludes $155,551 contributed funds. excludes contributed funds $138,189. 3. Excludes $378,989 contributed funds. 9. Includes $58,118 for jetty condition surveys 4. Includes $207,800 Public Works for FY 1987-1997. Administration funds and breakwater modifications 10. Includes $88,174 for reconnaissance and (1960 Act) placed inactive 1974. The barrier groin condition survey for FY 1990-1997. and sandtrap feature of the project was deauthorized 11. Includes $111,410 for reconnaissance and November 17, 1986, by WRDA condition survey for FY 1994-1997. of 1986. 12. Includes $56,367 for reconnaissance and 5. Includes $340,153 for reconnaissance and condition survey through FY 1997. condition survey for FY 1956-1997. 13. Includes $50,891 for reconnaissance and 6. Includes preauthorization costs $26,855 and condition survey through FY 1997. excludes contributed funds $153,618. TABLE 34-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Humboldt Bay (Buhne Point), CA 1958 Jan. 1, 1990 $ 2,000 - Lower San Francisco Bay, CA 1935 Jan. 1, 1990 - - Knights Valley Lake, R.R. Basin, CA 1974 Aug. 5, 1977 Oakland Harbor, CA (Deepen Tidal Canal) 1981 Nov. 6, 1977 Oakland Harbor, CA (Fruitvale Avenue Bridge) 1981 Nov. 6, 1977 San Lorenzo Creek, CA (Upper Portion) 1962 Nov. 6, 1977 San Pablo Bay and Mare Island Strait, CA (Approaches to Vallejo and South Vallejo) 1982 Nov. 6, 1977 - - Santa Cruz County, CA 1966 Jan. 1, 1990 245,639 - 34-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 34-H INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Section 10 of Text) Location Dates of Inspection Alameda Creek Mar 1997 Corte Madera Creek May 1997 Coyote Creek May 1997 Dry Creek Jun 1997 East Weaver Creek Aug 1997 Eel River at Sandy Prairie Jun 1997 Guadalupe River Mar 1997 Klamath River Mar 1997 Mad River at Blue Lake Mar 1997 Pajaro River, Monterey County Jul 1997 Pajaro River, Santa Cruz County Jun 1997 Pinole Creek Sep 1997 Redwood Creek Mar 1997 Rheem Creek Mar 1997 Rodeo Creek Apr 1997 Russian River, Mendocino County Jul 1997 Russian River, Sonoma County Jul 1997 San Leandro Mar 1997 San Lorenzo Creek Jun 1997 San Lorenzo River Jun 1997 San Pablo Creek Apr 1997 Uvas Creek May 1997 Wildcat Creek Apr 1997 34-22 SAN FRANCISCO, CA, DISTRICT TABLE 34-I RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: ESTIMATED COST FOR NEW WORK (See Section 14 of Text) Estimated Cost Non-Federal Project Feature Federal Contribution Total Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino): Channel Improvements below Dam on lower 98 miles of Russian River $ 14,436,000 $ 5,598,000 $ 20,034,000 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Improvements below Dam 259,240,000 103,777,000 2 363,017,000 Total $273,676,000 109,375,000 $ 383,051,000 1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation storage to be paid over a period not to exceed 50 facilities at completed projects. years after use of storage is initiated and inclusive of 2. Reimbursements by local interests to Federal lands and damages. Government for costs allocated to water supply TABLE 34-J RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: PROJECT FEATURES AND ESTIMATED COST (See Section 14 of Text) Height of Nearest City Distance Dam and Capacity Estimated Name (California) Above Mouth Type (Acre-Ft) Cost Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mile 0.8 East Fork 160 Feet- Mendocino) Ukiah of Russian River Earthfill 122,500 $ 17,550,000 1 Channel Improvements (East Mile 0 to 0.8 East Fork) Ukiah Fork - 2,484,000 below Coyote Valley Dam and lower 98 miles of Mile 0 to 98, Russian Russian River Guerneville River 319 Feet- Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Healdsburg Mile 14.4 Dry Creek Earthfill 181,000 363,017.000 Channel Improvements (Dry Creek) below Dry Creek Mile 1 to 14.4 Dry (Warm Springs Dam) Healdsburg Creek - 2,864,000 1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects. 34-23 SACRAMENTO CA, DISTRICT * This district comprises basins of Suisun Bay and San Joaquin and Sacramento Rivers in California; Goose Lake in Oregon; basins of the Great Salt Lake and Sevier Lake in Utah; an intervening portion of Great Basin in northern Nevada, northern California, and southeastern Idaho; and the upper Colorado River basin, which is in southwestern Wyoming, eastern Utah, northeastern Arizona and western Colorado, west of the Continental Divide. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. Sacramento River, CA ............ Page ..... 35-2 2. Sacramento River, Deep Water Ship Channel, CA .................... 35-3 3. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) ...................... 35-4 4. San Joaquin River, CA ................ 35-4 Flood Control 5. Buchanan Dam-H.V. Eastman Lake, Chowchilla River, CA .................. 35-5 6. Cache Creek Settling Basin, CA .......... 35-5 7. Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and Tributaries, including New Hogan Lake And Farmington Dam, CA .............. 35-6 8. Colorado River at Grand Junction, CO ... 35-7 9. Corte Madera Creek, CA ............... 35-8 10. Coyote and Berryessa Creeks, CA ........ 35-8 11. Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA ........... 35-9 12. Guadalupe River, CA .................. 35-9 13. Hidden Dam-Hensley Lake, Fresno River, CA ......................... 35-10 14. Isabella Lake, Kern River, CA .......... 35-11 15. Kaweah and Tule Rivers, including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, CA .... 35-13 16. Little Dell Lake, UT .................. 35-14 17. Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek NV and CA ...................... . 35-15 18. Merced County Streams ............... 35-15 19. Merced County Stream Group, CA ...... 35-16 20. Pajaro River, CA .................... 35-17 21. Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, CA ... 35-17 22. Redbank and Fancher Creeks, CA ....... 35-19 23. Russian River Basin, including Dry Creek (Warm Springs Lake) and Lake Mendocino (Coyote Valley Dam), CA .... 35-20 24. Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA from Collinsville to Shasta Dam ......... 35-21 25.San Lorenzo, CA ........ ....... 35-23 26. Upper Jordan, UT ................... 35-24 27. Walnut Creek, CA ................... 35-25 Flood Control (Cont'd) Page 28. West Sacramento, CA ............... 35-25 29. Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA ..... 35-26 30. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects .................... . 35-27 31. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization ..................... 35-28 32. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations .................. 35-28 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 33. New Melones Lake, CA .............. 35-28 General Investigation 34. Surveys ............................ 35-30 35. Collection and Study of Basic Data ...... 35-30 36. Research and Development ............ 35-30 37. Preconstruction Engineering & Design ... 35-30 38. Other Work under Special Authority ..... 35-31 Tables Page Table 35-A Cost and Financial Statement ............... 35-33 Table 35-B Authorizing Legislation .............. 35-45 Table 35-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects ....... 35-47 Table 35-D Not Applicable Table 35-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .......... 35-48 Table 35-F Not Applicable Table 35-G Deauthorized Projects ..... 35-51 Table 35-H Sacramento River, CA: Tidal and Flood Conditions Prevailing ............... 35-51 Table 35-I San Joaquin River, CA: Total Cost of New Work For Projects ............. 35-52 Table 35-J San Joaquin River, CA: Project Units (1950 Modification) Reclassified and Excluded from Project Cost ............. 35-52 Table 35-K Merced County Stream Group, CA, Maximum Inflow, Storage, 35-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 IMPROVEMENTS (Cont'd) And Outflow for Projects .. 35-53 Table 35-L Russian River Basin, CA: Estimated Cost for New Work ....... 35-53 Table 35-M Russian River Basin, CA: Project Features and Estimated Costs .......... 35-54 Table 35-N Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA, Collinsville To Shasta Dam: Project Units Units Reclassified and Excluded From Cost Estimate ...... 35-54 Table 35-0 Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA, from Collinsville To Shasta Dam: Construction Accomplished and Contract Costs .................. 35-55 Table 35-P Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization Flood Control Activities Pursuant To Section 205, Public Law 80-858, as Amended (Preauthorization) ........ 35-55 Table 35-Q Surveys ................ 35-56 Navigation 1. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Location. Rises in Trinity Mountains in north-central California, flows generally southerly about 374 miles and empties into Suisun Bay, an arm of San Francisco Bay, at Collinsville, CA. (See Geological Survey topographic map of Sacramento Valley, CA.) Previous projects. For details see page 1985 of Annual Report for 1915 and page 1708 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. For description of Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, see Annual Report for 1969. Total first cost for completed portion was $43,932,558 ($39,560,558 Federal (Corps), $300,000 (Coast Guard), and $4,072,000 non-Federal for lands and damages, including relocations) and excludes local interests cost $10,741,000 (June 1963) for 30-foot deep water ship channel and 13-foot deep connecting canal basic terminal facilities required under terms of project authorization. Project also provided for a shallow-draft channel 10 feet deep at mean lower low water 150 to 200 feet bottom width, from Suisun Bay to Sacramento, CA, 60 miles; a depth of 6 feet at low water between Sacramento and Colusa, 85 miles; a depth of 5 feet at low water between Colusa and Chico Landing, 50 miles; and such depths as practicable between Chico Landing and Red Bluff, 53 miles, a total distance of 248 miles. However, shallow-draft channel feature Colusa to Red Bluff (including Colusa to Chico Landing, 50 miles and Chico Landing to Red Bluff, 53 miles) was deauthorized by 1986 Water Resources Development Act on November 17, 1986 (Public Law 99-662). (See table 35-H on tidal and flood conditions prevailing.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for deep 35-2 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT water ship channel project. None required on shallow-draft feature. Terminal facilities. Piers, wharves, and docks at Port of Sacramento for shallow-draft navigation are open-pile structures with timber decks, some of which are designed to meet extreme high waters of flood stages. All main wharves at Sacramento have rail connections. Three of above facilities are owned by city of Sacramento and remainder by private interests; all are privately operated. For full description see "Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif., 1986." Deep water terminal facilities comprise wharves and piers, administration and storage buildings, and belt railroad facilities. Majority of these facilities are owned and operated by Sacramento-Yolo Port District; remainder are privately owned and operated. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New work, Deep Water Ship Channel: None. Maintenance: Shallow Draft Channel: Maintenance and operation activities continued in Sacramento River, Sacramento upstream to Colusa. Deep Water Ship Channel: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Historical summary. Construction of 7-foot shallow-draft channel below Sacramento was initiated in September 1899 and completed in 1904. Modified 10-foot shallow-draft channel up to Sacramento was initiated in FY 1928 and completed in 1931. Shallow-draft channel above Sacramento was begun in April 1946 but new work was discontinued when about 48 percent complete. In February 1974, remaining work for shallow-draft portion of project, provision of a 5-foot depth between Colusa and Chico Landing (50 miles), was reclassified as "deferred." Channel is navigable all year; however, there is no regular navigation above Colusa, 145 miles above river mouth. On November 17, 1986, remaining shallow-draft feature, Colusa to Red Bluff (including Colusa to Chico Landing, 50 miles and Chico Landing to Red Bluff, 53 miles) was deauthorized by 1986 Water Resources Development Act (Public Law 99-662). Construction of 30-foot deep water ship channel was initiated in July 1949; improvement dredging by continuing contracts resulted in provision of an operational facility for oceangoing vessels during June 1963. Bascule bridge was completed in April 1960, barge lock in August 1961, barge canal in November 1961, and entire deep water ship channel in June 1970. 2. SACRAMENTO RIVER DEEP WATER SHIP CHANNEL, CA Location. On the Sacramento River between Collinsville and the Port of Sacramento, a distance of about 43 miles, in the counties of Sacramento, Contra Costa, Solano, and Yolo, CA. Existing project. Project provides for deepening to 35 feet the Suisun Bay and Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channels from New York Slough to the Port of Sacramento, and the Avon to New York Slough reach to 35 feet which will be accomplished under the San Francisco Bay to Stockton (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) project, and widening the channel as necessary. Current selected plan also provides for a water quality monitoring program, and establishment of wetland habitat and upland habitat to mitigate for losses of such habitat. Project estimate (October 1996 price level) is $49,500,000 comprising Federal cost (Corps) of $24,600,000; Federal cost (Coast Guard) for navigation aids $300,000; and non-Federal cost of $24,600,000 for lands and damages, relocations, and spoil retention dikes, including the cash contribution ($8,210,000) that local interests must pay. Existing project was adopted by Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1985, August 15, 1985 (Public Law 99-88), 99th Cong., 1st sess. and modified by 1986 Water Resources Development Act, November 17, 1986 (Public Law 99-662) 99th Cong., 2d sess. Local cooperation. Local interests, through a public body legally authorized and financially capable, must give assurances they will furnish lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project; and provide retention dikes for dredged material disposal area; and pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep draft navigation during construction, presently estimated at $8,210,000. A Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) (sec. 221) was executed June 27, 35-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 1986. An LCA modification necessitated by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 was executed December 6, 1988. Construction has been postponed indefinitely until local interests develop a financial plan to obtain non-Federal cash contribution. Terminal facilities. All main wharves at Sacramento have rail connections. Three of above facilities are owned by city of Sacramento and remainder by private interests; all are privately operated. For full description see "Port and Terminal Facilities at the Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif., 1986." Deep water terminal facilities comprise wharves and piers, administration and storage buildings, and belt railroad facilities. Majority of these facilities are owned and operated by Sacramento-Yolo Port District; remainder are privately owned and operated. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations and results during fiscal year. Project coordination was continued. Historical summary. General Design Memorandum was approved and Record of Decision was signed in May 1987. Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) modification was approved and was signed by Port of Sacramento on August 19, 1987. LCA modification was executed December 6, 1988. First construction contract was awarded February 2, 1989 and completed in July 1990; second contract was awarded September 12, 1990 and completed in August 1991. 3. AND FRANCISCO BAY TO STOCKTON, CA (JOHN F. BALDWIN AND STOCKTON SHIP CHANNELS) Reported on by the San Francisco District. Refer to Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1995. 4. SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA Location. Rises in east central California and flows westerly and northwesterly about 340 miles to its confluence with Sacramento River at head of Suisun Bay, 48 miles northeast of San Francisco. Deep water channel in San Joaquin River extends 41 miles from its mouth in Suisun Bay at Pittsburg to city of Stockton. Waterborne access to city provided by Stockton Channel, an artificial cut extending from river about 2 miles into city. (See Coast and Geodetic Survey Sheet 5527.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement, modifications, and authorizing acts, see Annual Report for 1967. (See table 35-I for total cost of new work for project completed in May 1960.) Projects units (1950 modification) reclassified and excluded from project cost are set forth in table 35-J. Modification of existing project is included as one unit of San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA, (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels) project, authorized by 1965 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 209, 89th Cong., Ist sess.); this modification is reported in detail under Sacramento District, improvement No. 3 and San Francisco District, Improvement No. 3. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed portion of project; for details of required cash contributions on completed, inactive and deferred portions of project, see Existing project paragraph, Annual Report for 1967. Terminal facilities. For description of harbor facilities at Port of Stockton, CA, see Port Series 32, "The Ports of Sacramento, Stockton, Pittsburg and Antioch, Calif.," revised 1986. Downstream from Stockton, traffic is accommodated by bank landings and sheds except at Antioch and near Pittsburg, where there are wharves for shallow- and deep-draft vessels. Terminal transfer facilities at public ocean terminal of Port of Stockton are adequate for present and immediate future. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Condition studies and miscellaneous inspections and reports were accomplished by hired labor. Dredging was initiated and completed at contract cost of $5,302,462. High cost of dredging due to January 1997 floods.) (Repair or restoration of wavewash protection is required by legislation authorized by Improvement No. 3.) Historical Summary. Active portion of existing project was completed in May 1960. Construction of project was initiated in December 1877. 35-4 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT Flood Control 5. BUCHANAN DAM-H.V. EASTMAN LAKE, CHOWCHILLA RIVER, CA Location. On Chowchilla River about 36 miles above its mouth and about 16 miles northeast of city of Chowchilla, CA. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a 205-foot high rockfill dam to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 150,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, recreation, and fish and wildlife. In conjunction with dam, project plan provides for about 12 miles of downstream levee and channel construction on Ash Slough to accommodate a project design flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second within slough and 7 miles of levee and channel improvement on Berenda Slough. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is the responsibility of the Federal Government. Total first cost for existing project is $28,919,597, of which $27,369,597 is Federal cost, including $4,580,000 for basic recreation facilities, and $1,550,000 non-Federal costs for lands and damages, including relocations for downstream levee and channel improvements. Local interests have contracted with the Bureau of Reclamation for irrigation service. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Local interests have also, over a period of years, expended about $500,000 for construction of low levees and clearing downstream channels to provide some local flood protection in project area. This work is inadequate during major floods. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 98, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). Lake formed by Buchanan Dam on Chowchilla River was designated "H.V. Eastman Lake" by Public Law 93-217. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities were continued. Runoff of Chowchilla River above Buchanan Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 142,015 acre-feet occurred January 23, 1997. Maximum hourly inflow to reservoir was 17,018 cubic feet per second on January 25, 1997. Maximum release of 5,955 cubic feet per second on January 25, 1997, was above maximum permissible flood release. During the year, a total of 47,341 acre-feet of water was released for irrigation and other purposes. Releases for flood control purposes totaled 179,036 acre-feet. Historical summary. Construction began in July 1971 and was completed in May 1979. Construction of Buchanan and Hidden dam and appurtenances was combined under one contract. Project was completed in September 1983, except for installation of piezometers (now deferred indefinitely). Dam closure was in March 1975; dam was completed in January 1976. Reservoir clearing and boundary marking were completed May 1975. Bifurcation structure was completed in February 1976. Channel improvement, Ash and Berenda Sloughs, was completed in March 1976. Recreation areas: Phase I was completed in January 1976; Phase II was completed in February 1978. Residences, administration building, and visitors center contract was completed in May 1978. Landscaping was completed in May 1979 and erosion control was completed in April 1979. A resources interpretive display and road relocation were completed in FY 1982. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1981. Solar heating was installed at Chowchilla recreation area in FY 1984. An hydrilla eradication (spraying) program was initiated in FY 1989. Final land audit was approved on December 3, 1985. 6. CACHE CREEK BASIN, CA (CACHE CREEK SETTLING BASIN) Location. At the mouth of Cache Creek in Yolo County where it enters the Yolo Bypass about 2 miles east of city of Woodland and about 15 miles northwest of city of Sacramento, CA. Existing project. Provides for raising the perimeter levees of the existing settling basin an average of 12 feet, extending the levees upstream to County Road 102 to provide 50-year sediment storage capacity, enlarging 35-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 and reconstructing the cobble weir, and degrading existing training levees and rebuilding them adjacent to western perimeter levee to provide 50 years of sediment storage capacity (340 acre-feet annually.). Estimated cost (October 1993) for existing project is $20,130,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $11,710,000 is Federal and $8,420,000 is non-Federal (which includes $1,010,000 cash contribution). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986 (HD 98-134, 98th Cong., 1st sess., contains published map.) Project as authorized included development of a national wildlife refuge within the settling basin; however, the Department of the Army determined that such refuge would be more appropriately funded and developed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Refuge feature was reclassified to deferred category on April 11, 1988. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges) and other facilities where necessary in construction of the project; pay 5 percent of cost allocated to flood control to bring total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent of which $1,010,000 is cash contribution, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction.Local Cooperation Agreement was executed March 12, 1990. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities were continued. Levee repair contract was awarded in August 1996. Cache Creek Settling Basin work was transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance in December 1993. Historical summary. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed March 12, 1990. Cache Creek Settling Basin enlargement (multicomponent) construction contract was awarded August 5, 1991, completed in September 1993, and work was transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance on December 2, 1993. 7. CALAVERAS RIVER AND LITTLEJOHN CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, INCLUDING NEW HOGAN LAKE AND FARMINGTON DAM, CA Location. Streams comprising Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek groups rise in Sierra Nevada and its foothills, flow easterly across flatlands of San Joaquin Valley and empty into San Joaquin River directly, or through various sloughs, in vicinity of Stockton, CA. Littlejohn Creek is in Calaveras, Stanislaus, and San Joaquin Counties. The three principal stream systems of the group are, from south to north, Lone Tree Creek, Littlejohn Creek, and Duck Creek. Calaveras River group is in Calaveras and San Joaquin Counties. The two principal streams of the groups are, from south to north, Calaveras River and Bear Creek. (See Geological Survey Valley Springs quadrangle for New Hogan reservoir area and Trigo and Bachelor Valley quadrangles for Farmington reservoir area.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements consisting of Farmington Dam, New Hogan Lake, and Bear Creek levee and channel improvement, and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1967. (a) Farmington: Total first cost (July 1955) for project was $3,995,684, of which $3,676,384 was Federal and $319,300 non-Federal for lands and damages including relocations. (b) New Hogan: Federal cost for project is $15,906,150, including $543,514 for basic recreation facilities. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost for recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $897,742. (c) Bear Creek: Project cost is $6,485,734, of which $3,242,867 is Federal, including reimbursement ($488,096) to local interests of one-half of excess local interest cost of lands, rights-of-way, and relocations over estimated Federal construction cost in accordance with section 3, Public Law 738, 74th Congress. Non-Federal cost included in above amount is $3,242,867 for relocations and lands and damages, exclusive of above Federal reimbursement. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. New Hogan: Local interests must pay portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to 35-6 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT conservation functions of project. These costs are estimated at 36.2 percent of first cost and 38 percent of annual costs. In addition, local interests contributed land, the (July 1964) market value of which was $556,000. For years 1961 through 1970, an interim contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users provided for storage and payment of irrigation water; a long-term contract between that agency and local water users was executed August 25, 1970. Local interests paid $4,514,003 through December 31, 1996. A concessionaire at New Hogan Marina provided public use facilities in accordance with lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost to date of $234,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: New Hogan Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Bear Creek, San Joaquin County: None. Maintenance: Farmington Dam Maintenance and operation activities continued; structures were maintained in serviceable condition. During rainflood season, maximum flow of Duck Creek Diversion was 550 cubic feet per second on December 21, 1996. Maximum flow of Littlejohn Creek at Farmington was 1,920 cubic feet per second on January 25, 1997. Maximum flow of Duck Creek near Farmington was 1,670 cubic feet per second on January 22, 1997. Maximum storage in reservoir was 25,132 acre-feet on January 3, 1997, and maximum estimated inflow to reservoir was 12,929 cubic feet per second on January 2, 1997. Maximum release of 1,927 cubic feet per second on January 30, 1997, was above maximum permissible flood release. During the year, 162,417 acre-feet was released for flood control. New Hogan Lake Maintenance and operation activities continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $16,578. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Calaveras River above New Hogan was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 227,049 acre-feet occurred January 4, 1997. Maximum hourly inflow to reservoir was 23,924 cubic feet per second on January 2, 1997. Maximum release of 7,143 cubic feet per second on January 28, 1997, was above maximum permissible flood release. During the year, 148,418 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Release for flood control purposes amounted to 225,915 acre-feet. Historical summary. Farmington Dam: Construction of Farmington project was initiated in July 1949 and completed for beneficial flood control operation in 1952. Duck Creek channel improvement was completed in November 1951; and channel improvement on south Littlejohn Creek was completed in May 1955. There are no recreation facilities or public-use areas. All work completed. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1982. New Hogan Lake: Construction was initiated May 1960, main dam closure November 1963, project completed for operational use in June 1964, and all work completed October 1973. Recreation facilities have been provided from Code 710 appropriations. Seepage measurement weir constructed in June 1980. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980. Bear Creek, San Joaquin County: Construction began in June 1963 and was completed in June 1967. Final cash contribution was made to local interests December 23, 1970. Solar heating was installed at recreation facilities in FY 1984. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 8. COLORADO RIVER AT GRAND JUNCTION, CO Location. On north bank of Colorado River from 9th Street west to the Denver Rio Grande Western Railroad Bridge at city of Grand Junction, CO, in Mesa County. Existing project. Provides for construction of a 3,200 foot levee located on north side of Colorado River, one road ramp over levee for accessing Watson Island, 3 detention basins, a relief well system and a 550-foot-long impermeable blanket to prevent seepage though railroad embankment. Estimated cost (September 1994) is $1,651,200, of which $1,086,700 is Federal cost and $564,500 is non-Federal cost for lands and damages and includes a cash contribution of $63,000. Existing project was approved by Chief of Engineers on February 28, 1994, under provisions of section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act, as amended. Local cooperation. Local sponsor shall furnish to the Government all lands, easements, and rights-of-way, including suitable borrow and dredged material disposal areas, as determined by the Government to be necessary for construction, operation, and maintenance of the project, and shall furnish to the Government evidence supporting local sponsor's legal authority to grant rights-of-entry to such lands. Necessary lands, 35-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 easements, and rights-of-way may be provided incrementally, but all lands, easements, and rights-of-way determined by the Government to be necessary for work to be performed under a construction contract must be furnished prior to advertisement of the construction contract. Local sponsor shall provide or pay to the Government the cost of providing all retaining dikes, wasteweirs, bulkheads, and embankments, including all monitoring features and stilling basins that may be required at any dredged material disposal areas necessary for project construction. Upon notification from the Government, local sponsor shall accomplish or arrange for accomplishment at no cost to the Government all relocations (excluding railroad bridges and approaches thereto) determined by the Government to be necessary for project construction. Local sponsor shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, Public Law 91-646, as amended by Title IV of the Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987 (Public Law 100-17), and the Uniform Regulations contained in 49 CFR Part 24, in acquiring lands, easements, and rights-of-way for construction and subsequent operation and maintenance of the project, and inform all affected persons of applicable benefits, policies, and procedures in connection with said Act. Local sponsor shall provide such documentation as contracting officer requires to demonstrate compliance. The Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) between the Department of the Army and the City of Grand Junction, CO, was signed April 8, 1994. Operations and results during fiscal year. Plans and specifications were completed in August 1994. Non-Federal cash contribution of $63,000 for construction was received September 27, 1994. First construction contract in amount of $575,830 was awarded September 30, 1994. Historical summary. First construction contract in amount of $575,830 was awarded September 30, 1994. 9. CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA Reported on by San Francisco District. Refer to Report of the Secretary of the Army on Civil Works Activities for FY 1996. 10. COYOTE CREEK, CA (KNOWN AS COYOTE AND BERRYESSA CREEKS) Location. Project is located in the cities of San Jose and Milpitas immediately south of San Francisco Bay in Santa Clara County, CA. Existing project. Plan of improvement on Coyote Creek consists of overflow channels and offset levees. Improvement on Berryessa Creek includes two sedimentation basins at the upstream end of the concrete lined trapezoidal channel and offset levees. Combined plan would provide flood protection from Coyote and Berryessa Creeks to cities of San Jose and Milpitas, which include large industrial complexes and some residential development. Estimated cost (October 1997) for the Coyote Creek element of the existing project is $61,705,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $30,865,000 is Federal and $30,840,000 is non-Federal (which includes $3,080,000 cash contribution). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Estimated cost (October 1996) for the Berryessa Creek element of the existing project is $16,525,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $12,435,000 is Federal and $4,090,000 is non-Federal (which includes $1,820,000 cash contribution). Existing project was authorized under Section 101(a)(5) of WRDA 1990, Public Law 101-640 (HD 101-126, 101st Cong., 2d sess.). Local cooperation. (Coyote Creek) Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and borrow and excavated or dredged material disposal areas, which may be reduced for credit allowed based on prior work (Sec. 104 of WRDA 86 ($8,633,000), Sec. 26 of WRDA 88 (not to exceed $3,000,000) and Sec. 215 of the Flood Control Act of 1968 (not to exceed $3,000,000) after reductions for such credit have been made in the required cash payments; modify or relocate utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, and perform prior work under Sec. 104 of WRDA 86, Sec. 26 of WRDA 88, 35-8 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT and Sec. 215 of the Flood Control Act of 1968, where necessary for the construction of the project; and pay 5 percent of the costs allocated to flood control, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests will receive an estimated Federal reimbursement of $8,270,000 for one-half of non-Federal costs allocated to flood control in excess of Federal costs (Sec. 103 of WRDA 86). (Berryessa Creek) Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and borrow and excavated or dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project; and pay 12 percent of the costs allocated to flood control to bring the total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation and replacement of flood control facilities. The non-Federal sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Operations and results during fiscal year. Levee and channel improvement Contract 3B, Coyote Creek was fiscally completed September 2, 1997. Coyote Creek mitigation contract continued at a fiscal year cost of $565,091. Local sponsor received partial credit payment of $500,000 for construction of Coyote Creek Reach 3A integral work under Sec. 215 of the Flood Control Act of 1968. Payment of $1,400,000 was made to local sponsor as partial reimbursement for one-half of the non-Federal costs allocated to flood control in excess of Federal costs. Historical summary. Separate General Design Memorandums were prepared for Coyote and Berryessa Creeks. General Design Memorandum for Coyote was submitted in May 1993. Local interests have completed construction of Reach 1 (sec 104, Water Resources Development Act (WRDA), Reach 2 (sec 26, WRDA) and Reach 3A (sec 215, WRDA). National Defense Authorization Act for FY 1994 directed the Secretary of the Army to construct project notwithstanding sec 902, WRDA. Project Cooperation Agreement was executed in September 1994. Coyote Creek Reach 3B construction contract was completed at a final cost of $5,308,925. Preconstruction engineering and design cost is $4,410,000. Total reimbursement of $7,400,000 for costs in excess of 50% maximum requirement and credit payments of$14,633,000 for prior integral work, have been made to the local sponsor as of September 30, 1997. 11. FAIRFIELD VICINITY STREAMS, CA Location. On five streams in vicinity of cities of Fairfield and Suisun, Solano County, CA. Existing project. See Annual Report for 1996, p.35- 8. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. In accordance with FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (Public Law 99-88) and sec. 117 of the Further Continuing Appropriations Act for FY 1986 (Public Law 99-190), a Local Cooperation Agreement for flood control and recreation (sec. 221) was executed June 3, 1986. Sec. 117 of Further Continuing Appropriations Act for FY 1986 contained the following authorization language: Operations and results during fiscal year. Project close-out activities were on-going. Historical summary. Construction was initiated in October 1986. Enlargement of McCoy Creek and construction of Laurel Creek Diversion Channel, Phase I, was transferred to local interests in July 1987; Laurel Creek Diversion Channel, Phase II, was transferred to local interests in November 1988; Laurel Creek Diversion Channel, Phase III, was transferred to local interests in April 1990; and Laurel Creek Diversion , Phase IIA, was transferred to local interests in December 1990 for maintenance. Channel improvement contract for Ledgewood Creek Channel, Phase IV, was completed and transferred to local interests in December 1991 for maintenance. Mitigation planting on Ledgewood Creek was completed in April 1993; maintenance inspection has been completed. Construction of Laurel Creek pedestrian bridge overcrossing was completed and transferred to local interests on July 8, 1993. 12. GUADALUPE RIVER, CA 35-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Location. On Guadalupe River in downtown area of city of San Jose, Santa Clara County, CA. Existing project. Authorized plan provides for widening and deepening one or more sides of Guadalupe River for 2.5 miles from Interstate Highway 280 to Interstate Highway 880 in downtown San Jose, CA, and channel modifications with provisions for fish and wildlife mitigation, as necessary. Non-Federal sponsor must pay 100 percent of incremental construction cost of locally preferred plan. Project is an integral component of a much larger regional park plan being undertaken by the San Jose Redevelopment Agency. Estimated cost (October 1997) is $182,800,000 (which includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) of which $78,500,000 is Federal and $104,300,000 is non-Federal including reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1990 which directed the Secretary of the Army to construct the project notwithstanding sec. 902 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 regarding project cost limitations, and Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1992 which directed the Secretary of the Army to modify and construct the project in accordance with the January 1991 GDM; it is consistent with the Guadalupe River Park plan requested by the local sponsor and with cost sharing policy. Local cooperation. Local interests, through a public body legally authorized and financially capable, must give assurances they will furnish lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas, which are partially offset by a credit ($5,701,000) allowed for prior work (sec. 104, Water Resources Development Act of 1986); credit was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project; pay 5 percent of the costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Federal reimbursement will be made to non-Federal sponsor for one-half of non-Federal costs allocated to flood control in excess of Federal costs. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. On June 2, 1989, the local sponsor, the Santa Clara Valley Water District, expressed intent to provide all needed cost sharing funds. On September 21, 1990, the San Jose Redevelopment Agency requested modification of project to include recreation facilities and confirmed that they intend to participate as local sponsor for recreation. Local Cooperation Agreements for both flood control and recreation were executed March 30, 1992. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction contract No. 2 (Hedding Street to Coleman Avenue), was completed with fiscal year cost of $460,374 (Interstate 880 to Hedding Street). Fiscal year mitigation costs included Fish and Wildlife Mitigation for Contract 1 of $117,302 and Early Plant collection for Contract 2 (Hedding Street to Coleman Avenue) of $50,911. Historical summary. Final General Design Memorandum (GDM) reflecting locally preferred plan, was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army on March 26, 1992, with comments. Revision of GDM to address comments was completed in July 1993. Local Cooperation Agreements for both flood control and recreation were executed March 30, 1992. Construction contract No. 1 for channel improvement (Highway 880 to Hedding Street) was awarded August 10, 1992; and was essentially completed and transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation on August 11, 1994. Construction contract No. 2 (Hedding Street to Coleman Avenue) was awarded July 8, 1994, and was essentially completed and transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation on October 25, 1996. 13. HIDDEN DAM-HENSLEY LAKE, FRESNO RIVER, CA Location. On Fresno River about 50 miles above its mouth and about 15 miles northeast of Madera, CA (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a 163-foot high earthfill dam to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 90,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, recreation and other purposes. In 35-10 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT conjunction with the dam, the project provides for about 13 miles of downstream levee and channel improvements on Fresno River immediately upstream of Chowchilla Canal crossing to accommodate project design flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is the responsibility ofthe Federal Government. Total first cost for existing project is $31,785,426, of which $30,555,426 is Federal cost, including $3,564,168 for basic recreation facilities, and estimated $1,230,000 non-Federal cost for lands and damages including relocations for downstream levee and channel improvements. Local interests have contracted with the Bureau of Reclamation for irrigation service. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Local interests have also, over a period of years, expended about $300,000 for construction of low levees and clearing downstream channels to provide some local flood protection in the project area. This work is inadequate during major floods. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 37, 87th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Lake created by Hidden Reservoir project on Fresno River was designated "Hensley Lake" by Public Law 93-603. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work. None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities were continued. RunoffofFresno River below Hidden Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 76,994 acre-feet occurred January 24, 1997. Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir was 14,203 cubic feet per second on January 2, 1997. Maximum release of 4,594 cubic feet per second on January 24, 1997, was above maximum permissible flood release. During the year, 58,539 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes and 173,547 acre-feet was released for flood control. Historical summary. Construction began in July 1971 and was completed in January 1979. Dam closure was in March 1975; dam was completed November 1975. Instrumentation was completed in January 1976. Downstream channel improvement, Fresno River, was completed April 1976. Recreation areas: Phase I was completed in March 1976; Phase II was completed in June 1978. Residences, administration building, grounds, and utilities contract was completed in February 1978. Landscaping was completed in December 1978 and erosion control was completed in January 1979. Project was completed in September 1980. Final land audit was approved February 5, 1980. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980. Piezometer installation was completed in September 1982. Solar heating was installed at recreation areas in FY 1984. 14. ISABELLA LAKE, KERN RIVER, CA Location. About 35 miles northeast of city of Bakersfield, CA, near confluence of north and south forks of Kern River; auxiliary dam is about one-half mile east of main dam. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) In 1991, Isabella Lake and 16,000 acres of surrounding land was transferred to the Forest Service in exchange for about 2,500 acres of Forest Service land near Pine Flat Lake. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1967. Federal cost for new work is $22,027,452. For future non-Federal reimbursement see Local cooperation and Licenses paragraphs. Federal cost funded from Code 710 appropriations is $2,199,085. Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. California officially adopted project by chapter 1514 of statutes of 1945, State of California. Local interests, represented by North Kern, Buena Vista, and Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage Districts and La Hacienda Water District, were required to reimburse the Federal Government the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation functions of project. These costs, based on a cost allocation study completed in December 1955, are $4,573,000 of first cost and 21.7 percent of annual operation and maintenance cost. For the years 1956 through 1964, an interim contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users provided for storage and payment of irrigation water. Under provisions of this interim contract, local interests paid $1,936,229 through December 31, 1964. A long-term contract between the Bureau and local water users was executed October 23, 1964. Balance due on allocated first cost of $4,573,000 was paid by the water users on 35-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 March 31, 1965. Kern County assumed administration of recreation and development and maintenance of public use areas at project in accordance with a 25-year license February 15, 1955. The agreement with Kern County provided for joint operation and development by the Corps and Kern County including permits granted to concessionaires by the county to provide certain services. As of September 30, 1971, Kern County relinquished all administration of recreation and development and maintenance of public use areas at the project. A State law permitting the Department of Boating and Waterways (known as the Department of Navigation and Ocean Development prior to January 1979) to participate in inland water development with Federal agencies was signed by the Governor on August 11, 1972. Isabella Lake and surrounding land, 16,000 acres around the lake currently being used for park and recreation purposes, was turned over to the Forest Service by the Corps on May 15, 1991, in exchange for approximately 2,500 acres of Forest Service recreation land near Pine Flat Lake. This was accomplished by using a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of Agriculture (Forest Service). The MOU requires an exchange of land between departments. Three Corps maintenance employees, under supervision of the Success Lake park manager, will stay at Isabella to operate the dam for flood control and water conservation purposes. Authority for new concessionaire operating permits to be issued, as well as those previously granted by the Corps, will be transferred to the Forest Service. Total cost to date of present recreation facilities developed by the county and the marina concessionaires is about $965,000; $235,000 of this was a grant from the California Wildlife Conservation Board and about $534,000 is investment by marina concessionaires. Licenses. In accordance with Federal Power Commission Docket No. E-6578, issued April 1, 1963, payment of $377,426 was made to the Federal Government by Pacific Gas and Electric Co. ($108,352) and Southern California Edison Co. ($269,074) for headwater benefits to downstream existing plants from Isabella Dam to cover benefits from April 15, 1954, to December 31, 1962. Between 1962 and 1982, the power companies have in the aggregate made annual payments of $44,650 for headwater benefits. That amount was to be paid each year until changes in operation, development, or costs indicated some modification to be advisable. Federal Power Commission Docket No. E-6578 was revised by Docket No. HB07-75-4-000 (order issued July 11, 1983 under 24 FERC, paragraph 62052) which modified cumulative use charges after 1974, effective retroactively. Such charges will now vary each year. An adjustment (years 1974 through 1984) was included in 1984 payment of $244,790. The 1985 payment was $52,747; 1986 payment was $51,905. No payment was received in 1987. The 1988 payment was $58,187. No payment was received in 1989. Two payments ($60,894 and $55,443) were received in 1990; $60,983 was received in 1991; $65,975 in October 1991 (FY 1992) $77,577 in October 1992 (FY 1993), and $62,231 in October 1993 (FY 1994). Cumulative use charges collected by the Federal Power Commission (known as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission since January 9, 1978) and returned to the U. S. Treasury through period ending September 30, 1995, amounted to $2,150,458. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation continued. Structures were maintained in good condition. Runoff of Kern River above Isabella Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 491,992 acre-feet occurred June 6, 1997. Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir was 28,310 cubic feet per second on January 3, 1997, and maximum outflow of 3,337 cubic feet per second occurred March 4, 1997. During the year, 1,019,157 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Historical summary. Construction began in March 1948 and was completed in June 1968. Main dam, Borel Canal outlet works and appurtenances, and auxiliary dam were completed in April 1953. Storage impoundment began December 1952. Piezometer was installed in August 1982. Project is operating to provide flood protection and irrigation benefits for which it was designed. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. On May 15, 1991, Isabella Lake and surrounding land, 16,000 acres around the lake currently being used for park and recreational purposes, was turned over to the Forest Service by the Corps in exchange for approximately 2,500 acres of Forest 35-12 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT Service recreation land near Pine Flat Lake. A memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of Agriculture (Forest Service) was used. The MOU requires an exchange of land between departments. Three Corps maintenance employees, under supervision of the Success Lake park manager, will stay at Isabella to operate the dam for flood control and water conservation purposes. 15. KAWEAH AND TULE RIVERS, INCLUDING TERMINUS DAM AND SUCCESS LAKE, CA Location. Terminus Dam is on Kaweah River about 20 miles east of Visalia, CA. Success Lake is on Tule River about 5 miles east of Porterville, CA. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Existing project. Terminus Dam: For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost of new work is $19,302,957, including $242,605 for basic recreation facilities and excluding spreading works constructed by local interests at an estimated (July 1957) cost of about $750,000. Spreading works portion of project has been deauthorized. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, Public Law 93-251, as amended, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of that portion of project. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $700,004. Success Lake: For description of completion improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost of new work for Success Lake is $14,247,221, including $253,697 for basic recreation facilities. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $747,048. For future non-Federal reimbursements, see Local cooperation paragraph. Operation and maintenance of reservoirs is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. California officially adopted projects by chapter 1514 of statutes of 1945, State of California. Local interests for Terminus Dam are represented by Kaweah Delta Water Conservation District. Local interests for Success Lake are considered to be represented by the Vandalia, Porterville, and Lower Tule River Irrigation Districts, the Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District, and Pioneer Water Co., which represent over 90 percent of irrigated land and water-right holders along Tule River below damsite. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation functions of projects. These costs are estimated at 14.1 percent of first and annual costs for Terminus and 9.5 percent of first and annual costs for Success. Local interests for Terminus stated they will continue to operate and maintain spreading works and downstream channel systems to provide required capacity for disposal of floodwaters. Local interests for Success stated they will continue to maintain downstream channel systems to provide required capacity for disposal of floodwaters. Repayment contracts between the Bureau of Reclamation and local water users for irrigation supply from Terminus and Success reservoirs were executed January 11, 1965, and April 30, 1965, respectively. Reservoirs are being operated for irrigation storage as well as flood control and incidental recreation use. Tulare County acquired water for recreation pools at the projects. Local interests paid the following total amounts for irrigation services from the reservoirs through December 31, 1995: Terminus, $2,307,209 and Success, $1,110,572. Tulare County was granted a 25-year license for planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Success, July 10, 1960, and at Terminus, June 5, 1961. Basic public-use facilities constructed by Corps at the Success reservoir were transferred to jurisdiction of Tulare County on January 18, 1962; facilities at Terminus were transferred June 20, 1962. In March 1967, an amendment to the license agreements was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army. Under these amended licenses, Tulare County retained administration of only specified land areas and operation and maintenance of recreation facilities in these areas. In addition, they continued their program of water safety, boat inspection, and law enforcement at both reservoirs. The Corps took over the administration of the remainder of the project land areas and the operation and maintenance of recreation facilities in these areas. Calif. Department of Fish and Game expended funds to improve fishery resources of the Terminus reservoir. As of April 1, 1972, Tulare County relinquished all planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Terminus 35-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Dam. Tulare County by expenditure of county funds and by a lease to a marina concessionaire has aided in the development of recreation facilities at an estimated cost of $199,000. Calif. Department of Fish and Game expended funds in conjunction with Tulare Sportsman's Council and developed a habitat for upland game birds at Success Lake. As of April 1, 1972, Tulare County relinquished all planning, development, and management of public recreation areas at Success Lake, except for the Bartlett Park recreation area. Tulare County has aided in development of recreation facilities. Total cost to date of present recreation facilities developed by the county ($360,000) and the marina concessionaires ($373,000) is about $733,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Terminus Dam, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None .Success Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Terminus Dam: Maintenance and operation continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $559,109. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Kaweah River above Terminus Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 143,036 acre-feet occurred on June 2, 1997. Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir on January 2, 1997, was about56,595 cubic feet per second. Maximum outflow of 5,015 cubic feet per second occurred January 25, 1997. Irrigation and spreading releases totaled 440,392 acre-feet. Releases for flood control totaled 319,877 acre-feet. Success Lake: Maintenance and operation continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $607,069. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Tule River above Success Dam was above normal during the year. Maximum storage of 72,600 acre-feet occurred on January 6, 1997. Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir was 26,586 cubic feet per second on January 3, 1997, and maximum outflow of 3,198 feet per second occurred on January 25, 1997. Irrigation and spreading releases amounted to 139,806 acre-feet. Releases for flood control amounted to 214,162 acre-feet. Historical summary. Terminus Dam: Construction of project began in July 1957 and was completed in June 1968. Final land audit was approved on April 20, 1987. Construction of main dam and appurtenances, initiated in February 1959, was completed in June 1962. Dam has been operating since November 1961 to provide flood protection for which it was designed; conservation impoundment was commenced May 1962. Appurtenances are in good condition. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979 and completed in FY 1989. Piezometer installation and a cultural resources survey were completed in FY 1984. Success Lake: Construction of project began in November 1956, was completed in June 1968, and final audit of historical land record was approved December 17, 1979. Construction of main dam and appurtenances, initiated in October 1958, was completed in May 1961. Dam has been operating since October 1960 to provide flood protection for which it was designed; conservation impoundment was commenced March 1962. Recreation facilities were provided by Code 710 funds. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1979. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. 16. LITTLE DELL LAKE, UT Location. On Dell Creek, a tributary of Parleys Creek, about 8 miles east of Salt Lake City upstream of Mountain Dell Reservoir in Salt Lake County, UT. Existing Project. Project providing for construction of a dam about 253 feet high to create a reservoir with a gross capacity of 30,000 acre-feet for flood control, municipal and industrial water supply, recreation and fish and wildlife was authorized by the 1968 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 53, 90th Cong., 1st sess., contains published map) as modified by sec. 170, Water Resources Development Act of 1976, Public Law 94-587, October 22, 1976. Facility would be operated in conjunction with existing downstream 3,200 acre-foot Mountain Dell Reservoir on Parleys Creek for flood control and water supply. Authorized project has been reexamined and scaled down to reflect local interests' ability to pay. Current plan of improvement includes only flood control and water supply purposes. Recreation was deferred as of May 30, 1986, and Emigration Creek Diversion was deleted and placed in an inactive status. Recreation was reactivated in 1995 and the Recreation DM approved in 1996. The project includes an earthfill dam 224 feet high, a 20,500 acre-foot reservoir, and 10,035 feet of 35-14 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT pipeline to divert water from Parleys Creek. Estimated project cost (September 1997) is $65,300,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) of which $41,215,000 is Federal and $24,085,000 is non-Federal for lands and damages and includes a cash contribution of$19,955,000. Project is included in FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Act (Public Law 99-88) August 15, 1985. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project; pay all costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply; pay 13 percent of costs allocated to flood control to bring total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent, bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities; and pay a cash contribution presently estimated at $19,995,000. By letters of January 22, 1986, and January 24, 1986, the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake City and Salt Lake County indicated their support and willingness to proceed with a reduced scale project based on their "ability to pay." A Local Cooperation Agreement (sec. 221) was executed on June 10, 1986. Water Revenue Bonds were issued August 27, 1986, and proceeds from the sale in the amount of $14,300,000 have been deposited in the Little Dell Construction Fund Account. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities continued. Historical summary. A Local Cooperation Agreement (sec. 221) was executed June 10, 1986. Construction was initiated in April 1988. Construction of core trench and test fill was completed in February 1989. Main dam and appurtenances contract was awarded May 12, 1989 and completed in September 1993. Project was transferred to the local sponsor for maintenance and operation on March 26, 1993. Dam was dedicated on August 5, 1993. 17. MARTIS CREEK LAKE, MARTIS CREEK, NV AND CA Location. Reservoir is on Martis Creek a tributary of Truckee River, near Truckee, CA; intermittent channel improvements are on Truckee River in Reno, NV. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for areas.) Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Federal cost for project was $8,503,789 including $289,506 for basic recreation facilities. Federal cost of recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations was $1,200. Construction of recreation facilities under Code 710 was determined to be infeasible. Operation and maintenance of reservoir is Federal responsibility. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation of project, including recreation facilities, was continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff above Martis Creek Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 7,849 acre-feet occurred on January 6, 1997. Maximum inflow to the reservoir was 2,125 cubic feet per second on January 1, 1997, and maximum outflow of 378 cubic feet per second occurred January 2, 1997. During the year, 10,851 acre-feet was released for irrigation purposes. Releases for flood control amounted to 25,840 acre-feet. Historical summary. Project construction began in August 1967; dam closure was in October 1971; dam completed in August 1972; basic recreation facilities were completed in December 1972; and project was completed in June 1974. Recreation facilities under Code 710 funding were considered infeasible. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1981. 18. MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA Location. In vicinity of city of Merced, CA, on streams draining from Mariposa County foothills of the Sierra Nevada into Merced County. Streams lie easterly of and drain into the San Joaquin River between Chowchilla River on the south and Merced River on the north. Drainage area represents about 1,000 square miles; nearly 700 square miles of foothills and mountains in Mariposa County and about 300 square miles of flood plain in Merced County. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) 35-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Existing project. Project is a modification of Merced County Stream Group, Calif., Improvement No. 18, authorized by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 473, 78th Cong., 2d sess.) and completed in FY 1957. Existing project provides for construction of three new reservoirs Castle, Haystack Mountain, and Marguerite on Canal, Black Rascal, and Deadman-Dutchman Creeks, respectively, and enlargement of four existing reservoirs Burns, Bear, Owens, and Mariposa, providing a total capacity of 126,700 acre-feet for multipurpose storage; and about 52 miles of levee and channel improvements in lower reaches of Bear, Black Rascal, Mariposa, and Deadman Creeks, thereby tying the existing project channels into Eastside Bypass of San Joaquin River flood control system. Haystack Mountain, Bear, and Owens projects would provide flood control only; Castle and Burns projects, flood control and recreation; Marguerite project, flood control and irrigation; and Mariposa project, all three purposes. Existing project was adopted by 1970 Flood Control Act (Document not yet printed.) Current plan of improvement would defer enlargement of existing Burns reservoir, Mariposa reservoir, construction of Marguerite Dam, and the irrigation function associated with the latter two facilities, enlargement of existing Owens reservoir and about 32 miles of levee and channel improvement on Owens, Mariposa, and Deadman-Dutchman Creeks. Estimated total project cost (October 1996) is $132,700,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $91,800,000 is Federal and $40,900,000 is non-Federal (which includes a $6,855,000 cash contribution). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of the project; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $282,000, of which $240,000 is a cash contribution and $42,000 is for lands; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Total non-Federal share of Castle Dam first cost is $5,230,000 and includes cash contribution of $595,000. The California Reclamation Board and the City of Merced are the local sponsors of the authorized project. The Reclamation Board will serve as sole sponsor for the Castle Dam Unit. Merced County Board of Supervisors reaffirmed their support for the project by letter of April 4, 1986. City of Merced by letter of March 13, 1986, reaffirmed its support for and intent to furnish assurances for recreation aspects of the project. California Reclamation Board reaffirmed its support for total project by letter of April 9, 1986. A Local Cooperation Agreement (sec. 221) was executed for Castle Dam Unit on June 27, 1986. State of California legislation (AB3369) was enacted on September 14, 1986 which enabled the Reclamation Board to financially participate in the project. A new Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army November 30, 1988, in accordance with the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The California Reclamation Board, the Merced County Board of Supervisors and the city of Merced have indicated support for balance of the project by letters of intent dated August 29, 1991 and August 20, 1991, respectively. This support was again reaffirmed in letters of support as provided by the California Reclamation Board on January 9, 1996. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering activities continued for Bear Creek Dam Unit. Engineering activities continued at Castle Dam to prepare plans and specifications for one final contract (advertised for construction on August 26, 1997) to enable Edendale Turnout to provide the flow capacity as identified in the Check Structure Hydrology Report Criteria. Castle was transferred to sponsor for maintenance and operation in April 1995. Historical summary. Castle Dam multicomponent construction contract was awarded February 26, 1991, and construction was completed in March 1993. Castle Dam check structure contract was initiated in April 1993 and completed in January 1994. Castle Dam was transferred to the sponsor on April 12, 1995. 19. MERCED COUNTY STREAM GROUP, CA Location. Reservoirs and channel improvements are on Bear, Burns, Mariposa, and Owens Creeks, in foothills of Sierra Nevada about 15 to 20 miles east of 35-16 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT city of Merced, CA. (See Geological Survey Haystack Mountain quadrangle for Burns and Indian Gulch quadrangle for Bear, Owens, and Mariposa areas.) Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1962. Improvements consist of reservoirs at Mariposa, Owens, Burns and Bear Creeks and diversions from Black Rascal Creek to Bear Creek and from Creek to Mariposa Creek. Total first cost for project was $3,899,259, of which $2,751,259 was Federal and $1,148,000 non-Federal for lands including relocations and channel improvement. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Ordinary maintenance and operation of the four completed reservoirs continued. Structures were maintained in a serviceable condition. Runoff from drainage areas below Merced County stream group reservoirs was above normal for the year. See Table 35-K for maximum inflow storage and outflow for the projects. Outflows were less than channel capacity rates in the project streams. Historical summary. Construction was initiated March 1948, with construction of Mariposa project, which was completed in November 1948. Construction of Owens project, initiated in March, was completed in October 1949; Burns project, initiated in July 1949, was completed in January 1950; and Bear project initiated in April, was completed in December 1954. Black Rascal and Owens Creek diversion channels and stream-gaging stations were completed in April 1956. Local interests completed channel enlargement and restoration of channel capacities of Miles, Burns, Owens, and Mariposa Creeks in 1956 at their expense. Improvement of Bear Creek and Black Rascal Slough, below their confluence, was deferred pending possible improvements downstream, outside limits of project. 20. PAJARO RIVER, CA Location. In the Uvas-Carnadero and Llagas Creeks watersheds of the upper Pajaro River Basin in south Santa Clara County in vicinity of the city of Gilroy about 75 miles south of San Francisco, CA. Existing project. See Annual Report for 1996, pg. 35-15. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) for flood control was executed with the Santa Clara Valley Water District on June 25, 1987, and LCA for recreation was executed with the City of Gilroy on July 27, 1987. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project is fiscally completed. Historical summary. Responsibility for remaining portions of advance engineering and design, plans and specifications, and construction was transferred to Sacramento District in April 1982. Construction began in October 1987. Construction for the first contract (levee work and bike path upstream of Thomas Road Bridge), second contract (levee work and hiking trails), and third and final contract (landscaping) has been transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Total reimbursement of $5,583,369 has been made to the local sponsor. 21. PINE FLAT LAKE AND KINGS RIVER, CA Location. Reservoir is on Kings River, about 25 miles east of Fresno, CA, and channel improvements are on Kings River downstream from Lemoore weir, about 25 miles south of Fresno. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area.) Project also includes 2,500 acres of Forest Service recreation land near Pine Flat Lake. Existing project. Improvement is a unit in comprehensive plan for flood control and other related purposes for Sacramento-San Joaquin Basins. Project consists of a 429-foot high concrete gravity dam, including a gated overflow section with a maximum discharge capacity of 391,000 cubic feet per second, creating a reservoir with gross storage capacity of 1 million acre-feet, for flood control, irrigation, and related purposes. Outlet provisions for future power development are included in dam, but Federal construction of power-generating facilities is not authorized. Improvement also includes levee and channel work on Kings River and its tributaries on valley floor about 25 miles south of Fresno. Channel 35-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 improvement work will enlarge channel capacities and regulate flows in lower branches of the Kings River. There are nine public-use and recreation areas: One maintained by the Corps, four by the Forest Service, three jointly by the Corps and concession, and one by Fresno County. Also, five boat access-only areas are maintained by the Corps on the south side of the reservoir. Project cost is $42,072,330, of which $41,502,330 is Federal (including $13,700 for basic recreation facilities) and $570,000 non-Federal for rights-of-way for downstream channel improvements. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost of recreation facilities for Pine Flat Lake, funded from Code 710 appropriations is $1,595,100 exclusive of recreation facilities previously provided at a cost of $13,700. In addition, Federal cost of recreation facilities for Pine Flat Lake, funded from Public Works Acceleration Executive Act of 1962 appropriations, was $239,235 (July 1963). Operation and maintenance of dam and reservoir is Federal responsibility. Existing project was adopted by 1944 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 630, 76th Cong., 3d sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for first costs allocated to irrigation functions of reservoir portion of project in accordance with reclamation law. Under provision of War Department Civil Appropriations Act of 1947, the Secretary of War, with concurrence of the Secretary of the Interior, determined allocation of cost to irrigation should be set at an amount not to exceed $14,250,000. In addition, local interests must pay 37.4 percent of annual maintenance, operation, and replacement costs of dam and reservoir allocated to irrigation function. Repayment contracts between the Bureau of Reclamation and the local water users for the irrigation use of the reservoir were executed December 23, 1963. The Bureau is administering the contracts in accordance with reclamation law as amended by the Reclamation Reform Act of October 12, 1982. That act generally exempts the limitations under the early reclamation laws as being applicable to projects constructed by the Corps with two exceptions; however, all existing contracts to share construction and maintenance costs remain in effect. Prior to execution of the final contracts, the Bureau provided conservation water to local interests under an interim contract. Irrigation interests paid $140,872 for irrigation services through December 31, 1996. With respect to the downstream channel improvements, sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. King River Conservation District represents local interests; assurances were accepted November 20, 1959. Local interests have furnished all requirements for construction rights-of-way for construction of channel improvements required to date. Three concessionaires each at Lakeridge Marina (Deer Creek), Pine Flat Marina and Trimmer Marina provided public-use facilities in accordance with lease agreements with the Secretary of the Army. Estimated cost to date of facilities installed by these concessionaires is $1,727,000. Fresno County developed public-use facilities on an 85-acre tract immediately downstream from dam for picnicking, camping, swimming, and playground activities, at an estimated cost of $476,000 under provisions of a license agreement. The U.S. Forest Service developed and operates a picnic area at the upper end of reservoir. Cost of site development is about $37,500. Installation of a hydroelectric powerplant, located at the downstream toe of the Corps Pine Flat Dam, was completed in January 1984 by Kings River Conservation District. Project consists of an outdoor-type powerhouse containing three generating units with capacities of 55 megawatts each for a total of 165 megawatts. Conservation District would make use of the three existing 13.5-foot diameter penstocks that were installed in Pine Flat Dam when constructed in 1954. Licenses. License No. 1988, effective April 1, 1955, was issued by Federal Power Commission to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. for hydroelectric power development of North Fork Kings River by the company upstream from the Pine Flat reservoir. Under interim Contract No. DA-04-167-eng-1182 with the Department of the Army, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. paid for storage of power water in the Pine Flat reservoir May 15, 1954, through March 31, 1955. Current Contract No. DA-04-167-eng- 1328 with the Department of the Army provides for storage of power water at the rate of 0.1375 per acre-foot; the contract covers April 1, 1955, through March 31, 2005. By an agreement of January 1972, supplementing the December 1954 contract, Pacific Gas and Electric Co. transferred ownership of most of its Kings River system water to the Kings River Water Association. Accordingly, no further significant storage service to Pacific Gas and Electric Co. by the reservoir 35-18 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT at Pine Flat is anticipated. Total payment under these contracts through June 30, 1972, (last year of payment), amounts to $2,478,798; these funds were paid to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury. License No. 2741, effective September 25, 1979, was issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to the Kings River Conservation District for hydropower development at the downstream toe of the Corps Pine Flat Dam. Payment to the Department of the Army for construction and installation of the penstocks in the amount of $1,044,685 was made to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury in November 1985. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $238,877. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Kings River above Pine Flat Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 923,652 acre-feet occurred on June 10, 1997. Maximum hourly inflow to the reservoir was 87,030 cubic feet per second on January 2, 1997, and maximum outflow of 8,083 cubic feet per second occurred on February 10, 1997. During the year, 2,036,563 acre-feet was released for irrigation and spreading. Releases for flood control amounted to 456,958 acre-feet. Historical summary. Construction began in April 1947 and project, including channel improvement, was completed in September 1977. Main dam was initiated in January 1950, completed in June 1954, and has been operating since February 1954 to provide flood protection for which it was designed. Total of 35.2 miles of new and reconstructed levees and 13.2 miles of channel clearing have been transferred to the Kings River Conservation District for maintenance. Recreation facilities for various recreation areas under Code 710 appropriation are complete. Completed preliminary design and cost estimates for Pine Flat fish barrier were reviewed by the State, but the State was unable to provide necessary assurances of local cooperation. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1982. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. On May 15, 1991, Pine Flat Lake acquired additional acreage as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Secretary of the Army and Secretary of Agriculture (Forest Service). The Corps exchanged Isabella Lake and the 16,000 acres around that lake currently being used for park and recreational purposes for approximately 2,500 acres of Forest Service recreation land near Pine Flat Lake. 22. REDBANK AND FANCHER CREEKS, CA Location. Northeast and adjacent to the Fresno- Clovis Metropolitan Area in Fresno County about 170 miles southeast of Sacramento, CA. Existing project. Provides for flood control detention basins on Redbank Creek, Pup Creek, and Alluvial Drain; construction of a dam 45.5 feet high to create a reservoir with gross capacity of 10,300 acre-feet for flood control on Fancher Creek; and enlargement of Big Dry Creek project to provide increased flood protection and recreational development. Since the local sponsor does not support recreational development at this time, the recreation feature of the project is considered to be inactive. The authorization Act states "measures determined appropriate by the Secretary of the Army to minimize benefits to groundwater recharge" shall be included in the project. Estimated cost (October 1997) for existing project is $73,7610,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $47,460,000 is Federal and $26,250,000 is non-Federal (which includes $3,670,000 cash contribution). For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Existing project was adopted by sec. 401, Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, November 17, 1986. (HD 98-147, 98th Cong., 2d sess., contains published map.) Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges) and other facilities where necessary in construction of the project; pay 5 percent of cost allocated to flood control to bring total non-Federal share of flood control costs to 25 percent, of which $3.680,000 is cash contribution, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. 35-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Operations and results during .fiscal year. Engineering activities, real estate crediting, and project auditing were continued. Historical summary. Local Cooperation Agreement was executed on August 1, 1987. Project construction was begun in September 1987 with initiation of archaeological work on Cultural Resources Preservation. Construction contract for Dry Creek Crossing was completed and transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance on January 10, 1989. Construction at Redbank Creek Detention Basin was completed and transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance on August 23, 1990. Construction contract for Fancher Creek Dam awarded May 23, 1990, was completed and transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance on March 13, 1992. Construction contract for Big Dry Dam, Pup and Alluvial detention basins was awarded March 18, 1992. Big Dry Creek Dam and Pup Creek Detention Basin were transferred to local interests on June 22, 1994. Last piece of completed work, Alluvial Drain Detention Basin, was transferred to local interests for maintenance and operation on July 18, 1994. 23. RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA Location. Russian River rises in Coast Range in northwestern California, flows southerly for 87 miles, and then turns westerly to flow for 23 miles to Pacific Ocean at Jenner, 60 miles northwest of San Francisco, CA. (For general location see Geological Survey map for California.) Existing project. Active authorized project provides for construction of a dam on East Fork of Russian River at Coyote Valley to a height of 160 feet; a dam on Dry Creek at Warm Springs to a height of 319 feet; and channel stabilization works on Russian River between mouth and mile 98, on lower reaches of several tributaries, and on Dry Creek downstream from dam. Project also provides for expansion of fish hatchery capacity at Dry Creek, Warm Springs, to compensate for fish losses on Russian River attributed to operation of Coyote Dam component of project. Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino), completed in 1959, is operated and maintained by the United States. (See tables 35-L and 35-M for latest approved estimated costs.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for Coyote Valley Dam and channel improvements accomplished to date. For the Dry Creek portion, local interests are required by the authorizing act to comply with the usual a., b., c. requirements for channel improvements and, in addition, prevent any encroachment in the channel of Dry Creek which would interfere with proper functioning of the channel improvement works; adjust all claims concerning water rights arising from the construction and operation of the improvements, including acquisition of water rights needed for preservation of fish and wildlife resources affected by the project; and reimburse the United States in accordance with the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, for that part of the joint-use construction cost, (30.2 percent currently estimated at $103,760,000) and an ultimate 32.5 percent of the annual operation, maintenance, and replacement joint-use costs allocated to municipal and industrial water supply. The estimated annual cost to local interests for maintenance of channel improvement works is $80,000. Sonoma County Water Agency (formerly Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District) provided assurances of willingness and ability to meet requirements by Resolutions No. DR 00793-1, September 25, 1961, No. DR 4770-1, December 17, 1962, and No. DR 45759, August 5, 1974, for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel. By letter dated March 7, 1967, Sonoma County Flood Control and Water Conservation District further indicated their interest in optimization of the Dry Creek (Warm Springs) damsite to provide additional water supply storage. Reimbursement to the United States for Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel costs allocated to 212,000 acre-feet of water supply storage is specified in a water supply contract with the local sponsor approved in October 1982. Local interests have expended approximately $1,000,000 to provide partial flood protection in project area and have constructed facilities at an approximate cost of $20,000,000 to distribute water from the completed Coyote Valley reservoir. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Coyote Valley Dam: None. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel: Engineering activities continued. The Gualala Redwoods claim that their access to Kelly Road was cut off by Corps project (Warm Springs) went to trial in October 1992. Judgement resulting was a cost of $3,162,000 to the 35-20 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT Federal Government. Major items of contract work included: Completion of Liberty Glen wastewater system at fiscal year cost of $353,795 and initiation and completion of contaminated soil remediation, $83,000. Maintenance: Coyote Valley Dam: Operation and maintenance continued. Dam safety assurance studies were continued at a fiscal year cost of $14,327. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of East Fork Russian River at Coyote Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 107,292 acre-feet occurred on January 3, 1997. Maximum hourly inflow to reservoir was 9,503 cubic feet per second on January 1, 1997. Maximum release of 3,848 cubic feet per second occurred on January 3, 1997. During the year, 29,776 acre-feet was released for flood control, and 218,005 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel: Operation and maintenance continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff of Dry Creek at Warm Springs Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 333,138 acre-feet occurred January 4, 1997. Maximum hourly inflow to reservoir was 24,019 cubic feet per second on January 1, 1997. Maximum release of 4,002 cubic feet per second occurred January 6, 1997. During the year, 106,847 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. Releases for flood control amounted to 120,718 acre-feet. Historical summary. Entire project, exclusive of recreation facilities at completed project (Lake Mendocino), is about 99 percent complete. Coyote Valley Dam, initiated November 1958, was completed April 1959 (cost $17,550,000, of which $11,952,000 was Federal; and $5,598,000 contributed). Work, including removal of slides resulting from storms in 1958, was completed April 1959. Bank stabilization work on Russian River near Geyserville was completed in 1957 and channel improvements in remaining reaches on Russian River and East Fork of Russian River were completed in 1974 (cost $2,483,900). In April 1982, responsibility was transferred to the Sacramento District. Warm Springs construction completions include fish hatchery in December 1980, project overlook in May 1981, reservoir clearing in July 1981, downstream stabilization sills in October 1981, dam closure in October 1982, spillway repair at Warm Springs Dam in September 1985, boat launching facilities, Phase I, in September 1985, Rockpile Road Upgrade, Yorty Creek Beach, and remedial work at Liberty Glen camping area in September 1990, fish hatchery expansion in September 1992, final control tower grouting, dam access road repair, spillway stabilization, fish hatchery emergency water supply in September 1993, and Liberty Glen wastewater system and contaminated soil remediation. Initial filling of Warm Springs reservoir was commenced on November 1, 1984. Responsibility for construction was transferred to Sacramento District in August 1983. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at Coyote Valley Dam in fiscal year 1984. 24. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM Location. Rises in Trinity Mountains in north-central California, flows generally southerly about 374 miles and empties into Suisun Bay, an arm of San Francisco Bay at Collinsville, CA. Works covered by this improvement are on Sacramento River and tributaries from Collinsville to Shasta Dam, about mile 312. Drainage area above Rio Vista is 26,500 square miles (See Geological Survey quadrangles of area for Sacramento River and Upper Butte Basin; Flournoy and Fruto quadrangles for Black Butte Lake; and Tuscan Buttes, Tehama, Redding, and Hooker quadrangles for Table Mountain Lake.) Existing project. Improvement of Sacramento River and tributaries, from Collinsville to Shasta Dam was authorized as a unit of a comprehensive plan for flood control and other related purposes in Sacramento River Basin. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries, for flood control purposes: Enlargement of existing levees on Sacramento River between vicinity of Moulton weir and Ord Bend; construction of new levees from present levee terminus to vicinity of Chico Landing; construction of a weir near Chico Landing, extension of Moulton weir, and construction of a bypass through Upper Butte Basin; construction of new levees in Lower Butte Basin; enlargement of existing levees in Sutter, Tisdale, Sacramento, and Yolo Bypasses; and levee construction and/or channel enlargement on following minor tributaries of Sacramento River: Antelope Creek; Chico and Mud Creeks and Sandy Gulch; Butte and Little Chico Creeks; Cherokee Canal; Elder Creek; Deer Creek (Tehama County); Thomes 35-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Creek; and Willow Creek. Improvement.provides for about 155 miles of channel improvement and about 294 miles of levees with an average height of 12 feet and a freeboard of 3 feet. Improvement also provides for revetment as required for protection of bypass levee slopes against erosion. Total first cost for project is $18,300,000 (October 1988), of which $11,900,000 is Federal, and $6,400,000 non-Federal for lands and damages, including relocations. (See table 35-N on project units classified and excluded from cost estimate.) (b) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff, CA: An extension of the existing Sacramento River Flood Control project which provides for construction of bank protection works and minor channel improvements as required on Sacramento River between Chico Landing and Red Bluff for flood control purposes. Estimated first cost (October 1987) for project work in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties is $31,000,000, of which $25,700,000 is Federal cost and $5,300,000 non-Federal cost for lands and damages including relocations and cash contribution of $3,435,000. (c) Sacramento River, CA, Bank Protection Project: Includes initial phase covering 430,000 lineal feet of bank protection and a second phase covering 405,000 lineal feet of bank protection under a long range program of bank protection, erosion control works, and setback levees at critical locations within limits of authorized or existing levees included in the Sacramento River Flood Control project to protect integrity of levee system for flood control purposes. Total estimated (October 1997) first cost for project is $249,400,000, (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period) of which $179,900,000 is Federal and $69,500,000 non-Federal comprised of lands and damages including relocations $26,671,000 and required cash contribution $42,829,000 toward first cost. Total estimated cost for recreation facilities, $2,874,000 (includes both Federal and non-Federal). Construction in (a), (b), and (c) above supplements program of levee improvements as accomplished pursuant to 1917 Flood Control Act, as amended by subsequent acts, including 1941 Flood Control Act, and which are reported on page 35-3A under Sacramento River, CA, flood control. (d) Authorization also provided for Black Butte Lake. For description of completed project see Annual Report for 1975. Federal first cost for project is $14,508,820, including $475,507 for basic recreation facilities. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. Federal cost for recreation facilities funded from Code 710 appropriations is $1,000,162. A concessionaire at Black Butte Marina provided public use facilities in accordance with lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost to date of $87,000. (e) Authorization also provided for construction of Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) project, an earthfill dam on Sacramento River about 3 miles north of Red Bluff, CA. This project unit was deauthorized August 5, 1977. For details, see Annual Report for 1978. Local cooperation. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Fully complied with for all work completed or under contract, and local interests indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. Levee construction (107 miles) total requirement for the "active" project has been completed, transferred to, and accepted by the State. (b) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies; local interests must also assume responsibility for flood plain zoning. Fully complied with for portions completed in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties; completed work, bank protection at 36 sites, was transferred to and accepted by the State. (c) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: Sec. 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Local interests must also contribute an amount in cash that, when added to costs of lands, easements, rights-of-way and utility modifications, equals one-third of cost of each unit of remedial work; this contribution is estimated (October 1997) at $27,740,000. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Local interests must also contribute an amount in cash, that when added to the cost of lands easement, rights-of-way and utility modifications, equal one-quarter of each unit of remedial work; this contribution is estimated (October 1997) at $40,970,000, First phase mitigation equals thirty-seven percent for acquisition of land and establishment and maintenance of fish and wildlife habitat, this contribution is estimated (October 1997) at $790,000. Local interests fully complied with requirements for all work completed or under contract, and indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work as scheduled. In addition, for reaches where local interests request bank stabilization in lieu of more feasible levee setbacks, local interests will contribute costs over and above costs of setbacks, 35-22 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT and provide local contribution. Completed units transferred to and accepted by the State. (d) Black Butte Lake: None required for construction. Local interests must pay the portion of first cost and annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to the conservation functions of the project; these costs are estimated at 39.9 percent of first cost and 40.2 percent of annual costs. From March 2, 1960, to October 22, 1970, contract between the Bureau of Reclamation and the State of California provided for repayment of irrigation storage costs; Bureau administered contract in accordance with reclamation law. Local interests paid a total of $77,205 for irrigation services during this period. Public Law 502, 91st Cong., 2d sess., October 23, 1970, provided that Black Butte project be financially integrated with the Central Valley project, coordinated operationally with other Central Valley project storage units by the Bureau under the Secretary of the Interior, and that dam and reservoir at Black Butte be physically operated and maintained by the Corps in a manner compatible with recreational use of the reservoir. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributariesNone. (b) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project Complete construction of Contract 42A, Sacramento to Colusa, with a fiscal year cost of $296,562. Complete the first Lower American River construction contract in December 1996 with a fiscal year cost of $787,807. Complete final land acquisition for first phase mitigation with a fiscal cost of $167,999. The second Lower American River in River Park construction contract was awarded June 6, 1997 with a fiscal year cost of $2,021,772. Engineering and design activities continued. (See table 35-0 for construction accomplished and contract costs.) (c) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff. None. (d) Black Butte Lake, regular funds: None. Code 710 funds: None. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued. Structures were maintained in serviceable condition. Runoff above Black Butte Dam was above normal for the year. Maximum storage of 114,069 acre-feet occurred January 1, 1997. Maximum hourly inflow to Black Butte reservoir was 36,091 cubic feet per second on January 1, 1997, andmaximum outflow of 15,499 cubic feet per second occurred on January 1, 1997. During the year, 461,780 acre-feet was released for flood control and 157,284 acre-feet was released for irrigation and other purposes. (e) Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) Lake: None. Historical summary. (a) Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries (active portions): Construction was initiated in May 1949 on Deer Creek and Butte Creek units; Cherokee Canal, Elder Creek, Chico and Mud Creeks, and Sandy Gulch units have been completed. Active portion of this improvement is about 99 percent complete. Work remaining is bypass levee revetment as required, which will accomplished under Sacramento River Bank Protection project. (b) Sacramento River Bank Protection Project: Construction of first unit was initiated in June 1963; initial phase of project was completed in November 1974. Phase II is underway, and overall project is about 91 percent complete. (c) Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff: Active portion of project, bank protection in Tehama County, was initiated in June 1963 and completed in March 1964. Project was reopened in June 1968 to place additional necessary bank protection. Work at 36 sites was completed in Tehama, Butte, and Glenn Counties as of September 1985 and transferred to State for maintenance. Bank protection on Sacramento River, Tehama Countyone site, mile 215, (Unit 5), was completed November 1982, two sites, mile 209.5 and mile 217.5, (Unit 6), were completed in November 1983, and four sites, 241.0, 237.9, 237.7, and 237.5 (Unit 7) were completed in February 1985. (d) Black Butte Lake: Construction began in March 1960 and project is complete. Final land acquisition was completed in December 1966. Construction of main dam was initiated in June 1960 and completed in December 1963. Dam has been operating since November 1962 to provide the flood protection for which it was designed. Final cost allocation approved May 3, 1977. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated in FY 1980 and completed in FY 1986. Piezometer installation and slope for protection at dam were completed in FY 1983. A cultural resources survey was completed in FY 1984. (e) Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) Lake: Project unit deauthorized as of August 5, 1977. 25. SAN LORENZO, CA Location. Project is located in West Sacramento, Yolo County, in north-central California. Existing Project. Project consists of raising 4.9 miles 35-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 of levees up to 5.0 feet along the Sacramento and Yolo Bypasses; constructing 0.9 miles of slurry cut-off wall approximately 50 feet deep at the waterside toe along the east levee of the Yolo Bypass extending into the south levee of the Sacramento Bypass; constructing concrete wing walls with stop logs at the Union Pacific Railroad; constructing a concrete wing wall and flow cut-off wall on each side of Interstate 80; and developing approximately 40 acres of mitigation lands for riparian and upland habitat loss. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1992. Cost estimate (October 1997) is $21,700,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $16,300,000 is Federal cost and $5,400,000 is non- Federal cost. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities where necessary in construction of project; pay 1 1.4 percent of cost allocated to flood control to bring the total non-Federal share of costs to 25 percent, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, and replacement of flood control facilities. The non-Federal sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) with the local sponsor, the California State Reclamation Board, was executed in May 1996. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design continued, including revisions of plans and specifications. Fiscal year costs were $308,824. Historical summary. Funds were appropriated in FY 1992 to initiate preconstruction engineering and design (PED) for the combined American River Watershed and Sacramento Metropolitan studies. The two projects were separated when WRDA 92 authorized the West Sacramento Project (Sacramento Metropolitan) independently ofthe American River Watershed Project. Funds to initiate construction for the West Sacramento Project were appropriated in FY 1996. Design Memorandum was approved in March 1996. PED was completed at a cost of $1,847,000. 26. UPPER JORDAN RIVER, UT Location. Project is located in Salt Lake County, Utah just south of Salt Lake City corporate limit. Existing Project. The project includes construction of a flood control diversion and sediment control structure on Mill Creek, a 1.4 mile underground conduit from the diversion structure to a detention basin, and construction of a 100 acre foot Hillview Detention Basin. The project will divert flood flows from Mill Creek to the detention basin and ultimately into Big Cottonwood Creek. The project will provide 100 year flood protection on Mill Creek above State Street. Local Cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights of way, and borrow and excavated or dredged material disposal areas. Modify or relocate utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project. Pay 6 percent of the costs allocated to flood control and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation and replacement of flood control facilities. The non-Federal sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. Salt Lake County will act as the local sponsor for the project. A Project Cooperation Agreement is pending completion of the Supplemental DM and required funding. Operations and results during fiscal year. PED was completed at a cost of $1,576,000. At the request of Salt Lake County, the design is being reevaluated to address potential downsizing of the diversion structure and other project features. Results of the reevaluation will be included as a supplement to the DM. Historical Summary. A feasibility report was completed in 1987 and PED was completed in 1996. Funds were added in FY 1997 to initiate construction.. There has been a long history of flooding which is most commonly associated with snowmelt and rainfall. The most recent flooding occurred in 1982, 1983, and 1984. A General Design Memorandum (GDM) was approved in December 1993. Project Authorization Change (PAC) was submitted in January 1996 to obtain Congressional authorization for a new cost limit established by sec 902, WRDA 1986. 35-24 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT 27. WALNUT CREEK, CA Location. Project is on Walnut Creek and lower reaches of its principal tributaries, Pacheco, Grayson, San Ramon, Las Trampas, Galindo, and Pine Creeks in Contra Costa County, CA. Improvement will extend from Suisun Bay to head of project about I mile above southern limits of city of Walnut Creek. City of Walnut Creek is about 10 miles south of Suisun Bay. (See Geological Survey quadrangles for area.) Existing project. Comprises extension of existing levees, construction of new levees and concrete channels, channel rectification and enlargement, and utilization of improvements constructed or planned by local interests. Plan provides for about 21.8 miles of channel improvement, two reinforced-concrete drop structures, two stilling basins, and 13.8 miles of levees. Cost estimate (October 1996) is $97,100,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $71,900,000 is Federal cost and $25,100,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $19,785,000 for lands and damages and relocations except railroad facilities, and $5,840,000 required cash contribution for land enhancement benefits provided by the project). Local interests have expended about $3 million for flood control in the project area during the period 1955-1965, including the concrete conduits constructed through the city of Walnut Creek at an estimated cost of $1,000,000 considered a preproject condition to be incorporated in the Corps project. In addition, local developers have made channel improvements for Upper Pine Creek valued at $5,050,000. The cost thereof is not included in above costs of local cooperation. Improvement adopted by 1960 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 76, 86th Cong., 1st sess., contains latest published map). Local cooperation. Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies, except that relocation of railroad facilities is a Federal responsibility. In addition, local interests must make a cash contribution to the United States, in amount of 7.4 percent of cost of construction for land enhancement benefits provided by project. Cash contribution is estimated (October 1992) at $5,840,000. Local interests are represented by Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; formal assurances, including evidence of financial and legal ability to fulfill requirement for the cash contribution, were accepted by the Sacramento District Engineer on November 15, 1963. The Flood Control District furnished all rights-of-way required to date and indicated that it will furnish all requirements as needed for future construction. The Flood Control District arrangeD for highway bridge modifications and utility relocations before start of work by the Corps contractor. Payment of required contributed funds will be made in installments in amounts equal to 7.4 percent of the estimated construction expenditure for each fiscal year. Flood Control District and city of Walnut Creek requested that recreation be added as a project purpose and will share costs in accordance with Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Post Authorization Change for recreation was approved July 27, 1987. In 1995, the city of Walnut Creek, decided not to proceed with the recreation project. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: None. Historical summary. Construction was initiated June 1964; project is about 98 percent complete. Total of 17.7 miles of channel improvement, 9.2 miles of levee construction, part of channel improvement landscaping, Drop Structures No. I and 2 and construction under San Ramon Bypass Contract No. 1, Contract No. 2 and Contract No. 3 and Upper Pine Creek Channel contact have been transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Due to difficulties with Contract No. 1 part of the contract work was completed under Contract No. IA with a different contractor. A contract for remedial work on San Ramon Bypass Contract No. 2 channel cover was completed in August 1993. The 9-acre mitigation contract was completed in June 1993. Work remaining consists of completion of erosion control mitigation (8-acre). Construction responsibility was transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 1982. 28. WEST SACRAMENTO, CA Location. Project is located in West Sacramento, Yolo County, in north-central California. Existing Project. Project consists of raising 4.9 miles of levees up to 5.0 feet along the Sacramento and Yolo 35-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Bypasses; constructing 0.9 miles of slurry cut-off wall approximately 50 feet deep at the waterside toe along the east levee of the Yolo Bypass extending into the south levee of the Sacramento Bypass; constructing concrete wing walls with stop logs at the Union Pacific Railroad; constructing a concrete wing wall and flow cut-off wall on each side of Interstate 80; and developing approximately 40 acres of mitigation lands for riparian and upland habitat loss. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1992. Cost estimate (October 1997) is $21,700,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $16,300,000 is Federal cost and $5,400,000 is non- Federal cost. Local cooperation. Local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities where necessary in construction of project; pay 11.4 percent of cost allocated to flood control to bring the total non-Federal share of costs to 25 percent, and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, and replacement of flood control facilities. The non-Federal sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) with the local sponsor, the California State Reclamation Board, was executed in May 1996. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and design continued, including revisions of plans and specifications. Fiscal year costs were $308,824. Historical summary. Funds were appropriated in FY 1992 to initiate preconstruction engineering and design (PED) for the combined American River Watershed and Sacramento Metropolitan studies. The two projects were separated when WRDA 92 authorized the West Sacramento Project (Sacramento Metropolitan) independently of the American River Watershed Project. Funds to initiate construction for the West Sacramento Project were appropriated in FY 1996. Design Memorandum was approved in March 1996. PED was completed at a cost of $1,847,000. 29. WILDCAT AND SAN PABLO CREEKS, CA Location. Project is located in vicinity of San Pablo and Richmond, Contra Costa County, CA, about 20 miles northeast of San Francisco, CA. Existing project. Current plan of improvement reflects only Reach 1, which is from San Pablo Bay to AT&SF Railroad tracks on both Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks; Reach 1 consists of 9,900 lineal feet of channel improvements on Wildcat Creek and 10,000 lineal feet of channel improvements on San Pablo Creek. Improvements include channel deepening, levees, stilling basins, and flow control weirs. Additionally, about 20 acres will be planted for mitigation of fish and wildlife. Reach 2, which is upstream of AT&SF Railroad tracks and consists of 9,400 lineal feet of channel and levee work on Wildcat Creek, 1,800 lineal feet of channel and levee work on San Pablo Creek, and mitigation for fish and wildlife on 8 acres, was determined to be economically infeasible, excluded from total project cost, and reclassified as inactive. Project also includes recreation features on Wildcat Creek. Approved estimated cost of new work (1996) is $35,200,000 (includes an allowance for estimated inflation through the construction period), of which $20,200,000 is Federal cost, and $15,000,000 is non-Federal cost (includes $1,593,000 cash contribution). Improvements adopted by House and Senate Public Works Committee Resolutions June 9 and 15, 1976, respectively, under provisions of sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of 1965 (H. Doc. 511, 94th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map).For details on units, see Annual Report for 1968. Local cooperation. In accordance with cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights of way, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary in the construction of project; pay one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of recreation facilities; pay 5 percent of the costs allocated to flood control and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood 35-26 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT control facilities. Local interests have agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County by Resolution 73-466, June 25, 1973, agreed to assume obligations of local cooperation. On November 9, 1976, the Board reaffirmed sponsorship by Resolution 76-960. Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Board of Supervisors formed an Assessment District, August 3, 1982, which assures availability of funds for local share of non-Federal portion of flood control project costs for a modified plan of improvement. A flood control Local Cooperation Agreement satisfying all requirements ofsec. 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 (Public Law 91-661) and consistent with the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662), was executed on June 20, 1986 between the Department of the Army and the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. By Resolution No. 1985-12-351, adopted December 17, 1985, the East Bay Regional Park and Recreation District stated support for development of trail and recreational improvements for the project and indicated its intent to share in 50 percent of the cost of such improvements and perform operation and maintenance responsibility. A recreation Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) was signed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army on April 15, 1992. Operations and results during fiscal year. Engineering and construction continued. Channel improvement contract 3A, San Pablo Creek completed with fiscal year cost of $27,436. Channel improvement Contract 3 Wildcat Creek continued with fiscal year cost of $1,349,896. Historical summary. Local interests withdrew support of project in 1979. Project responsibility was transferred from San Francisco District on April 1, 1982. After 1982-1983 floods, local interests again indicated support of the project, and in October 1983, project work was resumed by Sacramento District. A revised final environmental impact statement was filed March 28, 1986, and a General Design Memorandum was approved May 29, 1986. Flood Control Local Cooperation Agreement was executed June 20, 1986. Recreation Design Memorandum was approved on February 19, 1992, and the recreation LCA was signed on April 15, 1992. Construction work under Contract No. 1 and Contract No. 2 for Reach No. 1 of Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks has been transferred to local sponsor for operation and maintenance. In March 1990, Reach 2 was declared infeasible and is now inactive. All costs have been deleted from project cost estimate. Flood control construction of the project is about 100 percent complete. Final accounting of project is underway. Recreation features are 50 percent complete. 30. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Approved regulations for operation and maintenance of flood control works, part 208, title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, provide for inspection of completed projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance to determine status of project and insure compliance with regulations. During fiscal year, inspections were made of: Completed units of Fairfield Vicinity Streams; completed units of Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries; completed units of Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff; completed units of Sacramento River flood control project, Kings River Channel Improvement (Pine Flat Lake project), and Walnut Creek project; American River levees; Merced County Stream group; Middle Creek (Lake County); Chester, North Fork Feather River; levee and channel improvements on Chowchilla River (Buchanan project) and Fresno River (Hidden project); Duck Creek diversion, Green Valley Creek, Littlejohn Creek, Mormon Slough, Bear Creek, Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, and North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, all in California; Truckee River, CA and NV; completed units of lower San Joaquin River and tributaries, CA; completed units of Red Bank and Fancher Creeks including Big Dry Creek Dam and diversion, and Fancher Dam and Redbank, Alluvial Drain and Pup Creek detention basins, CA; Reese River, Battle Mountain, NV; Sevier River, Redmond and vicinity, Jordan River, Big Wash near Milford, and Kays Creek, all in Utah; various emergency flood control works under authority of sec. 208, Flood Control Act of June 30, 1948, and September 3, 1954; Public Law 99, June 28, 1955, and antecedent legislation; and sec. 14 of Flood Control Act of July 24, 1946. Maintenance inspections conducted indicate that existing agreements and regulations are being complied with on completed flood control works. Continuing effort is required to improve maintenance 35-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 practices and active steps are being taken by responsible State and local agencies to achieve desired results. Local agencies were advised, as necessary, of measures required to maintain these projects in accordance with standards prescribed by regulations. Total cost of inspection for fiscal year of $352,920 included continuation of dam safety assurance program for Folsom Lake, CA for $85,733. 31. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to sec. 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (Preauthorization). Costs for preauthorization studies for fiscal year were $544,185. See Table 35-P for list of studies. Emergency flood control activities-repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation). Federal cost for fiscal year was $44,785,274, $230,762 was for disaster preparedness and $44,554,512 for emergency flood repairs. Emergency bank protection (sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.). Federal cost for fiscal year was $22,177,009, $22,154,066 was for emergency operations and $22,943 for emergency streambank and shoreline protection. Snagging and clearing navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control (sec. 208, 1954 Flood Control Act, Public Law 780, 83d Cong.). Federal cost for fiscal year was $39,577 all of which was used for snagging and clearing activities. Flood insurance activities (sec. 1301-1377, 1968 Housing and Urban Development Act, Public Law 90-448 as amended). In coordination with flood control activities, four flood insurance studies were continued. Inter-Agency Agreements EMW-94-E-4432, EMW-96-IA- 0295,EMW-96-IA-0195, and EMW-97-IA-0154, at a fiscal year cost of $117,5613 under Federal Emergency Management Agency reimbursable order. 32. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with sec. 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, summaries of monthly reservoir operations at Big Dry Creek, Boca, Camanche, Del Valle, Folsom, Friant (Millerton Lake), Indian Valley, Los Banos Detention, New Bullards Bar, New Don Pedro, New Exchequer (Lake McClure), New Melones, Oroviile, Prosser, Shasta, and Stampede, CA; East Canyon, Echo, Jordanelle, Little Dell, Lost Creek, Pineview, Red Fleet, Starvation, and Wanship, UT; and Blue Mesa, Lemon, Paonia, Ridgway, and Vallecito, CO, were prepared. No water control manual revisions were completed due to environmental issues. Corps personnel provided advice as requested during flood control operations at all sec. 7 reservoirs. Fiscal year cost was $951,417. Total cost to September 30, 1997, was $9,855,588. Multiple-Purpose Projects including Power 33. NEW MELONES LAKE, CA Location. On Stanislaus River about three-quarters mile downstream from existing Melones Dam and about 35 miles northeast of city of Modesto. (See Geological Survey quadrangles of the area.). Existing project. Provides for construction of (a) an earth and rockfill dam about 625 feet high to create a reservoir with gross storage capacity of about 2,400,000 acre-feet for flood control, irrigation, power, general recreation, fish and wildlife, and other purposes, and (b) a powerplant below the dam with an installed capacity of 300,000 kilowatts. Upon completion of construction of dam and powerplant by the Corps, the project became an integral part of Central Valley project and is being operated and maintained by the Secretary of the Interior pursuant to Federal reclamation laws, except that the flood control operation of the project shall be in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Army. Maintenance of Stanislaus River channel from Goodwin Dam to San Joaquin River to a capacity of at least 8,000 cubic feet per second will also 35-28 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT be Corps responsibility. Estimated (October 1996price level) Federal cost is $402,000,000. For future non-Federal reimbursement, see Local cooperation paragraph. In addition, local interests expended $300,000 for levees along lower reaches of Stanislaus River. Existing project was adopted by 1962 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 453, 87th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map). This act modified original authorization adopted by 1944 Flood Control Act. (H. Flood Control Committee Doc. 2, 78th Cong., 2d sess., contains latest published map.) The 1944 Flood Control act established $8 million monetary limitation for partial accomplishment of project. Further monetary authorizations of $2.5 million, $5 million, $13 million, $2 million, $17 million, $18 million, $44 million, $83 million, $46 million, $6 million, and $61 million were provided for this project by Public Laws 235 and 780, 83d Cong., and 85-500, 90-17, 90-483, 91-282, 92-222, 93-251, 94-397, 95-104, and 95-189, making a total monetary authorization of $305,500,000 available for the basin plan comprising Lower San Joaquin River and tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, CA. Since FY 1979, appropriations have not been subject to the river basin monetary limitation. Local cooperation. Based on approved preliminary cost allocation studies (July 1965) local interests will be required to pay 35.2 percent of first cost and 12.7 percent of annual operation and maintenance costs allocated to irrigation. In addition, 31.1 percent of first cost and 62.5 percent of annual cost would be allocated to power. Local interests must also maintain existing private levees along Stanislaus River from Goodwin Dam to San Joaquin River and prevent encroachment on channel and floodway between levees to preserve safe carrying capacity throughout the reach of at least 8,000 cubic feet per second. Recovery of costs allocated to irrigation and power will be the responsibility of the Bureau of Reclamation. Reimbursement of costs will be in accordance with Bureau policies and procedures for the Central Valley project. State of California officially adopted project by chapter 918 of statutes of 1963, and by chapter 1438 of those statutes authorized State Reclamation Board to furnish required assurances. The Board, by letter dated December 13, 1963, stated it would furnish required assurances when formally requested to do so. Assurances were requested by letter of December 30, 1977. On October 2, 1979, the Board reaffirmed its intent to furnish the required assurances. On January 6, 1983, the Board provided formal assurances of local cooperation. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Project close-out and flowage easement acquisition along the Lower Stanislaus River were continued. Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued on Lower Stanislaus River. Historical summary. Construction was initiated in August 1966. Main dam contract which was awarded in March 1974 has been completed; dam dedication ceremonies were held July 14, 1979. Cultural resources preservation, water intake facilities, flood control and irrigation tailrace modification, reservoir area clearing, Tuttletown Phase I recreation area, Oakdale recreation, Glory Hole Phase I and Phase II recreation area, and operations access road contracts have all been completed. Glory Hole minimal recreation facilities contract has been completed. Boundary fencing, Lower Stanislaus Phase I and Phase II minimal recreation facilities, Lower Stanislaus Corporation Yard, and Lower Stanislaus Administration Building contracts have been completed. Tuttletown minimal recreation facilities, McHenry recreation area, Tuttletown wastewater treatment, Knights Ferry recreation area, Knights Ferry Covered Bridge, Glory Hole recreation area sanitary system, Two-Mile Bar recreation, administration building, and Glory Hole recreation area force main contracts have been completed. Parrotts Ferry Bridge modification (Nov 93), Widening Highway 49 Intersection (Aug 94); Tuttletown Recreation Campgrounds, and Tuttletown and Glory Hole Improvement (Jan 94) have been completed. Remaining recreation facilities were unscheduled pending development of cost sharing agreements and/or specific Congressional appropriation of funds. A Memorandum of Understanding between the Department of the Interior and the Department of the Army transferring the New Melones dam and reservoir from the Corps of Engineers to the Bureau of Reclamation was executed on November 20, 1979. Agreement provides that the Corps complete land acquisition actions and retain budgeting, design, and construction responsibility for reservoir clearing and recreation development; completion of cultural resources mitigation in project area was vested in the Department of the Interior. The California State Water Resources Control Board's Decision 1422 of April 1973 35-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 established conditions which impacted on the planned filling and operation of the project by the Department of the Interior. As a result, the Department of Interior brought suit against the State of California claiming State limitations on project operation were contrary to Congressional intent and authority. The case was heard before the U.S. District Court in Fresno, CA, and in early March 1981, a Federal judge ruled that the Federal Government could fill the New Melones reservoir for purpose of generating electrical power, but not for agricultural or other purposes. Both the Government and the California State Resources Control Board appealed this decision to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, CA. On December 20, 1982, the Court upheld all 25 requirements placed on the Federal Government by the State Water Resources Control Board. The decision reversed the lower court's decision to permit filling of the reservoir for generating electrical power. The Bureau of Reclamation subsequently filed for a permit from the State Water Resources Control Board to fill the reservoir. Permit was approved. The Bureau had originally started generating power on a limited basis on July 1, 1979; however, after the filling of the reservoir in spring of 1983, full power generating benefits have been attained. Project is about 99.9 percent complete. General Investigations 34. SURVEYS See Table 35-Q. 35. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Technical assistance was performed for other Federal agencies as well as non-Federal agencies in connection with Flood Plain Management Services Program at fiscal year costs of $894,423. No Flood Plain Information Studies were prepared after FY 1980. Fiscal year costs for hydrologic studies were $13,895. 36. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT The Hydrologic Engineering Center was designated as a separate Field Operating Agency as of January 1, 1979, in accordance with OCE permanent orders 1-1, January 10, 1979, but Sacramento District is continuing to provide advisory and administrative support services to HEC as specified in local support agreement DACW05-79-A-0038 of March 1979. Fiscal year costs were $2,479,070, of which $41,902 was for collection and study of basic data (including flood plain management service), $1,197,633 was for research and development, and $1,239,535 was for operation and maintenance activities. 37. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED The project is locted in Placer, El Dorado, and Sacramento Counties on the North, Middle and South Forks of the American River and along the lower American River and Sacramento Rivers. Recent evaluations indicate that the level of flood protection along much of the American River is less than the 100-year level. The project consists of a slurry wall to strengthen the lower American River levees, levee an berm raising along the Sacramento River, telemetered gages above Folsom Dam, and improving the flood warning system of the lower American River. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $13,956. TRUCKEE MEADOWS, NV Project is located in metropolitan area of Reno and Sparks in Washoe County, NV. Current plan of improvement consists of about 7 miles of levees, 5 miles of floodwalls, 3 bridge replacements along Truckee River and includes limited channel excavation, a detention dam on Steamboat Creek at Huffaker Narrows, and backwater levees along Steamboat Creek, Boynton Slough, and the North Truckee Drain just north of the Interstate Highway 80 crossing. Plan also includes recreation facilities with bicycle and pedestrian paths, river overlooks, and picnic sites; mitigation measures (31 acres of riparian plantings to replace vegetation losses); and fish and wildlife 35-30 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT features. Project will provide flood protection from Truckee River to cities of Reno and Sparks and Truckee Meadows urban areas. Project was deferred and preconstruction planning had been terminated as project is economically infeasible. Coordination with local agencies and sponsors was continued. Flooding remains an issue and locals requested a review of the project. A reconnaissance study is reassessing the flood control needs. NAPA RIVER, CA Project is located in city and county of Napa, CA. Current plan of improvement consists of channel excavation and widening, floodwalls, levees, training dike, a dry bypass channel, and related environmental mitigation measures. The improvements on Napa River would extend about 5.6 miles, from Trancas Street to Kennedy Park. Approximately 3,100 feet of Napa Creek, from Main Street to Earl Street, would also be improved. Project will provide 100-year level of flood protection from Napa River and Napa Creek to city of Napa. A hazardous, toxic and radioactive waste preliminary evaluation was conducted. Drafts of a General Design Memorandum supplement and an Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report supplement were completed in March 1995. Estimated preconstruction planning cost is $15,000,000. 38. OTHER WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORITY YOLO BASIN WETLANDS, SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA (Section 1135) Project Modification for Improvement of Environment The Yolo Basin Wetlands area is primarily located within the boundaries of the Yolo Bypass, an operative feature of the Sacramento River Flood Control Project. Yolo Bypass extends 43 miles from Fremont Weir on the Sacramento River, south to the town of Rio Vista where it rejoins the river. Project includes restoration of wetlands and contributes to a larger program now in the planning stage, proposed by an interagency group of state and local governments and organizations. Yolo Basin Wetlands work includes physical improvements to help create a mixture of native marsh, permanent and seasonal wetlands, and riparian forest through modification of existing drainage canals or construction of small dikes and weirs to redirect available water sources to proposed wetland areas. Also to be included is preparation of a flood plain hydraulic management model to assess hydraulic impacts of wetland projects proposed in the Yolo Bypass and construction of an administrative and maintenance facility. Estimated project cost is $16,720,000. Project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986, Public Law 99-662, sec. 1135(b), as amended by sec. 304 of WRDA 1990. The California State Department of Fish and Game is the project sponsor for 3,480 acres located within the Yolo Bypass. A Project Modification Report and an Environmental Assessment/Initial Study were completed in April 1992. Three existing sites have been identified for wetlands restoration: Putah Creek Sink (3,000 acres), Yolo Causeway (182 acres) and Willow Slough Bypass (345 acres). Willow Slough Bypass site was later withdrawn due to difficulty in acquiring lands. A flood plain hydraulic management model was continued. Local Cooperation Agreement (LCA) for Putah Creek Sink site was executed on December 23, 1993. Fiscal year costs were $118,144. YOLO WETLANDS BASIN, DAVIS SITE, SACRAMENTO, CA (Section 1135) Project Modification for Improvement of Environment Project is located contiguous to boundaries of Yolo Bypass and Willow Slough Bypass, which is a leveed tributary of Sacramento River on west side of Yolo Bypass. Yolo Bypass and Willow Slough Bypass are operative features of the Sacramento River Flood Control Project. Project will include a 396-acre site that consists of 212 acres of permanent wetland, 64 acres of riparian 35-31 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 woodland, 64 acres of grassland/upland, and 56 acres of seasonal wetland, dikes, roads, gates, ponds and islands. Water for wetlands site is available from City of Davis waste water treatment plant and from its storm drain system. Estimated project cost is $6,000,000. A previous Davis site was included under Yolo Basin Wetlands, Sacramento River project, but was with drawn for consideration by local sponsor due to difficulty in obtaining lands. Current project is proceeding under authority of sec. 1135(b) of Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) of 1986. Fiscal year costs were $235,035. 35-32 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep 30 1997 1. Sacramento River CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds. Other) 2. Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel, CA (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 3. San Francisco Bay to Stockton, CA (John F. Baldwin and Stockton Ship Channels 4. San Joaquin River, CA 5. Buchanan Dam- H.V. Eastman Lake Chowchilla River, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds. Other) New Work Approp. - Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. - - - - 40,331,192 1 - - - - 40,331,192 2 189,000 558,000 1,454,000 2,167,000 51,128,578 3 238,875 520,153 1,535,679 2,145,480 51,095,161 4 86,000 61,466 - 92,000 32,785 23,158 -185,0000 -170,000 - 22,270 14,196 -50,000 7,759,474 s 18,947 7,735,756 30,000 2,610,000 6,316 2,582,389 15,000 14,578 1,026,000 1,300,000 914,019 1,019,962 100,000 - 64,649,000 6 62,622 64,152,283 7 - - - - 5,833,117 s - - - - 5,833,117 9 1,377,245 1,162,000 762,000 5,293,000 22,484,382 1,265,828 1,216,824 822,849 5,252,863 23,203,334 - - - - 27,369,597 - - - - 27,369,597 1,583,000 1,525,000 1,413,000 1,314,000 20,786,393 1,566,273 1,464,048 1,527,612 1,310,283 20,767,027 - - - - 111,187 1o 35-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 Cost 111,187 o 6. Cache Creek Settling Basin, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 7. Calaveras River and Littlejohn Creek and Tributaries including New Hogan Lake & Farnington Dam. CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 8. Colorado River at Great Junction, CO (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost - -235,000 3,550,000 -150,000 13,611,000 115,825 -245,384 566,356 2,921,834 13,605,417 38,169 16,803 - 180,000 6,389 3,500 - 1,159,000 161,564 1,108,300 724,000 ii 676,755 12 - - - - 23,723,144 13 - - - - 23,723,'44 13 1,855,400 1,766,000 1,882,500 1,834,000 3,103,611 14 1,881,016 1,781,777 1,561,355 1,830,517 31,661,017 14 - 1,398,251 15 16 17 - 1,398,251 s1156 17 5,000 456,700 446,400 - 373,358 253,407 63,000 - - 203,594 -23,566 9,910 908,100 830,359 39,434 9,910 9. Corte Madera Creek, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 10. Fairfield Vicinity Streams, CA (Federal Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost -21,551 4,260 4,341 17,840 17,840 2,325 -54,000 -35,000 -75,768 -40,088 7,276 16,894 - 12,458,725 18 5,113 12,451,883 18 - 14,744,000 5,036 14,715,034 35-34 190,213 19 190,213 19 804,761 20 804,761 20 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep 30 1997 (Required Contrib. New Work Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 11. Guadalupe River, CA (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 12. Hidden Dam - Hensley Lake, Fresno River, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds. Other) 13. Isabella Lake, Kern River, CA (Federal Funds) Contrib. Funds, Other) 14. Kaweah and Tule Rivers including Terminus Dam and Success Lake, CA (Federal Funds) Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. 124,997 59,012 59,016 -4,979 592,382 592,381 3,779,000 21 3,770,497 22 12,022,000 6,073,000 7,428,000 -403,000 37,275,000 7,804,439 2,499,041 4,719,421 2,781,245 29,950,862 3,202,000 -291,080 2,299,000 690,000 5,986,920 - 2,004,712 2,519,808 670,259 5,281,355 189,000 3,147,640 142,000 170,000 4,089,640 23 - 2,310,761 907,965 284,000 4,132,539 24 - - - - 30,555,426 - - - - 30,556,426 1,355,700 1,624,000 1,600,300 1,593,000 22,038,818 1,371,749 1,534,064 1,727,862 1,,541,262 21,982,672 - - - - 165,112 25 - - - - 165,122 25 - - - - 24,450,537 26 - - - - 24,450,5377 26 599,000 673,000 1,047,200 1,372,455 40,752,717 2728 656,706 633,458 952,773 1,087,352 40,320,587 2728 7,500 5,145 -2,122 753,000 29 269 747,718 30 3,561,200 4,253,000 4,270,700 3,727,000 34,997,230 31 34,997,230 31 53,170,574 32 35-35 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 (Contrib. Funds, Other) 15. Little Dell Lake, UT (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 16. Martis Creek Lake, Martis Creek, NV, and CA 17. Merced County Streams, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds Other) 18. Merced County Stream Group, CA 19. Pajaro River Basin CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work 3,487,774 3,487,774 4,695,841 3,761,806 53,013,542 32 - - - - 633,420 3334 61 - - - 632,342 33s3 -300,000 500,000 1,010,000 3,213,000 40,372,900 415,779 723,860 1,391,999 2,513,831 39,265,170 550,000 480,000 474,500 545,564 356,950 769,610 - 19,954,500 36,172 19,640,348 -20,318 4,300,147 36 4,300,147 37 - - - - 8,504,989 38 - - - - 8,504,989 38 422,000 629,000 443,000 506,000 7,802,383 418,835 648,017 459,909 493,233 7,786,057 1,348,000 599,000 422,000 497,000 18,167,000 1,509,149 463,374 608,354 451,434 18,095,077 104,505 80.000 614,505 510,000 480,000 285,272 40,000 109,545 4,589,938 3940 1,275,048 65,590 39,909 250,636 4,443,411 3040 - - - - 2,751,259 41 - - - - 2,751,259 41 197,000 146,000 100,500 230,000 2,938,340 162,155 176,222 130,403 205,951 2,913,668 960 - 480,000 1,930 480,317 8,686,968 42 179 8,686,937 42 35-36 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST. AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep 30 1997 Fund Contrib. Cost 20. Pine Flat Lake and Kings River, CA (Federal Fund) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 21. Redbank and Fancher Creeks, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 22. Russian River Basin, CA, Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino) and Channel Improvements (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Improvements, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrb. Funds, Other) New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. - - - - 43,356,265 45 - - - - 43,356,265 45 1,928,900 4,125,764 2,997,000 2,999,000 42,647,046 46 1,869,514 3,996,316 3,065,477 3,104,571 42,598,079 46 - - - - 110,000 47 - - - - 110,000 47 800,000 450,000 550,000 832,066 549,457 433,457 -8,500 2,796 8,500 23,134 3,920 100,000 -5,190 43,474 -3,900 - -90,000 47,516,065 48 62,466 47,499,471 48 - 3,354,920 3,312 3,223,360 -4,020 759,580 49 701,546 - - - - 14,435,869 so - - - - 14,435,869 50 2,318,500 2,516,000 2,692,600 -251,978 44,777,546 5152 2,324,765 2,407,709 2,877,136 -240,208 44,777,546 s s52 - - - - 589,911 sa 313,695 - - - 570,774 54 3,400,000 741,000 85,000 3,877,691 889,811 124,582 90,000 333,198,645 ss 37,063 333,118,836 ss5 2,588,900 3,284,000 3,338,900 -279,391 32,915,552 56 2,599,714 2,236,709 3,409,978 -268,282 31,836,635 s7 - - - - 230,574 58 35-37 37,250 43 37,250 44 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep 30 1997 Cost 228,732 59 23. Sacramento River and Tributaries, CA from Collinsville to Shasta Dam (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 24. San Lorenzo, CA (Federal Funds) 25. Upper Jordan UT New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. 2,654,000 3,900,000 3,251,000 4,870,000 136,645,000 6 61 2,603,331 3,434,929 2,901,135 5,478,886 136,064,674 60 1,454,200 1,649,000 1,738,000 1,600,000 29,159,128 62 1,487,843 1,623,025 1,782,894 1,600,525 29,144,567 62 930,000 190,000 1,225,950 1,350,000 26,924,354 387,030 707,149 774,787 1,214,896 26,063,835 15,000 24,468 5,500 5,533 6,000 - 2,927,796 6364 2,024 2,923,794 63 64 65 200,000 123,699 500,000 Cost 149,865 200,000 123,699 500,000 149,865 26. Walnut Creek, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib. Funds) (Contrib. Funds, Other) 27. West Sacramento CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contrib Funds) 28. Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks, CA (Federal Funds) New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp. Cost 200,000 195,629 -67,615 5,173 -16,800 - 212,900 - 100,000 71,492,430 66 70,899 47,659 71,438,505 67 70,791 - 5,683,472 68 7,904 66,058 5,669,462 69 70,791 - 14,783,553 70 - - 14,783,553 70 500,000 499,000 209,000 1,208,000 473,664 422,983 308,824 1,205,471 - - - 1,020,000 1,020,000 - - - 147,589 147,589 2,510,000 4,057,000 637,000 -100,000 20,373,000 2,477,730 2,978,994 1,476,552 179,737 20,360,828 35-38 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST. AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep 30 1997 (Required Contrib. New Work Funds) Contrib. 40,000 485,000 235,338 - 1,620,000 Cost 283,598 399,235 270,875 15,102 1,573,526 (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. -40,000 170,000 141,000 - 1,937,000 71 Cost - 65,000 257,042 2,518 1,906,943 72 29. Lower San New Work Joaquin River Approp. 64,000 150,000 - - 372,790,379 73 74 and Tributaries, Cost 1,571,821 706,876 81,618 - 371,059,615 74 CA including Maint Tuolumne and Approp. 841,000 1,079,000 980,400 1,182,000 11,849,716 Stanislaus Rivers, Cost 859,828 1,087,982 1,025,681 1,163,364 11,815,429 CA, New Melones Lake, CA (Federal Funds) (Contrib. Funds, New Work Other) Contrib. - - - - 80,000 75 Cost - - - - 80,000 7s 1. Includes the following amounts for new work: Regular Funds: Previous project, $185,198; existing project, $585,436 for shallow-draft and $39,650,558 for deep-draft. 2. Includes the following funds for maintenance: Regular Funds: Previous project, $553,720; existing project, $16,895,432 for shallow-draft and $33,609,426 for deep-draft; and deferred maintenance funds, $70,000 for shallow -draft. 3. Includes the following costs for maintenance: Regular Funds: Previous project, $553,720; existing project, $16,890,585 for shallow-draft and $33,580,856 for deep-draft; and deferred maintenance funds, $70,000 for shallow draft. 4. Includes $85,000 contributed funds, other, from Sacramento-Yolo Port District for clearing and grubbing on dredged material deposit areas to be used on ship channel maintenance dredging work. 5. Includes unobligated carryover for continuation of planing and engineering (CP&E) funds as of September 30, 1985 ($33,474) for Sacramento River Deep Water Ship Channel to be included in project cost (for cost sharing) per TWX of September 9, 1985. 6. Includes $28,304,800 funds for Sacramento District. 7. Includes $28,280,627 costs for Sacramento District. 8. Includes $1,158,348 public work funds, of which $207,198 was for work done along 30-foot channel in Suisun Bay Channel; excludes $19,000 expended for engineering for inactive portion of 1950 modification. In addition, $1,342,500 was expended from required contributed funds. 9. In addition, $1,250 was expended from required contributed funds for maintenance. 10. Contributed funds, other, from State of California for design and construction of downstream channel improvements on Ash and Berenda Sloughs below Buchanan Dam. 11. Includes $724,000 contributed funds, other, from State of California for relocation activities including demolition or salvage of various pipes and facilities, constriction of ramps, turnouts, pipe gates and bank protection at Cache Creek Settling Basin. 12. Includes $676,755 contributed funds, other, costs for relocation activities for State of California. 13. Includes code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at New Hogan lake: total to date $897,742. 14. Includes $99,000 special recreation use fees and costs at New Hogan Lake, and $826,600 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs (96X5125) at New Hogan Lake beginning in FY 1988. 15. For miscellaneous construction under local cooperation requirements, primarily for Bear Creek, San 35-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST.AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Joaquin County; includes $108,056 as related to Duck and Littlejohn Creeks channel improvements as part of Farmington Dam project unit. 16. Includes $393,195 contributed funds, other from California Department of Boating and Waterways for design and construction of boat launching and related facilities, and $30,000 for design and construction of a boarding float at North Shore recreation area at New Hogan Lake. 17. Includes $104,000 contributed funds, other, and costs from Calaveras County Water District for New Hogan hydropower studies. 18. Includes $6,999,725 San Francisco District construction funds and costs for Corte Madera Creek. 19. $8,695 contributed funds transferred to Sacramento District in FY 1983. Includes $97,400 San Francisco District required contributed funds and costs. 20. Contributed funds, other, and costs, from Marin County including $536,921 for miscellaneous bridge and road relocations and $267,840 for additional expenses for disposal sites at Corte Madera Creek. 21. Includes $3,643,000 contributed funds, other, from the State of California for relocation (automotive type bridge) at Laurel Creek Diversion near Fairfield, $113,000 from City of Fairfield for Phase III contract for channel development on Laurel Creek, and $23,000 from City of Suisun for Phase IIA contract for widening of Railroad Avenue 22. Includes $3,638,022 contributed funds, other costs for relocations at Laurel Creek Diversion, $19,537 contributed funds, other costs for Phase III contract, and $112,939 for Phase IIA contract. 23. Includes contributed funds, other: $2,278,000 for recreation betterment, $1,589,640 for NED relocation and $70,000 for incremental relocations at Guadalupe River. 24. Includes contributed funds, other costs: $2,218,027 for recreation betterment, $1,470,089 for NED relocations and $0 for incremental relocations at Guadalupe River, and $159,762 for flood control betterments. 25. Contributed funds, other from the State of California for miscellaneous design and construction at Hidden Dam. 26. Includes $2,199,085 code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at Isabella lake and $224,000 Code 713 funds and costs for improvement at Tillie Creek and Live Oak campgrounds. 27. Includes $407,640 special recreation use fees and costs at Isabella Lake. 28. Includes $131,900 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs (96X5125) at Isabella Lake beginning in FY 1985. 29. Includes $438,000 contributed funds, other, from California Department of Boating and Waterways for design and construction of boat launching and related facilities at Old Isabella Road and Isabella Peninsula and $337,500 for Isabella Dam hydropower studies. 30. Includes $438,000 contributed funds, other, costs for boat launching and related facilities at Old Isabella Road and Isabella Peninsula, and $309,808 costs for Isabella Dam hydropower studies. 31. Includes code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities: Success Lake: Total to date $747,048. Terminus Dam: Total to date: $704,000. 32. Includes $165,000 special recreation use fees and costs at Success Lake. 33. Includes contributed funds, other, from State of California Department of Boating and Waterways and costs for acquisition of a boarding float at Success Lake, $30,000 and at Terminus Dam, $12,420. 34. Includes contributed funds, other, from Kaweah River Power Authority, Visalia, California for Terminus Dam hydropower studies, $423,000; and from DITT, Inc., Paris, France, for Success Lake hydropower studies, $168,000. 35. Includes contributed funds, other, costs for Terminus Dam hydropower studies, $422,344, and for Success Lake hydropower studies, $167,579. 36. Includes $4,300,147 contributed funds, other from the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake City for relocation of State Highway 65 at Little Dell Lake. 37. Includes $4,300,147 contributed funds, other, costs for relocation of State Highway 65 at Little Dell Lake. 38. Includes $1,200 initiation of plans for specifications for Code 710 recreation facilities, for FY 1978. Construction of recreation facilities at Martis Creek Lake under Code 720 was determined to be infeasible. 39. Includes contributed funds, other, for lands, easements and rights-of-way for Castle Dam from State of California. 40. Includes $40,000 contributed funds, other, relocation and $39,909 costs. 41. In addition, $66,532 expended for new work from contributed funds, other, miscellaneous construction under local cooperation requirements as 35-40 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST,AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT related to acquisition of right-of-way and utility alterations for Merced County Stream Group. 42. Includes $1,949,968 San Francisco construction funds and costs and $260,000 Sacramento general investigation funds and costs for Pajaro River. 43. Includes $37,250 contributed funds, other, from Santa Clara Valley Water District for bridge relocation at Pajaro River. 44. Includes $37,250 contributed funds, other, costs for bridge relocation at Pajaro River. 45. Includes code 710 funds and costs for recreation facilities at Pine Flat Lake: Total to date: $1,595,100. Includes Public Work Acceleration, Executive (PL 87-68) (Transfer to Corps of Engineers, Civil) 1963 funds and costs ($239,235) for recreation facilities and $19,600 Code 713 funds and costs for Pine Flat fish barrier. 46. Includes $158,300 special recreation fees and costs at Pine Flat Lake and $699,785 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs at Pine Flat Dam. 47. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services (non-project) accomplished at expense of State of California under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-ofway and utility alterations at Pine Flat Lake. 48. Includes unobligated carryover for continuation of planning and engineering (CP&E) funds as of September 30, 1985 ($29,065) and FY 1986 allocation for Redbank and Fancher Creeks to be included in project cost (for cost sharing) per TWX of September 9, 1985. 49. Includes contributed funds, other, from Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District for road relocation and betterment's (Nees Avenue) at Fancher Dam. 50. Excludes $5,598,000 contributed funds: $400,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Public Works Acceleration Program; and $1,628,411 for recreation facilities at completed projects funded under Code 711 at Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino. 51. Includes $94,459 special recreation use fees and costs (FY 1982-1983), but excludes prior special recreation fees and cost for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino. 52. Includes $1,625,280 maintenance and operation of dam funds and costs at Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino for FY 1985 through FY 1996. 53. Includes $251,911 contributed funds, other from City of Ukiah for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino, hydropower studies; and $338,000 from California department of Boating and Waterways for launching facility at Lake Mendocino. 54. Includes $250,117 contributed funds, other, costs for Coyote Valley Dam, Lake Mendocino, hydropower studies; and $320,657 for California Department of Boating and Waterways for launching facility at Lake Mendocino. 55. Includes $253,421,793 San Francisco construction funds and costs through August 1983 for Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 56. Includes $964,114 San Francisco maintenance funds and costs through April 1982 for Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 57. Includes $75,400 maintenance and operations of dam funds and costs at Dry Creek, Warm Springs Dam. 58. Includes $208,074 contributed funds, other, from Sonoma county for Dry Creek, Warm Springs, hydropower studies; and $22,500 from City of Ukiah for hatchery pump design at Lake Mendocino. 59. Includes $208,074 contributed funds, other, costs for Dry Creek, Warm Springs hydropower studies; and $20,658 costs for hatchery pump design. 60. Excludes $614,608 for Table Mountain (Iron Canyon) project, deauthorized August 5, 1977, and $531,000 for Sacramento River and Major and Minor Tributaries portions which are considered inactive and deferred. 61. Includes Code 710 funds and cost for recreation facilities at Black Butte lake: Total to date $1,000,162. 62. Includes $104,100 special recreation use fees and costs at Black Butte Lake. 63. Miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services (non-project) accomplished at expense of State of California under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-ofway and utility alterations (primarily for Sacramento River and Major and Minor Tributaries project) Includes State Highway Commission payment, $789,008, for use of excess excavation from Chico and Mud Creeks and Sandy Gulch (Sacramento River and Major and Minor Tributaries) for freeway embankment 35-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 35-A (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT through the city of Chico. 64. Includes $41,984 contributed funds, other, from State of California for required modification of existing private facilities and salmon rearing habitat, Sacramento River, Chico Landing to Red Bluff; $15,977 contributed funds, other, from State of California Department of Boating and Waterways for replacing a boarding float at Orland Buttes boat launching ramp at Black Butte Lake; $392,000 contributed funds, other, from the City of Santa Clara for hydropower studies at Black Butte Lake; and $59,334 contributed funds, other from State of California for relocation. 65. Includes $385,998 contributed funds, other, costs for Black Butte hydropower studies; and $59,334 costs for relocations. 66. Includes $8,849,825 San Francisco construction funds for Walnut Creek. 67. Includes $9,049,609 San Francisco construction costs for Walnut Creek. 68.Includes $450,268 San Francisco required funds for Walnut Creek. 69. Includes $525,846 San Francisco required costs for Walnut Creek. 70. Includes $400,348 San Francisco contributed funds, other, and contributed funds costs for Walnut Creek. 71. Includes $1,906,943 contributed funds, other, from Contra Costa Flood Control and Water Conservation District for replacement of sewerline in Richmond for Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks project. 72. Includes $1,904,425 contributed funds, other, costs for replacement of sewerline in Richmond for Wildcat and San Pablo Creeks project. 73. Excludes funds applicable to other units of this basin authorization (Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, and Tuolomne River Basin, California). (See Table 35-E). 74. Includes $110,000 utilized for preparation of 1957 Economic Feasibility Report and of Revised Feasibility Report (FY 1960, 1961, and 1962) applicable to 1962 reauthorization of project. 75. Includes $80,000 contributed funds, other, and costs, from the Bureau of Reclamation for visitors center at Mark Twain area, New Melones Lake. 35-42 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep 30 1997 American River New Work Watershed CA, Approp. 4,850,000 3,780,000 2,223,000 2,127,000 17,122,000 Cost 4,834,610 3,500,283 2,495,692 2,004,798 16,965,136 Caliente Creek CA New Work Approp. - - - - 60,000 Cost - - - - 60,000 Coyote and New Work Berryessa Creeks, Approp. - 0 - -41,000 4,368,900 CA Cost 83,843 1 - -41,111 4,368,889 Napa River, CA New Work Approp. 1,400,000 1,600,000 1,017,000 1,125,000 10,615,000 3 Cost 1,422,351 1,432,375 1,010,877 1,263,905 10,571,548 3 San Lorenzo River, New Work CA Approp. 170,800 479,000 164,000 - 813,800 Cost 169,928 454,285 106,030 - 730,243 Truckee Meadows New Work NV Approp. 100 - - - 3,787,530 Cost 7,439 - - - 3,787,530 Upper Jordan New Work River, CA Approp. 50,000 292,000 134,000 - 1,576,000 Cost 91,850 258,987 169,404 9,265 1,575,950 West Sacramento New Work CA Approp. 1,040,000 252,000 - - 1,817,000 4 Cost 1,035,889 284,343 358 15 1,817,000 4 1. Beginning in FY 1982, Advance Engineering and 3. Excludes $2,639,955 funds and costs for a previous Design (Preconstruction, Engineering and Design) programs are funded under General Investigations Appropriations. 2. Includes FY 1985 unobligated carryover and FY 1986 allocation for CP&E funds and all AE&D funds to be included in project cost (for cost sharing) per TWX of September 9, 1985. flood control project on Napa River. (See Table 35-E). 4. Previously studied under Sacramento Metropolitan Area. Northern California Streams, CA. Funds transferred from American River Watershed. 35-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 35-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Mar 3, 1899 July 25,1912 Jan 21, 1927 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 30, 1935 Aug 26, 1937 July 24, 1946 Nov 17, 1987 A depth of 7 feet below Sacramento works. For work above Sacramento. The 10-foot channel up to Sacramento A depth of 6 feet between Sacramento and Colusa and 5 feet between Colusa and Chico Landing at a cost of $390,000 provided flow of rivers is increased to minimum flow of 5,000 cubic feet per second after Shasta Reservoir is built. Authority for a special direct participation of Federal Government of $12 million in cost of Shasta Reservoir. Transfer of authority for expenditure of above $12 million from Secretary of War to Secretary of the Interior. Modified existing navigation project for Sacramento River, CA, to provide for construction of a ship channel 30 feet deep and 200 to 300 feet wide from deep water in Suisun Bay to Washington Lake, including such works as may be necessary to compensate for or alleviate any detrimental salinity conditions resulting from ship channel; a triangular basin of equal depth, 2,400 by 2,000 by 3,400 feet at Washington Lake; and connecting channel 13 feet deep and 120 feet wide, with lock and drawbridge, thence to Sacramento River. Deauthorization of shallow-draft channel, Colusa to Red Bluff, feature of project for navigation, Sacramento River, California. H. Doc. 186, 55th Cong., 2d sess., and 48 55th Cong., 3d sess. (Annual Report 1898, p. 2844 and 1899, p. 3171). H. Doc. 76, 62d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 123, 69th cong., Ist sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 35, 73d Cong., 2d sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc 35, 73d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 142, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 1002, 1986 WRDA 35-44 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 9. Oct 23, 1962 Nov 7, 1966 Nov 17, 1986 CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA Levees and channel improvements, lower 11 miles of Corte Madera Creek and tributaries, as modified bu Chief of Engineers. Local cooperation requirements modified to provide 1.5 percent cash contribution toward cost of Ross Valley unit. Modify existing project to direct construction of Unit 4 from Lagunitas Road Bridge to Sir Francis Drake Boulevard, and to include construction of floodproofing measures in vicinity of Lagunitas Road Bridge to insure proper functioning of completed portions of authorized project. Further modify project to eliminate any channel modifications upstream of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard. H. Doc. 545, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 204, 1966 Flood Control Act. Sec 823, 1986 WRDA RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA May 17, 1950 Feb 10, 1956 Oct 23, 1962 Mar 7, 1974 24. Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino): Channel improvements on lower 98 miles of Russian River and lower reaches of tributaries. Increased appropriation authorization for initial stage of project development. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake: Channel Improvements on Dry Creek below dam. Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and channel; compensate for fish losses on the Russian River which may be attributed to the operation of the Coyote Dam component of the project through measures such as possible expansion of the capacity of the fish hatchery at the Warm Springs Dam component of the project. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, FROM COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM H. Doc. 585, 81st Cong., 2d sess. PL 404, 84th cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 547, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Sec. 95, 1974 WRDA 35-45 23. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 35-B (Cont'd) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents Dec 22, 1944 Modify Sacramento River Flood Control Project to provide for extensions in levees and other structures along Sacramento River and major and minor tributaries; construct Black Butte Dam and Reservoir; construct low-level Table Mountain Dam and Reservoir with power facilities; and provision of monetary authorization of $15 million for initiation of modification. May 17, 1950 Improvements for protection of Upper Butte Basin (included full monetary authorization). Jul 3, 1958 Extend existing Sacramento River Flood Control Project to Keswick Dam for purposes of zoning area below dam and modification of project by construction of bank protection and incidental channel improvements between Chico Landing and Red Bluff (included full monetary authorization). Jul 3, 1958 Additional authorization of $17 million for comprehensive plan approved in act of December 22, 1944. Jul 14, 1960 Further modification of Sacramento River Flood Control Project by construction of initial 10- year phase of bank erosion control works and setback levees on Sacramento River and authorization of $14,240,000 for prosecution of modification. May 12, 1967 Additional authorization of $7 million for bank protection approved in act of July 14, 1960. Mar 7, 1974 Initiation of construction of second phase of bank erosion control works and setback levees on Sacramento River as approved in act of July 14, 1960, and additional authorization of $16 million for such purpose. Jun 19, 1975 Deauthorization of Table Mountain Dam and Reservoir. H. Doc. 649, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 3667, 81st cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 272, 84th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 103, 80th Cong., PL 90-17 PL 93-251 H. Doc. 94-192, 94th Cong., Ist sess. 1. Contains latest published map of section above Sacramento. For map of section below Sacramento, see H. Doc. 1123, 6 0 th Cong., 2d sess. And S. Doc. 142, 79th cong., 2d sess. 2. Contains latest published map. 3. Total monetary authorization available, exclu-sive of preauthorization studies from general investi-gations appropriations, amounts to $72,740,000. 4. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, PL 93-251, as amended by sec. 157, 35-46 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1997 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance PL 94-587, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of project unit. Feather River, CA 1951 - $5,752 Middle River and Connecting Channels, CA Completed 1974 $8,354 93,494 Mokelumne River, CA Completed 1974 8,500 189,152 Navajo Reservoir, NM Completed - 2,132 Old River, CA Completed 1970 23,185 9631,128 Stockton and Mormon Channels, CA Completed 1970 253,151 218,854 Suisun Bay Channel, CA Completed 1974 200,928 3,316,622 Suisun Channel, CA Completed 1973 217,677 733,489 Suisun Point Channel, CA Completed 1965 191,728 1. Maintenance project, channels adequate for commerce. 2. Includes $10 for maintenance for previous project. Excludes $6,160 for previous project and $3,840 for existing project for maintenance expended from contributed funds. 3. Includes $1,600 for previous project. 4. Includes $790 for previous project. 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of sec. 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended. 6. All costs transferred from Los Angeles District in FY 1968. 7. Estimated cost to local interests was $3,6000 for lands, damages and public landings. Remaining portion of project, consisting of side channel at Orwood and completion of project channels from mouth of Old River to Lammers Ferry rod and from Crocker Cut to Holly Sugar Factory was deauthorized November 17, 1986, by WRDA of 1986. 8. Upon completion of Mormon Slough, Calaveral River, CA in February 1970, local interests accepted maintenance responsibility for Mormon Slough as well as for Stockton and Mormon Channels CA, and Federal maintenance was discontinued. No Federal maintenance costs have been incurred since FY 1969. 9. Includes $58, 901 for previous project. 10. Excludes $59,551 expended from required contributed funds for previous project. 11. Excludes work accomplished under existing project at a cost of $207,198 from Public Works Administration funds allotted to San Joaquin River, CA. 12. Includes $59,817 for previous projects. Excludes $5,449 expended from required contributed funds for previous project. 13. Maintenance responsibility transferred to San Francisco District, January 1, 1974. 14. Includes reconnaissance and condition surveys of $5,496 and $483 for fiscal year 1963 and 1964, respectively. 15. Estimated cost (July 1964) to local interests was $12,000 for lands, damages, and spoil retention dikes. 35-47 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 35-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1997 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Alameda Creek, CA Completed American River, CA Completed Aquatic Plant Control, CA Completed Big Dry Creek Dam and diversion, CA Completed Big Wash, Milford, Beaver County, UT Completed Burch Creek, Weber County, UT Cache Creek Basin, CA Active/no FY 95 (Outlet Channel) Expenditures Chester, CA Active/no FY 95 Expenditures Cottonwood Creek, CA Active/no FY 95 Expenditures Coyote Creek, CA Completed Duck Creek, San Joaquin County, CA Completed East Weaver Creek, CA Completed Folsom Lake, American River, CA Completed Green Valley Creek, Solano County, CA Completed Kays Creek, UT Completed Kern River-California Aqueduct Intertie, CA Completed Klamath River, CA Completed Lake Camanche, CA Completed Lake Oroville, CA Completed Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries, including Tuolumne and Stanislaus Rivers, CA Completed Marysville Lake, CA Active/no FY 95 Merced River, CA Middle Creek, CA Mormon Slough, CA Napa River Basin, CA Expenditures Completed Completed Completed Active/no FY 95 Expenditures New Bullards Bar, CA Completed North Fork, Pit River at Alturas, CA Completed Pinole Creek, CA Completed Redwood Creek, Humboldt County, CA Completed Reese River, Battle Mountain, NV Completed 1978 1959 1967 1955 1961 1964 1993 1981 1991 1968 1967 1965 1957 1963 1973 1977 1972 1976 1981 1976 1980 1976 1967 1976 1979 1972 1972 1968 1970 1969 $26,995,350 2,125,818 3 1,000 1,369,931 4 217,879 s56 26,049 5 - 7 3,570,000 8 15,765,000 705,622 is 664,825 59 220,636 15 10 63,014,810 >> 136,026 512 407,989 513 1,503,073 5 14 4,838,000 5 10,252,950 is 70,425,470 16 27,835,263 17 - 18s 10,918,796 19 2,643,499 20 2,965,402 21 2,639,955 122 12,890,625 23 904,278 52425 885,750 is 4,620,070 126 133,339 527 35-48 $54,778 1 2 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-E (Cont'd) OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to Sep. 30, 1997 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Rheem Creek, CA Completed 1962 400,000 1528 - Rodeo Creek, CA Completed 1966 974,100 s- Salinas River, CA Inactive 1952 94,213 1 29 - Salt Lake City, Jordan River, UT Completed 1961 1,227,570 30 - San Leandro Creek, CA Completed 1973 1,000,000 131 - San Lorenzo Creek, CA Completed 1962 5,130,821 1 32 - San Lorenzo River, CA Completed 1966 4,314,406 33 - Sevier River near Redmond, UT Completed 1952 919,000 134 - Sonoma Creek, CA Inactive 1973 781,500 135 - Truckee River and Tributaries, Active/no FY 95 1968 1,038,960 CA and NV Expenditures 1. Project responsibility transferred from San Francisco District to Sacramento District April 1, 1982. 2. Scheduling of reservoir operations costs. 3. Excludes $54,919 other contributed funds for miscellaneous construction for local interests pursuant to requirements of local cooperation were $951,000 (1959) for lands and relocations. 4. Excludes $44,008 other contributed funds for construction in connection with bridge construction pursuant to requirements of local cooperation. Total cost to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation was $370,000 (9159) for lands and relocations. 5. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of sec. 205, Public Law 80-858, as amended. 6. Excludes $22,000 for preauthorization studies. 7. Project not economically feasible; preconstruction planning was terminated in FY 1993. 8. Excludes $69,262 other contributed funds from State of California for two low water crossings and appurtenances at Chester. A fish ladder modification project was continued under sec. 1135 in FY 1995 at fiscal year cost of $172,565. 9. Excludes $50,000 for preauthorization studies. Estimated costs to local interests were $665,000 for lands and damages including relocations. 10. Includes $174,938 Public Works Acceleration Program Funds. 11. Transferred to Bureau of Reclamation in May 1956 for operation and maintenance by that agency in conjunction with other units of Central Valley project. 12. Excludes $20,000 for preauthorization studies. 13. Includes $30,000 for preauthorization studies. Estimated costs (FY 1973) to local interest for all requirements of local cooperation were $150,117 for lands and damages including relocation. 14. Includes $73,000 for preauthorization studies. Non-Federal (Kern County Water Agency) cost for road relocation was $18,260 (required contributed funds). 15. Constructed by East Bay Municipal Utility District. Final Federal contribution of $51,202 made July 18, 1978 (total $10,111,684). Non-Federal costs $34,988,536. 16. Constructed by State of California. Final Federal contribution of $64,186 was made on February 9, 1981 (total $69,994,105) for flood control reservation. 17. Cherry Valley and New don Pedro Reservoirs constructed by local interests. Federal contribution of $9,000,000 and $5,464,000, respectively, for flood control reservation. Final Federal contribution of $308,898 was made on January 18, 1972, for New don Pedro. Excludes $3,004,946, contributed funds, other, for miscellaneous engineering and construction (nonproject) at local interest expense under local cooperation requirements for acquisition of rights-of-way for levee and channel improvement on Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries. Unconstructed portion of snagging and clearing project modification of Lower San Joaquin River and Tributaries) was classified as "deferred" on April 9, 1993. For full report see Annual Report for FY 1993. 35-49 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 18. Planning and any future development is uncertain awaiting State of California's position on support of Marysville project. 19. Constructed by Merced Irrigation District, Final Federal contribution of $839 was made December 2, 1975 (total $10,818,638) for flood control reservation. 20. Estimated costs (FY 1967) to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation were $1,340,000 for lands and damages including relocation. 21. Non-Federal cost $2,965m402 (FY 1976) for lands and relocations. Federal contribution of $599,336 made to State Reclamation Board. 22. This project was reclassified as "active" on August 3, 1987. 23. Constructed by Yuba County Water Agency. Final Federal contribution of $33,470 was made in FY 1972 (total $12,759,127) for flood control reservation. 24. Includes $41,800 for preauthorization studies. 25. Excludes $146,000 other contributed funds for miscellaneous construction and engineering and design services under local cooperation requirements in connection with acquisition of rights-of-way, relocation and utility alterations. 26. Includes $107,000 costs for remedial work to drainage system completed in FY 1977. 27. Includes $52,549 contributed funds. 29. Cost includes engineering and design prior to June 30, 1952 and costs of $4,288 (FY 1962-1963) to determine if project classification to an active category was justified. 30. Estimated cost to local interest for all requirements of local cooperation were $463,000 (July 1962) for lands and damages including relocations. Project prevented $4,544,000 in damages from the April-May 1994 snowmelt runoff. 31. Excludes $285,329 contributed funds. 32. Excludes $200,000 estimated value of work performed in lieu of cash contribution. 33. Excludes $421,182 contributed funds. 34. Excludes $48,000 required contributed funds toward first cost. Costs to local interests for all requirements of local cooperation, including required contributions, were $118,000 (1951). Project prevented $9,000 in damages from the April-May 1994 snowmelt runoff. 35. Place inactive 1974. 35-50 TABLE 35-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Federal Contributed See Annual Date Funds Funds Project Report For Deauthorized Expended Expended Alhambra Creek, CA 1981 1986 $300,000 Bear River, CA 1980 1986 Eel River, CA 1971 1986 1,272,816 Gleason Creek, NV 1977 1986 215,826 Humbolt River and and Tributaries, NV 1982 1986 1,532,932 Lakeport Lake, CA i 1976 1993 2,353,000 Little Valley Wash, Magna, UT 1951 1977 Mad River Basin, CA 1973 1986 4,243,750 Spanish Fork River, UT 1955 1977 20,000 Weber River and Tributaries, UT 1974 1972 75,120 (Morgan County) 1. Lakeport Lake was deauthorized on November 17, 1988; and deauthorized November 18, 1993. TABLE 35-H SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA: TIDAL AND FLOOD CONDITIONS PREVAILING (See Section 1 of Text) Range in Feet Miles from Mean Extreme Ordinary Extreme Mouth of Tidal 1 Tidal 2 Flood 3 Flood 4 Place River Collinsville 0 4.3 7 8 10 Sacramento 59 2.0 2 3 20 28 Verona (Mouth of Feather River) 80 - Trace 22 30 Colusa 144 - - 26 32 Chico Landing 193 - - 20 25 Red Bluff 248 - - 24 30 1. Mean lower low water to mean higher high water. 2. Tide at low water season only. 3. Mean lower low water to flood stage. 4. Extreme low water to indicated flood condition. 35-51 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 35-I SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA: TOTAL COST OF NEW WORK FOR PROJECT , (See Section 4 of Text) Federal Non-Federal 2 Corps of Coast Required Lands and Engineers Guard Cash Damages (includ- Total Total Modification (Construction) (Construction) Contribution ing Relocations) Project Prior to 1950 Modification $4,009,938 $80,000 $1,307,500 $1,042,000 $2,349,500 $6,439,438 1950 Modification 1,823,179 - 35,000 135,00 170,000 1,993,170 Total 5,833,117 80,000 1,342,500 1,177,000 2,519,500 8,432,617 1. Completed in May 1960. for Stockton Deep Water Channel terminal facilities 2. Excludes $5,865,000 (Feb 1954) local interests costs required under terms of project authorization. TABLE 35-J SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, CA: PROJECT UNITS (1950 MODIFICATION) RECLASSIFIED AND EXCLUDED FROM PROJECT COST, (See Section 4 of Text) Non-Federal Federal Required Lands and Corps of Cash Damages (includ- Total Unit Engineers Contributions ing Relocations) Total Project Settling Basin above head of Burns Cutoff i $1,073,000 $30,000 $200,000 $230,000 $1,303,000 Burns Cutoff improvement; new turning basin; dredging Mormon Channel 25 7,882,000 3 431,000 1,455,000 1,886,000 9,768,000 Upper Stockton Channel enlargement 45 535,000 34,000 15,000 49,000 584,000 1. July 1959 price index. Deauthorized August 5, 1977. 2. Deferred; July 1960 price index. 3. For lands and construction. 4. Deleted by 1965 River and Harbor Act authorization of San Francisco Bay to Stockton Channel, Sacramento District, Improvement No. 3. 5. Deauthorized November 17, 1986. 35-52 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-K MERCED COUNTY STREAM GROUP, CA MAXIMUM INFLOW, STORAGE, AND OUTFLOW FOR PROJECTS (See Section 19 of Text) Maximum Inflow Maximum Maximum (c.f.s.) Storage Outflow Stream (hourly) (acre-feet) (c.f.s.) Burns 8,261 3,020 1,723 Bear 4,656 2,807 1,526 Owens 3,90 1,537 153 Mariposa 6,790 12,492 1,071 TABLE 35-L RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: ESTIMATED COST FOR NEW WORK (See Section 23 of Text) Estimated Cost Non-Federal Project Feature Federal Contribution Total Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Mendocino): Channel Improvements below Dam on lower 98 miles of Russian River $14,436,000 $5,598,000 $20,034,000 1 Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Lake and Channel Improvements below Dam 259,240,000 103,777,000 2 363,017,000 Total $273,676,000 $109,375,000 $383,051,000 1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects. 2. Reimbursement by local interests to Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage to be paid over a period not to exceed 50 years after use of storage is initiated and inclusive of lands and damages. 35-53 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 35-M RUSSIAN RIVER BASIN, CA: ESTIMATED FEATURES AND ESTIMATED COSTS (See Section 23 of Text) Height of Reservoir Nearest City Distance Dam and Capacity Estimated Name (California) Above Mouth Type (Acre-Ff) Cost Coyote Valley Dam (Lake Ukiah Mile 0.8-East Fork 160 Feet- 122,500 $17,550,000 Mendocino) of Russian River Earthfill Channel Improvements (East Ukiah Mile 0 to 0.8 East - - 2,484,000 Fork) Fork below Coyote Valley Dam Guerneville Mile 0 to 98,Russia - - and lower 98 miles of River Russian River) Dry Creek (Warm Springs) Healdsburg Mile 14.4 Dry Creek 319 Feet- 381,000 $363,017,000 Earthfill Channel Improvements (Dry Healdsburg Mile I to 14.4 Dry - - 2,864,000 Creek) below Dry Creek Creek (Warm Springs Dam) 1. Exclusive of $1,628,000 for recreation facilities at completed projects. TABLE 35-N SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM: PROJECT UNITS RECLASSIFIED AND EXCLUDED FROM COST ESTIMATE (See Section 24 of Text) Current Estimated Cost Unit Classification Federal Non-Federal 1 Total 1944 Modification: Antelope Creek 2 Inactive $1,400,000 $340,000 $1,740,000 Lower Butte Basin 3 Deferred 7,286,000 2,285,000 9,571,000 Thomas Creek 2 Deferred 1,140,000 140,000 1,280,000 Willow Creek 2 Inactive 1,290,000 120,000 1,410,000 Bypass Levees 4 Deferred 7,100,000 940,000 8,040,000 Bypass Levees 4 Inactive 3,010,000 - 3,010,000 1950 Modification: Upper Butte Basin 2 Deferred 3,530,000 1,787,000 5,317,000 1. For lands and damages, including relocation. 2. July 1960 price level. 3. Excludes work applicable to extension of Moulton weir (July 1954 price level). 4. July 1961 price level. 35-54 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-0 SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA, COLLINSVILLE TO SHASTA DAM: CONSTRUCTION ACCOMPLISHED AND CONTRACT COSTS (See Section 24 of Text) Required Contract Federal Contributed Total Contract 42A continuation (Bank protection, miles 88.8-143.3, Sacramento River, Sacramento, Colusa, Sutter and Yolo Counties) $803,695 $152,641 $956,336 Lower American River - River Park initiation (Bank Protection, Sacramento County). 500,000 0 500,000 TABLE 35-P FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 205, PUBLIC LAW 80-858 AS AMENDED (PREAUTHORIZATION) (See Section 31 of Text) Fiscal Year Cost Study Stage (Federal) Colorado River at Grand Junction, CO I Construction $203,594 Magpie and Don Julio Creeks, CA Feasibility 40,092 Battle Mountain, NV Plans and Specification 41,766 Hamilton City, CA Reconnaissance 44,211 Tehama, CA Reconnaissance 38,920 Winters, CA Plans and Specification $78,546 $447,129 z 1. See Improvement No. 8 for construction. 2. Excludes Coordination Account. 35-55 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 35-Q SURVEYS (See Section 34 of Text) Fiscal year costs were as follows: Flood Damage Prevention Studies $4,053,575 Required Cost Contributions 1,186,109 Non-Federal Contributions (not required) 0 Special Studies 1,754,728 Special Investigations 88,456 Review of FERC Licenses 15,723 Interagency Water Resources Development 66,515 National Estuary Program 6,651 American Waterfowl Management Plan 13,454 Coordination with Other Water Resource Agencies 47,079 Planning Assistance to States 2,113 (Colorado - $0) (California - $2,113) National Marine Fisheries Service $2,353 35-56 PROJECTS SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED UNDER THE FORMER CALIFORNIA DEBRIS COMMISSION The California Debris Commission, consisting of three Corps officers appointed by the President with the consent of the Senate, created by act of March 1, 1893 (27 Stat. L., p. 507), was organized in San Francisco, CA, on June 8, 1893, and has jurisdiction and duties extending over drainage area of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, comprising great central valley of California and extending from crest of the Sierra Nevada on the east to that of the Coast Range on the west, and from Mount Shasta and Pit River Basin on the north to Tehachapi Mountains on the south. These rivers empty into head of Suisun Bay ultimately discharging into the Pacific Ocean through connecting bays and straits and the Golden Gate. Duties of the Commission comprise regulation of hydraulic mining in drainage area of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, CA, so that debris will not be carried into navigable waters or otherwise cause damage; jurisdiction over construction and control of water storage facilities for domestic, irrigation, and power development purposes; and direction of improvements for control of floods on Sacramento River. On November 19, 1986, the Commission was abolished by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) and all authorities, powers, functions, and duties were transferred to the Secretary of the Army. All acquired lands and other interests presently under jurisdiction of the Commission were authorized to be retained and administered under direction of the Secretary. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Regulation of hydraulic mining and preparation of plans ................ 35-1A 2. Sacramento River and tributaries, CA (debris control) ................... 35-2A 3. Treatment of Yuba River debris situation-restraining barriers, CA ...... 35-3A Flood Control 4. Sacramento River, CA ............... 35-4A Tables Table 35-AA Table 35-BB Table 35-CC Page Cost and Financial Statement ............... 35-7A Authorizing Legislation .............. 35-10A Sacramento River, CA: Total Cost of Existing Project ... .35-12A Navigation 1. REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC MINING AND PREPARATION OF PLANS Location. Operations largely limited to territory between Mount Lassen on the north and Yosemite Valley on the south, on western watershed of Sierra Nevada. (See Geological Survey sheets for the area, 25 in number.) Existing project. Provided for regulating hydraulic mining operations, planning improvement of conditions upon Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers and their tributaries affected by such operations, and preparation of plans to enable hydraulic mining to be resumed in their drainage areas. In addition, the Secretary of the Army is authorized to enter into contracts to supply storage for water and use of outlet facilities from debris-storage reservoirs for domestic and irrigation purposes and power development upon such conditions of delivery, use, and payment as he may approve. Applications of prospective miners were fully investigated by the former California Debris Commission and permits to operate were issued to 35-1A _ _ ~_~~__ REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 those who provide satisfactory debris-restraining basins by construction of suitable dams where necessary or agree to make payment for storage in Government-constructed debris-restraining reservoirs constructed under act of June 19, 1934, as set forth below. For location and description of Government- constructed, debris-restraining reservoirs for general hydraulic mining, see Improvement 2. Local cooperation. Mineowners bore all expenses incurred in complying with orders of the former Commission for regulation of mining and restraint of debris. Operations and results during fiscal year. Minor administrative duties were accomplished. Administrative work overlaps that of improvements 2, 3, and 4, hereunder, and that of Sacramento District. Historical summary. The former Commission received 1,292 applications for hydraulic mining licenses; 1 mine is licensed, but does not use storage behind Government debris dams. Work remaining is, in general, continuation of above or similar operations. 2. SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, CA (DEBRIS CONTROL) Location. Project reservoirs are to be constructed in watersheds of Yuba, Bear, and American Rivers, CA (See Geological Survey sheets for basin areas, seven in number.) Existing project. For description of completed North Fork and Harry L. Englebright projects and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Initial recreation facilities were provided in FY 1959. Recreation areas at Harry L.Englebright Dam are maintained by the Corps. Recreation areas at North Fork Dam are no longer maintained and operated by Auburn Recreation Park and Parkway District, but have been turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation (known as the Water and Power Resources Service between November 6, 1979, and May 18, 1981) on a permit basis. Total Federal cost of new work for construction of these reservoirs was $4,646,872, including $40,000 and $25,000, respectively, for basic recreation facilities at Englebright Dam and North Fork Dam. Reservoir project sites on Middle Fork of American River and on Bear River have been deauthorized and excluded from foregoing cost. The 90-day Congressional project review period, required by sec. 12, Public Law 93-251, as amended, ended August 5, 1977, and resulted in deauthorization of that portion of the project. Estimated cost of that portion is $1,820,000 (1935). Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Improvements made to facilities at North Fork Dam by Auburn Recreation Park and Parkway District under a lease agreement with the Secretary of the Army and Auburn Boat Clubs (concessionaire) at an estimated cost of $46,000 since September 1953. On March 1, 1979, lands and waters at North Fork Dam were turned over to the Bureau of Reclamation on a 5-year renewable basis. Permit No. DACW05-4-79-527 was renewed for 5 years on March 1, 1984, March 1, 1989, and on March 1, 1994. Bureau will operate and maintain such use until Auburn project is completed, then a fee transfer will be made. Actual operation and maintenance of the recreation resource is being done by State of California by contract with the Bureau. Licenses. Under provisions of Contract No. W-1105-eng-2998 with Pacific Gas and Electric Co., (PG&E) (a 1941 contract which expired July 31, 1991) payment was made to Federal Government of $18,000 per year for first 30 years and $48,000 per year for the next 20 years in return for use of head at Englebright Dam and generation of hydroelectric power. Total payment through September 30, 1997, amounts to $1,614,393; these funds are now paid to the Secretary of the Army and deposited for return to the Treasury. Payment for FY 1997 has not been received. PG&E has obtained a new license, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission License No. 1403-004, issued February 11, 1993, for continued operation of Narrows No. I Hydroelectric Project and has entered into a new storage agreement and an operation agreement with the Federal Government (Corps). Total payment of $66,070 was received in FY 1994, but only $48,000 was reallocated to the District. In FY 1995, $18,070 was reallocated to the District. Payments under new agreement are effective as of Fiscal Year 1993 and will be 8.2 percent of previous fiscal year's total costs for operation and maintenance. License No. 2246, effective April 9, 1970 (date New Narrows powerplant was put in operation) was issued by Federal Power Commission (known as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission since January 9, 1978) to Yuba County 35-2A SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT Water Agency for hydroelectric power development of Yuba River by the company upstream from Englebright Dam. Under provisions of Contract No. DA-04-167-CIV-ENG-66-95 with Yuba County Water Agency, payment is to be made to the Federal Government of $100,000 per year for no more than 50 years. First payment (partial) of $73,151 was made April 1, 1971; total payment through September 30, 1997, amounts to $2,509,066. These funds are paid to Sacramento District and deposited for return to the Treasury. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: Maintenance: Maintenance and operation activities continued at Harry L. Englebright Dam at a cost of $1,277,023, including recreation facilities. Dam safety assurance studies at Englebright Dam have been completed. Historical summary. Construction of dams was initiated in 1937; North Fork project was completed and in use at end of FY 1939, and Harry L. Englebright project was completed in January 1941. The two debris-control structures are in good condition. Public use of these reservoir recreation areas greatly overtaxes present capacities. Dam safety assurance studies were initiated at Englebright Dam in FY 1981 and were completed in FY 1987. 3. TREATMENT OF YUBA RIVER DEBRIS SITUATION-RESTRAINING BARRIERS, CA Location. Works are on Yuba River between Marysville and where the river emerges from the foothills, near Hammonton, some 10 miles easterly from Marysville, or about 9 miles below the Narrows. (See Geological Survey Topographic map of Sacramento Valley, CA) Existing project. For description of completed project and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1975. Total cost of new work was $723,259, of which $361,482 was U.S. funds and $361,777 required contributed funds by State of California. (For details of project in its original form, see Annual Report, 1917, p. 1810.) In February 1963, center section of dam failed and major rehabilitation of structure was completed in December 1964. Total cost for required rehabilitation was $1,660,000, of which $830,000 was Federal cost and $830,000 required contribution by State of California toward rehabilitation cost. During the December 24, 1964, floodflows on the Yuba River, the rehabilitated Daguerre Point Dam sustained considerable damage. (See 1965 Annual Report, p. 1647 "Operations and results during fiscal year.") The reconstructed portion of the dam completed earlier in December 1964 was undamaged by the flood. Permanent repair of Daguerre Point Dam abutment and fish facilities was completed in October 1965 at a cost of $447,808 with Federal and required State contributed funds on a matching basis. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for new work and major rehabilitation work. Total first cost to local interests for new work was $361,777 (required contribution by State of California). In addition, training walls were built on each bank below Daguerre Point for 11,250 feet and just above Daguerre Point, on the south bank, for 11,000 linear feet by two gold-dredging companies in connection with their dredging operations. To build these training walls would have cost the United States $450,000 (1902 estimate). Flood channels were also built by gold-dredging companies within confines of project works. Cost to the United States of equally effective works to restrain debris movement would have been more than $776,000 (1926 estimate). Total costs to local interests for initial and permanent major rehabilitation works were $830,000 and $223,904, respectively, (required contribution by State of California). State of California must contribute annually an amount equal to the Federal allotment for maintenance. Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance: Operations consisted of condition and operation studies by hired labor on Yuba River. Historical summary. Construction of project works was initiated in November 1902. Construction of Daguerre Point Dam was completed in May 1906; diversion of river over dam was completed in 1910; training walls and dikes were completed in 1935. About 149 million cubic yards of debris are held in lower 7 miles of Yuba River between Marysville and downstream end of training walls. About 20 million cubic feet, are confined in river channel by Daguerre Point Dam. Additional millions of yards of loose material are in mine tailing fields adjacent to project 35-3A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 training walls in upper 7-mile reach of project. Initial rehabilitation of Daguerre Point Dam begun in July 1963 was completed in December 1964. Contract for permanent rehabilitation of structure was initiated in July and completed in October 1965. Flood Control 4. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA Location. Works covered by this improvement are on Sacramento River and tributaries in north-central California from Collinsville to Ordbend, a distance of 184 miles. Previous project. For details see page 1815 of Annual Report for 1917, page 1995 of Annual Report for 1938, and page 2262 of Annual Report for 1907. Existing project. Sacramento River flood control project is a comprehensive plan of flood control for Sacramento River and lower reaches of its principal tributaries. Improvement extends along Sacramento River from Ordbend in Glenn County, CA, 184 miles downstream to its mouth at Collinsville at upper end of Suisun Bay, and comprises a system of levees, overflow weirs, drainage pumping plants, and flood bypass channels or floodways designed to carry surplus floodwaters without inundation of valley lands. About 980 miles of levee construction, with an average height of 15 feet and 98 miles of bank protection are involved in project. For further details, see Annual Report for 1962, page 2115. (See table 35-BB for authorizing legislation.) Estimated (October 1987) cost for original project (exclusive of supplemental levee improvements), including new work and maintenance, is $163,925,000 of which $68,925,000 is Federal cost and $95 million non-Federal ($90,050,562 for lands and damages and relocations and $4,949,438 required contributed funds for levee construction, bank protection works, and levee setbacks). Of this amount, $4,939,752 was for new work and $9,686 for maintenance. Estimated October 1996 total project cost is $171,950,000, of which $76,322,000 is Federal and $95,628,000 is non-Federal. Total estimate now includes remedial levee work for Yolo Bypass and Cache Slough (Unit 109) and land acquisition for Little Holland Tract as hydraulic and environmental mitigation in potential projects impacting stages of the Sacramento River, but excludes Sacramento Urban Area; Marysville/Yuba City Area; Mid-Valley Area; Lower Sacramento Area; and Upper Sacramento Area Levee Reconstruction Projects. Colusa Basin Drain and Knights Landing (West Levee) are not incrementally economically feasible, but these sites have been transferred to Upper Sacramento Area. Knights Landing (East Levee) has been included with Mid-Valley Area. In addition to project requirements, local interests constructed several pumping plants for drainage of agricultural and urban land protected by project levees. Some channel clearing work was accomplished by State of California and other local interests to supplement project levee construction. Dredging below Cache Slough and reconstruction of Cache Creek settling basin weir are considered deferred and excluded from foregoing cost estimate. Estimated cost (July 1962) of these project units is $2,560,000 and $520,000, respectively, a total of $3,080,000 plus U.S. costs, for construction. Operation and maintenance of completed project will be responsibility of local interests; as units of project are completed, they are transferred to agencies of State of California for operation and maintenance. Existing project was adopted by 1917 Flood Control Act (H. Doc 81, 62d Cong., Ist sess., as modified by Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 63d Cong., 1st sess.), 1928 Flood Control Act (S. Doc. 23, 69th Cong., 1st sess.), River and Harbor Act of 1937 (S. Committee print 75th Cong., 1st sess.), and 1941 Flood Control Act (H. Doc. 205, 77th Cong., 1st sess.). Phase I - Sacramento River Flood Control System Evaluation recommended reconstruction of32 miles of Sacramento area levees. Report was approved and in March 1989, Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction project was established under authority of Sacramento River Flood Control Project. New project is located within boundaries of Sacramento River Flood Control System in highly urbanized area around city of Sacramento, near confluence of Sacramento and American Rivers. It includes Natomas area levees from Natomas Cross Canal Bypass through Reclamation District 900 and portions of the Yolo Bypass east levee in West Sacramento; and, in South Sacramento, the east bank of Sacramento River from Miller Park to town of Freeport. Estimated (October 1995) cost for Sacramento Urban project is $42,900,000 of which $28,215,000 is Federal and 35-4A SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT $14,685,000 is non-Federal (including a cash contribution of $2,135,000). Sacramento River Flood Control Project (Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District) (G.C.I.D.) is part of the fishery/irrigation enhancement project being developed by G.C.I.D. Project is located at River Mile 206 on Sacramento River near the Glenn-Tehama county line. The Corps riffle restoration project includes multiple sheet piles coupled with stone to replicate natural riffle and bank protection to restore river hydraulic gradient to pre-1970 conditions. This will stabilize river hydraulics. Estimated (October 1995) project cost is $14,200,000, of which $10,650,000 is Federal and $3,550,000 is non-Federal. Project was established under authority of the 1917 Sacramento River Flood Control Project (see Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act of 1990 and Water Resources Development Act of 1996). Phase II - Marysville/Yuba City Area Levee Reconstruction. Project is located within boundaries of the Sacramento River Flood Control System in Butte, Sutter and Yuba counties in north-central California. Area includes Feather and Yuba Rivers and their tributaries, Sutter Bypass, cities of Marysville and Yuba City and communities of Linda and Olivehurst. An evaluation of about 134 miles of Sacramento River Flood Control Project levees in Marysville/Yuba City area identified about 22 miles of levees as being structurally unstable. Project consists of reconstructing those levees by installing about 17 miles of toe drains, installing about 4 miles of slurry cut-off walls and backfilling about 1 mile of a drainage ditch to rectify structural stability; also consists of raising about 10 miles of levees to restore design freeboard and developing about 76 acres for fish and wildlife mitigation. Estimated October 1997 project cost is $39,200,000, of which $29,400,000 is Federal and $9,800,000 is non-Federal (including a cash contribution of $4,200,000). Project was established under authority of Sacramento River Flood Control Project. Phase III- Mid-Valley Area Levee Reconstruction. Project is located within the boundaries of the Sacramento River Flood Control System in Placer, Solano, Sutter, Yolo and Yuba Counties in north-central California. Area includes the Sacramento and Feather Rivers, Knights Landing Ridge Cut, Sutter and Yolo Bypasses and portions of the Bear River including Yankee Slough, Dry, Cache, Putah Creeks and the Natomas Cross Canal. Communities in the area include Knights Landing, Robbins, Davis and Woodland. An evaluation of about 240 miles of the Sacramento River Flood Control Project levees in the Mid-Valley area identified about 18 miles of levees that are structurally deficient. Project consists of reconstructing about 18 miles of levees by installing about 6.9 miles of landside berms with toe drains, relocation of ditches, about 11.2 miles of embankment modifications, about .2 miles of slurry cut-off walls, the restoration of levee height, and developing land for about 52 acres of fish and wildlife mitigation. Estimated October 1997 project cost is $17,620,000, of which $13,250,000 is Federal and $4,370,000 is non-Federal (including a cash contribution of $2,010,000). Project was established under authority of the Sacramento River Flood Control Project. Phase IV - Lower Sacramento Area Levee Reconstruction. Project is located within the boundaries of the Sacramento River Flood Control System in Sacramento County in north-central California. Area includes the lower Sacramento River and its distributary sloughs and the city of Clarksburg. An evaluation of about 295 miles of the Sacramento River Flood Control Project levees in the Lower Sacramento area identified about 47 miles of levees that are structurally deficient. Project consists of reconstructing about 2.6 miles of levees by installing landside berms with toe drains, backfilling of existing drainage collector systems, slurry cut-off walls, the restoration of levee height, and developing land for about 2 acres of fish and wildlife mitigation. Estimated October 1997 project cost is $5,200,000, of which $3,910,000 is Federal and $1,290,000 is non-Federal (including a cash contribution of $880,000). Project was established under authority of Sacramento River Flood Control Project. Phase V - Upper Sacramento Area Levee Reconstruction. Project is located within the boundaries of the Sacramento River Flood System in Colusa County in north-central California. Area includes the upper Sacramento River and its tributaries and the city of Colusa. An evaluation of about 315 miles of the Sacramento River Flood Control Project levees in the Upper Sacramento area identified about 35-5A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 12 miles of levees that are structurally deficient. Project consists of reconstruction of about 3.7 miles of levees by installing landside berms with toe drains, slurry cut-off walls, the restoration of levee height, and developing land for about 1.3 acres of fish and wildlife mitigation. Estimated October 1997 project cost is $6,380,000, of which $4,800,000 is Federal and $1,580,000 is non-Federal (including a cash contribution of $720,000). Project was established under authority of Sacramento River Flood Control Project. Local cooperation. Local interests have fully complied with requirements for all work completed and indicated they will be able to fulfill requirements for remaining work. Operations and results during fiscal year. New work: (a) Sacramento Urban Area Levee Recontruction: Construction is complete, however, final payment and contract close-out activities remain. (b) Sacramento River Flood Control Project (Glenn Colusa Irrigation District (G.C.I.D.): Engineering was continued on riffle restoration on Sacramento River including building of multiple sheet piles coupled with stone to replicate natural riffle and bank protection to restore river hydraulic gradient to pre-1970 conditions. (c) Marysville/Yuba City Area Levee Reconstruction: Completed contract 2a awarded July 1995 and continued the mitigation contract awarded August 1995. (d) Mid-Valley Area Levee Reconstruction: Completed Contract IA awarded in September 1996 and continued contract I B awarded in July 1997. Engineering continued for the second Project Cooperation Agreement for Areas 2, 3 and 4. (e) Lower Sacramento Area Levee Reconstruction: Engineering continued. (f) Upper Sacramento Area Levee Reconstruction: Engineering continued. A Section 215 agreement was signed September 22, 1997 to construct 1,000 lineal feet of seepage/stability berm along the Sacramento River (Site E). Historical summary. Construction of existing project began in FY 1918 and is about 99 percent complete. Channel improvement to date has produced a channel with a capacity of 579,000 cubic feet per second in Sacramento River below Cache Slough. In addition, discharges up to 21,000 cubic feet per second can be diverted from Sacramento River through Georgiana Slough. Completed major project items include about 977 miles of levees; five weirs with a combined discharge capacity of 602,000 cubic feet per second; two cutoff channels; two sets of outfall gates; channel improvement and clearing in Sacramento River, Butte Creek, Putah Creek, and Sutter and Tisdale Bypasses; construction of two main bypasses or floodways and secondary bypasses at Tisdale and Sacramento weirs and at Wadsworth Canal; construction of Knights Landing ridge cut and of Cache Creek settling basin; installation of gaging stations; and enlargement of Sacramento River below Cache Slough. Cutoffs at Collins Eddy and between Wild Irishman and Kinneys Bends were made in 1918 and 1919, respectively. Sacramento weir was completed in 1917, Fremont weir in 1924, Tisdale and Moulton weirs in 1932, and Colusa weir in 1933. Outfall gates at Knights Landing were constructed in 1930 and at mouth of Butte Slough in 1936. Pumping plants on Sutter Bypass were completed in 1944. Work items with reference to clearing, snagging, rectification of channels, and bank protection on Sacramento River and tributaries in Tehama County and from Red Bluff southerly, provided for by 1941 Flood Control Act were accomplished in fiscal years 1947, 1948, 1949, and 1951. Yolo Bypass and Cache Slouth (Unit 109) was completed in 1990. Work remaining comprises completion of levee stage construction Marysville/Yuba City Area levees; Mid-Valley Area; Lower Sacramento Area; and Upper Sacramento Area Levees. (See Table 35-CC for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1996.) 35-6A SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-AA COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 1. Regulation of Hydraulic Mining and Preparation of Plans 2. Sacramento River and Tributaries. CA (Debris Control) (Contributed Funds Other) 3. Treatment of Yuba River Debris Situation Restraining Barries, CA (Federal Funds) (Required Contributed Funds) (Contributed Funds, Other) 4. Sacramento River, CA including Sacramento River Flood Control Project (Federal Funds) Maint. Approp. Cost New York Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New York Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Contrib Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost Rehab. Approp. Cost New York Contrib. Cost New York Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 821,325 821,325 - - - - 5,093,999 12 - - - - 5,093,999 1,064,900 952,741 782,352 1,287,915 16,006,742 3 1,056,959 877,077 1,277.023 15,991,888 15,991,888 4 - - - - 323,420 s 280,317 - - - 315,777 6 361,482 361,482 -1,000 29,000 1,145 22,524 4,500 14,287 307,000 2,159,531 7 179,182 2,031,617 7 - 1,053.904 - 1,053,904 361,777 361,777 56,000 1,897,338 70,008 1,865,183 - 1,053,904 - 1,053,904 2,000 36,000 s 34,000 567,000 3,700,000 235,326 631,372 1,329,635 218,084 61,310 80,739,741 9 245,765 78,507,365 9 1,979,104 1,979,104 35-7A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 35-AA (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section in Text Project (Contributed Funds) Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction (Federal Funds) (Required Contributed Funds) Contributed Funds, Other) Sacramento River Flood Control (G.C.I.D), CA (Federal Funds) Total Cost to Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997 New Work Contrib. Cost Maint. Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost 10,724,085 to 10,724,085 to 9,686 ii 9,686 11 -600,000 3,663,000 700,000 842,439 3,760,711 143,950 - 247,327 129,714 197,338 115,402 -101,735 - 200,000 147,387 -10,217 -28,548 -437,408 400,000 400,000 300,000 209,066 241,207 660,133 72,000 28,075,000 803,419 28,060,581 - 2,157,613 - 2,045,424 - 5,940,027 12 - 5,867,175 12 820,000 3,713,000 13 692,144 3,481,341 13 Sacramento N, River Flood Control C (Marysville/Yuba City Area levees). CA (Federal Funds) Sacramento NE River Flood I Control C (Mid-Valley Area Levee Reconstruction) (Federal Funds) Sacramento NE River Flood Control C (Lower Sacramento Area Levee Reconstruction) (Federal Funds) BE377 ew Work Approp. :ost 689,000 1,479,000 2,445,000 7,174,000 12,325,000 14 656,774 525,117 2,826,445 4,930,067 9,474,245 14 ew Work Approp. :ost ew Work Approp. Cost 820,310 1,938,690 2,759,000 626,781 1,960,224 2,587,005 604,365 485,276 273,000 352,102 877,365 837,378 35-8A SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA, DISTRICT TABLE 35-AA (Cont'd) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Sacramento New Work River Flood Approp. - - - 354,000 354,000 Control Cost - - - 319,791 319,791 (Upper Sacramento Area Levee Reconstruction) (Federal Funds) 1. Exclusive of $644,503 appropriation and cost on inactive portion of project. 2. Includes $477,127 for recreational facilities at North Fork ($32,473) and Harry L. Englebright ($414,654), Code 710 appropriations and costs. 3. Includes $14,272,051 from regular funds and $1,734,690 from Hydraulic Mining in California funds. 4. Includes $14,257,199 from regular costs and $1,734,690 from Hydraulic Mining in California costs. 5. Includes $12,420 contributed funds, other, from State of California Department of Navigation and Ocean Development for acquisition of a boarding float; and $311,000 funds from State of California Department of Boating and Waterways for refurbishing restrooms and launching facilities at Englebright Dam. 6. Includes $12,420 costs for acquisition of boarding float and $280,317 costs for refurbishing restrooms and launching facilities at Englebright Dam. 7. Includes deferred maintenance funds in amount of $207,500. 8. Miscellaneous engineering and construction accomplished at expense of local interests in connection with rehabilitation of Daguerre Point Dam necessitated by December 1964 floodflows. 9. Includes appropriation and cost of $680,000 for new work for previous project and $1,486,469 public works funds for new work for existing project. 10. Includes $680,000 required contribution for previous project;$4,939,752 required contributed funds for existing project; and $310,801 voluntary contribution for bank protection for existing project. 11. Includes $9,686 required contributed funds for existing project. 12. Includes contributed funds, other, from the State of California for relocation of utilities, irrigation ditch, access ramps, and miscellaneous small structures in the Natomas, Greenhaven Pocket and West Sacramento areas. (Sacramento Urban Area). 13. G.C.I.D. construction funds received in FY 1991, but no costs were incurred. Includes $493,000 total funds and costs under General Investigations for Preconstruction Engineering and Design. 14. Not reflected in actual annual accounting records for Marysville/Yuba City are $1,710,000 costs for FY 91 and FY 92 incurred under Sacramento River Flood Control Project for design effort. These costs are considered part of Marysville/Yuba City cost-shared project. 35-9A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 35-BB AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorization in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. Ex. Doc. 267, 51st Cong., 2d sess., Ex. Doc. 98, 4 7 th Cong., 1 st sess. ! (Amendment of sec. 13, Act of Mar. 1, 1893.) i Mar. 1, 1983 Feb 27, 1907 35-10A REGULATION OF HYDRAULIC MINING AND PREPARATION OF PLANS Created California Debris Commission and authorized: (a) Hydraulic mining under its regulation in drainage areas of Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, if possible without injury to navigability of these river systems or to lands adjacent thereto; and (b) preparation of plans by Commission for improvement of navigability of these river systems, and flood and debris-control therein. Authorized California Debris Commission to permit hydraulic mining without construction of impounding works, provided there is no injury to navigability of above river systems or lands adjacent thereto. Amended act of Mar. 1, 1893, which provides for construction of debris dams or other restraining works by California Debris Commission and collection of a 3-percent tax on gross proceeds of each mine using such facilities, so as to eliminate this tax and substitute an annual tax per cubic yard mined, obtained by dividing total capital cost of each dam, reservoir, and rights-of-way, by total capacity of reservoir for restraint of debris; and authorized revocation of Commission orders permitting such mining, for failure to pay this annual tax within 30 days after its due date; and also authorized receipt of money advances, from mineowners to aid such construction, to be refunded later from annual payments of yardage taxes on material mined. Added at end of sec. 23 of above act, a provision that the Secretary of the Army is authorized to enter into contracts to supply storage for water and use of outlet facilities from debris-storage reservoirs for domestic and irrigation purposes and power development, upon such conditions of delivery, use, and payment as he may approve, these payments are to be deposited to credit of such reservoir project, reducing its capital cost to be repaid by tax on mining operations. Abolished the California Debris Commission and transferred all authorities, powers, functions, and Sec. 1001, 1986 WRDA June 19, 1934 June 25, 1938 Nov. 17, 1986 SACRAMENTO, CA DISTRICT TABLE 35-BB AUTHORIZATION LEGISLATION See Date of Section Authorization in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents duties to the Secretary of the Army. Authorized all acquired land and other interests presently under jurisdiction of the Commission to be retained and administered under direction of the Secretary. 4. SACRAMENTO RIVER, CA H. Doc. 649, 78th Dec. 22, 1944 Additional levee construction and reconstruction, Cong., 2d sess., and And May 17, 1950 including levee protection of Upper Butte Basin, and 367, 81St Cong., multipurpose reservoirs. 2 1st sess. H. Doc. 272, 84 th July 3, 1958 Bank protection and incidental channel improvements, Cong., 2d sess. Sacramento River from Chico Landing to Red Bluff, and local interests flood plain zoning above Chico Landing. 2 S. Doc. 103, 86 th July 14, 1960 Bank protection works at critical locations, Cong., 2d sess. Sacramento River. 2 H. Doc. 533, 108 th May 24, 1994 Acquiring and permanently restoring Little Holland Cong., 2d sess. Tract to tidal lands with seasonal and emergent marshlands would not only have substantial environmental benefits, but measurable flood control benefits as well. 1. For latest published map, see Annual Report for 1913, p. 3170, and Rivers and Harbors Committee Document 50, 7 4 th Cong., 1st sess. 2. This supplemental work is reported in detail under Sacramento District, Improvement No. 23. 35-11A REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 35- CC SACRAMENTO RIVER CA: TOTAL COST EXISTING PROJECT TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 (See Section 4 of Text) Funds New Work Maintenance Total Regular $74,111,286 $1,979,104 $76,090,390 Public Works 1,486,469 - 1,486,469 Total U.S. 75,597,755 1,979,104 77,576,859 Contributed Project Work 4,939,752 9,686 4,949,438 Contributed, Other 5,104,333 - 5,104,333 Total All Funds $85,641,840 1,988,790 $87,630,630 1. Includes $429,671 representing book value of plan purchased with previous project funds and transferred to existing project without reimbursement. 2. Excludes financial information for Sacramento Urban Area Levee Reconstruction, Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District (G.C.I.D.), Marysville/Yuba city Area Levee Reconstruction and Mid-Valley Area Levee Reconstruction, Lower Sacramento Area Levee Reconstruction and the Upper Sacramento Area Levee Reconstruction Projects, all authorized under the Sacramento River Flood control Project (See Table 35-AA). 35-12A ALBUQUERQUE, NM, DISTRICT* The district comprises the watershed of the Canadian River and its tributaries in New Mexico; the watershed of Arkansas River and its tributaries in Colorado; the watershed of Rio Grande and its tributaries including the Pecos River and its tributaries upstream of Amistad Lake; and the San Juan River Basin in New Mexico; and the watersheds of the Gila, San Francisco and Mimbres Rivers and its tributaries in New Mexico. Note: The district watershed boundaries were revised in June 1986 to include the portion of New Mexico west of the Continental Divide. IMPROVEMENTS Flood Control 1. Acequias Irrigation System, NM ....... 2. Alamogordo, NM ................... 3. Alam osa, CO ...................... 4. Albuquerque Diversion Channels, NM ... 5. Conchas Lake, NM .................. 6. El Paso, TX ........................ 7. John Martin Reservoir, CO ........... . 8. Las Cruces, NM .................... 9. Rio Grande Basin, NM ............... 9A. Abiquiu Dam, NM .................. 9B. Cochiti Lake, NM ................... 9C. Galisteo Dam, NM ................... 9D. Jemez Canyon Dam, NM ............. 9E. Middle Rio Grande Flood Protection, Bernalillo to Belen, NM .............. 9F. Rio Grande Floodway, NM ............ 9G. San Acacia to Bosque del Apache Unit, NM ....................... Page 36-1 36-2 36-2 36-2 36-3 36-4 36-4 36-5 36-5 36-5 36-6 36-7 36-7 36-7 36-8 36-8 Flood Control (Continued) Page 10. Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, NM ......... 36-9 11. Trinidad Lake, CO ................... 36-10 12. Two Rivers Dam, NM ................ 36-10 13. Inspection of completed flood control projects ..................... 36-11 14. Scheduling flood control reservoir operations .................. 36-11 15. Other authorized flood control projects ..................... 36-12 16. Flood control work under special authorizations ................. 36-12 General Investigations 17. Surveys ............................ 18. Collection and study of basic data ....... 19. Environmental Data Studies ........... 20. Preconstruction Engineering and Design .. 36-12 36-13 36-13 36-13 Flood Control 1. Acequias Irrigation System, NM Location. There are about one thousand acequias throughout the state of New Mexico, most of which are located in north-central New Mexico. Proposed project. Authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Section 1113, the project *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 36-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 consists of about one thousand acequias throughout the state of New Mexico. These community ditch systems provide irrigation water to about 160,000 acres on an estimated 12,000 farms. Acequias have been in existence since the early Spanish Colonization period of the 17th and 18th Centuries and represent one of the oldest forms of cooperative institutions in the United States. They are an integral part of the culture and heritage of New Mexico. Diversion structures, many of which are constructed of available materials such as rock and brush, are frequently destroyed by flows greater than normal resulting from spring runoff or summer thunderstorms. Disruption of the ditches usually occurs during peak irrigation season and severely impacts crop production. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 directs the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to undertake measures, without regard to economic analysis, as are necessary to protect and restore the river diversion structures and associated canals. Local Cooperation. The local sponsor, the State of New Mexico, has a law whereby the State of New Mexico provides 17.5% of the project costs, and low interest loans to the local Acequias for the remaining 7.5%. The State of New Mexico has appropriated, and will appropriate on an annual basis, the funds necessary to meet the requirements of local sponsorship. Operation and results during fiscal year. Funds to initiate construction were received in Fiscal Year 1988. Construction contracts have been awarded in every year since FY 1988. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated and completed on one project in FY 1997: Puerto de Luna Guaadalupe County, N.M. Los Trigos project in San Miguel County, N.M. was warded in September 1997. 2. Alamogordo, NM Location. The project is located in south central New Mexico in Otero County, in and near Alamogordo, NM. The city is situated at the foot of the Sacramento Mountains near the eastern edge of the Tularosa Basin. Proposed Project. The authorized project consists of a concrete and rip-rap lined diversion channel with 100 year flow capacity, which will intercept flows from the Sacramento Mountains east of the City. For a description of the complete improvement and authorizing legislation see page 694 of Annual Report for 1966. Local Cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. Operation and Results during fiscal year. A GRR, which addresses locally preferred alternatives for the 100- year flood protection, was ongoing durning FY 97. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. GRR was being finalized for review. 3. Alamosa, CO Location. The project lies in south central Colorado along the Rio Grande, in the community of Alamosa, CO. Proposed Project. The project consists of a levee system which will replace and augment the existing spoil bank levees. (See Table 36-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1992 applies. Operation and results during fiscal year. Preconstruction, Engineering and Design activities were completed, and a construction contract was awarded in September 1997. Condition at the end of the fiscal year. Construction contract award. 4. Albuquerque Diversion Channels, NM Location. The project is located in an area which comprises watersheds of ephemeral streams entering a 15- mile reach of the Rio Grande from the east at Albuquerque, NM, and vicinity. Combined drainage area of the tributaries is about 276 square miles. The Sandia range of the Rocky Mountains, which is about 12 miles east of the Rio Grande, forms the eastern border of the watersheds. The crest of this mountain range rises more than a mile over the river to an 36-2 ALBUQUERQUE, NM,DISTRICT elevation of 10,692 feet above mean sea level. (See Geological Survey Map, Albuquerque, NM, quadrangle, scale 1:62,500.). Existing project. Improvements consist of north and south diversion channels on high ground east of and parallel to the valley. Channels are designed to carry floods equal in magnitude to standard project flood from all tributaries. For a description of the complete improvement and authorizing legislation see page 17-15 of Annual Report for FY 1973. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. For details of local cooperation requirements see page 17-2 of the Annual Report for FY 1973. Operations and results during fiscal year. The South Diversion Channel prevented $433,300 in flood damages during FY 1997. The estimated total accumulated flood damages prevented are $6,456,000. Peak flood flows recorded during FY 1997 were: North Diversion Channel near Alameda 165 c.f.s.; South Diversion Channel 7,850 c.f.s. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the North and South Diversion Channels began in March 1965, and was completed in March 1972. The South Diversion Channel is in good condition and well maintained by the local interests. The North Diversion Channel has experienced severe arching and cracking of the concrete lined portion. Construction to correct this problem was initiated and completed in FY 1987. Additionally, a hydraulic flow problem exists on the North Diversion Channel. A model study, completed in February 1986, identified corrective measures. The local sponsor has constructed some the measures recommended by the model testing. Because of this, the remaining measures no longer exhibit economic justification, and hence do not warrant additional Federal involvement. Therefore, the project was terminated in September 1995. 5. Conchas Lake, NM Location. The dam is located in San Miguel County, NM, on the Canadian River, just below the confluence of the Canadian and Conchas Rivers. (See Geological Survey State map of New Mexico, scale 1:500,000, and Geological Survey topographic map, Tucumcari quadrangle, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. This dam consists of a concrete gravity main section 1,250 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet above streambed located in the Canadian River Canyon together with earth dikes on each side having an overall length of about 3.7 miles. The main section contains conduits in its base for the release of water from the reservoir, and an overflow, ungated spillway 300 feet long. The earth dikes vary in height up to 100 feet and the north dike contains a concrete ogee-type emergency spillway 3,000 feet long. The reservoir has a gross storage capacity of 513,900 acre-feet (198,170 for flood control, 254,200 for water conservation and irrigation, and 61,530 dead storage). The dam controls 7,409 square miles of drainage area. (See page 17-16 of Annual Report of 1973 for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. None Required. Operations and results during fiscal year. The reservoir was operated for storage of floodwater and releases for irrigation purposes. Sediment damages of $214,800 were prevented during FY 1997. There were no flood damages prevented in FY 1997. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project through FY 1997 were $4,153,800. Estimated irrigation benefits for FY 1997 were $160,900. Estimated total accumulated irrigation benefits through FY 1997 were $10,710,500. The pool elevation at the start of FY 1997 was 4,196.80 feet with corresponding storage of 277,351 acre-feet. Total releases for this reporting period were 128,730 acre-feet. Releases of 98,546 acre-feet were made to Arch Hurley Conservancy District and 1,807 acre-feet to Bell Ranch and 0 acre feet to the Canadian River Channel. The pool elevation on September 30, 1996 was 4,198.57 feet with corresponding storage of 293,047 acre-feet. Sediment deposition during the fiscal year was 1,918 acre-feet. Condition at end of fiscal year. The existing project was essentially complete in 1939. Irrigation of some lands downstream from the project began in November 1945. A cost sharing agreement between the Government and *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapte 36-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 the State of New Mexico for additional Recreation Development at Conchas Lake was completed in August 1977. Costs of the facilities are 50 percent State of New Mexico and 50 percent Federal. Construction of recreation facilities was initiated in FY 1978 and completed in FY 1983. Project structures ae in good condition and in operation. 6. El Paso, TX Location. The project is located at El Paso, El Paso County, TX, which is on the left bank of the Rio Grande in the reach that forms part of the international boundary between the United States and the Republic of Mexico. (Geological Survey map for El Paso, TX; New Mexico quadrangle, scale 1:250,000.) Existing project. This project consists of a singlepurpose flood control system of detention dams, diversion dikes, conduits and channels to collect, regulate and discharge arroyo runoff into the Rio Grande. Runoff from the tributary arroyos on the eastern, southern, and western slopes of the adjacent Franklin Mountains often inundates sections of the city and its outlying suburban developments. The project is divided into three independent elements: Northwest area, Central area, and Southeast area. The project plan satisfies the 1933 U.S. and Mexico agreement on limited tributary discharge into the Rio Grande in El Paso, Texas. (See Table 36-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of June 28, 1938 applied for the Northwest and Central areas. The Local Cooperation Agreement for the Southeast area reflects the cost sharing requirements contained in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. Operations and results during fiscal year. Flood control dams in operation during FY 1997 and dates of completion of construction are as follows: Northgate and Range Dams (February 1973); Sunrise and Mountain Park Dams (October 1974); and Pershing Dam (March 1977); Fort Bliss Diversion Channel (November 1978); Oxidation Pond and Buena Vista Diversion and Oxidation Pond Outlet Conduit (November 1980); Mulberry and Thorn Drive Dams (June 1982); Mesa Dam (September 1982); McKelligon Canyon Dam (October 1982); Keystone Dam (September 1983); Keystone Outlet Conduit (March 1984); Highway Diversion Channel (May 1985); Dam Safety Assurance Program to the existing Range and Northgate Dams (May 1986); Borderland Diversion Channel (September 1986); and Phelps Dodge Basin (January 1990), and Americas Basin (Mar 93). During FY 1997 flood flows and flood control storage were minimal, however, damages which would have resulted from these flows were prevented. Condition at end of fiscal year. At the end of 1996, all work in Central and Northwest areas were complete. Construction was completed in January 1990 on the Phelps Dodge Basin, in June 1992 on Phelps Dodge Channel, in March 1993 on Americas Basin, in January 1994 on Bluff Channel Phase I, January 1995 for Phase II, January 1996 for Phase III construction of Phase IV for Bluff was underway. 7. John Martin Reservoir, CO Location. The project is located on the Arkansas River, in Bent County, 1,159 miles upstream from its mouth, 300 miles downstream from its source, about 18 miles upstream from the city of Lamar, CO. (See Geological Survey maps for Lamar and Las Animas, CO quadrangles, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. The project consists of a concrete and earthfill structure about 2.6 miles long with a maximum height of 106 feet above streambed and an overflow, gated spillway 1,174 feet long. Total capacity of the reservoir at the top of flood control is 605,115 acre-feet (259,417 for flood control and 345,698 for conservation and recreation storage). This reservoir controls a contributing drainage area of 18,130 square miles and is operated as a unit of the coordinated reservoir system for flood control in the Arkansas River Basin. Public Law 89-298 modified the act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1570) to authorize 10,000 acre-feet of reservoir flood control storage space for fish and wildlife and recreation purposes. For details of the completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 17-16 of Annual Report for FY 1973. Local cooperation. Section 3 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of 36-4 ALBUQUERQUE, NM,DISTRICT the dam and reservoir continued. Regulation of conservation storage continued under rules and regulations of the Arkansas River Compact. Sediment damages of $329,600 were prevented during FY 1997. Estimated total flood and sediment damages prevented by this project through FY 1997 were $94,313,700. Estimated irrigation benefits for FY 1997 were $575,000. Estimated total accumulative irrigation benefits were $27,328,000. Maximum pool elevation of 3,850.03 feet with corresponding storage of 324,733 acre-feet occurred on June 29, 1997. Total releases for FY 1997 were 281,307 acre-feet. Releases attributed to irrigation benefits amounted to 146,315 acre-feet. Sediment deposition was 2,943 acre-feet in FY 1997. Condition at end of fiscal year. Storage and operation of the reservoir for irrigation began in March 1943. The project structures are in good condition and operational. 8. Las Cruces, NM Location. The project is located in Las Cruces, NM, 40 miles north of El Paso, TX. Proposed Project. The project is authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. The project consists of enlargement and modifications of two existing detention basins and a irrigation ditch in order to provide increased flood protection to the downtown commercial and residential district of Las Cruces. The proposed project will be constructed at an estimated cost of $8,800,000 ($6,600,000 Federal and $2,200,000 nonfederal) 1 Oct 96 price levels. Local Cooperation. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. The City of Las Cruces is the non- Federal Local sponsor. Operations and results during the fiscal year. Plans and specifications for the project will be completed in 1998. The construction contract for the project is scheduled to be awarded in December 1998. 9. Rio Grande Basin, NM Location. Improvements are located on the Rio Grande and tributaries in New Mexico. More definite locations and descriptions of individual projects are in following paragraphs and individual reports by projects. Existing project. The Flood Control Act of 1948 authorized the flood control phase of the comprehensive plan of development of water resources of the Rio Grande Basin in New Mexico (H. Doc 243, 81st Cong., 1st sess.) with the exception of Chiflo Dam and Reservoir and spillway gate structure at Chamita Dam. Although recommended, Chiflo Dam and Reservoir was deleted from the authorized plan. It was excluded without prejudice from future consideration by Congress. It was requested at that time, by the States of Colorado and Texas, that the project be deferred for restudy regarding required storage and methods of operation. By the same act, Congress also authorized for the construction irrigation phase of the comprehensive plan as recommended by the Bureau of Reclamation (H. Doc. 653, 81st Cong., 2nd sess.). The act also stipulated that work should be prosecuted in accordance with a joint agreement approved by the Secretary of the Army and Acting Secretary of the Interior on November 21, 1957. In addition, under that agreement the Bureau of Reclamation was given responsibility for construction, operation, and maintenance of channel rectification, and drainage rehabilitation and extension phases of the unified plan of improvement. Authority for the Chamita Dam and Reservoir was abrogated when Cochiti Dam and Reservoir was authorized. (See Table 36-B for authorizing legislation and Table 36-C for existing projects.) All operations and costs for projects contained in the authorized plan are reflected in individual reports on the following pages. 9A. Abiquiu Dam, NM Location. The project is one unit of the flood control plan for the Rio Grande and tributaries, New Mexico. Abiquiu Dam is located on the Rio Chama near the town of Abiquiu, NM, about 32 miles upstream from the confluence of Rio Chama and Rio Grande. (See Geological Survey Map for plan and profile of Rio Chama, NM, from mouth to mile 103, sheet 1, and Army Map Service, Aztec, NM; Colorado NJ 13-1, scale 1:250,000.) *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 36-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam 1,540 feet long, 325 feet high, with a 12-foot diameter controlled outlet, and an uncontrolled spillway in a natural saddle about one mile north of the left abutment. The reservoir provides 568,000 acre-feet of flood control and sediment storage. Total capacity at the spillway crest is 1,198,500 acre-feet. For a detailed description of the completed improvements and authorizing legislation see Annual Report of 1973. A major rehabilitation project was completed in September 1980 and the recreation facilities were completed in FY 1981. A non-Federal hydropower plant was completed in 1990 by the County of Los Alamos. The capacity of this plant is 13.2 MW. Drainage adits were completed in 1990 to alleviate seepage problems in the north and south abutments. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. Storage and flows were regulated in accordance with Section 203, Flood Control Act of 1960. On October 1, 1996, the pool elevation was 6,208.69 feet. The maximum pool (6,221.05 feet) and storage (193,634 acre-feet) occurred on June 09, 1997. On September 30, 1997, the pool elevation was 6,215.61 feet with a corresponding storage of 171,703 acre-feet. There was 1,095 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1997. There were $5,000 in flood damages prevented during FY 1997. Sediment damages prevented were $122,600. Accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project since completion were $390,900,400 through FY 1997. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in February 1963. The project structures are in good condition and operational. Abiquiu Dam is not equipped with Emergency Gates, however, provisions on initial construction were made for later installation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized construction of a set of emergency gates to increase safety and enhance flood and sediment control. Funds were appropriated under Construction General and in May 1997, construction of the gates commenced. Installation of the gates is programmed to start in November 1998. 9B. Cochiti Lake, NM Location. The dam is located at river mile 340 on the Rio Grande (river mile 0 being at the intersection of the New Mexico-Texas State line with international boundary at El Paso, TX), near Pueblo de Cochiti, which is about 50 miles upstream from Albuquerque, NM. (See Geological Survey Maps, Cochiti Dam, NM, quadrangle and Santo Domingo Pueblo, NM, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam about 5.4 miles long with a maximum height of 251 feet above streambed. The project extends generally in an east-west line across the Rio Grande to a point about 2 miles east of the Rio Grande and then southward across the Santa Fe River. An uncontrolled spillway with a 460- foot-long ogee-weir and a 160-foot notch 10.5 feet deep in the center is part of the embankment on the south side of the Santa Fe River. Operational releases for flood control and irrigation are made through a 3-barrel gated conduit in the left abutment on the Rio Grande. The reservoir has a storage capacity of 589,159 acre-feet at the spillway crest, of which 86,514 acre-feet is dedicated for recreation and sediment control. The project controls flood waters from a 11,695 square mile drainage area. For more improvement details see page 17-7 of Annual Report for 1980. See page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. The project was completed in June 1975. On October 1, 1996, the pool elevation was 5,340.22 feet with a corresponding storage of 56,559 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 5,354.23 feet with a storage of 79,792 acre-feet on May 27, 1997. On September 30, 1997 the pool elevation was 5,340.28 feet with a corresponding storage of 56,642 acrefeet. There was 1,046 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1997. There were $14,500,000 flood damages prevented during FY 1997. Sediment damages prevented were $117,200. Accumulated total damages prevented are $434,953,100. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The dam and appurtenances were placed in operation in 1975. The Cochiti Recreation area was completed in 1976, with the Visitors Center completed in 1977. The Tetilla Peak 36-6 ALBUQUERQUE, NM,DISTRICT recreation area was completed in 1981. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 9C. Galisteo Dam, NM Location. The dam is located at river mile 12 on Galisteo Creek, a tributary of the Rio Grande. The reservoir will extend upstream from the dam for about 4 miles, near the village of Waldo, NM. (See Geological Survey Map,. San Pedro 1, NM quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam 2,820 feet long with a maximum height of 158 feet above the streambed. The outlet works consist of a 10- foot diameter uncontrolled outlet with maximum discharge capacity of 4,980 cubic feet per second with a pool at the spillway crest elevation. The spillway is a broad crested weir 250 feet long in the right abutment. The project has 79,600 acre-feet of flood control storage and 9,868 acre-feet of sediment space. For more details of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see page 17-17 of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. Operation of the project began on October 11, 1970. The reservoir was empty on October 1, 1996. No storage occurred during FY 1997. Peak instantanlius inflow was 3,343 c.f.s. and maximum outflow was 3,343 c.f.s. There was 81 acre-feet of sediment deposition during the year and the reservoir was empty on September 30, 1997. Sediment damages prevented during the FY were $9,100 totaling $159,400 through FY 1997. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in October 1970. The project structures are in good condition and in operation. 9D. Jemez Canyon Dam, NM Location. The project is located in Sandoval County, NM, on the Jemez River about 2 miles upstream from the confluence of the Jemez River and the Rio Grande, about 5 miles northwest of Bernalillo, NM. (See Geological Survey map for Bernalillo quadrangle, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. This project consists of an earthfill dam 780 feet long with maximum height of 146.6 feet above streambed, and off-channel uncontrolled saddle spillway 400 feet wide, and a 13-foot diameter gated outlet in the left abutment with discharge capacity of 8,340 cubic feet per second with a pool at spillway crest elevation. The dam was raised 14.1 feet and the spillway widened 28 feet in 1986 and 1987 to provide adequate discharge capability to accommodate the revised probable maximum flood. The reservoir has a capacity of 100,485 acre-feet at spillway crest (73,000 acre-feet for flood control and 37,485 acre-feet for sediment control). For more detailed description of completed improvements and authorizing legislation see page 17-17 of Annual Report for 1973. Local cooperation. None required. Operations and results during fiscal year. On October 1, 1996, the pool elevation was 5,189.34 feet with a corresponding storage of 18,114 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 5,196.58 feet with a storage of 27,290 acre-feet on May 26, 1997. On September 30, 1997 the pool elevation was 5,193.31 feet with a corresponding storage of 22,929 acre-feet. The reservoir was regulated for sediment control during FY 1997. Sediment deposition during FY 1997 was 570 acre-feet. There were $4,950,000 flood damages prevented during FY 1997. Sediment benefits during FY 1997 were $63,800. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented by the project through FY 1997 were $25,016,500. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in October 1953. Project structures are in good condition and in operation. 9E. Middle Rio Grande Flood Protection, Bernalillo To Belen, NM Location. The project is composed of 45 square miles of floodplain lying along the Rio Grande from the vicinity of Corrales to Belen, New Mexico. *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 36-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Proposed project. The project is authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The project consists of raising and rehabilitating 51.5 miles of levees to provide the 270-year level of protection, and the creation of 75 acres of wetlands from borrow areas within the bosque, and acquisition of 200 acres to satisfy fish and wildlife mitigation requirements. The proposed project will be constructed at an estimated total cost of $62,400,000 ($46,800,000 Federal and $15,600,000 non-Federal) 1 Oct 97 price levels. (See Table 36-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 applies. The Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District is the local sponsor. Operations and results during fiscal year. The Project Cooperation Agreement for the Corrales Unit of the project was executed in July 1995. Construction of The Corrales Unit began in September 1996, and was completed in June 1997. A Limited Reevaluation report is underway for the Belen Unit and is scheduled to be completed in 1998. 9F. Rio Grande Floodway, NM Location. This project is one unit of the flood control phase of the comprehensive plan of improvement for the Rio Grande Basin in New Mexico. It is located on the Rio Grande and covers a section of the river commencing near Truth or Consequences (formerly Hot Springs) at about river mile 123 and extends upstream to Espafiola, NM, about river mile 394. (See Table 36- D on Rio Grande Floodway.) Existing project. This project consists of flood protection and major drainage improvements by channel rectification, levee enlargement and construction, and bank stabilization work where needed to protect the levees. Construction of the project is a joint undertaking by the Bureau of Reclamation and the Corps. Portions to be done by the Corps will consist of levee enlargement, construction, of bank protection work, with channel-rectification and drainage-rehabilitation work being the responsibility of Bureau of Reclamation. Levees constructed by local interests exist throughout the reach of the river involved, but are not uniform as to grade, section, or standard of construction, and in many places are threatened by the meandering river. (See Table 36-D on existing project and Table 36-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. In addition to the usual requirements, local interests are responsible for all highway, bridge, and public utility relocations or replacements required in construction of the project. Local interests will also be required to comply with requirements of Section 221, 1970 Flood Control Act, Section 401, 1986 Water Resource Development Act, and PL 91-646 Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1970. Total costs for all requirements for the completed Albuquerque unit under terms of project authorization were $75,000. There were no non-Federal costs in connection with the construction of the Cochiti to Rio Puerco unit of floodway. The Espafiola Valley unit is in the deferred category. Neither the city of Espafiola nor Santa Clara Pueblo have given any indication that they plan any positive action to solve the flooding problem. For more details see page 17-8 of Annual Report for 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. There were no flood damages prevented by the completed floodway project during FY 1997. Estimated total accumulated flood damages prevented by the floodway project through FY 1997 amounted to $48,471,700. The peak flow of the Rio Grande through the middle valley was 5,740 c.f.s. at Albuquerque on June 08, 1997. The peak at San Acacia was 10,400 c.f.s. on September 21, 1997. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of the Albuquerque unit of the Rio Grande Floodway project is complete. The General Design Memorandum for the Bemalillo to Belen unit was completed in June 1986. The General Design Memorandum for the San Acacia to Bosque del Apache unit was approved in August 1990. Construction was completed on the Truth or Consequences Unit in fiscal year 1991. The Espafiola Valley unit was reclassified to deferred category on 17 October 1973. 9G. San Acacia to Bosque Del Apache Unit, NM Location. The project is located along the Rio Grande, extending from the upper end of the Rio Grande low-flow conveyance channel at the San Acacia diversion works to the head of Elephant Butte Reservoir. 36-8 ALBUQUERQUE, NM,DISTRICT Proposed project. The project was authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1948. The project consists of the reconstruction of 42 miles of existing spoil bank levee which separates the Rio Grande low-flow conveyance channel from the cleared floodway. The proposed project will be constructed at an estimated total cost of $65,850,200 ($57,107,730 Federal and $8,231,275 non- Federal) 1 Oct 98 price levels. (See Table 36-B for authorizing legislation.) Local Cooperation. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 apply. The Water Resources Development Act of 1992 modified the Local Sponsor's required contribution. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction has been postponed while preparation of a supplemental EIS is completed. The Supplemental EIS was required when two species, found within the project area, were submitted and listed as endangered species. The proposed plan remains the same with features added to address alternatives recommended by USFWS under the Endangered Species consultation. 10. Santa Rosa Dam and Lake, NM Location. The project is located on a lake in Guadalupe County, on Pecos River, at river mile 766.4 approximately 7 miles north of Santa Rosa, NM. (See U.S. Geological Survey map, Corazon, NM, sheet, scale 1:125,000.) Existing project. Operation of the project began in November 1979. It consists of an earth and rock fill dam 1,950 feet long and 212 feet maximum height above the streambed. The purposes of the project are flood control, irrigation and sediment retention. An unlined, open rock cut about 1,000 feet back from the left abutment serves as an uncontrolled spillway. The outlet works, located in the left abutment, consists of a control tower, intake structure with gates, and a 10-foot diameter concrete lined tunnel with a terminal flip bucket energy dissipator. Storage capacity at the spillway crest is 439,860 acre-feet which includes 72,860 acre-feet sediment reserve, 200,000 acre-feet irrigation and 167,000 acre-feet flood control storage. The surface area of the reservoir at the spillway crest is 10,594 acres. The contributing drainage area at the dam site is 2,434 square miles. For a more detailed report of the authorized project including the modification to existing Sumner Lake see page 17-8 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. For authorizing legislation see page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperation. In addition to first costs, operation and maintenance of both reservoirs is the responsibility of the Federal Government; however, the Carlsbad Irrigation District is required to contribute to operation and maintenance costs an equal amount to what they now pay toward Sumner Lake. The Carlsbad Irrigation District also agreed to use Sumner Lake for flood control. Because they realize equivalent benefits from storage capacity in Santa Rosa Lake, they will continue to fulfill their repayment obligation. The New Mexico Division of Parks manages the recreation facilities. Activities include camping, picnicking, boating and hiking. For more requirements and details on final approval in 1974 for transfer of irrigation storage from Sumner Lake to Santa Rosa Dam and Lake (formerly Los Esteros Lake) see page 17-5 of Annual Report for 1980. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. Pool elevation at the start of the fiscal year was 4,722.85 feet with storage of 37,290 acre-feet. Total releases for the fiscal year were 81,361 acre-feet. Pool elevation on September 30, 1997 was 4,743.39 acre-feet with a storage of 91,306 acre-feet. The maximum elevation was 4,745.56 feet with a storage of 99,137 acre-feet on June 09, 1997. There was 760 acre-feet of sediment deposition during the fiscal year. There were $0 flood damages prevented in FY 1997. Sediment damages prevented during the fiscal year were $85,100. Releases attributed to irrigation benefits were 33,728 acre-feet. Irrigation benefits for the fiscal year were $118,000 with an accumulative total of $2,981,600 through FY 1997. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was completed in late 1979 and reservoir operation for *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter 36-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 irrigation was started in March 1980. Construction of the recreation area was completed in October 1980. Design studies for spillway modification were initiated in FY 1979 and construction was completed in FY 1982. The project structures are in good condition and in operation. 11. Trinidad Lake, CO Location. This project is located on the Purgatorie River about 161 miles above its junction with the Arkansas River. The Project is about 4 miles upstream from the city of Trinidad, CO. (See Geological Survey map, Trinidad, CO, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The project consists of an earthfill dam 6,610 feet long with a maximum height of 200 feet above the streambed, an uncontrolled spillway 1,000 feet wide in the left abutment, and a 10-foot diameter, gate-controlled conduit in the right abutment with discharge capacity of 5,800 c.f.s. with a water surface at top of the flood control pool. In 1985, a 3-foot high parapet wall on top of the upstream face of the dam and a supplemental 700-foot wide rock cut emergency spillway located on the right abutment were constructed to provide adequate discharge capability and freeboard allowance to accommodate the revised probable maximum flood. In 1989 the recreation pool was increased from 4,500 to 15,967 acre-feet, utilizing some originally unallocated space in the project. The reservoir provides for storage of 51,000 acre-feet for flood control, 36,284 acre-feet for sediment, 20,000 acre-feet for irrigation, and 15,967 acre-feet for recreation, a total of 124,463 acre-feet. The reservoir controls a drainage area of 671 square miles and is operated for flood and sediment control, irrigation, and recreation purposes. For authorizing legislation see page 17-14 of fiscal year 1981 Annual Report. Local cooperation. Assurances of local cooperation received from City of Trinidad and Purgatorie River Water Conservancy District were formally accepted May 11, 1967, after execution of irrigation repayment contract. For complete details of requirements and costs pertaining to the execution of the irrigation repayment contract and the addition of permanent storage for recreation facilities see page 17-9 of fiscal year 1980 Annual Report. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. On October 1, 1996 the pool elevation was 6,155.46 feet with a corresponding storage of 8,145 acre-feet. The maximum pool elevation was 6,185.34 feet with a corresponding storage of 24,776 acre-feet on August 25, 1997. On September 30, 1997 the pool elevation was 6,170.41 feet with a corresponding storage of 15,166 acre-feet. Sediment deposition during FY 1997 was 168 acre-feet. Sediment damages prevented during FY 1997 was $62,800. Accrued sediment benefits are $2,501,900. Irrigation benefits for FY 1997 were $68,400. Accrued irrigation benefits through FY 1997 were $1,927,300. Irrigation benefit releases for the year were 17,405 acre-feet. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation in 1977. The recreation facilities were completed in 1980. The Dam Safety Assurance Contract was completed in May 1983. The project structures are in good condition and in operation. 12. Two Rivers Dam, NM Location. The project is located about 14 miles southwest of Roswell, NM on the Rio Hondo and the Rocky Arroyo. The Rio Hondo is formed at the confluence of the Rio Ruidoso and the Rio Bonito, near the village of Hondo, NM, in the foothills region east of Sierra Blanca in the southeastern part of Lincoln County, NM, and flows generally easterly to its confluence with the Pecos River near Roswell, NM. (See Geological Survey map, Hondo Reservoir quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The Two Rivers project consists of two dams: Diamond "A" and Rocky. The Diamond "A" Dam is an earthfill structure, 4,885 feet long and 98 feet high, with a gated outlet. The Rocky Dam is an earthfill structure 2,940 feet long and 118 feet high with an uncontrolled outlet. No provision is made for water storage, except for flood control. Flood releases will be controlled so that flows through Roswell will not exceed the Rio Hondo channel capacity which is about 600 c.f.s. The capacity of the Two Rivers Reservoir at its spillway crest is 163,775 acre-feet, of which 13,775 acre-feet are provided for sediment reserve. Together these dams regulate runoff from 1,027 square miles of drainage area. 36-10 ALBUQUERQUE, NM,DISTRICT For details of completed improvement and authorizing legislation see page 17-18 of Annual Report for 1973. A Dam Safety Reconnaissance Report, approved in June 1995, identified need to increase the size of the spillway on the left abutment of the Rocky Dam by 1,170 feet in order to accommodate the revised Probable Maximum Flood flows for the Dam. Local cooperation. Section 2 Flood Control Act of 1938 applies and compliance is satisfactory. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation of the dam and reservoir continued. The reservoir was empty on October 1, 1996. There were $31,694,900 of flood damages prevented during 1997. Sediment damages prevented were $5,000. Estimated total accumulated flood and sediment damages prevented through FY 1997 were $190,603,700. There were 45 acre-feet of sediment deposition during FY 1997. The accrued sediment benefits through FY 1997 are $1,106,500. Plans and Specifications for the Dam Safety Assurance project were completed in March 1997. The construction contract for the project will be awarded in September 1997. Total cost for the modification is $3,030,000. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was placed in operation July 1963. The project structures are in good condition and in operation. 13. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects Included under this heading is inspection of completed flood control projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Projects in Texas, Colorado, and New Mexico were inspected. Federal costs for fiscal year 1997 were $205,000. 14. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations Pursuant to Section 7, Flood Control Act of 1944, five projects are operated by others for flood control. These projects are Platoro, Pueblo, Sumner, Navajo, and Brantley Dams. Platoro Dam on the Conejos River above the town of Platoro, Conejos County, CO controls runoff from 40 square miles of high mountain area. The authorized purposes are irrigation storage and flood control. Platoro is operated by the Conejos Water Conservancy District. Total storage is 59,571 acre-feet with the top 6,000 acrefeet solely for flood control. The 53,571 acre-feet is joint use storage with flood control on a forecast basis during spring runoff. Platoro Dam was authorized by the Interior Appropriation Act of 1941. (See H Doc 693, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess.) Construction of this project was completed by the Bureau of Reclamation in 1952. On October 1, 1996 storage in Platoro Reservoir was 24,400 acre-feet at elevation 9,990.23 feet. Maximum storage of 41,678 acre-feet at elevation 10,013.92 feet occurred on July 15, 1997. On September 30, 1997, storage was 32,211 acre-feet at elevation 10,001.70 feet. There were $373,500 flood damages prevented by the project during FY 1997. Total flood damages prevented to date are at $6,094,200. Total cost for activity, by the Corps of Engineers, during FY 1997 was $22,472. Pueblo Dam is part of the Fryingpan-Arkansas project which was authorized under Public Law 87-590, 87th Congress, HR 2206 on August 16, 1962. The project was completed in August 1975. Pueblo is operated by the Bureau of Reclamation and is located at river mile 1,293.7 on the Arkansas River in Pueblo County, Colorado. Pueblo Reservoir has a total capacity of 349,940 acre-feet at top of the flood pool with 27,000 acre-feet exclusive flood space and 66,000 acre-feet joint use space. Operation of Pueblo Reservoir began on February 10, 1974. Storage on October 1, 1996 was 200,289 acre-feet, elevation 4,867.00 feet. Maximum storage during the year was 280,931 acre-feet at elevation 4,885.56 feet on March 16, 1997. Storage on September 30, 1997 was 199,826 acre-feet at elevation 4,866.88 feet. There were $1,320,200 in flood damages prevented in FY 1997. Total flood damages prevented to date are $6,538,200. Total cost for FY 1997 activity, by the Corps of Engineers, was $19,516. *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 36-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Sumner Dam is located on the Pecos River at river mile 710.8 in DeBaca County, New Mexico. Sumner Dam was authorized as Alamogordo Dam by the Secretary of the Interior under a Finding of Feasibility approved by the President of the USA on 6 November 1935, under the Federal Reclamation laws. The original project was completed in 1937. Modification work of raising the dam 16 feet, adding a spillway and limiting the service spillway floor to 56,000 c.f.s. was completed in 1957. A twenty-four inch bypass line was installed in 1977 to pass flows less than 100 c.f.s. Sumner is operated by the Carlsbad Irrigation District. Storage on October 1, 1996 was 19,725 acre-feet at elevation 4,250.17 feet. Maximum storage for FY 1997 was 42,786 acre-feet at elevation 4,260.65 feet on June 17, 1997. Storage on September 30, 1997 was 37,070 acre-feet at elevation 4,258.50 feet. Total cost for FY 1997 activity, by the Corps of Engineers, was $21,325. Navajo Dam and Reservoir is located on the San Juan River at river mile 298.6 in San Juan County, New Mexico. Navajo Dam was authorized as part of a Colorado River Storage Project by an act of 84th Congress, 11 April 1956 (PL 485). The Bureau of Reclamation constructed and is responsible for operation of the project. Construction was initiated in June 1958 and the project was completed and placed in operation in March 1963. Total capacity at spillway crest is 1,708,600 acre-feet. The project controls a drainage area of 3,230 square miles. Storage on October 1, 1995 was 1,555,600 acre-feet, elevation 6,075.64 feet. Maximum storage for FY 1997 was 1,542,700 acre-feet, elevation 6,074.41 feet on September 30, 1997. Storage on September 30, 1997 was 1,542,700 acre-feet, elevation 6,074.41 feet. Total Corps of Engineers cost for FY 1997 activity was $21,969. Brantley Dam on the Pecos River above the town of Carlsbad in Eddy County, NM controls runoff from 13,208 square miles of uncontrolled area. The authorized purposes are irrigation, flood control, fish and wildlife and recreation and for the elimination of the hazards of failure of the McMillan and the Avalon Dams. The total storage is 348,544 acre-feet with 189,700 acre-feet for flood control. The Brantley Dam was authorized for construction on 20 October 1972 by Public Law 92-514 with the cost ceiling raised for the project in October 1980 by Public Law 96-375. On September 6, 1988 the conduits were closed and Brantley Dam started its initial filling. On September 30, 1996, the storage was 31,027 acre-feet at elevation 3,249.59 feet. Total Corps of Engineers cost for FY 1997 activity was $22,926. 15. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects See Table 36-D. 16. Flood Control Work under Special Authorization Flood control activities pursuant to section 205, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization). Costs during FY 1997 were: Little Puerco River, Gallup, NM, $82,241; Zuni River at Zuni, NM, $365. Emergency flood control activities; repair, flood fighting, and rescue work. (Public Law 99, 84th Cong., and antecedent legislation.) There were no Federal costs in FY 1997 for advance preparation, none for flood emergency operations, and there were no repair and restoration costs. Emergency bank protection (Sec. 14, 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 526, 79th Cong.) Madrid Fire Station, NM, $10,538; State Road 44, Rio Puerco, NM, $43,086, Section 14 Coordination Account $7,194, and Big House Ruin, Manuelito Canyon, $32,252. Snagging and Clearing for Flood Control (Section 208 of the 1954 Flood Control Act, 83rd Cong.) There were no costs in FY 1997. General Investigations 17. Surveys Costs for the fiscal year were $232,655 for flood damage prevention studies, $169,713 for special studies (coordination studies with other agencies). 36-12 ALBUQUERQUE, NM,DISTRICT 18. Collection and Study Of Basic Data Fiscal year costs were $326,628 for flood plain management and technical services. Hydrologic studies involving collection and study of basic data, such as stream flow data, collection of suspended sediment samples, recording rain gage data, special study for Pikes Peak flood warning systems, hydrometeorological studies, sedimentation studies, and environmental data studies continued. Costs during the fiscal year were $5,270. 19. Environmental Data Studies There were no Environmental Data Study costs for FY 1997. 20. Precontruction Engineering and Design Continuation of Engineering and Design costs in FY 1997 were $355,964. *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter 36-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 36-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sept. 30, 1997 1. Acequias Irrigation New Work System, NM 2. Alamogordo, NM 3. Alamosa, CO 4. Albuquerque Diversion Channels Project, NM (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) (Other Contributed Funds) 5. Conchas Lake, NM 6. El Paso, TX 7. John Martin Reservoir 8. Las Cruces, NM Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 750,000 518,973 345,000 343,800 300,000 75,658 30,000 22,410 1,194,000 1,100,671 6,830,000 1,690,991 2,069,700 1,968,115 2,104,000 1,458,000 397,000 361,948 1,023,000 319,160 100,000 36,758 1,245,000 1,331,911 3,788,000 4,470,823 1,961,900 2,140,246 1,500,000 1,234,832 100,000 375,725 600,000 537,939 1,000,000 480,301 454,350 (24,000) (201,000) 672,906 15,499 1,500,705 1,481,417 400,000 2,038,809 1,480,200 1,448,594 757,000 158,833 1,189,295 1,084,458 5,290,000 6,507,234 1,398,000 1.382.201 1,500,000 355,964 12,863,00 10,342,547' 3,757,350 3,483,774 12,456,0002 2,321,5582 17,975,450 17,762,795 518,356 518,356 854,664 854,664 13,821,4991 13,821,499 23,833,519 23,672,692 91571,29 92,724,28 15,555358 15,555358 30,702,018 30,704952 2257,000( 514,797' 36-14 ALBUQUERQUE, NM,DISTRICT TABLE 36-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sept. 30. 1997 9. Rio Grande Basin, NM 9A. Abiquiu Dam, NM 9B. Cochiti Lake, NM 9C. Galisteo Dam, NM 9D. Jemez Canyon Dam, NM 9E. Middle Rio Grande Flood Protection, Bernalillo to Belen, NM 9F. Rio Grande Floodway 9G. Rio Grande Floodway, San Acacia to Bosque del Apache, NM New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost 2,510,951 2,200,973 - 128,000 - 128,000 1,926,000 1,868,275 184,000 190,540 566,500 631,877 1,816,000 778,852 6,100,000 216,173 1,232,400 1,529,197 1,619,200 1,708,016 166,400 170,343 402,600 421,531 3,199,000 670,703 -4,858,000 369,005 1,322,000 1,253,079 1,725,000 1,577,321 265,000 143,405 202,100 185,311 326,000 294,323 890,737 (200,000) 454,646 1,420,600 1,227,406 96,956,559 1,837,400 1,743,874 292,000 309,791 250,300 258,210 504,000 380,767 560,000 3,842,369 280,000 570,839 26,745,028 26,745,028 35,436,204 35,149,387 96,956,559 26,649,567 26,371,663 14,832,053 14,728,249 3,376,724 3,510,901 6,293,972 6,293,972 10,336,732 10,855,679 5,618,0007 7,180,5317 4,794,8688 4,794,8688 3,655,000w 3,835,415' *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 36-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 36-A (Continued) COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Total Cost Section to In Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sept. 30, 1997 10. Santa Rosa Dam New Work & Lake, NM Approp. - - - - 41,039,741 Cost - - - - 41,039,056 Maint. Approp. 807,000 739,000 933,999 926,501 11,436,636 Cost 783,562 798,238 836,303 853,186 11,248,659 11. Trinidad Lake, CO New Work Approp. - - - - 55,774,758 Cost - - - - 55,774,758 Maint. Approp. 554,000 525,000 435,700 601,000 9,132,229 Cost 513,897 584,930 376,182 568,476 9,035,174 12. Two Rivers Dam, New Work NM Approp. - - 220,000 2,563,000 7,630,244 Cost - - 192,550 179,237 5,219,031 Maint. Approp. 334,000 177,000 350,000 304,000 4,874,722 Cost 337.611 184,559 325,855 155.317 4,693,613 'Reflects PED funding appropriations beginning in FY 1986. 5Excludes $59,977 emergency relief funds for new work. Includes $30,000 f include non-Federal contributions of $2,412,000. Code 710. 2PED activities were initiated in FY 1991. 1Includes $3,492,696 maintenance and improvement costs and $869,978 for emergency relief, excludes $2,279,326, cost of initiating project under the authority of Emergency Relief Appropriation Act of 1935 and $222,669, the cost for work performed with funds transferred to the Corps under Public Works acceleration Act of 1962. 4Does not include non-Federal contributions of $2,657,653. "Includes $514,741 PED funds. 'Includes $1,177,000 PED funds. 8Includes funds for preconstruction planning of Espaflola Valley unit. Exclud $1,000,011 appropriated funds transferred to Bureau of Reclamation und memorandum of agreement between that agency and the Corps. 'Includes $1,658,000 PED funds. 36-16 ALBUQUERQUE, NM,DISTRICT TABLE 36-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Date Authorizing Act Nov. 17, 1986 Oct. 12, 1996 Oct. 31, 1992 Oct. 27, 1965 Oct. 12,1996 Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Nov. 17, 1986 Project and Work Authorized ACEQUIAS IRRIGATION SYSTEM An Irrigation System dating back to the eighteenth century with significant engineering works in the settlement and development of the western portion of the United States. Restoration and preservation of this system has cultural and historic values to the region. Measures are necessary to restore and protect the river division structures and associated canals. Except that the Federal share of reconnaissance studies carried out by the Secretary under this section shall be 100 percent. ALAMOSA, COLORADO Authorized a flood control project for Alamosa, Colorado. EL PASO, TX A single-purpose flood control system of detention dams, diversion dikes and channels to collect, regulate and discharge arroyo runoff in the Rio Grande. Consists of four independent units (NW Area, Central Area, and two units, Copper System and Bluff Channel of the SE Area.) LAS CRUCES, NM The project for flood control, Las Cruces, New Mexico: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 24, 1996, at total of $8,278,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $5,494,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,784,000. RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM Authorized to be appropriated $3,500,000 to be expended by the Dept. of the Army for partial accomplishment of approved general comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin in NM and Colorado. Authorized to be appropriated an additional $39,000,000 for Department of the Army for prosecution of comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin. Authorized Cochiti Dam on Rio Grande and Galisteo Dam on Galisteo Creek as additions to authorized comprehensive plan for Rio Grande Basin (Cochiti Dam was authorized in lieu of Low Chamita Dam of Chamita Reservoir Project on Rio Chama under "substitute plan"). Also authorized to be appropriated an additional $58,300,000 for Dept. of the Army for this addition to comprehensive plan for the Rio Grande Basin. Authorized installation of the Abiquiu Dam Emergency Gates by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) Documents Public Law 662, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. (Sec. 1113) Public Law 104-303, 104th Cong., (Sec. 334) Public Law 102-580 102d Congress (Sec. 101) H. Doc. 207, 89th Cong., Ist sess.' Public Law 104-303 104 Congress (Sec. 101) H. Doc. 243, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. S. Doc. 94, 86th Cong. Public Law 662 99th Cong., 2nd sess. *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 36-17 See Section In I eXL 1. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 36-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing In Text Act Proiect and Work Authorized Documents The emergency gate construction project for Abiquiu Dam, New Mexico, authorized by section 1112 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662, 100 Stat. 4232) is modified to authorize the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, to construct the project at an estimated total cost of $7,000,000. The non-Federal share of the project shall be 25 percent of those costs of the project attributable to an increase in flood protection as a result of the installation of such gates. MIDDLE RIO GRANDE FLOOD PROTECTION, BERNALILLO TO BELEN, NM Authorized project for flood control, Middle Rio Grande Flood Protection, Bernalillo to Belen, NM. Authorized increase of flood protection through the dredging of the bed of the Rio Grande in the vicinity of Albuquerque, NM to an elevation lower than existed on the date of enactment of this Act. The project shall include the establishment of 75 acres of wetlands for fish and wildlife habitat and the acquisition of 200 acres of land for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses. RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, NM Channel rectification, levee enlargement and construction, and bank stabilization on Rio Grande between river mile 123 and 394 (San Acacia to Bosque Del Apache Unit.) RIO GRANDE FLOODWAY, SAN ACACIA TO BOSQUE DEL APACHE UNIT, NM Modified the cost sharing to more equitably reflect the non-Federal contribution for the project by that percentage of benefits which is attributable to the Federal properties; except that, for purposes of this subsection, Federal property benefits may not exceed 50 percent of the total project benefits. Public Law 104-206 (Sec. 112) Public Law 662, 99th Cong., 2nd sess. Cong., 1st sess. and Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2nd sess. Public Law 102-580 102d Congress (Sec. 102(e)) 36-18 Sep. 30, 1997 9E. Nov. 17, 1986 9F. Jun. 30, 1948 and May 17, 1950 9G. Oct. 31, 1992 ALBUQUERQUE, NM,DISTRICT TABLE 36-C RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM RIO GRANDE BASIN, NM: EXISTING PROJECT (See Section 8 of Text) Miles Above A'i .t, Nearest .^-. . Drainage Area (square -"i' Project River Abiquiu Dam Rio Chama Jemez Canyon Jemez Dam Rio Grande Rio Grande Floodway Cochiti Lake Rio Grande IVIUUIIn IUo WInII IIII 32 Espafiola, NM 2 Bernalillo, NM 2,147 1,034 123 Description Earthfill 325 feet high, 1,212,000 acre feet capacity Earthfill 136 feet high, 106,100 acre-feet capacity Channel rectification, levee to 394' enlargement and construction 340' Cochiti, NM 11,695 Earthfill 251 feet high, 596,300 acre-feet capacity Galisteo Dam Galisteo Creek 8 Waldo, NM 596 Earthfill 158 feet high, 89,000 14,340,280 acre-feet capacity 'River mile 0 is at intersection of New Mexico-Texas State Line with international boundary at El Paso, Texas. ZDoes not include non-Federal costs. 3Includes $5,383,000 major rehabilitation, $138,900 for recreation facilities and $3,600,000 for emergency gates. *All costs and financial statements for projects are listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of this chapter. 36-19 Total Estimated Cost 30,397,0963 4,217,206 25,744,0002 96,900,000 - ---- REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 36-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Cost to September 30. 1997 Full Report See Annual Operation & Project Report For Construction Maintenance Alamogordo Diversion Channel, Tularosa (closed) Basin, New Mexico 1966 189,356 Alpine, Texas' 1977 130,488 Cibolo Creek, Texas' 1983 829,500 Cochiti Wetfields, New Mexico 1994 13,921,290 Colorado Springs, Fountain que Bouille River, Colorado (Templeton Gap Floodway)' 1959 881,262 Creede, Willow Creek, Colorado (floodway)' 1952 219,789 Fountain Creek, Pueblo, Colorado' 1993 6,564,399 Highway 12, Colorado' 1985 120,500 Holly, Colorado' 1985 2,021,400 Las Animas, Colorado2 1980 4,956,000 Las Cruces, New Mexico2 1980 4,815,236 Pecos, Texas; 1977 480,273 Pinon Canyon Dam, Trinidad, Colorado (Sec.212)' - 130,678 Pueblo, Arkansas River, Colorado (floodway levee extension)' 1954 201,958 Puerco River, Gallup, New Mexico' 1993 4,678,239 - Rio Grande Floodway, T or C Unit, New Mexico' 1994 12,955,052 - Santa Fe River and Arroyo Mascaras, New Mexico' 1983 1,123,900 - Smith Creek, Colorado' 1985 219,000 - Socorro Diversion Channel, Tributaries of Rio Grande, New Mexico' 1965 2.259,328 - 'Completed. 2Responsibility of loca! interests. Inactive. 4Deferred. 36-20 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT * LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS The civil works portion of this District covers an area of approximately 36,414 square miles in northern, western, and southwestern Arkansas and a portion of Missouri. This area is within the Arkansas River, Little River, and White River basins. In the Arkansas River Basin, the District is responsible for planning, design, construction, operation and maintenance of the navigation portion of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation (MKARNS ). The District is also responsible for the areas included in the Arkansas River drainage basin from above Pine Bluff, AR, to below the mouth of the Poteau River, near Fort Smith, AR. In Little River Basin, the District is responsible for the portion of the Little River and its tributaries that are in the state of Arkansas above its mouth near Fulton, AR. In the White River Basin, the District is responsible for those portions in southern Missouri and northern and eastern Arkansas in the White River drainage basin and its tributaries above Peach Orchard Bluff, AR. The Memphis District is responsible for navigation maintenance on the White River below Newport, AR, to the mouth of Wild Goose Bayou, in Arkansas County, AR. The White River downstream from the mouth of Wild Goose Bayou is part of MKARNS. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation ................................... ....... 37-2 1. ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, AR, OK, AND Ks.......... 37-2 2. ARTHUR V. ORMOND LOCK & DAM (No.9), AR ... 37-3 3. MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, BANK STABILIZATION & CHANNEL RECTIFICATION, AR.................. ....................... 37-3 4. DAVID D. TERRY LOCKAND DAM (No. 6), AR..... 37-3 5. EMMETT SANDERS LOCKAND DAM, AR............... 37-3 6. JAMES W. TRIMBLE LOCK AND (No. 13), AR....... 37-3 7. LOCK No. 2 AND WILBUR D. MILLS (No. 2), AR. 37-4 8. JOE HARDIN LOCK AND DAM (No. 3), AR............ 37-4 9. LOCKAND DAM No. 5, AR .............................. 37-4 10. MURRAY LOCK AND DAM (No. 7), AR ............. 37-4 11. NORRELL LOCK AND DAM (No. 1) AND ENTRANCE CHANNEL, AR................................................. 37-4 12. TOAD SUCK FERRY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 8), AR.. 37-5 13. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR FLEET AND MARINE TERMINALS, AR.............................................. 37-5 14. OTHERAUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS ........ 37-5 15. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION ................................. 37-5 Flood Control ....................................................... 37-5 16. BLACK RIVER, POPLAR BLUFF, MO...................... 37-5 17. BLUE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR ................................ 37-5 18. CATO SPRINGS BRANCH AND TOWN BRANCH, FAYETTEVILLE, AR ............................................ 37-6 19. CLEARWATER LAKE, MO ................................. 37-6 20. DEQUEEN LAKE, AR........................................ 37-6 21. DIERKs LAKE, AR ........................................ 37-7 22. DRY JORDAN CREEK, HARRISON, AR ............... 37-7 23. FOURCHE BAYOU BASIN, LrTrLE ROCK, AR.......... 37-7 24. GILLHAM LAKE, AR.................... ................... 37-7 25. LITTLE RIVER BASIN, AR.................................... 37-8 26. MILL CREEK, FORT SMITH, AR............................ 37-8 27. MILLWOOD LAKE, AR......................................... 37-8 28. NIMROD LAKE, AR ....................................... 37-8 29. WHITE RIVER BASIN (LITTLE ROCK DIsTRICT), AR & Mo ........................................ 37-9 30. WHITE RIVER, BATESVILLE, AR.......................... 37-9 31. WHITE RIVER, JACKSONPORT, AR...................... 37-10 32. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS ............................. ........... 37-10 33. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS. 37-10 34. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION..................................... 37-10 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power......37-10 35. BEAVER LAKE, AR ..................................... 37-10 36. BULL SHOALS LAKE, AR ................................ 37-11 37. DARDANELLE LOCKAND DAM (No. 10), AR ....3.7.-1 2 38. GREERS FERRY LAKE, AR .............................. 37-12 39. NORFORK LAKE, AR .....................3.7.-.13. ... 40. OZARK-JETA TAYLOR LOCK AND DAM (No. 12), AR ........................................... .....3.7.-1.3........ 41. TABLE ROCK LAKE, MO........ .................. 37-13 General Investigations.............. ..... 37-14 42. SURVEYS ...................................... 37-14 43. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING & DESIGN (PED) .................................... 37-14 44. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA.......... 37-14 45. NIMROD WATERFOWL LEVEE ......................... 37-15 46. MORGAN PoINT BENDWAY CLOSURE STRUCTURE, DESHA COUNTY, AR................................... 37-15 47. ARKANSAS RIVER, LITTLE ROCK PORT, AR......3.7.-1.5 S716 l4 s ............................................................. .J 1 Table 37-A, Cost and Financial Statement ................. 37-16 Table 37-B, Authorizing Legislation............................. 37-20 Table 37-C, Other Authorized Navigation Projects .................................................... 37-22 Table 37-E, Other Authorized Flood Control Projects........................................ 37-23 Table 37-G, Deauthorized Projects ............................... 37-24 Table 37-H, Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Navigation............. .......................... 37-25 Table 37-I, Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS: Lakes......... ................................... 37-28 Table 37-J, Little River Basin, AR: Lakes................... 37-29 Table 37-K, White River Basin, AR & MO: Lakes .................... .............................. 37-29 37-1 TIl REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Navigation 1. ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, AR, OK, AND KS Location. The headwaters for the Arkansas River are in the Rocky Mountains near Leadville, CO. The river flows southeastward 1,396 miles through Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas to join the Mississippi River 599 miles above Head of Passes, LA. Previous projects. For details see page 1066, Annual Report for 1932, and pages 744, 864, and 881, Annual Report for 1943. Existing project. The MKARNS provides navigation, hydroelectric power, flood control, water supply, sediment control, recreation, and fish and wildlife propagation improvements in the Arkansas River Basin. The MKARNS provides a navigation channel 9 feet deep and 444.8 miles long. The channel begins at the mouth of the White River, which enters the Mississippi River 599 miles above Head of Passes, LA, thence 9.8 miles upstream to the mouth of Wild Goose Bayou; thence 9.2 miles by a land cut, designated as Arkansas Post Canal to mile 42 (1943 survey) on the Arkansas River; thence 376.0 miles to the mouth of the Verdigris River at navigation mile 395.0; thence 49.8 miles up the Verdigris River to the head of navigation at Catoosa, OK. The waterway is canalized throughout its length by 17 locks and dams with a total lift of 420 feet. Dardanelle, Ozark-Jeta Taylor, Robert S. Kerr, and Webbers Falls are multiple purpose projects that include hydropower. Lock chambers are 110 by 600 feet. A minimum channel width of 150 feet is provided for the Verdigris River, 225 feet for San Bois Creek, 250 feet for the Arkansas River, and 300 feet for Arkansas Post Canal and White River Entrance Channel. Other coordinated developments consist of 15 lakes, of which 13 are in Tulsa District, in the states of Kansas and Oklahoma, and two are in the Little Rock District. Pertinent data and estimated Federal cost are summarized in Tables 37-H and 37-I, Navigation: Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. For MKARNS, local interests must provide adequate terminal and transfer facilities and bear the increased costs of maintenance and operation of all altered rail and highway routes, including bridges and appurtenances, utilities, and other existing improvements, other than federally owned. For lakes see requirements for each individual lake. Terminal facilities. Public port facilities are in operation at Pine Bluff (Jefferson County), Little Rock, and Fort Smith, AR, and Muskogee and Catoosa (Tulsa- Rogers County), OK. Port authorities have been organized to develop public facilities at North Little Rock, Dardanelle-Russellville, Morrilton, Clarksville, Ozark, and Van Buren, AR, and Sallisaw, OK. Terminal facilities are in operation or being built at 35 locations in Arkansas and at 25 locations in Oklahoma along the improved waterways. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. (See Tables 37-H and 37-1 for navigation and lake listings.) For additional details of MKARNS and for the lakes in Oklahoma and Kansas, see the Tulsa District report. Flood damages prevented by Little Rock District projects in the Arkansas River Basin during FY 97 are estimated at $44,661,300; flood losses prevented through FY 97 are estimated $710,235,600. Approximately 11.7 million tons of commerce were moved on the Arkansas portion of the MKARNS during calendar year 1996. Details of the MKARNS and lakes in Arkansas are shown on the following pages. Withdrawals for water supply purposes were the city of Plainview, AR, 220 acre-feet from Nimrod Lake. Condition at end of fiscal year. (See Tables 37-H and 37-1, Navigation: Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK, and KS, for status for individual items, navigation projects, lakes, and basin plan.) Work continues on the Arkansas River project in this District including construction of a meander cutoff levee between the Arkansas and White Rivers, and land acquisition studies. Installation of tow haulage equipment was completed at David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No. 6), Lock and Dam No. 5, Emmett Sanders Lock and Dam (No. 4), and Joe Hardin Lock and Dam (No. 3) in 1994, and at Norrell Lock and Lock No. 1 in 1997. Montgomery Point Lock and Dam: Montgomery Point Lock and Dam (MPLD) is being constructed one half mile upstream from the Mississippi River, on the White River Entrance Channel, the first reach in the MKARNS. Declining water surface elevations on the Mississippi River have been observed on the Mississippi river for a number of years, resulting in navigation restrictions on the White River. Construction of the MPLD would allow control of the water level in the entrance channel which would maintain the reliability of the navigation system. 37-2 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT A construction contract for MPLD was awarded to the joint venture of J. A. Jones and Guy F. Atkinson Construction Companies on 21 July 1997 for $186M. A NTP was issued on 26 August 1997 and the contractor began mobilization on 23 September 1997. Clearing and grubbing operations are complete and a portion of the diversion channel has been dredged. The contractor has ordered and/or purchased sheet piling (approximately $10M) for the cofferdam and partial delivery has arrived at the site. However, on 13 January 1998 the contractor suspended work operations due to insufficient FY 1998 project funds. The Little Rock District requested higher authority assistance in obtaining available funds to continue with construction activities for the remainder of FY 1998. Construction of the access road was awarded to Patton Tully, Inc. and work was completed in December 1997. Bids for the Electrical Utility Service contract were received in November 1997 and award is expected late-Spring 1998. 2. ARTHUR V. ORMOND LOCK & DAM (NO.9), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Construction of a non-Federal hydropower project, under the authority provided by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, was completed and placed into operation in August 1993. Overall completion completed in May 1994. Rockefeller Lake (pool 9) has four developed parks that in FY 97 experienced public visitation exceeding 1.1 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in April 1965 and the lock and dam was placed in operation in July 1969. Construction of Holla Bend closure structure (fish and wildlife mitigation) began in July 1986 and was completed in September 1987. 3. MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, BANK STABILIZATION & CHANNEL RECTIFICATION, AR Location. Several bank stabilization and channel rectification projects are laid out in various reaches extending from fixed point to fixed point on the Arkansas River from 33.7 to 362 miles above mouth and across the Arkansas-White cutoff, a 4- to 5-mile natural channel joining the Arkansas and White rivers about 18 and 12 miles above their respective mouths. Existing project. Bank stabilization and channel rectification is a part of the MKARNS. For a complete description of reach and location of each bank stabilization and channel rectification project, see the FY 81 Annual Report. Total Federal cost to date is $119,300,184 for the existing project in the Little Rock District. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) 4. DAVID D. TERRY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 6), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in January 1965 and lock and dam project was placed in operation in August 1968. Tow haulage equipment was added in June 1993. Currently, the project has two developed parks which in FY 97 experienced public visitation exceeding 2.5 million visitorhours. 5. EMMETT SANDERS LOCK AND DAM, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Pool 4 has two developed parks which in FY 97 experienced public visitation exceeding 1.2 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1964 and the lock and dam project was placed in operation in December 1968. Construction of a 40-foot wide, 9,600-foot long highway bridge crossing the lock and dam was completed in July 1995. The Corps of Engineers, as the Federal agency, has jurisdiction and custody of the dam (23 U.S.C. 320 [Public Law 2810]). The project was 100 percent funded by the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. Tow haulage equipment was placed into operation in June 1993. 6. JAMES W. TRIMBLE LOCK AND (NO. 13), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. In FY 97, the proj- 37-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 ect's three developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 2.4 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in October 1965 and the lock and dam were placed in operation in April 1969. The bridge across the dam was completed in July 1968. Construction of a non- Federal hydropower facility at the project was completed in November 1988 under the authority provided by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 7. LOCK NO. 2 AND WILBUR D. MILLS (NO. 2), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Wilbur D. Mills has five developed parks which in FY 97 experienced public visitation exceeding 4.4 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963. The llock was placed in operation in March 1968. Emergency repairs to the scour protection features and tainter gates at the dam that resulted from a barge accident in December 1982 were completed in FY 85. The barges that clogged the dam gates during the December 1982 flood showed that, with a certain set of circumstances (higher than normal head combined with the clogged gates resulted in high current velocity that caused both upstream and downstream scouring), the structure could fail. This condition exists primarily because the structure was constructed on piling and designed for all of the gates to operate in unison. A model study by the Waterways Experiment Station determined the most feasible solution to this problem is to extend the stilling basin downstream. A contract to extend the stilling basin was awarded in June 1990 and completed in FY 1994. Project costs are estimated at $21.6 million. A contract was awarded in September 1995 to add tow haulage equipment at Lock No. 2. 8. JOE HARDIN LOCK AND DAM (NO. 3), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section I.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Pool 3 has three developed parks which in FY 97 experienced public visitation exceeding 0.4 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963 and lock and dam were placed in operation in December 1968. Tow haulage equipment was installed and operational in 1993. 9. LOCK AND DAM NO. 5, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operation and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Pool 5 has two developed parks which in FY 97 experienced public visitation exceeding 0.8 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in November 1964 and lock and dam were placed in operation in December 1968. Tow haulage equipment was installed in June 1993. 10. MURRAY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 7), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Murray has five developed parks which in FY 97 experienced public visitation exceeding 4.1 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in November 1964 and the lock and dam was placed in operation in October 1969. Construction of a non-Federal hydropower facility at the project was completed in May 1988 under the authority provided by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. 11. NORRELL LOCK AND DAM (NO. 1) AND ENTRANCE CHANNEL, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Recommended modification. The White River Entrance Channel is the first reach in the MKARNS project. This is the only reach in the navigation system where the minimum stage is not controlled by a downstream dam, but by the stages of the Mississippi River. Water surface elevations on the Mississippi River have been declining for years due to changed hydraulic conditions and river bed elevations, resulting in inadequate navigation depths in the White River Entrance Channel. Construction of the Montgomery Point Lock and Dam would eliminate the navigation restrictions. The new lock and dam will include "bottom" operated gates 37-4 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT and a lock chamber of 600 feet by 110 feet with miter gates. The navigation pass over the dam (gates down) will be approximately 77 percent of the time for present conditions and 64 percent of the time for future conditions. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. The project currently has one developed park which in FY 97 experienced public visitation exceeding 0.80 .million visitor- hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in May 1963, and the lock and dam were placed in operation in June 1967. A contract to add tow haulage equipment to the lock was completed in 1997. 12. TOAD SUCK FERRY LOCK AND DAM (NO. 8), AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. In FY 97, the project's five developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 1.5 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in July 1965 and the lock and dam was placed in operation in November 1969. The Conway water supply project was completed and transferred to the city for operation and maintenance in July 1983. 13. MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR FLEET AND MARINE TERMINALS, AR Location, existing project, local cooperation, and terminal facilities. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction of Pine Bluff Marine Terminal began March 1968 and was placed in operation in April 1969. Construction of the Dardanelle Marine Terminal began June 1968 and it was placed in operation in November 1969. 14. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS (See table 37-C for other authorized navigation projects.) 15. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Preauthorization studies under the small project continuing authorities program, navigation activities, Section 107, Public Law 86-645, as amended. No activity during this fiscal year. Flood Control 16. BLACK RIVER, POPLAR BLUFF, MO Location. The project is located along the Black River, in Poplar Bluff, MO, about 160 miles south of St. Louis, MO. Existing project. A Detailed Project Report and Environmental Assessment, dated November 1995, recommended a 1,300-foot long, 3-foot high, reinforced concrete floodwall and a stoplog structure. The estimated cost is $544,400. Construction is authorized under the Continuing Authorities Program, Section 205, Flood control Act of 1948, as amended. Local cooperation. The was signed December 2, 1996. Operations and results during fiscal year. The PCA was signed, and the city provided their cash contribution, and project easements, and performed all the required relocations. Condition at end of fiscal year. Contract was awarded November 7, 1997. 17. BLUE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR Location. (See Table 37-1: Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS: Lakes.) Existing project. Construction cost was approximately $5.1 million. For further information see pages 906 and 907 of the 1962 Annual Report. (For authorization, see table 37-B.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Flood damages prevented during FY 97 are estimated at $409,500; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1997, are estimated at $26,013,700. The project's seven developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 1.5 million visitor-hours. 37-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for additional recreational sanitary facilities. Construction of the project began in May 1940 and it was placed in operation in March 1947. 18. CATO SPRINGS BRANCH AND TOWN BRANCH, FAYETTEVILLE, AR Location. This project is located on the south side of Fayetteville, in Washington County (Northwestern Arkansas). Existing project. Plans consist of clearing and grubbing along Cato Springs Branch and Town Branch and removing a horseshoe shaped bend along Cato Springs Branch by excavating 300 feet of new channel. Construction is authorized under the Continuing Authorities Program, Section 205, Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. Local cooperation. The city of Fayetteville signed a local cooperation agreement on Aug.9, 1994. The total project cost is $267,100, with the Federal share amounting to $145,000. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project was physically completed in July 1996 and turned over to the local sponsor. Condition at end of fiscal year. The project was closed out on December 5, 1996. 19. CLEARWATER LAKE, MO Location. (See Table 37-K: White River Basin, AR & MO: Lakes.) Existing project. Construction cost, including the cost of modifying the project, is estimated at $22.4 million. For further information see pages 897 and 898 of 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation. ) Major rehabilitation. Construction began in November 1987 on a seepage berm on the upstream face of the dam, a grout curtain on the right abutment, and a parapet wall along the dam. An additional 9 acres of land was acquired to widen the spillway from 190 feet to 370 feet. The widened spillway will pass about 90 percent of the probable maximum flood with water surface at the top of existing dam and parapet wall, preventing waves from overtopping the dam. The cost of the modification was $11,467,910. Construction was complete in September 1989. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance continued. Flood damages prevented during FY 97 are estimated at $11,018,900; cumulative benefits through September 1997 are estimated at $147,730,300. Project currently has 6 developed parks which in FY 97 experienced public visitation exceeding 5 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for improvements to the sanitary facilities in the recreation areas. Construction of the project began in June 1940 and was ready for beneficial use in March 1948. 20. DEQUEEN LAKE, AR Location. On Rolling Fork River, RM 22.8, a tributary of the Little River, in Sevier County, about 4 miles northwest of DeQueen, AR. (See Geological Survey map for Chapel Hill, AR, quadrangle, scale 1:24, 000.) Existing project. An earth-fill dam, 2,360 feet long, constructed to 160 feet above streambed. An uncontrolled spillway, 200 feet wide, is about 1,400 feet east of main embankment. Outlet works consist of a gated conduit, 12 feet in diameter. The lake controls 169 square miles of drainage area and provides a total storage of 136,100 acre-feet (101,200 for flood control storage and 34,900 for conservation and sedimentation reserve). Federal cost of the project is estimated at $19,623,752. (See table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Flood damages prevented during FY 97 are estimated at $604,000; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1997, are estimated at $7,807,300. In FY 97, the project's seven developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 0.8 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began April 1966. Project was placed in useful operation in August 1977. 37-6 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT 21. DIERKS LAKE, AR Location. On Saline River, RM 56.6, a tributary of the Little River, about 5 miles northwest of Dierks, Howard County, AR. (See Geological Survey map for Dierks Dam, AR, quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. An earth-fill dam, 2,760 feet long, and about 153 feet above the streambed. An uncontrolled spillway 800 feet wide is in a saddle at the west end of the dam. Outlet works consisting of a gated 6. by 9-foot oblong conduit, one 24 -inch low-flow pipe, and one 30-inch water supply pipe are provided. The lake controls a drainage area of 114 square miles and provides for storage of 67,100 acre-feet for flood control and 29,700 acre-feet for water supply, conservation, and sedimentation reserve, a total of 96,800 acre-feet. The Federal cost of the project was $16,002,903. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 97 are estimated at $290,300; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1997, are estimated at $5,085,300. Currently has four developed parks which in FY 97 experienced 1.2 million visitorhours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1968. In May 1975, the embankment closure was completed and the project was placed in useful operation. 22. DRY JORDAN CREEK, HARRISON, AR Location. Dry Jordan Creek is within the city limits of Harrison, Boone County, Ark. Existing project. The Definite Project Report (DPR) recommended clearing and grubbing with some bank stabilization on 2.5 miles of Dry Jordan Creek, under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act. The estimated cost is $1.3 million and the Federal share is $845,000. Local cooperation. The city of Harrison, the local co-sponsor and the Federal government cost-shared the feasibility study. The city has signed a letter of intent to cost share construction of the project, according to Section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act, 1986 (P.L. 99-662). Operations and results during the fiscal year. Plans and specifications were essentially complete. The sponsor has delayed construction of the project. 23. FOURCHE BAYOU BASIN, LITTLE ROCK, AR Location. On Fourche, Rock and Grassy Flat Creeks in the vicinity of Little Rock, Pulaski County, AR. Existing project. The project, authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL99-662), consists of widening, clearing and snagging with alteration of highway and railroad bridges. This work was physically completed February 1996. Authorization also included the acquisition of 1,750 acres of bottomlands and nature appreciation areas. The estimated project cost is $34 million: Federal, $22.6 million; non- Federal, $10.8 million. Local cooperation. The city of Little Rock, the project sponsor, signed the local cooperation agreement in August 1987. Operations and results during the fiscal year. Preparation of updated floodplain maps, and the operation and maintenance manuals were completed in FY 97. An environmental baseline study was initiated in FY 97 to delineate between potential HTRW sites and clean areas within the bottomlands prior to any acquisitions, Financial close-out of the project is ready to begin pending city of Little Rock decision to acquire 1,750 acres of Fourche bottomlands. Acquisition of the Fourche bottomlands was authorized as a separate element of the project. 24. GILLHAM LAKE, AR Location. Damsite is on the Cossatot River, RM 49.0, in Howard County, about 5 miles northeast of Gillham in Sevier County, AR. (See Geological Survey quadrangle map for Gillham Dam, AR, scale 1:24, 000.) Existing project. Federal cost of project was $17,827,111. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Tri-Lakes Water District furnished a resolution of intent to repay costs allocated to water supply storage. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 97 are estimated at $974,200; total 37-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $10,759,600. In FY 97, the project's.five developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 0.7 million visitor-hours that resulted in $50,777 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in June 1968. The embankment closure was completed in May 1975, and the project was placed in useful operation. 25. LITTLE RIVER BASIN, AR Location. Improvements are on the Little River and tributaries in Arkansas. More definite location of individual items is shown in Table 37-J. Existing project. A six-lake system for flood control and other purposes in the Little River Basin. The system consists of four lakes in Arkansas: Millwood on the main stem, Dierks on the Saline River, DeQueen on the Rolling Fork River, and Gillham on the Cossatot River; and, two lakes in Oklahoma: Broken Bow on the Mountain Fork River and Pine Creek on the Little River. Under a District boundary change, effective in October 1980, the four projects in this system in Arkansas were reassigned from the Tulsa District to the Little Rock District. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, and Section 301, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, apply. Tri-Lakes Water District (DeQueen, Gillham, and Dierks) furnished a resolution of intent to repay costs allocated to water supply storage. The Southwest Arkansas Water District is currently repaying costs allocated to water supply storage at Millwood Lake. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of projects continued. See individual projects for details. Flood damages prevented by the Little River Basin reservoirs during FY 97 are estimated at $2,062,300; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1997, are estimated at $35,630,400. Withdrawals for water supply purposes were: The; Tri-Lakes Water District, AR, 1,189 acre-feet from Gillham Lake; Tri-Lakes Water District, AR, 309 acrefeet from Dierks Lake, and Southwest Arkansas Water District, AR, 72,261 acre-feet from Millwood Lake. Condition at end of fiscal year. Millwood, De- Queen, Gillham, and Dierks Lakes are complete and in operation. 26. MILL CREEK, FORT SMITH, AR Location. In southwest Fort Smith, Sebastian County, AR. Existing project. The project was constructed under Section 205 of the Continuing Authority Program. The project included improvements on 3.9 miles of the Mill Creek channel and modifications on three bridges. The estimated project cost is $8,959,300: $4,843,000, Federal and $4,116,300, non-Federal. Local cooperation. The city of Fort Smith, the local sponsor, signed the local cooperation agreement in November 1988. Conditions at end of fiscal year. The Engineers Board of Claims and Appeals awarded the contractor $200,000 in claims. The contractor appealed $1.2 million. The contract for channel construction was awarded in August 1990. Project construction was completed in November 1992 and turned over to the city of Fort Smith for operation and maintenance. Sponsor submitted it's final credit request for LERRD September 1997 and financial completion is pending. 27. MILLWOOD LAKE, AR Location. On the Little River, RM 16.0, approximately 7 miles east of Ashdown, Little River County, AR, and about 2 miles northeast of Millwood, Little River County, AR. (See Geological Survey quadrangle map for Red Bluff AR, scale 1.24, 000.) Existing project. The Federal cost of project was $46,087,382. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Flood damages prevented during FY 96 are estimated at $346,010; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1996, are estimated at $11,784,420 Millwood Lake has 12 developed parks which in FY 97 experienced public visitation exceeding 4 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in September 1961 and the project was placed in full flood control operation in August 1966. 28. NIMROD LAKE, AR Location. (See Table 37-1: Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS: Lakes.) 37-8 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT Existing project. Estimated cost is $4,092,825. For further information see pages 908 and 909 of 1962 Annual Report. See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the 1938 Flood Control Act applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of project continued. Addition and improvement to existing recreation sanitary facilities continued. In FY 97, seven parks experienced public visitation exceeding 1.8 million visitor-hours. During FY 97, flood damages prevented are estimated at $236,700; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1997, are estimated at $17,974,400. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. 29. WHITE RIVER BASIN (LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT), AR & MO Location. Improvements are on the White River and tributaries, Arkansas and Missouri. More definite location of individual items is shown in Table 37-K: White River Basin. Existing project. A general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the White River Basin. The plan includes seven lakes; two are flood control only projects and five are multiple-purpose projects. Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, Clearwater, Greers Ferry and Bell Foley lakes were selected and approved for construction by the Chief of Engineers, and individual reports on six of these seven lakes are presented on subsequent pages. The Bell Foley project, the remaining unbuilt authorized project, was reevaluated in FY 89; the project continues to have a favorable benefit-to-cost ratio since its formulation in 1968. The lakes in the plan are listed in Table 37-K: White River Basin. (For authorization see Table 37-B.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies, Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies to Beaver, Greers Ferry, and Norfork projects. Operations and results during fiscal year. Operation and maintenance of projects continued. Flood damages prevented by the White River Basin lakes during FY 97 are estimated at $22,071,300; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1997, are estimated at $490,452,400. Flood damages prevented by the White River Basin levees during FY97 are estimated at $2,564,300; cumulative benefits through September 30, 1997, are estimated at $81,821,700. Electric energy delivered to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing during FY 97 totaled 2.6 billion kilowatt-hours. Water releases for fish hatcheries were: 28,960 acrefeet from Norfork Lake for Fish and Wildlife Service trout hatchery; 14,480 acre-feet from Table Rock Lake for Missouri Conservation Commission trout hatchery; and, 14,480 acre-feet from Greers Ferry Lake for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service trout hatchery. Withdrawals for water supply purposes were: Beaver Water District, AR, 40,380 acre-feet, and Carroll-Boone Water District, AR, 7,104 acre-feet, from Beaver Lake; Madison County Water District, AR, 2,506 acre-feet from Beaver Lake; Marion County Regional Water District, AR, 816 acre-feet from Bull Shoals Lake; Water and Sewer Improvement District No.3 of Mountain Home, AR, 4,295 acre-feet from Norfork Lake; and the city of Clinton, AR, 1,703 acre-feet and the Community Water Treatment System, AR, 1,810 acre-feet, from Greers Ferry Lake. Condition at end of fiscal year. Beaver, Table Rock, Bull Shoals, Norfork, Clearwater, and Greers Ferry lakes are complete and in operation. Progress on these lakes is shown in individual reports. Bell Foley lake project is in a deferred status. Water Valley and Lone Rock lakes have been deauthorized. 30. WHITE RIVER, BATESVILLE, AR Location. On White River, within the city of Batesville, Independence County, AR. Existing project. The Definite Project Report (DPR), recommending construction of a levee and floodwall to protect the industrial area, under Section 205 of the 1948 Flood Control Act, was approved in June 1988. Estimated cost is $3.3 million. The federal share is $2.5 million. The levee/ floodwall construction contract was awarded in July 1995 and completed in Dec 1996. Local cooperation. The city of Batesville signed a local cooperation agreement in January 1994 with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The city's share was $830,000 Operations and results during the fiscal year. The stoplog storage area contract was completed in December 1997. 37-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 31. WHITE RIVER, JACKSONPORT, AR Location. On left bank of White River at RM 256 between Newport and Jacksonport, Jackson County, AR. Existing project. 300 feet of revetment was added to the existing revetment which protected the Massey- Alexander Levee (formerly known as Jackson County Levee District No. 2) under authority of Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948, as amended. The project cost was estimated at $131,000 with a Federal share of $93,000. The construction started August 1996 and was completed December 1996. Local cooperation. The Massey-Alexander Levee District signed a Project Cooperation Agreement in Sep 1995. An additional 535 feet of revetment was added, as a betterment, to protect a natural gas pipeline at the local sponsor's expense of $206,000. Operations and results during the fiscal year.The financial closeout is underway. 32. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Approved regulations for operation and maintenance of flood control works, Part 208 of Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, provide for periodic inspection of completed projects transferred to local interests for operation and maintenance. Inspections of local flood protection projects were made to determine extent of compliance with approved regulations for maintenance and operation of these projects. Responsible officials of improvement districts concerned were advised of inadequacies in maintenance and operation of local flood protection works under their jurisdiction where appropriate. Costs for FY 97 were $68,499.80. Total accumulative cost through September 30, 1997, was $1,915,534 33. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Fourche Bayou Basin, Little Rock, AR, FY 1997 costs, $192,027.54. (See Table 37-E: Other Authorized Flood Control Projects.) 34. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (1) Emergency bank protection, Section 14, 1946 Flood Control Act. FY 1997 costs, $40,900.15: Section 14, Coordination Act, $7,986.11; Batesville Water Tower, AR, $26,977.51; and Little Rock Port, Section 14, $5,936.53. (2) Snagging and clearing, Section 208, 1954 Flood Control Act. Fiscal year costs: None. (3) Flood control activities, Section 205, 1948 Flood Control Act. FY 1997 costs, $630,645.88: Section 205 Coordination Account, $12,858.68; Black River, Poplar Bluff, Mo., $36,196.27; Cato Springs Branch, Fayetteville, AR, -$5,000.00; Cornstalk Branch, Judsonia, AR, $5,294.45 Dry Jordan Creek, AR, $30,943.56; Grassy Flat, Little Rock, AR, $35,716.60; Hester, Heartsill, and Adamson Creeks, AR, $2,608.86; Mill Creek, AR, $548.34; White River, Batesville, AR, $454,832.22; White River, Jacksonport, AR, $56,646.90. Emergency Response Activities (1) Public Law 84-99 (Flood Control and Coastal Emergency): None (2) Emergency Work for Others: FEMA, EPA, etc. under the Federal Response Plan following a Presidential Declaration for Federal Assistance: Tornadoes on 1 March 1997 resulted in 25 Arkansas Counties being declared Disasters by President Clinton. The Little Rock District was assigned a debris removal mission by the Federal Emergency Management Agency ( FEMA ) in Pulaski County. This mission was completed by the end of May 1997. The cost was approximately $2,000,000. In addition to the debris removal mission, Little Rock District personnel served as technical advisors for FEMA as problems were encountered in other counties receiving assistance. Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 35. BEAVER LAKE, AR Location. (See Table 37-K: White River Basin.) Existing project. Estimated cost is $50,797,000. For further information see 788 and 789 of 1966 Annual Report. (For authorization see Table 37-B. ) Major rehabilitation. Since the dam was constructed there has been a seepage problem below Dike No. 1. Based on detailed investigation, it was determined that the limestone foundation under Dike 1 and 200 feet of the north end of the main dam embankment is the main problem. The plan of improvement was a concrete seepage cutoff in Dike 1 and the north end of the main dam. A $16.9-million contract to construct a concrete cutoff wall was awarded in June 1989; the notice to proceed was issued in October 1989. The con- 37-10 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT tract period was estimated to be 760 days. However, the contractor ceased productive work due to inability to excavate rock and was been placed in default. An $18.8 reprocurement contract was awarded in April 1992. Work began in May 1992 and all work was completed in Nov 1995. Project cost is estimated at $26,588,000 million. The Beaver Dam Safety Assurance study was completed with FY 97 expenditures of $1,359.61. Water Quality Enhancement. Congress directed the Corps to implement best management practices (BMP's) in the Beaver Lake watershed and monitor the effects of these practices on water quality. A study was completed and a project report was approved in July 1989. The BMP's and water quality monitoring were concurrently implemented over a 5-year period which began in May 1991 with a project completion date of July 1997. The BMP's were implemented under the terms of a memorandum of agreement between the Corps and the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), formerly the Soil Conservation Service, with the assistance of the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service. The water quality monitoring was implemented under terms of a local cost-sharing agreement with the Arkansas Soil and Water Conservation Commission. Water quality monitoring was performed in consultation with the Environmental Protection Agency by a Corps administered contract. The water quality monitoring contract was awarded on January 29, 1992 Water quality sampling began in May 1992 and was completed on July 1, 1996. BMP implementation was completed August 31,1995. Cost in FY 97 was $67,897.93 Federal, and $1,434.58 non-Federal. Total project cost was $6,878,775.15 Environmental Infrastructure Assistance. The Water Resources Development Act of 1992 authorized the Corps of Engineers to provide design and construction assistance to appropriate non-Federal interests for a water transmission line from the northern part of Beaver Lake, Arkansas, into Benton and Washington Counties. This project is part of a $40 million project which includes a water intake, treatment and storage facilities, and transmission lines. The project sponsor is the Benton/Washington County Water Association, and the primary source of funding is the Rural Economic and Community Development Service (formerly the Farmers Home Administration, U.S. Department of Agriculture). The Little Rock District and the project sponsor executed a Memorandum of Agreement in June 1997. The Little Rock District then transferred $3 million to the sponsor for construction of a segment of the water transmission line. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the 1938 Flood Control Act, and Section 301 of the 1958 Water Supply Act, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 97 are estimated at $2,042,500; cumulative benefits are estimated at $35,782,800. During the year, 170,052,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. The project has 9 developed parks which in FY 97 experienced public visitation exceeding 18.6 million visitor-hours that resulted in $657,882 fee revenue. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Alterations to existing parks to enhance fee collections, improve efficiency, and reduce the maintenance effort or rehabilitate the 26-year old park operation through operation and maintenance and SRUF funds, as appropriate. Construction of the project began in October 1959 and was placed in operation for flood control in December 1963, hydroelectric power generation with both units in May 1965, and water supply in January 1966. Work on a dam seepage problem is complete. 36. BULL SHOALS LAKE, AR Location. (See table 37-K: White River Basin, AR & MO.) Existing project. Cost with eight generating units was $88,858,711. For further information see pages 725 and 726 of 1965 Annual Report. (For authorization see table 37-B.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 97 are estimated at $3,001,900; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $141,671,500. During the year, more than 681,327,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. The project has 18 developed parks which in FY 97 experienced public visitation exceeding 26.8 million visitor- hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Alterations to existing parks are needed to enhance fee collections, to improve efficiency, to reduce 37-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 maintenance effort or to rehabilitate the 37-year-old park facilities through operations and maintenance or SRUF funds, as appropriate. Low dissolved oxygen readings in the downstream area of Bull Shoals Dam in October 1990 have resulted in ongoing studies to be undertaken to minimize harmful effects on the trout fishing of the White River. Unguaranteed short-term solutions to the problem, consisting of limiting generation, will sustain the existing fishery, but long-term guaranteed changes will require congressional authorization. Construction of the project began in April 1946 and was ready for beneficial flood control use in June 1951 and generation of electrical energy in September 1952. Units 1 through 8 were placed in operation September 1952, December 1952, June 1953, January 1962, February 1962, August 1963, and September 1963, respectively. Major rehabilitation (Powerhouse). A major rehabilitation study was initiated in October 1995. The study was to investigate a solution to the environmentally induced reliability problem (low dissolved oxygen) of these units. Potential solutions include new autoventing turbines, a down stream weir, turbine venting, or forced-air. Following preliminary study results, the turbines were modified in 1997 to increase downstream aeration. The study has been suspended while the effects of these modifications are evaluated. 37. DARDANELLE LOCK AND DAM (NO. 10), AR Location. (See Table 37-H: Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS: Navigation.) Existing project. Project is a unit of MKARNS. Dam is 2,683 feet long and 68 feet high. It has a spillway with 20 tainter gates 50 feet long and 39 feet high. Navigation lock is 110 by 600 feet with a lift of 54 feet. Powerhouse contains four 31,000 kilowatt generators. Lake has a storage capacity of 486,200 acre-feet. Estimated cost was $84,270,124. (See table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Pool fluctuated within 2-ft. power pondage, elevation 336.0 to 338.0. Power generation continued. During FY 97, about 499,785,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. In FY 97, the project's 16 developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 7.3 million visitor-hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction began June 1957. Power units were placed on line in April, May, and September 1965, and January 1966. The lock became operable in December 1969. The Visitors Center and resident office were completed in May 1985. Major rehabilitation. Work is underway to replace the existing four units with new "state-of-the-art" equipment which will increase the plant output by approximately 13 percent. The first unit was completed and returned to service in January 1998. The project is scheduled for completion in December 1999. Estimated cost of the powerhouse major rehabilitation is $29,700,000. 38. GREERS FERRY LAKE, AR Location. (See Table 37-K: White River, AR & MO. ) Existing project. Estimated cost is $55,125,000. For further information see page 740 of 1964 Annual Report. (See table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, 1938 Flood Control Act and 1988 Water Supply Act, as amended, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 97 are estimated at $308,500; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $27,944,300. In FY 97, 218,734,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy was delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. The project has 18 developed parks which in FY 97 experienced public visitation exceeding 38.6 million visitor-hours. The project's operational management plan provides means by which the natural resources, including water quality, aesthetic value, forestry, fish and wildlife are managed and protected for future generations. An all-volunteer environmental program (annual cleanup) has been most successful and serves as a model for the Nation. During the past 27 years the program has won more than 26 national awards. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete. Construction of the project began in June 1957 and was ready for beneficial flood control use in January 1962. Power units 1 and 2 were operable in March and May 1964, and water supply was operable in April 1971. The Visitors Center was completed in June 1983 at a cost of $813,000. 37-12 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT 39. NORFORK LAKE, AR Location. (See Table 37-K: White River Basin, AR & MO.) Existing project. The total estimated cost is $70,701,629, including highway bridge construction. This does not include an estimate for the addition of power units 3 and 4, which were authorized, but never. built. For further information see page 896 of 1962 Annual Report. (See Table 37-B for authorizing legislation.) Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938 and Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 97 are estimated at $688,900; total cumulative flood damages prevented through September 30, 1997, are estimated at $46,876,700. During the year, more than 192,872,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy was delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. The project's 18 developed parks experienced public visitation exceeding 16 million visitor-hours during FY 97. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition of power units 3 and 4. Construction of project began in October 1940, ready for beneficial flood control use in June 1943, and for generation of electrical energy with one unit in June 1944. Second unit was added in February 1950. Water supply was added as a purpose in December 1969. Construction of two highway bridges over Norfork Lake to replace ferries was completed in November 1982. The bridges were transferred to the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department for operation and maintenance in July 1984. 40. OZARK-JETA TAYLOR LOCK AND DAM (NO. 12), AR Location. (See Table 37-H: Arkansas River Basin, AR, OK, and KS: Navigation.) Existing project. Project is a unit of MKARNS. The dam is 2,480 feet long and 58 feet above streambed; spillway has 15 tainter gates, each 50 feet long and 46 feet high. Navigation lock is 110 by 600 feet with a lift of 34 feet. Powerhouse contains five 20,000 kilowatt generators. Lake has a storage capacity of 148,400 acre-feet. In addition, one foot of power pondage is provided in Pool 13 between elevations 391.0 and 392.0. Cost was $85,629,412. (For authorization see table 37-B.) Local cooperation. (See section 1.) Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Delivered 319,815,000 kilowatt-hours of electrical energy to Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. Ozark Lake has 10 developed parks which in FY 97 experienced public visitation exceeding 1.5-million visitor- hours. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction began in December 1964. Project is complete. Lock and dam was placed in operation in November 1969. Power units were placed on line as follows: unit 1, November 1972; unit 2, August 1973; unit 3, October 1973; unit 4, December 1973; and unit 5, May 1974. A major rehabilitation study was initiated in October 1996. The powerplant has experienced numerous mechanical problems and major repair requirements since its construction. The study will describe the condition of the powerplant and review alternative solutions. The Evaluation Report is scheduled to be completed in March 1999. 41. TABLE ROCK LAKE, MO Location. (See Table 37-K: White River Basin, AR & MO.) Existing project. Cost was $119,491.90. For further information see page 893 of 1962 Annual Report. (For authorization see table 37-B.) Dam Safety (Assurance). Table Rock Dam has a hydrologic deficiency. The Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) would overtop the dam more than 5 feet and would breach the earthen embankment portion of the dam, causing catastrophic flood conditions. An auxiliary gated spillway will be constructed to safely pass the PMF. Design on the project is ongoing and the first construction contract is scheduled for award in March 1999. The total estimated project cost is $60.2 million. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the 1938 Flood Control Act applies. Operations and results during fiscal year. Continued operation and maintenance. Flood damages prevented during FY 97 are estimated at $5,010,600; total cumulative flood damages prevented are estimated at $90,446,800. During the year, about 467,850,000 kilowatt- hours of electrical energy were delivered to the Southwestern Power Administration for marketing. The District and the Waterways Experiment Station are 37-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 investigating the possibilities of improving the quality of Table Rock releases with a hypolimnetic oxygenation system. Table Rock Lake has 16 developed parks which in FY 97 experienced public visitation exceeding 14.8 million visitor-hours. This project's operational management plan provides means by which the natural resources, including forestry, fish and wildlife, are managed and protected for future generations. Table Rock Dam Safety Assurance Report, which considered a new additional auxiliary gated spillway, was approved in June 1995. Plans and specifications are scheduled for completion by Dec 1998. Estimated project cost is $50 million. Condition at end of fiscal year. Project is complete except for addition and improvement to existing recreational sanitary facilities. Construction of project began in October 1954. The project was ready for beneficial flood control use in November 1958, and for generation of electrical energy with units 1 and 2 in May 1959. Units 3 and 4 were added in April and June 1961. General Investigations 42. SURVEYS Expenditures for surveys in FY 97 totaled $48,858.15. Flood damage prevention studies; May Branch, Ft. Smith, AR, $75.67. Special Studies. Environmental Services Partnerships (McCord Bend Village, MO, Partners for Environmental Progress Market Feasibility Study), $83.87; and Environmental Assessment Study, $334.31. Miscellaneous activities. Special investigations, $30,232.96; Review of FERC Licences, $3,347.99; Interagency Water Resource Development, $10,658.34. Coordination with Other Agencies and Non-Fed. Cooperation w/other Water Agencies, $3,932.54; Planning Assistance to States (PAS), Atalanta Dam Break, $177.47; and PAS Negotiation Funds, $15.00. 43. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING & DESIGN (PED). Total PED expenditures in FY 97 were $228,906.40. Arkansas River, Tucker Creek, $ $21,090.75. Plans and specifications were 90% completed during FY 97. The approved plan would raise low portions of the existing Faulkner County Levee No. 1 to provide 100-year Arkansas River flood protection for the city of Conway, Faulkner County, Arkansas, in the vicinity of Tucker Creek and Tupelo Bayou. The Project Cooperative Agreement is scheduled for execution during FY 98. Arkansas River Levees, AR, $207,815.65. Congress added funds in FY 1996 to continue preconstruction, engineering and design (PED). The plans and specifications for repairing the Plum Bayou system (Plum Bayou, Baucum and Old River Lake levees) were completed in FY 1997; the proposed repairs for this system include culvert replacements and slide repairs, and the estimated cost is $2.1 million.. 44. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood Plain Management Services (FPMS). Expenditures for FPMS activities in FY 97 totaled $382,834.57. National Flood Proofing Committee, $60,310.94; Flood Plain Management Services, $69,978.44; Technical Services, $47,957.22; Quick Responses, $9,963.30; SS - Camp Robinson, AR, $29,717.94; Eastgate, Ottawa County, OK, $13,455.39; SS - Cache Creek, AR, $985.37; Farmington, AR/SSSkiatook, OK, $898.63; SS Choctawhatchee Riv., FL,. $259.96; Black Cr., Forrest Co., MS., $134,855.92; Lowell, AR, $2,975.97; and Bull Creek, MO, $11,475.49. The authority for the Flood Plain Management Services program is Section 206 of the 1960 Flood Control Act, PL 86-645, as amended. Under the authority of Section 321 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990, PL 101-640, technical services and planning assistance are (1) provided to states and local governments without charge and (2) offered to Federal agencies and private persons on a cost recovery basis. Through these technical services and planning guidance, the program encourages comprehensive flood plain management planning at all levels to reduce the potential for losses to life and property from floods. Federal and non-Federal agencies and the private sector are assisted with planning and development information for flood hazard areas. This assistance is in the form of local flood plain regulations, Federal Insurance Program requirements, and Executive Order 11988 guidelines. Such assistance may include factual flood information (available or determined) and interpretation of flood frequencies, extent of flooding, flood-water velocity, duration of flooding and floodway limits. Hydrologic Data Collection. During FY 97, 131 stations were operated; 81 cooperatively with USGS and 50 by the Corps. The total cost for streamflow and 37-14 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT some sediment data from all sources of funding was $850,190, of which $596,550 was transferred to USGS. The District also participated in a cooperative program with the National Weather Service for rainfall and/or river reporting stations for use in forecasting streamflow for flood warning and operation of lake projects. Records were also collected at certain hydroclimate rainfall stations under a cooperative program between the two agencies. For these services, $52,165 was transferred to the National Weather Service. Environmental Restoration (Section 1135). Total FY 97 expenditures was $90,642.08, and it included the Coordination Account, $4,130.33; Initial Appraisal, $4,169.07; Morgan Point Bendway Closure, $52,861.21; and the Nimrod Waterfowl Levee, $29,481.47. 45. NIMROD WATERFOWL LEVEE Location. Nimrod Lake is located on the Fourche La Fave River at RM 62.6. The project area consists of a 2,400-acre green tree reservoir located within the flood control pool of the lake. Existing project. The proposed modification consists of constructing a new 7-foot by 7-foot by 13.6-foot gate well structure including a 36-inch canal gate with a handwheel and 68 feet of 36-inch reinforced concrete pipe on the existing levee. Construction is authorized under the Continuing Authority Program, Section 1135(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended: Environmental Restoration. Local cooperation. Arkansas Game and Fish Commission signed the PCA on June 26, 1997, and they have provided their cash contribution. Operations and results during the fiscal year. An initial appraisal report was submitted April 11, 1995. The PCA was signed, the local sponsor's cash contribution was received, and a contract was awarded August 15, 1997. Condition at end of fiscal year. Construction was initiated. 46. MORGAN POINT BENDWAY CLOSURE STRUCTURE, DESHA COUNTY, AR Location. This project is located immediately downstream of the non-overflow embankment of the Wilbur D. Mills Dam of the MKARNS, in Desha County (Southeastern Arkansas). Existing project. The project modification report was approved in September 1995 under Section 1135(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended: Environmental Restoration. The report recommended construction of a closure structure at the downstream end of the bendway, placement of a water intake structure, cypress tree plantings and placement of fish shelters. The project is intended to restore about 7 miles of riverine and wetland habitat damaged by the construction and operation of the Wilbur D. Mills Dam. Local cooperation. The state of Arkansas is the sponsor with a cost share of 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal. Operations and results during fiscal year. Plans and specifications were completed. The PCA was executed in May 1997, and land acquisition was initiated. Land acquisition was in progress at the end of FY 97. 47. ARKANSAS RIVER, LITTLE ROCK PORT, AR The Little Rock Port Authority requested the assistance of the Corps of Engineers during FY 97 to study riverbank erosion, under authority od Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, at their facilities. Funds were received and the problem was investigated. It was determined that there was not a Federal interest in solving problems at the Little Rock Port Authority facilities. Six thousand dollars were expended during this investigation. 37-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Table 37-A Cost And Financial Statement See Total Section Cost to in Text Project Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Sept. 30, 1997 3. McClellan--Kerr New Work Arkansas River Approp. - - - - 119,300,184 Bank Cost - - - - 119,300,184 Stabilization & Maint. Channel Approp. - - - - 4,561,666 Rectification, AR Cost - - - - 4,561,666 1.-15. McClellan-Kerr New Work Arkansas River Approp. 9,790,000 5,886,000 7,000,000 1,646,147 492,598,619 Navigation Cost 7,177,025 8,676,261 6,083,171 3,207,682 502,601,272 Locks & Dams, Maint. AR Approp. 21,926,500 20,127,906 20,238,375 18,863,000 421,936,375 2 Cost 23,295,395 21,011,143 19,958,273 17,216,514 418,755,668 2 New Work Contrib. - 262,574 - - 5,723,348 Cost - 494,725 - - 6,312,969 1. Montgomery New Work Point Lock & Dam Approp. - - - 3,338,000 3,338,000 Cost - - -- 3,314,818 3,314,818 16. Black River New Work Poplar Bluff, MO Approp. 25,000 46,200 74,400 - 165,600 Cost 23,615 44,433 37,029 36,196 154,036 New work Contrib. - 23,100 - 40,300 63,400 Cost - 16,388 - - 16,388 17. Blue Mountain New Work Lake, AR Approp. - - - - 5,069,974 Cost - - - - 5,069,974 Maint. Approp. 948,800 1,059,000 939,859 1,025,000 19,574,758 2 Cost 969,654 1,083,819 930,550 1,011,237 19,560,995 2 18. Cato Springs New Work Branch, Approp. 4,300 12,300 159,000 -45,000 235,700 Fayetteville, AR Cost 14,646 15,769 118,989 -5,000 235,499 New Work Contrib. - 12,400 -2 1,002 36,900 Cost 1,799 1,711 5,911 5,000 36,121 19. Clearwater Lake, New Work MO Approp. - - - - 10,406,300 Cost - - - - 10,406,3001 Maint. Approp. 2,044,900 1,753,400 1,898,900 2,008,978 39,668,679 Cost 1,960,593 1,930,001 1,828,237 1,996,594 39,656,295 Major Rehab. Approp. - - - - 12,087,910 2 Cost - - - - 12,087,9102 37-16 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT Table 37-A (Continued) Cost And Financial Statement See Total Section Cost to in Text Project Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Sept. 30, 1997 20. DeOueen Lake New Work Little River Basin, AR 21. Dierks Lake, Little River Basin, AR Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 19,629,753 19,623,752 1,075,600 915,900 979,624 996,000 1,162,626 900,066 892,504 850,893 14,998,325 2 14,755,089 2 16,002,903 16,002,781 998,500 1,043,860 810,747 1,027,000 15,281,151 2 974.657 1.208.048 799.002 872.216 15.057.060 2 22. Dry Jordon New Work Creek, Approp. - 100,000 134,200 -40,000 194,200 Harrison, AR Cost - 61,143 65,404 30,944 157,491 New Work Contrib. - - - - Cost - - - - 23. Fourche Bayou New Work Basin, Little Rock, AR 24. Gillham Lake, Little River Basin, AR 26. Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR 27. Millwood Lake, Little River Basin, AR Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost New Work Contrib. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 200,000 260,000 232,000 20,572,0003 730,921 763,807 382,371 192,028 20,498,260 3 -900 - 20,000 13,000 1,731,678 1,717,768 17,827,111 17,827,111 913,500 744,600 833,693 960,000 963,403 815,125 750,243 651,664 4,300 250,700 15,000 48,948 252,235 13,410 50,668 13,301 300,000 548 14,142,436 2 13,834,100 2 4,918,001 2 4,476,583 2 580,652 580,652 46,087,382 46,087,382 1,915,200 1,841,900 1,860,934 1,781,000 37,918,153 2 1,989,532 1,935,814 1,684,911 1,770,389 37,907,542 2 37-17 > > > > REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Table 37-A (Continued) Cost And Financial Statement See Total Section Cost to in Text Project Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Sept. 30, 1997 28. Nimrod Lake, New Work AR Approp. - - - - 4,092,826 Cost - - -- 4,092,826 Maint. Approp. 1,377,850 1,238,000 1,087,468 1,276,000 24,158,535 Cost 1,502,194 1,302,071 1,110,018 1,123,501 24,006,036 29. White River New Work Basin, AR & MO Approp. - 435,000 - - 342,618,387 (Little Rock Cost - 2,408,684 - - 342,439,802 District) Maint. Approp. 11,678,429 22,544,564 23,169,649 24,184,548 455,085,012 1 Cost 10,998,155 24,257,381 23,363,092 23,790,468 454,690,932 30. White River, New Work Batesville, Approp. 5,400 236,000 1,867,309 160,000 2,735,409 AR Cost 24,998 128,929 1,581,848 454,832 2,634,804 New Work Contrib. - 184,472 - - 184,472 Cost - 33,524 140,948 7,006 181,478 31. White River, New Work Jacksonport, Approp. - 40,000 67,691 -5,000 102,691 AR Cost - 15,967 18,696 56,647 91,310 New Work Contrib. - 35,000 282,500 - 317,500 Cost - - 53,208 177,361 230,569 35. Beaver Lake, New Work AR Approp. - - - - 46,183,033 Cost - - - - 46,183,033 Maint. Approp. 4,318,000 3,744,500 3,276,283 3,792,400 70,234,111 Cost 4,828,265 3,924,452 3,433,577 3,632,443 70,074,154 Major Rehab. Approp. 12,736,000 4,199,000 -- -32,147 33,571,573 Cost 11,683,743 5,304,009 37,149 1,360 27,410,331 35. Beaver Lake, New Work Water Quality Approp. 452,000 - -98,000 12,000 4,304,000 Cost 648,940 1,167,202 112,305 67,876 4,281,998 New Work Contrib. 33,750 41,285 22,400 1,390 557,406 Cost 39,880 39,417 31,300 1,415 540,103 35. Beaver Lake, New Work Infrastructure Approp. 3,000,000 - - 0 3,000,000 Cost 10,280 11,817 - 2,965,847 2,987,944 New Work Contrib. - - - - Cost - - - - 37-18 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT Table 37-A (Continued) Cost And Financial Statement See Total Section Cost to in Text Project Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Sept. 30, 1997 36. Bull Shoals New Work Lake, AR 37. Dardanelle Lock & Dam (No. 10) AR 38. Greers Ferry Lake, AR 39. Norfork Lake, AR Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Major Rehab. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 88,857,611 88,857,611 5,574,500 4,430,000 5,588,900 5,076,000 105,085,610 2 5,368,532 5,085,829 5,528,529 5,044,334 105,053,944 2 84,270,124 84,261,240 5,876,600 5,479,500 6,207,304 6,150,500 100,604,592 2 5,626,837 5,765,881 5,174,177 6,397,614 99,867,877 2 1,100,000 823,000 2,438,000 5,216,000 10,117,000 332,239 1,375,065 2,773356 5,261,790 10,100,709 48,865,512 48,865,512 4,983,200 4,769,800 4,247,060 4,487,100 90,838,535 2 5,175,303 4,622,640 4,485,247 4,391,651 90,743,086 2 74,578,929 70,701,629 3,973,300 3,896,500 3,136,263 3,469,000 75,060,118 2 3,584,567 4,383,323 3,188,343 3,347,796 74,938,914 2 40. Ozark-Jeta New Work Taylor Lock & Approp. - - - - 85,629,412 Dam (No. 12), Cost - - - - 85,629,412 AR Maint. Approp. 3,900,700 3,338,700 3,753,347 3,991,000 76,623,265 Cost 3,906,944 3,491,398 3,342,746 3,760,321 76,278,041 41. Table Rock Lake, New Work Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 1,015,000 68,092,875 944,116 68,021,991 6,128,550 5,384,700 5,022,243 5,351,070 103,449,583 2 5,785,817 6,241,137 4,899,159 5,377,651 103,476,164 2 45. Nimrod New Work Waterfowl Approp. - 37,000 9,000 26,200 72,200 Levee Cost - 17,153 23,997 29,481 70,631 New Work Contrib. - - - 24,100 24,100 Cost - - - 20,000 20,000 37-19 MO -- 7 7 77 7 7 7 ) ... _.__..r. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Table 37-A (Continued) Cost And Financial Statement See Total Section Cost to in Text Project Funding FY94 FY95 FY96 FY97 Sept. 30, 1997 46. Morgan Point New Work Bendway Approp. 10,000 5,000 288,000 -100,000 203,000 Closure Cost 10,000 - 130,641 52,861 193,502 Structure, New Work Arkansas River Contrib. - - - 270,700 270,700 Cost - - - - 1. For more details on project funds, see text for individual projects. 2. Beginning data shown in Table 37-A includes special recreation use fees. 3. Includes funds for plans and specifications. 4. Includes total project cost, including study cost. Table 37-B Authorizing Legislation Date of Authorizing Act Project and Work Authorized Documents ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN, AR, OK, & KS (See Section 1 of text) Approved General comprehensive plan: Mannford Reservoir, OK Oologah Lake, OK Canton Lake, OK Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK Wister Lake, OK Blue Mountain Lake, AR Nimrod Lake, AR Modified comprehensive plan to include reservoirs in Grand (Neosho) River Basin, OK, and Mo, and in Verdigris River Basin: Markham Ferry Reservoir, OK Fort Gibson Lake, OK Pensacola Reservoir Lake O' The Cherokees, OK Fall River Lake, KS Elk City Lake, KS Toronto Lake, KS Neodosha Lake, KS Authorized Chief of Engineers to provide in the Canton Lake 69,000 acre-feet of irrigation storage, subject to certain conditions. Flood Control Corn. Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 107 and 440, 76th Con., 1st sess. H. Doc 758, 79th Cong. 2d sess. 37-20 June 28, 1938 August 18, 1941 July 24, 1946 LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT Table 37-B (Continued) Authorizing Legislation Date of Authorizing Act July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 July 14, 1960 November 17, 1986 June 10, 1948 July 24, 1946 July 3, 1958 July 24, 1946 June 28, 1938 Project and Work Authorized Approved multiple-purpose plan: Oologah Lake, OK Markham Ferry Reservoir, OK Fort Gibson Lake, OK Blackburn Reservoir, OK Mannford Reservoir, OK Taft Reservoir, OK Bank stabilization Dardanelle Lock and Dam, AR Eufaula Lake, OK Navigation locks and dams Ozark Lock and Dam, AR Short Mountain Lock and Dam, OK Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, OK Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK Modified Arkansas River navigation comprehensive plan to include bank protection works at Bradens Bend, OK. Modified comprehensive plan authorized in 1938 Flood Control Act and multiple-purpose plan authorized in River and Harbor Act of 1946 to provide for substituting Keystone Lake Mannford, Blackburn and Taft Reservoirs. Authorized incorporation of River and Harbor and Flood Control plans into a single plan of development and made all pervious authorizations applicable to combined plan of development. Fourche Bayou Basin, Little Rock, AR (See Section 26 of text.) Mill Creek, Fort Smith, AR (See Section 30 of text.) RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM INCLUDING LITTLE RIVER BASIN, OK AND AR (See Section 26 of text) Construct Boswell, Hugo, and Millwood Lakes, and Bank Stabilization Modified Millwood: Construct Pine Creek, Lukfata, Broken Bow, DeQueen, Gillham, Dierks Lakes Emergency streambank erosion protection, Red River, Little River Co., AR WHITE RIVER BASIN (LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT) (See Section 34 of text) Approved comprehensive plan for White River Basin: Lone Rock Lake, AR, Norfork Lake, AR, Clearwater Lake, MO, Water Valley Lake, AR, Bell Foley Lake, AR, Greers Ferry Lake, AR, and White River emergency. 37-21 ~---~---- Documents H. Doc 758, 79th Cong. 2d sess. H. Doc 758, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Water Resources Development Act of 1986, P.L. 99-662, Sec. 401. Section 205, P.L. 80-858. Authorized by Asst. Sec. of the Army (CW), 10/14/88. H. Doc. 602, 79t Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 170, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Section 14, PL 79-526 Flood Control Com. Doc 1, 75t Cong., 1st sess. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Table 37-B (Continued) Authorizing Legislation Date of Authorizing Act August 18, 1941 September 3, 1954 October 23, 1962 March 1, 1974 May 11, 1962 October 22, 1976 June 30, 1948 . .r_ __ TABLE 37-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects For Last Federal Cost thru Sept. 30, 1997 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Arkansas River, Little Rock Slackwater Harbor, AR 1988 $736,869 Black River, AR and MO 2 1950 80,000 $930,324 Current River, AR and MO 2 1964 17,0003 132,178 Upper White River, AR 4, 1952 83,197 1,788,374 White River, AR (above Peach Orchard Bluff)2'3 1950 - 785,666 White River, Jacksonport, AR6 1984 43,110 Completed. Authorized by Chief of Engineers under authority of Sec. 107, 1960 R 8 H Act, as amended, (P.L.86-645). Channel adequate for existing commerce; completion not contemplated. Includes $7,000 for previous project. Federal operation and maintenance terminated June 30, 1952, due to lack of commerce. Facilities at Locks and Dams Nos. 1,2, and 3 disposed of in accordance with authority in Public Law 996, 84th Congress. Completed. Responsibility for maintenance of project downstream from Newport, AR; transferred to Memphis District in FY 62. 37-22 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. v v Project and Work Authorized Modified comprehensive plan to include Bull Shoals Lake, AR, and MO, Table Rock Lake, MO, and AR, and Norfork Lake, AR, and MO (power). Authorized power in Greers Ferry Reservoir and added Beaver Lake to the plan. Authorizing clearing and straightening of channel for Village Creek, Jackson and Lawrence Counties. Authorizing highway bridge construction across Norfork Lake Environmental restoration of wetlands and fish and wildlife resources in the White River Basin. AR and MO. (See Section 33 of text.) White River Fish Hatchery, Arkansas provides for trout production facilities downstream from Beaver Dam. White River, Batesville, AR. (See Section 35 of text.) Documents H. Doc. 917, 7 6 Cong., 3d sess. H. Doc. 290, 77th Cong., P t sess. H. Doc. 499, 83d Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc 352, 87th Cong., 2d sess. Flood Control Com. Doc. 1, 75 th Cong., 1st sess. Senate Report 102-344; Energy & Water Development Appropriations Act, 1993, PL 102-377 Water Resources Development Act of 1976, P.L. 94-587, Sec. 105. Section 205, P.L. 80-858, construction be approved by ASA (CW). LITTLE ROCK, AR DISTRICT TABLE 37-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1997 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Bell Foley Lake, White River, ARI Black River, Butler County Road 607, MO Black River, Poplar Bluff, MO, to Knobel, AR Butler County Drainage District 3, MO Carden's Bottom Drainage District No. 2, Arkansas River, AR Cato Springs, Fayetteville, AR Clarksville, AR Conway County Drainage and Levee District District No. 1, Arkansas River, AR Conway County Levee Districts Nos. 1, 2, and 8, Arkansas River, AR Conway County Levee District No. 6, Arkansas River, AR Crawford County Levee District, AR Crawford County Levee District, Arkansas River, AR Crooked Creek, Harrison, AR Curia Creek Drainage District, Independence County, AR East Poplar Bluff and Poplar Bluff, MO Faulkner County Levee District No. 1, Arkansas River, AR Fort Smith, Arkansas River, AR From North Little Rock to Gillett, AR (above Plum Bayou) Fourche Creek, Little Rock, AR2 Jackson County Levee District 2 White River, AR Little Massard Creek, Fort Smith, AR Little Red River District 1, AR Little Red River, White County Road Bridge, Judsonia, AR Little Rock Levee, AR, East End Fourche Bayou, AR McLean Bottom Levee District No. 3, Arkansas River, AR Near Dardanelle, Arkansas River, AR Newport, White River, AR North Little Rock, Arkansas River, AR Otter Creek and Tributaries Shannon Hills, AR Petit Jean River, AR Petit Jean River, AR Pine Mountain Lake, AR3 Point Remove Levee and Drainage District, Conway County, AR Red River, 1-30, Little River Co., AR Red River, Hwy. 31, Little River Co., AR Roland Drainage District, Arkansas River, AR Rolling Fork River, Sevier County, AR Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Under Const. Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Cancelled Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed Inactive Completed Completed Completed Completed Completed 1975 1985 1958 1983 1951 1995 1962 1959 1952 1952 1983 1954 1995 1983 1958 1941 1951 1954 1973 1986 1983 1988 1983 1975 1950 1953 1941 1958 1987 1966 1991 1985 1983 1992 1992 1950 1983 $1,432,116 - 44,500 - 84,315 - 42,172 - 919,955 - 426,000 - 271,717 - 187,440 - 1,018,840 - 390,952 - 53,506 - 2,001,820 - 1,245,000 - 117,898 - 304,699 - 99,511 - 1,077,546 - 845,300 - 22,890 - 131,699 - 198,096 - 28,968 - 63,355 - 1,901,899 - 422,549 - 198,069 - 314,276 - 512,001 - 162,204 - 84,350 - 88,379 - 1,432,331 - 86,943 - 119,897 - 144,828 - 269,907 - 64,500 - 37-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 37-E (Cont.) Other Authorized Flood Control Projects For Last Cost to Sept. 30, 1997 Full Report See Annual Operation and Project Status Report For Construction Maintenance Skaggs Ferry, Black River, AR Completed 1941 81,023 - South Bank, Arkansas River (Head Fourche Completed 1964 1,404,852 - Island to Pennington Bayou), AR South Bank, Arkansas River, Little Rock to Completed 1961 409,115 - Pine Bluff, AR, Tucker Lakes Swan Creek Bank Stab., Taney County, MO Completed 1986 76,800 - Van Buren, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1952 438,222 - Village Creek, White River, and Mayberry Completed 1972 1,567,156 - Levee Districts, AR4 Village Creek, Jackson and Inactive 1977 510,217 - Lawrence Counties, AR5 West of Morrilton, Arkansas River, AR Completed 1962 1,269,959 - White River, at Hwy 14, mile east Completed 1981 214,308 - of Oil Trough, AR White River Bank Stab., Batesville, AR Completed 1986 101,100 - White River, Jacksonport, AR6 Completed 1987 293,567 - White River, Newport, AR Completed 1989 93,929 - White River, St. Paul, AR Completed 1990 22,400 - 1. Reclassified as inactive in Jun '77; reviewed & deferred in May '85; funded for reevaluation (draft report dated Sep '89). 2. Construction of project cancelled because local interests failed to provide right-of-way for construction and maintenance. 3. Reclassified as inactive in Jul '85. 4. See H Doc 577.87th Cong for description. 5. Reclassified in Jun '77: local interests unable to meet local cooperation requirements; funded for reevaluation in FY 89; recommended to be placed in the inactive status. 6. Design deficiency correction to be completed 30 December 1996. TABLE 37-G Deauthorized Projects For Last Funds Expended Full Report See Annual Date Federal Contributed Project Report For Authority Deauthorized Funds Funds Crooked Creek Lake 1969 1990 & Levee, AR Lone Rock, Buffalo 1959 1977 $130,653 River, AR Prosperity Lake, MO 1989 864,000 Water Valley, Eleven 1959 1977 414,011 Point River, AR & MO 37-24 TABLE 37-H ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Elevation Depth on Miter Up- Upper Year stream Lock Pool Type of Opened to Total from Miles to Dimension Lift (feet, Upper Lower Character of Kind of Construc- Naviga- Estimated Feature Mouth Nearest Town (feet) (feet) MSL) (feet) (feet) Foundation Dam tion tion Cost LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT Norrell Lock and Dam No.1 Entrance Channel Lock No. 2 Wilbur D. Mills Dam (No. 2) Joe Hardin Lock and Dam No. 3 Emmett Sanders Lock and Dam (No. 4) Lock and Dam No. 5 David D. Terry Lock and Dam (No. 6) Murray Lock and Dam (No. 7) Toad Suck Ferry Lock and Dam (No. 8) Arthur V. Ormond Lock and Dam (No. 9) Dardanelle Lock and Dam (No. 10) 8 east of AR Post, AR First 10.3 miles of system 110 by 600 30 max 6 east of AR 20 nom 110 by Post, AR 600 28 max 3 southeast of AR Post, AR 5 north of Grady, AR 7 east of Pine Bluff, AR 4 southeast of Redfield, AR 12 southeast of Little Rock, AR 6 northwest of Little Rock, AR 6 west of Conway, AR 3 southwest of Morrilton, AR 2 northwest of Dardanelle, AR 110 by 600 142 162 16 15 1967 $22,472,000 $43,649,000 18 14 1967 $70,266,000 1968 20 182 llO by 600 14 196 110 by 600 17 213 110 by 600 110 by 600 18 18 231 18 14 18 14 18 14 18 14 1968 $38,040,000 1968 $45,246,000 1968 $31,710,000 1968 $69,086,000 249 18 14 1969 $46,076,000 110 by 600 16 265 18 14 1969 $57,831,000 110 by 600 110 by 600 19 54 284 18 14 338 18 14 1969 $37,798,000 1969 $84,270,124 Lock and Dam No. 11 Deleted - - - - - W t. r tm r 3 �3 'a ,yL~ H TABLE 37-H Cont. ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Lock Elevation Depth on Miter Type of Total Up- Miles to Dimension Lift Upper Upper Lower Character of Kind of Construc- Year Estimated Feature stream Nearest Town (feet) (feet) Pool (feet) (feet) Foundation Dam tion Opened to Cost Ozark-Jeta Taylor Lock and Dam (No. 12) James W. Trimble Lock and Dam (No. 13) TULSA DISTRICT James W. Trimble Lock and Dam (No. 13) W. D. Mayo Lock and Dam (No. 14) Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam (No. 15) Webbers Falls Lock and Dam (No.16) Chouteau Lock and Dam (No. 17) Newt Graham Lock and Dam (No.18) 1 east of Ozark, AR 7 east of Fort Smith, AR 4 east of Redland, OK 1 north of Cowlington, OK 1 northwest of Gore, OK 4 northwest of Okay, OK 8 southwest of Inola, OK 110 by 600 34 372 18 15 110 by 600 20 110 by 600 110 by 600 110 by 600 20 48 30 110 by 600 21 110 by 600 21 1969 $85,629,412 392 18 14 1969 $58,816,000 412 14 15 460 18 14 490 19 16 511 1970 $6,858,000 1970 $32,655,000 1970 $94,578,237 1970 $83,738,277 1970 $31,619,000 1970 $44,355,000 15 14 532 15 14 oN 0 0 rd tm > n r ,yC; HI G1 o TABLE 37-H Cont. ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: NAVIGATION (See Section 1 of Text) Additional features entering into cost of project Little Rock District: Bank stabilization and channel rectification, mile 33.7 to 362 and Arkansas-White Cutoff, 100 percent complete....... $119,300,184 Maintenance and repair fleet and marine terminals, complete .................... ............. ................... 10,247,000 Total, Little Rock District.............. .......... 814,362,720 Navigation aids (U.S. Coast Guard) .............. ....... 2,268,000 Tulsa District Bank stabilization and channel rectification, Short Mountain to Fort Smith, complete............................ 12,700,038 Maintenance and repair fleet and marine terminals, complete ................................. ........ ........ 2,750,000 Subtotal ................................................... $309,253,552 Upstream Lakes: Oologah, 90.2 miles upstream from mouth, Verdigris River complete .............. ............................ $ 46,722,329 Keystone, 638.8 miles upstream from mouth, Arkansas River, complete................................................... 123,170,773 Eufaula, 27 miles upstream from mouth, Canadian River, complete................... ............... 124,130,747 Subtotal ........ ............................ 294,023,849 Total, Tulsa District... .................. 60. 3,277,401 Total Project Cost 96 percent complete....... $ 1,419,908,121 1. Navigation mileage from mouth of White River, except Dam No. 2, is 40.5 miles above mouth of Arkansas River. 2. Details in Tulsa District report. W JJ No -, -r3 0 y -3 r O nncq y y3 --.. . TABLE 37-I ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN; AR, OK, AND KS: LAKES (See Section 1 of Text) Miles Drainage Height Reservoir Power Year or Above Area of Dam Capacity Development Percent Total Estim Lake and State River Mouth Nearest Town (sq mi) (feet) Type (acre-feet) (kilowatts) Complete Cost Blue Mountain, AR Petit Jean 74.4 Paris, AR 488 115 Earthfill 257,900 --- 1947 $ 5,069 Canton, OK North Canadian 384.3 Canton, OK 12,483 68 Earthfill 383,300 --- 1948 11,209 Elk City, KS Elk 8.7 Independence, KS 634 107 Earthfill 284,300 --- 1966 19,052 (Table Mound) Eufaula, OK Canadian 27.0 Eufaula, OK 47,522 114 Earthfill 3,798,000 90,000 1964 123,795 Fall River, KS Fall 54.2 Fall River, KS 585 94 Earthfill 256,400 --- 1949 10,550 Fort Gibson, OK Grand (Neosho) 7.7 Fort Gibson, OK 12,492 110 Concrete- 1,284,400 45,000 1953 43,821 Keystone, OK Arkansas 538.8 Sand Springs, OK 74,506 121 gravity 1,836,500 70,000 1964 123,171 Markham Ferry, OK Grand (Neosho) 47.4 Pryor, OK 11,533 90 Earthfill 444,500 100,000 1968 6,908 Neodesha, KS Verdigris 222.8 Neodesha, KS 1,152 74 Earthfill 90,000 --- 0 97 - Nimrod, AR Fourche La Fave 62.6 Plainview, AR 680 103 Earthfill 336,010 --- 1942 4,092 SOologah, OK Verdigris 90.2 Claremore, OK 4,339 137 Concrete- 1,519,000 --- 1974 37,029 Pensacola.OK Grand (Neosho) 77.0 Disney, OK 10,298 147 gravity 2,197,000 86,400 1940 52 Tenkiller Ferry, OK Illinois 12.8 Gore, OK 1,610 197 Earthfill 1,230,800 34,000 1953 25,723 Toronto, KS Verdigris 271.5 Toronto, KS 730 90 Concrete arch 199,700 --- 1960 13,896 Wister, OK Poteau 60.9 Wister, OK 993 99 Earthfill 427,900 --- 1949 10,687 Subtotal, exclusive of Eufaula, Keystone, and Oologah. 151,164 Arkansas River Basin; AR, OK and KS; Navigation (Table 28-H). 1,419,908 Total, Arkansas River Basin, 96 percent complete. 1,567,949 1.Project includes facilities for production of hydroelectric power. 2.Cost included in navigation project. 3.Details in Tulsa District report. 4.Constructed by State of Oklahoma under the name of Robert S. Kerr Dam (Lake Hudson). Estimate shown is for Federal participation. 5.Inactive. Estimate is based on 1954 price levels. 6.Constructed by State of Oklahoma under the name Grand River Dam (Lake O The Cherokees). Estimate shown is for Federal participation. ated r -o ,974 0 ,834 ,990 ,907 ,873 r ,405 ,173 '< ,756 0 ,910 ,826 ,928 ,126 ,704 0 ,324 ,439 C ,161 0 ,121 ; ,982 C ooi TABLE 37-J LITTLE RIVER BASIN, AR: LAKES (See Section 26 of Text) Project River Site Nearest Town DeQueen Lake Rolling Fork River 22.8 DeQueen, AR Gillham Lake Cossatot River 49 Gillham, AR Dierks Lake Saline River 56.6 Dierks, AR Millwood Lake Little River 16 Millwood, AR 1. Project is reported separately herein. TABLE 37-K WHITE RIVER BASIN; AR, AND MO: LAKES (See Section 34 of Text) Miles Drainage Height Reservoir Power Above Area of Dam Capacity Development Total Estim Lake River Mouth Nearest Town (sq mi) (feet) Type (acre-feet) (kilowatts) Cost Beaver' White 609 Eureka Springs, AR 1,186 228 Concrete-gravity & earthfill 1,952,000 112,000 $ 52,631,4 Bell Foley' Strawberry 27.2 Poughkeepsie, AR 519 136 Concrete-gravity & earthfill 518,000 ---- 93,700,0 Bull Shoals' White 418.6 Mountain Home, AR 6,036 258 Concrete-gravity 5,408,000 340,000 96,356,0 Clearwater' Black 257.4 Piedmont, MO 898 154 Earthfill 413,000 ---- 22,462,5 Greers Ferry' Little Red 79.0 Heber Springs, AR 1,146 243 Concrete-gravity 1,844,000 96,000 55,125,0 Norfork' North Fork 4.8 Norfork, AR 1,806 216 Concrete-gravity 1,983,000 80,550 111,624,0 Table Rock' White 523.8 Branson, MO 4,020 252 Concrete-gravity & earthfill 3,462,000 200,000 71,233,0 Total 15,580,000 828,550 503,132,0 1. For details see individual reports. 2. Inactive - placed in a deferred status in May 1985. Estimate based on 1983 price levels. ated 172 )00 )00 553 )00 )00 )00 )25 " 0 -] nd. U H) W 1r TULSA, OK, DISTRICT * TULSA, OKLAHOMA, DISTRICT The civil works boundry of the Tulsa District includes an area of approximately 160,000 square miles covering Oklahoma and parts of Kansas and Texas within the Arkansas and Red River Basins. The District's responsibilities within the Arkansas River Basin cover southern Kansas, northern Oklahoma, and the Texas Panhandle. These areas are included in the drainage basin of the Arkansas River and its tributaries above the mouth of the Poteau River, extending to the Kansas. Colorado State line, exclusive of that portion of the South Canadian River Basin and its tributaries west of the Texas-New Mexico State line. The District's responsibilities within the Red River Basin cover the northern portion of Texas, and the southern portion of Oklahoma. These areas are embraced in the drainage basin of the Red River and its tributaries above Index, Arkansas. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, OK 2. Other Authorized Navigation Projects Flood Control 3. Arcadia Lake, OK 4. Arkansas City, KS 5. Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control Projects, KS, OK, and TX 5a. Area V, Estelline Springs, TX 5b. Area VIII, TX 5c. Red River Basin Chloride Control, TX & OK 6. Birch Lake, OK 7. Bowie County Levee, TX 8. Candy Lake, OK 9. Canton Lake, OK 10. Copan Lake, OK 11. Council Grove Lake, KS 12. E1 Dorado Lake, KS 13. Elk City Lake, KS 14. Fall River Lake, KS 15. Fort Supply Lake, OK 16. Fry Creeks, Bixby, OK 17. Great Bend, KS 18. Great Salt Plains Lake, OK 19. Halstead, KS 20. Heyburn Lake and Polecat Creek, OK 38-2 38-2 38-2 38-3 38-3 38-3 38-3 38-4 38-4 38-4 38-4 38-5 38-5 38-5 38-5 38-6 'rn 306 38-6 38-6 38-6 38-6 38-7 38-7 21. Hugo Lake, OK 22. Hulah Lake, OK 23. John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, KS 24. Kaw Lake, OK 25. Lake Kemp, TX 26. Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX 27. Marion Reservoir, KS 28. McGrath Creek, Wichita Falls, TX 29. Mingo Creek, OK 30. Oologah Lake, OK 31. Optima Lake, OK 32. Parker Lake, OK 33. Pat Mayse Lake, TX 34. Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, KS 35. Pine Creek Lake, TX 36. Sardis Lake, OK 37. Skiatook Lake, OK 38. Toronto Lake, KS 39. Tulsa & West Tulsa Levees, OK 40. Waurika Lake, OK 41. Winfield, KS 42. Wister Lake, OK 43. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 44. Inspection of Completed Local Flood Protection Projects 45. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations 46. Emergency Flood Control Activities 47. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization 38-1 Page 38-7 38-7 38-7 38-8 38-8 38-8 38-8 38-8 38-9 38-9 38-9 38-9 38-10 38-10 38-10 38-10 38-10 38-10 38-11 38-11 38-11 38-11 38-12 38-12 38-12 38-12 38-12 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power Tables Broken Bow Lake, OK Eufaula Lake, OK Fort Gibson Lake, OK Keystone Lake, OK Lake Texoma (Denison Dam), OK & TX Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, OK Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, OK 38-12 38-12 38-13 38-13 38-13 38-13 38-13 38-14 General Investigations 56. Surveys 57. Collection and Study of Basic Data 38-14 38-14 38-A Cost and Financial Statement 38-B Authorizing Legislation 38-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects 38-D Not Applicable 38-E Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 38-F Not Applicable 38-G Deauthorized Projects 38-H Arkansas River Basin Multiple-Purpose Plan 38-I Inspection of Completed Local Flood Protection Projects 38-J Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization 38-K General Investigations Navigation 1. McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM (Tulsa District Portion), OK. Location. The Tulsa District portion of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System provides a navigation route up the Arkansas River from the Oklahoma-Arkansas State line to the head of navigation at Catoosa, OK, near Tulsa, OK. The total length of the Tulsa District portion of the system is 137 navigation miles. Descriptions and costs for the entire navigation system can be found in Little Rock District's entry in this Annual Report. Existing projects. The McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River navigation project is a component of the multiple- purpose plan for the Arkansas River Basin which provides for the improvement of the basin through the construction of coordinated developments for navigation, hydroelectric power, flood control, water supply, water quality control, sediment control, recreation, and fish and wildlife propagation. The McClellan- Kerr project also includes bank stabilization, channel straightening, and cutoffs as required. The navigation channel has a minimum depth of 9 feet and minimum widths of 250 feet on the Arkansas River and 150 feet on the Verdigris River. The Tulsa District portion of the navigation system consists of Arkansas River Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification, Chouteau Lock and Dam, Newt Graham Lock and Dam, Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, Sans Bois Navigation Channel, W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam, Webbers Falls Lock and Dam, and the pool in Oklahoma which was created by Lock and Dam 13 in Arkansas. The other parts of the multiple-purpose plan for the Arkansas River Basin are listed in Table 29-H. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Public port facilities are in operation at Muskogee and Catoosa, OK, and at Fort Smith, AR. Other private commercial port facilities are complete and in operation at eight Oklahoma locations. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 2. OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS. See Table 38-C. Flood Control 3. ARCADIA LAKE, OK. Location. On the Deep Fork River, at river mile 218.3, in the metropolitan area of Oklahoma City and Edmond, OK, about 1.5 miles west of Arcadia, in Oklahoma County, OK. (See Arcadia, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for flood control, water supply, and recreation by construction of an earthfill dam approximately 102 38-2 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. 38.15 38-24 38-27 38-27 38-28 38-28 38-29 38-29 38-30 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT feet high and 5,250 feet long with a high-level uncontrolled spillway. Outlet works consist of a gated tower and conduit. The lake has a total capacity of 92,000 acre-feet (27,380 for conservation, 64,430 for flood control, and 190 for sedimentation reserve), and controls a 105-square-mile drainage area. Construction began in October 1980, and the project became operational for flood control in November 1986. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 4. ARKANSAS CITY, KS. Location. Arkansas City is located approximately 4 miles north of the Kansas-Oklahoma state line at the crossroads of U.S. Highway's 77 and 166, in Cowley County, KS, immediately northwest of the confluence of the Arkansas and Walnut Rivers. Existing project. The project consists of raising and extending approximately 6 miles of levee along the Arkansas and Walnut Rivers, and rechanneling approximately 2-1/2 miles of the Walnut River. Structural steel gates will be constructed at two railroad/ river crossings and stoplog structures will be constructed at two U.S. Highway/river crossings. Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was signed on September 4, 1996. The city of Arkansas City, the local sponsor, are currently fulfilling their requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction began in FY 97. Estimated total project cost $38,330,000 (October 1996 price level base). 5. ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL PROJECTS, KS, OK, AND TX. Location. On certain tributary streams of the Arkansas and Red Rivers in the western half of the Tulsa District. Existing project. The project was initiated as a result of studies involving the control of water pollution caused by 15 natural salt sources identified in 1957 by the U.S. Public Health Service. The Arkansas and Red Rivers are major national and regional water resources which are severely limited due to poor water quality primarily caused by the natural pollutant, sodium chloride. The Arkansas River is polluted by five naturally occurring salt sources located in northwestern Oklahoma and southwestern Kansas. The Red River Basin is polluted by 10 naturally occurring salt sources located in northwestern Texas, and southwestern Oklahoma. Preliminary Feasibility Studies included the construction and subsequent maintenance of an injection well and a ring dike used for data collection. Preauthorization studies completed in 1966 and 1970 recommended construction of project features at 13 of the 15 chloride emission areas. For a detailed discussion of the chloride control projects, see page 19-4 of the Annual Report for 1983. The Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) authorized the Red River Basin and the Arkansas River Basin as separate projects with separate authority under Section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1966. The Arkansas River portion of the project was deferred in 1982 (not economically justified). 5a. AREA V, ESTELLINE SPRINGS, TX. Location. Chloride Control Area V is located about 0.5 mile east of Estelline, TX, on the Prairie Dog Town Fork of the Red River. Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see the Annual Report for 1987. Construction started in 1963, and the structure was completed in 1964. Local cooperation. Descriptive text concerning local cooperation requirements is given on page 19-5 of the Annual Report for 1983. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 5b. AREA VIII, TX. Location. Chloride Control Area VIII is located at river mile 74.9, of the South Fork of the Wichita River, in King County, TX, about 5 miles east of Guthrie, TX. Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of a low-flow brine collection dam (the Bateman Low-Flow Dam) with attendant pumping station and pipeline facilities. The collected brine is pumped to the storage reservoir behind the Truscott Brine Dam. This brine dam, located at river mile 3.6 on Bluff Creek (a tributary of the North Fork of the Wichita River) about 3 miles northwest of Truscott, TX, contains collected brine from Area VIII and will contain brine collected in the future from Area X. Construction was initiated at Area VIII and Truscott Brine Dam in 1976. The Bateman Low-Flow Dam was completed and put into full operation in May 1987. Local cooperation. Descriptive text concerning local cooperation requirements is given on page 19-5 of the Annual Report for 1983. 38-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Operations and results during fiscal year. New electronic controls and instrumentation for the pipeline were purchased. Microwave towers for the pipeline were purchased. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 5c. RED RIVER BASIN CHLORIDE CONTROL, TX & OK. Location. The project is located in Cottle, Hall, and King Counties, TX, and Harmon County, OK, along the Wichita and Red Rivers. Area VI is located on the Elm Fork of the Red River in Harmon County, OK; Area VII is on the North Fork of the Wichita River, Cottle County, TX; Crowell Brine Dam is on Canal Creek, a tributary of the Pease River; Area IX is on the Middle Pease River, Cottle County, TX; Area X is on the Middle Fork of the Wichita River, King County, TX; and Areas XIII-XIV are on the Jonah and Salt Creeks of Prairie Dog Town Fork of the Red River, Hall County, TX. Existing project. The plan of improvement consists of one deep-well injection system, three brine storage reservoirs, four low-flow brine collection dams, two well collection facilities, six pumping plants, and 56.3 miles of pipeline. Construction was completed at the Area X, low-flow dam, pump station and access road in March 1994. A Limited Reevaluation Report containing a project economic reevaluation was approved in November 1993. Local Cooperation. Section 1107 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the project at full Federal expense. The Red River Authority of Texas has signed a 221 Agreement as the non-Federal sponsor. Operation and results during fiscal year. Estimated total cost of the project is $241,500,000 (October 1997 price level base). A draft Supplement to the Final Environmental Impact Study (SFEIS) was submitted for public review in May 1995. Finalization of the SFEIS has been put on hold indefinitely and the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works directed that a reevaluation of the Wichita River Basin be performed with available funding. 6. BIRCH LAKE, OK. Location. On Birch Creek at river mile 0.8, about 1.5 miles south of Barnsdall, in Osage County, OK. (See Barnsdall, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see the Annual Report for 1979. Construction began in November 1973, and the project was placed in useful operation in March 1977. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 7. BOWIE COUNTY LEVEE, TX. Location. Bowie County is located in northeastern Texas, along the Red River, near Texarkana, Texas. The Bowie County Levee is situated on the south side of the Red River and extends almost 9 miles from the Kansas City Southern Railroad embankment westward to an area near Wamba, Texas. (See Wamba, TX, Gelogical Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The project, as authorized under the Flood Control Act of 1946, provides for the rehabilitation of the existing Bowie County, Texas, Levee. The levee was constructed in 1913 by the Bowie County Levee District No. 1. The Bowie County Levee is part of a levee system which includes the Miller County Levee that extends downstream approximately 35 miles. The existing Bowie County Levee does not meet current design standards and has not received proper maintenance. Studies completed in 1994 indicated that no economically feasible flood control alternative was identified and Federal interest in pursuing detailed design and project construction was not warranted. Local cooperation. The local sponsor, Bowie County Levee Board, has been successful in working with Congress to provide Federal funds for design of the project. Unles otherwise determined by Congress, the Water Development Resources Act of 1986 applies to this project. The local sponsor has provided a letter of intent, but a Project Cooperation Agreement has not been signed. Operations and results during fiscal year. Design activities were initiated in FY 96, and final design will be completed in FY 97. 8. CANDY LAKE, OK. Location. On Candy Creek, a tributary of Bird Creek in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 1.9. The damsite is about 1.5 miles northeast of Avant in Osage County, OK. (See Avant, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for an earthfill dam about 4,200 feet long, including an uncontrolled concrete spillway, with a maximum height of 103 feet above the streambed. 38-4 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT Outlet works will consist of a gated intake structure, a 10x11.25-foot conduit, and a stilling basin. An 18x24-inch low-flow pipe and an 18-inch water supply pipe will be provided. The lake will have a total capacity of 75,420 acre-feet (44,160 for conservation and sediment reserve and 31,260 for flood control). The drainage area above the damsite is 43 square miles. Candy Lake will be operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Construction began in September 1976. Local cooperation. Section 2 of the Flood Control Act of 1938, the Water Supply Act of 1958, and Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970, apply. Operations and results during fiscal year. In accordance with PL 99-662, 33 U.S.C. 579a 1001 (b)(2), the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works submitted a list of projects for deauthorization to Congress on January 8, 1993. Certain projects from this list, including Candy, were deauthorized on July 9, 1995. Congressman Coburn is seeking legislation to return the lands to the original owners. 9. CANTON LAKE, OK. Location. On the North Canadian River at river mile 394, about 2 miles north of Canton in Blaine County, OK. (See Canton, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 590 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in December 1940, and the project was placed in useful operation in April 1948. Local cooperation. The Canton Lake Committee was established to improve coordination and communication between the multi-purpose users of Canton Lake. The committee coordinates Oklahoma City's water supply release schedule with interested parties to minimize impacts.. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project was hooked up to rural water and the service gates were repaired and painted. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 10. COPAN LAKE, OK. Location. On the Little Caney River, a tributary of the Caney River, in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 7.4, about 2 miles west of Copan in Washington County, OK. (See Copan, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-7 of the Annual Report for 1983. Copan Lake is operated as a unit of a seven-lake system for flood control in the Verdigris River Basin in Oklahoma. Construction began in November 1972, and the project was placed in useful operation in April 1983. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 11. COUNCIL GROVE LAKE, KS. Location. On the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 450, about 1.5 miles northwest of Council Grove, in Morris County, KS. (See Council Grove Lake, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 519 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in June 1959, and the project was placed in useful operation in July 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 12. EL DORADO LAKE, KS. Location. On the Walnut River, a tributary of the Arkansas River, at river mile 100.2, about 4 miles northeast of El Dorado in Butler County, KS. (See El Dorado, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-7 of the Annual Report for 1983. El Dorado Lake was authorized as a unit of a three-lake system for flood control in the Walnut River Basin. Construction began in October 1973, and impoundment began in June 1981. Project is complete. Local cooperation. By payment of $8.17 million on May 18, 1997, the Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks has fully complied with the Local Cooperation Agreement. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 38-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 13. ELK CITY LAKE, KS. Location. On the Elk River at river mile 8.7, about 7 miles northwest of Independence, in Montgomery County, KS. (See Table Mound, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 593 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in February 1962, and the project was placed in useful operation in March 1966. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 14. FALL RIVER LAKE, KS. Location. On the Fall River at river mile 54.2, about 4 miles northwest of Fall River, in Greenwood County, KS. (See Severy, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 953 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in May 1946, and the project was placed in full operation in April 1949. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 15. FORT SUPPLY LAKE, OK. Location. On Wolf Creek, a tributary of the North Canadian River, at river mile 5.5, about 12 miles northwest of Woodward, in Woodward County, OK. (See Fort Supply, OK, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 594 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in October 1938, and the project was placed in full flood control operation in May 1942. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 16. FRY CREEKS, BIXBY, OK. Location. In the northern part of the city of Bixby, in Tulsa County, OK. Existing project. The project consists of enlarging both Fry Creeks, diverting Fry Creek 1 into Fry Creek 2 and then diverting the combined creeks into the Arkansas River. The total length of the modified channels would total 4.3 miles, with bottom widths of 30 to 225 feet and depths of 6 to 12 feet. Three bridges will be constructed and 20 acres of land has been acquired for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses. Local Cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement was signed in January 1995. The city of Bixby, the local sponsor, is currently fulfilling its requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. Estimated total cost of the project is $13,540,000 (October 1997 price level base). In September 1996, construction efforts were initiated on this project. 17. GREAT BEND, KS. Location. In Barton County, KS, on the north bank of the Arkansas River about 4.5 miles above its confluence with Walnut Creek. (See Great Bend, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The plan, authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1965, provides for 6.2 miles of leveed channel to divert Walnut Creek flood flow around Great Bend into the Arkansas River upstream from the city; a 1.5-mile leveed channel to divert Little Walnut Creek flood flow into the Walnut Creek diversion levees along the Arkansas River; a tie-back levee 4.3 miles long on the Arkansas River left bank upstream from the junction of the Walnut diversion channel; and appurtenant facilities. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Financial closeout on this project was completed during FY 97. This project has been fully operational since June 1994. Estimated total cost of the project is $36,350,000 (October 1994 price level base). 18. GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE, OK. Location. On the Salt Fork of the Arkansas River at river mile 103.3, about 12 miles east of Cherokee, in Alfalfa County, OK. (See Jet, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 594 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction of the project began in September 1938, and was completed in July 1941. The project was placed in full flood control operation in May 1941. 38-6 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 19. HALSTEAD, KS. Location. In the city of Halstead, in Harvey County, KS, along the Arkansas River. (See Halstead, KS, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Provides for channel modification and construction of about 4 miles of levee in combination with straightening and widening approximately 3.6 miles of the Little Arkansas River channel to a 50-foot-bottom width in the vicinity of Halstead. Channel modification will be restricted to one side of the channel except in transition areas. Tree planting and revegetation will be done and ten pool riffle areas will be established to minimize environmental impacts. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project is fully operational, however, the Corps is evaluating a construction contract claim on this project. This effort is expected to continue through the end of FY 99. 20. HEYBURN LAKE AND POLECAT CREEK, OK. Location. On Polecat Creek, a minor tributary of the Arkansas River, at river mile 48.6, about 11 miles west of Sapulpa, in Creek County, OK. (See Lake Heyburn, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 599 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction started in March 1948, and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1950. Channel improvements below the lake were completed in September 1952. Local cooperation. The channel improvement project below the lake was never maintained by the sponsor, Joint Drainage District No. 1, Tulsa and Creek Counties, OK. For this reason, the channel returned to its pre-project condition and does not provide flood protection for the affected area. The Corps of Engineers discontinued maintenance inspections of the channel project in 1982, due to the condition of the project and lack of cooperation on the part of the sponsor. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 21. HUGO LAKE, OK. Location. On the Kiamichi River at river mile 17.6, about 7 miles east of Hugo, in Choctaw County, OK. (See Hugo Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-12 of the Annual Report for 1977. Construction began in October 1967, and the project was placed in useful operation in January 1974. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 22. HULAH LAKE, OK. Location. On the Caney River at river mile 96.2, about 15 miles northwest of Bartlesville, near Hulah, in Osage County, OK. (See Bowring, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 595 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in May 1946, and was completed in June 1950. The project was placed in full flood control operation in September 1951. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 23. JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, KS. Location. The dam is located on the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 343.7, about 2 miles northwest of Burlington, in Coffey County, KS. (See John Redmond Dam, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 581 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction was initiated in July 1959, and was completed in December 1965. The project was placed in flood control operation in July 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The Hartford Levee was repaired to stop underseepage which was threatening the structure as well as a large 38-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 part of the town of Hartford, Kansas. The relief well collector pipe at the toe of the emankment was extended another 2,500 feet to add relief to uplift pressure in a critical area of the emankment. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 24. KAW LAKE, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at river mile 653.7, about 8 miles east of Ponca City, in Kay County, OK. (See Charley Creek West, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-13 of the Annual Report for 1977. Construction began in June 1966, and the project was placed in operation in May 1976. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 25. LAKE KEMP, TX. Location. On the Wichita River at river mile 126.7, about 40 miles southwest of Wichita Falls, TX. (See Northeast Lake Kemp, TX, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-14 of the Annual Report for 1977. Construction began in May 1970, and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1972. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 26. LAKE WICHITA, HOLLIDAY CREEK, TX. Location. The project is located in Wichita and Archer Counties, TX. The Lake Wichita dam and the Holliday Creek channel are located in the city of Wichita Falls, TX. (See Wichita Falls, TX, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The existing Lake Wichita dam was replaced with an earthen dam approximately 16,000 feet long with a concrete spillway, an auxiliary spillway, and low-flow outlet works. Channel improvements along Holliday Creek from the new spillway to the Wichita River, a distance of 9.3 miles, were also constructed. Local cooperation. Fully compiled with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The project was completed October 1, 1996, and is fully operational. Estimated total project cost is $48,789,000 (October 1995 price level base). 27. MARION RESERVOIR, KS. Location. On the Cottonwood River at river mile 126.7, about 3 miles northwest of Marion, in Marion County, KS. (See Pilson, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 597 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in June 1964, and the project was placed in flood control operation in February 1968. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Construction completed on embankment roadway and spillway bridge deck repair. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 28. MCGRATH CREEK, WICHITA FALLS, TX. Location. The project is located in the northern central portion of Texas, in the city of Wichita Falls. Existing project. McGrath Creek is approximately 3,900 feet long and connects Sikes Lake and the recently constructed Holliday Creek project. The project involves realigning and concrete lining the McGrath Creek Channel, and constructing a new spillway to pass flows through Sikes Lake. Local cooperation. The city of Wichita Falls, TX, is the non-Federal sponsor. The Project Cooperation Agreement was executed in November 1994. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Act of 1986, the non- Federal sponsor must provide lands, easements, rightsof- way and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities, where necessary for the construction of the project; and pay five percent of the costs allocated to flood control and bear all cost of operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation and replacement of flood control facilities. The non-Federal sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. 38-8 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT Operations and results during fiscal year. Channel construction continued. Estimated total project cost is $13,520,000 (October 1996 price level base). 29. MINGO CREEK, OK. Location. On the right-bank tributary of Bird Creek in the city of Tulsa, in Tulsa County, OK. (See Tulsa, OK, Geological Survey Map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. The recommended plan will consist of 23 detention sites, which would capture peak flows and hold them temporarily until downstream flows subside. There will be about 9.4 miles of channelization in selected locations on the tributaries and main stem of Mingo Creek. Local cooperation. In accordance with the cost sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, the non-Federal sponsor must provide lands, easements, rights-ofway, and dredged material disposal areas; modify or relocate buildings, utilities, roads, bridges (except railroad bridges), and other facilities where necessary in the construction of the project; pay five percent of the costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. The non-Federal sponsor has also agreed to make all required payments concurrently with project construction. The local sponsor is the city of Tulsa, OK. The city has constructed 4.75 miles of channel and placed two excavated detention facilities into flood control operation prior to initiation of Federal construction in September 1988. The project is currently 80% complete. Operations and results during fiscal year. Reimbursement to date for work completed by the City of Tulsa is $19,000,000. Estimated total project cost is $119,200,000 (October 1997 price level base). 30. OOLOGAH LAKE, OK. Location. On the Verdigris River at river mile 90.2, about 2 miles southeast of Oologah, in Rogers County, OK. (See Oologah, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-15 of the Annual Report for 1972. Construction began in July 1950, but the project was placed in standby status in October 1951. Construction resumed in December 1955, and was completed in May 1963 for initial development. Construction for ultimate (second stage) development was initiated in July 1967, and was completed in 1974. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Replacement of roller chains on the flood control gates in the outlet structure was completed. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 31. OPTIMA LAKE, OK. Location. On the North Canadian River at river mile 623.2, about 4.5 miles northeast of Hardesty, in Texas County, OK. (See Optima Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the existing improvement, see page 19-16 of the Annual Report for 1979. Construction began in March 1966, and impoundment began in October 1978. Construction was completed in 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 32. PARKER LAKE, OK. Location. On Muddy Boggy Creek, a tributary of the Red River, about 23 miles east of Ada, in Coal County, OK. (See Parker, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. Parker Lake, if constructed, would be a multipurpose element in a plan of improvement for the Upper Muddy Boggy Creek Basin, OK. The project would consist of an earthfill dam about 2,200 feet long, a gated outlet works for flood control and water supply, and a 100-foot-wide spillway. The lake created would have a total storage capacity of 220,240 acre-feet and would yield 42 million gallons per day for municipal and industrial water supply. The project was authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The project has not been funded for construction, however, a Limited Project Review of the project is scheduled to be completed in March 1998. Federal accomplishment of single purpose municipal and industrial water supply projects is not in accord with current Administration priorities. Local cooperation. The Oklahoma Water Resources Board, the sponsor, has agreed to cost share in the flood control portion of the project and the water supply provided enough interested users for the water supply can be identified. 38-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Operation and results during fiscal year. Estimated total project cost is $71,400,000 (October 1992 price level base). 33. PAT MAYSE LAKE, TX. Location. On Sanders Creek, a tributary of the Red River, at river mile 4.6, about 12 miles north of Paris, in Lamar County, TX. (See Grant, TX, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 584 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in March 1965, and the project was placed in full flood control operation in September 1967. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The stilling basin repair was completed. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 34. PEARSON-SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE, KS. Location. On Big Hill Creek at river mile 33.3, about 4.5 miles east of Cherryvale, KS. (See Dennis, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-11 of the Annual Report for 1983. Construction began in April 1974, and impoundment began in March 1981. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 35. PINE CREEK LAKE, OK. Location. On the Little River at river mile 145.3, about 5 miles northwest of Wright City, in McCurtain County, OK. (See Wright City, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 584 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in February 1963, and the project was placed in useful operation in June 1969. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 36. SARDIS LAKE, OK. Location. On Jackfork Creek, a tributary of the Kiamichi River, at river mile 2.8, about 2.5 miles north of Clayton, in Pushmataha County, OK. (See Yanush, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-11 of the Annual Report for 1983. Sardis Lake is operated as a unit of a two-lake system for flood control in the Kiamichi River Basin. (The other lake in the system is Hugo Lake). Construction began in August 1975, and the project became operational in January 1983. Local cooperation. Pursuant to a letter exchange in September 1997 with Governor Keating and receipt of $1,175,850 litigation has been deferred until July 1, 1998. If payments for the water supply storage are not initiated by June 30, 1998, the Department of Justice will continue legal proceedings for collection. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 37. SKIATOOK LAKE, OK. Location. On Hominy Creek, a tributary of Bird Creek in the Verdigris River Basin, at river mile 14.3, about 5 miles west of Skiatook, in Osage County, OK. (See Avant S.E., OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see Page 19-8 of the Annual Report for 1987. Construction began in January 1974, impoundment began in October 1984, and the project became operational in November 1984. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The construction of Twin Points Recreation Area was completed. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 38. TORONTO LAKE, KS. Location. On the Verdigris River at river mile 271.5, about 4 miles southeast of Toronto, in Woodson County, KS. (See Fredonia, KS, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 600 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in November 1954, and the project was placed in full operation in March 1960. 38-10 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 39. TULSA AND WEST TULSA LEVEES, OK. Location. On the banks of the Arkansas River near Tulsa, OK. On the left bank, the levee extends from river mile 531.0 near Sand Springs, OK, downstream to river mile 521.4 at Tulsa. On the right bank, the levee extends from near river mile 526.7 downstream to river mile 521.3 and is adjacent to the major portion of the business and residential districts in West Tulsa, Tulsa County, OK. Existing project. The Tulsa and West Tulsa Levees were completed by the Tulsa District in 1945. The project was turned over to the Tulsa County Drainage District No. 12 for operations and maintenance. The project consists of 3 levees with a total length of about 20 miles and an average height of 10 feet. The levees provide protection from flooding to property valued at approximately $1 billion dollars. Many of the drainage pipes that pass under the levee have deteriorated and levee material has eroded into the pipes leaving small cavities in the embankment. The Tulsa District completed an evaluation of the levees in September 1989, which determined that rehabilitation would be required for the levees to operate as designed. Funds to repair the levee were provided in FY 91 and FY 94 by the U.S. Congress. Local cooperation. The Local Cooperation Agreement was executed in March 1992, and Tulsa County and Levee District No. 12, the non-Federal sponsors, provided funds of $325,000 in March 1992. Approximately one-half of the project repairs have been completed to date. The sponsors will be required to sign a supplement to the LCA and provide and additional $150,000 as a result of funding and authority included in the FY 94 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act by the U.S. Congress. Operations and results during fiscal year. Phase I contract for repair of 23 of the 48 deficient pipes was awarded July 30, 1992, and completed in July 1993. Phase II construction is scheduled to be initiated in September 1998, pending execution of a supplement to the LCA. 40. WAURIKA LAKE, OK. Location. On Beaver Creek, a tributary of the Red River, at river mile 27.0, about 6 miles northwest of Waurika, in Jefferson County, OK. (See Hastings, OK-TX, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-12 of the Annual Report for 1983. Waurika Lake is operated as a unit of a coordinated lake system for flood control in the Red River Basin. Construction began in July 1971, and impoundment began in August 1977. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance continued. 41. WINFIELD, KS. Location. Winfield is located approximately 15 miles north of the Kansas-Oklahoma state line on U.S. Highway 77 in Cowley County, KS. The city is located immediately southeast of the confluence of the Walnut River and Timber Creek. Existing project. The project consists of raising and extending approximately 4 miles of levee along Timber Creek and the Walnut River. Road ramps will be constructed at two locations where city streets cross the Walnut River. Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was signed on September 4, 1996. The city of Winfield, the local sponsor, is currently fulfilling its requirements. Operations and results during fiscal year. A construction contract was awarded in FY 98. Estimated total project cost is $8,777,000 (October 1996 price level base). 42. WISTER LAKE, OK. Location. On the Poteau River at river mile 60.9, about 2 miles south of Wister, in LeFlore County, OK. (See Wister, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 601 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in April 1946, and was completed in May 1949. The project was placed in full flood control operation in October 1949. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The gate tower roof was replaced. Per Congressional direction, the pool elevation was held to a minimum of 475.5 feet, NGVD, one foot above the existing conservation pool elevation of 474.6. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 38-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 43. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS. See Table 38-E. 44. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS. Inspections of completed, Federally constructed local flood protection projects which are owned, operated, and maintained by local interests are made to determine the extent of compliance with approved regulations for operations and maintenance. The inspections assist the Corps of Engineers in determining if the project provides the flood protection for which it was constructed. See Table 38-I for a list of projects inspected in FY 97. Fiscal year cost was $156,478. 45. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS. The Tulsa District Corps of Engineers is responsible for flood control operations at 12 non-Corps projects. These include nine Bureau of Reclamation lakes, two Grand River Dam Authority lakes, and one citycounty owned lake. All of these projects were constructed wholly or in part with Federal funds. Routine flood control releases were required at several of the projects. Fiscal year costs for scheduling flood control reservoir operations totaled $1,835,117 (includes $1 million for a Congressional add on the Pensacola Reservoir, Grand Lake Flood Easement Adequacy Study). 46. EMERGENCY FLOOD CONTROL ACTIVITIES. Fiscal year cost for national emergency preparedness was $72,283; advance preparation was $115,265; and Rehabilitation costs of $6,131. 47. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION. See Table 38-J for FY 97 expenditures for Small Flood Control Projects Not Specifically Authorized by Congress (Section 205); Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Projects (Section 14). Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 48. BROKEN BOW LAKE, OK. Location. On the Mountain Fork River at river mile 20.3, about 9 miles northeast of Broken Bow, in McCurtain County, OK. (See Broken Bow, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvements, see page 29-17 of the Annual Report for 1971. Construction began in November 1961, and the project was placed in useful operation in October 1969. Power units 1 and 2 were placed in operation in January and June 1970, respectively. Local cooperation. The development of a trout fishery in the Mountain Fork River below Broken Bow Lake was implemented in 1989, in cooperation with the Corps of Engineers (Corps), Southwestern Power Administration, Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, and the Oklahoma Water Resources Board. The operation of the trout stream has been cooperatively managed by a Memorandum of Understanding. The Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (WRDA 96), Sec. 338, modified the project to provide for the reallocation of sufficient quantity of water supply storage space to support the Mountain Fork trout fishery at no expense to the State of Oklahoma. The District is waiting implementing guidance on WRDA 96. Operations and results during fiscal year. A new bulkhead was constructed which will be used to maintain and repair the tainter gates. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 49. EUFAULA LAKE, OK. Location. On the Canadian River at river mile 27.0, about 12 miles east of Eufaula, in McIntosh County, OK. (See Porum, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 588 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in December 1956, and the project was placed in full flood control operation in February 1964. There are numerous areas along the shoreline where private property is subject to flooding and erosion as a result of the construction and operation. Erosion problems in numerous subdivisions bordering the lake were studied in 1989 and 1993. At this time, it is estimated that there are approximately 22 miles of shoreline in need of attention. Estimated costs for repair is approximately $15 million. 38-12 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The erosion repair contract has been completed on Eagle Bluff II and Southport and property has been purchased at Hideaway Cove for future erosion repair. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 50. FORT GIBSON LAKE, OK. Location. On the Grand (Neosho) River at river mile 7.7, about 5 miles north of Fort Gibson, in Muskogee County, OK. (See Fort Gibson Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 604 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in March 1942, but was held in abeyance during World War II. Construction resumed in May 1946, and was completed in June 1950. The fourth generator was installed and the project placed in full operation in September 1953. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The powerhouse switchyard oil circuit breakers were replaced. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 51. KEYSTONE LAKE, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at river mile 538.8, near Sand Springs, OK, and about 15 miles west of Tulsa, OK. (See Keystone Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 589 of the Annual Report for 1970. Construction began in January 1957, and the project was placed in flood control operation in September 1964. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. The powerhouse and spillway elevators were refurbished. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 52. LAKE TEXOMA (DENISON DAM), OK AND TX. Location. On the Red River at river mile 725.9, about 5 miles northwest of Denison, TX. (See Denison Dam, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 603 of the Annual Report for 1969. Lake Texoma is operated as a unit of a coordinated lake system for flood control in the Red River Basin. Construction started in August 1939, and was completed in February 1944. Commercial power generation was started in March 1945. Authorized work is complete except for installation of the third, fourth, and fifth power units. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. New supervisory control equipment, new generator switchgear, and automation and remote control equipment were purchased and installed. The embankment toe drain was repaired. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 53. ROBERT S. KERR LOCK AND DAM AND RESERVOIR, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at navigation mile 336.2, about 8 miles south of Sallisaw, in LeFlore County, OK. (See Robert S. Kerr, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-21 of the Annual Report for 1972. The Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir is a unit of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Construction began in April 1964, and closure was completed in October 1970. The lock and dam became operational for navigation in December 1970. Generating units 1, 2, 3, and 4 were placed in operation in October, July, September, and November 1971, respectively. Local cooperation. See section 1 of this report. Terminal facilities. Five sites have been developed for handling coal, grain, construction aggregates, and miscellaneous cargo. The facilities are considered adequate for present traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. The painting of the tainter gates at Lock and Dam 14 and 15 was completed. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 54. TENKILLER FERRY LAKE, OK. Location. On the Illinois River at river mile 12.8, 7 miles northeast of Gore, in Sequoyah County, OK. (See Gore, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) 38-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 606 of the Annual Report for 1969. Construction began in June 1947, and was completed in July 1953. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations and results during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. A project to build an auxiliary spillway and to modify the existing spillway was authorized February 22, 1994, by the Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army, under the Dam Safety Assurance Program. Plans and specifications to construct the spillway are ready to advertise. 55. WEBBERS FALLS LOCK AND DAM, OK. Location. On the Arkansas River at navigation mile 366.6, about 5 miles northwest of Webbers Falls, in Muskogee County, OK. (See Webbers Falls, OK, Geological Survey map, scale 1:24,000.) Existing project. For a description of the completed improvement, see page 19-23 of the Annual Report for 1977. The Webbers Falls Lock and Dam is a unit of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System. Construction began in January 1965, and the project was placed in useful operation in November 1970. The lock and dam became operational for navigation in December 1970. Generating units 1, 2, and 3 were placed in operation in August, September, and November 1973, respectively. Local cooperation. See section 1 of this report. Terminal facilities. Facilities at the Port of Muskogee include: a cargo pier, mooring dolphins, warehouse, terminal building, and fuel facility built by the Muskogee City-County Port Authority; a liquid cargo loading facility and a steel unloading facility built by Frontier Steel Company; grain holding facilities built by Conagra, Inc.; and a general-purpose private dock built by the Fort Howard Paper Company. The facilities are considered adequate for present traffic. Operations and results during fiscal year. A cracked bull gear was removed from one of the generators and a contract for fabrication of a new gear was awarded. A new supervisory control system was purchased for the powerhouse. New powerhouse intake trash racks were fabricated. Two new dredge disposal areas were constructed. Dredging was completed on the navigation channel at 3 forks. Routine operation and maintenance continued. General Investigations 56. SURVEYS. Fiscal year cost was $176,333, which included one flood damage prevention study; one special study; review of authorized projects, recon study; miscellaneous activities-special investigations, review of FERC licenses, and intragency water resources development; coordination with other Federal agencies, States, and non-Federal interests, and seven Planning Assistance to States Studies. Table 38-K provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 57. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA. Fiscal year cost was $345,402, which includes floodplain management services. Table 38-K provides a specific list and respective fiscal year expenditures. 38-14 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT Table 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep 80, 1997' 1. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, OK, (Tulsa District Portion) New Work Approp Cost - 130,936,6382 - 130,936,6382 3,413,250 4,525,000 4,351,000 3,919,000 161,950,962 3,206,865 4,573,329 4,430,125 4,080,296 162,097,370 3. Arcadia Lake, OK -28,000 14,512 500 82,965,900 - 82,952,439 Maint Approp Cost 4. Arkansas City, KS 5. Arkansas-Red River Basins Chloride Control, KS, OK, and TX New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 295,000 301,000 305,100 298,818 257,686 322,128 167,000 462,000 651,000 236,109 354,615 189,780 Maint Approp Cost 5a. Area V, Estelline Springs, TX New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 3,000 1,443 7,000 6,461 -1,000 1,041 5b. Area VIII, TX New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 892,000 978,000 1,218,700 1,556,100 914,559 964,210 1,181,429 1,518,053 5c. Red River Basin Chloride Control, TX & OK 6. Birch Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 10,000,000 11,468,000 -4,805,200 5,353,915 4,848,035 4,686,819 2,137,000 26,799,800 4,063,142 25,304,010 13,549,170 13,549,170 38-15 Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost -8,472 459,700 351,059 -95,000 274,651 3,562,582 3,426,055 2,930,000 2,728,008 25,705,208 25,705,208 2,316,354 2,316,354 300,028 300,028 153,857 153,781 900 900 46,682,242 46,682,242 9,754,048 9,639,801 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Table 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep 30, 1997' Birch Lake, OK (Cont'd) 7. Bowie County Levee, TX 8. Candy Lake, OK 9. Canton Lake, OK Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 657,200 648,000 545,700 666,319 619,845 565,467 - 600,000 500,000 6,500 104,558 537,251 24,000 27,726 25,000 19,770 13,400 19,118 553,200 12,061,866 541,678 12,031,727 100,000 487,934 15,100 8,116 1,775,000 1,703,669 4,927,922 4,927,922 209,770 202,775 11,209,834 11,209,834 Maint Approp Cost 10. Copan Lake, OK 1,419,100 1,731,000 1,976,600 1,737,000 30,459,368 1,362,442 1,756,383 1,914,609 1,682,862 30,305,309 New Work Approp Cost -44,000 -200 83,831,107 83,800,814 935,300 835,000 870,550 882,083 917,655 905,816 678,900 10,342,479 640,770 10,292,255 11. Council Grove Lake, KS New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 12. El Dorado Lake, KS New Work Approp Cost 11,810,509 11,810,509 1,058,200 1,040,000 1,017,600 1,134,800 17,501,310 1,053,649 1,002,187 1,034,025 1,112,760 17,437,949 3,210 2,064 5,781 - 92,413,349 29,369 92,413,317 Maint Approp Cost 13. Elk City Lake, KS 420,000 406,000 429,700 413,261 372,675 460,637 New Work Approp Cost 38-16 Maint Approp Cost 430,500 419,541 6,324,180 6,301,462 19,052,990 19,052,990 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT Table 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep 30, 1997' Elk City Lake, KS (Cont'd) 14. Fall River Lake, KS (Federal) (Contrib. Funds) 15. Fort Supply Lake, OK 16. Fry Creeks, Bixby, OK Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 749,000 631,000 584,500 777,848 627,936 612,379 900,000 981,000 765,300 821,770 1,038,375 758,359 612 12 4,896 622,800 597,575 14,578,250 14,542,608 10,550,873 10,550,873 845,500 16,022,442 850,016 15,991,213 612 6108 717,000 789,000 806,400 720,621 764,216 757,720 6120 6120 734,300 771,363 231,000 842,000 -441,000 2,837,000 156,345 136,987 166,296 2,385,420 7,723,134 7,723,134 16,802,098 16,757,370 5,606,568 4,969,247 (Contrib. Funds) 17. Great Bend, KS (Federal) (Contrib. Funds) 18. Great Salt Plains Lake, OK 19. Halstead, KS (Federal) (Contrib. Funds) New Work Approp Cost Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost Contrib. Cost - -400,000 -732,000 783,727 646,387 58,816 -373,000 19,968,400 -335,263 19,968,023 - 178,254 176,956 - 371,147 386,600 303,000 280,800 397,650 285,870 290,215 905,000 1,591,289 140,000 575,764 -46,684 35,348 94,944 298,000 302,592 200,000 113,882 4,259,254 4,259,254 4,626,270 4,626,270 7,769,347 7,757,685 8,483,000 8,301,809 940,000 924,537 38-17 Contrib. Cost 275,000 140,854 275,000 140,854 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Table 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep 30, 19971 20. Heyburn Lake and Polecat Creek, OK 741,000 709,000 682,400 653,511 748,671 711,519 730,300 12,511,486 643,679 12,401,665 21. Hugo Lake, OK -4,800 - 41,211,642 - 41,211,562 Maint Approp Cost 22. Hulah Lake, OK 1,567,283 1,362,000 1,552,800 1,444,600 27,944,062 1,484,063 1,339,108 1,633,828 1,452,729 27,882,114 New Work Approp Cost 11,388,150 11,388,150 Maint Approp Cost 361,000 210,000 287,200 280,721 268,215 299,951 351,700 10,747,612 350,942 10,727,703 Minor Rehabilitation Approp Cost 135,718 135,718 23. John Redmond Dam and Reservoir, KS New Work Approp Cost - 28,151,470 - 28,151,470 Maint Approp Cost 23. Kaw Lake, OK (Federal) (Contributed Funds) 25. Lake Kemp, TX 1,030,000 2,048,000 1,387,500 2,513,000 27,395,467 993,779 1,920,624 1,387,313 2,328,060 27,017,394 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Contrib. Cost 109,430,750 876 109,430,750 1,539,400 1,685,000 1,829,900 1,778,100 32,475,775 1,564,402 1,635,730 1,823,545 1,812,806 32,412,418 -5,394 - New Work Approp Cost - 43,934 - 43,934 - 7,637,702 - 7,637,702 38-18 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 2,560,572 2,560,572 New Work Approp Cost TULSA, OK, DISTRICT Table 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep 30, 19971 Lake Kemp, TX (Cont'd) 26. Lake Wichita, Holliday Creek, TX (Federal) (Contrib. Funds) 27. Marion Reservoir, KS Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 157,000 145,000 176,800 157,928 116,038 192,262 3,446,000 1,894,000 850,000 2,462,180 4,030,735 1,086,914 Contrib. 1,500,000 Cost 2,014,046 New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost - 575,000 476,659 575,000 140,100 161,347 3,094,101 3,089,264 - 33,844,000 227,260 33,767,429 7,835,000 7,835,000 - - - 13,420,818 - - - 13,420,818 1,008,800 1,033,000 2,720,400 2,372,000 21,029,555 996,250 1,009,661 2,641,500 2,438,030 20,972,661 Minor Rehabilitation Approp Cost 68,924 44,000 68,924 28. McGrath Creek, Wichita Falls, TX (Federal) (Contrib. Funds) 29. Mingo Creek, OK (Federal) (Contrib. Funds) 30. Oologah Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost 86,000 1,429,000 157,840 3,393,000 120,608 117,896 677,449 3,945,215 - 187,500 250,000 2,315,000 - - 250,000 2,376,586 5,067,840 4,803,180 2,752,500 2,626,586 11,500,000 7,764,000 1,135,000 4,785,000 61,044,000 7,250,412 5,915,342 10,275,863 4,534,340 60,620,236 - 1,750,000 3,515,000 1,785,000 13,763,400 382,267 684,498 3,389,184 3,184,924 13,136,379 37,029,9288 37,029,9289 Maint Approp Cost 31. Optima Lake, OK 1,617,150 1,564,000 1,560,400 1,543,000 27,519,360 1,604,516 1,554,425 1,496,720 1,596,187 27,474,711 New Work Approp Cost 47,173,438 47,173,438 38-19 1,111 49,600 24,924 REPORT. OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Table 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep 30, 1997' Optima Lake, OK (Cont'd) 32. Parker Lake, OK 33. Pat Mayse Lake, TX Maint Approp Cost 400,000 195,000 123,600 424,560 169,839 139,603 New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost -12,000 991 846,200 776,000 912,000 841,146 774,479 913,131 878,000 16,702,206 857,128 16,650,682 34. Pearson-Skubitz Big Hill Lake, KS New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost 35. Pine Creek Lake, OK 841,210 893,000 860,600 815,567 911,799 874,573 New Work Approp Cost 1,233,000 1,130,000 1,904,200 1,074,900 18,582,787 1,219,309 1,078,109 1,159,860 1,024,551 18,509,220 36. Sardis Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost -104,314 106,090 -104,314 106,090 -100 - 68,799,480 - 68,624,169 Maint Approp Cost 37. Skiatook Lake, OK 946,000 894,000 1,054,000 1,000,100 11,673,221 941,081 833,195 1,067,305 1,023,550 11,588,813 New Work Approp Cost -8,000 -300 106,269,982 106,268,738 Maint Approp Cost 38. Toronto Lake, KS 1,183,500 1,165,000 2,096,800 1,230,900 13,299,938 1,097,303 1,304,943 1,968,658 1,270,191 13,164,060 New Work Approp Cost 13,896,324 13,896,324 38-20 91,000 97,887 75,000 15,326 Maint Approp Cost 7,384,649 7,379,658 585,326 525,326 9,310,661 9,310,661 929,800 911,511 16,879,166 16,879,166 12,723,228 12,697,032 20,628,049 20,628,049 Maint Approp Cost TULSA, OK, DISTRICT Table 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep 30, 1997' Toronto Lake, KS (Cont'd) 39. Tulsa & West Tulsa, OK (Federal) (Contrib. Funds) Maint Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 295,000 327,000 318,200 292,371 314,665 315,903 450,000 90,558 10,416 111,072 10,416 111,072 Contrib. Cost Minor Rehabilitation Approp Cost 40. Waurika Lake, OK 347,700 344,096 17,749 679 39,000 36,764 -8,700 - New Work Approp Cost 7,673,116 7,650,127 1,425,000 946,599 325,000 100,679 1,118,111 1,110,444 69,729,530 69,729,281 Maint Approp 1,210,000 1,353,000 1,848,700 1,364,500 19,388,862 Cost 1,207,690 1,334,822 1,840,342 1,327,246 19,316,533 41. Winfield, KS 42. Wister Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 124,000 319,000 658,000 98,752 409,416 355,547 -86,000 248,869 -6,745 1,901,617 1,835,412 10,690,751 10,687,439 Maint Approp Cost Major Rehabilitation Approp Cost 48. Broken Bow Lake, OK 916,000 709,000 773,400 798,671 670,741 890,328 2,488 1,011,400 14,092,524 919,324 13,948,270 11,131,529 11,131,529 41,222,692 41,222,692 New Work Approp Cost 1,728,000 1,769,000 1,257,100 1,318,000 30,007,297 1,726,921 1,462,774 1,562,791 1,251,537 29,905,383 38-21 Maint Approp Cost REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Table 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep 80, 1997' 49. Eufaula Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost 660,763 - -224,840 32,946 -29,117 - 123,795,9074 - 123,795,907' (Contributed Funds) 50. Fort Gibson Lake, OK (Contributed Funds) 51. Keystone Lake, OK Maint Approp Cost Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost Maint Approp Cost Contrib. Cost New Work Approp Cost 4,487,430 3,941,000 4,276,700 3,884,800 73,798,583 4,063,353 4,424,156 4,139,697 4,006,071 73,646,794 -76,449 212,318 41,223 254,780 254,180 43,821,4056 43,821,4056 3,392,100 3,325,000 4,084,300 3,436,000 62,399,612 3,339,648 3,352,223 4,007,568 3,486,300 62,282,637 1,200 4,306 501,000 487,164 - 123,171,1736 - 123,171,1736 Maint Approp Cost 52. Lake Texoma (Denison Dam), OK and TX 3,306,542 3,452,000 3,590,500 3,588,800 58,014,405 3,250,637 3,545,721 3,564,897 3,660,176 57,932,829 New Work Approp Cost 68,168,9607 68,168,960' Maint Approp Cost 53. Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam and Reservoir, OK Minor Rehabilitati Approp Cost New Work Approp Cost 5,744,100 5,283,000 6,184,500 5,680,000 108,486,668 5,758,102 5,221,818 5,595,256 6,241,324 108,153,973 on - - - 46,237 - - 46,237 94,578,237 94,578,237 2,935,950 3,184,000 3,896,000 4,176,000 64,065,845 2,839,011 3,169,736 3,518,357 4,561,323 63,924,605 38-22 Maint Approp Cost TULSA, OK, DISTRICT Table 38-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT (Continued) See Section Total to in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep 80, 1997' 54. Tenkiller Ferry Lake, OK New Work Approp Cost 870,000 45,775 - 486,000 556,414 508,091 411,000 25,784,720 a 595,704 25,723,7048 Maint Approp Cost 55. Webbers Falls Lock & Dam, OK 3,098,550 3,350,000 3,284,800 3,078,700 56,154,720 3,060,313 3,302,805 3,268,051 3,076,723 56,009,740 New Work Approp Cost 86,107,967 86,107,967 Maint Approp Cost 2,672,250 2,677,000 3,180,000 3,484,900 58,575,424 2,572,133 2,734,587 2,831,359 3,192,062 57,830,551 1. Includes $2,077,900 expended by the Jobs Act (P.L. 98-8 dated, March 24, 1983) for projects listed in Tables 29-M of the FY 85 Annual Report. 2. Includes $12,700,038 for Bank Stabilization and Channel Rectification. 3. Excludes $81,460 contributed funds and $1,348,816 special funds. 4. Excludes $299,803 contributed funds and $13,211,728 special funds. 5. Excludes $134,919 contributed funds. Includes $49,581 Public Works acceleration funds; and $1,058,500 Hydropower. 6. Excludes $5,366,231 special funds. 7. Includes $433,549 Emergency Relief funds. Exchange $1,256,068 from special contributed funds. 8. Excludes $946 contributed funds. Includes $39,999 Public Works acceleration funds. 9. The cost for Grand Lake O' the Cherokees has been added to the amount reported in paragraph 45, Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations. 38-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 38-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Project Section Authorizing and Work In Text Act Authorized Documents July 24, 1946 October 22, 1976 November 17, 1986 December 31, 1970 October 22, 1976 November 17, 1986 October 23, 1962 November 7, 1966 December 31, 1970 November 17, 1986 October 23, 1962 August 26, 1994 October 23, 1962 June 28, 1938 July 24, 1946 June 30, 1948 October 23, 1962 May 17, 1950 October 27, 1965 August 18, 1941 August 18, 1941 June 22, 1936 November 17, 1986 November 17, 1986 McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM Big and Little Sallisaw Creeks Navigation Project W.D. Mayo Hydropwer ARCADIA LAKE Changed water quality to water supply ARKANSAS CITY ARKANSAS-RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE CONTROL Authorized Area V (Estelline Springs) Authorized Areas VII, VIII, and X Authorized Areas I, II-III, VI, IX, XIII, XIV, and XV Authorized the Red River Basin and the Arkansas River Basin as separate projects with separate authority. BIRCH LAKE BOWIE COUNTY LEVEE CANDY LAKE CANTON LAKE Approved Irrigation Storage Approved Water Supply Storage COPAN LAKE COUNCIL GROVE LAKE EL DORADO LAKE ELK CITY LAKE FALL RIVER LAKE FORT SUPPLY LAKE FRY CREEKS GREAT BEND 38-24 HD 79-758 PL 79-525 PL 94-587 PL 99-662 HD 91-299 PL 94-587 PL 99-662 SD 87-107 PL 89-789 SD 110 PL 91-611 PL 99-662 HD 87-563 PL 103-316 HD 87-564 HD 75-569 3. 4. 5. 5a. 5b.&5c. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. HD HD HD HD HD HD PL PL 87-563 80-442 89-232 76-440 76-440 74-308 99-662 99-662 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT TABLE 38-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) See Date of Project Section Authorizing and Work In Text Act Authorized Documents 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE HALSTEAD HEYBURN LAKE AND POLECAT CREEK HUGO LAKE HD 74-308 PL 99-662 HD 80-290 HD 79-602 June 22, 1936 November 17, 1986 July 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 June 22, 1936 May 17, 1950 February 15, 1958 October 23, 1962 October 23, 1962 November 17, 1986 May 17, 1950 March 14, 1990 November 17, 1988 November 17, 1986 June 28, 1938 June 22, 1936 November 17, 1986 October 23, 1962 October 23, 1962 November 10, 1978 July 3, 1958 October 23, 1962 December 4, 1981 October 23, 1962 August 18, 1941 August 18, 1941 38-25 HULAH LAKE HD 74-308 JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR HD 80-442 Authorized name change PL 85-327 KAW LAKE HD 87-143 LAKE KEMP HD 87-144 LAKE WICHITA, HOLLIDAY CREEK PL 99-662 MARION RESERVOIR HD 80-442 Authorized name change PL 101-253 MCGARTH CREEK WICHITA FALLS, TX PL 100-676 MINGO CREEK PL 99-662 OOLOGAH LAKE Committee Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Session OPTIMA LAKE HD 74-308 PARKER LAKE PL 99-662 PAT MAYSE LAKE HD 88-71 PEARSON-SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE HD 87-472 Authorized name change PL 95-265 PINE CREEK LAKE HD 85-170 SARDIS LAKE SD 87-145 Authorized name change PL 97-88 SKIATOOK LAKE HD 87-563 TORONTO LAKE HD 76-440 PL 77-228 TULSA & WEST TULSA, OK PL 77-228 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 38-B (Continued) AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date of Project Section Authorizing and Work In Text Act Authorized Documents December 30, 1963 October 27, 1965 June 28, 1938 July 30, 1983 July 3, 1958 October 23, 1962 July 24, 1946 July 16,1984 November 17, 1986 August 18, 1941 July 24, 1946 November 17, 1986 May 17, 1950 June 28, 1938 October 17, 1940 Sepember 30, 1944 August 14, 1953 November 17, 1986 July 24, 1946 July 8, 1963 June 28, 1938 June 24, 1946 July 24, 1946 WAURIKA LAKE WINFIELD WISTER LAKE Changed conservation pool elevation BROKEN BOW LAKE EUFAULA LAKE Authorized Piney Creek and Muddy Creek bridge replacement Authorized cost sharing FORT GIBSON LAKE Incorporated into the multiple-purpose plan for the Arkansas River Basin Added hydropower units 5 & 6 KEYSTONE LAKE LAKE TEXOMA (Denison Dam) Flood control and power Navigation and regulating flows Authorized name Water supply Recreation ROBERT S. KERR LOCK AND DAM AND RESERVOIR Authorized name change TENKILLER FERRY LAKE Power WEBBERS FALLS LOCK AND DAM SD 88-33 PL 88-253 PL 89-298 Committee Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Session PL 98-63 HD 85-170 SD 87-137 HD 79-758 PL 98-360 PL99-662 HD 76-107 PL 76-228 PL 99-662 SD 81-07 HD 75-541 PL 76-868 PL 78-454 PL 83-273 PL 99-662 HD 79-758 PL 88-62 Committee Doc. No. 1, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. HD 79-758 HD 79-758 38-26 40. 41. 42. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. 55. TULSA, OK, DISTRICT TABLE 38-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30. 1997 See Annual Operation and Project Status Report for Construction Maintnenace Big and Little Sallisaw Inactive Navigation Project Poteau River Navigation Project, Complete 1983 536,952 OK and AR Red River from Fulton, AR, Complete 1924 378,574 182,157 to Mouth of Washita River TABLE 38-E OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Report Cost to September 30S 1997 See Annual Operation and Project Report For Construction Maintenance Augusta LPP, KS1' 2 1938 84,217 Big Pine Lake, TX3 1984 1,701,670 Boswell Lake, OK3 1952 Cherry and Red Fork Creeks LPP, OK2 1970 261,448 Crutcho Creek LPP, OK3 1972 213,016 Dodge City LPP, KS2 Enid LPP, OK2 1963 743,612 14,599 Flat Rock and Valley View Creeks LPP, 1975 1,741,000 Tulsa, OK2, 4 Florence LPP, KS2 1965 369,782 Hutchinson LPP, KS2 1956 3,497,718 Iola LPP, KS2 1939 22,290 Jenks LPP, OK2 1950 344,797 Joe Creek LPP, OK2 - 308,041 Lamed LPP, KS2 Lukfata Lake, OK3 1983 1,424,685 Marion, KS 1988 5,488,618 Oklahoma City LPP, OK2 1960 8,047,512 Red River Bank Stabilization Below Denison, 1953 222,105 OK and TX2 Red River Emergency Bank Protection - 274,919 Sand Creek LPP, KS2 1968 545,996 Sand Lake, OK3 1963 - Shidler Lake, OK S 1983 568,191 Tulsa and West Tulsa LPP, OK2 1954 3,592,432 Turtle Creek LPP, Yukon, OK3 1975 144,853 Tuskahoma Lake, OK3 1963 - West Branch Chisholm Creek LPP, KS2 1965 364,200 Wichita and Valley Center LPP, KS2 1960 12,247,379 LPP - Local Protection Project. 1. Completed by Kansas Works Progress Administration. 2. Complete. 3. Deferred. 4. Federal cost limited to $1,000,000. 5. Active with no current year expenditures. 38-27 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 38-G DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report Day Federal Contributed See Annual and Funds Funds Project Report for Authority Expended Expended Candy Lake, OK 1996 July 9, 1995 4,950,000 0 Cedar Point Lake, KS 1980 November 17,1986 0 0 Public Law 99-662 Cow Creek, Hutchinson, KS 1971 November 17, 1986 363,720 0 Public Law 99-662 El Dorado, West Branch, 1977 November 17, 1986 92,319 0 Walnut River, KS Public Law 99-662 Neodesha Lake, KS 1952 November 17, 1986 97,910 0 Public Law 99-662 Towanda Lake, KS 1981 November 17, 1986 393,361 0 Public Law 99-662 TABLE 38-H ARKANSAS RIVER BASIN MULTIPLE-PUPOSE PLAN (See Section 1 of Text) Feature River River Mile' Nearest Town LAKES Canton North Canadian 394.3 Canton, OK Elk City Elk River 8.7 Elk City, KS Eufaula Canadian 27.0 Eufaula, OK Fall River Fall River 54.2 Fall River, KS Fort Gibson Grand (Neosho) 7.7 Fort Gibson, OK Grand Lake O' the Cherokees Grand (Neosho) 77.0 Disney, OK Keystone Arkansas 538.8 Sand Springs, OK Lake Hudson (Markham Ferry) Grand (Neosho) 47.4 Locust Grove, OK Neodesha Verdigris 222.8 Neodesha, KS Oologah Verdigris 90.2 Oologah, OK Tenkiller Ferry Illinois 12.8 Gore, OK Toronto Verdigris 271.5 Toronto, KS Wister Poteau 60.9 Wister, OK McCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, OK (Tulsa District Portion) Bank Stabilization and Verdigris and N/A2 Fort Smith, AR, Channel Rectification Arkansas to Catoosa, OK Chouteau Lock and Dam (17), OK Verdigris 401.5 Okay, OK Newt Graham Lock and Dam (18), OK Verdigris 421.6 Inola, OK Robert S. Kerr Lock and Dam (15), OK Arkansas 339.0 Sallisaw, OK Robert S. Kerr Marine Terminal, OK Arkansas 336.2 Cowlington, OK Sans Bois Navigation Channel, OK Sans Bois Creek 341.0 Keota, OK W.D. Mayo Lock and Dam (14), OK Arkansas 319.6 Redland, OK Webbers Falls Lock and Dam (16), OK Arkansas 366.6 Gore, OK 1. On the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River Navigation System, these are navigation miles. 2. As required for a channel 9 feet deep. 38-28 TULSA, OK, DISTRICT TABLE 38-I INSPECTION OF COMPLETED LOCAL FLOOD PROTECTION PROJECTS (See Section 44 of Text) Projects Inspected in Fiscal Year Inspection Date Cherry/Red Fork Creeks, OK November 1997 Dodge City, KS October 1997 Enid Diviersion Channel, OK October 1997 Flat Rock/Valley View Creeks, OK November 1997 Florence, KS October 1997 Great Bend, KS October 1997 Haikey Creek, OK October, 1997 Halstead, KS October 1997 Hutchinson, KS October 1997 Iola, KS April 1997 Jenks, OK Joe Creek, OK October 1997 Larned, KS November 1997 Marion, KS November 1997 Mingo Creek, Audubon Creek, OK November 1997 North Canadian Waster Water Treatment Plant, OK April 1997 Oklahoma City Floodway, OK April 1997 Park City, KS April 1997 Sand Creek, City of Newton, KS November 1997 South Deer Creek, OK October 1997 Tulsa and West Tulsa Levees, OK November 1997 West Branch Chisholm Creek, KS April 1997 Wichita/Valley Center, KS April 1997 TABLE 38-J FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Section 47 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Identification/Name Cost SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS NOT SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED BY CONGRESS - Section 205 Coordination 9,988 Coody Creek, Muskogee, OK 61 East Boomer Creek, Stillwater, OK 908 Liberal KS 772 Sycamore Creek, Coffeyvill, KS 75,269 Wichita Falls, TX, Plum Creek 21,669 Wolf Creek, Lawton, OK 8,597 TOTAL SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 117,264 EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION (Section 14) Section 14 Coordination 14,996 Arkansas River,Sand Springs, OK 8 City Dam, Fall River, KS 369 City Dam, Little Caney River, KS 900 County Bridge, Arkansas River, Ralston, OK 78,192 County Bridge, Washita River, Garvin County, OK 6,340 Kiowa Tribe Housing Developement, Andarko, OK 70 Levee, Arkansas River, Tulsa, OK 3,761 North Canadian River, Okfuskee County, OK 3,640 Sewage Lagoons, Washita River, OK 3,211 Washita River, Caddo County Bridge, OK 12,507 Walnut River, Cowley County, KS 511 TOTAL EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE PROTECTION 124,505 38-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 38-K GENERAL INVESTIGATIONS (See Sections 56 and 57 of Text) Fiscal Year Study Identification/Name Cost SURVEYS Flood Damage Prevention Studies Bird Creek Basin, OK 2,393 Special Studies Watershed/Ecosystem Reconnaissance Study Grand (Neosho) River, KS 67,762 Review of Authorized Projects Recon Phase Study/Wister Lake, OK 3,312 Miscellaneous Activities Special Investigations 30,108 Review of FERC Licenses 2,012 Intragency Water Resources Development 10,076 Coordination with Other Federal Agencies, States, and Non-Federal Interests Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (PL 83-566) Coop with Other Water Resource Development Agencies 11,024 Planning Assistance to States Indian Workshop 28 Cheroke Nation Dock 12,634 Oklahoma, McClellan Kerr Arkansas River 6,500 Oklahoma, Poteau River Phase 17,452 Oklahoma, Sardis Lake Water Development 250 Oklahoma, Tenkiller Water Treatment 12,663 Oklahoma, Lake Wister Revegetation 879 Poteau Valley Improvement -758 TOTAL SURVEYS 176,333 COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Flood Plain Management Services Eastgate, Ottawa County, OK 4,960 Flood Plain Management Services 112,754 Guides, Phamplets and Supporting Studies 6,704 Indian Workshops 28 NFPC 5,550 Quick Responses 12,367 SS-Bixby, OK FPP 5,553 SS-Cache Creek, OK 369 SS-Del City, OK 13,880 SS-Haysville, KS 9,938 SS-Midwest City, OK 7,660 SS-Skiatook, OK/Farmington, AR 13,965 SS-Webbers Falls, OK 14,559 SS-Wichita, KS 5,828 Technical Services General 131.337 .TOTAL COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA 345,402 38-30 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT * District includes that portion of Texas south of Red River drainage basin exclusive of drainage basin of Rio Grande and its tributaries above and including Pecos River; exclusive of drainage basins to all short streams arising in coastal plain of Texas and flowing into the Gulf of Mexico, including entire basins of Buffalo Bayou, San Jacinto, San Bernard, Lavaca, Navidad, Mission, and Arkansas Rivers; exclusive of lower basins of major streams flowing into the gulf as follows: Sabine River, Texas and Louisiana, downstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas; Neches River downstream from Town Bluff gaging station; Trinity River downstream from Texas State Highway 45 crossing at Riverside, Texas; Brazos River downstream from confluence with Navasota River; Colorado River downstream from gaging station at Austin; Guadalupe River downstream from confluence with San Marcos River, San Antonio River downstream from confluence with Escondido Creek; Nueces River downstream from confluence with Frio and Atascosa Rivers; and exclusive of Agua Dulce, San Fernando, and Olmos Creek basins draining into Baffin Bay; coastal area south thereof to Rio Grande and south to the northern boundaries of Newton, Jasper, Tyler, Polk, Trinity, Walker, Waller, Austin, Fayette, Gonzales, Karnes, Live Oak, Jim Hogg, Zapata; the northern and western boundaries of McMullan; and the western boundaries of Montgomery and Duval Counties, Texas. District also includes those portions of the Sulphur River and Cypress Creek Watershed located in the State of Texas; that portion of western Louisiana in Sabine River drainage basin upstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas. 39-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 IMPROVEMENTS Navigation Page 1. Trinity River Project, TX ............. 39-2 Flood Control 2. Aquilla Lake, TX ................... 39-3 3. Bardwell Lake, TX .................. 39-3 4. Beals Creek, Big Spring, TX .......... 39-4 5. Belton Lake, TX .................... 39-4 6. Benbrook Lake, TX. ................. 39-4 7. Canyon Lake, TX................... 39-4 8. Ferrells Bridge Dam- Lake O' The Pines, TX .............. 39-5 9. Grapevine Lake, TX ................. 39-5 10. Hords Creek Lake, TX .............. 39-6 11. Jim Chapman Lake, TX.............. 39-6 12. Joe Pool Lake, TX ................... 39-7 13. LavonLake,TX..................... 39-7 14. Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement, TX ........... 39-8 15. Lewisville Dam, TX ................ 39-8 16. Navarro Mills Lake, TX .............. 39-9 17. O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake, TX ........ 39-9 18. Proctor Lake, TX .................. 39-9 19. Ray Roberts Lake, TX............... 39-9 20. San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX .......... 39-10 21. San Gabriel River, TX............... 39-10 22. Somerville Lake, TX................ 39-11 23. Stillhouse Hollow Dam, TX .......... 39-11 24. Waco Lake,TX ................... 39-12 25. Waco Lake, TX (Dam Safety)......... 39-12 26. Wright Patman Dam and Lake, TX ... 39-12 27. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects ............. 39-13 Navigation 1. TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TX The project authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (H. Doc 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.) consists of five major components: Multiple-Purpose Channel, Tennessee Colony Lake, Dallas Floodway Extension, West Fork Floodway, and Water Conveyance Facilities. For the last full report on the project as authorized, see Annual Report of 1978. The project information present herein is based on the tentatively selected project plan presented in the Draft General Design Memorandum. The plan consists of three structural components: Dallas Floodway Extension, Tennessee Colony Lake, and Channel to Liberty in the lower basin. The estimated cost of the improvements is $1,060,000,000 including $44,000,000 non-Federal cost for land acquisition Flood Control (Cont) Page 28. Scheduling Flood Control Reservoir Operations........................ 39-13 29. Other Authorized Flood Control Projects .............. 39-13 30. Work Under Special Authorization ... 39-13 Multiple-Purpose Projects Including Power 31. Robert Douglas Willis Hydropower, TX .................. 39-13 32. Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX................... 39-13 33. Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX (Dam Safety) .................. 39-14 34. Town Bluff Dam- B.A. Steinhagen Lake, TX ........... 39-14 35. Whitney Lake,TX ................. 39-14 General Investigations 36. Surveys ......................... 39-14 37. Preconstruction Engineering and Design ...................... 39-15 38. Collection and Study of Basic Data ... 39-15 Tables Table 39-A Cost and Financial Statement ................. 39-17 Table 39-B Authorizing Legislation ..... 39-21 Table 39-C Other Authorized Flood Control Projects....... 39-25 Table 39-D Inspection of Completed Flood Control Projects....... 39-26 Table 39-E Work Under Special Authorization ............. 39-27 and relocation required for the local protection features (Oct. 1, 1987, base price). Operations during fiscal year. Channel to Liberty and Tennessee Colony Lake have been dormant for several years due to lack of local support. The Dallas Floodway Extension has advanced to the Preconstruction Engineering and Design stage and is described in Preconstruction Engineering and Design section. CHANNEL TO LIBERTY: Location. The Channel to Liberty begins at the Houston Ship Channel, crosses the bay area in an easterly direction to intersect the existing Double Bayou Channel turns northward along the coastline to Wallisville Lake and then continues northward through the lake area along the course of the Trinity River to River Mile 45 above Liberty, Texas. 39-2 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT Existing project. See Galveston,Texas District Annual Report writeup for existing project. Proposed project. The navigation portion of the channel will have a width of 200 feet with a depth of 12 feet and will extend from the Houston Ship Channel in Galveston Bay to the port of Liberty, Texas. The flood control portion of the channel will have a bottom width of 200 feet with a depth of 30 feet, and will extend from Wallisville Lake to River Mile 45 above Liberty, Texas. Estimated Federal cost of the improvements is $147,000,000 and estimated non-Federal cost is $44,000,000 for a total estimated cost of $191,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1987, base price). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to: (a) provide, without cost to the Federal Government, all lands, easements and rights-of-way required for construction, operation and maintenance of the project, (b) accomplish, without cost to the Federal Government, all relocations and alterations to existing improvements, other than highway bridges over new land cuts and railroad bridges required for the construction of the project, (c) maintain and operate the flood control portion of the channel upstream of Liberty, Texas, and (d) reimburse the Federal Government for one-half of the separable costs allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $34,000, exclusive of interest. TENNESSEE COLONY LAKE: Location. The Tennessee Colony dam site is located at River Mile 341.7 on the Trinity River about 22 miles west of Palestine, Texas. The lake would extend into Freestone, Anderson, Henderson, and Navarro Counties, and would control a drainage area of 12,302 square miles. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for the construction of an earthfilled dam with a maximum height of 123 feet above the streambed and a total embankment length of 42,350 feet with a gated concrete spillway. The lake will have a total controlled storage of 3,455,000 acre-feet and a water surface area of 114,400 acres at the top of the flood control pool and 68,100 acres at the top of the conservation pool. The total storage includes 2,269,500 acre-feet for flood control, 1,040,000 acre-feet for conservation, and 145,500 acrefeet for sediment reserve. Estimated Federal cost of the improvement is $913,000,000 (Oct. 1, 1983, base price). Local cooperation. Local interests are required to reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply storage and one-half of the separable cost allocated to recreation and fish and wildlife enhancement. This reimbursement is presently estimated at $461,754,000 for water supply and $9,533,000 for recreation (excluding future recreation facilities), for a total cost of $471,287,000, exclusive of interest. Flood Control 2. AQUILLA LAKE, TX Location. On Aquilla Creek in Hill County, Texas, with the dam at River Mile 23.3, about 6.8 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas, and about 24.0 miles north of Waco, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing Acts see Annual Report for 1984. Construction was started March 1977, and project was ready for beneficial use April 29, 1983. Estimated cost is $46,100,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. A contract with the Brazos River Authority for water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army, June 29,1976. To date, the Authority has paid $873,712 toward principal and $98,633 to operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continue. Benefits accrued to Aquilla Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1997 were $17,812,800. 3. BARDWELL LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Waxahachie Creek, 5 river miles upstream from its confluence with Chambers Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, and about 5 miles south of Ennis, Ellis County, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction of project was started August 1963 and completed for beneficial use in November 1965. Estimated cost of project is $12,941,000. Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to increased water supply storage under the terms of the Water Supply Act of 1958. A contract was approved by the Secretary of the Army on June 24, 1963, and the Trinity River Authority, a State agency, agreed to fulfill all requirements of local cooperation. To date the authority has paid $1,382,393 toward principal and $1,781,517 toward annual cost of operation and maintenance of project, including cost of operating 10-foot conduit. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 39-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Benefits accrued to Bardwell Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1997 were $11,866,500. 4. BEALS CREEK, BIG SPRING, TX Location. Beals Creek, Big Spring, Texas is located in the city of Big Spring, Howard County, Texas on Beals Creek, a tributary of the Colorado River. Existing project. The Beals Creek Flood Control Project consists of construction of a channel to the north of and within a portion of the existing Beals Creek channel. The channel extends approximately 7,200 feet from a point south of Channing Street at Onemile Lake and ends at the Benton Street Bridge. The channel is a trapezoidal grass-lined channel with an average depth of 11 feet, a bottom width of 20 feet, and side slopes of 1 vertical to 3 horizontal. A grade control structure will be constructed at the upper limit of the project at Onemile Lake to allow the proper drainage gradient while preserving the existing wetland environment in the Onemile Lake area. Estimated Federal cost (Oct. 1, 1997, base price) is $8,420,300; non-Federal cost for real estate, relocation of utilities and disposal is $3,424,500. Project is scheduled for completion in September 1998. Local cooperation. The Project Cooperation Agreement with the city of Big Spring was signed by the Assistant Secretary of the Army (CW) on March 10, 1994. Operations during fiscal year. The city has purchased the lands, easements and rights-ofway. A relocation contract was signed with the Union Pacific Railroad in May 1994 for the relocation of a spur bridge. The channel contract was awarded May 1996 and is currently 75 percent complete. 5. BELTON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Leon River about 16.7 miles above confluence of Leon and Lampasas Rivers and about 3 miles north of Belton, Texas. Existing project. For a description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report of 1962. Construction started June 1949 and project was ready for beneficial use in March 1954. Raising water supply pool: Construction started in July 1970 and the pool raise is complete. Estimated cost of project is $18,410,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for remaining water supply storage in reservoir was approved by Secretary of the Army on January 15, 1958, at an estimated cost of $5,125,003. To date $1,749,329 has been paid. Under the contract Brazos River Authority must also pay annually 11.2 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date $2,730,273 has been paid. An interim contract with Brazos River Authority for emergency use of water supply storage in project was approved by Secretary of the Army on January 2,1957. Amount of $433,083 paid by authority on March 21, 1957 for use of these facilities was credited to interest and principal payable under formal water supply contract. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Belton Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1997 were $135,585,900. 6. BENBROOK LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Tarrant County, Texas, on Clear Fork of Trinity River 15 river miles upstream from its confluence with West Fork of Trinity River about 10 miles southwest of downtown Fort Worth, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for beneficial use in September 1952. Estimated cost of project is $14,544,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. No water supply storage is included in project. In 1956, Congress passed legislation enabling the city of Fort Worth to purchase conservation storage space in Benbrook Lake. Contracts have been negotiated with the city of Fort Worth and the Benbrook Water and Sewer Authority for the use of portions of the navigation storage for water supply purposes until such storage is required for Trinity River Navigation. To date $524,567 has been paid by the city of Fort Worth and $160,926 by Benbrook Water and Sewer Authority. A cost sharing contract with the city of Benbrook for Recreation Development was approved by the Secretary of the Army May 20, 1977. To date, $20,484 has been paid. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to system consisting of Benbrook Lake, Clear Fork and West Fork Floodways: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1997 are estimated at $2,944,585,600. 7. CANYON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Guadalupe River, 303 miles above its mouth, and about 12 miles northwest of New Braunfels, Comal County, Texas. 39-4 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT Existing project, For a description of completed improvement and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction started April 1958 and project completed for beneficial use June 1964. Estimated cost of project is $21,732,000, including $1,400,000 contributed by local interests. Hydropower: The Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority (GBRA) was licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to construct a 6,070 kilowatt plant which is located adjacent to the existing outlet channel. The project operates utilizing conservation releases, i.e., no change from the present operating regiment is anticipated. GBRA has an agreement with the Pedernales Electric Cooperative for sale of power. Construction of the hydropower was completed in 1989 with non-Federal funds. Local cooperation. Local interests (Guadalupe- Blanco River Authority) will utilize water impounded for water supply and streamflow regulation for development of electric power. In a formal contract approved by Chief of Engineers on October 24, 1957, Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority agreed to fulfill all requirements of local cooperation. Required contribution of $1,400,000 was made in full by Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority. The estimated cost of the water storage contract is about $9,000,000. To date, $2,994,722 has been paid. In addition, $22,848 was contributed for installation and operation of reservoir leakage gages. Under the contract the authority must pay 34.8 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date, $1,947,897 has been paid. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Canyon Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1997 were $148,029,100. 8. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAMLAKE O' THE PINES, TX Location. Dam is on Cypress Creek in Marion, Harrison, Upshur, Morris, Camp, and Titus Counties, Texas, 8 miles west of Jefferson, Texas. Existing project. An earthfll dam 10,600 feet long and 77 feet high includes a 200-foot spillway with a capacity of 68,200 cubic feet per second. Reservoir controls runoff from 850 square miles of drainage area, and has a gross storage capacity of 842,100 acre-feet including 587,200 acre-feet flood control storage, 3,800 acre-feet conservation storage, and 251,000 acre-feet for municipal and industrial water supply. Reservoir extends 28 miles upstream. Project affords substantial flood protection of Cypress Creek Valley from damsite to confluence with Red River and, together with operation of other reservoirs proposed in Red River Basin, will provide flood protection along main stem of Red River below Denison Dam. Construction commenced in January 1955 and was completed June 1960. Estimated Federal cost of project is $17,231,700 (Oct. 1, 1983, base price), including $4,349,200 for Code 711 and $399,739 accelerated Public Works fund. This project transferred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of FY 1979. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Ferrells Bridge Dam-Lake O' The Pines project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1997 were $12,367,800. 9. GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Tarrant County, Texas, on Denton Creek, 11.7 river miles upstream from its confluence with Elm Fork of Trinity River and about 20 miles northwest of city of Dallas, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing act, see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started December 1947 and ready for beneficial use in July 1952. Estimated cost of project is $18,896,000, including $2,040,000 contributed by local interests. A contract for modification of Embankment and Spillway was awarded September 30, 1983 and completed Fiscal Year 1990. The improvements provided for spillway modification by construction of spillway chute and stilling basin and a berm on the downstream side of the main embankment. Local cooperation. A contract with Dallas County Park Cities Water Control and Improvement District No. 2 for 50,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on March 21, 1955. Park Cities paid the required $607,000. A contract with city of Dallas for 85,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on March 17, 1954. Dallas paid the required $1,433,026. A contract with city of Grapevine, Texas, for 1,250 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by Secretary of the Army on September 14, 1953, at an estimated cost of $22,654. A contract for Interim Use of Navigation Storage with city of Grapevine was approved by Secretary of the Army on February 27, 1981, at an estimated cost of $684,000. To date, $733,404 has been paid. Above contracts include payment of operation and maintenance costs as follows: Dallas County Park Cities Water Control and Improvement District No. 2, a pro rata part of the actual annual cost, which part is to be not less than $2,000 nor more than $3,000; Dallas, 9.2 percent of actual annual cost; and Grapevine, its pro rata part of actual annual cost 39-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 (estimated at $79.55 annually and included in total annual payment). Following operation and maintenance payments have been made: Park Cities, $133,231; Dallas, $737,137; and Grapevine, $294,924. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continue. Benefits accrued to system comprised of Grapevine Lake and Dallas Floodway: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1997 were $4,271,269,600. 10. HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX Location. On Hords Creek, a tributary of Pecan Bayou, about 13.5 miles west of Coleman, Texas, and about 27.8 miles upstream from mouth of Hords Creek. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started January 1947 and completed for beneficial use in April 1948. Estimated cost of project is $4,337,000 including $105,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Hords Creek project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1997 were $937,000. 11. JIM CHAPMAN LAKE, TX Location. Jim Chapman Lake is located in northeast Texas about 4 miles southeast of Cooper, 13.0 miles north of Sulphur Springs, and is at river mile 23.3 on the South Sulphur River. The South Sulphur River rises in Fannin County, Texas, and flows generally east for about 80 miles to its confluence with the North Sulphur River to form the Sulphur River. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of a multipurpose reservoir with levee and channel improvements on the Sulphur River. The reservoir consists of a rolled earthfill dam with a maximum height of about 79 feet, 28,070 feet long at its crest, a single conduit 10.5 feet in diameter, 530 feet long, two 10.5 foot by 4.75 foot sluices, and a 700 foot wide uncontrolled concrete spillway. The reservoir surface area will be 22,740 acres at the top of the flood control pool, 19,305 acres at the top of the water supply pool, and 5,084 acres at the top of the sediment pool. The reservoir will contain 131,400 acre-feet of flood control storage, 273,000 acre-feet of municipal and industrial water supply storage, and 37,000 acre-feet of sediment storage. Construction of the project began in July 1958 and, to date, approximately 100 percent of the lands required for project construction have been acquired and 100 percent of the levees and 100 percent of the channel work have been completed. Approximately 14.8 miles of the South Sulphur River and 6.3 miles of the Middle Sulphur River channels have been excavated. Approximately 3.4 miles of levee embankment on the South Sulphur River and 7.3 miles on the Middle Sulphur River have been constructed upstream of the Jim Chapman Lake. About 10.5 miles of levee on the North Sulphur River, 8.2 miles of levee on the Sulphur River, 14 miles of levee on Cuthand Creek, and 4.2 miles of levee on Brushy Creek were strengthened; 0.5 mile of levee on Kickapoo Creek was enlarged; and 15.3 miles of new channel in Cuthand Creek, 0.8 mile of new channel in Brushy Creek, and 0.2 mile of cutoff channel in Kickapoo Creek were excavated; all downstream from Jim Chapman Lake. Lack of funds and spending limitations prevented construction of the levees and channel work between April 1964 and February 1971. Construction was started again in May 1971. The Texas Committee on Natural Resources, et. al., secured an injunction to halt construction on the project pending preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), required by the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. A statement was prepared and filed on June 24, 1977. The plan recommended, in the Final EIS, minimized further construction of the authorized channels and provided for construction of the lake and downstream levees. The sufficiency of the Final EIS was challenged in the court and in December 1978 the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas ruled the statement inadequate, citing five deficiencies and halting all further construction. A Supplemental EIS to comply with the court's decision was prepared and filed with the Environmental Protection Agency in March 1981. The recommended plan of improvement consists of the multipurpose lake, 48.2 miles of levee, and the acquisition of 24,724 acres of wildlife mitigation lands. All remaining channel and levee work was deleted from the recommended plan. The Supplemental EIS was filed with the court in July 1981 and numerous motions, documents, affidavits, and briefs were subsequently filed. After the Supplemental EIS was filed in July 1981, numerous motions, documents, affidavits, and briefs were filed through October 1982. On December 30, 1982, the U.S. District Court issued a 95-page order continuing the permanent injunction. On March 22, 1983, the order was revised and Judge William Wayne Justice issued an Amended Memorandum Opinion and a Permanent Injunction against the construction of Cooper Lake. The Government filed a Notice of Appeal with the court 39-6 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT in May 1983. On July 16, 1984, litigation was resolved and the injunction was released. The project was transferred to the Fort Worth District at the end of Fiscal Year 1979. Public Law 101-101, H. R. 101-235, approved September 29, 1989, authorized $5 million for additional recreation. Estimated Federal cost (Oct. 1, 1994 base price) is $143,000,000, non-Federal cost for land for the levees is $227,000 and in addition $54,600,000 is to be reimbursed by water supply users over a 50-year period. Local cooperation. Local interests (North Texas Municipal Water District, Sulphur River Municipal Water District, city of Irving) will utilize water impounded for present and future water supply. The total cost allocated to water supply to be reimbursed is $54,600,000. North Texas Municipal Water District, NTMWD, has contracted for 36.859. percent of the water supply storage for future use with deferred payments for ten years. Under the contract NTMWD must pay 13.803 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. Sulphur River Municipal Water District, SRMWD, has contracted for 6.5 percent of the water supply storage for initial use and 19.78 percent for future use for a total of 26.282 percent of the water supply storage. To date $182,805 has been paid. Under the contract SRMWD must pay 2.435 percent of actual annual operation and maintenance. To date $44,014 has been paid. The city of Irving has contracted for 16.923 percent of the water supply storage for initial use and 19.936 for future use for a total of 36.859 of the water supply storage. To date $480,975 has been paid. Under the contract Irving must pay 6.337 percent of actual annual operation and maintenance. To date $133,843 has been paid. The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department and the Corps of Engineers have entered into or have agreed to formal Operation and Maintenance contracts for recreation facilities and wildlife conservation and management. Under the contracts for recreation facilities dated 7 November 1988 and 11 September 1990, Texas Parks and Wildlife will be responsible for 100 percent of the operations and maintenance of two state parks that are being constructed with Federal funds. Under the contracts for wildlife conservation and management the state will be responsible for 24.14 percent of the operations, maintenance and replacement annual costs for areas totaling approximately 35,500 acres. The remaining balance will be the responsibility of the Project Sponsors and the Government. Operations during fiscal year. Jim Chapman Lake is approximately 99 percent complete overall. Major items completed through FY 1997 are Relocations of Railroads, 100 percent; Channels and Canals, 100 percent; Levees and Floodwalls, 100 percent; and Lands and Damages, 100 percent. Items to be completed are curation of archelogical artifacts and fiscal closeout. Deliberate Impoundment began 29 September 1991 and project completion is scheduled for September 1998. The Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act PL 104-206 of 1997 changed the name of Cooper Lake and Channels, TX, to Jim Chapman Lake, TX. Benefits accrued to Jim Chapman Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1997 are estimated at $4,646,600. 12. JOE POOL LAKE, TX Location. Dam is located at River Mile 11.2 on Mountain Creek, a right bank tributary of the West Fork of the Trinity River, and is adjacent to the city limits of Grand Prairie, Dallas County, Texas, which is one of the rapid growing cities in the Dallas-Fort Worth Metropolitan area. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1996. Construction of project was started in 1975 and completed for beneficial use in September 1994. Estimated cost of project is $215,540,000 including $11,350,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended, and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 apply. Contracts for water supply storage and recreation with the Trinity River Authority were approved by the Acting Secretary of the Army, June 15, 1977. The recreation contract with Trinity Valley Authority was modified March 28,1979, to allow the Corps to participate with the State of Texas and approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army March 21, 1980. Recreation development contract with the State of Texas was approved by the Assistant Secretary of the Army March 21, 1980. Reimbursement is currently estimated at $57,240,000 for water supply and $19,840,000 for recreation (excluding future recreation facilities) for a total of $76,790,000 exclusive of interest. To date $1,387,717 has been paid. Of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance, $31,991 has been paid. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Public Law 97-400, H.R. 7377, 97th Congress, effective December 31, 1982, changed the name of Lakeview Lake to Joe Pool Lake. Benefits accrued to Joe Pool Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1997 were $672,048,400. 13. LAVON LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Collin County, Texas, on East Fork of Trinity River 55.9 miles above its 39-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started January 1948 and ready for beneficial use in September 1953. Project is complete. See following section for Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement authorized by Flood Control Act of 1962. Estimated cost of project is $15,470,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with North Texas Municipal Water District for water supply storage, including cost of intake structure, was approved by Secretary of the Army July 8, 1954, at an estimated cost of $1,405,753. Contract was revised in 1973 and final revised contract amount is $1,445,262. To date North Texas Municipal Water District has paid $4,653,708. Under the contract North Texas Municipal Water District must pay annually 13.6 percent of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance, and to date has paid $1,005,327. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Lavon Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1997 were $195,785,300. 14. LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION AND EAST FORK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Location. Existing dam is in Collin County, Texas, on East Fork of Trinity River, 55.9 miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22.0 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. Channel improvement of East Fork extends from its mouth to River Miles 31.8. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1988. Construction of project was initiated in May 1970 and ready for beneficial use in December 1975. Estimated Federal cost of the modification and improvement is $69,750,000 and $220,000 local interests, a total of $69,970,000. Project is complete. Local cooperation. Local interests must reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to increased water supply storage under the terms of the Water Supply Act of 1958. The North Texas Municipal Water District has contracted for 43 percent of the water supply (approved September 22, 1967, by the Secretary of the Army) and to date $603,460 has been paid. North Texas Municipal Water Supply District has submitted assurance to contract for 57 percent of future water supply. Reimbursement is currently estimated at $37,825,004. Levee Districts 4 and 5, which comprise the lower 10 miles of the East Fork Channel, entered into agreements as required by Section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 on January 28, 1972 and have furnished all necessary construction easements. Levee Districts 6, 8, 10, 13, and 15, which comprise the upper 15 miles of the East Fork Channel, have declined to provide the necessary assurances. On December 8, 1972, this portion of the project was reclassified from "active" to "inactive" category. Operations during fiscal year. Improvement of the lower ten miles of the East Fork Channel and Levees and total project are 100 percent complete. 15. LEWISVILLE DAM, TX Location. Dam is in Denton County, Texas, on Elm Fork of Trinity River 30 river miles above its confluence with Trinity River and about 22 miles northwest of city of Dallas, Texas at a site downstream from old Garza Dam. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started November 1948 and ready for beneficial use in November 1954. Estimated cost of project is $25,902,000, including $3,677,000 contributed by local interests. Hydropower: The city of Denton, Texas (COD) was licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to construct a 2,000 kilowatt plant which is located adjacent to the existing outlet channel. The project operates utilizing conservation releases, i.e., no change from the present operating regiment is anticipated. COD Utilities Department utilizes this power for its local customers. Construction of the hydropower was completed in 1991 with non- Federal funds. Local cooperation. A contract with city of Dallas for 415,000 acre-feet of water supply storage land rights and interests to Garza Dam and Reservoir was approved by the Secretary of the Army on July 16,1953. Local contributions have been made in full. A contract with city of Denton, Texas, for remaining 21,000 acre-feet of water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army on May 20, 1954, with an estimated cost of $250,064. Local contributions have been paid in full. Under above contracts, cities of Dallas and Denison must pay annually 21.9 and 1 percent, respectively, of actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date Dallas has paid $4,001,197 and Denton $187,541. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to system comprised of 39-8 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT Lewisville Lake; this includes Ray Roberts Lake and Dallas Floodway Systems. Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1997 were $16,717,186,300. 16. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX Location. Dam is in Navarro County, Texas, at River Mile 63.9 on Richland Creek, a tributary of Trinity River, about 16.0 miles southwest of Corsicana, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorization acts see Annual Report for 1965. Construction started December 1959 and project completed for beneficial use March 1963. Estimated cost of project $13,154,000 including $300,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended applies. A formal contract with the Trinity River Authority was approved March 3, 1966, by the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $2,260,800. To date the Authority has paid $1,284,102 for water supply and $1,430,122 for operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Navarro Mills Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1997 were $41,015,300. 17. O.C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on North Concho River, a tributary of Concho River, about 6.6 miles above mouth of North Concho River near city of San Angelo, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Name was changed from San Angelo Dam and Reservoir to O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake January 3, 1975 by Public Law 93-634. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for beneficial use February 1952. Estimated cost of project is $17,111,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A water supply contract with Upper Colorado River Authority for water supply storage in reservoir was approved by Secretary of the Army on October 11, 1948. The Authority has contributed $860,444 toward cost of project and $64,336 toward operation and maintenance for a 50- year period. The Authority must pay additional contributions of $1 a year for useful life of project, beginning January 1, 1965. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1997 were $2,376,000. 18. PROCTOR LAKE, TX Location. Dam is at River Mile 238.9 on Leon River, a tributary of Brazos River, about 8.0 miles northeast of Comanche in Comanche County, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorization act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction of project was started July 1960 and completed for beneficial use 1963. Estimated cost of project is $16,249,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 applies. A formal contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, was approved by Secretary of the Army, July 1, 1960, and was modified and approved May 9, 1966, at an estimated cost of $1,707,900. To date the Authority has paid $546,498 for water supply and $593,842 for operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance were continued. Benefits accrued to Proctor Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1997 were $38,564,800. 19. RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX Location. Damsite is located at River Mile 60.0 on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River, Denton County, between Sanger and Aubrey, Texas and 30 miles upstream from Lewisville Dam. Existing project. The plan of improvement provides for construction of an earthfilled dam with a maximum height of 141 feet above the streambed, a length of 15,250 feet including an uncontrolled broadcrested spillway 100 feet long, controlling 682 square miles of drainage area. The lake will have a total controlled storage of 1,064,600 acre-feet, with a water surface area of 36,900 acres. The total storage includes 260,800 acre-feet for flood control, 749,200 acre-feet for water supply, and 54,600 acre-feet for sediment reserve. The Water Resources Development Act of 1990 authorized the Greenbelt Corridor between Lewisville and Ray Roberts Lakes. Estimated Federal cost of the project is $317,300,000 (Oct. 1,1995 base price). Public Law 96-384, 96th Congress, H.R. 8094, effective January 4, 1981, changed the name of Aubrey Lake to Ray Roberts Lake. Hydropower: At the request of the city of Denton and the approval of the Secretary of the Army, the penstock was added to the embankment as a minimum facility for future hydropower. The city 39-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 of Denton, Texas (COD) was licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to construct a 1,000 kilowatt plant which is located adjacent to the existing outlet channel. The project operates utilizing conservation releases, i.e., no change from the present operating regiment is anticipated. COD Utilities Department utilizes this power for its local customers. Construction of the hydropower was completed in 1991 with non-Federal funds. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 as amended and the Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965 and Section 221, Flood Control Act of 1970 apply. Contracts with the cities of Dallas and Denton, Texas, for water supply storage and recreation were approved by the Secretary of the Army September 16, 1980. To date the city of Dallas has paid $7,345,322. The city of Denton has paid in full their share of the water supply storage. Dallas has paid $422,431 and Denton has paid $148,417 toward annual cost of operation and maintenance of project. Operations during fiscal year. The project is about 99 percent complete overall. Through FY 1997 100 percent of the land acquisition, the road and utility relocations and the embankment, spillway and outlet works have been completed. Major work item remaining to be completed is recreational facilities for the Greenbelt. Deliberate Impoundment began 30 June 1987 at Ray Roberts Lake, the pool raise at Lewisville Lake was 30 November 1988. The project is scheduled to be completed in September 1998. Benefits accrued to Ray Roberts Lake project: Accumulated flood damage prevented is shown in with Lewisville Dam, TX. 20. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Location. Floodway is in city of San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas, on San Antonio River and San Pedro, Apache, Alazan, Martinez, and Six Mile Creeks. Existing project. The project consists of 30.7 miles of channel and associated improvements on six separate streams. Completion of detailed engineering and design studies revealed that the least costly alternative for the remaining channel improvements would consist of two tunnels 120 feet below the surface each having an inside diameter of 24 feet and vertical intake, outlet and access shafts. The San Pedro Creek tunnel is 6,040 feet in length and the San Antonio River tunnel is 16,360 feet in length. Estimated Federal cost of these modifications is $152,600,000 (Oct. 1, 1997, base price), and estimated cost to local interests is $65,900,000 which includes $4,050,000 cash contributions and $61,850,000 for lands, damages, and construction, a total of $218,500,000. The existing project was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act. The Water Resources Act of 1976 added authorization to the existing project for construction of flood control measures needed to preserve and protect the Espada Aqueduct located in the vicinity of Six Mile Creek. Construction was started in October 1957. Local cooperation. Local interests must furnish lands and rights-of-way for construction, including purchase and removal of buildings, relocation or reconstruction of bridges (exclusive of railway bridges), channel dams where applicable, and utility lines; hold the United States free from damages; maintain and operate all works after completion; and provide a cash contribution for enhancement benefits of 2.65 percent of actual Federal construction cost. San Antonio River Authority furnished assurances that it will comply with all requirements of local cooperation. These assurances were accepted by the District Engineer on April 15, 1957. To date $3,957,700 has been contributed by San Antonio River Authority. In addition, $30,000 has been contributed and accepted, under the authority of Civil Functions Appropriations Act of 1958, for vehicular crossings over the San Antonio Channel. Operations during fiscal year. During FY 1997 funds were used to continue construction and engineering and design studies. The project is about 99 percent complete overall and is scheduled to be completed in September 2000. Benefits accrued to San Antonio project: Accumulated damages prevented through FY 1997 were $117,515,000. 21. SAN GABRIEL RIVER, TX Location. Project is a system of three reservoirs in Williamson County in the central portion of Brazos River Basin, which consists of Granger Dam at River Mile 31.9 on San Gabriel River, about 7.0 miles east of Granger, Texas; North San Gabriel Dam at River Mile 4.3 on North Fork of San Gabriel River, about 3.5 miles northwest of Georgetown, Texas; and South Fork Dam at River Mile 4.7 on South Fork of San Gabriel River, about 3.0 miles southwest of Georgetown, Texas. Existing project. Granger Lake was authorized by 1954 Flood Control Act, and North (North San Gabriel Dam and Lake Georgetown) and South Fork Lakes were authorized by 1962 Flood Control Act. Estimated total Federal cost of project is $181,400,000 (Oct. 1, 1986, base price) and estimated non-Federal cost of $90,600,000 for a project total of $272,000,000. Plan of improvement provides for the following: Granger: An earthfilled dam 16,320 39-10 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 115 feet above streambed, which controls 709 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 244,200 acre-feet, of which 162,200 acre-feet are for flood control, 37,900 acrefeet for water supply storage, and 44,100 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of project is $62,062,000. North San Gabriel Dam: A rockfill dam 6,700 feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 164 feet above streambed, which controls 246 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 130,800 acre-feet of which 87,600 acre-feet are for flood control, 29,200 acre-feet for water supply storage, and 14,000 acre-feet for sediment reserve. Estimated cost of project is $38,765,000. South Fork: A rockfill dam 5,620 feet long, including spillway with maximum height of 152 feet above streambed, which controls 123 square miles of drainage area. Reservoir provides a total storage capacity of 82,600 acre-feet (45,700 for flood control, 28,900 for water supply storage, and 8,000 for sediment reserve). Estimated cost of project is $171,173,000. Public Law 96-575, 96th Congress, H.R. 4941 effective January 4, 1981, changed the name of North Fork Lake to North San Gabriel Dam and Lake Georgetown. Local cooperation. Construction is subject to condition that local interests reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to water supply at Granger, Lake Georgetown, and South Fork Lakes. Reimbursement currently estimated at $13,315,000 for Granger, $6,295,000 for Lake Georgetown, and $50,563,000 for South Fork, for a total of $70,172,000 exclusive of interest. Brazos River Authority, a State agency, is the local interests' sponsor of project, and by letter dated April 18, 1966, indicated its acceptance of the proposed plan of development and its willingness to pay for the costs allocated to water supply in each reservoir in the ultimate plan. Such water supply assurances for Granger and Lake Georgetown Lakes were approved May 24, 1968 as satisfactory in accordance with requirements of the Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended. Contract negotiations for South Fork Lake will be deferred until the need for water supply develops and the reservoir is scheduled for construction. Operations during fiscal year. Through 1983 all work has been completed. Deliberate impoundment of water commenced at Granger and Lake Georgetown Lakes on January 21, 1980 and March 3, 1980, respectively. In FY 1982, studies on South Fork Lake were resumed in preparation of General Design Memorandum to provide reaffirmation prior to construction. A Draft Reevaluation Report on South Fork Lake was submitted to headquarters in October 1986. The report recommended no Federal action and defer further studies indefinitely. Future water supply needs of the area would be addressed by reallocating storage at Granger Lake. The South Fork Lake project was placed on inactive status and would be eligible for deauthorization in FY 1998 if no funds are obligated by then. Benefits accrued to project consisting of Granger and Lake Georgetown: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1997 were $34,366,200. 22. SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Yegua Creek 20 miles upstream from its confluence with Brazos River and about 2 miles south of Somerville, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction started in June 1962 and the project was ready for beneficial use in January 1967. Estimated cost of project is $30,227,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958, as amended, applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage approved May 10, 1962, by the Secretary of the Army, has paid $2,209,936 to date. Also under the contract, the Authority must pay annually 28.655 percent of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Somerville Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1997 were $61,801,500. 23. STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX Location. Dam is on Lampasas River 16 miles upstream from its confluence with Little River, a tributary of the Brazos River, and about 5 miles southwest of Belton, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Construction was initiated in July 1962 and the project was ready for beneficial use in February 1968. Estimated cost of project is $23,670,000. Local cooperation. The Water Supply Act of 1958 applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage was approved April 13, 1962, by the Secretary of the Army, at an estimated cost of $6,912,430. To date the Authority has paid $2,805,836. Also under the contract the Authority must pay annually 27.748 percent of the actual annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the Authority has paid $1,417,367. 39-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Stillhouse Hollow Dam Project: Accumulated estimate of flood damages prevented through FY 1997 is $32,039,800. 24. WACO LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Bosque River, 4.6 river miles above its confluence with Brazos River, at city of Waco, McLennan County, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1969. Estimated cost of project is $50,853,000 including $250,000 contributed by local interests and $2,500,000 other non-Federal cost. Construction was started in July 1958, and project was ready for beneficial use in February 1965. Local cooperation. Section G of the Flood Control Act of December 1944 applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage and the contract with the city of Waco transferring the existing Lake Waco to the Government for their water storage, was approved by the Secretary of the Army on April 15, 1958. To date, the Authority for their portion of the water supply storage has paid $2,770,535. Also under the contract the Authority and the city must pay 14.706 and 2.087 percent respectively of the actual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the Authority has paid $1,324,597 and the city has paid $201,545. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, for additional storage for municipal and industrial water supply, was approved by the Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army, September 28, 1984. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operations and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Waco Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1997 were $117,453,900. 25. WACO LAKE, TX (DAM SAFETY) Location. For location of completed dam see Waco Lake, Texas in this chapter. Existing project. The existing rolled earthfill embankment's top elevation of 510 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD), is hydrologically deficient. The original hydrologic design criteria used for Waco Dam design has been revised. Current hydrologic design criteria indicates the spillway and outlet works cannot pass the Probable Maximum Flood (PMF) without overtopping the dam by 1.0 foot, which could lead to failure of the embankment and catastrophic release of the reservoir. Adding required freeboard, Waco Dam crest height is hydrologically deficient by 4.6 feet. The proposed modification consists of raising the dam crest approximately by 4.6 feet to 514.6 feet NGVD utilizing a combination of compacted earthfill and reinforced cast-in-place concrete parapet wall for the full length of the dam. No major modification to the spillway, spillway service bridge, outlet works tower, or outlet works tower service bridge will be required. However, the spillway hoist mechanisms for the tainter gates will be waterproofed. The outlet works service bridge will be provided with a removeable bulkhead to be installed only during large flood events but would otherwise remain unchanged. Estimated Federal cost for raising the dam modification is $6,480,000 (Oct. 1, 1997, base price) and $220,000 is to be reimbursed by local sponsors. Operations during fiscal year. During FY 1997 funds were used to initiate engineering and design under the Design Memorandum. The Design Memorandum is scheduled to be completed in January 1997. Plans and Specifications scheduled to be completed in February 1998 and project construction scheduled to be completed September 2000. 26. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Sulphur River in Cass and Bowie Counties, Texas. Dam is 45 miles above mouth of Sulphur River, and about 8 miles southwest of Texarkana, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report of 1984. Estimated cost of project is $51,945,000 which includes $5,449,100 Code 711, $399,939 accelerated public works funds, and $13,138,004 to be reimbursed by local interests, over a period not to exceed 50 years, for water supply storage, and including $2,092,040 for pro rata share of original reservoir cost. Construction was initiated in August 1948 and completed in March 1962, except real estate activities, construction under Code 711, and conversion of 120,000 acre-feet to water supply storage after completion of Cooper Reservoir (Jim Chapman Lake). This project transferred to the Fort Worth District as of the end of FY 1979. Local cooperation. A contract with the city of Texarkana, Texas, for reserving water supply storage space was approved by the Secretary of the Army December 17, 1968. To date, the city has paid $739,760. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. Benefits accrued to Wright Patman Dam and Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1997 were $13,859,000. 39-12 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT 27. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS Inspection of completed local flood protection projects is made periodically in compliance with Section 208.10, of Title 33, Code of Federal Regulations, which contains regulations for operation and maintenance of local flood-protection works approved by the Secretary of the Army in accordance with authority in Section 3, Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936. See Table 39-D for inspections made this fiscal year. Inspection costs for FY 1997 from regular funds for maintenance were $84,495. Total costs to September 30, 1997 were $1,316,405. 28. SCHEDULING FLOOD CONTROL RESERVOIR OPERATIONS In accordance with Flood Control Act of 1944, expenditures were made for scheduling flood control reservoir operations and preparation of reservoir regulation manual for Marshall Ford Dam, on the Colorado River, near city of Austin, Texas, and for preparation of reservoir regulation manual for Twin Buttes Dam, on Middle and South Concho Rivers near city of San Angelo, Texas. Marshall Ford Dam was authorized by 1937 River and Harbor Act. Project was constructed jointly by Bureau of Reclamation and Lower Colorado River Authority and was completed during FY 1942. Twin Buttes Reservoir was authorized for construction by Department of Interior by Public Law 152, 85th Congress. Construction was initiated in June 1960; closure of dam started in June 1962; deliberate impoundment was started January 23, 1963. Accumulated damages prevented by Marshall Ford Reservoir through FY 1997 were $269,924,700 and by Twin Buttes through FY 1997 were $1,118,000. Twin Buttes Reservoir consists of two separate pools, one on South Concho River and the other on Middle Concho River and Spring Creek. Equalizing channel between these two pools is at elevation 1925.0. Costs for FY 1997 from regular funds for operation of both reservoirs were $48,488. 29. OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (See Table 39-C.) 30. WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION (See Table 39-E.) Flood control activities pursuant to Section 205, Public Law 585, 80th Congress, as amended (preauthorization); emergency streambank protection under Section 14, Public Law 526, 79th Congress, as amended; Snagging and Clearing of navigable streams and tributaries in interest of flood control Section 208, Public Law 780, 83rd Congress, as amended. Emergency flood control, hurricane-flood, and shore protection activities (Public Law 99, 84th Congress, and antecedent legislation). Environmental restoration under Section 1135, Public Law 99-662, 99th Congress, as amended. Fiscal year costs were $106,881 for disaster preparedness; no levee repair. Multi-Purpose Projects Including Power 31. ROBERT DOUGLAS WILLIS HYDROPOWER, TX Location. For location of completed dam see Town Bluff Dam-BA Steinhagen Lake, Texas in this chapter. Existing project. Installation of hydroelectric power generating facilities at Town Bluff Dam was authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1945 (Public Law 79-14), March 2, 1945, but deferred in the original construction. Town Bluff Dam was completed and placed in operation in 1951. A Design Analysis Report completed in April 1982 and a Feasibility Report was approved September 9, 1983 indicated that installing hydropower at this project was economically feasible. The hydropower facilities include a 7,400 kilowatt power plant (two units at 3,700 kilowatts each), intake and outlet facilities, and necessary switchgear equipment is located in the main embankment at the old diversion channel. The plant is operated remotely from the Sam Rayburn project. The project produces an estimated 35,900 megawatt hours of energy per year. There is no Federal cost on this project. It is completely funded by non-Federal funds. The estimated non- Federal cost is $18,643,000. 101st Congress House Report 923, effective February 7, 1989, changed the name of Town Bluff Hydropower to Robert Douglas Willis Hydropower. Local cooperation. A contract with the Sam Rayburn Municipal Power Authority was approved by Secretary of the Army, June 28, 1985, relative to financing, escrow agreement, and power sales agreement. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 32. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX Location. Dam is on Angelina River 25.2 miles upstream from its confluence with Neches River and about 10.0 miles northwest of Jasper, Texas. 39-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Existing project. For description of completed improvements and authorizing act see Annual Report 1969. Construction was started August 1956 and project was ready for beneficial use in March 1965. Estimated cost of project is $68,683,000 including $3,000,000 contributed by local interests. Local cooperation. A contract with the Lower Neches Valley Authority, a State agency, to contribute $3,000,000 toward the first cost and an additional $200,000 annually for 50 years after completion of the project was approved by the Secretary of the Army on January 22, 1957. Contribution of $3,000,000 was made in full and annual payments to date of $5,200,000 have been made by the Authority. A contract with the city of Lufkin for water supply storage was approved May 27, 1969 by the Secretary of the Army at an estimated cost of $525,600. To date the city has paid $219,435. Also under the contract the city of Lufkin must pay annually 0.692 percent of the annual cost of operation and maintenance. To date the city has paid $193,922. Operations during fiscal year. Continued routine operation and maintenance. Benefits accrued to Sam Rayburn project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1997 were $377,007,200. 33. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX (DAM SAFETY) Location. For location of completed dam see Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, Texas in this chapter. Existing project. The original 2200-foot wide uncontrolled spillway was constructed through erodible loose sand, shaley clay, and sandstone. Based on experience of significant erosion at other uncontrolled and unlined spillways constructed through less erodible material, the spillway at Sam Rayburn Dam would have experienced severe erosion damage and probably breach during passage of floods in excess of the 150-year flood frequency (25 percent of Probable Maximum Flood). The original spillway was removed in part and replaced with a new reinforced concrete weir, stilling basin and outfall channel near the existing spillway structure. The new weir was completed December 1996 and has a width of 640 feet, an overall length of 433 feet, an outfall channel approximately 5,000 feet long and a crest elevation of 176.0 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD). Estimated Federal cost for the spillway modification is $40,000,000 (Oct 1,1997, base price) and $1,000,200 is to be reimbursed by hydropower sponsors, $101,000 from the city of Lufkin and $330,000 from the Lower Neches Valley Authority. Operations during fiscal year. During FY 1997 funds were used to complete construction on the spillway modification and parapet wall and engineering and design. The project was completed in December 1996. 34. TOWN BLUFF DAMB. A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Neches River about 12.4 miles below mouth of Angelina River, onehalf mile north of Town Bluff, Texas, and 93.0 river miles north of Beaumont, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction started March 1947 and project was ready for beneficial use in April 1951. Estimated cost of project is $9,888,000, including $2,000,000 contribution by local interests. Local cooperation. Completed as required. Operations during fiscal year. Routine operation and maintenance continued. 35. WHITNEY LAKE, TX Location. Dam is on Brazos River, about 442 miles above mouth of river, 5.5 miles southwest' of Whitney, Texas, and about 38 miles upstream from city of Waco, Texas. Existing project. For description of completed improvement and authorizing acts see Annual Report for 1962. Construction of project was started May 1947 and ready for flood control use in December 1951. First power was placed on-the-line in June 1953. Raise power pool is complete. Estimated cost of project is $46,306,000. Local cooperation. Section 2, Flood Control Act of 1938, applies. A contract with the Brazos River Authority, a State agency, for water supply storage was approved by the Secretary of the Army November 3, 1982. To date, the Authority has paid $255,798. Operations during fiscal year. Continued routine operation and maintenance. Benefits accrued to Whitney Lake project: Accumulated flood damages prevented through FY 1997 were $232,940,700. General Investigations 36. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $893,278 for flood damage prevention studies; $36,928 for coordination with other agencies; $0 for reviewed of deferred projects; $60,197 for special studies; $0 for review 39-14 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT of completed projects; $0 for environmental services partnerships; $99,944 for miscellaneous activities; and for a total of $1,090,347. 37. PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION, TX Dallas Floodway Extension is located on the Trinity River in the city of Dallas, Dallas County, Texas. The plan of improvement provides for extending the existing Floodway downstream about 9 miles to the confluence of the Trinity River and Five Mile Creek. The plan consists of a leveed floodway and flood conveyance improvement (channel) along the main stem, Five Mile Creek and White Rock Creek. Maintained free of encroachments, the levees and channels would provide Standard Project Flood protection for approximately 7,300 acres of urban lands currently subject to flooding. The estimated planning and engineering estimate is $6,750,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1991. Fiscal year costs were $1,551,743. 38. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Work was continued under the Flood Plain Management Services on the compilation of information on floods and potential flood damages, including identification of those areas subject to inundation. Fiscal year expenditures for these activities totaled $270,607. Fiscal year costs were $6,842 for hydrologic studies. 39-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 This page intentionally left blank. 39-16 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT TABLE 39-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997~ 1. Trinity River Project, TX Includes Channel to Liberty, Tennessee Colony Lake, and Dallas Floodway Extension 2. Aquilla Lake, TX New Work: Approp. Cost: New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - 22,574,865 - 22,574,865 943,000 581,500 546,960 686,922 770,640 610,311 - 45,506,300 - 45,506,300 560,000 7,364,567 577,909 7,337,628 3. Bardwell Lake, TX 4. Beals Creek, Big Spring, TX 5. Belton Lake, TX 6. Benbrook Lake, TX 7. Canyon Lake, TX 8. Ferrells Bridge Dam- Lake O' The Pines, TX 9. Grapevine Lake, TX New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - - - 10,934,505 - - - - 10,934,505 1,797,000 1,150,300 1,167,730 1,329,000 26,065,352 18 1,825,524 1,118,165 1,158,409 1,271,354 24,777,590 18 430,000 470,000 1,217,008 3,811,000 5,928,000 251,428 545,392 269,195 4,136,348 5,202,363 - - - - 16,960,549 -- - 16,960,549' 2,733,000 2,056,800 2,166,950 2,636,000 40,021,85918 2,759,446 2,027,560 2,210,757 2,615,172 39,886,40918 - - - - 13,130,463 - - - 13,069,991 2 2,122,000 1,526,200 1,615,650 1,656,000 33,775,185 18 2,134,845 1,457,542 1,733,258 1,643,236 32,361,565 18 - - - - 19,088,524 3 - - -- 19,088,524 1,763,600 1,872,400 2,192,200 2,591,000 29,244,70418 1,748,915 1,875,076 2,231,476 2,546,045 28,916,144 18 --- - 14,175,1974 -- - - 14,175,197 16 2,798,000 2,054,500 2,039,800 2,477,208 44,131,533 18 2,673,620 2,123,787 2,161,065 2,180,427 43,808,791 18 - - - - 21,317,790 - - -- 21,317,790 1,981,600 1,687,000 1,857,675 2,078,500 39,188,51418 2,048,010 1,597,687 1,930,147 1,988,540 39,041,88618 39-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 39-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997" 10. Hords Creek Lake, TX 11. Jim Chapman Lake, TX (Contributed Funds) 12. Joe Pool Lake, TX 13. Lavon Lake, TX 14. Lavon Lake Modification and East Fork Channel Improvement, TX 15. Lewisville Dam, TX 16. Navarro Mills Lake, TX 17. O.C. Fisher Dam and Lake, TX 18. Proctor Lake, TX New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Aprop. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost - - - 2,731,0898 -- - - 2,731,089 964,950 1,098,050 960,203 991,000 18,701,42018 999,910 1,065,184 959,881 1,017,136 18,608,271 18 7,200,000 3,047,000 8,562,318 3,456,602 502,000 2,376,166 400,000 138,544,887 418,497 138,152,651 -- - - 227,000 -- - - 227,000 818,000 1,748,000 822,400 2,592,000 7,245,400 799,893 1,648,229 924,711 979,828 5,578,255 152,000 320,401 1,241,000 988,169 2,761,900 2,657,652 94,374 706,800 937,495 8,650 686,325 735,482 2,049,400 2,217,557 2,127,500 2,193,757 (-)8,995 701,000 684,504 2,681,000 2,392,643 188,960,000 188,873,609 7,109,733 7,062,266 12,864,796 12,864,796 44,978,793 18 44,603,66618 _ 69,796,862 _ 69,796,862 2,348,000 2,261,609 1,691,600 1,685,954 1,584,000 1,485,677 4,219,400 4,458,311 2,054,600 2,173,121 1,034,200 982,783 1,062,975 1,113,091 1,432,400 1,404,795 3,926,250 3,775,204 1,296,700 1,360,083 1,215,050 1,319,881 1,421,550 1,404,574 2,533,328 2,348,636 1,394,000 1,367,519 25,333,988 25,333,988 9 57,416,76318 54,377,855 18 9,846,759 9,846,75911 24,910,51318 24,851,49318 _ 16,027,467 _ 16,027,467 731,000 22,416,95018 696,444 22,347,86518 2,073,000 2,125,556 14,469,585 14,469,585 30,287,289 18 30,036,547 18 39-18 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT TABLE 39-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 1997"7 19. Ray Roberts Lake, TX 31. Robert Douglas Willis Hydropower, TX (Contributed Funds) 32. Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservior, TX 33. Sam Rayburn Dam and Reservoir, TX (Dam Safety) (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 20. San Antonio Channel Improvement, TX (Federal Funds) (Contributed Funds) 21. San Gabriel River, TX Granger Lake Georgetown 22. Somerville Lake, TX 23. Stillhouse Hollow Dam, TX New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Contri. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost Maint Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Aprop. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint. Approp. Cost 8,600,000 9,519,329 1,312,000 976,883 5,695,000 5,334,718 798,200 1,094,670 4,279,000 4,093,294 651,900 660,181 1,893,000 2,130,533 731,000 696,961 316,428,700 315,607,321 6,732,502 6,640,264 - 18,628,463 - 18,628,463 -- - - 60,670,957 - - -- 60,670,95712 5,843,000 3,526,500 3,497,250 4,314,000 69,836,283 18 5,889,066 3,687,148 3,809,294 3,740,446 68,776,02718 10,770,000 13,468,000 8,688,000 2,200,000 37,914,000 8,183,421 11,699,241 13,031,871 2,126,180 37,701,334 73,487 56,235 2,536,000 2,890,538 67,204 220,666 107,639 112,489 - - 7,300,000 5,982,000 7,487,355 5,309,631 - 177,600 - 293,615 55,933 112,168 3,564,000 3,832,116 268,900 177,600 149,349,048 148,938,511 3,957,700 3,689,000 - 101,796,100 - 101,796,100 1,457,000 1,416,971 1,299,500 1,317,434 1,184,850 1,212,836 1,211,300 1,200,344 1,255,400 1,273,893 1,397,550 1,422,543 1,411,000 1,436,996 1,484,000 1,434,107 19,742,201 18 18,429,07618 18,641,173 18 18,576,340 18 -- - - 27,790,438 -- - - 27,790,438 2,479,000 1,911,350 2,127,900 2,309,000 40,398,388 18 2,267,417 2,114,655 2,162,852 2,308,393 32,261,68318 - - - 20,522,08413 -- - - 20,522,084 1,822,950 1,365,000 1,364,000 1,688,000 25,774,497 18 1,875,237 1,345,714 1,373,463 1,689,654 25,675,247 18 39-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 39-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 199717 34. Town Bluff Dam- New Work: B.A. Steinhagen Lake, Approp. - - - - 6,602,737 'TX Cost - - - - 6,602,737 14 Maint. Approp. 1,448,000 1,261,500 1,491,200 1,418,500 24,866,657 18 Cost 1,540,534 1,223,596 1,483,018 1,412,917 24,708,377 18 24. Waco Lake, TX New Work: Approp. - - - - 49,521,121 5 Cost - - - - 49,521,121 Maint Approp. 3,205,500 2,125,250 1,930,125 1,845,672 39,320,061 18 Cost 2,766,048 2,457,946 1,968,762 1,925,185 39,200,73518 25. Waco Lake, TX New Work: (Dam Safety) Approp. - 200,000 245,000 284,000 729,000 Cost - 33,642 387,924 225,002 646,560 35. Whitney Lake, TX New Work: Approp. - - - - 42,952,938 Cost - - - 42,952,93816 Maint. Approp. 3,980,000 3,832,300 3,437,925 3,262,000 66,017,889 18 Cost 3,911,727 3,284,113 3,905,527 3,540,370 65,668,143 18 26. Wright Patman Dam New Work: and Lake, TX Approp. - - - - 35,731,626 Cost - - - - 35,731,626 Maint. Approp. 3,740,200 2,185,625 2,237,750 2,386,292 43,120,812 18 Cost 3,317,209 2,515,359 2,291,675 2,204,934 42,826,494 18 1 Excludes $47,309 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts. 2 Excludes $322,346 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts. 3 Excludes $1,422,848 expended for new work from contributed funds, including $22,848 "Contributed Funds Other" for installation and operation of gages for leakage study. 4 Includes $1,378,486 for Code 711, $52,808 for Code 713, and $399,739 accelerated Public Works Act funds. Excludes $1,711,200 contributed funds. 5 Includes $1,376,322 for Code 711, $52,808 for Code 713, and $399,739 accelerated Public Works Act funds. Excludes $4,137 reimbursed in Fiscal Year 1973. 6 Claim Northeast Texas Municipal Water District $16,546. Three payments of $12,410 less real estate charges of $1,325, making a total of $2,811 reimbursed in Fiscal Year 1972, Fiscal Year 1973, and Fiscal Year 1974. ' Excludes $146,795 receipts from reconveyance of land deposited to miscellaneous receipts, and $2,040,026 for new work expended from contributed funds. 8 Excludes $105,079 expended from contributed funds. 9 Excludes receipts from reconveyance of land of $426,606 which were deposited to miscellaneous receipts, and $3,676,661 for new work expended from contributed funds. 10 Includes $130,000 under appropriation 96X5125. 1 Excludes $300,000 expended from contributed funds. 12 Excludes $3,000,000 expended from contributed funds. 13 Includes receipts from disposals and revocation of funds related thereto. 14 Excludes $2,000,000 contributed funds expended. 15 Excludes $2,750,000 expended for contributed funds. 16 Excludes $188,282 receipts from reconveyance of lands deposited to miscellaneous receipts. 17 Includes funds provided by the Jobs Act (PL 98-8, dated March 24, 1983). '8 Beginning Fiscal Year 1985 data shown on Table A includes Special Recreation Use Fees. Data for previous fiscal years have been changed to conform to the new procedure. 39-20 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT TABLE 39-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 2. Aug. 13, 1968 3. Mar. 31, 1960 4. Oct. 12, 1972 5. Jul. 24, 1946 Sep. 3, 1954 6. Mar. 2, 1945 7. Mar. 2, 1945 Sep. 3, 1954 8. Jul. 24, 1946 9. Mar. 2, 1945 10. Aug. 18, 1941 11. Aug. 3, 1955 12. Oct. 27, 1965 13. Mar. 2, 1945 AQUILLA LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Aquilla Creek, about 6.8 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas and about 24 miles north of Waco, Texas. BARDWELL LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Waxahachie Creek about 5 miles south of Ennis, Texas. BEALS CREEK, BIG SPRING, TX Construction of a channel. BELTON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Leon River about 3 miles north of Belton, Texas. Modification of the dam to provide for generation of hydroelectric power. BENBROOK LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Clear Fork of the Trinity River about 10 miles southwest of Fort Worth, Texas. CANYON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Guadalupe River about 12 miles northwest of New Braunfels, Texas. FERRELLS BRIDGE DAMLAKE O' THE PINES, TX Provides for construction of an earth-fill dam and reservoir area. GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Denton Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, about 20 miles northwest of Dallas, Texas. HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Hords Creek, a tributary of Pecan Bayou, near the city of Coleman, Texas. JIM CHAPMAN LAKE, TX Construction of an earth-fill dam and reservoir area. JOE POOL LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Mountain Creek, adjacent to the city limits of Grand Prairie, Texas, about 3 miles above the existing Mountain Creek Dam. LAVON LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the East Fork of the Trinity River, about 22 miles northeast of Dallas, Texas. S. Doc. 52, 90th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc 424, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 115, 92nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 88, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc, 247, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 370, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc 488, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 533, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. 39-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 39-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 14. Oct. 23, 1962 Mar. 7, 1974 15. Mar. 2, 1945 16. Sep. 3, 1954 Dec. 31, 1970 17. Aug. 18, 1941 18. Sep. 3, 1954 19. Oct. 27, 1965 32. Mar. 2, 1945 33. Mar. 2, 1945 20. Sep. 3, 1954 LAVON LAKE MODIFICATION AND EAST FORK CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Enlarge Lavon Dam and enlargement and realignment of the lower 25 miles of the East Fork of the Trinity River, including rehabilitation of existing levees. Improvement of Collin County Road 115. LEWISVILLE DAM, TX Construction of a dam on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River near the city of Lewisville, Texas. NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Richland Creek, a tributary of the Trinity River, about 16 miles southwest of Corsicana, Texas. Alteration of FM Highway 3164 in Wolf Creek Park. O.C. FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the North Concho River just above San Angelo, Texas. PROCTOR LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Leon River about 8 miles northeast of Comanche, Texas. RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Elm Fork of the Trinity River between Sanger and Aubrey, Texas, about 30 miles upstream from the existing Lewisville Dam. SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX Construction of a dam on the Angelina River about 10 miles northwest of Jasper, Texas. SAM RAYBURN SPILLWAY (DAM SAFETY ASSURANCE), TX Modification of the spillway and embankment. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, TX Channel improvement of the San Antonio River and tributaries in and near the city of San Antonio, Texas. H. Doc. 554, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 498, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 315, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 344, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. 39-22 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT TABLE 39-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 21. Sep. 3, 1954 Jan. 3, 1975 22. Sep. 3, 1954 23. Sep. 3, 1954 34. Mar. 2, 1945 31. Mar. 2, 1945 1. Oct. 27, 1965 24. Sep. 3, 1954 SAN GABRIEL RIVER PROJECT, TX Construction of: (1) a dam (Granger Dam and Lake) on the San Gabriel River about 7 miles east of Granger, Texas, (2) a dam (North Fork Lake) on the north Fork of the San Gabriel River about 3.5 miles northwest of Georgetown, Texas and (3) a dam (South Fork Lake) on the South Fork of the San Gabriel River about 3 miles southwest of Georgetown, Texas. SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on Yegua Creek about 2 miles south of Somerville, Texas. STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX Construction of a dam on the Lampasas River about 5 miles southwest of Belton, Texas. TOWN BLUFF DAM-B.A. STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the Neches River near Jasper, Texas. ROBERT DOUGLAS WILLIS HYDROPOWER, TX Construction of two units at 3,000 kilowatts each of hydroelectric power generating facilities connected with Town Bluff-BA Steinhagen Lake, Texas. TRINITY RIVER PROJECT, TX Construction of Tennessee Colony Dam located at river mile 339.2 on the Trinity River about 16 miles west of Palestine, Texas; a multiple purpose channel from the Houston, Texas ship channel to Fort Worth, Texas; a distance of approximately 363 miles, an extension of the existing Dallas, Texas, Floodway downstream approximately 9.0 miles; a realignment and enlargement of the West Fork of the Trinty River from the mouth of the West Fork to the existing Fort Worth, Texas, Floodway, a distance of approximately 31 miles; and water conveyance facilities involving construction of about 98 miles of pipeline from Tennessee Colony Lake to the existing Benbrook Lake. WACO LAKE, TX Construction of a dam on the northwest edge of Waco, Texas, below the confluence of the North, South, and Middle Bosque Rivers. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. and H Doc. 591, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess., and H. Doc. 364, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. 39-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 39-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents WACO LAKE, TX (Dam Safety) 25. Sep. 3, 1954 Modification of raising the dam crest. H. Doc. 535, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. WHITNEY LAKE, TX 35. Aug. 18, 1941 Construction of a dam on the Brazos River, about H. Doc, 390, 76th Cong., 19 miles southwest of Hillsboro, Texas. Raise 1st Sess. the power pool 13.0 feet. WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX 26. Jul. 24, 1946 Construction of an earth-fill dam and reservoir. H. Doc, 602, 79th Cong.,. 2nd Sess. 39-24 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 39-C (See Section 28 of Text) For Last Full Cost to September 30, 1997 Report See Annual Report Operation and Project For Construction Maintenance Belton Lake Hydropower Study, TX4 Belton Lake Modification, TX3 1988 - - Big Fossil Creek, TX' 1969 - - Big Sandy Lake, TX5 1986 - - Big Spring, TX2 1979 - - Boggy Creek, Austin, TX' 1992 - - Brownwood Channel Improvment, TX - - - Carl L. Estes Dam and Lake, TX4 1979 - - Dam "A" Lake, TX5 1987 - - Duck Creek Channel Improvment, TX 1983 - - Elm Fork Floodway, TX 1987 - - Fort Worth Floodway (Clear Fork), TX' 1971 - - Fort Worth Floodway (West Fork), TX' 1971 - - Grand Prairie, TX (Landfill)' 1987 - - Grand Prairie, TX (Meyers Road)' 1989 - - Greenville, TX' 1983 - Lake Brownwood Modification, TX' 1983 - - Lake Fork Lake, Sabine River, TX5 - - Millican, TX2 1988 Navasota Lake, Navasota River, TX5 - - Roanoak Lake, TX' 1979 - Rockland Lake, TX' 1988 - Rutledge Hollow Creek Channel Improvement, 1969 - - Poteet, TX' Zacate Creek Channel, TX' 1983 - - Calloway Branch, Hurst, TX' 1986 - - 4Recommended for Deauthorization 6Deauthorized 39-25 'Completed 2Inactive 3Deferred REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TABLE 39-D (See Section 26 of Text) Location Dates of Inspection Bear Creek, Collin County ....................................................... Apr. 14, 1997 Beltline Road Bridge, Richardson ................................................. Dec. 12, 1996 Big Fossil Creek................................................................. Apr. 1, 1997 Boggy Creek, Austin ................. .......................................... Apr. 21, 1995 Calloway Branch, Hurst ......................................................... Oct. 17, 1996 Calloway Branch, Airline Dr. Pk., Richland ......................................... Aug. 14, 1997 Cat Claw Creek, Abilene .......................................................... Aug. 5, 1997 Dallas Floodway ................. ............................................. Nov. 13, 1996 East Fork.................. .......................................... Jul. 20 & Nov. 30, 1994 Fort Worth Floodway ............................................................ Oct. 17, 1996 Grand Prairie Landfill ............................................................ Mar. 6, 1997 Grand Prairie Meyers Road ...................................................... Mar. 6, 1997 Johnson Creek, Grand Prairie ..................................................... Jul. 30,1997 Long Branch, Greenville ........................................................ Oct. 16, 1996 Lorean Branch, Hurst ............................................................ Oct. 17, 1996 McCoy Road Bridge, Carrollton ................................................... Dec. 12, 1996 Munday ............................................................ .......... Nov.18,1996 Park Row Bridge, Arlington ..................................................... Oct. 23, 1996 Pleasanton ........................................................... Apr.18,1996 Poteet ........................................................................ Apr.19,1996 Ridglea C. C. Dr. Bridge, Fort Worth.............................................. Jan. 27, 1997 Roaring Springs Road Bridge, Westover Hills ....................................... Jan. 27, 1997 Rush Creek Channel, Arlington .................................................. Oct. 23, 1996 San Antonio Floodway ........................................................ Jun. 12-13, 1995 San Antonio Tunnels ............................................................ Jul. 20, 1995 Singing Hills Creek, Watauga ..................................................... Oct. 20, 1996 Sulphur Branch Channel, Euless.................................................. Dec. 12, 1996 Walnut Creek, Seguin ......................................................... . Nov. 16, 1994 Wheeler Creek, Gainsville ......................................................... Jul. 9, 1997 Zacate Creek, Laredo ........................................................... Dec. 20, 1994 39-26 FORT WORTH, TX, DISTRICT WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION TABLE 39-E (See Section 29 of Text) Project Flood Control Activities - Section 205 Cost Arlington, Grand Prairie, TX ................... .................................... $ 1,155 Browder Creek, Springton, TX ...................................................... 12,288 Calloway Branch, Richland Hills, TX............................................... 23,005 Delaware Creek, Dallas, TX ........................................................ 22,942 Dry Branch Creek, Grand Prairie, TX ................................................ 495,052 Duck Creek, Garland, TX ......................................................... .. 774,352 Hickory Creek, Balch Springs, TX .................................................. 4,605 Johnson Creek, Grand Prairie, TX ................................................... 170,250 Little Fossil Creek, Haltom City, TX ................................................. 6,882 Rush Creek, Arlington, TX ......................................................... 14,301 Section 205 Coordination ........................................................... 1,238 Sulphur Branch, Euless, TX ....................................................... 124,940 Ten Mile Creek, De Soto, TX ........................................................ 516,392 Ten Mile Creek, Lancaster, TX ...................................................... 39 Upper Zacate Creek, Laredo, TX .................................................... 11,041 Walnut Branch, Seguin, TX ........................................................ 29,800 Project Emergency Bank Protection - Section 14 Cost Bear Creek, County Rd. 485, Collin, TX .............................................. $ (-) 1,749 Colorado River, Smithville Water Supply, TX ......................................... 2,536 Dudley Branch, Hebron Parkway, Carrollton, TX ...................................... (-) 12,680 Furneaux Creek, Carrollton, TX .................................................... 95 Hutton Bridge, Reach H. Stream, TX .................. .............................. 13,382 Section 14 Coordination ............................................................ 3,763 Washington on Brazos State Park, TX................................................ 85,907 West Fork Trinity River Landfill, Arlington, TX ...................................... 26,523 39-27 GALVESTON, TEXAS DISTRICT * Galveston District comprises drainage basins of all short streams arising in coastal plain of Texas and flowing into the Gulf of Mexico, including the entire basin of Buffalo Bayou, San Jacinto, San Bernard, Lavaca, Navidad, Mission, and Aransas Rivers. It embraces Agua Dulce, San Fernando, and Olmos Creek Basins draining into Baffin Bay, and coastal area south thereof to the Rio Grande and east of western Boundary of Starr County, Texas. It includes lower basins of major streams flowing into the Gulf of Mexico: Sabine River, Texas and Louisiana, downstream from U.S. Highway 190 crossing at Bon Wier, Texas; Neches River downstream from Town Bluff gaging station; Trinity River downstream from Texas State Highway 19 crossing at Riverside, Texas; Brazos River downstream from confluence with Navasota River; Colorado River downstream from northern boundary of Fayette County; Guadalupe River downstream from confluence with San Marcos River; San Antonio River downstream from confluence with Escondido Creek; Nueces River downstream from confluence with Frio and Atascosa River. IMPROVEMENTS Navigation 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 12A. 12B. 12C. 13. 14. Page Flood Control (cont.) Aquatic Plant Control (Southwestern Division) Brazos Island Harbor, TX Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX Double Bayou, TX Freeport Harbor, TX Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL, and the Mexican Border Houston Ship Channel, TX Matagorda Ship Channel, TX Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX Texas City Channel, TX Trinity River and Tributaries, TX Anahuac Channel, TX Channel to Liberty, TX Wallisville Lake, TX Reconnaissance and Condition Surveys Navigation Work Under Special Authorization Shore Protection 15. Corpus Christi Beach, TX Flood Control 16. Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX 16A. Addicks and Barker Reservoirs, TX 16B. Brays Bayou, TX 16C. Greens Bayou, TX 16D. Halls Bayou, TX 16E. Hunting Bayou, TX 16F. Little White Oak Bayou, TX 16G. Carpenters Bayou, TX 17. Buffalo Bayou at Lynchburg, TX 18. Clear Creek, TX 19. Cypress Creek, TX 20. Lower Rio Grande Basin, TX 40-2 40-2 40-3 40-3 40-4 40-4 40-5 40-7 40-8 40-8 40-9 40-9 40-10 40-10 40-10 40-11 40-11 20A. Arroyo Colorado, TX 20B. South Main Channel, TX 20C. Raymondville Drain, TX 21. Port Arthur and Vicinity, TX Hurricane-Flood Protection 22. Sims Bayou, TX 23. Taylors Bayou, TX 24. Inspection of Completed Flood Control Works 25. Flood Control Work Under Special Authorization 26. Emergency Stream Bank and Shoreline Erosion Work and Snagging and Clearing Under Special Authorization Environmental Restoration 27. Project Modifications for Improvement of 28. 29. Environment Laguna Madre Seagrass Restoration, TX Salt Bayou, McFadden Ranch, TX General Investigations 30. Surveys 40-11 31. Coordination With Other Agencies 32. Collection and Study of Basic Data 33. Pre-construction Engineering and Design 40-12 40-12 40-13 40-13 40-13 40-13 40-14 40-14 40-14 40-14 40-15 40-15 Tables 40-A Cost and Financial Statement 40-B Authorizing Legislation 40-C Other Authorized Navigation Projects 40-D Other Authorized Flood Control Projects 40-E Deauthorized Projects 40-F Total Cost of Existing Projects 40-G Channel Dimensions 40-H Channel Dimensions, GIWW Tributary Channels 40-I Dredging Operations Page 40-15 40-15 40-16 40-16 40-16 40-17 40-17 40-17 40-17 40-18 40-18 40-18 40-18 40-18 40-18 40-19 40-20 40-25 40-41 40-42 40-43 40-44 40-45 40-49 40-51 40-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Navigation 1. AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL (SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION) 1965 ACT Location. Navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Texas. Previous project. For details see page 699 of Annual Report for 1963. Existing project. A comprehensive project to provide for control and progressive eradication of water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian watermilfoil, hydrilla, and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths, from navigable waters, tributary streams, connecting channels, and other allied waters in Texas in the combined interest of navigation, flood control, drainage, agriculture, fish and wildlife conservation, public health, and related purposes, including continued research for development of the most effective and economic control measures. Control of hydrilla, water-hyacinth and alligatorweed continues in the Nueces River Basin, North Coastal Area, Guadalupe River Basin, Sabine River Basin, Trinity River Basin, Cypress Creek Basin, Neches River Basin, South Coastal Area, San Jacinto River Basin, Rio Grande Basin, Colorado River Basin and Brazos River Basin. Local cooperation. Sec. 302, 1965 River and Harbor Act, amended by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, applies. Operations during fiscal year. Control work by the State of Texas continued without participation by the District. No funding was received for the costsharing program in FY 97. A one year cost-sharing, cost-reimbursable contract, with options for an additional four years, was extended for option year two with the State of Texas in order to keep the contract in force. The State of Texas has contracted with the Waterways Experiment Station (WES) technology transfer in the area of biological control, and the monitoring of insect populations introduced by WES through FY 95, in cooperation with the District, continues. 2. BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX Location. At extreme south end of coast of Texas, about 7 miles north of mouth of Rio Grande and about 5 miles east of Brownsville, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11301.) Previous project. For details see page 1017 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in various sections of the waterway as shown in Table 40-G. Project also provides for dual jetties at the gulf entrance, a north jetty 6,330 feet long, a south jetty 5,092 feet long, and 1,000-foot extension to existing north jetty and for maintenance of 3rd fishing harbor constructed by local interests. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet, and extreme range is about 2 feet. All depths refer to mean low tide. To some extent, height of tides is dependent on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season, water surface in southern end of Laguna Madre may be raised 4 feet or more above mean low tide in the gulf. Estimated cost for new work is: Federal (Corps) $27,731,647, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects, and non-Federal $12,383,258, including $7,193,258 contributed funds, $1,400,000 lands, $796,000 relocations, and $2,994,000 other costs, exclusive of amount expended on previous projects. (October 1, 1994 base price). Widening Brownsville Channel from Goose Island to Brownsville turning basin and deepening southeast corner of Brownsville turning basin to 36 feet was completed in April 1980. The 1,000-foot extension to existing north jetty was deauthorized under Section 1001 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986. The entrance channel was enlarged from 38 feet by 300 feet to 44 feet by 300 feet in FY 1992. Work remaining consists of construction of an environmental mitigation site consisting of the creation of a 16 acre tidal wetland which is to be planted with shoal grass and black mangroves. This construction will complete the project as authorized by Water Resource Development Act of 1986. (See Table 40-F for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1997.) Local cooperation. Complied with for the completed work. For the 42 foot project authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and material disposal areas; levees and spillways for disposal areas; modify or relocate utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; and pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation, during construction, and pay an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to navigation within a period of 30 years following completion if not offset by credit allowed for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and dredged material disposal areas. Terminal facilities. Numerous terminal facilities for bulk and liquid cargo are available. (See Port Series No. 26, revised 1991.) Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The mitigation contract for grade lowering, awarded February 1, 1996, remained in litigation through FY 97 with no cost. Maintenance: In addition to the routine maintenance, the City of South Padre Island paid $600,000 for placement of beach quality sand, dredged from the Brazos Island Harbor Entrance Channel, on to the beach between Lantana Street and Bahia Mar Road. This area was subject to progressive rates of erosion along the beach frontage. (See Table 40-I for dredging operations.) 40-2 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT 3. CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. This project, formerly known as the Port Aransas-Corpus Christi Waterway, Texas, was changed to Corpus Christi Ship Channel, Texas, by 1968 River and Harbor Act. This is a consolidation of old improvements of Port Aransas, Texas, and channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi, Texas. Aransas Pass is on southern portion of Texas Coast, 180 miles southwest of Galveston and 132 miles north of mouth of Rio Grande. Aransas Pass connects Corpus Christi Bay with the gulf. Waterway extends from deep water in the gulf through Aransas Pass jettied entrance, thence westerly 20.75 miles to and including a turning basin at Corpus Christi, thence westerly 1.75 miles through Industrial Canal to and including turning basin at Avery Point, thence westerly 4.25 miles to and including a turning basin near Tule Lake, thence northwesterly 1.8 miles to and including a turning basin at Viola, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11308, 11309, 11311, and 11314.) Previous project. For details see page 1861 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. (See Table 40-G for existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins comprising this waterway.) Project also provides for two rubblestone jetties at Aransas Pass entrance, extending into the gulf from St. Joseph and Mustang Islands, project lengths of which are 11,190 and 8,610 feet, respectively. Project further provides for a stone dike on St. Joseph Island about 20,991 feet long, connecting with north jetty and extending up this island to prevent a channel being cut around jetty. Project also provides for a breakwater at the entrance to the harbor area at Port Aransas, and for the realignment of the existing 12-foot by 100-foot project channel to Port Aransas. The breakwater consists of two overlapping sections. The one on the east side of the realigned entrance channel has a length of 830 feet and the second, located on the west side of the entrance channel, has a length of 1,290 feet. The channel to Port Aransas was relocated in the 300-foot clear distance between the overlapping sections. The portion of the channel remaining inside the breakwaters was widened to 150 feet. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range at Aransas Pass is about 1.1 feet and extreme range about 2 feet, and at Corpus Christi mean range about 1 foot and extreme about 1.5 feet. Heights of tides are dependent largely on strength and directions of winds, and during strong "northers" in the winter season water surface may be depressed as much as 3 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: Federal (Corps) $74,938,515, including $456,515 for Port Aransas Breakwaters and exclusive of amount expended on previous projects: and non-Federal $18,977,431 (includes $768 for Port Aransas Breakwaters) including $7,644,435 contributed funds and value of useful work performed, $3,320,228 lands, $6,027,000 relocations and $1,985,000 other cost. (October 1, 1992 base price.) The Port Aransas-Corpus Christi 40-foot project was completed in 1966. The Jewel Fulton Canal was completed in 1963. The Port Aransas Breakwaters were completed in July 1973. Deepening deep-draft channels to 45 feet from Tule Lake Turning Basin through Viola Turning Basin was completed in 1989, and constructing a mooring area at Port Ingleside with dolphins has been deferred. Entrance and jetty channels have been dredged to project depth and width, and dredging of channel from Harbor Island to and through the Chemical Turning Basin at 45- foot depth has been completed. Initial mooring dolphins were completed in May 1979. Disposal area levees, Area 1 and Rincon were completed in August 1984. First stage disposal area levees, South Shore, were completed in September 1984. (See Table 40-F for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1997.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Terminal facilities on Harbor Island at head of Aransas Pass, Ingleside, Corpus Christi, La Quinta, Avery Point, and Viola, are considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series, No. 25, revised 1993, Corps of Engineers.) Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract for mitigation area terracing was awarded December 20, 1996, and continued through FY 97 at a cost of $112,230. Maintenance: The FY 96 contract for dredging Corpus Christi Ship Channel to La Quinta was financially completed in October 1996 with a decrease in cost of $325,170 due to a revision in estimated quantities. The contract agreement with Texas A&M for monitoring and analysis of sediment transport and hydrodynamics at dredged material placement sites at Corpus Christi Bay continued through FY 97 at a fiscal year cost of $55,977. (See Table 40-I for dredging operations.) 4. DOUBLE BAYOU, TX Location. Enters Trinity Bay on the east side about 30 miles north of Galveston and about 8.25 miles south of Anahuac, Texas. Existing Project. Project provides for a channel 7 feet by 125 feet from the mouth of Double Bayou to the 7-foot contour in Trinity Bay, a length of 3.9 miles; and a channel, know as West Fork, 7 feet by 100 feet for a length of 2.0 miles. The project was completed in 1971. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 0.5 feet and extreme range is about 1.2 feet. Height of tides is dependent largely on winds, and during strong north winds in the winter season, water surfaces may be depressed 1.5 feet below mean low tide. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11326.) Local cooperation. Fully Complied with. Terminal facilities. Facilities are privately owned. At the mouth of the bayou is a timber wharf for loading oil barges. Between miles I and 1.5 above the mouth are 40-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 a timber wharf, a boat slip, and a marine railway owned by the Brown and Root Corporation. At mile 3 above the mouth is a small depot for handling oyster shell. The facility consists of a timber bulkhead and hoppers for loading trucks. One-half mile above the mouth are several fishing vessel docks. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Debris was cleared from the levee at a cost of $22,123. (See Table 40-I for dredging operations.) 5. FREEPORT HARBOR, TX Location. Formed by improvement of Brazos River, Texas, from mouth to about 6 miles upstream to Freeport, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11321 and 11322.) Previous projects. For details see page 1860 of Annual Report for 1915, and page 872 of Annual Report for 1938. Existing project. Existing project dimensions for various channels and basins are shown in Table 40-G on channel dimensions at end of chapter. Existing project also provides for: Dual jetties and a diversion canal for the Brazos River, including a dam, a lock in the dam and necessary auxiliary equipment. Also provides for rehabilitation of southwest jetty and the relocation of the northeast jetty (about 640 feet to the northeast); realignment of the channel between the Jetty Channel and Brazosport Turning Basin; realignment of the channel between Brazosport Turning Basin and Upper Turning Basin; relocation of Upper Turning Basin; and public use facilities adjacent to the Freeport Jetties. The 30-foot channel from Upper Turning Basin to Stauffer Chemical Plant, including the turning basin, was deauthorized by Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. Construction of lock in diversion dam at local expense is considered inactive. The 38-36 foot project was completed in 1962. New work consists of realigning, deepening and widening the Outer Bar and Jetty Channels; relocating the northeast jetty; rehabilitating the southwest jetty; realigning and deepening the harbor channel between the jetty channel and the Upper Turning Basin; relocating and enlarging the Upper Turning Basin; constructing a turning point near the northwesterly end of the jetty channel; enlarging Brazosport Turning Basin; deepening Brazos Harbor Channel; and enlarging and deepening Brazos Harbor Turning Basin, as authorized by the R&H Act of 1970. The initial contract for the 45 foot project, construction of 3,700 feet of the North Jetty, was awarded in May 1987. Project is essentially complete. Quintana Recreation area is under construction by the Local Sponsor. Navigation problems have been identified by the Local Sponsor and pilots, and studies are underway by Waterways Experiment Station and the District. These studies will recommend a solution to provide full utilization of the 45-foot channel. (See Table 40-F for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1997.) Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.5 feet and extreme range is about 2.5 feet. Except under extreme conditions, rises on river and in diversion channel do not cause greater variations in water surface than those caused by tidal action. Estimated cost of new work is: $63,707,000 Federal (Corps) and $470,000 Federal (USCG); and $32,313,000 non- Federal, including $21,302,000 contributed funds, $300,000 contributed work, $6,967,000 lands, $3,174,000 levees and spillways, and $570,000 relocations. (October 1, 1997 base price.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for Section 101 of River and Harbor Act of 1970, under costsharing tenets of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 and the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. Local Cooperation Agreement, executed June 26, 1986, along with Amendments 1, 2, 3, and 4 executed March 19, 1987; July 19, 1991; July 19, 1991; and July 15, 1997; respectively, require that local interest provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, including land for recreation, and dredged material disposal areas, presently estimated at $10,141,000, modify or relocate utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary for construction of the project, presently estimated at $570,000, contribute in cash one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation, presently estimated at $530,000; and, during construction, pay 25 percent of the construction costs allocated to deep-draft navigation, including disposal facility construction, presently estimated at $21,302,000. Terminal facilities. Small privately owned wharves, two oil docks, one acid dock, two shell unloading docks and one caustic dock. Brazos River Navigation District has one large dock with four transit sheds over rail facilities permitting all-weather work. Facilities considered adequate for existing commerce. (See Port Series No. 26, revised 1991, for additional facilities.) Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A contract for bend easing was awarded July 15, 1997, and continued through FY 97 at a cost of $1,959,943. Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 40-1 for dredging operations.) 6. GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX Location. A consolidation of authorized improvements at Galveston, Texas, which includes projects formerly identified as Galveston Harbor, Texas; Galveston Channel, Texas; and Galveston seawall extension. Entrance to Galveston Harbor is on Gulf of Mexico on the northern portion of the Texas Coast. Galveston Channel extends from a point in Galveston Harbor between Bolivar Peninsula and Fort Point to and 40-4 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT along wharf front Galveston, Texas, and is about 5 miles long and 1,200 feet wide. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11324/5.) Previous projects. For details see page 1854 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in sections of the waterway shown in Table 40-G. Also provided are: two rubble-mound jetties, the south one extending from Galveston Island and the north one extending from Bolivar Peninsula, for distances of 35,900 feet and 25,907 feet, respectively, into the Gulf of Mexico; a concrete seawall from the angle at Sixth Street and Broadway, in the city of Galveston, to the south jetty, and a 16,300-foot extension of the concrete seawall in a southwesterly direction from 61st Street; for 11 groins along the gulf shore between 12th Street and 61st Street; and for maintenance of seawall from the angle at 6th Street and Broadway to the south jetty. Under ordinary conditions, mean tidal range in Galveston Harbor is 1.6 feet on outer bar and 1.4 feet on inner bar with extreme ranges of 2.3 and 2.1 feet, respectively. Mean range in Galveston channel is about 1.3 feet and extreme range about 2 feet under ordinary conditions. Height of tides in both Galveston harbor and channel is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Existing project is complete. Dredging of Galveston channel to 36 foot depth was completed in November 1966. Dredging of the realigned entrance and Outer Bar Channel was completed in October 1967. Rehabilitation of the Beach Front Groins was completed June 1970. Dredging of Galveston channel to 40 feet was completed in March 1976. See Section 11. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX regarding work authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, and Section 33, PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN under Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels, TX, for work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. (See Table 40-F for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1997.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. None on Galveston Harbor, which is entrance channel leading to terminal facilities on Galveston, Texas City, and Houston Ship Channels. Galveston Channel terminal facilities are mostly on south side of channel. Principal wharves, owned by the city of Galveston, extend from 10th to 41st Street (see Port Series No. 23, revised 1996). A container ship terminal equipped with a crane capable of stacking containers three units high on the deck of any normal container ship has been completed and placed into operation by the city of Galveston at Piers 10 and 11, on the south side of Galveston Channel. The city of Galveston has also placed into operation a barge terminal equipped with two 35-ton and one 5-ton cranes for loading and unloading barges on Lash and Seabee ships at Pier 35 and a docking and holding area for Lash and Seabee barges on Pelican Island, directly across the channel from Piers 35 and 36. Present facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Repairs were made in April 1997 to the 16th Street groin at the Galveston Seawall at a cost of $21,642. See Section 33, PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN (See Table 40-I for dredging operations.) 7. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL, AND MEXICAN BORDER Location. Extends from a point on Sabine River about 3 miles below Orange, Texas, to Brownsville, Texas, about 421 miles; a navigation channel, about 7 miles long, in Colorado River, extending from Matagorda, Texas, to Gulf of Mexico; a tributary channel in San Bernard River, extending from Intracoastal Waterway crossing to State highway bridge some 30 miles above crossing; a tributary channel in Colorado River extending from Intracoastal Waterway upstream 15.5 miles; a tributary channel extending about 14 miles from Intracoastal Waterway to Palacios, Texas; a tributary channel extending about 2 miles from Intracoastal Waterway to Rockport, Texas; a tributary channel extending about 6 miles from Intracoastal Waterway near Port Aransas, Texas, to town of Aransas Pass, Texas; a tributary channel about onefourth mile long extending from Intracoastal Waterway near Port O'Connor, Texas, into Barroom Bay; a tributary channel extending about 38.8 miles from Intracoastal Waterway via Seadrift to a point in Guadalupe River 5.5 miles below Victoria, Texas; a harbor of refuge for small craft at Seadrift; a channel extending from gulf to Port Mansfield, Texas, about 11 miles; and a tributary channel in Arroyo, Colorado extending from Intracoastal Waterway to a point near Harlingen, Texas, about 31 miles; side channels in vicinity of Port Isabel, Texas, and a small boat basin at Port Isabel, Texas, and a tributary channel extending from Intracoastal Waterway main channel at a point in West Galveston Bay into Offatts Bayou about 2.2 miles with a west turnout (wye connection) 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide between Offatts Bayou Channel and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11302, 11303, 11305, 11306, 11308, 11309, 11314, 11315, 11317, 11319, 11322, 11326, and 11331.) Previous project. For details see page 1859 of Annual Report for 1915. (West Galveston Bay and Brazos River Canal, Texas.) Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in main channel of waterway: A channel 12 feet deep (below mean low tide) and 125 feet wide from the Sabine River to Brownsville, Texas. Relocation 40-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 of channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide in Matagorda Bay, miles 454.3 to 471.3, relocation of channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide in Corpus Christi Bay, miles 539.4 to 549.7 (mileage is west of Harvey Lock, Louisiana); and alternate channel, 12 feet deep (below mean low tide) and 125 feet wide via Galveston Channel and Galveston Bay to the Galveston causeway; maintenance of existing channel 12 feet deep by 125 feet wide through Lydia Ann Channel, between Aransas Bay and Aransas Pass; provisions of such passing places, widening of bends, locks and guard locks, railway bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary, and the tributary channels shown in tabulation. The authorized channel 16 feet deep and 125 feet wide from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel is inactive. (See Table 40-H on existing project dimensions provided for in tributary channels.) Removal of the railroad bridge across the canal at Mud Bayou was completed and operation and care of the facility was discontinued on April 14, 1969. Deepening the existing 6 foot by 60 foot side channels at Port Isabel to 12 feet was completed February 22, 1972, Offatts Bayou channel was completed January 1974. Relocation of main channel across Corpus Christi Bay was completed in September 1976. The 14 foot by 175 foot Channel to Aransas Pass was completed in April 1979. Dredging Chocolate Bayou Channel was completed in January 1981. Construction of a saltwater barrier in Chocolate Bayou was completed in February 1981. The 12 foot by 125 foot channel relocation route in Matagorda Bay has been deauthorized. The Harbor of Refuge at Seadrift, Texas, has been placed in the inactive category. Construction of jetties at mouth of Colorado River was completed in 1986. Construction of a navigation channel from the Gulf to the GIWW and an impoundment basin were fiscally completed in 1991. Construction of Tiger Island Dam and recreation facilities were also completed in 1991. Construction of the recreation facilities at Jetty Park was completed in 1992. Construction of the diversion dam and connecting channel was completed in 1993. Construction of the oyster cultch was completed in 1995. Active authorized work remaining consists of the following: (1) Work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 for enlarging the existing Channel to Victoria from a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet to a depth of 12 feet and width of 125 feet. (2) Sargent Beach, work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 for construction of a concrete-pile and concreteblock revetment structure which extends for an estimated 8 miles to protect the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. (3) Brazos River Floodgates, major rehabilitation of the East Floodgate Guidewalls. (See Table 40-F for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1997.) Mean tidal variation is 0.5 foot at Orange, 1 foot at Port Arthur, 1.3 feet in Galveston Bay, 1.5 feet at Freeport, 1 foot in Matagorda Bay, 1 foot in San Antonio Bay, 1 foot at Corpus Christi, 1.5 feet at Port Isabel, and 1.5 feet at Brownsville. Extreme ranges of tide under ordinary conditions are 1 foot at Orange, 1.5 feet at Port Arthur, 2 feet in Galveston Bay, 2 feet at Freeport, 1.5 feet in Matagorda and San Antonio Bays, 1.5 feet at Corpus Christi, 2 feet at Port Isabel, and 1.5 feet at Brownsville. Height of tides is dependent largely on wind. Strong north winds have depressed water surface as much as 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is: Channel to Victoria - $24,370,000 Federal (Corps), $422,000 Federal (Department of Transportation), $57,000 Federal (U.S. Coast Guard), and $6,082,000 non-Federal consisting of $2,708,000 cash, $1,643,000 lands, $171,000 fender system, and $1,560,000 levees and other associated costs. (October 1, 1997 base prices.) Sargent Beach - $29,460,000 Federal (Corps) and $29,460,000 Federal (Inland Waterways Trust Fund). (October 1, 1997 base prices.) Brazos River Floodgates (Major Rehabilitation) - $2,750,000 Federal (Corps) and $2,750,000 Federal (Inland Waterways Trust Fund). (October 1, 1995 base prices.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with except for provisions of Section 101, 1968 River and Harbor Act and Water Resources Development Act of 1988. The Project Cooperation Agreement for Channel to Victoria was executed November 17, 1994. Terminal facilities. There are terminal facilities at Aransas Pass, Port Arthur, Galveston, Port Isabel, and Brownsville. See Port Series No. 22 (revised 1988), Port Series No. 23 (revised 1996), Port Series No. 25 (revised 1983) and Port Series No. 26 (revised 1991), Corps of Engineers. Local interests constructed terminal facilities at Port Mansfield and Port Harlingen. There are numerous privately owned piers and wharves along the waterway. A 330-foot navigation district owned general cargo dock, a 770-foot private dock and a 760-foot private timber trestle have recently been completed at the upper end of the Channel to Victoria. Facilities are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: - Channel to Victoria - The contract for dredging Stations 0+00 to 600+00 and constructing levees for the Local Sponsor, awarded January 23, 1996, was completed in December 1996 and financially completed in January 1997 at a cost of $1,065,120. Sargent Beach - The contract to construct a concrete and rock barrier along an eight mile reach of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway at Sargent, Texas, awarded April 21, 1995, continued through FY 1997 at a cost of $16,477,632 of which $8,382,750 were Corps of Engineers funds and $8,094,882 were Inland Waterways Trust funds. 40-6 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT Brazos River Floodgates - The major rehabilitation contract to replace the guidewalls at the east gate, awarded August 10, 1994, was physically completed in September 1997 at a cost of $365,242 of which $182,621 were Corps of Engineers funds and $182,621 were Inland Waterways Trust funds. Maintenance: - Main Channel and Tributaries - A contract for maintenance of the mooring facilities at Port O'Connor to Harlingen was completed for a total cost of $131,024 in FY 97. A contract for maintenance of the mooring facilities at Port Arthur to Matagorda Bay was completed in FY 97 for a total cost of $988,708. A Memorandum of Agreement was executed on August 12, 1994, with Texas A&M Research Foundation for environmental monitoring of dredging processes in the Lower Laguna Madre and continued through FY 1997 with a cost of $38,486. On October 1, 1994, another Memorandum of Agreement was executed with the Research Foundation for environmental monitoring of dredging processes in the Upper Laguna Madre. The cost incurred for FY 1997 was $126,765. The cost incurred for 1997 for Dredged Material Management Plans was as follows - GIWW, Corpus Christi Bay to Port Isabel $740,061; GIWW, High Island to Brazos River $26,062; GIWW, Brazos River to Port O'Connor $111,389; and GIWW, Port O'Connor to Corpus Christi $130,311. (See Table 40-I for dredging operations.) Aransas National Wildlife Refuge - Contract awarded July 1, 1997, for erosion protection from Station 774+600 to Station 792+600 along the Aransas National Wildlife Refuge in Aransas and Nueces County continued through FY 1997 at a cost of $294,702. Brazos River Floodgates - The Brazos River Floodgates were operated and maintained at a cost of $816,373. Channel to Victoria - An archaeological service contract was awarded in FY 97 for Channel to Victoria Barge Canal, Calhoun County, Texas. The project consists of conducting full-scale data recovery (field excavations and extensive post-artifact processing, analysis, and project report preparation) investigations at prehistoric archaeological site 41CL59. Site 41CL59 is an extensive prehistoric shell and earth midden with an occupation dating beginning about 400 B.C. and continuing up until A.D. 1000. The site measures 700 meters long by 100 meters wide, and is 10 to 25 feet thick, sandwiched stratigraphically within the adjoining terrace bluff overlooking the Barge Canal and the former Guadalupe River floodplain. Vast amount of lithics (stone dart and arrow points, knives, scrapers, awls, etc.), special perforated shell tools, ceramics, along with an extensive collection of faunal and floral material have been recovered from the site. In addition, rich features associated with the later historic Indian period and early Texan ranching settlers have also been recovered from this site. The project is being conducted by the Corps in compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and 36 CFR Part 800 regulations. The field work was initiated in FY 97 and continued through the FY at a cost of $438,164. Colorado River Locks - The Colorado River Locks were operated and maintained at a cost of $877,114. A contract to rehabilitate the east and west locks and boat basin was awarded September 26, 1997, and incurred a cost of $5,000 for FY 97. Channel to Port Mansfield - A contract was awarded in October 1996 to perform monitoring of the piping plover along the Channel to Port Mansfield at a fiscal year cost of $158,844. In September 1997 a contract was awarded to repair the north and south jetties. Funds in the amount of $50,000 were expended in FY 97. (See Table 40-I for dredging operations.) 8. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. Connects Galveston Harbor, at a point opposite Port Bolivar, with city of Houston, Texas, extending 50 miles northwesterly across Galveston Bay through San Jacinto River and Buffalo Bayou to a turning basin at head of Long Reach with light-draft channel 5 miles long from turning basin to Jensen Drive, Houston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11324/5, 11327, 11328, and 11329.) Previous project. For details see page 1856 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel dimensions in sections of the waterway shown in Table 40-G. Also provides for certain cut-offs, for easing sharp bends, an earthen dam across the upper end of Turkey Bend, and for off-channel silting basins as deemed necessary by the Chief of Engineers. Construction of 26,000 linear feet of pile dike to protect the channel in upper Galveston Bay was deauthorized by Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. The 40-foot project was completed in March 1966. Dredging a channel in Greens Bayou to Mile 1.57 was completed in 1970. Dredging Greens Bayou, Mile 1.57 to Mile 2.73, has been deauthorized. See Section 33, PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN under Houston- Galveston Navigation Channels, TX, for work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. (See Table 40-F for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1997.) Mean tidal range under ordinary conditions is 0.6 foot to 1.3 feet in lower part of Galveston Bay; 0.6 foot to 1.3 feet in upper bay; and 0.5 to 1 foot in San Jacinto River and Buffalo Bayou. Extreme ranges under ordinary conditions are about 2 feet, 1.2 feet and I foot, respectively. Freshets caused rises of over 12 feet in Buffalo Bayou; however, this condition has not occurred since completion of Addicks and Barker Dams for flood control on upper watershed of Buffalo Bayou. Height of tides is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season the water 40-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for Houston Ship Channel. Local Cooperation Agreement for assumption of maintenance on Bayport Ship Channel was executed April 6, 1993. Local Cooperation Agreements for assumption of maintenance on Barbour Terminal Channel and Greens Bayou Channel were both executed on February 8, 1994. Terminal facilities. City of Houston and Port of Houston Authority operate modern terminals which supplement privately owned wharves, piers, and docks, as described in Port Series No. 24 (revised 1989), Corps of Engineers. Facilities are considered adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The contract for erosion protection at Alexander Island and Peggy Lake, awarded July 19, 1996, was completed in FY 97 for a cost of $479,876. The dredging contract awarded October 13, 1994, for dredging Sims Bayou to the Turning Basin and Greens Bayou Channel was financially completed for a cost of $837, 380 to provide an equitable adjustment for differing site conditions. Routine maintenance included mosquito control spraying at a cost of $113,305. (See Table 40-I for dredging operations.) See Section 33, PRECONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. 9. MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX Location. This is a consolidation of shallow draft channel improvements of "Channel from Pass Cavallo to Port Lavaca, Texas," and deep draft channel improvements authorized under "Matagorda Ship Channel, Texas." Bar at Pass Cavallo is 125 miles southwest of Galveston entrance and 54 miles north of Aransas Pass. It connects Matagorda Bay with the gulf. Project extends across Matagorda Bay and Lavaca Bay to towns of Port Lavaca and Point Comfort. These two towns are on opposite sides of Lavaca Bay and both are about 26 miles northwest from Pass Cavallo. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11316.) Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins are listed in Table 40-G on channel dimensions. Project also provides for dual jetties at entrance, south jetty extending 6,000 feet to 24-foot depth in the gulf and north jetty extending 5,900 feet to 24-foot depth. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about I foot and extreme range about 2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on the wind, and during strong "northers" in winter season the water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. (See Table 40- F for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1997.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Terminal facilities. Privately owned facilities at Port Lavaca, municipally owned facilities at mouth of Lynn bayou, privately owned and publicly owned facilities at Point Comfort, Texas. These facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. Facilities at Point Comfort consist of a channel, turning basin with wharfs, oil dock and loading equipment, all owned by Aluminum Company of America; and a wharf built by local interest at Point Comfort turning basin. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: Routine maintenance. (See Table 40-I for dredging operations.) 10. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX Location. This is a consolidation of old improvements of "Harbor at Sabine Pass and Port Arthur Canal" and "Sabine-Neches Canal, including Sabine River to Orange and Neches River to Beaumont, Texas." Sabine Pass is on Gulf of Mexico about 58 miles east of Galveston and 280 miles west of Southwest Pass, Mississippi River. It connects Sabine Lake with gulf. Port Arthur canal extends 7 miles from near upper end of Sabine Pass to Port Arthur docks at mouth of Taylors Bayou. Near its upper end, Sabine-Neches canal joins and extends to mouths of Neches and Sabine Rivers. Waterway next extends up Neches River to Beaumont and up Sabine River to Orange. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11341, 11342, and 11343.) Previous projects. For details see page 1863 of Annual Report for 1915, page 985 of Annual Report for 1916, and page 873 of Annual Report for 1926. Existing project. Existing project dimensions provided for in various channels and basins are set forth in Table 40-G on channel dimensions. Project also provides for two stone jetties at Sabine Pass entrance from the gulf, western jetty to be 21,905 feet long and eastern jetty 25,310 feet long. Project further provides for removal of guard lock in Sabine-Neches Canal, construction of suitable permanent protective works along Sabine Lake frontage owned by city of Port Arthur to prevent dredged material from entering Sabine Lake and to prevent erosion of material deposited, reconstruction of Port Arthur Bridge, and relocation of Port Arthur field office. Mean tidal variation at entrance is about 1.5 feet, at Port Arthur about 1 foot, and at Orange and Beaumont about 0.5 foot. Prolonged north winds during winter season have depressed water surface as much as 3.4 feet below mean low tide while tropical disturbances have caused heights as much as 8 feet above mean low tide. Existing project is complete. Removal of obstructive bridge at Port Arthur was completed May 1969. The high level fixed bridge across Sabine-Neches Canal was completed October 1970. Deepening project to 40 feet was completed April 1972. (See Table 40-F for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1997.) Local cooperation. Complied with. Terminal facilities. See volume 2, Port Series No. 22 (revised 1988), Corps of Engineers. Facilities are considered adequate for present commerce. 40-8 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: The contract to rehabilitate Placement Area No. 11, awarded June 17, 1996, continued through FY 97 at a cost of $1,736,345. FY 96 contract for dredging the Upper Neches River Channel was modified and financially completed in FY 97 at a cost of $30,315 for installing a dredge pipeline at KCS rail line and dredge standby. The contract for dredging the Sabine-Neches Canal (Section B) and the Sabine River Channel was also financially completed with modifications for pipeline delay and repairing levee features, for a cost of $165,433 in FY 97. Mosquito control spraying was performed in FY 97 for $55,225. (See Table 40-I for dredging operations.) 11. TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX Location. Texas City is on the mainland of Texas on west side of Galveston Bay, about 10 miles northwest of city of Galveston. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11324/5.) Previous projects. For details see page 1856 of Annual Report for 1915. Existing project. Provides for channel 40 feet deep, 400 feet wide and about 6.75 miles long, from Bolivar Roads to a turning basin at Texas City, 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet to 1,200 feet wide and 4,253 feet long; and an Industrial Canal, 40 feet deep and 300-400 feet wide extending a distance of 1.7 miles southwestward from the south end of Texas City Turning Basin, and a turning basin, 40 feet deep, 1,000 feet wide and 1,150 feet long. Project also provides for easing the approach to the turning basin; a pile dike 28,200 feet long, parallel to and north of the channel; and a rubble-mound dike, 27,600 feet long, along the southerly side of the pile dike. The 40-foot channel was completed in June 1967. Widening the Texas City Turning Basin; realigning the Texas City Turning Basin to a location 85 feet easterly from its present position; and enlargement through widening and deepening of the Industrial Canal and basins was initiated in July 1980 and completed in June 1982. The only work remaining is deferred construction consisting of widening the Industrial Canal from 250 feet to 300 feet at 40 foot depth. Work authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986 would modify the project by providing for deepening the Texas City Turning Basin to 50 feet, enlarging the 6.7-mile long Texas City Channel to 50 feet by 600 feet, deepening the existing 800-foot wide Bolivar Roads Channel and Inner Bar Channel to 50 feet, deepening the existing 800-foot wide Outer Bar and Galveston Entrance Channel to a 52-foot depth for 4.1 miles at a width of 800 feet and an additional reach at a width of 600 feet to the 52 foot contour in the Gulf of Mexico. Establishment of 600 acres of wetland and development of water-oriented recreational facilities on a 90-acre enlargement of the Texas City Dike are also proposed. The project is currently in the "deferred" category. (See Table 40-F for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1997.) Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range is about 1.3 feet and extreme range is about 2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on the wind and during strong "northers" water surface may be depressed 2 feet below mean low tide. Estimated cost for new work is $123,300,000 Federal (Corps), excluding expenditures on previous projects, and $74,393,700 non-Federal, including $62,027,741 contributed funds, $248,000 work contribution, $427,959 lands, $10,737,000 levees and spillways, $6,000 for removal of barge mooring facilities from Shoal Point (formerly known as Snake Island), $561,000 for berthing areas, and $386,000 relocations. (October 1, 1988 base price.) Local cooperation. Fully complied with for completed work. For work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, as amended, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, and disposal areas; relocate utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges; provide berthing areas; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation facilities, and, during construction, pay 25 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation to a depth of 45 feet plus 50 percent of the costs allocated to deep-draft navigation deeper than 45 feet; pay an additional 10 percent of the costs allocated to deepdraft navigation within a period of 30 years following completion if not offset by credit allowed for lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations and disposal areas; and pay 50 percent of the costs incurred for operation and maintenance below the 45-foot depth. Terminal facilities. Privately owned terminal facilities are on the mainland at inner end of this channel and are considered adequate for existing commerce. A deep-draft channel and turning basin extend about 1.9 miles southwestward from south end of Texas City Turning Basin have been constructed by local interests. See Port Series No. 23 (revised 1996), Corps of Engineers. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: See Section 33, PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. Maintenance: Routine Maintenance. (See Table 40-1 for dredging operations.) 12. TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Location. The main stem of the Trinity River is formed at Dallas by the confluence of the West Fork and the Elm Fork at river mile 505.5. The mouth of the 40-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Trinity is about one-half mile west of Anahuac, Texas. (See Geological Survey base map, Texas, scale 1:500,000.) Previous project. For details of abandoned locks and dam construction see page 986 of Annual Report for 1933. Existing project. See individual detailed reports on Anahuac Channel, Channel to Liberty and Wallisville Lake. Project includes the existing Federal project designated as "Mouth of Trinity River, Texas," which was completed in 1907 at a cost of $80,000 (no cost to local interest). Project is not being maintained. (See Table 40-F for total cost of existing project to September 30, 1997.) Local cooperation. See individual detailed reports on Channel to Liberty and Wallisville Lake. There is no local cooperation required for Anahuac Channel. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and piers at Anahuac, Moss Bluff, Wallisville, and Liberty, Texas, are adequate for existing commerce. 12A. ANAHUAC CHANNEL, TX Location: Extends from 6-foot depth in Galveston Bay to Anahuac, Texas, opposite mouth of Trinity River 38 miles north of Galveston, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11323.) Existing project. No project dimensions authorized by 1905 River and Harbor Act. A 6- by 80- foot channel, 16,000 feet long was dredged in 1905. At present a 6- by 100-foot channel is maintained. Under ordinary conditions tidal range is 0.6 to 1.2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on wind. Strong north winds depress water surface 1.5 feet below mean sea level. Latest published map is in House Document 440, 56th Congress, 1st Session. Project was completed in 1911. Local cooperation. None required. Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and piers are the only terminal facilities at Anahuac. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: No work was incurred during the fiscal year. 12B. CHANNEL TO LIBERTY, TX Location. Improvement is located in Galveston Bay and tidal reach of lower Trinity River. (See Geological Survey Maps for Anahuac, Cove, Moss Bluff, and Liberty, Texas.) Previous projects. For details see page 986 of Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. Provides for a 6-foot channel from Anahuac to Liberty which was completed in 1925. A navigable channel from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston Bay to Liberty, Texas, with depth of 9 feet and width of 150 feet, extending along the east shore of Trinity Bay to the mouth of the Trinity River at Anahuac, thence in the river channel to a turning basin at Liberty, Texas, and a protective embankment along the west side of the channel in Trinity Bay. The 6-foot Channel to Liberty was completed in 1925. The 9-foot Channel to Liberty has been dredged from junction with Houston Ship Channel to a point one mile below Anahuac, Texas. Work remaining consists of dredging a 9- by 150-foot channel from one mile below Anahuac, Texas to Liberty, Texas. Local cooperation. Fully complied with for portion of "Channel to Liberty" between Houston Ship Channel and 1 mile below Anahuac, Texas, as required by 1946 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 634, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess.), but not complied with for remaining portion of "Channel to Liberty" as required by River and Harbor Act of 1945 (H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess.). Terminal facilities. Privately owned wharves and docks at Anahuac, Wallisville, Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.'s slip, Moss Bluff and Liberty, Texas, are adequate for existing commerce. Operations during fiscal year. Maintenance: A FY 1996 cost of $550,000 was incurred for an equitable adjustment for temporary levees and an additional 7,000 feet of dredge pipeline on the contract for dredging Channel to Liberty and Anahuac, awarded October 1, 1994. Routine maintenance. (See Table 40-I for dredging operations.) 12C. WALLISVILLE LAKE, TX Location. Dam is at river mile 3.9, about 4 miles northwest of Anahuac, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Chart 11323.) Existing project. Provides for construction of a dam and overflow spillway approximately 8 miles long to prevent salinity intrusion and create a 3,800 acre reservoir. The maximum pool elevation will be 2 feet above National Geodetic Vertical Datum. (The reservoir was reduced from 5600 acres with a maximum pool elevation of 4 feet N.G.V.D. by agreement to protect the endangered bald eagle.) Project provides for an 84 foot by 600-foot navigation lock to facilitate navigation on Channel to Liberty. The sill has a depth of minus 16 feet below National Geodetic Vertical Datum. Project also provides for two recreational areas; and three water control structures to control salinity intrusion and regulate freshwater flows to the saltwater marsh west of the river. Dam controls a drainage area of 1,262 square miles below Livingston Dam (non-Federal project at channel mile 99.2) and has a storage capacity of 14,000 acre-feet. Under ordinary conditions mean tidal range in bay is from 0.6 foot to 1.2 feet. Height of tide is dependent largely on wind. Strong northerly winds depress water surface 1.5 feet below mean sea level. Total estimated cost of authorized project is $78,000,000 Federal (Corps). (October 1, 1997 base price.) A contract for construction of access road, Big Hog intake structure, intake canal and access bridge was completed in October 1968. Work started in July 1970 on 40-10 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT construction of the lock and dam, roads, diversion channel, and navigation channel. Work was suspended in February 1973 because of an injunction halting construction. Protective work on the lock and dam was permitted and was completed in April 1973. An exception to the injunction was granted for plugging oil wells which was completed in August 1973. Notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit was filed in April 1973. In August 1974, the Court of Appeals reversed the judgment and remanded the case with directions that a revised or supplemental statement be prepared and judged anew. Final supplement to the Environmental Impact Statement for the modified project authorized in the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1983 (PL 98-63) was submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency on September 21, 1983. In March 1986, the Court rendered its Memorandum of order continuing the injunction and directing the Corps to recommence the administrative process at the time when the first departure from standard NEPA procedures occurred prior to the 1983 legislative action. The Corps and Local Sponsors perfected an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals and on May 11, 1987, the Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the Corps and dismissed the suit in its entirety. The Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act of 1991 provided $9,200,000 for the project and directive language for continuation of construction. In the fall of 1989, a pair of bald eagles were discovered nesting at the project site which led to additional consultation under the Endangered Species Act. Solicitation of the contract for the non-overflow dam was postponed to allow for environmental coordination. An Environmental Assessment was prepared with a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) which was signed in September 1991. Environmental documents were approved and construction was resumed. Work remaining consist of design and construction of lock rehabilitation; gated navigation channel; controlled spillway and bridge; and three water control structures. Local cooperation. Local interest must contribute an amount equal to cost allocated to water supply, onehalf of cost allocated to salinity control and cost allocated to recreation less cost of basic facilities and less 15 percent of total project cost. Local interest reimbursement is estimated at $10,500,000. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The architect/engineering contract, awarded April 4, 1994 to prepare plans and specifications and cost estimates for lock rehabilitation and construction of new facilities, completed the design in 1996 and continued through FY 1997 providing construction phase services at a cost of $100,000. Architect/engineering contract awarded September 20, 1995, to design Structure A, provide construction phase services and reestablish property boundary lines, continued through Fiscal Year 1997 at a cost of $177,055. The construction contract for lock rehabilitation and construction of new facilities was awarded December 22, 1995 and continued through FY 1997 at a cost of $10,820,000. The contract includes rehabilitation and completion of the navigation lock, completion of the North and South navigation channels, construction of a new administration/resident office building, and electrical and mechanical equipment controls for the controlled spillway structure. Maintenance: Ranger surveillance, administration of project, and administration of duck blind permit program was conducted. Routine maintenance included mosquito control spraying at a cost of $7,080. 13. RECONNAISSANCE AND CONDITION SURVEYS Reconnaissance and condition surveys were conducted in FY 1997 at a total cost of $50,415. The surveys were on the following projects: Channel to Palacios Corpus Christi Entrance Channel Clear Creek and Clear Lake Channel to La Quinta Texas City Harbor Feb 97 Feb-Mar 97 May 97 Feb 97 May 97 14. NAVIGATION WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Navigation activities pursuant to Section 107, Public Law 86-645 (preauthorization): Initial coordination for Section 107 navigation activities was performed in FY 97 at a cost of $1,556. Mitigation of shore damages attributable to navigation projects pursuant to Section 111, Public Law 90-483: No mitigation of shore damages studies were performed in FY 97. Shore Protection 15. CORPUS CHRISTI BEACH, TX (RESTORATION PROJECT) Location. Corpus Christi Beach, a shore area having a length of about 2 miles, is located on the west side of Corpus Christi Bay in Nueces County at Corpus Christi, Texas. (See National Ocean Survey Charts 11309 and 11311.) Existing project. The plan of improvement provided for initial restoration of eroded areas of Corpus Christi Beach, over a shore length of 1.4 miles, located on the easterly side of Rincon Peninsula, with periodic nourishment as required. Construction was completed in March 1978. Periodic nourishment and construction of sand retention groin was completed in November 1985. 40-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operations during fiscal year. Section 934 of Water Resources Development Act of 1986 provides for extension of nourishment period to 50 years for beach nourishment projects. A study to determine the appropriateness of such an extended nourishment period for the Federal beach nourishment project was completed. The study indicated that there was no economic justification for continued Federal participation in the program. The responsibility for beach monitoring and maintenance was transferred to the City of Corpus Christi in July 1990. Flood Control 16. BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Location. Improvements are on Buffalo Bayou watershed, a part of San Jacinto River watershed, in Harris County, west and northwest of city of Houston, Texas. (See Geological Survey quadrangle sheets for Harris County.) Existing project. Provides for improvements of Buffalo Bayou and its tributaries above turning basin of Houston Ship Channel to control floods for protection of city of Houston, and prevent deposition of silt in turning basin of ship channel by construction of detention reservoirs, enlargement and rectification of channels and construction of control works. Channel rectification on Brays Bayou with an improved channel length 25.4 miles was completed in March 1971. Channel rectification on White Oak Bayou was completed in 1976. Work remaining consists of rectification of approximately 22 miles of main stem of Buffalo Bayou. See individual detailed reports on Addicks and Barker Reservoirs; and Brays, Greens, Halls, Hunting, Little White Oak, and Carpenters Bayous. Local cooperation. Section 203, 1954 Flood Control Act applies. Local interests have accomplished all required local cooperation on Brays Bayou and White Oak Bayou. On Buffalo Bayou, local interests purchased interests that the United States had in 7 miles of rectified channel below Barker and Addicks Dams for $256,651. Of the remaining required rights-of-way on Buffalo Bayou, local interests have acquired about 40 percent. About 53 percent of required bridge relocations and 3 percent of the required bridge relocations have been accomplished. Advance of $4,400,000 by the Harris County Flood Control District was refunded in September 1956. Public Law 86-53 authorized reimbursement of $38,726 to Galveston, Houston and Henderson Railroad Company for bridge alterations at Brays Bayou. Non-Federal contributions totaled $63,661 for project betterment. Recreation development is subject to conditions of non-Federal cost-sharing under Federal Water Project Recreation Act of 1965. See individual detailed reports on Addicks and Barker Reservoirs; and Brays, Greens, Halls, Hunting, Little White Oak, and Carpenters Bayous. 16A. ADDICKS AND BARKER RESERVOIRS, TX Location. Reservoirs are located in and west of the City of Houston in Harris, Waller, and Fort Bend Counties, Texas. Existing project. Construction of Barker Dam was complete in February 1945. Construction of Addicks Dam and 7.4 miles of channel rectification downstream from Addicks and Barker Dams was completed in October 1948. Modification of Barker and Addicks Dams consisting of gating of two uncontrolled conduits in each dam, was complete in 1969. Major rehabilitation of Addicks and Barker Dams to prevent seepage through the embankment was completed in 1982. Work under the Dam Safety Assurance program was initiated in Fiscal Year 1986. Work accomplished included raising approximately 32,400 feet of Addicks Dam 1 to 3 feet and raising approximately 57,600 feet of Barker Dam 3 to 5 feet and armor-plating low ends of both dams. A contract with the city of Houston for costsharing in the construction of recreation facilities was entered into in November 1981. The lease for approximately 10,534 acres of land and water areas was approved in February 1983. Local cooperation. None required. Operations during fiscal year. Recreation: Community Park West (Phase IB) and the velodrome were completed in November 1986. Grading and clearing for an archery range was performed by the City of Houston in March and April 1987. Work on Community Park West (Phase 4) by the City of Houston was completed in 1992, as was the development of Community Park 2 (soccer fields, ball fields, and parking lots) by Harris County Precinct 3 in Cullen- Barker Park. Additional playground equipment was installed in Bear Creek Park, Addicks Reservoir, by Harris County Precinct 3. The Fort Bend County YMCA built a pavilion, archery range, and nature trails in Barker Reservoir. Maintenance and improvements of these recreation areas continues. Maintenance: Construction contract for repairs and rehabilitation to Barker ditch and dam outfall was awarded April 9, 1997 and continued through FY 97 at a cost of $575,940. Road repairs to Barker Dam and Addicks Dam for FY 97 cost $39,458 and $30,269, respectively. A construction contract for embankment restoration at Addicks and Barker Dams was awarded April 24, 1997 and continued through FY 97 at a cost of $104,874. A contract for rehabilitation and repairs to the outlet works at Addicks and Barker Dams was awarded September 15, 1997. Fiscal year costs for 1997 were $10,000ooo. 40-12 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT 16B. BRAYS BAYOU, TX Location. The project is located in the south-central portion of Buffalo Bayou, Harris County, TX. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 3 miles of stream improvements, 3 flood detention basins, and 7 miles of stream diversion channels. Aesthetic vegetation is included. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, sports fields, comfort stations and parking areas. The estimated cost for new work is $219,578,000 Federal (Corps) and $125,448,000 non-Federal consisting of $19,509,000 cash contributions, and $105,939,000 for lands and relocations (October 1997 base price). Location cooperation. Local Sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local Sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-ofway; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $19,509,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). The Local Sponsor was authorized to develop the project and design and construct an alternative to the diversion component and be reimbursed for the Federal share by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (PL 104-303). See Section 33, PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. 16C. GREENS BAYOU, TX Location. The project is located in the northcentral portion of Buffalo Bayou, Harris County, TX, and does not include the Halls Bayou tributary. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 25 miles of stream enlargements, 14 miles of stream clearing and 4 flood detention basins. Aesthetic vegetation and mitigation is included. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, sports fields, launches, ramps, comfort stations and parking areas. The estimated cost for new work is $146,653,000 Federal (Corps) and $91,620,000 non-Federal consisting of $13,231,000 cash contributions, and $78,389,000 for lands and relocations (October 1997 base price). Local cooperation. Local Sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local Sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $13,231,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). See Section 33, PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. 16D. HALLS BAYOU, TX Location. Halls Bayou is a major tributary of Greens Bayou, located in the north-central portion of Buffalo Bayou, Harris County, TX. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 18 miles of stream improvements. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, boat ramps, a comfort station and parking areas. The estimated cost for new work is $64,334,000 Federal (Corps) and $49,352,000 non-Federal consisting of $7,256,000 cash contributions, and $42,096,000 for lands and relocations (October 1997 base price). Local cooperation. Local Sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local Sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $7,256,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). Project is awaiting Pre-construction Engineering and Design funds. 16E. HUNTING BAYOU, TX Location. Hunting Bayou is located in Houston, approximately 4 to 5 miles from the central business district. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 14.3 miles of stream improvements. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, a comfort station and parking areas. The estimated cost for new work is $63,532,000 Federal (Corps) and $58,387,000 non-Federal consisting of $6,514,000 cash contributions, and $51,873,000 for lands and relocations (October 1997 base price). Local cooperation. Local Sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local Sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-ofway; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $6,514,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). The Local Sponsor was authorized to design and construct an alternative to the project and be reimbursed for the Federal share by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (PL 104-303). 40-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 16F. LITTLE WHITE OAK BAYOU, TX Location. Little White Oak Bayou is a tributary of White Oak Bayou in north-central Houston. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 6.0 miles of stream enlargements. Recreation facilities include trails and picnic facilities. The estimated cost for new work is $17,958,000 Federal (Corps) and $17,957,000 non-Federal consisting of $1,996,000 cash contributions, and $15,961,000 for lands and relocations (October 1990 base price). Local cooperation. Local Sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local Sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $1,996,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). Project is awaiting Pre-construction Engineering and Design funds. 16G. CARPENTERS BAYOU, TX Location. Carpenters Bayou is a tributary of Buffalo Bayou in northeastern Houston. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of 9.7 miles of stream enlargements. Recreation facilities include trails and picnic facilities. The estimated cost for new work is $3,900,000 Federal (Corps) and $1,950,000 non-Federal consisting of $370,000 cash contributions, and $2,320,000 for lands and relocations (October 1990 base price). Local cooperation. Local Sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. Local Sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $370,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was authorized for construction in the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (PL 101-640). Project is awaiting Pre-construction Engineering and Design funds. 17. BUFFALO BAYOU, TX (LYNCHBURG PUMP STATION) Location. The project is located 10 miles east of Houston, Texas near the entrance to the Houston Ship Channel. Existing project. The Lynchburg Pump Station is to be protected by a flood barrier encircling the facility. A plan consisting of a combination sheet pile wall and earth levee is recommended. Total barrier length is approximately 2000 feet. The Crosby-Lynchburg Road will be rerouted to the top of the levee. Local cooperation. The Coastal Water Authority, owned by the City of Houston, is the Local Sponsor of the project. Operation during the fiscal year. The Detailed Project Study was underway throughout FY 1996 and completed in September 1996. An implementation plan in the amount of $5,985,000 has been tentatively agreed upon by the Local Sponsor, subject to approval by higher authority of the Corps of Engineers. Construction could be initiated in late FY 1998 if funds are available. 18. CLEAR CREEK, TX Location. The project is located about midway between the two metropolitan centers of Houston, Texas, on the north and Galveston-Texas City on the south in Harris and Galveston Counties above and below existing Clear Lake. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of an improved channel from Mile 3.8 to Mile 34.8 to contain within its banks all flood flows up to and including that of a 100-year flood. The selected plan provides channel enlargement and easing of bends within the existing stream from Mile 3.8 to Mile 26.05 to contain at least the 10-year frequency storm, and additional outlet with gated structure from Clear Lake to Galveston Bay, restriction of development in the residual 100-year flood plain and measures to mitigate environmental effects. In 1986, at the request of Brazoria County Drainage District No. 4, that portion of the project upstream of the Brazoria/Galveston County line, approximate improved Mile 19.1, was placed in the "inactive" category. Estimated cost for new work, excluding "inactive" portion, is $68,822,000 Federal (Corps) and $53,299,000 non-Federal consisting of $6,106,000 cash contributions, $22,600,000 for lands, and $24,593,000 for relocations (October 1, 1997 base price). Local cooperation. Local Sponsors for the project are Galveston and Harris counties. The Local Cooperation Agreement, executed June 30, 1986, requires local interests to provide lands, easements, rights-ofway, and material disposal areas; modify or relocate building, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary in the construction of the project; make a cash contribution for mitigation measures consistent with the non-Federal share of total project costs without mitigation measures; pay five percent of the total costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation and maintenance of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The construction contract for dredging the Second Outlet Channel, awarded July 23, 1996, continued through FY 1997 at a cost of $4,964,975. 40-14 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT 19. CYPRESS CREEK, TX Location. The project is located north of Houston, Texas in Harris County. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement consists of enlargement of the lower 29.4 miles of the Cypress Creek Channel, incorporating grassed side slopes and channel bottom and appropriate erosion control measures; application of floodplain management techniques in the residual floodplain; construction of project-oriented recreation features, including 1 1.5 miles of hike-and-bike trails and related facilities for health, safety, and public access; and habitat management measures on 844 acres of Harris County Parkway land, creation of wooded and brush habitat along 100 acres of the project right-of-way, acquisition of 329 acres of wildlife habitat along the creek, and creation of 35 acres of ponds and marshes. The authorized plan is no longer under consideration. The current plan is to buy out or raise houses where inhabitants are at or below the five year flood level. Estimated cost for the new plan is $9,636,000 Federal (Corps) and $3,212,000 non-Federal consisting of $835,000 cash contribution and $2,377,000 lands. (October 1, 1997 base price.) Local cooperation. Local Sponsor for the project is Harris County. Local Sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $9,303,000; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control and recreation facilities. Operations during fiscal year. See Section 33, PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. 20. LOWER RIO GRANDE BASIN, TX Location. The project is located in Willacy, Hidalgo, and Cameron Counties. The basin is bounded on the east by the Gulf of Mexico, on the south by the Rio Grande which forms the international boundary between the United States and Mexico, on the west by Starr County, and on the north by Brooks and Kenedy Counties. Existing project. See individual detailed reports on Arroyo Colorado, South Main Channel, and Raymondville Drain. Local cooperation. See individual detailed reports on Arroyo Colorado, South Main Channel, and Raymondville Drain. 20A. ARROYO COLORADO, TX Location. The project is located in Hidalgo and Cameron Counties, Texas. Existing project. The authorized project will provide flood protection along Highway 83 and erosion protection for the banks of the Arroyo Colorado in the city of Harlingen. The project consists of a gated water control structure, 1.4 miles of channel improvements, and stone armoring of selected reaches in Harlingen. The estimated cost for new work is $5,851,000 Federal (Corps) and $1,951,000 non-Federal consisting of $1,848,000 cash and $103,000 for lands and relocations (October 1, 1993 base prices). The project has reached a stalemate as the Local Sponsor, the Hidalgo County Drainage District #1, can not provide required guarantee to hold and save the Government free from all damages arising from the construction, operation, maintenance, repair and replacement for the project, nor are they able to operate and maintain the project when completed. The International Boundary and Water Commission has complete jurisdiction over the project as it is one of the elements of the Rio Grande Floodway System. The Commission is interested in the project but only if additional funds to do operations and maintenance are provided. Legislative approval will be required to alter the current status. Local cooperation. Local Sponsor, the Hidalgo County Drainage District #1, is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $1,848,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. None. 20B. SOUTH MAIN CHANNEL, TX Location. The project is located in Hidalgo and Willacy Counties, Texas. Existing project. The authorized project consists of channel improvements which will provide flood protection to the cities of McAllen, Edinburg, Edcouch, La Villa and Lyford, as well as the rural areas of Hidalgo and Willacy Counties north of U.S. Highway 83. The estimated cost for new work is $121,309,000 Federal (Corps) and $68,711,000 non-Federal consisting of $9,501,000 cash and $28,107,000 lands and $31,103,000 relocations (October 1, 1997 base prices). Local cooperation. Local Sponsors for the project are Hidalgo County Drainage District #1 and Willacy County Drainage District #1. Local Sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $9,501,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: See Section 33, PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. 40-15 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 20C. RAYMONDVILLE DRAIN, TX Location. The project is located in northern Hidalgo and Willacy Counties, Texas. Existing project. The authorized project will provide a drainage outlet to the Laguna Madre for northern Hidalgo and Willacy Counties. The project consists of 43.8 miles of channel work, including enlargement of existing channels and construction of new channels, a 3.88-mile long levee, and diversion ditches along the west side of Raymondville. The estimated cost for new work is $55,780,000 Federal (Corps) and $18,594,000 non-Federal consisting of $5,359,000 cash and $6,142,000 lands and $7,093,000 relocations (October 1, 1997 base prices). Local cooperation. Local Sponsor for the project is Hidalgo County Drainage District #1 and Willacy County Drainage District #1. Local Sponsor is required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads and other facilities, except for railroad bridges; provide a cash contribution presently estimated at $5,359,000 and bear all costs of operation, maintenance, and replacement of flood control facilities. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: See Section 33, PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN. 21. PORT ARTHUR AND VICINITY, TX (HURRCANE-FLOOD PROTECTION) Location. Port Arthur is on west shore of Sabine Lake in extreme southeast part of Texas, about 14 miles from the gulf. Area under consideration is comprised of about 38,500 acres, and includes cities of Port Arthur and Groves, towns of Griffin Park, Pearl Ridge, and Lakeview, and adjacent industrial areas. Existing project. Authorized plan provides for raising and reconstructing 6.3 miles of existing concrete and steel sheet-pile seawall; constructing 0.3 mile of new concrete and sheet-pile seawall; raising and improving 3.0 miles of existing earth levees; constructing 20.3 miles of new earth levees and constructing five interior drainage pumping plants. Raising and strengthening of levees surrounding Gulf Oil Company's fresh water reservoir was placed in the "inactive" category in December 1980. The project was initiated in March 1966 and the active portion of the project was completed in 1984. The repairs of the severe settlement problem at the Chevron Sabine Road Tank Farm were completed in 1995 and the project was transferred to the Local Sponsor, Jefferson County Drainage District No. 7, on June 8, 1995. Total cost for the project was $61,550,000 Federal (Corps) and $26,037,967 non-Federal. In addition, $223,000 non-Federal funds were expended on betterments in connection with construction of the Pumping Stations at Crane Bayou, Lakeside and Port Acres. Local cooperation. Fully complied with. Operation during fiscal year. New Work: The project was financially completed in accordance with applicable cost-sharing requirements. 22. SIMS BAYOU, TX Location. The project is located in Harris County, in the southern portion of Houston, Texas. Existing project. The authorized plan of improvement provides for enlargement and rectification, with appropriate erosion control measures, of 19.3 miles of Sims Bayou to provide 25-year flood protection; environmental measures and riparian habitat improvement along the entire alignment; and recreational development to include 27 miles of hike-and-bike trails connecting to existing public parks, together with picnic, playground, and other leisure facilities. Estimated cost for new work is $198,962,000 Federal (Corps) and $101,914,000 non- Federal consisting of $17,425,000 cash contributions, $38,738,000 for lands, $45,463,000 for relocations and $288,000 for channels (October 1, 1997 base price). Local cooperation. Local Sponsor for the project is Harris County Flood Control District. In accordance with the cost-sharing and financing concepts reflected in the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, local interests are required to provide lands, easements, and rights-of-way; modify or relocate buildings, pipelines, utilities, roads, and other facilities, except railroad bridges, where necessary for the construction of the project; pay one-half of the separable and joint costs allocated to recreation; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of recreation facilities; and pay 5 percent of the costs allocated to flood control; and bear all costs of operation, maintenance and replacement of flood control facilities. The Local Cooperation Agreement for flood control was executed on October 19, 1990. The recreation Local Cooperation Agreement is pending. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: A construction contract for channel rectification from Interstate Highway 45 to Reveille Park was awarded January 28, 1994 and continued through FY 1997 at a fiscal year cost of $1,073,932. Construction contract for channel rectification from Hemingway Drive to Reveille Park was awarded December 22, 1994 and continued through FY 1997 at a cost of $5,920,066. An architect/engineering contract for preparing plans, technical specifications and quality estimates for construction of channel improvements between Mykawa Road and Hemingway Drive, approximately Stations 391+00 to 316+71 was awarded February 22, 1995. The design for the reach between Swallow to Hemingway Drive was completed on April 23, 1996, and the design for the remaining reach, Swallow to Mykawa Road was completed September 4, 1997. The cost for the fiscal year was $79,984. The construction contract for channel rectification from Swallow to Hemingway was awarded July 19, 1996, and continued in FY 1997 with a cost of $2,807,491. Surveys were performed by contract in connection with plans and 40-16 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT specifications for the Mykawa to Cullen reach and the Cullen to State Highway 288 reach at a cost of $49,031 for FY 1997. Reimbursement was made to Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) for plans and specifications in connection with the UPRR bridge design. Cost for the design was $76, 316. An architect/engineering contract was awarded in FY 97 for preparation of the feature design memorandum on the Hiram Clarke to End reach. Cost incurred for FY 97 was $126,000. Reimbursement was made to the Local Sponsor, Harris County Flood Control District, for their work on the reach from Port Terminal Railroad to Interstate Highway 45, in the amount of $1,800,000. 23. TAYLORS BAYOU, TX Location. Watershed of Taylors Bayou is in extreme southeast corner of Texas adjoining basins of Neches River and Sabine Lake on the east. City of Port Arthur is about 8 miles from the main stream of Taylors Bayou. Existing project. Improvement consists of enlarging and rectifying approximately 53 miles of natural and artificial channels on Taylors Bayou and tributary water courses. Phase I consists of constructing a gated structure to prevent saltwater intrusion and 2.9 miles of new diversion channel and enlarging 1.8 miles of Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and a 1.9 mile section of the Outfall Canal. Phase II consists of enlarging 6.0 miles of Taylors Bayou, 14.3 miles of Hillebrandt Bayou, 1.5 miles of Pivitot Bayou, 2.3 miles of Bayou Din, and 3.5 miles of Willow Marsh Bayou. Phase III consists of enlarging 7.0 miles of North Fork Taylors Bayou, 7.8 miles of South Fork Taylors Bayou and 4.4 miles of Mayhaw Bayou. The Phase III portion of the project was placed in the "inactive" category in November 1980. Initial contract on the "active" portion of the project was awarded in August 1982. All work on authorized features was completed in October 1995 with the exception of the inactive Phase III portion. The project was transferred to the Local Sponsor, Jefferson County Drainage District No. 6, on February 1, 1996, for operation and maintenance. Total cost for the project was $37,413,209 Federal (Corps) and $12,738,546 non-Federal, which includes $397,549 credit for work performed by the Sponsor. Local cooperation. Fully complied with Section 204, 1965 Flood Control Act. Operation during fiscal year. New Work: The project was financially completed in accordance with the applicable cost-sharing requirements. 24. INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FLOOD CONTROL WORKS Inspections of completed projects operated and maintained by local interests were made on the following projects. Fiscal year cost was $164,200. Proiect Buffalo Bayou, Addicks and Barker Dams, TX - Flood Control Freeport and Vicinity, TX - Hurricane Flood Protection Port Arthur, TX - Hurricane Flood Protection Date of Inspection July 1997 June 1997 June 1997 25. FLOOD CONTROL WORK UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Flood control activities pursuant to section 205 of 1970 Flood Control Act, Public Law 858, 80th Congress, as amended: Initial coordination for Section 205 Flood Control activities was performed in FY 97 at a cost of $4,655. Construction of the flood protection project for Buffalo Bayou, Texas (Lynchburg Pump Station) is discussed in Section 17. Further work was delayed on the Brazos Valley Subdivision at Simonton, Texas study until a costsharing sponsor could be identified. FY 97 cost to complete the study was $3,570. An initial appraisal for flood protection at Castor Creek and Tributaries at Leesville, LA, was performed in FY 97 at a cost of $12,143. Because of low flood damage reduction potential, the project was terminated in August, 1997 Emergency flood control - repair, flood fighting, and rescue work (Public Law 99, 84th Congress and antecedent legislation): Disaster Preparedness cost for Fiscal Year 1997 was $276,589. National Emergency Preparedness Program fiscal year cost was $43,297. Emergency Operations FY 97 cost was $22,406 for the District's support to the USACE Headquarters readiness program for emergency operations in California and North Dakota. 26. EMERGENCY STREAM BANK AND SHORELINE EROSION WORK AND SNAGGING AND CLEARING ACTIVITIES UNDER SPECIAL AUTHORIZATION Stream bank and shoreline erosion activities pursuant to Section 14 of the 1946 Flood Control Act, Public Law 525, as amended: Initial coordination for stream bank and shoreline erosion activities were performed in FY 97 at a cost of $248. Snagging and clearing activities for flood control pursuant to Section 208 of the Flood Control Act of 1954, Public Law 780, as amended: No new feasibility studies of snagging and clearing 40-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 activities for flood control improvements were performed in Fiscal Year 1997. Environmental Restoration 27. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF ENVIRONMENT Project modifications for improvement of environment activities pursuant to Section 1 135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, as amended: Construction of the environmental restoration project at Laguna Madre, Texas is discussed in Section 28. Construction of the environmental restoration project at Salt Bayou, McFaddin Ranch, Texas is discussed in Section 29. Plans and specifications and environmental documentation were completed in FY 1996 for restoration of the wetlands at Barker Reservoir for a waterfowl habitat. Project title is Addicks and Barker Waterfowl Habitat Restoration, Texas. Project is awaiting approval of the Project Cooperation Agreement. 28. LAGUNA MADRE SEAGRASS PROJECT Location. The project is located in Laguna Madre about 7 miles north of Port Isabel, Texas in Cameron County. Existing project. The objective of the proposed project is to determine whether unconfined open-bay disposal operations can be modified to increase the seagrass colonization rate between dredging cycles and improve habitat value for estuarine fauna in the disposal area. The work consists of transplanting seagrass from nearby undisturbed seagrass meadows onto freshly deposited dredged maintenance material in two openbay disposal areas near the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. The transplanted seagrass and control sites will be sampled and monitored for various physical and biological parameters to determine the success of the demonstration project in restoring fish habitat in the disposal areas. Local cooperation. The Local Sponsor for this project is the Texas Department of Transportation. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on October 6, 1994. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: National Marine Fisheries continued to monitor the development of the seagrass and the associated marine community. The cost incurred for FY 1997 was $6,784. 29. SALT BAYOU WATER CONTROL STRUCTURE, PORT ARTHUR, TX Location. The project is located in the McFaddin National Wildlife Refuge, Sea Rim State Park, and J.D. Murphree Wildlife Management Area, near the City of Port Arthur, Jefferson County, Texas. Existing project. This project provides for the second of two water control structures needed to restore historical salinity conditions to a 60,000-acre wetland area. Prior to construction of the GIWW and Sabine- Neches Waterway, Salt Bayou consisted of fresh to brackish marshlands. Construction of the Sabine- Neches Waterway and GIWW disrupted natural drainage patterns and introduced salt water to the marsh. Increased salinity resulted in conversion of vegetated areas to open water and a reduction in wildlife habitat values. With this new structure at Salt Lake, historical estuarine conditions will be restored to the extent possible. The project was completed in FY 1996. Work consisted of a Water Control Structure, 27,000 C.Y. of excavation, 4,600 tons of riprap, and 1,428 L.F. of precast prestressed concrete piles. The total project cost was $2,339,510, of which $1,754,632 was Federal (Corps) and $584,877 was non-Federal which included $8,000 cost for lands, easements, rights-of-way and utility relocations. Local cooperation. The Local Sponsor was the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. A Project Cooperation Agreement was executed on March 8, 1994. Operations during fiscal year. New Work: The project was financially completed in accordance with the applicable cost-sharing requirements. General Investigations 30. SURVEYS Fiscal year costs were $162,449 for reconnaissance studies and $1,154,299 for feasibility studies on Review of Completed Projects. Miscellaneous Activities for FY 97 include the following: Special Investigations at a cost of $39,826; Interagency Water Resources Development at $9,797; National Estuary Program at $7,468; North American Waterfowl Management Plan at $2,346; and National Marine Fisheries Service at a cost of $1,434. 31. COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES Cost for Coordination With Other Agencies was $3,945 for FY 1997. 32. COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA Floodplain management, technical services and quick responses were performed at a cost of $15,002, $69,655, and $3,015, respectively. Hydrologic studies cost $7,886. Floodplain management services were continued for 40-18 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT the Alabama-Coushatta Indian Tribe at Big Sandy, Texas for a fiscal year cost of $58. 33. PRE-CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN Aransas National Wildlife Refuge, Texas _ The project will provide erosion protection and limited spill containment for the existing alignment of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway (GIWW) along a 31-mile reach of the GIWW which crosses the critical wintering habitat of the rare and endangered whooping crane. The project includes a 13.25-mile reach within the boundary of the Aransas National Wildlife Refuge. The dredged material management plan includes marsh creation with the beneficial uses of dredged material. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $1,630,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1995. Fiscal year costs were $1,083,776. Houston-Galveston Navigation Channels, Texas - The project was authorized for construction by the Water Resources Development Act of 1996. The total project provides for enlarging the Houston Ship Channel to a depth of 45 feet and a width of 530 feet, and the Galveston Channel to a depth of 45 feet over a width which varies between 650 and 1112 feet, and deepening the Galveston Harbor Channel to 47 feet over its original 800-foot width and 10.5 mile length, and extending the channel an additional 3.9 miles to the 47-foot bottom contour in the Gulf of Mexico along the existing alignment. Dredged material will be used for construction of environmental restoration sites to include approximately 118 acres of oyster cultch, 4,250 acres of marsh, and 12 acres of bird island. Estimated planning and engineering cost is $19,800,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1990. Fiscal year costs were $1,654,890 and $540,853 was expended from Sponsor contributed funds. Brays Bayou, Texas - The project will provide for 3 miles of stream improvements, 3 flood detention basins, and 7 miles of stream diversion channels. Aesthetic vegetation is included. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, sports fields, comfort stations and parking areas. Estimated planning and engineering cost is $7,290,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1990. Fiscal year costs were $922,813. Greens Bayou, Texas - The project will provide for 25 miles of stream enlargements, 14 miles of stream clearing and 4 flood detention basins. Aesthetic vegetation and mitigation is included. Recreation facilities include trails, picnic facilities, sports fields, launches, ramps, comfort stations and parking areas. Estimated planning and engineering cost is $5,820,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1990. Fiscal year costs were $558,320. Cypress Creek, Texas - The project will provide for enlargement of the lower 29.4 miles of the channel. Project-oriented recreation features include 11.5 miles of hike-and-bike trails and related recreation facilities, habitat management measures on 844 acres of Harris County Parkway project land, creation of wooded and brush habitat along 100 acres of project right-of-way, acquisition of 329 acres of wildlife habitat, and creation of 35 acres of ponds and marshes. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $3,810,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1990. Fiscal year costs were $162,349 and $189,180 was expended from sponsor contributed funds. South Main Channel, Texas - The project consists of channel improvements which will provide flood protection to the cities of McAllen, Edinburg, Edcouch, La Villa and Lyford, as well as the rural areas of Hidalgo and Willacy Counties north of U.S. Highway 83. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $6,560,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1990. Fiscal year costs were $852,118. Neches River and Tributaries, Salt Water Barrier, Texas - The project consists of a tainter gated salt water barrier structure, a gated navigation bypass channel, an access road and levee, and an auxiliary dam across an associated canal. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $5,660,000. A review of the project economics was completed in FY 1994. Fiscal year costs were $481,833. Texas City Channel, Texas - Work authorized by the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 would modify the existing 40-foot project by providing for deepening the Texas City Turning Basin to 50 feet, enlarging the 6.7 mile long Texas City Channel to 50 feet by 600 feet, deepening the existing 800-foot wide Bolivar Roads Channel and Inner Bar Channel to 50 feet, deepening the existing 800-foot wide Outer Bar and Galveston Entrance Channel to a 52-foot depth for 4.1 miles at a width of 800 feet and an additional reach at a width of 600 feet to the 52 foot contour in the Gulf Mexico. Establishment of 600 acres of wetland and development of water-oriented recreational facilities on a 90-acre enlargement of the Texas City Dike are also proposed. The project was placed in the deferred category in 1989 at the request of the project sponsor, the City of Texas City. By letter dated, March 10, 1997, the City of Texas City requested the project be reactivated. A project review and assessment was prepared to justify removal from the deferred category at a cost of $24,922 for FY 97. Raymondville Drain, Texas - The project consist of 43.8 miles of channel work, including enlargement of existing channels, and construction of new channels, a 3.88-mile long levee, and diversion ditches along the west side of Raymondville, Texas. Estimated planning and engineering estimate is $2,210,000. Planning and engineering studies were initiated in FY 1997. Fiscal year costs were $121,334. 40-19 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 40-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 19972 ' 1. Aquatic Plant Control (Southwestern Division) 1965 Act 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX 3. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 4. Double Bayou, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 5. Freeport Harbor, TX 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Contrib. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Minor Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost 275,000 219,974 5,913,000 4,143,377 2,123,000 2,112,333 300,000 404,198 6,194,000 6,247,886 224,000 220,848 30,000 166,490 479,000 635,000 3,167,008 603,742 6,319 4,502,600' 4,502,334' - 27,978,5022 27,305 27,921,3212 1,980,000 664,500 2,691,260 55,269,2363 1,982,037 673,911 2,664,921 55,240,4273 - - - 2,170,080 - - - 2,170,080 21,919 250,000 115,789 5,241,800 2,510,000 4,873,769 2,876,195 89,280 77,474,6394 340,542 77,460,3744 (3,957) 114,211,591s 75,970 114,207,6645 - 3,576,684 -- 3,576,684 10,033 1,300,000 350,007 2,347,000 2,347,937 3,184,000 3,170,293 (800,000) 542,125 - 149,887 - 433,050 - 431,188 - 154,569 - 131,000 6,279,088 6,143,152 226,558 226,558 1,845,128 1,843,266 256,894 233,325 45,000 2,564,804 60,669,956 ' 442,008 2,503,579 60417,3526 2,703,500 5,948,000 4,620,841 71,499,2567 2,708,717 5,947,444 4,587,072 71,462,6997 - - - 8,935 - - - 8,935 - - - 29,096,392K -- - 29,096,392 4,667,200 315,000 4,263,430 107,551,918' 4,710,615 321,195 4,246,903 107,534,027' - - - 7,969,329 - - - 7,969,329 40-20 GALVESTON. TEXAS. DISTRICT TABLE 40-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 19972( 7. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and the Mexican Border (Galveston District) (Regular Funds) (Inland Waterways Trust Fund) (Regular Funds) (Inland Waterways Trust Fund) (Regular Funds) 8. Houston Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) 9. Matagorda, Ship Channel, TX (Regular Funds) 10. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX (Regular Funds) 11. Texas City Channel, TX 12. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX (Includes Wallisville) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp Cost 5,786,000 1,774,646 2,544,000 1,583,471 Maint: Appr 24,871,000 Cost 24,261,481 Major Rehab: Approp. 1,000,000 Cost 63,521 Major Rehab: Approp. 1,000,000 Cost 56,631 Minor Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost 4,050,900 3,990,130 5,209,540 5.355,402 12,620,000 12,543,607 452,000 424,763 8,000,000 2,719,171 2,074,000 2,040,590 3,704,194 13,859,000 11,184,330 115,278,827'" 6,717,663 15,186,302 11,248,880 115,064,335'" 3,751,000 10,971,000 8,558,000 25,824,000 4,144,554 11,108,145 8,649,381 25,485,551 27,826,450 15,516,954 24,577,401 404,860,847" 28,655,473 15,409,003 24,582,562 404,647,12512 1,946,000 (200,0000) 1,398,800 1,077,391 1,946,000 (200,000) 1,308,974 1,116,142 250,000 415,369 250,000 467,140 3,480,638 3,389,719 2,996,000 2,948,887 - 835,873 - 835,873 - - - 35,760,382's - - - 35,760,382'13 11,912,050 6,671,600 6,742,478 170,909,806'14 11,989,150 6,669,239 6,739,949 170,895,04414 - - - 18,058,7775 - - - 18,058,777'" 147,500 3,855,000 1,406,029 59,983,007' 13,491 3,996,501 1,400,113 59,972,404' - - - 56,136,81517 - - - 56,136,815"7 3,304,000 17,125,646 11,594,320 218,824,506' x 3,425,495 17,118,474 11,587,144 218,802,606' X - - 25,000 - - 24,922 921,000 1,636,700 (50,596) 943,524 1,640,884 (52,144) 1,000,000 3,010,334 1,654,000 1,661,395 5,000,000 8,853,079 1,178,100 1,196,514 12,000,000 11,989,713 739,714 665,091 15,156,972'" 15,156,894'" 29,125,11521 29,122,97821 726,158 726,158 61,923,67621 61,619,57221 21,224,32822 21, 122,41622 40-21 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 40-A See Section in Text COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 Total Cost To FY 97 Sep. 30, 199726 14. Corpus Christi Beach, TX (Restoration Project) (Contributed Funds) 15. Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, TX 16. Buffalo Bayou at Lynchburg, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 18. Clear Creek, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 19. Cypress Creek, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 20. Lower Rio Grande Basin, TX 21. Port Arthur and Vicinity, TX Hurricane- Flood Protection (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) 22. Sims Bayou, TX (Regular Funds) (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost Recreation: Approp. Cost Maint: Approp. Cost Major Rehab: Approp. Cost Dam Safety: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost New Work: Approp. Cost 2,120,641 2,120,641 2,038,345 2,009,710 880,000 885,410 1,685,000 1,668,586 2,730 123,800 100,358 71,971 506,000 282,821 704,000 856,225 820,837 1,493,500 64,850,76123 835,514 1,481,133 64,837,00723 - - 377,804 - 174 377,797 2,292,000 3,134,500 2,835,440 36,148,055 2,246,100 3.169,504 2,825,098 36,055,356 - - - 12,475,000 - - - 12,475,000 (79,300) - - 12,693,700 2,136 - - 12,693,700 66,000 87,634 90,596 62,275 1,213,000 1,178,005 43,500 64,056 118,879 165,000 463,800 96,969 395,763 - 273,346 161 253,286 231,000 5,463,502 20,892,863 758,944 5,526,988 20,872,737 - 400,000 - 10,000 254,000 195,497 169,200 105,426 359,000 518,116 2,100,000 713,344 522,900 302,813 8,100,000 5,132,752 600,000 84,592 174,100 258,497 175,000 235,257 1,631,500 1,698,995 (715,000) 747,921 75,000 168,131 5,080,000 8,042,245 400,000 632,223 40-22 335,000 324,518 320,800 305,072 711,663 723,293 275,000 523,381 155,000 162,349 170,000 189,180 962,000 973,452 1,315,000 1,151,977 1,990,100 1,986,876 835,000 834,935 5,423,063 5,404,982 - (153,217) 61,400,292 4,017 (149,995) 61,400,292 1,722 15,032,000 15,144,932 1,900,000 1,615,661 - 16,976,67524 149,996 16,976,67524 13,026,290 12,855,241 885,500 1,146,701 50,537,290 50,315,773 3,785,50025 3,479,17725 __ v GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT TABLE 40-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 199726 23. Taylors Bayou, TX New Work: (Regular Funds) Approp. 2,010,000 300,000 (100,000) 60,011 37,413,209 Cost 2,129,557 573,039 20,361 71,904 37,413,209 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. 700,000 24,721 - (654,324) 12,340,997 Cost 652,181 143,621 1,254 (72,704) 12,340,997 28. Laguna Madre New Work: Seagrass Approp. 5,000 103,000 94,000 - 227,000 (Regular Funds) Cost 303 49,184 128,949 6,784 209,953 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. - 44,000 31,000 4,000 79,000 Cost - 19,275 55,725 3,994 78,994 29. Salt Bayou, McFaddin New Work: Ranch Wetlands, TX Approp. - 1,456,900 (26,000) (163,200) 1,754,700 (Regular Funds) Cost 59,556 1,360,422 70,192 (162,902) 1,754,700 (Contributed Funds) New Work: Approp. - 608,097 - (31,220) 576,877 Cost - 405,416 8,492 162,969 576,877 Excludes $1,637,270 credit for contributed work. 2 Includes $675,855 for previous projects. In addition, $10,486,119 expended from contributed funds, of which $123,361 was for previous projects. Excludes $874,258 expended from contributed funds for dock removal for the local sponsor. In addition, $1,352,092 expended from contributed funds and $34,000 expended from contributed funds for Port Isabel. In addition $600,000 expended from contributed funds from the City of South Padre Island for beneficial placement of dredged material on the South Padre Island Beach. Includes $1,372,534 for previous projects. Includes $456,515 for Sec. 107 project for Port Aransas Breakwaters. In addition $768 expended from contributed funds for Port Aransas Breakwaters. Includes $62,452 for previous projects. In addition, $985,345 expended from contributed funds. " Includes $147,098 for previous projects. In addition, $19,513,507 expended from contributed funds. ($581,615 on 45� project.) 7 In addition, $229,311 expended from contributed funds. " Includes $8,421,996 for previous projects. In addition, $3,648,932 expended from contributed funds. ' Includes $86,126 for previous projects. In addition, $2,322,583 expended from contributed funds. '" Includes $706,709 for previous projects. Includes Sec. 107 projects for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin ($46,559); Port Isabel Side Channel ($8,414); Offatts Bayou ($356,466); and Channel to Aransas Pass ($658,573). In addition contributed funds expended for Port Isabel Small Boat Basin ($46,559); Offatts Bayou ($49,665); Channel to Aransas Pass ($347,950); Chocolate Bayou ($658,310); Mouth of Colorado River ($3,379,080); ($288,349) Channel to Victoria; and ($862,716) expended for the local sponsor's levee requirement on Channel to Victoria. " Includes $1,526,564 for previous projects. In addition $22,672 contributed funds for main channel and $126,450 contributed funds for Rollover Pass (beginning 1997). Includes following amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1987: Channel to Victoria $9,567,750. Channel to Aransas Pass $2,600. Chocolate Bayou Channel $2,245,540. Includes following amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1989: Channel to Harlingen $4,634,815. Channel to Port Mansfield $5,784,609. Also includes $8,138,656 for Mouth of Colorado River, separately funded beginning in fiscal year 1992. 12 Includes $1,526,564 for previous projects. In addition $22,672 expended from contributed fundsfor main channel and $114,091 contributed funds for Rollover Pass (beginning 1997) for the beneficial placement of dredge material at Rollover Pass. Includes following amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1987: Channel to Victoria $9,559,784, Channel to Aransas Pass $2,600, Chocolate Bayou Channel $2,244,740. In addition $955,574 was expended from contributed funds for Chocolate Bayou Channel. Also includes amounts for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1989: Channel to Harlingen $4,632,986. Channel to Port Mansfield $5,782,695. Also includes an expended amount of $8,135,755 for Mouth of Colorado River, separately funded in fiscal year 1992. '3 Includes $4,105,157 for previous projects. 40-23 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 40-A COST AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT See Section Total Cost To in Text Project Funding FY 94 FY 95 FY 96 FY 97 Sep. 30, 199726 In addition, $2,591,939 expended from contributed funds, of which $1,209,179 was for previous projects. '' Includes $1,213,142 for previous projects. In addition, $534,641 expended from contributed funds for Houston Ship Channel, of which $200,000 was for previous projects and $125,000 expended from contributed funds for Greens Bayou Channel. Includes appropriated funds for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1992: Greens Bayou Channel $560,968. Barbour Terminal Channel $1,375,360. Bayport Ship Channel $6,404,375. Expenditures for tributary channels separately funded starting in fiscal year 1992: Greens Bayou Channel $560,731. Barbour Terminal Channel $1,374,853. Bayport Ship Channel $6,402,310. '" In addition, $12,259,619 expended from contributed funds and $182,800 for contributed lands. '" Starting in fiscal year 1990 includes an appropriation of $2,243,885 and expenditures of $2,243,807 for Channel to Red Bluff. " Includes $5,180,832 for previous projects. In addition, $2,680,942 expended from contributed funds, of which $577,507 was for previous projects. 'x Includes $2,379,677 for previous projects. In addition, $5,042,792 expended from contributed funds and $7,944 expended from contributed funds for real estate acquisition for the local sponsor. '" Includes $366,823 for previous projects. In addition, $1,023,819 expended from contributed funds, of which $99,000 was for mitigation measures. 21 Includes $195,083 for previous projects. 21 Includes $1,966,306 for previous projects. In addition, $66,000 expended from contributed funds. 22 Includes $543,662 for previous projects. 23 Includes $4,400,000 of advanced funds repaid to Harris County Flood Control District. In addition, $63,661 contributed funds expended for Brays Bayou and $12,900 Federal funds and $19,104 contributed funds expended for enlargement of Clodine Ditch. 24 Excludes $3,402,588 estimated value of contributed lands, $6,168,360 for relocations, and $217,000 credit given local sponsor for work-in-kind. 25 Excludes $1,903,371 expended from contributed funds for real estate acquisition for the local sponsor. 26 Includes funds ($12,544,400) provided by the Jobs Act (P.L. 98-8, dated March 24, 1983) for projects listed in Table 15-I of Annual Report for 1985. 40-24 GA ,VESTON. TEXAS. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 1. Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 2. Jun. 3, 1930 May 24, 1934 (PWA) Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 Jul. 14, 1960 Nov. 17, 1986 3. Mar. 3, 1899 AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL Provides for control of progressive eradication of aquatic plant growth from the navigable waters and streams in the U.S. Amended cost sharing requirements to provide for 50 percent Federal and 50 percent non-Federal participation in control operations. BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX Jetties and jetty channel, inside channels and basins. Local cooperation requirement modified to provide contribution of funds to cover cost of original dredging of all inside channels and basins. Deepen jetty channel to 31 feet and inner channels and Brownsville and Port Isabel turning basins to 28 feet. Enlarge Port Isabel turning basin. Deepen entrance channel to 35 feet; deepen to 33 feet channel across Laguna Madre; deepen to 32 feet channels from Laguna Madre to turning basins at Brownsville and Port Isabel; widen turning basins; and dredging present shallow-draft channel south of Port Isabel from railroad bridge to Laguna Madre and connecting channel to Port Isabel turning basin. Additional connecting channel between Port Isabel and Brownsville channels; and transfer shallow-draft channels at Port Isabel to GIWW. Deepen to 38 feet in outer bar channels and 36 feet in all other authorized channels and basins; extend existing turning basins at Brownsville and Port Isabel; and construct small-boat basin with a connecting channel next to Brownsville ship channel. Widen Brownsville Channel to 300 feet at a depth of 36 feet from former Goose Island passing basin to turning basin extension, thence at a width of 500 feet and same depth to turning basin proper, deepen to 36 feet in area in southeast corner of turning basin, maintain two existing basins of fishing harbor, and a connecting channel, and construct a third basin, with necessary connecting channel and extend Brazos Island Harbor north jetty seaward 1,000 feet. 27 Enlargement of the entrance channel from deep water in the Gulf of Mexico to the Laguna Madre to a depth of 44 feet and a width of 400 feet; enlargement of the Turning Basin Extension to a point 800 feet beyond the grain elevator to a depth of 42 feet at widths varying from 325 to 400 feet; removal of Brownsville Navigation District Wharves 5, 6, and 9 to permit widening of the adjacent portion of the Turning Basin to 1,200 feet at a depth of 36 feet; construction of asphalt walkways with handrails on the crown of the North and South Jetties, and construction of park-type public use facilities at the inner end of the North Jetty. CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX Acquisition of old curvey portion of north jetty previously constructed by private parties. H. Doc. 251, 89th Cong., Ist Sess. Sec. 103(c), PL 99-662 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 16, 71st Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 32, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 335, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 347, 77th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 627, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 192, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 428, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess.' Sec. 201, PL 99-662 Specified in Act. 40-25 TABLE 40-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 3. Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Feb. 27, 1911 Mar. 4, 19132 Sep. 23, 1922 Jul. 3, 19302 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 19354 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug 30, 1935 Jun. 20, 1938 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX (Continued) Complete north jetty in accordance with builder's plans. Complete north jetty in accordance with builder's plans. Connect old curve to St. Joseph Island, and construct south jetty. Dredge roadstead in Harbor Island Basin to 20 feet deep and construct 10,000 linear feet of stone dike on St. Joseph Island. Channel between jetties and Harbor Island Basin to 25 feet deep, extend jetties seaward, extend dike on St. Joseph Island 9,100 feet, and dredge approach channel 12 feet deep to town of Port Aransas. Dredging channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi, 25 feet deep, 200 feet bottom width. Deepen entrance channel from gulf to Harbor Island and provide an inner basin at Harbor Island of reduced area but greater depth. Channel from Aransas Pass to Corpus Christi Channel with depth 30 feet. Enlarge all channels from gulf to western end of basin dredge by Humble Oil and Refining Co., at its docks on Harbor Island. Maintain channel and maneuvering basin between breakwater and western shoreline of Corpus Christi Bay. Maintain 30-foot depth of approach channel, turning basin at Corpus Christi, Industrial Canal and turning basin at Avery Point. Maintain and deepen to 32 feet channel from deep water at Port Aransas to and including turning basin at Corpus Christi. Extend main turning basin at Corpus Christi westward 2,500 feet at its present width and depth, deepen existing Industrial Canal and turning basin to 32 feet and extend this canal at a depth of 32 feet and general width of 150 feet, westward along Nueces Bay shore to a turning basin 32 feet by 900 feet, and 1,000 feet long near Tule Lake. Provide depth of 34 feet in all project channels and basins from Port Aransas to and including Tule Lake turning basin, for a width of 250 feet from Port Aransas to breakwater at Corpus Christi, for a width of 200 feet in Industrial Canal and in channel between Avery Point and Tule Lake turning basins, and widen Avery Point turning basin to 1,000 feet. Deepen entrance channel to 38 feet from gulf to outer end ofjetty; 38 feet decreasing to 36 feet thence to station 90 north jetty; and 36 feet in all other deep water channels and basins except 2,000-foot undredged part of inner basin at Harbor Island, and a width of 400 feet in channel from Port Aransas to Maneuvering basin at Corpus Christi. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 5, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1094, 61st Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 1125, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 321, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 214, 70th Cong., Ist Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 9, 71st Cong., Ist Sess. Committee Docs. 35, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess., and 40, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 130, 72nd Cong., Ist Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 13, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 63. 74th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 574, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 544, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 560, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. 40-26 GALVESTON. TEXAS. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 3. Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 3, 1954 - Sep. 3, 1954 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 3, 1958 Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended by Dec. 31, 1970) Aug. 13, 1968 Oct. 22, 1976 Sep. 15, 1994 4. Mar. 3, 1899 Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Oct. 25, 1965) CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX (Continued) An anchorage basin 12 feet deep, from 300 to 400 feet wide, and 900 feet long in Turtle Cove at Port Aransas, Texas. Branch channel 32 feet by 150 feet, extending northerly from main channel in vicinity of Port Ingleside, along north shore of Corpus Christi Bay to Reynolds Metals Co. plant and turning basin 32 feet deep and 800 feet square near plant in general vicinity of LaQuinta, Texas. An entrance channel 36 by 400 feet on a tangent alignment from 400-foot channel in Corpus Christi Bay, near Corpus Christi breakwater to flared approach channel to Corpus Christi turning basin. Deepen and widen LaQuinta Channel to 36 by 200 feet; enlarge LaQuinta turning basin to 36 by 800 by 1,000 feet; a flared entrance to channel; and widening at curves. Deepen entrance channel to 42 feet from gulf to outer end of jetty; 40 feet in all other deep-water channels and basins except undredged northward extension to inner basin at Harbor Island and branch channel to LaQuinta; and widen Industrial Channel to 400 feet with flared entrances to Corpus Christi and Avery Point turning basins. Channel 40 by 200 feet extending 2.2 miles from Tule Lake turning basin to a turning basin 40 feet deep, 700 to 900 feet wide, 1,000 feet long at Viola, Texas. Depth of 12 feet and a width of 100 feet in locally dredged Jewel Fulton Canal from LaQuinta Channel to a turning basin 12 by 200 by 400 feet, and assumption of maintenance by United States. Construction of a breakwater at entrance to harbor area at Port Aransas, and realignment of existing 12-foot by 100-foot project channel. Provides for a project depth of 45 feet in the existing deep-draft channels and basins, for construction of a new deep-draft turning point, for construction of a deep draft mooring area and mooring facilities and for widening of the channels and basins at certain locations. The Act also deauthorized the undredged northward extension of Inner Basin at Harbor Island and the undredged west turnout (Wye connection) between the LaQuinta Channel and the main channel of the waterway. Modified local cooperation requirements for 1968 Act. Shifted responsibility for cost of disposal areas and confinement works from sponsor to joint 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non- Federal responsibility. Assume maintenance of 17 foot by 100 foot Jewel Fulton Canal, after construction by local interest. DOUBLE BAYOU, TX A channel 6-feet deep and 100-feet wide through the bar at mouth of Double Bayou. 7-foot by 125-foot channel from the 7-foot depth in Trinity Bay to the intersection of Double Bayou Channel with the channel to Liberty; and thence a 7- by 100-foot channel upstream for 2.0 miles. 40-27 H. Doc. 654, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 89, 83rd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 487, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 33, 85th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 361, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 S. Doc. 99, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess.' Sec. 124, PL 94-587 Sec. 204, PL 99-662 as amended H. Doc. 387, 55th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 TABLE 40-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents FREEPORT HARBOR, TX 5. Mar. 3, 1899 Dredging and other work necessary in judgment of Secretary of War for improving harbor; for taking over jetties and privately built works at mouth of river. Mar. 2, 1907 Examination authorized. Work later confined to maintenance of jetties. Feb. 27, 1911 Repairs to jetties and dredging. Mar. 4, 1913 Construct seagoing hopper dredge. Aug. 8, 1917 Purchase of one 15-inch pipeline dredge and equipment, its operation of 3 years, operation of seagoing dredge one-half time for 3 years, and repairs to jetties. Mar. 3, 19256 Diversion dam, diversion channel, and necessary auxiliary works. Jul. 3, 1930 Maintenance of diversion channel at expense of local interest. Aug. 30, 19357 Aug. 30, 1935 Deepening channels and basins. Maintenance of present project dimensions of channels and basins at Federal expense. May 17, 1950 Deepen outer bar channel to 38 feet from gulf to a point within jetties, thence 36 feet in authorized channels to and including upper turning basin. Jul. 3, 1958 Relocate outer bar channel on straight alignment with jetty channel and maintain Brazos Harbor entrance channel and turning basin (constructed by local interests). Oct. 5, 1961 Modification of HD 1469. Revoking certain provisions of local cooperation. Dec. 31, 1970 Nov. 17, 1986 Relocation of entrance channel and deepen to 47 feet; enlargement to a depth of 45 feet and relocation of jetty channel and inside main channel; deepening to 45 feet of channel to Brazosport; enlargement of the widened area of Quintana Point to provide a depth of 45 feet with a 750-foot diameter turning area; Brazosport turning basin to 45 feet deep with a 1,000 foot turning area; a new turning basin with a 1,200 foot diameter turning area and 45 feet deep; deepening Brazosport channel to 36 by 750 feet diameter; flared approaches from Brazos Harbor Channel; relocation of north jetty and rehabilitation of south jetty. Modified local cooperation requirements for the 1970 Act. GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX 6. Aug. 5, 1886 Construct 2 rubblestone jetties at entrance to Galveston Harbor. Specified in Act. H. Doc. 1087, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 10, 68th Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 18, 70th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 15, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Docs. 15, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess., and 29, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 195, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 433, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. PL 394, 87th Cong. H. Doc. 289, 93rd Cong., 2nd Sess.2 Sec. 101, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 85, 49th Cong., Ist Sess., and Annual Report, 1886, p. 1311. 40-28 GAIVESTON. TEXAS. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 6. Jun. 13, 1902 Mar. 3, 1905 Mar. 2, 1907 Mar. 2, 1907 Jun. 25, 1910 ' Jul. 27, 1916 Jul. 18, 1918 Sep. 22, 1922 Jan. 21, 1927 Aug. 30, 1935" Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Apr. 4, 1938 Jun. 30, 1948 May 17, 1950 GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX (Continued) A channel 1,200 by 30 feet from Bolivar Roads (outer end of old inner bar near Fort Point) at 51st Street.x Purchase or construct hydraulic pipeline dredge. Extension of jetties to present project length and construction and operation of a dredge. Extension of Galveston Channel from 51st to 57th Sts., with depth of 30 feet and width of 700 feet. Conditional extension of Galveston Channel between 51st and 57th Sts., 30 feet deep and 1,000 feet wide. Extend seawall at Galveston from angle at 6th St., and Broadway to vicinity of Fort San Jacinto. Deepen harbor channel to 35 feet and widen to 800 feet. Further extension of seawall at Galveston to a junction with south jetty; and repairing seawall in front of Fort Crockett reservation. Deepen Galveston Channel to 32 feet; and maintain Galveston Harbor channels to dimensions of 800 feet wide, 35 feet deep on outer bar and 34 feet deep in inner bar.' Maintain State Highway Ferry Landing Channels to dimensions of 12 by 100 feet. Construct 13 groins along gulf shore from 12th to 61st Sts. in city of Galveston at a limited cost of $234,000 (10 groins constructed). Deepen Galveston Channel to 34 feet (Bolivar Roads to 43rd St.). Deepen Galveston entrance channel to 36 feet. Completion of project for construction of 13 groins. Deepen Galveston Harbor to 38 feet from gulf to a point 2 miles west of seaward end of north jetty; thence 36 feet to Bolivar Roads; revoking authority for maintenance of ferry channels; and Galveston channel to 36 feet deep from Bolivar Roads to 43rd Street. Deepen outer bar channel to 38 feet from gulf to a point within jetties, thence 36 feet in authorized channels to and including upper turning basin. H. Doc, 264, 56th Cong., 2nd Sess. Specified in Act. H. Doc. 340, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess., and Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 11, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 768, 59th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 328, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1390, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc 758, 65th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 693, 66th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 307, 69th Cong., 1st Sess. River and Harbors Committee Doc. 31, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 400, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 61, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 57, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. PL 463, 75th Cong. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 195, 81st Cong., 1st Sess. 40-29 TABLE 40-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX (Continued) 6. Jul. 3, 1958 Dredge to a depth of 42 feet over the authorized width of 800 feet from the Gulf of Mexico to a point 2 miles west of the seawall and of the North jetty thence at a depth of 40 feet to the junction of the Houston Ship Channel, with widths of 800 feet to Bolivar Roads, thence decreasing to 400 feet at the junction with the Houston Ship Channel. Jun. 23, 1971 Deepen Galveston Channel to 40 feet from Bolivar to 43rd Street. (House Res.) Nov. 18, 1971 (Senate Res. Oct. 12, 1996 Provides for navigation and environmental restoration improvements. The navigation improvements consist of deepening and widening the Entrance Channel to 47 feet deep and 800 feet wide; the Houston Ship Channel to 45 feet deep and 530 feet wide; and the Galveston Channel to 45 feet deep. The environmental restoration portion consist of initial construction of marsh habitat and a colonial waterbird nesting island through the beneficial use of new work dredged material, and incremental development (deferred construction) of additional marsh over the life of the navigation project through the beneficial use of maintenance materials dredged from Galveston Bay. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BETWEEN APALACHEE BAY, FL AND MEXICAN BORDER 12 7. Mar. 2, 1907 Channel 4 by 100 feet from West Galveston Bay across Chocolate Bay to 4 feet of water in Chocolate Bay. Mar. 3, 1925 Channel 9 by 100 feet, Sabine River to Galveston Bay, and a 20- inch pipeline dredge. Such passing places, widening at bends, locks or guard locks and railway bridges over artificial cuts as are necessary. Jan. 21, 1927 Channel 9 by 100 feet, Galveston Bay to Corpus Christi. Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 193813 Maintenance of a flood-discharge channel in Colorado River. Channel 9 by 100 feet in San Bernard River, Texas. Jun. 20, 1938 Channel in Colorado River, 9 by 100 feet, with basin. Jun. 20, 1938 Channel 9 by 100 feet from Palacios through Trepalacios and Matagorda Bays. Jun. 20, 1938 Channel 9 by 200 feet from main channel to harbor at Rockport and improve harbor to 9-foot depth. Jun. 20, 1938 Channel 6 by 100 feet from main channel to Aransas Pass, Texas. Mar. 23, 1939 Enlarge waterway to depth of 12 feet and a width of 125 feet from Sabine River to Corpus Christi. H. Doc. 350, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 121, 92nd Cong. Sec. 101 (30), PL 104-303 H. Doc 445, 56th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., ist Sess. H. Doc. 238, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. S. Committee print, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 640, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 642, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 564, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 641, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 643, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 230, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. 40-30 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 7. Jul. 23, 1942 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945' Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945' Jul. 24, 1946 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 May 17, 1950 Jul. 12, 1952 Sep. 3, 1954's Sep. 3, 1954 Sep. 9, 1959 GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (Continued) Construct waterway from Corpus Christi to vicinity of Mexican border to provide a depth of 12 feet and width of 125 feet throughout. Channel 6 by 60 feet from GIWW to a point in Chocolate Bayou near Liverpool. Channel 6 feet deep and 60 feet wide from main channel near Port O'Connor, Texas, in Barroom Bay. Enlarge channel from main channel to Aransas Pass, Texas, providing a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet. Channel 12 by 125 feet from main channel to Red Fish Landing, Texas, with basin. Channel 12 feet deep and 125 feet wide from main channel to vicinity of Harlingen. Texas, via Arroyo Colorado with basin. Fill a portion of shallow-draft channel adjacent to Port Isabel Turning Basin, construct a channel to connect shallow-draft channel with main channel near shoreline of Laguna Madre, and enlarge shallow-draft channel west of this connection, all to 12-foot depth and bottom width of 125 feet. Reroute main channel to north shore of Red Fish Bay between Aransas Bay and Corpus Christi Bay; deepen tributary channel from Port Aransas to Aransas Pass, Texas, 12 feet and extended basin at same depth. Deauthorized 6 by 60 foot channel in Chocolate Bayou and reauthorized the 4 by 100-foot channel. Alternate channel across South Galveston Bay between Port Bolivar and Galveston causeway. "Red Fish Landing" changed to "'Port Mansfield, Texas." Incorporate as part of Intracoastal Waterway a channel 9 by 100 feet from main channel via Seadrift to point on Guadalupe River 3 miles above Victoria, Texas, authorized by River and Harbor Act of 1945. Small craft harbor 9 by 200 by 1,000 feet at Seadrift with an entrance channel 9 by 100 feet. Widen tributary channel between Port Aransas and Aransas Pass, Texas, to 125 feet; straighten and widen to 125 feet connecting channel to Conn Brown Harbor, and maintain Conn Brown Harbor at Federal expense, all to 12 feet deep. Improve channels and basins comprising channel to Port Mansfield constructed in part by Federal Government and in part by local interest; constructing turnout curves at Gulf Intracoastal Waterway intersection and bend easing at entrance to turning basin; construct parallel jetties at gulf entrance; maintenance of locally dredged jetty channel 16 by 250 feet; and maintenance of small craft basin. PL 675, 77th Cong. H. Doc. 337, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 428, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 383, 77th Cong., Ist Sess. S. Doc 248, 78th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 402, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. (See PL 14, 79th Cong.) H. Doc. 627, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 700, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 768, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 196, 81st Cong., Ist Sess. PL 516, 81st Cong. PL 527, 82nd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 478, 81st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 376, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. S. Doc. 11, 86th Cong., 1st Sess. 40-31 TABLE 40-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (Continued) 7. Jul. 14, 1960 Entrance channel 7 feet deep by 75 feet wide from main channel to Gulf of Mexico to inside shoreline at Port Isabel, Texas, an inner channel 6 feet deep by 50 feet wide from entrance channel to East Harbor Basin, and an irregular-shaped harbor basin 6 feet deep having a surface area of about 7 acres. Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Jul. 14, 1960 (As amended Dec. 31, 1970) Oct. 23, 1962" Deepen the existing 6-foot channel at Port Isabel to 12 feet and removing the submerged bars at each end of the island to a depth of-12 feet MLT. Deepening the existing channel to 12 by 125 feet, and extend southeasterly from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway main channel in West Galveston Bay, into Offatts Bayou, a distance of 2.2 miles, and a west turnout 12 by 125 feet between the proposed Offatts Bayou Channel and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Deepening Aransas Pass tributary channel to 14 feet from mile 0 at Harbor Island to mile 6.1 at the city of Aransas Pass; widening to 175 feet between miles 3.5 and 4.6; and deepening Conn Brown Harbor, turning basin and connecting channel between Conn Brown Harbor and turning basin. Improve main channel 16 feet deep and 150 feet wide from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel; with two relocations; relocate main channel in Matagorda Bay and Corpus Christi Bay; and maintaining existing Lydia Ann Channel. Oct. 23, 1962 Deepen and widen channel to Palacios; construct two protective breakwaters; maintain and deepen existing basins; and deepen, enlarge and maintain existing approach channel to basin No. 2. Oct. 23, 1962 Eliminates requirement of local interest to construct bridge at mile 29.2 turning basin at Victoria, and maintain turning basins at Victoria and Seadrift; provide: Federal construction of verticallift railroad bridge at Missouri-Pacific Railroad mainline crossing, mile 29.2; construction and future maintenance of basin near Victoria, Texas, and maintenance of basin constructed by local interests at Seadrift, Texas. Sec. 107, PL 645, 86th Cong. Sec. 107, PL 86-645 Sec. 107, PL 86-645 Sec. 107, PL 86-645 H. Doc. 556, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 504, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 288, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess. Oct. 27, 1965"7 Aug. 13, 1968 Nov. 17, 1986 Nov. 17, 1988 Modify existing Federal navigation project to provide a channel extending from Gulf Intracoastal Waterway through Chocolate Bay and Chocolate Bayou to project channel mile 8.2, thence to a turning basin near channel mile 13.2 and for salt water barrier in Chocolate Bayou about 3.7 miles upstream from basin (channel mile 16.9). Entrance channel 15 feet deep and 200 feet wide at the mouth of Colorado River Channel protected by an east jetty 3,500 feet long extending to 12-foot depth and a west jetty 2,900 feet long extending to 5-foot contour; make channel 12 feet by 100 feet from gulf shore to Matagorda, including recreation facility, a turning basin 12 feet by 300 feet wide and 1,450 feet long, and a new diversion channel 250 feet wide and varying in depth from 20 to 23 feet including a closure dam across the present river channel. Modified 1968 authorization to provide that diversion features be constructed at Federal expense and operation and maintenance be shared 75 percent Federal and 25 percent non-Federal. Enlarge existing Channel to Victoria from a depth of 9 feet and width of 100 feet to a depth of 12 feet and width of 125 feet. H. Doc. 217, 89th Cong., Ist Sess. S. Doc. 102, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 812, PL 99-662 Sec. 3, PL 100-676 40-32 GALVESTON. TEXAS. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 7. Oct. 31, 1992 Oct. 12, 1996 8. Mar. 5, 1905 Mar. 2, 1919 Mar. 3, 1925 Jul. 3, 1930 Aug. 30, 1935" Aug. 30, 1935 Mar. 2,1945 Mar 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jun. 30, 1948 Jul. 3, 19582" Jul. 14, 1960 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 17, 1986 GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (Continued) Provide 8 miles of erosion protection for the existing waterway in the vicinity of Sargent, Texas. Provides for erosion protection along a 31-mile reach of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway which crosses the critical wintering habitat of the endangered whooping crane, including a 13.25 mile reach within the boundary of the Aransas National Wildlife Refuge. Also, provides for limited oil spill containment features and equipment to protect those areas from accidental hazardous spills. HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX Easing or cutting off sharp bends and construction of a pile dike.'x A channel 30 feet deep, widen bend at Manchester and enlarge turning basin. A light-draft extension of channel to mouth of White Oak Bayou.'" Widen channel through Morgan Point and to a point 4,000 feet above Baytown and widen certain bends. Deepen to 32 feet in main channel and turning basin, and a 400-foot width through Galveston Bay. Deepen to 34 feet in main channel and widen from Morgan Point to turning basin Branch channel 10 by 60 feet behind Brady Island. Widen channel from Morgan Point to lower end of Fidelity Island with turning points at mouth of Hunting Bayou and lower end of Brady Island. Widen channel from lower end of Fidelity Island to Houston turning basin and dredge off-channel silting basins. Deepen to 36 feet from Bolivar Roads to and including main turning basin at Houston, Texas, including turning points at Hunting Bayou and Brady Island. Deepen to 40 feet from Bolivar Roads to Brady Island, construct Clinton Island turning basin, a channel 8 by 125 feet at Five Mile Cut, and improve shallow-draft channel at Turkey Bend. Barbour Terminal at Morgan Point. Restoring existing locally dredged channel from mile 0 to 0.34 to 36 feet deep and dredging a 15-12 ft. channel from mile 0.34 to 2.81, in Greens Bayou. 2' Maintenance of Greens Bayou, Barbour Terminal Channel, and Bayport Ship Channel to forty-foot depths at Federal expense. Sec. 101 (20), PL 102-580 Sec. 101 (29), PL 104-303 Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 35, 61st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 1632, 65th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 93, 67th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 13, 71st Cong., Ist Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 58, 74th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 226, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 226, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 737, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 350, 85th Cong., 2nd Sess.' Sec. 107, PL 86-645 H. Doc. 257, 89th Cong., Ist Sess. Sec. 819, PL 99-662 40-33 TABLE 40-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 8. Oct. 12, 1996 9. Jun. 25, 1910 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX (Continued) Provides for navigation and environmental restoration improvements. The navigation improvements consist of deepening and widening the Entrance Channel to 47 feet deep and 800 feet wide; the Houston Ship Channel to 45 feet deep and 530 feet wide; and the Galveston Channel to 45 feet deep. The environmental restoration portion consist of initial construction of marsh habitat and a colonial waterbird nesting island through the beneficial use of new work dredged material, and incremental development (deferred construction) of additional marsh over the life of the navigation project through the beneficial use of maintenance materials dredged from Galveston Bay. MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX Channel to Port Lavaca, Texas 7 feet deep and 89 feet bottom width. Extend 7-foot channel to shoreline of Lavaca Bay at mouth of Lynns Bayou. Deepen and widen channel to present project dimensions. Mar. 2, 1945 Extend channel 6 by 100 feet from Port Lavaca via Lavaca Bay, Lavaca and Navidad Rivers to Red Bluff, a distance of 20 miles. Mar. 2, 1945 A harbor of refuge 9 feet deep near Port Lavaca and an approach channel 100 feet wide and equal depth. Jul. 3, 1958 Deepen to 12 feet and widen to 125 feet Port Lavaca Channel and approach channel to harbor of refuge; deepen to 12 feet Port Lavaca turning basin and basins at harbor of refuge. Jul. 3, 1958 An entrance channel 38 by 300 feet, a channel 36 by 200 feet, 22 miles long across Matagorda and Lavaca Bays to Point Comfort, Texas, a turning basin 36 feet deep and 1,000 feet square at Point Comfort, and dual jetties at entrance from gulf. SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX 10. Jul. 25, 1912 Existing project dimensions of jetties, a 26-foot channel through Sabine Pass, Port Arthur Canal and Port Arthur turning basin; and a 26-foot turning basin at Port Arthur. A depth of 25-feet in Sabine-Neches Canal, Neches River to Beaumont and Sabine River to Orange, including cutoffs and widening channels. Sep. 22, 1922 Deepen channels to 30 feet from gulf to Beaumont, with increased widths and an anchorage basin in Sabine Pass. Sep. 22, 1922 Deepen Port Arthur east and west turning basins and approach channel to 30 feet. Take over and deepen to 30 feet channel connecting west turning basin with Taylors Bayou turning basin. For a 30-foot depth in channel from mouth of Neches River to cutoff in Sabine River near Orange. Mar. 3, 1925 Removal of guard lock in Sabine-Neches Canal. Jan. 21, 1927 Widen Sabine Pass and jetty channel, Port Arthur Canal, and Sabine- Neches Canal. For dredging 2 passing places in Sabine- Neches Canal, easing of bends, removal and reconstructing Port Arthur field office, extending Beaumont turning basin upstream 200 feet above new city wharves, and an anchorage basin in Sabine Pass. 40-34 Sec. 101 (30), PL 104-303 H. Doc. 1082, 60th Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 28, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 37, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 314, 76th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 731, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 131, 84th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 388, 84th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 773, 61 st Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 975, 66th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc. 152, 67th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 234, 68th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc 287, 69th Cong., Ist Sess. CAIVESTON. TEXAS. DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 10. Aug. 30, 1935" Aug. 30, 1935" Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Aug. 26, 1937 Jun. 20, 193822 Oct. 17, 1940 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 194623 Jul. 24, 194624 Jul. 24, 1946 May 17, 1950 SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX (Continued) A depth of 32 feet in channels from gulf to Beaumont turning basin, including all turning basins at Port Arthur. Deepen channels to 34 feet with increased widths from gulf to Beaumont turning basin. Construct suitable permanent protective works along Sabine Lake. Maintain Taylors Bayou turning basin. Maintain channel from Sabine River to Orange Municipal wharf. Dredging 500 feet from eastern end of Harbor Island and abandonment of channel south and west of Harbor Island. Increased widths of channels from gulf to Beaumont turning basin and channel connecting Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin, deepen Beaumont turning basin and Beaumont turning extension to 34 feet; and dredge a new cutoff from Smith's Bluff cutoff to McFadden Bend. Abandon Orange turning basin; dredge a channel 25 by 150 feet, suitably widened on bends to highway bridge, and dredge a cutoff channel opposite Orange. Extend Beaumont turning basin upstream 300 feet. Widen Port Arthur west turning basin to 600 feet. Dredge a channel from Beaumont turning basin to vicinity of Pennsylvania Shipyard. Deepen Sabine Pass outer bar channel to 37 feet, Sabine Pass jetty channel to 36 feet at inner end, deepen to 36 feet Sabine Pass Channel, Port Arthur Canal, Port Arthur east and west turning basins, Taylors Bayou turning basin and channel from Port Arthur west turning basin to Taylors Bayou turning basin, deepen to 36 feet and widen to 400 feet Sabine-Neches Canal from Port Arthur Canal to mouth of Neches River except through Port Arthur Bridge; deepen Neches River channel from mouth to Beaumont turning basin to 36 feet widening to 350 feet from Smith's Bluff to Beaumont turning basin; deepen junction area on Neches River at Beaumont turning basin to 36 feet; and widen Sabine-Neches Canal between Neches and Sabine Rivers to 150 feet. Improve Cow Bayou. Texas, by construction of a channel 100 feet wide and 13 feet deep extending from navigation channel in Sabine River to a point 0.5 mile above county bridge at Orangefield, Texas, with a turning basin. Improve Adams Bayou, Texas, to provide a channel 12 feet deep and 100 feet wide extending from 12-foot depth in Sabine River to first county highway bridge across bayou. Deepen to 36 feet and widen to 400 feet the Sabine-Neches Canal near Port Arthur bridge; reconstruct Port Arthur Bridge and relocate Port Arthur field office. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 27, 72nd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 12, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Specified in Act. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 3, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 20, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 581, 75th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc 14, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 685, 76th Cong., 3rd Sess. S. Doc 60, 77th Cong., Ist Sess. S. Doc 158, 77th Cong. 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 571, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 702, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 626, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 174, 81st Cong., I st Sess. 40-35 TABLE 40-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 10. Sep. 3, 195425 Oct. 23, 19622(' SABINE-NECHES WATERWAY, TX (Continued) Rectification of certain reaches of existing Sabine Pass Channel, Sabine-Neches Canal, and Neches River and Sabine River Channel; widen to 350 feet entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basins; widen curve at junction of Port Arthur and Sabine-Neches Canals; relocate and enlarge Sabine Pass anchorage basin to 34 by 1,500 by 3,000 feet; widen to 200 feet Sabine- Neches Canal from mouth of Neches River to mouth of Sabine River and Sabine River Channel to upper end of existing project at Orange, except for channel around Harbor Island at Orange; deepen to 30 feet Sabine River Channel from cutoff near Orange municipal slip to upper end of project, except around Harbor Island; and enlarge area at entrance to Orange municipal slip to provide a maneuvering basin. Improve outer bar channel to 42 and 40 feet for all inland channels to Port Arthur and Beaumont; width of 500 feet in Port Arthur Canal and 400 feet in Neches River Channel to Beaumont with three turning points in Neches River; a channel, 12 by 125 feet, extending in Sabine River to Echo; and replace an obstructive bridge at Port Arthur, Texas. Deauthorization of uncompleted portion of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin and enlargement of entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basins. S. Doc. 80, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 553, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.' TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX 11. Mar. 4, 1913 A channel 300 by 30 feet and construct a pile dike 28,200 feet long north to channel. Jul. 3, 1930 A harbor 800 by 30 feet at Texas City, and construct a rubblemound dike. Aug. 30, 1935" Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 30, 1935 Aug. 26, 1937 Extension of rubblemound dike to shoreline. Deepen channel and harbor to 32 feet. Deepen channel and harbor to 34 feet. Extend harbor 1,000 feet southward, 800 by 34 feet. Jun. 30, 1948 Deepen channel and harbor to 36 feet, widen channel to 400 feet and harbor to 1,000 feet and changing name of project to "TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TEXAS." Jul. 14, 1960 Deepen channel and turning basin to 40 feet and construct 16-foot Industrial Barge Canal. Oct. 12, 1972 (Senate Res.) Oct. 12, 1972 (House Res.) Widen the existing main turning basin to 1,200 feet including relocation of the basin 85 feet to the east; providing a 40-foot deep channel in the Industrial Canal at widths of 300-400 feet, with a turning basin at the head of the canal 40 feet deep, 1,150 feet long, and 1,000 feet wide, and easing of the bend at the entrance to the canal, and deauthorization of shallow-draft Industrial Barge Canal not incorporated in the plan of improvement above. H. Doc. 1390, 62nd Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 107, 71st Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 4, 73rd Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 46, 73rd Cong., 2nd Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 62, 74th Cong., 1st Sess. Rivers and Harbors Committee Doc. 47, 75th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 561, 80th Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 427, 86th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 199, 92nd Cong., 2nd Sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) 40-36 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Project and Work Authorized 11. Nov. 17, 1986 12. Jun. 18, 1878 1889 Jun. 13, 1902 (As amended Mar. 3, 1905, Mar. 2, 1907, Jun. 25, 1910, Jul. 25, 1912, Mar. 4, 1913, and Jul. 27, 1916) Mar. 3, 1905 Sep. 22, 1922 Mar. 2, 1945 Jul. 24, 1946 Oct. 23, 1962 Oct. 27, 1965 Jul. 30, 1983 TEXAS CITY CHANNEL, TX (Continued) Deepening the Texas City Turning Basin to 50 feet, enlarging the 6.7 mile long Texas City Channel to 50 feet by 600 feet; deepening the existing 800-foot wide Bolivar Roads Channel and Inner Bar Channel to 50 feet; deepening the existing 800-foot wide Outer Bar and Galveston Entrance Channels to 52 feet; extending the Galveston Entrance Channel to a 52 foot depth for 4.1 miles at a width of 800 feet and an additional reach at a width of 600 feet to the 52 foot contour in the Gulf of Mexico; and establishment of 600 acres of wetland and development of water- oriented recreational facilities on a 90-acre enlargement of the Texas City Dike. TRINITY RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Dredging of a channel through the bar at the mouth of the Trinity River. Modified to include two parallel jetties 275 feet apart, the westerly one of length 7,359 feet and the other of length 300 feet. Improvement of the Trinity River in the interest of providing navigation from the mouth of the Trinity River to Dallas. The plan provided for the construction of 37 locks and dams, with auxiliary dredging and other open-channel work necessary to obtain a 6-foot depth for continuous navigation (excepting periods of excessive drought). Each Act also authorized the construction of certain-named locks and dams. Authorized the Anahuac Channel. No project dimensions were specified by the Act, so a 7- by 8-foot channel, 12,238 feet long was dredged in 1905. Abandon improvements above Liberty and terminate all improvements by lock and dam, leaving a 6-foot channel from Liberty to mouth. Provides for a navigable channel from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston and Trinity Bays to the mouth of Trinity River and 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide in the river section, with a turning basin at Liberty. Modification of the project to provide for a channel 9 feet deep and 150 feet wide from the Houston Ship Channel near Red Fish Bar in Galveston Bay extending along the east shore of Trinity Bay to the mouth of the Trinity River at Anahuac, including protective spoil embankment on the bay side of the channel in lieu of the 9 by 200-foot channel in Galveston and Trinity Bays. Provides for the multiple-purpose Wallisville Reservoir, including a navigation lock in the Wallisville Dam at Channel Mile 28.30 and advancement of the Channel to Liberty from one mile below Anahuac (Mile 23.2) to the Texas Gulf Sulphur Company's slip at Channel Mile 35.8, and incorporation into existing project Anahuac Channel and mouth of Trinity River projects. Reevaluation of navigation benefits. Modified Wallisville Reservoir by reducing the size to 5,600 acres and confining the reservoir to east side of Trinity River. Sec. 201, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 409, 56th Cong., Ist Sess. Specified in Act. H. Doc. 989, 66th Cong., 3rd Sess. H. Doc. 403, 77th Cong., 1st Sess. H. Doc. 634, 79th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 215, 87th Cong., Ist Sess. H. Doc. 276, 89th Cong., 1st Sess. PL 98-63 40-37 TABLE 40-B See Section in Text Date Authorizing Act Docu ments _ _ . REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 15. Dec. 15, 1970 (House Res.) Dec. 17, 1970 (Senate Res.) 16. Jun. 20, 1938 Sep. 3, 1954 Oct. 27, 1965 Nov. 28, 1990 Oct. 12, 1996 Oct. 12, 1996 Oct. 12, 1996 18. Aug. 13, 1968 Nov. 17, 1986 CORPUS CHRISTI BEACH, TX (RESTORATION PROJECT) Restoration and periodic nourishment of 1.4 miles of beach. BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX Barker and Addicks Reservoirs, Texas. Clearing, straightening, enlarging and lining of Buffalo, Brays, and White Oak Bayous. Extend upper limits of White Oak Bayou upstream about 2.1 miles from BRI RR bridge to mouth of Cole Creek. Flood damage reduction improvements and recreational development for the Houston, Texas urban area, divided into six separable elements - Brays, Greens, Hunting, Halls, Carpenters and Little White Oak Bayous. Flood control improvements consist of 75.3 miles of stream enlargement, 14 miles of stream clearing, 7 flood detention basins, 7 miles of diversion channels and environmental revegetation. Recreation features consist of 14.7 miles of trails, 502 picnic facilities, 12 group pavilions, 2 boat launching ramps, 10 restrooms, playgrounds, exercise stations and parking facilities. Authorizes non-Federal interests to undertake flood control projects in the United States, subject to obtaining any permits required pursuant to Federal and State laws in advance of actual construction. For the purpose of demonstrating the potential advantages and effectiveness of non-Federal implementation of flood control projects, the Secretary shall enter into agreements pursuant to this section with non-Federal interests for development of the following Buffalo Bayou projects: Brays Bayou, Hunting Bayou, and White Oak Bayou. The non-Federal interest for the Buffalo Bayou and tributaries authorized flood control projects, may be reimbursed by up to $5,000,000 or may receive a credit of up to $5,000,000 toward required non-Federal project cost-sharing contributions for work performed by the non-Federal interest at each of the following locations if such work is compatible with I or more of the follwing authorized projects: White Oak Bayou, Brays Bayou, Hunting Bayou, Garners Bayou (not authorized), and the Upper Reach of Greens Bayou. During any evaluation of economic benefits and costs that occurs after October 12, 1996, the Secretary shall not consider flood control works constructed by non-Federal interests within the drainage area of such projects prior to the date of such evaluation in the determination of conditions existing prior to construction of the following authorized projects: Buffalo Bayou Basin, Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries (Brays, Greens, Hunting, Halls, Little White Oak, and Carpenters Bayous), and Cypress Creek. CLEAR CREEK, TX Channel enlargement and rectification from upper end of Clear Lake at Mile 3.8 to improved channel Mile 34.8.3"' Modified local cooperation requirements of the 1968 authorization. H. Doc. 415, 91st Cong., 2nd Sess. (Sec. 201, PL 89-298) H. Doc. 456, 75th Cong., 2nd Sess. H. Doc. 250, 83rd Cong., 2nd Sess.' H. Doc. 169, 89th Cong., Ist Sess. Sec. 101, PL 101-640 Sec. 211, PL 104-303 Sec 350, PL 104-303 Sec. 575, PL 104-303 H. Doc. 351, 90th Cong., 2nd Sess. Sec. 1001, PL 99-662 40-38 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents 19. Nov. 17, 1988 20. Nov. 17, 1986 21. Oct. 23, 1962 22. Nov. 17, 1986 Sep. 29, 1989 23. Oct. 27, 1965 CYPRESS CREEK, TX Enlargement and rectification of lower 29.4 miles of Cypress Creek channel and recreational development. LOWER RIO GRANDE BASIN, TX Channel improvements to provide drainage protection for the area in Hidalgo and Willacy Counties north of U.S. Highway 83, and for the area between U.S. Highway 83 and the Rio Grande in Hidalgo County; and to provide flood protection for the cities of McAllen, Edinburg, Raymondville, Edcouch, La Villa, and Lyford. PORT ARTHUR AND VICINITY, TX (HURRICANEFLOOD PROTECTION) Raising and reconstructing 6.3 miles of existing seawall; constructing 0.3 mile of new seawall, 20.3 miles new levees and five pumping plants; and raising and improving 7.5 miles of existing levees.28 SIMS BAYOU, TX Enlargement and rectification, with appropriate erosion control measures of 19.31 miles of Sims Bayou; environmental measures and riparian habitat along entire alignment, and recreational development. Amended the Water Resources and Development Act (WRDA) of 1986 authorization as project cost estimate had exceeded limit established in Section 902 of WRDA 1986. TAYLORS BAYOU, TX Enlarging and rectifying channels; construction of diversion channel; a salt water gate; enlargement of GIWW 1.3 miles and alteration of State Highway 87 bridge. 29 Sec. 3, PL 100-676 Sec. 401, PL 99-662 H. Doc. 505, 87th Cong., 2nd Sess.' Sec. 401, PL 99-662 Sec. 103, PL 101-101 H. Doc. 206, 89th Cong., 1st Sess.' Contains latest published maps. 2 Extension of north jetty 1,950 feet and south jetty 1,265 feet considered inactive. 3 Dredging 2,000 by 650-foot northerly extension of inner basin deauthorized. 4 Included in Public Works Administration program September 6, 1933 and February 16, 1935. - West leg of Wye junction with main channel deauthorized. 6 Construction of lock in diversion dam at local expense considered inactive. 7 Dredging upper .5 mile of channel to vicinity of Stauffer Chemical plant was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. Included in Public Works Administration program September 6, 1933. X Dredging 43rd to 51st Streets was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. ' Deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. so Deepening 43rd to 57th Streets was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. " Previously authorized September 6, 1933 by Public Works Administration. 12 H. Doc. 230, 76th Cong., 1st Sess. and project documents contain latest published maps. '" Dredging upper 3.5 miles was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. '~ Dredging upper 5 miles was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. '- Inactive. 40-39 TABLE 40-B REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 40-B AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION See Date Section Authorizing in Text Act Project and Work Authorized Documents " Portion of 16-foot by 150-foot channel from Sabine River to Houston Ship Channel is inactive. Relocation of channel in Matagorda Bay deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. '7 The 9 feet by 100 feet channel from Mile 8.2 to Mile 13.2 in Chocolate Bayou was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. X Construction of pile dike was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 19 Hill Street Bridge to mouth of White Oak Bayou was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 21 Deepening channel to 40 feet from Southern Pacific Slip to Brady Island was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93- 251. 21 The 12-foot channel from mile 1.65 to mile 2.81 deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 22 Complete widening of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 23 Complete deepening of channel between Port Arthur west turning basin and Taylors Bayou turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 24 Channel extension above Cow Bayou turning basin near Orangefield was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93- 251. 25 Widening to 350 feet entrance channel to Port Arthur turning basin deauthorized by 1962 R&H Act. 26 The 12-foot channel in Sabine River from Orange to Echo, Texas deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 27 Jetty extension was deauthorized under Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662. 28 Raising and strengthening of levees surrounding Gulf Oil Company's fresh water reservoir is inactive. 29 Enlarging 7.0 miles of North Fork Taylors Bayou, 7.8 miles of South Fork Taylors Bayou and 4.4 miles of Mayhaw Bayou are inactive. 3o Portion of project upstream of Brazoria/Galveston County line, approximately mile 18.5, in inactive category. 40-40 GALVESTON. TEXAS. DISTRICT TABLE 40-C OTHER AUTHORIZED NAVIGATION PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to September 30, 1997 Report See Annual Report Operation and Project For Construction Maintenance Aquatic Plant Control (1958 and 1962 River and Harbor Acts) ' 1967 38,2522 Bastrop Bayou, TX3 1931 9,920 27,129 Cedar Bayou, TX 1996 681,263K 3,461,546 ' Channel to Port Bolivar, TX 1995 133,9254 1,231,061S Clear Creek and Clear Lake, TX 1982 66,934 537,139 Corpus Christi, TX, Channel to Navy Seaplane Base Encinal Peninsula 1968 1,194,344 26,467 Dickinson Bayou, TX 1954 33,942 57,553 East Bay (Hanna Reef), TX' 1922 2,476 847 Greens Bayou Bridges, TX 1993 450,000 Johnson Bayou, LA' 1933 2,261 54,042 Little Bay, TX7 1979 - 252,728 Neches River and Trib., Salt Water Barrier at Beaumont,TX (Advance Engineering & Design) 1984 1,503,843 Oyster Creek, TX 1922 6,942 7,556 Channel adequate for existing commerce. 2 Excludes $1,672 work contribution. 3 Widening from 60 feet to 100 feet at 4-foot depth was deauthorized under Sec. 12 of PL 93-251. 4 Includes $48,711 for previous projects. s Includes $46,101 for previous projects. ' Inactive category for maintenance. 7 Aransas County Navigation District, Rockport, TX, constructed project as authorized by 1950 River and Harbor Act (H. Doc. 114, 81st Cong., 1st Sess.) in 1955 under Department of Army permit. * Includes $39,087 for previous projects. In addition $25,000 expended from contributed funds. Includes $69,784 for previous projects. 40-41 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 40-D OTHER AUTHORIZED FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS For Last Full Cost to September 30, 1997 Report See Annual Report Operation and Project For Construction Maintenance Arroyo Colorado, Rio Hondo, TX 1986 201,300 Baytown, TX' 1980 245,400 Buffalo Bayou at Piney Point, TX 1996 473,800 - Colorado River, Matagorda, TX2 1963 273,757 - Falfurrias, TX 1995 103,454 - Freeport and Vicinity, Texas, Hurricane-Flood Protection 2 1984 29,285,0423 - Guadalupe River at Victoria, TX 1996 532,187'" Guadalupe River (Remove Log Jams), TX 2 1978 505,749 - Highland Bayou, TX2 1984 12,254,390 - Kirbyville, TX2 1993 1,484,6134 - Lavaca-Navidad River, TX: Hallettsville Project 1961 256,043 General channel project 1952 21,086 Mill Creek, TX' 1952 24,753 San Diego Creek, Alice, TX2 1963 135,175 - State Highway 111 Bridge, Lake Texana, TX 1995 214,1555 - Texas City and Vicinity, Texas, Hurricane-Flood Protection2 1993 38,882,400 - Tranquitas Creek, Kingsville, TX2 1956 130,239 - Three Rivers, TX5 ( 5,835,927 Upper White Oak Bayou, TX 1989 972,300 - U.S. 190 Bridge, Sabine River, Merryville, LA2 1993 500,0008 - Vince and Little Vince Bayous, TX2 1993 19,307,100 - ' Inactive. 2 Completed. 3 In addition, $8,695,438 expended from contributed funds, $1,126,905 estimated value of contributed lands, and $2,726,446 for relocations by local interests. In addition, $1,484,613 expended from contributed funds, estimated value of $200,096 for contributed lands, and $202,456 for relocations by local interests. - In addition, $71,370 expended from contibuted funds. * See Annual Report for 1983, Fort Worth District, page 16-12. 7 In addition, $14,396,307 expended from contributed funds, estimated value of $1,224,219 for contributed lands, and contributed work in the amount of $1,070,806 by local interests. Work performed at 100% Local Sponsor expense was in the amount of $320,347. K In addition, $237,792 expended from contributed funds. ' In addition, $92,920 expended from contributed funds. '" In addition, $480,888 expended from contributed funds. 40-42 TABLE 40-E GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT DEAUTHORIZED PROJECTS For Last Full Report See Date Annual Report and Federal Funds Contributed Funds Project For Authority Expended Expended Brazos River, TX, Velasco to Old Washington 1924 Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662 216,989' 223,010 17 Nov 1986 Liberty Local Protection Project, TX 1971 Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662 98,517 17 Nov 1986 Peyton Creek, TX 1975 Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662 66,377 17 Nov 1986 Sabine River and Tributaries, TX 1971 Sec. 1001 of PL 99-662 (Echo to Morgan Bluff) 17 Nov 1986 ' Includes $123,676 for previous projects. 40-43 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 40-F TOTAL COST OF EXISTING PROJECTS See Total Cost Section to in Text Project Funds New Work Maintenance Rehabilitation Sep. 30, 1997 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX 3. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX 5. Freeport Harbor, TX 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX 7. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway between Apalachee Bay, FL and the Mexican Border 8. Houston Ship Channel, TX 10. Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX 11. Texas City Channel, TX 12. Trinity River and Tributaries, TX Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performnned Total cost of project Regular Channel Seawall Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public Works Inland WW. Trust Fund Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total Value of useful work performed Contributed land Total cost of project Regular Public Works Contributed Total cost of project Regular Contributed Total cost of project 24,369,601 2,848,560 10,362,758 37,608,224 75,763,553 324,287 6,143,152 82,231,760 1,716,695 276,720 84,225,175 60,153,679 116,575 19,513,507 79,779,192 360,249 80,139,441 11,920,187 8,754209 0 3,648,932 24,323,328 113,891,149 466,477 25,485,551 4,787,913 144,631,090 395,000 139,776 145,165,866 29,042,293 2,612,932 1,382,760 33,037,985 49,592,331 1,363,652 2,103,435 53,059,418 32,000 116,760 53,208,178 14,653,775 136,296 1,023,819 15,813,890 59,653,266 66,000 59,719,266 55,240,427 0 1,352,092 56,592,519 114,145,212 0 985,345 115,130,557 0 0 115,130,557 71,462,698 0 229,311 71,692,009 0 71,692,009 106,922,617 512,163 13,121 2,322,583 109,770,484 403,120,561 0 0 978,246 404,098,807 0 0 404,098,807 169,681,902 0 334,641 170,016,543 216,422,929 0 5,042,792 221,465,721 0 0 221,465,721 28,927,895 0 0 28,927,895 20,578,754 0 20,578,754 2,170,080 0 0 2,170,080 3,576,684 0 0 3,576,684 0 0 3,576,684 8,935 0 0 8,935 0 8,935 7,373,356 595,973 0 0 7,969,329 3,389,719 0 2,948,887 0 6,338,606 0 0 6,338,606 81,807,413 2,848,560 11,714,850 96,370,823 193,485,449 324,287 7,128,497 200,939,001 1,716,695 276,720 202,932,416 131,625,312 116,575 19,742,818 151,480,136 360,249 151,840,385 126,216,160 9,862,345 13,121 5,971,515 142,063,141 520,401,429 466,477 28,434,438 5,766,159 555,068,503 395,000 139,776 555,603,279 198,724,195 2,612,932 1,717,401 203,054,528 266,015,260 1,363,652 7,146,227 274,525,139 0 32,000 0 116,760 0 274,673,899 726,158 0 0 726,158 0 0 0 44,307,828 136,296 1,023,819 45,467,943 80,232,020 66,000 80,298,020 40-44 TABLE 40-G GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet Feet See (Below (Below Bottom Section Mean Low Bottom Mean Low Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Tide) Width (Feet) Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 2. Brazos Island Harbor, TX 3. Corpus Christi Ship Channel, TX 4. Double Bayou, TX Outer Bar and Jetty Channel Padre Island to Long Island Long Island to Goose Island Goose Island to Turning Basin Extension Turning Basin Extension Brownsville Turning Basin Port Isabel Channel via East Turnout West Wye, from Brownsville Channel Port Isabel Turning Basin Fishing Boat Harbor: West Basin Middle Basin East Basin Connecting Channel Entrance Channel Aransas Pass Outer Bar Channel Aransas Pass Jetty Channel Inner Basin at Harbor Island Channel to Port Aransas Port Aransas Turning Basin Anchorage Basin at Port Aransas Inner Basin to Mile 8.5 Mile 8.5 to LaQuinta Junction LaQuinta Junction to Corpus Christi Turning Basin Corpus Christi Turning Basin Industrial Canal Avery Point Turning Basin Channel to Chemical Turning Basin Chemical Turning Basin Tule Lake Channel Tule Lake Turning Basin Viola Channel Viola Turning Basin Channel to LaQuinta LaQuinta Turning Basin Turning Point at LaQuinta Channel Junction Jewel Fulton Canal Jewel Fulton Turning Basin Mooring Area at Ingleside: Mooring Area (a) Mooring Area (b) Double Bayou Channel: Mouth to 7-foot contour in Trinity Bay West Fork 44 42 42 42 42 36 36 36 36 15 15 15 15 15 47 45 45 12 12 12 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 12 12 45 45 400 250 250 300 325 1,200 200 200 200-1,000 370-305 370-305 370 270 100 700 600-730 730-1,720 100-150 200-4002 300-400 600-500 500 400 800 400 975 400 1,200' 300 1,200 300-350 1,200 300-400 1,200 1,250' 100 200 150 150 125 100 44 42 42 42 42 36 36 36 36 15 15 15 15 15 47 45 45 12 12 12 45 45 40-45 45 45 45 45 45 40 40 40 40 45 45 45 12 12 45 400 250 250 300 375 660-1,200 200 200 200-1,000 370-305 370-305 370 265 100 Irregi 300- 600- 1, 1, 1, 200- 700- 300- 1. 1, 700 600 ular 100 2002 400 -500 500 2.5 2.1 9.6 32 13 2,670 0.5 1.4 0.8 1,300 0.2 1,470 03 1,200 02 1,470 0.3 1,230 02 770 0.1 1.8 1.0 1,550 0.1 200 900 0.2 8.5 3.6 400 8.6 ,000 5,423 1.0 400 1.1 ,000 1,150 02 350 0.6 )505 1,690 0.3 200 3.1 900 1,000 02 250 1.8 -900 1,000 02 -400 5.6 ,200 800 0.1 2501 1,250 02 100 - 0.8 200 400 0.1 150 - 0.8 125 - 3.9 100 - 2.0 40-45 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 40-G CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet Feet See (Below (Below Bottom Section Mean Low Bottom Mean Low Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Tide) Width (Feet) Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 5. Freeport Outer Bar Channel Harbor, TX Jetty Channel Quintana Turning Basin Channel to Brazosport Turning Basin Brazosport Turning Basin Channel to Upper Turning Basin Upper Turning Basin Channel to Stauffer Chemical Plant Stauffer Turning Basin Brazos Harbor Channel Brazos Harbor Turning Basin 6. Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX Entrance Channel Outer Bar Channel Inner Bar Channel Anchorage Basin Bolivar Roads Channel Bolivar Roads Channel to 43rd St. 47 45 45 45 45 45 45 30 30 36 36 52 52 50 36 50 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 36 36 10 40 40 40 40 40 8 10 10 40 15 8. Houston Ship Bolivar Roads to Morgan Channel, TX Point Morgan Point to Boggy Bayou Boggy Bayou to Greens Bayou Greens Bayou to Sims Bayou Hunting Bayou Turning Point Clinton Island Turning Basin Sims Bayou to Southern Pacific Slip Southern Pacific Slip to Houston Turning Basin Houston Turning Basin Upper Turning Basin Brady Island Channel Barbour Terminal Channel Turning Basin Bayport Ship Channel Turning Basin Anchorage Area Five-Mile Cut Channel Light-Draft Channel: Upper Turning Basin to Jensen Drive Turkey Bend Channel Greens Bayou Channel: Mile 0 to Mile 0.36 Mile 0.36 to Mile 1.57 400 400 750a 400 1,000; 285-375 1,2004 200 500 200 7504 800 800 800 2,875' 800 1,125 47 45 45 45 45 45 30 25 30 30 42 42 40 36 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 36 36 10 40 40 40 40 40 8 10 10 40 15 400 400 300 300 900-1,000" 800" 300 300 400-1,000 150 60 300 2,000 300 1,600 150 125 60 60 175 100 300 200 390 1000 285-375 1200' 200 500 200 7504 800 800 800 2,875 800 1,125 400 400 300 300 948-1,000'" 965-1,070'" 300 300 400-1,000 150 60 300 2,000 300 1,600 150 125 3.0 0.8 - 1.2 667 0.1 - 1.4 800 0.1 - 1.1 500 0.1 - 0.5 675 0.1 - 4.7 - 1.7 - 3.2 - 1.8' - 1.0 - 3.9 - 262 - 12.8 - 2.4 - 5.3 1,375 1,592 0.6 - 2.9 3,100 0.6 1,000 02 - 0.9 - 3.1 2,000 0.4 - 3.8 1,000 0.3 - 1.9 60 - 4.1 60 - 0.8 175 - 0.3 100 - 1.3 40-46 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet Feet See (Below (Below Bottom Section Mean Low Bottom Mean Low Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Tide) Width (Feet) Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 9. Matagorda Ship Outer Bar and Jetty Channel Channel, TX Channel to Point Comfort Approach Channel to Turning Basin Turning Basin Channel to Port Lavaca Lynn Bayou Turning Basin Channel to Harbor of Refuge North-South Basin East-West Basin Channel to Red Bluff 10. Sabine-Neches Sabine Bank Channel Waterway, TX Sabine Pass Outer Bar Channel Sabine Pass Jetty Channel Sabine Pass Anchorage Basin Sabine Pass Channel Port Arthur Canal Entrance to Port Arthur Turning Basins Port Arthur East Turning Basin Port Arthur West Turning Basin Channel connecting Port Arthur West and Taylors Bayou Turning Basins Taylors Bayou Turning Basin Sabine-Neches Canal, Port Arthur Canal to Neches River Turning Point at Mile 19.5 Neches River, Mouth to Maneuvering Area Beaumont Turning Basin Turning Point, Mile 31.1 Turning Point, Mile 36.6 Turning Point, Mile 40.3 Channel Extension, Mile40.3 Maneuvering Area at Beaumont Turning Basin Beaumont Turning Basin Beaumont Turning Basin Extension Beaumont Turning Basin Extension to End of Project Channel Vicinity Bethlehem Steel Company Sabine-Neches Canal, Neches River to Sabine River Sabine River Channel, Mouth to Foot of Green Ave. Orange Turning Basin Orange Municipal Slip Old Channel Around Harbor Island Channel to Echo7 Adams Bayou Cow Bayou Orangefield Turning Basin 38 36 36 36 12 12 12 12 12 6 42 42 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 300 300-200' 200-300 1,000 125 27-340 125 300 250 100 800 800 800-500 1,500 500 500 275-678 420 600 38 36 36 36 12 12 12 12 12 6 42 42 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 200-250 40 150-1,000 40 40 40 40 40 40 36 40 34 34 30 30 30 30 30 25 12 12 13 13 400 900' 400 1,0004 1,000 1,000 350 Irregular 500 350 200 200 200 Irregular 200 150-200 125 100 100 300 300 300-200' 200-300 1,000 125 27-340 125 300 250 100 800 800 800-500 1,500 500 500 275-678 370-547 350-550 - 32 - 20.9 - 1.1 1,000 02 - 4.1 532 0.1 - 1.9 1,682 0.3 1,750 0.3 - 202 - 14.7 - 3.4 - 4.1 3,000 - - 5.6 - 62 - 0.3 1,765 0.3 1,610 0.3 40 200-250 - 0.6 40 90-1,233 3,470 0.7 40 400 40 900' 40 40 40 40 36 40 34 34 30 30 30 30 30 25 12 13 13 400 1,000 1,000 1,300 350 Irregular 160-535 300 200 200 200 Irregular 150-200 150-200 100 100 300 - 11.2 x - 183 700 930 K 1,530 K 1,265 02 1,300 0.2 1,500 0.3 - 0.4 - 0.7 - 4.4 - 9.5 1,550 0.3 2,435 0.5 - 2.4 - 1.7 - 7.0 500 0.1 40-47 TABLE 40-G REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 40-G CHANNEL DIMENSIONS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet Feet See (Below (Below Bottom Section Mean Low Bottom Mean Low Width Length in Text Project Section of Waterway Tide) Width (Feet) Tide) (Feet) Feet Miles 11. Texas City Texas City Channel 40 400 40 400 - 6.8 Channel, TX Turning Basin 40 1,000-1,200 40 1,000 4,253 .8 Industrial Barge Canal:'" Channel from Texas City Turning Basin to Mile 1.7 40 300-400 - - - - Turning Basin 40 1,000 - - - - 12. Trinity River Multiple Purpose Channel Channel, TX to Fort Worth" 12 200 - - - Channel to Libertyl 2 9 150 6 100 - 41.4 Anahuac Channel 6 100 6 100 - 5.8 Average. Includes 100-foot channel width. Includes 450-foot channel to Corpus Christi. Diameter. Includes 350-foot channel width. 300-foot width through Matagorda Peninsula. Deauthorized. Included in channel length. Includes 300-foot channel width. io Channel dredged 34 feet deep by 250-200 feet wide by 9,908 feet long and basin 34 feet deep by 1,000 feet wide by 1,150 feet long by local interests. '' Not constructed. 12 9-foot by 150-foot channel completed from Houston Ship Channel to a point one mile below Anahuac, a distance of 23 miles. Upper end not connected to river channel to prevent salt intrusion into river. River channel maintained at 6 by 100-foot from mouth to Liberty, Texas. 40-48 GALVESTON, TEXAS, DISTRICT GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY APALACHEE BAY, FLORIDA TO MEXICAN BORDER EXISTING PROJECT DIMENSIONS, PROVIDED FOR IN TRIBUTARY CHANNELS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet (Below Bottom Feet (Below Mean Low Width Mean Low Bottom Length Tributary Channel Tide) (Feet) Tide) Width (Feet) Feet Miles Offats Bayou Main Channel West Wye Chocolate Bayou Channel 12-Foot Channel via East Turnout 2 West Turnout 9-Foot Channel Turning Basin San Bernard River Channel ' Colorado River Channel Turning Basin Silting Basin Mouth of Colorado River Navigation Channel, GIWW to Gulf Turning Basin at Matagorda Channel to Palacios x Turning Basin No. 1 Turning Basin No. 2 Connecting Channel Channel to Barroom Bay Channel to Victoria Main Channel via East Turnout Turning Basin West Turnout Channel Channel to Seadrift via South Turnout9 Turning Basin North Turnout Channel Harbor of Refuge at Seadrift Channel Basin Channel to Rockport Turning Basin Channel to Aransas Pass Turning Basin Channel to Conn Brown Harbor Conn Brown Harbor Channel to Port Mansfield Entrance Channel Approach Channel to Hopper Dredge Turning Basin Hopper Dredge Turning Basin Channel Across Padre Island and Laguna Madre Turnout Channels, East Side of Main Channel, GIWW North Turnout South Turnout Channel West Side of Main Channel, GIWW, to P.T. of Turnout Channels Turnout Channels, West Side of Main Channel, GIWW North Turnout South Turnout Channel from P.T. of Turnout Channels to Approach Channel to Main Turning Basin Approach Channel to Main Turning Basin Main Turning Basin Turning Basin Extension Small Craft Basin Shrimp Basin 12 12 12 12 9 99 99 9 15-12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 100 999999 14 14 14 14 16 16 16 14 12 12 14 12 12 14 14 14 14 8 12 125 125 125 125 100 600 100 100 400 150 100-200-300 350 125 200 300 150-480 60 125 6 0 0 (c) 125 9 250 100 100 200 200 475 175 300 125 300 250 100 300 100 100 100 100 200 200 125 200 400 1,000 160 350 12 12 12 12 9999 15-20 12 12 12 12 12 9 12 100 99 99 14 14 14 14 16 16 16 14 12 12 14 12 12 14 14 14 14 8 12 125 - 125 2,200 125 125 100 100 400 150 100-200-300 125 200 300 130-400 125 500vOOaV 125 200 100 200 342 ayco 125-175 300 02 300 250 100 300 100 500 635 1,130 800(vc)o 2.0 230 1,225 2,212 125 100 100 100 200 200 125 200 400 1,000 160 350 2.3 0.4 82 0.8 26.0 15.5 0.1 1.0 16.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 34.8 0.1 0.8 0.5 2.1 0.2 6.1 0.4 ,800 0.3 - 0.8 - 0.4 300 0.1 7.7 - 0.6 - 0.6 - 0.6 - 0.6 - 0.6 1,250 580 860 1,450 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 40-49 TABLE 40-H 1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY APALACHEE BAY, FLORIDA TO MEXICAN BORDER EXISTING PROJECT DIMENSIONS, PROVIDED TABLE 40-H FOR IN TRIBUTARY CHANNELS Adopted Project Dimensions Improved Project Dimensions Depth in Depth in Feet (Below Bottom Feet (Below Mean Low Width Mean Low Bottom Length Tributary Channel Tide) (Feet) Tide) Width (Feet) Feet Miles Channel to Harlingen via South Turnout from Main Channel, GIWW 12 125 12 125" - 25.812 Turning Basin near Rio Hondo 12 400 12 400 500 0.1 North Turnout from Main Channel 12 200 12 200 - 0.7 Port Isabel Side Channels Main Channel 12 125 12 125-90 - 0.6 Main Channel 12 233-60 12 233-60 - 0.4 South Leg 12 125 12 125 - 0.2 Port Isabel Small Boat Harbor Entrance Channel 7 75 7 75 - 1.4 Harbor Channel 6 50 6 50 - 0.3 Boat Basin 6 Variable 6 72-501 1,308 02 Includes the construction of a salt water barrier at Mile 16.9. 2 Constructed 10 feet deep by 100 feet wide by local interests. East turnout channel constructed 150 feet wide. 3 Constructed by local interests. 4 Authorized to mile 13.2. Mile 8.2 to Mile 13.2 was deauthorized. s Authorized to Mile 31 above mouth (channel mile 29.41). Upper 3.4 miles was deauthorized under Section 12 of PL 93-251. ' Includes a discharge channel from Matagorda, Texas, to the gulf which was dredged by local interests in 1939. (Maintenance will be discontinued upon completion of improvements authorized by R&H Act of 1968.) 7 Authorized by R&H Act of 1968. Also provides for a dam across the present discharge channel, a new 250-foot wide by 20 to 23- feet deep discharge channel into Matagorda Bay, and a 15-foot by 200- foot wide entrance channel with parallel jetties from the gulf shoreline into the Gulf of Mexico. East jetty to be 3,500 feet long and west jetty 2,900 feet long. x Includes two protective breakwaters at entrance to turning basins. ' In the inactive category for maintenance. "o Also provides for two stone jetties at the gulf entrance about 1,000 feet apart. (North jetty constructed 2,300 feet long and south jetty constructed 2,270 feet long.) " South turnout is 200 feet wide. 12 Authorized to mile 31. Mile 25.8 to Mile 31 was deauthorized. 40-50 GALVESTON. TEXAS, DISTRICT TABLE 40-I DREDGING OPERATIONS .. .. 40-51 Brazos Island Harbor, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Brownsville Entrance Channel December 28, 1996 to June 14, 1997 855,877 $2,454,105 Double Bayou Channel, TX Dredging Double Bayou Channel May 25, 1997 to July 18, 1997 276,665 $349,639 Freeport Harbor, TX (New Work) Dredging Freeport Harbor - Bend Easing (45' project) August 4, 1997 to September 30, 1997 613,786 $1,848,043 Freeport Harbor, TX (Maintenance) Emergency Dredging Freeport Entrance Channel and Jetty Channels January 5, 1997 to April 21, 1997 2,488,808 $4,327,831 Galveston Harbor and Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Entrance Channel and Anchorage Area December 21, 1996 to March 31, 1997 2,525,532 $3,604,158 Dredging Bolivar Roads to Pier B September 3, 1997 to September 30, 1997 9,650 $200,00 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, TX Channel to Victoria (New Work) Dredging Channel to Victoria Stations 0+00 to 600+00 October 1, 1996 to December 20, 1996 981,436 $1,097,698 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, TX Channel to Victoria (Maintenance) Dredging Channel to Seadrift October 1, 1996 to December 20, 1996 313,429 $333,652 Dredging Channel to Victoria September 25, 1997 to September30, 1997 0 $50,000 GIWW- Main Channel (Maintenance) Dredging GIWW Main Channel in Matagorda Bay October 1, 1996 to October 24, 1996 21,272 $11,831 Dredging Channel to Port Mansfield January 16, 1997 to April 20, 1997 1,361,230 $2,316,280 Dredging Galveston Causeway to Bastrop Bayou February 15, 1997 to June 20, 1997 1,780,218 $2,583,903 Dredging Brazos River Crossing to Boggy Bayou July 21, 1997 to September 30, 1997 308,080 $990,000 Dredging Vicinity of Rollover Pass and Port Bolivar June 4, 1997 to July 6, 1997 501,439 $703,163 Dredging Turnstake Island to Rattlesnake Island May 6, 1997 to August 15, 1997 2,170,686 $2,257,595 Dredging Main Channel in Matagorda Bay and Port O'Connor Beach Nourishment May 21, 1997 to August 24, 1997 254,359 $523,700 Emergency Dredging Colorado River and Basins August 30, 1997 to September 30, 1997 100,000 $509,800 Channel to Harlingen (Maintenance) Dredging Channel to Harlingen September 12, 1997 to September 30, 1997 0 $363,307 Mouth of Colorado River (Maintenance) Dredging Navigation Channel and Impoundment Basin December 24, 1996 to March 28, 1997 764,975 $1,320,711 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 40-I DREDGING OPERATIONS See Cubic Section Yards of in Text Proiect Description Period Materials Cost Houston Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Carpenters Bayou to Greens Bayou October 1, 1996 to December 1, 1996 193,225 $1,632,638 Dredging Morgans Point to Carpenters Bayou August 3, 1997 to September 30, 1997 441,323 $964,739 Dredging Houston Ship Channel September 3, 1997 to September 30, 1997 155,742 $151,137 Barbour Terminal Channel (Maintenance) Dredging Barbour Tenninal August 3, 1997 to September 30, 1997 300,000 $479,148 Bayport Ship Channel (Maintenance) Dredging Bayport Ship Channel September 3, 1997 to September 30, 1997 446,552 $765,212 Matagorda Ship Channel, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Matagorda Peninsula to Point Comfort October 1, 1996 to October 24, 1996 238,210 $46,098 Dredging Matagorda Entrance and Channel of Refuge October 1, 1996 to October24, 1996 488,383 $1,208,978 Sabine-Neches Waterway, TX (Maintenance) Dredging Sabine Pass Channel, Port Arthur Canal, Junction and Turning Basin October 1, 1996 to April 27, 1997 4,638,399 $4,536,304 Dredging Marina at Placement Area No. 13. April 3, 1997 to August 11, 1997 29,000 $121,002 Dredging Sabine Pass Outer Bar and Sabine Bank Channel March 12, 1997 to September 25, 1997 4,742,465 $3,510,280 1In addition $600,000 expended from contributed funds for beneficial placement of dredged material at South Padre Island. 2 In addition $131,000 expended from contributed funds. 3 In addition $111,900 expended from contributed funds. 4 In addition $39,537 expended from U.S. Coast Guard funds. s In addition $32,578 was decreased from expended contributed funds. 6 Partial cost incurred in FY 97 for mobilization. 7 Includes $973,668 for levee repairs. 8 In addition $114,091 expended from contributed funds for beneficial placement of dredged material. ' Cost incurred in FY 97 for mobilization. "' In addition $291,675 expended from contributed funds. 40-52 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION* The Mississippi River Commission (MRC) was created by an act of Congress on Jun. 28, 1879. The Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928, authorized the Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries (MR&T) Project. The Commission consists of three officers of the Corps of Engineers, one from the former Coast and Geodetic Survey (presently the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), and three civilians, two of whom must be civil engineers. All members are appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate. During the fiscal year the Commissioners were: MG Robert B. Flowers, President Designee until Jun. 1997 when confirmed as President; MG Phillip R. Anderson, President Designee, Jul. 1997 to present; Mr. Sam E. Angel, appointed Sep. 25, 1979; Mr. R. D. James, civil engineer, appointed Dec. 1, 1981; Mr. William Clifford Smith, member designee; MG Albert J. Genetti, Jr., appointed Oct. 9, 1992, Deputy Commander, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; RADM John C. Albright, Member, NOAA, appointed Dec. 26, 1995; BG Robert H. Griffin, Commander, Northwestern Division, member designee; and COL John F. Castonguay served as Secretary of the Commission. The MRC is charged, under direction of the Secretary of the Army and supervision of the Chief of Engineers, with prosecution of improvements for flood control of the Mississippi River and of its tributaries and outlets in its alluvial valley, so far as they are affected by Mississippi River backwater, between Head of Passes, LA (mile 0), and Cape Girardeau, MO (1,006 miles AHP-Lower Mississippi mileage terminates at mile 954 AHP), and with prosecution of improvements in the interest of navigation between Cairo, IL (954 miles AHP), and Baton Rouge, LA (234 miles AHP); and for stabilization of the lower 7 miles of the right bank of the Ohio River, to former mouth of Cache River. It also is charged with prosecution of certain flood control works on the Mississippi River and tributaries, as far as they are affected by backwater, between Cape Girardeau, MO, and Rock Island, IL (1,437 miles AHP), and with prosecution of improvements on designated tributaries and outlets below Cape Girardeau for flood control, navigation, major drainage, and related water uses. Authorized operations of the Commission below Cape Girardeau are conducted by District Engineers of New Orleans, Vicksburg, and Memphis Districts within the areas described below, in accordance with approved directives and programs and congressional appropriations therefore. New Orleans District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required from Head of Passes, mile 0 to 320 AHP, construction of five salinity-control structures for fish and wildlife enhancement, four in lower Mississippi River Delta region, and one in the Mississippi- Louisiana Estuarine Area; Bonnet Carre and Morganza Floodways; maintenance and improvements of Mississippi River navigation channel from Baton Rouge, LA (mile 234 AHP), to mile 320; Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp); navigation improvement of Atchafalaya and Old Rivers from Mississippi River to Morgan City; control of Old and Atchafalaya Rivers; Atchafalaya Basin Floodways; flood control and drainage improvements in Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, in Bayou des Glaises, and in Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area; flood protection in eastern Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, LA; and freshwater distribution from Atchafalaya River to Teche-Vermilion Basins. Vicksburg District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required from upper limits of New Orleans District (mile 320 AHP) in vicinity of Black Hawk, LA, to Coahoma-Bolivar County line, MS (mile 620 AHP) on left bank, and to vicinity of mouth of White River, AR (mile 599 AHP), on right bank including south bank Arkansas River levee to vicinity of Pine Bluff, AR, and north bank levee to vicinity of Tucker on left bank of Plum Bayou, AR; bank stabilization in lower 36.1 miles of Arkansas River; maintenance and improvement of Mississippi * Authorizing legislation (Tables 41-D and 41-E is listed at the end of this chapter. All other tables are referenced in text and also appear at the end of the chapter. 41-1 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 River navigation channel between miles 320 and 599 AHP; Vicksburg and Greenville Harbors; specific fish and wildlife facilities in Tensas, Yazoo, and Big Sunflower Basins; a demonstration erosion control project in the Yazoo Basin; flood control and drainage improvements in Red River backwater area including leveed portions east and west of Black River and south of Red River; Jonesville, LA, Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, Bayou Macon Basins and tributaries, AR and LA, and Bayou Lafourche, LA; Yazoo River Basin, MS, including backwater area; Big and Little Sunflower Rivers, Deer Creek, and Steele Bayou, MS; and Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR, including provision for agricultural water supply. Memphis District: Mississippi River project levees and river channel stabilization as required, from upper limits of Vicksburg District to north bank of Little River diversion channel, MO (1,003 miles AHP), a few miles below Cape Girardeau, MO, on right bank, and to Cache River diversion channel (967 miles AHP) above Cairo, IL, on left bank, including levees and revetment on right bank of Ohio River, in Mounds-Mound City area, IL; except operations above Cairo, IL, do not include channel stabilization on the Mississippi River. Maintenance and improvement of Mississippi River navigation channel between mile 599 and 954 AHP and of Memphis Harbor, TN; specific fish and wildlife facilities in St. Francis Basin; levees in White River backwater area up to vicinity of Augusta, AR, and a pumping plant near mouth of White River; levees and pumping plants at De Valls Bluff and Des Arc, AR; channel improvements in Cache River Basin, AR; channel improvements in Big Creek and tributaries, AR; improvement works in St. Francis River Basin, MO and AR, including backwater area improvements in Belle Fountain Ditch and Drainage District No. 17, AR; Little River diversion channel, MO, and L--Anguille River, AR; Wolf River Basin, TN; Obion and Forked Deer River Basins, TN; Reelfoot Lake area, including channel improvement for Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9, TN and KY; West Kentucky tributaries, KY; Mud Lake pumping station, TN; and pumping plants and outlet structures in the Cairo-Mounds-Mounds City area, IL. Channel improvements to Eight Mile Creek, Arkansas; Ten Mile and Fifteen Mile Bayous in West Memphis, and vicinity Arkansas; Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries, Mississippi; and Nonconnah Creek, Tennessee and Mississippi. Navigation channel and harbor improvements to Helena Harbor and vicinity, Arkansas at Mississippi River, mile 652 AHP. Channel improvements and pumping station for Helena, Phillips County,and vicinity, Arkansas and St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, Missouri. Field operations of the commission restricted to levee construction under Sec. 6, 1928 Flood Control Act (local interests contributing one-third of costs and furnishing rights-of-way) are conducted within the following limits by two districts reporting directly to the Commission on matters within their jurisdiction-St. Louis District: Mississippi River (Sec. 6) levees from upper limits of Memphis District to Clemens Station, MO (1,254 miles AHP), on right bank, and Hamburg Bay, IL (1,215 miles AHP), on left bank, and Illinois River from its mouth to mile 120 at Havana, IL. Rock Island District: Mississippi River (Sec. 6) levees from upper limits of St. Louis District to Rock Island, IL (1,437 miles AHP). For work accomplished see Table 42-N, page 42-50, Annual Report for 1975. MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ALLUVIAL VALLEY BELOW CAPE GIRARDEAU, MO Location and description. The Mississippi River rises in Lake Itasca, MN, and flows generally southerly for 2,340 miles through the central portion of United States to empty into the Gulf of Mexico 115 miles below New Orleans. It is improved for barge navigation for 1,832 miles to Minneapolis, MN. The Mississippi River and its major tributaries, the Missouri, Ohio, St. Francis, White, Arkansas, Yazoo, and Red-Old Rivers, drain 1,245,000 square miles in all or part of 31 states between the Rocky and Appalachian Mountains and part of two Canadian provinces. Below Cape Girardeau, MO, 53 miles above Ohio River, river bottomlands widen abruptly into an alluvial valley of 35,460 square miles which was originally subjected to flood overflow. A major part of the alluvial valley has been protected from floods by levees which confine floodflows within a floodplain having an average width of 5 miles. (See map of alluvial valley of Mississippi River, scale 1:500,000.) Observations made by Mississippi River Commission to Sep. 30, 1982, show approximate all-time maximum and minimum discharges between levees as follows: Cairo to White River, 2,000,000 and 70,000 cubic feet per second; thence to Red River, 2,150,000 and 90,000 cubic feet per second; thence to the Gulf of Mexico, 1,500,000 and 50,000 cubic feet per second in Mississippi River and 660,000 and 11,000 cubic feet per second in Atchafalaya River. As the 1927 floodflow was not confined between levees, maximum discharges recorded do not include entire flow of the 1927 flood, maximum of record below White River. High water and flood stages usually occur in late winter or early spring, but great floods such as that of 1937 occurred as early as January. Low water stages generally prevail from 41-2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION August to December. Extreme all-time high in stages recorded at representative gages (rounded to nearest foot) are 60 feet at Cairo, 49 feet at Memphis, 61 feet at Red River Landing, and 21 feet at New Orleans (Carrollton). The river is nontidal above Red River Landing where tidal amplitude rarely exceeds 0.1 foot during extreme low water. Previous projects. For details see page 1944, Annual Report for 1932. Existing project. The Mississippi River and Tributaries Project in the alluvial valley between Head of Passes, LA, and Cape Girardeau, MO, provides protection from floods by means of levees, floodwalls, floodways, reservoirs (in Yazoo and St. Francis Basins), bank stabilization, and channel improvements in and along the river and its tributaries and outlets insofar as affected by backwater of Mississippi River, including levee work on the main stem between Cape Girardeau and Rock Island. When completed, 23,621 square miles will be protected from the Mississippi River project flood. The project also provides for a 12- by 300-foot navigation channel between Baton Rouge, LA, and Cairo, IL; for salinity-control structures; and for channel realignment and improvement including bank stabilization and dikes to reduce flood heights, control natural tendency of river to lengthen by meandering, and protect levees from being destroyed by caving banks. Locations of major main stem Mississippi River improvements are shown in Table 41-A and those for off-main stem tributaries are shown in Table 41-B. Pertinent data on dams and lakes are shown in Table 41-C. Authorizing and incorporating legislation are shown in Tables 41-D and 41-E. Summary of presently estimated Federal cost of authorized improvements is shown in Table 41-F. Construction of the existing project began in 1928 and has continued throughout ensuing years. Through Sep. 30, 1997, physical completion of the entire project is 86.1 percent. Recommended modifications. None. Local cooperation. The Flood Control Act of 1928, as amended, applies. Such requirements have, in general, been complied with by local interests. Terminal facilities. See Port Series No. 21, 1990, for Ports of Baton Rouge and Lake Charles, LA; Port Series No. 20, 1990, for Port of New Orleans, LA; also folio of Flood Control and Navigation Maps of Mississippi River from Cairo, IL, to the Gulf of Mexico (59th edition), 1992. Project cost. Total allotted for flood control, excluding maintenance charges through Aug. 18, 1941, chargeable under authorizations to Sep. 30, 1996, was $6,207,653,857 (See Table 41-V.) (See also Tables 41-U, 41-W, and 41-X for additional financial statements. The 350 th Session was held on Mar. 17-21, 1997, on board the Motor Vessel MISSISSIPPI enroute on the Mississippi River from Cape Girardeau, MO, to New Orleans, LA. Bank protection works, levees, and channel conditions were observed enroute. On Mar. 17, 1997, MG Flowers, certain staff and MRC members participated in the opening of the Bonnet Carre Spillway in New Orleans, LA. Public meetings were held at Cape Girardeau, MO; Memphis, TN; Greenville, MS; Natchez, MS/Vidalia, LA; and New Orleans, LA, with approximately 410 people in attendance. This session was adjourned in New Orleans, LA, at 10:20 a.m. on Mar. 21, 1997. The 351st Session was held on Aug. 11-22, 1997, on board the Motor Vessel MISSISSIPPI. The Mississippi River Commission (MRC) conducted its first inspection trip in the upper part of the Mississippi River as a result of restructuring of the Corps of Engineers Divisions implemented by the Secretary of the Army in April 1997. In addition to the usual semiannual low-water inspection in the lower river, the Commision conducted public meetings in St. Paul, MN; Davenport, IO; and St. Louis, MO, with approximately 215 people in attendance. Informational meetings were also held for local interests en route from Lacrosse, Wisconsin, and from Quincy, Illinois, with approximately 415 people in attendance. Public meetings on the lower river were held at New Madrid, MO; Helena, Arkansas; Lake Providence, LA; and Morgan City, LA, with approximately 345 people in attendance. The Commission members departed the vessel in the upper river area to tour the environmental management facility in LaCross, WI, and were given a briefing on this project by the St. Paul District staff. The MRC also had tours and briefings on various Rock Island District projects before the public meeting in Davenport, IO, and again before departure from Quincy, IL. The 351st Session adjourned at 11:25 a.m., on Aug. 22, 1997, in Morgan City, LA. 41-3 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Records of Proceedings of all sessions of the Mississippi River Commission are on file in the office of the President. Alluvial Valley Mapping General. Contoured quadrangles and general maps of the alluvial valley are available for departmental use and public distribution under prescribed regulations. Preparation, revision, and publication of quadrangle maps (scale 1:62,500) continued. Roadmap-type information brochures of principal portions of the overall project were published along with pamphlets on the subject of flood control and navigation. Maps and supplemental data sheets for active works were updated and published as required. The 1994, 60th edition of the folio of flood control and navigation maps (Scale 1:62,500) covering the Mississippi River and outlets was revised and printed in FY 1995. Approximately 3,021 flight-line miles of blackand- white aerial photography (various scales); 4,213 flight-line miles of color true photography; and about 587 hours of oblique photography were flown along the Mississippi River and tributaries in the New Orleans, Vicksburg, and Memphis Districts. Work accomplished in the Districts: New Orleans District: The revision of 1:62,500 scale quadrangle maps Slidell, LA; Carencro, LA; and Napoleonville, LA were completed in 1997. Memphis District-Series conversion of U.S. Geological Survey 1:24,000-scale to 1:62,500-scale quads of Middleton, TN; Whiteville, TN; Teaque, TN were published in FY1997. Vicksburg District-Series Conversion of U.S. Geological Survey 1:24,000 - Scale Quadrangles to 1:62,500 - Scale Quadrangles of Calvin, LA, Campti, LA; Hanna, LA; Mansfield, LA; Cas piana, LA were published in FY97. Lake Providence, LA-MS and Alsatia, LA-MS are in progress. Floods Streamflow observations during the fiscal year follow: Memphis District-Mississippi River crest stage of 56.2 feet at Cairo gage on Mar. 10-12, 1997, and maximum discharge of 1,450,000 cubic feet per second occurred at Hickman, KY on Mar 10-17, 1997, a crest stage of 40.6 feet at Memphis on Mar. 14-15 and 19-20, 1997, and a maximum discharge of 1,610,000 cubic feet per second at Memphis on Mar. 14-15 and 19-20, 1997. Vicksburg District-The Mississippi River in the Vicksburg District - Peak stages and discharges on the Vicksburg District's reach of the Mississippi River were as follows: Arkansas City, 43.7 feet on Mar. 21, 1997, and maximum discharge of 830,000 cubic feet per second; Vicksburg, 49.9 feet on Mar. 22, 1997, and a maximum discharge of 1,850,000 cubic feet per second; and Natchez, 56.3 feet on Mar. 26, 1997, and maximum discharge of 1,850,000 cubic feet per second. New Orleans District---On the Mississippi River, the Red River Landing gage recorded a maximum stage of 61.3 feet NGVD on Mar. 26, 1997, and the New Orleans gage recorded a maximum stage of 16.9 feet NGVD on Mar. 20, 1997. On the Atchafalaya River, the Simmesport gage recorded a maximum stage of 41.9 feet NGVD on Mar. 28, 1997. Studies and Investigations General investigations. Surveys and reports, authorized by laws and by Senate and House Public Works Committee resolutions, were made as required. Collection and study of basic data continued. The Energy and Water Development Appropriation Bill of 1990 directed the Corps to develop the most costeffective flood control plan for the City of West Memphis without regard to frequency of flooding, drainage area, and the amount of runoff. It also directed the Secretary of the Army to incorporate existing flood control features of the Bayou Rapides Drainage Structure and Pumping Plant into the Lower Red River, South Bank Levees portion of the MR&T Project. The FY 1994 Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act (Public Law 103-126), dated Oct. 28, 1993, includes authority to within available funds, investigate conditions at Wax Lake Outlet Bayou Black and other features, and recommend modifications desirable for flood protection, navigation, and environmental management. This effort is being conducted under the Lower Atchafalaya Basin Reevaluation Study which began in Dec. 94 and is scheduled to be completed in FY 2000. This study includes an extensive public involvement program, with the objective to promote public awareness and participation. 41-4 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION Mississippi River and Tributaries Levees Operations and results during fiscal year. This feature consists of construction of new, and enlargement of existing, levees to approved grade and section; construction and restoration of levee berms; and construction, repair, and maintenance of roads on levees. Work accomplished is summarized in Table 41-N and further broken down as follows: New Orleans District--Enlarged 7.6 miles of levees in the Main Stem System. See Table 41-K. Vicksburg District-Constructed 7.6 miles of berms in the Main Stem System. See Table 41-L. Memphis District--Completed construction of 2.3 miles of berms and 1.1 miles of levees in the Main Stem System. See Table 41-M. Condition as of Sep. 30. (See Tables 41-K, 41-L, 41-M, and 41-N.) There are 1,609.8 miles of levees authorized for the Mississippi River below Cape Girardeau, of which 1,603.0 are in place with 1,323.7 built to approved grade and section. The Main Stem Levee System consists of 2,203.6 miles, of which 2,196.8 are in place with 1,837.7 miles completed to approved grade and section. Included in this system are 85.4 miles of levees and structures along the south bank of Arkansas River miles (all completed); 59.2 along the south bank of Red River (all completed); and 449.2 miles in the Atchafalaya River Basin, with 449.2 miles in place and 369.4 miles completed to grade and section (see Table 41-N). Of the authorized 675.9 miles of berms, 544.1 are complete. Graveled or hard-surfaced roads have been constructed on 2,094.8 miles of these levees. There are an additional 1,511.0 miles of authorized tributary levees in the MR&T Project, of which 1,220.4 miles, are in place with 1,024.9 to approved grade and section. Berms have been completed on 15.3 miles and 911.4 miles of graveled or hard-surfaced roads have been constructed on the levees. For summary of levee work Table 41-N. A Supplement I to the Final Environmental Impact Statement, Mississippi River and Tributaries, Mississippi River Levees and Channel Improvement, which was filed with the Council on Environmental Quality in April 1976 is being prepared. The SEIS will comply with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, subsequent implementing instructions, Engineer Regulations, and Consent Decree negotiated Jun. 16, 1997, with the Earthjustice Legal Defense Fund. The SEIS will provide a description of the Mississippi River Mainline Levees Project from Cape Girardeau, Missouri, to Head of Passes, Louisiana, a distance of more than 900 miles of river. The SEIS will evaluate impacts of all remaining levee and seepage control construction items scheduled for construction after FY 98. The SEIS will discuss and evaluate the various alternatives of avoiding, minimizing, and mitigating for unavoidable adverse impacts to significant environmental resources during construction of the remaining levee items. Environmental impacts, both beneficial and adverse, will be estimated and unavoidable impacts described. Uncompensated losses will be identified and compensatory mitigation needed to offset losses will be detailed. Mississippi River and Tributaries-Channel Improvements Operations and results during fiscal year. Dredging: Mississippi River Main Stem-(See Table 41-G.) Work included dredging $13,834,800 cubic yards for maintenance of channel and harbor improvements. Minimum channel depth of 9 feet was maintained. Dredging was done with the following plant: Vicksburg District, channel maintenance was performed by government-owned dredges Jadwin and Hurley. Memphis District channel maintenance dredging was performed by the Government-owned dustpan dredge Hurley. New Orleans district channel maintenance dredging was performed by government-owned dustpan dredges Jadwin and Hurley. The MR&T Harbor maintained in Memphis District was Memphis Harbor (McKellar Lake), by leased cutterhead dredge Natchez. MR&T Harbors maintained in Vicksburg District were Greenville Harbor and Vicksburg by cutterhead dredge Alabama. Bank revetment and dikes: (See Table 41-H, 41-I, and 41-J.) Construction of 2.05 miles of new bank revetment and 161,640 squares of concrete mattress, for maintenance, along the Mississippi River was completed by Government plant and hired labor. Also, 6.96 miles of new dikes were constructed and required maintenance was performed. 41-5 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Approximately 1.5 miles of new bank revetment was constructed on the Atchafalaya River. Other work performed in the interest of navigation, supplementing maintenance dredging on Mississippi River between Cairo, IL, and Baton Rouge, LA, included removal of snags, wrecks, and obstructions; issuance of bulletins by the Vicksburg District providing information on available high-water velocities at selected locations; maintenance of bulletin boards showing daily gage readings at regular MRC gages; and contact pilot service furnishing navigation interests with latest information and advice on channel conditions and navigation interests. Cost of this work is given in Table 41-U. Condition as of Sep. 30. In carrying out authorized channel improvement program between Baton Rouge and Cairo, 16 cutoffs were developed between 1933 and 1942. These, combined with chute channel development and alignment improvements, decreased channel length between these cities by about 170 miles. However, current velocities increased the attack on the banks and the river began to regain its length. As a result, the net shortening between 1933 and 1962 was 114 miles of the theoretical 170-mile cutoff. There are now in place 1,025.1 miles of operative bank revetment and 295.3 miles of dikes on the lower Mississippi River. This amount of channel stabilization should prevent the river from regaining much more of its length due to meandering. A navigation channel 9 by 300 feet is being accomplished by revetment and dikes and maintained by dredging as required during the low-water season. Due to growing effectiveness of channel improvement program, average maintenance dredging requirements are steadily being reduced, and an increase in navigable depth is being obtained. Approximately 139.9 miles of foreshore protection have been constructed along the lower Mississippi River. There are 82 miles of revetment and 5.7 miles of dikes on tributary channels as listed in Tables 41-H, 41-1, and 41-J. New Orleans District ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor: Real estate activities and planning for construction were continued. Construction of levee enlargements and floodwalls continued on the east and west protection levees, and levees west of Berwick. In FY 97, four contracts were awarded and another contract was essentially completed. The sites are: E96/E99 Erosion Protection Phase I, B/L Stas. 242+00 to 251+00, B/L Stas. 352+00 to 362+00, St. Mary Parish, La. (460 cy semi-compacted fill embankment and 850 squares of concrete slope pavement), awarded Nov. 20, 1996, expected completion 1st quarter FY 98; Wax Lake West Levee "B" (145,000 cy semicompacted and 222,000 cy un-compacted fill for levee enlargement and berms), awarded Dec. 12, 1996, expected completion 4th quarter FY 98; E-84A 1st Contract, awarded Aug. 14, 1997, expected completion 3rd quarter FY 98; Teche Ridge Centerville (125,000 cy semi compacted fill), awarded Aug. 20, 1997, expected completion 3rd quarter FY 98; and W-40, substantially completed Oct. 3, 1997. In FY 98, plans are to award 6 contracts in the Atchafalaya Basin: 4 for levee enlargements; W-95, Teche Ridge Franklin, Wax Lake West Levee "A", and Todd-Yellow Bayou Area levee enlargement, one for the Yellow Bayou Pumping Station, and one for the E-84 "B" 1st Reach Floodwall. In FY 98, 5 contracts will be completed: E-84 "A" 1st Reach, Wax Lake West Levee "B", Teche Ridge Franklin, Teche Ridge Centerville, and E96/E99 Erosion Protection, Phase I. Maintenance by hired labor: Operation and maintenance of Bayou Boeuf, Berwick, and Bayou Sorrel Locks, Morganza Control Structure, condition and operation studies, and water control management activities were continued. Completed the hydraulic operating machinery contract at Bayou Boeuf Lock. Additionally, the new shops building contract continued in FY 97 and will be completed in FY 98. A contract for SE guidewall replacement at Bayou Sorrell will continue in FY 98. Maintenance dredging was performed, resulting in the removal of 1,960,000 cubic yards by two leased cutterhead dredges from Berwick Bay harbor at a total cost of $2,134,517. Another contract was awarded for $317,207 to remove 123,815 cubic yards at Three Rivers. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated Aug. 7, 1929, with commencement of the west protection levee from Bordelonville to Hamburg, LA. 41-6 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION The project is 91 percent complete. The current estimated Federal cost is $1,730,000,000 and non-Federal cost is $8,000,000. Of the 449.2 miles of levees and floodwalls authorized for the Atchafalaya system, 369.4 miles are built to grade. See Table 41-K for status of levees. Construction of the first 2.5 miles of the proposed 5 miles of channel was initiated in January 1958 and completed in July 1959, with 7,458,086 cubic yards excavated. The remaining 2.5 miles were to be constructed when development of the initially constructed portion warrants expansion. Project expansion has not been necessary. Therfore this feature was deauthorized on Nov. 2, 1979, under the provisions of Section 12, Public Law 93-251 (WRDA 74), as amended. Major items remaining to be completed include completion of levees to grade and section, channel training works below Morgan City, modification of existing structures and construction of two freshwater distribution structures. Approximately 50.5 miles of bank stabilization have been placed as shown in Table 41-H. Flood Control ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA Location. The project lies in the lower part of the Atchafalaya Basin which is situated in south-central Louisiana. It lies in parts of Iberville, Iberia, Point Coupee, St. Martin, St. Mary and St. Landry Parishes. Further, it is limited to the part of the Atchafalaya River Basin that has been confined between protection or guide levees that are about 15 miles apart. The northern boundary, west of the Atchafalaya River, lies along the south right-of-way line for the Union Pacific Railroad near the south side of U.S. Highway 190 between the West Atchafalaya Basin Protection Levee (WABPL) and the west limits of the Town of Krotz Springs, thence southerly along the west limits of the town and easterly along the south limits of the town to the Atchafalaya River; east of the Atchafalaya River it lies along the southern right-of-way line for the Union Pacific Railroad. The eastern and western boundaries lie at the floodside toes of the East Atchafalaya Basin Protection Levee (EABPL) and WABPL, respectively. The area within these limits has been calculated at about 595,000 acres. Existing Project. This project consists of the acquisition of 50,000 acres of fee title, excluding minerals, from willing sellers and 338,000 acres of easements including: (1) flowage easements; (2) flowage, developmental control and environmental protection easements; and (3) developmental control and environmental protection easements. All acquisition is over privately owned land. The state will provide its 150,000 acres of existing lands and also about 30,000 acres of land donated by the Dow Chemical Company to accomplish the project features. Other state and Federal lands in the project area include 15,000 acres acquired by the Department of Interior for the Atchafalaya National Wildlife Refuge and 12,000 acres acquired by the State for the Sherburne Wildlife Management Area. Additionally, the project includes features to protect and improve the environmental resources of the area and to provide for improved recreational use. To date approximately 33,000 acres of fee and 32,000 acres of easements have been acquired. Local Cooperation: A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) is not required for the acquisition of flowage, developmental control and environmental protection easements nor for acquisition of the public access lands (fee). A PCA will be required for the unscheduled work, such as the Operations and Maintenance and Recreation features. One recreational feature, the Simmesport boat launch and appurtenant facilities, has been approved for construction. ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA Operations and Results During Fiscal Year 97: During FY 97, more restrictive easements were acquired over 29,800 acres. Approximately 1,900 acres of additional fee were acquired in FY 97. Conditions as of Sep 30. Revised easements will be acquired over the remaining previously-acquired acreage as well as first acquisition of easements over scheduled lands. Revised easements over 32,100 acres as well as 32,900 acres in fee have been acquired to date. In FY 98, approximately 200 tracts and 40,000 acres of easements and approximately 225 tracts and 48,000 acres of bald cypress (17,000 acres would be acquired in fee from willing sellers) will be acquired, funds permitting. Additionally, road easements will be negotiated over 6 ownerships to provide access to previously-acquired fee lands. 41-7 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Maintenance dredging was performed in FY 1997, by cutterhead dredge BDT 51, at a cost of $154,000. BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of water control management. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in June 1946 and is 57 percent complete, based on the current estimated Federal cost of $20,400,000 and non-Federal cost of $323,000. See page 2031, Annual Report for 1961, for description of completed work. Work required to complete the project consists of enlargement of 13.5 miles of upper Bayou Boeuf, channel improvement of 25.3 miles of Bayou Cocodrie, enlargement of Bayou Courtableau from Washington, LA, to the west protection levee, and additional culverts through the west protection levee at 100 percent Federal cost in lieu of the previously authorized diversion channel from Washington to the Bayou Courtableau drainage structure. With the termination of the Eastern Rapides and South Central Avoyelles project, it has become necessary to provide an adequate outlet structure solely for the Bayou Cocodrie and Tributaries project. The economic effects of this change along with current benefits estimates have caused the benefit-cost ratio for the project to be less than unity. As a result, the project has now been classified as inactive. If economic conditions change, the project could be reactivated. BONNET CARRE' SPILLWAY, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor: Condition and operation studies, water control management, and ordinary maintenance of the control structure and spillway continued. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction of the spillway was initiated in FY 1929. The control structure was completed in 1931, levees were completed in 1932, and utility crossings were completed in 1936. The cost of the completed work is $14,212,200. It was necessary to operate the structure to reduce flood stages in 1937, 1945, 1950, 1973, 1975, 1979, 1983 and 1997. The structure was operated in 1994 to transfer fresh water from the Mississippi River to Lake Pontchartrain. The structure was operated for one month from March 17-April 17, 1997, to reduce flood stages. A new office building was completed in FY 1990 at a cost of $245,500. Needle replacement began in FY 96 with the purchase of about 625 needles for $80,000. The total replacement quantity required is approximately 7,000. An additional cable security system has been installed through needle eyes to prevent needles from dislodging during sever storms. OLD RIVER, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of operation and maintenance of the lock and control structures as required, condition and operation studies, water control management, maintenance of cleared areas, levee shaping, and engineering studies. A picket boat was previously used at the inflow channels to the low sill and auxiliary control structures. It was removed from operation in FY 1988. Maintenance by contract: Maintenance dredging was performed in FY 1997 at the Old River Lock Forebay where approximately 93,160 cubic yards were removed at a cost of $321,921. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction began September 1955 and is complete at a Federal cost of $292,273,000. Principal items completed are as follows: Low-sill structure, June 1959; overbank structure, October 1959; auxiliary structure, September 1986; levees and levee enlargements, October 1963; inflow and outflow channels for the low-sill structure, February 1961; inflow and outflow channels for the auxiliary structure, August 1987; navigation lock completed December 1962 and opened to navigation March 1963, at which time Old River was closed to navigation with a rock and earthfill dam; highway approaches and bridge over the lock completed March 1965. Approximately 9.4 miles of bank protection have been constructed at the inflow and outflow channels. (See Table 41-H for details of bank protection.) Vicksburg District LOWER ARKANSAS BASIN, AR Condition as of Sep. 30. Arkansas River levees. A total of 56.2 miles of the 61.5 miles of north bank 41-8 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION levees and all of the 85.4 miles of south bank levees have been completed to approved grade and section. These levees above mile 36.1 are protected by bank-protection works constructed as a feature of project for Arkansas River and tributaries, AR and OK. For present status of this work, see report of Little Rock District. Below mile 36.1, needed bank protection is constructed with project maintenance funds. Little Bayou Meto gates and lifting mechanism were replaced during FY 88. Big Bayou Meto Gate operating mechanisms replaced FY 94, 95, 96. LOWER RED RIVER SOUTH BANK RED RIVER LEVEES, LA Operations and results during fiscal year. New work by hired labor consisted of engineering studies. A Project Management Plan to address replacement of the drainage structure and pumping plant was approved in Aug 94. A major maintenance report was prepared and approved Sep. 95 recommending replacement of the drainage structure. Inititation of design of the replacement structure is awaiting approval of chief's office. Maintenance by hired labor consisted of water control management and economic studies. Condition as of Sep. 30. Construction was initiated in FY 92 and is complete. All of the 59.2 miles of levees authorized are completed to approved grade and section. TENSAS BASIN, AR AND LA (a) Boeuf and Tensas Rivers, and Bayou Macon, AR and LA. Operations and results during fiscal year. Planning and design on project features are complete. The Lake Chicot Pumping Plant and related features are complete and in operation. No further work on the Tensas River Project (Separable Element) will be initiated due to lack of commitment from a local sponsor to cost share remaining E&D and construction. This project has been placed in the "inactive" category. Condition as of Sep. 30. Channel improvement has been accomplished on 741.7 miles of project streams, providing major drainage outlets for the tributary areas. Additionally, 61.0 miles of the Tensas River has been cleared and snagged. The GDM for the Tensas River Project, above mile 61, including Mill Bayou-Bayou Vidal is complete. However, no further work will be initiated due to lack of a local sponsor. (b) Red River backwater area. Operations and results during fiscal year. Planning and design continued on project features. All channel work required to get flows to the Tensas Cocodrie Pumping Plant and gravity structure is complete. The gravity structure and the pumping plant are complete and are being operated and maintained by contract. One mitigation item, the construction of two water control weirs, was completed in May 1988. Contracts for three additional mitigation features are complete. Construction of the Durham Prong mitigation feature is complete. Tensas-Cocodrie, Item 4-A, levee enlargement, 6.3 miles in length, was completed in September 1988, and Item 4-B, 2.4 miles of levee enlargement, was completed in October 1990. A contract for Item 2 was awarded in January 1991 and is physically complete. These contracts will complete the levee enlargement for all of the levee system, except 0.8 miles. Work on the Below Red River Phase II GDM has been reclassified as inactive. Design and construction of the Sicily Island Area Levee project is underway. Condition as of Sep. 30. Levees in Tensas- Cocodrie area are complete except for levee raising of 0.8 miles. The work comprised 93.1 miles of new levee, excluding 2.1 miles of high ground where no levees are required, and 86.9 miles of gravel road on levees. Construction of 63.4 miles of levee, Larto Lake to Jonesville levee system, has been completed. A levee grade reevaluation study for all levee systems in the Red River Backwater area was completed in Mar. 1985. Levee work on Sicily Island area consists of 56 miles of new levee, 2 pumping plants. 11 miles of channel work, and structural mitigation features. Levee items 1A, 1B, 4A, 4B, 5A-R, and 5B are complete. Construction of Levee Items 3A and 3B, the Fool River Pump Plant, the Haha Bayou Pump Plant, and the Bayou Louis weir and connecting channel are underway. YAZOO BASIN, MS Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Big Sunflower River, etc. The Project is authorized by the Flood Control Acts of 1944, 1946, 1950, 1962, and 1965. Construction of channel 41-9 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 improvements on Steele Bayou, Main Canal and Black Bayou are underway. Construction on Steele Bayou Channel in the Swan Lake Area is being done in phases. Phase III is under construction and scheduled for completion in January 1998. Phase IV is scheduled for award in April 1998 followed by the final Phase V in FY 99. Channel improvements on Main Canal Item 1 were completed in May 1996. Relocation of facilities necessary to complete channel improvements on Main Canal are underway. A construction contract for Main Canal Item 2 is scheduled for award in April 1998. Channel improvements on Black Bayou Item 1 were completed in October 1994. A construction contract for Black Bayou Item 2 was awarded in April 1997. A contract to complete Black Bayou Item is scheduled for award in October 1999. (b) Flood Control Reservoirs (1) Arkabutla Lake. (See Table 41-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Clearing of tributary streams in the lake area was continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 235.1 feet NGVD on Jul. 1, 1997, and storage in flood control pool was 426,000 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow was 41,800 cubic feet per second on Mar. 3, 1997. On Sep. 30, 1997, the pool elevation was 222.4 feet NGVD, and storage in the flood control pool was 154,800 acre-feet. (2) Enid Lake. (See Table 41-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Rehabilitation of boat channels and snagging and clearing of tributary streams in the lake area continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 261.8 feet NGVD on Jul. 4, 1997, when storage in the flood control pool was 500,900 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow was 18,600 cubic feet per second on Mar. 3, 1997. On Sep. 30, 1997, pool elevation was 254.3 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 341,400 acre-feet. Storage Reallocation Study was completed recommending reallocating 2,000 ac. ft. of storage in conservation pool to municipal and industrial water supply. Report is under review in MVD. (3) Grenada Lake. (See Table 41-C.) Construction of remaining public-use facilities has been deferred pending development of cost-sharing agreements with local interests for construction and non-Federal operation and maintenance, consistent with projects for which recreation facilities are being constructed under the provisions of the Federal Water Project Recreational Act of 1965 (Public Law 89-72), as amended. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 228.7 feet NGVD on Jul. 1, 1997, when storage in the flood control pool was 1,194,400 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow was 50,250 cubic feet per second on Mar. 4, 1997. On Sep. 30, 1997, the pool elevation was 4.1 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 517,700 acre-feet. (4) Sardis Lake (See Table 41-C.) The dam and appurtenant structures were maintained and operated. Clearing of tributary streams in the lake area continued. Maximum pool elevation in the lake was 271.6 feet NGVD on Jul. 4, 1997, when storage in the flood control pool was 669,200 acre-feet. Peak 24-hour inflow was 33,400 cubic feet per second on Mar. 4, 1997. On Sep. 30, 1997 the pool elevation was 262.0 feet NGVD and storage in the flood control pool was 679,500 acre-feet. A construction contract was awarded for the seismic remediation of Sardis Dam utilizing driven pre-stressed concrete piling as a result of an extensive study and evaluation of the expected performance of the dam during a major earthquake in the New Madrid earthquake zone of the central United States. (c) Greenwood, Yazoo City and Belzoni protection works. Contract forces continued operation and maintenance of levees, drainage facilities, and pumping plant. (d) Main stem. Contract forces continued operation and maintenance of channels, levees, and drainage facilities. (e) Mississippi Delta, MS. Feasibility studies limited solely to flood control problems in the Big Sunflower River Basin, are complete. No economically feasible projects were identified. A negative feasibility report was forwarded to the Mississippi River Commission in September 1997. (f) Reformulation Study. The uncompleted portions of the Yazoo Basin construction program are being reformulated. This reformulation study includes investigations of the engineering, economic, and environmental aspects of the basin and is being accomplished in 4 phases. These studies will evaluate reasonable arrays of alternatives to the project features that remained after construction of items budgeted and scheduled for award in FY 90. The Upper Steele Bayou and Upper Yazoo Project reports were approved on May 25, 1993 and Jun. 21, 1994, respectively. Concerning the final 2 phases, the Yazoo Backwater Reformulation Study began in FY 93 and the Tributaries Reformulation study began in FY 95. The 41-10 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION Backwater Study includes nonstructural, structural, and combination plans. Nonstructural features include conservation and water management easements and reforesting of cleared agricultural lands. Structural features include an array of various capacity pumping stations and a levee alternative. Current completion date is FY 98. The Yazoo Tributaries Reformulation Study is evaluating flood control requirements on nine project features. Study efforts were suspended in 1996 due to lack of funds. Therefore, completion date was delayed one year to FY 01. (g) Streambank erosion control. Construction of the following projects has been completed: North Fork Tillatoba Creek, Items A and 3A. All construction under this feature is complete, and a final report was submitted to the Secretary of the Army Jan. 5, 1982. All work constructed has been turned over to the local sponsors for operation and maintenance except for the instrumented system on Goodwin Creek where the structures were retained for possible future studies. The Demonstration Erosion Control Project (DEC), a joint project with the USDA NRCS was initiated by FY 85 appropriations as a continuation on streambank erosion control efforts. The purpose of the project is to demonstrate the applicability of a systems approach to the design of erosion, sedimentation, and flood control works by applying this approach to 16 demonstration watersheds in the Yazoo Basin hill area. During FY 97, work continued in the DEC toward development of the systems plans and implementation of a monitoring program. Cumulative through FY 97, the District has completed the construction of 118 low drop grade control structures, 528,000 linear feet of bank stabilization, 115,000 linear feet of channel improvement, 1 box culverts, 6 high drop grade control structures, 660 riser pipe grade control structures, two floodwater retarding structures, and 50,000 feet of levees. (h) Tributaries. Construction: (1) Bank Stabilization. Three bank stabilization items located on the Tallahatchie and Yalobusha Rivers were awarded in FY 94. The work was completed in FY 95. (2) Channels. Construction of the Alligator-Catfish, Round Lake Water Control Structure was completed Nov. 28, 1989. Construction on the remaining channel work on the Ascalmore-Tippo Project is complete. Contract forces continued operation and maintenance of channels, levees, and drainage facilities. (3) Levees. Levee work associated with the last item of work on Ascalmore-Tippo Project is complete. Levee work associated with Item 1 and Item 1-A Pelucia Creek is complete. Three Pelucia Creek pumping stations are complete. Construction of Pelucia Creek, Item 2, Item 3, and Item 4 were completed in FY 94. Pelucia Creek relocations are scheduled for completion in FY 98. (i) Upper Yazoo Projects. The first ten items of channel improvement, approximately 67 miles, and nine drainage structures have been completed. This work extends from Yazoo City, Mississippi, to about 26 miles upstream of Belzoni, Mississippi. The Fort Pemberton Flood Control Structure was completed on Apr. 29, 1991. Roebuck Lake and Fort Loring water control structures and Tchula Lake weirs were completed in FY 95. Item 3A-2 levee was completed in FY 94. Channel Item 3A-1 was completed in FY 96. Item 3A-2 channel work was completed in FY 97. This item contains the first thin layer disposal site. Channel Item 3B-1 was awarded in Sep. 97 and is scheduled for completion in Aug. 98. Design efforts for Channel Item 5 is underway. Design efforts for Channel Items 3B-2 and 4 are complete. The Alligator-Catfish water control structure was awarded in FY 95 and is scheduled for completion in FY 98. This structure has been renamed the J. Tol Thomas Water Control Structure. Mitigation for Upper Yazoo Projects. Mitigation for the terrestrial impacts is now underway. Approximately 6,600 acres of cleared, frequently flooded lands have been obtained in the Yazoo Backwater area of Mississippi to mitigate the wildlife losses resulting from construction of the Upper Yazoo Projects. This land has been reforested and will be managed for terrestrial wildlife. A total of 17,000 acres of mitigation will be required for this project. (j) Yazoo Basin backwater. The Yazoo area backwater levees are complete, including the backwater levee from the Mississippi River levee to the west levee 41-11 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 of the lower Auxiliary Channel, the Little Sunflower River drainage structure, and the connecting channel from the Steele Bayou drainage structure to the Big Sunflower River. The Satartia area backwater levee is complete. Rocky Bayou area levee Items lA and lB have been completed. Completed backwater levees will require raising to provide the degree of protection intended based on the project design flow line developed for the Mississippi River following the 1973 flood. Four Greentree Reservoirs and pumping stations have been constructed to mitigate for the waterfowl impacts of the project. Mitigation of the terrestrial impacts is now underway. Approximately 8,800 acres of cleared, frequently flooded, agricultural lands have been obtained in the Yazoo Backwater area of Mississippi to mitigate the wildlife losses resulting from construction and operation of the Yazoo Area and Satartia Area levees projects. This land has been reforested and will be managed for terrestrial wildlife. Condition as of Sep. 30. The first feature of Yazoo Basin project was started in 1936, and the total project is about 65 percent complete. Memphis District CACHE BASIN, AR Operations and results during fiscal year. No contracts were awarded or completed during the fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1972 and is 4 percent complete. Construction of the authorized project was stopped in 1978 due to environmental opposition. Reevaluation studies of the authorized plan were initiated in June 1987 to provide a more environmentally balanced plan. The reevaluation effort was terminated on Dec. 15, 1994, due to a lack of local sponsorship. The Memphis District has initiated action to turn the acquired mitigation lands (7,959 acres) over to the U.S. Department of Interior. CONSTRUCTION GENERAL HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS COUNTY, AR Operations and results during fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project construction was initiated during 1989 and completed in December 1994. HORN LAKE CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES INCLUDING COW PEN CREEK, TENNESSEE AND MISSISSIPPI Location. Horn Lake Creek is located in northwest Desoto County, MS and southwest Shelby County, TN. Existing project. The project was approved for construction on Nov. 17, 1986, under authority of Title IV, Section 401 of the 1986 Water Resources Development Act. The project consists of 3.5 miles of drift removal and 2.75 miles of channel clearing on Horn Lake Creek; 2.1 miles of channel clearing on Rocky Creek and 0.62 miles of channel clearing and 1.85 miles of channel enlargement on Cow Pen Creek. The project will provide 1.1-year flood frequency protection on Horn Lake and Rocky Creeks and 25-year flood frequency protection on Cow Pen Creek. The estimated construction cost for the project is $4,800,000. The initial contract for project construction was awarded in Apr. 1993. Project completion is expected in 1998. Local Cooperation. A Local Cooperation Agreement was executed with the Horn Lake Creek Watershed Drainage District on Feb. 26, 1992. The sponsor is required to provide the lands, easements, rights-of-way and relocations required for project construction and a cash contribution. Total non-Federal cost share will be between 25 and 50 percent of total project cost. Condition as of Sep. 30. The contract for work on Cow Pen Creek was awarded in September 1997 with completion scheduled for Sept. 1998. LOWER WHITE RIVER Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Augusta to Clarendon Levee. There were no contracts awarded or completed during the fiscal year. (b) Clarendon Levee. Contract awarded on Aug. 31, 1995, to provide a gravel surface on 6.0 miles of levee at Clarendon. Gravel was not originally provided on the levee crown. (c) Oldtown Culvert Phillips County. Contract awarded on Feb. 28, 1997 to replace culverts, 10 percent complete. 41-12 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION Condition as of Sep. 30. (a) Augusta to Clarendon Levee. Project was initiated during 1946 and is 39 percent complete. (b) Clarendon Levee. Gravel surfacing job was completed on Dec. 6, 1995. NONCONNAH CREEK, MS AND TN Operations and results during fiscal year. U.S. Hwy 51 Bridge relocation (by local sponsor) 100 percent complete. Item 1 channel work is scheduled to be awarded in Nov. 1998. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project construction was initiated during 1990 and is 50 percent complete. MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES Operations and results during fiscal year. In addition minor maintenance on levees is performed as required by the local interests and major maintenance is performed as required for slide repairs, road rehabilitation, and other similar work by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. St. Johns-New Madrid slope stability, awarded Aug. 1994 was completed in Nov. 1995. Flower Lake, MS, slope stability awarded Aug. 19, 1994, was completed in Oct. 1996. Gammon, AR berm awarded Aug. 15, 1996, completed Sep. 18, 1997. Tiptonville, TN levee extension, awarded Mar. 8, 1996, and completed Jul. 20, 1997. Farrenburg Levee Culvert Replacement, awarded Jun. 19, 1996, completed Jul. 20, 1997. Helena Floodwalls Concrete & Joint, awarded, Apr. 30, 1996, 50 percent complete. Poker Point Levee Restoration, awarded Dec. 28, 1995, 84 percent complete. Repair Cache River Culvert awarded Sep. 22, 1993, 99 percent complete. Mooring Bayou Floodgate L-869 awarded Jul. 28, 1995, completed Jan. 6, 1997. MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES Seepage Stoval, Coahoma awarded Jul. 25, 1997, 30 percent complete. Caruthersville Floodwall Repairs awarded May 9, 1997, 10 percent complete. Nash Relief Wells awarded Oct. 21, 1996, completed Sep. 19, 1997. St. Johns, Floodgate Repairs, awarded Jul. 30, 1996, completed Jul. 24, 1997. Dogtooth Bend, Scour Repairs, awarded Jun. 27, 1997, completed Sep. 26, 1997. Hatchie River channel awarded Oct. 10, 1996, completed Apr. 3, 1997. REELFOOT LAKE - LAKE NO. 9, TN AND KY Operations and results during fiscal year. No contracts awarded or completed during this fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1974 and is 95 percent complete. ST. FRANCIS BASIN, AR AND MO (a) Little River Drainage. Operations and results during fiscal year. Sals Creek Channel Enlargement awarded Apr. 28, 1995, completed Aug. 12, 1995. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1938 and is 95 percent complete. (b) Lower St. Francis River. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. DD17 Personnel Facility awarded May 31, 1995, completed Sep. 30, 1997. Big Creek Channel Cleanout, awarded Aug. 21, 1996, completed Jun. 27, 1997. Lake City Levee Restoration, awarded Aug. 26, 1996, completed Sep. 11, 1997. Land Reclamation - Mark Tree, awarded Dec. 11, 1995, completed Oct. 20, 1996. Upper Ditch 1, Channel Clearing, awarded Jan. 10, 1996, completed Apr. 6, 1997. Higginbottom Creek, Moore's Ditch Item 1, awarded Aug. 30, 1996, completed Jun. 13, 1997; Rivervale Levee Slope awarded Jun. 30, 1997, 0 percent complete. (c) Upper St. Francis River. Operations and Results During Fiscal Year. New Franklin, bridge, mile 9.60, awarded Jul. 30, 1992, completed Aug. 29, 1996. Main and Ditch 2, Item 1, bridge, mile 12.07, awarded Sep. 19, 1995, completed May 11, 1997. State Bridge, Main and Ditch 2, Item 2, Mile 17.70, awarded Mar. 21, 1996, 50 percent complete. Main and Ditch 2, Item 2, bridge, Mile 20.89, awarded Jun. 27, 1997, 10 percent complete. Main and Ditch 2, Item 2, bridges, Miles 19.85 and 17.12 awarded Nov. 21, 1996, 52 percent complete. Main and Ditch 2, Item 1, Channel Enlargement, awarded Oct. 21, 1996, 82 percent complete. 41-13 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 Condition as of Sep. 30. Project initiated 1937. project is 90 percent complete. WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KY Operations and results during fiscal year. No contract awarded or completed during fiscal year. Condition as of Sep. 30. Project was initiated during 1978 and is 4 percent complete. Project is currently inactive due to lack of local support; however, locals have formally requested assistance in developing an environmentally sensitive plan of improvement. A preliminary time and cost estimate for a general reevaluation have been prepared. WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES, TN Operations and results during fiscal year. (a) Forked Deer River and principal tributaries, TN. Forked Deer River channel improvement is 14 percent complete. (b) Obion River and principal tributaries, TN. Obion Rivers channel improvement is 68 percent complete. (c) Riprap Protection at four sites Dyer, Crockett, Haywood, and Lauderdale awarded Aug. 29, 1996, 22 percent complete. Protection of Gas Pipelines on the South Fork Forked Deer River in Haywood County. Condition as of Sep. 30. West Tennessee Tributaries Project is 60 percent complete. WHITEMAN'S CREEK, ARKANSAS Location. The project is located in the city of Jonesboro, AR. Existing project. The project was authorized for construction by the Water Resources Development Act of 1992, on Oct. 31, 1992. The project consists of 6.1 miles of channel improvements on Whiteman's, Turtle, Moore's and Higginbottom Creeks. The proposed improvements will provide 10-year level of flood protection along Whiteman's, Turtle and Moores and 25-year protection on Higginbottom. Local cooperation. A Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) was executed May 31, 1996. Conditions as of Sep. 30. The contract to initiate work on Item 1, Higginbottom Creek and Moore's Ditch was awarded in August 1996 and completed in June 1997. The City of Jonesboro, AR, the project sponsor, continues to work to meet PCA requirements (i.e., lands, relocations, etc.) for construction Item 2, Turtle and Whiteman's Creeks. 41-14 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-A MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Above Head of Passes Locality Improvement Remarks 0-9571 10-81 11-25 38 45 118 81 44-91 81-96 91-104 96-279 104-234 127-129 129 129-234 235 279-287 Head of Passes, LA-Cairo, IL The Jump-New Orleans, LA Baptiste Collette-Bayou Ostrica, LA Homeplace, LA Bohemia, LA Davis Pond, LA (formerly Myrtle Grove, LA) Caernarvon, LA Bohemia, LA-New Orleans, LA New Orleans, LA New Orleans, LA New Orleans-Morganza, LA New Orleans-Baton Rouge, LA Bonnet Carre' Floodway, LA Mississippi-Louisiana Estuarine Areas, LA/MS (Bonnet Carre') Bonnet Carre'-Baton Rouge, LA Baton Rouge Harbor Morganza Floodway, LA Dredging, revetment, and contract work Main line levee, right bank Local levees, left bank Salinity control structure, right bank Salinity control structure, left bank Salinity control structure, right bank Salinity control structure, left bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Main line levee, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, left bank Main line levee, right bank Main line levee, left bank Regulating spillway, left bank Salinity control structure, left bank Main line levee, left bank Devils Swamp barge channel Regulating spillway, right bank Modified by Public Law 87-874. 41-15 Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Pending deauthorization. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Pending deauthorization. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Postauthorization change report, approved June 1987. Authorized by Public Law 89-298 (HD 308/74/1). Included in MS Delta Region, LA feature. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Public Law 100-676 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 41-A MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS (Continued) Mileage Above Head of Passes Locality Improvement Remarks 287-303 303-314 314-572 437 437-721 490 537 646 605-666 672-993 722-725 721-734 803-873 857 890 890 890-954 902-922 922 Morganza-Old River, LA Old River, LA control Old River-Cypress Creek, AR Vicksburg Harbor, MS Vicksburg-Lake View, MS Wilson Point, LA Greenville Harbor, MS Long Lake, Helena, AR Henrico-Helena, AR St. Francis River-Commerce, MO3 Industrial levee (Ensley Bottoms) Memphis Harbor, TN Tiptonville-Obion River Near Mud Lake, TN St. Johns Bayou, MO New Madrid Floodway, MO New Madrid-Birds Point, MO Slough Bend, Hickman, KY Hickman, KY Extends up south bank of Old River to Barbre Landing. Authorized by Public Law 83-780. Joins Arkansas River, south bank levee. Authorized by Public Law 70-391. Modified by Public Laws 79-526 and 83- 780. -- Unpublished Vicksburg District's MRC report approved Apr. 14, 1966. Authorized by Public Law 85-500. Authorized by Public Law 79-526.2 Main line levee, right bank Levee closure and enlargement, low and high water spillway structures, navigation lock, and approach channels, right bank Main line levee, right bank Harbor extension and industrial fill Main line levee, left bank Pumping Plant and drainage structure, right bank Harbor improvements and port area Culvert and floodgate, right bank Main line levee and floodwall, right bank Main line levee, right bank Levee and pumping station Closure of Tennessee Chute, industrial fill, levee, harbor channels, etc. Main line levee, left bank, levee extension, and diversion Obion River Pumping station and adjacent channel improvements Drainage floodgate and levee closure Drainage floodgate and levee closure Floodway, right bank Main line levee, left bank Floodwall, left bank 41-16 Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Modified by Acts of Jul. 24, 1946 and Dec. 23, 1971. Authorized Dec. 15 and 17, 1970 under Sec. 201 of Oct. 27, 1965 FC Act. Modified by Jul. 24, 1946 Act. Modified by Sep. 3, 1954 Act. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-A MISSISSIPPI RIVER IMPROVEMENTS (Continued) Mileage Above Head of Passes Locality Improvement Remarks 946 Peafield, MO Drainage floodgate Authorized by Sep. 3, 1954 Act. 9571 Cairo, Cairo drainage Floodwalls and levees -- district 9571 Cairo, Cairo drainage Floodwalls, levees, and pumping district, Mounds, Mound plant City, and vicinity Thebes-Rock Island, IL Levees, both banks Intermittent (Sec. 6). Cape Girardeau, MO, to Rock Levees Intermittent (Sec. 6). Island, IL 1. Cairo, IL, is on Ohio River about 3 miles above its mouth (Mississippi River mile 954 AHP). 2. Also see Table 41-D, "Authorizing Legislation." 3. Commerce, MO, is on Upper Mississippi River, 39 miles above mouth of Ohio River. 41-17 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 41-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA1 Atchafalaya Basin, Morganza and West Atchafalaya Floodways West Atchafalaya Floodway between Red River and Alabama Bayou Morganza Floodway between Mississippi River and Alabama Bayou Atchafalaya Basin Floodway between Alabama Bayou and Morgan City East protection levee (Morganza and Atchafalaya Floodways) Lacour-Red Cross Morganza-Morgan City Bayou Latenache Upper Pointe Coupee Loop area Bayou Fordoche-Ramah Bayou Sorrel 1 Bayou Sorrel Lock-Morgan City Morgan City Below Morgan City Below Morgan City Atchafalaya Basin Floodway lower protection levee Calumet Below Morgan City Berwick1 Patterson West protection levee (Atchafalaya Basin and West Atchafalaya Floodways) Simmesport-Hamburg Mansura to Wax Lake Outlet Floodway Floodway Floodway 0-54 27-54 54-117 20-27 25-117 27 0-27 31-57 80 53-117 117 117-129 117-129 105 105-120 115 116 5 5-105 Including lower Morganza Floodway guide levee. Through upper Morganza guide levee and enlargement of outlet channel. Enlargement of Bayou Latenache. Approved Jun. 4, 1970. See Table 41-D. Levee landside borrow pit. Alternate route, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Port Allen to Morgan City. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway utilizes levee west side borrow pit channel. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. Bypass route for Gulf Intracoastal Waterway. East of lower river. Bayou Teche-Wax Lake Outlet. Inclosed area between Wax Lake Lake Outlet and Berwick. Lower Atchafalaya River. Adjustment to provide fresh water. West Atchafalaya Floodway. 41-18 Levee, upper Morganza guide Levee and Morgan City floodwall Drainage structure, Pointe Coupee, and channel enlargement Additional drainage facilities Drainage channel Lock Alternate navigation channel. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Lock in Bayou Boeuf1 Channel relocation Levee, floodwall Floodgate, east Levees, floodwall, drainage structures, and pumping plants Lock Water system Levee fuse plug Protection levee MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND (Continued) OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage Below Head of Atchafalaya River Locality Improvement Remarks 29 29 40 40 40 41 41 41 94 94 Levee enlargement and floodgate extension Railway Railway Gated drainage structures Highway Highway Gated drainage control structures and channels Railway Railway Floodgate and approach channels Outlet, Charenton drainage canal and protection levee Floodgate, west Drainage canal-railway and highway bridges Through West Atchafalaya protection levee. Borrow pit channel to Grand Lake through West Atchafalaya protection levee. Restoration of drainage west of West Atchafalaya Basin protection levee. Bayou Teche and Wax Lake Outlet. To lower flood heights. Coulee des Grues West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Bayou Darbonne West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Bayou Courtableau West Atchafalaya Floodway Morganza Floodway Charenton Jaws-Lake Fausse Pointe Calumet Wax Lake Outlet Atchafalaya River Barbre Landing-Alabama Bayou Simmesport Simmesport-Bayou Garofier Melville Krotz Springs Below Alabama Bayou Mississippi River-Morgan City TECHE-VERMILION BASINS, LA Atchafalaya River to Teche- Vermilion Basins Courtableau Basin, LA, and outlets Charenton Canal West Atchafalaya protection levee borrow pit channel Bayou Courtableau spillway Bayou des Glaises Levee, ring, and drainage structure West bank, levee Levee, ring Levee, ring Channel enlargement 12- by 125-foot navigation channel Pumping station above Krotz Springs, conveyance channels, and appurtenant works Drainage channel Drainage channel Drainage control structure Diversion channel Increase channel capacities to decrease flood heights. Through Grand and Six Mile Lakes. Freshwater distribution from Atchafalaya River to Teche- Vermilion Basins. Outlet to gulf Intercepting drainage channel. 41-19 East bank, levee 105 105 0-54 5-6 5-66 28-30 40-41 54-117 94-106 Mileage Above Mouth 0-8 50-133 96 133 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 41-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND (Continued) OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage above mouth Locality Improvement Remarks 0-17 17-40 40-51 51-60 17-42 87-107 40 60 87 BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES Bayou Courtableau Bayou Cocodrie Bayous Cocodrie-Boeuf diversion Bayou Boeuf Bayous Boeuf-Rapides diversion Upper Cocodrie Bayou Boeuf Bayou Lamourie to Kincaid Structures Lecompte Control Structure Bayou Rapides Control Structure Bayou Lamourie Control Structure Various LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LA Lake Pontchartrain, Jefferson Parish, LA AMITE RIVER, LA Amite River, LA LOWER RED RIVER, SOUTH BANK, RED RIVER LEVEES, LA Moncla-Hotwells Bayou Rapides Pumping plant and gravity structure Red River-Moncla to Lake Long EASTERN RAPIDES AND SOUTH-CENTRAL AVOYELLES PARISHES, LA Eastern Rapides and southcentral Avoyelles Parishes, LA Washington to west protection levee. Enlargement and additional culverts Enlargement and realinement New channel New channel New channel Enlargement, clearing, and snagging Enlargement, realinement, clearing, and snagging Fixed elevation weir Gated drainage structure Gated drainage structure Railway, highway, and local road bridges, and pipeline crossing Flood protection Bank protection Levee, south bank Levee, south bank Levees Flood protection and drainage improvement Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Eliminated by Public Law 89-298. Senate Doc. (Public Law 84-99) Added to project by Public Law 101-514. Intermittent (Sec. 6). Authorized by Public Law 91-611. 41-20 (2,3) 82-145 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND (Continued) OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage above mouth Locality Improvement Remarks 3-56 TENSAS BASIN, AR AND LA Red River backwater area Tensas-Cocodrie area Larto Lake-Jonesville Sicily Island area Below Red River area Black River, LA Six Mile Bayou area Jonesville, LA Ouachita River Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, AR and LA Boeuf River, AR and LA Below Bayou La Fourche Bayou La Fourche Boeuf River, AR and LA above Bayou La Fourche Canal 19 Canal 19 extension Big and Colewa Creeks Tributaries of Boeuf River-- Canal 19 Fleschmans Bayou Caney Bayou Big Bayou Canal 18 Kirsch Lake Canal Black Pond Slough Bayou Macon, AR and LA Bayou Macon Canal 43 Canal 81 Pumping plant and drainage structure Tributary of Bayou Macon Rush Bayou Tensas River, AR and LA Tensas River Tributary of Tensas River Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plant Levees, drainage channels, and structures Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plants Levees, drainage channels, structures, and pumping plants Drainage structure and appurtenant channel works Levees, floodwall, pumping plant, and interior drainage Levees, drainage channels, and structures Clearing Channel improvement and realinement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement To divert flows from Lake Chicot Clearing Channel improvement 41-21 (4) (4) (4) (4) Unpublished VXD-MRC Letter Report dated May 31, 1977, MR&T authority.2 Portion of levee built under Sec. 6. Incorporated in MR&T by Public Law 81-516.2 Monroe to Sandy Bayou and Bawcomville (Sec. 6). (5) (5) Authorized by Public Laws 78-534 and 79-526.2,3 (5) (6) Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 (6) (6) (5 (6) (6) (6) See Table 41-E (5) (5) Authorized by Public Law 90-483. (6) Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 3-56 5 56 0-32 0-56 151-235 210-286 286-296 0-75 0-8 0-7 0-33 0-10 0-9 0-14 0-170 0-34 0-35 Lake Chicot 0-6 0-165 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 41-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND (Continued) OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage above mouth Locality Improvement Remarks 0-22 0-0.2 23-98 35-98 48-102 Channel improvement Filling canal Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Levee, south bank Revetment Mill and Vidal Bayous Grant's Canal, LA Grant's Canal at Lake Providence LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, AR Yancopin-Pine Bluff Fletcher Bend, AR, to Pine Bluff North Little Rock to Gillett (below Plum Bayou) GRAND PRAIRIE-BAYOU METO, AR Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR YAZOO BASIN, MS Yazoo Backwater area Yazoo River System below Arkabutla Lake Yazoo River between Yazoo City and Prichard Yazoo River between Yazoo City and Askew Will M. Whittington Auxiliary Channel Yazoo City protection Rocky Bayou area Belzoni protection Greenwood protection Arkabutla Lake Yalobusha River below Grenada Lake Grenada Lake Tallahatchie River-Little Tallahatchie River Little Tallahatchie River below Sardis Lake Sardis Lake Yocono River below Enid Lake Enid Lake Cassidy Bayou below Old Coldwater River Upper Yazoo Projects (5) Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Including Tallahatchie and Coldwater Rivers. Intermittent. Intermittent. Floodway channel Levee, drainage structure, and pumping plant Channel clearing and enlargement Levee and floodwall Levees, channel improvement, drainage structures, and pumping plants Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Levees, Panola-Quitman Floodway Improvement of 7.8 miles was approved Apr. 29, 1970. See Table 41-C. See Table 41-C. Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Flood detention and conservation Channel improvement Floodway channel See Table 41-C. See Table 41-C. Including Moores Bayou, Cutoff Bayou, Whiting Lake and outlet. 41-22 Levee, north bank Water supply and drainage improvements Levees and pumping plants Channel improvement Levees, right bank Levees, left bank 0-75 0-381 75-366 75-345 45-109 75 127 185 381 0-64 64 0-24 0-26 26 0-13 13 0-88 137-260 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND (Continued) OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage above mouth Locality Improvement Remarks 75-381 0-8.3 0-23 0-42 275-290 0-204 0-8 0-28 0-81 0-43 0-4 0-27 153-160 0-68 13-55 0-68 99 108-192 122 Area between main stem and hills including Bobo Bayou McKinney Bayou enlargement of pumping plant. Alligator-Catfish Bayous Bear Creek Whiteoak Bayou Tallahatchie River, MS Big Sunflower River, etc. Big Sunflower River Hull Brake-Mill Creek Canal Hushpuckena River Quiver River Gin and Muddy Bayous; MS Bogue Phalia Ditchlow Bayou Little Sunflower River Deer Creek Steele Bayou Muddy Bayou LOWER WHITE RIVER AND BASIN, AR Laconia Circle-Old Town Lake Big Creek and tributaries structures Clarendon levee Augusta to Clarendon De Valls Bluff Levees and channel improvement Channel improvement and Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Two road crossings of Panola- Quitman Floodway, MS, and for protection of Sheley Bridge Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Water-control structure Levee, backwater including outlet Pumping plant Channel improvement and Levee and outlet structures Levees, outlet structures Levee, outlet structure, and pumping station 41-23 Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Authorized by Public Law 79-526. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. As modified in GDM in 1967. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 90-147. Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 87-874. Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Authorized by Public Law 78-534. 3 Modified in December 1970. See Table 41-D. Approved Mar. 3, 1970. See Table 41-D. Mile 605-645 Mississippi River. (6) Authorized by Public Law 89-298. Authorized by Public Law 89-298. (5) (5) REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 41-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND (Continued) OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage above mouth Locality Improvement Remarks Des Arc, AR 0-196 0-90 260 0-225 225 0-105 86 0-36 0-29 0-17 0-12 0-108 0-25 143 CACHE BASIN, AR Cache River, AR Bayou DeView, AR ST. FRANCIS RIVER AND BASIN, AR AND MO Inter-River Drainage District in Missouri Mouth of St. Francis River- Wappapello Dam Wappapello Lake Little River Basin Marked Tree, AR Tyronza River Big Slough Ditch Mayo Ditch Cross County Ditch Belle Fountain Ditch Drainage District No. 17 L'ANGUILLE RIVER, AR L'Anguille River and tributaries, Brushy and First Creeks WEST TENNESSEE TRIBUTARIES Wolf River and tributaries, TN Obion River and tributaries, North, South, Middle, and Rutherford Forks Forked Deer River and tributaries, North, Middle, and South Forks Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY 41-24 Levee, outlet structure, and pumping station Channel improvement and structures Channel improvement and structures Channel improvement and two outlet structures Floodway, levees, drainage channels, and structures Flood detention and conservation Floodway, levees, drainage channels, and structures Marked Tree Siphon Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement and pumping station Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Channel improvement Pumping plant Flood control improvements Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized by Public Law 81-516. Authorized Dec. 16, 1975. See Table 41-D. See Table 41-C. -- Authorized by Public Law 90-483. Authorized by Public Law 90-483. Authorized by Public Law 80-858. (6) Authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act. Authorized by 1948 Flood Control Act. Authorized by Resolutions Dec. 15 and 17, 1970.2 Authorized by Water Resources Act of Oct. 22, 1976.2 Section 102, 1976.2 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-B MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY AND (Continued) OUTLET IMPROVEMENTS Mileage above mouth Locality Improvement Remarks Porter Gap, TN Construction to main-stem Section 183, 1976.2 standards, levee and appurtenant structures for flood control REELFOOT LAKE-LAKE NO. 9, TN AND KY 0-20 Running Reelfoot Bayou, TN Channel improvement Authorized by Public Law 83-780. 0-15 Bayou du Chien and Lake Channel improvements and Authorized in December 1970. No. 9, KY and TN pumping station See Table 41-D. WEST KENTUCKY TRIBUTARIES, KY 0-47 Obion Creek, KY Channel improvement Authorized by Public Law 89-298. LITTLE RIVER DIVERSION CHANNEL, MO Delta to Ancell, MO Levees Mile 49 above Cairo. MISSOURI RIVER, MO 0-28 Mouth to St. Charles, MO Levees Intermittent (Sec. 6). ILLINOIS RIVER, IL 0-120 Mouth to Havana, IL Levees Intermittent (Sec. 6). OHIO RIVER, IL AND KY Cairo to Mound City and Floodwall, levee, revetment, and Mounds, IL pumping plant 1. General data concerning Bayou Boeuf, Bayou Sorrel, and Berwick locks where Atchafalaya Basin protection levees cross Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, alternate route to Plaquemine, LA, and lower Atchafalaya River (extension of Bayou Tech Waterway), respectively, are in report of New Orleans District. 2. Also see Table 41-D, "Authorizing Legislation." 3. Public Law 81-516 modified requirements of local cooperation. 4. Authorized by Public Law 77-228. Modified by Public Law 89-298. 5. Authorized or incorporated in MR&T by Public Law 79-526. 3 See Table 41-D. 6. Authorized by Public Law 85-500. 41-25 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 41-C MISSISSIPPI RIVER TRIBUTARY DAMS AND LAKES Grenada Enid Sardis Arkabutla Wappapello Name 1 Lake Lake Lake Lake Lake River Nearest town to damsite Drainage area, square miles Conservation pool: Area, thousand acres Volume, thousand acre-feet Elevation, feet, NGVD Flood control pool: Area, thousand acres Volume, thousand acre-feet Runoff, inches Outlet gates: Number Size, feet Capacity, thousand cubic feet per second Spillway: Type, uncontrolled Length, feet Elevation, crest, feet, NGVD Discharge capacity, thousand cubic feet per second Surcharge pool: Area, thousand acres Volume, thousand acre-feet Runoff, inches Elevation, feet, NGVD Dam: Type, earthfill Length, thousand feet Elevation, crest, feet, NGVD Yalobusha Grenada 1,320 10 86 193.0 65 1.252 17.8 3 7.5 by 14 10.7 Chute 200 231.0 52 106 1,385 19.7 247.5 Rolled 13.9 256.0 Yocona Enid 560 6 58 230.0 28 602 20.2 Little Tallahatchie Sardis 1,545 11 108 236.0 58.5 1,462 17.7 2 4 8 by 16 6 by 12 9.4 Chute 200 268.0 50 41 554 18.5 284.0 Rolled 8.4 293.0 10.0 Chute 400 281.4 132 90 1,447 17.6 301.0 Hydraulic 15.3 311.4' 41-26 Coldwater Arkabutla 1,000 5 31 209.3 33 494 9.3 3 8.5 by 19 10.0 Chute 300 238.3 89 63 858 16.1 256.3 Rolled 11.5 264.3 St. Francis Wappapello 1,310 4 31 354.7 23 582 8.4 3 10 by 20 18.0 Gravity 740 394.7 229 32 521 7.5 413.7 Rolled 2.7 419.7 1. Grenada, Enid, Sardis, and Arkabutla Lakes are in Yazoo River Basin, MS; Wappapello Lake is in St. Francis River Basin, MO. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document May 15, 1928 Jun. 19, 1930 Feb. 15, 1933 Apr. 23, 1934 Aug. 30, 1935 Jun. 15, 1936 H. Doc. 90, 70th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 395, 71st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 351, 72d Cong. Public Law 171, 73d Cong. R&H Comm. Doc. 26, 72d Cong., 1st sess. R&H Comm. Doc. 45, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Unpublished report dated Apr. 2, 1925. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 74th Cong., 1st sess. Flood protection in alluvial valley of Mississippi River, revetment and contraction works and dredging to provide least channel depth of 9 feet and width of 300 feet below Cairo. Provided for allotment of the balance of emergency rescue funds to reimburse levee districts and others for expenditures in floodcontrol works during the 1927 and subsequent floods. Provided for ownership of lands in Bonnet Carre' Spillway and Floodway with proviso for granting rights-of-way, easements, and permits, in said lands. Authorized payment for purchase of, or to reimburse states and local levee districts for the cost of, levee rights-of-way for floodcontrol work in the Mississippi Valley, and for other purposes. Improvement of Wolf and Nonconnah Rivers, TN (Nonconnah Creek is correct title). Improvement of Wolf River (Memphis Harbor), TN. Modification of the 1928 Act to provide for: Construction of a backwater levee at mouth of White River, AR. Construction of Eudora floodway in lieu of Boeuf floodway; flood control, Yazoo River: construction of Morganza floodway; and an outlet to the Gulf of Mexico west of Berwick, LA, including a 6-year program for the improvement and regularization of the Mississippi River between Arkansas and Red Rivers, and Atchafalaya River; and construction of roads on levees and drainage adjustments incident to floodway levees. Provided for construction of floodwalls, levees, and revetments along Wolf River and Nonconnah Creek for protection of Memphis, TN. Modify the Yazoo River project to substitute a combined reservoir floodway and levee plan. Construction of Mounds to Mound City levee and control works along Cache River, IL. Modification of previous act pertaining to floodways and outlets and lands therein; including program for the improvement and regularization of the Mississippi River, between Cairo and Arkansas River, extension of levee road system; strengthening of levees. Enlarge main line levees to offset abandonment of floodways between Arkansas and Red Rivers, flood-control works in backwater areas of Yazoo and Red Rivers, and in Bayous Rapides, Beouf, and Cocodrie, LA. H. Doc. 359, 77th Cong., 1st sess. 41-27 Unpublished report on record in OCE. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. H. Comm. on Flood Control, Doc. 1, 75th Cong., 1st sess. Aug. 28, 1937 Jun. 28, 1938 Aug. 18, 1941 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Dec. 22, 1944 Navigation channel 12 feet deep and 300 feet wide between Baton Rouge and Cairo; flood protection of Yazoo River Backwater Area in vicinity of Satartia, MS. Continue prosecution of channel improvement and stabilization program, $200 million. Jul. 24, 1946 Flood control on the Big Sunflower, Little Sunflower, Hushpuckena, and Quiver Rivers and their tributaries, and on Hull Brake-Mill Creek Canal, Bogue Phalia, Ditchlow Bayou, Deer Creek, and Steele.Bayou, MS. 1 Improve Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon, AR. 1 Improve Bayou Lafourche, LA. Improve Yazoo River tributaries. North bank, Arkansas River levees(below Plum Bayou). 1 Levees on White River (Augusta to Clarendon).1 Bayou des Glaises diversion channel, LA. 1 Modify local cooperation requirements in St. Francis and Yazoo Basins. Tiptonville-Obion levee and drainage improvements.l Improvement of St. Johns Bayou, MO. Big Sunflower River, etc.1 Tennessee Chute (Memphis Harbor), TN. Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $100 million. Jun. 30, 1948 Improve Mississippi River below Cape Girardeau, MO, with respect to West Tennessee tributaries. Improve L'Anguille River, AR. Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), LA. 1 May 17, 1950 Flood protection at Des Arc, AR. Improve St. Francis River and Basin, AR and MO. Improve Cache River and Bayou DeView, AR and MO. Improve Grand Prairie Region and Bayou Meto Basin, AR. H. Doc. 509, 78th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 534, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 151, 78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 191, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 516, 78th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 74th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 98, 76th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 602, 79th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 757, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 138, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 516,78th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 51, 80th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 526, 79th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 627, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 651, 80th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 321, 80th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 485, 81st Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc., 132, 81st Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 88, 81st Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 255, 81st Cong., 1st sess. 41-28 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Flood protection, Lake Pontchartrain, Jefferson Parish, LA. 1 Filling Grant's Canal, Lake Providence, LA. Additional protection to Red River Backwater Area. Extend Federal jurisdiction to cover levees in Orleans Parish, LA. Bank protection, Amite River, LA. Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $200 million. Jonesville, LA, levee, retaining wall, and drainage structure. 1 Oct. 30, 1951 Modify requirements for local cooperation in White River Backwater Area, AR. Sep. 3, 1954 Navigation improvement of Atchafalaya from Mississippi River to Morgan City, LA. Modify project for Vicksburg-Yazoo Area (Harbor), MS. Improve New Madrid Floodway, MO, including Peafield drainage floodgate. Control of Old and Atchafalaya Rivers and a lock for navigation. Improve Reelfoot Lake area, KY and TN. Jul. 3, 1958 Improve Greenville Harbor, MS. Extensions to project for Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon in Arkansas. White River backwater area pumping plant. Wolf River and tributaries for flood protection in Tennessee. Jul. 14, 1960 Continue prosecution of project for channel improvement-- $50 million. Oct. 23, 1962 Modification--Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp), LA. Construct improvements in Gin and Muddy Bayous, Yazoo River Basin, MS. Replace 2 bridges with adequate floodway over Boeuf River and Big Bayou in Boeuf Basin, AR. Jun. 18, 1965 Continue prosecution of project for flood control and channel improvement, $53 million. S. Doc. 139, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 516, 81st Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 117, 81st Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 237, 82d Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 53, 82d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 85, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 183, 83d Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 478, 83d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 160, 83d Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 15, 86th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 108, 85th Cong., 1st sess. S. Doc. 26, 85th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 76, 85th Cong., 1st sess. Public Law 86-645. Public Law 87-874. Public Law 87-874 Public Law 87-874. Public Law 89-42. 41-29 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Modify and expand levees and channel improvement features of main stem project. Modify flood control improvements in following tributary areas and basins: Cairo-Mounds-Mounds City, St. Francis, Lower White, Boeuf-Tensas-Macon, Red River backwater, Yazoo headwater, Grand Prairie, and Bayou Meto. Acquire any modified easements required in New Madrid Floodway as provided by Sec. 4 of May 15, 1928 act. Operate and maintain pumping plant in Red River backwater area (Tensas-Cocodrie Pumping Plant). Provide improvements in West Kentucky tributaries. Provide fish and wildlife facilities in St. Francis and Big Sunflower Basins; Yazoo Headwater and Backwater Areas; and Mississippi Delta region. Deauthorize Amite River, LA, project. Modify St. Francis River, MO and AR, project within District No. 7, Poinsett County, AR. Provide pumping plant and drainage structure at Wilson Point, LA. Nov. 7, 1966 Construction of improvements to supplement freshwater supply in Teche-Vermilion Basins in Louisiana. Bank revetment for protection of existing industrial facilities along Mississippi River below Baton Rouge, LA. Modification of West Tennessee tributaries feature to provide relocation of gas transmission lines at Federal expense. Nov. 20, 1967 Aug. 13, 1968 Sep. 10, 19683 Mar. 3, 19703 Continue emergency work, $87,135,000, which includes $100,000 for road crossing of Panola-Quitman Floodway, MS, and $80,000 for protection of Sheley Bridge, Tallahatchie River, MS. Improvements in Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou Macon Basin to divert flows that would otherwise enter Lake Chicot, AR. Improvements in the Belle Fountain ditch and tributaries, MO, and Drainage District No. 17, AR. Provide pumping plants and other drainage facilities in Cairo, IL, and vicinity. Modification of Yazoo Headwater Project to include cleanout along David Bayou, MS. Modify Yazoo Backwater feature to include a control structure in Muddy Bayou, MS. Oct. 27, 1965 41-30 H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc., 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. H. Doc. 308, 88th Cong., 2d sess. S. Doc. 57, 89th Cong., 1st sess. Unpublished Vicksburg District's MRC report. Approved Apr. 14, 1966. H. Doc. 524, 89th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 89-789. Public Law 89-789. Public Law 90-147. H. Doc. 168, 90th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 339, 90th Cong., 2d sess. Public Law 90-483. Unpublished MRC report dated May 8, 1968. Unpublished MRC report dated Feb. 2, 1970. Apr. 14, 19662 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Modification of Yazoo Headwater Project to include drainage structure and channel improvement on Rocky Bayou, MS. Jun. 4, 19703 Provide for enlargement of Bayou Latenache from Pointe Coupee drainage structure to Alabama Bayou, LA. Dec. 31, 1970 Senate and House Public Works Resolutions adopted Dec. 17 and 15, 1970, respectively. 4 River Basin Monetary Act of Dec. 23, 1971 Jan. 19, 19732 TITLE I Water Resources Development Act of 1974. Modify and expand project to include flood protection within the area of eastern Rapides and south-central Avoyelles Parishes, LA, that are drained by Bayou des Glaises diversion channel and Lake Long, and their tributaries. Modify the project for West Kentucky tributaries (Obion Creek), KY, to provide for all relocations, at Federal expense, of all transmission lines required by the project. Report on Western Tennessee Tributaries, TN and KY, authorized: a. Modification of Reelfoot Lake feature to provide channel improvements on Bayou du Chien and Lake No. 9 in KY and TN. b. Modification of Mississippi levee feature to include a pumping station near Mud Lake floodgate and adjacent channel improvements. Modification of Big Sunflower Basin feature to provide additional improvements in Steele Bayou Basin, MS. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $97 million. Modification of Tiptonville-Obion River levee feature to relieve local interests of all responsibility except that of providing maintenance. Modification of the Mississippi levee feature to provide additional drainage facilities in Long Lake area, vicinity of Helena, AR. Projects recommended by four completed reports were authorized for accomplishment of Phase I design memorandum of advance engineering and design on: a. Greenville Harbor, Greenville, MS. b. East bank of Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson Counties, MS (Natchez area). c. East bank of Mississippi River, Warren to Wilkinson Counties, MS (Vicksburg-Yazoo area). d. Bushley Bayou Area of Red River Backwater Area, LA. Modification of West Tennessee tributaries feature (Obion and Forked Deer Rivers), TN, to acquire lands for fish and wildlife, recreation, and environmental purposes. Apr. 29, 19703 41-31 Unpublished MRC report dated Mar. 6, 1970. Unpublished MRC report dated Sep. 22, 1969. S. Doc. 91-113, 2d sess. Public Law 91-611. H. Doc. 91-414, 2d sess. S. Doc. 91-74, 2d sess. Sec. 1, Public Law 92-222. Sec. 7, Public Law 92-222. Unpublished Memphis District's MRC report dated Oct. 4, 1972. Sec. 1, Public Law 93-251, Mar. 7, 1974. S. Doc. 93-38, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-148, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-148, 1st sess. H. Doc. 93-157, 1st sess. Sec. 3, Public Law 93-251. REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document TITLE II River Basin Monetary Authorization Act of 1974 River Basin Monetary Act of Oct. 2, 1975 Dec. 16, 19752 TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1976. Modification of the Yazoo Basin, MS, feature to provide for a streambank erosion control demonstration project for the delta and hill areas of basin. Modification of project to provide that the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, can substitute authorized mitigation lands, not yet acquired and no longer suitable, for like acreage in the same or adjacent subbasins of the project area. This section provides the authority to substitute authorized mitigation lands in: a. Tensas Basin, LA and AR, feature (Red River backwater). b. St. Francis Basin, AR and MO, feature. Modification of Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, LA, feature, to provide for: enlargement of Bayou Courtableau from Washington to west protection levee; right-of-way and spoil disposal areas at Federal expense; and necessary additional culverts through west protection levee. Modification of Cache River Basin, AR, feature to provide for: acquisition by fee easements of lands for fish and wildlife management, recreation, and environmental purposes. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $211 million. Continue prosecution of project for the comprehensive development of the basin, $158,000,000. Modification of St. Francis Basin, AR and MO, feature to provide relief from ponding of interior runoff in the Inter-River Drainage District of Missouri. Continue prosecution of project for comprehensive development during period Jul. 1-Sep. 30, 1976, $60,300,000. Sec. 32, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 42, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 87, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 99, Public Law 93-251. Sec. 201, Public Law 93-251. Mar. 7, 1974. Sec. 1, Public Law 94-101. Unpublished Memphis District's MRC report dated Nov. 11, 1975. Public Law 94-180, Dec. 26, 1975. 41-32 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1977. Water Resources Development Act of 1976. TITLE II Public Works for Water and Power Development and Energy Research Appropriation Act, 1978. Dec. 9, 1977, 5th Ind. on VXD May 31, 1977, Letter Report. 2 Jun. 28, 1980 Continue prosecution of project for flood control, rescue work, repair, restoration, and control of bank erosion, $231,497,000. Sec. 101(a) authorized accomplishment of Phase I - Advanced Engineering and Design Memoranda-On: a. St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, MO, project: Report of OCE - Sep. 26,1975. b. Nonconnah Creek, TN and MS, project: Report of OCE - Jun. 23, 1976, and as an independent part of the project: Improvements for flood control and allied purposes on Horn Lake Creek and tributaries, including Cowpen Creek, TN and MS. Modification of West Tennessee Tributaries feature (Obion and Forked Deer Rivers), TN, to: a. (Sec. 102) - Provide project for flood control for Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY: (H.D. 94-221) except that highway bridge relocations and alterations shall be at Federal expense. b. (Sec. 183) - Provide for construction of a levee and appurtenant works from mouth of Obion diversion channel to vicinity Highway 88 and thence to vicinity of Porter Gap, TN. Continue prosecution of project for flood control, rescue work, repair, restoration, and control of bank erosion, $253,081,000. Modification of the Tensas Basin Project, Red River Backwater Area, to include a drainage structure and appurtenant channel works in the Six Mile Bayou area of Concordia Parish, LA. The establishment of the Tensas River National Wildlife Refuge for the preservation and development of environmental resources and in lieu of mitigation acquisitions which otherwise would be required for certain water resources projects, within designated limits, in the basins of the Tensas, Boeuf, and Red Rivers in the State of Louisiana. Public Law 94-355, Jul. 12, 1976. Public Law 94-587, Oct. 22, 1976. Public Law 95-96 Aug. 7, 1977. Unpublished Vicksburg District report dated May 31, 1977, on Cynthia and Six Mile Bayous, LA. Public Law 96-285, Jun. 28, 1980. 41-33 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act. 1981 Supplemental Appropriations Bill for FY Ending Sep. 30, 1985 (PL 99-88), and the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662) Water Resources Development Act, 1986 For expenses necessary for prosecuting work of flood control projects, rescue work, repair, restoration or maintenance of flood control projects threatened or destroyed by flood, $232,519,000: Provided, That not less than $250,000 be available for control of bank erosion of streams in the Yazoo Basin, including the foothill area. Provided further, That funds for the Tensas Basin Red River Backwater Area, be used for flood control, etc., for Sicily Island and Below Red River including pumping stations. Authorizes and directs the Secretary of the Army acting through the Chief of Engineers to proceed with planning, design, engineering, and construction of 41 water resources projects, including Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System. For the Atchafalaya Basin Floodway Systems project, cost-sharing is only required for the recreation feature of the project. The flood control and environmental features are Federal costs. Sec. 104(a), Authorization of Projects - Authorization of Construction: Incorporation of the project for flood control, Louisiana State Penitentiary levee, Mississippi River, LA: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated Dec. 10, 1982, at a total cost of $23,400,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $17,600,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of $5,800,000. No acquisition of land for or actual construction of the project may commence until appropriate non-Federal interests shall agree to undertake measures to minimize the loss of fish and wildlife habitat lands in the project area. The work is unscheduled. a. Bushley Bayou, LA. Water Resources Development Act of 1986 authorized the project for flood control, Bushley Bayou, LA. b. Eight Mile Creek, Paragould, AR. Project entails channel improvement along the creek with miniparks and hiking/ biking trails. c. Helena and Vicinity, AR. The Helena Basin is an urban basin containing approximately 3,500 acres which frequently and severely floods the city of Helena. A pumping station and sump with channel enlargement and a gated culvert was recommended. d. West Memphis and Vicinity, AR. Channel improvements along Ten Mile Bayou and Fifteen Mile Bayou for a total of 23.86 miles, with limited revegetation of right-of-way to maintain environmental stability. e. St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, MO. Flood control for urban and rural land. Public Law 96-367, Oct. 1, 1980. FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Bill (PL 99-88), and Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (PL 99-662). Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986. 41-34 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document f. Nonconnah Creek and Johns Creek, TN and MS. Channel enlargement, recreation features with channel construction and environmental enhancement. g. Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries, TN and MS. This is an urban flood control project located in extreme northwest Mississippi and southwest Tennessee. The plan of improvement consists of 3.5 miles of selective drift removal on lower Horn Lake Creek and 2.6 miles of vegetative clearing on Horn Lake Creek, 2.1 miles on Rocky Creek and 0.6 miles of vegetative clearing and 1.8 miles of channel enlargement on Cow Pen Creek. Hike/bike trails are included along Rocky Creek and Cow Pen Creek. h. Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, La. Not mentioned, but this Act authorized basic cost sharing principles for the project. In particular establishes that the fish and wildlife enhancement feature of the project is of national significance, and therefore, a 100 percent Federal cost. i. Lower Atchafalaya Basin Reevaluation Study. Authority to, within available funds, investiage conditions at Wax Lake Outlet, Bayou Black, and other features, and recommend any modification desirable for flood protection navigation, and environmental program. Sec. 601(a) Authorization of Projects. Authorization of Construction: a. Yazoo Backwater Area, MS. Authorized the project for mitigation of fish and wildlife losses at the Yazoo Backwater Project, MS. The project shall include acquisition of 40,000 acres for mitigation of project-induced fish and wildlife losses. b. Greenville Harbor, MS. Authorized the project for navigation, Greenville Harbor, MS, as contained in the reports of Chief of Engineers, Nov. 15, 1977 and Feb. 2, 1982, at a total cost of $43,700,000 with an estimated first Federal cost of $28,000,000 and an estimated non- Federal first cost of $15,700,000. c. Vicksburg Harbor, MS. Authorized the project for navigation, Vicksburg Harbor, as contained in the report of the Chief of Engineers, Aug. 13, 1979, at a total estimated first Federal cost of $55,900,000 and an estimated non- Federal first cost of $23,300,000. d. Helena Harbor, Phillips County, AR. The recommended plan consists of dredging a navigation channel to provide access to 685 acres of landfill; construction of an overlook park; implementing landscaping and erosion control measures; and mitigation fish and wildlife losses. The project is scheduled to be constructed in two phases. 41-35 Energy and water Development Appropriation Act, 1994 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document e. White River Navigation to Batesville, AR. The plan of improvement recommended in the Feasibility Report provides for construction and maintenance to provide a 200-foot wide, 9-foot deep channel available 95 percent of the time from mile 10 (Arkansas Post Canal) to mile 254, two scenic overlooks, a primitive camping area, and acquisition of about 1,865 acres of woodlands for mitigation. However, section 52 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 deauthorized this project. f. Obion Creek, KY. To prevent headwater flooding along tributary streams and backwater flooding of alluvial lands. g. Memphis Harbor, Memphis, TN. This is a navigation project in the vicinity of Memphis, TN, which would consist of dredging and maintaining a 4.9 mile long, 500-foot minimum width, 9-foot deep general navigation channel with additional dredging as required and strategic placement of dredged material to create and provide navigation access to 1,000 acres to be developed as a waterfront industrial complex. Sec. 806. Reelfoot Lake, KY. This project is modified to provide that the Federal share of the cost of operating the pumping plant feature of such project shall be 50 percent. Sec. 836. Mud Lake, Western Tennessee Tributaries. This project is modified to provide that the requirements of local cooperation shall be (1) 50 percent of the value of the lands, easements, and rights-of-way, (2) to hold and save the United States free from damages due to the construction works, and (3) to maintain and operate all the works after completion. Jun. 4, 1987 Modification of Mississippi Delta Region project to construct salinity control structure at Davis Pond (mile 118) rather than at Myrtle Grove (mile 59). Water Resources Development Act, 1988 Water Resources Development Act, 1988 Sec. 3(a), Project Authorizations - Authorization of Construction: a. Mississippi-Louisiana Estuarine Area, MS and LA. Authorized the project for environmental enhancement, as contained in the report of Chief of Engineers, dated May 19, 1986, at a total cost of $59,300,000. Section 4(b) West Memphis and Vicinity, AR. Modified the project by allowing that non-Federal cooperation may be provided by levee districts, drainage districts, or any unit of a state, county, or local government. Unpublished New Orleans District report, Nov. 1, 1984. Public Law 100-676 Nov. 17, 1988 Public Law 100-676, Nov. 17, 1988 41-36 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-D AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION (Continued) Act or Authorization Work Authorized Document Energy and West Memphis and Vicinity, AR. Public Law 101-83, Water Directed the Corps to develop the most cost-effective Jul. 25, 1989 Development flood control plan for the City of West Memphis without Appropriation regard to frequency of flooding, drainage area, and the Bill, 1990 amount of runoff. Energy and Bayou Rapides Drainage Structure and Pumping Plant Public Law 101-514, Water Directed the Secretary of the Army to incorporate Nov. 5, 1990 Development existing flood control features for the Bayou Rapides Appropriation Drainage Structure and Pumping Plant into the Lower Red Bill, 1990 River, South Bank Levees portion of the MR&T Project. Supplemental Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, LA. FY 1985 Supplemental Appropriations Authorizes and directs the Secretary of the Army acting Appropriations Bill Bill for FY through the Chief of Engineers to proceed with planning, (PL 99-88), and Water Ending design, engineering, and construction of 41 water resources Resoureces Development Sep. 30, 1985 projects, including Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System. For Act of 1986 (PL 99-662). (PL 99-83), and the Atchafalaya Basin Floodway Systems project, cost-sharing the Water is only required for the recreation feature of the project. The Resources flood control and environmental features are Federal costs. Development This act authorized basic cost sharing principles for the project. Act of 1986 In particular, establishes that the fish and wildlife enhancement (PL 99-662) feature of this project is of national significance and therefore a 100% federal cost. Water Resource Whiteman's Creek, Arkansas. Public Law 102-580 Development Directed the Secretary of the Army to implement flood control Oct. 31, 1992 Act, 1992 improvement, which essentially consist of 6.1 miles of channel enlargement along streams within the city limits of Jonesboro, Arkansas. 1. Incorporated into Mississippi River and tributaries project as shown in Table 41-E. 2. Date minor modification for blocked drainage was approved under delegated authority of the President, Mississippi River Commission, and in accordance with Sec. 10(p) of the 1946 Flood Control Act (Public Law 79-526). 3. Date minor modification was approved under discretionary authority of Chief of Engineers contained in May 15, 1928, Flood Control Act, as amended. 4. Projects approved under the provisions of Sec. 201 of Flood Control Act of Oct. 27, 1965. 41-37 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 41-E INCORPORATING AND AUTHORIZING LEGISLATION For Last Public Full Report Act of Law Authorizing See Annual Incorporation No. Act Description Report for Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Jun. 22, 1936 Tiptonville-Obion levee and drainage 1941, p. 943 improvements, TN Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Jun. 22, 1936 Bayou des Glaises diversion ditch, LA 1946, p. 1029 Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Jun. 22, 1936 From North Little Rock, AR, to Gillett, 1946, p. 1053 AR, on north bank of Arkansas River (portion below Plum Bayou) Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Aug. 18, 1941 White River levees, Augusta to 1946, p. 1083 Clarendon and De Valls Bluff, AR Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Dec. 22, 1944 Boeuf and Tensas Rivers and Bayou 1945, p. 982 Macon, LA Jul. 24, 1946 79-526 Dec. 22, 1944 Big Sunflower River, etc. 1946, p. 1061 Jun. 30, 1948 80-858 Jul. 24, 1946 Devils Swamp barge channel at Baton 1948, p. 1059 Rouge, LA (Baton Rouge Harbor) May 17, 1950 81-516 Jun. 22, 1936 Jonesville, LA 1953, p. 773 May 17, 1950 81-516 Jul. 24, 1946 Lake Pontchartrain-Jefferson Parish, LA 1953, p. 737 41-38 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-F SUMMARY OF PRESENTLY ESTIMATED FEDERAL FIRST COST OF AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS Estimated Cost 1 Project Title Fiscal Year 1997 Completed features2 Mississippi River levees Mud Lake Pumping Station, TN Sec. 6 levees, 1928 Flood Control Act Channel improvement Atchafalaya Basin, LA Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, LA Bayou Cocodrie and tributaries, LA Old River, LA Lower Red River--South Bank Red River levees, LA Eastern Rapides and South-Central Avoyelles Parishes, LA Mississippi Delta Region, LA Tensas Basin, AR and LA Lower Arkansas River, AR Grand Prairie-Bayou Meto, AR (Flood Control & Water Supply) Yazoo Basin, MS Lower White River, AR (All except Big Creek & Tribs.) Lower White River (Big Creek & Tribs.) Cache Basin, AR St. Francis Basin, AR and MO Eight Mile Creek, AR L'Anguille Basin, AR West Tennessee Tributaries, TN Harris Fork Creek, TN and KY Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, TN and KY Reelfoot Lake, TN and KY (Completed) Reelfoot Lake-Lake No. 9, TN and KY West Kentucky Tributaries, KY Sardis Dam (Dam Safety Assurance), MS St. Johns Bayou and New Madrid Floodway, MO Nonconnah Creek, TN and MS Horn Lake Creek and Tributaries, TN and MS Greenville Harbor, MS Memphis Harbor (Ensley Berm), TN Helena Harbor, Phillips County, AR Helena, AR, and Vicinity West Memphis, AR, and Vicinity Vicksburg Harbor, MS Louisiana State Penitentiary Levee, LA Hickman Bluff, KY Whiteman's Creek, AR $ 297,798,621 1,486,000,000 5,270,0003 4,000,0003 3,620,000,000 1,750,000,000 185,000,000 20,400,0003 292,273,000 23,200,0003 50,000,000 3 98,500,000 479,539,000 29,676,0003 229,800,0003 1,737,098,000 16,802,0003 55,400,0003 155,000,000 381,000,000 9,020,0003 13,300,0003 143,000,000 14,300,000 3 (11,000,000) 3 440,000 10,560,0008 24,800,0003 29,200,000 56,300,0004 18,400,0004 3,120,0004 32,400,0003,4 23,100,0004 32,156,0004 8,193,0003,4 11,600,0004,6 63,500,0004 25,100,0004,7 14,925,0003 3,300,000 41-39 REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY ON CIVIL WORKS ACTIVITIES FOR FY 1997 TABLE 41-F SUMMARY OF PRESENTLY ESTIMATED (Continued) FEDERAL. FIRST COST OF AUTHORIZED IMPROVEMENTS Estimated Cost 1 Project Title Fiscal Year 1997 Mississippi and Louisiana Estuarine Areas, LA and MS 64,500,0005 Eastern Arkansas, AR 114,0003 Jackson and Trenton, AR 9,650,0003 Mississippi Delta, MS 61,600,0003 Bushley Bayou, LA 37,000,000 Bayou Meto, AR 192,000,000 TOTAL $11,818,034,621 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Inflation projected through the construction period. Harbors; Lake Pontchartrain; Wolf River; completed roads. Includes Bonnet Carre', Morganza, and New Madrid Floodways; Memphis, Greenville, and Vicksburg on main stem levees; channel construction works; Atchafalaya River and Basin; Wax Lake Outlet; Charenton Canal; Bayou des Glaises diversion channel, Boeuf Basin levees; Grant's Canal; De Valls Bluff, Jonesville, and Des Arc protection works; Baton Rouge Harbor; and miscellaneous features; Teche-Vermilion Basins, LA. Incremental (not projected through the construction period). Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1986, Public Law 99-662, Nov. 17, 1986. Authorized by Water Resources Development Act of 1988, Public Law 100-676, Nov. 18, 1988. Locals built their own project. Price Level as of 1988. 41-40 MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION TABLE 41-G MISSISSIPPI RIVER MAIN STEM CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS Location Operations in 1,000 Cubic Yards Mileage Fiscal Year 1997 Above Head Channel District of Passes Construction Maintenance Total New Orleans Baton Rouge Harbor (Devils Swamp) 235 -- 113.1 113.1 Main stem channel 234-320 -- 1,186.4 1,186.4 Vicksburg Main stem channel 322-600 -- 832.5 832.5 Vicksburg Harbor 437 -- 86.0 86.0 Greenville Harbor 537 -- 85.3 85.3 Memphis Main stem channel 600-954 -- 11,531.5 11,531.5 Memphis Harbor, McKellar Lake 725 -- 0 0 TOTAL -- 13,834.8 13,834.8 41-41 TABLE 41-H BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1997) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares) 1 (Squares) ' Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard Revetment: Venice, LA............... Olga, LA ............... Lower Childress- Fort Jackson, LA ......... Neptune, LA ............ Buras, LA .............. Tropical Bend, LA ........ Bayou Lamoque, LA ....... Port Sulphur, LA ......... Nestor, LA .............. Point Michel, LA ......... Bohemia, LA ............ Diamond, LA ............ Gravolet, LA ............ Junior, LA............... Harlem, LA ........... Myrtle Grove, LA ........ Monsecour, LA .......... Alliance, LA ............ Belair, LA .............. Jesuit Bend, LA .......... Linwood, LA ............ Oak Point, LA ........... Scarsdale, LA ........... English Turn, LA ........ Poydras, LA.............. Twelve Mile Point, LA ..... Cutoff, LA .............. 12 19 22 23 25 30 33 39 41 44 46 49 51 54 56 59 61 62 65 68 71 72 75 78 82 84 88 R L R L RRL R L RL RL R LR L RL R L RL R L RR 49,552 13,885 1,795 1,678 -- 114 10,771 _-- 4,702 29,045 8,011 5,457 3,235 -- -- 15,430 -- 14,399 -- 17,283 -- 25,012 -- 21,505 -- 36,995 -- 12,4202 -- 22,932 -- 15,441 -- 11,600 -- 23,874 -- 23,599 -- 15,148 -- 17,435 -- 13,340 -- 17,265 -- 26,111 -- 24,978 -- 14,643 -- 15,377 -- 17,8252 -- 21,845 -- 45,864 -- 9,979 -- 23,234 m 0 -.4 **9 - b TABLE 41-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1997) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares) 1 Feet) Feet) Standard Revetment: Third district reach, LA ....... Algiers Point, LA ........... Gouldsboro Bend, LA ........ Gretna Bend, LA ............ Greenville Bend, LA ......... Carrollton Bend, LA ......... Avondale Bend, LA .......... Kenner, LA ..... Luling, LA ..... Destrehan, LA... Good Hope, LA Waterford, LA... Montz, LA ..... Lucy, LA ...... Reserve, LA .... Willow Bend, LA Angelina, LA ... Vacherie, LA . .. Belmont, LA .... Rich Bend, LA ............. Romeville, LA ............. St. Alice, LA .............. Burnside, LA .............. Aben, LA ................. St. Elmo, LA .............. Smoke Bend, LA ............ Marchand, LA .............. Philadelphia Point, LA ........ New River Bend, LA ......... White Castle, LA ........... 93 95 .96 97 100 104 109 114 119 102 126 128 132 136 138 141 145 148 152 157 161 165 170 172 174 177 180 183 185 193 L R R R R L R L R L L R L R 1,858 1,224 9,487 7,938 --. 8,875 5,845 --. -- -- -- --. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 612 -- -- 431 _-- --_ 6,270 -- _ -- -- -- 27,167 -- 12,238 -- 4,960 -- 9,662 -- 22,045 -- 16,262. -- 28,409 -- 45,492 -- 44,893 -- 5,409 -- 24,531 -- 21,264 -- 17,502 -- 19,450 -- 23,234 -- 13,227 -- 34,192 -- 26,025 -- 25,575 -- 38,498 -- 33,986 -- 31,1302 -- 29,304 -- 11,700 -- 12,014 -- 18,792 -- 19,6032 -- 5,379 -- 45,672 -- 45,968 ri1 C/1 tvl 0a 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . TABLE 41-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1997) Operations This FY Nonop. Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares) ' Feet) Feet) Standard Revetment: St. Gabriel, LA ............. Plaquemine Bend, LA ........ Manchac, LA ............... Missouri Bend, LA .......... Arlington, LA .............. Port Allen, LA ............. Scotlandville, LA ........... Allendale, LA . ............. Springfield Bend, LA ......... Arboth, LA ................ Faulkner Lake, LA .......... Grand Bay, LA ............. Bayou Sara, LA ............ Red Store, LA .............. Arrow Bend, LA ............ Boies Point, LA ............ Morganza, LA .............. Iowa Point, LA ............. Brunette Point, LA .......... Greenwood Bend, LA ........ Hog Point, LA ............. Carr Point, LA ............. Above Old River, LA ........ Fort Adams, MS ............ Point Breeze, LA ............ Coochie, LA ............... 201 209 215 222 227 231 234 238 244 250 253 258 265 269- 272 275 279 282 285 289 296 304 305 308 313 317 1,551 -- 8,678 -- _ L R L R L R R L R L R R R L R R 8,889 -- -- 33,292 -- 45,094 -- 38,976 -- 30,437 -- 18,050 -- 17,627 -- 1,623 -- 28,698 -- 25,690 -- 20,1902 -- 18,807 -- 21,025 -- 29,722 -- 18,464 -- 13,600 -- 16,094 -- 20,513 -- 15,477 -- 14,335 -- 26,032 -- 33,539 -- 20,725 -- 9,958 -- 24,206 -- 13,565 -- 17,150 m 0 o 3 4 0 x t* C o m 0 .� c o r 0 vl a jm c-- TABLE 41-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1997) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squarets ) Feet) Feet) Palmetto, MS .............. 322 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 34,650 Total Revetment New Orleans District, Mississippi River ........ Dikes: Profit Island Chute Closure, LA ............... Hog Point, LA .............. Hog Point Chute Closure ....... Total Dikes New Orleans District, Mississippi River ........ OLD RIVER CONTROL Standard Revetment: Inflow channel .............. Inflow channel ............. Outflow channel ............ Auxiliary inflow channel ...... Auxiliary outflow channel ..... Total Standard Revetment, Old River............... 252 299 300 315 315 315 312 312 L L R L R L&R L&R L&R 2,290 545 11,727 6,428 36,874 68,602 -- 1,886,581 (0.43 Miles) (357.31 Miles) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,315 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,850 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 900 12,065 (2.29 Miles) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,415 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,365 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 19,891 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,200 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,790 -- 49,661 (9.41 Miles) H hU 0 0 M 1 0 zI TABLE 41-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1997) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Below Construction erative tive Confluence New Work Since Thru of Red and Bank Exten- Prior This Atchafalaya R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Rivers or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) ATCHAFALAYA RIVER Standard Revetment: Mile One, LA .............. Coville Bayou, LA .......... Legonier, LA .............. Simmesport, LA ............ Kuhlman Bayou, LA ......... Odenburg, LA .............. Jacoby, LA ................ Cason, LA ................ McCrea, LA ............... Woodside, LA .............. Provosty, LA .............. Crooked Bayou, LA .......... Mercier, LA ............... Barberton, LA .............. Evans Point, LA ............ Goudeau, LA .............. Morris Bayou, LA ........... Goodwood, LA ............. Red Cross, LA ............. Melville LA ............... Cross Bayou, LA ............ Melville South, LA .......... Toles, LA ................. Petite Prairie, LA ........... Three Mile Bayou, LA ........ 1 3 4 6 7 9 10 12 13 14 17 18 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 33 35 36 37 L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R L R R 790 -- 728 __ -- -- 4,150 -- -- 6,550 -- -- 8,940 -- -- 12,491 -- -- 5,565 -- -- 5,375 -- -- 7,390 -- -- 10,798 -- -- 6,572 -- -- 13,002 -- -- 9,111 -- -- 16,246 -- -- 10,478 -- -- 3,592 -- -- 6,6682 -- -- 3,938 -- -- 5,440 -- -- 8,505 -- -- 8,065 -- -- 5,660 -- -- 6,0652 -- -- 13,340 -- -- 6,355 -- 6,725 8,381 -- -- 6,3302 8,004 O O 'E tt tlb 0 O x CC 'El 0 .: n OO o J~ TABLE 41-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1997) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Below Construction erative tive Confluence New Work Since Thru of Red and Bank Exten- Prior This Atchafalaya R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Rivers or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares) ' Feet) Feet) Standard Revetment: Holloway Lake, LA .......... Bayou Sherman, LA ......... Krotz Springs, LA . ........... Sherburne, LA.............. Bayou Big Graw, LA ......... Coswell Bayou, LA .......... Alabama Bayou, LA ......... Happy Town, LA ........... Otis Landing, LA ........... Morgan City, LA ............ 37 38 40 43 46 48 50 53 54 115 L L R R R L L L R L 4,601 -- 7,285 -- 7,085 5,200 7,925 7,035 8,394 6,490 9,410 7,285 5,251 3,410 29,840 Total Standard Revetment Atchafalaya River Dikes: Ten Mile Dikes LOWER RED RIVER Standard Revetment: Long Lake, LA ............ Naples, LA ................ Turnbull Island, LA .......... 8,075 (1.53 Miles) 728 37,884 11,326 10 R Below Confluence of Old River Outflow Channel and Red River (Miles) 10 7 9 R R L Total Standard Revetment -- 266,492 (50.47 Miles) -- 2,500 (.47 Miles) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,652 S- -- -- -- -- 6,190 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,038 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 23,880 (4.52 Miles) c!Mrc M 1 0z TABLE 41-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1997) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Tons of (Linear (Tons of Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) Stone) Feet) Stone) (Tons of Stone) Feet) Feet) Dikes: None MISSISSIPPI RIVER Foreshore Protection: Port Allen ................. Cottage Plantation . .......... Upper Plaquemine Point ....... Lower Plaquemine Point ...... Point Pleasant .............. Upper Point Clair ........... Point Clair ................ Belle Grove ................ Donaldsonville ............. Point Houmas .............. Sunshine.................. Union .................... Convent .................. Oak Alley ................. Lutcher................... W allace .................. Garyville ................. Edgard ................... Reserve .................. Waterford ................. 26 Mile Point .............. Destrehan ................. St. Rose .................. Lower St. Rose ............. Ama ................... 228.3 222.6 210.5 207.0 201.7 196.0 191.0 189.9 174.2 168.9 167.4 166.3 158.3 153.4 148.6 145.5 140.4 138.2 136.0 129.0 122.8 121.0 120.8 116.6 115.0 L L L R L L R R R L L L R L R L R L R L L L L R 4,350 700 --_ --_ -- --_ 700 38,522 4,191 -- _ -- .-- -- _ -- 7,500 -- 2,000 -- 4,350 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 10,251 -- 0 -- 0 -- 5,400 -- 900 -- 6,500 -- 11,900 -- 7,800 -- 8,910 -- 10,390 -- 0 -- 7,700 -- 2,200 -- 500 -- 1,320 -- 0 -- 9,830 -- 7,050 -- 0 0 0 0 'Ti 0z c3 r 0 'TI 0 cM 0 TABLE 41-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1997) Operations This FY Nonop. Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Tons of (Linear (Tons of Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) Stone) Feet) Stone) (Tons of Stone) Feet) Feet) Foreshore Protection: American Cyanamid ......... Willswood ................ Avondale .................. Twelve Mile Point ........... Avondale ................. Nine Mile Point ............ Greenville ............. Snowdrift ................. Gretna-Gouldsboro ........... Algiers ................... Holy Cross ................ Arabi .................... Quarantine ................ Huntlee ................... Chalmette .................. Norman .................. Brou .................... Auora .................... Blythe Blvd ............... Upper Stanton .............. Saxonholm-Docville .......... Pecan Grove-Story ........... Story-Allo ................ Delacroix ................. Twelve Mile Point ........... Merrit ................... Saxonholm-Docville .......... Naval Depot ............... Caernarvon ................ 114.8 113.2 109.4 108.9 105.5 105.0 100.0 97.6 96.7 95.4 92.2 91.9 91.5 90.4 90.2 90.0 89.5 89.3 88.6 86.5 86.0 85.8 84.5 84.2 83.5 83.0 82.5 82.5 81.2 R R R L R R R R R R L L R R L R L R R R L L L R R L L R L - 4,788 -- 2,430 -- 6,500 -- 4,580 -- 2,070 - 1,760 - 6,900 - 8,450 - 1,683 - 1,548 - 1,915 - 6,130 -- 3,805 -- 3,139 - 1,260 - 2,968 - 3,030 -- 3,700 -- 4,345 -- 12,890 -- 1,060 - 1,910 -- 5,400 -- 8,220 - 1,300 -- 7,800 -- 7,700 -- 1,950 -- 13,200 MI, ct v 0 0 z TABLE 41-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1997) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Tons of (Linear (Tons of Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) Stone) Feet) Stone) (Tons of Stone) Feet) Feet) Foreshore Protection: English Turn ............... Little Rock ................. St. Claire ................. Fort St. Leon .............. Scarsdale ................. Belle Chase . .............. Stella-Delcour .............. Oak Point ................. Promised Land-Woodlawn ..... Augusta-Live Oak ........... Jesuit Bend ................ Fanny-Belair ............... Sara-Star ................. Star...................... Bayhi .................... Burbridge ................. St. Rosalie ................ Beau-Carlisle .............. Alliance .................. Monsecour-Poverty Point ...... Irontown .................. Myrtle Grove-Woodpark ....... Harlem ................... Wood Park-Deer Range ....... Nero ................... Deer Range................ Upper Point-A-La-Hache ...... Junior.................... Point Celeste ............... 79.3 78.8 78.8 78.2 75.5 75.5 73.6 73.3 70.5 70.5 69.2 66.8 66.3 65.8 64.0 63.2 62.4 62.3 62.0 60.3 60.0 58.8 57.0 56.0 54.7 54.1 53.5 53.5 52.2 L R L R L R L R L R R L R R R L R L R L R R L R L R L R R 1,678 -- -- 2,028 -- -- -- 7,500 -- 9,268 -- 1,025 -- 10,700 -- 16,611 -- 11,500 -- 6,405 -- 13,766 -- 15,495 -- 13,135 -- 16,454 -- 12,400 -- 2,100 -- 5,470 -- 11,190 -- 12,335 -- 6,976 -- 6,258 -- 4,300 -- 7,380 -- 2,298 -- 8,450 -- 15,550 -- 17,650 -- 4,450 -- 4,220 -- 9,101 -- 7,811 -- 3,300 8 am O x 701 O x1 c= 01 z1 c O c r 0C o TABLE 41-H BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: (Continued) NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1997) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Tons of (Linear (Tons of Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) Stone) Feet) Stone) (Tons of Stone) Feet) Feet) Foreshore Protection: Davant ................... 51.5 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10,795 St. Thomas ................ 50.0 L -- -- -- -- -- .-.-- - 6,430 Woodland .... ..... . 50.0 R -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,800 Point-A-La-Hache ........... 48.1 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 23,030 Nolan .................... 47.2 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 13,400 5 Socola ................... 46.5 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,255 Point Michel ............... 44.2 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,350 Happy Jack ................ 43.0 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 18,785 Port Sulphur ............... 39.7 R -- -- -- -- -- 3,708 -- 6,430 Little Texas ............... 39.0 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 300 Home Place ................ 37.6 R -- -- -- -- -- - -- 13,250 Nairn .................... 34.5 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,915 Sixty Mile Point ............ 32.1 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0 Tropical Bend.............. 31.2 R -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,775 Bowers ................... 30.8 R - -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,836 Empire .................... 29.7 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,865 Anderson ................. 29.2 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,100 Fredrick ................... 27.5 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,820 Buras ...................... 26.0 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 13,495 Lower Buras ............... 24.0 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,900 Triumph .................. 22.5 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,220 Fort Jackson ............... 21.9 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 16,690 Grand Prairie .............. 19.2 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,350 Upper Commander ........... 18.2 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,180 Commander ............... .18.0 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 22,232 nI n .y n n b b C 7, Vn n4 TABLE 41-H (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS, DIKES, AND FORESHORE PROTECTION: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1997) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Tons of (Linear (Tons of Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) Stone) Feet) Stone) (Tons of Stone) Feet) Feet) Foreshore Protection: Boothville-Commander ........ 16.0 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,824 Upper Venice ............... 12.0 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,800 Total Foreshore Protection New Orleans District Mississippi River ........ 5,050 -- 42,713 1,678 2,028 3,708 -- 738,857 (0.96 Miles) (139.94 Miles) 1. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). 2. Changed to correct previous error. 'U 0 0 'El 51~ O tEl 0 z 90 4 'y 0 i O cc O xb c~ a TABLE 41-I BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1997) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera. Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares) Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard Revetment: Bougere Bend, LA ........... Dead Mans Bend, MS ........ Glasscock Cutoff, MS-LA ..... Railroad Landing, MS ........ St. Catherine Bend, LA ....... Morville, LA................ Natchez Island, MS .......... Carthage, MS .............. Vidalia Casting Field ......... Natchez Front, MS .......... Giles Cutoff, LA-MS ......... Gibson, LA................. Ashland, LA-MS ............ Kempe Bend, LA ........... Browns Field, LA ........... Goldbottom, MS ............ Hardscrabble, LA ........... Grand Gulf, MS ............ Point Pleasant, MS-LA ........ Togo Island, LA ............. Lake Karnac, LA-MS ......... Diamond Point, LA-MS ....... Oakbend, MS .............. Reid-Bedford, LA ........... Racetrack, MS .............. Barge Line Terminal, MS ...... Vicksburg Harbor, MS ........ Delta Point, LA ............. 329 335 342 346 350 356 357 361 363 364 366 371 374 383 389 392 398 403 413 415 419 423 425 429 433 437 437 437 R L RL RRR L L L RR L RR L R L RR L R L R L L L R 1,905 -- -3-5 35 -- 10,292 18,874 -- --_ --_ 1,515 --_ 70 -- -- -- 5,085 -- 26,055 -- 33,220 -- 26,083 -- 14,740 -- 29,108 -- 16,917 -- 2,180 - 14,700 -- 2,670 -- 6,510 -- 12,020 -- 26,000 -- 33,427 -- 28,285 -- 9,280 -- 30,250 -- 22,530 -- 56,118 -- 32,345 -- 7,080 -- 19,260 -- 15,725 -- 4,290 -- 18,392 -- 13,935 -- 3,040 -- 7,350 -- 7,650 rM1 cn 0 0z TABLE 41-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1997) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares) 1 (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Standard Revetment: King's Point--Opposite Delta Point, LA-MS ........ False Point, LA ............. Marshall-Brown's Point, LA-MS ................. Milliken Bend, LA .......... Belle Island, LA-MS ......... Goodrich, LA .............. Cottonwood Bar, MS ......... Filter-Cottonwood, MS ........ Hagaman, LA .............. Ben Lomond, MS ........... Baleshed Towhead-Stack Island, LA-MS ............. Lake Providence, LA ......... Mayersville, MS ............ Sarah Island-Opossum Point, LA-MS ............. Carolina, MS .............. Cracraft, AR ............... Worthington, MS-AR ......... Walnut Point Kentucky Bend, MS ................ American Cutoff, MS-AR ...... Sunnyside-Lakeport, AR ....... Vancluse, AR .............. Island 84, AR-MS ........... Warfield Point, MS .......... Leland-LaGrange, AR-MS ..... 439 L 443 R 446 453 460 467 470 474 481 486 488 489 497 501 507 511 514 519 526 530 534 535 537 538 L R L R R L R L R R L R L R R L L R R L L L 5,080 1,090 -- 230 _-- -- 3,370 -- .-- 19,330 12,860 -- 19,580 -- 46,140 -- 24,160 -- 40,765 -- 18,580 -- 38,672 -- 37,756 -- 10,235 53,214 11,600 34,992 -- 26,815 -- 11,080 -- 22,210 -- 8,350 -- 45,653 -- 2,980 -- 33,685 -- 13,016 -- 13,475 -- 4,320 -- 14,150 it bb 0 0 0 0I r3 0 o LZM c cM 0 Ja TABLE 41-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1997) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) Standard Revetment: Spanish Moss, AR ........... Tarpley Island, MS .......... Miller Bend, MS ............ Island 82, AR .............. Ashbrook Island, MS ......... Arkansas City-Yellow Bend, AR ................ Huntington Point, MS ........ Pair O'Dice, AR ............ Eutaw-Mounds, MS .......... Cypress Bend, AR ........... Catfish Point, MS ........... Ozark, AR-MS ............. Prentiss, AR-MS ............ Rosedale Bend, AR .......... Riverton, MS .............. Klondike, AR .............. Victoria Bend-Terrene, MS ..... Lake Concordia, MS ......... Big Island, AR ............. Smith Point, MS ............ Dennis, MS ............... Cessions, MS .............. Total Revetment, Vicksburg District, Mississippi River ......... 539 542 544 546 549 553 556 561 563 568 573 578 582 585 586 588 593 596 598 601 611 615 R R L R R R L R L R L R L L L R L 4,510 (.85 Miles) 335 18,747 -- 12,621 4,580 2,000 29,360 3,080 3,455 12,621 -- 5,291 -- 31,045 1,800 44,335 -- 21,205 -- 9,095 -- 40,188 -- 34,405 -- 20,075 -- 22,015 -- 20,315 -- 4,820 -- 12,500 -- 23,400 -- 29,245 -- 6,980 -- 16,515 -- 18,185 -- 25,195 -- 10,910 -- 1,484,636 (281.18 Miles) E po bb bb 0 0 z Ed gI 8 TABLE 41-I BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (Continued) (FISCAL YEAR 1997) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linea Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Dikes: (2) (3) Jackson Point, MS ........... . 330 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,306 Buck Island, MS .............. 339 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,334 Opposite Warnicott Ldg., MS ..................... 352 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10,791 Natchez Island, LA-MS ....... 358 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,608 Opposite Rifle Point, MS ...... 369 L 3,214 -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,214 Rifle Point, LA ............... 369 R 4,197 -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,197 Waterproof Bar, LA .......... 379 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,580 S Spithead Towhead, MS ...... 386 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9,681 S Browns Field, LA ........... .388 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 10,917 Cottage Bend, LA-MS ........ 389 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,049 Bondurant Towhead, LA ...... 394 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,029 Coffee Point, LA ............ 405 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,925 Yucatan, MS ............... 410 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9,010 Togo Island, LA ............ 416 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 8,256 Newtown Bend, LA .......... 420 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,739 Diamond Cutoff, MS ......... 423 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,711 Below Racetrack, MS ........ 430 L 4,519 -- -- -- -- -- -- 19,378 Racetrack Towhead, MS ....... .431 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 15,270 False Point, LA ............. . 441 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,675 Marshall Cutoff, LA ......... 448 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,166 Below Grand Gulf, MS ....... 399 L -- -- -- -- -- 3,575 Fritz Island, LA ............. . 338 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,160 Forest Home Towhead, LA ..... 449 L 2,340 -- 4,530 -- -- -- -- 15,873 Willow Cutoff, LA .......... 462 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,275 Tennessee Bar, MS .......... 465 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 4,58 Arcadia Point, MS ........... . 470 L -- - -- -- -- - -- 9,463 Cottonwood Bar, MS ......... 471 R -- -- -- - -- 2,406 Point Lookout, LA ........... . 478 R -- -- -- - -- 2,751 r r r 5 ) 3 5 0 0 'o 0 0 0 0c 0 z c r 0 0 TABLE 41-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1997) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera. Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares) Feet) Feet) Dikes: Ajax Bar, MS .............. Ben Lomond, MS ........... Baleshed Ldg., MS .......... Wilson Point, LA ........... Corregidor, MS ............. Carolina, AR ............... Cracraft Lower, AR .......... Cracraft, AR ............... Leota, MS ................ Island 86, AR .............. Seven Oaks, AR ............ Walnut Point, MS ........... Anconia Chute, AR .......... Refuge, MS ............... Island 84, AR .............. Warfield Point, AR .......... Leland Bar, AR-MS .......... Leland Neck, AR-MS ........ Tarpley Cutoff, MS-AR ....... Island 82-Miller Bend, AR-MS ................. Ashbrook-Miller Bend, AR-MS ................. Ashbrook Cutoff, MS ......... Chicot Ldg., AR ............ Catfish Point, MS ........... Below Prentiss, MS .......... Above Ozark, AR-MS ........ Malone Field, AR ........... 482 488 493 500 505 509 510 513 514 520 523 525 527 528 532 535 538 540 540 L L L R L L R R L R R L R L L L R L R (2) 6,350 630 5,480 -- 2,555 -- --_ --_ 3,815 544 R&L 547 549 564 571 580 580 585 L&R L R L L R R (3) -- 28,152 -- 24,667 -- 15,721 -- 8,423 -- 6,730 -- 2,897 -- 10,329 -- 3,809 -- 7,571 -- 18,477 -- 5,829 -- 4,725 -- 7,159 -- 19,695 -- 12,475 -- 2,020 -- 15,086 -- 4,315 -- 10,478 -- 13,646 -- 13,015 -- 8,728 -- 22,381 -- 5,290 -- 12,413 -- 5,545 -- 7,549 .I Vt 'rVn CM cM 0 cc 0z TABLE 41-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1997) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares) Feet) Feet) Dikes Terrene, MS ............... White River Landing, AR ...... Montgomery Towhead, AR ..... Victoria Bend, AR ........... Smith Point, MS ............ Island 70, MS .............. Total Dikes, Vicksburg District, Mississippi River ......... 590 591 592 596 600 608 L R R R L L (2) (3) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,921 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,201 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,071 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6,736 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,617 S- -- -- -- -- 26,355 17,455 (3.31 Miles) -- 20,175 600,057 (113.65 Miles) Miles Above Mouth ARKANSAS RIVER 4 Standard revetment: Menard Bend, AR ........... Como, AR ................ Morgan Bend, AR ........... Yancopin, AR .............. Total Standard Revetment, Arkansas River ........... Dikes: Hopedale Cutoff, AR ......... Morgan Bend, AR ........... 31 34 36 24 L R L R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,770 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 11,720 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,250 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,800 (2) 30 R 36 L (3) -- 31,540 (5.97 Miles) -- 1,848 -- 3,658 0 0 y 0 rin 0 c3 0 TABLE 41-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1997) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Above Construction erative tive Confluence New Work Since Thru with Bank Exten- Prior This Miss. R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY River or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) Dikes: Fletcher Bend, AR ........... Total Dikes, Arkansas River .................. RED RIVERS Standard Revetment: Dupre, LA ................ Bringol, LA ............... Egg Bend, LA .............. Colonel Bend, LA ........... Roxana, LA ............... Ryland, LA ................ Whittington, LA ............ Smith, LA ................ Latanier, LA ............... Hudson, LA ............... Robert, LA ................ Alexandria Front, LA ......... Callahan, LA .............. Cotton, LA ................ Rapides, LA ............... Boyce, LA ................ Total Standard Revetment, Red River .............. 39 R (2) (3) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,187 7,693 (1.46 Miles) 69 73 75 77 83 88 89 91 93 99 102 105 110 116 119 125 R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R -- 2,690 -- 4,000 -- 2,400 -- 650 -- 3,325 -- 3,925 -- 2,900 -- 2,700 -- 2,460 -- 1,458 -- 5,500 -- 5,280 -- 4,000 -- 14,700 -- 1,030 -- 4,548 -- 61,566 (11.66 Miles) Mt Il t o 0 0 z 4 82 TABLE 41-I (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: VICKSBURG DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1997) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Above Construction erative tive Confluence New Work Since Thru with Bank Exten- Prior This Miss. R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY River or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) Dikes6 : (2) (3) Choctaw Bayou Bend, LA ..... 71 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,000 Bringol (Egg Bend), LA ....... 73 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,477 Egg Bend, LA .............. 75 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 900 Cologne Bend, LA ............. 77 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,850 Echo, LA ................. 78 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,900 Richardson, LA............. 79 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,700 Alexandria, LA ............. 105 R -- -- -- -- -- -- (Rock groin) 270 Bertrand, LA............... 122 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,630 Total Dikes, Red River ......-- -- -- -- -- -- -- 19,727 (3.74 Miles) 1. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). 2. Linear feet of dike which were raised. 3. Linear feet of dike on which repairs were made. 4. See report on Arkansas River and tributaries, AR and OK, under Little Rock District. 5. Mileages based on 1967 hydrographic survey. 6. Includes all types of dikes and retards. 0 O 0O 0 O z 00 r" �3 0 -t c 0 r q2 TABLE 41-J BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1997) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares) Feet) Feet) MISSISSIPPI RIVER Standard Revetment: Big Island, AR ............. Scrubgrass Bend, AR ......... Henrico, AR ............... Cessions Towhead, AR ....... Island 67, MS .............. Island 68 Bar-- Knowlton, AR ............ Ludlow, AR ............... Rescue Land, AR-MS ........ Fair Landing, AR ........... Burke Landing, MS .......... Island 62, AR .............. Island 63, MS .............. Island 63 Bar, MS ........... Oldtown Bend, AR .......... Horseshoe, MS ..... Westover, AR ..... . Delta-Friars Point, MS Helena, AR ........ Helena Towhead, AR . Trotters Landing, MS . Flower Lake, MS ... St. Francis, AR ..... Harbert Point, MS ... Walnut Bend, AR . . Mhoon Bend, MS ... Peters, AR ................ Commerce, MS ............. 598 600 606 615 621 622 626 629 632 637 638 639 639 644 647 650 665 660 664 665 667 672 675 680 685 692 695 R R R L L R R L R L R L L R L R L R R L L R L R L R L 1,860 -- -- 120 -- --_ 6,170 -- _ -- _ -- 3,905 -- 7,315 -- 33,310 -- 11,465 -- 9,630 -- 26,710 -- 10,390 -- 27,020 -- 27,550 -- 19,070 -- 9,030 -- 11,514 -- 3,795 -- 26,860 -- 16,385 -- 15,640 -- 30,090 -- 36,460 -- 3,690 -- 50,930 -- 16,385 -- 24,663 -- 9,065 8,203 31,070 8,116 35,828 -- 33,760 -- 29,085 M,, cr Mrl b c C 0 zo 'o zr TABLE 41-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1997) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Standard Revetment: Porter Lake, AR ............ Pickett, MS-AR .. ........... Seyppel, AR ............... Norfolk-Star, MS ............ Cow Island Bend, AR ........ Cow Island Bend (Upper), TN .............. Coahoma, TN .............. Ensley, TN ................ Dismal Point, AR ........... Bauxippi-Wyanoke, AR ....... Presidents Island, TN ......... Hopefield Point, AR-TN ....... Loosahatchie-Memphis, TN .................... Loosahatchie Bar, TN ........ St. Clair, AR ............... Island 40, TN-AR ........... Brandywine, AR-TN ......... Shelby Forest, TN ........... Dean Island, AR ............ Cedar Point-Densford, TN .................... Chute of Island 35, TN ....... Lookout Bar, TN ............ Lookout, TN ............... Sunrise Towhead, TN ........ Lower Bullerton, AR ......... 700 703 709 711 714 716 717 723 724 730 733 736 737 740 742 744 750 753 756 759 764 772 774 776 782 R R R L R R L L R R L R L R R R R L R L R R R R R 9,728 19,441 -- 34,155 -- 12,575 -- 4,830 -- 35,582 -- 22,274 -- 8,623 -- 9,270 -- 46,256 -- 7,200 -- 24,530 -- 12,755 -- 10,360 -- 31,293 -- 2,070 -- 2,930 -- 30,750 -- 18,010 -- 9,550 -- 7,555 -- 20,190 -- 30,930 -- 2,990 -- 5,005 -- 18,275 -- 28,350 0 0 0 rr tEj 0 c 0 0 TABLE 41-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1997) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Standard Revetment: Kate Aubrey Towhead- Island 30, TN ............. Osceola, AR ............... Osceola, AR ............... Ashport-Keyes Point, TN ...... Kate Aubrey, TN ............ Island 26, TN .............. Bend of Island 25, TN ........ Barfield, AR ............... Obion-Tamm, TN ........... Huffman-Hickman, AR-TN ................. Heloise, TN ............... Island 18, MO .............. Linwood Bend, TN .......... Blaker Towhead, TN ......... Bells Point, MO ............ Gayoso-Caruthersville, MO .................... Island 15, TN .............. Hathaway Landing, TN ....... Robinson Bayou, MO ........ Fritz Landing, TN ........... Lee Towhead, MO ........... Bend of Island 14, TN ........ Above Lee Towhead, TN ...... Little Cypress, MO .......... Merriwether-Cherokee, TN ........... ....... 786 786 786 791 793 798 803 808 819 826 831 836 841 845 845 848 851 852 852 857 859 859 861 864 R R R L R R L R L R L R L L R R L L R L L L L R 821 -__ 400 400 -- 30,808 -- 1,3503 -- 5,823 -- 44,232 -- 2,500 -- 15,690 -- 32,386 -- 52,335 -- 53,831 6,276 8,366 -- .-- -- _-- _-- 29,764 15,770 30,490 14,850 18,562 5,420 25,600 -- 3,630 -- 1,000 -- 22,630 -- 15,670 -- 9,640 -- 12,050 -- 4,943 -- 40,140 869 L -- 41,058 b cn M On zn TABLE 41-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1997) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera. Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) Standard Revetment: Linda, MO ................ Below Toney's Towhead, TN .................... Toney's Towhead, KY-TN ................. Kentucky Point, KY ......... New Madrid Bar, KY ........ New Madrid Bend, MO ....... La Forge, MO .............. Slough Landing Neck, TN-KY ................. Winchester Towhead, MO .................... Island 9, KY-TN ............ Milton Bell, MO ............ Chute of Island 8, KY ........ Bend of Island 8, MO ........ Island 8, KY ............... Hickman-Reelfoot, KY ........ Beckwith Bend, MO ......... Williams, KY .............. Wolf Island, KY ............ Columbus, KY ............. Belmont, MO .............. Island 3 and 4, KY .......... Campbell, KY .............. Pritchard, MO .............. Mayfield Creek, KY ......... Wickliffe, KY .............. 876 R 879 L 882 887 888 889 892 L L R R R 899 L 900 905 908 913 914 914 919 924 927 934 937 938 940 943 948 949 4,486 16,469 R L R L R R L R L R L R R L R L 953 L 1,365 75 4,038 3,560 4,579 -- -- --_ 20,000 20,895 13,640 7,960 16,825 43,262 24,930 37,520 -- 5,540 -- 33,585 -- 16,600 -- 12,620 -- 39,945 -- 18,515 -- 46,399 -- 18,203 -- 10,015 -- 22,495 -- 7,395 -- 5,785 -- 19,970 -- 6,865 -- 15,045 -- 8,935 -- 11,210 ttj yn O 'TI y x n c yb 'T 0C TABLE 41-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1997) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)' Feet) Feet) Standard Revetment: Cache-Cairo, IL (Ohio River) .............. Total Revetment, Memphis District, Mississippi River ......... Dikes: Henrico, AR ............... Below Knowlton, AR ......... Island 67, MS .............. Below Ludlow, AR .......... Sunflower, AR ............. Island 64, AR .............. Rescue Landing, MS ......... Island 62, AR .............. Island 63 Bar, MS ........... Island 63, MS .............. Kangaroo Point, AR ......... Friars Point, MS ............ Montezuma Bar, MS ......... Montezuma Towhead, AR ..... Prairie Point, AR ............ Flower Lake, MS ........... Walnut Bend, AR ........... St. Francis Towhead, MS ...... Below Walnut Bend, AR ...... Bordeaux Point, MS ......... 958 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 29,927 4,046 (1.11 Miles) 603 616 621 624 627 630 631 638 639 640 649 652 657 656 668 668 681 671 676 681 R R L R L R L R L L R L L R R L R L R L 595 16,484 4,486 16,469 (8) 61,993 (6) 6,285 1,910 -- 2,041,176 (386.59 Miles) -- 9,080 -- 20,670 -- 4,320 -- 5,040 -- 5,520 -- 7,330 -- 2,530 -- 23,180 -- 2,600 -- 5,640 -- 5,730 -- 6,870 -- 15,240 -- 3,450 -- 10,391 -- 11,060 -- 6,285 -- 3,380 -- 8,330 -- 11,080 ON - 0\ Qt CCM!1 c0 CM 0a z TABLE 41-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1997) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) Dikes: Peters, AR ................ Commerce, MS............. Basket Bar, AR ............. Buck Island, MS ............ Porter Lake, AR ............ Pickett, MS ................ Seyppel, AR ............... Cat Island, AR ............. Coahoma, TN .............. Armstrong, AR-TN .......... Dismal Point, AR ........... Engineers Bar, AR ........... Hopefield Point, AR ......... Memphis Front, TN .......... Robinson Crusoe, TN ......... Loosahatchie Bar, TN ........ Sycamore Chute, AR-TN ...... Above Loosahatchie, TN ...... Redman Point, AR ........... Randolph Point, TN .......... Poker Point, AR ............ Shelby Forest, TN ........... Corona Bar, TN-AR .......... Densford, TN .............. Cedar Point, TN ............ Below Richardson Landing, TN .............. Lookout, TN-AR ............ Plum Point, TN ............. 693 694 696 700 701 704 706 710 718 720 724 734 736 736 738 739 741 742 743 747 748 751 755 757 759 (8) L R L R R L R R R R L R R R L R L R L R 2,880 3,400 4,230 --_ 3,220 3,320 -- _ 767 L 771 R 784 L (6) -- 7,830 -- 10,745 -- 5,810 -- 5,505 -- 22,315 -- 10,060 -- 15,650 -- 15,590 -- 4,640 -- 18,690 -- 25,510 -- 4,155 -- 5,350 -- 6,300 -- 21,939 -- 3,950 -- 6,725 -- 10,645 -- 7,750 -- 16,740 -- 8,060 -- 4,950 -- 9,400 -- 7,780 -- 2,890 5,950 12,865 10,195 0 " 0 3 0 .-48 m 3a TABLE 41-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1997) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares) ' Feet) Feet) Dikes: Lake Neark, AR ............ Island 30 ................. Kate Aubrey, TN ............ Keyes Point, TN ............ Ashport-Goldust, TN-AR ...... Forked Deer, TN ............ Island 25, AR .............. Nebraska Point, TN .......... Below Tamm Bend, TN ....... Wrights Point, AR ........... Island 21, Chute, TN ......... Head of Island 21, TN ........ Island 20, MO-TN ........... Island 18, TN .............. Tennemo, TN .............. Blaker Towhead, TN ......... Caruthersville-Linwood Bend, MO ............... Opposite Carthersville, TN ..... Sandy Hook, TN ............ Island 15, TN .............. Robinson Bayou, MO ........ Hathaway, TN .............. Island 15 Neck, TN .......... Above Lee Towhead, TN ...... Below Cherokee, TN ......... Stewart Towhead, MO ........ Ruddles Point, MO .......... Island 11, MO .............. 786 787 791 791 795 798 804 808 813 820 824 828 831 837 842 843 844 846 850 851 853 854 854 859 866 871 874 882 (8) R R R L R L R L L R L L R L L L R L R L R L L L L R R R (6) -- 2,545 -- 5,485 -- 11,270 -- 24,690 -- 17,330 -- 8,550 -- 5,450 -- 12,149 -- 8,300 -- 34,775 -- 3,170 -- 15,540 -- 20,8692 -- 8,670 -- 8,240 -- 4,080 -- 30,590 -- 3,300 -- 2,350 -- 8,830 -- 10,768 -- 27,355 -- 21,100 -- 1,300 -- 6,230 -- 18,290 -- 8,130 -- 14,330 r" C/1 y a r b Cd � 70 n O O 'z TABLE 41-J (Continued) BANK REVETMENTS AND DIKES: MEMPHIS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1997) Operations This FY Nonop- Opera- Construction erative tive Above New Work Since Thru Head Bank Exten- Prior This of R sion Lap Reinforcement FY FY Passes or (Linear (Linear (Linear Maintenance (Linear (Linear Location (Miles) L Feet) Feet) (Squares)1 Feet) (Squares)1 (Squares)1 Feet) Feet) Dikes: (8) (6) New Madrid Bend, MO ....... 887 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,715 Kentucky Point, KY ............. 887 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 12,400 Morrison Towhead, MO ....... ... 890 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,070 Hotchkiss Bend, MO ......... 895 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 14,208 Slough Landing, KY ......... ... 896 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5,065 Below Island 9, TN .......... ... 901 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 18,859 Donaldson Point, MO ............ 905 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 18,225 Island 9, KY ............... 906 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,0105 Island 7 - Island 8, MO-KY .... 917 R -- -- 4,780 -- -- -- -- 14,795 Below Williams, KY ......... . 925 L 1,480 -- 2,010 -- -- -- -- 3,640 Moore Island, KY-MO ........ .. 929 R -- -- 7,290 -- -- -- -- 7,925 Above Williams, KY ......... ... 930 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,150 Wolf Island Bar, KY ......... ... 933 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 12,260 Campbell, KY .............. ... 942 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 2,610 Pritchard, MO .............. ... 944 R -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 9,390 Island 1, KY ............... 948 L -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17,345 Total Dikes Memphis District, Mississippi River .. 19,275 -- 18,310 -- -- 3,220 -- 947,068 (3.65 Miles) (179.37 Miles) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Gross squares articulated concrete mattress (100 square feet). Changed to correct previous errors. Lumber mattress revetment. Rock Groins. Linear feet of triangular frame retards and pile dikes. Linear feet of dike on which repairs were made. Stone paving only. Linear feet of dike which were raised. 00 4 0 0 o r" 0 0 ;p. 03 TABLE 41-K PROJECT LEVEES: NEW ORLEANS DISTRICT (FISCAL YEAR 1997) Levees and Floodwalls Berm Surfaced Roads on Levees (Miles) (Miles) (Miles) Built to Approved Grade and Total Total Section Cur- In Corn- Cur- In Corn- Curin Total rently System plete rently System plete rently Authorized Place Thru Under When Built Thru Under When Built Thru Under for This This This Con- Corn- This This Con. Corn- This This Con- Location System FY FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction pleted FY FY struction Main Stem Levees Mississippi River Levees Fifth Louisiana Levee District... Levees .................. Old River structures and levees .................. Atchafalaya Basin Levee District . ........... ..... Levees. .................. Morganza structure and levee .................. Morganza forebay levee ...... Port Allen lock............. Lafourche Basin Levee District Levees ................... Plaquemines West Levee District Levees ........... Buras Levee District ......... Levees ................... Empire lock .............. Baton Rouge front levees ...... Pontchartrain Levee District.................. Levees .................... Bonnet Carre' guide levees ... Bonnet Cane' forebay levee .. Bonnet Carrne' structure ..... East Jefferson Levee District Levees.................... West Jefferson Levee District .. Levees ........... ..... Floodwalls................ Harvey Canal Lock ......... (16.8) (16.8) (--) (13.3) (--) 15.5 15.5 -- 12.0 -- 1.3 1.3 -- (--) (15.5) (--) (15.5) - 15.5 -- 15.5 1.3 (126.3) (126.3) (7.6) (120.1) (--) (1.0) (--) (1.0) 118.7 118.7 7.6 112.5 -- 1.0 -- 1.0 0.8 6.7 0.1 0.8 -- 6.7 -- 0.1 -- 61.7 61.7 -- 61.7 (--) (118.7) - 118.7 (-_) (118.7) S 118.7 0.8 -- - -- -- 6.7 -- -- -- -- 0.1 -- - - - 0.1 -- 0.1 37.9 37.9 -- 30.7 -- (34.1) (34.1) -- (34.1) (--) 34.0 34.0 -- 34.0 -- 0.1 0.1 -- 0.1 -- 2.1 2.1 -- 1.9 -- (124.9) (124.9) (--) (111.2) (12.5) (0.1) (--) (--) 110.8 110.8 -- 97.1 12.5 0.1 -- -- 11.3 11.3 -- 11.3 -- -- -- -- 1.3 1.3 -- 1.3 -- -- -- -- 1.5 1.5 -- 1.5 -- -- -- -- 11.6 11.6 -- 10.8 -- (20.0) (20.0) -- (20.0) (--) 19.8 19.8 -- 19.8 -- 0.1 0.1 -- 0.1 -- 0.1 0.1 -- 0.1 -- - 61.7 - 61.7 - 37.9 (--) (34.0) - 34.0 - 2.1 (--) (110.8) -- 110.8 - 11.6 (--) (19.9) -- 19.8 -- 0.1 - 37.9 (__) (34.0) (.) - 34.0 - 2.1 (--) (110.8) -- 110.8 - 11.6 (--__) (19.9) __-- 19.8 -- 0.1 -- ) (--) 0 0 zi